after $30 million we will start the process again because jerry nadler was the started or because shift was to started. all rely on the attorney general to make decisions but i will tell you anything that is given to them will never be good enough and you can give them the more documents that they've ever seen and it would never be good enough. so i think it's a waste of time. it's politics at a low level. >> what about in 1998? >> it's nice that you bring that up. jerry nadler was on the opposite side of this and he thought it was a disgusting terrible thing to even think about giving the report but now we should give the mueller report. in the mueller report is much tighter because the other report went to congress and the mueller report goes to the attorney general. there's a big difference.

canon this as house judiciary chair jerry nadler leading that charge and we'll take you back to when jerry nadler said the polar opposite plus a fact check and reality check that bounced nearly for aoc, alexandria ocasio-cortez you're wrong in how to fix income and equality, economists are saying that too we'll show you why as aoc is locked in twitter battles over constitutional settled 70 years ago with republicans so when will the licensed democrat social it'ses really sit down with serious policies to fix the problems facing americans? healthcare reform, infrastructure and the crisis at the border we'll talk about all of that tonight. this as democrats think they have the bullet proof roadmap to win in 2020 you won't believe what it is. we're trying to overturn the constitution, and we'll ask if trump can get his own parties to step up and get his back on the border and on healthcare reform. also to joe biden, critics are saying democrats are shooting themselves in the foot by

i'll speak with both chairman adam schiff and jerry nadler and our correspondents and analysts. they will have full coverage of the day's top stories. but let's begin with our chief white house correspondent, jim acosta. jim, the president was already fuming over a number of issues today and he's unleashed dramatically on house democrats. >> that's right, wolf. add a familiar topic to the list. president trump railed against his chief democratic critics, complaining that he will never be able to meet their demands when it comes to releasing the findings from the mueller report. the president also unveiled what could be the new gop strategy for replacing obamacare. now it sounds like repeal and retreat. >> thank you very much. >> reporter: in his latest showdown over the russia investigation, president trump ripped into top house democrats, who were insisting that the administration release the full report from special counsel robert mueller. >> nothing you give them, whether it's shifty schiff or jerry nadler, who i've known, he's been fighting me for half of my life in manhatta

now, these essentially will be in jerry nadler's back pocket to issue at any time, but what jerry nadler has been saying is that he cannot trust bill barr in the aftermath of that four-page letter, as well as after bill barr has -- has raised concerns about the obstruction investigation before he was confirmed as attorney general. they are saying that they may go forward with these subpoenas regardless of what he does. so listen to jerry nadler from yesterday making clear why he won't give the attorney general the benefit of the doubt. >> the attorney general is an agent of the president, he auditioned for his job by saying that this kind of investigation was wrong. he deserves no benefit of the doubt. >> so the republicans are saying essentially that democrats are trying to find a new narrative after the barr letter exonerated the president, that's how the republicans view it, even though the letter said he was not fully exonerated on the issue of obstruction, but nevertheless that's going to be the argument today from republicans on this committee. give the attorney general a chance, t

at: 30 or so, we will take you to the jerry nadler event live in new york city. now, we will get that kellyanne conway brief news conference. we are going to show you the house judiciary committee earlier today. the report was brought to capitol hill in cd-rom form, and some of the pages from that report displayed for reporters in the house judiciary committee hearing room. let us take a look. [indiscernible] >> just give us a few minutes. no problem. >> once those of you have had a chance, could we go back to allow others. >> move it around, please. it is the same shot, just take another one. let us go. [people conversing] >> we will go around. [people conversing] the 440four or five of eight pages of the report delivered to congress today. you can read it at www.c-span.org. jerry nadler with more about that at 2:30 eastern and a couple of comments from the members of the senate judiciary committee. patrick lahey tweeting this, " even the redacted mueller report reveals serious misconduct. the president demeaned his office in the rule of law by attempting to int

nadler is making an argument. >> jerry nadler is making a phony argument. jerry nadler can't change the law. the law is the law. the attorney general has to apply the law. jerry nadler is a biased completely predetermined -- does he want us to believe that he's going to give us a fair hearing? some of his members have announced a year ago he should be impeached. >> brennan: you just said he wants to have some of the investigators come before his committee and answer questions. do you support that? >> what? for a political show? why? >> brennan: why not? they have oversight. >> mueller -- >> brennan: if some people in the justice department did think the president commited obstruction of justice, shouldn't they be heard out? and if there is nothing it to, why not allow it? >> can we listen to the report first? the leakers who leaked to the any ti has the there were problems in the report, notice they leak nod specifics. i can't imagine that the reporter didn't ask, give me an example. give me an example of something in the report that suggests that the presi

that's what jerry nadler just said. and also asked him are you going to go to court without the justice department to try to get that grand jury information that they are asking for, democrats are asking for? he said absolutely. so they are gearing up for what could be a protracted legal fight for the justice department. we'll see how the justice department ultimately responds. >> as our guest noted last hour, barr could go to the courts with nadler and say we think there's public interest. let us release this grand jury information. manu, great reporting. of course, you got nadler to talk. thank you so much. >>> the president is now agreeing with experts that closing the border would hurt the u.s. economy. that's a big admission and big deal. what does it tell us he will do? we'll discuss ahead. this time, it's his turn. you have 4.3 minutes to yourself. this calls for a taste of cheesecake. philadelphia cheesecake cups. rich, creamy cheesecake with real strawberries. find them with the refrigerated desserts. -it's our

. >> a brief news conference there from the house judiciary committee, jerry nadler confirming what the attorney general said earlier, that they would indeed testify before the committee, before the judiciary committee may 2. both of those will be live on c-span and c-span radio. in the next 15 minutes, the house will come in briefly. we should not hear any sort of legislative business and then we expect lines from adam schiff. he is holding a news briefing and we join that in progress and will wait for it to start live. in the meantime, we will take some of your phone calls. we are joined by eric rossman. he is than posting all afternoon reading the report. how far have you gotten through so far? >> i have been skimming it, looking for the highlights. you have to read every page, but interestinge reading, especially the firing of james comey and the attempts to get donald mccann as .ounselor of course, the big quote coming twonow, on page 78, volume were present from react to the appointment of robert mueller and says this will be the end of my presidency and raises a lot of questions

democratic congressman jerry nadler says the subpoena his panel authorized some two weeks ago is being served today. anytime now. for the full report produced by the special counsel without the 900-plus redactions made by the attorney general. >> even with those blacked out passages which by our count shield roughly 8% of the report from public view a staggering portrait emerges apart from the bottom line issues of conspiracy and obstruction, robert mueller lays out a presidency virtually founded upon deception, desperation and dysfunction. though impeachment seems no more likely this morning than it did yesterday, the president's mood seems to have soured quite a bit. in early morning tweets the president claims the, quote, crazy mueller report contains statements about him that are, quote, total bull shit. >> abby phillip is near mar-a-lago, joining us now with more on the president's reaction. he was relatively silent yesterday in the immediate after matt of the release, but all of a sudden following the release at the very, very, angry. >> it seems clear the president's mood has de

. >> i would hear him refer to nadler as fat jerry or fat nadler. you could tell it was not a term of endearment. it was clearly he did not like the guy. >> the name calling wasn't just behind closed doors. in 1995, trump defended the use of the insult to the new york daily news, saying he was trying to inspire nadler. to be honest with you, he's a walking time bomb, and if i can convince him to put himself not in great shape but in reasonable shape, i'm doing a great service to him and his family. nadler underwent gastric weight loss surgery in 2002. as for that real estate project, nadler cult off federal funds that would have allotted to be built as trump originally imagined. the highway was not moved but trump did build a number of residential condos and apartm t apartments bearing his name, although residents of the apartment voted to have trump's name removed after his election. those who know nadler say because he's had this long history with trump, who better to know how to handle his personal insults. what seems clear given the history betw

throughout the sport there is we hear from congressman jerry nadler from the house judiciary committee on the report. that's one possibility there are there are others we obviously have to get to the bottom of what happened and. take whatever action seems necessary at that time too early to reach those conclusions it's one reason we wanted the mother report we still want the most important it's entirety and one other evidence to congress and . proceed with their own obstruction groups. we will proceed with their increase i mean the first thing we will do. is make sure we get the rest of the report and the underlying evidence we will have. general by testify in front of the judiciary committee may second dissipate the. mother will testify sometime next couple weeks after that and we will probably hold a series of hearings. and other aspects and we'll see where we go from there you know is huge to go home with his report do you think if we are doing road map. well it's too early to talk about that you know because we will have to go follow the evidence where it leads and i don't know exa

i agree with jerry nadler of 1998, not the jerry nadler of 2019. >> sandra: on to immigration, congressman. what can you tell us, the continued threat from the president to shut down our border. even some republicans warning. of the economic consequences from mitch mcconnell. at the same time the president's homeland security chief is warning it's a cat 5 hurricane crisis situation at our border. >> i agree there is a crisis, we need more border barriers and patrol agents. if the president will shut down the border i hope he can do it surgically. it could cause severe economic dislocation. it should be done in a way that will have the least impact on the united states economy. >> sandra: what does that look like? you suggested if it is done it should be done surgically. what do you mean? >> i'm asking the president to do it in a way with minimal impact on the american economy. do it in a way which is not going to bring our economy down. senator kennedy said it would be like a billion half a day in economic loss. if we get into that over a two, three, four week period how does the president

. >> a brief news conference there from the house judiciary committee, jerry nadler confirming what the attorney general said earlier, that they would indeed testify before the committee, before the judiciary committee may 2. we know the attorney general 1.l testify on may most of those will be live on -- thepan's network c-span networks. the mueller report has been posted for about four hours. we do like to hear your thoughts . we will get to your phone calls momentarily. lines.ear the joining us on the phone -- we don't have him on the phone. a number of reporters that is report,g the mueller have to should -- jerry nadler, -- incompleterm form, the mueller report outlines serving evidence that president trump engaged in the structure justice and other misconduct. let's go to michigan. you are on the air. >> good afternoon. and so glad and honored to talk to you all. i am from a very republican part of michigan and i just wanted to democrat, he was a wastes our time. it is the same all the money that has been spent on this that was so unnecessary and if i could have had the result, --

. >> i look at what jerry nadler and we're waiting for him to come out. it's clear both sides will dig through and find what they want and what they find is supportive of all of this. so nadler's going to say it's clear the president engaged in obstruction of justice. that's his takeaway from reading the report. it's clear he was partaking in obstruction of justice and you look at the report and the inability to prove and i think nadler will stoke flames when he comes out the big debate in the democratic party is how they'll use this. >> dana: chris, you've had a sense of how big is it? where do the democrats go from here? do they think upon first reading they have a case for impeachment or more hearings? this is not going away. >> i'm guessing at this point because i haven't talked to any democrats since the report came out. there's no question they'll say this doesn't answer all of their issues and they will have more hearings at the very least with william barr and with robert mueller. i would have to say reading this report there's a lot of stuff in h

house judiciary jerry nadler said disturbing evidence the president engage in obstruction of justice and as republican claim democrats are desperate. we will talk to them to have them north carolina and mark meadows, jim jordan the ranking member of oversight committee. that is coming up but first chad on capitol hill, the likelihood, i guess, chad come a lot of hearings. >> chad: here's what happened for words. jerry nadler will go ahead and hit send on the subpoena authorized by the judiciary committee a couple of weeks ago to get the full unredacted report. that will set in motion back and forth and may be lawsuits. we will see if they ever actually get that. the next thing that will happen if the attorney general william barr to come to speak before senate and house judiciary committee's mate first and may 2nd. that comes second and then robert mueller layer order on. everybody on capitol hill, the republican or democrat and a lot of this up to interpretation and jerry nadler of the chair of judiciary committee sees this differently than william barr the attorney general. listen

jerry nadler might be on the list. the effort, however, here is to take control of the entire report, which would eventually possibly be released to the public. if you look at the reductions yesterday, some of this was easy to read. just at first glance, and i don't know how you feel about this, but there were fewer reductions than i or many others had expected. what was your to? >> i am also fascinated, bill, by all of the attacks against the attorney general. remember just a few weeks ago everyone wringing their hands. he might write his own summary. what is taking them so long? he will do 70% blacked out. we won't really see anything. they will not see it appeared it seems like they just keep updating their complaints against the sky based on the latest thing that i am out abou about. and we played a clip earlier of a democrat saying that what bill barr's original letter was to us three and a half weeks ago was contradictory to what we actually saw in the mueller report. now it wasn't. if you are paying any attentio

we saw the starting gunfired today by jerry nadler. i'm making available a redacted but a version of the mueller report that the public can begin to look at and look at and draw their own conclusions. he offered to make available toll a much smaller universe of member of congress in a secure facility at the capitol and justice department. what you heard from jerry nadler is i cannot accept any proposal in which a majority of members of congress will be left in the dark. that request that went over to the justice department is not just for the complete unredacteds mueller report but for every scrap of paper that was a work product of robert mueller and his team. what happens now behind the scenes is projetracted legal battle. we know subpoenas have been much more political tool than a legal one. we have the attorney general will be testifying on may 2nd at house and later maybe mueller himself. the ultimate question is what does this material provide the lawmakers if they get it. jerry nadler announced sweeping investigation in the hous

jerry nadler insists that the justice department turn over communications between the special counsel the office. what's the latest up there, manu? >> reporter: yeah, jerry nadler just sent a letter to the attorney general, saying that he is troubled by news reports about tension between robert mueller's team and the justice department, saying that he wants to understand why the justice department did not release apparent summaries that mueller's team wrote that may reflect differently than the four-page letter that barr put out, laying out the top-line conclusions of the mueller report. and in this letter to the justice department, the house judiciary committee chairman is demanding all communications, between the mueller team and the justice department over the release of the mueller report. now, nadler says this. he says, these reports suggest that the special counsel prepared his own summaries intended for public consumption, which you chose to withhold in favor of your own. we also request that you produce to the committee all communications between the special counsel's office a

jerry nadler just told you, wolf, that he would issue those subpoenas as necessary, suggesting that he would not wait until mid-april, when bill barr plans to release a redacted version of the mueller report, a significant ratcheting up of this fight that could end up in court, wolf. >> and that could be a long, long legal battle. manu raju, thank you very much. >>> also breaking tonight, we're learning about a very disturbing security breach at the president's florida resort this past weekend, while the president was there. let's bring in our justice department correspondent, jessica schneider. jessica, charges have now been filed. tell us what happened. >> well, wolf, a woman holding two public of china passports, she got through that first initial security at mar-a-lago. that happened around noon on saturday and she allegedly made it all the way to the main reception area of the club all while carrying several electronic devices, one of which carried malicious malware. authorities say yujing zhang presented herself at that checkpoint, showed her passported, and gained entry under gu

committee jerry nadler now chairs. she is the author of the case for impeaching trump. melissa murray who thinks a lot about the koj solution and constitutional law. let me start with you, liz. on just this roll out. i have to say, i was a reporter in washington for years and standard operating procedure, some big document is coming out. an indictment, a report. you get it 10 to 15 minutes before the press conference and you sit there going through to prep your questions. that's standard. that's hurried and it gives the people unrolling it a leg up because they continue better than you do. i have never ever heard of a press conference on a document that no one gets to see until after the press conference is over. >> they are desperate to control this news. this news is going have something very bad in it for the president of the united states and what we are seeing, sad, sad, sad, to use three trump words is the attorney general of the united states who is the attorney general for all the people acting as a political h

manu, you had a chance to speak with the chairman of the judiciary committee, jerry nadler. what'd he say? >> he's ready to fight this in court. he said that a subpoena will be issued after the redacted report is received on capitol hill. he said that soon after that, they would issue a subpoena, demanding the full report, demanding the underlying evidence, and he said they're prepared to go to court. and he also said that his committee is entitled to the grand jury information that bill barr said he had no intention of seeking a court order to provide to congress. he said that there's ample precedent behind his effort. now, democrats are raising a lot of concerns, including the top democrat, the speaker, nancy pelosi, who told me just earlier this afternoon that barr has, quote, no business redacting information. he said that we all believe in protecting sources and methods, but she said, the only reason to redact is for security, and that's not a subjective thing. but you're hearing republicans line up very closely with bill barr's decision. kevin mccarthy, thousands repub

as we break down the flipflopping of jerry nadler. he was against releases of the report to bill clinton but for releasing the entire report on collusion. alexandria ocasio-cortez her campaign slapped with a new campaign complaint alleging, she and her campaign manager run an illegal subsidy scheme. >> and biden camp said that the sanders team is leaking. a big democrat fight there. we break it down. other 2020 democrats have had similar problem with their staffers. >> team pelosi is breaking stories try to stir upo upon -- opposition against bernie sanders. we debate that tonight, thank you for joining us, i am elizabeth macdonald. the evenin "evening edit" startt now. elizabeth: thank you. you are watching fox business network, we have angles to border covered for you. right to edward lawrence in washington. reporter: liz, a wave of pressure telling president to not close the southern border. saying it would be devastating to close the border, manufacturers and farmers could lose 726 million dollars every day that the border is clos

the judiciary chairman jerry nadler is threatening subpoena. let's go to senior correspondent manu raju. what are you learning? >> reporter: democrats want to allow staff members to question in addition to members. what jerry nadler is proposing and the committee will vote on in wednesday in advance of the thursday hearing is to allow for committee staff attorneys to engage in half an hour of questioning on both sides, but the attorney general is saying no. they're rejecting that approach, saying only members of the committee should be allowed to question. now bill barr is threatening not to show up at thursday's hearing. i am told, wolf, that democrats plan to move forward with the hearing, even if bill barr doesn't show up. there could be visuals of an empty chair. no significant progress on that front or part of democratic demands to get the full mueller report of which they issued a subpoena for, closed door meeting between democratic staff and justice department yielded no progress. both sides at logger heads. now jerry nadler threatening

jerry nadler is holding a news conference and we will have it live. we will hear his comments and report his questions as well and keeping an eye on reaction on editor fore deputy defense news. what is really impressive is how it lines up with the individual viewpoints and expectations of everyone reading it. one of those reading it, i'm grateful for the utmost professionalism and diligence displayed by general bar to release as much of the report as possible. what is clear is that the russians sought to influence the 2016 election and so discordant our country. report thing did mueller contains critical information about the tactics used by russia to interfere in our elections. congress has a-- constitutional duty to great laws that protect our democracy. we are waiting for the start of the news conference with jerry nadler and open up our phone lines after that and get your reaction as well. we can also tell you that 8:00 tonight, we are doing the very same thing, looking at an .nalysis of the mueller report they will be joining us with their analys

nadler or shifty adam schiff.

steve: 21 years ago on september 9th, 1998, the day the ken starr released the starr report jerry nadler. ainsley: sat on that same committee. steve: went onto the charlie rose show and he said exactly the opposite of what he is saying today. watch this. >> as a matter of decency and protecting people's privacy rights, people who may be totally innocent third parties what must mouth be released at all. it's grand jury material. it represents statements which may or may not be true by various witnesses, salacious material. all kinds of material that it would be unfair to release.

jerry nadler warned against that impeachment trial. he said the effect of impeachment is overturn popular will of the voters, we must not remove a president from office to defend our system of government or constitutional liberties against a dire threat and must not do so without overwhelming consensus of the american people. he said it couldn't be one party pushing for it, one party pushing against it, or the consequences, paraphrasing, would be catastrophic for political institutions. democrats go forward, that's the keen. >> i make a distinction between the american people and elected republicans. those are two different things. if the american people are reading the mueller report, they can go and read it for themselves are reading that and are troubled by the behavior described to be clear is very troubling, it is not as if the mueller report was a dud. this is something that has a lot in it that implicates the president in actual crimes. if you are a citizen and voter who feels as if the 2016 election had some manipulation by a f

no amount of testimony or document production that can satisfy jerry nadler or shifty adam schiff. it is now time to focus exclusive laon properly running our great country and no matter what information is given to the crazed democrats, also no matter what the radical left democrats get, no matter what we give them t will never be enough. and we have a country to run.

jerry nadler who is the chair of the house judiciary committee was on meet the press and here is what he had to say. >> i do think that if proven which hasn't been proven yet, some of this would be impeachable, yes. obstruction of justice if proven would be impeachable. >> you will go about to see if you can prove it? >> we will see where the facts leave us. >> are you concerned that the efforts on capitol hill will be holding the hearings. they are going to be investigating whether or not there was obstruction of justice and then possibly move forward with impeachment hearings. >> so to be blunt about this one, i think democrats pursuing this against president trump i think is politically good for the president because if the democrats are talking about impeachment they are not talking about health care or other issue wheres they may have a better matchup against the president or republicans. i think it is bad for the country and sets a really bad precedent. there was a complete year before that where the fbi and doj were going through this. the fact that former director mueller did

we will look at feud with donald trump and jerry nadler. they started brawling in manhattan in real estate. now they are facing off in washington. we are talking about the

nothing you give them, whether it's shifty shift or jerry nadler, i know he's been fighting for half of my life in manhattan, and i was very successful, thank you. but nadler's been fighting me for years and years in manhattan. not successfully. i will tell you, anything we give them will never be enough. we could give them -- it's a 400-page report, right? we could give them 800 pages and it wouldn't be enough. they'll always come back and say, it's not enough. this thing has gone on for two years. and really it started long before that. it practically started from the time i came down the escalator because this was a whole plot. whether you want to use the insurance policy as a time frame, this was an insurance policy, just in case she, hillary clinton, loses. well, she lost. and she lost big. this has been going on for years. now they want to keep it going on? we had -- they spent over $30 million on an investigation, they found no collusion. which by the way was the most ridiculous premise i've ever heard of anyway. and you understand exactly what i mean. no collusion. there was

. >> the fact is jerry nadler was on the opposite side of this. the mueller report is much tighter. there is a big difference. the starr report got out of control. now they limited it to the attorney general. it is hypocrisy and a disgrace.

jerry nadler comes to mind. he wants dunn redacted report out but he had a very different view at the time that ken starr report was coming out on bill clinton. i want you to listen to this juxtapose how he feels now versus how he felt about 20 years ago. this is jerry nadler. >> congress must get the full report along with the underlying report by mueller so congress can perform their responsibilities. >> as a matter of decency and protecting people's privacy reports, people may be innocent, third parties. it's grand jury material. it represents statements which may or may not be true by various witnesses, salacious material, all kind of material that is unfair to release. >> neil: isn't that a bit of a double standard? >> well, you know, politicians are prone to take their -- change their positions from day to day, including the president. i really do think that, you know, the american people are a little sick and tired of the partisanship in washington. my hope would be that chairman nadler could work with hi

barr has already indicated that he would testify in early may, and chairman jerry nadler sent mueller a letter yesterday asking him to appear before congress no later than may 23rd. nadler has also said he will issue a subpoena for the full report. note that yesterday evening the department of justice did send key lawmakers a letter, inviting them to review a less redacted version of the mueller report over the next couple of weeks. >> all right. natalie brand in washington. thank you, natalie. >>> white house press secretary sarah huckabee sanders responded to part of the report saying she made false statements regarding the firing of fbi director james comey. she said council members approached the white house regarding his leadership. according to the report she told the special counsel's office she had a slip of the tongue, even though she said it multiple times. last night sanders said i acknowledge i had a slip of the tongue when i used the word tr that a number of former and current fbi agents agreed with the president. coming up on "cbs this morning," sarah sanders will discus

tomorrow morning the house judiciary committee led by jerry nadler is expected to vote to authorize a subpoena for special counsel mueller's report without redactions. attorney general william barr did not deliver the report by the committee's deadline, which was today. chairman nadler made his case for legal action. >> we'll use the subpoenas as necessary. to make sure we get the whole report and all the underlying documents.rt the special prosecutor said that he couldn't rule in or out, he couldn't exonerate the president of obstruction of justice. so barr took it upon himself to do that. that's not the job of the attorney general. >> the president has said he wanted the mueller report to be released. today he was asked about the upcoming vote to subpoena the report. >> i think it's ridiculous. we went through two years of the mueller investigation. after $30 million we're going to start this process again because jerry nadler wants to start it or because schiff wants to start it? i'll rely on the attorney general to make decisions but bill tell you, anything that's given to them is

that is what jerry nadler said. but just moments ago here, sending this letter to bill barr demanding all communications over the release of the report. we'll see how the justice department ultimately decides to respond. brooke. >> manu, thank you for the >>> still ahead -- president trump backtracks on his threat to shut down the border with mexico. why he says he's now willing to wait an entire year to follow through. >>> labor secretary alexandra ocasio grilled by lawmakers about his role in a plea deal with jeffrey abstein. acosta was the u.s. attorney in florida at the time. a federal judge ruled in february that the 2008 deal illegal because prosecutors did not refer to the victims as required by law. federal investigators reportedly identified dozens of underage victims. >> how, as secretary of labor, can you tell this panel and the american people that you can responsibly oversee this budget, the department of labor including human trafficking? is there no answer? >> is that a question? >> that was a questio

house judiciary chairman jerry nadler wants a vote on wednesday issuing so pooh thats for the report. in a statement saying, congress requires the full and complete special counsel report without redactions as well as access to the underlying evidence. president trump tweeting his thoughts on the move this morning saying, no matter what information is given to the crazed democrats from the no collusion mueller report, it will never be good enough. the department of justice today had no board on how it might respond to congressional subpoenas. the attorney general continue to work with the special counsel robert mueller to determine how much of the mueller report can legally be released to congress and the public. gregg: radical dimms remain unsatisfied with robert mueller's conclusion of no collusion and they're ramping up narrative tefforts to keep theie alive. kat lynn hecatherine herridge he latest. >> this sets up a snowdown with the house democrats. jerry nadler and dianne feinstein insist on seein seeine full report and underlying evidence this week. attorney general william bar

plus, house judiciary committee chair jerry nadler subpoenas former white house counsel don began to testify before congress. legitimate oversight, or are democrats buying politics customer congressman darrell issa on that next. ♪ eteransfor a va loan y for up to 100% of your home's value. thank you, admiral. so if you need money for your family, call newday usa. need cash? at newday, veteran homeowners can get $54,000 dollars or more to consolidate high rate credit card debt and lower their payments by $600 every month. 0g$ç)fmnndv-b0.h#ú$dp;n.úun&>xqi when you start with a better that's no way to treat a dog... ...you can do no wrong. where did you learn that? the internet... yeah? mmm! with no artificial preservatives or added nitrates or nitrites, it's all for the love of hot dogs. the pain and swelling.. the psoriasis. cosentyx treats more than just the joint pain of active psoriatic arthritis. it even helps stop further joint damage. don't use if you're allergic to cosentyx. before starting, get checked for tuberculosis. an increased risk of infections and lowered ability

this is purely politics for jerry nadler. he has nothing to talk about from the democrat side except for a green new deal that would bankrupt the country that they can't get a single vote for. killing babies after they're born and making america socialist. they don't want to talk about that so they'll continue to press for documents. if we gave them the entire report and every tax return of the president they would come up with something else. it is never good enough for the democrats because they have nothing positive to offer the american people. >> sandra: what are the expectations for william barr. he will testify this week since his summary was released. >> he is capable of handling questions from congress. he will be honest and forthright and show how ridiculous the democrats are being in this. this has gone way past oversight th. is now overreach. i think attorney general barr will expose that when he talks to members of congress next week. >> bill: on the taxes, there is a new push. it feels washington has gone to a d

he wants the jerry nadler and the house to begin hearings. you also heard him say pretty honestly, i thought, we need to educate the american people. in other words, this needs to be campaign to explain to the person people, if i'm reading him correctly, why the president should be impeached although he wasn't there yet. dwroup thi do you think this is right course for your party in. >> i trust the instincts of nancy pelosi. to me that obstruction volume is so overwhelming that there are ten episodes of obstruction with very specific acts. if i were a prosecutor, i would charge. not the president because you can't charge the president according to doj rules but after he's out, i would. which means that is a crime or misdemeanor that the congress should take up. in my opinion, i get that you're not going to get it in the senate. i get that. if you don't stand for what is unlawful against -- against what is unlawful then you may end up being complicit down the road. the house should take a stand this is not acceptable behavior for the president

house judiciary chairman jerry nadler unleashed his first post-mueller report subpoena for a witness from the mueller report to testify to his committee. today, former trump white house counsel don mcgahn is that first subpoenaed witness, don mcgahn is the personification of history repeating itself just just as richard nixon's white house counsel became a star witness in the last investigation of a republican president. white house counsel don mcgahn is the star witness in the second half of the redacted mueller report in which mcgahn is quoted as saying the president was always asking him to do "crazy crap" much of which don mcgahn seemed to believe was illegal crazy crap. and the redamaged mueller report, don mcgahn was in the oval office when the president first discovered that robert mueller was appointed special prosecutor and the president said my god, this is terrible, this is the ends of my presidency. i'm effed. don mcgahn heard the president say that. he will testify that he heard the president say that. he's going to testify to all of in the house judiciary committee next

house judiciary chairman jerry nadler his letter to the attorney general today begins this way. i write to you regarding troubling press reports relating to your handling of special counsel mueller's report and to your knowledge that you immediately release to the public nel summaries contained in the report that may have been prepared by the special counsel, "the new york times" and the "washington post" both report that some in the special counsel's office have raised concerns about your letter summarizing the results of the special counsel's investigation. these reports suggest that the special counsel prepared his own summaries intended for public consumption which you chose to withhold in favor your own. in fact, one unnamed u.s. official is quoted as saying that mueller's team assumed the information was going to be made available to the public and so they prepared their summaries to be shared in their own words and not in the attorney general's summary of their work as turned out to be the case. the news stories provoked nadler to make a new request of the attorney genera

whether it's shifty shift, or jerry nadler. anything we give them will never be enough. we can give them -- it's a 400 page report, right? we can give them 800 pages. and it wouldn't be enough. >> melissa: sean, is that fair customer he's saying, "if we give you the report, you would want the underlying documents that made up the report." and if they did, "we would want the witnesses firsthand." >> sean: that's right. let's go back in context. a year plus, we heard from democrats that we have to trust bob mueller, he's got the highest degree of professionalism and integrity. what he says goes. if there's a problem, he will find it. 2,800 subpoenas, 500 witnesses. and it came out publicly through this report and said there was no collusion. now democrats are unsatisfied with that result, saying, "we need to look at the underlying evidence." here's the thing -- legally, the attorney general's going above and beyond what he's required to do. he's in communication with them, saying that by mid-april he would reveal the report to them. of course he will cover up grand jury an

watch this. >> jerry nadler is irrelevant in this situation. the american people now know that regardless of what the democrats were saying about the president's lies, they were telling it with zero evidence of their proof. now he wants to go deeper. one is the stop? the fact is it's more political grandstanding by someone who has nothing to run on, nothing to talk about other than trying to attack a man who has now been proven completely innocent of any crimes. >> julie: catherine herridge is live at the justice department with the latest. hi, katherine. >> think you come julie come and good afternoon. the democratic chairman of faust judiciary committee issued this eight page subpoena earlier today calling for the full mueller report as well as the underlying evidence. and grand jury material. under the federal rules of criminal procedure, dream material cannot be shared with congress about a court order. chairman adler was press this morning on whether he would be in a stronger position if he opened an impeachment investigation. >> some peop

i think what happens as jerry nadler moves forward with a subpoena to the attorney general. and then there is a decision whether the to fight that subpa over the next step is. it sounds like the administration is kind of laying down the gauntlet on the number of fronts, as rich mentioned. and is ready to fight subpoenas about this. this has to do with questioning of the attorney general, and the justice department says he is ready to sit in front of this committee and have congress men and women asking questions. they would like to set it up as committee lawyers and staffers who have gone through all of this mueller report to the extent that they have. to do the questioning. that's where the sticking point is. i assume you're going to get a resolution when we were the other, whether it's a subpoena or the ag will be there. >> harris: i'm just looking at a kind of in a plain way. would you want the most expense people with the material questioning you rather than people who were taking a step at a question of asking open-ended lee. i am also wondering if the attorney general

watch this. >> jerry nadler is irrelevant in this situation. the american people now know that regardless of what the democrats were saying about the