richard st. george, the exhibitions starring figure, a wealthy irishman who finds himself on the wrong side of two revolutions in america and ireland, as part dickens with a spritz of yankee doodl. doodle. it is a cracking good tale, but the story reveals so much more than love my death, and psychodrama. in st. george, we see the complex entanglements of social, political and cultural identities of the time and the connectedness of the american revolution. we find a story of the age of revolution and a story of today, of who we are and how we got here, and what the past means to us as a people or as nations. in st. george, we also find a detective story. a decades long mystery that started with two relatively obscure paintings, and a mystery that ended with this deal for and moving exhibition featuring 22 works of art depicting or commissioned by richard st. george. or perhaps the mystery ended, we will find out. one of the joys of the past year, and my job brings me many joys, has been watching

richard st. george, who fought alongside the british against the rebellious colonists. the pritzker military museum and library, and richard see yvonne has foundation cohosted the three-dayart of a conference. i introduce our next speaker, i would like to introduce myself, i am elizabeth grant, director of education at the museum of the american revolution. it is my pleasure to introduce ic, next speaker, matthew sk curator of our newest exhibition. boldlyladelphia inquiry proclaims this has it all, love, death, and psychodrama. it describes the life story of richard st. george, the exhibitions starring figure, a wealthy irishman who finds himself on the wrong side of two revolutions in america and ireland, as part dickens with a oodl.z of yankee d .- doodle it is a cracking good tale, but the story reveals so much more than love my death, and psychodrama. in st. george, we see the complex entanglements of social, political and cultural identities of the time and the connectedness of the american

richard b. frank. [applause] richard: thank you for those kind remarks. we are here on the 75th anniversary of the battle of midway. it is on the perennial list of the most important battles of world war ii, it is often cited as the single most important naval battle in united states naval history. it is usually listed as among the most decisive naval battles in all of history. it is an enthralling story that has been told a number of times. we do not have time to go into all the details of it today. in a sparse outline, let me point out -- the battle ultimately was one of a great triumph against odds. the foundation was intelligence, particularly radio intelligence developed by american radio officers with british and australian support. the key figure is lieutenant commander joseph rochefort who was the commander at pearl harbor. joe is now legendary figure, he is better remembered than dozens of admirals who served in world war ii. he is also an inspiration, those of you who are feeling that your efforts are not properly appreciated, you should remembe

richard st. george, who fought alongside the british against the rebellious colonists. the museum, pritzker military museum and library, and richard c. von hess foundation cohosted this event as part of a three-day international conference. elizabeth: i can hear you all buzzing about the exhibition you have the opportunity to see this morning. before i introduce our next speaker, i would like to introduce myself, my name is dr. elizabeth grant, director of education at the museum of the american revolution. it is my pleasure to introduce our next speaker, matthew skic, curator of our newest exhibition. a recent review in the philadelphia inquiry boldly proclaims this has it all, love, death, and psychodrama. it goes on to describe the life story of richard st. george, the exhibition's starring figure, a wealthy irishman who finds himself on the wrong side of two revolutions in america and ireland, as part dickens with a spritz of yankee doodle. there is no doubt that richard st. george's story is

fox news in 1974 i guess we'll never know richard. won't talk about that the next time we talk with you mr ben-veniste richard ben-veniste former watergate prosecutor we appreciate your time in your insights tonight thank you oh it's a pleasure thank. ari for more analysis now on the testimony that we heard today on capitol hill i'm joined here at the big table by rachel rizzo she is a us political analyst and a bosch fellow here in berlin and d.-w. news is very own economy he is in kiev in ukraine with that part of the story to both of you welcome nick let me start with you the testimony today as we've been saying it was very damning for the u.s. president and it wasn't exactly flattering to the leadership in ukraine what's been the reaction where you are to what we heard today. well brant the government here in present staying as tight lipped as they have throughout there's very little in this for them to gain by saying anything either way they'll either offend the current white house and the team or the democrats so they seem to th

commissioner richards? >> commissioner richards: so i just have to hand it again to mr. kevlin and mr. sia. they make a great team. this is the second or third time you've come together, and you always produce something for the neighborhood. i hope to see you together over and over. i'm proud to be a member of dt&a because we support housing. we worked on the market and on octavia plan. this was one those that was a bank -- i don't know if it was bank of the west or whatever, but finally, this gets to be repaired back to what it should be. housing was knocked down to make this, and now we're getting back to housing. i just have two questions. first, i see on page 8-4.1, i see the parapet. however, as i look on 8-3.1 and 8-0.1, the plans call for a base, a middle, and a top. that doesn't look like much of a base here. >> yeah. brad terell, sia consulting. we looked at that, and one of the things that came back to us was why don't we just do it simpler, so we just developed an aesthetic that was a foreground element. so the base -- drag this with me over here. here, you se

and then there's richard nixon. by 1968, the perennial republican presidential wannabe had lost his last two elections, and he knew that this was his last shot. >> in 1968, he wanted that presidency so bad that he was willing to do whatever was necessary. >> this is twice as big a crowd as we had in 1960, and the result is going to be twice as good as in 1960. >> so back on fifth avenue, july 12th, we have three men in a hotel room -- a veteran politician plotting his comeback, the man running his political operation, and south vietnam's man in washington. plus one lone woman, anna chennau chennault. >> of course i had the opportunity to not only talking to the leaders but the people. >> nixon knew that anna chennault could establish a relationship between him and the south vietnamese and that just in case it became public, nixon could pretend that she was not his real envoy. >> after just ten years in washington, d.c., anna had fast-tracked her way to wealth and influence and a penthouse on top of the brand-new wat

. >> commissioner richards: okay. i wondered. >> every single live work unit that was approved in san francisco has an n.s.r. on it and saying it's not housing, it's commercial. and so academy put students in the housing -- pardon me -- in the buildings and considered it to be student housing, but they didn't comply with the law oliv on live-work units. there were units that were abandoned, and there were more on harrison street. so they were not housing at that time because they were not conforming housing. that w they were both substantial buildings. >> president melgar: thank you, miss hester. mr. adams, did you want to explain the methodology further? >> dan adams, mohcd. scott sanchez' explanation was spot on. >> commissioner richards: we had a case here probably three or four units where essex trust legalized live-work units, but at the time, live-work was still live-work. it was still illegal to use it as dwelling units or student housing, so what would that do to the units if we included bloxom. >> it would in

. >> we need commissioner richards. for 461 29th street, please note on august 29th, 2019 after hearing in closing public this was continued to november 7th, 2019 with direction from the commission about a 6-0. commissioner johnson, you were absent. on november 7th, without hearing it was continued to today's date. commissioner johnson, you were absent and commissioner diamond you were not yet seated as a commissioner. in order to participate, you would have had to reviewed the previous hearing and materials and if you can acknowledge as much today you can participate. >> i have reviewed the material. >> i have not given i was appointed this week, i have not. >> we will need to recuse you from this matter but it would be better if commissioner richards were here. >> so we would need -- we have quorum to be and to hear the items so i just texted commissioner richards -- i don't know where he is. should we go onto the next item. >> we'll be forced to take the next item. >> i'm so zar, we have to take the next item and com

say what you will about richard nixon at the end of the day. he was ashamed and apologized for his misuse of his presidential office to date there is no indication that there is anything that will shame donald trump about and whether it's interesting that you say that i noticed today when mr zonen was speaking we saw new tweets coming from the president i mean it was completely quiet for the several hours when testimony was being given which is unusual for the president as a former prosecutor when you look at the evidence that's been given when you look at the testimony in your mind have there been enough presented for articles of impeachment to be sent from the house to the senate for trial well our constitution specifies a great grounds for impeachment of the president and one of which is bribery and i believe there's been a prime aphasia case made in the absence of any defense by the president. of solicitation of a bride that is release of the funds that were authorized by congress to the ukraine in return for a statement by the ukrainian pr

that's richard. it's spring, 1992. in four months, richard will be dead. it's been almost 30 years since crystal shot and killed her husband, richard. and we're about to meet her now, not in prison but her home in southern california. crystal has been a free woman since 2012. but i want to go back further. before she became a convicted felon, crystal was farm girl. have you always had horses? >> yeah. yeah. >> horses are a passion of mine. >> you rode bareback? >> yeah, i still do. >> crystal grew up in a poor neighborhood independent duluth, minnesota. she and her siblings ran wild all day while her father worked. >> i was a rebel, very independent as a child. >> crystal paid the price when he came home. >> we used to get beat a lot. strap, bare butt, lean over on the couch and he would whip us from top to bottom. >> you don't have very many pleasant memories of childhood? >> no. no. i was just determined to go as far as i could and get away, you know. >> at 19, crystal got her chance. she joined the air force and got transferred to california. >> i loved

and he said, number 39, richard m. nixon, president of the united states. >> what if this trail leads into the oval office at the white house? >> well, as i replied then, the trail should be followed wherever it leads. now only six hundred dollars. every best gift ever begins with kay ♪ peroni italia. i've always loved and i'm still going for my best, even though i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib not caused by a heart valve problem. so if there's a better treatment than warfarin, i'll go for that. eliquis. eliquis is proven to reduce stroke risk better than warfarin. plus has significantly less major bleeding than warfarin. eliquis is fda-approved and has both. what's next? sharing my roots. don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily and it may take lo

richard nixon self-sabotaged. not because he wanted to leave office as he said, i think leaving office before the end of my term >> thank you. i'm not going to do that anymore. i was the director when it became a federal institution. richard nixon was temperamentally ill suited to be president in that he was an introvert in an extrovert's job. what he did not know, other than being sneaky and running a cover-up, which we know from the tapes he did, he actually was not very good at creating public sympathy for himself. he, unlike other presidents who have come under scrutiny, he actually with drew from the public space. there wasn't any social media, but he was a near recluse in 1974. he used surrogates to get his story out and his surrogates were not like certain surrogates in this era. they were not attack dogs. richard nixon was very sick with pneumonia, when alexander butterfield, alexander butterfield, he's the man who put the system, the taping system in the white house at the request of the president and, yo

commissioner richards? >> so what is the story on the grove street project? why does staff want it continued >> we have it listed as a continuance. i don't know the reason for the continuance, but i think there are members of the public that aren't support -- that are supportive of continuing it as well. we would have the hearing on december 12th if we were to continue it. >> it would be almost impossible to hear because we don't have the material. >> yes. >> okay. somebody needs to make a motion and that is it. commissioner koppel? >> motion to continue items one, two, three, five, and 14. >> so number one until the time when there is only four of us here on the 21st of november? >> i am okay with changing the date. >> i don't think a four member commission is a good idea on such a big item. >> do you have an alternate date commissioner his, if i may say, item one, that is the date has been requested by staff and working with the city's attorney office. we do have milestones as part of our development agre

richard and a good friend of richard, a former senator from georgia, we became good friends. we didn't agree on everything. i think at the end of the day the secret sauce that is missing from too much of our politics is the trust. that trust means at some point you will have to be willing to do what you think is right, even if your team does not agree with it. until you can show your willingness to stand up for something you believe in, that frankly your team doesn't agree earn, you don't fully that trust. i think richard and i have had to try to earn that trust with each other. we give each other plenty of grief along the way. we have traveled some of these times around the world. it starts with a personal relationship. of theecognition friendship and trusting relationship is more important than short-term partisan political points. what it issn't know like to subpoena the president's son. he did talk to me and say you are going to do what? the fact is doing things like expect not something you to do when you take this job. the process that he and i committed to at the begin

how do you know what the real richard nixon or donald trump is? it's a real problem and a problem for scholars and one of the things i have learned in my affiliation with the miller center over the years and conducting interviews is how often the public image that has captured everyone's attention is wrong. and how important it is to puncture whatever that reputation is. richard nixon famously reinvented himself in the 1968 campaign and it is beginning to come apart here. we need to constantly be on the alert so we are not fooled by the many images we see. >> i agree. >> i would like to add look at all of the reporters. can you remember a time when presidents felt like they had no choice but to hold press conferences on a regular basis? even when it was politically inconvenient for them. we all watched the press conferences because we only got three channels and they were broadcast live on all three at the same time. so in some ways, the cartoon speaks to an earlier era in the way in which the media and public are able to see the president, as wel

next example, richard nixon. as we look at that presidency, he resigned before a formal impeachment vote could take place in 1974. the house judiciary committee approved three articles of impeachment, all related, breaking into the democratic national committee headquarters at watergate. the charges included obstruction of the investigation, resisting subpoenas, and abuse of power by violating the, quote, constitutional right of citizens, misusing agencies like the fbi. third example for you, that's president bill clinton, the most recent. in 1998 this was related to his relationship with monica lewinsky. the president was accused of two counts of perjury, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power. in his closing statement thursday, congressman adam schiff alluded to all of this history. >> what we've seen here is far more serious than a third-rate burglary of the democratic headquarters. what we're talking about here is the withholding of recognition in that white house meeting, the withholding of military aid

well i think what's different here is with richard nixon for example most of the evidence that the house judiciary committee had was developed by prosecutors i assume it was developed by the senate select committee investigating the watergate break in this is a situation with the house of representatives has really taken this matter right from the beginning and has developed the evidence on it and is doing it on its own without any other organisation having been involved in this before hand so it's kind of a unique opportunity in the sense that they have total control over the evidence they know what the evidence is and they're putting it together to the public so i think it remains to be seen how this all plays out what this is the right way to do it i'd like to take a listen to part of the testimony that was given today i wrote that withholding security assistance in exchange for help with a domestic political campaign in the united states would be crazy i believe that then and i believe it now i do not believe the united states should ask other countries to engage in selective politic

>> i like to think i was or icactually am older than richard but i never acknowledge that. >> he dies his hair. [laughter] >> at least i got hair. [laughter] i would like to think i was old enough to touch by the idealism of the 60s but not old enough to be jaded. i had grown up in the midwest, indiana and illinois, connecticut and bent at thean se company for 35 years and first in my family to graduate from college. somehow my parents were political, involved in pta, boy scouts but i always had the bug. took some time or when offhanded business came back to politics because i did politics during college and law school but one of the things is all the frustrations and politics when you absolutely get stuff done which unfortunately becomes rarer and rarer in our day job the ability to affect people's lives in an extraordinary positive way emboldens me more now and now. >> many in this room who my father and mother. they instilled in me there's a time to complain and when that is over with you sign up or shut up. i remember the day i told my wife i would run for congress and i'm still r

it's interesting that nancy pelosi is making the comparison to richard nixon. whateversaying happened in that call, whether or not there was withholding of aid, that is the president's right to do that. everything has shifted in the past week. hearingsow gone to that will be held in public. the democrats are figured how they are going to go about this. the republicans are starting to hunchback and say -- hunchback -- punch back and say the president has every right to withhold aid. allegations. the is talk about richard nixon. ins is going to be right president trump's wheelhouse. he is going to enjoy that comparison. host: we are talking with the white house correspondent for the washington examiner. you talked to president trump in the oval office. he was behind the resolute desk. the president wants to read the transcript of that phone call and do so as a sort of fireside chat on live telev call and do so as a sort of fireside like thursday when they were talking about how to hunchback on this. -- punch back on this. house democrats put forward their plan of

richard? >> great summary to start this hour. white house correspondent kelly o'donnell watching that for us at white house. thank you, kelly. let's start off with you on this, joyce. who should they include and who should they not? let's get straight to what kelly was saying. especially from the list the republicans put out, as you saw she listed some of those who were on that list, joyce. >> you know, it's also a discretionary call, richard, but it's important to remember this is still the investigative stage of proceedings. democrats are working towards a decision as to whether or not there will be articles of impeachment at some point. this is not the impeachment equivalent of a trial which occurs in the senate. so, at this point it's really up to investigators to speak to witnesses, who they believe will help them establish the facts and learn all of the important evidence that's available. it's not incumbent upon them to go upon wild fishing expeditions like ones the republicans appear to be calling for here, trying to inse

katy, richard and lawrence. richard, why would you want to focus on an issue that is just a road map for other people to take you out of the job you want? >> i to be honest, i think you will hear democrat do tomorrow. kennedy: i want to be president but not very long. >> that is not -- i think if you hear. >> that logic. >> you talk with speaker pelosi or any other democrat, they will tell you house can handle impeachment by themselves, they don't need the candidates to weigh in on it,. kennedy: that is all washington is focused on on. >> there are no primary in washington. kennedy: all of the -- >> you know who will not be at iowa senators in the si senate f impeachment goes to senate in january, be careful when you look for, elizabeth warren and klobuchar are banking on going in with momentum, you have to be at impeachment trial. kennedy: elizabeth warren is in fight of her life, it is such a heated race between joe biden, elizabeth warren and bernie sanders, she and bernie have to make face time with voters o

i will point out richard nixon and his nose. too tired with johnson and opinion polls done at the time, they basically asked the survey respondents, do you trust the government to do the right thing unless cases? the johner at kennedy/lyndon johnson level is bumping up at 80%. by the time we get to richard nixon, it is dropping down while below the 50's and into the 20's, so we see this precipitous drop. the noses in these cartoons are indicating in the american public that faith in the thernment and presidency -- sense that these authoritative leaders are lying to us. it is the political cartoonist that let us know this ahead of time that we should listen more. >> to nixon's great advantage, when it came to the vietnam issue in 1968, he was able to say i am not this and i am not that. i am not going to be the president who got us into a war, and deeper and deeper into a war, and now cannot seem to find any way out of it. i am also not going to be one of who, asvish politicians he would put it, cuts and runs. i don't know that n

aviv get in the v column mr horowitz news and author of the punishment of gaza on skype from harare richard fuld professor emeritus at princeton university richards the former un special rapporteur for the occupied palestinian territories and in ramallah no doubt a political analyst and former spokesman for the palestinian task force on public diplomacy welcome to you all i want to start with richard fuld in harare what on earth are the white house doing making israeli policy surely that's the question. if there is no coherent persuasive answer it would seem that the timing of this shift on the settlement scheme as a way of helping mentioned yahoo in the overcome the political impasse in israel but there's no assurance that they even correlated this initiative with anything that adds up to a coherent power but richard do you think it's a question of 'd this is a continuation of traditional u.s. policies in a way it always felt like they would have to accept that these settlements existed and to try to find a legal way of making them legal or is this a complete about. well i'd say it's somew

but richard do you think it's a question of this is a continuation of traditional u.s. policies in a way it always felt like they would have to accept that these settlements existed and to try to find a legal way of making them legal or is this a complete about. well i'd say it's somewhere in between i think george w. bush back in 2004 seemed to agree with shura that the settlement blocks would have to be incorporated into israel when a final agreement was reached but there was never any explicit departure from the international consensus which is that the settlements are unlawful and that they are a breach of the 4th geneva convention article 49 there was there is never been any serious doubt about that and the fact that the u.s. expresses a political opinion that they now are legal has no real weight beyond its geo political leverage it has no legal significance let me bring in ramallah has an order of a no to what's the palestinian reaction to this. you've long said the palestinians have long said that this administration isn't a partner for peace that was echoed by

on richard nixon, timothy naftali joins us. he is a pfessor at new york university and former director of theichard nixon presidential library, and he also coauthored "impeachment: an ry."ican his and for andrew johnson, brenda she is the author of "the impeachers," the trial of andren johnsothe dream of a just nation. u,k th o ayoofll yo yu.fo backward go kind of in time here. if you had to give sort of aor 90-second hi lesson on what the story of b bill clinton's impeachment was about, how would do you that? >> well, it's hard to do in0 seconds, but we'll give it a try. look, president clhtnton got cap in a sex scandal. he was being accuse of of sexual harassment in a lawsuit, and as part of that lawsuit he was asked to testify abo his relationship with other women. he lied about a relatiohip f withrmer intern named monica lewinsky. >> i did not hve sexual relations with thatoman, miss lewinskyou >> and the hse ultimately impeached him along party lines for perjury and obstruction of justice. >> i hereby deliver these article

the facts are there, richard. what we will end up at the end of the day as a country, this is on us. we will know what the facts are. the president has done this. are we a country that says that's okay? or are we a country that says it's not and the president should be impeached? >> that is related to the very heart of this impeachment inquiry here, david. i want to move over to you, chris lou. just looking at the calendar. okay. so we have sondland on wednesday who is going to be on the hill. and then dewe move to the day before and we've got williams and morrison as well. but gordon sondland now because of the david holmes revelation, he's going to have some tough questions here. you would not necessarily want to be sondland on wednesday, would you like to, at 9:00 a.m., right, chris? >> yeah. look, ambassador sondland has some explaining to do. in his deposition, he didn't recall a lot of details. he dent giidn't give a lot of specifics. we now know from every other witness, whether it's george kent, bill taylo

>> commissioner richards: can you push it up? >> what? >> commissioner richards: can you push it up? >> you see for residential hotels or housing payment equals one-third of the total cost to replace the land or s.r.o. units to current standards. using the actual figures from the mayor's office of housing and urban development, the figure is $205,000 per one-room single occupancy unit and $250,000 for one single apartment family suite. >> you all have this in your packet. i don't want to bore you with these numbers, but if you look at them -- >> commissioner richards: they add up to $28 million more. >> i want to get to where the $78 million is calculated. hang on two seconds. sue hester has said she's had to try to deal with about 500 pages. i've had to deal with 200. in any event you add up these figures and you get the $78 million. >> commissioner richards: okay. great. question for staff. have you looked at mr. jones' -- >> it's 26, 33 and 28 and change. >> commissioner richards: okay. i just wanted to reconcile. thank you ve

jon: that was vice chair richard clarida. from toronto and new york, this is bloomberg. ♪ mark: i'm mark crumpton with bloomberg first word news. china's ministry of commerce as the country has achieved what it is calling consensus in principle with the united dates on trade. a ministry statement mark: i'm mark crumpton with bloomberg's first word news. have ministry of commerce says the country has achieved what it is calling "a consensus and principle with the united states on trade." the ministry sites a phone call today between the chinese vice u.s. trade representative robert lighthizer, and treasury secretary steven mnuchin. a wildfire that arrested overnight near los angeles has forced 7500 people to flee. -- blaze comes as as it tries to skirt u.s. sanctions that limit access to the global financial system. u.s. dollars and euro notes

doubtful that trump would accept a conviction by the senate in this process mr trump trump is not a richard nixon who flies away on a helicopter i mean do you agree do you see trump accepting conviction if it were to come. i don't think you have a choice because if there's a conviction it means that the republicans have jumped ship and have turned on him i mean at that point it would be very similar to what happened to richard nixon when barry goldwater who was really the dean of the senate republicans took a delegation from the hill to the white house and basically told richard nixon it's all over he doesn't have the votes and by the way i'm one of the senators that's not going to vote for you so that's where it has to be and if there's that kind of support in favor of removal. truck trample the history at that point but that remains to be seen as it is a former prosecutor today the republicans said that they want to subpoena the whistleblower and they also want hunter biden and joe biden to testify what are your thoughts on that. both that all those are ridiculous i mean then 1st of all t

when the supreme court held unanimously that richard m. nixon could not use executive privilege to withhold the watergate tapes, president nixon immediately agreed to comply even though he knew it would mean the end of his presidency. >> there is the president waving good-bye, and you hear the applause. >> all modern u.s. presidents, both republican and democratic, have expanded their powers, and that expansion has been excessive in the past few decades. but donald trump is on a different planet. >> i alone can fix it. >> he has refused to comply with wholly constitutional legislative requests for documents, information, and testimony. were his position to prevail, the u.s. president would become an elected dictator. democrats meanwhile are on firm constitutional ground but are being politically unwise. they should ensure that this impeachment inquiry looks and is fair. >> in this committee, the staff was nonpartisan, and i must give credit where credit is due for a fair presentation. >> they should follow the precedents laid down during t

>> richard pryor. >> when i walk on stage, i'm riddled with fear and excitement, because i have no idea what i'm going to do. >> this was what, oh no, you idiots. oh, god. oh, god. oh, god. oh, god. ♪ ♪ >>> i despised myself from pretty much close to getting out of the womb. i was always wrong. let's start with that. when you're always wrong, you seek an audience to disprove that theory. i was just hellbent on having to prove myself. i know i'm right. i can't be always wrong, you know. i was the victim. >> my father was a very strange man. he was kind of a performance artist that was fueled by beer. >> i was very shy. and at home i was always quiet and didn't get to speak very often, just because other people were jibber jabbering a lot. some people wouldn't clam up, mom. when i did different voices or different noises, people say, that's weird, or shut up. i feel like there's a fear of seeming crazy. >> a lot of comedians are people that are very introverted, very shy, very sensitive to humiliation. a little narcissistic, a little damaged. and so the only way to combat it is to go

richard, a good friend of richards, former senator from georgia, we became good friends and we didn't agree on everything. but i say at the end of the day, the secret sauce that is missing from is it too much of our politics, is the trust. trust means that something you gotta be wheeling to do what you say is right even if your team does not agree with it. and until you can show your willingness to senate prasanna hubley and, frankly your team doesn't agree with, you don't fully earn that trust. richard and i have tried earn that with each other we give each other plenty of grief along this way and we traveled and we traveled in some of these times around the world. but it starts with a personal relationship in recognition in the friendship and trusting relationship is more important than short-term partisan points. >> what it's like to be subpoenaed by the president's son. [laughter] but he did turn to me and see you going to do wet. >> and the fact is doing things like that, it's not something you expect to do we take this job. but it is part of the process that he and i committed t

all right let's bring in our panel now in new jersey on skype richard good scene a political consultant for the democratic party and former advisor to president bill clinton in washington d.c. is jack kingston a republican party member and a former senior adviser to donald trump's 2016 presidential campaign and in birmingham in the u.k. scott lucas a professor of political science and international studies at the university of birmingham welcome to you all gentlemen thank you for being on inside story richard goodstein let me start with you donald trump very combative he says his a victim part isn't but chant what is motivating democrats house members to move forward with this process is it politics or is it duty. imagine if president barack obama had told the saudis we will give you a lot of aid if you in the aid of hillary clinton's presidential campaign find dirt on donald trump and publicize it and we will not have a meeting saudis in the white house unless you get dirt on hillary clinton the republicans in congress would have gone ballistic they would have started impeachment proce

china continue their poll long traits that the people's republic has look to your business professor richard wolfe joins the program today to sift through the latest developments in what trade and what the latest. element for the state of the world economy class. bring back professor while for. a few 1000 for the sake of the macro economy in the way of increased trade tension and what the chances are for a recession and states and abroad and later as u.s. china tensions continue on the rise tech programs have found themselves in the crosshairs christiane is back on the show today to bring down her bring down how video sharing app and tick tock has come under fire in congress so many stories with so little time let's do it. the prospects of the united states and china signing a phase one trade deal may have to wait at least beyond next week's bric summit in brazil the south china morning post is reporting that sources close to beijing say president xi jinping this trip to americas may be too soon for the 2 sides to prepare all of the particulars needed to finalize that portion of the deal off

colonel richard rescorla. richard was a great gentleman. he's looking down proudly on this wonderful family. and congratulations. it's a big -- it's a big evening. and it's great to have you at the white house because there's no place like it. thank you. [applause] we're profoundly grateful to have with us rick's beloved family. please join me in welcoming his wife susan. thank you, susan. [applause] his son trevor and his daughter kim. thank you. thank you. [applause] thank you. thank you. and to each of you we cannot fathom all that you have endured, but today we express the gratitude of 329 million americans. it's a lot of people. rick was born in cornwall, england. as a boy, he met american soldiers preparing for the normandy landing and dreamed of one day serving in uniform. it's a big thing for rick. soon he had his chance and joined the british army. he spent six years fighting communism, then flew to america and found the recruiting center in times square and joined the united states army. he wanted to continue his fight against com