do the california laws go too far? or have they stayed within the side of what california can rightfully do? >> all right. david levine, thank you very much. >> you bet. >>> and stay right here with ktvu for continuing coverage on this story. at 6:30 a look at fox's one-on- one interview with attorney general jeff sessions after his announcement and we'll have extensive coverage on ktvu.com. >>> the white house confirmed president trump is planning the first trip to california since taking office. no details were released but the president is expected to visit san diego and inspect prototypes for his proposed border wall. he is also expected to attend a republican fundraiser in beverly hits. the last time a president waited this long to visit california was during the administration of franklin roosevelt. >>> coming up, bay area schools dealing with an increased number of threats following that massacre in parkland, florida. coming up at 6: 30, the efforts to try to keep students safe without scaring them. >> and we ha

that california's role in this process, but california is not the arbiter of these issues. the epa, the department of transportation and others make those decisions. california contributes, as well. but that shouldn't and can't dictate to the rest of the country what these laws are going to be. >> reporter: california's attorney general says he will file suit if the epa reduces those standards. he says cutting greenhouse gas emissions is crucial for the health and well-being of people who live here as well as for the environment. now, this is also an issue that people are watching closely. that's because a third of all of the cars purchased are in states that have stricter antismog laws. live in millbrae, katie nielsen, kpix 5. >>> 10 minutes after 6:00 now. and the construction under way on the richmond/san rafael bridge, how it could impact your commute. >> it's taking a full bridge check coming up in the next traffic report. also a new problem on 580. will it slow you down? find out coming up. >> and we're starting off on another warm start to the day. so temperatures ar

. >> a very busy morning here in california. as we bring in a live picture of protesters set up outside the california peace officers association conference in sacramento. this is minutes ago. we brought it to you live. attorney general jeff sessions spoke and he got personal. he called out oakland mayor libby happen for her warning oaklanders about impending immigration raids, saying how dare you. seemingly in response mayor schaaf tweeted this is a good time to remind the community that the oakland crime rate has dropped dramatically in the last five years. you talk about the polarization happening. there are many that are upset with mayor schaaf and that extends straight to the white house for her warning pending immigration raids. they say that 800 people that should have been arrested were not because of her warning. she says she will go to jail to uphold the sanctuary city policy. we see this playing out in the bay area, in washington, here in the states of our street capitol. we expect to hear from the governor himself in

proof in california. not the defendants. i used to be a prosecutor, my former life, i'm the chief legal officer and chief law enforcement officer in arkansas. it is not up to the defendants to prove that they are not guilty. it certainly is in their best interest. but it is up to the state to prove that someone is guilty. if someone -- these centers are being accused of deceptive practices, it is up to california to prove that. and i know i kind of back tracked on you, kimberly. but i wanted to weigh in on that point. i think those points are very important for us to keep in mind. again as a country. and for us not to lose sight and be forced into compelling someone's speech but into compelling these women's actions. when you are compelling women by saying, call this number because you're low-kin income to perhap have a state-fund aid borgs you are compelling not only crisis center speech but perhaps may be compelling these women's actions. >> it is interesting you mention a lot about the evidence that ca

why is california doing this? >> the ninth circuit found that the commercial speech the centers are engaging out. they put it in a footnote. it's kind of interesting that a sort of resurfaced here when i was there really a part of that. ultimately, california is treating dissenters as though they are required to get some commercial disclosure, even though they don't meet any of the qualifications for a commercial actor. they are not trying to get paying customers. in the stream of commerce and they are private speakers. and so, i just think consistent with what we have said before, the government bears the burden before it opposes speech burden on private individuals. so i think california hasn't come right out and said their commercial actors. they haven't been quite bold enough, but they are asking for a very, very lenient first amendment nonetheless. >> i will just add quickly, this has made a lot of charges further services, the disclosure requirements to make sure individuals are rights and services available

hy is california doing this? denise: the ninth circuit found that this wasn't commercial speech that these centers were engaging. that's kind of interesting that's resurfaced here when that wasn't really part of the holding. ultimately california's treating these centers as though they are required to give some sort of commercial disclosure even though they don't meet any of the qualifications for a commercial actor. they are not soliciting the public for money. they are not trying to get paying customers. they are not in the stream of commerce. and they are private speakers. i just think consistent with what we said before, the government has to -- the government bears the burden before it imposes speech burdens on private individuals. and -- i actually think california hasn't come right out and said they are treating these centers as commercial actors. i think they haven't been bold enough to think this is commercial speech, but they are asking for a very, very lenient first amendment nonetheless. brianne: a lo

latinos vote 80% in california. >> in california. >> n california fordemocrats. so, it's going to be helping democrats d hurting republicans, who are impotent in california already as we know. >> there's a special election in pennsylvania and the dynamics are different. there's a republican incumbant that is getting a tough challenge from connor lamb that is taking a runth a seat. does it play out differently in a place like that? >> yes, it does, i grew up in western pennsylvania and i know the area well. that is trump territory. and so, but that race is very close. like too close to call at this point. but immigration is not a major issue here -- >> the tariff is more important. >> yeah, to that election than immigration. the -- they have two audiences. one is in california that will help democrats and trump and sessions a of the country that is certainly to the red states. >> and o of the big problems for democrats is a, turn out is out elections and latinos tend to punch below -- you are saying perhaps this will change that? >> it's one in a series of things

general, why don't you help us clean up california customer let's talk to her, california is slim is assemblywoman, melissa melendez. good to have you with us tonight. >> thank you for having me. >> shannon: let's talk about some of the reaction that the attorney general is getting paid i want to play a little bit of sound. this comes from your attorney general here in the state of california, not a fan of this law. here is what he says. >> eight make here in california, we respect the law and the constitution. we expects to kick federal the same. >> shannon: how do these sides see this so differently, both say you are not adhering to the constitution. >> what is interesting to those who have been watching this unfold, attorney general becerr becerra, who came to him congress, had a number of years to do something but the immigration reforms, they did nothing, now he is in the state of california, crying when someone is trying to enforce the immigration laws that are on the books. when you have president trump saying, look, we are going to enforce federal law and have a state of cali

can california be saved? actor and californian, an immigrant to california but a long-time resident fabio joins us next. today, big thinking in the finger lakes is pushing the new new york forward. we're the number one dairy and apple producers in the eastern united states supported by innovative packaging that extends the shelf life of foods and infrastructure upgrades that help us share our produce with the world. all across new york state, we're building the new new york. to grow your business with us in new york state, visit esd.ny.gov ♪ come to my window ♪ ohh ♪ crawl inside ♪ wait by the light of the moon ♪ applebee's to go. order online and get $10 off $30. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood. and get $10 off $30. at a comfort inn with a glow taround them, so people watching will be like, "wow, maybe i'll glow too if i book direct at choicehotels.com." who glows? just say, badda book. badda boom. book now at choicehotels.com. >> california became the face's first sanctuary state in jan

why is california doing this? >> the ninth circuit found that this isn't commercial speech they are engaging in. that is kind of interesting that that resurfaced here when that wasn't really a part of the holding. : : : they are not in the stream of commerce and they are private speakers. i just think consistent with what we have said before the government has to the government bears the burden before it imposes speech burdens on private individuals and so i actually think california has not come right out and said they are treating these as commercial actors and they have not been bold enough to say it's commercial speech but they are asking for a very, very lenient first amendment standard nonetheless. >> i will adequately, this made a lot of the fact that it doesn't charge for services but the purpose of these types of disclosure requirements is make sure the individuals are aware of rights and services available to them under law and people need to have that information whether they are being charged for the s

but,s calling in from now california, in the operational lines of california. napa, california. caller: the last colors do not represent the majority of california. we are happy out here. the state is booming. infrastructure, 16 years back-to-back -- the cut and did nothing to repair it. the real question is, where are we right now on sb 562? the democrats shelved that bill. we need to get that ready. we want health care for all. we want the state to stay number one and show the rest of the country how that could work. host: is that a universal health care bill? caller: right, sb 562. the democrats can temporarily change the rules in the house to vote this through with their majority that they hold. they may not hold it long if they don't do this. we could have helped care for all and be the first state to lead the way, just like in canada. that is how it started in canada. host: that is great. eric? guest: i hope you worked in the you were in the area with the fires, and i hope all is well for you as we recover from damage in that area. universal health care is a primary tenet

la vida para todos en california. ramÓn: en la ciudad de san francisco se encuentra luz,quien hablÓ con el fiscal esa ciudad. luz: precisamente, en san francisco, el fiscal esa ciudad categorizÓ el anuncio de sessions como una distracciÓn y asegurÓ que en san francisco nada cambiarÁ. la tensiÓn aumentó en california tras la demanda de departamento de justicia de estados unidos, asegurando que usarÁ todo su poder para detener las leyes santuario. >>estÁn diciendo . yose que ustedes no estÁn de acuerdo. vamos a atacarlos. no es la manera. luz: el fiscal de san francisco asegurÓ que aunque sessions haya demandado a california, hay leyes que protegen a la comunidad indocumentada. >> confiar en nuestro procurador general. luz: cada vez que sessions habla de querer deportar a criminales, mÁs de uno sin delito es afectado, segÚn el fiscal. >>son gente buena, que estÁ trabajando, que participan en la fÁbrica social de nuestra comunidad. luz: en el sur de la bahÍa josÉ reiterÓ su apoyo. >> es un gasto innece

well those are california leaders are obviously blastingng attorney genenal jeff sessions visit to california his speech and obviouslyy. the lawsuitit against the state's governor jerry brown even held a news conference immmmediately afr sesessionsns speech saying t the trumump admdministratios full of liars calling the entire thing a stand and saying that sessionss j jt cacame. to california to further polarize and divide america attorney. california general how you're a star who is also named in a lawsuit said that he is not in the business of the deportation and that he has. he doesn't hold a lot and out in california he says we don't confuse coercion with cooperation and he said about something t that the trump administration should learn to do now california senator com liars has always been supporting immigrants. she said that trump and sessions i think they can bully california but it's not gonna work another fierce advocate of this of immigrants is senator haven'tt alolone saying that attorney general john sessions is suing californi. becausealiforniaa refuses to help from administrat

democratic party, and ray is calling in from napa, california, from the upper echelons of california. >> caller: hey, how are you guys? i wanted the american people to know that the last four callers don't are represent the majority of california, and we are happy out here, and the state is booming. and the reason that the infrastructure is run down is because 16 years back-to-back, cut, cut, cut and did nothing to repair it. but my real question is where are we right now on sb-562. the democrats have shelved that bill, and we need the health r care for all if we want it to be number one and we need the rest of the country to understand how to have it run. >> is that the health care bill? >> caller: yes, and the democrats can like the republicans in power now, they can temporarily change the rules in the house the vote it through with the majority they hold and they may not hold it long if they don't do it, and to have health care for all and be the first state to lead the way just like it started in canada. >> that is ray in napa. eric baughman. >> ray, i hope you weren't in the area

washington to california. >> the trump administration has failed utterly. this is what comes down to. >> how dare you distort the reality about declining violent crime? especially in a diverse sanctuary city like oakland california in order to advance your racist agenda. >> mayor libby schaaf says she stands behind her decision. she was careful not to share specific information that would endanger law enforcement . >>> sanctuary laws are not unique to california. they have different protections in different places. in addition to california, illinois and oregon also passed sanctuary state laws last year. according to the legal resource center, hundreds of local governments have sanctuary policies. berkley is said to be the original sanctuary city. they passed a law in 1971 that protected servicemembers that wanted to resist the vietnam war.>>> president trump is planning his first visit to california since taking office. the official agenda was not released. he is and -- expected to visit san diego and inspect prototypes for the border wall. he is also expe

general of california, was on record, and he said very directly, if you are a california business owner and you try to comply with federal immigration law and actually help federal immigration officers doing their constitutional duty, he will prosecute you. that is criminal obstruction of justice. now, because he was not prosecuted by the department of justice, this has embolden other democratic politicians. gavin newsom has: other democrats to openly violate these laws, and libby schaaf, the mayor of oakland, just recently, just a couple days ago, she warned everybody in her local area of impending i.c.e. raids, 800 criminals, 600 criminals are not on the streets of california because libby schaaf was aiding and abetting criminals in californi california. again, another county. now that jeff sessions is in sacramento, we are very happy. somebody has to step up. >> shannon: somebody who is not happy, you're not surprised to hear this, governor brown. he says this. at a time of unprecedented turmoil, jeff sessions has come to california to further divide and polarize america. jeff, these

>> the governor says the white house is going to war with the state of california. the administration also has oakland in it sights. >> here's my message to mayor schaaf, how dare you? how dare you needlessly endanger the lives of our law enforcement officers to promote a radical open boards agenda. >> a showdown tonight over sanctuary status. >> attorney general jeff sessions was in sacramento today to officially announce a lite against california over its sanctuary state policies. >> the attorney general strongly criticized oakland when the mayor notified immigrants about an i.c.e. raid in oakland. >> reporter: during today's press conference, the mayor of oakland said she was not looking for this kind of attention. with that said, she then lashed out at sessions and president trump. when asked if she would alert the community again, libby schaaf said absolutely. attorney general jeff sessions wasted no time slamming oakland mayor libby schaaf during a california peace officer's association event in sacramento. >> so here's my message, to mayor schaaf, how dare yo

i grew up in california. it was always a trendsetter and i hope it's not a trendsetter anymore. 13% of the country's population. if it is, the country is in trouble. the reality is the figures that you throw out, the cost of immigration, the vast majority of americans have no idea what it costs for the vast immigration programs. and the fact that you can come here illegal and get on wale wee is absurd. we need to tougher the immigration laws and do it today. lou: and we've got to give the president great credit because she's taking them on. and he keeps referra referring e wall. i can't wait to see the darn thing. >> he's going to get the wall. he made two promises that were sacred. one i'm going to build a wall and we's going to build a wall. i'm going to lock hillary clinton up. that is probably not going to happen. lou: we've got an inspector general investigating this. >> i'd much rather have an attorney general wake up and do it. but at the end of the day his commitments have been valid and he's going to

joining us with more on that california, under sheriff don decision is the orange county, california, under sheriff don barnes is with us. sir, first, i want to applaud you secondly i took what your attorney said in california as a threat. in other words, he would almost insinuated he might try to arrest you for just putting out who is in jail and when they are getting released. isn't that legal? >> well, it is completely legal. under the law was passed under senate bill 54 there is a provision clearly cannot do. we cannot communicate with immigrations and customs enforcement, but it says we can make this information available to the public, which is exactly what we have done. we are following the law and have an obligation to follow the law. >> sean: doesn't the state of california, oakland mayor, i.c.e. was trying to enforce laws against criminal illegal immigrants. those who committed other crimes beyond that which was not respecting our laws and sovereignty. if i were to give people a warning that you were about to go in and hold them accountable for crimes, would i be abetting an

la vida para todos en california. locutora: un joven universitario sus hermanas estÁn a punto de terminar en las calles. conocerÉ la historia de superaciÓn de estos jÓvenes pese a la crisis de vivienda que enfrentan. ademÁs, algunos empleados podrÍan recibir beneficios si fueron vÍctimas de robo de salarios. tomÉ le contaremos una dieta que no tiene que decirle adiÓs a los alimentos altos en azÚcar. los detalles, sÓlo a las 11. locutor: honrÓ a los ganadores. locutora: tambiÉn reconoce la manera en que se ha encontrado el equipo de la recuperaciÓn despuÉs del huracÁn y los elogiados le entregaron una franela el presidente. locutor: ojalÁ la medida haya sido la de Él. buenas noches. llegamos al final de la informaciÓn . jorge: lunes de marzo y estÁs a las principales noticias. a cosa no mexicana hacerse pasar por ciudadano estado unida en --unidense. a golpes y martillazos testigos de un choque, la comunidad trata de detener la huida del conductor que lo provocÓ . empezamos. ♪ ♪ ♪

bringing washington to california.>> reporter: sessions filed a lawsuit against california and called some officials radical extremist. >> this is going to war with the state of california. it is not wise, it is not right and it will not stand.>> reporter: he also called out libby chef -- mayor schaaf . >> how dare you endanger the lives of our offices to promote a radical agenda. >> they are painting a racist rod rush -- broad brush of the community. >> reporter: should did say she would do it all over again. later you can hear more from the mayor. >>> for more on the finer points we are joined by david levine. the attorney general said he is going after three california laws. we will start with a sanctuary state law. can they force the state to overturn that?>> we will find out. it is an interesting lawsuit. there is no question that the federal government has a lot of power. that was confirmed with arizona versus california a few years ago. today have absolute power? that is the question. the line that we are looking at is this. is the state choosing not to work with federal agenci

. >> california, we have a problem. how dare you needlessly promote radical open border. >> there is no bigger radical open border cloud car than the one filled by politicians. >> president trump was planning on going forward with 3:30 p.m. eastern time. we are just learning this event now looks like it's thought on the schedule u. >> after seven years the probe into the fast and furious scandal reopened. >> there needs to be accountability. there needs to be justice from brother. >> at least 7 house democrats receiving calls to resign because they have had direct ties to the racist anti-sem men tack louis farrakhan. >> we are trying to have a daca victory by the way and democrats are nowhere to be found. they are nowhere to be found. ♪ ♪ ♪ because i'm happy ♪ clap along if you feel like a room without a roof ♪ because i'm happy ♪ clap along if you feel that happiness is the truth. steve: i'm just happy i was able to get into work. rachel: i'm happy i made it out of wisconsin. steve: we wound up with 2 feet

peter: we are in sacramento, california. there is the c-span bus, part in front of the state capital, which was finished in 1874. on that bus is the california senate president pro tem, kevin daly on. -- de leon. they give for being with us at this early hour. how would you describe the state of the state in california? guest: good morning. i would describe the state of the state as being very good, in spite of the incessant attacks from a federal administration that seeks to undermine our economic prosperity and progressive values, as well as our people. as you know, it has been across the country -- california has led the resistance against this administration. with her guards to climate change, with regards to the environment, with regards to high wages and adding jobs to the economy, with regards to immigrant families, i would say the state of our state is very good, in spite of the incredible challenges we are facing today. eight largest economy in the world. peter: you use the word resistance when it comes to the feder

not in california, certainly not the bay area. but there's a lot of folks talking about this at their heocal school boards and communities >> and the argument forearming teachers from the nra and from president trump is that thisld coe a deterrent based on what you see out there, with ur officers, would it be a deterrent? would it be effectiv stopping a determined shooter? >> i'm glad you answered the questio -- the question, becaus. we get confused between school safety andwhat happened in florida. the everyday schools in california and oakland and i'm sure in otherreas are very safe. kids go to school, we might recover a handry gun evnce in a while, but for the most part, schools are safe. in our district, as well as most districts in california. thisn gentle came in with a high powellered rifle, o the police officer stationed in florida didn't stop him. office, kid came into my it would be hard pressed for us to stop him. nowou expect one teacher to stop somebody with a high powered weapon? it's ridiculousto consider that. the

we have the criminal attorney general of california l openly threatening california businesses. if you follow immigration law he is going to prosecute you. >> tucker: tell me about the quarter million californians who have left in the past seven years. those are normal middle-class people, the kind that you form a around. >> these are my parents, my parents have left the state. my best friend lives in texas where he doubled the size of his house into business and he pays no state income tax. i am an investment advisor and n addition to being an assemblyma assemblyman. i can tell you my friends are and 22 states around the nation. >> tucker: do they know this, do they paying attention? the tech sector is doing well, you are sort of booming on either end. are they worried about the middle class fleeing? >> if you listen to jerry brown and gavin newsom it's as if they live in a bubble. understandable. if you are the former mayor of san francisco and you had maps of human waste, hypodermic needles on the sidewalk and opening heroin injection centers starting in july in san francisco

here, we have the state of california basically saying this. even though you're at this place that doesn't offer any surgical procedures let alone abortion, we want to post a sign to remind you of a surgical procedure you could have and then entice you with the fact the state will pay for it. that has absolutely nothing to do with the normal types of governmental regulatory, regulation that compel disclosures so that medical patients, for example, can be fully informed of their decisions. i want to end with this. one of the greatest decisions of the supreme court, all americans can be proud of, was the west virginia v barnett. at the height of world war ii, we're fighting nazis and access powers the supreme court saw the wisdom of the first amendment to stop a west virginia law in effect that forced unwilling people to say the pledge of allegiance. they were viewed as nazi supporters or whatever. all that cultural mileu, the supreme court said the first amendment protects the right of conscience against compelled speech. they wrote this, if the

california sues the feds as often as the feds sue california. javier bassera's office fired back. then our cities sued over daca. we were quick to sue about that. california was success envelop convincing a judge to delay president trump's order. how about the transgender issue? california sued again claiming president trump's ban on transgender troops would hurt the california national guard. and student loans. president obama said students shouldn't to have pay lopez to for profit colleges. but the secretary of education changed those rules back this california once again, sued. right now she's in florida visiting the stoneman douglas high school. so bottom line, california cause as lot of trouble for the white house. the feds sued california yesterday over sanctuary city. but even there california beat them to it. we had a lawsuit against the feds over sanctuary cities since last august. >> and running against marijuana. >> i can only put five things on the list. >> so many things. >>> the sacramento visit was anything quiet. dozens of protesters taking to the streets in downto

department against california. a dozen states are coming together with the administration in that in the amicus briefs. this is a state that is really waging war on the administration. where does it end and must it take up all of the court time available? >> it's not just waging war on the administration and the president. this is a state whose politicians are waging war on common sense. whether it's sanctuary cities or any other aspect of think you you get to determine federal immigration policy. it's clear in our constitution, there is one person who decide on immigration policy, it's not the supreme court, it's not the governor of california, it's not independent mayors of a specific district. it's the president. the trouble is, there is an old saying, you deserve the politicians you elected to office, and california keeps re-elected these people and they are at odds with common sense. lou: and winning. up next, a growing revolt over those california sanctuary policies. one county joining the trump administratio

of the california highway patrol. that's a good group. and i'm honored to be with you and this association. mcgregor scott is a great leader in the department of justice. i learned about him before i took office. and we talked about towing around the country and people who could do things to make america better. you have clearly by reputation i think he will prove once again to be one of the very finest united states attorneys in our country. also i would note that california is a big state, an important state. it is important that we have safety and order here. and we need talented united states attorneys. and that will be our goal. and one more thing i would say so you. a directive i've given to every one of our washington prosecutors and staff and to our united states attorneys around the country, that we are partners with you. we're going to establish the kind of law enforcement partnership that will be effective in making our communities safer. i know firsthand the importance of the work that you do. i know it is

that's what california is doing. it's now illegal for private citizens in california to assist federal law enforcement authorities. i'm wondering is a reasonable person, can you really defend that? would it be okay for a stick to say it's illegal to cooperateau with the fbi, is that okay?? >> no, that wouldn't be okay. but that's not what we're saying. there's no specific law that says you should obstruct anyy. sort of legal process. that's not happening anywhere. >> tucker: it's illegal to cooperate with federal lawl enforcement authorities. it's illegal in the state of california according to yourer attorney general to cooperate with law enforcement authorities. how is that different than what happened in the south on the '50s and '60s? it's not so different and if so, how? >> no californian has a legal obligation to cooperate with federal law enforcement. >> tucker: california has banned, made it illegal to cooperate and here you have a sitting officeholder actively undermining, obstructing federal law. just as a

to california protest breakout. the extra security measures as he inspects models of the proposed wall between the united states and mexico. >>> and why spokesperson for the division of immigration and customs enforcement resigned and those numbers he says are being falsely reported. >>> anthony request that they are making amid the hostage crisis that turned deadly.>>> first, we're on storm watch. it is tuesday, march 14. >> rain is definitely moving throughout the bay area. as we take a live look, it is lit up on the left we have live team coverage osborne is in the mountains. but first, tracking storm in the weather center.>> and this is what it is doing it looks like soaking wet windy conditions is slick roads the rain is coming down strong and let's take a look at the south. a little bit of a break on highway 17 but you can see a lot of that. over an inch are ready. san jose seeing some wind pickup and it will be a slick commute. rain is coming down for your section and it is moving towards kensington. martinez

and in california, everyone should count. >> california now suing the trump administration over one single question. the question, are you an american citizen. the trump administration says that question will protect voters. california says it will hurt our state. nbc's blayne alexander joins us live from washington with more on this controversy. >> reporter: jessica, the california attorney general also said today that not only is it the wrong choice, but it is illegal. now, the u.s. constitution says that the point of the census is to make sure that everyone in the u.s. is accurately counted, but some critics say that that cannot happen with this new question if some people are too scared to take it. are you a u.s. citizen? it's a question not asked on the ten-year u.s. census in decades, but urnnder the trump administration it is coming back in 2020. >> it is going to determine the individuals in our country and provide information that allows us to comply with our own laws. >> reporter: the administration says the move was requested by the justice department to help protect the rights

you know, hey, i have property in california, i will say. i don't think too much about my property anymore. but i have great property in california. the taxes are way, way out of whack. and people are going to start to move pretty soon. if you don't have safety, meaning if you don't have this kind of wall, the drugs are pouring through in california, can't do it. so, the governor of california, nice guy, i think he is a nice guy. i knew him a long time ago. has not done the job. the taxes are double and triple what they should be. everybody that lives in california they know it thank you very much, everybody. >> thank you. to your left, everyone. to your left.

. >> growing up on the east coast we idealize california and that was the goal to live in california because they have this perception that the quality of life is so #34u67 better. that's really weird. >> the study looked at natural environment like pollution and social environment like community engagement and voter participation.  north dakota came in on top in this category. california came in right behind new jersey. >> this ranking we're looking at how states themselves are serving their citizens. we're not saying how many days of sunshine a year. >> california also had dismal ranks in other areas. 49th in affordability and road quality. >> we also think it's a bad rep. it doesn't feel great. >> he says the report doesn't take in the traditional quality of life measurements but their own report found signs of trouble. >> more people are leaving our region here in silicon valley than coming. this is the first time we have seen this in the four years of this report. is this something we're raising with policy makers, you bet. >> the cost of living is impacting his quality of liv

and you can see it definitely is going to impact southern california, central california and for us especially along the south bay. that's where we are going to start to see that moisture so this type of storm is it going to go south to north and it's going to be a pretty warm storm. not much measurable rainfall. southern california will get the brunt of it. what we are going to is about two-tenths to .3" in the area. today cloudy and warm ahead of the rain this afternoon. then we are expecting up to .3" of rain today through saturday. our snow levels with this system, they are extremely high because it's warmer air that's out there. so only snow about 6,000 feet and above. just the ridgetops with a few flurries, maybe an inch if anything. by sunday, monday, we are drying up for the latter half of your weekend and start of the week and more storms in store for tuesday. i thought it was cool because i have the iphone 8 plus. but apparently that's old news, michelle? >> it's still cool. >>> new research actually reveals apple's biggest mistake when it comes to the iphone x. the tech giant overpr

it's empty rhetoric, because all it will be doing is denying california employees and california corporations the ability to earn a living in a legal way. >> mexico is the united states biggest trading partners. he says the states should be building bridges not walls. >> these fights are challenging. i think the one thing we won't do is to stop fighting. >> he expects his bill to be heard in committee next month. >> and while promoting the border wall today, president trump took a moment to criticize the governor's leadership of the state. >> i think the governor's doing a terrible job running the state of california. you know, i have property in the state of california, i don't think too much about my property anymore, but i have great property in california. the taxes are way, way out of whack. and people are going to start to move pretty soon. >> in a tweet, governor brown said, thanks for the shoutout, but bridges are still better than walls and california remains the sixth largest economy in the world and the most prosperous state in america, #facts. we have posted the president's entire

we're right next-door to california. loss ofw in the sergeant mendoza, it is the policy of other cities that are letting these people go and it impacts the rest of us. this is a federal government responsibility. a lot of the things that happen, the federal government overreaches. the federal government should be doing this. for them to be thumbing their nose at law and order is so dangerous. we look at the dangers of a southern border. wallght need to build a between california and arizona to keep the criminals and of our state. they cannot provide century for these terminals. it is not just impacting california. it impacts the rest of us because the criminals move quickly to other jurisdictions. we have ms 13 gang members in arizona that have come from california with previous criminal records. this is a very serious public safety issue. thank you. sheriff from georgia. we cooperated from -- we cooperated with her officers. we started a 287 j program and in 2010.th ice we have more than 47,000 inmates as they came into

. >> california, we have a problem. how dare you needlessly endanger the lives of our law enforcement officers to promote a radical open borders agenda. rob: jeff sessions blasting california's radical move to block ice raids. how liberal lawmakers refused to back down. jillian: air travel gridlock, ripple effects from a powerful nor'easter being felt across the country. major airlines canceling, delaying thousands of flights as people in the northeast begin to dig and try out. "fox and friends first" continues now. ♪ so wake me up ♪ ♪ ♪ >> depends on where you live. sixth avenue in midtown, not much snow on the ground. rob: 30 minutes north of new york city, you get two feet. janice will dive into all of this. we are waiting for that, we don't really know why there is snow on the ground. >> why the shovel so much. rob: you are watching "fox and friends first" on thursday morning. jillian: donald trump putting pressure on mexico, canada, to renegotiate, appears to delay the signing of the deal. >> i woke up this

. >> at 11:00, the nation's top law enforcement officer sues california. the bay area says this means war. i am veronica de la cruz. i am elizabeth -- >> and i am elizabeth cook. with alndria borba. >> reporter: 21% of the nation's undocumented population lives in california. governor brown in his words predicted this lawsuit would go on much longer than the trump administration. to a packed house in sacramento, attorney general jeff sessions took aim at so- called "sanctuary laws" in the golden state. >> in recent years, the california legislature has enacted a number of laws intentionally to obstruct the work of our sworn immigration officers. >> reporter: a 45 page lawsuit filed by the department of justice takes aim in particular at three laws: one, requires private employers to give notice before cooperating with i.c.e. another prevents police from tipping off immigration agents. the third stops i.c.e. from detaining jailers as detainees. >> california is using powers it doesn't have to frustrate federal law enforcement. so you can be sure i am going

he announces the suit today, california's capital, sacrament sacramento. >> california, we have a proble problem. a series of actions and events has occurred here that directly and adversely impacts the work of our federal officers. that is just not unconstitutional, it is a plain violation of federal state or and a violation of common sense, the laws are harmful to californians and especially harmful to our law enforcement. that is why the department filed a suit against the state of california to invalidate these unjust laws and to immediately freeze the effect. >> sandra: california democrat dianne feinstein says that she is concerned that federal immigration laws do not always target criminals. >> i think that the standard was established is to go after the people that are problems, that have criminal records or are a problem. not to pick up the father escorting his daughter to school in the morning. or the mother coming home to work in the evening. >> sandra: in the meantime, a county general javier becerra is expected to speak out about the suit today, he has already said that the

to california next week. a source told the l-a times... >>> the white house now confirms that president trump is coming to california next week. he will be in the san diego area on tuesday to check out the border wall prototypes. this is the president's first california visit since taking office. >> why it's taken so long? he has been busy creating jobs, defeating isis, remaking the judiciary. >> he is the first president since eisenhower to not visit california in the first year in office. >>> this morning, there's a threat along the coast. a new study says the bay area shoreline is sinking faster than expected. kpix 5's betty yu shows us the areas that could soon be in the flood zone. >> reporter: sea levels are rising around the bay area due to global climate change. at the same time, some areas along the coast are sinking. that's according to a new study out of uc-berkeley. it found that more of the bay area could be under water by the end of the century than previously expected. >> the map shows the area

has clearly put a target on california's backalexandra limon / @alexlimonnews california officials argue they don't have the resources or money to enforce federal immigration laws. attorney general sessions says he's not asking them to, but he says the states laws endanger public safety.sessionswe are simply asking the state and other sanctuary jurisdictions to stop actively obstructing federal law enforcement.the court's decision could affect other cities counties and states with similar immigration policies. oregon senator jeff merkley says it's the attorney general who's putting communities at risk sen. jeff merkely / oregon (d) he's damanging public safety. because when you try to turn your local police and local sheriff's into ice agents they lose cooperation. under president obama, the justice department sued the state of arizona for its immigration laws - in that case the supreme court struck down portions of the arizona immigration falls under the federal jurisdiction.in washington alexandra limon. (steve) governor jerry brown fired back at attorney general sessions and the trump