it was a massive move in the 30 yada yada, out of risk today. earlier on, what cause the immediate move in a 30-year, the pmi that came out. the initial data for february. the yellow line is the composite. the white line is services, which went into contraction. luckily for the economy, we are still in expansion. the composite for the first time in many months, if not years, is in contraction territory. that servicea: component had an effect on the 30-year. take a look at the positioning on that. we are keeping our eyes on the yield. at a record low now. there are the bearish positions on the 30-year easing up. this has been surprisingly volatile in recent months. we have seen some big turns in the yield here. let's check in with luke kawa who was writing about this this the exceptionalism of u.s. treasuries. tell us what you are seeing here. towhat's been interesting watch, we know u.s. stock have been doing great, the u.s. dollar has been doing great relative to global currencies. but it is surprising in an environment where u.s. data, up unti

yada. "the wall street journal" has a section called mansions, the mansion section and they took a deep dive over the weekend in the candidates' houses on the democratic side. really interesting. pete buttigieg, how much did he pay for his house and he's it worth? he paid 125 in 2009 and it is now estimated at current value is $230,000. >> nice little profit. >> that is double the median price of homes in that area. give you an idea of who is double what. next up, bernie sanders. he and his wife brought their property in burlington, vermont, for $405,000 in 2009. it is now valued at $439,000. of the candidates we will go through, bernie sanders is the only one of the top five here who has a house almost exactly the same value as the median typical home in his area. everyone else is doing a lot better than their neighbors. elizabeth warren and her husband bought their cambridge, massachusetts, victorian for $447,000 in 1995. it is now worth $4 million. a beautiful home there. pretty nice pic

yada, yada. and he freaks out and has this like look of fear in his eye. >> a short time later, her phone rang. it was dan calling from his jail cell. the call recorded by police. >> what did you do? >> i helped sam cover some stuff up and helped him get some drugs. that's it. i didn't murder anybody. >> babe, why on earth would you try and cover for him? >> because we needed the money. >> no. we never need money. we need to be good people and just have each other. >> i'm sorry. >> rachel revealed she had new information for detectives. >> my mom's working on canceling all the wedding plans now. and i just talked to tim, and i need to make a phone call to the detectives now. >> why? >> because tim's involved. >> because of what? >> or -- i need to call the detective first because i need to call him and let him know before they catch me on this recording device because it looks like i'm not trying to tell them right away. tim says he has evidence with him or he knew where it was or something. >> w

yada yada, he was basically now still vying for first with pete buttigieg. what does that tell but the enduring strength of bernie sanders in this primary going into new hampshire where did he well last cycle? are you the democrat that can get behind him if he's the nominee? >> well, i get behind him. i have no choice. look at the british labor party. we're like talking about people voting from jail cells. we're talking about not having a border. i mean, come on, people. every day people are out there struggling. >> you were saying you consider bernie sanders for open borders? for people voting? >> he said that we should give people a ticket. all right? i'm saying what he said. if you read are brownstein, $35 trillion in spending, read all of it. of course i would vote for him but i don't want democratic party of the united states to be the labor party of the united kingdom. >> we'll bring back all of our panelists. >> the best bio i've seen in a presidential campaign. she had a very good critique which was that corruption is holding the country back. for so

liz: that is technical term, yadi yada. dave, would you go into big names? or start to go into smaller ecosystem type of names, suppliers to apple or perhaps, smaller graphic chips? >> well, i mean certainly this market has been large cap bias to a historic degree. it is worth looking down into the mid-cap, small-cap growth boxes. historically those boxes don't tend to do very well. they tend to be overvalued with the hype that surrounds smaller names. at this point in the cycle, in the u.s. you really only one win way, which is the earnings rise. by the way i think this market is looking past 2020 into 2021. if the world holds up, you see earnings growth, at least analysts do of 20% between now and then. that is upward bias in the market i think. if you believe there is an economic recovery afoot, you know, barring the coronavirus, then, yeah you want to move down the cap spectrum, whether in the small-cap growth box, or not. i don't know, it had a great year last year. [closing bell rings] liz: david waddle, president of waddell and associates. the dow, to