sof still breathing. then, his wife. then, his father. >> it was a horror, very scary and hard to undstand. we h someone was still alive, hiding in a basement. opejames: all he is left with or memories and pictures. helena died the same day. ivan was six and his family that in his fatin his family. this is the police station where ivan was working when his home was hit. ivan is not interested in justice. in his words, he was the russians carried out the attack to die inside ukraine, to send a message. but the police fce he works for says it is working to hold those russians to account. that is a long way off, if it happens at all. kasia: ukrainian authorities are trying to hold russian soldiers to account for her crimes. they are being held by international roots. the international middle court has sent its biggest i team to ukraine to investigate -- biggest-admiral -- biggest-ever team to ukraine to investigate. our colin doyle expins. colin: one of the key lessons would be to ensure that whatever crimes

now your west africa weekly goes out on a subscription platform sof stock. how much of a game changer are online outlets like this? what they have done is that they have completely democratized the flow of information because the hyper independence of platforms, like west africa, we as place them completely outside of the zone of influenza control of any nigeria and public or private sector entity. so essentially, that makes in the jungle men's eyes that makes us very dangerous because what are we going, for example, has a such driver base of just about $21000.00 as that last week and a total, a global distribution list of in the region of a $100000.00 plus. so there's a lot audience for it. and this is essentially media that is not controlled in any way during government is not funded, even with money that comes from nigeria in any way. so that's from the point of view of, of objective on by asked press is good news, but from the point of view of the drink, government is probably very bad news indeed. so you, on the 2020 people is journalism prize for infor

see, you know, what's happening sof sudan even if stuffs were done with trying to produce food. when you have a conflict, when you are fluid and you will still be very happy to be able to bring foot from somewhere in this market need to exist on a regular basis. similarly, maroka is going to lose half of his production of grains due to drug this year. and just in a walk re impacted by clement sent and more and more. what we need is more cooperation is more diversity, but not a more egoistic behavior. david about that from the international food poly reset policy research institute in washington d. c. thank you very much for having me for astronauts have left the international space station and are on their way back to us. the caps, you will safely undocked from the ice as ending their crews, 6 months, science, omission. if everything goes according to plan, they're due to touched on 1st. then i was off the coast of the u. s. they to florida. both that capsule is german astronaut monte us molla did obviously i blazed. takes a look back at his time in space. next step is your opin

now, they say they have nothing to hide, but when they got the invitations, the response was sort sof anger and bluster. just because they won't testify doesn't mean they're in the clear or won't be the subject of the hearings. mccarthy, for example, maybe he won't testify, but the committee has recordings of him saying donald trump is to blame in his view, saying donald trump acknowledged some responsibility. maybe jim jordan won't testify. they have texts. other witnesses and that's going to be one of the tasks for the committee. you don't always get testimony from key players, but you can put together documents, texts. so i think these are going to be very much a focus of these hearings. >> and the committee is going to be getting interesting testimony this week. we have confirmed that a former aide to meadows is going to be appearing before the committee to give a deposition. that will be very interesting. but getting back to these five house republicans refusing to testify and comply, what legal options does the committee have? would they pursue those options? >> so, you and i ha

sof course, harold goes to d.c. ap it was a meeting and secretary kerry was a gentleman and they-- >> do tellments one of the interesting things, harold says well, we've g it look at equity in energy and understandings these ssidies that you're living wind and he says, you've been getting oil and gassubdyes for years. and here is onehing i have to say drilled 17 holes, 18 if you talk about it. no one gave him a dime. if you leave nothing fro today, take this, when anyone says that oil and gas subdys. it's an expensive process. what they've done is put something different for oil and gas and they use that number to throw at us as an expense. it's got to stop and they said, look, you're-- they're saying that expense is a subsidy and that's a problem. that's not relying on being honest. that's-- he talks a lot about i.t. versus eq. that we've got to have eye iq in narg and not being emotionally applied for these communities. harold is to meet with this administration. we'd love to meet with them. and when our guys pull

and that is now under direct ideological challenge in terms sof the families core interest and there is final one which really doesn't bring the electric notice together which is the future of taiwan in the future of the unresolved territorial disputes in east china sea in the south china sea in a a different context from te indian border and so, are these reconcilablest end of the basic question of logic, no but what is manageable and what thank you so therefore doable is a series of mutual understanding is perhaps reach internally and diplomatically about what constitutes the redlines in the mind of each government and each system which cannot be crossed unless you want to risk moving across the trip wire into the real risk of conflict and war. i can only be done it with a couple of i describes kissinger clarity between the two side is sue what that is hyper to be there for not just police to accidentally by a mood in the congress this day or a crazy opinion piece in the global times in beijing the next day and it should be this solves the national security advisor of the united st

border mill had some to seller you thousand just like president biden has today another outlandish idea sof in m that area. >> active you interactive duty military guard and reserve recall effort covid-19 and they did a variety things and to operating medical stations and handing out supplies and things of that nature, and we call that event support for civil authority in their of things in the book where you basically because of the civil unrest, the work requirements for military to perhaps be a participant in one thing the people should understand for example, how this 250,000 active duty the border they have no enforcement authority and now the president can declare certain national emergencies and perhaps the guard actually national guard can actually exercise law enforcement so talk a little bit about some of the civil unrestho situation that you had to deal with and how you saw the role of the active military compared to that of the national guard. >> in was fortunate in that sene of base myve experience was serd on active duty in the guard and so i have a good understanding of what

>> i think the points of caution were three one is he described the possibility of a soft or quote sof softish landing. he described that as a plausible bath and certainly pointed out that they have very plblunt too and some things may be beyond their control. so it's pretty clear that he has a preferred path toward a soft landing, but there was some flexibility built inaround that, that maybe it will be more softish and perhaps they can't control their destiny as fully as they'd like >> roger, when bullard started bandying about this 75-point basis point idea, do you think that was an unauthorized sort of idea, and to put that into the market place in part, potentially to sort of dampen where things had been? can you sort of take us behind the scenes of how these things happen does that mean that powell won and bullard somehow lost? is there something else to this >> no, i think bullard has been speaking very much for himself he obviously, as everyone on the committee, as they said, is focussed on inflation. i think there are judgment calls as to exactly what the pace should be. one t

, the evaluations sof a trade school kind of approach, there's an answer within a range and so when you look at disparity in evaluations, letting it's interesting to see some of the research you've done mr. peter, in the space, there are lots of correlations and miss rice has highlighted that and this is where we can pick up into well, you and your testimony study you cite a booking study from 2018, two claim your is it bias and in evaluations and i'm just curious, when you get that granularity of that he picked up on credit scores as a factor but you know to what extent do you see that to continue thought mse neighborhood in the same block on mediated out under different evaluation it on a comparable property and so, there are certainly things we should be alert to but can you address that. >> certainly thank you so much for the question and so we did in part, base our analysis of the brookings institution study but also the analysis done by the federal housing finance agency which founded that in thousands of appraisals recently conducted that there existed an appropriate language and

and sof i've always been pretty good about looking at other people and learning from other people. so why's that is that's the root of wisdom. yeah. we have this all these college courses right in front ofon us called other people. watch them absolutely. and you can learn so much. hi. yes. you know so i think i learnedat a lot from that and just all of it sort of came together. it was like an epiphany for me.e it just kind of all came together at the same time. it's like, look, man, youto you've got you've got to stop. this doesn't mean you have to quit it completely. you know, i still would drink and you know but you were able to keep whittman like pretty much. yes, exactly. >> so tell us your tour schedule at this point. this well, the firsthi two years i can tell you this the first two years of that after we started having success with recordings, the first two years i was home, a total of fourteen days each year.so 2 so twenty eight days over the course88 of two years and no two days were everr together. our viewers can see it but your wife is here and clearly likes you. you ca