WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en
00:00:01.310 --> 00:00:03.439 align:start position:0%
progress<00:00:02.310> can<00:00:02.460> be<00:00:02.520> measured<00:00:02.820> in<00:00:03.090> the<00:00:03.179> amount
00:00:03.439 --> 00:00:03.449 align:start position:0%
progress can be measured in the amount
00:00:03.449 --> 00:00:05.720 align:start position:0%
progress can be measured in the amount
of<00:00:03.540> Inca<00:00:03.929> subject<00:00:04.380> receives<00:00:04.680> then<00:00:05.220> the<00:00:05.370> effort
00:00:05.720 --> 00:00:05.730 align:start position:0%
of Inca subject receives then the effort
00:00:05.730 --> 00:00:07.519 align:start position:0%
of Inca subject receives then the effort
to<00:00:05.879> increase<00:00:06.120> the<00:00:06.390> minimum<00:00:06.509> wage<00:00:06.779> in<00:00:07.170> Maryland
00:00:07.519 --> 00:00:07.529 align:start position:0%
to increase the minimum wage in Maryland
00:00:07.529 --> 00:00:10.040 align:start position:0%
to increase the minimum wage in Maryland
is<00:00:07.649> gathering<00:00:08.309> support<00:00:08.790> every<00:00:09.660> politician
00:00:10.040 --> 00:00:10.050 align:start position:0%
is gathering support every politician
00:00:10.050 --> 00:00:12.110 align:start position:0%
is gathering support every politician
running<00:00:10.469> for<00:00:10.650> office<00:00:10.950> is<00:00:11.309> advocating<00:00:12.000> an
00:00:12.110 --> 00:00:12.120 align:start position:0%
running for office is advocating an
00:00:12.120 --> 00:00:14.390 align:start position:0%
running for office is advocating an
increase<00:00:12.480> in<00:00:12.509> the<00:00:12.750> minimum<00:00:12.840> wage<00:00:13.080> now<00:00:14.070> mark
00:00:14.390 --> 00:00:14.400 align:start position:0%
increase in the minimum wage now mark
00:00:14.400 --> 00:00:16.609 align:start position:0%
increase in the minimum wage now mark
the<00:00:14.969> vast<00:00:15.240> majority<00:00:15.360> of<00:00:15.839> economists<00:00:16.049> believe
00:00:16.609 --> 00:00:16.619 align:start position:0%
the vast majority of economists believe
00:00:16.619 --> 00:00:19.070 align:start position:0%
the vast majority of economists believe
the<00:00:17.039> minimum<00:00:17.400> wage<00:00:17.430> laws<00:00:17.910> cost<00:00:18.539> the<00:00:18.750> economy
00:00:19.070 --> 00:00:19.080 align:start position:0%
the minimum wage laws cost the economy
00:00:19.080 --> 00:00:21.650 align:start position:0%
the minimum wage laws cost the economy
thousands<00:00:19.800> of<00:00:19.890> jobs<00:00:20.130> so<00:00:20.850> why<00:00:21.119> are<00:00:21.180> we<00:00:21.359> going<00:00:21.570> to
00:00:21.650 --> 00:00:21.660 align:start position:0%
thousands of jobs so why are we going to
00:00:21.660 --> 00:00:24.080 align:start position:0%
thousands of jobs so why are we going to
raise<00:00:21.840> the<00:00:22.050> minimum<00:00:22.949> wage<00:00:23.189> here<00:00:23.550> in<00:00:23.670> Maryland
00:00:24.080 --> 00:00:24.090 align:start position:0%
raise the minimum wage here in Maryland
00:00:24.090 --> 00:00:26.720 align:start position:0%
raise the minimum wage here in Maryland
well<00:00:24.600> because<00:00:24.930> it's<00:00:25.109> a<00:00:25.199> feel-good<00:00:25.730> exercise
00:00:26.720 --> 00:00:26.730 align:start position:0%
well because it's a feel-good exercise
00:00:26.730 --> 00:00:29.000 align:start position:0%
well because it's a feel-good exercise
it<00:00:27.090> really<00:00:27.480> as<00:00:27.570> you<00:00:27.720> said<00:00:27.930> is<00:00:28.080> bad<00:00:28.289> economics
00:00:29.000 --> 00:00:29.010 align:start position:0%
it really as you said is bad economics
00:00:29.010 --> 00:00:31.460 align:start position:0%
it really as you said is bad economics
under<00:00:29.970> martin<00:00:30.330> O'Malley<00:00:30.599> the<00:00:30.990> unemployment
00:00:31.460 --> 00:00:31.470 align:start position:0%
under martin O'Malley the unemployment
00:00:31.470 --> 00:00:33.979 align:start position:0%
under martin O'Malley the unemployment
rate<00:00:31.679> has<00:00:31.949> doubled<00:00:32.250> and<00:00:32.640> the<00:00:33.270> number<00:00:33.870> of
00:00:33.979 --> 00:00:33.989 align:start position:0%
rate has doubled and the number of
00:00:33.989 --> 00:00:35.930 align:start position:0%
rate has doubled and the number of
unemployed<00:00:34.290> has<00:00:34.829> doubled<00:00:35.280> we<00:00:35.489> haven't
00:00:35.930 --> 00:00:35.940 align:start position:0%
unemployed has doubled we haven't
00:00:35.940 --> 00:00:38.299 align:start position:0%
unemployed has doubled we haven't
created<00:00:36.180> private-sector<00:00:37.079> jobs<00:00:37.559> in<00:00:37.829> Maryland
00:00:38.299 --> 00:00:38.309 align:start position:0%
created private-sector jobs in Maryland
00:00:38.309 --> 00:00:41.060 align:start position:0%
created private-sector jobs in Maryland
so<00:00:38.910> why<00:00:39.570> would<00:00:39.809> we<00:00:39.930> expect<00:00:40.260> to<00:00:40.410> continue<00:00:40.500> to
00:00:41.060 --> 00:00:41.070 align:start position:0%
so why would we expect to continue to
00:00:41.070 --> 00:00:43.940 align:start position:0%
so why would we expect to continue to
create<00:00:41.579> new<00:00:41.790> private<00:00:42.180> sector<00:00:42.210> jobs<00:00:42.770> this<00:00:43.770> is
00:00:43.940 --> 00:00:43.950 align:start position:0%
create new private sector jobs this is
00:00:43.950 --> 00:00:46.279 align:start position:0%
create new private sector jobs this is
going<00:00:44.129> to<00:00:44.190> be<00:00:44.340> a<00:00:44.370> devastating<00:00:44.960> impact<00:00:45.960> on
00:00:46.279 --> 00:00:46.289 align:start position:0%
going to be a devastating impact on
00:00:46.289 --> 00:00:48.860 align:start position:0%
going to be a devastating impact on
frankly<00:00:47.190> not<00:00:47.340> poor<00:00:48.149> people<00:00:48.480> as<00:00:48.629> much<00:00:48.660> as
00:00:48.860 --> 00:00:48.870 align:start position:0%
frankly not poor people as much as
00:00:48.870 --> 00:00:50.540 align:start position:0%
frankly not poor people as much as
people<00:00:49.200> who<00:00:49.469> are<00:00:49.649> starting<00:00:50.129> out<00:00:50.250> in<00:00:50.280> their
00:00:50.540 --> 00:00:50.550 align:start position:0%
people who are starting out in their
00:00:50.550 --> 00:00:52.369 align:start position:0%
people who are starting out in their
careers<00:00:50.940> who<00:00:51.210> haven't<00:00:51.629> been<00:00:51.690> trained<00:00:52.140> who
00:00:52.369 --> 00:00:52.379 align:start position:0%
careers who haven't been trained who
00:00:52.379 --> 00:00:54.439 align:start position:0%
careers who haven't been trained who
haven't<00:00:52.770> been<00:00:52.800> in<00:00:52.980> the<00:00:53.070> workforce<00:00:53.280> who<00:00:54.149> need<00:00:54.420> a
00:00:54.439 --> 00:00:54.449 align:start position:0%
haven't been in the workforce who need a
00:00:54.449 --> 00:00:57.049 align:start position:0%
haven't been in the workforce who need a
job<00:00:54.930> that's<00:00:55.260> at<00:00:55.469> the<00:00:55.500> bottom<00:00:55.649> long<00:00:56.250> and<00:00:56.579> then
00:00:57.049 --> 00:00:57.059 align:start position:0%
job that's at the bottom long and then
00:00:57.059 --> 00:01:00.349 align:start position:0%
job that's at the bottom long and then
they<00:00:57.239> can<00:00:57.420> move<00:00:57.539> up<00:00:57.750> from<00:00:58.020> there<00:00:58.579> Susan<00:00:59.579> some
00:01:00.349 --> 00:01:00.359 align:start position:0%
they can move up from there Susan some
00:01:00.359 --> 00:01:02.150 align:start position:0%
they can move up from there Susan some
argue<00:01:00.690> that<00:01:00.750> the<00:01:00.960> minimum<00:01:01.320> wage<00:01:01.350> shouldn't<00:01:02.070> be
00:01:02.150 --> 00:01:02.160 align:start position:0%
argue that the minimum wage shouldn't be
00:01:02.160 --> 00:01:03.880 align:start position:0%
argue that the minimum wage shouldn't be
increased<00:01:02.489> that<00:01:02.699> it<00:01:02.820> should<00:01:03.030> be<00:01:03.059> abolished
00:01:03.880 --> 00:01:03.890 align:start position:0%
increased that it should be abolished
00:01:03.890 --> 00:01:07.280 align:start position:0%
increased that it should be abolished
what<00:01:04.890> do<00:01:04.979> you<00:01:05.070> think<00:01:05.630> well<00:01:06.630> they<00:01:06.750> asked<00:01:06.930> me<00:01:07.200> if
00:01:07.280 --> 00:01:07.290 align:start position:0%
what do you think well they asked me if
00:01:07.290 --> 00:01:08.990 align:start position:0%
what do you think well they asked me if
the<00:01:07.409> minimum<00:01:07.680> wage<00:01:07.950> should<00:01:07.979> be<00:01:08.369> abolished<00:01:08.549> is
00:01:08.990 --> 00:01:09.000 align:start position:0%
the minimum wage should be abolished is
00:01:09.000 --> 00:01:11.539 align:start position:0%
the minimum wage should be abolished is
just<00:01:09.270> a<00:01:09.540> stupid<00:01:09.960> question<00:01:10.260> to<00:01:10.650> ask<00:01:10.799> you<00:01:11.130> Casey
00:01:11.539 --> 00:01:11.549 align:start position:0%
just a stupid question to ask you Casey
00:01:11.549 --> 00:01:13.850 align:start position:0%
just a stupid question to ask you Casey
but<00:01:11.909> let's<00:01:12.119> go<00:01:12.390> back<00:01:12.689> to<00:01:12.990> nineteen
00:01:13.850 --> 00:01:13.860 align:start position:0%
but let's go back to nineteen
00:01:13.860 --> 00:01:16.640 align:start position:0%
but let's go back to nineteen
sixty-three<00:01:14.610> at<00:01:15.150> the<00:01:15.630> Martin<00:01:16.080> Luther<00:01:16.110> King
00:01:16.640 --> 00:01:16.650 align:start position:0%
sixty-three at the Martin Luther King
00:01:16.650 --> 00:01:18.859 align:start position:0%
sixty-three at the Martin Luther King
mark<00:01:16.920> the<00:01:17.430> minimum<00:01:17.790> wage<00:01:18.000> was<00:01:18.270> then<00:01:18.600> two
00:01:18.859 --> 00:01:18.869 align:start position:0%
mark the minimum wage was then two
00:01:18.869 --> 00:01:21.080 align:start position:0%
mark the minimum wage was then two
dollars<00:01:19.320> if<00:01:19.500> it<00:01:20.070> were<00:01:20.220> in<00:01:20.400> today's<00:01:20.790> dollars
00:01:21.080 --> 00:01:21.090 align:start position:0%
dollars if it were in today's dollars
00:01:21.090 --> 00:01:23.749 align:start position:0%
dollars if it were in today's dollars
for<00:01:21.659> same<00:01:22.020> buying<00:01:22.380> power<00:01:22.619> fifteen<00:01:23.280> dollars
00:01:23.749 --> 00:01:23.759 align:start position:0%
for same buying power fifteen dollars
00:01:23.759 --> 00:01:25.910 align:start position:0%
for same buying power fifteen dollars
the<00:01:24.210> federal<00:01:24.600> minimum<00:01:24.869> wage<00:01:25.020> is<00:01:25.439> less<00:01:25.680> than
00:01:25.910 --> 00:01:25.920 align:start position:0%
the federal minimum wage is less than
00:01:25.920 --> 00:01:28.010 align:start position:0%
the federal minimum wage is less than
half<00:01:25.979> of<00:01:26.340> this<00:01:26.520> let's<00:01:27.030> fast-forward<00:01:27.390> to
00:01:28.010 --> 00:01:28.020 align:start position:0%
half of this let's fast-forward to
00:01:28.020 --> 00:01:30.380 align:start position:0%
half of this let's fast-forward to
Ronald<00:01:28.380> Reagan's<00:01:28.799> time<00:01:29.100> in<00:01:29.310> the<00:01:29.430> office<00:01:29.460> if<00:01:29.970> we
00:01:30.380 --> 00:01:30.390 align:start position:0%
Ronald Reagan's time in the office if we
00:01:30.390 --> 00:01:32.060 align:start position:0%
Ronald Reagan's time in the office if we
were<00:01:30.540> to<00:01:30.659> have<00:01:30.750> the<00:01:30.900> same<00:01:31.140> buying<00:01:31.470> power<00:01:31.770> with
00:01:32.060 --> 00:01:32.070 align:start position:0%
were to have the same buying power with
00:01:32.070 --> 00:01:34.249 align:start position:0%
were to have the same buying power with
minimum<00:01:32.520> wage<00:01:32.820> under<00:01:33.509> Ronald<00:01:33.810> Reagan<00:01:34.079> it
00:01:34.249 --> 00:01:34.259 align:start position:0%
minimum wage under Ronald Reagan it
00:01:34.259 --> 00:01:37.310 align:start position:0%
minimum wage under Ronald Reagan it
would<00:01:34.380> be<00:01:34.560> nine<00:01:34.860> dollars<00:01:35.430> a<00:01:35.579> short<00:01:36.240> but<00:01:36.479> shark
00:01:37.310 --> 00:01:37.320 align:start position:0%
would be nine dollars a short but shark
00:01:37.320 --> 00:01:39.800 align:start position:0%
would be nine dollars a short but shark
watch<00:01:37.650> you<00:01:37.950> cannot<00:01:38.400> survive<00:01:39.030> on<00:01:39.390> seven
00:01:39.800 --> 00:01:39.810 align:start position:0%
watch you cannot survive on seven
00:01:39.810 --> 00:01:41.600 align:start position:0%
watch you cannot survive on seven
dollars<00:01:40.170> and<00:01:40.380> twenty-five<00:01:40.710> cents<00:01:41.340> an<00:01:41.460> hour
00:01:41.600 --> 00:01:41.610 align:start position:0%
dollars and twenty-five cents an hour
00:01:41.610 --> 00:01:45.050 align:start position:0%
dollars and twenty-five cents an hour
they<00:01:42.060> cannot<00:01:42.540> how<00:01:43.170> there<00:01:44.100> is<00:01:44.310> no<00:01:44.700> way<00:01:44.880> unless
00:01:45.050 --> 00:01:45.060 align:start position:0%
they cannot how there is no way unless
00:01:45.060 --> 00:01:47.240 align:start position:0%
they cannot how there is no way unless
you<00:01:45.420> have<00:01:45.600> four<00:01:45.869> or<00:01:45.990> five<00:01:46.200> jobs<00:01:46.500> and<00:01:46.829> you
00:01:47.240 --> 00:01:47.250 align:start position:0%
you have four or five jobs and you
00:01:47.250 --> 00:01:49.190 align:start position:0%
you have four or five jobs and you
ignore<00:01:47.610> everything<00:01:47.820> else<00:01:48.030> can<00:01:48.390> you<00:01:48.630> survive
00:01:49.190 --> 00:01:49.200 align:start position:0%
ignore everything else can you survive
00:01:49.200 --> 00:01:51.740 align:start position:0%
ignore everything else can you survive
on<00:01:49.530> sevens<00:01:49.979> money<00:01:50.310> by
00:01:51.740 --> 00:01:51.750 align:start position:0%
on sevens money by
00:01:51.750 --> 00:01:53.810 align:start position:0%
on sevens money by
you