. >> joining me no is david henderson, former civil rights attorney and prosecutor. thanks for being here. david, i thought that this man's testimony was actually really power. if he was very much a republican. he made it very clear because he was asked like all the rest of them, you're a conservative republican, you wanted trump to win, yes, i did. very religious man. let me play a little bit about that. he talked about his faith a lot. take a look. >> it is a tenet of my faith that the constitution is divinely inspired. of my most basic foundational beliefs, and so for me to do that because somebody just asked me to is foreign to my very being. i will not do it. >> i know -- i know that this is not a peru, but if it, how great who it be to have a witness like that? >> i mean, joy, he's a great witness hemp's a great witness to start with for reasons you've already been discussing. i've got no love for him overall in terms of his ultimate point of view. he said it himself. he was a supporter of trump and went along with everything until he was asked to do something

henderson. ali, yesterday you told us about maw documentary filmmaker alex holder gave the committee video of trump and his inner circle that were conduct bfd the january 6th riot. what are we learning about the interviews. >> we are learning more about what's in them, specifically this officer view with ivanka trump which was first reported in the "new york times." we confirmed its contents and we heard from the president's daughter at various points throughout the committee's hearings specifically when she said she agreed with the former attorney general bill barr when he said that the president lost the election and there were no signs of fraud. in one of these interviews, ivanka said her father should continue to fight until every legal entity is exhausted because people were asking for it. it does present, again, another example of the fact there is more information coming in in real time to this committee. this is someone, this documentary filmmaker who they subpoenaed last week who has 15

. >> jamie, dana, henderson and casey, thank you so much. >>> david coates, and claire griffin are with me once again. these were originally expected to wrap up pretty soon but it has now been extended, do we know when the next ones are? >> i think probably mid july, although these things are dynamic, they could change at any moment. >> they say it is because they are getting -- >> they are getting a lot more information. i was told by one of my committee sources that there is archival information that we do not know about. >> if the supreme court ruling on abortion comes out next week, that will take all the news coverage. >> obviously, they don't want to compete with that, but i do believe that they have a lot more work to do, and we have all remarked on how organized these hearings have been. it has been kind of remarkable. one member at a time, one narrative at a time, you come away with one big message, every hearing, and i think they have had some hearings, with more things to talk about. what they are going to do, at the very end, is give you a minute by minute recitation of janu