reagan is professor of computer science. he says he has no evidence of foul play in the latest match. i was screening the tournament officially for the chief arbiter and they, we made a press release saying, so one of the main things during the pandemic that i've been involved in has been tracking the growth rate of young players while their official ratings have been frozen. and i had 2 inquiries in the past 4 days of people. ready misunderstanding that the young players. ready had advanced quite a lot, then their official rating showed and i was screening. i was in daily communication with the organizers of the tournament. now there are 2 other factors. one carlson may have suspected that is pre match preparation was leaked because nemo, or hacked me mart himself, referred to the ridiculous miracle that he had been able to preview the 1st 13 moves of the game an hour before the match. the 2nd factor is that carlson's recent action which you opened your program with may be a way of trying to sell, said the chest community.

reagan, he's a chest cheating expert, and a professor of computer science had the university at buffalo. he joined us from ham host in new york. good abbey with us of cut off your 1st guess. so what do you make of this was the cheating in that match or not? i have no evidence of cheating that match and i'm on record as such. i was screening the tournament officially or the chief arbiter and they, we made a press release saying, so those cheating primarily occur in chess when it's an online distance game where you can get the help of computers or is it more pervasive than that? yes, unfortunately, online chess, the raw cheating rate is about a $100.00 to $200.00 times higher than an over the board chess. and over the board chest, the best decade has had maybe $5.00 to $10.00 credible cases a year and not all ultimately sustain but online, cheating it into the hundreds. how do you detect cheating then? well, i deal with the statistical end of it. so i check only the moves of the game. i have a predictive analytic model. set, set expectations based of players ratings for how many agreement

reagan is a professor of computer science. he says he saw no evidence of foul play in the latest match. i. ready screening the tournament officially, or the chief arbiter and they were made a press release saying, so one of the main things during the pandemic that i've been involved in has been tracking the growth rate of young players while their official ratings have been frozen. and i had 2 inquiries in the past 4 days of people misunderstanding that the young players had advanced quite a lot than their official rating showed. and i was screening. i was in daily communication with the organizers of the tournament. now there are 2 other factors . one carlson may have suspected that his pre match preparation was leaked because nemo or hack need might himself referred to the ridiculous miracle that he had been able to preview the 1st 13 moves of the game an hour before the match. the 2nd factor is that carlson's recent action which you opened your program with may be a way of trying to sell, said the chest community. we need t