john boyd, air force col., the author of the decision act. it's how you get through the disciple of decision-making which is really never about the designer. it's about the orient. but in future fight we are looking at, this will be happening who fast, if we are trying to do this by human against machines, and the other side has machines and algorithms that we don't, it will be unacceptably high risk of losing that conflict. this is challenging because part of what you are getting at, in the future scenario, how are people going to be assured that our algorithms are going to work as an intended. they don't take on other things. but we will fall back on, is the starting.who the principles gave us. this will be test validation. we have to do a lot more work on the front and by the time that we know it is being fielded. we are really going to be at a disadvantage if we say we are going to be in human against machine, it will be human and machine on one side, and human and machine on the other but the temples, the fleeting superiority, the decisi

colonel john boyd, air force colonel who was the author of the observed fact which is how you get through the cycle of decision-making which is never really about the decider but it's more about in the future fight we are looking at this would be happening so fast if we are trying to do this by humans against machines and the other side has the machines in algorithms and we don't, we are at a high risk of losing that conflict. now this is a challenging one because i think part of what you are getting at is in a future scenario how are people going to be assured that our algorithms are going to work as intended and they don't take on the life of the state. what we'vwhat we've hopeful bacd this is the starting point for the principles that were given to us is to test evaluations. we have to do a lot more work on the front end by the time they feel we know what is being fielded. but i think that we are really going to be at a disadvantage if we think you're going to be in a pure human against machines andn it will be human and machine on one side, human and machine on the others, but the tem

f boyd. and another opportunity will present itself or them to further embarrass themselves with desperation. so what can we expect, and we go to fox news white house correspondent kevin corke. kevin? >> it is effectively a race against the clock for the d white house with a number of deadlines quickly approaching for them to tell the committee howee they wish to proceed. let me tell you inside the numbers if you will as we lay out what will be happening from this point forward. at least as we understand it at this point in time, we've all heard about the sunday deadline before the white house must declare its intention to participate in the proceedings. then, how about december 6th?he that's the deadline for the white house introduced evidence and witnesses. 9 and the committee gets a chance to consider the matter. the white house white house is greatly concerned that what happened with adam schiff, and they say as they have said repeatedly this will be grossly unfair process. the committee