fair enough, moving on, david shapiro, in the filings, prosecutors argued they needed to keep secret their search warrant paper work, before the search last monday, because of concerns about evidence being destroyed. you served in the fbi. the fbi doesn't search anyone's home without, you know, legal backing to do so, a warrant. and particularly a former president's home. in your experience, would that have to be a genuine fear of the investigating agencies to go in there and say, hey, man, we're worried this stuff might be shredded or something, destroyed in some way? >> first, jim sciutto, thank you for having me this morning. and, yes, it would be a very strong fear, motivating the actions that law enforcement took in this case. you need to look at the history and discover that there were efforts made to have mr. trump turn over the documents voluntarily and there has been some dissertation regarding that and when that was not promptly complied with, the fear that evidence would be destroyed, could be destroyed, is great. >> yeah. elie honig, you have three laws under which the do

david shapiro, thank you. elie stay with us. we have new insight into another controversial legal decision concerning donald trump. evan perez joining us. this goes back to the mueller report and whether or not president trump was obstructing justice. what have we learned? >> this is a 2019 memo that the courts finally ordered the justice department to release. they said that this memo that went to bill barr, this came from other top officials at the justice department, explaining which the justice department should not charge the former president with obstruction of justice. according to the judges who looked at this, they said bill barr had already made a decision not to charge trump and this memo really, what they called it was an academic exercise and a thought experiment. you'll see why. in this nine pages you see they go through -- the basic point that they make is that because trump was not charged with collusion with the russians, therefore, he cannot be charged with obstruction. i'll read you just a part of what they wr

david shapiro, thank you for helping us understand. we appreciate it. joining me now to discuss the effects on intelligence here, central to the investigation, former director of national intelligence james clapper. thanks for joining us this morning. >> thanks, jim. >> so first, with the caveat none of us know the true extent of the documents, we know outlines and categories of intelligence included up to the level as its known top secret special compartmentalized information, you served in intelligence for decades. based on what we know so far, what is the potential danger to national security? is that something folks at home should be concerned about? >> well, potentially it is, jim but as you eluded, we actually don't know the content of these documents. you know, we have a general -- generic listing of them and in the case of intelligence, what is really critical here is often the source or method of the acquisition of the means by which the information was collected and in the absence of knowing that and the content of these documents and i'm spea

but as many justices say we are not going to go back and changes david shapiro loved it. put it in his heart and wexler, but you know when we're not going to overturn this it looks like the adversarial system was inevitable. it wasn't but also that was the beginning of judicial review and eventually the court. just didn't decide the case because they didn't want to step on congress's toes. i mean they say that will wait. we'll put it off another. tour and they only met in february and august and usually for a few days to a few weeks at the most. and by the time they met congress changed the law and did what the judges want? and so judicial review was accepted and then the supreme court in 1796 considered a case called hilton view united states. which considered the constitutionality of the carriage tax case? it was a case that put taxes on carriages. but what's interesting about the case is that? both the opponents of the tax. madison and the proponents hamilton and other people they both wanted the supreme court to make the decision one way or the other which means the s

college of criminal justice david shapiro and president of bo wave joshua school. thank you for being with us this morning. i want to focus on what is actually real and what we know and what we've seen and one of the things we've seen in this case in our reporting has shown is the fbi was actually really careful and in some ways much more restricted in the way they went about this search, showing up at 10:00, not wearing the jackets. explain that. >> good morning, thank you for having me on. many investigations you're not going to want to showcase or draw attention to yourself. certainly this was under the highest levels of scrutiny and attention by both the fbi seventh floor, the director of the fbi, the attorney general knowing this was going and they of course wanted to have a low profile. they had to coordinate with the secret service whose duty it is to secure the residence, they have a very difficult rules, there was i'm assume nothing guns for the agents going in, but myself i've done searches where i'm in a suit and no raid jacket and trying to draw less at

elon musk left, ben shapiro left, david rubin left. a lot of people are leaving there taken the taxes with them. take elon musk alone, this sure is going to pay about two and a half billion dollars in taxes. in california 13.3% state income tax. you arelo losing all of that money. not just one year but every single year this medicineis business. sooner or later the state is going to hit rock bottom. then and only then do i think democrats are going to rethink their hostilities toward republicans. until and unless that happens will be very daunting for anybl republican to win office statewide. i decided not to do it again. we would have you considered leaving? works i have not pressed born and raised there for the dirty little secret if you bought a house in the 80s in california you've got a lot of money in equity. and i bought houses the first house i bought was in 1986. i bought another in the hollywood hills. i've got a lot of equity in my house burns born and raised there, he went to school there, my friends are there, my pastor is

we were each assigned a student in isi studio minus ilya shapiro he has been in the news lately. we have kept upha over the year. he once showed up at my house, my farm and said i need to be in the arts of agriculture for a month. that was my first connection with isi. thank you very much for the award. i thought i would speak 25 or 30 minutes about the dying citizen. i wrote the book for the entire george floyd, the woke and covid. i added to it afterward. i think all of us are bewildered right now. i have recently been in downtown denver, downtown seattle. it looks like you're oshima, it really does. nobody goessa there. santa monica is the same way and venice beach, i was in san francisco not long ago and billion dollars has been invested in solving the homeless problem and it's worse than it has ever been. i said to another group this evening, people have signs in their cars is stay tuned nothing here or unlocked. can you imagine anyone would think that in the united states? we talk about scenes from the border were going to see people say at the is porous. there is no border