the other point i want to make, garland can -- merrick garland can fire john durham, but he has to do so and -- in writing and specify the specific cause. it is weird being a special counsel, you report to the justice department, and you do not. you do not really report to the justice department, but if merrick garland wants to to explain steps or know why he is approving a warrant or subpoena, you have to explain that to him. there is oversight. you are sort of on your own, but there is justice department oversight. guest: host: what about the steel dossier? guest: i do not know if we have learned much more than we did before. we knew a lot of this stuff was under verified. we are several years out of its use for the fbi, these claims have still not been verified. we know more about how some of the unverified claims and allegations that have been disproven have ended up in the steel dossier, we will learn more about that in the dick cheney go case, which goes to trial in october. the sussman case issue went into the inner workings of the clinton campaign. we have had two clinton offi

but merrick garland isn't worried about any of that. his fellow democrats support that. they are calling for it. they long have. here is chuck schumer from two years ago threatening mob action if any supreme court justice were ever to get out of line. watch this. >> i want to tell you, gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh, you have unleashed a whirlwind and you will pay the price. you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. >> tucker: you will pay the price? really? these are people with lifetime appointments, so how exactly could they pay the price? we can't vote against them. what can we do? we can hurt them. we can harass their families. we can make it impossible to live in this country through threats of violence. "you won't know what hit you" said the thug from new york. apparently they are about to learn what is going to hit them. remember when liberals use to oppose violence? they did. give peace a chance. it is hard to believe there was ever a time that was true. maybe they're just pretending. in any case, they are not foreign. vio

what is the more that merrick garland could -- and we hear this again and again, that merrick garland needs to get moving and do more. what does it mean? he tried to let the committee do its business. what should we be doing? >> the ball is in his court. charge with contempt and -- >> it's been in his court for months. >> do it, keep going. i would say the parallel here is remember right after january 6th, there were many, many people who said, oh, we shouldn't in impeachment have direct testimony. we shouldn't have direct eyewitnessing coming and speaking. we need to get on with the business of legislation. the biden administration shouldn't get bogged down. look at what's happened since that moment. there's conspiracy theories running amuck, like we didn't get the first draft of history out there. we have to get the first draft of history out there for posterity. merrick garland has a critical role to play in making that happen. >> on the upside, we know there are reas and reams of information and texts this committee already has and has talked to trump officials. they'll get what t

what we need now is for the merrick garland to go ahead and do his job. you saw that he six the police on parents when they were at the

: two parts, like this close of the study of merrick garland because last week remember we had him on, and talk about environmental justice here that is what he's focused on. and the rest, like people like me, far left totally incompetent and less reaction to you for that. >> i don't know where we go from here. i really don't. to your point, it feels like the analogy are used, steve i came out of the world of sports but i have to get you to an sec football game because i live it down here in the south he would look, sometimes in sports, someone tanks to try to get thec best draft pick and it happens in the nfl sometimes, nba, major league baseball not as much. but there was always this tanking element. it feels like the biden administration is intentionally tanking. when i see the border, the crime, the inflation, all of the issues overseen in europe and ability to anyway help rectify them it feels like consciously making the worst possible decision in an effort to ensure joe biden is the worst president in the past 100 years. >> todd: you are right. strong close, clay travis, good to

i don't trust merrick garland at all. now, with respect to being indictedded, i think there's already enough evidence to indict hunter biden on a whole menu of things. the problem is and what i predict is they will possibly indict hunter biden after the november elections but before january when republicans, hopefully, retake the majority in both the house and the senate and then that would protect hunter bind, theoretically, from having to appear before a congressional panel with a subpoena. so i think that merrick garland has a lot of opportunities to protect the biden family, and i think we just need to keep pressure on hunter biden and continue to do what we're doing in both the senate and the house and being very transparent with all the evidence that continues to pile up against the biden crime family. maria: senator, look, you've talked a lot about what hunter biden has done and the fact that this is a joe biden story, not a hunter biden story is. tell us if he can get away with saying, well, i didn't even know who

congressman jim jordan's ranking judiciary committee penned a letter to merrick garland. did he lie on the roof when he answered that question? >> what he said was a direct contradiction. he said he would not use counterterrorism resources -- would not do that, that looks exactly like what they did. if you are a mom, a dad, a gun owner standing up your kids, look out, because here comes the fbi. again, a direct contradiction to what he told us under oath in the committee. remember how quickly this happens. september 29th, they sent this letter to the biden white house. five days later, merrick garland issues this memorandum, and 16 days later, the fbi sends out this email that establishes the threat for the parents. all that happened last fall in 22 days. have you ever seen anyone -- move that fast? they were going after people. the obama irs one after conservatives. same dynamic, but this is as -- >> jesse: may become of the school board union could write a letter to biden and tell them to lower the prices. >> do these parents, who were illegally targeted as domestic ter

garland, i'm impatient and the defendant of merrick garland, he can't comment publicly and we don't know what is going on behind the scenes and let me ask you this, from the public reporting we have so far, is it possible to tell how far along the d.o.j. investigation is or is that all still a black box? >> i think you can speculate, but to be honest, i think we'll find out how far along d.o.j. is in its investigation when we wake up one morning to find an indictment has been returned. this isn't really something that you can gauge by knowing that d.o.j. wants to see these document. it is suggestive of the fact that d.o.j. is engaging in a broadly-based investigation that fulfills that promise that merrick garland made on january 5th that he didn't care how high up people were, which were involved in january 6th which i took to mean the entire tist big lie, that d.o.j. was heading in to take a look. >> joyce, shifting gears a bit before we run out of time. in wisconsin yesterday, we saw a totally new legal approach to january 6th. the actual electoral college delegates in wisconsin

of that's what merrick garland is most afraid of tonight . and of course, in order to f fim global warming, which iser existential, whatever that means, you're going to have to hand merrick garland and joe biden a lotk more powerth over your life. sorry,at that'sn. the only solution. much more one. that to come.shod but for now, here's what youdn should know. merrick garland didn't even t mention the threat, the physical threats too this country's highest court because those threats come from. the left and therefore aren't really threats. see how that worksow. you're about to see more of it. a left wing activist group isub nowli published what it says are the home addresses of justices amy coni h barrett, john roberte samuel alito, bretttt kavanaugh, clarence thomass, n and gorsuch quote we must rise up to forceta accountability using a diversity of tactics, explainsbi the group's website.i a diversity of tactics.csse >> s what are those where youidre imagined they already include disrupting catholic church services s.? t, not a big deal in o

sogi did merrick garland lie to the country? so w it looks like he wasn't square with his son and that example you just gavehe about that dad when the fbin interviewed the person who filed the complaint , that person then said, well, there was no crime, there was no threat. i just thought it looked likeom someone who might do something we don't we don't agree with . that's not how it works in america. but the apparatus, the process that administration set up that merrick garland, the attorney general, the united states set upha isid how this all came to light. he did the memo to all us attorneys after he's after the letter was sent to l the white house from the school board association. and 16 daysio after he does the memo, the fbi sends out the email saying to establishhi this threat tag , put it on parents who've been reporteds on this this line merrick garland said you needed to set up that apparatus all work. and ie think the first thing to take away i've never seen the federal government move that fast. they did all that in

remember merrick garland said this about investigating parents? >> i can't imagine any circumstance in which the patriot act would be used in the circumstances of parents complaining about their children nor can i imagine the circumstance where they would be labeled as domestic terrorism. >> todd: imagine it merrick garland whistle-blower claims the doj did come in fact my target parents who spoke out at school board meetings and used counterterrorism tools to do it. here to react who nearly parents and cofounder of the president, and mom's for america's senior director and amanda wright, a mom in arizona who tracked a dossier by school board member. thanks to all three, nicole what was your reaction when our suspicions on this were actually confirmed? >> we were not surprised because this is exactly what america's parents said would happen with attorney general garland. october 2021. for months the biden administration, gas is up and what was taking place in american schools. now we know the fbi was, indeed, leveraging the e.u. officials and terr

she clerked for merrick garland, and justice -- it is 11:00 pm. i am going to try to stay as calm as i possibly can. but i warn you all, i am pretty fired up. when i hear jamie raskin say he fully believes that they will fulfill their war of duties and comply with these subpoenas, i am not sure why he thinks that based on what we have seen for the last four years. but let's get to it. luke, serving subpoenas to your colleagues in congress, many people who have been asking for this for months, but it is a huge undertaking, and huge risk. why do it now? >> they are really out of other options. the january six committee is coming up on an important set of hearings in june. and there is a key avenue of the investigation which is basically left unexplored. and that is the role members of congress played. they have information of their sources, they have been able to compile a record of one of some of these members of congress did. so far, so -- has sent to a republican member of congress has been rebuffed. no one has been willing to come in voluntarily

this appears to be a top-down operation and unfortunately it does appear that merrick garland lied to congress and you're absolutely right. all threats that are real should absolutely be investigated but were it not for the memorandum that came from merrick garland, it appears according to the whistle-blower none of the parents entrapped or enmeshed in this investigation would ever even be on the fbi's radar. >> congressman are saying this is violating so many different constitutional rights. first amendment activity and more, parents advocacy of children. they were probing things like a father opposed to mask mandates because he fit the bill of an insurrectionist, rails against the government, has a lot of guns but found no specific observations of any crimes and threats. what is this, minority report, the movie? they will predict what crimes are coming with parents upset what is going on at schools? >> look, that is exactly right here. garland set up, bunch of parents ensnared for no reason whatsoever. unfortunately this is who the biden administration views concerned parents. they

fingers are pointing at the attorney general merrick garland. we'll cover it as it unfolds. good to have you in "focus." president biden honing his attacks against the all tra maga republicans as he likes to refer to them now as primary season kicks into high gear. you know what? there is also some backlash growing over this tense exchange. >> i think framing it in the context of labor force participation is -- it feels callous to me. >> in many cases abortions of teenage women, particularly low income and often black, who aren't in the position to be able to care for children. >> harris: of course, we know senator scott read her like a book. wow. critics tearing into treasury secretary yellen after claiming abortion has damaging effects on the economy. power panel next. riders! let your queries be known. uh, how come we don't call ourselves bikers anymore? i mean, "riders" is cool, but "bikers"...is really cool. -seriously? -denied. can we go back to meeting at the rec center? the commute here is brutal. denied. how do we feel about getting a quote to see if we can save wit

both presidential hopefuls sent this letter to attorney general merrick garland citing title 18 section 15. 0, 7, of u.s. code which prohibits protesting outside the home of a justice that could influence a decision. >> the 2 governors voiced concerns about reports of demonstrators using threatening language before saying federal law enforcement must take the lead to protect the justices. the justice department has remained quiet on the matter, only releasing this short statement saying attorney general merrick garland directed u.s. marshals to provide additional support to ensure the safety of the justices. democrats remain focused on the issue of abortion this week while downplaying any threat posed by protesters. if protests are peaceful, yes, my house is there's protests 3, 4, times a week outside my house. >> that was tom dempsey reporting for us. coming up on the kron 4 morning news. gas prices are still through the roof. we need to tell you that hole we have details on the bay area's county where he is the chief. this. >> and also where it's the most expensive. we'll be right bac

. >> carley: supreme court justices meeting with merrick garland on new enhanced judicial security. garland says threats of violence directed at those who serve the public is unacceptable and dangerous to our democracy. president biden set to meet with prime minister of finland and sweden as the two push for nato membership. >> todd: mike tobin is live. >> mike: finland and sweden into the arms of nato. the two have formally applied for nato membership. the application is not on the fast track. turkey opposes them from joining, saying they are consider -- membership of the nordic nation to nato would rearrange the security map of europe and draw nato up to the border of russia. vladamir putin said there will be consequence if that happens. the last hold out in mariupol, azovstal steel plant, sea of azov and land bridge connecting crimea. many are wounded and being taken into custody by russia for pre-trial detention. many with the azov brigade, president putin said those are nazis creating pretext for invasion. in the meantime, a russian soldier pleaded guilty to war crimes. he admi

merrick garland directed the fbi to look into threats made against school boards because as he put it back then, threats against public servants are not only illegal, they run counter to our nation's core values. well, still no d.o.j. memo for the supreme court justices yet as republicans claim the white house knows exactly what it's doing. >> the same thing we saw with black lives matter and antifa riots where the left embraced them, and now they are embracing mob violence to get their partisan outcomes. >> the white house only goes so far as to say no violence against the justices yet. >> we have not seen violence or vandalism against supreme court justices. we have seen it at catholic churches, unacceptable, the president does not support thacht and some conservative organizations, we don't support that. >> the senate last night passed a bipartisan bill to expand to boost security for scotus justices and their immediate family members. jacqui. >> jacqui: john. >> john: and no violence yet. bring in arkansas republican senator tom cotton, senator, we should point out you are introdu

plus how these sprawling investigations are moving inside merrick garland's justice department. do today's breaking news headlines reassure his vocal critics that justice will eventually be served. later in the program, january 6th committee member is live for her republican colleagues and all those stories and more when "deadline white house" returns after a quick break. don't go anywhere today. r a qui. don't go anywhere today. -dad, what's with your toenail? -oh, that...? i'm not sure... -it's a nail fungus infection. -...that's gross! -it's nothing, really... -it's contagious. you can even spread it to other people. -mom, come here! -don't worry about it. it'll go away on its own! -no, it won't go away on its own. it's an infection. you need a prescription. nail fungus is a contagious infection. at the first signs, show it to your doctor... ... and ask if jublia is right for you. jublia is a prescription medicine used to treat toenail fungus. its most common side effects include ingrown toenail, application site redness... ... itching, swelling, burning or stinging, blisters

merrick garland to go out thereo and read something. i don't think as much emphasis. it can even point to a crime at this point. i would love to see it appear they are out there, but i would love to see them point to it. >> steve: it is exactly right. it really captures how for them it is virtual signaling with ideology or something a virtuous ideal virtual signaling link. here is one more for you which is just brilliant. the elitists that gala which took place in new york seems to be an annual goldmine of leftists hypocrisy.tu here is this picture of hillary, laughing off the attention of the media but meanwhile her feet. this picture, i don't know, it said so much. itct is so perfect in so man ways. >> you know, you could have left the picture of blake lively come i wouldld be fine with that. but steve, you pepper or television with this picture. there were so many things wrong with this. especially the people looking at her feet, having to wear a mask, it is just the absurdity of it. she is proving yet again why america so glad that donald trump was the president a

merrick garland testified the doj did not target parents. here is garlin on the 21st of october. >> i can imagine any circumstance in which the patriot act would be used and the circumstances of parents complaining about their children nor could i imagine the circumstances where they would be labeled as domestic terrorism. >> so the two republican representatives sent a letter addressed to ag garlin when it says "in testimony before the department, components using counterterrorism resources to target parents at school board meetings. we have evidence contrary to your testimony of the federal bureau of investigation has labeled at least dozens of investigation into parents with a tag created by the fbi's counterterrorism division to access and track investigations related to school boards." another part of the letter lays an example of such targeting things, "the fbi field office open an investigation into republican elected officials over allegations from state democratic party officials that republicans incited violence by expressing publi

garland, changed and ran through, the hard right, hard ideological judges on the bench. they spent years encouraging radical legislatures the past scores of cruel restrictions on abortion, one of the laws is unfortunately about to be upheld in the supreme court. republicans can run but they can't hide. republicans can run but they can't hide. they have two choices. they own it now or they try to begin to undo the damage. again to my colleagues, fellow americans, it's not an abstract exercise in the slightest. do you know why that's true? the hard right is not treating it like abstract exercise at all. in recent t years they've been racing to pass unhinged cool antichoice legislation that would catapult women's rights back into the stone age. preparing for this moment for yearse, mississippi law before the supreme court has zero, zero exceptions for rape or incest. a position that would be regarded on the extreme of the extreme not too long ago. imagine telling a woman for some white male politician is going to do determine whether she has to continue to carry the child.

steve: so it sounds a he's turning into merrick garland because last week he was talking about environmental justice then there was a crime wave and then there was nice reaction so either they are far left ideologues are totally incompetent. >> [laughter] i don't know where we go from here. i really don't. to your point with that analogy coming out of the world of sports but i said if someone takes to get the best draft pick it happens in the nfl or the nba and they'll be not so much but it feels like the biden administration is intentionally thinking when i see the border and the crime and those with the inability to rectify them and feels like they are making the worst possible decision in an effort to ensure joe biden is the worst president in the last 100 years. steve: strong close. we will see you here next in america with trey gowdy" is up next. ♪ trey: thank you for joining us, i am trey gowdy, it is "sunday night in america," we begin with a fox news alert out of california one person has been killed, 5 others hurt after a shooting at a church in laguna woods, california. orange co

we now know that attorney general merrick garland's department of justice, is investigating -- exactly the same attempts to overthrow the election that the january 6th invite committee is investigating the exact same territory. dog master no may well, then, we the subject of that justice department investigation. four republican candidate for governor in pennsylvania, has been subpoenaed by the january six committee, ignore that subpoena illegally, and maybe the subject of a federal criminal investigation right now for his role in attempting to overturn the presidential election, and 580,042 pennsylvanians voted for that candidate. elections for governor are not supposed to matter like this. and yes, there can be important issues in government elections. but the future of the american government? the future of american democracy is not supposed to be one of the things at issue in the election of a governor. it never has been before. until now, no candidate for governor deserves to have the kind of pressure that josh shapiro is bearing tonight. and it's up to joshua perot to save americ

yeah, merrick garland has announced today again really on the pulse of the country. what's really weird tcountry,, e announced the launch of a comprehensive environmental justice strategy that's what the focus of the democrat on the inflation the democrat and supply chain and gas pricess and selling and off of the mark. that's where they want to go. >>at's where they want to go. yes, because remember, in obama's words, laura , the objective is the fundamental transformation of the nation into a very v far left, some would say socialist or communist kind of model. of environmental of model. justice entity within the doj makes perfect sense. it's totally along the lineses h their agenda has nothing to do with criminal justice, which is what his jobt but has everything to do with the ideologicalee that they are waging.monica, t the global reset monaca the global reset here it ishe great to see you as always. and despite their threats and intimidation left, they haven't been able to stop parents, have they , amanda, or ran the campaigns of the winning candidates in the s

merrick garland can go out there and read something. i don't think it has much emphasis. he can't even point to a crime. i would love to see him point to it. steve: it captures how for them it's virtue signaling. ideology signaling. here is one more for you which is just brilliant. the elitest met gala seems to be an annual gold mine of leftist hypocrisy. here is a picture of hillary lapping up the attention from the media. this picture was just -- said so much. it's so perfect in so many ways. >> you could have left up the picture of blake lively. but you are going to pepper our televisions with this picture. there are so many things wrong with this. especially the people working at our feet, having to wear masks. it's just the absurdity of it. she is proving why america is so glad donald trump was the president and she'll never be the president of the united states of america. steve: if you look at that picture, she thinks she is the queen. there is something about the way she is standing there while a foot man fusses around her. she thinks she'll be. we had a clip from

it's been almost a month since attorney general merrick garland's justice department sent a letter to the january six committee requesting transcripts of interviews conducted by the committee, and the chairman bennie thompson is now made it very clear that the committee has refused to share that information with federal prosecutors, thompson told reporters, quote, they made it a request and we told them that, as a committee, the product we was hours, and we are not giving exodus to that work product. five months ago, the january 6th referred mark meadows to the justice department for criminal prosecution on contempt of congress charges, for refusing to comply with the january 6th committee subpoena. and so, the justice department has been investigating issues involving mark meadows subpoenaed to the january 6th committee for five months already. the january 6th committee invited the justice department to, in effect, overlap with their investigation involving mark meadows in an attempt to see through the legal fog. we are now joined by neil katz yell, he's former acting attorney genera

again, everyone is concerned about not having merrick garland look like he is willing to do for president biden what bill barr was not willing to do for donald trump. but we've got so much. we're way beyond the political considerations. at this point, equal justice under the law, accountability, all of the values of the united states department of justice i was proud to serve in way in favor of prosecuting donald trump. >> paul, i'm going follow up on this -- who are these institutionalists? who are these people who think -- seriously! who think that the institutions of our government are more important than holding people accountable who tried to tear those institutions down? i'm not just talking as a political scientist here. this is what regular people are asking. so paul, who are these institutionalists who have been so apprehensive thus far? >> the standard of the justice department is you don't bring a case unless you think you can win. no former president has ever been charged with a crime, so this would be a huge deal, and at this point, again, i think we're getting the kind of ev

i have great faith in merrick garland. i have known him for a bunch of years. i have great faith in the people of the department of justice to do the right thing. i think they'll take into account a whole variety of things including the divisive nature of the impact of an indictment. but again, cardinal principles of criminal law are accountability and deterrence. if you focus on those issues, as i think we should, i think the possibility of indictment is certainly there. >> would you do that if you were attorney general now? >> well, i don't have access to all of the information. >> from public record. >> right, to the extent that i was satisfied that the statutory requirements were met and that you could show the necessary intent, given the nature of this crime, yeah, i would proceed. >> merrick garland is very quiet in public about what the doj is doing in this investigation. as attorney general, you took a different tack. how important is it for the public to know what's going on as this investigation is happening inside the doj? >> the attorney general has

merrick garland is obviously lying. we have evidence the fbi did in fact probably at his instruction target these parents. why can't they just come out and say they are become an enforcement arm of the democrat party? it's sad to watch. >> the fact that they are not focused on actual domestic terrorists. we watched portland and seattle and every other major city in america burn for two years. if youou are a parent concerned about your children being indoctrinated in our public school system, you are targeted. it's disgusting that it's taking place. bit is happening. and people have to start making their voices heard. they must not be afraid because that's what the tactics they are trying to employ. they are trying to scare you to allow this garbage to continue. you will destroy our education system. youon will destroy it, and you will destroy our children's future if we don't stand up to this nonsense. >> the good news is there is a silver lining. you will see whistleblowers come forward. a lot of decent people who had

attention, merrick garland, look what we have in front of you. is anybody going to be held accountable for this? i continue to find it amazing that these guys put the coup in writing. [ laughter ] >> me, too! >> we have it, and there are more out there because he's telling pennsylvania, look, jackie's right that what eastman was doing basically throwing spaghetti up against the wall and seeing what would stick, but what he's basically telling legislators in pennsylvania and probably in wisconsin and michigan, too, is just make stuff up so it looks like trump won, and that line that neal highlighted is that it provides us cover really is an indication that that's what they're talking about doing. let's come up with completely fake, bogus, statistical measure and we'll wink, wink, wink, use that to justify overcoming the election. it is so bizarre, and i think it's even more bizarre that someone of eastman's former stature would have put that in writing, and my guess is there's a lot more where that came from. >> well, i guess, neal back to you wit

mainly, they'll see what mitch mcconnell and the republican senate did with merrick garland. oh, no, wait a second, no, no, we have a rule and can't support anyone going into the last year. that was barack obama's last year. of course, in donald trump's last few months, suddenly, that rule didn't matter. what i was concerned about then and what i said then and what i'm concerned about now is the fact that this might makes right approach will be used against republicans. will be used. the court will be expanded. democrats, when they get in power at some point where they have majority, a larger majority, will say, "well, republicans did it, so why can't we?" then you're talking, again, the further illegitimacy of the court that we have to depend on to uphold our constitution. >> absolutely. and the illusion you're making is to abraham lincoln's speech at cooper union, as he was beginning to run for president. that the principle of right makes might must be upheld, not that might makes right. this is an assertion of raw strength marshalled under the provisions of the constitutio

senate republicans deliberately stole the seat that president obama elected merrick garland to fill. senate republicans then turned around and rushed the confirmation of justice amy barrett after the death of ruth bader ginsburg even though voting began in the 2021 elections. a recent poll of "the washington post" and abs showed that -- abc showed that 70% of americans say that the supreme court should uphold roe. now more than ever it's essential for the senate to pass the women's health protection act. the legislation would protect the right to abortion, free from medically unnecessary restrictions, and create a statutory right for providers to provide and patients to receive care. this would codify roe v. wade and prevent states from continuing to enact restrictions on reproductive freedoms. despite the opinion just being a draft and abortion still being a constitutional right, states are already seizing on the momentum of this draft opinion and moving to limit women's constitutional rights. since the leak of this draft opinion, legislatures around the country are rushing to crimi

i look at this where is merrick garland? isn't there equal justice under the law. the maker garland is a political hack saying i'm not going to en40s law. i want them to be subjected to the hate that's coming from this left wing mob. make no mistake, it's not just the justices. it's a threat to their families. do what we say or your family is in danger. we are coming for you. that is a threat they are making. again, this is mob justice. and, again, merrick garland should step in and say no more of this. where is the swat team? where is the fbi? where is the national guard to remove justices from home. this has no place in american justice. whether it's judges, witnesses, or juries. stay away. >> todd: you don't get to go on the field of a baseball game if you are not happy with the way the mlb players are playing. it's a confined environment that lawyers are there to do their job. the judge do their job. extra judicial influence is not part of the process. with that sean, what do you make of protesters going to nancy pelosi's home? >> yeah, listen. no one is safe w

there's a weird thing where is merrick garland lying or ignorant? this ploy, alejandra mallorca's did this, they are always first to know stuff. he is in charge. >> the government does this all the time. it's never like they say we are doing this because we want to gain power and control over you and take some of your rights away, it's always a for your own good thing. they saw an opportunity here, obviously to try and expand powers that they were given and have it apply to spy on parents that may be didn't like vaccine mandates or masks but when it became the war on covid, they thought that applied there. the government does time, that's why you're not supposed to trust them. >> greg: there you go. up guy, i imagine spying on you would probably get nothing exciting out of that. [laughter] >> thanks. [laughter] >> greg: even your response. >> scintillating! >> greg: what are your thoughts on this? it's not good. >> if i recall correctly, the education department solicited a complaint from the school board group to go to doj to then have an excuse to

the attorney general merrick garland making comments on this event from yesterday. part of his comments read as such saying, tonight the country mourns the victims of a senseless shooting in buffalo, new york. the fbi are working closely with the police department and federal, state and local law enforcement partners. the justice department is investigating this matter as a hate crime and an act of racially motivated violent extremism. we will conduct a thorough investigation into the shooting and seeking justice for these innocent victims. you can read the full statement at the justice department website. patterson, new jersey, we hear from michael, republican line. caller: good morning. i am calling because i think it is appalling this happened but also i believe the government is pushing for division of this country and pushing for racism. i believe the last caller, the way he talked, i don't want to say he is racist but we are all americans. we are all trying to make a living. we are americans first. host: how does that relate to yesterday? caller: he was an ind

if it happened anywhere else where they were protected the, they would be calling in merrick garland. >> it's one thing to protest but it's not mardi gras you can't dress up and scream during lit jib. that should be off limits. >> laura: they should try it in a mosque next time see how far they get. raymond thank you >> if you cannot watch us live don't forget to hit series record on your dvr so you don't miss us every night at 10:00 p.m. how bad are the threats the justices are getting. breaking news out of the senate in just a moment plus we'll show you how some of liz cheyney's biggest donors have made common cause with more lunatics. stay there. >> the day you get your clearchoice dental implants makes every day... a "let's dig in" day... >> mm. >> ...a "chow down" day... a "take a big bite" day... a "perfectly delicious" day... >> mm. [ chuckles ] >> ...a "love my new teeth" day. because your clearchoice day is the day everything is back on the menu. a clearchoice day changes every day. schedule a free consultation. ♪ did you know you can address one of the root causes of aging

what if people are upset with merrick garland for whatever reason? does he want people around his house? when are democrats going to realize it doesn't end with what you are seeing. there is going to be a response to what we are allowing. this is going to be out of control. i can't tell you how many people are going to say i'm not going to run. not fair to my family. >> ainsley: i agree with you. intimidation that's wrong. when they're going into their houses and neighborhoods and intimidating the neighbors and the kids and getting the kids involved, they are talking about amy coney barrett's children? how many kids she has. >> steve: hold on, nancy pelosi has a compound? >> brian: sure she does. hold those refrigerators. >> ainsley: one of the wealthiest if not the wealthiest in the house. coming up, we are following. >> steve: california. >> ainsley: southern california horrific coastal fire destroying over two dozen homes laguna beach. hear from those evacuated coming up. >> steve: people using a popular virtual exchange coin base. well, you know

apparently merrick garland or president of the united states does not, not speaking out against it. as a main street ba, pnc has helplion kidsthr passion for leeat intive. and now, we're providing billioars for affordable hndinprogr. as parllion to support rserved communities... including loans for small businesses in low and moderate income areas. so everyone has a chance to move forward financially. pnc bank: see how we can make a difference for you. your shipping manager left to “find themself.” leaving you lost. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire elizabeth: okay, let's welcome back to the show, congressman greg stuebe from house judiciary. congressman always a pleasure. we understand where you will probably come from. markets are about freedom, companies allowed to do what they do. we want to give viewers update. starbucks are with other companies traveling eligible expenses for seeking abortion. apple, microsoft, sales force doing that too. your thoug

the attorney general merrick garland making comments on this event from yesterday. part of his comments read as such saying, tonight the country mourns the victims of a senseless shooting in buffalo, new york. the fbi are working closely with the police department and federal, state and local law enforcement partners. the justice department is investigating this matter as a hate crime and an act of racially motivated violent extremism. we will conduct a thorough investigation into the shooting and seeking justice for these innocent victims. you can read the full statement at the justice department website. patterson, new jersey, we hear from michael, republican line. caller: good morning. i am calling because i think it is appalling this happened but also i believe the government is pushing for division of this country and pushing for racism. i believe the last caller, the way he talked, i don't want to say he is racist but we are all americans. we are all trying to make a living. we are americans first. host: how does that relate to yesterday? caller: he was an ind

. >> what is merrick garland's role here? >> a federal indictment has to be brought by the attorney general. we don't know exactly what the attorney general is doing. there is a school of thought that says it is a good thing. merrick garland is by the book, he is not leaking, and so on. another school of thought is that he is such an institutionalist that maybe he is too afraid to go after trump. my hope is that, because he is such an institutionalist, because he cares so much about this country, the department of justice and the rule of law, he will look at all of this, look at watch judge carter said, look at what the january six committee says next month and concludes in hearings. i suspect that evidence will be overwhelming that donald trump committed federal felonies. >> thank you very much for joining us tonight, neal katyal. >> and thank, you lawrence. >> tonight's last word is next. under district attorney gascón, i prosecuted car break-ins. all repeat offenders, often in organized crime rings. but when chesa boudin

the only thing one can conclude is that joe biden and merrick garland are poll itizing and weaponizing people against their philosophical opponents. >> harris: john cornyn is in "focus" with us. his bill to protect the justices and their families just passed the senate this week and heads to the house next. great to have you. i have put a fine point on the u.s. code that specifically talks about the protection of justices and jurors. would you please explain to our audience the difference between what jen psaki says at the white house lectern, people protesting, and people protesting on the personal property of a u.s. supreme court justice? >> this reminds me a little bit of some of the scenes we saw the protests in seattle and other places, portland, where the news media called this mostly peaceful protests while the fires were blazing in the background and obviously it was not peaceful. they are making the point that the first amendment does protect free speech but there is a line that you can cross and the criminal code sets that line out. and the department of justice is responsibl

merrick garland is out to lunch. you would think if a parent went to the home school administrator to the home started death threats. he domestic terrorists do i expect to enforce the breaking of this federal code. >> i think the white house is calling the shots. during the trump administration, hypocrisy of the left was just lane bare. they started with all the attacks on trump supporters in early in the campaign in the spring of 2016. remember, there were a whole series of attacks in costa mesa and san jose and albuquerque and so forth. it kept on going. that was perfectly fine to go and beat up trump supporters at political rallies. that was the insinuation of politics. and the whole rhetoric of resistance suggests that the government is not a legitimate government, anything goes. and that's essentially what the left is all about. anything goes because they are holy. they are virtuous and they know what they're leading history vanguard of history. they know what's best for everyone. if you oppose them and get in t