the democratic party really history democratic party, you can say use the history of american politics, you know with with sort of in half. it's it's a history of parties as you mentioned as disintegration twice the party almost permanently ruptured it managed to come back together after the civil war after the civil rights revolution of the 1960s the dixiecrat revolution dixiecrat convention in 1948. we're going to get to all of that, but you know whenever i prepare for a podcast interview. i try to see five anything in common with my guest and this is a stunning coincidence. we were both born in new york city imagine that right two people from this. yeah. you're a baby boomer. sorry. i'm generation x great note to start off talking about how old you are, but baby boomer you already mentioned you you came of age politically in the 60s handing out leaflets for kennedy. then you took a more radical turn in your politics. how did this inform your your journey to becoming a professional scholar. who as i mentioned has been writing about this issue multiple books for decades. a lot of hist

the democratic party was looking to change and how did it change? well one of the key ways it changed and there have been discussion sort of going forward but the 1984 election and this landslide defeat is a sort of wake-up call and a group of democrats come together from a couple of different places one of the group from from congress and another is a group of moderate democratic governors, especially from the south like chuck robb of virginia who sort of see that the party needs to shift its direction and they form what is what they comes to me on the democratic leadership council the dlc. and what did the dlc stand for the dlc was believe? d idea that mark free market could was the best means to bring about opportunity for for people? so one of what the things i argue in my book, is that the dlc believed in using sort of private sector means to achieve traditional liberal goals, so they still democrats they still believe in kind of traditional ideas that it's that there's needs to you need to help people create a quality, but they thought they wa

we are talk about the future of the democratic party. >>caller. >> i wonder if you can tell me i mentioned i was in there i was a republican i went with my parents to analyze politics but today people just want to win a net trying to force each other out. >> there are two parts and what happens after you win and then we elect the officials and we have parties were only focusing on winning with that also leaves many americans behind those who are fighting for their interest and another critical is the lack of bipartisan cooperation so theta nineties are the era where we see the polarization emerge that there was more bipartisan cooperation in the nineties on many critical issues for better or for worse but that has gone away and with a focus on winning the questions are real americans. >> one of the things you talk about in your book left behind with the market oriented approach with a dedicated government funding has beend gone away and picked up by foundations and ngos think that's a key part of what happens because when you focus on th

i think they pertain to the democratic party. don thank you very much book tv has covered both of those books peter schweikert and miranda devine and miranda devine has aired already peter schweikert has not aired yet, but will be airing in the near future. so thank you for that advice. we appreciate it mary astoria, ohio mary you're on with author lily geisler. we're talking about the future of the democratic party. yes very from foster, ohio. i wonder if you could tell me a little bit about. some mary you gotta turn down that tv and just talk in phone. we're listening. thank you. okay, i'll turn it down. i mean, okay. so um, i i mentioned that i was a republican so i was probably about 60, but i i learned my parents to observe and to analyze politics and these news that today just want to win. and i wonder if you could come in on that because it's really important that the both parties because of what they can and not try to each other out. and well, i think there are two two parts of that. i mean one is an issue of what happen

people in the democratic party. i think about your initial question about the direction of the party and where it is going, this actually ends up obscuring some of the tension of the parties direction more towards bill clinton. but tensions are very much emerging today. it has been in theirs since the early 90s. clickers want gentlemen we have not talked about is very involved in this democratic leadership council who is al? is a fascinating and impressive figure. he himself was a democratic congressional staffer who worked his way throughout the 70s and early 80s in various different positions. chief of staff was the head of the democratic caucus. and he becomes the leader the executive director in the mid- 80s. and really worked hand in hand withth bill clinton to craft the message also democratic party message. one thing that is a fascinating, he is a very serious person who believes and ideas. i think one thing what the dlc there for us to focus on are not trying to make a lot of money. they fundamentally believ

i felt that the democratic party was a corrupt party. there -- in the end, we have a two party system. one of the two parties going to win. i was certainly on the side of the democratic party winning. i gravitated back toward the democratic party. as a historian, i notice a needle lack. historians write about all kinds of subjects politically in america. very few right about the major parties. the history of major parties. we the right one about -- one president of course, two presidents. one controversy surrounding a party. this very few books on the whole history of either the republican on the democratic party. historians like to write about things that people have written about before. obviously, we use lots of books and documents people who have written about it before. this was an attempt to sum up the whole history of the party. when it stood for, as the title has it, when it was successful, and why. that was the theme. >> when i saw your title, when it took to win, i thought of james carville. as it turns, out you quote him early

the democratic party needs to ct and not waist this opportunity. we are putting aside politics and leading with values which means putting in the hard work. and win the elections right in and win the elections right in november. if democrats can't talk to rural voters we have a problem. we can appeal to rural working-class americans. to maintain the white house we can't afford to ignore this group of americans and iowans. if we win iowa we win across the county. lower your hand. >> thank you you started to answer my question. 's we have seen republicans say that i might not consider the rural voters. do you share that concern if iowa isn't among the early carve out states they end up being more dominated by bigger cities. that could be just another issue that makes it challenging for democrats to reach those kind of voters. >> i disagree with my republican colleague that says the democrats nationally have given up. that's quiet the contrary. we are always looking at the president alcandor and make sure all voices are heard. scott and i would like t

the democratic party of simply 10 years ago, the democratic party under barack obama is quaint and meek compared to the democratic activity is that control the democratic party today. today it's week-to-week that it changes. barack obama in 2012 was vastly out of step with the democratic party of 2022. he stood for traditional marriage, harris. and today that position is worthy of mockery and presumed bigotry. the democratic party today would destroy every process of the positions of the democratic party 10 years ago and why you haven't seen that when democrats have control. it is unpopular. roe v. wade was a shield to a very unpopular opinion accepted within the democratic party. i don't care how many polls people show me about what people think about roe v. wade. if the democrats in the senate push forward a bill to codify abortion, they will be forced to lay out the specifics of actually what they believe. and actually what they believe, harris, is incredibly unpopular. bret baier had tim ryan, democrat from ohio on. he pushed him what would be the line? and his answer was always it'

they are agents of the democratic party. antifa and black lives matter, agents of the democratic party. mark: we have an attitude american people are a good people, they have a heart and soul, throughout generations, men and women here, have gone overseas, put their lives on the line to defend people who den look like them, they don't share the same faith. not on concur, we're not an imperialist nation. we're good people. people who come into this country, even illegally they get healthcare and education. yet there is an element within the country, the democrat party hates this country, brents bozell ended this way, you began this way, what else explains the fact that party never endorses our institutions or traditions our customs and gives voice to most radical american-hating professors and activists you could imagine. i want to thank you for having courage to do what you do and say what you say, leo terrell, it is a great honor, god bless you my friend. >> god bless you my friend, keep doing what do you every day. mark: t

[applause] next chair of the iowa democratic party. he talked about retaining iowa's position as the first in nation presidential caucuses after the democratic national committee recently suggested a change to the early primary and schedule for the 2024 presidential election. this is about 25 minutes. >> good morning everyone and thank you for joining us. i'm the chair of the iowa democratic party and i'm joined by scott brennan who is our member on the bylaws committee. we are going to make three statements and then open up for questions. this morning the iowa democratic party submitted a letter of intent to the rules and bylaws committee to begin the application process in our fight to keep iowa first in the nation. a copy of the letter will be e-mailed to all of the journalists on the call as soon as possible ability is finished. let me be clear the layer of intent is just the first step in a robust application process. in addition to the application, we are also planning to engage with numerous stakeholders all over iowa to explore

the democrat party is insane. the democrat party is at war with our institutions, it's destroying them. immediately bernie sanders wants to destroy the senate and his side kick elizabeth warren when it comes to the filibuster rule. let me make something clear. this is not the united states of the democrat party this is the united states of america dam it and we americans have a say in what goes on in our country. keep your dam hands off our constitution. they say about our children they're destroying their minds in elementary and middle schools. they say they care about women, they destroy women's sports and title nine they don't even recognize woman hood. they say they care about citizens they're destroying citizenship on the southern border and elsewhere. the democrat party is out to undermine this country. they've been threatening this court for years, threatening its independence, threatening individual justices, have destroyed the confirmation process, destroyed people's names. we don't have to take this from

but as i was saying before the break about the republican party not being the same, the democratic party is not the same as it with was five years ago, six years ago, and it's never going to go back as well. to the point of fetterman's wife tonight on our own air saying, you know, i will embrace the progressive title if you want to talk about minimum wage at $15, if you want to talk about health care for all and what have you. but what that's going to do, though, is it's going to squeeze out the linebackers of conor lamb and the centrist democrat. and i know bakari doesn't want to hear, they i have to fundamentally disagree with you, because i don't think the facts don't bear out what you're saying. your saying it's not the same democratic party five years ago. >> it's not. >> who was vice president in barack obama? who was speaker of the house? nancy pelosi. the number two in charge was chuck schumer. we had jim blclyburn. >> who is driving national conversation right now? it's not chuck schumer and nancy pelosi. it is the more liberal wing of the water. >> it's not true. >> aoc, where

this is the democratic party it wants. but term limits on judges are judges because they don't like our judges. this is the democratic party that would abolish the electoral college. so delaware and south carolina wouldn't have much of a say about whose president would be new york and california. what happened to joe biden? he got hijacked by the most radical people in the country. he's captive their interest. what happened to the court today was the saddest chapter in the history of the united states supreme court. this was despicable, is dangerous and it was done to the person who did this . if it's a conservative, you're a traitor to the cause. if it's a liberal, you're the dumbest person in washington because it's not going to change the midterms. you're not going to scare any conservative judge away from repealing roe v. wade and it should be repealed. they should go back to the states and you're adding a narrative to a storyline that you want to win and you don't give a damn about how you win. you want to keep the se

the dnc, national democratic party needs to commit to it and not waste this opportunity. iowa democrats are listening, putting aside politics which means putting in the hard work every day n. not only forgetting our candidates ready but trying to win the elections that are right in front of us in november. >> the other piece i'll add to is if democrats can't figure out how to talk to rural voters then we're in big trouble as a party. so it's no secret party has been losing seats across the country because of we can appeal to rural working-class americans and retain the white house and maintain congress can't afford to ignore this group of americans and iowans and if we win iowa we went across thecountry . >> i see your hand, go ahead and state your question. >> thank you and you kind of started to answer my question there . but i'll just ask you to expand on that because we've seen republicans making a similar point at this maybe a signal that the national democrats are unwilling to consider the rural voters. do you share that concern that if iowa is among the early carve

this legislation is not from your mom's democratic party. in recent years we've taken votes on my legislation, the born-alive abortion survivors protection act. it is a simple straightforward bill that protects babies who surfive botched abortions. it is just a simple requirement that if a baby is born alive in an abortion clinic, she must receive the same lel of care -- level much of care as if she were born in the hospital. the democrats have filibustered this over and over. it's so weird. here we are, the lobbies have been bullied into an extreme position that doesn't reflect even the majority opinion in the democratic party today let alone of the majority position of americans. this bill today is ugly. winner takes all politics. it is full of aggressive pro-abortion provisions. let's consider just a few. one, it would formally create a national right to abortion up until the moment of birth in all 50 states and it would undo even state-based partial birth abortion bans. it would prohibit states from requiring parental consent to perform

the problem is, that didn't make the democratic party more powerful? ponder that for a moment. let's say for example that you really believe global warming was an existential threat to humanity and that rising carbon dioxide levels were causing global warming. what would you do to fix it? well, you might think back to tenth grade biology class, co2, co2, hmm, don't trees consume co2 for photosynthesis? quick google check. how about we plant a whole lot more trees across the country and across the world? that seems like a natural solution with lots of upside, trees are beautiful, and might help fight global warming. oh, but no, there is a problem with that idea. planting more trees might help solve climate change, but it definitely will not enrich your donors. trees are cheap. it is hard to make money from trees. worse than that, trees are impossible to regulate. once you plant trees, they grow by themselves, they do not need federal help. trees definitely will not make you more powerful, so instead, here is an idea, let's invest trillions of dollars of

it's pretty sad when the democrat party has come to this. a party that has historically portrayed itself as the defender of the little guy is now the party seeking to deny even the smallest protections to the littlest and most vulnerable guys and girls among us, unborn human beings. but, hey, i guess democrats can at least claim that they are standing up for the abortion industry. mr. president, i believe we are better than this. we have to be better than this. and i hope that not only republicans but some of my democratic colleagues will stand up today and say that we can do better than a a law that ripsy even the smallest protections for unborn americans. mr. president, i yield the floor. >> thank you so much. i find it very frustrating to hear from my colleagues on other side of the aisle about how we are s extreme because we are supporting a woman's freedom to make her own reproductive health decisions. that is the vote today. the vote today is about who decides, who

this legislation is not from your mom's democratic party. in recent years, we have taken both on my legislation, the survivors protection act, pretty simple straightforward bill that aims to protect babies that survived botched abortions. no restrictions on abortion access in my bill, just a simple requirement that if the baby is born alive in an abortion clinic, she must receive the same level of care she whatever received should she have been born in a hospital. if senator schumer and the abortion lobby have filibustered this legislation over and over, it is so weird. the abortion industry lobbyists have bullied leader schumer and all but one courageous democratic senator my friend joe mansion into an extreme position that does not reflect even the majority opinion in the democratic party today let alone the majority position of americans. this bill today is ugly. winner takes all politics. it is all aggressive pro- abortion provisions. let's consider just a few. it would formally create a national right to abortion up until the moment of

as much as i can't stand the leadership of the democratic party, most of the people across the state of ohio are good people, ladies and gentlemen, and we believe we ought to fight for them. [applause] but i think about how caught they must feel, in the same way that our campaign felt caught between the establishment right like the club for growth and the establishment left like tim ryan. a lot of people just want a voice and they want someone who believes in them and somebody who will fight for their american dream. my story is literally an open book. i wrote a book about it. i'm sure it provided plenty of opposition research to the clowns out there in political world. but i am joined here by my mom and dad, by my aunt laurie, by my uncle dan, by my sister lindsay, by so many of the people who have made me who i am. [applause] and irene ember when i declared this candidacy in july, we always had a traditional family in a lot of ways, it was the first time that i had seen my mom and dad together in at least 20 years. think about that. but what i love about this country is it is not j

party and what barack obama did to set the direction of the democratic party, i don't think you can look at joe biden or kamala harris. either of them has even attempted to do that and i think when you look back at the last primary campaign, whether it's elizabeth warren on one wing of the party or pete buttigieg on a very different wing of the party, i think you can you can tell there's this hunger in the democratic party for somebody who's gonna say what on earth they're about for the future right? i think that's a huge opportunity for somebody if biden doesn't let me ask you a question about this kind of thank you your question parochial political question, but it's one that i think about a lot. doesn't it matter when by an announces his decision because all of the people you're talking about? are not household political names in this kano and celebrities a huge driving force obviously in today's politics. so if if biden says in summer of 2023 and his habit is not to make these decisions early. i've noticed that if he says in the summer of 2023, you know what? i'm going to just d

they're leaving the democrat party. they fear the rise of socialism and communism in america's democrat left. biden's approval rating with hispanics, cut in half. in "quinnepiac poll." new twist in the hillary trump russia trial shows how low they went. the white house let es trump pandemic border policy expire on monday. florida governor ron desantis again says he will send illegals to biden's home state of delaware. i'm elizabeth macdonald. "the evening edit" starts right now. ♪. elizabeth: okay. we begin with stocks falling on recession fears. the s&p is on the brink of a bear market. here is what is it going on. retailer kohl's, they joined target, walmart sounding the alarm on inflation. sysco missed on sales. here is the silver lining. wall street economists say this doesn't feel like 2008 crash or 1987. feels like the slow grind of 1981. numerous asset classes getting hit across the board. remember 1981 was about fixing government that was in a mess. reagan fixed it. we can do it again. we have another major st

party, now tweeting "in the past, i voted democrat because they were mostly the kindness party, but they have become the party of division and eight, so i can no longer support them and will vote republican. now watch their dirty church campaign against me unfold." we have seen just one example -- the images that -- >> that's a great example of what elon musk is talking about. i think there are interesting things happening right now, where you have several high-profile deep thinking liberals moving away -- he talks about it all the time on his podcast. with him, it was the covid lockdowns overreaching to texas because of it. you also have bill marr. his message has been "i didn't leave the democratic party, it left me." he because he is championing free speech, he is now being accused of racism for it. there are a lot of people saying "the democratic party needs to be one where it was a message of love, but it's not that anymore." >> take a watch out what that message is now, what might happen to it if a draft opinion comes here. >> my worry is that this is just the beginning, and -

abortion is that third rail of politics in the democratic party. you cannot get nominated by the party cannot get money from the party. you cannot get the support of the big establishments of the party unless you toe the line on joe biden's press secretary saying this week the ninth month abortion is what the president thanks it should be. that's an extreme position atop the position and are in the civilized world on the position of american democratic party. and so i think what they were willing to do here is permanently damage the court to do this. a couple more points i want to make is this draft is from february so to me it is clearly this draft is been circulating and democratic circles for some time before it was released strategically in may. gerry: tam it we don't know who leak that there is a theory maybe it was a conservative i find that hard to believe to make sure kavanaugh does not go wobbly. more likely it seems to be assents to intimidate perhaps intimidate the justices received the reaction of people saying the court is illegitimate

there is a strong political component to the democratic party's immigration policy. we are not guessing this. we know this. and we know it because they have said so. they said it again and again and again. they have written books on it and monographs and magazine articles, they have bragged about it endlessly and talked about it on cable news constantly, and they say out loud, we are doing this because it helps us to win elections. that is not something said once, it is something they have gloated about again and again and again, and we think that is wrong, and in case you doubt us, here they are. >> the blue wave is african-americans. it is white, it is latino, asian or pacific islander, it is made up of those who have been told that they are not worthy of being here. it is comprised of those who are documented and undocumented. >> a couple of presidential cycles, you will be on election night, announcing that we are calling the 38th electoral votes in texas for the democratic nominee for president, it is changing, it is going to become a purple state and then a blu

that's what the focus of the democrat party is on. with the inflation and supply chain and gas prices and selling off of the market, that's where they want to go. >> yeah. because remember in obama's words laura the objective is the fundamental transformation of the nation into a very far left, some would say socialist or communist kind of model. so this kind of environmental justice entity within the doj makes perfect sense. it's totally along the lines of their agenda. has nothing to do with criminal justice, which is what his job is, but has everything to do with did ideological gee thatted they are waging. >> laura: the global reset monica, the global reset. here it is. great to see you as always. and despite their threats and intimidation, the left, they haven't been able to stop parents, have they? amanda orr done with school race in texas after her client won a may 2021 race, liberal activists pulled out all the stops to delay and change the rules for the 2022 race. so the leftist voting rights act federal court alleged discrim

party and more moderate fashion of democrats. ' think we'll see a number of governors give it a look, senators, cabinet members, perhaps mayors. i can see the governor of this date, in colorado, gavin newsom in california, roy cooper in north carolina, stacey abrams with the governorship this year absolutely, phil murphy and new jersey and the cabinet rolando, more moderate wing with the democratic party, perhaps andrew and then you have to consider bernie sanders and elizabeth warren, they run for president before, a good indicator would consider doing it again, it could be said for other senators like amy klobuchar. you'd have a pretty robust primary. >> this is the first administration, first democratic administration in my lifetime, i think arguably first administration. where neither the president nor the vice president seen as a person of deeply anchored ideological perspective. the trump administration also in a different way not deeply -- >> pence wasn't a big vision back but fixed principles but when you think about what bill clinton did to set the direction of the democrati

the democratic unionist party has lost a — delivery. the democratic unionist party has lost a fifth _ delivery. the democratic unionist party has lost a fifth of— delivery. the democratic unionist party has lost a fifth of its - party has lost a fifth of its support. a strong focus of the campaign was opposition to the brexit trade border with the rest of the uk. the dup says it will block the uk. the dup says it will block the formation of a devolved government until checks on goods arriving in northern ireland are scrapped. the traditional unionist voice says the dup has been too weak on the issue. h0 voice says the dup has been too weak on the issue-— on the issue. no point denying it. it has been _ on the issue. no point denying it. it has been very _ on the issue. no point denying it. it has been very difficult. - on the issue. no point denying it. it has been very difficult. it - on the issue. no point denying it. it has been very difficult. it has . it has been very difficult. it has been a very difficult year for the dup. th

and then members of third parties and so i went to unite a utah party, democratic party and asked them to join my coalition to defeat mike lee, i asked them to help me form this majority that already wants to replace him, so that we can do that and the process was the following both for the united utah party and for the democratic party at utah, they had their conventions on their delegates cast a vote in order to join our coalition, to support my candidacy rather than nominating other candidates into the general election. so, for the last several months we've been working very hard, engaging with delegates in both of those parties, meeting with them all over the state and all our 29 counties, meeting with them remotely, messaging to them, listening to them and doing the heavy lifting, building this cross partisan coalition to defeat mike lee and protect our democracy. >> so, you're building this coalition, if its coalition gets you into office, as you pull off this unlikely victory let's say in november, with the support of local democrats, would you caucus with the democrats in the s

the democratic party that left so many blacks and latinos behind. coming down to our community here in columbus. saying we want to put food on the table. we want to have our faith respected and families respected. i have to ask for every vote from place of respect and to listen. that's why we've been able to win. you can look at our website, we're talking about lot of these issues. we're bold and we're speaking up. >> pete: carol, last word. >> look at the polls. blacks are fleeing from the democratic party and it's about time. the democratic party has a serious problem. wake up democrats. wake up. >> pete: we'll see if they can when they are handing them to the view. thank you very much. appreciate it. coming up, -- (vo) with armor all, a little bit of this... protects you from a lot... of that. armor all. minimum effort. maximum protection. (gong rings) - this is joe. (combative yelling) he used to have bad breath. now, he uses a capful of therabreath fresh breath oral rinse to keep his breath smelling

i never want to be like the democrat party. the party that today where a majority of that party, a vast majority are going to show up and vote for abortion in the final trimester! in the ninth month, in the 10th month where a mom is literally giving birth. i never want to be that party, nancy pelosi. you want to talk about the strength of the republican party. you're going on find out all about it when you're handing that gavel over after november 8th. >> emily: amen. coming up, elon musk is fueling more outrage from the left with his latest comments, what he said he'd do if the twitter deal goes through. that's next. looking to get back in your type 2 diabetes zone? once-weekly ozempic® can help. ♪ oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! ♪ ♪ oh, oh, oh ♪ ozempic® is proven to lower a1c. most people who took ozempic® reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. and you may lose weight. adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. in adults also with known heart disease, ozempic® lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart a

and this is where today's democratic party is. they are afraid of november, because they know the voters are going to throw them out on their reruns. >> their estates right now, the big myth that they froze over to her and that abortion would become a legal in america you know, it will not. the states will decide, because roe was bad law, from my perspective. you are the law students. one of alan dershowitz best. in his own words. basically what they did in the case of roe was they granted a right, not granted in the constitution, so i would argue does rather than go forward and give that a right to individuals, they basically send it back to the states. there is a whole bunch of states that allow abortion up until the hour before birth. for crying out loud. that will still continue in some states. abortion is not going anywhere. >> that's right. if you look at our nation's history for the first 185 years of our nation's history, abortion was decided by elected legislatures, primarily at the state level. and listen, we all recogni

okay, what on earth is happening in the once respectable democratic party? now this goes back to even since before biden was elected, it's been engaged in kind of a slow act of self sabotage. but why i mean, they see the numbers right? biden and harris like the stock market, they're tanking, failing to take inflation seriously means that biden may be at a point of no return, which indicates what a looming political disaster for democrats with voters in a disgruntled mood ahead of the midterms. yet instead of doing the basics to address a number one issue facing american families, democrats spend their time supporting blm, lgbtq propaganda in schools obviously open borders, limiting our oil and gas industry. oh , and of course their go to january six . democrats have become political crack addicts. they know what they're doing is hurting them politically, but they still can't quit their drug of choice. it's kind of a cocked tale of rabid anti-americanism with a shot of abortion on demand and has left wing threats against supreme court justices . houses of wor

the democratic party in some ways. his style. his focus. his style of politics. the way that he talks to voters that respond by saying you are not a typical democrat. is that what the party needs to find when the party is clearly struggling politically and campaigned with bernie sanders in the past. today he prefers populist or plain old democrat. he is running for the third time state wide. failed in a senate run in 2016 and succeeded in a run for lieutenant governor in 2018. in some ways he is paying his dues if you are a rank in file democrat. some something fetterman's appeal because voters hear they are simply tired of the party's current status quo. i talked to a group of pennsylvania democrats, one backing lamb, one kenyata and one fetterman. but they feel like their party's message is stale and does not speak to them. >> i think there are so many times where the democrats in politics in general have this messaging problem where it does not meet you where you are. >> a thousand times. the messaging of the party

the democrat party. embracing various american marxist movements and at war with our economic system, private sector some american people themselves. no, i'm not one of those putinnoid in media and services parties, who seem to believe that if only we wouldn't help the ukranians survive, somehow these things would be addressed by our government and improved. that is insanity, the people in charge of our government would continue to do what they are doing. undermining the prosperity, and success, representative nature of this republic. i want to talk about the courts briefly. later we have two great guests ken starr and senator mic mike lee. article 2 second 3 of the constitution. among other things, that the executive shall faithfully execute our laws, called faithful execution clause or take care clause, under a duty to faithfuly execute the laws of congress, not ignore them event if they disagree with them. going a step further, george washington made the point, my duty to see the laws executed to perm

party the democratic precincts in battleground states. it is dark money by a billionaire trying to buy the presidency. i am thrilled to death the january 6 committee is looking into this. they are not. not a single committee of congress looking into this because the democrats control both parties. that a single committee of congress looking into the law firm that went all over the country changing election laws in violation of the federal constitution governors, boards of election, state boards, state supreme court's. the constitution says the state legislature determines the election process for choosing the president and vice president. unfortunately united states supreme court went to cases came to the court refused to take up either one. and then you have a supreme court that is rogue every bit as much as the florida supreme court in 2000. it changed the election laws to help biden and the democrats in the democratic areas when the florida supreme court cap changing how you count the ballots, finally under the great leadership of chie

the democratic party, there is no distinction between extremist groups and democratic party. the actual democratic party, there is no difference now between extremist groups and the white house, because the white house knew this was going to come down. i believe this was orchestrated from the supreme court. i think they realized the only way they can win this is through actual violence. they don't condemn black lives matter, they are tearing down and torching cities. they do not believe in life anywhere as long as it means they can get what they want. we need to treat the democratic party and the white house the way they need to be treated. these are extremists who say that we will hold you hostage as a country and, after you at your homes until we get our way. and we will silencing online and try to put you in jail everywhere we can. that is the democratic party now. let's stop acting like there's a certain section over here. the democratic party is running all of this from the beginning. steel and the pro-abortion extremists will march to your your homecoming while the pres

the video tweeted the democrat party has become a party of division and hate. a political attack on me will escalate dramatically in coming months after most president biden for not getting anything done in saying twitter has a far left bias. will his backing of the republican party pushed democrats to wake up and do their job? what kind of a different will it make? >> none. it should, here's a guy who got rich off building electric cars. not a thing you normally associate with conservative. they've managed to alienate him but it should be a moment of reflection for the democratic party where they look around and say if we are turning off guys like elon musk, who should be the bread and butter of our party, a tech guy all about building electronic cars and green energy and instead turn them up so much, what are we doing wrong? the truth is there will be no moment of reflection, they will continue to plow forward and why the things that are going wrong in this country right now, biden said of looking at his own policies and asking questions about should we do so