kirkland is one such paid expert monsanto has relied on. in 2012 months it was very worried about you know toxicity questions arising from research gauge needed someone to help counter these concerns that were persisting with bill hayden wrote in that email i think i was just naive and it clearly did not lead to any policy decision we all have decades of experience in the industry and then a full week reputations to maintain and that means that there is no point in being responding to the influence of one stakeholder over another because those reputations would be destroyed i can say absolutely. categorically this paper was not ghost written we all imports our own sections to the paper there was no input involvement or influence of the review. thinking. well it seems apparent that monsanto actually fears real independent authentic science said itself it feared the i.r. preview when it found an n 2014 this is before down before the classification monsanto says it fears this it says internally that it knew it had vulnerability in epidemiology