WEBVTT Kind: captions Language: en Style: ::cue(c.colorCCCCCC) { color: rgb(204,204,204); } ::cue(c.colorE5E5E5) { color: rgb(229,229,229); } ## 00:00:01.890 --> 00:00:03.190 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:00:03.190 --> 00:00:03.200 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:05.809 align:start position:0% [Music] so<00:00:04.200> Ken<00:00:04.380> Rogoff<00:00:04.529> made<00:00:04.859> an<00:00:04.950> argument<00:00:05.339> that<00:00:05.370> that 00:00:05.809 --> 00:00:05.819 align:start position:0% so Ken Rogoff made an argument that that 00:00:05.819 --> 00:00:07.190 align:start position:0% so Ken Rogoff made an argument that that he<00:00:05.970> doesn't<00:00:06.299> think<00:00:06.420> that<00:00:06.540> we're<00:00:06.839> in<00:00:06.870> safe 00:00:07.190 --> 00:00:07.200 align:start position:0% he doesn't think that we're in safe 00:00:07.200 --> 00:00:08.930 align:start position:0% he doesn't think that we're in safe hands<00:00:07.440> these<00:00:08.099> days<00:00:08.309> he<00:00:08.550> didn't<00:00:08.790> mention 00:00:08.930 --> 00:00:08.940 align:start position:0% hands these days he didn't mention 00:00:08.940 --> 00:00:13.370 align:start position:0% hands these days he didn't mention anybody<00:00:09.269> by<00:00:09.570> name<00:00:11.300> but<00:00:12.300> I<00:00:12.570> think<00:00:12.840> you<00:00:13.139> get<00:00:13.349> a 00:00:13.370 --> 00:00:13.380 align:start position:0% anybody by name but I think you get a 00:00:13.380 --> 00:00:15.200 align:start position:0% anybody by name but I think you get a sense<00:00:13.679> that<00:00:13.769> he<00:00:14.009> feels<00:00:14.219> that<00:00:14.429> not<00:00:14.790> only<00:00:14.910> and 00:00:15.200 --> 00:00:15.210 align:start position:0% sense that he feels that not only and 00:00:15.210 --> 00:00:17.060 align:start position:0% sense that he feels that not only and Bob<00:00:15.540> Rosencrantz<00:00:16.109> made<00:00:16.289> this<00:00:16.379> the<00:00:16.650> argument 00:00:17.060 --> 00:00:17.070 align:start position:0% Bob Rosencrantz made this the argument 00:00:17.070 --> 00:00:19.730 align:start position:0% Bob Rosencrantz made this the argument as<00:00:17.460> well<00:00:17.609> that<00:00:18.060> our<00:00:18.330> alliances<00:00:18.900> are<00:00:19.170> frayed 00:00:19.730 --> 00:00:19.740 align:start position:0% as well that our alliances are frayed 00:00:19.740 --> 00:00:23.540 align:start position:0% as well that our alliances are frayed China<00:00:20.670> is<00:00:21.330> not<00:00:21.710> necessarily<00:00:22.710> a<00:00:22.859> friendly 00:00:23.540 --> 00:00:23.550 align:start position:0% China is not necessarily a friendly 00:00:23.550 --> 00:00:26.900 align:start position:0% China is not necessarily a friendly interlocutor<00:00:24.500> in<00:00:25.500> the<00:00:25.920> economic<00:00:26.369> sense<00:00:26.670> and 00:00:26.900 --> 00:00:26.910 align:start position:0% interlocutor in the economic sense and 00:00:26.910 --> 00:00:29.589 align:start position:0% interlocutor in the economic sense and that<00:00:27.599> if<00:00:27.930> a<00:00:28.140> crisis<00:00:28.529> were<00:00:28.650> to<00:00:28.830> come<00:00:29.039> today 00:00:29.589 --> 00:00:29.599 align:start position:0% that if a crisis were to come today 00:00:29.599 --> 00:00:32.060 align:start position:0% that if a crisis were to come today they're<00:00:30.599> arguing<00:00:31.170> that<00:00:31.289> we<00:00:31.439> don't<00:00:31.619> have<00:00:31.859> the 00:00:32.060 --> 00:00:32.070 align:start position:0% they're arguing that we don't have the 00:00:32.070 --> 00:00:33.950 align:start position:0% they're arguing that we don't have the cool<00:00:32.279> heads<00:00:32.640> that<00:00:32.910> would<00:00:33.090> be<00:00:33.210> able<00:00:33.300> to<00:00:33.570> handle 00:00:33.950 --> 00:00:33.960 align:start position:0% cool heads that would be able to handle 00:00:33.960 --> 00:00:34.250 align:start position:0% cool heads that would be able to handle it 00:00:34.250 --> 00:00:34.260 align:start position:0% it 00:00:34.260 --> 00:00:36.709 align:start position:0% it brexit<00:00:34.860> I<00:00:35.040> know<00:00:35.219> you<00:00:35.280> know<00:00:35.460> also<00:00:35.700> a<00:00:35.910> mess<00:00:36.300> which 00:00:36.709 --> 00:00:36.719 align:start position:0% brexit I know you know also a mess which 00:00:36.719 --> 00:00:38.600 align:start position:0% brexit I know you know also a mess which is<00:00:36.750> serious<00:00:37.230> partner<00:00:37.500> last<00:00:37.770> time<00:00:37.980> so<00:00:38.190> you<00:00:38.550> know 00:00:38.600 --> 00:00:38.610 align:start position:0% is serious partner last time so you know 00:00:38.610 --> 00:00:40.280 align:start position:0% is serious partner last time so you know Kashkari<00:00:39.000> take<00:00:39.210> that<00:00:39.360> argument<00:00:39.780> on<00:00:39.870> you<00:00:40.230> know 00:00:40.280 --> 00:00:40.290 align:start position:0% Kashkari take that argument on you know 00:00:40.290 --> 00:00:41.990 align:start position:0% Kashkari take that argument on you know I<00:00:40.350> was<00:00:40.620> at<00:00:40.800> Treasury<00:00:41.160> from<00:00:41.370> oh<00:00:41.550> six<00:00:41.850> two<00:00:41.969> oh 00:00:41.990 --> 00:00:42.000 align:start position:0% I was at Treasury from oh six two oh 00:00:42.000 --> 00:00:44.180 align:start position:0% I was at Treasury from oh six two oh nine<00:00:42.090> and<00:00:42.600> people<00:00:43.079> may<00:00:43.200> forget<00:00:43.530> in<00:00:43.920> the<00:00:44.010> middle 00:00:44.180 --> 00:00:44.190 align:start position:0% nine and people may forget in the middle 00:00:44.190 --> 00:00:45.740 align:start position:0% nine and people may forget in the middle of<00:00:44.250> the<00:00:44.309> financial<00:00:44.670> crisis<00:00:45.059> we<00:00:45.600> had<00:00:45.690> a 00:00:45.740 --> 00:00:45.750 align:start position:0% of the financial crisis we had a 00:00:45.750 --> 00:00:48.110 align:start position:0% of the financial crisis we had a presidential<00:00:46.050> election<00:00:46.620> in<00:00:46.710> 2008<00:00:47.250> Senator 00:00:48.110 --> 00:00:48.120 align:start position:0% presidential election in 2008 Senator 00:00:48.120 --> 00:00:50.209 align:start position:0% presidential election in 2008 Senator McCain<00:00:48.420> and<00:00:48.450> then<00:00:48.719> senator<00:00:48.989> Obama<00:00:49.170> that<00:00:50.070> was 00:00:50.209 --> 00:00:50.219 align:start position:0% McCain and then senator Obama that was 00:00:50.219 --> 00:00:52.639 align:start position:0% McCain and then senator Obama that was hardly<00:00:50.550> political<00:00:51.420> harmonious<00:00:52.110> time<00:00:52.350> I<00:00:52.379> mean 00:00:52.639 --> 00:00:52.649 align:start position:0% hardly political harmonious time I mean 00:00:52.649 --> 00:00:55.160 align:start position:0% hardly political harmonious time I mean I<00:00:52.739> was<00:00:52.890> sitting<00:00:53.210> in<00:00:54.210> the<00:00:54.390> gallery<00:00:54.539> above<00:00:55.079> the 00:00:55.160 --> 00:00:55.170 align:start position:0% I was sitting in the gallery above the 00:00:55.170 --> 00:00:56.569 align:start position:0% I was sitting in the gallery above the House<00:00:55.320> of<00:00:55.530> Representatives<00:00:56.160> when<00:00:56.340> the<00:00:56.430> House 00:00:56.569 --> 00:00:56.579 align:start position:0% House of Representatives when the House 00:00:56.579 --> 00:00:59.090 align:start position:0% House of Representatives when the House voted<00:00:56.969> down<00:00:57.360> the<00:00:58.079> tarp<00:00:58.379> the<00:00:58.530> first<00:00:58.739> time<00:00:58.949> under 00:00:59.090 --> 00:00:59.100 align:start position:0% voted down the tarp the first time under 00:00:59.100 --> 00:01:00.560 align:start position:0% voted down the tarp the first time under if<00:00:59.250> you<00:00:59.340> remember<00:00:59.579> members<00:01:00.059> of<00:01:00.149> Congress<00:01:00.449> were 00:01:00.560 --> 00:01:00.570 align:start position:0% if you remember members of Congress were 00:01:00.570 --> 00:01:02.360 align:start position:0% if you remember members of Congress were telling<00:01:00.840> us<00:01:00.989> their<00:01:01.530> phones<00:01:01.859> were<00:01:02.039> ringing<00:01:02.070> off 00:01:02.360 --> 00:01:02.370 align:start position:0% telling us their phones were ringing off 00:01:02.370 --> 00:01:04.969 align:start position:0% telling us their phones were ringing off the<00:01:02.460> hook<00:01:02.579> 99<00:01:03.270> to<00:01:03.420> one<00:01:03.629> saying<00:01:04.350> don't<00:01:04.680> you<00:01:04.949> dare 00:01:04.969 --> 00:01:04.979 align:start position:0% the hook 99 to one saying don't you dare 00:01:04.979 --> 00:01:07.190 align:start position:0% the hook 99 to one saying don't you dare vote<00:01:05.640> for<00:01:05.880> this<00:01:06.030> then<00:01:06.900> the<00:01:07.049> Dow<00:01:07.170> Jones 00:01:07.190 --> 00:01:07.200 align:start position:0% vote for this then the Dow Jones 00:01:07.200 --> 00:01:09.380 align:start position:0% vote for this then the Dow Jones Industrial<00:01:07.860> Average<00:01:07.920> dropped<00:01:08.210> 777<00:01:09.210> points 00:01:09.380 --> 00:01:09.390 align:start position:0% Industrial Average dropped 777 points 00:01:09.390 --> 00:01:11.240 align:start position:0% Industrial Average dropped 777 points that<00:01:09.659> afternoon<00:01:09.930> and<00:01:10.290> two<00:01:10.710> days<00:01:10.860> later<00:01:11.070> they 00:01:11.240 --> 00:01:11.250 align:start position:0% that afternoon and two days later they 00:01:11.250 --> 00:01:14.359 align:start position:0% that afternoon and two days later they voted<00:01:11.549> for<00:01:11.580> it<00:01:11.850> our<00:01:12.420> democracy<00:01:13.080> is<00:01:13.369> deeply 00:01:14.359 --> 00:01:14.369 align:start position:0% voted for it our democracy is deeply 00:01:14.369 --> 00:01:16.730 align:start position:0% voted for it our democracy is deeply flawed<00:01:14.509> imperfect<00:01:15.509> but<00:01:16.110> in<00:01:16.229> moments<00:01:16.409> of 00:01:16.730 --> 00:01:16.740 align:start position:0% flawed imperfect but in moments of 00:01:16.740 --> 00:01:18.980 align:start position:0% flawed imperfect but in moments of crisis<00:01:17.189> we<00:01:17.310> tend<00:01:17.549> to<00:01:17.580> come<00:01:17.790> together<00:01:17.909> and<00:01:18.299> I 00:01:18.980 --> 00:01:18.990 align:start position:0% crisis we tend to come together and I 00:01:18.990 --> 00:01:20.420 align:start position:0% crisis we tend to come together and I believe<00:01:19.049> that<00:01:19.350> in<00:01:19.619> a<00:01:19.680> moment<00:01:20.009> of<00:01:20.070> a<00:01:20.159> future 00:01:20.420 --> 00:01:20.430 align:start position:0% believe that in a moment of a future 00:01:20.430 --> 00:01:22.340 align:start position:0% believe that in a moment of a future crisis<00:01:20.850> we<00:01:21.000> came<00:01:21.180> together<00:01:21.299> in<00:01:21.540> 2008<00:01:22.140> I 00:01:22.340 --> 00:01:22.350 align:start position:0% crisis we came together in 2008 I 00:01:22.350 --> 00:01:24.289 align:start position:0% crisis we came together in 2008 I believe<00:01:22.860> in<00:01:23.070> the<00:01:23.159> moment<00:01:23.490> of<00:01:23.580> future<00:01:23.820> crisis 00:01:24.289 --> 00:01:24.299 align:start position:0% believe in the moment of future crisis 00:01:24.299 --> 00:01:26.630 align:start position:0% believe in the moment of future crisis American<00:01:25.020> history<00:01:25.350> has<00:01:25.500> shown<00:01:25.530> that<00:01:25.979> we<00:01:26.490> will 00:01:26.630 --> 00:01:26.640 align:start position:0% American history has shown that we will 00:01:26.640 --> 00:01:28.310 align:start position:0% American history has shown that we will come<00:01:26.820> together<00:01:26.970> and<00:01:27.360> do<00:01:27.540> what's<00:01:27.750> necessary<00:01:27.960> on 00:01:28.310 --> 00:01:28.320 align:start position:0% come together and do what's necessary on 00:01:28.320 --> 00:01:29.359 align:start position:0% come together and do what's necessary on behalf<00:01:28.530> of<00:01:28.650> the<00:01:28.770> American<00:01:29.100> people 00:01:29.359 --> 00:01:29.369 align:start position:0% behalf of the American people 00:01:29.369 --> 00:01:31.130 align:start position:0% behalf of the American people that<00:01:29.850> was<00:01:29.970> what<00:01:30.150> I<00:01:30.180> lived<00:01:30.540> that<00:01:30.840> was<00:01:30.990> my 00:01:31.130 --> 00:01:31.140 align:start position:0% that was what I lived that was my 00:01:31.140 --> 00:01:32.810 align:start position:0% that was what I lived that was my experience<00:01:31.350> in<00:01:31.710> 2008<00:01:32.250> I<00:01:32.280> think<00:01:32.369> that's<00:01:32.640> true 00:01:32.810 --> 00:01:32.820 align:start position:0% experience in 2008 I think that's true 00:01:32.820 --> 00:01:33.940 align:start position:0% experience in 2008 I think that's true today 00:01:33.940 --> 00:01:33.950 align:start position:0% today 00:01:33.950 --> 00:01:35.800 align:start position:0% today [Music] 00:01:35.800 --> 00:01:35.810 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:01:35.810 --> 00:01:37.869 align:start position:0% [Music] you