bush, donald trump got that. -- donald trump never got that. you need to put together a coalition, which donald trump is incapable of crating. there needs to be liz cheney. i do think she is going to succeed in her primary. i feel good about that. [applause] what she understands is she has political capital and she is using it. a lot of people have political capital who have not used it and we have got to get them to -- if we say, yes, good, use it. send them a note. do something on social media saying, thank you for speaking out and doing this. i have had people, numbers who are out there, not saying much about trump, but going thank you for saying that, or thank you for agreeing with this. they need support. >> from the center right to the far left over there. >> michael, we have the microphones to give people to ask the questions. thank you for pointing that out. >> thank you. >> sorry. who is talking? >> for the panel, my question is simple. you are faced with the republican party and i cannot even tell you what it stands for. did you want

bush, donald trump got that. -- donald trump never got that. you need to put together a coalition, which donald trump is incapable of crating. there needs to be liz cheney. i do think she is going to succeed in her primary. i feel good about that. [applause] what she understands is she has political capital and she is using it. a lot of people have political capital who have not used it and we have got to get them to -- if we say, yes, good, use it. send them a note. do something on social media saying, thank you for speaking out and doing this. i have had people, numbers who are out there, not saying much about trump, but going thank you for saying that, or thank you for agreeing with this. they need support. >> from the center right to the far left over there. >> michael, we have the microphones to give people to ask the questions. thank you for pointing that out. >> thank you. >> sorry. who is talking? >> for the panel, my question is simple. you are faced with the republican party and i cannot even tell you what it stands for. did you want

donald trump can never ever be commander-in-chief again. it is not just what happened on january 6 but everything after the election day that disqualifies him from ever being within 100 city blocks of any real power. with that being said there is a danger with that. cannot have nuclear weapons ever again for the third party could also get quite a few democrats and we could very well end up in the position were donald trump is been sworn in again. that being said you're not going to like me for this question is that more immoral to vote for the thing that feels good, the third party and 24 or is it more moral to vote for the democrats? i am not going to shake your question head-on. [laughter] i paid for this microphone. [laughter] the morality in this case is option analogy. i think we need to at this very moment consider investing in a third-party ballot lent against donald trump in 2024. we may end up in a situation rico spent $25 million in all 50 states, we get the ballot i'm can destroy donald trump the spoiler is very risky scenario. n

and that is what we're seeing with donald trump. and you have democrats who are very excited about this behind closed doors hoping that the candidates that donald trump helps to choose for republicans to run in some of these suburban districts, they very far right and something that will turn off those suburban moms an dads that are out there. but the republicans also are concerned about this. they won't say it to anyone -- they wouldn't come on your air or go on fox news and talk about it too much but they are concerned about this because they feel really good. like i said, about how the midterms are going to turn out for them and the one thing that they're nervous about it donald trump and the scandals around him first of all turning off voters. and then also choosing candidates who are too far right and then running in these suburbs and mucking things up. and it is interesting because last year we talked to tom emmer on a playbook live event and he's the head of the republicans in the house and he said, that he didn't think it wa

it's because i believe in donald trump. i was in the trenches fighting for the america-first agenda and that's what i'm going to go in the united states senate. >> we're going to have more questions but first, a raise your hand question. the question is, do you think, as some high-level republicans have suggested, that for the betterment of the republican party, it's time for donald trump to stop talking to be 2020 election and move on. if yes, you think he should move on, raise your hand. mr. dolan is the ronald one who has not raised his hands. mr. vance, why did not -- you not raise your hand? >> we have to get to the bottom of this. two particular things that happened in 2020. the first is ma mark zuckerberg, the founder of facebook spent 220 impact to buy boards of election. that could be illegal and number two, they've have censored reports about the computer of hunter biden. >> why did you raise your hand? >> because elections are a staged issue. in ohio we have very secure election. two studies have shown there are

what exactly was donald trump asking congressman to do? >> explain to the president that what he asked is legally impossible and violates the united states constitution. i'm not gonna do it. >> all in starts now. good evening from new york. i'm chris hayes. the senate judiciary commission closed its [inaudible] for judge ketanji brown jackson, after ten hours on camera testimony, the proceedings move behind closed doors. throughout the day, democrats and some republicans asked substantive questions about key decisions, that likely will come before the court. questions of methodology and her approach. others republican senators chose once again to share their conspiracy theories and grievances about past conference nation hearings. >> the meetings they had with judge kavanaugh, it was literally ambush, he was ambushed. how would you feel if we did that to you? >> senator, i have appreciated the kindness that each of you have shown me. >> what do you say to some of them who may doubt that they can one day achieve the same great heights that

the donald trump of 2020. perhaps the donald trump of 2024. the difference between donald trump of 2000 and his later years is that he did not really have anything to say. you can hear him saying that in that clip. he is talking about his popularity and his liberty and the public response to his efforts to begin a presidential campaign. all of this is very familiar. he did not have an ideology. the ideology was good for me, i am famous. there was another candidate who is running within the reform party. the reform party was a third-party that was begun with as a vehicle for his third-party presidential campaign in 1992 and 1996. the core of the reform party is the same group of people ideologically we think of as the trump base or the republican base. these are people who are anti-trade agreements. these are people who talk about things like restrictive immigration policies. they actually had a candidate who spoke their language in that campaign in 2000. he was pat buchanan. he was a guy that donald trump ran

and, you know, we know donald trump, we know he does these things. in that way, too, we know his character, but i think it drives home something that there are a lot of foreign leaders, you know, vladimir putin is not the only foreign leader. there's lots of places conceivably that they could come up with if they're going to find the mother load of dirt about hunter biden or joe biden but it always comes back to vladimir putin. even when putin has become a little more unpopular in the united states in the last couple months. and i think, you know, look, that just tells us something about donald trump and something he has with vladimir putin. now, i will say i think at the same time this is playing into something that donald trump is losing some of his juice in the gop. he's still the leader of the party, but we saw this situation with mo brooks, down in i believe it's alabama. if i have that wrong, i apologize, where he's pulling his endorsements, getting in fights with people he's endorses, trying to drive brian kemp in georgia from power. looks lik

the difference between donald trump in 2000 and donald trump in these later years is, he really didn't have anything to say. you can hear him saying in that clip, he is talking about poll numbers, his popularity, his celebrity. he is talking about the public response efforts to begin a presidential campaign. all of this is very familiar. he didn't have an ideology. essentially his ideology was, "vote for me i'm famous." there was another candidate who was running, -- another candidate who was running in the reformed power -- reform party. the core of the reform party is the same group of people ideologically that we now think of as the trump base or the republican base. these are people who are anti-trade agreements, they talk about things like restrictive immigration policies and retributive law and order policies. they had a candidate who spoke their language in that campaign in 2000 and he was a guy that donald trump ran against and ultimately lost two. or pulled out in lieu of losing too. canon, his slogan was america first. he talked about building a wall or a barrier along the bo

be engaged to donald trump jr. in a statement committee chair thompson writes, miss guilfoyle met with donald trump inside the white house, spoke at the rally that took place before the riot on january 6 and apparently played a key role to organize and raise funds for the event. the select committee is seeking information from her about these and other matters. because she backed out of her original commitment we issue the subpoena to compel her to testify. he expect her to comply with the law and cooperate. joining us is legal analyst neal katiel and now a georgetown law professor and jonathan carl, author of "betrayal." on the breaking news, this is clearly part of the follow the money part of their investigation? >> absolute. she was there on january 6. she was in the oval office when donald trump had that conversation with mike pence and told him as he admitted to me you can either be a patriot or a whatever. >> right. >> and -- but i think if you look at the letter from bennie thompson the role in raising mone

and people have concerns of donald trump's ego, and who won the 2020 election. i mean, he's somehow managed to advance its significant amount of republicans, that the election was stolen from. him the fact of the matter is, is not going to drive the vote in 22, and 2024? it didn't even drive the vote in january of 2021. so, you know, he is creating problems for the republican party by focusing, trying to focus the base of the party, on things that don't necessarily matter to the people who decide general elections. >> right. i think that that -- there are two really important points. that one is the boring this. i think this is, say what you will about donald trump, generally not boring. you know what i mean? that is not the -- he -- has ability to stoke attention, to be outrageous, to gain attention, but the other thing 's attention is a cool cruel mistress. peoples attention spans are short. if you keep saying the same thing in obsessing over the same things, it is hard to keep their attention. the other thing that i think you pointed out here is that there is

donald trump did it. i was a donald trump so i'll -- ohio chairman fighting for america first priorities. vladimir putin did not invade ukraine under president trump. jd, you said i don't care one way or another what happens in ukraine. >> a quick follow-up. would you support the no-fly zone? >> we should not have american pilots flying in ukraine. what we should be doing is providing the migs from poland that president zelenskyy has requested. that is peace through strength. we need to make sure they have the weapons they need to defend ukraine. >> we are sticking with ukraine and i have a 32nd follow-up for you, mr. mandel. you are endorsed by congressman call thorne, who called ukrainian president zelenskyy a thug. do you agree? >> i fundamentally disagree. i think the thug is vladimir putin. people forget he was the kgb station chief in east germany when the wall fell. the kgb station was surrounded and he was embarrassed for his life and mother russia, and he hated president reagan and hated us. thos

claudia:¿a quiÉn llamÓ donald trump entre las 11 y casi 7:00 de la noche de ese dÍa ? no hay respuesta, pero hay evidencias que durante ese tiempo donald trump se comunicÓ hoy intento comunicarse con los senadores republicanos y el lÍder de la minorÍa republicana de la cÁmara de representantes. llamadas que no aparecen en el registro de la casa blanca. lo que se aparece una llamada recibida de su ex asesora las 8:37 de la maÑana y otra llamada recibida de juli giuliani a las 8:45 a.m. se conoce que donald trump durante la maÑana llamÓ el vicepresidente mike pence, pero esa llamada tampoco estÁ en los registros de la casa blanca. se investiga si donald trump utilizÓ un telÉfono desechable o se comunicÓ a travÉs del telÉfono de otras personas, algo que estÁ prohibido por ley. donald trump indicÓ que no sabe que es un telÉfono desechable y que nunca habÍa escuchado ese tÉrmino. en washington, claudia, univisiÓn. jorge: tenemos la informaciÓn sobre el caso de ayotzinapa. la marina de mÉxico ayudÓ a manipular y ocultar pruebas en investigaciÓn sobre l

court donald trump committed crimes. you have the judiciary, which can't charge anybody with a crime, saying things like to the department of justice, we understand that you're prosecuting the people who breached the capitol, the foot soldiers, but they are but pawns in donald trump's game. and you have the judiciary saying that donald trump's conduct on january 6th is the essence of a conspiracy. but these two branches of government can't prosecute anybody. the branch of government responsible for prosecuting people, the executive branch through the department of justice, we get crickets. this is not the way government is supposed to work. >> and it seems it only works that way for donald trump or maybe because he's a republican. i don't know what's going on at doj. just dial this back for a second. it would seem to me if donald trump is involved in this conspiracy, he would have to know that he really did lose. we have lots of people on the record, including william barr, who is , so that means the head of his departme

it is actually impossible to bring donald trump in. to say that is crazy that will not happen. which we have done before. i know something you and i have discussed before is an idea of right wing far right ideologies, autocrats with crazy ideas and the rest laughing. i worry that is happening here. >> in fact yes. it can seem crazy because the last person to be interested in any rules of the house or anything is donald trump. he has no interest in learning about anything but the constitution. i think he is above it. what is really scary is if you immerse yourself for years in the heads of autocrats like i have what is scary is the idea he would be there and they would not think he would be there very long. as speaker the line of succession to the head of state is very short. they would start immediately impeaching or god knows what. the key thing with people who think like donald trump who were completely lawless, nothing is beyond the bounds of imagination. that has been what hindered people for 100 years, the destruction that people like autocrats can cause. you have to go in

that is what donald trump calls genius. and on saturday, outstanding time to think about that genius for a few more days, donald trump once again called vladimir putin smart. and while he was at it, he attacked the president, who has united the world against vladimir putin. donald trump sought, the problem is not that putin is smart, which of course, he's smart. but the real problem is that our leaders are dumb. putin is playing biden like a drum. donald trump has read these words from a teleprompter in star, without the slightest indication that he believed any of them. the russian attack on ukraine's appalling. it's an outrage, and then atrocity it should never have been allowed to occur. also this weekend, the republican party had to make a decision about how they feel about congressman marjorie taylor greene speaking at an event where the host expressed his personal admiration, and the groups admiration, for both vladimir putin, and adolf hitler. and finally, after about three days of thinking about it, house republican

it's because i believe in donald trump. i was in the trenches fighting for the america-first agenda and that's what i'm going to go in the united states senate. >> we're going to have more questions but first, a raise your hand question. the question is, do you think, as some high-level republicans have suggested, that for the betterment of the republican party, it's time for donald trump to stop talking to be 2020 election and move on. if yes, you think he should move on, raise your hand. mr. dolan is the ronald one who has not raised his hands. mr. vance, why did not -- you not raise your hand? >> we have to get to the bottom of this. two particular things that happened in 2020. the first is ma mark zuckerberg, the founder of facebook spent 220 impact to buy boards of election. that could be illegal and number two, they've have censored reports about the computer of hunter biden. >> why did you raise your hand? >> because elections are a staged issue. in ohio we have very secure election. two studies have shown there are

ba da ba ba ba. >> (♪♪ mÚsica ♪♪) . >> donald trump y algunos asesores, participaron en conspiración criminal, lo dice, así el comité del ataque al capitolio que intentó que presidentes defraudaran al país para crear esta situación . >> a donald trump le informaron que perdió la elección varias ceces y liderógualmente esta campaña para la situación del capitolio así lo dice el documento que dice tener pruebas por esta situación . >> planes que tenían planes de bloquear la transferencia del poder . >> jason es uno de los entrevistados . >> pondrías las manos al fuego por donald trump de que él no sabnia de esta situación . >> Él es humano está consciente de esto, y lo (inentendible) a él lo más cercanos lo traicionaron no solamente a él al país también . >> dice también que donald trump y su abogado son parte del plan corrupto para el conteo electoral y la conspiración para el traspaso del poder, pero el ex presidente dice que es noticia falsa, insiste en que le robaron las elecciones, y quieren evitar que se lance nuevamente en la presidencia . >> la gente co

trump did into i was donald trump's ohio republican chairman and fighting for the work in verse policy that he secured the southern border and the strength and vladimir putin did not invade ukraine over president trump and jd said that i don't care one way or another what happens in ukraine. >> on ask you a quick follow-up his own would you support the no-fly zone. >> we should not have american pilots flying in ukraine what we should bein doing is providing t the makes for: that volodymyr zelensky is' requested it, we need to make sure they have the weapons they needed to defend it ukraine's sovereignty. >> thank you sticking with ukraine and i have a follow-up, 32nd follow-up for you josh mandel your door spike congressman hawthorne who calls ukrainian volodymyr zelensky a thug. >> i fundamentally disagree and a thug in this cup elected this work is vladimir putin they forget that vladimir putin was the station chief any serving with the ball fell, that station was surrounded and he embarrassed for his life and his russia and he hated president reagan and us everyone here watching at

>> donald trump made it very clear. so clear that the talent did not kill one american soldier the last year of the trump administration. he spoke clearly and forcefully. that is a credible deterrent. when he talked to foreign leaders he was always strong and clear and that included dictators around the world. i have every confidence that we would not be in in situation because donald trump made that very clear and would have made that very clear to vladimir putin. that's why that didn't happen. it would have to be the strangest of coincidences, vladimir putin wanted to bring ukraine back into the fold of russia and took a giant bite of crimea when joe biden was last in the white house. it's strange he would lose that an tight for 4 years and not move on ukraine until after donald trump left the white house or perhaps because donald trump left the white house to amass troops last april. he was moving on this last april, sean. president biden did not do anything to confront him. he appeased him by lifting sanctions on no

that doesn't mean that donald trump told the truth. his own auditors don't even say he told the truth. but it means his financial activities were hard to pin only on him. and none of this means there were never any legal consequences at all. the people jailed or indicted for their work for trump include the same company's lawyer, its cfo, the long-time former lobbyists who has gotten in trouble for more than one thing. at the end of the day, the evidence shows donald trump did exploit the american legal system, much as he exploited its political system. you don't always need more votes to win, it turns out. you can get away with a lot more if you're rich and powerful, as many people knew. then as every effective thug or gangster knows, you don't go to jail for everything you ever did. you only go to jail for something they can really prove. we'll be right back. (vo) right now, the big switch is happening across the country. small businesses are fed up with big bills and 5g maps that are mostly gaps— they're switching to t-mobile for

in donald trump's lawsuit against his niece, mary trump, donald trump accuses mary trump and others three times, of using burner phones. today, white house communications director kit bedingfield made it clear that president biden, who is the only person in the world who can claim executive privilege in the january six investigation, will not be claiming executive privilege, for ivanka trump or jared kushner. >> the president has spoken to the fact that january 6th was one of the darkest days in our country's history, and we must have a full accounting of what happened, to ensure that it never occurs again. and, he's been quite clear that they posed a unique threat to our democracy, and at the constitutional protections of executive privilege, should not be used to shield from congress or the public, information about an attack on the constitution itself. so, as a result, the white house has decided not to assert executive privilege over the testimony of jared kushner and ivanka trump. >> joining our discussion, now ej dion i comments from washington post, he's a co-author the new book 10

donald trump was known to use other people's phones. some people called dan scovino if they wanted to get the president on the line. he was going back and forth and went to the residence and the oval office. so, anyway, it's still very much a matter of investigation why these calls were not recorded, calls we know about. but i do think they show just how much donald trump and his allies were reaching out to members of congress that day to try to prevent the certification of the election. as you highlighted, he calls tommy tuberville as the capitol is under siege and tries to encourage him to object to the certification of the election. rudy guiliani calls after 150 police officers have been assaulted and again asks for a delay. so what we do see from the calls shows, i think, that donald trump was very much personally involved that day in trying to halt the certification of joe biden's victory to try to cling to power and yes, it's important with they weren't recorded, if there is a document somewhere that has them. we don't know the an

much of donald trump's habitual wrongdoing is not out in the open. in fact, we just saw a another example of that today, when trump called on russian president by vladimir putin, whose army he's marauding through the ukraine, killing ukrainians citizens by the thousands, calling on that man, viewed, rightly right now, as kind of a global villain. to do him a solid and and release dirt about his political opponent sons. today, he did that. hey vladimir, if you're not too busy, hook me up. the brazenness of donald trump's wrongdoing, along with the fact that he has no sense of writer, wrong deeply in his marrow. has actually perversely protected him. when he does something awful, his defenders have been able to say, look, he can't mean any harm, he's doing an openly. he doesn't hide anything, he doesn't even realize it's wrong. he really thought his phone call with ukrainian president zelenskyy back in 2019, shaken it down for dirt on a political opponent was perfectly legitimate. or when he told georgia secretary of state brad raffensperger, to just f

donald trump understands who putin is. he had to work with him every single day -- howard: he also said he was a friend the other day. >> right, absolutely. of course, working with foreign leaders to yield results. look, talk is cheap, and it's pretty prevalent in washington d.c., as you well know, howe wisconsin. the bottom line -- howie. the bottom line is russia didn't invade under donald trump's administration because he knew that had they been aggressive, like north korea, for example, they would have been met with swift, decisive action from our standpoint. howard: gotta that answer -- >> you can say what you want to about the relationship with foreign leaders, but we were safer, the world was safer because of donald trump. howard: well, we appreciate you views, hogan gidley. that debate will, of course, continue. >>> why ukraine is being called the tiktok war and how the app's disturbing images are having a real impact. ♪ because every day matters. and having more of them is possible with verzenio. the only one of

america democracy survive 2020, donald trump was defeated. the guardrails held. turnout increased, what are we worried about? it's fine, what do you say for that argument? >> i come out of a tradition that has not been so tethered to the idea of the democracy being achieved. i come out of a tradition mehdi that has experienced the blunt of america's failure to live up to its principles. and the idea that american democracy is so strong, so resilient, presumes that it has always been the case. and we know for much of our existence and i responded to the matt gates kind of sound. and i'm clear about that, i'm not concluding that these folks are not dangerous. and the most toxic combination we've faced in u.s. history, in my view, when it comes to matters such as these. matters around race, matters around democracy, is the combination of the kind of rabbit races, the loud racist. and the loud liberal moderate who's afraid of going too far. it is the combination of those to that arrest substance of change. that typically keep us from actually aggressively defending o

you have also said that hard donald trump been re-elected in l donald trump been re—elected in 2020, that he would potentially have pulled out of nato. how do you think things would have panned out now because you are saying the unity seems to not be making any kind of difference? ii seems to not be making any kind of difference? , ., ., , difference? if trump had one things would be worse, _ difference? if trump had one things would be worse, the _ difference? if trump had one things would be worse, the russians i difference? if trump had one things| would be worse, the russians would already have captured kyiv may beat six months ago. already have captured kyiv may beat six months ago-— already have captured kyiv may beat six months ago. ambassador bolton, thank ou six months ago. ambassador bolton, thank you for— six months ago. ambassador bolton, thank you forjoining _ six months ago. ambassador bolton, thank you forjoining us _ six months ago. ambassador bolton, thank you forjoining us on _ six months ago. ambassador bolton, thank you forjoining us on the i thank you forjoin

he said that donald trump actually made the ukraine invasion more possible. he said that trump's delay of military aid to ukraine in 2019 as he pressured president zelenskyy for dirt actually made the invasion more likely. he said you still have people in the united states who think the dnc server is there, that hunter biden is missing hundreds of dollars there and to the extent there was a natural environment created made it much more natural for putin. do you agree with that? >> he must have been listening to some of my interviews. i worked as the european affairs director and it's consistent. i think that's right. he did make it a lot easier. he offered the opportunity, this notion this would be a low cost operation that the right, the republicans donald trump would be in his corner and undo or weaken the ability for joe biden to impose costs and i think that's really one of the major things in the week before this war a temperature check for vladimir putin that what was critical to the green light to conduct this war but that's been the case for frankly y

it was donald trump who provided ukraine with the game changing missiles. it was donald trump who warned europe and nato repeatedly about the dangers of russian dependence on -- europe's dependence on russian oil. he was right all along. here with reaction, florida congressman michael waltz along with the author of "the strategy of denial," former trump defense department official, eldridge colby. without the javelins, without the stingers, they've got no shot. are they getting them fast enough? >> well, i mean, as you said, it's already case of somewhat too little, too late but i think it does sound like stuff is getting in their along those as they call them rat lines. but i think what ilhan omar said, these people are standing up other countries, for the life, we need to give them what they need. they can't fight with nurse bats so we should be ensuring that they can get the weapons they need very quickly because in a conventional fight like this, matters of sort of one or 2% can mean a dramatic difference. >> sean: congressman, i'm a new book -- i'm in

donald trump is donald trump. he hasn't changed. he's not going to change. it's more interesting to the washington press corps than it is to the general public. was it the wisest thing in the world to say? perhaps not, but he's donald trump and he says these things. the reality is that vladimir putin is a war criminal. i wouldn't trust anything that came out of it. if he had actual evidence that a crime was committed, if any of us had evidence, we ought to present it, that's obvious. the problem is to your point the source would not be a trustworthy source, obviously, but once again donald trump baited you all and you all took the bait. now we're having to, you know, discuss this. >> i'm not going to debate you about whether trump gets too much coverage or not enough. but he is the leader of your party, sir. at the end of the day, whether you like it or not, he's the leader of your party. are you comfortable with leader of your party playing footsie with vladimir putin? >> here's what i know. playing footsie with vladimir putin, the evidence that's come out

so now, here we are in 2022, donald trump is back at it again. still the same unethical, unpatriotic man he's always been. this man, donald trump, cannot change. he will not change. he is who he is. he will always seek to cheat, he will always seek to get foreign help. >> as we report on this program last night, yesterday, in an interview, donald trump asked vladimir putin to release -- about hunter business -- donald trump said, i would think putin would know the answer to that. i think he should release it. today, north dakota senator said he had no idea what donald trump was talking about, but he completely agrees with him. >> i don't know if he has dirt on biden, if he does he should reveal it,. but he's a war criminal so i don't expect it. he sitting around thinking about ways you can reveal other information, if in fact he has it. i don't know that he has it, so i don't know if woody might be talking about. >> joining us now, eddie glaude, chair of african american studies at princeton university. and, john heilemann, executive editor of th

the evacuist nature of a donald trump republican party. that lawsuit against clinton, one analyst called a press release, i will call it a platform, right? the republican party does not have a platform. they did not adopt one. but i think what is in that lawsuit is essentially how donald trump will run for president again. it shows the emptiness of today's republican party, compared to the responsible sober leadership of a joe biden lead democratic party. >> joe, thank you as always for spending your time soon your weekend with us. david, you're staying with me. >> next, the gop attacks on judge jackson, and why is it more about the state republican party than the two about the supreme court nominee herself? we're gonna take you back to lviv, the western ukrainian city under siege from russian rockets today. an update, just ahead. ♪ limu emu ♪ and doug. we gotta tell people that liberty mutual customizes car insurance so you only pay for what you need, and we gotta do it fast. [limu emu squawks] woo! thirty-four miles per hour! new per

you look at david perdue who's been endorsed by donald trump. he's trailing governor kemp for that nomination there. do you think in georgia specifically, i'm talking specifically to your state here, greg, does a trump endorsement help or hurt or do we still not know? >> the jury is still out on that question. but i think georgia's the biggest test of trump's influence in the entire nation. not just by the fact that he's endorsed seven candidates here but by the fact that he is endorsing candidates in very tough battles where his word and his loyalty and the loyalty to trump among the republican party will be very much tested. this is seen as somewhat of a rescue effort for david perdue, who is trailing governor kemp by as you just saw double digits in some polls and struggling in fund-raising. with the georgia primary less than two months away, perdue is under immense pressure to gain some sort of traction and donald trump is his best bet right now. that is his ace card. he's played it and he's playing it over and over again. he's got nothing e

el gobierno de joe biden anuncia que pondrÁ fin a la medida del ex presidente donald trump que amplia la pretensiÓnexportaciÓn express de inmigrantes aumenta la lista vez garrapatas que puede ser letal. se reportan hospitalizaciones y por ahora no hay un tratamiento para la enfermedad. comienza la ediciÓn nocturna. locutor: Éste ese noticiero univisiÓn ediciÓn nocturna con patricia janiot y leÓn krauze. leon: amigos, buenas noches. comenzamos hoy con la triste imagen de este homenaje emotivo, simbÓlico que en ucrania le dedicaron a los mÁs de 100 niÑos que han muerto durante estas cuatro semanas de intensos ataques, bombardeos rusos. la plaza central de leÓpolis se llenÓ de sillas y carrero las vacÍas en honor a los niÑos muertos. habÍa tambiÉn juguetes, ositos de peluche. el alcalde le pidiÓ a la gente que compartiera esta imagen para denunciar y recordar el terrible precio que el pueblo de ucrania estÁ pagando por esta guerra que es injustificable. hay nuevas imÁgenes satelitales que muestran al ejÉrcito ruso excavando y construyendo lo que parece ser zanjas de t

this is part of problem of donald trump. we kind of run out of words to describe what he is doing and of course it's disgusting but it's much worse than that. it is a fundamental betrayal of the country and it is dangerous. it is dangerous because he is the odds-on favorite to be the republican nominee for president again. he is sending a message to vladimir putin that we are not united, that perhaps he could wait out our national resolve, and it was a betrayal because the way that trump put it was, well, putin might actually give me this dirt on joe biden because he doesn't like this country. he made it very clear that putin might do it because he would want to damage the united states, and again, we have done this so often over the last five years, sort of take a deep breath and say, okay, this is not normal. this is outrageous. but i think we need to understand how dangerous it is at a time of war, and katty is absolutely right, we sometimes tell ourselves these kumbaya stories. we think it's a movie that has a happy endi

what was that like when adam schiff reads to you donald trump. he says murray evanovich is a disaster everywhere. she's been right. he talks about like that is if you personally running the motor pool at the us embassy in mogadishu had personally ruined somalia. what's it like when adam schiff is reading you that to me? yeah, well, so it was a complete surprise obviously to me. i had no idea what was coming and you know when first he announced that he was going to do this understandably. and so there's then there's the anticipation. i mean, what's he gonna say? what's he gonna what is he going to say? what could he say and then the actual tweet itself as you just recounted was ridiculous. it was absolutely ridiculous. and so, you know trying to compose my face, although when i looked back at the video that was played that night of me listening to adam schiff recounting this i mean all of my emotions were there for everybody to see including frankly a little bit of contempt because my eyes rolled i just i couldn't believe that the president of the

he was a key witness in the first impeachment of donald trump, and he joins me now. ambassador, thank you so much. so grateful to have your expertise in the midst of this. let me ask you this, first of all, just on this narrow question on the story that we're falling right now on the nuclear plant. the possibility of, in the midst of this conflict and combat to create some sort of safety order to prioritize putting the fire out, getting safety personnel in. >> absolutely, chris. this would be high priority. you noted that there was some progress on the humanitarian orders when two sides got together earlier today on the border between belarus and ukraine. they made some progress on these court orders. this would be an obvious place for them to agree. to move back, to pull back from the hostilities at that point, and allow the firefighters to move in there and contain the fire. >> you worked in this part of the world. you are the awesome master of ukraine at different points in different administrations. did you think we would be at this point, or this committed shock

it was donald trump's sons, it would be a story. one "new york times" article repairing to the report as farcical russian disinformation. "the washington post" also suggested without evidence that it was part of some foreign election disinformation scheme. where is the proof? where is the evidence? none of these outlets never lift a finger or a total verify the laptop until now. and your report in "the washington post" details what we've been telling you now for nearly two years on this program here that is zero experience hunter biden got paid millions of dollars from the chinese nationals in return to next to nothing with no expertise other than a connection to his vice president father at the time. here with more are the senators behind the key report, wisconsin senator ron johnson along with iowa senator chuck grassley. gentlemen, great to see you both. i will start with you, senator johnson, if you could explain what we now know, is there anything in my monologue that you heard that is not true and what else are you learning as

i past few years and how it donald trump dealt _ past few years and how it donald trump dealt with _ past few years and how it donald trump dealt with everything i past few years and how it donald trump dealt with everything thatj past few years and how it donald i trump dealt with everything that led us at this— trump dealt with everything that led us at this moment. _ trump dealt with everything that led us at this moment. and _ trump dealt with everything that led us at this moment. and i— trump dealt with everything that led us at this moment. and i don't i trump dealt with everything that led us at this moment. and i don't wishl us at this moment. and i don't wish to put— us at this moment. and i don't wish to put it _ us at this moment. and i don't wish to put it on — us at this moment. and i don't wish to put it on one _ us at this moment. and i don't wish to put it on one administration or. to put it on one administration or one—man because _ to put it on one administration or one—man because right— to put it on one administration or one—man because right now-

donald trump was the first iteration of that. what i fear is that his use of xenophobia and his use of are the rising -- other-izing minorities will be taken to the next level. that is something we have to nip in the bud however we can. we have to make government functional again for everybody. it used to be that in this country, they had a military draft and everyone would have a common experience of the military draft and learned about each other and diversity and so forth. we do not have that now. we are siloing further and further. we have to do whatever we can to bring shared experiences again. a shared common understanding of our joint aspirations. to me, it is getting everyone on the economic ladder climbing upwards, regardless of who you are. that means everyone, regardless of the color of your skin, how you pray, how many letters in your name. that is what i think we have to get back to, asap. >> congressman, does your research so you anything regarding that? >> in line with that, the key thing that has happened with the

that prosecutor says in the letter, that donald trump is guilty of numerous felonies and that he quit his job because he wasn't going to be allowed to indict the former president. we're going to have much more on that in just a few minutes. i want to start back here in europe. president biden has arrived in brussels. meeting with fellow nato members about the ongoing crisis in ukraine. later this week, biden will be coming here to poland. poland became a member of nato in 1999. and in 1999 is relevant because that year the alliance was faced with another crisis that was beyond its borders. less than two weeks after poland joined nato, nato began a bombing campaign against yugoslavia. it had the goal of getting serbian ruler slow biden slope anomalous of it -- where he was massacring albanian's. it was right in the middle of that bombing campaign and ongoing negotiations to try to strike a deal with miloevi that this happened. >> and the deal -- slope anomalous which has been indicted as a war criminal by the international tribunal in the hague. >> -- charged with the murder of -- the

donald trump had energy independence for america. donald trump made sure america did not rely on russian oil, the rest of the world was less reliant and now we see the position that joe biden and the democrats have put us in. it is horrific and it's bad obviously for americans, paying more for gas, paying more for everything, but then you have a situation like this going on and, gosh, if covid taught us anything, didn't it teaches that we need to be able to manufacture things ourselves here in america? whether it's ppe, whether it's microchips, whether it's machine parts, or whether it's oil and gas, it is vital to the future of america that we are self-sufficient, that we are self-reliant, and obviously we now see how unfortunately it has impacted the world, ukraine is paying the price right now. >> sean: leo, i argue that joe biden abandoning, as large as stated eloquently, being -- i argue that he pushed nato allies, european allies into putin's arms by doing so, because we could have been providing their energy needs and we could