new reporting on how influential vladmir putin may have been thinking about ukraine. that and more when 360 continues. drivers just wont put their phones down. we need a solution. introducing... smartdogs. the first dogs trained to train humans. stopping drivers from: liking. selfie-ing. and whatever this is. available to the public... never. smartdogs are not the answer. but geico has a simple tip. turn on "do not disturb while driving" mode. brought to you by geico. we're portuguese? i thought we were hungarian. can you tell me that story again? behind every question is a story waiting to be discovered. this holiday, start the journey with a dna kit from ancestry. ♪ ♪ everything your trip needs, for everyone you love. expedia. for everyone you love. a president who abuses power. and obstructs justice. the impeachment of donald j. trump. he was supposed to protect our constitution. not trample on it by asking foreign countries to undermine our democracy for his personal political gain. trump broke his oath to america. members of the house and senate must now do t

vladmir putin had one goal. divide and conquer undermine the integrity of the great american election system and that he sure did. >> i brought a hat too, a russian hat. i mean, if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. >> tried to hack into an affect a lech. >> chris, chris -- >> do you deny that. >> russia hacked our election. >> donald trump would not be president today if it not for the assist he received from the kremlin. >> the russians were successful. >> they accomplished what think set out to do. trish: who needs russian influence when vladmir putin has hillary clinton, adam schiff, obama's intel team and cnn doing the whole job for them, right? yes, we are a victim of foreign influence. putin stirred the pot and the democrats and mainstream media, if he them for it hook, line, sinker. something even former ukraine ambassador at mitted in her closed-door testimony. as for a call with the ukrainian president they're trying to attempt to pin this entire people peach on. watch nancy pelosi try to spin her narrative

bases offer a treasure-trove of possible intelligence for vladmir putin's navy. >> they will be looking for the schedule of ships entering and levering the port. trying to monitor as much add communications as possible. they would be trying to monitor underwater developments if they can track submarines. >> reporter: russian vessels have been spying on under see internet cables. >> in future conflict or crisis they can attack or destroy it or tamper with it. >> reporter: despite the dazzling unveilings of weapon, putin's military hasn't been hitting on all cylin derders. in august during what u.s. officials believe was the testing of a secret nuclear powered missile, a mysterious explosion occurred killing five. this summer 14 crew members were killed. tragic examples of the russian president over extending his milita military. >> there's certain poarts that are formidable but they push the entire military so those parts that might be weaker or older might be subject to accidents. >> reporter: despite the recklessness, the accidents, the set backs, we should not expect any of this to de

i asked her whether russia's president vladmir putin was correct when he said that the advance put russia in a class of its own. ina sense, in a sense, he is. the united states and other countries have been very far behind in this technology. we have been focused on counterterrorism in the past two decades and china, as your introduction noted, as well as russia have been developing this kind of technology, so it is something that the united states has started to make some advances on, we are currently investing in hypersonic strike, but we are not as far along, as the russians a p pa re ntly far along, as the russians apparently are. if the us feels compelled to respond, i we now on the cusp of 2020, on the cusp of a new arms race? i don't know that it is an arms race, but it has been a one—sided as is an arms race, but it has been a as the united states has not been focusing on this. there are problems and we need to keep it in perspective. whether it is market 27 oi’ perspective. whether it is market 27 or mock 20, they can do a lot of damage, and we need to be ready for that, but

i asked her whether russia's president vladmir putin was correct when he said that the advance put russia in a class of its own. in a sense he is. the united states and other countries have been very far behind in this technology. we have been focused on counterterrorism the last two decades. and china, as your introduction noted, as well as russia, have been developing this kind of technology. so it's something the united states have started to make some advances on. we are currently investing in hypersonic strike but we are not as far along as the russians apparently are. if the us feels compelled to respond, are we now, on the cusp of 2020, on the cusp of a new arms race? i don't know that it's an arms race but if it is an arms race, as i mentioned before, it's been a one—sided one as the united states has not been focusing on this. there are problems with this. we need to keep it in perspective, whether it's mach 27, as putin said today, or mach 20, that can do a lot of damage and we need to be ready for that. but the concern is that these weapons are highly manoeuvrable, they're ve

no less vladmir putin said that there are still avenues open to appeal the decision to work around the baton to discuss it further. those also a question to start the press conference of just over 2 hours ago about a very hot topic today and that is global warming climate change and pointed out that russia is especially. by the issue because it is warming at an average of 2 and a half times the global average that entire cities that have built in permafrost are a threat and let me putin said that action must be taken we all know the of the live causes a tally whether it's just human activity whether it's you know geographical geological astronomical events that are. promoting climate change and nevertheless action must be taken but there was also a question about. the divide near putin saying that he doesn't see any chance of trump actually being impeached he says that the underlying causes for impeachment are completely made up it is a political spat between 2 factions of the democrats lost the election and the republicans who won it and this is the democrats trying to try to get thei

vladmir putin 56%. bloomberg, 47. warren, 53. sanders 49. they're all bunched up, biden seems to still besides the hundreder biden news, stumbles in his campaign, nationally he seems relatively strong. >> relatively strong. remember hillary at this time would have been more in the 40s. we go back, gore would be stronger. no question biden remains front-runner. he hasn't expanded his base. hasn't lost it. old time democrats have trust in him. african-american voters say he was obama's vice president. they don't care what they hear. they trust him. they're sticking with him. ed: what do you make as a last question, about hypothetical matchups. these are so far up from a general election they don't matter but in some of these democrats trailing democrats in hypothetical matchups even as his job approval we noted is going up and seems to get the upper hand in the impeachment battle? >> i think it is early to look at those questions. if you look at midwestern states, president seems to be doing very well on electoral college basis. i think it is

. >> this idea vladmir putin buying facebook ads is an attack on democracy. what is undermining us having former intelligence chief like clapper and brennan go on television pretend they have secret interview and imply the president is a manchurian candidate. barry goldwater had john burch society expelled from the conservative movement suggesting eisenhower was a communist, that was ludicrous. we're seeing it all over again. it is collective amnesia and sick to give it a platform. liz: i want to point out, steele dossier according to doj-ig full of exaggerations that steele was misleading. multiple layers of hearsay on hearsay, taken? jest, sources undercourting. christopher, thank you. come back. >> thank you. liz: what historians now know that president trump is accomplishing more than any other president in recent memory. it could change the country in a big way. the story next. >> legal historians say no president in recent memory has done more to change the u.s. judicial system then trump. let's bring an author and conservative commentator kristen tate,

there's a new report that says vladmir putin may be responsible for the president's ukraine obsession. the president believes wa he believes in the president's own words because putin told me. it has been that kind of week. the kind of week that sees a president impeached for the only third time ever.

russian president vladmir putin says u.s. president donald trump's impeachment is farfetched and predicts the u.s. senate will reject it. that is president trump retweet what putin said about him. at the same time, white house threatened to veto the big spending bill, which would avoid a government shutdown unless democrats dropped a provision that would have said the president must release any funding that congress approves, military aid for ukraine. i know there were separation of power issues there, congress dictating what the president must do or not do but does president trump still believe that it was ukraine, not russia, that interfered in the sift set of election? >> chris it doesn't have to be either/or can be both. that was once again miserable reporting by "washington post." we requested $250 million in aid to ukraine. if congress did their job, completed spending bill by september 30th we would have it then. it was delayed for three months because of sham impeachment. they're the ones delaying aid to ukraine. what

mike: meanwhile russian president vladmir putin is boasting about a new hyper son son -- hypersonic weapon that can evade american defense systems. do you believe the hype. >> i would take that very seriously. the president wants to embrace, president putin and president xi of china. this is ridiculous. they are enemies of the united states. they are trying to bring down our system of government. we have to take their threats seriously and protect our national interests. mike: there are public reports to suggest that the united states is behind the russians in the hopes to deploy our hypersonic system by 2020, which some say is optimistic. do you find that troubling, sir? >> what the united states should be in leadership is to try to calm things down globally. we are the leader of the free world. it is in our interests to not only enga in arms agreements with russia but expand them. not only have a non-proliferation policy but a policy that will reduce the amount of arms around the world, particularly nuclear weapons. so it is concerning that our intermediate arms agreement, inf, the presi

. >> i'm no fan of vladmir putin. i think he is one of the chief enemies of the united states. i'm also no fan of terrorism. any chance we can share intel that may thwart a terrorist attack that is right thing to do. obviously hope russia would do it if they encounter something similar happens here. you can hate terrorism and terrorism risk at the same time you dislike russia but at the same time we can't blind ourselves to the fact that rush is trying to rebuild the soviet union and for instance in syria, is creating conditions for terrorists to really thrive again. you can cooperate on one hand, be competitors on the other. ashley: as we head into the new year, congressman, are you happy with the way the trump administration handled it is foreign policy? has he set the right tone? >> generally, yeah. there is lot of areas where i would do slightly different. i would push back against russia more verbally, in terms of actual action the administration has been far better than the prior administration, lethal weapons to ukraine, et cetera. continuing to fight china on the trade