stan once and for role. so again, it depends on the audience, but it's very much a split reaction. it has indeed will be fascinating to see exactly which will be in the us president will be addressing when he speaks at 1945 g and c will be covering that. of course, for jordan, i'm sure you're going to be watching that very closely. but i wasn't jordan, thank you very much. indeed. the un secretary general, antonio terrorist is urging the taliban to protect the lives of african people. and he's asking council members to help suppress the threads, paused for the armed group. the international community must be united and he lies all available instruments to ensure the following. first, we must speak with one voice to oppose human rights. in afghan is done. i call upon the taliban and all parties to respect and protect international humanitarian law and rights and freedoms. of all persons receiving chilling reports of c, v, restrictions on human rights throughout the country. and i am particularly concerned by

i think it reflects the reality that when the united states decided to end its presence in of kenneth stan, and of course the united states has been responsible for the majority of the soldiers and has carried the road to the burden all the way -- carried the brunt of the burden all the way, allies like canada, all the partner nations to replace or fill in after the united states. so, that's also reflected in the fact that after an extensive consultation, several administrative meetings, made -- many meetings at the ambassador level in february and march and april, we decided together, 30 allies that we would end the mission. we have said many times we went into afghanistan together -- [no audio] adjusted our presence together and that yeah, we are part of that decision. >> the next question will go to nrk. >> good afternoon. does nader -- native consider it probable that groups like al qaeda returned to afghanistan in full force? what kind of assurances has the alliance got from the taliban that this will not be the case? >> the agreement the united states made with the taliban last

it's hubris that defeated us and f kenneth. stan not to tell about, well, and that's, that's probably a big question, not only applies that case and but several other theaters around the world that the us got involved with. i want to talk to you about how quickly the african student government actually felt. you know, we keep here with this vietnam britain reference, at least south vietnam, actually held for 2 months. couple was actually just 2 weeks. do you think those in power in the u. s. government, you order the withdrawal actually thought these governments were prepared to stand on their own, or was that just saying things when they actually knew the truth? a certain amount to the military industrial complex has gotten the idea that they can dictate to reality. and that's what you saw there are certainly people inside the u. s. government who were telling other people inside the u. s. government, this is all going to be fine. we. we spent our $6000000000.00 a year building is fighting force. and it's all going to be fine. the problem is they ran up against 2 things. first of all

have kenneth stan political leaders gave up and fled the country. the afghan military collapsed sometime without trying to fight. now the president said that the united states provided the money, the training, the resources. but in the end, the afghan gover military simply didn't have the will, and the u. s. could not provide them the well to fight for their own country. he said, 6000 us troops will be on the ground this week to help with the ongoing really evacuation . and that's what it is. efforts as to why the u. s. t. employee can sooner. well, the president said some just simply didn't want to leave. and that the afghan government, he said, did not want to create panic by allowing the us to pull thousands of people ahead of time. that will argue way. that will be a big point of contention. i'm sure, finally, scotty, the president said that the buck stops with him at a quote. i know my decision will be criticized, but i'd rather have that and pass an endless war onto yet another president and administration and quote, you, john, you are fine fo

stan to what this book and particularly kenneth stanton the predominant view in the early 20th century of slavery was the one propagated by the historian who believe the plantation was a great place and there were plenty of benevolent slaveowners and that is how most americans through the 1910s, 20s, 40s and 50's thought of slavery until you had them come and make clear that the reason the disparities between black and white communities even existed in the mid-20th centuries in the way that they did was intimately tied to an institution that ended less than 100 years ago and so really chattel slavery which seems so self-evident but part of the national discourse of what inequality was at that time. >> i think it does this is so important because when i was researching and when i researched it and colonialism and imperialism so often the christianizing force the taking of the savages and making them noble is a very common ideology that's found throughout the 18th and 19th century to justify their campaign of feeling and murder. rather than looking at the nations that are the kernels the

enough kenneth stand and then in iraq. and joe biden has, has even when he was vice president did not approve of obama was 100000 troop increase. and, and as a consequence, this decision of he is today is not surprising. his excuses are lame. it's a matter of double speak that's coming from him. and i, and this is a, he knew he knew very early on of the corruption and the in the fighting in that government and how decadent it really, really was. and how it could not be, it could not sustain any kind of leadership under stress. and that was very clear, 2 years ago i was on r t saying that intelligence people were telling me then that the us ever pulled out cabal would fall in 5 days. well, it went only 6. so i, i'm not surprised at this. and i think that there's, there's going to be a lot of, there's going to be congressional hearings on this, on capitol hill in the u. s. and it's going to be, we're seeing basically a repeat of what happened in saigon in 1975. and even up until the time that our evacuated vietnam, we were g