1
00:00:02,800 --> 00:00:08,760
What's the fuel consumption of a car? Say,
on the highway moving at highway speeds? We
2
00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:13,100
can look it up, but can we understand those
numbers? Can we predict them from our knowledge
3
00:00:13,100 --> 00:00:18,619
of science and engineering? That's what we're
gonna do in this video.
4
00:00:18,619 --> 00:00:21,859
This video is part of the problem solving
video series.
5
00:00:21,859 --> 00:00:27,460
Problem-solving skills, in combination with
an understanding of the natural and human-made
6
00:00:27,460 --> 00:00:32,660
world, are critical to the design and optimization
of systems and processes.
7
00:00:32,660 --> 00:00:38,399
Hi, my name is Sanjoy Mahajan, and I'm a professor
of Applied Science and Engineering at Olin
8
00:00:38,399 --> 00:00:43,899
College. And I excel at streetfighting mathematics.
Before watching this video, you should be
9
00:00:43,899 --> 00:00:49,359
familiar with free body diagrams and dimensional
analysis.
10
00:00:49,359 --> 00:00:54,370
After watching this video, you will be able
to: Model drag to predict terminal velocities;
11
00:00:54,370 --> 00:01:01,370
and Determine the fuel efficiency of a car.
12
00:01:02,329 --> 00:01:07,330
Fuel is consumed in fighting drag, on the
highway at least. What's the force of drag
13
00:01:07,330 --> 00:01:12,770
on a car? That's fluid mechanics. We could
try the hard wayâ€”solving the Navier-Stokes,
14
00:01:12,770 --> 00:01:15,430
the equations of fluid mechanics.
15
00:01:15,430 --> 00:01:21,690
Now after 10 years of learning mathematics,
you'll discover this is a really hard problem.
16
00:01:21,690 --> 00:01:26,240
You can only solve it analytically in certain
special cases like a sphere moving at really
17
00:01:26,240 --> 00:01:31,590
slow speeds and a car is not one of those
special cases; certainly not a car moving
18
00:01:31,590 --> 00:01:36,430
at any reasonable speed. So we need another
way.
19
00:01:36,430 --> 00:01:40,990
By applying approximations artfully, we're
gonna find the drag force and the fuel consumption
20
00:01:40,990 --> 00:01:47,910
of a car with a simple experiment and some
scientific and engineering reasoning.
21
00:01:47,910 --> 00:01:54,800
First, we need to model drag. To do this,
we're gonna figure out how the drag force
22
00:01:54,800 --> 00:01:59,650
depends on the quantities that control it.
Drag force F depends on the density of the
23
00:01:59,650 --> 00:02:04,240
air, to some power which we don't know yet,
times the speed of the car moving through
24
00:02:04,240 --> 00:02:09,250
the air, to some power we don't know yet.
It depends on how big the car is, which we'll
25
00:02:09,250 --> 00:02:14,220
represent by the area; traditionally, the
cross- sectional area, to some power. And
26
00:02:14,220 --> 00:02:19,190
it also can depend on the viscosity here,
the kinematic viscosity of the air to some
27
00:02:19,190 --> 00:02:25,560
power. And what those powers are, we don't
yet know. To figure them out, let's do an
28
00:02:25,560 --> 00:02:26,880
experiment.
29
00:02:26,880 --> 00:02:32,000
For the experiment, we make two cones. First,
by making a large circle and cutting out a
30
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:37,480
quarter of it. The large circle has a radius
of seven centimeters. And the small three-quarter
31
00:02:37,480 --> 00:02:42,800
circle has half the radius. Cut them out and
then tape this edge to that edge and this
32
00:02:42,800 --> 00:02:46,950
edge to that edge in order to make the 2 cones.
33
00:02:46,950 --> 00:02:53,850
Next we're gonna race them, the big cone vs.
the small cone. But first, make a prediction.
34
00:02:53,850 --> 00:02:58,680
The question is: what is the ratio of fall
speeds of the big cone and the small cone
35
00:02:58,680 --> 00:03:03,959
approximately? Is the big cone roughly twice
as fast, is the small cone twice as fast,
36
00:03:03,959 --> 00:03:10,200
or do they fall at roughly the same speed?
Pause the video and make your best guess.
37
00:03:10,200 --> 00:03:17,200
You may want to try the experiment yourself.
38
00:03:19,990 --> 00:03:25,300
The experimental result is that they both
fall at roughly the same speed. Now what does
39
00:03:25,300 --> 00:03:31,870
that mean for the exponents in the drag force?
To decide, use a free body diagram. Here is
40
00:03:31,870 --> 00:03:37,430
a free body diagram of a cone as it falls.
What are the forces on the cone? Pause and
41
00:03:37,430 --> 00:03:44,430
fill in the diagram.
42
00:03:45,209 --> 00:03:50,020
There is drag and gravity. Because the cones
are falling at their terminal speed, in other
43
00:03:50,020 --> 00:03:54,709
words at the constant velocity that they reach
pretty quickly, the drag must equal the force
44
00:03:54,709 --> 00:03:59,160
due to gravity.
So the drag force can easily be measured just
45
00:03:59,160 --> 00:04:03,910
by sticking the cones on a scale. We don't
actually have to stick the cones on a scale
46
00:04:03,910 --> 00:04:07,709
because we know what their relative weights
are and that's what we're gonna use to figure
47
00:04:07,709 --> 00:04:09,819
out one of the exponents.
48
00:04:09,819 --> 00:04:15,090
Knowing that the drag equals the force due
to gravity, let's compare the drag forces,
49
00:04:15,090 --> 00:04:20,459
which are the factors on the right side, of
the small and large cones. The large cone
50
00:04:20,459 --> 00:04:25,319
was made out of a paper circle with twice
the radius so it has four times the area,
51
00:04:25,319 --> 00:04:30,960
four times the mass, and four times the force
due to gravity. Therefore, four times the
52
00:04:30,960 --> 00:04:32,960
drag force.
53
00:04:32,960 --> 00:04:38,379
Now let's look at the causes one by one. This
density here is the density of the air and
54
00:04:38,379 --> 00:04:43,340
both cones feel the same air so there's no
difference here, so that's times one no matter
55
00:04:43,340 --> 00:04:49,110
the exponent. Now, what about the speed? The
speeds were the same; that was the result
56
00:04:49,110 --> 00:04:53,979
of our experiment, so no matter what the exponent
here, the speed contributes to the effect
57
00:04:53,979 --> 00:05:00,960
by a factor of one; in other words, nothing.
Now the area. This is traditionally the cross-sectional
58
00:05:00,960 --> 00:05:07,330
area. The big cone has four times the cross-sectional
area of the small cone so this area factor
59
00:05:07,330 --> 00:05:14,330
is times four and raised to the unknown exponent.
And here, the kinematic viscosity, that's
60
00:05:14,330 --> 00:05:20,919
the kinematic viscosity of air and both cones
feel the same kinematic viscosity. Therefore,
61
00:05:20,919 --> 00:05:25,520
that contributes a factor of one just like
the density does.
62
00:05:25,520 --> 00:05:30,270
So now we know what the question mark here
has to be. The question mark here must be
63
00:05:30,270 --> 00:05:37,270
one so that this four to the question mark
is equal to this four. And so does this one.
64
00:05:39,960 --> 00:05:44,169
Now that we have found one exponent, we can
find the remaining three using dimensional
65
00:05:44,169 --> 00:05:46,309
analysis.
66
00:05:46,309 --> 00:05:51,539
We make sure that the exponents chosen on
the right side produce dimensions of force,
67
00:05:51,539 --> 00:05:56,729
which are the dimensions on the left side.
A force has dimensions of mass, length per
68
00:05:56,729 --> 00:06:01,740
time squared, that's mass times acceleration.
69
00:06:01,740 --> 00:06:07,559
Density has dimensions of mass per length
cubed, raised to this unknown exponent. Velocity
70
00:06:07,559 --> 00:06:13,689
has dimensions of length per time, raised
to this unknown exponent. Area has dimensions
71
00:06:13,689 --> 00:06:19,409
of length squared, raised to the power 1,
we've already figured that out. And kinematic
72
00:06:19,409 --> 00:06:24,529
viscosity; now, that's the regular viscosity
divided by the density. It has dimensions
73
00:06:24,529 --> 00:06:31,439
of length squared per time raised to this
unknown exponent
74
00:06:31,439 --> 00:06:36,689
Now let's solve for these unknown exponents
one at a time. Looking first at the mass,
75
00:06:36,689 --> 00:06:42,039
there is mass here and mass here on the left
side, but there is no other mass. So the only
76
00:06:42,039 --> 00:06:46,529
way to get the mass to work out is to make
this exponent one.
77
00:06:46,529 --> 00:06:52,719
Now, what do we have left? We have to make
sure the lengths and times work out and we
78
00:06:52,719 --> 00:06:57,719
have two unknowns, this exponent and this
exponent.
79
00:06:57,719 --> 00:07:02,300
Let's see how many more lengths we need, given
what we already have. We have mass worked
80
00:07:02,300 --> 00:07:08,129
out, we have two lengths here over three lengths
so we have mass per length. So we have length
81
00:07:08,129 --> 00:07:11,619
to the minus one so far.
82
00:07:11,619 --> 00:07:16,949
And what about time? Well, we have no times
yet except in these question marks so we need
83
00:07:16,949 --> 00:07:22,279
to get two more times on the bottom two more
lengths on the top. So we need to multiply
84
00:07:22,279 --> 00:07:27,930
by length squared over time squared, and the
only way to do that is to make this exponent
85
00:07:27,930 --> 00:07:32,520
a two... and this exponent here a zero.
86
00:07:32,520 --> 00:07:36,819
You can pause the video and go ahead and try
other combinations of exponents. You'll find
87
00:07:36,819 --> 00:07:43,819
that none of them will get both length and
time correct.
88
00:07:46,149 --> 00:07:52,279
So now we have all the exponents, we can actually
enter that into our force formula. Drag force
89
00:07:52,279 --> 00:07:58,659
is proportional to density to the first power,
speed squared, area to the first power we
90
00:07:58,659 --> 00:08:04,399
got from our home experiment and viscosity
here to the zeroth power.
91
00:08:04,399 --> 00:08:09,649
Now let's test our formula with a second demonstration
and see if it predicts this new situation.
92
00:08:09,649 --> 00:08:15,279
We're gonna race four small cones stacked
on top of each other. One, two, three, four.
93
00:08:15,279 --> 00:08:19,689
So we stack them to make one small cone that
is four times the mass of the other small
94
00:08:19,689 --> 00:08:21,830
cone. Next we're going to race them.
95
00:08:21,830 --> 00:08:28,779
But first, what's the drag force ratio between
the small cone and 4 small cones stacked together.
96
00:08:28,779 --> 00:08:35,169
Pause the video and use the formula to make
a prediction.
97
00:08:35,169 --> 00:08:40,419
The four cones weigh four times as much as
one cone so that's times four on the left
98
00:08:40,419 --> 00:08:46,560
side. What about the right side? Again, both
contestants feel the same air density. The
99
00:08:46,560 --> 00:08:50,250
velocity ratio, that's what we're trying to
figure out, and let's see what all the other
100
00:08:50,250 --> 00:08:55,519
pieces are. The area; well here in this case,
the stack of four has the same cross- sectional
101
00:08:55,519 --> 00:09:01,399
area as the one cone so that's just one. And
the viscosity doesn't matter. So, this factor
102
00:09:01,399 --> 00:09:07,100
of four on the left side has to be produced
by the v squared; in other words, the v goes
103
00:09:07,100 --> 00:09:12,810
up by a factor of two so that when it's squared,
you get a factor of four. That means the correct
104
00:09:12,810 --> 00:09:14,779
answer should be two to one.
105
00:09:14,779 --> 00:09:21,779
Now, let's test our prediction with a demonstration
to check whether nature behaves as we predict.
106
00:09:21,980 --> 00:09:28,100
It looks like our prediction was correct!
Now we feel pretty confident that we can use
107
00:09:28,100 --> 00:09:35,100
this formula to try to figure out the fuel
consumption of a car.
108
00:09:36,500 --> 00:09:40,180
Let's clean up our formula here just a bit
and erase the viscosity since it comes in
109
00:09:40,180 --> 00:09:44,899
with a zero exponent so it doesn't matter.
And this is our drag formula, which we're
110
00:09:44,899 --> 00:09:49,769
gonna use to estimate the fuel consumption
of a car on the highway.
111
00:09:49,769 --> 00:09:53,920
Fuel efficiency is measured as the distance
that that the car travels on one gallon or
112
00:09:53,920 --> 00:09:57,000
liter of gasoline.
113
00:09:57,000 --> 00:10:01,139
So it depends on how much energy you can get
out of a gallon of gasoline divided by the
114
00:10:01,139 --> 00:10:06,449
drag force, which is the formula we've just
found.
115
00:10:06,449 --> 00:10:13,389
So let's put in some numbers. What's the energy
from a gallon of gasoline? A gallon is roughly
116
00:10:13,389 --> 00:10:20,329
4 liters. And gasoline is roughly like water
so, there are 1,000g/liter.
117
00:10:20,329 --> 00:10:25,220
How much energy do you get out of each gram
of gasoline? Gasoline is like fat and from
118
00:10:25,220 --> 00:10:30,639
the side of a butter packet, you can read
that 100 kilocalories, 10 to the 2 kilocalories
119
00:10:30,639 --> 00:10:33,509
come from 11 grams of butter.
120
00:10:33,509 --> 00:10:38,170
But now we want to convert kilocalories to
some reasonable metric unit. So that's four
121
00:10:38,170 --> 00:10:45,170
joules/calorie or four kilojoules per kilocalorie.
And that all divided by the drag force so
122
00:10:46,910 --> 00:10:50,470
let's put in those terms one by one.
123
00:10:50,470 --> 00:10:56,660
First the density here, one kilogram per meter
cubed is the density of air roughly. Now v
124
00:10:56,660 --> 00:11:03,060
for highway speeds. Say 100 kilometers an
hour, 65 miles an hour. That's roughly 30
125
00:11:03,060 --> 00:11:08,329
meters per second. Don't forget to square
it. And then the area of a car. Well, it's
126
00:11:08,329 --> 00:11:15,329
about... two meters wide by 1.5 meters high.
Now we have to work all the numbers, but before
127
00:11:16,550 --> 00:11:23,550
you do that, pause the video to check that
the dimensions all cancel appropriately.
128
00:11:27,290 --> 00:11:32,550
You should have found that the result has
units of meters, which is good! But how many?
129
00:11:32,550 --> 00:11:37,959
A quick numerical approximation will tell
you that you get 50 kilometers, which is 30
130
00:11:37,959 --> 00:11:44,959
miles roughly. The fuel efficiency of a car
on the highway is about 30 miles per gallon;
131
00:11:45,129 --> 00:11:52,129
or 50 kilometers per gallon. In typical European
Union units, that's eight liters per hundred
132
00:11:52,319 --> 00:11:59,319
kilometers.To Review With our approximation
methods, we've come to pretty reasonable numbers
133
00:12:01,189 --> 00:12:05,519
for the fuel efficiency of a car, without
having to solve any of the complicated equations
134
00:12:05,519 --> 00:12:10,910
of fluid mechanics. Instead, we used one simple
home experiment, dropping the cones, and the
135
00:12:10,910 --> 00:12:17,699
powerful principle of dimensional analysis.
From that, we were able to find all the exponents
136
00:12:17,699 --> 00:12:23,579
here, in the relationship between drag and
density, speed, and cross-sectional area.
137
00:12:23,579 --> 00:12:28,560
So the moral of this is that there is an art
to approximations, and reasoning tools such
138
00:12:28,560 --> 00:12:32,949
as dimensional analysis, they give you an
understanding of how systems behave without
139
00:12:32,949 --> 00:12:38,449
having to solve every single last bit of the
detailed mathematics. This understanding allows
140
00:12:38,449 --> 00:12:44,529
us to redesign the world.