as i've said before the china of 2021 is not the china of 1971 or even the china of 2011. china today is challenging the united states and destabilizing the international community across every dimension of power. political, diplomatic, economic, military, and even cultural, with an alternative and deeply disturbing model for global governance. i truly believe that china today led by the communist party and propelled by xi jinping's hypernationalism is unlike any challenge we have faced as a nation before. for decades, we failed to comprehensively address china's growing reach of its predatory economic behavior and aggressive efforts to coerce its neighbors in a maritime domain. its dangerous flexing of military muscle against taiwan, and its campaign of genocide against the uyghur people as well as the imposition of the chilling system of digital authoritarianism to suppress its own people. they are more active and more emboldened than ever before. the right basic framework for thinking about our relationship with china today is strategic competition. not because that is

however, the china is not the china global change, and now it's more of a direct competitor to united states. so there's more of a need, therefore, to renegotiate economic partnership as well. to also accommodate on the what format they can actually come. deep level are going to leave out there because unfortunately time has come up against us. but i want to thank all august to go hydro clean and glen d. c. thank you. to course for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website. i'll just here at dot com for further discussion. go to our facebook page, that's facebook dot com, forward slash a j inside story. you can also join the conversation on twitter. we are at a inside story for me, robots, and i hope to hear you bye. for now. the ah. a war in afghanistan is now told will non taliban figures make up a part of them that american youth can report within the caliber believe it. there will be a powerful itala baldessari inside story parker, a frank assessment of the days headlines subscribe. now, however you listened to podcast with the world's pollinators ar

we are not in china. rep. castro: this is not necessarily have to be something that in flames tensions towards china. there is already in the united states, and in the congress -- [no audio] -- also have to define when they cheat. this could be a way to a greater understanding of their perspective. there are challenges that americans and congress face. i do not believe we have clearly defined what it is we should compete with china when they are competing with the united states and other nations. when they are cheating and when -- and what we need to call them out and finally when we ought to cooperate on certain issues like climate change or security in different regions of the world. jonathan: this is no small feat getting bipartisan legislation related to this center. it was introduced alongside republicans like gallagher. both of you have spent time talking about china and the challenges it represents. what you talk about it it different ways. you have characterized a challenge in different ways. you said

there is only one china, taiwan is part of china. this is acknowledged by the united nations by almost all the countries in the world, including all that you members states, including the united states, including all it's 5 i members, state your name it japan. acknowledge that this is the corner stone of china's foreign relations with all the countries in the world. with all the united nations, not the united states, cannot have the cake, i eat it back in 1979, the united states did the right thing. they sever the relations with taiwan. they cancel the defense treaty between the united states and taiwan. they withdrew all the u. s. troops, station leading taiwan. now if they want to really reverse that, be my guest, but the consequences will be there will be no more to provide the relations between china and the united states and the real legal status between channels. mainland anti one is the our finished a civil war. why taiwan ended up with his current situation. first of all, it's because of the cairo declaration pottstown declar

then china has decision. i can say i'll give up to live to fight another way or i can try to escalate this. they lost in the immediate battle and they can do that, they could blow some tankers in the middle east but have probably not matter that much. or they could see launch nuclear strikes in america in we're really going to be angry and we can impose costs back on them by then that context it will be the ones are been what i think of as the burden of escalation. they are going to seem like the aggressor and the bad guy and we will be, fdr talked about our righteous might or the flashing sort of anger or vengeance i should say. that's not going to end well for them either. that kind of mixture is the right for emphasizing to his right strategy plus the right strategy for the american people. we can't have a strategy that relies on acceptance risks with a think about how we would get there. >> we're going to go to audience questions next. i want to hit you with one more because of one mature we talked about

the china of 2021 is not the china of 1971 or even the china of 2011. china today is challenging the united states and destabilizing the international community across every dimension of power. political, diplomatic, economic military and cultural. i truly believe that china today led by the communist party and from pedal by xi jinping's hypernationalism is unlike any challenge we've faced as a nation before. from its predatory economic behavior and aggressive efforts to coerce neighbors in the maritime domain. ive to the crushing and religious autonomy of tibet and campaign of genocide against the uyghur people and digital authoritarianism. china today is more emboldened thavren before. there should be little doubt that the right framework for thinking about our relationship with china today is strategic competition. not because that is necessarily what we want. but because of the choices beijing is making. therefore if confirmed you will need to be cleared eyed about beijing's intentions and actions and play a key role in calibrating this administrati

however, the china is not the china local chains and now it's more of a direct competitor to united states. so there's more of a need, therefore, to renegotiate economic partnership as well. to also accommodate on the what format they can actually compete. level are going to leave right there because unfortunately time has come up against us. but i want to thank all i guess, victor gao, hydro clean kind. glenn decent. thank you. to course for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website. i'll just here at dot com for further discussion, go to our facebook page that facebook dot com forward slash a j inside story. you can also join the conversation on twitter. we are at a g inside story for me, robots, and our whole team here by the this is al jazeera, it's november the 15th day, one of the new era and television news. if you have known that, that was the scale of bloodshed would you have still gone to moments ago to miss all landed about a 100 meters away from us. we're on the front line, but it's on we're being all that is it on is very, really, it is coming ou

welcomes all countries to participate in the developer initiative of china and that china must aaron t quality of opportunity, rules, and that china should not force other nations. president xi jinping delivering the first doctrine on the communist party history in 40 years. rishaad: monitoring all things china today. with our chief north asia correspondent. i lot of, how can i say, justification, talking about common prosperity. things are being framed ideologically here. what is your take from that? stephen: it is the communist party of china. they talk in these ideological terms. essentially what the communist party officials are doing is putting a big, nice bow, wrapping up the plenum but of course wrapped up yesterday that essentially sealed this historic document, proclamation if you will, that xi jinping will be enshrined in the party way going forward, and it essentially gives him a mandate to potentially rule indefinitely. there is no heir apparent named or even promoted to a position where we would all assume this would be the person, much like was done when jintao was -- w

the same applies when it comes to china. where are the stable and predictable policies we were told about? ah, to discuss these issues and more, i'm joined by my guess, jordan, samuel in budapest. he's a podcast to read the goggle and can, which can be found on youtube and locals. and in also we have these and he is professor at the university of southeastern norway as well as author of great power politics and the 4th industrial revolution. hi gentlemen, crossed out rules and effect. that means you can jump any time you want. and i would appreciate it, it was good to glen in our slow glen over the last couple of weeks. we're getting a lot of different conflicting signals. let's focus in on the, from the bite administration on foreign policy. let's focus in on ukraine here as it's well known as the, the, to stop the worst part of the hostilities after the illegal takeover of power in 19, i'm sorry, 2014. we had the minster courts and russia is not a part of the conflict, but now we're getting from brussels in washington. now

should china attack it or invade it? okay, well, so since it's what's causing them, the chinese is great anxiety about similar tenuously while that's happening in the south china sea or the indo pacific as, as we now call it the all because veal, the pull out of a get this done. i mean the obviously the we their easton took is done is that make the movement has been taken off the u. s. terrorist list and you, china is putting $2000000.00 of burn leave investment to have get this done. one f b i whistle blow, sybil edmund sydney to seize. jin chang is the next tie. one is actually it happening simultaneously. is that credible lid? no, it's a little bit. i think this is very credible because me and part of sullivan's talk, he said, part of setting the part of setting this new global order. in the c n n interview. he said, well, he said also it would be based on enshrining the text of the declaration, the universal declaration of human rights into every international institution as well as into the border. and i think it's

[inaudible] some is a justified and the response to what china did, so you know china did fail to refuse to cooperate. it became much more assertive and cracked down on hong kong and so even though trump sort of changed because he felt politically of frontage, china was giving many reasons for the community to respond in that way and i think by the time biden came in for president biden i don't think it was obvious, but he was going to pursue a very tough on china policy, but i think when he came in the situation was such h that it was what he was presented with, that he had chinese activity in a range of areas that he felt was unjustified and he needed to push back. now, the big question is how do we get to that equilibrium where you can compete responsibly and you also have some coronation you know some boundaries on the competition and that's the big challenge i think they and china have two figure out how to get to that point. we are not there yet. it could take some time. >> i mean, i do want to ask us china questions and maybe the view as i said earlier they can post questions , bu

and china. wondering what australian-china conversation looks like. gas, oil, iron ore, and oil down by 1%. could china and u.s. really go for a joint strategic reserve draw? the special petroleum reserve was drawn down by 3.1 million barrels. there is a draw by stealth in oil, we are down by 1%. we spoke exclusively with the hsbc ceo, noah clean here at the new bloomberg economy forum on a range of issues, including china. he said the world cannot decouple from china, which is still the world's biggest manufacturing hub. >> the world's economy is recovering. it is recovering well. there are tensions in the supply chain. we should not be surprised by that. we went fast reverse, now we are going fast forward. there will be friction for a period of time. but take it is a positive the economy is recovering and economies are rebounding. if i don't look at the concerns for the future, i'm concerned about inflation. i think at the same time as the supply chain recovery, there are new issues. supply chains are repositioning. partly because of geopolitics. pa

so while many has said that china's targets are not ambitious enough, even as china pledge that it would achieve a peak and carbon dioxide emissions before 2030, and carbon neutrality before 2060, it is still more realistic than some of the u. s. numbers in which the u. s. wants to just cut emissions by half by 2030. so i think the coal industry has had a fair head start warning that change is coming to the industry and that this will prevent a bigger shake out in the market because they will have ample time to prepare and pivot. now with this global energy crisis going on, that we've talked so much about and the need for fossil fuels right now, does it take away from the importance of it when the u. s. is out there calling for opec to increase the oil output? i'm talking more so about the overall conference when we're talking about all of these promises. it does take away a lot from it. as we've been talking about the for the past couple of weeks, it almost makes us sound hypocritical because the us, that all these arbitrary timelines and deadlines for shifting the countries over to gre

china is coming along. the ability to solve these problems on a global basis is going to take a long time. banks and other financial players are playing a meaningful role. capital allocation is changing. one of the things that's having a big impact on markets is institutional allocators of capital are demanding different things. we have created a framework where we said that the other -- over the next decade we will commit $760 billion to advisory financing or investing capital. to support a more sustainable planet. and by the way, we define sustainability in a very broad sense. and we talk about climate and also talk about inclusive growth. and we have nine -- subthemes that are important to making the globe more sustainable. in the first year we did $156 billion. and trapped this stuff. and my guess is over time if we continue at the pace that we're at we'll continue to expand that commitment. that's one of the big ways that we as an organization can have impact is we can direct capital and resources to h

china is still in china. what does it mean for the consumer consumption power if we see that deterioration in property? >> it is key as i said in japan. and could be a broad based economy and prolonged inflation. if it persists that could devalue the wealth of households and making households and bore to repay their debts. >> betty, great to have you with us. we will have more analysis on china. jacqueline joins us out of beijing. the bond selloff is rising to a record. and is there any way that investors are seeking shelter? >> they are providing shelters-h the chinese bank bonds over the past six months right on this chart is second best in property bonds, the blue line. this performance, we could see is a vote of confidence in the financial system. this is after lenders rising default risk. and relatively stable but ultimately there are concerns for china's banking sector given the risks of default. >> coming up next, general electric splitting into three companies. we hear from the c.e.o. about his career

but don't china for you. they are working with the rest of the world. insignificant ways, all of this though, is set against the backdrop of new u. s. moves to bolster trade ties with the rest of asia. as the u. s. is working to counter china's influence just 24 hours after she and biden met for the 1st time via video on tuesday, china's vice president stress that beijing and washington should keep their focus on cooperation. managing control their differences to not only bring the bilateral relationship back on track, but also contribute to the world economic recovery and peace. joining us now to break all this down, professor richard will host of economic update always a pleasure to have you on professor will top us trade and commerce officials are meeting this week with their counterparts in japan, south korea, india, but not china in attempt to build stronger economic ties with friendly nations in asia. why leave china out of these discussions? well, i think it's a combination policy. you reach out with o

is gonna back up tiwana, china invades. and then you've been telling, this is very dangerous to me because you're getting 2 different makers and all they know today then media is not covering that the media is not se, nope, according to the chinese minister, they yes, bite and told them that if we made taiwan, they're not gonna do anything about it. that's exactly opposite of the rhetoric that we're hearing out of the media out of this white house here at home. do they not think people talk to each other? well, and keep in mind that we got into the 1st gulf war when you had the administration basically say to a brand, we don't, we don't mind if you invade kuwait or erect, we don't, might have to invade kuwait and they did because they were given the green light that the president has now, given china, essentially the green light to take action against taiwan and they are watching very closely as the u. s. doesn't do anything around the world to, to kind of step up in the face of these kinds of aggressive pastors, whether it

and china. it did not break new ground, except perhaps on china's commitment to reducing methane emissions, but a lot of people, easier knowing they could come together for a joint communiquÉ. taylor: in the past, we looked at it as u.s. versus china, and this represents a shift of u.s. and its allies pressuring china to play fair, to play by the fare rules. is that going to work better where you need the west pressuring china because the u.s. can't do it on its own? >> that is something we will see in the framework from the biden administration in which national security, a framework for asia that will work closely with allies, but again, there have been warnings from president xi about the rest of the world circling the wagons against china, and the extent to which the u.s. can cores its allies on a key issue to keep china out of the technology supply chain is certainly somewhat weak. other countries don't see china the same way completely, even though they oppose what they see as chinese bul

to the other case is a colony of china. and from colony a few came back. cartoon has always been very powerful that even the chinese government knows that to some extent they're quite afraid of. it was quite a little bit of lucky for me. i'm currently working from daddy and danny. i think this is the only 2 newspaper that allowed me to go cartoon. but there are a lot of father, young cotton is where it's not the job and they were quite afraid of the new national security law. they don't want to draw the national flag or the hong kong stack and they won't play with the national anthem. they used to make fun of seeing things so right right now they are afraid of doing as trying to cotton their red lines everywhere. and we won't know where the red line moved on one side from rock direction. and it's actually the casing right now in hong kong. me. so it's important for us to, to keep on turing, i've got cartoon and to one day, this is a, b, i. e, if the thing that they're, they're not going to do something i'm asked, but to me

and china. i think in china's case we might come to this in a second, it actually reversed 17 years or so of reforms on global public health where it was being more cooperative, relatively more transparent for the most part with some bumps throughout that period, and what 2020s did was bring it to a halt and reverse it. i think it is a separate dynamic and not just a continuation of what we had previously. >> i get to the subtitle but just on the u.s.-china stuff, china's lack of cooperation with the w.h.o., trump's got a very salty, not sure what the rules are on the commonwealth -- >> in the audience, probably the -- >> trump says something very spicy about what campaign has done to him, to them personally. but talk to us a little bit about what you discovered in terms of the w.h.o. politics. >> in trump's case the shock to him of having to shut down the economy really cost him to turn reinventions on xi jinping and doors those in his administration wanted a more comprehensive continued approa

i'd like to announce any holden's message. china and united states have jointly released at china us joined glasgow declaration and enhancing climate action in 2020 a line. shortly after that came john kerry confirming what amounts to some sort of partnership the united states and china have no shortage of differences. but on climate and climate cooperation is the only way to get this job done. this is not a discretionary thing, frankly. this is science, it's math and physics that dictate the road that we have to travel. china and the u . s. aren't only the 2 biggest economies on earth. they're also responsible for the biggest emissions of carbon dioxide and methane gases. and that's why such a joint effort may have added value details about exactly what effect to below have . i'll limited at this stage. but regardless of that, it's given a lift to proceedings here at a difficult time. earlier boris johnson had headed back to glasgow on an electric train, not the private jet. he used to fly to london last week. his mission to try bridging the gaps on a final agreement. the world is h

let's begin with china. we knew that president xijinping wouldn't attend cop26, the climate change conference in glasgow. what we didn't know was that his country would absent itself from many of the key agreements, too. a pledge to cut methane by 2030? not there. a pledge to phase out coal? not there. as for agreeing that global temperatures should be allowed to rise no more than 1.5 degrees above pre—industrial levels, forget it. david, you're in the heart of things up in glasgow. tell us what china has and has not signed up to, and why it matters. china's the biggest polluter. something like 28% of global emissions come from chinese soil. so any effort to tackle climate change pretty well has to involve the chinese. so far, they have actually stuck to their guns in terms of existing policy. there were high hopes, especially from the uk presidency of this process, that in the run—up to it, there might be some new breakthrough chinese initiative. but that didn't happen. there were some minor concessions

and china to a military conflict. find it and xi jinping asked biden and xi jinping have spoken on the phone twice this year. this is the first time the conversation is being billed as a summit. senate majority leader chuck schumer could be set to fast-track a bill aimed at competing with china by attaching it to a must pass defense bill this week. the bill would boost domestic semiconductor manufacturing with $62 billion and authorize another $190 billion to research and development. the china bill passed the senate in june but is being held up in the house. china launches the beijing stock exchange intended as a platform for small and medium-sized companies that face difficulties raising capital. about 70 companies will migrate from the existing chinese fours and an additional 10 will debut for the first time. global news on air and on bloombergquint take is powered by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in or than 120 countries. i am su keenan and this is bloomberg. >> more ambitious and somewhat expected. last

into china. the world needs china, china needs the world and we have henry kissinger talking about improvement, and optimism about the relationship. so it does seem that there's a continuing -- tinge of positive moving between china and relations with the world. mark: you're right, the narrative at the moment is definitely continuinged more -- tinged more positively. and the xi-biden summit or virtual summit where there was a positive takeaway. not a massive one. and they'll need to distinguish between the fact that it was definitely positive. jut very incrementally so. the fact that they met at all and as you say that's encouraged or furthered by some of the sounds we're hearing of the new economy forum here. we're hearing some generally very positive statements. but i wouldn't want to run too far. and i'm thankful you didn't ask me to explain that bit and crypto because i can never explain that asset class. dani: i don't know if anyone really can or we're taking a stab in the dark. really inter

that means there's one china. taiwan and china. not china turns it one way. other countries interpret it another way. we maintained the illusion of one china. so this is a pretty big deal. i think it's dangerous because the more we push on taiwan to china, the more we risk a con in grags in the taiwan straits. >> there may have been semantic differences there in the president biden, what he's said, for example, at a town hall versus for example the summit he had with the leader of china last week. senior administration officials says biden was clearly reaffirming the one china policy. but ambassador, it's interesting. so china is threatened or upset by the united states' democracy inviting taiwan, a democracy, to a meeting about democracy. what's the threat for china? >> well, china sees taiwan not as a separate country. and china sees taiwan as an island over there that is democratic, but from china's perspective is chinese. and that's the main reason why china feels taiwan should not be invited separately to this summit. >> right. it's kind of like what it

and china that they'll work gather climate action. the countries issued their joints deck liberation separately on wednesday, or amvoy said they would cooperate, seek, celebrate emission reductions and meets the temperature goals of the 2015 paris agreements. yeah, local gold. closer climate is a common challenge faced by humanity and will impact the wellbeing of future generations is becoming increasingly urgent and severe. turning a future challenge into a crisis happening now on the subject of climate change. there is more agreement between china and the u. s. the divergence making it merrier with huge potential for corporation. the united states and china have no shortage of differences, but on climate and climate cooperation is the only way to get this job done. this is not a discretionary thing, frankly. this is science. it's math and physics that dictate the road that we have to travel. well, a heads of the last day of the summit on friday, the nearly $200.00 nations taking parts have not worked out. the final details of how to

and china moving forward? because again, whether president biden conveyed a stronger message for china or not, and maybe that's being debated right now. china is certainly claiming that the u. s . has not well 1st, it's very important that the tone for the, from the top was set constructively in this conversation. and that tone from the top will ensure that the negotiations that occur among junior bureaucrats in various fields, whether they be military trade, taiwan will be construct, will be undertaken and a cordial and respectful way. some of the rhetoric over the past year has been pretty intense. as far as taiwan is concerned, i regard this as the most important potential flash point in the us china relationship. it's a flash point because any mistake in tie when these air space or any mistake in the south china sea, where there is of course, increasing naval activity, both on the chinese side and on the us side. any mistake can result in a very, very serious diplomatic situation that could disrupt world m

and the world found itself with 2 chinas. at 1st, taiwan was seen as the real china. but that changed in the seventy's when the u. s . and the u. n. recognized beijing as the official, china and ty, ones, republic of china became what we have to day, a largely unrecognized non state. ah, the taiwanese means different things to different people. did the divide between those who say ty, one is the republic of china, which is the status quo, and others who say taiwan is just well, taiwan? ah, don't you, dear, is in the republic of china camp. this is common for families like he is who arrived from china after the civil war 70 years ago. it's willoughby, does this bill or forging foam? obeyed the man for life high? no, i'm a hyphen usually bigger for me is the way to the only thing i felt either how i got hired to run to meet with her or mental judges. man go me. yeah, ha, ha ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha ha. dungeons ear lives with his wife, 2 kids and his elderly father. about tyler? oh, oh oh, i mean, oh oh oh, being wrong, granpa was a came t soldier who fought a

in china, there is a process in china. if you allege someone did something to you, you can do this in multiple ways. posting ah, are writing other internet is one of the many ways. and each way of dealing with this will trigger different consequences. i'm so happy that we all know that punch, right, as a household naming chimeras is highly liked, and she is highly respected. she is no, not only in china, she is know everywhere. and i'm pretty sure once i will continue to be very famous, very well liked and very well respected throughout the world. this is what matters the most. and i hope events like this will not be a highly publicized or politicized, because that's not the most constructive way to deal with such highly personal matters to start with. and privacy need to be respected and privacy is what matters when you have, you know, very, very personal things emotional things like this. so i'm just going to share this with him later. this is from one of our viewers have been following the story on my laptop at vincent

as influence, and now that influences being undermined by china and china's way of life. it's very interesting because obviously there's a lot of pressure from the business community to keep exactly what you just said going where we can export our culture to china. but obviously there have been some concerns in recent years over that now been expected that in the discussion will also surround the issue of climate change. what would the by the ministration be asking for from china in that regard? well here's, here's part of the problem with the questions about climate change, right. is that yes, essentially what the white house, the signaling in advance of it is that look, they're going to impress upon china that this isn't really something that they're asking as a bargaining chip. this is in china's best interest. but here's here, the factor trying to doesn't care about climate change right now. they care about energy care about cheap energy for their people. and so china is rapidly, as you guys know, building a large numbers of coal powered plants and getting them online

this is china with mock-ups according to satellite images of u.s. aircraft carriers and other naval vessels that the u.s. could operate. we showed those satellite images on the screen. mockups of the aircraft carriers for exercises. and add this to the current mix of what we're looking at. you have the hypersonic missile test that caught the intelligence and the pentagon off guard. you have aggressive flyovers of taiwan increasing not decreasing. and some very belligerent language coming from the chinese. we are back with the panel. jeff, where do you think this is on the white house alert, you know, as far as what they talk about, what they care about on the national security front? >> i think it's high and i think, bret, it just underscores the extent to which china and the relationship with china is sort of the underpinning all of president biden's foreign policy. when i was-when he was at the g-20 and i was traveling with him last week, he was asked about china and, of course, he has this virtual meeting coming up with the president xi and he sa

you, also, were inside china when you spoke out. five nights in a cargo box ten months later to escape because you were on its most wanted list. is he right that there is no real way out for peng shuai? >> um, it's -- if we don't speak out, there's really no way for her to continue to survive in that kind of entire culture. and she's already made her interview and to -- and to basically be played -- play a role in the undermining the severity of this assault, i really feel the wta's demand not only ensure her physical safety, her freedom, but also to demand for investigation to hold the premiere -- vice premiere responsible. the kind of details she shared in her blog, how he brought her into his -- he assaulted her seven years ago. and then, he was obsessed about her and brought her back to his home. even to cause her to accept -- you know, sexual assault against her. she cried all night. and this go on for a period of t time. after that, he discarded her. and so, this is brutal. this -- you know, humiliating. this degrading to any

china does so against particular interpretation of history. china is ambitious. china is aggrieved. and it is trying to increase its influence, especially in its neighborhood, in the south china sea and the taiwan straits. the united states, for its part, is worried about its relative decline, influence, and relative wealth. the two countries have truly begun clashing in the western pacific. they have interests that are clashing. i'm afraid that for the long-term this is going to be a worldwide competition in the security, economic, technological, and international law and ideology spheres. this is going to be with us for a long time. host: where do our interests class? guest: our interests clash in the western pacific, where the united states, she has not signed the u.n. convention on the law of the sea, never act in accordance with it. do not see this enormous area as china's leg. we see it as part of the global commons through which all countries should be able to sail or fly, in accordance with international law. whereas china increasingly is trying to assert its dominance in th

to have greater china's focus on china. when there is a lot of pushback in some of these recent decisions that i think really for the first time are showing that the rubber is starting to meet the road, in terms of a u.s. shift towards china. especially for example, the withdrawal from afghanistan or this recent deal with australia with a submarine. these are disruptive decisions, but they could be part of this larger shift. there is a lot of criticism, for both parties, two elements of those decisions. i'm wondering, how do you do that? >> i think the good news is, right now when it comes to china, they're strong bipartisan support both in the house and the senate. that we need to basically deal with the issues associated with china. there's a lot of legislation in the works. we've got the military build. the pacific initiative. they're building on that. the pentagon gets it. so, i actually think that is one of the real good things in our congress right now. people are are not fighting the problem in terms of understanding

however, to see a china, it is not the china needs to climb the local chains and now it's more of a direct competitor to united states. so there's more of a need, therefore, to renegotiate economic partnership as well. to also accommodate on the one format they can actually come, deep level are going to leave right there because unfortunately time has come up against us. but i want to thank all i guess, victor gao, hydro clean and glen decent. thank you to course for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website. i'll just here at dot com for further discussion. go to our facebook page that facebook dot com forward slash a j inside story. you can also join the conversation on twitter. we are at a g inside story for me, robotics and i hope to hear you bye. for now. the ah and a november 21st venezuelans head for the poles, teaches the regional and municipal representatives. after 4 years of election boycott can proposition party effect change at the ballot box and will this be a step towards progress for the rising number of those living in extreme poverty? the ve

so if you want to the fuel situation, just the found china, you know, we will stick by the one china policy. and this is where the implicitly comes in because it's a button that he calls china explains, we're fully committed to one china policy just combo. well, they don't repeat the rich rhetoric international community. one days after getting off the call with china, america begin suggesting pie one must have an independence or presentation in the room, which isn't just a stepping stone, but it's like the last that before the session. so it's know, it's a little bit like you're going to want to have both ways to say we're going to live by the agreements. but at the same time that you throw them away, you know how to strategic advantage. so it's very, how can you have diplomacy or, or is it must be very frustrating? well, in it but georgia, me, where's the, where's the gray hairs in the professionalism? well this, i mean, anyone that knows anything about american policy in the pacific is so preaching ambiguity that that's the corners the corner stone of it. ok. and that is before th

one china policy. and this is where the implicitly comes in because that's what it calls, trying to explain. we're fully committed to one china policy just combo, but they don't repeat these rhetoric towards the international community. after getting off the call with china, america begin suggesting by one must have an independent representation in the urine, which isn't just a stepping stone, but it's like the last that before secession. so this know if a little bit like your brand new on both ways. you say we're going to live by the agreements, but at the same time a throw them away in order to how's your strategic advantage? so, it's very how can you have diplomacy or is it must be very frustrated. well, in each but georgia, me, where's the, where's the gray hairs in the professional isabel this? i mean, anyone that knows anything about american policy in the pacific is so preaching ambiguity. that's, that's the corners. that's a cornerstone of it. ok. and that is before the quote unquote rise of ch

if anyone in china wants to split any part of china against china or from china, he or she becomes our public enemy. >> xi and his loyalists often respond with what aboutism. they argue, what about american human rights abuses. >> if any country has practiced genocide, it is not china. enslavery of negro americans for example, for hundreds of years, that's the real crime against humanity. >> china's abuses are mostly hidden from western eyes. >> why you are here? >> we are here to believe what -- we are here to film what we believe are camps of uyghurs. >> xi's -- is part of a larger campaign to snuff out separatist threats everywhere. from xinjiang to tibet to hong kong. it's one of the final pieces of china's revolution under xi jinping. >> for years, china had had an almost apologetic approach to its human rights abuses. xi jinping said, that's no longer how we are going to talk about it. we are not going to apologize. they were just going do it. >> for all the criticism from the west, it's important to understand that in china, which is more than 90% hahn chinese, there is not much

let's get back to china. investors are eyeing chinese education stocks after dow jones reported beijing plans to issue a dozen licenses that would allow companies to offer afterschool tutoring. what is this all about? given the clampdown over the sector. >> obviously the clampdown on private tutoring was one of the biggest things that happened this summer. a summary of regulatory scrutiny all around -- a summer of regulatory scrutiny all around. they asked all of the companies to become nonprofits. this dow jones report is laying out the government is planning to do that by issuing licenses to these companies allowing them to provide touring services -- provide tutoring services from grade nine and younger. they will have to do it on a nonprofit basis. those companies will be allowed to make a profit when it comes to training adults for professional licenses. but not for tutoring of kids. that will have to be nonprofit. haidi: more insight into further regulatory shery: -- more insight to further regulatory a

is great because china is on our side against the soviet union, even though china was then in the midst of this cultural revolution. but all great and good guys because outside and that went on from why to why? because it was still a grade below that it was russian. and you can see that manifested in the expansion of nato. and then i think, you know, right, you know, with trauma and weight, china is now a serious economic rival. i mean, you know, it will be the number one economy in the world, but trump made this into a known media, logical conflict. i mean, he was taking on everybody who's of economic interest class and those of the united states when buying is done, he said, going back to the cold war aspect to it, which is china's e d. a logical rival, chinese amount waging some sort of a flight project. they've got an american idea that waging a flight of b r a. and we're going to go, we're going to go to a short break, but george's right. that's why they got rid of for those reasons. exactly. all right, we're going to go to a short breaking up about your break. we'll continue our d

and china. in china's case, we might come to this in a second, it reversed 17 years or so on global public health where it was more cooperative,e, relatively more transparent for the most part with some bumps and 2020 brought that to a halt and reverse it so i think it. is a separate dynamc is not just a continuation of what we had previously. >> in a second i'll get to the subtitle, and of the old international order but on the u.s. china, fascinating material about china's corporation with the who, i'm not sure the language was. >> the audience evidence quote. >> he said something about what xi jinping has done to him personally but talk about what you discovered in terms of who politics. >> entrance case, the shock to him of having tohe shut down the economy in turn with a vengeance and xi jinping in the administration wanted a more comprehensive continued approach but after who questioned, this is fascinating, the who finds out they have this global crisis in the dictator in china, they beli

increase the appeal of china. while the comically speaking, sometimes i often to remit and economies eat on image. ah, but by following it on path, it does not speak to me africa, nissan, anemic. in terms of balance. and i think those 2 things, one is to constants. however, our look at everything that means that by the leader of china as more public diplomacy, but it meant to be those of the continent. and generally, the local population that has been complaining about increased chinese influence in ways that sometimes these advantages efficient local antennae, golden are becoming. but for this question by 31 to andy mach bouncing spring in, earlier in the week we showed on al jazeera report, why chinese mind officials had sanctioned the beating of a local man in the democratic republic of congo for stealing cobalt rock. this was videoed, as we showed widely, we reported on it when anti mocked, says, you know, china's initial false, always the empathy with africa being equal with africa, understanding the needs of

-china. it comes to taiwan, though, the world has a different view of taiwan than it does of hong kong. there is great anxiety. the potential of a clash between the two is real as far as he is concerned. so we will have to watch what they do. shery: it was one virtual summit that really doesn't change the long-term picture. you need to have a better strategy for both sides to come together. this coming at a time when we continue to have all of these other issues in the background as well as supply chain disruptions and inflationary pressures as well. haslinda: communications need to be kept open. they talked about how they want janet yellen to keep talking, communication has to be open. today there will be a discussion on emerging power. we have a minister of india who will be weighing in on the issue, coming as the backdrop of tensions between india and china as a border going on, and the clashes remained. shery: what to expect the rest of the day as we are wrapping up the final day of the b