the thing, i would much rather they said inventor jeff bezos or entrepreneur jeff bezos or father jeff bezos. those kinds of things are more meaningful to me. it is an output measure. if you look at the financial success of amazon and the stock, and i own 16% of amazon. amazon is worth roughly $1 trillion. that means what we have built over 20 years is $840 billion of wealth for other people, and that is great. that is how it should be. i believe so powerfully in the ability of entrepreneurial capitalism and free markets to solve so many of the world's problems, not all of them. david: you live in washington state, outside of seattle. the man who was the richest man is named bill gates. what is the likelihood that the two richest men in the world live not only in the same country state, city, but same neighborhood? is there something about that neighborhood we should know about? are there any more houses there for sale? [laughter] jeff: after i saw bill not too long ago, we were joking about the world richest man thing. i basically said, you are welcome. he immediately turned to me and

the thing, i would much rather they said inventor jeff bezos or entrepreneur jeff bezos or father jeff bezos. those kinds of things are more meaningful to me. it is an output measure. if you look at the financial entrepreneur jeff bezos or success of amazon and the stock, and i own 16% of amazon. amazon is worth roughly $1 trillion. that means what we have built over 20 years is $840 billion of wealth for other people, and that is great. that is how it should be. i believe so powerfully in the ability of entrepreneurial capitalism and free markets to solve so many of the world's problems, not all of them. david: you live in washington state, outside of seattle. the man who was the richest man is named bill gates. what is the likelihood that the two richest men in the world live not only in the same country state, city, but same neighborhood? is there something about that neighborhood we should know about? are there any more houses there for sale? [laughter] jeff: after i saw bill not too long ago, we were joking about the world richest man thing. i basically said, you are welcome. he i

jeff: world's oldest man. [laughter] jeff: that is a famous line i like. the real thing is, it will be whatever it is going to be. i will be proud of the things -- i live my life in such a way that when i am in a quiet moment of reflection thinking about on -- thinking back on my life, i have as few regrets as possible. what will my legacy be? i have no idea. i do not even want to spend a lot of time thinking about it. david: do you intend to give away the bulk of your fortune at and some point in your life? jeff: i don't know how much i will give away. i will give away a lot of money in a nonprofit model, but i will also invest a lot of money in something that any rational investor would say is a really bad investment, which is blue origin, but i think it is super important. if i cannot make blue origin a for-profit, maybe i will convert it to a nonprofit at some point in the future, but i would not want that. i would want it to be a thriving ecosystem like ups and fedex. david: let's close with your wife. we have not mentioned her. jeff: we met in new yo

but that's not jeff flake. and so jeff flake decided to do this his way. >> i have been speaking with a number of people on the other side, had conversations ongoing for a while with regard to making sure that we do do diligence here, and i think it would be proper to delay the floor vote for up to but not more than one week in order to let the fbi continue to do an investigation, limited in time and scope to the current allegations that are there. and limit in time to no more than one week. and i will vote to advance the bill to the floor with that understanding. >> and so tonight the train has stopped and the fbi is investigating brett kavanaugh again. after jeff flake and the rest of the republicans on the committee voted to send brett kavanaugh's nomination to the senate floor, jeff flake created a mini republican stampede for an fbi investigation. senator susan collins and lisa murkowski quickly tweeted they too wanted an fbi investigation. and then mitch mcconnell knew the deal was completely undone. and

cnn jeff zeleny is at the white house. we heard the questions from our chief white house correspondent, you know, as far as what do you support this notion of an fbi investigation, and it sounded like the president said it's up to the senate. >> reporter: that's right, brooke. the president is being unusually restrained about this today. he really is leaving this in the hands of mitch mcconnell and the senate. what a difference from anything we've heard from him over the last week or so. we have spent so much time this week talking about how he's been blasting democrats, calling it a con game, saying why didn't she report this some 36 years ago? well, today president trump seems to be, you know, restrained is the only word i can really think about as he was answering the questions. and he is trying to determine what the next steps are here but he's not blaming anyone, blasting anyone. take a listen to how he answered the question just shortly ago in the oval office. >> i guess the vote was a positive vote, that there seems

and jeff is trying to be fair. i just don't see we are going to benefit from anything in terms of i have been doing this most of my adult life. 35 years ago, you know what you know and have you heard what you are going to hear. having said that, this is called democracy. >> people like you who believe that brett kavanaugh is innocent of things he has been accused of. do you think this might help other people in the country feel better about this person on the supreme court if a week from now the fbi comes back and says we're good. >> i think the people in the country are going to feel different lay week from now you can probably put in a phone booth. however, if jeff feels better about it, i feel better about it. >> i'm practical guy. >> senator graham, do you think he was moved after he was con fronted by protesters on his way to vote this morning? >> no. listen, this is jeff flake. i mean, this is wh what i actually like about the guy. susan, all these people take it really seriously. jeff is not a lawyer. this i

jeff: world's oldest man. [laughter] jeff: that is a famous line i like. the real thing is, it will be whatever it is going to be. i will be proud of the things -- i live my life in such a way that when i am in a quiet moment of reflection thinking about on my life, i have as few regrets as possible. what will my legacy be? i have no idea. i do not even want to spend a lot of time thinking about it. david: do you intend to give away the bulk of your fortune at and some point in your life? jeff: i don't know how much i will give away. i will give away a lot of money in a nonprofit model, but i will also invest a lot of money in something that any rational investor would say is a really bad investment, which is blue origin, but i think it is super important. if i cannot make blue origin a for-profit, maybe i will convert it to a nonprofit at some point in the future, but i would not want that. i would want it to be a thriving ecosystem like ups. -- ups and fedex. david: let's close with your wife. jeff: we met in new york city where we worked. we got engaged

>> jeff, thank you. jeff zeleny at the white house. we also have some new reporting on the attorney general jeff sessions. i want to bring in white house correspondent kaitlan collins. where does the attorney general -- what does he think right now? where does he think he stands as far as the president is concerned? >> reporter: well, wolf, he is really come to terms with the fact that the relationship with president trump won't end well one way or another and the request to investigate who it is that wrote that critical op-ed of him isn't going to help. wolf, over the last year and a half now that the president has been attacking jeff sessions at the beginning he said he was going to keep his head down, keep doing his job at the justice department and then as those attacks increased we saw him push back on the president more and more and now even in recent weeks he's acknowledged that that relationship with president trump has only gotten worse. wolf, some days he treats this with humor joking with people looking at the president's tw

i am not surprised it moved forward given jeff flake's surprised it moved forward given jeff fla ke's announcement surprised it moved forward given jeff flake's announcement earlier today he was going to vote yes, he would have to break his word to the people but he found a way to have a face—saving compromise and try and getan face—saving compromise and try and get an investigation. it's unprecedented but it's not terribly surprising in light of the conflicts he's been going through over the last week. what about this motion he put forward, were you expecting that? the argument is due diligence, fairenough? that? the argument is due diligence, fair enough? i think he had a last—minute change of heart after being ambushed by the sexual assault survivor in the elevator, he had already committed to voting yes and then she and would other things were going on behind the scenes that we don't know about persuaded him that he ought to take the democrats side and asking for a further investigations so he found a creative way to have his cake and eat it too. i am surprised about the way

if that's what jeff flake wants, that what jeff flake gets. >> how much his tone has change inside the last 24 hours. he was the most visibly upset. he was devastated. what jeff flake has carefully and artfully asked for is he's supporting chuck grassley. he's respecting sort of the chain of command and saying just a week. let's get some more info. what's your take here? >> i think this all comes down to whether or not the president re-opens this. senator graham said just as much. someone has got to explain this to the president. he's got to agree to re-open it. i think that's still a very big question of whether he will do it. i don't think that senator flake, who the president doesn't like very much, saying that in the committee hearing or the committee meeting is necessarily going to convince him. i think it would take more republicans saying firmly, we will not vote yes for this nominee unless you re-open the investigation. that still remains to be seen. i wouldn't rule the other option out which is that flake says a week from now, i asked. he didn't want to do it. what can i do. i

first, the cnn senior white house correspondent, jeff, the president regularly has criticized jeff sessions, but this stands out right in the middle of two criminal investigations? >> it does stand out. it's pretty extraordinary that the attacks from the president have become routine by now. this was different. the president was talking about an ongoing criminal case, suggesting the attorney and his justice department should have used political considerations here to not effectively go after or indict these two house republicans. but, jim, all this comes as another sign. the president at war with his own justice department. summer may be over at the white house, but the same storm clouds are gathering as president trump heads into the fall. tonight the president lashing out again at attorney general jeff sessions, but this time over the justice department's recent indictments of two republican congressmen. two easy wins now in doubt because there is not enough time. good job, jeff, the president said on twitter. he is referring to chris collins of new york, indicted on insider trading charg

jonathan: jeff? jeffrey: let's break down the movement in interest rates between real and inflation. most of the movement up through this 3% latest move has been a move from real interest rate. that's about fed speak and debate over the neutral rate. so that leaves you some room on the inflationary side. if there was any uptick in terms of inflation that you could still press to higher rates, you also have the neutral rate debate. as the economy, to krishna's point -- he is absolutely right. it is about the economy. as the strength of the economy persists, and if it persists, so too will expectation about where the equilibrium neutral rates can go. you can get higher rates on both the real and inflationary side. jonathan: the neutral rate will move along with it in the future as the economy improves. the big question for a lot of people in the moment are they are seeing risk appetite returning to the market is whether you can get a simultaneous lift in treasury yields and risk appetite abroad. can yo

jeff, can you hear me? >> glor: apologies again for some of the communication issues here as we deal with some of the worst of florence as she arrives now. rain is coming sideways, down and up. florence drove more than a million people from their homes, and more than 700,000 lost power. rain ranging from one to 3.5 feet has already fallen, and it's not over. north carolina governor, roy cooper. >> for overall damage, it will be hard at the end of the day, i think, to find a rival for this storm. >> glor: in wilmington, many of the trees that contributed to its historic beauty are now gone. >> this is my street. >> glor: this is your street right here? >> yes. >> glor: george pace returned to his neighborhood and saw his home for the first time, expecting the worst, but discovering only minimal damage. florence may be gone from here by tomorrow, but she will not be forgotten. wilmington mayor bill saffo. >> you can walk faster than the storm is moving. >> glor: there are trees down all over. >> right. >> glo

jeff flake is. murkowski has said that she supports jeff flake's request for an fbi investigation and a one-week delay. >> reporter: correct. you've got it all right. but let me bring you breaking news from my colleagues inside the capitol seeking out that meeting with mitch mcconnell and senators murkowski and flake. senator cornyn telling us that there will be an fbi background check investigation lasting no more than one week so we're not sure what they know that we don't, if they have been in communication with the president who would have to authorize that, but that is a marked difference from leadership who had previously until this time been saying there was no need to do that, that they were going to push full steam ahead no matter what. this is the result of what we have seen unfold over the course of the past few -- i was going to say past few days. it's actually been hours maybe but over this afternoon as jeff flake seemed to suddenly change his mind. he went into this judiciary committee

you can see it on jeff flake's face. he later then tells jeff coons that he's concerned that they are tearing the country apart, this whole thing, i think. do you think he's right? do you think this episode is doing that? >> yeah. well, i think our politics is more emotional and vitriolic than ever and you see more of these personal confrontations. these women, obviously, they weren't threatening but you see things like ted cruz in a restaurant where you have goonz confronting him and you're a couple inches away from some sort of physical confrontation so i think we're going down a road where public officials will probably need almost constant security and it's a very bad thing for this country and a sign of how the political debate is going off the rails. >> do you think it's a bad thing for the country? yesterday you were arrested protesting outside the capitol in between the supreme court and the capitol. do you think it's a bad thing where this is headed? >> i think there are a lot of things headed a bad direction. i

jeff flake was expected to speak as well. nevertheless, this panel is bitterly, bitterly divided over this nomination. it has been hugely contentious and the key question, where do the moderate senators come down and does jeff flake have a change of heard. we don't have any indication that's the case yet, but curious him not delivering remarks announcing support after he put out a paper statement earlier today. >> after he voted to confirm judge kavanaugh, he was going towards an elevator. let me play the clip of what happened then. >> what you are doing is allowing someone who actually supreme court.an to sit on the - this is not tolerable. you have children in your family. think about them. i have two children. i cannot imagine that for the next 50 years, they will have to have someone in the supreme court who has been accused of violating a young girl. what are you doing, sir? >> noble believes me. i didn't tell anyone and you are telling all women they don't matter and they should stay quiet because if they tell you what

sam, another issue for jeff sessions, george papadopoulos contradicts sworn system by jeff sessions regarding a possible meeting between president trump and vladimir putin. the following coming from his sentencing memo. while some in the room rebuffed george's offer mr. trump nodded with approval and deferred to mr. sessions who appeared to like the idea and stated that the campaign should look into it. here's what he said. >> i have no clear recollection of the details of what he said at that meeting. after reading his account and to the best of my recollection i believe that i wanted to make clear to him that he was not authorized to represent the campaign with the russian government or any other foreign government for that matter. i pushed back against his suggestion that i thought may have been improper. >> i pushed back at his suggestion said jeff sessions. is it possible he perjured himself here? >> it's honestly so difficult to know who's lying about lying at this point, isn't it, jim? we have a long way to go from the george papadopoulos statement in the sentencing memo to proving tha

it is not about jeff sessions or jeff sessions as some sort of southerner. it is jeff sessions as the attorney general who was appointed by trump, reduced himself from treduced -- recusing position from the russia investigation. >> and i want to talk about this op-ed published in your newspaper, mr. trump suggesting strapping people down to a lie detector test to find out who did it. for a president who often complains about witch hunts, what are your thoughts about this witch hunt and is it a matter of national security as mr. trump says it is? >> well, i doubt it is a matter of national security, but other presidents have authorized lie detector tests to find out le leaks. this is not unusual. as a journalist, i find it sat and rather pathetic, but the fact is leaks are a nightmare for every administration. and this one is no different. the difference inside this one is because it is like an anonymous source speaking, but it is an anonymous source writing which may to my mind give it more credibility. but i don't believe it is a national security issue. it

am i mad at jeff? no. am i in a different place, yes. >> what happens if the fbi is not done with this background check or investigation? >> i think what jeff is saying -- one, you can have the fbi, cia and foreign legion and they're not going to tell you anything more than you have now. that's my view, but we'll see what happens. he said a week is enough for him. or maybe less. so we're not playing this game of opening this up and it goes on forever. what he said was, that i would feel better if they had a week to look at what's in front of us, no more. some democrats have said, okay with that. now, i would like them to come forward. i'm going to talk to mitch and jeff, and eventually engage with the white house. but, you know, again, i don't think we need this. i am long since ready to vote. i think he's been very poorly treated, judge kavanaugh. >> you think this is going to sink judge kavanaugh's nomination? >> absolutely not. i think jeff feels good about judge kavanaugh. he just wants to make sure th

listen, this is jeff flake. i mean, this is why i actually like about the guy, susan, all these people take it really seriously. jeff is not a lawyer. this is hard. again i've been in the legal system. you have a lot of emotional decisions to make but the fact pattern here leads itself, i'm sorry there is not enough we've got to move on, having said that, this is jeff flake, very sincere in what he is trying to do, i respect the hell out of this, democrats a week matter. some of them would. some would go own and on. a few say week longer would make it a better process he probably done -- >> republicans agreed to one-week delay. >> if i could quit talking to y'all come out. >> please do. come on back, senator. trish: all right, senator graham, talking rather optimistically about a one week delay. the hope maybe you get some democrats to reconsider and maybe they would actually vote to confirm judge kavanaugh if they had the peace of mind would come from an investigation for one week by the fbi. i'm joined again b

jeff flake is a very conservative senator. he says he admires judge kavanau kavanaugh's judicial record. shares his philosophical world view. he's concerned about the allegations. he's eager the hear from mark judge judge. he wants the former friend of kavanaugh's who was part of this alleged assault. he wants to hear from him and he wants more details around dr. ford's allegations and that experience to surface. flake did say that if there are new details that come out that seem to corroborate, he's open to changing his mind and voting no. as of now he's planning to vote yes unless the fbi surfaces new information that the troubis tro him. >> thank you very much for the time. i appreciate it. >> thank you. >>> the hearing this week was emotional and astonishing. i'll talk to a lawmaker who was there in the room where it happened. in the room where it happened for your heart... your joints... or your digestion... so why wouldn't you take something for the most important part of you... your brain. with an ingredient originally

jeff zeleny, cnn, the white house. >> all right. so the anonymous writer isn't the only administration official out with an op-ed. nikki haley published her own in "the washington post" writing i too many a senior trump administration official. if i disagree with something and think it is important enough to raise with the president, i do it. and he listens. sometimes he changes course, sometimes he doesn't. that's the way the system should work. the author and frenzy media reaction to the op-ed hurts all of us who are trying to do our jobs for the country by throwing gas on a fire of endless distraction. on twitter, you called this anonymous op-ed a cry for help and its author a coward. so what do you think about nikki haley and what she wrote in "the washington post"? >> thank you, fredricka, for your question. let me first say the senior white house official has confirmed what books and articles have shown about the trump presidency, which is that donald trump is unfit for office. but i agree with nikki haley that the way the whi

but this second is not about jeff bezos. it's about flint michigan you remember how upset we were about flints water right with poison with lead it was destroying the lives of people who were already poor to begin with and they came to the conclusion that it would cost two hundred sixteen million dollars to fix it and everyone was aghast two hundred and sixteen. well you dollars that's is sane amount of money how could any city afford that well jeff bezos himself could pay for that six hundred ninety four times over he could pay for it he's paid for six hundred ninety times and still have eight hundred sixty eight million dollars left over to pay for you know i cast of people to dance around him dressed like would sprites and sprinkling the leader down on him for the rest of my life. but this time it is not about jeff bezos. it's about homelessness there are five hundred fifty four thousand homeless in the united states what would it cost to give these almost people each their own apartment recent numbers show the cheapest a

good job jeff. that criticism as trump preparing to stump for republicans amid rising fears of a blue wave in the midterm elections where the stakes could p n't be higher and concerns of impeachment are growing louder. trump traveling this week as part of the white house's effort to boot vulnerable democrats and boost republican hopefuls. ♪ with nine weeks left in the battle to control the house, the president sending this message. >> in this election, you aren't just voting for a candidate. you are voting for which party controls congress. very, very big vote. it's very close. people say we have the majority. by how much? like, by almost nothing. somebody has a cold, we no longer have the majority. we need republicans in congress. >> reporter: that amid a creeping sense of panic from republicans who fear that seats which were once safely theirs are now up for grabs. >> over the next two months republicans had to point out the success. >> reporter: those republican fears on full display in texas w

woodward. >> jeff is a patriot. he loves this country. >> reporter: diana whitehead says she has personally known sessions for about 20 years, and says she voted for donald trump. the president dispages him, disrespects him, criticizes him, makes fun of him. how does that make you feel? >> not very good. >> reporter: there are trump and sessions supporters here who say it's not a big deal that this is just trump being trump. >> it doesn't bother me. i don't think it bothers jeff. >> you don't think it bothers him? >> no. >> reporter: mr. attorney general, can we ask you a question? we couldn't find out if the attorney general is bothered because he did not take reporter questions at the dedication of a new federal courthouse in mobile. but the strange relationship with the president certainly bothers a great many people in this city where sessions lived and worked. >> i'm surprised that jeff sessions ever really got involved with somebody of that low character. >> reporter: the attorney general has plenty of support

. >> did jeff sessions do the right thing? >> he had to. i've been a lawyer all my adult life. you can't investigate a campaign of which you are a part. so he had to recuse himself, but there's a lot deeper stuff than just that. all i would tell the president, if you want to replace jeff sessions after the election, there are people that could take this job that i think would get confirmed. but here's the bottom line. nobody is going to replace jeff sessions unless they promise the nation to protect mueller and let him do his job. that's the price of admission to be the next attorney general. >> well, the only reason he wants to fire him is because he recused himself from the russia probe. he wants him to protect him, to do what maybe a rio cohn would do to protect him. but that's not the role of the attorney general of the united states. >> right. it's not the president's lawyer, but there's a lot more going on than that. and i think you'll hear about some of it later. >> what else is going on? >> i think performance. >> what

jeff flake, senator coons and rod rosenstein. that conversation was had before the big announcement. rosenstein said they could do the investigation in a week but they would not learn more than we know. shannon bream and the fox news might team up next. shannon: brett kavanaugh makes it out of the senate judiciary committee as donald trump calls for an fbi investigation and latebreaking news, maybe holding back. delay for the weekend, brett kavanaugh's nomination to the supreme court takes a big step forward but also facing a delay as donald trump orders the fbi to conduct an investigation because of a last-minute condition set by republican jeff flake. we talk to a former doj prosecutor worked closely with the fbi who knows about the background check process and tells a what the fbi will or won't be doing next, mitch mcconnell vowing brett kavanaugh's nomination will soon go to a senate vote. and henry with what happens next and but breaking news. >> the times of northwest indiana just posted a story on its website saying joe do

he said they are certainly exploring jeff flake's proposal. he is not in support of it but he gave an assurance that he would look into this. he emphasized the promise made to senator flake was to look at specifically the fbi reopening the allegations based around dr. ford. so that seems to indicate that republican leadership could potentially go along with that very limited in scope fbi investigation, not including these other allegations. all of this lisa murkowski's voice, senator manchin's voice are such key voices here, adding their voices of support to jeff flake's proposal, increasing the pressure on republican leadership at this moment, who have summoned many members into mcconnell's office as well as obviously these key republican voices like lisa murkowski, who is still in there right now. >> a short while ago the president spoke out about this week delay and the fbi investigation. high gave his first on-camera reaction to the gut-wrenching testimony of his supreme court pick brett kavanaugh and his accuser christine blasey ford. her

i am jeff glor in wilmington, north carolina. this is an expanded edition of the "cbs evening news" tonight, as florence-- what was hurricane florence, which is now tropical storm florence-- continues to lash the carolinas. this is an enormous storm. it is a slow-moving storm. it was downgraded earlier today with 75-mile-an-hour winds now, still very dangerous. florence is now blamed for five deaths in north carolina. it made landfall this morning as a category 1 hurricane about 10 miles east of here in wrightsville beach. since then, it has been hitting the carolinas with strong winds. ee're just getting another one of these heavy bands right now. the rain is going to be around for a long time here. florence is moving west at less than five miles an hour. as the mayor of wilmington said to me, at times, people have been able to walk faster than florence is moving. the storm has knocked out power to nearly one million homes and businesses. we do have a team of correspondents in the region providing full coverage tonight of floren

my name is jeff sheldon, and i'm the founder of ugmonk. before shipstation it was crazy. it's great when you see a hundred orders come in, a hundred orders come in, but then you realize i've got a hundred orders i have to ship out. shipstation streamlined that wh the order data, the weights of , everything is seamlessly put into shipstation, so when we print the shipping ll everything's pretty much done. it's so much easier so now, we're ready, bring on t. shipstation. the number one ch of online sellers. go to shipstation.com/tv and get two months free. howie: president trump made off the record comments about canada. but the toronto stash * not bound by the ad the "toronto star" not bound by the agreement found out and leaked the comments. justin trudeau found out. the president said the powerful understanding was blatantly violated. the "toronto star" reporter says he's smearing the bloomberg interest viewers and they were not his source. the "national enquirer" buying and burying the story about karen mcdougal may just be the tip of th

i'm jeff glor. this is our western edition. and we're going to begin tonight with hurricane florence. it grew today into a powerful category 4, which the national hurricane center says is capable of catastrophic damage. florence is on a collision course with the carolinas. here is what it looks like from space. the hurricane is now packing winds of up to 140mph. the satellite view shows the storm about 1,200 miles east of the carolinas now. states of emergency are in effect from south carolina to maryland, and many coastal residents are being ordered out. david begnaud is on the coast of uthth carolina. we will check in with him in just a moment. rat first, helping us track this storm all week long is meteorologist megan glaros from our chicago station wbbm. megan, so good to have you here. what is the latest? >> look, we are looking at a eajor storm here, jeff. nl's not only intensified in the last 12 hours, but the expansive zone of hurricane-force winds has also nearly doubled in size. it's strengthening. it's now to a categ

jeff? >> all right, manuel in gastonia, north carolina for us. thank you. >>> still ahead here tonight, the sec just slapped tesla's elon musk with a lawsuit for securities fraud. when you humble yourself under the mighty hand of god, in due time he will exalt you. hi, i'm joel osteen. i'm excited about being with you every week. i hope you'll tune in. you'll be inspired, you'll be encouraged. i'm looking forward to seeing you right here. you are fully loaded and completely equipped for the race that's been designed for you. >>> federal regulators today sued elon musk for securities fraud and are seeking to remove him as ceo of tesla. this is over his august tweet during trading hours that he was considering taking the electric car maker private and had the funding secured to do so. the sec says musk never had any discussions without side investors. musk called the suit unjustified. in a statement he wrote, i have always taken action in the best interest of truth, transparency and investors. >>> new figures released today show last winter's flu s

jeff denham: votes do matter. you should vote. it's critical. >> we are going to move on to our next topic of discussion. economy and jobs. areas of thehe country are seeing great economic gains. district 10 is slow to recover. we are currently in a slow down. employment growth across california continues to outpace the valley. inflation is rising and interest rates are rising. if elected, how will you help stimulate the economy, specifically in district 10 and address the growing housing crisis? weh harder: you are right, have a real economic challenge in this district. we have an unemployment rate close to twice the national average. we do not have the same chance at economic opportunity here as other areas of the country. i think about seneca, which had 10,000 jobs 20 years ago. the pha -- peach cannery is slowing down. now people have to pay two or three hours away -- now they have to drive two or three hours away to find a job that paid as well as that one. we have some options. we can believe in trickle-down economics. it ha

this is a condition asked for by republican senator jeff

how unexpected was jeff flake's moment? does this all stem from the elevator moment or had this been sort of percolateling before then? >> keep in mind there were four republicans on the fence essentially until yesterday after the hearing. jeff flake, bob corker, lisa more cow skirks and susan collins. i haven't seen them being so vocal until this issue. even with the daca debate, there were a lot of protesters but not quite in your face as the anti-kavanaugh folks. number two, jeff flake is ons he way out. he's retiring and not seeking re-election. he did have concerns about this nomination moving forward, and after thursday's hearing he was one of the first to call -- to hear from dr. ford when the allegations came public. after that hearing listening to both dr. ford and to brett kavanaugh, he said, i came away with as many questions as not. so what was more surprising was hearing friday morning when it was announced he was going to vote for the confirmation. in fact, e was listening to some folks. i overheard anti-kavan

. >>> the president targets jeff sessions again. this time he slams the attorney general for not placing allies above the law. >>> nike throws its support behind colin kaepernick. now part of the iconic marketing campaign. everybody has an opinion on this one. >> they do. get ready for the latest boycott. i'm certain. >> maybe presidential tweet. i'm christine romans. welcome to "early start." >> i'm dave briggs. good to have you back. tuesday, september 4th. we will get to kaepernick in a moment. >>> we begin with tropical storm gordon. it strengthened overnight and expected to make it to hurricane status. up to 2 million people under hurricane watch for warnings. officials in biloxi ordered the evacuation of harbors and marinas. people along the coast turning to sand bags to keep boats and property safe. >> in new orleans, the mayor declared a voluntary vevacuatio for people outside the levee system. gordon has lashed south florida with rain and tropical storm force winds. many schools are closing early. we have meteorologist pedr

i'm jeff glor. and this is our western edition. we're going to begin with something we rarely see: two presidents, past and present, on the campaign trail, going off on each other. former president barack obama broke with tradition today by calling out president trump by name and telling students at the university of illinois, democracy itself is at stake in the midterm elections. nancy cordes is there. >> they're undermining our alliances, cozying up to russia. what happened to the republican party? >> reporter: the 44th president re-entered the political fray in dramatic fashion, accusing his successor of stoking racial division. >> we're supposed to stand up to discrimination! and we're sure as heck supposed to stand up, clearly and unequivocally, to nazi sympathizers. how hard can that be? saying that nazis are bad? >> reporter: with control of congress at stake, president obama argued the g.o.p. has lost its way. >> it did not start with donald trump. he is a symptom, not the cause. he's just capitalizing on resentments that p

if it is jeff flake, then this whole thing stops because jeff flake is on the judiciary committee. they need every republican vote on that committee in order to move that confirmation out of the committee. so if they don't have jeff flake on the committee, jeff flake is empowered now to stop the whole thing. >> and, you know, it's interesting. i should tell you that chris coons was just on my show this past hour live. and it was interesting. i asked him if there were not sort of off camera discussions happening among senators and if it's just among democrats or republicans happening, too. and he said i've had conversations with democrats and republicans who are deeply uncomfortable and unhappy with this process on the committee and are trying to find a way to get a brief but appropriate process in place. you've been saying this for a long time, if any 1 one of these senators particularly jeff flake on committee say, listen, i'm just telling you i'm not going to vote until there's an fbi investigation, that is sort of a third way out here. that is sort of a way to get through this p

jeff flake wants more time. a number of his colleagues here on capitol hill think that would be a very good idea. trace? >> yeah. all the attention right now is focused on young senator flake, mike. but there are other key senators to watch. >> absolutely correct. assuming senator flake stays a yes on judge kavanaugh, there are really four key senators to watch very closely. republican susan collins of maine and lisa murkowski of alaska and democrats from conservative states heidi heitkamp of north dakota and joe manchin of west virginia. manchin said moments ago he supports a delay. this call for delay has left some senior republicans scratching their heads. >> all i can say is right now what jeff is saying is makes sense to me. i'm not speaking for mitch. i'm going to talk with jeff. somebody has got to explain this to trump. i guess that will be my job. >> some sources close to this confirmation process that i have spoken with in the last few minutes say this could be a blessing in disguise if it gives some o

i'm jeff glor. and this is our western edition. we are going to begin here with more fast-moving developments on supreme court nominee brett kavanaugh. president trump is now asking for an f.b.i. investigation, but one limited in time and scope. an investigation leading to a week-long delay and a full- senate vote was first proposed in public by arizona senator jeff flake, as a condition. it was quickly endorsed by a few other senators yet to make a decision on his nomination. today's high drama came during and after the judiciary committee voted along party lines to send the nomination to the full senate floor. it is a lot to sort out tonight, and we're going to begin with nancy cordes. nancy? >> reporter: well, jeff, flake had just decided this morning to go ahead and vote for judge kavanaugh, but then he told a democratic colleague, "i'm really having trouble with this." republicans tried to talk him out of this idea of a week-long delay. he even had a last-minute phone call with deputy attorney general rod rosenstein before mak

good job jeff. the democrats, none of whom voted for jeff sessions, must love him now. same thing with lyin james comey. the dems all hated him, wanted him out, thought he was disgusting until i fired him.

let's duoto jeff. jeff, tell us more about the president's response. >> good evening. a sign of how close the president and his advisers are watching these sentencings unfold, it was just a few minutes after it was announced, the president weighing in like this. let's take a look. he said 14 days for $28 million. $2 million a day. no collusion. a great day for america. that's all he said without elaboration of course. we presume he is talking to the cost of this investigation. at $28 million, but that is in fact incorrect. the entire cost of the whole russia investigation is about 17 million or so. the entire cost of bob mueller's was around 7 million or so this summer, but the despite that, it was interesting the president weighing in on this. earlier today when flying aboard air force one, he was asked about george papadopoulos. he said i don't know him. i barely know him. he distanced himself from him. he was only at one meeting with him during the campaign, but all of this is comeing as this whit house watching this so carefully. coming on the heel of the president

ok jeff jeff you know in looking at the media coverage of the president. it's particularly from the liberal cable station c.n.n. amisom b.c. it for me it's just hour after hour of virtue signaling you don't learn any new news and you learn about opinions about people that. i personally have almost zero respect for it's politics a virtual virtuously and that doesn't get anywhere because there's no debate there's no debate about policy that way go ahead jeff and over if you can if you could go back a few years to toward the end of obama's term and say look democrats the next president's going to be republican but absent good news stories not going to be some red in a red state governor he's going to be a new york city real estate developer with a bunch of beautiful wives who's worked all his life around gay lesbian folks all his life isn't adam aided by social conservatism abortion any of these issues and by the way he is also a trade protectionist who look who's pro-union i think you want it taken that you would have preferred to have hillary but if you had