as whitewater. >> lady hillary rodham clinton arriving at the u.s. district court to answer questions concerning her work for the failed arkansas savings and loans at the center of the whitewater criminal investigation. this was at 1:45 this afternoon. she's the first first lady to appear before a grand jury. here are a couple of comments. >> i just want to say before i go in that i am happy to answer the grand jury's questions and look forward to telling them everything i know with the hope that it will help them in their investigation, and i have to go in now, but when i come out i will see you all then. thank you. well, you're all still here, i see. i was glad to have the opportunity to tell the grand jury what i have been telling all of you. i do not know how the billing records came to be found, where they were found, but i am pleased that they were found because they confirm what i have been saying. now it's been a long day, and i will take a question or two from some of you. >> how wide ranging were the questions? did they go beyond the simple

this is hillary rodham clinton first lady of the united states. she won that woman given a real voice can make a last and difference in their communities and their countries and in the whole world. so good. thank you. thank you very much fiona for that introduction and even more for your adding your vital voice to this conference. i'm sure if you need a note to be excused from school. they're about a thousand of us who would sign it. the road to peace will never be easy. but the world has also seen how no fires bombs or terrorists will ever turn you back. when my husband and i go to omaha tomorrow. we will pay tribute to those who were murdered by the enemies of peace. they were mostly women and children. they were catholic and protestant unionists and nationalists young and old. they were people simply living their lives. working at a drapery store hanging out with friends buying school uniforms for their children the terrorist targeted the people of northern ireland and in response. it was the people all the people. who bravely stood side by sid

she has published several rhetorical studies of hillary rodham clinton. and is an inaugural lifetime member of flare. and finally, but certainly not least dr. tammy v hill tammy is associate professor of communication and the senior associate dean of the college of communication at boston university. dr. viejo's books include moms in chief the rhetoric of republican motherhood and the spouses of presidential nominees 1992 through 2016, melania and michelle first ladies in a new era and connecting with constituents identification building and blocking in the contemporary national convention addresses. tammy is also an inaugural lifetime member of flair. it's my pleasure at this moment to turn the program over to nancy keegan smith. nancy you're muted it's a pleasure to be here today and to welcome all of our people and i think we have a very interesting program lined up recent first ladies and their speeches have often tackled issues as leaders of society ladybird johnson said that while the job had no assign duties a podium is there she chooses to use it

you're watching american history tv and listening to hillary rodham clinton in her own words midway through the clinton's first term historian carl anthony interviewed the first lady as part of a forum hosted by george, washington. university one young woman asked when americans would elect a woman to the white house if he had decided not to go into politics or if perchance you hadn't met at school. thinking back before you met him. do you think you yourself might have pursued a political career? probably not in elective office. i i think that there are so many ways to serve and i be involved in my community wherever that was and i would be i hope working on issues that i care about no matter where i was but i don't know that i would have pursued an elective now. what do you think perhaps this is another way of ask. what do you think in terms of the reaction you get from people when you meet them in the mail you symbolize do you to to the people at large or are you many things to many people? well again, probably i mean we get such wonderful letters from people and i have such a great time

>> a few months ago i came on my program and i suggested that everybody keep a watch on hillary rodham clinton because she was making noise about how the election was taken from her, and that she would be somebody who can save the party, really. there are three people saying this on the record. one is hillary clinton, the other is bane sanders, and now your friend liz warren. they all three on the record are saying if biden chooses newt run again, i will run. then there's all of these people that are on background and all the mainstream media, have you noticed this? it's like joe biden is leading us to a terrible place. the question becomes would it be comma law harris kamala harris. would be the wednesday before thanksgiving or the wednesday after. immediately the question is, will you endorse kamala harris? i think that is really the question and unlikely. i think sees a lot of his son, bow, in mayor pete. i also think that stacey abrams, if she were to somehow win the governorship in georgia, she's an automatic entry into this race. jared polis is the governor of colorado, people ar

we have a special counsel would like to introduce tweets from jake sullivan and hillary rodham clinton for the false statements. the evidence is certainly trying to show a lot of complicity and conspiratorial activity. we're not at an indictment of hillary and lawyers around here. we have to gauge that from the outside of this particular trial. >> the irony is so rich, they accuse of trump of trump-russia collusion, now they're could be accuse of conspiracy. it comes with a heavy prison sentence. we're not say that could happen. sometimes, five, 10 years, life. we're not saying that could come to pass. durham has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the clinton campaign acted with criminal intent. do you see him being able to do that. >> that is in the shadows. what we know from the sussman indictment, they're looking heavily at the campaign, the funding of russian dossier, false statements promulgated. that is the hilarious irony of this motion, liz, the reason why hillary clinton's tweet is probably admissible, this is the government's theory as well, it is not for the truth. they

you have an aggressive pegs counsel sniffing around a lot of people up the fbi chain, hillary rodham clinton campaign chain, up through lawyerers that were working for her. it is almost malpractice if you were a lawyer representing one of these people am i a subject of or target or a witness? if i'm a witness we'll talk, i will be cooperative. if i'm anything else you will have to immunize me or go without me. non-croptores are not obstructing justice. they're not participating until they get assurance they're not in harm's way. elizabeth: the thing that durham's court filing brings up that is troubling cia was monitoring the trump white house, cia was looking at the white house, executive office building after trump won. looking at the trump team, who they were communicateing with. do we want the cia looking at this? the phones story has since been debunked. what do you make of the ci-a getting roped in here? >> it is still early to know 100% they were doing. john brennan tipped off everyone at the white house, hillary would come up with a big distraction at trump's expense, about r

rodham clinton. so then trump gets involved , because he had been fought by washington on both sides. democrats, maxine waters impeach 45, republicans fighting against him, it could have been a different story. democrats have to look at their party with the superdelegates. trump's super popular and i would vote for him again. host: as an independent, does it ever frustrate you that as an independent, it is really hard for you to have influence in those parties locally and much more broadly, nationally? caller: yeah, for sure. i have called in before and said that the two-party system is limited. that is frustrating, yes. i feel boxed in to vote for republicans. the democratic party has been a part of my family history for decades. i hope that answers your questions. host: we will go to arizona next on the independent line, this is richard. caller: good morning. i don't think i will let it interfere with my vote. i don't think i will give it a whole lot of consideration. host: to sharon on the democra

her mentee, our third female secretary of state, hillary rodham clinton, drove that point home in her eulogy. >> during the last phone call two weeks before she died, she talked about the importance of what president biden is doing to rally the world against putin's horrific invasion of ukraine and the urgent work of defending democracy at home and around the world. we must heed the wisdom of her life and the cause of her publishing service. stand up to dictators and demagogues, from battlefields of ukraine to the halls of our own capitol, defend democracy at home just as vigorously as we do abroad. >> that message could not be more relevant today. with our democracy hanging on by its fingertips. we have crossed the rubicon to the point where issues like racism and anti-semitism are back in business, in the public context in america. as a point of not just social but also of political contention. a new politico warning consult poll reveals that just 25% of republicans think that it's a major problem if a political candidate is accused of homophobic remarks. 38% luis alicea the same of

rodham clinton. trump gets involved because he had been fought by washington on both sides. republicans fighting against him, it could have been a different story. democrats have to look at their party with the superdelegates. trump's super popular and i would vote for him again. host: as an independent, does it every frustrate you that as an independent, it is really hard for you to have influence in those parties locally and much more broadly, nationally? caller: i have called them before and said that the two-party system is limited. that is frustrating, yes. the democratic party has had a difficult history for decades. i hope that answers your questions. host: we will go to arizona next on the independent line, this is richard. caller: good morning. i don't think i will let it interfere with my vote. i don't think i will give it a whole lot of consideration. host: to sharon on the democrats line in new york. caller: i would like to say thank you for taking my call and i am calling to counteract s