WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:01.890 --> 00:00:03.220 align:start position:0%
 
[Music]

00:00:03.220 --> 00:00:03.230 align:start position:0%
[Music]
 

00:00:03.230 --> 00:00:06.260 align:start position:0%
[Music]
it<00:00:04.230><c> was</c><00:00:04.440><c> best</c><00:00:04.770><c> said</c><00:00:05.220><c> by</c><00:00:05.670><c> Robert</c><00:00:06.089><c> Zoellick</c>

00:00:06.260 --> 00:00:06.270 align:start position:0%
it was best said by Robert Zoellick
 

00:00:06.270 --> 00:00:08.870 align:start position:0%
it was best said by Robert Zoellick
which<00:00:06.930><c> is</c><00:00:07.140><c> that</c><00:00:07.319><c> what</c><00:00:07.560><c> the</c><00:00:07.710><c> United</c><00:00:07.919><c> States</c><00:00:08.250><c> is</c>

00:00:08.870 --> 00:00:08.880 align:start position:0%
which is that what the United States is
 

00:00:08.880 --> 00:00:13.280 align:start position:0%
which is that what the United States is
seeking<00:00:09.510><c> to</c><00:00:09.690><c> do</c><00:00:09.929><c> is</c><00:00:10.250><c> have</c><00:00:11.250><c> China</c><00:00:11.730><c> a</c><00:00:12.290><c> prosperous</c>

00:00:13.280 --> 00:00:13.290 align:start position:0%
seeking to do is have China a prosperous
 

00:00:13.290 --> 00:00:15.980 align:start position:0%
seeking to do is have China a prosperous
powerful<00:00:13.679><c> China</c><00:00:14.460><c> be</c><00:00:15.150><c> a</c><00:00:15.179><c> responsible</c>

00:00:15.980 --> 00:00:15.990 align:start position:0%
powerful China be a responsible
 

00:00:15.990 --> 00:00:17.990 align:start position:0%
powerful China be a responsible
stakeholder<00:00:16.320><c> of</c><00:00:17.010><c> the</c><00:00:17.160><c> international</c><00:00:17.820><c> order</c>

00:00:17.990 --> 00:00:18.000 align:start position:0%
stakeholder of the international order
 

00:00:18.000 --> 00:00:20.630 align:start position:0%
stakeholder of the international order
that's<00:00:18.779><c> what</c><00:00:19.170><c> we</c><00:00:19.320><c> wanted</c><00:00:19.740><c> that's</c><00:00:20.070><c> what</c><00:00:20.400><c> we</c>

00:00:20.630 --> 00:00:20.640 align:start position:0%
that's what we wanted that's what we
 

00:00:20.640 --> 00:00:24.109 align:start position:0%
that's what we wanted that's what we
want<00:00:20.910><c> now</c><00:00:21.300><c> the</c><00:00:22.199><c> problem</c><00:00:22.650><c> is</c><00:00:22.859><c> that</c><00:00:23.460><c> over</c><00:00:23.970><c> the</c>

00:00:24.109 --> 00:00:24.119 align:start position:0%
want now the problem is that over the
 

00:00:24.119 --> 00:00:25.880 align:start position:0%
want now the problem is that over the
last<00:00:24.330><c> thirty</c><00:00:24.689><c> years</c><00:00:24.779><c> quite</c><00:00:25.260><c> a</c><00:00:25.320><c> lot</c><00:00:25.590><c> of</c><00:00:25.619><c> data</c>

00:00:25.880 --> 00:00:25.890 align:start position:0%
last thirty years quite a lot of data
 

00:00:25.890 --> 00:00:27.800 align:start position:0%
last thirty years quite a lot of data
has<00:00:26.220><c> accrued</c><00:00:26.609><c> that</c><00:00:26.880><c> that's</c><00:00:27.060><c> not</c><00:00:27.240><c> what</c><00:00:27.449><c> China</c>

00:00:27.800 --> 00:00:27.810 align:start position:0%
has accrued that that's not what China
 

00:00:27.810 --> 00:00:32.269 align:start position:0%
has accrued that that's not what China
wants<00:00:28.289><c> so</c><00:00:28.949><c> they</c><00:00:29.609><c> are</c><00:00:30.000><c> Xi</c><00:00:30.810><c> Jinping</c><00:00:30.949><c> stood</c><00:00:31.949><c> in</c>

00:00:32.269 --> 00:00:32.279 align:start position:0%
wants so they are Xi Jinping stood in
 

00:00:32.279 --> 00:00:35.000 align:start position:0%
wants so they are Xi Jinping stood in
the<00:00:32.460><c> Rose</c><00:00:32.759><c> Garden</c><00:00:32.790><c> and</c><00:00:33.540><c> publicly</c><00:00:34.230><c> promised</c>

00:00:35.000 --> 00:00:35.010 align:start position:0%
the Rose Garden and publicly promised
 

00:00:35.010 --> 00:00:38.150 align:start position:0%
the Rose Garden and publicly promised
President<00:00:35.969><c> Obama</c><00:00:36.450><c> that</c><00:00:37.140><c> they</c><00:00:37.649><c> would</c><00:00:37.950><c> not</c>

00:00:38.150 --> 00:00:38.160 align:start position:0%
President Obama that they would not
 

00:00:38.160 --> 00:00:40.250 align:start position:0%
President Obama that they would not
militarize<00:00:39.090><c> the</c><00:00:39.120><c> islands</c><00:00:40.020><c> they</c><00:00:40.200><c> were</c>

00:00:40.250 --> 00:00:40.260 align:start position:0%
militarize the islands they were
 

00:00:40.260 --> 00:00:42.190 align:start position:0%
militarize the islands they were
building<00:00:40.739><c> in</c><00:00:40.890><c> the</c><00:00:41.010><c> South</c><00:00:41.219><c> China</c><00:00:41.250><c> Sea</c>

00:00:42.190 --> 00:00:42.200 align:start position:0%
building in the South China Sea
 

00:00:42.200 --> 00:00:45.290 align:start position:0%
building in the South China Sea
they<00:00:43.200><c> have</c><00:00:43.530><c> militarized</c><00:00:44.250><c> the</c><00:00:44.460><c> islands</c><00:00:44.940><c> they</c>

00:00:45.290 --> 00:00:45.300 align:start position:0%
they have militarized the islands they
 

00:00:45.300 --> 00:00:47.360 align:start position:0%
they have militarized the islands they
built<00:00:45.570><c> in</c><00:00:45.719><c> the</c><00:00:45.840><c> South</c><00:00:46.079><c> China</c><00:00:46.110><c> Sea</c><00:00:46.530><c> they</c><00:00:47.219><c> are</c>

00:00:47.360 --> 00:00:47.370 align:start position:0%
built in the South China Sea they are
 

00:00:47.370 --> 00:00:50.180 align:start position:0%
built in the South China Sea they are
behaving<00:00:47.579><c> in</c><00:00:48.090><c> a</c><00:00:48.210><c> predatory</c><00:00:48.899><c> way</c><00:00:49.320><c> towards</c>

00:00:50.180 --> 00:00:50.190 align:start position:0%
behaving in a predatory way towards
 

00:00:50.190 --> 00:00:52.160 align:start position:0%
behaving in a predatory way towards
their<00:00:50.460><c> neighbors</c><00:00:50.910><c> many</c><00:00:51.539><c> of</c><00:00:51.750><c> whom</c><00:00:51.989><c> are</c>

00:00:52.160 --> 00:00:52.170 align:start position:0%
their neighbors many of whom are
 

00:00:52.170 --> 00:00:56.240 align:start position:0%
their neighbors many of whom are
American<00:00:52.739><c> allies</c><00:00:53.219><c> they</c><00:00:54.000><c> are</c><00:00:54.300><c> not</c><00:00:55.250><c> honoring</c>

00:00:56.240 --> 00:00:56.250 align:start position:0%
American allies they are not honoring
 

00:00:56.250 --> 00:00:59.450 align:start position:0%
American allies they are not honoring
their<00:00:56.489><c> promises</c><00:00:57.149><c> not</c><00:00:57.510><c> to</c><00:00:57.930><c> hack</c><00:00:58.649><c> American</c>

00:00:59.450 --> 00:00:59.460 align:start position:0%
their promises not to hack American
 

00:00:59.460 --> 00:01:02.630 align:start position:0%
their promises not to hack American
businesses<00:01:00.030><c> they</c><00:01:00.570><c> are</c><00:01:00.870><c> forcing</c><00:01:01.680><c> Communist</c>

00:01:02.630 --> 00:01:02.640 align:start position:0%
businesses they are forcing Communist
 

00:01:02.640 --> 00:01:04.670 align:start position:0%
businesses they are forcing Communist
Party<00:01:03.059><c> commissar</c><00:01:03.690><c> Zhan</c><00:01:03.989><c> to</c><00:01:04.140><c> the</c><00:01:04.229><c> boards</c><00:01:04.559><c> of</c>

00:01:04.670 --> 00:01:04.680 align:start position:0%
Party commissar Zhan to the boards of
 

00:01:04.680 --> 00:01:07.070 align:start position:0%
Party commissar Zhan to the boards of
American<00:01:05.159><c> businesses</c><00:01:05.729><c> that</c><00:01:05.970><c> operate</c><00:01:06.540><c> in</c>

00:01:07.070 --> 00:01:07.080 align:start position:0%
American businesses that operate in
 

00:01:07.080 --> 00:01:10.520 align:start position:0%
American businesses that operate in
China<00:01:07.640><c> thieving</c><00:01:08.990><c> intellectual</c><00:01:09.990><c> property</c>

00:01:10.520 --> 00:01:10.530 align:start position:0%
China thieving intellectual property
 

00:01:10.530 --> 00:01:13.609 align:start position:0%
China thieving intellectual property
from<00:01:10.799><c> American</c><00:01:11.340><c> businesses</c><00:01:12.619><c> threatening</c>

00:01:13.609 --> 00:01:13.619 align:start position:0%
from American businesses threatening
 

00:01:13.619 --> 00:01:17.060 align:start position:0%
from American businesses threatening
American<00:01:14.340><c> allies</c><00:01:14.820><c> what</c><00:01:15.810><c> has</c><00:01:16.080><c> changed</c><00:01:16.560><c> in</c>

00:01:17.060 --> 00:01:17.070 align:start position:0%
American allies what has changed in
 

00:01:17.070 --> 00:01:20.270 align:start position:0%
American allies what has changed in
American<00:01:18.030><c> policy</c><00:01:18.540><c> and</c><00:01:18.990><c> I</c><00:01:19.380><c> would</c><00:01:19.590><c> argue</c><00:01:19.830><c> it</c>

00:01:20.270 --> 00:01:20.280 align:start position:0%
American policy and I would argue it
 

00:01:20.280 --> 00:01:22.160 align:start position:0%
American policy and I would argue it
would<00:01:20.400><c> have</c><00:01:20.549><c> needed</c><00:01:20.790><c> to</c><00:01:21.000><c> change</c><00:01:21.479><c> whether</c>

00:01:22.160 --> 00:01:22.170 align:start position:0%
would have needed to change whether
 

00:01:22.170 --> 00:01:26.450 align:start position:0%
would have needed to change whether
President<00:01:22.890><c> Obama</c><00:01:23.689><c> continued</c><00:01:25.460><c> whether</c>

00:01:26.450 --> 00:01:26.460 align:start position:0%
President Obama continued whether
 

00:01:26.460 --> 00:01:28.609 align:start position:0%
President Obama continued whether
President<00:01:27.150><c> Clinton</c><00:01:27.930><c> had</c><00:01:28.140><c> been</c><00:01:28.170><c> elected</c>

00:01:28.609 --> 00:01:28.619 align:start position:0%
President Clinton had been elected
 

00:01:28.619 --> 00:01:32.749 align:start position:0%
President Clinton had been elected
whether<00:01:29.310><c> President</c><00:01:29.820><c> Trump</c><00:01:30.150><c> was</c><00:01:31.079><c> that</c><00:01:31.759><c> China's</c>

00:01:32.749 --> 00:01:32.759 align:start position:0%
whether President Trump was that China's
 

00:01:32.759 --> 00:01:35.749 align:start position:0%
whether President Trump was that China's
behavior<00:01:33.409><c> argues</c><00:01:34.409><c> for</c><00:01:34.770><c> a</c><00:01:35.040><c> different</c><00:01:35.610><c> a</c>

00:01:35.749 --> 00:01:35.759 align:start position:0%
behavior argues for a different a
 

00:01:35.759 --> 00:01:38.800 align:start position:0%
behavior argues for a different a
sharper<00:01:36.240><c> edge</c><00:01:36.390><c> de</c><00:01:36.720><c> merican</c><00:01:37.140><c> approach</c><00:01:37.610><c> and</c>

00:01:38.800 --> 00:01:38.810 align:start position:0%
sharper edge de merican approach and
 

00:01:38.810 --> 00:01:41.210 align:start position:0%
sharper edge de merican approach and
President<00:01:39.810><c> Trump</c><00:01:39.990><c> is</c><00:01:40.229><c> right</c><00:01:40.650><c> to</c><00:01:40.950><c> take</c><00:01:41.189><c> a</c>

00:01:41.210 --> 00:01:41.220 align:start position:0%
President Trump is right to take a
 

00:01:41.220 --> 00:01:44.730 align:start position:0%
President Trump is right to take a
different<00:01:41.579><c> and</c><00:01:41.970><c> sharper</c><00:01:42.600><c> edge</c><00:01:42.810><c> approach</c>

00:01:44.730 --> 00:01:44.740 align:start position:0%
different and sharper edge approach
 

00:01:44.740 --> 00:01:46.610 align:start position:0%
different and sharper edge approach
[Music]

00:01:46.610 --> 00:01:46.620 align:start position:0%
[Music]
 

00:01:46.620 --> 00:01:48.680 align:start position:0%
[Music]
you