ms. clinton: i don't know the answer that. i think a reporter like you and others should be relentless in trying to get to the bottom of it. we know from even this current trump administration's intelligence officials that the russians are still in ou electoral system. we know they are still pumping we know that they very much like to ensure the reelection of someone who has done their bidding, who just recently said he hopes he can be in red square on may 1 with military parade.ay day there is no doubt of the role that russia played iour 2016el tion and is continuing to play. there is a lot of evidence that russ played in the brexit election. now, i am not in your country bod i d't have a say any of that, but the fact that the current government won't release this report by your own questions. should raise some laura: hillary clinton asking questions about motion election interference in the now, royal history is being made in communist cuba. the king and queen of spain have begun an official visit to the island, the first ti

ms. clinton: i don't think so. i think i will support them and ananswer their questions i way i can.bu owce we have a nominee, to do everything i o do to win. mishal: what do you think about what is happening in this country, the direction o brexit?to ms. cl my real hope is that the u.k. sorts itself out. it is up to thpeople of this untry to decide the direction. but we need a strong u.k. we need a u.k. with smart, leadership.orward-looking i'm dumbfounded that this government won't release poe about russian influence, because every person who votes in this countrdeserves to see that report before your election happens. that should be an absolute condition, because there is no doubt, we know it co our try, we have seen in europe, we have seen it here, that russia in particular is determined to try to shape the politics of western democracies, not to our benefit, but tors th. mishal: why do you think they are not releasing it? ms. clinton: i don't know the answer that. i thk a reporter like you an others should be

ms. lewinsky. >> reporter: president clinton lied under oath about his affair with a white house intern, triggering an impeachment inquiry in the republican-led house. then, like now, the parties were split over whether the president's actions represented what the constitution refers to as high crimes and misdemeanors. california democrat zoe lofgren. >> he lied about sex, not an admiral thing, but really not an activity that shook the foundations of the constitution and the democracy. >> reporter: wisconsin republican jim sensenbrenner. >> the president of the united states should be held to the highest standard of anybody in the country. >> reporter: both lawmakers sit on the house judiciary committee, which handles impeachment. they were there in 1998 too. what stands out to you about that time? >> it was a heck of a lot of work. the judiciary committee got all the starr's evidence dumped on us with a few days' notice. >> reporter: in this case there is no special prosecutor like kenne

clinton or ms. williams in his early appearances were tied to wellness gospel ideas a renewal and rebirth, rather they are the white of avenging angels in flaming swords of someone combative and righteous, also called leaders. that is written by friedman, the entire session critic and editor who appeared on one of your favorite topics this week, jim jordan's jacket or lack thereof, had a quote about that saying it is a symbol of his willingness to be the republican party after-tax art, jim jordan's jacket had a twitter account, we couldn't find one for tulsi garrett's wait pantsuit. >> bret baer asked about the jakelin special report and he said he wears it as you are required to. otherwise -- >> whether he is going to wear it for immigration. i did notice some different shirts for immigration. shannon: those are for different topics, thank you. we are less then a year from the 2020 election, social media taking steps to stop the spread of fake news. christina fills us in. >> reporter: with 348 days

. >> i did not have sexual relations with that woman, ms. lewinsky. >> when we think of the clinton presidency, we think of monica lewinsky. and we think of the mcdougalls. they had other financial ties as well, so when jim and susan landed in legal trouble for fraud -- >> if i'm found guilty i will slam it. >> whitewater development is not going to go away. there are too many questions. >> the clintons came under fire too. >> questions have been raised about the clinton's financial and personal involvement with mcdougall. >> in it nothing came of it in terms of the clintons themselves but it planted the seed for something bigger, something that would lead to the ultimate constitutional confrontation. >> there was a growing drum beat to investigate whitewater. >> we did nothing improper and i have nothing to say about it. >> thank you. >> old story. >> clinton had a fateful choice to make. block a special counsel and take a beating in the press -- >> it appears to be a case of the president's past coming back to haunt him. >> -- or give in l

ms. cary: the only thing i would add is this is exactly what republicans thought was going on at the time. and that whole perfectly captured sense of entitlement that seemed to pervade mrs. clinton for many years. i just think it is very funny from the other side of the aisle. prof. nelson: at this time, the battleearly in for the 2008 democratic nomination, which was 1.5 years yet to be decided, there was sort of uncertainty about obama among many african-americans. not so much about him per se, although he was a relatively new figure on the national stage, but rather, could an african-american be elected president in the united states of america? and obama, as chris pointed out, did not run as jesse jackson had run, for example as essentially the candidate of black america. more transcendent way. but what was validated among many black americans, and you see this reflected in the polling over many months, is when he won the iowa caucuses. because then the message to african-american vot

ms. hill -- >> well, let me just interrupt to say the entire intelligence community said it was russia. >> right, but it could also be ukraine. i'm not saying i know one way or the other, i'm saying that ms. hill is entitled to her opinion but no rebuttal evidence was allowed to be offered. >> can you confirm that you guys have been given an intelligence briefing on this issue that russia is trying to frame ukraine? >> some members have, i have not, but i'm not at all surprised that russia is gearing up -- not at all surprised that -- she's correct that russia tried to interfere in 2016. also, ukrainians themselves tried to interfere also, but chuck -- >> isn't there a big difference between the two? i understand there's individual ukrainians who were upset that candidate donald trump wanted crimea to stay with russia. is that the same as the russian government and putin ordering a full-fledged interference in the united states election? >> i'm concerned about both. >> following the testi

ms. it will have an influence on the election. there have been a number of commentators who have said really the american people are going to have the final say on this regardless of what happens in the house and senate because this president is going to have to deal with this issue before voters. i think that's correct. >> john dean, i really appreciate your perspective and expertise. thanks for joining us this evening. >> thanks, ana. >>> right now, ukraine is in the middle of this impeachment inquiry connected to a quid pro quo and bye dunkdebunked conspi theories. how damaged is ukraine's relationship with the u.s.? we'll talk to a former u.s. ambassador to ukraine next. you're live in the cnn newsroom. imagine a disease is caused by too much of a bad protein, but a company develops a way to actually attack it. what drew me to capital allocation in health sciences was the potential to help many people through investments that help fund medical innovation. my team and i often choose to

ms. hill -- >> let me just interrupt to say the entire intelligence community says it was russia. >> right. but it could also be ukraine. >> see what he did there? i don't know. you don't either. clever, huh? so it bears repeating, there is no as in zero evidence ukraine interfered in the election. not only that, members of congress were briefed that it was russia pushing that nonsense. joining us now, "washington post" op-ed columnist michael gerson, a former speechwriter for president george w bush, and rick wilson, author of "everything trump touches dies." michael, you wrote an op-ed in the "washington post" today in which you say, quote, loyalty to trump among republicans is proved by the loosening of all other loyalties to truth, to honesty, and to the national good. by this measure, you write, kennedy is profoundly loyal to the president. i just think back to when i first met you in 2000 when you were a speechwriter for george w. bush. can you even recognize someone like this in yo

ms. hill -- >> let me interrupt to say the entire intelligence community says it was russia. >> right. but it could also be ukraine. i was wrong so let me be clear, russia hacked the dnc computer. i have no evidence whatsoever that ukraine did it. >> does that make you hopeful that he felt enough shame or i don't know double-checked his sources, he went back and read the ic report and then came back and said i was wrong about it? >> no, it doesn't make me particularly hopeful, katey, because what the republican strategy is and has been throughout the trump years is to muddy the waters. trump has been caught doing something just like russia was caught meddling in our election, but what they do instead is create an alternative theory, maybe it was ukraine. and that's nothing to give their people something to hang onto, that maybe everybody does this. pompeo, you heard him say lots of countries interfere in our election. there's lots of countries that had a multifaceted effort to interfere i

ms. hill -- chris: let me interrupt to say, the entire intelligence community says it was russia. >> right, but it could also be ukraine, i'm not saying that i know one way or the other, i'm saying that ms. hill is entitled to her opinion but no rebuttal evidence was allowed to be offered. we know at least the republicans in the house wanted to call a witness, dnc political operative who lobbied the ukrainian embassy to be involved and get involved in 2016 election, we don't know if ukraine did that and we don't know to what extent because they won't let the president offer his evidence and that's why i will say once again the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence if you're not allowed to call your own witnesses. senator kennedy, always interesting to talk to you and even more interesting to listen to you, thank you and thanks for joining us today and have a good thanksgiving holiday, sir. >> you too, chris. chris: up next democrats push investigation despite the white house

ms. henderson: any other questions? we will just wrap it up then. thank you all so much for coming. let's give a round of applause. [applause] announcer: here the rerouting clinton during the impeachment inquiry of president richard nixon in 1973 and 74. feature history tv will their interviews about their experience next sunday, december 1 at 6:00 p.m. eastern. conducted by former nixon presidential library director timothy, they are from the library's oral history collection. a behind the scenes collective -- perspective on the work during the nixon impeachment inquiry. that is next sunday at 6:00 p.m. eastern here on american history tv, only on c-span 3. baton was the 6888 the only all-female african-american unit sent overseas during world war ii. next, veterans of that unit share memories of their service, processing millions of pieces of background mail for troops. they spoke at the annual conference in washington dc . the first female african-american graduate of the military academy, moderates. >> young american stood in front of number 10 downing street in the mid-1950's i

ms. hill -- >> let me just interrupt to say the entire intelligence community says it was russia. >> right. but it could also be ukraine. i'm not saying that i know one way or the other. i'm saying that ms. hill is entitled to her opinion. but no rebuttal evidence was allowed to be offered. >> that is a cup in front of me but it could also be a ladybug. >> right. it's like that painting, you know -- >> this is not a pipe. >> right. you know, that paul newman movie where that is the line what we have here is a failure of communication? what we have here is a failure of epistemology. like literally the very theory of knowledge on which we understand things -- >> we don't share facts any longer. >> we don't share facts. we don't even share a common sense of how one approximates the truth. and by the way, this is not a surprise because who is the most important conspiracy theorist in the world today? it's the president of the united states. so why is it -- why is anyone surprised that -- that

and you see here with ms. warren, who's confronted with a very raucous crowd of black protesters, she handles it very well, all things considered. and it wasn't just ms. presley there. it was everything about how even ms. warren's face, how she handled it. these are populist times in our country and in our party. and every candidate has to be prepared to deal with protesters with respect and with an open heart. and people see your heart right away. and i thought it was a good moment for warren. >> okay. can you give an explanation, ben, as to joe biden's popularity, why it's as high as it is? >> it's name recognition. you know, he's been out there for a long time, before obama. he stumbled with obama. and then obama embraced him and he came back and was obama's, you know, greatest bulldog, quite frankly, for eight years in the white house. when you're this early in the campaign cycle -- and we're still early. i know we've been talking about it for a long time, but it's still early. >> right. >> people are just

and the great menve and women of secretary hale and ms. cooper they carry the message around the world but when they see a president of the united states not devoted to the rule of law but instead demonstrates word and deed corruption, they are forced to ask themselves what does america stand for anymore? that concludes this evening's hearing. asked the witnesses to excuse themselves we have a business matter to take up. >> [inaudible conversations] by the ranking members request that the committee issue subpoenas to - - pursuant to the house resolution we received this request this morning we'll add it without objection. by way of overview with compel deposition testimony by the whistleblower and hunter biden they would compel certain parties to produce records the shistleblower to produce documents and communications related to the complaint and related to hunterr biden's role on the teethree board and the dnc to produce communications over records relating to alexandria i do not concuri for subpoenas we will not allow before this commit

ms. hill -- >> well, let me interrupt to say the entire intelligence community says it was russia. >> right. but it could also be ukraine. i'm not saying that i know one way or the other. i'm saying that ms. hill is entitled to her opinion, but no rebuttal evidence was allowed to be offered. >> rev, i can't stress enough how deep a conspiracy theory that was until it reached the white house. it was a crowdstrike thing, crowdstrike's an american company, by the way, it's not a ukraine company. there's no physical server. we can go through this all again as we've done a million times. that was the president pushing on fox and friends. but, again, the second layer of these last three years has been the republican support. the president says something wild, conspiratorial, false, and he has an entire group of snores who come in behind him and support. senator kennedy knows better. he knows that's a conspiracy theory and he's ignoring all the intel agencies when he says that on tv. >> it's fri

ms. waters: thank you very much, mr. chairman. on the another member opposite side of the aisle, the gentleman from arkansas who, we were trying to get the bank up and running, he voted against re-authorization. against it again today. i don't know what it would take to make these members who have opposed tly re-authorization to ever support ex-im. remind him, ke to there are 10 exporters in his a total of $46 million. that's the total value of 2014 and 2020. with that, i yield two minutes arizona, tleman from mr. stanton. the chair: the gentlelady is recognized for two minutes. ms. stanton: thank you. bill, in support of this act, port finance agency which would re-authorize the ex-im bank for 10 years. businesses across arizona, looking to create great jobs and export their products across our international borders, need certainty to succeed. main street is still the my state's economy, and the export-import bank is an tool to ensure they remain competitive in an global ngly competitive market. i want to highlight one business e

ms. but you can't ignore a congressional subpoena. that's the big takeaway. >> let's bring in yamiche and nbc news correspondent covering national security and intelligence ken dilanian. mike, we should point out, we're talking about don mcgahn because we've had so many names come through in the last several months. don mcgahn was the former white house counsel that left last fall. we're talking here about the mueller investigation which, in this case, is separate from the ukrainian investigation. but there may be some implications for the ukrainian investigation if it sets a precedent that allows someone like john bolton to go testify. >> clearly. but in this sea of subpoenas, danny, that have been issued, many people who have been issued a subpoena have just totally ignore the subpoena? how does that happen? if i get a subpoena, eddie gets a subpoena, we have to respond to it. >> they're playing a game of chicken. what we're finding out is that the congress doesn't have a very good enfo