jeffrey: it is just great. i am so eager to learn from both of you and with both of you, in the spirit of louis brandeis. come, let us reason together. let the learning begin. ed, let us begin with you, because you have this powerful pairing of the two founders you consider the first among the founders, washington and franklin. you note they are labeled first and second in the most famous portrait of the constitutional convention and are often considered foremost by their contemporaries. you developed so many parallels among them, including their shared support for strong central government. the friendship they cultivated during the battles of the french and indian war and their opposition to the stamp acts and during the colonial era and the constitutional convention, you also noted a shared quality in both of their characters. that is their devotion to a roman, almost stoic conception of virtue. both said in different ways that a government cannot succeed without a virtuous people who believe that happiness i

jeffrey: thanks for that. david, and as justin kagan put it, this is not strictly an argument that the left is making about the original understanding of the constitution rated justin kagan said that might be for medication. but after the ratification certainly by the time of the 12th amendment, things switched and we adopted this new understanding so are you hanging your hat, excuse the expression, the justice kevin agape. are you saying that that textual meaning of the word elect very close the power to make sure an independent judgment the canopies constrained or is there rasomething beyond that argument at thehe core of yours. david: certainly we can start with that. in our brief, which is founded on the principle of the declaration of independence. it was surely originalist. there are lots of important issues in this case but we wanted to give the court the most solid and explanation of the original meeting. it's not only the original meeting of the philadelphia convention convention, but the debates afte

jeffrey. there's a whole network of people. there's so much more to this than we thought and it doesn't stop with jeffrey's death. >> ahead, in her first network tv interview, alleged epstein survivor shares why she believes others should face justice. you're watching cbs this morning. u're watching "cbs this morning". try olay skin care. just one jar of micro-sculpting cream has the hydrating power of 5 jars of a prestige cream, which helps plump skin cells and visibly smooth wrinkles. while new olay retinol24... provides visibly smoother, brighter skin. for dramatic skincare results, try olay. and now receive 25% off your purchase at olay.com brand power. helping you buy better. are your asthma treatments just not enough? then see what could open up for you with fasenra. it is not a steroid or inhaler. it is not a rescue medicine or for other eosinophilic conditions. it's an add-on injection for people 12 and up with asthma driven by eosinophils. nearly 7 out of 10 adults with asthma may hav

that is what jeffrey was talking about. they care about vision, they care about, they care much less about experience than a president's judgment. well of course, lincoln had both. many are great presidents, that's what they had. >> jeffrey, i will turn to you for this. why has wilson dropped so many points? >> his views on race. a president who resegregate of the federal government is not a president who can speak to our time. that is one important reason for progressives now questioning wilson. at the same time, conservatives and libertarians are questioning wilson. george will was here two years ago, he is coming back next, i think it is next wednesday, june 20th to talk about his new book. george will says the defining question for whether you are conservative today is who you would have voted for in the election of 1912. conservatives had voted for tapped and anyone who voted for wilson or roosevelt is a progressive. george will traces to woodrow wilson. the questioning of the madisonian separation of power, the birth

jeffrey: many thanks to that. there is an important case that said the domestic entities cannot be forced to take the pledge, but that the core of the government case is they are foreign affiliates, care india, for example, lacks those rights and should not be able to claim them. lawyer forument, the the petitioner's, mr. david there are two violations of the first amendment rights in the -- of the u.s. respondents. he said the speech compulsion wasn't tribute at to them, when kenya takes the pledge its actions are to beaded to care u.s., and the second is the speech restriction that prohibits the u.s. entity from even contradicting the pledge on its own time and time, quoting chief justice robert's original 2013 opinion in the u.s. id case, making it possible for care u.s. to disavow the message without doublespeak, and quoting from chief justice roberts's opinion. was appealing to the cheap, saying this is covered by a decision you wrote in 2013, which was 6-2. justice kagan was recused, as she is in this one. t

as jeffrey was saying. i do not know when this became true, but maybe it was always true, that the president is the most well-known person in america. maybe muhammad ali was more well known. they had babe ruth and herbert hoover. in general, he is the one who represents america in some way. both internally and externally. i do not see how you cannot say that donald trump is not the most well-known person in america. that makes it different even from the english system, which is parliamentary. the heads of parties. theresa may is not prime minister. who is the next guy? he might last for a few months. iddene a celebrity-r country anyway. the president is a celebrity. i know there are a lot of people who must read ashton kutcher's tweets but not as many as donald trump's. >> that's a really good question. is not just because americans like to rate things. it's because presidents care about ratings. presidents care about something else. they care about being remembered. stories help that. presidents, i think,

jeffrey roberts go ahead jeff show everybody here this is exactly the photograph we're talking about. my goodness and here he has the props even for the program he had no idea it was going to ask is going to that's exactly it just to tell my office at the university i'm going to get must mean that it's a matter. yeah so are we russians who are thinking why you describe in russia now is certainly. that the country or the west then the soviet union i will war well of course style we have a pluralistic edge if you through history you know right now. in russia you can hear and you can read any kind of stuff about the war but to from an apple down to you know stalinist revisionist you can get everything that makes us different from the west now well just one narrative seems to be related in the last year and my explanation is that the problem is with the new west and i go with you because it's impossible that the same sad story would suddenly happen in separate independent countries that you would count that sexual for marshall corner removed from prague and the czechs say it was just the

. >> here's jeffrey. >> stephen: hey! jeffrey! good to see you. >> good to see you. >> do you want to see how we are so good together in quarantine. a stra for you. a stra for me. we're good. >> stephen: though, technically, i think the straws are supposed to be six feet long. >> this is good! that's good! yeah, that's really good. >> it's good, isn't it? >> stephen: now, this is a time of great anxiety for a lot of people. what do you do? what qawm calms you down? >> what do we do that calms us down? i think anything that makes you feel normal calms me down. like, we get in the car and we drive to the beach and listen to a podcast, you know. just take a ride or-- i don't know. >> watch a movie. >> watch a movie. like normal things. work during the day. i cook-- i cook breakfast-- i had no idea what this was going to be. fortunately, i like to cook. >> stephen: one of my favorite things about the hoe show, jeffrey, is when ina sends you on chores. what shores is she sending you to do now? >> now i can't. now i can't go out. >> tha

jeffrey: you have taken madison. we need him back. there is an amazing moment in the civil war exhibit when lincoln in 1840 and frederick douglass discover madison's notes being published. those are so important that they convince lincoln that we the people of the united states as a whole are sovereign and secession as constitutional. they persuade frederick douglass to change his conception of himself as a citizen. so what an amazing thrill and necessity it would be for all of us to talk to madison and find out exactly what went on. you have to invite jefferson to see if you can have a better dinner party. also to talk about music and science with him. just channel his genius and conversation, which was supposed to be so incredibly sparkling. i love the question. there are so many. i would like so much to meet harry truman who just seemed so authentic, staying up nights reading. burning a hole in the pillow because he was determined to teach himself about the ancient greeks and rome. learning about the american century from this stro

jeffrey roberts go ahead jeff you know everybody here this is exactly the photograph are talking about i'm. my goodness and here he has the props even for the program he had no idea it was going to pass there's going to be that's exactly it is still my office at the university so i'm going to mean that's a matter. yeah so are we russians who are thinking why you describe in russia now is certainly. that the country or the west then the soviet union i will war well of course style we have a pluralistic educator history you know right now in russia you can hear and you can read any kind of stuff about their war what you from and apple do you know if stalinist revisionist you can get everything. and that makes us different from the west now where just one narrative seems to be made in the last year and my explanation is that the problem is with the new west and i go with you because it's impossible that the same sad story would suddenly happen in separate independent countries that you would count that sexual for marshal cohen you removed from prague and the czech say it was just the loca

as jeffrey was saying. and i would say, i don't know when this became true, but maybe it was always true. the president is the most well-known person in america. now maybe muhammad ali was more well-known, or big roof and hurt who were babe roofs, but generally he is the one who represents america in some way. both internally and externally that. i don't see how you could not say that donald trump is not the most well-known person in america. and that makes us different from even the english system. it's parliamentary its heads a party, theresa may is not prime minister, who is the next guy. he might last for the next couple of months. but we are destin, and we are a celebrity ridden country anyway. i mean i know there are a lot of people, who must read ashton kutcher's tweet, but maybe not as many as donald trump. >> i think again that's a really good question, i think it's not just because americans like to rate things, and great things but it's because presidents care about ratings. president care about

here we go again this is almost like our tradition with our calling jeffrey we do this every single year commemorating victory in europe over fascism and for every single year that we do it we find ourselves in more and more in a revisionist mode here i mean as i understand as we're sitting down doing our chat right now. is it facebook has banned a colorized version of the of the serbian banner over europe and the very very iconic one of showing victory in europe and you know i've searched around it's a true story i mean what in the world is going on here the black and white version seems to be acceptable the color when not are there different meanings or is this a revision and sell and why in the world would anyone want to deny that iconic photograph it's like the sailor kissing the young lady on times square in victory over japan i mean what is going on here go ahead well i don't know which exactly of which we're acting exactly. we mean here more likely it's there i want to image or west soviet soldier would you not there had been or were riots which was basically the central issue of

jeffrey: thank you for that. the question of consequences is one that the court dealt with recently in the ramos case, which came up several times. ramos decided a few weeks ago, held that there might have to be many cases retried because of the incorporation of a previously unincorporated criminal procedure requirement, and the court was willing to take that risk. robert, as you listen to the argument -- listened to the argument, what did you hear the eight where what w they giving to those particle considerations? seemed torsuch suggest that if congress never did in fact turn over jurisdiction to the states, would we have to take the consequences and let the -- fall? other justices were more pragmatic. tell us about the competing approaches is within the justices on whether the practical effects should matter. robert: so, i just want to be clear on this because there has thisthis perception anin case that ok, you have the law, the law is not really good so we are appointed to the consequences to say let's ignor

jeffrey thanks for coming back on before i even get to coronavirus actually want to talk about terrorism given you've defended people unjustly accused of terrorism but let's go to the cia which theoretically protects us from terrorism just take us through the interpol red notice this week on the case of a child jake killing in this country of a british subject by an alleged cia spy well the tragic is certainly the word for it was a 19 year old boy on a bike and a large american car came at him almost wrong side of the road and he was killed knocked over and died in agony made of that night is parents see just the drive through the run and sucralose was a cia wife probably operative in the times and she was very quickly taken out of the country by. her american boss probably by her husband she's guilty she's admitted choose driving on the wrong side of the globe terrible accident groups but if the rule of law has any meaning she should be put be poor judge she's charged with causing death by dangerous driving. if the call to satisfy that it was an accident then it's like prelude she will

sanjay gupta and jeffrey toobin. we'll see what dr. bright says. it will be interesting because he was there in the early stages of the response in the pandemic. sanjay, another bit of breaking news overnight. that's wisconsin where the state supreme court struck down the stay-at-home orders that were in place by the governor and it resulted in this. scenes at bars across the state where clearly they're not social distancing or wearing masks. you can't make a toast like that to be social distanced. when you see these pictures, what are your concerns? >> this is obviously concerning. anybody who has been following the story along now for the last few months recognizes that a contagious virus is still out there. it's in the environment. people cluster together like that, the chances of that virus continuing to spread and developing these clusters is really concerning. i mean, that is some of what we saw a few months ago. i think people's memories are short. in some ways, this doesn't surprise me. you get the sense that there's been a real impatience

so he probably would have been my third. >> jeffrey? >> you've taken madison, at the constitution center. we need him back. ask him quite a few questions. there's this amazing moment in the civil war exhibit when lincoln in 1840 and fred drying douglass discovered madison's notes being published. they are so important they convince lincoln twe people of the u.p.s. whole and sovereign and secession is unconstitutional and persuade free district douglass when he saw madison said there could be no position of property and men. what an amazing thrill and necessity for all of us to talk to madison to find out what went on. you have to invite jefferson to see if could you have a better dinner party but also to talk about music and science and to just channel his genius and his conversation which was supposed to be so incredibly sparkling. and then i would -- i love the question, there's so many but i think i would like so much to meet harry truman who just seemed authentic, spending up nights reading, so determined to teach himself about the

city of boston we have jeffrey seglins a senior lecturer in public policy at harvard kennedy school is also the author of the right thing conscience profit and personal responsibility in today's business in india's capital new delhi we have an earwig student at lady shriram college at the university of delhi and part of its students' union she started a petition to have a reevaluation of exam papers at college from portland oregon in the united states ryan carson an online learning specialist and founder of the online tech school treehouse welcome to you all jeffrey i'll begin with you if i may if you were offered a place to start the university this year would you go for it in the current circumstances . it depends i mean it depends on what how the said it would be obviously we couldn't right now with what we know we couldn't have classes like we had them last year in prison and they're too close to $200.00 to too much proximity to one another so the conditions would have to change. but i wouldn't necessarily refuse to return but would that make you nervous you'd want to be part of a

my husband jeffrey is away. why don't you come over. >> reporter: she has inspired me and, yes, even become a member of taylor swift's squad. given how much you enjoy your life and tried to make it simple, is it strange to you still you're such a celebrity? >> i don't get it. i was walking down madison avenue and a woman in a big fur coat and she said, darling, i just love your cookbooks. a block later a truck driver pulled over and said, hey, babe, love your show. i thought, that's what it is. that's -- food is everything. it's everybody. ♪ >> you want to take a ride to the beach? >> reporter: oh, gosh. it just keeps getting better. >> this is what we do here. ♪ >> reporter: i love being out here. >> isn't it great? there's jeffrey walking. ♪ >> wow. it's just another day at the >> reporter: not bad. >> not a bad life, right? >> reporter: i could get used to this. >> it was a good day at the office. my big thanks to ina for that ride and for opening her home to us that day. >>> the new season of "cook lik

rosen, from jeffrey michael gerhardt, and robert strauss. [applause] >> welcome to the national constitution center. this is such a happy day to celebrate the great collaboration between national constitution center and c-span! [applause] c-span has an inspiring, nonpartisan mission to bring unfiltered information about the u.s. government to american citizens, and that coincides with the national constitution center mission, which i want you all to recite along with me to inspire our guests and c-span viewers. [laughter] the national constitution center is the only institution in america chartered by congress to disseminate information about the u.s. constitution on a nonpartisan basis! beautiful, that was so well done. [applause] i was thrilled when my friend and colleague, susan swain, head of c-span, came a few weeks ago, about three weeks ago, and said we have this great book on the presidents, less launch it at the national constitution center. we are here to do it and it is an honor to welcome back to the national constitution center,

demon here in moscow you know dma here we go again this is almost like our tradition with our calling jeffrey we do this every single year commemorating victory in europe over fascism and for every single year that we do it we find ourselves in more and more in a revisionist moment here i mean as i understand as we're sitting down doing our chat right now is that facebook has banned a colorized version of the of the soviet banner over europe and the very very iconic one of showing victory in europe and you know i've searched around it's a true story i mean what in the world is going on here the black and white version seems to be acceptable the color when not are there different meanings or is this a revisionist cell and why in the world would anyone want to deny that iconic photographs it's like the sailor kissing the young lady on times square in victory over japan i mean what is going on here go ahead well i don't know which exactly of which we're acting exactly. we mean here more likely it's that i want to image or west soviet soldier which are not their advantage or rights which was basi

demon here in moscow you know dma here we go again this is almost like our tradition with our calling jeffrey we do this every single year commemorating victory in europe over fascism and for every single year that we do it we find ourselves in more and more in a revisionist mode here i mean as i understand as we're sitting down doing our chat right now is it facebook has. and a colorized version of the of the soviet banner over europe the very very iconic one of showing victory in europe and you know i've searched around it's a true story meaning what in the world is going on here the black and white version seems to be acceptable the color when not are there different meanings or is this a revision and sell and why in the world would anyone want to deny that iconic photograph it's like the sailor kissing the young lady on times square in victory over japan i mean what is going on here go ahead well i don't know which exactly of which we're acting exactly. we mean here more likely it's their image or west obvious old europe which are not their advantage or rights which was basically the cent

jeffrey, are you as worried about this? unlike say the financial crisis of a decade or so ago when the europeans in part were blaming the southern europeans, that their behaviour, as eunice was saying, that they were somehow sinners, they had not been good europeans and saved, they'd spent and all the rest of it. the reality of this is it is nothing to do with whether you are a good or a bad country, everybody gets this. you are a victim of this virus and therefore, that argument that some of the northern european countries were using then, ought to be a lot weaker this time, didn't it? i think that what worries me and what scares me more than the virus itself is the political virus that seems to have taken hold in the world that makes it impossible... the agendas of different countries and different leaders have so divided the world at a time when the world needs to come together. it is notjust the european union, where is the united nations in this? look at the world health organization and the politicisation of it by pre

here we go again this is almost like our tradition with our calling jeffrey we do this every single year commemorating victory in europe over fascism and for every single year that we do it we find ourselves in more and more in a revisionist mode here i mean as i understand as we're sitting down doing our chat right now is that facebook has banned a colorized version of the of the soviet banner over europe on the very very iconic one of showing victory in europe and you know i've searched around it's a true story i mean what in the world is going on here the black and white version seems to be except for the color one. not are there different meanings or is this a revision and sell and why in the world would anyone want to deny that iconic photographs it's like the sailor kissing the young lady on times square in victory over japan i mean what is going on here. well i don't know which exactly of which we're acting exactly. we mean here more likely it's their image or west soviet soldier which are not their advantage or rights which was basically the central power of that issue of central

immediately following the live supreme court session, joined jeffrey rosen of the national constitution center leading a live discussion with scholars. >> today the house revealed its plan, the covid for bill. it's big and bold, just what america needs. our problems are large, they are enormous. they are on the health from the economic front and it will take big, bold, action to help the american people. and so i am supportive of the plan that speaker pelosi has put together. the bottom line is very, very simple. what is it going to take for mitch mcconnell to wake up and see that the american people need help and need it now. what is it going to take for him to understand there are miles and miles of lines trying to get food. the first time people who have always fed their families are trying to get food to feed their kids. for the first time, people who never worried about paying the mortgage or paying the rent are worried they will be kicked out of their homes. for the first time, we have a healthcare crisis that every one of us is afraid that we might come down with an illness we st

lord jeffrey welcome back sara you were of course a contributor at c.n.n. and you've been around a long time now how does a confrontation we just saw on squawk box right. man i've seen i've seen worse than that but that was that was just not good and you know i have a column that's going to come out at news busters tomorrow and andrew ross sorkin talks in there about the 100000 deaths you know what they're not talking about apparently he is not talking about it what the media is not talking about they're not talking about all their predictions back in march that millions of americans were going to die millions i mean i've gone back and looked it up anywhere from 500-0022 point 2000000 the new york times the washington post c.n.n. ran a story on this on and on and on they went well now it's hit the 100000 mark which suffice to say i mean it's horrific but is it 2200000 no but they're not going to mention that they just do you know down the memory hole yeah and they've been waiting it seems to me for this 100000 plateaus so they could now blame it on trump of

. >> joining me now cnn chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin and elie honig. jeff, you think the most important moment during questioning was straight off the top why. >> because chief justice roberts who will be a swing vote here, he seemed to recognize that the president could not be completely immune from any sort of scrutiny from congress or in the second case from a subpoena from the new york city -- the manhattan district attorney. but the question is what is the standard? what kind of subpoenas are allowed? can the congress, can the district attorney go into anything or what are the limits and that balance of rejecting the absolute claim from the -- from the president's lawyers, but not giving carte blanche to the prosecutors, that is the balance i think they'll try to strike here. >> does one case impact the other, are the outcomes int intertwined. >> there is a relationship. but the cases are about much more than donald trump's tax returns. this is a constitutional balance of powers showdown and we heard it today. is the president meaningfully account

jeffrey wright is here now. looking forward to this, not only to talk to you, which i like, but i like that you're doing something great, and i know there are people like you who in all sorts of ways, local, big, small, whatever you can do, people are doing things. so thank you for doing that. tell us what you're up to. >> well, i appreciate it, ari. i've got to correct you, though. we're serving all 11 fdny and ems stations in brooklyn, and we're up to 11 medical facilities as well. ten in brooklyn, one in lower manhattan. and that's through a circle of now over 40 restaurants. and as you said, started with two. and it was really a very simple idea. our health care workers, our frontline folks need to eat in the midst of all of this. of course restaurants in our neighborhood have been shutting down. this was in late march. and so there was a void to fill. so there is a restaurant here called brooklyn moon owned by a very good friend of mine for 20 years in the neighborhood named michael thompson. been in busine

oh, my god [ laughter ] jeffrey, jeffrey, jeffrey, jeffrey. [ laughter ] first of all, cheers >> cheers. >> seth: i have so enjoyed our afternoon so far >> so great! >> seth: and i want to say, i know that tomorrow is your birthday >> oh, it is >> seth: and so i actually prepared something special for you. >> uh-oh >> seth: and i'm going to be right back to surprise you >> does it involve cocktails >> seth: no. >> good. >> seth: yeah. you're actually okay this time >> okay. uh-oh. what is this going to be >> seth: so i used your recipe, and made you - [ laughter ] a hot pink butter cake [ laughter ] and now i'm going to put the icing on >> this is literally the icing on the cake? >> seth: yeah. i'm going to write -- i'm going to write "ina. >> okay. i want see this. [ laughter ] >> seth: oh, my god! [ laughter ] >> can i help you? >> seth: yeah. >> okay. >> seth: why, what would you do? >> i've got my own here. >> seth: what would you do >> i'm going write "seth" on it. i want to see "ina" on the top of that. >> seth: all right, hold on. wait, hold on. here, i'm going to do it on the --

branwen jeffreys, bbc news. ministers insist they will be led by the science when making decisions — so what does the science say about how children are affected? lauren moss explains. we have only known about covid—i9 for under six months and the science community is still learning about it. one of the big questions to a nswer it. one of the big questions to answer is how our children affected. put simply, children seem to catch coronavirus as much as anyone else, and a survey by the office for national statistics published this week suggests that one in 400 people in england has coronavirus and that children are alsojust in england has coronavirus and that children are also just as likely to test positive as adults. but they don't appear to develop symptoms which are a serious or be as vulnerable to it. in terms of the respiratory illness in adults we have not seen this in children which of course is great news, and the cases we have had in oxford where we have found coronavirus, it seems to have found cor

jeffrey wright, i didn't think i could love you more but now i do. thank you for coming on, brother. good luck with the efforts. >> i appreciate it brother. keep well. >> we'll be right back. the new . ...gabriel rules. after a hard day on the job... ...he's still working hard making sure a family tradition... ...stays a tradition. get the brand-new iphone se for less than a hundred bucks when you switch to metro. and right now, get four lines of unlimited for just twenty-five bucks each. metro. it's all gabriel needs to rule his day. did yocould be signs that syour digestive systemwn isn't working at its best? taking metamucil every day can help. metamucil supports your daily digestive health using a special plant-based fiber called psyllium. psyllium works by forming a gel in your digestive system to trap and remove the waste that weighs you down. metamucil's gelling action also helps to lower cholesterol and slows sugar absorption to promote healthy blood sugar levels. so, start feeling lighter and more energetic... by taking metamucil every day.

branwen jeffreys, bbc news. it was 75 years ago this month that the second world war came to an end in europe. the surrender document signed by germany was drafted not by senior diplomats or ministers but by an officer in the british army who was by training an actor and theatre manager. few people, including his own daughters, realised the role that he played on ve day, as my colleague reeta chakra barti explains. meetjohn counsell, the british army colonel who played a pivotal role in ending world war ii. an actor and theatre manager, in 1940 he was called up into the theatre of war. but army life, his twin daughters told me, wasn't for him. what sort of soldier was he? inept, i think the word would be. his battery commander said that he was the worst soldier he had ever come across. jenny and eizabeth were small children at the time. theirfather, despite being a poor soldier, was a good writer, and was propelled into ghost writing official reports for the allied commander general eisenhower. newsreel: nazism

joining us now chief legal analyst jeffrey tubin. he's the author of true crimes and misdemeanors, the investigation of donald trump which comes out august 4th. no doubt you're writing a new postscript based on the michael flynn news. the question i have, apparently martin savidge reports that police have this videotape that shows arbery jogging. they can see it with their own eyes. they've had the tape for two months. it wasn't until it was publicly released that there was enough pressure to press these charges. what does that tell you? >> well, i mean, the question is whether they cared enough about the murder of a black man, apparently by two white people until there was public pressure, until there was a horrific video. i mean, the racial animus, the racial backdrop to this case is so strong and so disturbing and yes, it is good that this case has been brought, but the fact that it wasn't brought until there was public pressure and outrage is a cause for concern. if it's a successful prosecution, perhaps all's well that ends well

jeffrey, welcome to "prime time." >> thanks, chris. glad to be here. i'm glad to see you on the better side of this thing, too. and i hope you're the same for your family as well. >> thank you so much. i'm one of the lucky ones. let's talk about those who need help. what are you doing? how does it work? how can we get a piece of the action? >> this thing started simply, i was really just trying to help out a couple friends of mine who are restaurant owners here in brooklyn. the brooklyn moon in the community for 25 years. i have lived here 20 years. he wasn't so delivery oriented. we went on lock down and he tried to convert to delivery mode. i'll help you out and boost you on social media and make it known. and so i did. called him back the next day after we went on lock down. he said i have five orders today. that's not going to work. we caught wind another friend has a place over here. my kids and i eat the pizza every day since he's been there. for 15 years. he's a friend as well. he was having folks call in to order pizza on behalf of staff and br

jeffrey: it is now my great pleasure to put on my constitutional reading glasses -- you can tell i am not actually outside because i have ut

netflix has a new documentary coming out about jeffrey epstein and his victims this as the lawyer for delay in maxwell has asked a federal judge to move a lawsuit against her by one of epstein's victims to new mexico raising new questions if maxwell may be hiding out at epstein's ranch correspondent john harvey has the story. there have been a lot of questions and theories about where in the world grain maxwell may be hiding out the 58 year old maxwell jeffrey epstein's former girlfriend is accused of running epstein sex trafficking ring and recruiting dozens of young women who claim they were sexually abused by epstein and some of his rich and powerful friends there have been possible sightings of her in london massachusetts and los angeles but nothing concrete now maxwell's attorney is asking a federal judge to move a civil case brought by one of edge teens accusers against her from new york district court to new mexico where the alleged abuse happened nearly 25 years ago maxwell is moving to get the case dismissed arguing it's past the statute of limitations but the fact that she o

. >> hi, i'm jeffrey rosen, the president of the national constitution center, which is the beautiful building that you see behinds me. it's located in philadelphia in independence mall, right across from independence hall where the constitution was drafted. like c-span, it's a private non prift with an inspiring mission from congress. to december sim nate information about the constitution on a non-partisan basis to increase awarrens and understanding of the constitution among the american people. justice holmes once said of the constitution, it is an experiment as all of life is an experiment. the arguments that you've just heard are technical. the kind that law proimples and journalists and citizens often don't listen to closely but we just had the privilege of hearing them live is -- so our job in the next hour is to unpack them and understand as thoughtfully and as nonpartisan a spirit as possible what the competing arguments are so that ultimately you, c-span watchers and friends from across the country can evaluate the arguments for yourself. i do want you to do some homework a

michael osterholm from the university of minnesota, and columbia university's jeffrey shaman. gentlemen, welcome to "meet the press." dr. osterholm, let me start with you. simple question, are we ready to reopen the economy? >> well, first of all, let me say what do we mean by opening the economy, that's really unclear. we can't stay locked down for 18 months, but at the same time, when you have cases increasing, deaths increasing, health care without adequate protective equipment and we're suddenly going back to what once was our normal lives, that's not a safe place to be. we can't do that and not expect to see a major increase in cases. >> jeffrey shaman, have we squandered the eight weeks in lockdown in that are we either rushing the reopening in that we don't have the testing and tracing program in place yet or have we just squandered the eight weeks? >> we have not used the eight weeks as well as we could have, unfortunately. it would have been benefitted enormously from consistent messaging and a concerted, consolidated plan of attack for actually aggressively and proac

jeffrey: it so great, you're working crafting this script. the insertion of the word male was so central. it showed that for the framers of the 14th amendment, they did not expect it would grant the right to vote because if southern states denied it to any male citizen, then the apportionment in congress would be correspondingly reduced. that made it harder for women's suffrage advocates to argue as they did in the 1870's and 80's that the 14th amendment should be extended to women. you tell the story of people like victoria woodhull, who argued before john bingham, the man who framed the amendment, as having rejected the claim. a very big and important part of the exhibit, you tell about how the right for vote -- the right state-by-state. there were surprisingly a few the granted it, but it really picked up in the 1870's and 1880's. why? elena: at that point particularly in western territories they wanted to encourage women to come. it was a practical reason to attract more people who would be able to give them cause to apply for statehood.

jeffrey ryan mentioned that it took them 10 years to try and refine the way they taught and in that gap the haves and the have nots the gap between the haves and the have nots will widen wonted there are those who just don't have the space to study as well as those who have got a spare room those have a good internet connection that sort of thing there's a big problem that has none. that is a real problem that is the real issue i think the the the the the pressure is there to make sure that people have access both through a laptop and have a steady connection i think one of the things with the flipped classroom is exactly right and even in person colleges have been doing that we've been experimenting with that for many years as well where we have students doing the work on the outside of the class so we actually do the discussion inside the bus so there is that that's a really good model to use i think one of the things though that ends up happening . the had the access to connectivity is really important one of the things that potentially does happen is i know that when we did this and

jeffrey? well, i don't know that my life has changed but i know that a lot of life on the street has changed. construction sites around where i live are starting to come alive, more people on the streets, some of the fast food outlets are opening for take—out, but i think what's really changed is people don't really know what to do. the mixed messages from the prime minister and government... "stay alert", how do you stay alert to a virus you can't see? it's not like bombs being left in packages on the tube. i think this confusing message has forced people to make up their own rules. lyse, how's it been for you? as eunice said, she used the word "lucky". i think we are among the privileged, we have food in ourfridge, we have jobs and work to keep us busy, but i think all of us would embrace the slogan "in it together". when you see that the restrictions have been eased, you think of those who are living in crowded apartments, trying to work at home with children, or really, really desperatel

joining me now cnn's chief political analyst jeffrey tobacco bib. jeffrey, it's been a month of sundays. how are you holding up, sir? >> i'm all right. i've been so proud because there hasn't been a big legal story but i'm so proud to watch cnn the past couple of months and see what a great job you all have done. >> thank you, thank you. and we miss seeing you. so thank you very much. let's talk about this. jeffrey, there's no evidence to back up the president's claims of voter fraud. for someone who constantly tells us how popular he is, the president seems pretty scared of that being tested with free and fair voting. >> well, you know, one of the basic principles of the republican party for the past couple of decades has been to make it harder for people to vote. you know, limit absentee ballots, limit early voting. you know, trying to get, especially african-americans, poor people, people who are more casual voters who don't always turn out, getting them not to vote. so, what happened today with this ridiculous tweet by the president about michig