they wanted the judiciary commission to investigate the 3 judges, 2 of which 2 of them came from the same province where west to my brow, where the petition came from. what does the government not have any option? can't the government appeal or try and challenge this order? the federal government has many options, including re forking via the ministry of home affairs. the local provincial city and regency level executive decrease, execute the regulation. the federal government cannot requote local legacy, let the laws, but they can revoke executive orders. and all of this, at least 64 national provincial and local regulations were mostly made by the executive governors regions of males that the federal government can revoke that because they are against the constitution because they are discriminatory against was slim woman and muslim girls. so the fact that the government, the federal government hasn't done this, is yet, what does that mean? what are we to read into that? is there islam that is making an impact on the government's political calculus or if there's something else? obv

we see issues in judiciary system. we discussed the media drinking space or the civil society. there are thousands of little or bigger things which goals some kind of erosion of, of the hungary and democracy. and so this is snow the choice for, for hungary to prove that they belong to the club of europe and take countries while it's my job to have a dialog on gary or to use the tools which i haven't the commission to try to convince them through different measures to come back and in the past, victor alba and hunger and prime minister already verbally attacked you and demanded you resignation. so are you not afraid of a backlash in hungry and in other countries? for instance, poland because of this legislation. when you enter politics, you cannot take things personally. i had several other enemies. i realize that that is something on the slogan. it's my slogan. tell me who your enemies are and i will tell you who you are. and i was not happy that mister mon was taking me, but i was happy that love on the lion protected me, that she, she was supporting me. and i think that in ge

the first question is it a select committee or is it a commission? do you bring a few outsiders with powerful members of congress, clearly have to be bipartisan to have the impack like the church commit did. but a lot f people are talking about this different constructs, nunez likes the idea of maybe couple outsiders but you're going to see a lot of discussion about this in the december-january timeframe after the election. >> we what if you have a problem, though, john, that is merrick garland remindd everybody recently that if you work for the doj or the fbi, you're not loued to talk to members of congress or the senate. >> yeah, i don't care that's going to hold. believe me, there are over 25 people that i know from the fbi justice department that have made contact with the congress despite merrick garland's effort to muzzle them. people are coming out of the woodwork. people who just recently left they dent have to follow that construct. >> last word, jason. >> i it used the chairman of the oversight committee. if you're at the department of just

he's the likely chairman ofth the house judiciary committee. e quar. he could be the quarterback fora this. the first question is t fewi a select committee or is it a commission? doer you bring a few outsiders with powerful members of to have congress? clearly has to be bipartisan toc have the impact likeh a church committee did. but a lot of people are talking about there's different constructs. devin nunes likes the idea of maybe a couple outsiders, but you're going to see a lot ofdecb discussion about this in the december, january timeframe after the election. >> i thougf weh, have a problem, though, john , and that is merrick garland reminded everybody recently that ifif yoc work for the doj or the fbi, you're not allowed to talk to members of congress orare that the senate. >> yeah, i don't's think that's going to hold. believe me, there are over twenty five people that i know deom the fbi, justice department have made contactgarl with the congress despite merricand'uzzlk garland's effor. muzzle them. people are coming out ofle whot the woodwork a

and i want to apologize because you see me go in and out with the judiciary and the hearing in the armed services butve i wanted to be here to ask that specific question to a bill that a recently introduced the financial literacy act it was a direct commission to conduct a study on the impact of the limited english proficiency on health. 20 percent of households speak language other than english at home anda nearly 9 percent of individuals have limited english proficiency meaning less than english very well. that means 26 million households in the united states have limited englishk proficiency. i huge number of potential customers. it's important to me and constituents with my district at 77 percent latino and it's important for the economy everyone have the same opportunity for financial help in which they speak so i went to begin with you starting a new mobile branchag of service for the unpainted under bank communities it operates in residence have the opportunity from the atm open bank accounts has this ever been successful so far and have you been able to get a sense of what it mak

you can have plenty of policy debates. 9/11 commission finds something, what should you do about it? but here we're seeing more attacks on the basic facts themselves. take thomas massie who was at a judiciary committee hearing and brought up this debunked conspiracy theory that man named ray epps, a trump supporter worked with the fbi to fake the attack. and 9/11, both national security disasters, this would be a little like saying the thing that everyone lived through and watched on video and was real was actually this fake conspiracy theory. they used to call those people truthers. here is congressman jamie raskin going after not only that lie, but what he says has been a parade of irresponsible lies over the past 14 months. >> it was vetoed by the cult leader donald trump, who said he wanted no investigation at all. that's your guy, donald trump said he wanted no investigation. and so you pulled the plug on the investigation you originally advocated because donald trump didn't want it. let's tell some truth. we ended up with a bipartisan committee of people really interested in ge