nancy: you just do it. you just get up and take each day as it comes and put one step in front of the other. i don't know how. you love. susan: how did she approach the years of his illness? karen: she would describe it as a crash course in patience. she becomes, and i go on at great length what life was like for her, she becomes the caregiver of his physical well-being, protecting him not only physically but protecting his dignity. she also becomes at that point the caregiver the shaper of his , legacy. typically, presidents live for decades after they are out of office. they really have a chance to write for themselves the first draft of how they're going to be viewed by history. ronald reagan, who became incapacitated so soon after he was out of office was , essentially denied that. it does fall on nancy reagan. she devotes herself to building the library. she gets very weary of people on the right who would invoke her husband's name and image for causes that she is not sure that ronald reagan would have

davidson later nancy reagan. hers is a complicated and often very painful story but i think that ronald reagan chose well and his partner for life and i do think that the country owes ahim a debt for that. >> what you say about someone who gives your life meaning and what do you sayy about someone who is always there with support in understanding? someone who makes sacrifices so that your life willac be easier and more successful? what you say is that you love that person and treasure her. [applause]ea i simply can't imagine the last eight years without nancy. presidency would have been joyous without her there beside me and that second-floor h livig quarters in the white house would have seemed a bit lonely spot without her waiting for me every day at the end of the day. you know she once said the president has all kinds of advisers and experts who look after his interests when it comes to foreign policy or the economy or whatever but no one looks after the human being. nancy has done that through recuperation's

davis and later nancy reagan. hers is a complicated and often very painful story but i think that ronald reagan shows well and the country owes him a debt for that. >> what do you say about someone who gives your life meaning and support and understanding, someone who makes sacrifices so that your life will be easier and more successful but what you say is you love that person and treasure her i simply can't imagine the last eight years without nancy. the presidency wouldn't have been the joy without her there beside me and that second floor living quarters in the white house would have seemed a lonely spot without her waiting for me every day. they had all kinds of advisors and experts who look after his interests when it comes to foreign policy or the economy but no one looks after their needs for a human being nancy has done that for me through recuperation's and crisis. every president should be so lucky. [applause] i think it is all too common in marriages that no matter how much partners love each other they

visit ncicap.org] ♪ susan: your new biography, nancy reagan: triumph of nancy reagan. explain how. karen: the thing to understand about ronald reagan is that as affable as he was and as gifted as he was with connecting with the american public, he was at heart a loner. he didn't like many people with exception of one person. nancy reagan was the only human being in the will to whom ronald reagan was close. she was also just a fierce guardian of his image, his personal care and safety. she was fearless, i think. as a result, she was the one, truly disinterested observer of all the drama that goes on in a white house. she had one agenda, ronald reagan's well-being and success. she had better instincts about people than he did. a better nose for trouble than he did. the people in the administration who understood all of this, who recognized her power, george schultz or white house chief of staff, james baker. they really understood that she was a very important, a crucial ally to have if you were trying to get ronald reagan on board something. she always said she was never involved in

nancy reagan had diplomatic hand into. instead we are relying on technology today to take us back in time the daughter, the actress, the partner, the mother, first lady, and then caregiver. before we launch into the meat of the book and tackle so many topics can you share a bit of what inspires you to take this on? what did you go about it and how did you start the book about the sovietst union. >> first of all thank you so much for having me. i toorw look forward to when we can be sitting out there on that beautiful patio at the reagan library where i spent so many, so many wonderful hours. mostly defrosting from the frigidity of the research room at the library. new simon & schuster my publisher was my editor on the book facilitating it was one of my dearest friends was my editor at time magazine. so she came to me in early summer late fall just a few months after mrs. reagan died. and said we love to have biography of her. there was just something about this idea. driving around doing errands and listening to it on c-sp

soviet relations became nancy's special cause. ronald reagan, as we all know, despise everything about communism and he was poised to do business with a new kind of leader. you spoke about the role of george schultz but could you touch a little bit on how both men, ronald reagan were the right man for the moment and how nancy reagan worked behind the scenes to pave the way. >> first of all, i don't think it was any great strategic on her part that she felt so deeply about this, there were a number of things. one is that she wanted her husband to go down in history as a great president, as a peacemaker. she really believed this was his role also made some political sense that even people who liked ronald reagan were afraid perhaps there's a little too close on the trigger which she also understood something many people didn't about ronald reagan which is that along with his harsh cold war anti-communist rhetoric that there was real idealism, he was a believer in the difficult prophecy of armageddon that he was enough of an idealist

nancy? >> nancy: fascinating results. the recall lacks election, september 14th. anthony salvanto, thank you. and that's it for us today. and thank you all for watching. for next week for "face the nation," i'm nancy cordes. captioning sponsored by cbs tretch of the pbr season heats up in arkansas. >> no score has been better in the history of the pbr! >> for the pbr world championship contenders, the time is now. >> davis dialed in. >> the top cowboys in the world have traded punches all season long. >> to tie kaique! >> the top bull in the world, woopaa, continues to turn heads. >> whoa! 95.5! >> today a rematch with last year's world finals

he took an incredibly deep dive into nancy davis' childhood. the instability of her home life, her larger-than-life mother, edith who was largely absent during critical years. her father who had no role in her life and the stepfather, doctor doyle davis who ultimately gave her the stability and love she craved. tell us about the young nancycys davis. >> you're right, she was the product of a bad match between a very ambitious actress and a car salesman who very shortly after her birth would go their separate ways. her mother shortly after that, leaves the little baby named and francis robin in the care of relatives. for the next six years of her life, she just yearned for this absenten mother and asked her s, ron, told me as other people pointed out to me, it sort of cast a shadow on her spirit, a sort of insecurity that never really leaves her. it's one of the reasons she was so complex. she believed that no matter how successful they were, that there was always sort of a trapdoor in life at any minute the bottom could all fall out and certain

. >> reporter: good morning, nancy. when i was last in afghanistan, just last month, the government had control of most of the country and all of the provincial capitals, but even that taliban militants were on the rampage, excel rating their offensive, until finally reaching the capitol itself today. with the shocking speed of the unstoppable taliban offensive, it soon became clear that the takeover of kabul itself was inevitable. it gathered pace as the militant group overran major cities, often without afghanistan forces even putting up a fight. the afghanistan military, around 350,000, trained and funded by america and its allies, surrendered or fled in the fti. about the only thing capable of stopping the taliban: u.s. airstrikes were all but removed from the battlefield. when we were last on theo3 front lines a few weeks ago, the militants were focusing on smaller, regional cities. it was thought then that they would hold off launching an all-out offensive until all u.s. forces were out by august 31st. but then th

i am nancy. the headlines. taliban security around the airport following yesterday's devastating attack. the death toll has risen to 170. > those killed in> this awful attack were trying to escape years of violence. instead, they became the latest victims in a country torn apart i bloodshed. nancy: explain is one of the latest nations to announce its operation has conclud. the u.s. says there are more than 5000 people inside the airport waiting for flights out. food shortages and a few days of medical supplies are left. eight agencies say the humanitarian crisis in afghanistan -- aid agencies say the humanitarian crisis in afghanistan is worsening. we have a special report from northern france. an agreement has been reached with an italian club to re-sign cristiano ronaldo. ♪ hello and welcome. if you are watching on pbs in the u.s. or around the world. more than 24 hours after the bomb attack at kabul airport, the details about what happened are only getting clearer. the number of people killed in the blast

tragic events that happened on speaker nancy pelosi's watch. it's clear at this point nancy pelosi has cherry picked the members to serve on this committee. she has prewritten a narrative only numbers who will stick to her talking points are allowed to serve on this committee. if this is truly a fact-finding mission to make sure january 6th never happens again, this isn't what that looks like. today i want to repeat a call that i made last week to the chairman of this committee to bring before this committee today on this panel the head of the capitol police union who told many of us last week and has said publicly and privately that on january 6th the rank-and-file members of the capitol police department, the heroes that make up the many women, the heroes that make up the capitol police department, they were not prepared for what happened on january 6th in spite of intelligence reports that date back three weeks before that date, they weren't equipped on january 6th with the proper equipment that they needed to handle what happened that day a

in the house, nancy pelosi can only use -- lose three democrats on any given vote. josh gottheimer has now -- they were known as the moderate nine. they had nine moderates sticking together and saying my way or the highway or we are going to take down joe biden's agenda. now they have 10. stephanie murphy, one of the other leaders of the moderates. she is one of the cochairs of the blue dog democrats. she also has joined the group so now they have 10, so they have incredible leverage. they flexed their muscle last night and showed they mean business. it sounds like the two sides are inching closer to a deal. there's going to be another meeting at 9:00 a.m. this morning. they will have a separate briefing on the other big crisis, which is afghanistan. they will hear from officials including secretary of state tony blinken. nancy pelosi saying she hopes to have some kind of deal with gottheimer by noon, when she plans to bring this rule, this procedural vote, to the floor. she is hoping they have something in hand with timer -- in hand to move this forward. host: what

nancy: the u.s. fought a 20-year war against the taliban and now we're talking about working with them. that's a jarring thing to hear for many. the approach was contingent on the idea that for some period of time certainly on the u.s. withdrawal from afghanistan, it would have a u.s.-backed government to support them and that hasn't happened. the only force left is the taliban. the taliban is in charge of every part of the country now. they control the capital. they are in the presidential palace. there aren't enough forces to secure the city. it would take tens of thousands. so they're using taliban elements. these are not elements they have trained or can tell what to do or can manage how they do the security checkpoints. u.s. is communicating with the taliban every day in an effort to navigate that but it doesn't mean they're working side by side or that they have a shared interest. the taliban objective is to get the united states out and by august 31. the u.s. objective is to do it as safely as

nine a moderate democrats who became ten moderate democrats at the last minute in the house to knock nancy pelosi off the legislative track that she has set up for the infrastructure bills, you bet wrong. those ten democrats publicly insisted that they would not absolutely would not vote for the budget resolution that would begin the biggest part of the infrastructure bill in the house, which is supported only by democrats, unless the house voted first on the bipartisan infrastructure bill that has already passed the senate. that was their demand, very simple, first we vote on the senate infrastructure bill, before we do anything else, we vote on the senate infrastructure bill and only then will we vote for the budget resolution, and so, today, they all voted for the budget resolution first after being promised by speaker pelosi that they would be allowed to vote on the senate infrastructure bill by september 22nd. that was the compromised speaker pelosi struck to get over the speed bump presented by ten house members. and so the biden infrastructure legislature remains smoothly on track i

it is criminal what nancy pelosi is doing. it is criminal for her to calls back to do what she is asking us to do which is to spend more of your money. i am thankful for all of my colleagues at the freedom caucus. we have just begun to fight. and i do not care whether it is not printed in the press, whether the majority of people are not seeing anything, we are going to stand up because our country is too important. where do you go if it is not america? venezuela? cuba? china? see how that works out. thank you all for coming today and appreciate everyone coming. louie gohmert. >> thank you. if it were not for what was going on, real travesty going on in afghanistan. the travesty going on in our southern border. all of the crises this administration has created themselves, then it's hard to believe that anyone would have the nerve to say let's come to washington and spend trillions of dollars we don't have on pet projects that will move us to being a marxist nation. ayn rand decades ago put it right. the course that they are wa

elizabeth: we told you this would happen and it's now happening the tactic of house speaker nancy pelosing and chuck schumer those tactics a backfiring, falling apart there is major democrat and siding between the far left and centrist democrat moderates the far left says they're gonna be the spoilers and have the votes to block the 1 trillion-dollarre infrastructure deal unless they get their bigotry and half trillion dollar spending bill passed we have that tonight and this, when democrats are demanding more from as conditions for all the new spending, joining me tonight congresswoman beth van duyne, jason chaffetz, jim trusty, doctor marc siegel, mark green and michael walt and deneen borelli and former u.s. border patrol chief robin tello we have this as well, the debate the cdc saying there will not be a nationwide vaccine mandate, this as more and more local businesses and governments are instituting them, government worker unions pushing back and pushing back hard on the legality of vaccine mandates. this as republican u.s. senator lindsey graham says he is a breakthrough case and h

it is a fact that on that in december of 2020 nancy pelosi was made aware of potential security threats to the capital, and she failed to act. it is a fact that the u.s. capitol police raised concerns and rather than providing them with the support and resources they needed and they deserve, she prioritized her partisan political optics over their safety. the american people deserve to know the truth, that nancy pelosi bears responsibility as speaker of the house for the tragedy that occurred on january 6th. and it was only after republicans started asking these

and nancy pelosi is not even speaking to these moderates. man, this is getting ugly on capitol hill. and i just -- you know, i thought, this is a real thing, you know, some work is going to have to happen here. but by the standards of tough acts that nancy pelosi has had to deal with in her career, this was not the highest degree of difficulty. i think in aggregate, and you and i have talked about this before, in aggregate is whole thing they're trying to do is about as hard as anything i've seen congress try to pull off. but overcoming those ten moderates who, you know, it turned out, as you pointed out in your opening were kind of folded -- i mean, they feel like they got a victory by getting a date certain on the vote but they sold out pretty quick and pretty cheap and i think nancy pelosi knew that was going to happen. >> and, norman, she isn't even granting the point that there was a deal. she is simply saying, no, we just clarified when the vote would be in september. and, i mean, we're laughing because just in the past we have all see

and, nancy pelosi, get out of the way. elizabeth: you know, remember nancy pelosi was caught getting a hair blowout without a mask in a san francisco salon at a time when everyone else in the city was barred from such visits. and salons weren't allowed to operate. they were told to wear a mask. she made things worse by claiming she was set up. that salon was forced to shut down. you know, do you see where we're headed here? so this attitude that you can come in with bare, raw-knuckle power -- raw, bare-knuckle power into california and shut down a recall out of d.c.? if i mean, how are voters in california going to take that? >> i think that voters in california are going to brush with whatever pelosi says aside, and that's why the democrats are so worried right now about the recall. because when you look at the polls in california, they've been trending in the direction of removing gavin newsom. and i think that nancy pelosi realizes she's too late. but she's going to try to throw everything and the kitchen sink at proble

nancy pelosi says that anyone without a mask on in the capitol will be arrested. your thoughts on -- on the bigger picture here and how this is affecting people's freedom and liberty? doctor: well, that's the very important. you know, when we have people using this as an excuse, and that's what it is because, again, the vaccinations are very effective and a lot of people have already gotten immunity. so and very few people are dying. it really is a -- a matter of how you present it, you know, if you had two people who died and now you have four people who died and you say, you know, there's been 100% increase. this thing is just raging or you could actually give the statistics which would show that we really are much better off than we were a year ago. but you can use that to frighten people and to control people and that's what we got to be careful about. yes, we have made tremendous progress. there's no question about it and kudos go to our scientific community for coming up with effective vaccines, but we also have to give people the real information and let th

listen to nancy pelosi on this. watch this. >> so here's the thing, we cannot require someone to be vaccinated. that is just not what we can do. it's a matter of privacy to know who is or isn't. i can't go to the capitol physician give me names of people not vaccinated or encourage them or make it known to others to encourage them to be vaccinated. so we can do that but you would hope science would guide them to protect themselves, their family members and the good colleagues in the work place to get vaccinated. elizabeth: so that's nancy pelosi saying you can't require people to be vaccinated but just listen to the science and how vaccines help. let's jump to this, listen to dr. anthony fauci. he is saying no to lockdowns. he says misinformation on social media would have stopped vaccinations to wipe out smallpox. let's listen to dr. fauci here. watch this. >> john, i don't think we're going to see lockdowns. i think we have enough of the percentage in the people in the country, not enough to crush the outbreak but

look at lawmakers like nancy pelosi. she is now worth, nearly $100 million more than she was about 15 years ago. how did that happen? well she has got lots of investments in all these big tech companies for instance, which she constantly and her colleagues among the democrat party, they claim they want to regulate these companies, they want to break them apart, tear them down, that is all lip service. do you think nancy pelosi will behead her golden goose? no way. google, facebook, twitter, apple. she is constantly trading, making money off the companies. she has cushy relationship with them. somehow they end up with gigantic government contracts. it's a self licking ice cream cone that keeps going. tools like this how lawmakers take advantage what is supposed to be public service. elizabeth: nancy pelosi saying she is within the letter of the law. she is disclosing it. she is doing it in accordance with the stock act how they're making trades but we're talking tens of millions of dollars in tech company trades. in her b

guest: some have made the same argument that nancy pelosi is holding that bill hostage. the other wing of the democratic party says if they pass the of structure bills, then the moderates would not have a stake in the outcome of the larger budget bill. i think one thing that is important to note is that many of the centrists do expected support the budget bill ultimately. for instance, the congressman of new jersey, one of the leaders of the group, has said he wants to support that. he wants to see tax changes that could affect new jersey. ultimately, this is more about the strategy, not necessarily that the centrists want to block the budget from passing, although i think we expected couple of them to probably ultimately block it. host: holding hostage is the term they used in the washington post today chimeric and solution can wait, let's pass infrastructure now, saying we are opposed to holding the president's legislation hostage, risking the passage and the bipartisan support behind it. we will hear from teresa now in tennessee, good morning. caller: hi, good morning

elizabeth: nancy pelosi interfamily nancy pelosi same shoes within the letter of the law disclosing that she's doing dit and courting to the stock t and how they're making the trade but were talking tens of millions of dollars in tech company trade in her backyard of her district were talking google, apple, facebook, google donated to nancy pelosi it seems people are going to say what is really going on we can talk about being within the letter of the law but were talking about conversations or phone calls with apple ceo tim cook that nancy pelosi had, there is information, insider information that you can profit from d a d.. how can you nail that down that there's any malfeasance or. >> is on display it's in the letter of the law but by every sense of any normal person's perception just a casual corruption of washington, d.c. how is it the people elect to become members of congress they go in with middle-class salaries and they become some of the richest people in the united states, nancy pelosi is a six richest member of congress, how did that happen it's really no wonder you watch a r

nancy -- the delta variant. nancy: i think there is a lot of desperation out there right now. people want to be vaccinated and want a sufficient vaccination rate in their countries of the covid isn't running wild and overwhelming their health care system. that is understandable. that is what we are feeling in australia. but this is a war that is going to be fought with a number of battles. so, we are at the first stage where we are fighting back against covid. we have these new vaccines, but we are going to be developing more vaccines, vaccines that are more effective against the variants, and also potentially vaccines that don't rely on attacking the parts of covid that change. there are parts of the virus that don't change as much, so potentially getting those parts of the virus with a vaccine might avoid us having to keep re-vaccinating. there is a lot happening in the vaccine world right now, trying to make it so we can reduce death and illness from the virus in as many places as possible, obviously critical. and then, developing better vaccines that would allow us to elim

you have a mob looking for nancy pelosi, where's nancy? where's nancy? we see that in court documents. that was one of the rooms they targeted. they went into computer and stole that. members of her staff were hidden behind doors and you have people literally locking doors and hiding under tables as the mob was outside. any jokes about violence about nancy pelosi should be out of bounds. jokes about violence aren't good in politics in january, and especially after january 6th and we are six months out and it was a tasteless joke to me given the political targeting that we've seen on the right against nancy pelosi. >> joyce, as they are making those jokes and as they are trying to deflect, we are learning what role some gop lawmakers may have played in the insurrection. slate reporting congressman mo brooks was wearing a bulletproof vest at the january 6th rally and jim jordan telling spectrum news he spoke to trump. take a listen. >> did you speak with president trump on january 6th? >> i spoke with the president last week. i speak with the president all

dagen: nancy, what say you? they're like stink magnets, it's like they attract stench, like the whole -- chuck schumer video not only is it just cringe-worthy because he's dancing and he's dancing with colbert, being beaten in the ratings by greg gut field, ba boom but this video was tweeted by senator schumer's slack. nancy: i think you're being generous, dagen, i mean, that -- i think jonathan's right, i think this is why people leave the state because of the tone deafness and i think people are fed up and i hope they express that at the ballot box. dagen: i just shook my head, again. i'm struggling to say anything about this that doesn't involve a stream of expletives so i'm going to move on. thank you both. coming up, the growing violence in kabul putting americans and afghans at risk, especially women and children. we look at the evacuation efforts ahead. plus, scar jo versus disney, the latest on her mega lawsuit, that's scarlet johansson for all you amateurs out there, that's next, (vo) singing, or speaki

and nancy pelosi is an incredibly powerful woman. she will go down in the history books as one of the most powerful speakers of the house. one of the most dept leaders of congress. kevin mccarthy, if he is lucky, will be a footnote. and i think that this is what happens when you have a woman that reaches the level that nancy pelosi does. this kind of resentment that you get from kevin mccarthy that comes out as a joke about being violent against a woman, who is too powerful. >> that's interesting. i -- i think that's -- that's -- i mean, it -- nancy pelosi, in many regards, has from time to time and many times kind of run circles around kevin mccarthy. >> oh. most republican members of congress would kill to have nancy pelosi as their leader. kevin mccarthy isn't even really that powerful, even though he holds the position that he holds. there are other members of congress, obviously. marjorie taylor greene. he can't control marjorie taylor greene. he can't control jim jordan. there are other people that seem to have more power in hi

nancy, thank you. well, tonight, the.s is scrambling to process roughly 8,000 afghan citizens at a u.s. airbase in germany. for the afghans, it's the first stop on their way to a new life far from home. cbs' holly williams reports from landstuhl, germany. >> reporter: at this giant u.s. military airbase, they're doing their best to feed, care for, and entertain thousands of evacuees from afghanistan. >> their entire life possessions might be in a plastic shopping bag. it certainly helps to put things in perspective. >> reporter: this is just a way station for the afghan evacuees. they'll stay here a few days before flying elsewhere, very likely the u.s., to start a new life. rahmat safari worked as an interpreter for u.s. special forces. if you hadn't gotten out, you worked with u.s. special forces, what would the taliban have done to you? >> they would have killed me right away. >> reporter: he told us his family owed their lives to a former green beret who became a friend. >> his name is greg adams.

the roughly the number of houses nancy pelosi owns as the moratorium expire to congress left for vacation. and why shouldn't they? they weren't there off the day, they made sure the minimum wage wasn't increased. they fought hard against universal healthcare and they allow the bombing of somalia in theory and again of this without the slightest peep, with the possible exception of senator grassley brake and wind, but hard to call that a vibrant protest. but congresswoman corey bush led in the occupation all the steps of congress to get the moratorium renewed. ultimately they did win a partial extension of the moratorium for the next 60 days, which is not nearly enough, but better than nothing. oh, and after the congress people left, some protesters stayed to fight for housing for all, all of the time. and they were probably moved away from the capital steps shoed, shoed off the steps. apparently, only congress endorsed protest is allowed at the capital. does all this mean i trust, some of the st rats who made cameos that this protest like chuck schumer or the people who congratulated core

nancy pelosi, the speaker of the house, acted like she just couldn't do anything about it. she just couldn't. what can i do? but at least she doesn't have any conflicts of interest. like connections to real estate. landlords. right. back in 2011, the washington post wrote nancy pelosi and her husband, paula san francisco, real estate magnate and financial investor, or worth $42000000.00. withholding spread across property investments in northern california. since that time, open secrets reports, nancy pelosi has seen her wealth, increased to nearly a $115000000.00 from $41000000.00 in 2004. what about the bite administration? do they have any conflicts of interests? well, to tell that story, let me back up a little as the atlanta detailed between 20112017, some of the world's largest private equity groups and hedge funds, as well as other large investors spent a combined to $36000000000.00 on more than $200000.00 homes and ailing markets across the country. in one atlanta zip code alone, they bought almost 90 percent of the 7500 home sold. black rock owns about $60000000000

bet against nancy pelosi. she's been there before. she knows how these things work. and she can work miracles. she's obviously one of the most experienced legislators in the room. she understands rules and procedures. so she may have a trick up her sleeve yet. if they are unable to come to an agreement, it really -- won't say it derails joe biden's domestic agenda, but it really flows down -- slows down the momentum where just a few weeks ago we were talking about how much momentum joe biden had with the senate victory on his infrastructure package. obviously in just a few weeks things have turned considerably given the situation in afghanistan and given this rebellion that we are seeing from moderates in his own party. host: to follow everything that's happening on capitol hill throughout today, go to the hill.com, scott wong is the -- one of the reporters for the hill. you can follow him on twitter@scottwongdc. thank you. that from earlier this morning. we are watching on capitol hill as democrats are gather

nancy pelosi is third in line for the presidency. joe biden, kamala harris, nancy pelosi. why isn't she in washington right now? after 13 service member heroes gave their lives for joe biden's botched-up man to cut and run out of afghanistan. -- plan to cut and run out of afghanistan. pelosi apparently refusing gop leader kevin mccarthy's demands to bring the house back in to review what went wrong in afghanistan. the congressman joins me this morning from where he is in washington d.c. congressman, it's good to see you. thanks very much for coming back this morning because of this breaking news. we spoke over the weekend, and i know that you've been working the phones trying to get americans out of afghanistan. if i'm going to get to nancy pelosi in a minute. tell us about your efforts to get people out. >> maria, there are hundreds and could be thousands of americans that are going to get left behind in afghanistan. as michael waltz just saw you and brian mast, many of the members have been working, such as myself, trying to get americans that we know that are our consti

. >> house speaker nancy pelosi and several house democratic leaders spoke about the john lewis voting rights advancement act that has passed by a vote of 219-212. this is about 40 minutes. >> what a historic day in the united states capitol. we are so happy to pass the john robert lewis voting rights advancement act. what a historic moment, not just for us in the capitol, but for the people. it is about restoring the voices of the excluded. i want to thank all of you for being here as we celebrate this historic milestone in our fight to protect the right to vote for all americans. i want to extend a special thank you to speaker nancy, leader steny hoyer, and majority whip james clyburn for your leadership and attention to the need of the american people to get this bill across the finish line. i also want to thank chairperson jerry nadler, steve, and, zoe lofgren, g.k. butterfield, and the other members of the house committee on judiciary and administration for holding the necessary meetings and oversight hearings to provide an opportunity for thoughtful engagement with civil rights a

troops are gone. >> duncan: nancy cordes at the white house. thank you. >> while those countries as you just heard have made that commitment to help, getting out. cbs's charlie dag ata is in doha qatar where many of the evac uees have landed on their way out of kabul. >> a plume of smoke rose above the kabul sky line again today after another explosion near the airport. this time the results of a u.s. drone strike targeting suspected isis-k suicide bmers. -- say there is uncertainty whether the strike destroyed a car bomb or explosive suicide vests that were being loaded into a car. it came just hours after the white house warned that a terrorist attack against the airport was highly likely. just tonight gunfire sent people scattering outside the airport underlining the tensions as the mass evacuation comes to an end. the white house now says more than 1230-- 120,000 people have been evac yaided, including 5400 americans. now with the august 31st deadline for a full u.s. military pullout looming, the focus has shifted to bringing their own troo

paul: but i want to ask about this of this because you watch nancy pelosi for a long time and i have an seems to me that she is going to basically say the swing straight democrats, are majorities in jeopardy right but it is even more jeopardy if we do not pass these things pretty see you might as well sign up for this and take the risk by keeping your own party united and will take our chances in november of 2022 by the way, then you have a legacy. and that i thank you so with the argument they're going to use and i would not downplay her chances of getting through. guest: person something to that, you're right, she's a powerful persuasive personality rated no fans or butts about it, the theme underneath that is you are at risk and you're likely to lose your seat the least have a legacy passing a bunch of stuff that aoc bernie sanders liked the question is, are there eccentric democrats like those in virginia new jersey and elsewhere are going to say yeah you know what, as i assign my own death what i want to do something that's going to be cathartic to my party not certain that new