statement, home secretary, priti patel. today the home - priti patel. today the home secretary — priti patel. today the home secretary said _ priti patel. today the home secretary said it _ priti patel. today the home secretary said it had - priti patel. today the home secretary said it had the - priti patel. today the home - secretary said it had the right to control its borders. this government will not be deterred _ control its borders. this government will not be deterred from _ control its borders. this government will not be deterred from doing - control its borders. this government will not be deterred from doing the l will not be deterred from doing the film will not be deterred from doing the right thing. we will not be put off by the _ right thing. we will not be put off by the inevitable legal last—minute challenges. norwill we by the inevitable legal last—minute challenges. nor will we allow mobs, madam _ challenges. nor will we allow mobs, madam deputy speaker, to block removals — madam deputy speaker, to block removals. we will not

a statement from the home secretary priti patel over what's happened in the last hour, that last—minute legal battle, the flight that was due to take off from the uk to rhonda with micros on board will now not happen —— from the uk to rhonda. i want to bring you her statement now, it is long but there are important points in it. "i've always said that this policy will not be easy to deliver, i'm disappointed that legal challenges and last—minute claims have meant today's flight was unable to depart. it's very surprising that the european court of human rights is intervened despite repeated earlier successes and our domestic courts. these repeated legal barriers are similar to those we experienced with other flights, and those that are removed from this flight will be placed onto the next one. we won't be deterred from doing the right thing and from controlling our nation's borders. our legal team are reviewing every decision possible and preparing for the next flight now begins." that's a statement we have from the home secretary in the last few minutes, given that flight with mig

and priti patel has leased that for— migrants. and priti patel has leased that for the — migrants. and priti patel has leased that for the ministry of defence and what she _ that for the ministry of defence and what she wanted to do was extend that for— what she wanted to do was extend that for another four years. now campaigners have gone to the high court _ campaigners have gone to the high court and _ campaigners have gone to the high court and said this is discriminatory under the equalities act and _ discriminatory under the equalities act and the judge has agreed. and said that _ act and the judge has agreed. and said that it— act and the judge has agreed. and said that it would breach the equality— said that it would breach the equality at both for the people who are stuck— equality at both for the people who are stuck inside napier barracks and also for— are stuck inside napier barracks and also for local people because of the impact of— also for local people because of the impact of having so many migrants on them _ impact of having so many migrants on them soâ

the secrecy of this court ruling has priti patel venting — this court ruling has priti patel venting her frustration about this, and expresses one of the papers that's— and expresses one of the papers that's thrown its weight behind this policy— that's thrown its weight behind this policy and — that's thrown its weight behind this policy and thinks that it is good to have _ policy and thinks that it is good to have a _ policy and thinks that it is good to have a strong and decisive stance on how to _ have a strong and decisive stance on how to tackle illegal immigration. so it was— how to tackle illegal immigration. so it was really sympathetic to the priti patel and her frustration at the grounding of the flight in the 11th the grounding of the flight in the iith hour, — the grounding of the flight in the 11th hour, and now potentially throwing _ 11th hour, and now potentially throwing this policy into disarray. let's _ throwing this policy into disarray. let's move — throwing this policy into disarray. let's move on to the financial times now, a couple big international

priti patel claims it is _ legal obligations. priti patel claims it is lawful _ legal obligations. priti patel claims it is lawful under - legal obligations. priti patel claims it is lawful under the | claims it is lawful under the refugee convention, but in court today, a barristerfor the un told thejudge today, a barristerfor the un told the judge the today, a barristerfor the un told thejudge the unhcr today, a barristerfor the un told the judge the unhcr and then delete backin the judge the unhcr and then delete back in no way endorses the arrangement. we have informed the defendant that it is unlawful. not just one spot on numerous occasions, it was claimed, after the deal was signed in kigali in april, the un had two meetings with priti patel and told her the arrangement broke international law. then last month the home secretary went to geneva with rwanda's foreign minister to meet the un high commission for refugees, hoping he would back the deal, but he didn't. in fact, a grandee told the home secretary that it ran counter to the letter and spirit of the refugee convention

of on monday —— home secretary priti patel. the ukrainian ambassador... by russian proxy court. new figures suggest more than half of uk households have cut their energy use because they are so worried about the rising cost of living. a french government report says a chain of failures by the authorities at the champions league final in paris severely damaged france's image. and in half an and in half an hour's time, leading uk commentators and foreign correspondents based in london debate borisjohnson�*s survival. and, in the week of the begian king's visit to congo, why colonial powers find it so hard to say "sorry". that's in dateline: london — stay with us. hello, good evening if you'rejust joining us, welcome to bbc news. campaigners have failed in their legal bid to stop a migrant removal flight to rwanda from departing on tuesday. united nations refugee officials warned the home office on two occasions that the plans to send asylum seekers to rwanda were unlawful. but tonight, the high court ruled that 31 migrants ca

home secretary priti _ there. it is shocking. home secretary priti patel - there. it is shocking. home secretary priti patel has - there. it is shocking. home. secretary priti patel has that it is very surprising that the european court of human rights has intervened, despite repeated early success in our domestic courts. adding... this row could also feel the uk governing party's election promise to reform human rights law centre affecting the uk after borisjohnson said the government may very well have to change the law to help with the policy. to change the law to help with the policy-— the policy. what the criminal ans the policy. what the criminal gangs are — the policy. what the criminal gangs are doing _ the policy. what the criminal gangs are doing and - the policy. what the criminal gangs are doing and what. the policy. what the criminal i gangs are doing and what those who effectively are abetting the work of the criminal gangs are doing is undermining people's confidence in the safe and legal system, undermining people's general acceptance of immigration.— immigra

priti patel has consistently claimed her deal with rwanda is lawful under the refugee convention. this agreement is comparable with all our domestic and international legal obligations. but in court today, a barrister for the un told thejudge... notjust once, but on numerous occasions it was claimed. after the deal was signed in kigali in april, the un had two meetings with priti patel and told her the arrangement broke international law. the government's legal team, however, interprets the convention differently, noting that more than 10,000 asylum seekers have risked their lives crossing the channel in small boats already this year, and arguing there is a significant public interest in a policy that will deter people from making those journeys and undermine the activities of criminal people smugglers. around 100 asylum seekers are now in immigration detention, threatened with deportation to rwanda. in brook house near gatwick, some have been on hunger strike. one syrian spoke to the bbc, a translator has voiced his words. i came to the uk because it's the |only place i have conn

it is another question for pity patel to answer, and underlying it —— priti patel, the system isn't working at, that is why she has gone for this dramatic rwanda settlement policy and to try to stem the numbers coming across the channel. the question will be a she crossing the line to the way of dealing with this asylum seekers which is unfair? the numbers hoop the government in a poor light —— put the government. trying to get the balance right on the numbers that you feel you can accommodate but not falling off a treat getting mixed up with your general immigration policy, that has tested home secretaries over the years, priti patel has a robust response, not of a body likes it. who wants to talk about prince charles but a slightly different subject, he wants the slave trade port and understood as widely as the holocaust? —— taught and understood. interesting idea, prince charles has said we _ interesting idea, prince charles has said we should have something like the holocaust memorial day trust, the holocaust memorial day trust, the charity— the holocaust memorial day trust, t

priti patel has consistently claimed her deal with rwanda is lawful under the refugee convention. this agreement is comparable with all our domestic and international legal obligations. but in court today, a barrister for the un told thejudge... notjust once, but on numerous occasions it was claimed. after the deal was signed in kigali in april, the un had two meetings with priti patel and told her the arrangement broke international law. the government's legal team, however, interprets the convention differently, noting that more than 10,000 asylum—seekers have risked their lives crossing the channel in small boats already this year and arguing there is a significant public interest in a policy that will deter people from making those journeys and undermine the activities of criminal people smugglers. around 100 asylum—seekers are now in immigration detention, threatened with deportation to rwanda. in brook house near gatwick, some have been on hunger strike. 0ne syrian spoke to the bbc. a translator has voiced his words. translation: i came to the uk because it's the only pl

in statement, wikileaks said -- "it was in priti patel's power to do the right thing. instead she will forever be remembered as an accomplice of the united states in its agenda to turn investigative journalism into a criminal enterprise." jameel jaffer of the knight first amendment institute at columbia university tweeted -- "the assange indictment is a dagger at the throat of press freedom. the biden administration should drop the prosecution, as press freedom groups have repeatedly asked it to do." we will speak with julian assange's brother after headlines. the house select committee investigating the january 6 insurrection has revealed donald trump knew his plan to overturn the 2020 election was illegal but pushed his vice president mike pence to take part anyway in what the committee has described as an attempted coup. but pence refused to take part after trump asked him to unilaterally reject the electoral college results on january 6. the committee also revealed the architect of trump's plan, the attorney john eastman, also knew the plan was illegal but pushed i

the guardian headline is, "priti patel faces outcry over rwanda shambles." focused on this and outcry over rwanda shambles." focused on thi- outcry over rwanda shambles." focused on this and other dominant sto for focused on this and other dominant story for the news _ focused on this and other dominant story for the news agenda _ focused on this and other dominant l story for the news agenda this week. the first flight to take asylum—seekers to rwanda under this massive new deal the government have struck — however this flight was grounded at the 11th hour after intervention from the european court of human rights. this guardian story really takes aim at priti patel, containing accusations that actually this whole policy to send asylum—seekers to rwanda is nothing more than a government gimmick, and actually it was something that was never going to work at all — itjust played to the crowd, played to their party faithful to look like they've got big plans, like the government have got it under control with immigration, but knowing full well the legal

the home secretary, priti patel, said she was disappointed but would not be deterred, and preparations for a second flight were underway. mark lobel reports. going nowhere. borisjohnson�*s rwanda plan to cut immigration grounded for now. this flight was originally meant to take over 100 asylum seekers to rwanda, thenjust a handful, when finally all passengers were removed following a series of legal challenges. it's particularly galling for the government, coming on the day more than 300 people arrived in dover after attempting to cross the channel in small boats. the exact journey this policy is meant to deter. britain's partner in this, the rwandan government, remains on board. we are undeterred. we are committed to this partnership and we stand ready to welcome the migrants when they do arrive in rwanda. and so we will wait to see what happens, but on our part we are ready to receive the migrants. the european court of human rights, which is separate to the european union, and to which the uk is a signatory, has the final say in human rights issues. it ruled asylum applicants woul

this was always a possibility that priti patel would approve — possibility that priti patel would approve sending julian to the country— approve sending julian to the country that has plotted to assassinate him. to a country that julian— assassinate him. to a country that julian exposed the crimes of. we are not at _ julian exposed the crimes of. we are not at the _ julian exposed the crimes of. we are not at the end of the road here, we will fight _ not at the end of the road here, we will fight this. we are going to use every— will fight this. we are going to use every appeal avenue and we are going to fight _ every appeal avenue and we are going to fight i_ every appeal avenue and we are going to fight. i am going to spend every waking _ to fight. i am going to spend every waking hour fighting forjulian waking hour fighting for julian until— waking hour fighting for julian until he — waking hour fighting forjulian until he is free, untiljustice. untit— until he is free, untiljustice. untiljustice is served. hello, everyone. can you hear me ok? my hello, everyone. can you he

priti patel is speaking now. the british people _ priti patel is speaking now. ii2 british people have repeatedly voted british people have repeatedly voted for control of immigration, and the right to secure borders, madam deputy speaker. this is a government that acts and hears the message clearly, and we are determined to deliver that. clearly, and we are determined to deliverthat. last clearly, and we are determined to deliver that. last night, we aimed to relocate the first people from our country who arrived here through dangerous and illegal means, including by small boat. over the course of this week, many and various claims to prevent relocation have been brought forward. madam deputy speaker mo i welcomed the decisions of our domestic courts, the high court and court of appeal, the high court and court of appeal, the supreme to uphold our rights to send the flight. however, following a decision by an out of hours judge in the european court of human rights in strasbourg minutes before the flight�*s departure, there final individuals remaining on the

priti patel has signed order to extraditejulian assange. wikileaks called the decision a dark day for press freedom. mr assange's white about to fight it.— about to fight it. we're going to fiuht this. about to fight it. we're going to fight this- -- — about to fight it. we're going to fight this. -- vowed _ about to fight it. we're going to fight this. -- vowed to - about to fight it. we're going to fight this. -- vowed to fight - about to fight it. we're going to fight this. -- vowed to fight it. | fight this. —— vowed to fight it. we're going to fight. i'm going to spend every waking hourfighting we're going to fight. i'm going to spend every waking hour fighting for julian until he's free, until justice... is served. the eurovision song contest could be held in the uk next year after organisers confirmed that they are in talks with the bbc about hosting the 2023 song contest. ukraine won this year's competition, and would normally host the following year — but they've been ruled out as hosts because of the ongoing war with rus

home secretary priti patel has said: adding: by by continuing the path to deportation back to kigali, it is being said the uk is avoiding moral responsibilities. avoiding moral resonsibilities. ~ responsibilities. where production _ responsibilities. where production has - responsibilities. where production has been i responsibilities. where - production has been sought. the uk ublic production has been sought. the uk public is _ production has been sought. the uk public is divided over the issue and borisjohnson says his government may very well have to change the law to help it with the policy. this was the foreign secretary speaking on bbc breakfast on tuesday. it's about establishing a principal and establishing a read to break the business model of the people traffickers who are causing untold misery and untold cost to the british economy. and untold cost to the british economy-— and untold cost to the british econom . , ., .,, ., , economy. the plan has not yet not off economy. the plan has not yet got off the _ economy. the plan has not yet got off the ground _ economy. the p

we have heard from the home secretary, priti patel. — from the home secretary, priti patel, that the government is already— patel, that the government is already looking at the next flight to take _ already looking at the next flight to take people to rwanda. i think we will hear a bit more from the home secretary— will hear a bit more from the home secretary later. she is due to give a statement to the house of commons setting _ a statement to the house of commons setting out— a statement to the house of commons setting out some of those next steps — setting out some of those next steps. one of the question is a lot of tory— steps. one of the question is a lot of tory mps — steps. one of the question is a lot of tory mps i have been speaking to this morning have been asking though. — this morning have been asking though, is whether the government needs— though, is whether the government needs to _ though, is whether the government needs to rethink the uk's relationship with the european court of human _ relationship with the european court of human rights. it is some

immigrant — and on that basis, priti patel would — immigrant — and on that basis, priti patel would want her to go off to rwanda. �* , rwanda. laughter i did wonder - rwanda. laughterl i did wonder whether rwanda. laughter _ i did wonder whether someone at the palace thought that to and thought it would be a great sketch to make of timely clinical point. laughter i was not expecting that! more me! where do we _ i was not expecting that! more me! where do we go — i was not expecting that! more me! where do we go from _ i was not expecting that! more me! where do we go from here? - i was not expecting that! more me! where do we go from here? let's l i was not expecting that! more me! | where do we go from here? let's go to the front — where do we go from here? let's go to the front of _ where do we go from here? let's go to the front of the _ where do we go from here? let's go to the front of the times. _ where do we go from here? let's go to the front of the times. the - to the front of the times. the sunday times brings the element of the fact that she is so well respected glo

statement, home i secretary priti patel. today, the home secretary said the uk had the right to control its borders. we will not be put off by the inevitable legal last—minute challenges, nor will we allow mobs, madam deputy speaker, to block removals. we will not stand idly by and let organised crime gangs, who are despicable in their nature and their conduct, evil people, treat human beings as cargo. but labour say the plans make britain look shameful around the world. this isn't a long—term plan — it's a short—term stunt. everyone can see it. it's not serious policy — it's shameless posturing and she knows it. it's not building consensus — it'sjust pursuing division. it is government by gimmick. after days of legal action in the british courts, there were just four passengers due to leave on the first flight to rwanda last night. after a last—minute intervention by a judge from the european court of human rights, the plane stayed on the tarmac. many conservatives are now questioning the powers of that court

patel, the home secretary, is to be able to blame lefty lawyers, who they attack, and this gives them another excuse to blame the lefty lawyers for stopping them doing what they want. the whole thing is a ridiculous smoke screen. if they want to tackle the asylum, they can do so, as france suggested, they could process on french soil, they could have a more effective system in the uk. we desperately need an efficient asylum system, and we don't have it. instead we get these ridiculous stunts. latika, 28,526 people made it to britain last year on this route, 45 people either went missing or died attempting to do so. so you can see statistically why people might carry on coming, although it is very dangerous water, one of the most crowded waterways in the world, actually the risk to life is proportionally relatively low. terrible what happened to that a5, but proportionally it's quite a low figure. australia had exactly this problem of offshoring. it tried to offshore, and australia, it seemed to work. well, if you look to australia, this is playing out perfectly. for the british conser

that lawyer has told the judge that they have had two meetings with the home office since priti patel announced this policy. in both of those meetings, they said as far as they are concerned, as, effectively, they are concerned, as, effectively, the guardians of international refugee law, the plan is entirely illegal, and they say that is why they cannot endorse what the uk home office is doing. they have two principal concerns within that. one is rwanda's capacity to effectively deal with anybody who is coming from the uk, and a second is that they say there is evidence that some asylum seekers in rwanda have then been transferred to countries where they have been subject to persecution, and perhaps torture and other awful circumstances. that is why this case matter so much. what we think it's going to happen is possibly a decision today on whether or not to injunctive and stop the flights, but that there will be a fundamentally longer hearing over 6-8 fundamentally longer hearing over 6—8 weeks, if that happens, over whether or not the policy can survive. so there is a lot to figh

the home secretary, priti patel, said she was disappointed, but would not be deterred and preparations for a second flight were under way. let's get the latest from our correspondent duncan kennedy at the airfierld where the flight was due to take off. what has happened really is that the flight is not leaving. that's the bottom line message in all of this. after hours and hours of uncertainty both let me take you through some of the day's events both here and in the courts. certainly here all afternoon we were seeing these asylum—seekers being brought to this base behind me in a series of police convoys. then, later on, we saw various vehicle activity by the aircraft on the runway about 200 metres behind me. there were catering trucks and police vehicles, it looked like the flight crew getting on. then mid—evening, they turned on the lights on the runway here and it looked as though it was all going ahead. and then we started picking up these noises, these messages from the courts and london and in brussels to the effect that something might be on and not everybody was going to be

do you think priti patel is a bully or was a bully? i think that the — as i set out in my advice — i think she had, in some of what she did, bullied some of her staff and i did also set out a lot of mitigating factors, like it had not been brought to her attention, there were sort of — she did get frustrated sometimes with some of the staff in the department. and the other bit was that since it was brought to her attention, she had taken note of it. so, i set out some mitigating factors but i did think actually, the evidence was there that she had bullied some staff. there are lots of tory mps who say to us that they are worried the prime minister is tarnishing notjust his own reputation but that of the government and the conservative party and also institutions, the actual office of prime minister. are you worried that this pattern of behaviour — and we pointed out that you resigned and lord geidt has resigned — that it is dragging down that office? there have been quite a lot of issues. i mean, there were, for example, ther

of on monday —— home secretary priti patel. the ukrainian ambassador... by russian proxy court. new figures suggest more than half of uk households have cut their energy use because they are so worried about the rising cost of living. a french government report says a chain of failures by the authorities at the champions league final in paris severely damaged france's image. and in half an

in april, one civil servant wrote to priti patel, saint... these doubts led to the government doing this. officials in the home office weren't able to precisely quantify the potential benefits of this plan and so they weren't able to approve it so they weren't able to approve it so their british home secretary priti patel had to use a technique called and ministerial direction to actually get their policy signed off. :, , . actually get their policy signed off. :, ' . . :, �* off. the home office couldn't recisel off. the home office couldn't precisely quantify _ off. the home office couldn't precisely quantify the - off. the home office couldn't i precisely quantify the benefits... this scheme is completely unworkable, deeply unethical and extortion— unworkable, deeply unethical and extortion at the expense. while labour makes its case, the government highlight seven safe and legal groups that already exist to claim asylum in the uk. it points to... as we see the government two policy being fought over, simply perhaps this was a goal. to

secretary— charles and priti patel the home secretary get on really well. the bit that — secretary get on really well. the bit that really interests me in this, — bit that really interests me in this, because when i read the times story— this, because when i read the times story yesterday i was thinking, was the story— story yesterday i was thinking, was the story leaked by charles's analysed to get out his feelings because — analysed to get out his feelings because he wanted it out there or was somebody leaking it for damage prince _ was somebody leaking it for damage prince charles? jennie bond, the respected — prince charles? jennie bond, the respected former bbc royal correspondent says she thinks prince chartes— correspondent says she thinks prince charles almost certainly knew this was going — charles almost certainly knew this was going to be put out, which then raises _ was going to be put out, which then raises the _ was going to be put out, which then raises the question of prince chartes— raises the question of prince charles wh

earlier this year when _ met priti patel earlier this year when she — met priti patel earlier this year when she visited washington, and this issue — when she visited washington, and this issue ever wanda hadn't really come _ this issue ever wanda hadn't really come up _ this issue ever wanda hadn't really come up yet, but one of the things that she _ come up yet, but one of the things that she said which consisted with what _ that she said which consisted with what she has said publicly as that they need — what she has said publicly as that they need to secure your border, which _ they need to secure your border, which is — they need to secure your border, which is a — they need to secure your border, which is a phrase that you would hear— which is a phrase that you would hear a lot— which is a phrase that you would hear a lot from certainly republicans here in the united states— republicans here in the united states is— republicans here in the united states is something that is of paramount concern to voters, and to reference — paramount concern to voters, and to ref

we heard from the home secretary priti patel in the comments today saying the government is not can it be put off by the last—minute legal challenge, that there was last night which means the flight was grounded. in fact it says they are preparing for another flight.— in fact it says they are preparing for another flight. yes. the extent ofthe for another flight. yes. the extent of the legal _ for another flight. yes. the extent of the legal challenges _ for another flight. yes. the extent of the legal challenges and - for another flight. yes. the extent of the legal challenges and the - of the legal challenges and the european court of human rights getting involved to block this government policy or at least prevent it from being put into action has surprised ministers, it isn't going to anyway deter them from pursuing what they believe to be in appropriate and proportionate policy to deter people from crossing the channel in small boats by putting them on planes when they get here to rolando. but there's not much the government can do at the moment be on the logistics, the admini

patel, and everyone else invested in this policy~ — everyone else invested in this policy. they'll be delighted to see headlines about european judges blocking — headlines about european judges blocking the good old will of the british _ blocking the good old will of the british people — that rallies their base _ british people — that rallies their base 0h — british people — that rallies their base. 0n the other hand, what even anti—immigration and people who believe _ anti—immigration and people who believe in — anti—immigration and people who believe in this policy want is a government that can deliver a. that sto is government that can deliver a. that story is still— government that can deliver a. trust story is still developing and we will keep an eye on whether we hear more details over the course of this evening. let's turn our attention to some of the other stories — also on the front page of the telegraph is nicola sturgeon's plea for another scottish recommend democrat referendum. a suggestion that she should wait until 2039 —— another sco

if you try to come to the uk in a way that prili _ to come to the uk in a way that priti patel has deemed illegal. that is different. this kind of op—ed from rwanda's high commissioner is basically— from rwanda's high commissioner is basically a _ from rwanda's high commissioner is basically a response not only to charities, — basically a response not only to charities, campaigners and the labour— charities, campaigners and the labour party and other people who have criticised the plan. also unhcr, _ have criticised the plan. also unhcr, who said rwanda failed to meet _ unhcr, who said rwanda failed to meet the — unhcr, who said rwanda failed to meet the standards of legality. so, rwanda _ meet the standards of legality. so, rwanda and ready patel were making the argument, what you're saying is offensive _ the argument, what you're saying is offensive. they were capable of providing — offensive. they were capable of providing a safe environment, but at the moment, we basically don't know much _ the moment, we basically don't know much about— the moment, we basically don't kn

the home secretary, priti patel, said... let's get the latest political reaction from david wallace lockhart, our political correspondent in westminster. thank you for coming up and the home secretary hasjust thank you for coming up and the home secretary has just commented in a red at what she had to say. have a list of government they are going to be viewing this? give us a more detail on what we actually can expect as far as the next steps are concerned with mac you been out the statement and it's true that the uk government has been unhappy. 1truiith government has been unhappy. with this development in i talked about having _ this development in i talked about having a _ this development in i talked about having a success in domestic courts in the _ having a success in domestic courts in the uk _ having a success in domestic courts in the uk. that may be true for the seven_ in the uk. that may be true for the seven passengers for this evening were due — seven passengers for this evening were due to be on that plane be

priti patel has consistently claimed her deal with rwanda is lawful under the refugee convention, but in court today, a barrister for the un told thejudge... notjust once, but on numerous occasions, it was claimed, after the deal was signed in kigali in april, the un had two meetings with priti patel and told her the arrangement broke international law. and then, last month, the home secretary went to geneva with rwanda's foreign minister to meet the un's high commissioner for refugees hoping he'd back their deal, but he didn't. in fact, filippo grandi told the home secretary that the proposal ran... the home office legal team, however, noted that more than 10,000 asylum—seekers have risked their lives crossing the channel in small boats already this year and argued there's a significant public interest in a policy that will deter people from making those journeys and undermine the activities of criminal people—smugglers. around 100 asylum—seekers are now in immigration detention, threatened with deportation to rwanda. in brook house, near gatwick, some have been on a hunger str

the home secretary priti patel has described the ruling by the european court of human rights — which grounded the first plane due to take asylum—seekers to rwanda — as "scandalous". the flight had been due to take off on tuesday night before the court intervened. supermarkets and utility companies should be helping people struggling with soaring prices — that's according to the uk government's new �*cost of living' adviser. militants have attacked a sikh temple in the afghan capital, kabul. two people are said to have been killed. the attackers threw hand grenades at the building but the taliban say a car bomb detonated before reaching the temple. brazilian police say they've confirmed from dental records the remains of one of the two bodies found in the remote amazon rainforest is that of missing britishjournalist, dom phillips. a second body is still under analysis. now on bbc news, it's time for the travel show. coming up on this week's travel show. hello and welcome to this week's travel show, with me, ade adepitan. now, it's a beautiful day and i am in my home city of lo

priti patel says he can but he has the right to appeal. how day of the year so far. and kate bush's bracket number one. —— hottest day of the year so far. kate bush back at number one in the chart up bush back at number one in the chart up a0 years. prime minister borisjohnson has travelled to kyiv, to have talks with ukrainian president volodymyr zelensky. during the visit, the pm offered a uk—led military training programme which he said could "change the equation of the war". downing street says the operation would have the potential to train up to 10,000 soldiers every 120 days. both leaders have been speaking about the talks in kyiv. let's have a listen to what they said. translation: we do not have any doubt that - ukraine's going to prevail, so we are preparing for postwar reconstruction after our victory. i thank you for this. i thank you for your help in terms of reconstruction of kyiv that the united kingdom has undertaken. i thank you for the fact that these negotiations are, as usual, very frank and substantial. and, taking this opportunity, i'd lik

priti patel actually had good news on that today, the high court has ruled that that first flight with 31 migrants can go ahead even though there is going to be a fuller trial injuly about whether the scheme as a whole is actually legal. the court for the moment at least that it will be appealed is permitted the fight to go ahead. prince charles is comments in that context is put them somewhat at loggerheads with what the courts are staying at the moment and certainly with the government. claire's house is quoted as saying, "we would not comment on supposed anonymous private conversations with the prince of wales, we remain politically neutral, that a policy decision for the government. "in the strictest sense these binding conventions, it seems to be widely thatis conventions, it seems to be widely that is on two pages. i suppose it's got to do with something that the prince representing the queen at the commonwealth heads of government meeting, which is by coincidence, in rwanda next month.— meeting, which is by coincidence, in rwanda next month. coming up quite soon. what rwanda n