one, the united states to remain the preeminent global power. two, for the united states to remain as it were the strategic mainstay of what we call the liberal international order. which is comprised not just of the un system is of other relationships anchored in institutions and beyond that again underpinned by a network of global alliances of which the united states and the military remain the fulcrum. and thirdly the united states has a deep and abiding national interest in continuing to be testament to how do i put it in turned the arsenal of democracy. giving the democracy is under such challenge around the world. a range of subnational entities that proceed from those three overarching interest that we can come too. if i was trying to summarize it it's in those terms what the chinese core national interest? just a plant united states as a preeminent global power militarily and economically. t an index score it's not just the regional ambition by the chinese i do believe i have a global ambition. secondly, to begin to change the nature of

the united states and russia. no wonder there's a bulletin of atomic scientists has brought the doomsday clock to it than 100 seconds of midnight. it began at seven minutes to midnight. we are now at 100 seconds. the reason the bulletin of atomic scientists gives for this is the unilateral withdrawal by the united states from basically the entire architecture of arms control with russia in particular. so there has got to be pressure on the biden administration, not only to back off and allow zelenskyy and putin to talk, to allow them to have some kind of peace agreement that is filled with dignity for all sides, but also the united states needs to go back to the table with the russians and talk to them. if united states can talk to the saudis, why can't they talk to the russians? it is ridiculous to say the russians are not a good partner, they're not going to standby agreements. look who is talking. the united states is the country that unilaterally walked away from the iran nuclear deal. it was stop the iranians

as a major upheaval, i or major threat can only come to the united states from within the united states rather than from the outside. but they look at the behavior of many of the american allies, including some of the oil producing arab countries. for example, saudi arabia and i'm not even mentioning countries like china, india, south africa, many of their latin american countries. they're not taking sides, but they're clearly not excited about the american hegemony. because for very pragmatic reasons subscribing to anyone's hegemony at this point of time when you need sovereignty as a means of making decisions, it's not just an abstract and constant construction, but it's a way of functioning in them and predictable world. they don't seem to be buying that concept anymore. do you think gemini is sustainable in the world today? not in the mind of american the leads, but within the global community as well, within part of the global community. yes. that, that part of the community will include europe, that thought of the community will include other america, now lies in what they call th

and again, logically speaking, one way to the united states, or maybe the only way to turn the united states from supporting your credit and to the level when that support can make a strategic difference for russia would be to strengthen departments. now how do you strengthen deterrence? you basically strengthen by saying that, you know, in certain circumstances, but we will not be hitting at ukraine will be hitting elsewhere. and that shared the so, but people of, so basically the idea was not to try to suggest russian needs to know hip united states where the nuke, the idea was to strength and to tons the foundation of peace as we know it. and it's interesting that most of the western decision makers, when they make statements about rush as possible, use of nuclear weapons, they need focus on tactical strikes upon ukraine. they never met, even conceive of russia being able to reach their own homelands. do you think that said deflection on their part, or do they honestly believe that given russia's potential and those people in the know they know of fresh as nuclear potential? they k

states and nato and the ability of the united states. and they talk to continue. those supplies is we're city, it's not increasing the, the kinds of actual weapons that the united states can said that the europeans consent is this not the top of the lines, material tanks, planes. it's the 2nd hand stuff. and on top of that, the ammunition supplies that the west has just to provide can are being depleted and they do not have the industrial base they once had. this is not the world war 2 united states that could really crank up and produce stuff. so the, once he's in trouble is just the world hasn't caught up to it yet. you know, michael with the, the, the sabotage of the nord stream pipelines. again, that's kind of taking a piece off the chessboard because that was something very important for the russians. and for particularly the germans, but europe in general here, i think we all know who did it, but i'm not, i don't want to waste time talking about that. but the fact of the matter is, is that, that was some that was a form of interact

that has led to colds for the united states to decouple. in other words, disentangle itself from china, but it's not realistic. if the united states tried to de couple entirely from china, it would be very harmful to our economy. it would probably be harmful to our innovation. it would just have other economies industries step in where the united states stepped out. so it wouldn't work. decoupling probably wouldn't be a very good idea for china either. china also knows that its larger economic faith lives with the rest of the world. and even though it has this tense relationship with united states and others, it is you know, most of its economic growth. it's been dependent on globalization with the rest of the world. it needs to find a way to balance those things. at the beginning of this video, we asked whether we're at the dawn of a new global economic age. is the case of a us versus a chinese lead system. the differences are major. the market lead system of the u. s. favors the lack of government intervention that chinese system favors h

it would just have other economies industries step in where the united states stepped out. so it wouldn't work. decoupling probably wouldn't be a very good idea for china either. china also knows that its larger economic faith lives with the rest of the world. and even though it has this tense relationship with the united states and others, it is you know, most of it's academic growth that's been dependent on globalization with the rest. the world needs to find a way to balance those things. at the beginning of this video, we are whether we're at the dawn of a new global economic age. if it's a case of a us versus a chinese lead system, the differences are major. the market lead system of the u. s. favors a lack of government intervention that chinese system favors had the state involvement. ah, they have reinvigorated support for state enterprises really focused on indigenous using technology. achieving, trying to achieve self reliance, not done what previous leaders have done and trying to manage and maintain a healthier constructive relationship with the united states an

the united states won't remove the blockade. of course people in russia are against the war, also suffering on it when we are the other. they don't want to be conscripted. we need to fight for negotiations. we need to be peace builders in the world, not to accelerate conflict. i think noam is correct, anyone who calls for peace, anyone who has a dissenting opinion is called now a purveyor of disinformation. i think this is a very dangerous situation we have got ourselves into. those who are for peacebuilding are maligned and those who are wanting to accelerate war are considered to be heroes of human rights. very, very dangerous situation in the culture where those who are peace builders simply cannot find a way to be heard or to be taken seriously. i think this is a problem for the culture, not just for us. amy: noam chomsky, your thoughts on this and the subtitle of your book, the very end of it, "the fragility of u.s. power. >> that is not very distant background of all of these subscriptions. ukraine conflict has accelerated

of the united states against all enemies. we celebrate that he helped our nation navigate through world war two. we we're thankful for the truman doctrine the berlin airlift, the creation of the united nations and the end of racial segregation in the united states armed forces that occurred during his presidency. lord, you brought him from humble beginnings and used even his setbacks to provide him stepping stones to greater use in inspired by his note of all life, give us the wisdom to permit our reach to exceed our grasp for courage, creativity and commitment we pray in your sovereign. amen. ladies and, gentlemen, please take your seats. ladies and gentlemen, the honorable pelosi, speaker of the united states house of representatives. now, this is what you all came for. now it is special honor to invite word president truman's clifton truman daniel and his wife, polly and thomas. daniel alex burden and dr. kurt graham of the truman library institute, members of the missouri delegation, both and senate. and i might as curren

looking united states today though. it's a different story the majority of americans say that immigrants strengthen the united states americans also say diversity makes the country a better place and they like diversity in their in their communities and their workspaces. you've also find that americans are the view that they show some sympathy or have some sympathy for the challenges that undocumented immigrants face in the country. what if you could talk a little bit about this what seems to be the american public even republicans moving towards a more accepting view of immigrants and yet we continue to have the conversations around immigration. and nativism that we do today. yeah, and you know these majorities that you're talking about that have moved towards a more liberal view of immigrant of immigration on our significant majorities, you know, we're talking 60% in some cases even more, you know, i think about the creating legal pathways for undocumented people who came over as childhood arrivals and you know, that'

so i like this for the united states for us. the war is very close to home, both in the russian territory. and as i sat across the border in ukraine, where most of us have relative, do you think the 2 sides have the same amount of issues at stake here? they think this war means the same for, for russia, as it means for the united states, well is completely unconvincing for russia to place a victim in this war. since it's russia that invaded ukraine and continues to bomb major cities from the air. and ukraine. don't have any sympathy for the russian, ordinary russian people who are being killed in those strikes and that has goes with them being right. i have tremendous sympathy for everybody who dies in a war. i have tremendous sympathy for people who are drafted, conscripted or bombed in a war. that's why we should have posed or not just an abstraction, but continue to work towards diplomatic solutions and say that it's not ok to send people in to battle to kill others. and to kill civilians. i also heard you say that the world

the united states. and the subjectivities of your racial or ethnic identity i really present because it is only in the eye of the beholder on the eye of the person with a pen who's actually checking different boxes on the census forms. and so certainly most latinos self identify as latino or hispanic in this case, but the following question about race is really interesting because for many latinos they feel in the united states as brown for all intents and purposes, which of course is not an option from a racial perspective because of course race itself is very constructive. but without that being an option, about 60% of u.s. latinos self identify as white. from the purposes of understanding a majority minority milestone is totally possible that we could see the postponement of the majority minority milestone it enough white hispanics self identify from a savings perspective more as white and as hispanic and join for political purposes as majority-minority milestone matters with the non-hispanic white g

however, we heard the representative of the united states completely flat out, deny that the united states is in any way involved with biological weapons or research involving the use of biological materials and biological agents for military purposes. many countries spoke about why it is very, very important to make sure that biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction are not use. the representative of china. emphasize that de escalation and negotiation was the best way to move toward ending the conflict in ukraine, as well as talking about the importance of opposing biological weapons from the organ she did as a country who suffered immensely from biological weapons during world war 2. in china stands for a complete prohibition of weapons of destruction including biological ones. the information on biological military activity released by russia deserves the corresponding response by the party's concern. china's position on the conflict in ukraine is clear. we expect to cease fire and call on parties for negotiation and dialogue. however, the specific words of the u. s. seemed to

to the united states and by trying to convince the united states that native people are going along with some of its policy agenda, that this will help them to hold on to what they have. hold on to their land. hold on to their political autonomy. remain here in the cherokee houma. the economy is changing. especially, you have more cherokee people who are fluent in english, as the next century goes on. some social changes. politically, probably the most profound change, politically you see the cherokee nation, cherokee leaders forming a central government. the political trickster of the cherokee people is fairly de centralized. so towns tended to be autonomous. different towns, different areas of the turkey nation can work together, but towns were able to follow their own policies basically ended their own affairs. in the early part of the 19th century, in the response to the united states as a way to try to prevent further loss of land and ultimately to prevent forced deportation, to prevent removal, you see cherry case creating a central government, that in that briefly being takin

and the idea that the united states believes that there's a future in selling l and g to the united states as i, to, to europe and, and you're not going to be bailed out either by the mythology of us, alan gee, even steepest possible price control. clearly, clearly, and none of these people thought any of this are, you know, larry and what are future historians are going to think about this. i mean, this is all self inflicted. these are craving choices. these none of this should be happening larry. so airy parallels if you will, with the 1st world war, because when you look back at the health, the world got drug in europe in particular, was drug into a completely unnecessary massive slaughter. there are the historians will look back at this period and see a complete failure of leadership across the board, an unnecessary provocation of russia and refusal to negotiate and, and then the end, it will, this is going to lead to, unfortunately widespread pain. i think das destruction, i don't mean to be a doom say or but it just or the future is dark and what we're looking at because the leaders

i don't see the united states doing this. this is, this is trickery that even the united states realizes, will lead to nothing more than an escalation of a conflict, both united states and they don't make clear. they don't want escalate. yeah, now given the weapons and supplies that the u. s. has already been giving to yeah, i mean, ukrainian troops have showed residential areas and crucial civil and infrastructure allegedly using those us applied high mars missiles. so what is your take on that, and is the us showing at all here that it's concerned about that civilian infrastructure, or is it more so just showing that it isn't quite ready to escalate that conflict directly with russia? well, i think it's, it's, look, the u. s. is clear that they don't want to escalate to. they don't want to turn this into a direct conflict between nato and russia. on the other hand, the united states has shown an absolute disregard for the strikes that ukraine has been doing a regular and ongoing basis against civilian targets, purely civili

we've seen what happened in the magic that the united states is dangerous, and when the united states was using and this is public record ukrainian territory to pump arms there to send that military advisors. what other means? we, as a nation, had to put an end to it. i can tell you what news does not exist that should have been pursued and that is to invade and then make war on your credit. that should have been off the table. and then negotiations and diplomacy would be nothing that weren't negotiations and diplomacy put in and bite in math in 2001 in geneva. and they talked about. 1 not pushing the situation further, but the americans still continue doing that, arming ukraine using its land for its own military purposes, even not making it a member of nathan with all taking any defense obligations whatsoever. how could we have put an end to that? well, i can tell you that invading and then slaughtering people and ukraine is not a solution, nor does it reduce the chances of nuclear war. in fact, it increasing the chancellor nuclear war, which is what we began talking about. i have a

states and burning our neighborhoods in the united states? so santa ana is well aware of the anti catholic rioting in the united states and trying to lure american soldiers out of the army and into his army. coming with that is gonna be some -- a good bit of land. that is a pretty good lore to. so the leader of the st. patrick's was from clifton, iowa. that's in the west of ireland in galloway where college students go every year to go across ireland. it's the biggest little town, i shouldn't call us the biggest little town, it's the only town, really, near ofany real size. there is a sand patricia street there, there used to be a little monument to john riley. last time i was there, someone had taken it. there was just a marvel block. here a monument to john riley once stood, i guess, maybe they need a new sign, maybe they replaced it since last time i was there. anyway, the san patricio's become heroic in mexico, they become traitors in the united states. when scott catches them, he's gonna hang 27 of them. john riley who had deserted. -- b

and that as the united states has to carry the burden of europe, it's not as if the united states doesn't suffer nicely, does suffer. and the nice is also doesn't benefit from a week and broken euro even if there is it. if they force a divorce between europe and russia to their own benefit, when a broken euro is, is a wage that the magazine has to carry with it. so it's not a waiver for the united states. meanwhile, china continues to evolve. iran is now used to the sanctions even though the united states has tried desperately to the same life, the country and it didn't work and it's not going to work. iran is now a member of the shanghai population organization in the summit meeting and was pakistan. there were major and agreements between the line of russia. you run in china, iran, in the specs on russia and china, india wanting to do business with russia to re run through the whole of asia is changing. the math is changing and there's really nothing that the united is, can do about a professional. i am in in new ellie the last time you were on the program. i think we talked about the,

it's the second world war that pulled united states into the world that makes the united states a global power, that engaged the united states the affairs of the world. it is a conclusion of the makers of american policy. after 1945 that the us has to act very seriously, very in a sort of creatively to prevent a world war three, to prevent a third world war. first world war was very costly for europe, for the united states for the world, second world war was immeasurably costly. the us paid a huge price, maybe not quite the price numerically of the soviet union, but it paid a huge price for the second world war. and so the lodestar of american foreign policy, the driving impulse of foreign policy is no world war three. we need to something better. we need to have a different system mind. we need to have a different state of affairs. where do the first two world wars begin? they begin in europe. they are european wars. what's the american as to why these wars begin is that you have too little democracy, the one hand and too little deliberation cooperation on the other hand. it is necessar

now, at this point, what can the united states do? but rant and rave at the saudis for not doing what they want here. some of what we've heard, what saudi arabia did to help prudent continue to wage his despicable, vicious war against ukraine will long be remembered by americans. we are looking at all the legislative tools to best deal with this appalling and deeply cynical action, though the no peck bill is up for discussion. this is a bill that would allow the united states to sue opec countries take them to court, possibly have you escort, seize their assets, if they don't do what the united states wants, it would allow civil actions against opec countries by the united states in retaliation for move such as this, that bill is up for discussion. in addition to that, the military relationship between the united states and saudi arabia is being questioned. this is what's been said as well. i just don't see any good reason for us to maintain troops that are there almost solely for the purpose of protecting their oil fields and their s

states and the natural gas companies in the united states with the main beneficiaries of the axis sabotage against the north stream to pipeline, the russian representatives pointed out that earlier we have heard from by saying that he would put an end to the north stream to pipeline in response to russia, moves, and ukraine. the threat was made for the united states to do something like this. furthermore, u. s. military drill that happened in june involved rehearsing activities near the north stream. 2 sites near the strikes that the places that were struck. russia also pointed to the former foreign minister of poland to tweet it out, thanking the united states for these attacks on the north stream pipeline. and so at this point, everything seems to indicate that the united states is to blame. the representative of the united states did not present any evidence to counter russia's claims pointing toward us involvement in the attack. he simply dismissed it as a conspiracy theory. and then went further to claim that the celebration yet russia held for the expansion and the joining of these r

that is a steadfast longtime partner of the united states. but now we're seeing the circles of power in washington, turning on them pretty rapidly in response to recent moves around opec people will recall the words of former us president george w bush, who said you're either with us or against us. and that kind of thinking seems to be prevailing in washington dc. why can't the by get american oil companies to increase the output? they just won't do it. because american oil companies are doing is raising prices at home to make up for this slowing of demand. well, it's the same thing that the saudis and opec are doing globally, you know, negotiate is going on right now between us, well, companies and biden, about exporting oil from the u. s. to europe. so, you know, that's going to cause more of a supply problem, u. s. and raise prices, even more. prices are going up faster. the u. s. a. partly because the oil companies are shutting down the refineries. you know, they're not, they're having these a regular maintenance and then there's the so c

i do worry about political instability and united states. i worry about political instability in europe. that's something that i think joe biden and the united states are very aware of. but i think that's why we need to keep making the case. this is not just about ukraine, is about protecting the international global security order that has benefited the united states and europe more than anybody else. but i do also agree with corey that the message needs to be clear about accountability. i'm very confident that message has been really privately up and down the military chain of command in russia. when i was in government, that was part of the plans that we had in place to signal and message. we can debate whether those are needed publicly or not. i think vladimir putin through minister showing through general grosse and all the way down through the 12 gm. you understand that very well. and i think they know the united states is prepared and capable of carrying it out. will fascinating discussion. both of you. i think this is, you know, thin

the united states had never done so before. they weren't sure how offended france was going to be and were very tentative and nervous this step. but they felt like it was really essential because he just was so difficult to manage ultimately, france did issue recall orders. interestingly, washington did not make him go home because this was the height of the french revolution and if he had gone home, he would have been executed. so washington allowed him to stay in the united states as a private citizen. he went to upstate new york and married the daughter of governor clinton and actually lived the rest of life very quietly and got into actually no trouble whatsoever. so it was only when he was french minister that he was troublesome. but the fact that the french acknowledged that he had been a problem, the fact that france had said, you have a right to establish your own foreign policy and to demand that foreign ministers on your soil, respect that policy was precedent. so things with france are okay for the moment, for moment

states still by that the united states does a good thing for, for the benefit of freedom and liberty. i think largely they do. yes, i mean that is what i see. ah, it's called american. exceptional is right to the u. s. is this unique country. it's to speak and on the hill, it's the indispensable nation. is obama put it on? i think that is, that is in the dna of, of most americans, even when the u. s. does bad things, even when they know that their country does a bad thing in vietnam or whatever, they just write it off as an aberration. but believe that is, you know, essentially we're a good nation that acts you know, out of good intentions. and that's what allows the us to get away with what it gets away with. also, the american people i find, are more willing now than ever to frankly believe absurdities and lives. for example, that russia blew up its own pipeline, that russia is shelling itself, but the nuclear power plant, that right russia maybe even blew up its own. you know, crimean bridge these lies are being paddled constantly in the news in the, in the u. s. and people seem t

you will actually post body united states on. ready russian yachts, it is not supported or has not been supported by you know, nation. well, we really appreciate you joining us here in a very busy tuesday at our t international. it's always good to have your company. a lot of the stories have been updated as we speak. you can get your updates either via r t dot com or check out all these numerous telegram a with with me. hello and welcome to worlds apart. rushes massive retaliation for ukraine's attacks on infrastructure has moved the war much closer to home for many ukrainians. but is it persuasive or frankly frightening enough to change the counter was not only in here, but also in washington? well, to discuss that, i'm now joined by a daniel about adjunct professor of international human rights at the university of pittsburgh school of law professor of alec. it's good to see you. thank you very much for being available. thank you for having me. now we are recording this conversation on monday afternoon, most good time when the

the united states is rapidly on the decline. they continue with their and this war as an occupations. the nice it is basically a military machine and it constantly feeds that military machine. and meanwhile, the rest of the global south is, is on the rise. i mean, when one side is on the decline, the other side rises whether in or whether it's in relative terms or otherwise. so i think that actually this winter will make things much clearer. yeah, because as europe moves towards crisis and as the united states has to carry the burden of europe, it's not as if the united states doesn't suffer nicely, does suffer. and the nice is also doesn't benefit from a week and broken europe, even if there is it, if they force a divorce between europe and russia to their own benefit. when a broke in europe is, is a wage that the magazine has to carry with it. so it's not a waiver for the united states. meanwhile, china continues to evolve. iran is now used to the sanctions, even though the united states has tried desperately to the same life,

the united states must acknowledge the simple fact that ukraine ultimately do whatever the united states wants to do. that's the simple fact for better for worse, that's the way it is. we are not controlled by mr. lensky. mrs. laskey ultimately is controlled by us. so there's no way in the world that the u. s. should be acting on every statement is mrs. lensky makes, and they certainly should not be acting on statements they could lead to rapid escalation and nuclear war. well, let's leave it at that. thank you very much for your time, and congratulations on the book. thank you. and thank you for watching cold to see her again on will the part ah with mm ah, i mean with, [000:00:00;00] with many in the west and ukraine celebrating the explosion on the crimean bridge. russia slums, the reaction as revealing to quote the terrorist nature of the kiev regime and is nato partners. pavilion areas up the next remain under ukrainian shelling as a local school is hits and the attacks on the store is the shape. the news this week, us lawmakers, slums, saudi arabia, royal back stabbers, following t

the united states must acknowledge the simple fact that ukraine ultimately do whatever the united states wants to do. that's the simple fact for better for worse, that's the way it is. we are not controlled by mr. lensky. mrs. laskey ultimately is controlled by us. so there's no way in the world that the u. s. should be acting on every statement the mrs. lensky makes, and they certainly should not be acting on statements they could lead to rapid escalation and nuclear war. well, let's leave it at that. thank you very much for your time, and congratulations on the book. thank you. and thank you for watching cold to see her again on will the part ah ah ah ah ah, ah oh russia is the gross. no. if injured much about we have any quality for russians. we have actual racism, bigotry, against russians. it's now dangerous to be russian than europe. so bruce, a was possible it a nation suddenly be disliked was the hotel it he always there and only now come to the for.

to speak on the part of the united states. the united states put up with a rise of jihadist state in northeastern syria right from the early days. we have this from the documents that have been given out through wikileaks. the dia, defense intelligence agency for example already in 2012 said that it was the purpose, it was the intention of the west, turkey and the gulf states to allow an islamic state of some kind to rise up and northeast in order to pressure, to use it as leverage against assad. and we see this time and time again in the american documents. already in 2013 for example, the number two and the cia gave us one single interview on tv and he said that the way they were going to get rid of assad by building up the opposition and they said already the opposition is dominated by al qaeda and related militias. so what they wanted to do was build them up to a weaken the syrian army but they were terrified of destroying the syrian army because we would need the syrian military and the institutions of the syrian security

states this work published in the united states this work published in the united states this work made fukuyama famous all over the world made fukuyama famous all over the world made fukuyama famous all over the world the philosopher and political scientist the philosopher and political scientist the philosopher and political scientist argued that the spread of western style argued that the spread of western style argued that the spread of western style liberal democracy proves that the liberal democracy proves that the liberal democracy proves that the socio-cultural evolution of humanity has socio-cultural evolution of humanity has socio-cultural evolution of humanity has come to an end no more grand ideological come to an end no more grand ideological come to an end no more grand ideological confrontation global revolution and war confrontation global revolution and war confrontation global revolution and war there will be nothing beyond liberal there will be nothing beyond liberal there will be nothing beyond liberal democracy as it is precisely this form democracy as it is precise

the united kingdom, the united states, and the ussr. march the 31st 1945, a british royal air force plane lands in crimea with a very important passenger, the british prime minister's wife, clementine churchill. boop, our daughter cathedral ye mil to perdition. cheers. shrimps. mm. you see your blue bus glucose through this year. yes, panella should be sharply. are they flow? boost of the secret service is historian. explains why that unusual visit took place. hon at washing leakage narration in your ocean. a few different ask, but he for pushing up on junior enough obviously things jeremiah unless of the allow form for michelle failure school for usual prosecutor did you need your if my toilet verbal got down to the citizenship? clementine churchill became the 1st financial donor. mm. the fund eventually raised a total of more than a 1000000 pounds sterling, but to swim up, send it with national net, but you would. mila mean, of course i should do it. you should p u by then you have got, you could've been queued up top manager. i'm bri

, european manufacturing, to the united states. and that is a boon for them. now, europe may become poor i, europe may become less advanced europe now because that europe will not, will not seek to separate a geopolitical and militarily from the united states. indeed, the opposite is happening. europe has never been as closely allied with united states as it is today. so no, i don't think that the feel the pinch, the europeans filled the pinch, the pinch, but not the americans. americans of the beneficiaries of their was so fun. and of course, all these weapons that are being sent to ukraine, all these weapons that are destroyed in ukraine. and these are these things mean more orders for american defense companies. and that is, that is another good. and that also means higher gas prices at the pump, and more and more people, i mean, look at my data approval ratings. i know that there are many and many ways of influencing electoral politics. so didn't say, but still, i mean, the conservative base has never been asked fired and as a

and of course purchased more of them from the united states. we hear from us colleagues, actually advice, invest in your own strategic enablers because there might come a time. and it could be pretty soon when actually we, the u. s. might be engaged fully elsewhere in asia pacific and we will be simply unable to support you. and as washington goes, so goes there allies. a poll now shows that 50 percent of those living in australia would be in favor of military action to defend taiwan. so while joe biden says he does not seek any confrontation or conflict with china, he simply wants competition. his actions tell us something very different and the result of those actions going to have dire consequences for the world war is a very intense thing. latest defense, strategic pay for this recently come out lists. china is more dangerous than russia. well, the tech industry is choke point for the chinese for their future. and 5th, 6 generation development, for example, and they're pushing electronics very, very hard. that's a very significant developme

states, it will surpass the united states. and there's nothing that you can do about those trying to has a larger population. they have world class infrastructure and they graduate millions more in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics yield every single year. they are going to surpass the united states and there's nothing that you can do about it. and thinking that they can is delusional and delusion results in increasingly desperate and dangerous measures. the only way they can sell measures that are going to have a serious cost, not, not, not for china, china in the short term, long term, it's going to be americans. the only way to solve that is to convince americans that there are some sort of threats that makes all, all of this trouble, that it's coming forth worth going for the united states is going to continue pursuing what will be increasingly desperate measures they will be increasingly dangerous and other nations around the world need to think about if it's china today, and the united states is able to,

the united kingdom, the united states, and the ussr. ah. march the 31st 1945, a british royal air force plane lands in crimea with a very important passenger, the british prime minister's wife, clementine churchill. boop, our daughter capital a ye will to perdition. she assures me you see, you believe. but clinical mostly this year. yes, panella, she deceptive or a club last of secret service is historian, explains why that unusual visit took place at the bar, watching luggage narration in your shirt, washing a few that aren't osgood but he's pushing up idea enough, as you say, was germany on us of de la forms for michelle, famous for you to ask you, who did you speak? gerald? if my toilet bubble got down to the citizenship? clementine churchill became the 1st financial donor. mm. the fund eventually raised a total of more than $9000000.00 pounds. sterling for tusham alternative was national nav bye. kimberly miller. v. none of karesha doing to succeed you but by then you have got you the top bunk, cute of top manager. i'm bringing my today