court now and also to make the land court permanent. it will also develop jurisprudence. that land court bill, which also have been passed by the national assembly, is now in the ncop, which immediately after being passed there and also the national assembly, it will have to be accepted to by the, by the president. the current sixth administration is, also, in the process of distributing about 700,000 hectares of land to respond to this challenge. yeah. we remain committed to the land question. we will also obviously have to accelerate some of the various pieces of legislation aimed to accelerate land reform. 0k, thank you. you've set that up very clearly for us. you mentioned the ncop, which of course is the national council of provinces, which is the upper house of the south african parliament. another big challenge which is often associated with south africa is the issue of crime. we've seen the murder rate go up by 40% since 2010. we've seen kidnappings for ransom quadruple. we've seen the theft of infrastructure, such as copper and

earded to the highert court in the land. ♪ srt court in the land. t court in the land. this year take the time to melt into your holiday moments with linr. ♪ ♪ irresistibly smooth chocolate. from the lindt master chocolatier. happiness is just one step away. all you need to do is take it. ♪♪ ♪♪ make it beautiful. la vie est belle. the iconic eau de parfum. lancome. at macy's. the fragrance destination. vo: it's a new day. because covid vaccines just got a big update. just in time for everyone who works. with other people. just in time for... ...more togetherness. just in time to say “oh, you bet we'll be there!” because the updated vaccines can now protect against both the original covid virus and omicron. and that's a moment... we've all been waiting for. just between us, you know what's better than mopping? anything! ugh. well, i switched to swiffer wetjet, and it's awesome. it's an all-in-one, that absorbs dirt and grime deep inside. and it helps prevent streaks and haze. wetjet is so worth it. love it, or your money back. collapsebame, d s scene of a

and a series of land courts were formed in the united states because investors would claim they had been entitled. things obviously didn't improve much from their. by the time we have this rate in all of mexico, 95% of the land for farming or mining or fishing is owned by the rich mexican families or american investors. peasants working the land make up 80% of the population. in all of mexico, this 80% of the people owned 2% of the land. things were going to combust and they did eventually. the funny thing is when i wrote thiswo book i was worried i woud see the american government doing terrible things and i didn't want to see that. the american government did do some terrible things. the negotiators agreed america would pay $15 million for those little portions of arizona and new mexico. everybody shook hands on it. then it went to the senate to be ratified and the senate said we are only going to give 10 million. they might not like it, but they have to take it anyway. $5 million is a lot of money to mexico and it was arbitrarily taken away but it's also true that the mexican mil

if you can't pay them in time, you off your land and a series of land courts were formed in the united states, because investors would claim they have title to this land that mexican families in what was doubt america might have lived on for generations. things obviously did not improve much from there. by the time we have the raid, and all of mexico, 95% of the arable land for farming, or for mining, or for fishing, is owned by either the houston daughters, the rich mexican families, or american investors. peasants, working the land make up 80% of the mexican population. in all of mexico this 80% of the people owned 2% of the land. things were going to combust, and he did eventually. and the funny thing is when i wrote this book i was worried that i would just see the american government doing terrible things and he didn't want to see that. the american government did do some terrible things, folks. the negotiators agreed a quick pay $15 million for the sole portions of arizona and mexico. everybody shook hands on it. then it went to the senate to be ratified. the u.s. senate just sai

schools are being shot across beijing and using lands. highest court has ruled the voting age is discriminatory. the judgment forces parliaments to discuss with the current voting age of 18 should be lowered to 16. prominence said jason to, adrienne says in pays, we'll consider the law change cern. and i to all the fee for world comp, england's have recorded the big when i've a ron and the opening game, if they could be english school 3 goals in the 1st half to take control and added 3 more after the break. kids finish 62. but those are the headlines. the news continues on al jazeera out to counting the cost. ah, i hello, i'm wrong. office of this is time to the cost on al jazeera, your weekly look at the world of business and economics. this week it's been called criptos lehman brothers moment, and the collapse of the f t x empire has shaken the crypto currency market. so can the crisis be confined on investors losing trust in crypto? also this week, a tech industry layoffs for he is reviving memories of the stock market crash 22 years ago. but why are firms cutting down jobs and his at the en

and let they set regardless of your position on the issue the highest court of the land has just overturned the precedent of nearly 50 years. and the same legal arguments the supreme court vested upon in that is easily those related to families with contraception and marriage.uc and then access to abortion care or denial and in wisconsin subjected to a lot in 1849. long after wisconsin became a state before women had the right to vote or cannot serve in the legislature. and those landmark cases related to marriage it can be threatened should the supreme court consider cases and so one such case loving virginia decided 1967 so state laws prohibiting based upon the equal protection due process clause of the 14th amendment and the liberty provision at the time of the decision 16 states have laws banning interracial marriage and you might be surprised to learn that it took until the year 2000 to repeal the law. with a 2015 and with the due process clause to prohibit states and then refusing to recognize same-sex marriages. thirty-five states across the country and with those constitutions are b

the land deal occurred while former prime minister abe shinzo was in office. it sparked allegations of favoritism as abe's wife was involved with a school the developer was planning to build on the property. >>> tokyo prosecutors have raided the headquarters of japan's largest ad agency dentsu over alleged bid-rigging involving test events for the tokyo olympics and paralympics. japan's fair trade commission also searched the location. sources have told nhk the tokyo olympic and paralympic games organizing committee may have also been involved in bidding that violates japan's anti-monopoly law. sources also say committee officials may have given some ad agencies and other companies an edge in the competition for contracts. the contracts involved were for checks of security and how athletes would navigate each venue. in 2018, nine companies and one consortium won contracts worth about $3.6 million at the current exchange rate. successful bidders included dentsu. the suspected collusion surfaced during investigations into a series of alleged bribes involving a f

however, were the decisions by the highest court in the land contradictory. on the case of guns, it took away the rights of a state to decide the legislation regarding concealed carrying a firearms. but in regards to abortion, said it was a decision which would be left to the states. why the difference in today's a 1st edition, other $360.00 view, we're going to look at the issue of abortion right here in america with the latest ruling reversing. roe vs wade and making the procedure immediately illegal in 13 states with more expected to follow. but abortion is not just a controversial issue in america, and we will not only look at how abortion is handled by other countries. but why many countries that like the united states have recently changed their policy. i'm scale hughes and join me as we look at abortion and a global context on his inaugural episode of 360 view. whoa, abortion is one of the most controversial topics in american culture. oh wow. wow. wow. well, the supreme court decision had fired up this, a divisive issue, leading to cause for a summer

now, is this legal with the supreme court who is supposed to be obviously the highest court of the lands their decision? and how do you see this playing out? well, i think the short answer your question is that it's complicated. so in many cases, the types of arguments that we're seeing. so louisiana, for example, the trigger law and not state was state. but the reason was because the law was unconstitutionally vague. the plaintiffs there argued that there were a number of laws and conflicting provisions, so it was hard to comply with the law until those ambiguities will result. so in that sense, yes, it's legal, but it probably does nothing more than by time. while state legislators who are obviously very passionate about their pro life views will respond to what the perceived ambiguities are as a court decision comes out. in contrast, in utah, for example, the plaintiffs there have argued that even though there is not a national constitutional right to portion that the utah state constitution reserves that right. so state constitutions very, in terms of what their language specifically

democrats appeal to the highest court in the land. >> and the supreme court of the united states using the independent state legislatures theory says we don't care that the pennsylvania legislature has violated its own law and violated its own constitution because it's up to the legislature to say how the president is selected. >> the republican enters the white house, the loser becomes the winner. >> that would be a constitutional travesty. >> not everyone agrees the theory can lead to a stolen election. >> federal law prohibits state legislatures from overturning the results of elections. >> the federal government could rein in a runaway state legislature, but who can predict what this supreme court would decide? with a supermajority anchored by three of its youngest and most idealogical members, this court does have the chance to rewrite life in america. >> these people will affect our lives, our children's lives, probably our grandchildren's lives. >> as with the last term's abortion decision, the future may rest in the hands of one justice in particular. >> justice kavanaugh, for

the supreme court of the land should be the most fair, the most dependable court in the land. and i worry that we have now found a supreme court that is really unbalanced, and we could -- and it scares me for what in the future. these people are young people. they have lifetime appointments, and now we have them for life. and what's going to happen to us? i don't know, but it's scary. >> ms. tshibaka, you have 30 seconds to weigh in. >> i will support constitutionalist nominees for the supreme court, regardless of which president appoints them. i think that the process is fine. it's not about politics. it's about how you interpret the constitution. and people who interpret the constitution with a constitutional perspective are going to be the people who uphold the rights of alaskans. it's a pretty simple test for me. >> all right, now it's senator murkowski's turn to ask a question of one of your opponents. >> so, pat, this is a question to you, and i thank you for joining us at the debate there in kodiak comfish, certainly a very important part of the alaska discussion. we've

court decided to apply chilly in law. so the statute of limitations hadn't expired when i'm bored about the verdict states that there is no proven connection between bullied and toxic waste and the arsenic found in people's urine to see it up despite the fact that the court says bullied and acted negligently and it states that this is not relevant because a level of 30 micrograms of arsenic per late of urine does not represent tom. instead, the court said a new level for damages at $100.00 micrograms, which is what bullied and had asked for philip. ha. oh, andrew caught them out on an a $2.00 to $3.00. seemed to me, am men the men that ok, so the lawyers for rica of course do not agree with the verdict, but they also say that the court has made an important error on empty and hooks up in chile, the supreme court decided that $9000.00 micrograms of arsenic per liter of urine all represents hom, which the swedish court did not take into consideration all the lawyers are convinced that they can win on appeal on them can be n

. >> as you know, we are -- we have sent this up to the highest court of the land a, the highest court of our nation to make sure that we move forward quickly with making sure that the student loan relief that the president put forward, his plan gets to the american people very quickly. maria: i don't know. we don't know, josh. i don't know. your thoughts? >> yeah, i mean, i don't know either. i can only try to make out what that muddle or quasi-museing from the white house actually was. the reported underlying statutory authority for the biden administration student loan quote, unquote forgiveness plan is a statute called the hero's act of 2003 which was a post 9/11 piece of legislation. the department of education has never prior to this, has never relied upon the hero's act, to unilaterally discharge large swaths of held student loan debt so it has been legally dubious since the get-go, takes me back to law school days. there's statutory construction that the late justice anthony scalia said, he said that congress, quote,s does not hide elephants in house holes. what he was trying t

now let's face it regardless of your position on the issue of abortion, the highest court of the land has just overturned a precedent of nearly 50 years. there is no questioning that. and the same legal arguments that the supreme court left upon to reverse roe versus wade could justes as easily be applied to reverse numerous other casesie related to intimate relations, to contraception, and marriage. in the wake of the supreme court's decision to overturn roe versus wade in the dobbs case, access to abortion care or denial of such care has been left in the hands of the state. by the way, and wisconsin we are subject to criminal abortion law that was passed in 1849. one year after wisconsin became a state. and before women have the right to vote and certainly before women served in the legislature that rules upon the rights. there are landmark cases related to marriage. it could be threatened should the supreme court consider cases challenging those earlier decisions. one such case is versus virginia. that was decided in 1967. the supreme court rules in loving that state laws prohibiti

as you know, we have sent this up to the highest court of the land, the highest court of our nation to make sure we move forward quickly with making sure the student loan relief plan the president put forward gets to americans quickly. there are many people who have signed up and been approved to get the loan. not that loan, but the relief. we think it is incredibly important to make that happen. we believe very strongly and are confident in ever legal authority to carry out this program. but again, want to be very clear here, and i have said this before, it is unfortunate we seek -- see congressional officials trying to block this. the way the president sees this, it gives americans breathing room, americans to start a family themselves, to be able to buy a house, to be able to move forward with their lives in a way that they have that opportunity to do so. again, a little bit of that breathing room. we are going to continue to fight. the president knows how to fight here. he wants to fight for the american people. and so we are going to continue to make sure we get this done. reporte

. >>> coming up, is another land mark supreme court decision about to fall? justices are now weighing ending affirmative action in college admissions. are decades of precedence about to be overturned again? next. because i trust their quality. they were the first to be verified by usp... ...aindependent organization that sets stri quality and purity standards. nature made. the number one pharmacist recommended vitamin and supplement brand. migraine hits hard, so u hit back with ubrelvy u level up u won't take a time-out one dose of ubrelvy works fast it can quickly stop migraine in its tracks within 2 hours without worrying if it's too late or where you are unlike older medicines, ubrelvy is a pill that directly blocks a protein believed to be a cause of migraine. do not take with strong cyp3a4 inhibitors. most common side effects were nausea and tiredness. migraine pain relief starts with u learn how abbvie could help you save. ask about ubrelvy, the anytime, anywhere migraine medicine. it's nice to unwind after a long week of telling people how liberty mutu

but we will not abandon this land because our ancestors were here . they say that this land is a firing zone, but it is not necessary yet to several villages, with a population of more than a 1000 people. i said to be cleared out, they have moved. it says in lee with the ship, which is something that isn't recognized because it's a western society that doesn't necessarily understand seasonal movement and shepherding. but it's just how people live. people have lived there in caves, way before the occupation, and where before is i was even established something a bit clever that they're doing. it's not like in 1999. that what they did is just to take people from their homes at night, put them on clocks and throw them at the end of the fires on. and i think the understand that it doesn't look so good these days that they're doing in or so outside of their so called the fire is on. is us to make life so miserable that people that it won't be livable, a tie isn't israeli june and enact to this defendant the rights of the people. his state who believes is a

>> i think it is insane that there is not a code of ethics for the highest court court in the land. this is the most powerful court. they have lifetime appointments. they -- even if they are not doing anything unethical, which i'm not saying they are not, even the appearance of being unethical is -- you have a court that is very right leaning. it's a 6 to 3 court. it is a lifetime appointment. and you have clearly a lot of you -- have these two leaks. it has justice thomas's wife, who's very involved in republican politics, whatever that looks like. and you don't have a code for these people. so, this seems like a no-brainer. again, the problem is you have this republican party that is so dug in that even though the american people >> -- i mean, remember, the court is very unpopular right now. it's probably the most unpopular it has been for many decades. but this republican party does not really care about that. they just care about the -- >> right, and molly jong-fast, i'll stay with you. that's something senator durbin has pushed, to have these types of code and ethical norms. wh

now, is this legal with the supreme court who is supposed to be obviously the highest court of the lands their decision? and how do you see this playing out? well, i think the short answer your question is that it's complicated. so in many cases, the types of arguments that we're seeing. so louisiana, for example, the trigger law and not state was state. but the reason was because the law was unconstitutionally vague. the plaintiffs there argued that there were a number of laws had conflicting provisions, so it was hard to comply with the law until those ambiguities will result. so in that sense, yes, it's legal, but it probably does nothing more than by time. while state legislators who are obviously very passionate about their pro life views will respond to what the perceived ambiguities are as a court decision comes out. in contrast, in utah, for example, the plaintiffs there have argued that even though there is not a national constitutional right to abortion, that utah state constitution reserves that right. so the state constitutions very, in terms of what their language specifical

and there's been a lot of legal wrangling since then, but it has gone to the highest court in the land, which has, as you say, ruled in the last few hours that those documents, those six years of tax returns relating to the former president, must be handed over to this committee immediately. so what happens next, peter, in terms of what donald trump might do? the clock is ticking, as far as the committee is concerned, because the republicans take over in the house in the new year, and clearly they take over the committees as well and this investigation is very likely to be dropped. we're approaching the thanksgiving holiday here in the states. everything will stop for a few days. then there will be four weeks before christmas for this committee do its work with those documents, to analyse what they see, and the big question is, will any information from those tax returns be eventually made public? now, clearly, donald trump has argued against this for many years, saying that the committee was motivated by politics, but this committee is determined to look at those documents as part of

the supreme court is the only court in the land that operates without ethics rules. and these supreme court justices have been wilding out ever since roberts took over, the conservative side, because if you are part of the federalist society industrial complex, it is very easy to get access to these judges, and the thing that's really, i think, explosive from shank's allegations is not just how easy it was for him to get access, but what they were actually trying to do. if you listen to what he was saying, he was saying they weren't trying to convince them. you don't have to convince these people. they're already on your side. he was trying to temper them. he was trying to steel their resolve. basically, what these right-wing forces tried to do to the justices is to get them to be the worst versions of themselves. and we have seen that for years. we saw it in hobby lobby. we saw it in the bruin decision on guns. we saw it in shelby county on voting rights. we obviously saw it in dobbs on abortion rights. this goes back to citizens united when alito, mr. fact resistan

however, were the decisions by the highest court in the land contradictory. while the case of gun it took away the rights of a state to decide the legislation regarding can filled carrying a firearms. but in regards to abortion said, it was a decision which should be left to the states. why the different in today's a 1st edition of that 360 view, we're going to look at the issue of abortion right here in america with the latest ruling reversing. roe vs wade and making the procedure immediately illegal in 13 states with more expected to follow. but abortion is not just a controversial issue in america, and we will not only look at how abortion is handled by other countries. but why many countries that like the united states have recently changed their policy? i'm sky now use and join me as we look at abortion and a global context on this inaugural episode of 360 view. ah huh. abortion is one of the most controversial topics in american culture. oh well.

however, were the decisions by the highest court in the land contradictory. while the case of god, it took away the rights of a state to decide the legislation regarding concealed carrying a firearms. but in regards to abortion, said, it was a decision which should be left to the states. why the difference in today's a 1st edition of that $360.00 view, we're going to look at the issue of abortion rights here in america, with the latest ruling reversing, rover.

in the land, which has come as you say, wrote in last hours that those documents, those six years of tax returns, relating to the former president, must be handed over to this committee immediately. so what ha--ens this committee immediately. so what happens next. _ this committee immediately. so what happens next, peter, _ this committee immediately. so what happens next, peter, in _ this committee immediately. so what happens next, peter, in terms - this committee immediately. so what happens next, peter, in terms of - happens next, peter, in terms of what donald trump might do? the clock is what donald trump might do? tue: clock is ticking, what donald trump might do? tte: clock is ticking, as far as the committee is concerned, because the republicans take over in the house in the new year and clearly they take over the committees as well. and this investigation is very likely to be dropped. we are approaching the thanksgiving holiday here in the states. everything. for a few days. then there will be a few days before christmas for this given do its work with those documents, to a

has its own court, its own land base, its own government, its own elections like tribes do? >> rebecca, thank you so much. there is so much more to unpack there but thank you for grounding us in the importance of this case. i really appreciate. it >> thank you so much for having me. >> of course. coming up, in the face of conservative fueled hate, a mother moves with her family a mile -- 1000 miles from texas to a state dealing with his own tragedy. strike at any time. think you're not at risk? wake up. because shingles could wake up in you. if you're over 50, talk to your doctor or pharmacist about shingles prevention. ♪ ♪ well would you look at that? ♪ ♪ jerry, you've got to see this. seen it. trust me, after 15 walks it gets a little old. i really should be retired by now. wish i'd invested when i had the chance... to the moon! [golf ball bounces off rover] unbelievable. ugh. [ding] (vo) after fifteen years of the share the love event, subaru and our retailers have donated over ugh. two hundred and fifty million dollars to charity. in fact, subaru is the largest c

so while the supreme court of appeal is the highest in the land, it does appear as if the former president does have $30.00 to $60.00 days to approach the constitutional court to say that his rights were infringed while on medical parole. because while he was out of prison while he was at home, he did have to abide by certain restrictions put in place by correctional services . so he didn't enjoy all the rights that a free person in this country would enjoy essentially. so this is one of the questions at hand at the moment is whether or not he will go to the constitutional court. and also what wasn't clear in the judgement by the supreme court of appeal was a timeline. they didn't give a timeline around when he should report to correctional services and how long he would have to stay in prison once he returns. they have said that it is up to the commissioner, a new commission at this point of a correctional services. if his time on medical parole will count. so again, for the former president who has managed to evade, i suppose time in prison. and he is facing a number of issues, legal iss