she found judy's son, actually. >> he said are you sitting? i said yes. he said they reopened david's case. >> thepe detectivene and the mo talked about david for hours. it wasn't a problem for judy. shefo loves talking about her b, even now to us. >> david was my first child. he loved everything and everyone. he would walk in a room and everyone would be a magnet to him. >> he was the eldest of judy's three children and he idolized his older brother. >> he looked out for me. he was f that way with his friends, with everybody. >> bill brown was one of those friends. in 1982 after high school brown and david jackson worked together at burger king where david became a manager. brown also had a front row seat to the romance between jackson and a co-worker named barbara britain. >> they were together. if you can find love that's what we all want. >> so all of these years later, the detective played a visit to the woman that had been the girl that had fallen in love with david jackson. happy to help she told the detective. same thing when we called on her to t

and i said, but we are talking. he said yes. he said you sound like a very nice young man, but unfortunately, we are not going to be taking anyone from the waiting list this year. our yield was higher than we thought. where else were you accepted? i said i was accepted at yale. he said you will have a very good time at yale, and you will enjoy it. i said i am sure that i would, but that was not my objective. -- objective for the phone call. he said i understand that, but i'm just so sorry. david: did you ever see him? or hear from him again? steve: ironically, it is really a great story. the ceo of mckinsey was in my office, 25 years later. he was on the harvard corporation. i told him the story. he asked what year. and that dean of admissions was a close friend of his. he said, do you mind if i told him that i ran into you? i said, no, that's fine. i got a letter two weeks later from that former dean of admissions. he said, i remember getting that phone call in 1964. he said that every time i see you in the newspaper, i realize

, laura ingraham said it, a lot of people have said it. they said there is nobody in the world that could have handled that stuff that happened and still created one of the greatest economies and done more than any other president ever before in the first three years. i understand that. i understand that but it's my life, very unfair to my family. i have to say that is very unfair to my family, what they put my family through is a disgrace. me it's my life, it's fine but you know what what they put my family through is a disgrace and they ought to be ashamed and we should get apologies all over the place. so yesterday i sent to losey a letter denouncing and condemning her party's outrageous abuse of power, that's what it is. they have nothing, there's the ones that should be impeached every one of them. [cheering] i mean, you have adam schiff, he makes up a statement and goes in front of congress where he has immunity and he makes up a statement from me that is totally fictitious, totally out of thin air, the worst statement i've ever hear

what i said in my closing i will say it again one more time. what were worried about is the eroding trust of the people and our institutions. we have to town halls in my district, the people are deeply concerned that are beginning not to trust the congress, not trust our system of justice and they certainly don't trust this impeachment sham and this is the thing they're worried about going forward for the decades to come. we set a very dangerous president with disarray frustrated about it as you can tell. >> we will take questions. >> he said at the end of the hearing they don't know what's next, it don't know what the course of action will be. with that said, do you encourage intelligence committee members on your side to come before the committee it? that was the inclination of what nadler said to some sort of hearing or reform that they should come and present their side? >> we don't know, you bring up a great question and if i don't understand, there is an old saying from my background as a pastor. when there is a fog in the congregation an

so he said... after i made the speech and presentation, he said, "can you invest 45?" he said "no." i said, "well... "i did a nice try at least. uh...so how much you want to invest?" "if you're investing 25, the remaining 75. so i want to invest all." so i said, "no, no. you cannot invest 75. "you can invest 45. the remaining i have to save for the other investors to invest." [laughter] in 45 minutes, you iotually raised $75 bi wow. ok. that's pretty impressive. but what is it that you told people and what was the vision that you actually gave them? so, one vision, which is singularity. singularity is the concept that the computing power, computer's artificial intelligence surpass mankind's brains. david: the singularity is the concept. the word means that is the point at which a cputer becomes smarter than a human brain. masayoshi: yes. today, already, computer is smarter than mankind for chess or go or weather forecasts. to some expert systems, computer is already smarter. but in 30 years, most of the subject that we are thinking, they will be smarter than us-- that's my belief. d

if they said you have no authority. i said, call him. i am telling you you are not getting the $1 billion. to leave hereeady and i think about six hours, i look at them and said, i am leaving in six hours, if the prosecutor is not fired, you are not getting the money. he got fired. did he requested something and holds on the of value? i am asking about this -- mr. goldman: it is important -- >> answer this question. you joe biden is a liar, telling a story to make people impressed, or he actually did this. is it? mr. goldman: he did it pursuant to u.s. official policy. >> holding us out there. only one whothe has done a quid pro quo. he used taxpayer dollars to threaten a foreign government. yet we are sitting here pretending that this is not happening? we are pretending a present now would not be concerned? joe biden is a terrible candidate, he can destroy himself, but he cannot get by this. it does not matter who brings it up. it does not matter who does it. this is what happened. you can whitewash it all you want, go whatever you want

i said yes but i'd love to see it. so he put it on and the minute i sure this image of the snowman and the boy flying. i thought it's a marvelous image and i said i have had a coon in my head for years that i've never known what to do with i think it would work for this and i think more than that i think you could make a whole film without dot org and just do it with the music and joan said no no i don't know what you're talking about so i say well can i do a demo for you he said if you'd like to and john took it to the new director of channel 4 it had literally opened that 'd jeremy isaacs looked at it and he said absolutely bring that will make i think you know it was in a way it was something i had wanted to do all my life i'd always believed you could make a film and a story we've just musing tell me about bernard famous for citizen kane forever hitchcock how he kind of took you under his wing. and it. through my agent lee's keys and she said to me would you like to me that herman i said i would love to because of

and she said, yeah, they're really nice. >> and i said -- >> and she said i just met some. we have some here from africa. and they're really really nice. >> and i said, we'll i like some black americans and some than they're really nice and there are some that aren't so nice. they're just like people. and you know good and bad. so but she sh never had that experience. and so -- a lot of what they were thinking and working was very much outside of the realm of their personal experience. and so that made for some very interesting conversations sometimes when you were trying to figure out what was going on. it -- it -- but that's what diplomacy is all about, discovery. and that's when it gets exciting when you can discover something. >> and miss koob how did you find out you were coming home and what did it feel like coming back to the u.s. >> anne and i were in our room at the guesthouse and was was afoot we didn't know what. but there were a group of allergan medical doctor there is giving us exams, sort of weird. and -- so many stories. then they said get your stuff togethe

and he said would you also various pieces of jazz need to be written for it i said to do what have i have a very extraordinary career in a way that i started as a as a classical pianist i want to see a classical scholarship the world economy. piano but while i was i got more interested in film and i got very interested in film 0 spent all my time in national film theatre to some. after i left the academy there was a projectionist i was there for about 2 years and then i missed music so much and i thought i actually want to know how to play it will be soul music and all that music this is the music if i want to know about it i left there and got a job in a pub would you believe where you had to play after everything one day i was playing in a band in the club and a guard came up through and he said would you would you do. would you would you come along to abbey road and tune or dition i went along and i became a pianist in residence at abbey road and i also played on films and then it was the avengers film music pretty score they've put in so many different films you made the hunger t

you don't like what he said or how he said it. i don't like how joe biden side it but you blew that off because he has the back of the international community. we're a perpetual state of impeachment. don't come here and be a person who is a witness. sworn witness and not answer the question. adam schiff is doing that fine without you. but don't come here and say i'm not going say because you know good and well in some committee room, somebody said hey this is interesting i have munoz phone number and that number is in that report. he had a phone call with somebody we're investigating. that's a drive by and it's beneath you and this congress. and that is why have such a problem with this. then you leaked further information. this is the problem here. we can be righteous about trying to get this president or not. this is why people are getting so just turned off by this whole thing. when we understand that, that's the problem i have because could you have handled this differently. i'll blame the chairman, i'll hold the one with the

as long as you are here i said i have some questions for you. is a boring and he said no. meeting being clean. and to go into an hour of questions and they had been what i have been. and then one month later january 2016 they say was that your bottom? moneywise i made sure i didn't have any money left that would be an incredible story to help people i would know them as they were happening. that was weird thinking that so with the addiction. mark: but did he turn you on? >> no. >> and then to give you the jumpstart to do something about it? >> going back to the days i owned a bar for 13 years after the bar would close he would go back afterwords and sit and do cocaine. i would say these drugs are bad but revelation in the bible and then i would wake up. i didn't really know what i was trying to convince myself that i could function and talk to people. mark: so when did he catch you? >> for this? 2017 when i did a full surrende surrender. and what happened there i couldn't speak up for jesus like i could until i went to the stadium in minneapolis a couple months after that

undoubtedly you can have a trouble reading an article that said people died. no one said that. and you can accuse whatever because you're just sitting there just telling untruths because you don't get it because you have personal agenda, and maybe you're auditioning for the prospect of being an impeachment manager. that's great. but you can't get into this one, because as someone who sat there and watched people die on the battlefield, i know when people die. i know when they've come into the hospital and been shot up and been hit with iuds. that's a load of hogwash. in fact it's so wrong to get a cheap shot to say what didn't happen, when you can't even read your own article you put into commission. i mean, maybe we can go by it word by word. although there is no way to link mark offs or dozens of other deaths directly to lack of aid. under-secretary hale said this was prospective not at the time. that's the most ridiculous comment, and there's been a lot of them here. that is the most amazing, amazing lack of honesty and integrity i've seen so far. looking at your own article

he said the evidence needs to be clear. it is not. he said offense is needed to be grave. they are not. he said that once the evidence is laid out, that the opposition will admit they had to do it. well, that hasn't happened. in fact, polling and the fact that not one single republican voted on the impeachment inquiry resolution, or the schiff report, and i doubt that one single republican will vote on these articles of impeachment tonight, or on the floor of the house of representatives reveals that the opposite is in fact true. in fact, what you hear democratic colleagues have done is the opposite of what you said had to be done. this is a partisan impeachment and it is tearing the country apart and with that, i yield back. >> little idiots back. does anyone else -- >> mister chairman. i seek recognition. >> for what person to refresh johnson street recognition? >> strike last. where >> the gentleman is recognized. >> i thank you, mister chairman, i am just rising to speak in support of this amendment for mr. jordan and i think it is really appropriate, i do not think we

[applause] she said that's it and i said that's it. i will text it to you so you have it in writing. so she goes and she does it and within ten minutes, where he calls me. larry calls me. i'm so sorry. you know i love you. i have my tail between my legs. i'm so sorry. and i said at what point do you say i am confused and he said i know, i shouldn't have done it. trust me i will make it up to you and i said you will by going out there and telling them that youll were wrong and he said i n do that. i suggest yo said yes you can, l read and heeded. in fairness he went out, contacted a reporter but what was surprising to me is how it was a simple movement of the defending myself and how it went viral across the country on t-shirts and everything and it goes to show so many people have been in a moment. and i hope the lesson you take from that is no one is going to protect your integrity that you. at the end of the day you have to do it. it's all you have and you have to know how to protect your self. so that was another lesson learned. a v

end everything. >> reporter: that's not quite what the ukrainian president said as he said to "time" magazine he complained president trump wasn't exactly treating him like a true ally holding up aid to his country. said, i never talked to the president from a position of a quid pro quo. i don't want us to look like beggars. you have to understand. we're at war. if you're our strategic partner you can't go blocking anything for us. i think that's about fairness. the president will be in london for nato meetings and won't be participating in the latest impeachment hearings and house judiciary meetings wednesday. he told jerry nadler we do not intend to participate in your wednesday hearing. democrats accusing republicans hiding behind arguments about the process. >> i think the white house put itself in a straight jacket of its own making by questioning the legitimacy of the constitutional process. by questioning that legitimacy, it makes it very difficult for them to participate. >> reporter: some of the president's top defenders make it harder than that of bogus conspiracy of russia

we said fine, chief. looked around, looked around, and six months later, after 40 lawyers had gone blind trying to figure out what answer to that question was, we decided that the answer to the question really resided in the newspapers at the time. not in decided law cases. >> some of the literature written about the committee suggests that you and john davidson wrote a minority opinion on the grounds for constitution. for constitutional grounds for impeachment. >> i know we wrote a minority memo on the right of jim st. clair, my future law partner, to cross-examine witnesses. i'm not sure that we ever wrote a formal minority memo. the big question in the early days was does the grounds for impeachment have to be a crime? and i can remember being of the view early on that really that it should be required that it's a crime or there is eally no stopping point. there would be no any president could be impeached for anything. he ultimate memo said, well, what if a president took up a life of pleasure in a fo

he said yes. i didn't interview with sam garrison, who was running the republican side of the staff that was not yet fully unified. some thought it never was. sam and had ath good interview with him. i was engaged to come in quite shortly thereafter. i reported for duty in december of 1973. >> tell us about sam garrison. give us a picture of him. man, was a devoted family from the south. from richmond. worked like a tiger and slept in on sunday mornings. he and i had a good personal relationship. >> you are there before john was named. >> i'm sure i was there before bert jenner. maybe it was before john doerr. i remember showing up for work. if i was the first staffer, hilary rodham was the second staffer. i remember john doerr calling us into his office and saying bill, hilary, we have a research project. we have to find out what constitutes foreground of impeachment on the president. there does not seem to be a case on point. it is friday afternoon and i don't want to ruin your weekend, why don'

officials said column for u.s. officials said several american official said officials say say u.s. officials but u.s. officials said one u.s. counterterrorism official said i'm not joking there it is that is the journalism you're getting fed i sometimes think the l a times the new york times here because american officials say. i denounce the call to invade iraq publicly the new york times issued me a formal. written reprimand which is what you get before you're fired under union rules to stop speaking out against the war had been a middle east bureau chief from an i'm better iraq than 7 years in the middle east . how can you come out of gaza and not being free. what's being done to those people how can you come out of the sudan also. dozens of other places i better not be. i've seen the bodies of a lot of children which i can't forget. you know especially having done it for 20 years and. dostoevsky 7 was the inability to love and that's what kills people. i fully get why people blow their brains out. it's really. and i don't use love as a kind of hallmarks small c n l we all got t

and he said there was no bribery. but you know what is more important what turley said? he said if there is abuse of power that you want to impeach this president over, that is not the case. it is actually the abuse of congress if you move forward based upon what they want to do. why would they not listen to that? why would she not hold herself to the standard she said to move forward? >> but that vote was before we had heard from any witnesses, that was before this investigation. now are you confident that not a single republican will back this? >> i am more confident that the bipartisan vote on impeachment that comes to the floor will be no. >> -- including mr. turley expressed concern with the obstruction, the refufs al to comply with any subpoena. why shouldn't the president of the united states have to comply with lawful subpoenas from congress and do you worry that this president sets an example for the democratic president in the future? >> i watched president obama do this. if you watched the hearing yesterday, turley you was he stated and agreed no bribery, no e

a guy who manages viral people want to in an ad said that. if you have a 1000000 followers you can get $10000.00 per post right brother nature has $5000000.00 combined so imagine what he's getting so you know it's not only the fact that he's popular and he gets a gazillion likes on all of his pictures you know every life you can get what he's getting money from it's really fascinating too because it's not like you know when you're a musician or an actor loosely you're say well we came up you had you know your celebrity was kind of cultivated and created by p.r. company used in like big corporations and you don't want to do and you don't want to work now you have social media you know you like you said you have these kids come up and there are stars for playing a video game at home and you know they don't need the p.r. machine and the corporation there you know why in a i am in the machine you know do you think that will have the one adverse effect on you know kids come and go but a minute or so left will that have an adverse effect in some ca

david: and he said not for him? stephen: he said, i am not interested. i said, why don't we open stores over pennsylvania? he said, i don't want to do that. a third option, why don't we open stores all over philadelphia? he said, i don't want to do that either. i said, why don't you? happy the way i am. i have a house, i have two cars, i have enough money to send you and your brothers to college. that is all i want. went, imy head and don't understand that. --aw the overturning opportunity to open stores and he did not want to do it. what was surprising, he was very intelligent. david: you say in your bookie was more intelligent than you. that might be an exaggeration. but he was a smart person. stephen: that was not an exaggeration. i would talk to him. on,atter what i was working he could always find the weakness in the argument or in the deal. david: what about your mother? stephen: she was aggressive. she was a housewife. it was the 1950's. and the three of us were a handful. that was the paradigm. david: i have known you for quite a wild, but until

both said the call was fine. president zelensky said there was never any pressure. and not only was there no quid pro quo but ukraine got the money. ultimately there was no push that they made for investigation into anything. they said that. but they still drive on. you're hearing a lot of democrats trying to get out of this mess. during the break you had a number of democrats trying to break from pelosi, saying they should stop pursuing impeachment because they're hearing from people like we are that are and lower prices for family but we're not doing that i wish we were working here in congress to support what we're going to strengthen nato, working with our allies to make nato stronger. mr. scalise: but we're not doing that. what's disappointing is right now as we speak, adam schiff, meeting behind closed doors once again, holding votes in secret is an affront to transparency. it's going ton right now. you knowing, you look at how this whole impeachment sham has been going. while president trump is in london meeting with our allies, to strengthen nato and to help

he said listen, let's make up some dirt. that's not what was said. the transcript, the chairman misled the american people as an attorney, as a chairman, as a member of congress who swore an oath to tell -- basically to be honest with the american people and underhold the constitution. that was such a massive malpractice i've ever seen. you know why, again, they don't care about what actually was in the transcript. they don't actually care what happened. and we heard last week from witnesses they don't even care that aid was released. they're simply looking at the facts to make it fit their narrative. what else happened? this is also the chairman schiff who also said that collusion in plain sight, it was there before the mueller report came out, all this was going to happen. i guess maybe i might need to not just stop commenting on chairman schiff because i may end up on the next phone records subpoena as we go forward. you see, we've taken a dangerous turn in this congress. subpoenas are fine. properly ton. and should be done. properly. but they sho

it has been said all along. we have to do this because if we don't impeachment, he will win against next year. a man came up to me in the grocery store, he said keep doing what you're doing, i have never seen an economy this good, people are good, people are being taken care of. november is easy, november 2016 they lost. january 2017, just a few minutes in the "washington post" said now is the time for impeachment. tweet after tweet saying now let's -- they start with impeachment and they spent two years trying to figure out what do we impeachment on? the means became what we see now. the means is to always talk about impeachment welcome say i doing something wrong. it is constantly tear down on a president that is is working on behalf of the american people. the chairman said a president should not be above the law and should be held accountable. i think congress should be held accountable and not do what we're doing right now which is run a process that does not fit fairness or decorum. but what was the opport

said hey, do you need a ride, and i said wait, where are you going? and he said he was going towards desert hot springs, and that is exactly where i was going so i went, i sighed a sigh of relief like this was meant to be. i rushed behind his car and i thought look at his license plate, just in case, try to memorize it. right when i sat down, he started talking, i forgot about it. he came off as a little strange but harmless. just maybe not that social. just two awkward people in a car trying to have a conversation. >> there was no stranger danger alarm going off in her head. >> i just thought he was weird, but at least i'm not going to get fired. >> during the ride, there was some creepy moments. >> we stopped at a red light, and he asked what my goals and dreams were in life, and i said to be an actress, and he said like to be a porn start? and i said no, you sicko, not a porn star, and he stopped and he said what did you call me? >> it was 10:00 p.m. on sunday night when he dropped her off and asked for her phone number. >> i gave him a fake number

he said there was no bribery. you know what's more important what turley said? he said if there is abuse of power that you want to impeach this president over, that's not the case. it's actually the abuse of congress if you move forward. based upon what they want to do. why would they not listen to that? why would she not hold herself to the standard she said to move forward? reporter: that vote was before we heard from any witnesses. that was before this investigation. now, are you confident that not a single republican will back this? rep. mccarthy: i'm more confident that the bipartisan vote on impeachment that comes to the floor will be no. reporter: including mr. turley expressed concern about the obstruction part of it. the president's refusal to comply with subpoenas. why shouldn't the president of the united states have to comply with the lawful subpoenas from congress? are you worried that this sets an example for a democratic president who might do this in the future. rep. mccarthy: i watched president obama do this. if you watched the hearing yesterda

election and we've seen republicans not with any substantive response as you said i think that's right when it's a diversionary tactic both by the republicans in the committee and the president sorry chris you're not really not there for not helping you get your guy back we're going to go back to the house judiciary committee we'll talk to you get the 5 out the evidence gathered during our. impeachment inquiry at the outset let me say that the evidence does not support the allegations that my democrat colleagues have made and i don't believe the evidence leads to the conclusions they suggest i'm hopeful to add some important perspective and context to the facts under discussion today. the chief allegation that the democrats impeachment inquiry has been trying to assess over the last 76 days is this whether president trump abused the power of his office through a quid pro quo robbery extortion or whatever by withholding a meeting or security assistance as a way of pressuring ukrainian president selenski to investigate the president's political rival former v.p. biden for the president's

she said, "i saw john. and i said, "where?" she goes, "outside in a car." >> are this terrified family's worst fears about to come true? >> i was i frad afraid had e would kill me mom. or me and my sisters or something. year, that's really important. so we're making it easier than ever to become part of our family. that's why our chevy employee discount is now available to everyone. the chevy price you pay is what we pay. not a cent more. family is important to us. and we want you to be part of ours. so happy holidays. and welcome to the family. all: the chevy family! get the chevy employee discount for everyone today. male anchor: ...an update on the cat who captured our hearts. female anchor: how often should you clean your fridge? stay tuned to find out. male anchor: beats the odds at the box office to become a rare non-franchise hit. you can give help and hope to those in need. >>> welcome back. they did not know each other but the two shared a connection. both fell in love with and victim to con man john. she escaped the e

that is what he said. he said it in congress. nobody ever says that. we are dealing with a lot of corrupt people. there was nothing done wrong. to use the power of impeachment on this nonsense is an embarrassment to this country. the president just said it. it is an embarrassment to our country. thank you very much, everybody. thank you very much. thank you very much. are 23chairman, there ayes and 17 knows. >> with the judiciary committee approving two articles of impeachment against president trump, abuse of power and obstruction of congress, the house rules committee will meet to determine the guidelines on how the debate will unfold on the house floor. watch live coverage of house on c-span three. watch online at c-span.org/impeachment or listen live with free c-span radio app. >> today on washington journal, a former senior adviser for president trump talked about impeachment and president trump's reelection strategy. guest: -- host: we want to walk -- whoome back jason miller -- served at a partnership titled s h.w.. guest: yes. that is the firm

i said what did you say? she said no, i told them no. i said what do you mean?r not she gave me all these patently weak arguments for not going. and i said what's the real reason? and she said, well, you're going to san francisco.ar eno going to new york is too far.neo l.a. is far enough. i'm not even happy about that. i said well, if you want to go to new york, i'll go to new york. and that sort of started the conversation. and in a couple of days we had t decided i was going to turn down the offer i had accepted already at the firm in san francisco and follow her, jobless, to new yor. and we were going to get dream married. so, we did goli toeve new york. i got my dream job, believe it or not. it's amazing the hand that touches you when you let go. and we found a marvelous house in brooklyn that was kind of a u dream for bothr of us. and we're married there and started our family there. >> so, how did you end up in massachusetts? >> well, i grew up on the southd chicago, as i think you ved th know, steve. and igr lived there with my grandparents and mother and

evidence of abuse they found a whole catalogue of dishonesty and cover ups across the country they said bishops had mark these boards in secrecy often hiding who served on them in dozens of cases secular courts or government investigators later decided abuse was credible after the board said it wasn't you know these people have been chosen from among professionals they are lay people mostly on those board is the bishops have chosen yeah but they have wanted to go on the board so it is also their responsibility what they do we have had enormous numbers on the some cases the board members were lied to or weren't even told the truth yeah this is up to the bishops responsibility and then they have to take whatever they need to do as responsibility they are responsible for that yeah but they're not i mean they're not taking responsibility a.p. says that the review boards appointed by the bishops operating in secrecy have routinely undermined sex abuse claims from victims shielded abuse accused priests and help the church of void payments all this has to be uncovered and that's why we need th

things were positive this isn't positive and saw there's no absolutely and i said in my 1st response to you that there are things that are difficult to change but there are other elements that are changing this investigation that points to the fact that there are significant numbers of senior clergy in your church who basically rotten church despite everything still provides a home for deceivers. criminal priests or buz don't you ever ask why. they managed to find a home in the catholic church the people you know i mean they have not found a home for the how they have chosen that and they have behaved as they have so they have to be taken to accountability uses for them appart unity and cover over the years because because we have we have now instead established a system of accountability with the meeting of the presidents of the bishops conferences that we organized in february for the 1st time we have made a 1st step forward in something like a delegation of accountability from rome to the local level that was one of the problems because the catholic church is not a monolithic bloc

this was brought forth by adam schiff who said he did not know who the whistleblower was, who said he had proved beyond circumstantial evidence and today said he did not know where he would be on impeachment. i have no concerns. >> you talk about the white house not participating tomorrow. would you like to see them participate if they are leading fax on the table and don't come in and give their side? >> in the past history, we've always had a fair process. an individual could call witnesses and cross-examine. in future hearings. >> is it going to be an open process? >> the letter from the white house counsel said if they were leaving their options open, then they will. there has to be something here to be held accountable. you have the ability to hold them accountable. for adam schiff to say he is not going to testify and since that, i have a question, what are you hiding? whate going to send your we call bring your daughter to work day. why stand behind mr. goldman? you have the gavel. happy.te house would be tomorrow is just a filler because jerry nadler do not know what else to d

bill barr said it may have been more than that. he said he wanted to know if they had active "bad faith" when they went into investigation on the trump campaign. he does not seem to mind the barrage from the left. i traveled with the attorney general to fight a crime-fighting effort in the city. and i asked him about those attacks on the president who just was hours away at the time from impeachment. here's part 1 of our conversation. attorney general barr, thank you for sitting down with me today. >> thank you for having me appear >> martha: by the time this airs this evening, it is expected that the president will be impeached by the house of representatives of the united states. what do you think about that? >> as i said it is a constitutional political process that is underway right now. the department of justice is not part of that. it is premature for me to comment on impeachment at this point. >> martha: when you listen to the call, do you think that it was perfect as the president says? >> i'm not going to get into, if issu

and i said oh, she said yeah there really nice. and she said i just met some, their here from africa there really really nice. and i said yeah well yeah there are some nice black americans, and there are some that aren't so nice they're just like people. good and bad. but she had never had that experience. and so a lot of what they were thinking, was very much outside of the realm of their personal experience. and so that made for some very interesting conversations sometimes when you are trying to figure out what was going on. but that's what diplomacy is all about. discovery. and that's when it gets exciting. when you can discover something. >> sorry how did you find it you are coming home and what did it feel like to come back to the u.s.. >> and i were in a room at the guesthouse, and something was a foot we didn't know what, but there were a group of algerian doctors, medical doctors there. and they were giving us exams, which was sort of weird. and, so many stories. and then he said well get yourself together you're going hom

she said, "have a seat." and i said, "okay." i thought i was in trouble. and she leaned over from her chair and she grabbed my hand and says, "james, i got something i really need to tell you." i thought i was, like, "you're fired." no, she said, "i've fallen hopelessly in love with you, and i don't know what to do about it." >> reporter: what was it like to hear that? >> it was a huge relief. >> reporter: relief? >> yeah. >> reporter: because you were in will have -- >> i was already in love with her at the time, but i couldn't tell her. i didn't feel that i should tell her. you know, i wouldn't know how she would react. i'd rather have her as my friend than have her as nothing at all. >> reporter: so having left artist tim to marry ex-fighter pilot todd, rachel now launched into an affair with ex-marine james. this, by the way, wasn't one of those sneak off into a closet and steal a kiss kind of affairs. with todd living and working in the san francisco bay area during the week james and rachel were together almost constantly. >> we tried to spend as muc

and one line that stands out for me from today certainly from the democratic lawyer who said it simply the facts are clear donald trump put his own political and personal interests above the nation while steve consta the republican lawyer talked to the democrats obsession with impeachment saying they believed if they didn't impeach then president trump would simply be reelected jaimie joe counts our correspondent up on capitol hill today just the tone of the whole event today heidi i mean i know we've seen plenty of conflict in the hearing so far but it feels like it's coming to a head today between the 2 sides. that's right this is really ratcheting up in the heat between the 2 sides we saw that by the republicans many style tactics in a way you saw them. trying to get votes on these points of order at 1 point one member even suggested that statements that were impugning the president's motives and that suggested he was disloyal to the nation that parliamentary rules of decorum actually required that such statements not be made in this type of hearing to which the democrats responded

i said is that accurate? they said no, that was a referral. this is an article on impeachment on the floor of the house of representatives that if it had not been tabled you would actually have been voting on the floor of the house of representatives for articles of impeachment against the president. the one that was on december 6, 2017 was because you didn't like that president trump said something negative about the nfl anthem protest and called a member of congress wacky and all nine of you -- all nine of you here voted against tabling that. >> mr. chairman, with all due respect if i can interrupt. i don't think miss scanlon, miss sh shalala or myself remember the house. >> oh, oh, oh. i was on the wrong one. i apologize. thank you for pointing that out to me. this one was mr. mcgovern, hastings, raskin and desonlier voted against tabling. there's another one where it's all nine, so i misstepped. >> what are we talking about, impeachment? >> yes. it was house resolution 646. it was -- the staff has told me there were articles of impeachment

i said paul said that we have a duty to honor the jewish people for their contributions to us. and i said, and so that's exactly what i am doing. and henceforth, to understand that judaism does not need christianity to explain its existence. christianity cannot explain its existence without judaism. that's why st. paul said, in romans 11 in a chapter for christians but it is drafted in branches for the olive tree, do not boast against the root because the root supports you and the root of the christian olive tree is abraham, isaac and jacob. our roots are jewish to the core and we should remember that god has not cast away the jewish people. they are still the apple of his eye. they are still the covenant people. there are still the cherished people. they are still the people who own the land of israel and in the final analysis, they are always going to receive the love of god because israel, according to the book of exodus is god's firstborn son. mark: when did you decide you wanted to be a pastor. >> when i was 18 years of age i had an appointment to go to west point military

the three experts who testified yesterday said it was and one expert said it was not. 75% of the experts that testified and frankly, literally, hundreds and thousands of editorial writers, op ed writers and citizens of this country have said this is an abuse of power. the senate will make that conclusion and will decide whether or not in the trial phase of this matter to indicate that the evidence is not overwhelming that was alist ted in the hearings by the intelligence committee, see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. i yield. mr. scalise: the gentleman is acknowledging that they are going to pass impeachment of the president because he is saying it is going to the senate. all four witnesses this week said they had no firsthand knowledge of anything that happened and they were giving their opinions and not one of them voted for president trump but some testified that they have given money to democrat candidates for president who were running against president trump. hey were actively engaged in defeating president trump and they are giving evidence that they have seen acknowledging

senator mcconnell said. i am going to coordinate with the president's lawyers so there won't be any difference between us and how to do this. in other words, the jury, senate republicans, are going to coordinate with the defendant, donald trump, on how exactly the kangaroo court is going to be run.. i submit to you respectfully that is a process concern. that the american people should be worried about. now america is a resilient nation we have been through minutes of turmoil before. we've always come through, we are resilient nation, and lincoln said we are in the heart of the civil, war america is the last, vast hope on earth. fdr, said on the eve of the second world war, democracy is not dying. reagan said in the midst of the cold war, america is a shining city on a hill. what exactly will history say about us? will we put principle over party? will we put the constitution above corruption? will we put democracy over demagoguery? what exactly will history say about us?. i yield now to my distinguished col

undoubtedly you can have a trouble reading an article that said people died. no one said that. you can accuse whatever because you are just telling untruths, because you have a personal agenda. that's great. but you can't get into this one. as someone who is seen people die on the battlefield, i know and people die. i know when they come into the hospital and they have been shot. to come in here and say that people died, that is a load of hogwash. that is so wrong, such a cheap shot. you can't even read your own article you put into submission. maybe we could go through it word by word, although there is no way to leak our calls, directly to a lack of aid. secretary hill said this was prospect of not at the time. i could draw a picture and put it on a chart for you. that is the most ridiculous comments, in there have been a lot of them here. that is the most amazing amazing lack of honesty, and integrity that i've seen so far. look at your own article, to say that i never said no one died. in wars, people die. is that difficult to understand. maybe that is why you are back here

and he said neither. he said the biggest thing you did for israel was breaking up and terminating the horrible, one-sided catastrophic deal that was made by president obama. >> i said bob craft, which is bigger, more important to the jewish people and he said neither. what you did by terminating the iran nuclear deal is bigger than both. >> and then i asked charley kushner. what's bigger? for the jewish people? giving the embassy to jerusalem that becomes the capitol of israel? what's bigger? that or the golan heights? he said the biggest thing you did is ending the iran nuclear catastrophe. i think that's true. i think that's true. >>> ever since the hois started moving forward with the impeachment inquiry, there's been an effort -- neverminds house democrats pass said nearly 400 bills before the impeachment started, and big ones, legislation for gun safety and climate change. the democratic houses has passed a bunch more of important legislation, including a bill to restore the voting rights act, which

said, okay, don't we have to admit it, and carter said, what are you going to ask me to do if they storm the embassy as they did in february, but this time they don't leave and take our diplomats as hostage. >> we will hear from president carter in his 1980 state of the union address. and now jim in churchland, maryland. go ahead. >> caller: good morning, c-span and good morning to the two guests. interesting chapter that you are discussing here, but to get to root of the problem, one has to go back to the beginning of the book, and the beginning of the history of the country, and we are first foreign war that was fought was called the barbary wars, and it was a war on the religion of islam, and it is not a war on the radical extremists like you are talking about here in iran, and this is something that jefferson and adams addressed to congress on, and addressed the ruthfulness and the savagery that was taking place on our merchant ships over there in the mediterranean and they quoted from the ambassador to tripoli and asked why are you being so savage against us? why are you asking for

i said, yeah. she said, remember when you were a kid and they desegregated the adjacent neighborhood and sold a home, a real estate guy sold a home to an african-american couple, and people were protesting at night, it was in the summer, i told you not to go down there, you went down and got arrested by police were standing on the porch with the black couple? i said, yeah, i remember that. she said, remember when you had a country club job, but wanted to work at the city pool and be the only white employee in the projects? yeah, mom. she said, remember when you had that good job at a law firm and you became a public defender because the city was occupied? i said, yeah, what is the point? she said, let me get this straight, the first african-american man in history who has the chance to be president offered you to work for him and you told him no? [laughter] mr. biden: dammit all, mom. true story. [applause] mr. biden: best decision my mother ever made for me. the point was this. we sit down and dis