. >> of course putin wanted hillary clinton to lose. >> he despised hillary clinton. >> whom would you like better? vladimir putin is not a friend to democracy. he is a crook. >> actual the strange summit between donald trump and vladimir putin in helsinki, americans are asking, what did putin get? and what more does he want? and is he really the most powerful man in the world? december 5th, 1989. it was a cold night in dresden, east germany. and it would change the course of vladimir putin's life. the berlin wall had just fallen. all over east germany angry crowds roamed the streets, lashing out at symbols of communist rule. that night in dresden they found a target. the local kgb headquarters. a mob surrounded the building. as the hour grew later, the crowd grew larger. inside peering through the curtains was a young kgb lieutenant colonel named vladimir putin. >> he was terrified that they were going to storm the building. >> putin was a junior officer, but the boss was away. he was in charge. >> the berlin wall had come down. police weren't going to help and he called for instructi

putin wanted hillary clinton to lose. he despised hille lary clinton >> who do you want vladimir putin or a crook? >> and so americans are asking, what did putin get and what more does he want? is he really the most powerful man in the world? >> december 5th, 1989. it was a cold night in dresden, east germany, and it would change the course of vladimir putin's life. the berlin wall had just fallen. they were lash iing out against communist rule. that night in dresden they found a target, the local kgb headquarters. the mob was outside and peering through the curtaining was a young kgb lieutenant colonel named vladimir putin. >> he was terrified that they were going to storm the building. >> putin was a junior officer, but the boss was away. he was in charge. >> the berlin wall had come down. police weren't going to help and he called for instructions. >> desperate for help putin dialed kgb headquarters in moscow over and over again. >> finally one official told him simply moscow is silent. >> and i think it felt like a de

vladimir putin was not a fan of hillary clinton. >> of course putin wanted hillary clinton to lose. he hated hillary clinton. >> prime minister, we have a lot of problems. >> the tension between the leaders had been brewing for years. in 2001, another american leader, george w. bush, vouched for putin. >> i looked the man in the eye. i found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy. i was able to get a sense of his soul. >> but on the campaign trail in 2008, hillary had a different take. >> i could have told him he was a kgb agent. by definition he doesn't have a soul. this is a waste of time, right? >> translator: recently mrs. clinton said you as a former kgb agent by definition can have no soul. >> putin's reply? statesmen shouldn't be guided by their hearts. they should use their heads. clinton had a lot of tough words for putin over the years. >> he's a very arrogant person to deal with. we have to stand up to his bullying. he is somebody who will take as much as he possibly can. >> but it was what happened in 2011 that marked a point of no return. it began with the arab

hillary clinton had a rigged investigation. i think the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible for obstruction and for the espionage act and a number of statutes we laid out here. what happens to her? and what happens to the people that were involved in the exoneration before the investigation to impact the presidential election? never mind lying to four fisa judges to get warrants to spy on americans and opposition party candidate representatives. >> this is where i get myself in trouble. because all of the principle decision makers now were put in place by president trump. jeff sessions, rod rosenstein, wries wray. it's no longer loretta lynch and jim comey. if they have uncovered systemic abuse or criminalality. they have an obligation to prosecute it. but when the head of the fbi stands up in front of the entire world and exonerate her like jim comey did i don't know a prosecute good enough to win that case. so to find out whether she -- jim comey ruined it by not interviewing her seriously and ruined it with that pr

hillary clinton. listerine® total care ps better than brushing alone. with 6 benefits in one, from cavity prevention to strengthening teeth. so instead of protection like this, you get protection like this. listerine® total care. bring out the bold.™ it's willingham, edge of the box, willingham shoots... goooooooaaaaaaaallllllll! that...was...magic. willingham tucks it in and puts the championship to bed. sweet dreams, nighty night. as long as soccer players celebrate with a slide, you can count on geico saving folks money. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. pressure, what pressure? the players on the... it's a high-tech revolution in sleep. the new sleep number 360 smart bed. it intelligently senses your movement and automatically adjusts on each side to keep you both comfortable. and snoring? how smart is that? smarter sleep. to help you lose your dad bod, train for that marathon, and wake up with the patience of a saint. the new sleep number 360 smart bed,

because he thought crooked hillary clinton would win, that's why. it had nothing to do with the trump administration. but fake news doesn't want to report the truth as usual. i remember obama saying edtold putin to knock it off. do you think that kgb agent was scared when obama said knock it off? >> i'll tell you, putin had to take half a baby aspirin that night to get to sleep, he was so frightened by what had been said to him by obama. the continues is the press is half right. they said russia tried to meddle in the election. what they are wrong about is saying it has a thing to do with donald trump. even these indictments do not in any way tie anything to president trump. judge jeanine: we all know no one will be extradited, arraigned, tried, convicted or sentenced why do we spend millions of dollars on investigations like this when we know no russian will be sent over by russia to be prosecuted by the mueller team. >> i think it's window dressing. it's show. it's trying to prove there was some basis for the mueller investigation. but the more we

it's some kind of tick between hillary clinton, hillary clinton, and the server, the right loves the server. he is asking where the server is. i can tell you where the server is. the dnc server is on display at the dnc next to the watergate file cabinet because it is equivalent of the last presidential scandal we have. but, look, you know, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome. while i do think donald trump is insane, it's the rest of us that get into this hyper ventilating every time he does something. the bottom line is his motivations no longer matter. only his actions do. frankly, our actions and the actions, whether you look at the republicans in congress who listen to what we just talked about, whether marco rubio sent a tough enough tweet. i can tell you tomorrow mitch mcconnell will be jamming brett kavanaugh into a seat that he stole. and frankly, the democrats have to step it up, too. we debate among ourselves whether or not we can even whisper the word impeachment before the house flips, hopefully. these ar

thing, i don't know if hillary clinton paid for it. that is terrible investigative if you don't know where your intelligence is coming from. are you writing i tomorrow? >> i am, not on this but read it anyway. it's on taxes. >> brian: good, i'm against them. thanks so much, appreciate it. will have even more on the peter strzok capitol hill showdown, we have to wrap up the 12 hours of testimony, only the "tucker carlson tonight" can do it. keep your fingers crossed, i think we can at the lexus golden opportunity sales event. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. until her laptop crashed this morning. her salon was booked for weeks, having it problems? ask a business advisor how to get on demand tech support for as little as $15 a month. right now, save $300 on our hp 2-in-1 laptop bundle at office depot officemax does it look like i'm done? shouldn't you be at work? [ mockingly ] "shouldn't you be at work?" todd. hold on. [ engine revs ] arcade game: fist pump! your real bike's all fixed. man, you guys are good! well, we are the num

i beat hillary clinton easily, zero collusion. and it has had a negative impact upon the relationship of the two largest nuclear powers in the world. it's ridiculous. it's ridiculous what's going on with the probe. it came out as a reason why the democrats lost an election. which, frankly, they should have been able to win just to say it one time again and i say it all the time. there was no collusion. i didn't know the president. there was nobody to collude with. we have two thoughts. you have groups that are wondering why the fbi never took the server. why haven't they taken the server? why was the fbi told to leave the office of the democratic national committee? all i can do is ask the question. my people came to me, dan coats came to me and some others. they said they think it's russia. i have president putin. he just said it's not russia. i have confidence in both parties. i really believe that this will probably go on for a while but i don't think it can go on without finding out what happened to the server. what happened t

hillary clinton, martin o'malley who you called a freak show. that's not nice, but there's a first amendment here in america. you can still insult government officials without being thrown into jail or held in contempt of congress, at least by our side of the aisle. there are no kings here and we have freedom of speech, the right that is cherished by the people and feared only by t tyrants. my colleagues insisted making a conspiracy theory out of pillow talk texts. but there are a couple facts they can't get around. number one, the ig found no partisan bias effecting the official investigation. number two, attorney general sessions is a republican appointed by donald trump. rod rosenstein is a republican appointed by donald trump. james comey is a republican appointed by donald trump. fbi director wray is appointed by donald trump, and robert mueller is a lifelong republican. this would have to be a republican conspiracy. i am looking for evidence of a republican conspiracy, all i could find were the kind of statements you have been arraigned on

we know hillary clinton lied to, we knew rice lied to. that information from tunisia or rather from livia that said, their version was totally false. and they deliberately and maliciously lied to the american people. that should all be released, we should be able to see with these people really are. then you say to yourself, if that's all true, and if clapper and brown and others were engaged in lying to the american people, why would they keep their secrecy? why would they be allowed clearance? i think it's important to get all the stuff out in the open. >> sean: all right mr. speaker, a very powerful. when we come back, we will get tom fenton and andy mccarthy's report of the situation -i've seen lots of homes helping new customers bundle and save big, but now it's time to find my dream abode. -right away, i could tell his priorities were a little unorthodox. -keep going. stop. a little bit down. stop. back up again. is this adequate sunlight for a komodo dragon? -yeah. -sure, i want that discount on car insurance just for owning a home

>> a matter of time before hillary clinton chimes in on this. she used the other big news of the day, the world cup, great world cup, question for donald trump as he meets vladimir putin, do you know which team you play for? the president's supporters not letting her get away with that, cara says she's the last person who should ask that question. michelle says the real question is what team do you play for? we know it is not america. joseph says you did not make the cut. a lot of hostile reaction. jillian: apparently today fear makes your problems better. >> according to a finish brewery they released a special trump vladimir putin summit beer, here is donald trump with the tagline let's settle this like adults, also make breweries better again. rock paper scissors, having a lot of fun with it and announced it on twitter you have difficult decisions to make in helsinki, disagreements to solve because we are the best in problem solving. they say beer makes things better. who knew? rob: beer makes your problems worse? >> you get too much beer. th

that they did not get grand jury subpoena to demand testimony from top hillary clinton aides. they did not obtain search warrants to gain access to the laptops clinton's lawyers use to review their emails. they did not take personal phones or similar devices used by her top aides. very stark contrast to the treatment that you and your family received. >> it's apples and oranges. the treatment that i received, it was obvious they were going after me. never once have i said what i did wasn't wrong. i have accepted responsibility and i think it's shameful that hillary clinton and her aides just want to accept responsibility. i pled guilty. i didn't go to trial. you look at even reality winter, she made a mistake, but guilty. james comey released information to the press to benefit himself. hillary clinton, who mishandled classified information at the highest level where i mishandled low-level classified information. and they threatened me and intimidated me for four years and finally put me away in prison for a year. i just want the rest of them to be held to the same standard. n

se acusÓ a 12 oficiales de inteligencia rusadeja crear --de hackear la campaÑa de hillary clinton. johnson y johnson deberÁ pagar $5,000,000,000 a 22 mujeres y sus familias por daÑos causados por su talco que terminaron en cÁncer. vamos ahora con toda la informaciÓn. ♪ locutor: este es su "noticiero univisiÓn" con jorge ramos e ilia calderÓn. ♪ ilia: la niÑa salvadoreÑa que se convirtiÓ en la angustiosa voz de la separaciÓn de familias estÁ al lado de su madre luego de un mes de separaciÓn. cindy madrid estuvo detenida en texas y hoy pudo viajar a arizona para reunirse con su pequeÑa alison de seis aÑos en un emotivo encuentro. pedro: juntas llegaron hoy cindy madrid y su hija alison a la primera rueda de prensa luego de su reunificaciÓn que tuvo lugar la madrugada de hoy en el aeropuerto de houston, texas. la emociÓn de la madre emigrante y de su pequeÑa fue imponente. tambiÉn la pequeÑa traÍa una muÑeca la mano. quÉ le dijiste cuando la viste? >> que la querÍa y que la extraÑÉ mucho. >> empezamos a recuperar el tiempo perdido. estamos felices de estar

up hillary clinton's private email server. then there's you and ms. page. it is interesting to me that when you were so damaging to the investigation that you had to go, that bob mueller, the person who brought in all these people that had connections to hillary clinton, did not ask you about a single text message. i believe it is because he did not want to know the answer and there was bias, and your perception of bob mueller's perception of you is totally unreliable. >> the time of the gentleman has expired. the chair recognizes ms. dennings for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. mr. strzok, let me just clear this up. i am not angry and i am not desperate and i am not afraid of the truth, but i am in pursuit of it. first of all, i want to thank you for your service to our country through the federal bureau of investigation and for your service to our country through the united states army. mr. chairman, each of us as members of congress took an oath to uphold and defend the constitution of the united states. my oath w

four years of hillary clinton is not what's best for this country. mr. trump should put the country first and do the right thing. that's you, certainly, right? >> no, sir. >> it was republican member congress mike coffin from colorado. in light of these comments. i would not vote for mr. trump. >> that's yours. >> no. >> here is ooanother one. it is clear that donald trump is not fit to be president of the united states and can't defeat hillary clinton, i believe you should step aside and allow governor pence to lead the ticket. you wrote that one? >> no, sir. >> that's republican bradley of alabama. >> how about this. i won't vote for him as disappointing as i have been with his antics throughout the campaign, i thought supporting the nominee was the best thing for our country and our party. it is clear the best thing for our party is for trump to step aside and allow responsible and respectable republicans to lead the ticket. you wrote that? >> no, sir. >> how about this, i ask you mr. trump, all due respect, step aside and allow someone else carrying

hundreds of hours dedicated to the hillary clinton scandal. we have failed and our responsibilities to the american people. when we finally have an opportunity to raise the issue, we are to talk about hillary clinton's emails. shame on all of you. >> time for the gentleman has expired. we recognize the gentleman from florida. >> you have defended your actions, said that you did not put bias in your actions. inspector general disagreed. he asked you about the insurance policy text, the we will stop it text. you provided an excellent nation. he found your explanation to be unpersuasive. you are aware of that? >> i'm not aware of that. >> he testified when we have them in here in june. he also said that your explanation for how you handle the end the lee weiner laptop -- laptop, he weiner thought your explanation was not persuasive. >> i'm aware of facts regarding that specific assertion. he was notfied that persuaded by your explanation for why you focused on the trump-rest collusion and let the weiner thinks it. he testified in front of our com

we're doing a hearing into the investigation of hillary clinton's e-mails in 2016. that's just dumb. second, before this hearing today my republican colleagues could not point to a single act you took in an official capacity that showed bias in any of these official investigations. now, more than eight hours later, they still can't point to a single official act you took that showed bias in these investigations. there's a famous book i read called "all i really need to know i learned in kindergarten." based on today's circus, i hope more members on this committee read that book. there's one thing all of us are taught in kindergarten, which is that actions speak louder than words. your words show that you did not like trump. you used the f-word referring to trump. you wanted donald trump to lose. the one thing you could have done to cause him to lose is disclose the russia investigation in july of 2016. did you do that? >> i did not. >> did you disclose an investigation in august? >> no. >> september? >> no. >> october? >> no. >> november? >> no. >> what you did is w

he did that to protect hillary clinton, not to go after hillary clinton. >> ask hillary clinton if she feels like that, chris collins. you let me know if i'm heching you if i came with one of the worst pieces of dirty laundry before your election -- >> it certainly did not play out well, but he did not think there was any chance, nor did -- >> i know this isn't over because jim jordan was talking about connecting that the mueller probe is only about the dossier. and -- but to me, i don't know that they made a great case, and this is going to go on. i want a promise from you, sir, please. when we learn more, please come back so we can chew on it for the audience. >> oh, absolutely. >> we've got a good audience here. they like to think and are open minded. appreciate it. >>> we're going to have congressman luis gutierrez. he was in that room today and throwing some haymakers of his own. a lot of them against his republican colleagues. but up next, we've got some good folks waiting to get in on this. perfect people to debate the impact of today. a former fbi agent and a former federal pro

that seems to be a reference to hillary clinton's private personal server. so, it's unusual. they put it in the indictment for a reason. >> it's a heck of a coincidence, you know, whether the someone close to the president mentioned this to him before he went on stage, we don't know. i don't want to speculate and put stuff out that might not be true. you have to put those together. there's no way to separate them. to simone's point, there are the president, if this was out there, you could say, yeah, you should keep the meeting because he could walk in and say, look, this is what you have. with this president, we haven't seen him strike any sort of aggressive posture with putin. very little. we have seen things here and there. not to mention what happened in the uk. >> the poison? >> the poisoning. they found the bottle that was the place where the poison came from. all of these events, all these events with allies, with our own elections, the midterms are only a couple months away. they still have dccc e-mails. >> dccc -- >> i think it's interesting because, i believe it's n

hillary clinton won we would never know. i don't understand why you can't admit that sometimes this looks really bad for the institution of the fbi and what they were doing politically. >> peter strzok was a bad actor and shouldn't have been there. but i refer you back to the i.q. the network has touted. the inspector general said he was a bad actor but he did not influence the final decisions of the fbi. let me put it this way. the fwib, nobody in their -- fbi, nobody in their right mind, no republican consultant thinks the fbi helped hillary clinton and hurt donald trump. the fbi hurt hillary clinton by putting this information out. james comey put it out -- >> they believed she would be the next president of the united states. >> you don't interrupt tom. you don't interrupt tom. >> tom makes sense. >> you don't want to hear the facts? you said ined a ver tently. inadvertently. >> you said the i.g. -- >> excuse me. >> he covered the hillary clinton server. this covers the trump issue. the i.g. hasn't exonerated strzok on t

leaks and guccifer 2.0, that those were released to damage hillary clinton. there was discussion about when they would be released. we know that to be the case. there's also evidence in this indictment that somebody who had a relationship with senior members of the trump campaign was in contact with guccifer 2.0, which we know not to be one hacker but the russian military intelligence. so these are the facts as presented by robert mueller and the justice department. these are the assertions that they're making. there was election interference. they don't know if it affected the count, but all the theories, the crazy things from the fever swamps about the deep state, the crazy things about seth rich, none of that's true. i want to go now on the phone to jeff toobin to get his reaction to this indictment. jeff? >> well, the first thing to recognize, i think, is that as a legal matter, this indictment is probably all we're going to learn about this side of the case because these defendants are in russia. we don't have an extradition treaty that would cover this

he was in charge of the hillary clinton email investigation. peter strzok was in charge of the -- he was an agent in charg- >> he was the lead investigator. let's get the facts straight. >> i'm sorry. lead investigator. i'm happy to use whatever term you'd like to use. he was dismissed from the mueller probe for his anti-trump bias. we learn he wanted to stop trump, wanted to find a pretext. how can you sit there, who wanted to get the facts from the committees before, and say this isn't relevant? by the way, we wouldn't know this information if not for committees and the ig unearthing it. beyond why you can't admit it one moment that sometimes this looks really bad for the institutional of the fbi, what they were doing politically. >> i think peter strzok was a bad actor, and shouldn't have been there to begin with. the inspector general said he was a bad actor, but he did not influence the final decisions of the fbi which was not to charge -- [laughter] >> let me put it to you this way. nobody in their right mind, no republican consultant, th

on march 4, you sent the text that hillary clinton should win. at what point in there was the memo changed from gross negligence to extremely careless. >> i'm not going to give you a break down of what occurred before. >> and i understand you have been here a long time and so have we, but it was in may. >> okay. >> and what it appears here and it is in the context of the need to finish the mid year investigation is that donald trump had just won the primary. it was obvious that he was going to be the republican nominee and i believe you when you say you are a patriot and you care deeply about the country and i can see how you and your colleagues concluded that was in the best interest to change it from gross negligence to extremely careless because you couldn't comprehend a president trump or in your mind, the danger that that might pose to the country. >> that's not what happened, sir. >> well something happened to change this from gross negligence to extremely careless. >> i can tell you what happened. >> i know what the inspector general said,

trump or hillary clinton or anything else political in nature? >> i don't specifically recall, but it's probably a safe assumption that yes, i did. >> it's likely they would be similar. >> safe assumption. >> your personal phone has likely similar texts to the ones that we found on your government phone, correct? >> i would say it has similar expressions of personal belief, yes. >> okay. so in front of you, you have one sheet of paper that was presented to you a few minutes ago and i'm going to just go to a date and ask to you read your own words. march 4th, 2016. >> you want me to read this? >> yes, please. >> omg, he's an idiot. >> may 4th, 2016. >> now the pressure really starts to finish mye. >> july 19th 2016. >> hi, how was trump other than a deutsch? melania? >> july 21st, 2016? >> trump is a disaster. i have no idea how destabilizing his presidency would be. >> august 6th, 2016. >> i don't believe i wrote this text, sir. >> okay. it's been attributed to you. august 8th, 2016 and i'll preface it by saying for context, ms. page said, not ev

hillary clinton and martin o'malley that you called a freak show. there's a first amendment here in america. you can still insult government officials without being thrown into jail or held in contempt of congress by our side of the aisle. there's no kings here and we have freedom of speech. the right that is cherished by the people and feared by tyrants. there's a couple of facts they can't get around. number 1, the i.g. found no bias affecting the official investigation. number 2, attorney general sessions is a republican appointed by donald trump. rod rosenstein is a republican appointed by donald trump. james comey is a republican appointed by donald trump. director wray is a republican appointed by trump and robert mueller is a life-long republican. all i can find are statements that you've have been arraigned on today. i want to ask you about the statements. in the spring of 2016, senator ted cruz called donald trump a coward, a pathological liar and a serial flanderer. is this attack on trump by senator cruz a part of a deep state conspiracy

to give the republicans the chance of defeating hillary clinton, mr. trump should step aside, his defeat seems almost certain and four years of hillary clinton is not what's best for this country. mr. trump should put the country first and do the right thing. that's you, certainly, right? >> no, sir. >> no, it was republican member of congress mike coppen from colorado. in light of these comments, donald trump should step aside to allow our party to replace him with mike pence, i cannot vote for donald trump. is that yours? >> no. >> no, that's barbara comstock from virginia. here's another. it's clear donald trump is not fit to be president of the united states and cannot defeat hillary clinton, i believe he should step aside and allow governor pence to lead the republican ticket. you wrote that one? >> no, sir. >> you didn't? no, you're right, that's republican bradley burn of alabama. how about this one? donald trump's behavior makes him unacceptable as a candidate for president and i won't vote for him. as disappointed as i have been with his antic

maria: would robert mueller interview hillary clinton? >> well again i can't speak for robert mueller but i can very much agree with senator paul when he says that democratic operatives related to the clinton campaign and the democratic national committee paid for, the creation of the so-called steele dossier and then turned it over to the federal bureau of investigation but what's so unprecedented about this is that the fbi then took it, weaponized it without ever verifying its credibility and brought it to the fisa court without disclosing the source of that information. that is deeply troubling and it is a part of the reason why the new fbi director has been hard at work trying to reform this organization whose credibility has been damaged by a few key people and by the way those few key people are the same people in both of these investigations. james comey, andrew mccabe, peter strzok, lisa page, the fbi counsel, the chief of staff to the director, the same people in both these investigations. in one instance doing everything possibl

would he have announced a major speech about hillary clinton if he had not known this information was coming. would he have canceled the speech if the meeting had not turned out to be a bust? cohen squares that saying of course donald trump knew. is michael cohen lying? this raises a lot of questions. is there any corroboration? >> on another larger issue, michael cohen knows everything. he is the long time fixer. he has been at the president's side. so the idea that he is ready, he says, through sources to cooperate with robert mueller, is it a game changer? >> it could be, it depends on in michael cohen is telling the truth, and whether or not he has any corroboration, any other witnesses, any tape recordings, any e-mails or texts that corroborate what he is saying. >> all right special agent, someone that has investigated matters before, this information comes out overnight, michael cohen making this public revelation, cnn reporting michael cohen's mind-set on this. what happens now. if you're robert mueller, what do you do? >> i think at the outset, what this tells us is that for

strzok. >> you were apart of the hillary clinton's e-mail investigation, is that correct? >> yes. >> in that investigation, you were part of the decision for her to and her lawyers to go through e-mails that were produced during exclusively used during her time as secretary, go through and determine which ones were government and which ones were not. both classified and unclassified. is that correct? >> i was not. >> you are not involved at all. >> that's correct. >> but you are aware of it? >> i was aware how they did it. >> you think it was okay how secretary clinton to determine what could or could not qualify for her to turn under the federal record act? >> i can't speak to that. that was the decision my understanding between her and her attorneys. >> she failed to deliver some items that have been ruled as classified, correct? >> i am aware that we recovered information that was not in the materials that she turned over. i don't know if it was her failure or the failure of the attorneys conducting that sort or simply because she does not have it. i don't know the answ

i did not vote for donald trump or hillary clinton. host: i want to ask you about the access hollywood video. it came to light on october 7. we know what the president said. i will use part of it. you know, i am automatically attracted to beautiful women. it is like a magnet. i don't even wait, and when you are a star, they let you do it. they let you do anything. and it goes on to expletives we will not use on-air. how to they react to this, evangelicals? guest: any evangelical react to that in a negative way. host: but some did not say anything. guest: those who didn't say anything -- very few didn't they anything, but they said something like that is for rent this, i don't endorse that kind of behavior, whether it really happened or was locker room talk. but they click -- quickly moved on. of course i don't endorse that, but here is why we need to support trump. back to the playbook. as it developed in the 1970's and 1980's under the moral majority, connected to a president who had some kind of and respected american institutions, i

hillary clinton has to get -- of the people who vote for him smell and are ignorant. so this is going back and forth. did he say that was within the code of conduct for the fbi? >> he repeatedly claimed he violated nothing according to the policies. and his own personal moral concept which is laid out in the ig report. >> he also said the ig report said no bias. i regret doing those text messages but it didn't affect my investigation. >> and that's not the case at all. in some fact horowitz said he he had a clear, highest mind-set and also in the case of the laptop that they had no confidence that he did not have bias in doing the decision. so they said he had bias in decision-making. we heard repeatedly today the opposite from the other side of the of the island from the witness himself under oath. that was not the case. >> do you take your foot off the gas for the hillary clinton investigation? by the way he is they are interrogating hillary clinton on the fourth of july weekend in that summer, and he's also there for michael flynn. there were reports that he did no

he goes on e, he even retained bill and crooked hillary clinton's lawyer. gee, i wonder if they helped him make the choice. so that, of course, a reference to lanny davis, who happens to be one of the lawyers who worked for bill and hillary clinton, bill clinton during the impeachment phase back years and years ago. of course, what's very clear here is that the president is angry, according to the reporting from cnn's jeff zeleny, from jeff last night. a republican source telling jeff, as a matter of fact, it's getting closer and closer to his inner circle. how do you think he feels? so so far a forceful denial from the president of the united states. he's denied it before. back to you, alysn. >> thank you very much for all of that. >>> now to this, about one in three children who were separated from their parents at the border are not reunited. they are still in government custody. as you know there was this government deadline to reunite them yesterday. that has expired. so the government offering no time line now for tracking down those hundreds of paren

to harm hillary clinton, ignition that you did? >> anything that i it, no. >> you are well aware that mr. flynn has pled guilty, is that correct? >> that's correct. >> you are well aware that he was the national security advisor for the president of the united states. >> that's correct. >> well, in his statement that we have right here, mr. flynn, he indicated that his statements, his false statements, in the mentions caused the impeding of the russian investigation but more importantly it is important to take note of the fact that he provided information to the russian ambassador that said, here, calm down. don't bother to get upset about sanctions. and according to a whistle-blower he said the sanctions would be, "ripped up to allow money to start flowing to one of flynn's business projects. you had no interference with that, did you not? >> i did not. >> and you had no involvement if you will during your june 2018 interview i noticed concern in your voice recalling the 2016 campaign season specifically october 2016 as it related

clinton ideology that has really -- what did hillary clinton stand for politically aside from herself and reaching herself? i think bernieism is the -- what has survived the 2016 election for the democratic side and until it's challenged by somebody else on the democratic side i think that will continue to pick up stream and be organizing tool for a lot of the candidates throughout the country. >> is it your analysis this is the response to president trump like the tea party on the other side was the response to president obama? >> i long thought that but i don't know, you know, i think -- i perhaps think it's different. perhaps this is left-wing populism in response to conservative populism. if president trump was the conservative populist then this is, of course, left-wing populism, there's debate if you can have that, perhaps it's socialism and they are coming out and saying that they are socialists. so what's strange is that they are trying to pick up the strands of president trump, they agree on trade, for instance, it's not president trump, it's not at all what he believes in bu

the hillary clinton emails found no effect of any criminal violation. yet, republicans have continued over and over again to hold these hearings without addressing the question of jailed children snatched from their families. today, we understand that the health and human services is holding back the reunification of some of these babies under 5 to their moms and their dads on or basis of unrelatable unnecessary predicaments of these parents where they have been incarcerated for misdemeanors regarding immigration. this is the administration that really has no caring and no love for people. finally, mr. speaker, the world health organization had the delegation from this nation, not representing me, fight a country that was trying to support breast-feeding. and they wanted to condemn ecuador for a resolution supporting breast-feeding for mothers around the world. what are we coming to? where is the heart in this administration? i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady's time has expired. for what purpose does the gentleman from nevada seek re

we know hillary clinton lied to. we knew rice lyda, we know that they knew they were lying and we know that in fact, information from libya that said their version was totally false. they deliberately and maliciously lied to. that should all be released and we should see with those people really are. so if that's all true and if clapper and brown and others were engaged in line to the american people, why would they keep their secrecy? why would they be allowed clearance? it's very important to get all the stuff out in the open. >> sean: mr. speaker, very powerful. when we come back, we will get more reports. straight ahead ♪ ♪ ♪ >> lots of questions for john brennan and he will definitely be sought by the committees for an interview. this is an extremely disturbing to link to see, both he and james comey, supposedly a partial government officials carrying out their job in areas and intelligence authoring and the force expressing the kind of extreme bias they have shown now, which i think reflects quite accurat

that he knew it was about russian operatives having dirt on hillary clinton and he said i love it if that's what it was about and the meeting took place and steve bannon said it's hard to believe that that meeting would have happened without president trump knowing about it. candidate trump. also, look at all the behavior of the president. in both refusing to say anything negative about vladimir putin and refusing to acknowledge russian interference in the election. and a number of trump operatives lying or forgetting about meetings with the russians. look at the context o. facts. and i think president trump is in a tough position to argue somehow we should believe that he is honest and we should disbelieve michael cohen. the president with a long history of not being truthful. michael cohen understands he will be unable to reach an agreement with the special counsel. he had to come clean and tell the truth as a cooperating witness. with false testimony, no deal will be blown up. i think he has to understand that and does. so i think we have to wait and see but this is very disturbin

clinton ideology that has really -- what did hillary clinton stand for politically aside from herself and reaching herself? i think bernieism is the -- what has survived the 2016 election for the democratic side and until it's challenged by somebody else on the democratic side i think that will continue to pick up stream and be organizing tool for a lot of the candidates throughout the country. >> is it your analysis this is the response to president trump like the tea party on the other side was the response to president obama? >> i long thought that but i don't know, you know, i think -- i perhaps think it's different. perhaps this is left-wing populism in response to conservative populism. if president trump was the conservative populist then this is, of course, left-wing populism, there's debate if you can have that, perhaps it's socialism and they are coming out and saying that they are socialists. so what's strange is that they are trying to pick up the strands of president trump, they agree on trade, for instance, it's not president trump, it's not at all what he believes in bu

i embraced hillary clinton into the party, i think she's tremendous asset, she will add much value to the conversation and here is what happens in elections, you either win or learn, although she may not have learned the electoral college we can learn a lot from hillary clinton in the race she ran, because every day -- [inaudible conversations] rob: hang on. let me ask you about that, as the democratic party moves to the left, the socialists have been coming out -- >> that's your perspective. rob: would hillary clinton be better candidate as moderate because the socialist alleged will get evicerated. >> the bo oh tom -- bottom line is our party is big ten party. we really not. going into 2018 midterms we are on pace to come across finish line first. rob: let me ask you, would anybody trust hillary clinton, would the democrats trust her again in 2020? a lot of people in the party that are angry with herby -- herby losing party that was unlosable. >> you know, she neglected entire states, you know, she favored a campaign that was based solely on data and ignored people on the ground, al

that any time it came up that russia hacked the dnc or hillary clinton or podesto. this makes all those denials even bigger lies than we suspect that i had were to begin with. why would he be told about this meeting? it goes to the question you asked me. his partners in the ms. universe contest, a big russian oligarch and his son who was a pop star who performed at ms. universe, they were the ones that brought this offer, who sent the e-mail to trump jr. saying there is a secret kremlin plot. we have set this up. will you meet with us. so it was people that he trusted, people who donald trump jr. and donald trump jr. had done business with and so it makes a lot of sense that donald trump sr. would be told about this. you know, i don't know what they're going to say about this at this point on, but it is collusion and it shows donald trump was covering up from the get go if this is true. >> jennifer, i want to get your reaction now that you have a little bit of time to stare at it. >> you know, this is the piece of evidence that you never get. it's so good. it is so

. >> what happened to hillary clinton's e-mails? >> tonight, accusations of treason. >> mr. putin now is the master puppeteer of donald trump, the person who is in our oval office. outrageous. >> and a big flashing red warning light about the next election. >> this was a very constructive few hours that we spent together. >> plus, the mueller investigation under attack. >> i think that the probe is a disaster for our country. >> and putin's non-denial on compromat. >> now to the compromising material. >> what does russia know about trump? >> if that's not the explanation, that trump has something on it, what is it? what the heck could it be? >> "all in" starts now. >>> good evening from new york. i'm ali velshi, in for chris hayes. three days ago, on the same day that robert mueller charged 12 russian military officers in a conspiracy to disrupt the 2016 election, the president's own director of national intelligence, former republican senator dan coats, warned that it may be about to happen again. comparing this moment right now to the summer before 9/11. >> it was in the m