at the new york times. or two? - like two and a half. - two and a half years at the new york times. so you're not coming to this subject without a perspective. you have a sense of who he is. - i have a sense of who he is and i have a sense of who his voters are, because i spent time out on the campaign trail talking to his voters, talking to people when the access hollywood tape came out. i also only covered bernie sanders and donald trump, so i never covered hillary clinton, which to me helps me understand that there are a lot of americans that are angry for a lot of different reasons. - i agree, well the sanders and the trump people, it's often thought, had more in common with one another than with the people in their parties. - they have a lot in common. mainly, they're both very angry at kind of government and how it's worked. - they think they've been getting screwed by the system. - they think they're getting screwed by the system, they both think that the system is rigged. one group is largely blamin

lying to the "new york times" isn't a crime or being misleading to the "new york times" isn't a crime. so if you don't have an underlying crime to investigate, the president doesn't need to answer your question. so that's a fascinating question. but it goes to show this is front and center, very much of interest to bob mueller. >> that is obviously why mark corallo's input here changes what was going on on air force one from being a story lying to the "new york times" to something 34u67 more important that goes right to the center of the investigation. please stay with us if you can because there might be questions from our other guests. john hileman, barbara mcquad an msnbc legal contributor, and frank montoya, jr. he's a retired fbi executive. john, i want to get in one more word buy graphically here about mark corallo. here's a former spokesperson for the attorney general. a republican attorney general. he knows his way around this arena. and he develops concerns of the people he's dealing with and what he hears in this conference call that hope hicks could be leading the president

newsstand today the new york times next to the new york daily news and the new york times it says essentially russia bought jumping on the chance to divide the you know american public over the shooting in florida they said it in fewer words on the other hand right next to it there's a full page picture in the daily news of donald trump playing golf saying can i play through that says trump plays golf less than a mile from scene of shooting. in other words they're doing exactly you know a full page spot what they're accusing russian box of doing which is dividing people over the issue of these kids getting murdered in florida and i'm wondering you know i see this obviously not a newsstand one newspaper next to another throughout the new york area those two papers why next to each other on a new step but i'm wondering if whatever is there when the little segment did push you know this narrative if anybody there is actually seeing these things side by side because those two things are contradictory you know it's very interesting adam you know in looking at the big picture like what don was just

post" and former editor of "the new york times." [applause] >> well, thank you very much. this is a great day and it's especially a great day because i have two wonderful reporters here who usually are in the position of asking the questions, but today i'm going to get to ask them some questions. you in the audience are also invited towards the end of our half-hour to jump in with questions of year-round and i hope you will. so, we will get started on the topic of leaks, which i'm curious to hear both of you talk about because this past year has been one in which leaks have certainly been at the center of many news stories. i wonder if you would each talk to me and to the audience a little bit about what you see as the state of reporting through leaked information on what the challenges are and where we are on the trajectory. there were a lot of people who thought after the obama administration crackdown on those who leaked and president trumps fair at, that things would dry up. that doesn't seem to have happened. michael, i would l

"the new york times." what donald trump's legal team thinks about their client sitting down for an interview with mueller. the times reporter on the story joins us live. >>> also as trump spoke about the economy today and declared america open for business, the cable networks cut away to cover the largest single point drop in the history of the market. and the president says the democrats who sat silently and didn't applaud his speech are un-american and suggest they might be guilty of treason. all of it as "the 11th hour" gets under way on a monday night. >>> good evening once again. as we start a new week from nbc news headquarters in new york, day 382 of the trump administration, a day when the stock market took a massive and

i think he knows i worked for -- work for "the new york times." host: the failing "new york times." the failing "new york times," exactly. that hurts, "the new york times" is the greatest news organization in the world. we do not put out fake news. that gets under my skin when i hear it. i think a lot of journalists feel that way, when they are around him and he says that. host: have you ever had a conversation with him? doug: for the white house news photographers contest, we were invited to the oval office to have our picture taken with him. it was a brief handshake. that was the first time i had ever shaken his hand. i think it was the first time i realized he knew who i was. he said something to the other photographers like, oh, he is very good. you watch out for this guy. i realized, then, that he knew who i was and who i worked for. it is definitely different, he is not a politician. every time you are in the oval office, you realize that. when he is around members of congress, to have a cabinet room photo op about immigration and be in their for about 55 minutes. we were flie

new york times since then this residence has been home to a succession of new york times bureau chiefs this is from a video tour of the home shop by former bureau chief jody roux doron and this piece of furniture was here when we when we go i think it's been here since tom friedman pretty much journalist and author are exposed the story of how the new york times took over a house from which palestinians were forcibly expelled and the fact that the new york times is occupying the property through which to me from italy was forcibly expelled during the night by like so many other palestinians is some symbolic because the new york times is reporting. so many. kind of justified cover up israel's expulsion of dispossession of palestinians and here the new york times goes beyond simply. the complicity of it supporting to becoming really an actual participant in this now. so unfortunately no one was home to answer my question but i was hoping to get to talk to the current residents here about the former residents of this home the palestinians who can no longer return for the subject of countl

vocal critics of the memo have been the washington post and the new york times the journalism is currently the subject of a new film but as i recall it explains journalistic values can change over time the washington post and the new york times once establish themselves as shining beacons of true journalism a brave group of reporters who would stop at nothing to find out as much as they can in their quest for truth but i'm actually talking about the seventy's back then new york times and poster less risk jail time by publishing classified documents on the vietnam war the new york times begins its explosive series based on the pentagon papers publication of a covert version of the war that recount due to much of the optimistic talk that it permeated official state. now daniel ellsberg leaks the documents to the washington post you want to learn more go to the movies and check out the oscar nominated film the post seems like the perfect robot alter trumps the talks on the media and according to the creators that was actually the intention one thing that both of these areas have in common tha

covering tonight comes from the new york times. what donald trump's legal team thinks about him sitting down with mueller. >>> also as trump spoke about the economy today and declared america open for business, the cable networks cut away to cover the largest single point drop in the history of the market. and the president says the democrats who sat silently and didn't applaud his speech are

critics of the pfizer memo have been the washington post and the new york times journalism has become the subject of a new film but it's odd to use american explains journalistic values can suddenly change over time. the washington post and the new york times once established themselves as shining beacons of true journalism a brave group of reporters who would stop at nothing to find out as much as they can in their quest for truth but i'm actually talking about the seventy's back then new york times and poster as risk jail time by publishing classified documents on the vietnam war the new york times begins its explosive series based on the pentagon papers publication of a covert version of the war that ran counter to much of the optimistic talk that permeated official statements for years now daniel ellsberg leaks the documents to the washington post you want to learn more go to the movies and check out the oscar nominated film the post seems like the perfect robot alter trump attacks on the media and according to the creators that was actually the intention one thing that both of th

the way the "new york times" got this story and reported it out is that mark corallo told three people contemporaneously at the time it happened what happened. they've now given their reports to the "new york times," mr. corallo is not disputing the reports. and now we have, after he said it alarmed him, we know he quit. we didn't have an explanation at the time why he was quitting, this now gives us the explanation. so we have the reporting, the witnesses coming forward and going on the record and he's attesting to the truth of what they're saying, that's a lot of weight. that's not he said, she said, that's he said and these folks can back it up. >> it's a gigantic development in the obstruction of justice investigation. i try to find an adjective that will get this to land because we get so many bombshells and

york times to be the news brand of record. it puts you in front of an audience and they think, "well the new york times has the story. "they're the ones." - yeah, the papers really had to shift and change about how it views these things. your right, it used to be we would say, "nah, that's not what we want to do. "we want to be the old gray lady." now we understand we have to evolve like everybody else. it's a new environment, a new type of audience, a new type of marketplace and we want to play it. we want to play in all the different platforms. - back to this point about the waterboarding or the fire hose. given the news environment, it is literally the case that almost ever yday there's some major scoop that you or the washington post or both of you or the wall street journal, i mean it really, you hit five or six in the afternoon and it's like scoop o'clock. and you guys are putting out whatever the big thing of the day is. and so then you spend the entire night talking about it and breaking it apart and analyzing it on te

i think he knows i worked for the new york times. brian: the failing new york times. doug: the failing new york times, exactly. yes. that hurts, the new york times is the greatest news organization in the world. we do not put out fake news. that gets under my skin when i hear it. i think a lot of journalists feel that. brian: have you ever had a conversation with him? doug: for the white house news photographers contest, we were invited to the oval office to have our picture taken with him. there was a brief handshake. that was the first time i had ever shaken his hand. i think it was the first time i realized he knew who i was. he said watch out for this guy, he is very good. i realize he knew who i was and who i worked for. it is definitely different, he is not a politician. every time you are in the oval office, when he is around members of congress, to have a room about immigration, and be in there for 55 minutes. we were flies on the wall negotiating the immigration bill. it was fascinating. it was unprecedented. senator lindsey graham was sitting right in front

it had been blocked out by "the new york times." amy: explain that. for people who don't understand what it means to be blocked by the new york times. we are talking about 1971. to had gotten these papers "the new york times" and wanted the stories published, but explain what happened next. gar: the nixon administration went to court and stopped the new york times from publishing. that was a major infringement of the constitutional right of the free press, but nonetheless there was a stop. then the question was, it was stopped, how could you bring the story to the american public? decisions clandestine in which decision-makers in the government knew that they were doing something that was a most impossible in many peoples lives would be lost and there was great deception to the public. that is what the pentagon papers show. if it went on to put other papers, which had not yet been stopped, because they had done nothing yet, could they publish the papers? the next one was "the washington post." we got the papers to "the washington po

on the new york time's best-seller list. so it was certain degree that we made that decision to say, no, despite the fact that that is frankly a powerful marketing tool and we didn't feel that we could in good conscious use that anymore if we didn't believe it was reflective of what was going on. >> marji, back to time to get tough, 2011, whose idea was it? >> you know, it was a combination of watching donald trump start to speak at conservative events and to speak more politically and so we had the idea and he had the idea at the same time and we heard that he was thinking about a book, we had been talking about him doing a book, so we approached him and said, you know, we should talk about this. i went up to his office in new york city and we made our case for why we thought we would be a good partner, he agreed, he's pretty entrepreneurial and so we struck a deal and -- and started right away. it was a terrific project. i really enjoyed working with him and he was one of the hardest-working authors i've ever worked with.

list going forward. >> have you brought this to the attention of the "new york times"? >> we had on a number of occasions, not just this year, but in previous years and their response has been and has always been we have a proprietary formula and system for calculating this, so basically it's a secret how they do it and that's a hard thing to argue with. it's certainly not a transparent way of calculating data or reporting on data and we just help that it wasn't reflective anymore. >> was a good promotional tool to put that on a book, "new york times" best seller? >> yes, frankly it was because i think most people, the average reader who is not sort of following this controversy day to day didn't know that the "new york times" bestseller list was no longer quite in sync with the actual best-selling book in the country. people inside the industry have frankly complained about it for a long time and have known this is an issue, certainly conservatives have talked about the sport years feeling that they had been treated unfairly, but the average real reader what is the "ne

most vocal critics of the memo have been the washington post and the new york times that currently the subject of a new film busses american explains journalistic values can change over time. the washington post and the new york times once established themselves as shining beacons of true journalism a brave group of reporters who would stop at nothing to find out as much as they can in their quest for truth but i'm actually talking about the seventy's back then new york times and poster as risk jail time by publishing classified documents on the vietnam war the new york times begins its explosive series based on the pentagon papers publication of a covert version of the war that ran counter to much of the optimistic talk that it permeated official statements for years now daniel ellsberg leaks the documents to the washington post you want to learn more go to the movies and check out the oscar nominated film the post seems like the perfect robot alter trying to talk on the media and according to the creators that was actually the intention one thing that both of these areas have in comm

new york times goes beyond simply. the complicity of its reporting to becoming really a participant in this now. so unfortunately no one was home to answer my question but i was hoping to get to talk to the current residents here about the former residents of this home the palestinians who can no longer return for the subject of countless new york times articles in jerusalem this is on your part and pilfer r.t. . there's a fascinating bit of what another would never would have known that never would have known the that all the new york times over his barrel there was a single most or that they don't understand the symbolism of it that they don't understand what it can mean for someone and how it can imply a certain amount of bias that's about the situation considering that the older their editorials are on right now is how dangerous this looks and i don't. and so it's sort of there is this narrative that this is how you should think and you should think about how things look how things look to the outside and so it's v

new york times" prior? >> we have on a number of occasions not just this year but previous years. their response has been in has always been we have a proprietary formula and system for calculating this list, so basically it's a secret how they do it anonymously hard thing to argue with. certainly not a transparent way of calculating data for reporting on data and we just felt that he wasn't reflect it anymore. >> was it a good promotional tool to put down on a book? "new york times" bestseller? >> s., frankly was. most people, the average reader who is not sort of following the controversy day-to-day didn't know that "the new york times" bestseller list was no longer quite in sync with the actual best-selling book in the country. people inside the industry brinkley complained about it for a long time and have known this is an issue. certainly conservatives have talked about this for years, feeling that they have been treated unfairly. but the average reader would see "new york times" best seller and to the

times to the "new york times" to the washington post. everybody who works in the white house as a white house staffer reports to john kelly. they are rushing to reporters to tell them how terrible and incompetent they think john kelly is and john kelly is quote a big fat liar and further demand that subborthey lie to h this matter. once it gets to that point, it not likely to be sustainable. in a white house that lost one chief of staff and three deputy chiefs of staff and a national security advisor and all these people, there is wide spread expectation that president trump is going to need a third white house chief of staff very soon. and honestly, while on the subject. the other very senior white house official plainly on the hook for the handling of the rob porter matter is don mcgahn. we'll be talking later on this hour about why it is there is not the same immediate expectation that don mcgahn might have to resign over this scandal as well as john kelly. the answer there might be as simple as the fact that don mcgahn has been in wo

can change over time the washington post and the new york times once established themselves as shining beacons of true journalism a brave group of reporters who would stop at nothing to find out as much as they can in their quest for truth but i'm actually talking about the seventy's back then new york times and poster as risk jail time by publishing classified documents on the vietnam war the new york times begins its explosive series based on the pentagon papers publication of a covert version of the war that recount due to much of the optimistic talk to me that official state. now daniel ellsberg leaks the documents to the washington post you want to learn more go to the movies and check out the oscar nominated film the post seems like the perfect robot alter trump attacks on the media and according to the creators that was actually the intention one thing that both of these areas have in common that really attracted me also to tell the story is two presidents. declaring war on the news media i really feel that we shall overcome what all of us have been so subjected to over the past

regnery publishes the, 27 weeks on "the news york times" bestsellers list. it was not flags of our mothers. publishers turned it down and published at 44 weeks on the "new york times" bestsellers list. the way things are going in the trumpcare there's a hysteria and i'm not sure if you were still reading but it's everyday a facebook page that they think russia was behind. if you've visited america in 2016 you would notice the major cities. you couldn't drive a mile without seeing it six-foot tall trump signed but i'm sure it's on the facebook page. in any event they have a couple more hysterical than i've ever seen. i think the errors that i've written about and i think this is worse than even that. we could be right back to regnery being the only source. the only way for conservatives to communicate with one another. [laughter] so remember there is a reason it's called -- he was called henry regnery the most dangerous man in america. here's to regnery. [applause] regnery publishing recently celebrated her 78th anniversary. booktv be visited their offices in

most vocal critics of the might have been the washington post and the new york times the journalism is currently the subject of a new film called explains the journalistic values and change over time. the washington post and the new york times once established themselves as shining beacons of true journalism a brave group of reporters who would stop at nothing to find out as much as they can in their quest for truth but i'm actually talking about the seventy's back then new york times and poster as risk jail time by publishing classified documents on the war the new york times begins its explosive series based on the pentagon papers publication of a covert version of the war recount due to much of the optimistic talk that permeated officials to. now daniel ellsberg leaks the documents to the washington post you want to learn more go to the movies and check out the oscar nominated film the post seems like the perfect robot alter trump attacks on the media and according to the creators that was actually the contention one thing that both of these areas have in common that really attra

a new report in "the new york times" claims american spies paid a russian man $100,000 after he claimed to have hacking tools stolen from the nsa, along with compromising material on president trump. this man, however, never handed over these materials. according to the paper, the american spies were not interested in the supposed dirt on trump, but they did want the stolen hacking tools back and agreed to pay this russian $1 million. at one point, the u.s. spies gave the man $100,000 in a brief case as a down payment. according to the "times" the nsa even used its official twitter account to send coded messages to the russian nearly a dozen times, but they soon had doubt. the paper writes this apparent eagerness to sell the trump kompromat to american spied suspicions among officials he was part of an operation to feed the information to united states intelligence agencies and pit them against mr. trump. there were other questions. he had a history of money laundering and legitimate cover business, a nearly bankrupt company that sold portable grills for streetside sausage salesmen. >>

and i have one the reporters from "the new york times" just a reminer to the viewers, "the new york times" reporting tonight and in the discussions about this famous trump tower meeting in 2016 during the campaign that hope hiks, communications adviser to the president at the time made a comment that don trump junior's emails wouldn't come out. mark, you reported this story and tell us the significance of this. >> i think it's significant when corallo testifies to mueller this is a conversation he had with hope hicks. how he interpreted her statement. he believes she was perhaps trying to bury some of the e-mails or ensure they didn't come out. this would be maybe his word against hers. this is a senior member of the legal team who is going to testify to the mueller investigation that he was concerned about how in whole 24 hours went down. this is the day after the statement had been put out, the misleading statement aboard air force 1 describing the trump tower meeting in a certain way. he know that the meeting happened in a very different manner. >> no question. as you refer to, there,

most vocal critics of the memo have been the washington post and the new york times they're currently the subject of a new film but a similar call it explains journalistic values can change over time the washington post and the new york times once established themselves as shining beacons of true journalism a brave group of reporters who would stop at nothing to find out as much as they can in their quest for truth but i'm actually talking about the seventy's back then new york times and poster less risk jail time by publishing classified documents on the vietnam war the new york times begins its explosive series based on the pentagon papers publication of a covert version of the war that recount due to much of the optimistic talk that permeated officials to. now daniel ellsberg leaks the documents to the washington post you want to learn more go to the movies and check out the oscar nominated film the post seems like the perfect were bottle to trump attacks on the media and according to the creators that was actually the intention one thing that both of these areas have in common tha