one lord said that h52 is emphatically green. - the green option. one lord said that h52 is emphatically green. yes, - the green option. one lord said that h52 is emphatically green. yes, i. h52 is emphatically green. yes, i have heard _ h52 is emphatically green. yes, i have heard him _ h52 is emphatically green. yes, i have heard him say _ h52 is emphatically green. yes, i have heard him say that. - h52 is emphatically green. yes, i have heard him say that. i'm - h52 is emphatically green. yes, i i have heard him say that. i'm afraid it is nonsense. it was never green and now it is even less green than it was before. the ceo of hs2 limited said that he did not know how many services they would run or how many services they would run or how many services they would run or how many passages there would be because of the pandemic, because people have learnt a different way of living, staying closest to home, see more of their family, of living, staying closest to home, see more of theirfamily, their pets, shopping locally, is a know it is even less v

i'm 2035 is this ambitious that said to ourselves to come in service with a green green something 5 commercial aircraft. 2035 why so late the core challenges are to really build an aircraft that can safely run on hydrogen biggest storage and a whole new design will be needed before hydrogen planes can take off. and the infrastructure fighter jet needs to be developed from planes to refuel into production building up a coherent hydrogen system takes time and costs a lot of money. and finally there's simply not enough green hydrogen available yet the share of the new builds worldwide is still too low to produce enough eco friendly hydrogen for the industry right now the hydrogen we use is almost entirely made from natural gas and coal. and of course it's all just a promise and promises have been broken by the time it does work it may be too late the problem with hydrogen is that it doesn't yet know it's simply not there yet despite industry assurances we are being out so if we have to reduce the sea with through my work force or the c.e.o. of the future scientists like stephan gosling remain ske

to come in service with a green the green something 5 come out for are crossed. 2035 why so late the core challenges are to really build an aircraft that can safely run on hydrogen biggest storage and a whole new design will be needed before hydrogen planes can take off. and the infrastructure fighter jet needs to be developed from planes to refuel into production building up a coherent hydrogen system takes time and costs a lot of money. and finally there's simply not enough green hydrogen available yet the share of the new builds worldwide is still too low to produce enough eco friendly hydrogen for the industry right now the hydrogen we use is almost entirely made from natural gas and coal. and of course it's all just a promise and promises have been broken by the time it does work it may be too late the problem with hydrogen is that it doesn't yet know it's simply not there yet despite industry assurances we are being upset if we can't refuse to see what through. work towards earth is your vision future scientists like stephan gosling remain skeptical. well off the train 5 years

marjorie taylor green. who is still pushing the big lie in a town hall tonight. >> we have done a lot of work in our preparation. talked to a lot of people. looked a lot of evidence that i think still needs to be looked at. and should be presented in court. i truly believe that. >> still, still, and they know it's a lie. marjorie taylor green has removed dozens of facebook posts from 2018 and 2019 in which she endorsed conspiracy theories, repeatedly indicated support for executing prominent democrats. executing prominent democrats. but cnn has attained video so shocking that i want you to hear them, and i want you to think about the fact that marjorie taylor green is now a united states congresswoman. okay? so, pay close attention to your screen. we don't know the exact dates but we believe that they are recorded over the past few years. before she was elected to congress, in november. so, listen to her false, racist claims about black men and gangs. >> okay. so, going on. you know -- you know, what keeps

to come in service with a green aircraft a green something 5 come out for their craft. 2035 why so late the core challenges are to really build an aircraft that can safely run on hydrogen biggest storage and a whole new design will be needed before hydrogen planes can take off. and the infrastructure fighter jet needs to be developed from planes to refuel into production building up a coherent hydrogen system takes time and costs a lot of money. and finally there's simply not enough green hydrogen available yet the share of the new builds worldwide is still too low to produce enough eco friendly hydrogen for the industry right now the hydrogen we use is almost entirely made from natural gas and coal. and of course it's all just a promise and promises have been broken by the time it does work it may be too late the problem with hydrogen is that it doesn't wear yet well it's certainly not there yet despite industry assurances we are going out so everything we have to reduce the sea with through my work force her to see what the future scientists like stefan gosling remain skeptical. well

green: yes. some are not, but a number of them are returning, and they have of course all been asked, "are you going to be asked for nancy pelosi? you did not support her last time." the majority of them have said that they will vote for pelosi, or they will not commit either way. if a member is not willing to commit either way, that is often a sign that they can be persuaded, or they are not firmly set in the preferences. so far, only a small number of democrats have said openly that they would vote against pelosi, but they have not said that they will vote for someone else. so, again, if they vote present, for example, that will not hurt pelosi's vote total as much as if they were to vote for someone else my name. greta: according to news reports, the leader ship are telling members that are thinking about not voting for her that if they do not vote for her, it is a vote for minority leader kevin mccarthy. is that true? prof. green: well, yes and no. that is an argument that the majority party

we're hearing what greene's constituents thinks. let's go to msnbc's amanda golden in greene's district where she's been talking to her constituents. did you it yesterday, too. had you some really remarkable responses. how about today? what are they telling you? >> reporter: well, alex, as you know marjorie taylor greene is doubling down as you pointed to the social media spats she's having with some fellow congressional republicans is a small snapshot. on her ground, knows who previously supported her are very much still very much supporting her. those that are against feel embarrassed and ashamed now that their district is being associated with her in such a strong way but it comes to the larger point of the voters here having put her in that congressional seat and that is their will. that's what the people decided to move forward and that's part of the reason why you're not seeing congressional republicans come out with a strong stance to either condemn her words or action or promote any kind of punishment. we saw a brief snapsho

greene liked the post and replied in a comment this. this is all true. again, nbc news has not independently reviewed these posts but the congresswoman has not kept her opinions to just social media. video of greene confronting parkland shooting survivor david hoge in march of 2019 has also surfaced. in it, greene repeats baseless claims and calls him a coward. >> you are using your lobby and the money behind it and the kids to try to take away my second amendment rights. you don't have anything to say for yourself? he's a coward. he can't say one because he can't defend his stance, because there is no defense for taking away guns. >> my god. joining me now, nicole hackley, who lost her 6-year-old son, dylan in 2012 in the sandy hook shooting. she is cofounder and director of the nonprofit organization, sandy hook promise. i'm at a loss of words, nicole. seeing that interaction with david, i have not -- did not lose my son in a school shooting. my heart breaks for someone like you every single day for you, every single day, knowing what you went through.

what we do know from marjorie taylor greene is she said it was a great call. she was grateful to have what she called the former president's support, and she also said that democrats are now attacking her in the same way that they used to attack donald trump. so, assuming that call happened, it is significant just because it shows how the former president remains in the background pulling strings, despite the fact that he does not is a twitter megaphone even as his own party up here on capitol hill continues the identity crisis, the blood letting, if you will. there's another example of that, as you mentioned, that is the back and forth between marjorie taylor greene and senator mitt romney of utah. romney tweeted out talking about the lies marjorie taylor greene has told and her claims that the election was stolen. she essentially shot back that romney cares nothing about what she called the people's number one concern, and then, there was this, please grow a pair or get a spine, she tweeted. so, that is the state of play. no remorse, no apologies, no backing

so there would be no marjorie green and there would be no blockbuster story about marjorie green if the media didn't begin covering her to begin with because she was a back bench candidate and she should be a back bench member of the united states congress but today she is all over the media because the media began to cover her initially because of her crazy conspiracy theories and her views. .>> well, i don't know. i got to tell you, the people of georgia, you're assuming a lot about them. they meet the candidates, they go through these issues. what i think she said about violence is absolutely, totally wrong. but the disrespect for the people of georgia or any congressional district that makes these decisions, i don't know about that. howie: jason, let me jump in. hold on. i want to finish a question to jason and you go next, richard. you said republicans are calling out some of this rhetoric. kevin mccarthy, the house minority lead e all he said was that he's going to talk to green next week. by the way, she said she had to call president trump. does that allow the media to make this

another hurdle for a quick transition to truly green hydrogen is the cost. bins it more meant in didn't get in the arctic if you compare renewable green or even hydrogen with fossil fuels under the current regulatory framework then it's a very expensive option and another for the total value and. but as more electricity is produced from renewable sources green hydrogen should become less expensive. for cars predict the cost will more than half by 2030 but so far the production of green hydrogen is not widespread in the european union. experts predict that the blue option where the c o 2 emitted during production is stored remain a key source of hydrogen for years to come. well germany is keen on expanding its capacity for hydrogen production the aim is to produce the gas on an industrial scale with 0 emissions this green hydrogen would be used not only for fuels but also for heating and generating electricity still produces like to cope and sites get or are investing billions of euros to make production climate you troll with the help of hydrogen power even

but what will it take for green investments to truly take off. so it is convinced that this will only happen once people are convinced it will turn a profit. then people think that when they make sustainability an investment criteria they'll automatically lose money and then that's not true for you you effectively lose money when you don't have all the information relevant for development of your investment investment and today the relevant issues are climate change resource scarcity and depletion social stability. they drive the economy and determine the value of investments it's off time if you don't take that information into account on your a bad investor but for the finance world that hasn't quite sunk in yet it was good enough once that. this is the headquarters of one of germany's largest asset management companies in munich. is responsible for billions of euros. of quartz headed the 270000000000 euro investment branch of the world's largest reinsurer unit green until june 2020. he's been involved with sustainable investments for decades d

marjorie taylor greene takes it to be a grient q in the sky. a lengthy thread of language sprinkled with conspiracy theories, george soros, marjorie taylor greene. yes, a nazi himself trying to continue what was not finished. february 201. that was verified by cnn as well. it is still up on twitter right now if you want to take a look. and just so that you can see what she is engaging calling soros a nazi. this portrays him as a vampire going up in flames. this is outrageous. this stuff ain't normal. this is not normal. this is some racist b.s. that is what it is. you are bigots. listen, i shouldn't have to explain it. george soros is jewish, the root of endless anti-semitic tropps about him. he is not a nazi. but he is the subject of countless ugly conspiracy theories embraced by marjorie taylor greene and her cronies. there is more, sadly. boy. this same source shared screen shots of two now removed facebook posts of marjorie taylor greene's page which cnn hasn't independently confirmed. one, a fake promo for the funeral of the late senator j

it's not that marjorie taylor greene is an aberration. it's that maybe, maybe she's not and it's telling us something much more than that. greg bleustein, you have been working on this from the beginning. you have been telling people, telling the world if they're willing to listen about this from the beginning. we thank you for your reporting and thank you for being with us this morning. >> thank you. >>> all right, a blistering report accusing new york's governor of undercounting coronavirus deaths and nursing homes by a lot. we have new reaction to this, next. >>> developing this morning, new york's attorney general is accusing the state's health department of undercounting coronavirus deaths at nursing homes, by the thousands. the state health commissioner disputes this report. alexandra field joins us now with more. what have we learned? >> we're talking about a huge disparity between the number of deaths of residents in nursing homes related to covid that were reported by the state's department of health and the number being reported

i'm 2035 is this ambitious the serves to come in service with a green green come out for are crossed. 2035 why so late the core challenges are to really build an aircraft that can safely run on hydrogen biggest storage and a whole new design will be needed before hydrogen planes can take off. and the infrastructure fighter jet needs to be developed from planes to refuel into production building up a coherent hydrogen system takes time and costs a lot of money. and finally there's simply not enough green hydrogen available yet the share of the new builds worldwide is still too low to produce enough eco friendly hydrogen for the industry right now the hydrogen we use is almost entirely made from natural gas and coal. and of course it's all just a promise and promises have been broken by the time it does work it may be too late the problem with hydrogen is that it doesn't work yet well it's simply not there yet despite industry assurances we are being outside everything we can to reduce the sea with through my work force or to see what the future scientists like stephan gosling remain sk

must turn away from fossil fuels and embrace green energy, a green energy future. host: a caller in wyoming, an independent. caller: good morning. does the administration plan to incentivize auto manufacturers to produce self charging electric vehicles, like those produced in munich, germany? guest: that is a terrific question. one of the big ideas, or one of the big efforts that jennifer granholm, it will be at a confirmation hearing today, the department of energy oversees a huge loan program that has about $40 billion in it, and it's offered to places to do groundbreaking, sometimes entrepreneurial research and development on things like solar, cars, or electric vehicles. and it got a lot of bad rap, if you remember in the obama administration, for backing risky propositions, including one that went bankrupt. and the obama administration had to do hearings on that. but it also gave a big loan to tesla, which everybody is a pretty familiar with now. they have been pretty successful as a company, an electric vehicle company. that will be interesting to see what th

and 2035 is this ambitious they're said to ourselves to come in service with a green after green something fried come out for are crossed. 2035 why so late the core challenges are to really build an aircraft that can safely run on hydrogen biggest storage and a whole new design will be needed before hydrogen planes can take off. and the infrastructure fighter jet needs to be developed from planes to refuel into production building up a coherent hydrogen system takes time and costs a lot of money. and finally there's simply not enough green hydrogen available yet the share of the new builds worldwide is still too low to produce enough eco friendly hydrogen for the industry right now the hydrogen we use is almost entirely made from natural gas and coal. and of course it's all just a promise and promises have been broken by the time it does work it may be too late the problem with hydrogen is that it doesn't well yet well it's simply not there yet despite industry assurances we are being upset everything we can to reduce the sea with through my work for church the c.e.o. of the future scienti

i know you have come out in support of the green new deal. what do you make of the president's executive orders to try to tackle the climate crisis, including stopping the construction of the keystone xl pipeline, move to reduce fossil fuels, some of the job losses, as you know, they would be immediate. so is there a way to train folks to fill green jobs without some sort of gap there and having no income in between? >> look, joe biden and kamala harris ran on the need to address our climate crisis. they won based on young people turning out in record levels, largely to respond to the climate crisis. and if really what he's doing with his executive absence is fulfilling the promises he made in the campaign and also doing the right thing, but, alex, a huge part of that campaign promise is the promise to rebuild america in a clean, green way and create millions of good-paying union jobs. the president can do a lot of things in terms of executive action but he can't spend $2 trillion without congress supporting him. and that is jobs for republic

democrats are calling for greene to be removed from committees. jen psaki said this when asked about greene. >> we don't want to elevate conspiracy theories further in the briefing room. i'll leave it at that. >> reporter: in green's district offering support. republicans facing when it comes to choosing a path forward. >> she needs to continue to fight and i'm behind her all the way. >> reporter: there's no doubt the antics have become a distraction on capitol hill. missouri congresswoman kori bush also a freshman like greene said she asked to have her office moved away from green in the longworth house office building because of a verbal altercation the two had in the tunnel in the capitol on the day of the impeachment. greene went and posted that video on her twitter feed, claiming that she was the one that was the victim, not bush. but it is an example of how this is dominating conversations in washington. so much so that the house minority leader kevin mccarthy is scheduled to speak to greene about the situation next week. ryan nobles, cnn on

what was the green traffic light? >> four years of propaganda and then positions of people in power, through those positions, them directing that. 30 years ago when i was a neonazi skinhead for the time i was 14 to the time i was 23, we didn't have that person of power. we found that information in dark alleys, on the fringe, in the backs of magazines and passing pamphlets. when the internet came out, it gave a lot of power to influencers within that movement to spread hate to the mainstream. which was part of the concerted effort because in the '80s and '90s, there was an effort to infiltrate law enforcement and the military, to find people within those groups who had what i call potholes in life that we could fill with hate. that they could then direct at other people. there was a lot of that happening in the last four years of the trump administration. what i do, the disengagement work i do is just a band-aid because we clean up after the fact. what we need is a national strategy kind of like we're doing with the p

yet largely given congresswoman greene a pass. when you watch it play out, do you see this as helpful for democrats. >> listen, what we are watching now is a complete dumpster fire. the republicans in disarray. leaderless at this point. schizophrenic in some situations. you got folks like lindsey graham who basically said in one breath that to count him out in terms of supporting the president. in the next breath he flew down to texas on air force 1. you got kevin mccarthy blaming the american people for what happened at the capitol. then he said it was the president that was responsible. and now he is kissing the president's ring. >> do you see this as helpful for democrats, what you just laid out? >> well, listen, it's not helpful for america. because these leaders are leaders who took a sworn oath to protect and defend the constitution of the united states. >> but what about democrats? do you think -- when you see this playing out, what is your -- how do you view it from your perch as head of dnc now. >> well in terms of my per

greene chases hub on capitol hill as he walks around the capitol, greene calling him a coward because he does not engage with her and complaining he met with senators when she was not able to. >> i'm a gun owner. i have a concealed carry permit. i carry a gun for protection for myself. and you are using your lobby and the money behind it and the kids to try to take away my second amendment rights. you don't have anything to say for yourself? >> greene has repeatedly promoted false conspiracy theories including baseless qanon ideas. greene's extremism represents a growing rift in the republican party. while she faces a backlash in washington, she won her district in georgia by nearly 50 points in november. and that's where nbc news correspondent blayne alexander joins me now. what are voters telling you? >> reporter: well, andrea, it really is a mixed bag among the people we spoke to. but i want to underscore something you said, she won this district by nearly 50 points. that was just a few months ago so clearly there were a number of voters to voted to send her to congress not too lon

that is what she asked congresswoman greene to do. just outside of the hallway where they both share offices. she says that greene, as well as her staff, berated her, as well as her staff members. and she just doesn't feel safe to be seeing her, with a lot of frequency in the hallway. she actually asked speaker nancy pelosi to move offices. a request that has been granted. but, i want you to take a listen to bush, in her own words, talking about that encounter. take a listen. >> i moved my office because i am here to do a job for the people of st. louis. they deserve that. and what i cannot do is continue to look over my shoulder, wondering if a white supremacist in congress by -- by the name of marjorie taylor greene or anyone else because there are others. that they are doing something or conspiring against us. my team deserves better. they should not have to come to -- to work, and have to wonder if their door's going to open that does not have a peephole, if their door is going to open and it's somebody that does not want to do th

what do you think will happen here with greene? and then the separate question, what do you think should happen? >> so, i have several different feelings. i certainly hope that kevin mccarthy will be consistent in his treating of members for inappropriate behavior. and as we have seen video after video come out, we have seen her, i mean, i am horrified that she is on the education committee when she made fun of a student who was in the midst of a shooting at the florida high school. you know, former secretary of states, first ladies, presidential candidates in the head. we just keep seeing -- [ inaudible ] it's not -- i mean, she's -- largest population of muslims in the country, attacking muslims, attacking jewish -- she basically doesn't like a whole lot of people. it's a free country, but it is not okay to threaten people. it is not okay to threaten violence. and as a house, we may have to take a stronger stance about what are the guidelines for conduct in this congress, and do we need to take more strong action? >> congresswoma

but what will it take for green investments to truly take off. pencil it is convinced that this will only happen once people are convinced it will turn a profit. then people think that when they make sustainability an investment criteria they'll automatically lose money and then that's not true for you you effectively lose money when you don't have all the information relevant for development of your investment investment and today the relevant issues are climate change resource scarcity and depletion social stability. they drive the economy and determine the value of investments tough time if you don't take that information into account of the one year of bad investor but for the finance world that hasn't quite sunk in yet it will in a few months that. this is the headquarters of one of germany's largest asset management companies and munich. is responsible for billions of euros . most of course headed the 270000000000 euro investment branch of the world's largest reinsurer unit green until june 2020. he has been involved with sustainable invest

he said, margaret taylor green is a carrier of the virus, as it were, nia. she is representative of something. she's representative of the republican party. some of the polling i have seen on how many republicans believe some aspect of this crazy and dangerous and anti-semitic qanon theory, anywhere from 20 to 40% of republicans and trump voters believe some aspect of it. so she is representing those people. hopefully, it's just 20%, but even if it's just 20%, that's a big portion of the population. that's a big portion of the republican party. and again, it seems to be growing. and you see kevin mccarthy, he at one point actually said that marjorie taylor greene had denounced qanon. she has not denounced qanon and she got that plum committee assignment, as well. and there is this broad range of conspiracy theories, whether it's 9/11 trutherism, marjorie taylor greene seems to be adherent to all of those andtai in the republican party and it is not just crazy, it is dangerous. we saw that on january 6th. some of those people had on "q" t-shirts, they were qa

what we are hearing from congresswoman green today. fill us in. >> reporter: well, it's a time to choose, essentially, the republican party must make a decision and lawmakers are taking sides, whether or not you are in the camp of trump, the former president or whether or not you have moved on. she clearly, congresswoman green, says that she is very excited, very happy about the phone call, the great phone call that she and trump shared, that it is about 100% loyalty and that that is important to her and that she will not apologize, nor will she back down. the important question here is where does she belong in this party? the house leader, republican leader, kevin mccarthy, recently having visited former president trump at mar-a-lago emerged with him with a statement, essentially, saying they want to take the house and the senate back, put it back into the gop hands and that this was something that was about rejecting the democratic agenda, what he feel is a radical agenda. you have somebody, however, like congresswoman greene, who is

what happens to marjorie taylor-greene? >> she would be brought before the united states house of representatives on the floor and members would rebuke her and condemn her remark, condemn her actions and she would have to stand there, and listen to this. now do i think she would actually show up? that's on her. i'm doing my part. i wrote the resolution and my colleague and i sarah jacobs out of california we are moving forward to make sure we're doing our part. it only takes a simple majority to pass and i also support an expulsion and i've signed on for her to be removed from the united states congress and that takes a two-thirds majority. i don't know where we would end up on that, but as a simple majority we should be able to move forward to hold her accountable for her actions because enough is enough and we've come way to far. her party has dna nothing. a talking to is nothing. we have to move forward with taking action. >> congresswoman williams, thank you for joining me again. nakima williams representing georgia's 5

to be moved away from greene's office in the longworth house office building. i can confirm there were moving boxes in front of bush's office. now, greene pushing back saying bush started thisality case but, wolf, an indication of how this is a big distraction for all the work that needs to be done here on capitol hill. kevin mccarthy, the house minority leader, attempting to address it at least on some level saying that he will meet with marjorie taylor greene here on capitol hill next week. >> he will have the work cut out and she is promoting the disgusting anti-semitic conspiracy theories blaming jewish conspiracy for the wildfires, for example, out in california. and it's really disgusting to hear as we look back on those social media posts that she came up with. really totally, totally disgusting. ryan, thank you very much. >>> let's get insight from the chief political analyst gloria borger and former ohio governor john kasich. governor, have you ever seen your party, the republican party, in such complete disarray? >> i'm just -- i'm sick over this, wol

should greene lose hers over these revelations? >> absolutely. and i mean -- and, you know, the silence is complicity and is cowardice. i was thinking today, i was remembering today when congresswoman ilhan omar from minnesota made some comments that people interpreted as anti-semitic. and the democratic leadership as a whole came down on her and said you have to apologize, and she unequivocally apologized. i was remembering when it was his democratic colleagues in the senate -- for taking some stupid pictures, inappropriate pictures. i was remembering the outrage of republicans when alexandria ocasio-cortez wore some very expensive outfit for a cover shoot of a magazine or wore a very nice skirt to "the view." there is more outrage for liz cheney -- than there is for the fact this woman is a conspiracy theorist, she's dangerous, she is threatening. i mean, how do you put a grown ass adult woman who is stalking a teenage boy who recently survived a school shooting, how do you put somebody like that in the education committee? i mean, i just don't

this isn't just about marjorie taylor greene. this sabt the republican party. the republican leadership and marjorie taylor green represents what i have come to believe are three fundamental truths about where the republican party is today. number one, she epitomizes radicalization in clear broad daylight. that is the conspiracy theories, the violent extremist groups she is associated with. she is the epitome of all that and proudly and in open daylight. second, she epitomizes the discarding of democracy for the big lie. the big lie of course being the election, being thrown or fraudulent. that she and other republicans have ascribed to. and also the big lie about exactly what is happening in this country. whatever issue you look at. there is a lie being told about what is actually happening in this country. and third, she represents what the republican party has become, a one-man cult. this is not a party of principles anymore. this is a party of one person. if you look at what the arizona republican party did, they censured jeff lake, cindy mccain and governo

clinton, greene replied, stage is being set. players are being put in place. we must be patient. this must be done perfectly, or liberal judges would let them off. does that sound like she was joking to you? what would the defense for that statement be? kevin mccarthy, the republican leader of the house, absolutely did not want marjorie taylor greene to become a republican member of the house of representatives. he supported her opponent in the republican primary, as did congressman steve scalise, the house minority whip. quote, these comments are appalling, and leader mccarthy has no tolerance for them, said a spokesman back when she was a candidate. steve scalise issued this when she was a candidate, the comments made by ms. greene are disgusting and don't reflect our country. i will be supporting dr. cowan. and now both of them have nothing to say, nothing to say publicly about marjorie taylor greene. axios is reporting that kevin mccarthy plans to talk privately with marjorie taylor greene about her homicidal thoughts. tonig

marjorie taylor greene has always been marjorie taylor greene. it's everyone around her now that's the problem. >> that's correct, john. but remember, too, steve king was elected multiple times, but not until the leadership of the party stood up and kevin mccarthy, to his credit, stood up and condemned him skpad, no more. you're off the committees. you know what, after leadership took their foot down on his neck, so to speak, they said, it's done. he was defeated in his primary. the same thing has to happen to marjorie taylor greene. the leadership needs to speak clearly, that she is not welcome in the party, he is not welcome in the conference, and that she and her ilk, these conspiracy theorists and all of these whacky things that she supports, there is no room for them. make it crystal cloear. and they will defeat her in the next primary. her opponent in the primary last time said he had a dumpster full of opposition research on this woman that was just devastating. now we're learning more and more about it. so, i think he said, no shirt, no s

congress, referring to greene and some other republican lawmakers. we have also now heard from senator mitt romney, the republican often very critical of trump, now taking on congresswoman greene. who has almost become somewhat of a substitute, and when you take a look at her rhetoric on her twitter feed romney is saying here, lies of a feather flock together. marjorie taylor greene's nonsense and the big lie of a stolen election. so the big question, fred, becomes how does the house leader, the republican leader, mccarthy, deal with all of this? well, we've seen, he's -- he took a trip to mar-a-lago. he came out with the former president trump, very unified saying their goal is to take back the house and the senate, to make it republican controlled again, he framed it in terms of a rejection of the democratic agenda, calling it a radical one. and so as we see this rhetoric play out formerly from president trump, now being adopted by mccarthy and furthermore by greene the big question does become how many other republicans sound the same way? use the

we can't just shame marjorie taylor green. we need to ask people to give up in what we invested in 200 plus years. >> there is a distinction between the leadership and our fellow americans who vote and do whatever. we share the country with them. democracy means sharing it and means we've got to figure out how to do it together. and it relates to the role that you play in the senate majority now, which is it just seems to me the stakes right now of democratic government delivering, i mean small d democratic government and the democratic party delivering tangible improvements to people's lives are the stakes of whether we slip towards authoritarianism. you have to show a proof of concept. you and your colleagues have to do that to rescue us from the abyss. >> no, i think that's exactly the point that i'm making, right. you have this crowd of americans -- listen, been watching democracy as their income is flat, the planet is lit on fire as there are more threats posed to the united states than ever before. they're literally sitt

first of all, i think what's going on with congressman greene is absolutely crazy. i think it's kind of outside the bounds of what a responsible member should be saying. and i think that the party should look at doing what they did to steve king and strip her committee assignments to try to really just send a strong message that this is completely outside the mainstream. what's happening with liz cheney i think is completely different. congressman goetz is grandstanding and trying to come up with some kind of purity test. i don't think this is how the republicans get back to the majority. i don't think this is how we should be wandering around the wilderness the next two years or four years. and i think that liz cheney should be up for -- if there was an additional one of john f. kennedy's profile in courage second book, i think she's earned herself a chapter in that book for speaking her mind. look, she's a clear-cut common sense conservative with a long term in this background. i think she voted her conscience here. i think she thought was trump did was abominable

her constituency are house republicans and this ties back to the issue with green. house republicans are going to have to decide who and what they want to represent them in the two years between now and 2022. and it is not clear that they have made that choice. they're very much competing visions for what house republicans are supposed to be about in this new administration. >> all right. garrett, stay with us. monica, the president has signed more than 40 executive orders since taking office. none today. what can we expect in the week ahead? what has he got planned? >> yeah. today it was the first weekday without seeing president biden take some executive action. instead he's at walter reed talking to wounded warriors. on monday my colleague is reporting that president biden is expected to make a major foreign policy address. his first of that kind when he is expected to go to the state department and meet with tony blinken. we're told that speech will be largely focused in the words of one senior administration official, on restoring america's place in the world.

marjorie taylor green, a history of homephobic comments. we want no more part of amplifying this person. you need to hear it for yourself. just buckle up and take a listen to this. >> q is a patriot. we know that for sure. there is an islamic inversion into our government offices right now. they are -- you saw after midterm elections, we saw so many muslims elected. there were quite a few. the generations of black and hispanic men. you want to know what holds them down? gangs. being in gangs and dealing drugs is what holds them down. the gangs are holding them back. it's not white people. how do you get avid gun owners and people who support the second amendment to give up their guns and go with the constitution? maybe you perform a mass shooting into a crowd that is very likely to be conservative. is that what happened in las vegas? >> okay. okay. now, keep in mind, that this person is not just some lady selling qanon tracks on the side of the ride. she is a member of congress. green's prolific internet trail has come under increased scrut

and greene replied, "stage is being set, players are being put in place. we must be patient." holy haul them to the hague, batman! she's not even trying to be discreet. at least mobsters use coded language. there's a reason the godfather doesn't say this: >> i'm going to make an offer he can't refuse, because if he does i'm going to kill him. >> stephen: and this week, a video surfaced of green berating one of the parkland survivors. >> david, why are you supporting the red flag laws? do you not know how to defend your stance? look, i'm an american citizen, i'm a gun owner. i have a concealed carry permit. i carry a gun for protection. the best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun. >> stephen: okay, that looks stupid and cruel, but that could just be a false flag operation by antifa to get us to think marjorie taylor greene is a child-harassing psychopath. luckily, she won't have much time to yell at the kids about her guns, because house republicans just appointed greene to the house education committee. oh, come on! the lady who denies school shooti

and the greens are trying again to present themselves as a respectable, not as a far left or only green, only committed to green issues kind of party, but as a serious political force. and i have heard leaders of the green party speak out about the need to support nato. i've heard members of the green party speak out about supporting a bigger defense budget even. that is not going to go down very well with all the wings of the green party. but simply to say that things are changing even in the german landscape, german political landscape, for obvious historical, political and other reasons the military has not enjoyed the kind of centrality that it might've enjoyed or might still be enjoyed, for example, in your country or even in france or in the united kingdom. but things have changed so i am not without some degree of optimism that the next german coalition will, in fact, follow this advice issued or expressed six years ago. germany needs to take more responsibility. germany needs to accept a kind of cold leadership role, even on such painful issues -- cold leadership -- war and peac

the question is whher th can be called green in the first place? marn: there certainly is a definition problem in regard to esg. the lack of a central standard is an issue. hauke so a company could, in theory, score very well on these esg rankings, but on the other hand, have very large negative externalities on the environment. >> and even if a company is genuinely green, buying its shares mayot translate into creating an impact. ththeorystraight forward. the more funds green companies receive, the more they can pursue their sustainable goals. but divestments are unlikely to financially starve the fossil fuel industry. for this strategy to be effective, it must permanently reduce a company's ability to access capital. but when capital is divested, this also creates an opportunity for other investors touy shares at a lower price. when this happens, the stock ice can quickly bounce back to its previous level, without impacting the company's valuation. hauke: it's not enough, it simply isn't because the effect , is so tiny. >> esg invtments are not a

i'm 2035 this ambitious that line we set off serves to come in service with a green profit green something 5 commercial aircraft. 2035 why so late the core challenges are to really build an aircraft that can safely run on hydrogen biggest storage and a whole new design will be needed before hydrogen planes can take off. and the infrastructure fighter jet needs to be developed from planes to refuel into production building up a coherent hydrogen system takes time and costs a lot of money. and finally there's simply not enough green hydrogen available yet the share of the new boats worldwide is still too low to produce enough eco friendly hydrogen for the industry right now the hydrogen we use is almost entirely made from natural gas and coal. and of course it's all just a promise and promises have been broken by the time it does work it may be too late the problem with hydrogen is that it doesn't well yes well it's simply not there yet despite industry assurances we are being outspent everything we can to reduce the sea with through. work for church and see what the future scientists like s

long as they are green. with an ecological concerns with their start in business ideas they are setting the financial world on a sustainable course they. can green investment change the world. to distort the. story of. propaganda. the rhineland sturtz. their mothers were germans living in the occupied drying land their fathers soldiers from the french. they grew up in a climate of. racism. the children of shame. in 45 minutes fought d.w. . what secrets lie behind these walls to discover new adventures in 360 degree. and explore fascinating world heritage sites the t.w. world heritage $316.00 get kidnapped now. climate change is transforming the earth at an ever increasing pace. a new movement wants to stem the tide. with money. invest to in a sense investors determine what happens in the world of those. young influential millionaires want the world of business and finance to go green. if the time's running out and we have to act i'm good. for decades environmental protection was seen as a money loser for the

that green growth is possible. over the last 30 years we managed to grow our economy by 75% and cut emissions by 23%. going back to the issue of climate finance and supporting developing countries, that is vitally important. one of the messages i get when i talk to countries which are vulnerable which are the front line of climate change, which are not responsible for the position we are in right now. what they say to me is they completely understand developing countries have managed to raise significant funds to support their own economies, but they contrast that with the fact we have not got to the $100 billion, and that is why we need to make sure that we are supporting our economies, we are supporting jobs and livelihoods, but also support vulnerable countries as well. guy: you bring up the boris johnson government. how committed is the boris johnson government to the green agenda. we have just seen the green lighting of the first in the u.k. for 30 years. we have just also seen the green light for the biggest

tourism you mentioned could be green. all businesses become green. all businesses will be aligned with this trend. manus: ok. everything could be green. it's just a question of qualifying that. the next time you come back on the rich list, i will promote you again. don't worry. you are right. thank you for joining us. that's alexey mordashov. thank you for being with us this morning. it is the world economic forum. it will look a little bit different this year. i'm broadcasting from home. even global leaders have to go virtual. bloomberg brings you that news flow and a piece of the action. don't miss today's exclusive interviews. the dutch central bank governor at 9:00 in london. this is bloomberg. ♪ >> europe invested billions to help develop the world's first covid-19 vaccine. to create a truly global common good. and now the companies must deliver. they must honor their obligation. >> china will continue to share its experience with other countries, do its best to assist companies -- countries and regions that were less prepared for the pandemic

so kevin mccarthy, he is to meet with greene next week. what are the expectations of what that kind of conversation or potential punishments might be? >> reporter: fred, i think one person put it well. this is representative steve scalise. he is the gop whip and he essentially said that he has consistently condemned this kind of violent rhetoric against politicians on both sides. that is very likely what you're going to be hearing from mccarthy as well, on both sides, not necessarily specifically addressing greene's comments, but broadening it, if you will, and really being political in that fashion. we saw mccarthy, he was with the former president, president trump, at mar-a-lago. they both emerged with statements saying they're cooperating with each other, that they've got to bring the republicans back to power in the senate, as well as the house. trump saying that he's more popular now than ever and that his endorsement more important now than ever. and mccarthy framing it, if you will, as a rejection of the democratic agenda, what they

and you know, marjorie taylor greene is not backing down. we saw that statement that she released yesterday and a tweet this morning saying she spoke to former president trump and thangd him for his support, reiterating that she is 100% loyal to him as her favorite president. >> you mean the person about whom you're speaking is the one who used the noah and the ark analogy as her reasoning for supporting marjorie taylor greene? okay, good. thank you so much, amanda golden for that one. >>> let's be joined right now by california congresswoman sarah jacobs, a democratic member of the house foreign affairs and armed services committee. congresswoman, welcome. good to see you. i know that you were planning a resolution, you're going to introduce it next week, to censure the congresswoman and call for her resignation, so first of all, what compelled you to put this bill forward, and does that mean that you don't support the resolution that's been drafted by congressman jimmy gomez to get her expelled from congress? >> well, alex, it's great to b