so google grew out of the ph d. program at stanford right they have this affinity for academics they view themselves as academic a little bit in nature their campus looks like a college campus so google provides a ton of funding for academic institutions individual academics all around the world so we found something like $300.00 papers that were funded by google in some way that supported google's policy positions they like to say hey we have the country's foremost academic experts behind us and what they're not telling it to the public is the fact that they're actually funding these so-called independent experts he's so hot in the pen and academics where shows have time for congress about whether or not google is a monopoly he was relying on academic study to bolster his point they didn't disclose at the paper with actually funded by google. are you concerned that your company has been exerting enormous power. kirby in ways that hurt many small businesses a local extremely good and well meaning small business and

to get people on to google and off of google out into the open web as quickly as possible and largely they're really successful about that the success of google led to in many ways the success of the open web and this explosive growth in startups and innovation during that period google had developed this incredible technology called page rank unveiling what was known in the back row about them and it was just leaps and bounds ahead of services like yahoo altavista and quickly became the clear winner in the space just from a technology basis and what page does is it spiders around the internet instead of being a directory service like yahoo was it's taking pictures of web pages and analyzing the links between the web pages and using them to make some assumptions about relevance and so if you're looking for some history of abraham lincoln and there's a bunch of links to process the web pointing to a particular site that must mean that this page is the quote unquote most relevant . now they had to figure out how do we make money off this we've got an index how do we make money well they

and then google. this is so google was saying no actually we're going to keep your data and we're going to organize a society you know how to improve an optimized world. there are a couple trends i think lead google off of its path of being the the place that just match people with the best information on the web and led them off into the internet and that was the birth of smartphones steve jobs unveiled the i phone and the rise of facebook and this notion that time spent on a site where users doing lots and lots of time on facebook became really important metrics that advertisers are paying attention to and so google's response was basically to deviate from that original eat those and becoming a place where they were trying to keep people on google so they very rapidly started to branch out into other areas they were getting a lot of information from people using the search engine but if people went directly to a website. that's bad because now google doesn't know that so they developed a browser whi

and as good for the world as google. emily: google's core business, online ads, search ads, is slowing down. is there more pressure on x to deliver a hit, a moonshot that works? astro: that is not my experience. my experience -- i sit regularly with larry, sergey, and ruth. the spirit of the conversation is essentially, you give me a lot of money every year, and you have to wait a long time, on the order of 7, 9 years. a lot of the money you have given during that time just falls away. not because i'm purposefully wasting it, but because we are running experiments and the answer to a lot of experiments is no. you have to decide if the value of that set of things is worth the money and the time value of money. that is the real conversation that we should be having and that we are having. if that has a good return on investment for alphabet and if that is good for the world, we should keep doing it. emily: well, since you mentioned ruth porat, the cfo, there is this perception she was brought into tighten the belt and that

google the company. tech giant and the focus will mainly be on google's control of online advertising businesses and search trends and the focus will mainly be on google's control of online advertising businesses and search traffic and basically if the company is manipulating those results to undermine their own competitors afaik and basically if the company is manipulating those results to undermine their own competitors or perhaps influence elections as some politicians seem to feel kristie soldier perhaps influence elections as some politicians seem to feel kristie the federal trade commission finished a probe into some allegations against google and found no manipulate the federal trade commission finished a probe into some allegations against google and found no manipulations of surface all intending to her rivals so what's new about this probe actions of surface all intending to her rivals so what's new about this probe. just more information more concerns more complete. just more information more

google's. google's parent company apple the and is expected to report 3rd quarter earnings after the market closes today and company apple the and is expected to report 3rd quarter earnings after the market closes today when they give the report company executives could also face questions over the u.s. antitrust probe when they give the report company executives could also face questions over the u.s. antitrust probe legal journalist molly barrows contributor for american morning here now with more so legal journalist molly barrows 6 contributor for american morning here now with more so molly 1st any word on what the stock earnings report will be. amalia 1st any word on what the stock earnings report will be. well hi christi yes financial analysts say alphabet and is expected to post quarterly earnings well hi christi you all define it all into analysts say hours and it also is expected to post quarterly earnings at a share on twitter at all dollars of nvidia $0.07 a share on funny or you $40

google is the definition of defying the law of large numbers. i think that theme of being the oxygen of the internet plays through where the stock is at today. effectively we're close to all-time highs this is a $900 billion market cap. i think that it was a solid quarter. one other piece that jumped out at me was the paid click number. so that is the -- excuse me, the clicks, was up 18%, a slight deceleration from the mid-20% last quarter but the cost per click or what they get paid each click was down 2%. it was down 11% in the previous quarter. if they ever get that intersection where paid clicks are growing and they're growing profitability or growing price per click year over year, if they can get that, i think you'll see nirvana on the stock. >> in terms of other platforms, gene, how does alphabet keep up that growth streak at that magnitude if the areas for mo t monetization could be capped by regulators and i'm talking about youtube primarily. >> that's the big question is the regulatory piece they have a standard response to, which is t

google. requests in the e.u. to not remove things online this is about removing things on this like this is removing things from the top of google's search history so that when you know you have a family like the source family who had a picture of their to capitated daughter in a car accident leaked online but by the california highway patrol and it became the thing when their family's name was searched that came up all the time when that family went to google and wanted to see it can't take that out of the the search algorithm so it's not on the 1st search page not offline but not on the 1st search history google said no so the right to be forgotten is all about telling google and search engines only that you can't prioritize results that are. that are for nonpublic figures these are for the families who want their privacy you know information that got their it wrongly or information that that is irrelevant to a nonpublic figures like a new picture guppy a malicious teacher got fired because

and that's what google die. ochs is and that's where newble maps is and literally now more than a 100 different platforms that google controls companies that use this surveillance business model the 2 biggest being google and facebook they don't sell you anything . they sell you we are the product that will google will tell you is we're very transparent there's a user agreement everybody knows that if you're going to search on google and we're going to give you access to this free information we need to get paid so we're going to take your data the problem is most people don't believe or don't want to believe that that data is going to be used to manipulate you. live. live live. live. live. live live. live. live live. live live. live . live. live. oh. please. live. live live. live. and very well welcome to you watching us inside us. the world is driven by shaped by the curse of those great. snow dares thinks. we dare to ask. what politicians do something. to put themselves on the line. to get accepted or rejecte

and the google assistant. joining me to discuss is olo ceo noah glass. from a financial perspective, walk me through the partnership between olo and google. noah: thank you for having me. the relationship is about enabling our restaurant brands to be found by consumers when they're looking for restaurants on google. consumers naturally do that today. now they will be able to find those restaurants, order directly from the google platform, and then send that order directly through our platform into the restaurant's point of sale. i cannot speak to the way google's financial model works. our financial model is to be a subscription platform, with transaction fees on top of the platform for increased order volume. taylor: do you share profits with google per click, when i click on the ad, your site, or when the delivery is confirmed? noah: it is coming from the context of consumers today ordering through different platforms like third-party restaurant delivery marketplaces. when they order through those platforms,

google. requests in the e.u. to not remove things online this is about removing things on this like this is removing things from the top of google's search history so that when you know you have a family like the source family who had a picture of their to capitated daughter in a car accident leaked online but by the california highway patrol and it became the thing when their family's name was searched that came up all the time when that family went to google and wanted to say hey can't take that out of the search algorithm so it's not on the 1st search page not offline but not on the 1st search history google said no so the right to be forgotten is all about telling google and search engines only that you can't prioritize results that are. that are for nonpublic figures these are for the families who want their privacy you know information that got their it wrongly or information that that is irrelevant to a nonpublic figures like a new picture guppy a malicious teacher got fired because th

google has the scale. if they can come out and show the exposure -- look, this is how fast we are growing, it could spur the company. taylor: i just got off the phone with the cfo who said it was the messy quarter. but there are changes in accounting and mark to market. some of those losses are on the income statement. she would not specify that uber and slot for the companies. is there a real impact to the venture capital arm of the company's that lead to the bottom-line relative to where you think they should be? >> i think that's possible. my biggest take away for google, we do focus on the ad side and the expectations for their at revenues and although cpc's are declining a bit, the individual clicks are way up. i think it's a really good sign for the bottom line. taylor: last week we sat here and said the same thing about amazon. but that ad business is so strong. how mature are their ad businesses? >> mobile search still has room to grow. as the results show, it's a very valuable franchise for the co

google. requests in the e.u. to not remove things online this is about removing things on this like this is removing things from the top of google's search history so that when you know you have a family like the source family do it at a picture of their to capitated daughter in a car accident leaked online but by the california highway patrol and it became the thing when their family's name was searched that came up all the time when that family went to google and wanted to say hey can take that out of the the search algorithm so it's not on the 1st search page not offline but not on the 1st search history google said no so the right to be forgotten is all about telling google and search engines only that you can't prioritize results that are. that are for nonpublic figures these are for the families who want their privacy you know information that got their it wrongly or information that that is irrelevant to a nonpublic figures like a new picture guppy a push teacher got fired because that

shouldn't be the only deciding factor way into rate that when people petition google as though it's the king of the internet it's still going to bill that makes this decision and that's it that's what she wanted when removing quotes from this equation where removing any kind of redress from the from the journalists for instance and write those articles like the exist this is important point to this when they write are held to a standard ok it's a legal standard for which they can be sued and the problem is we have on the internet with google and other content content pushed by a 3rd party absolutely no legal liability can. indications decency that's not true actually 2 very true to me and you know it is actually true that last year we got the 1st liability for our online child sex trafficking but then you know what is it online sex or now why would you know what google you know why google closed it because it believes anything done on the internet is free speech even trafficking judicial free and not have to meet you know it kind of push back on this because to me because we actuall

with google come down here it is going to be more expensive. these are hard-working people that live in this area.>> reporter: it would be anchored by san jose's train station. a future home to bart. the application doesn't spell out how many of the new homes would be affordable. and critics say that is a problem. >>> there is a correlation in silicon valley between the ascent of major corporations like google and the cost of housing. it is not a mistake to so many people are house loose here.>> there is no one development that is going to stop the cost of living from rising in silicon valley. >>>>> reporter: this is not going to be a quick process. google and the city estimate could take up to a year to begin to study and evaluate every aspect of what is being proposed. i will push the likely votes by the planning commission until the latter part of next year. >>> google facing backlash tonight from forking over substantial contributions to influential positions and events that denied the existence of climate change. according to the guardian

in 2004 google cofounder larry page said the purpose of google is to have google quickly find what up and get to the right place as fast as possible. would you agree still claims that that's your principle guiding principle? congressman our goal is to provide user information as quickly and fishily as possible. >> i want to direct your attention to two studies. the first is a study recently produced by rand fish kin a leading represent expert on search engine. opt mission i found that google traffic no longer goes for the goingle web but stays on google products. the second a research by cafra consulting finding that google is increasing keeping both majority and growing share of traffic within google's cosystem, walled garden. do you agree that these sites show that google is no longer thoeg showing people the best products or best results but instead is giving results to keep them on google products not on google's platform. >> thank you for the question, congressman. i'm not familiar with either of the studies. what i can say we send a lot of clicks and traffic to competitors in ou

>> la bocina permite interactuar con el asistente de google lgfo videojuegos estara desde el p primero 19 de noviembre para p empleadel primer trimestre del p1020020oge tendra nuevos aparatos >> gracias por la informacion un tema delicioso pero algo caro q porque en la india esta el cho o chocolate mas caro del mundo san francisco la son las trufas de (...) disponibles en 3 sabores cada una representa una parte de la vida del recic a reciclaje el precio es de seis m mil dolares por kilo funciona funcionarios s ade salud exigeqe se divulgen luen las consecuen d de los implantes de s enosenos complicaciones como riesgo de cancer piden que tengan una li t lista de decisiones seguramntel sociales una familia latina de a arizona se salvo de ser atropqe n se paso un semaforo rojo >> lo que parecia una noche t tranquila , se convirtio en un momento de terror que ulices con su esposa no olvidaran en m mucho tiempo >> es un milagros es una bend i bendicion que salimos sanos y a salvos >> un milagro porque hubopudohr 4 victimas el incidente muestr g milagro cuando el conductor se p pasa una luz

we would love to talk all things alphabet and google. meantime, big market day dow up almost 300 points revisited s&p 3k first time since mid september. jpmorgan, record high 121. i am saying it is phase one week, china, brexit or gm. lot of tentative agreements being written. >> it shows you how clenched up how people were because of those issues seeing some release of that. regained that final hour decline of friday after getting news about the trade agreement and a little more than that. it makes sense you mention hit 3,000, september 19th we closed above it, probably chris crossed it separate days back to july it is not obviously fresh territory but shows you some resilience, reminds me of the setup we had in april and july because you had had selloffs prior months, people very defensive in costs, i think that fund manager server we were talking about reflects the skepticism maybe all you need is things not to be as bad how do you know things aren't as bad, ten year yield is up and up to 175 to me that's how the equation works at the

google is designed to be opaque. in a sense, they work together because google manages all of the infrastructure behind digital advertising. so they play a role in that whole ecosystem that allows companies like facebook to prevenent anyone from inspectitg what is going on. the truth is, they had to know before the election that there was something really wrong because i'm sure i was not the only one who brought it to their attention. but at the end of the day, their view of the world is that they should just connect everybody and not be responsible for the consequences. they said, roger, the law says we are a platform, not a media company. we are not responsible for what third parties do. this is ark, sheryl, trust business. the law does not protect you if your users believe you're theymining democracy, if believe you're harming civil rights, if you're harming public health, if you're harming privacy. there is no protection against that. and that is what we're seeing today. the issue i run into is in 2016, i am will

accuses google of raising public expectations too high but google c.e.o. maintains its quantum supremacies experiment is like the 1st rocket to leave earth's atmosphere an advance that made interplanetary travel at least theoretically possible though that suggests it could be decades before quantum computing can be widely utilized. a serious of pollution crises in vietnam have triggered a public backlash amid accusations that the government is disregarding environmental concerns to develop the economy residents there are dealing with mercury and drinking water and air pollution and dangerous levels among others more and more people are asking if that's the price for economic progress. on containers with clean water supplied by the government because these residents can no longer trust what's coming out of their taps at home after toxic river waste contaminated the water supply of several neighborhoods in the vietnamese capital affecting about a 1000000 people. and the local authorities were slow to act. they didn't warn the residents soon enough because it

that inspired another insider, a guy in google pb greg coppola went public for while employed for g google. >> it's a time to decide, you know do we run the technology does the technology run us? are we continuing to have election that is mean anything? are we going to continue to think for ourselves or are we going to just let the biggest tech companies decide who wins every election from from now. >> google retaliated but that inspired third insider in google to come public. this one leaked a memorandum, secret memorandum talking about something out of a george orwell novel, allege richlic unfairness listen to this. >> in this project veritas video which i did watch last night, imagine that a google image yeary for ceo shows predominantly men. if it were a factually representation of the world, it would be algorithmic unfairness. in some cases it may be appropriate to take no action if the system alkt affects current reality while in other cases it may be desirable to consider how we might help society reach a more equitable state via product intervention. what does that mean? >> when i

says google's claim is exaggerated. professor who coined quantum supremacyy says google's breaktkthrough is a milestone. envision,lications we which could havee a big potentil impact are improved ways of using computers to simulate chemistry, materials that might help us find new pharmaceuticals or newew ways of f capturining r power. been an immediate impapact to google's breakthrou. to hackication could be bitcoin, which is based on block chain encryption immune to cracking. bitcoin took a hit on its price, which tumbled around 7%. to moment is being compared the first rocket flight into space and to the wright brothers first flight. the impact is difficult to predict, but it will be -- >> you are watching live from paris. headlines coming up very shortly. - hey, i'm darius rucker. coming up onreel south. - [henrietta] the southern way of f life was something sacred. close your mind, do not question. - [darius] in 1940, a young woman left sweet home alabama for the porta vida of costa rica. - [henrietta] i would be ou

russell, i want to tackle this first regarding google. google had a very solid quarter. we are expecting for services growth. but what do you make of the news it might make a play for fitbit? it kind of would make sense. one thing google doesn't make is wearables. >> actually, google works with a lot of different companies to try and make wearables but the problem is none of them do very well. they don't sell particularly well, even when they have high end brands that are involved, including fossil. they just haven't done particularly well, compared to what apple has been able to do with the watch and a lot of it comes down to performance. apple is straight up able to do more with the watch and have it be a more seamless experience. i'm actually wearing one right now. that is a big part of google's frustration, trying to get this solved. fitbit is really the only game in town. this decision more than just makes sense. it kind of has to happen in order for there to be any competition for apple in this market within the next couple years. liz: okay. jeremy, what do you thi

google has a very good algorithm. google also has a huge amount of data about how consumers search to train that algorithm. a bright kid in a garage could come up with a good algorithm. but they wouldn't have anything like that type of data in order to make it work nearly as well as google works today. >> thank you. and mr. chair, if i could just, i'd also like to hear from miss layton, just in response to either of the questions that i asked that you would just like to respond to. >> well, thank you. i appreciate that opportunity. i would agree with dr. furman, that when we look at artificial intelligence, that this is a greenfield. he's absolutely correct that a scientist sitting in the garage or in the lab could come up with a life changing or transformative kind of algorithm. i am, in contrast to the other panelists, i don't believe data is a bottleneck. because of having been a person working in the industry, the data you collect degrades over time. so if you are a new innovator, you'll looking for spaces where t

, and the google assistant. i sat down for an exclusive interview with the c.e.o. on monday. >> so the relationship is really about enabling our restaurant brands to be found by consumers when they are searching for restaurants on google. consumers kind of naturally do that today. they are looking for their favorite restaurants. now they will be able to find those restaurants, order directly from the google platform, whether that's search or maps or even the google assistance and send the order directly through our platform to the restaurant's point of sale. i can't speak to the way google's financial model works. our financial model is to be a subscription platform with transaction fees on top of that millennium for increased order volume. >> and so do you share profits with google per click, when i click on the ad, when i click on your site, or when the delivery is confirmed? >> it's really come from the context of consumers today ordering through different platforms like third party restaurant delivery market

coming up, google's answer to the iphone. how the company plans to take on apple and smart -- samsung's smartphone dominance. we will have the latest from their product launch. this is bloomberg. ♪ amanda: this is "bloomberg markets." i'm amanda lang in toronto. shery: i'm shery ahn in new york. out a newrolling bundle of products today in new york, showing how it plans to take on apple and samsung. the new pixel phones it future more memory, new cameras, and increased ai technology, but will it be enough to entice consumers? our technology reporter is at the event with the story. how did the pixel 4 look so far? >> the phone looks cool, they have an interesting origin version which some people have been calling the hipster version of the new iphone. more exciting than those high-end phones, at least what it looks like. the phone is a little bit cheaper than the latest high-end iphone, but we still have this issue with high quality android phones. if somebody is willing to spend $1000 for a phone, most of those people, rega