. >> supervisor melgar. >> aye. >> clerk: you have three ayes. >> supervisor melgar: thank you. motion passes. we are now on item 7. >> clerk: hearing on the review and status of the mayor's office of housing and community development below market rate program including about the number of participants in the program, what area median incomes are currently served and the program's funding availability and participant demographics, number of units in development and number of units currently available and requesting the report. call 415-655-0001. if you have not done so and would like to speak on item 7 press star 3 and the system will indicate you have raised your hand. >> supervisor melgar: we are now joined by supervisor safai who is a sponsor for this hearing. welcome, supervisor, the floor is yours. >> supervisor safai: thank you for saying my name so perfectly. i appreciate that. thank you, colleagues. i don't think i have to tell you or members of public that we are experiencing a housing crisis in san francisco and more specifically affordable housing shortage and crisis

preston. >> thank you, chair melgar. i want to concur with the sentiments expressed by my colleagues. it is hard for me to see the situation on the fleets where we would not want be to have conditional use. i will take issue with the department of environment framing of the reduction of red tape. i think there are real issues that come along especially on the fleet front. i don't know that conditional use. i think it is unfair to that aspect of our planning code to frame that as being red tape. i think we are talking about what would for fleets we are looking at potentially exponen shall increase in vehicles accessing those sites. that trigger important issues including how it lines up with vision zero and preventing fatalities and injuries on the streets. we can have that conversation around the appropriate way to address fleets, but i would certainly concur with all of the comments both colleagues have raised. >> thank you, supervisor preston. madam clerk. if there is no other comments. >> i will do mine after public c

member melgar. melgar, aye. and chair mar. >> mar, aye. you have three ayes. >> great, thank you. madam clerk, please call item 2. >> item 2 is a resolution urging the california state legislature to pass state senate bills 929, 965, 970, 1035, 1154, 1227, 1238 and 1416 introduced by california senator susan eggman on legislation modernizing californias a behavioral health continuum. members may line up to speak now or joining remotely, call the public comment line at 415-655-0001. meeting i.d. 2393 3084663 and press pound twice. wasn't connected to the meeting, you will press star 3 to enter the speaking line and the system prompt will indicate that you have raised your hand. wait until it tells you that you have been unmuted and you can begin your comments. mr. chair. >> thank you. floor is yours. >> thank you, chair mar. and after the efforts to address mental health and the lack of success with the sb1045 program that i championed several years ago to be having a conversation about another round of efforts at the state level to address conservatorship more broadly. i introduce

melgar not present. >> supervispe

preston. >> thank you, chair melgar. i want to concur with the sentiments expressed by my colleagues. it is hard for me to see the situation on the fleets where we would not want be to have conditional use. i will take issue with the department of environment framing of the reduction of red tape. i think there are real issues that come along especially on the fleet front. i don't know that conditional use. i think it is unfair to that aspect of our planning code to frame that as being red tape. i think we are talking about what would for fleets we are looking at potentially exponen shall increase in vehicles accessing those sites. that trigger important issues including how it lines up with vision zero and preventing fatalities and injuries on the streets. we can have that conversation around the appropriate way to address fleets, but i would certainly concur with all of the comments both colleagues have raised. >> thank you, supervisor preston. madam clerk. if there is no other comments. >> i will do mine after public c

supervisor melgar? >> supervisor melgar: thank you. i want to advise my colleagues that i have had to sadly step back from two of my time-consuming boards due to my on going and hopefully temporary challenges in my family, so i have stepped back from the bay area air quality management board and the golden gate highway transportation authority, so i will only report on the first five commission, which i'm still on. i have been involved, as you know, with the merger discussions and the tratic planning process that has led to the merger plan of -- strategic planning process that has led to the merger plan of the early childhood and first five commission. there has been a strategic planning process by the first five staff that has set up the plan for the merger. i also sit on the ad hoc strategic plan advisory committee at the board of supervisors representative. we have been meeting for several months, and there is still more work to be done. there was a decision to continue receiving feedback until the end of the year. i do feel that we

supervisor peskin. >> thank you, chair melgar and thank you to mr. bentless and supervisor mandelman. i am happy and would like to add my name as a co-sponsor and then i had one question as to the resolve, which is that -- this maybe is just a wordsmithing things and its we are requesting that the department, the planning department plan a landmark report that considers the full historical architecture and anesthetic interest of the castro that ther and it doesn't use the words including the interior. i assume by reference full includes interior but if it would be acceptable to the maker, i would suggest adding the words "including but not limited to the interior." thank you. for clarity were you suggesting town conclude that after the full historical architectural anesthetic and cultural interest comma, yeah. [laughter] including but not the interior. >> ok. >> and we will work with the clerk's office of city attorney to make it's includessed. >> i see city pearson nodding her head in confirmation of her understanding. >> that's right. that would no

supervisor melgar? >> supervisor melgar: thank you. i want to advise my colleagues that i have had to sadly step back from two of my time-consuming boards due to my on going and hopefully temporary challenges in my family, so i have stepped back from the bay area air quality management board and the golden gate highway transportation authority, so i will only report on the first five commission, which i'm still on. i have been involved, as you know, with the merger discussions and the tratic planning process that has led to the merger plan of -- strategic planning process that has led to the merger plan of the early childhood and first five commission. there has been a strategic planning process by the first five staff that has set up the plan for the merger. i also sit on the ad hoc strategic plan advisory committee at the board of supervisors representative. we have been meeting for several months, and there is still more work to be done. there was a decision to continue receiving feedback until the end of the year. i do feel that we

preston. >> thank you, chair melgar. i want to concur with the sentiments expressed by my colleagues. it is hard for me to see the situation on the fleets where we would not want be to have conditional use. i will take issue with the department of environment framing of the reduction of red tape. i think there are real issues that come along especially on the fleet front. i don't know that conditional use. i think it is unfair to that aspect of our planning code to frame that as being red tape. i think we are talking about what would for fleets we are looking at potentially exponen shall increase in vehicles accessing those sites. that trigger important issues including how it lines up with vision zero and preventing fatalities and injuries on the streets. we can have that conversation around the appropriate way to address fleets, but i would certainly concur with all of the comments both colleagues have raised. >> thank you, supervisor preston. madam clerk. if there is no other comments. >> i will do mine after public c

and i'm very committed to working with you, supervisor melgar. i just can't figure out what the solution is and it's driving me crazy. fining the victim over and over again is hard to stomach. >> clerk: through the president to supervisor ronen 29 mission was remediated and removed from the list. good news. >> that's good. i didn't see it on the list and i was wondering about that but the point the owner made stayed the same and i very much agree with it. i'm hoping supervisor melgar finds the answer for us because i tried, i tried. i haven't found it yet. we have to figure something out. >> supervisor: thank you, supervisor ronen. i don't see anyone else on the roster. the hearing has been heard and filed as madame clerk started, if you have discrepancies and want a discussion with publishing works they can have a discussion with you in the hallway and we have dealt with item 23 and will come aback and possibly amend for item 24, if you are able to work out a solution. they'll discuss item 24 and possible amendments. with that said, madame clerk

moved by commissioner mandelman, seconded by commissioner melgar. roll call, please. >> clerk: i'm going to go ahead and read all the names again. commissioner chan is excused. >> supervisor dorsey: yes. >> supervisor mandelman: aye. >> supervisor mar: aye. >> supervisor melgar: aye. peskin is absent. preston is absent. ronen is absent. safai is absent. >> supervisor stefani: aye. i'm sorry, i forgot to say that commissioner preston is excused. walton aye. the consent agenda is approved. >> supervisor dorsey: thank you, madame clerk. would you please call the next item. >> item 4, chair's report, this is an information item. >> supervisor dorsey: good morning, colleagues. so since joining this body seven weeks ago i've had the opportunity to visit treasure island several times and meet with community members and with the treasure island development authority staff. there is a tremendous amount of work happening there and it is exciting to see the ferry dock and services thriving already. there is more to do obviously and i'd like to thank members of

supervisor melgar. >> supervisor melgar: thank you, president walton. so, like my colleagues, i'm having a really hard time with this. before i became supervisor, i was executive director of a non-profit that had a contract with d.p.h. that was medicare reimbursement, it never covered our costs. and it never occurred to me that we were to get in trouble not meeting that 30-40%, that the costs didn't cover that i could go to d.p.h. to get, you know, bailed out. i mean, i'm just having a really hard time that a structural deficit -- this is a structural deficit that goes back years, would just be covered like that through an action of the board of supervisors without ensuring there is a sound business plan. so, you know -- and i'm also, like, wondering how is that going to happen? so, you know, you guys are the experts on the compliance requirements for the medicare reimbursement. i'm not sure that that's necessarily the case for like a non-profit business plan. so if the income that has been, you know, comprised is the -- compromised is what i understand

supervisor melgar. >> supervisor melgar: any of the committee members have questions first? thank you for that wonderful presentation. i do have a few questions. colleagues, as you know, i am the supervisor appointee to the first commission so i did get a little more detail about the budget. so the first question i have is, you know, in the merger, you know, when the presentation was done, i did express my worries that your staff is lean and mean and perhaps a little too mean and lean and i'm worried about that because as you stated in your presentation, our biggest need is for space for the little ones, for, you know, 0-3. we only have $40 million this year for, you know, the new spaces category, but it's also, you know, to make deals work, to leverage private funding to look at, you know, what the employers are providing and, you know, what is being built and the city just takes a lot, you know, and then getting the new department up and running takes a lot. i am wondering if you can talk about the department's capacity and building out new h.r. capacities with the limited

supervisor melgar. >> supervisor melgar: thank you, president walton. so, like my colleagues, i'm having a really hard time with this. before i became supervisor, i was executive director of a non-profit that had a contract with d.p.h. that was medicare reimbursement, it never covered our costs. and it never occurred to me that we were to get in trouble not meeting that 30-40%, that the costs didn't cover that i could go to d.p.h. to get, you know, bailed out. i mean, i'm just having a really hard time that a structural deficit -- this is a structural deficit that goes back years, would just be covered like that through an action of the board of supervisors without ensuring there is a sound business plan. so, you know -- and i'm also, like, wondering how is that going to happen? so, you know, you guys are the experts on the compliance requirements for the medicare reimbursement. i'm not sure that that's necessarily the case for like a non-profit business plan. so if the income that has been, you know, comprised is the -- compromised is what i understand

supervisor melgar. [roll call vote] >>. [roll call vote] there are 10 aye's. >> motion carried unanimously. are we ready to go back to 64, 65? can you call those?>> for the record item 64 and 65 were called earlier but i will indicate that these are two ordinances that authorize the department of public health to award a one time term limited grant ending without engaging in the competitive solicitation process otherwise required by the administrative code for grants for the purpose of maintaining thefinancial solvency of both the positive resource center and favorite places incorporated . >> thank you so much. >> thank you colleagues. i think that this conversation benefited from taking a pause and listening to the laguna honda conversation because of course they are interrelated. and we've got 2 crises on our hands. i want to suggest and it's not a perfect answer because we don't have enough information i feel like to have a perfect response in this impossible situation but what i would suggest that w

supervisor melgar. >> supervisor melgar: submit, thank you. >> supervisor preston? >> supervisor preston: -- >> supervisor peskin: i will submit. >> supervisor preston: thank you, madame clerk. i have two items today. first, i'm introducing a resolution calling on the san francisco housing authority to evaluate as an alternative to the plans currently being proposed by developer mccormack redevelopment options that result in 100% of the units on site at plaza east being redeveloped as affordable housing, including but not limited to evaluating an alternative proposal that uses opportunities presented by the relatively new fair cloth to rad program. some of you may remember my office called and held a hearing back on may 6th and then again on july 15th last year. on plaza east and redevelopment plans and conditions of the property. we made requests and those meetings regarding the future redevelopment of plaza east and specifically asked the developer and the housing authority at that time whether there

moved by melgar, seconded by walton. madame clerk, please call the roll. >> clerk: commissioner chan? >> commissioner chan: aye. >> supervisor dorsey: aye. >> commissioner mandelman: aye. >> commissioner mar: aye. >> commissioner melgar: aye. >> commissioner peskin: aye. >> commissioner preston: aye. >> commissioner ronen: aye. commissioner safai is excused. commissioner stefani? >> commissioner stefani: aye. >> commissioner walton: aye. >> we have 10 ayes, the consent agenda is approved. >> chair mandelman: all right. thank you, madame clerk. please call item 9. item 9, vision zero, 2021 traffic fatality report. this is an information item. >> chair mandelman: thank you. colleagues, this is part two of the vision zero discussion that we started at our last meeting that focused on the progress of the updated action plan and we anticipate that will be the subject of the follow-up hearing this fall. today we're going to hear from department of public health on the 2021 traffic fatality report. while this data covers last y

supervisor melgar. >> supervisor melgar: thank you, president walton. so, like my colleagues, i'm having a really hard time with this. before i became supervisor, i was executive director of a non-profit that had a contract with d.p.h. that was medicare reimbursement, it never covered our costs. and it never occurred to me that we were to get in trouble not meeting that 30-40%, that the costs didn't cover that i could go to d.p.h. to get, you know, bailed out. i mean, i'm just having a really hard time that a structural deficit -- this is a structural deficit that goes back years, would just be covered like that through an action of the board of supervisors without ensuring there is a sound business plan. so, you know -- and i'm also, like, wondering how is that going to happen? so, you know, you guys are the experts on the compliance requirements for the medicare reimbursement. i'm not sure that that's necessarily the case for like a non-profit business plan. so if the income that has been, you know, comprised is the -- compromised is what i understand

commissioner chan has asked to be excused, and commissioner melgar may need to step out, as well. the chair can just do this unless the body is unhappy with that, so i'm going to proceed, and who are the chair of timma can do as they want, so i am just going to excuse commissioner chan and commissioner melgar from those parts of the meeting that they need to miss. and then, i also want to just remind folks that i am invoking rule 3.26 from the timma rules to limit total public comment for today's meeting to 30 minutes. with that, i will ask madam clerk to call the consent jend. >> clerk: items 2 through 5 is the consent agenda. it is not anticipated there will be any presentation on these items. if i may, you do need to take public comment on consent agenda. >> supervisor mandelman: yes. >> clerk: okay. so i'll just reannounce the announcement. for members of the public interested -- and can we hear on-line, as well? okay. for members of the public interested in participating in this board meeting, we welcome your participation in this room, 250 in city hall, or you may watch cabl

supervisor melgar? >> supervisor melgar: thank you. my daughter is an employee of the water department. >> president walton: thank you. madam clerk, can we vote on all items except 80 and 81? >> clerk: yes. on items 52 through 83 except 80 and 81 -- [roll call] >> clerk: you have 11 ayes. >> president walton: thank you. without objection, these items are passed unanimously. madam clerk, please call 80. >> clerk: item 80 is an ordinance adopting and implementing the second amendment to the 2018-2023 m.o.u. between the city and county of san francisco and the san francisco police officers association, to restore effective june 30, 2022, a deferred 1% base wage increase originally due on july 1, 2020. >> president walton: thank you. supervisor preston? >> supervisor preston: i would ask that we call 80 and 81 together. >> president walton: madam clerk, would you please call item 81. >> clerk: item 81 is an ordinance adopting and implementing the second amendment to the 2018-2023 m.o.u. between the city and the municipal executives' associ

first, just on the quick bill i want to say and i think supervisor melgar, commissioner melgar referenced frustrations on some of the things i want to echo that, especially on goldengate greenway moving forward to make slow streets. there's variousthings-we are all greenies have . we've done some really amazing stuff with quick bill and just we need to pace on some of these other projects. nothing new from my office but i will say that there's quite a bit of community consensus on a lot of these projects goldengate greenwayis a great example . we just need to move some of theseprojects forward . then finally, final question following up on or related to what supervisor melgar referenced in your response to her around the max, i wanted to ask about what's the network of safe streets max. there was the green connection i think was called mac from 2014 april 20, 2015. that's kind of been that way for a little bit for how we are choosing some of our safe streets. but is there an update, now we move forward, got a bunch of slow streets, theimprovements . we had some walls on others where we wa

moved by melgar, seconded by walton. madame clerk, please call the roll. >> clerk: commissioner chan? >> commissioner chan: aye. >> supervisor dorsey: aye. >> commissioner mandelman: aye. >> commissioner mar: aye. >> commissioner melgar: aye. >> commissioner peskin: aye. >> commissioner preston: aye. >> commissioner ronen: aye. commissioner safai is excused. commissioner stefani? >> commissioner stefani: aye. >> commissioner walton: aye. >> we have 10 ayes, the consent agenda is approved. >> chair mandelman: all right. thank you, madame clerk. please call item 9. item 9, vision zero, 2021 traffic fatality report. this is an information item. >> chair mandelman: thank you. colleagues, this is part two of the vision zero discussion that we started at our last meeting that focused on the progress of the updated action plan and we anticipate that will be the subject of the follow-up hearing this fall. today we're going to hear from department of public health on the 2021 traffic fatality report. while this data covers last y

first, just on the quick bill i want to say and i think supervisor melgar, commissioner melgar referenced frustrations on some of the things i want to echo that, especially on goldengate greenway moving forward to make slow streets. there's variousthings-we are all greenies have . we've done some really amazing stuff with quick bill and just we need to pace on some of these other projects. nothing new from my office but i will say that there's quite a bit of community consensus on a lot of these projects goldengate greenwayis a great example . we just need to move some of theseprojects forward . then finally, final question following up on or related to what supervisor melgar referenced in your response to her around the max, i wanted to ask about what's the network of safe streets max. there was the green connection i think was called mac from 2014 april 20, 2015. that's kind of been that way for a little bit for how we are choosing some of our safe streets. but is there an update, now we move forward, got a bunch of slow streets, theimprovements . we had some walls on others where we wa

. >> supervisor melgar: submit, thank you. >> supervisor preston? >> supervisor preston: -- >> supervisor peskin: i will submit. >> supervisor preston: thank you, madame clerk. i have two items today. first, i'm introducing a resolution calling on the san francisco housing authority to evaluate as an alternative to the plans currently being proposed by developer mccormack redevelopment options that result in 100% of the units on site at plaza east being redeveloped as affordable housing, including but not limited to evaluating an alternative proposal that uses opportunities presented by the relatively new fair cloth to rad program. some of you may remember my office called and held a hearing back on may 6th and then again on july 15th last year. on plaza east and redevelopment plans and conditions of the property. we made requests and those meetings regarding the future redevelopment of plaza east and specifically asked the developer and the housing authority at that time whether there would be -- and there were plans for market rate housing on this

i know chair melgar has questions. >> supervisor melgar: when there is a building that has an inconclusionnary obligation under 415. there is planning document o c.u. and you work with developer to set the prices and do the marketing plan. that is pretty straightforward. what happens after the developer has fulfilled their obligation and the building is owned by a landlord, not the original builder? there is a vacancy. how do you know there is a vacancy? >> we meet with all building owners and their leasing agents, property managers, on a regular basis. we have a staff person in contact with each of the buildings. if they have changes and we are not notified of the change, we do our outreach to each project we would become notified. >> would you meet on a regular basis with every building in san francisco? >> we have training for property managers, yes, on an annual basis. >> are they required to come to the trainings? >> they are required to complete the annual monitoring report and guidelines. they are required to do that with each of their tenants. they tend to come because it is important

supervisor melgar? >> supervisor melgar: thank you. my daughter is an employee of the water department. >> president walton: thank you. madam clerk, can we vote on all items except 80 and 81? >> clerk: yes. on items 52 through 83 except 80 and 81 -- [roll call] >> clerk: you have 11 ayes. >> president walton: thank you. without objection, these items are passed unanimously. madam clerk, please call 80. >> clerk: item 80 is an ordinance adopting and implementing the second amendment to the 2018-2023 m.o.u. between the city and county of san francisco and the san francisco police officers association, to restore effective june 30, 2022, a deferred 1% base wage increase originally due on july 1, 2020. >> president walton: thank you. supervisor preston? >> supervisor preston: i would ask that we call 80 and 81 together. >> president walton: madam clerk, would you please call item 81. >> clerk: item 81 is an ordinance adopting and implementing the second amendment to the 2018-2023 m.o.u. between the city and the municipal executives' associ

thank you to supervisor melgar. there's a couple other supervisors that have committed but have not signedon it. supervisor walton, we have not gotten the official . supervisor chan, supervisor ronen. all of whom have committed to this charter amendment. thank you mister chair. if you have any questions i'm happy to answer them but i want to keep my promise of staying to 30 minutes or less. thank you for adjusting us in the schedule today . >> why don't we go to the office of the comptroller. supervisor chan. >> i can't see you on the roster. the floor is yours. >> thank you chair peskin and my apologies for beingremote . i just have a clarifying statement from what supervisor safai said. i appreciate his leadership on thisissue . i am a supporter of the charter amendment even though i willnot be a cosponsor but i will be in support of the . i do have a question specifically about the total dollar amount that will be coming with this adjustment and i understand that he has worked really hard on the costs of living a