WEBVTT Kind: captions Language: en 00:00:10.050 --> 00:00:16.069 align:start position:0% you 00:00:16.069 --> 00:00:16.079 align:start position:0% 00:00:16.079 --> 00:00:25.870 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:00:25.870 --> 00:00:25.880 align:start position:0% 00:00:25.880 --> 00:00:46.070 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:00:46.070 --> 00:00:46.080 align:start position:0% 00:00:46.080 --> 00:00:55.870 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:00:55.870 --> 00:00:55.880 align:start position:0% 00:00:55.880 --> 00:01:17.790 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:01:17.790 --> 00:01:17.800 align:start position:0% 00:01:17.800 --> 00:01:25.860 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:01:25.860 --> 00:01:25.870 align:start position:0% 00:01:25.870 --> 00:01:46.060 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:01:46.060 --> 00:01:46.070 align:start position:0% 00:01:46.070 --> 00:01:56.650 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:01:56.650 --> 00:01:56.660 align:start position:0% 00:01:56.660 --> 00:02:16.060 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:02:16.060 --> 00:02:16.070 align:start position:0% 00:02:16.070 --> 00:02:26.580 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:02:26.580 --> 00:02:26.590 align:start position:0% 00:02:26.590 --> 00:02:46.060 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:02:46.060 --> 00:02:46.070 align:start position:0% 00:02:46.070 --> 00:02:56.650 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:02:56.650 --> 00:02:56.660 align:start position:0% 00:02:56.660 --> 00:03:11.970 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:03:11.970 --> 00:03:11.980 align:start position:0% 00:03:11.980 --> 00:03:16.060 align:start position:0% you 00:03:16.060 --> 00:03:16.070 align:start position:0% 00:03:16.070 --> 00:03:26.650 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:03:26.650 --> 00:03:26.660 align:start position:0% 00:03:26.660 --> 00:03:41.970 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:03:41.970 --> 00:03:41.980 align:start position:0% 00:03:41.980 --> 00:03:46.050 align:start position:0% you 00:03:46.050 --> 00:03:46.060 align:start position:0% 00:03:46.060 --> 00:03:56.650 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:03:56.650 --> 00:03:56.660 align:start position:0% 00:03:56.660 --> 00:04:16.050 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:04:16.050 --> 00:04:16.060 align:start position:0% 00:04:16.060 --> 00:04:26.640 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:04:26.640 --> 00:04:26.650 align:start position:0% 00:04:26.650 --> 00:04:46.050 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:04:46.050 --> 00:04:46.060 align:start position:0% 00:04:46.060 --> 00:04:56.640 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:04:56.640 --> 00:04:56.650 align:start position:0% 00:04:56.650 --> 00:05:11.990 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:05:11.990 --> 00:05:12.000 align:start position:0% 00:05:12.000 --> 00:05:16.040 align:start position:0% you 00:05:16.040 --> 00:05:16.050 align:start position:0% 00:05:16.050 --> 00:05:26.630 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:05:26.630 --> 00:05:26.640 align:start position:0% 00:05:26.640 --> 00:05:46.040 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:05:46.040 --> 00:05:46.050 align:start position:0% 00:05:46.050 --> 00:05:56.630 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:05:56.630 --> 00:05:56.640 align:start position:0% 00:05:56.640 --> 00:06:16.030 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:06:16.030 --> 00:06:16.040 align:start position:0% 00:06:16.040 --> 00:06:17.930 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:06:17.930 --> 00:06:17.940 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:06:17.940 --> 00:06:21.870 align:start position:0% [Music] ladies<00:06:18.940> and<00:06:19.090> gentlemen<00:06:19.860> I'd<00:06:20.860> like<00:06:20.919> to<00:06:21.099> call<00:06:21.669> to 00:06:21.870 --> 00:06:21.880 align:start position:0% ladies and gentlemen I'd like to call to 00:06:21.880 --> 00:06:23.850 align:start position:0% ladies and gentlemen I'd like to call to order<00:06:21.910> the<00:06:22.419> meeting<00:06:22.900> of<00:06:23.139> the<00:06:23.380> Planning 00:06:23.850 --> 00:06:23.860 align:start position:0% order the meeting of the Planning 00:06:23.860 --> 00:06:25.409 align:start position:0% order the meeting of the Planning Commission<00:06:24.190> of<00:06:24.280> the<00:06:24.340> city<00:06:24.610> of<00:06:24.759> Halfmoon<00:06:25.270> Bay 00:06:25.409 --> 00:06:25.419 align:start position:0% Commission of the city of Halfmoon Bay 00:06:25.419 --> 00:06:28.379 align:start position:0% Commission of the city of Halfmoon Bay for<00:06:25.780> Tuesday<00:06:26.229> November<00:06:26.940> sorry<00:06:27.940> this<00:06:28.150> would<00:06:28.270> be 00:06:28.379 --> 00:06:28.389 align:start position:0% for Tuesday November sorry this would be 00:06:28.389 --> 00:06:31.830 align:start position:0% for Tuesday November sorry this would be January<00:06:28.900> 28<00:06:29.430> 2020<00:06:30.430> could<00:06:30.940> we<00:06:31.090> begin<00:06:31.449> with<00:06:31.810> a 00:06:31.830 --> 00:06:31.840 align:start position:0% January 28 2020 could we begin with a 00:06:31.840 --> 00:06:50.800 align:start position:0% January 28 2020 could we begin with a Pledge<00:06:32.440> of<00:06:32.590> Allegiance<00:06:32.680> please 00:06:50.800 --> 00:06:50.810 align:start position:0% 00:06:50.810 --> 00:06:54.160 align:start position:0% thank<00:06:51.410> you<00:06:51.560> could<00:06:52.550> we<00:06:52.730> have<00:06:53.660> a<00:06:53.690> roll<00:06:53.960> call 00:06:54.160 --> 00:06:54.170 align:start position:0% thank you could we have a roll call 00:06:54.170 --> 00:07:00.330 align:start position:0% thank you could we have a roll call please 00:07:00.330 --> 00:07:00.340 align:start position:0% 00:07:00.340 --> 00:07:03.540 align:start position:0% all<00:07:00.850> right<00:07:01.030> commissioner<00:07:01.570> hold<00:07:02.550> here 00:07:03.540 --> 00:07:03.550 align:start position:0% all right commissioner hold here 00:07:03.550 --> 00:07:06.450 align:start position:0% all right commissioner hold here commissioner<00:07:04.360> polgár<00:07:04.810> here<00:07:05.560> vice-chair 00:07:06.450 --> 00:07:06.460 align:start position:0% commissioner polgár here vice-chair 00:07:06.460 --> 00:07:09.570 align:start position:0% commissioner polgár here vice-chair Riddick<00:07:06.790> here<00:07:07.480> sheriff<00:07:08.050> Benjamin<00:07:08.470> here<00:07:09.130> and 00:07:09.570 --> 00:07:09.580 align:start position:0% Riddick here sheriff Benjamin here and 00:07:09.580 --> 00:07:12.300 align:start position:0% Riddick here sheriff Benjamin here and we<00:07:09.790> note<00:07:10.030> that<00:07:10.140> Commissioner<00:07:11.140> Hernandez<00:07:12.040> is 00:07:12.300 --> 00:07:12.310 align:start position:0% we note that Commissioner Hernandez is 00:07:12.310 --> 00:07:14.760 align:start position:0% we note that Commissioner Hernandez is absent<00:07:12.880> this<00:07:13.000> evening<00:07:13.390> this<00:07:14.170> place<00:07:14.440> will<00:07:14.650> be 00:07:14.760 --> 00:07:14.770 align:start position:0% absent this evening this place will be 00:07:14.770 --> 00:07:18.720 align:start position:0% absent this evening this place will be empty<00:07:15.120> so<00:07:16.740> the<00:07:17.740> agenda<00:07:17.950> looks<00:07:18.220> pretty<00:07:18.520> short 00:07:18.720 --> 00:07:18.730 align:start position:0% empty so the agenda looks pretty short 00:07:18.730 --> 00:07:21.060 align:start position:0% empty so the agenda looks pretty short any<00:07:19.000> proposed<00:07:19.570> changes<00:07:20.050> or<00:07:20.260> we<00:07:20.590> all<00:07:20.710> good<00:07:20.920> with 00:07:21.060 --> 00:07:21.070 align:start position:0% any proposed changes or we all good with 00:07:21.070 --> 00:07:21.840 align:start position:0% any proposed changes or we all good with the<00:07:21.130> way<00:07:21.250> it<00:07:21.370> looks 00:07:21.840 --> 00:07:21.850 align:start position:0% the way it looks 00:07:21.850 --> 00:07:25.710 align:start position:0% the way it looks seeing<00:07:22.690> no<00:07:22.840> objection<00:07:23.970> then<00:07:24.970> the<00:07:25.180> first<00:07:25.420> item 00:07:25.710 --> 00:07:25.720 align:start position:0% seeing no objection then the first item 00:07:25.720 --> 00:07:28.080 align:start position:0% seeing no objection then the first item on<00:07:25.810> our<00:07:25.870> agenda<00:07:26.020> is<00:07:26.500> the<00:07:26.770> approval<00:07:27.460> of<00:07:27.880> the 00:07:28.080 --> 00:07:28.090 align:start position:0% on our agenda is the approval of the 00:07:28.090 --> 00:07:32.070 align:start position:0% on our agenda is the approval of the minutes<00:07:28.240> of<00:07:28.800> January<00:07:29.800> the<00:07:29.920> 14th<00:07:30.370> 2020<00:07:31.240> are 00:07:32.070 --> 00:07:32.080 align:start position:0% minutes of January the 14th 2020 are 00:07:32.080 --> 00:07:34.440 align:start position:0% minutes of January the 14th 2020 are there<00:07:32.290> any<00:07:32.470> Corrections<00:07:33.460> or<00:07:33.880> additions<00:07:34.150> to 00:07:34.440 --> 00:07:34.450 align:start position:0% there any Corrections or additions to 00:07:34.450 --> 00:07:39.480 align:start position:0% there any Corrections or additions to these<00:07:34.720> minutes<00:07:35.140> Brian<00:07:36.330> that<00:07:37.330> would<00:07:37.450> be<00:07:38.460> no<00:07:39.460> I 00:07:39.480 --> 00:07:39.490 align:start position:0% these minutes Brian that would be no I 00:07:39.490 --> 00:07:42.030 align:start position:0% these minutes Brian that would be no I think<00:07:39.700> we<00:07:40.450> just<00:07:40.600> had<00:07:40.870> the<00:07:41.560> correction 00:07:42.030 --> 00:07:42.040 align:start position:0% think we just had the correction 00:07:42.040 --> 00:07:43.500 align:start position:0% think we just had the correction underneath<00:07:42.430> the<00:07:42.550> election<00:07:42.970> chair<00:07:43.240> and<00:07:43.360> Vice 00:07:43.500 --> 00:07:43.510 align:start position:0% underneath the election chair and Vice 00:07:43.510 --> 00:07:46.290 align:start position:0% underneath the election chair and Vice Chair<00:07:43.540> says<00:07:44.190> nominated<00:07:45.190> and<00:07:45.460> accepted<00:07:46.090> I 00:07:46.290 --> 00:07:46.300 align:start position:0% Chair says nominated and accepted I 00:07:46.300 --> 00:07:50.970 align:start position:0% Chair says nominated and accepted I think<00:07:46.750> that<00:07:46.900> should<00:07:47.110> be<00:07:47.140> accepted<00:07:49.800> thank<00:07:50.800> you 00:07:50.970 --> 00:07:50.980 align:start position:0% think that should be accepted thank you 00:07:50.980 --> 00:07:56.430 align:start position:0% think that should be accepted thank you any<00:07:51.460> other<00:07:51.640> changes<00:07:54.420> before<00:07:55.420> you<00:07:55.660> before<00:07:56.170> we 00:07:56.430 --> 00:07:56.440 align:start position:0% any other changes before you before we 00:07:56.440 --> 00:07:58.290 align:start position:0% any other changes before you before we take<00:07:56.620> a<00:07:56.650> second<00:07:57.130> I<00:07:57.190> just<00:07:57.220> wanted<00:07:57.730> to<00:07:57.910> ask 00:07:58.290 --> 00:07:58.300 align:start position:0% take a second I just wanted to ask 00:07:58.300 --> 00:08:01.530 align:start position:0% take a second I just wanted to ask whether<00:07:59.110> the<00:07:59.350> Commission<00:07:59.770> would<00:07:59.920> clarify<00:08:00.540> one 00:08:01.530 --> 00:08:01.540 align:start position:0% whether the Commission would clarify one 00:08:01.540 --> 00:08:03.630 align:start position:0% whether the Commission would clarify one particular<00:08:02.170> motion<00:08:02.560> and<00:08:02.980> that<00:08:03.040> was<00:08:03.400> with 00:08:03.630 --> 00:08:03.640 align:start position:0% particular motion and that was with 00:08:03.640 --> 00:08:09.290 align:start position:0% particular motion and that was with respect<00:08:03.880> to<00:08:04.270> a<00:08:05.340> deviation<00:08:06.340> from<00:08:06.790> the<00:08:07.150> original 00:08:09.290 --> 00:08:09.300 align:start position:0% respect to a deviation from the original 00:08:09.300 --> 00:08:12.780 align:start position:0% respect to a deviation from the original suggested<00:08:10.300> motion<00:08:10.750> for<00:08:11.220> maintaining<00:08:12.220> the 00:08:12.780 --> 00:08:12.790 align:start position:0% suggested motion for maintaining the 00:08:12.790 --> 00:08:15.810 align:start position:0% suggested motion for maintaining the triplex<00:08:13.480> the<00:08:14.440> motion<00:08:14.950> was<00:08:15.100> to<00:08:15.310> remove<00:08:15.640> the 00:08:15.810 --> 00:08:15.820 align:start position:0% triplex the motion was to remove the 00:08:15.820 --> 00:08:18.660 align:start position:0% triplex the motion was to remove the parking<00:08:16.060> for<00:08:16.450> duplex<00:08:17.230> and<00:08:17.410> triplex<00:08:17.950> and<00:08:18.190> the 00:08:18.660 --> 00:08:18.670 align:start position:0% parking for duplex and triplex and the 00:08:18.670 --> 00:08:20.730 align:start position:0% parking for duplex and triplex and the motion<00:08:19.000> was<00:08:19.030> a<00:08:19.270> little<00:08:19.630> bit<00:08:19.750> vague<00:08:20.020> about<00:08:20.410> that 00:08:20.730 --> 00:08:20.740 align:start position:0% motion was a little bit vague about that 00:08:20.740 --> 00:08:23.360 align:start position:0% motion was a little bit vague about that in<00:08:21.610> art<00:08:21.760> I<00:08:22.000> believe<00:08:22.090> the<00:08:22.510> intention<00:08:22.960> of<00:08:23.050> the 00:08:23.360 --> 00:08:23.370 align:start position:0% in art I believe the intention of the 00:08:23.370 --> 00:08:27.780 align:start position:0% in art I believe the intention of the Commission<00:08:24.370> was<00:08:24.640> to<00:08:25.200> retain<00:08:26.200> the<00:08:26.790> visitor 00:08:27.780 --> 00:08:27.790 align:start position:0% Commission was to retain the visitor 00:08:27.790 --> 00:08:29.520 align:start position:0% Commission was to retain the visitor parking<00:08:27.970> requirements<00:08:28.750> in<00:08:28.840> the<00:08:28.960> duplex<00:08:29.350> in 00:08:29.520 --> 00:08:29.530 align:start position:0% parking requirements in the duplex in 00:08:29.530 --> 00:08:31.920 align:start position:0% parking requirements in the duplex in triplex<00:08:30.010> area<00:08:30.400> and<00:08:30.610> I<00:08:31.060> just<00:08:31.090> wanted<00:08:31.570> that<00:08:31.780> to 00:08:31.920 --> 00:08:31.930 align:start position:0% triplex area and I just wanted that to 00:08:31.930 --> 00:08:33.450 align:start position:0% triplex area and I just wanted that to be<00:08:32.050> very<00:08:32.260> clear<00:08:32.560> and<00:08:32.650> the<00:08:32.740> motion<00:08:33.100> should<00:08:33.340> it 00:08:33.450 --> 00:08:33.460 align:start position:0% be very clear and the motion should it 00:08:33.460 --> 00:08:38.520 align:start position:0% be very clear and the motion should it ever<00:08:33.670> come<00:08:33.820> up<00:08:34.180> with<00:08:34.420> that<00:08:35.410> in<00:08:35.710> mind<00:08:37.290> maybe<00:08:38.290> we 00:08:38.520 --> 00:08:38.530 align:start position:0% ever come up with that in mind maybe we 00:08:38.530 --> 00:08:40.080 align:start position:0% ever come up with that in mind maybe we can<00:08:38.680> get<00:08:38.800> a<00:08:38.860> second<00:08:39.280> with<00:08:39.400> that<00:08:39.430> change<00:08:39.850> if 00:08:40.080 --> 00:08:40.090 align:start position:0% can get a second with that change if 00:08:40.090 --> 00:08:44.460 align:start position:0% can get a second with that change if it's<00:08:40.240> acceptable<00:08:40.690> to<00:08:40.840> the<00:08:41.050> maker<00:08:42.390> second<00:08:43.470> and 00:08:44.460 --> 00:08:44.470 align:start position:0% it's acceptable to the maker second and 00:08:44.470 --> 00:08:45.780 align:start position:0% it's acceptable to the maker second and it's<00:08:44.680> okay<00:08:44.920> with<00:08:45.070> a<00:08:45.100> maker<00:08:45.340> to<00:08:45.520> make<00:08:45.670> the 00:08:45.780 --> 00:08:45.790 align:start position:0% it's okay with a maker to make the 00:08:45.790 --> 00:08:46.470 align:start position:0% it's okay with a maker to make the change 00:08:46.470 --> 00:08:46.480 align:start position:0% change 00:08:46.480 --> 00:08:49.050 align:start position:0% change okay<00:08:46.930> any<00:08:47.410> other<00:08:47.440> comment<00:08:48.190> all<00:08:48.340> in<00:08:48.550> favor<00:08:48.790> aye 00:08:49.050 --> 00:08:49.060 align:start position:0% okay any other comment all in favor aye 00:08:49.060 --> 00:08:52.530 align:start position:0% okay any other comment all in favor aye aye<00:08:50.040> okay<00:08:51.040> thank<00:08:51.310> you 00:08:52.530 --> 00:08:52.540 align:start position:0% aye okay thank you 00:08:52.540 --> 00:08:55.260 align:start position:0% aye okay thank you then<00:08:52.900> we<00:08:53.050> move<00:08:53.290> on<00:08:53.530> to<00:08:53.710> the<00:08:53.950> next<00:08:54.220> item<00:08:54.520> on<00:08:55.210> our 00:08:55.260 --> 00:08:55.270 align:start position:0% then we move on to the next item on our 00:08:55.270 --> 00:08:58.080 align:start position:0% then we move on to the next item on our agenda<00:08:55.510> this<00:08:56.380> is<00:08:56.620> the<00:08:56.920> oral<00:08:57.310> communications 00:08:58.080 --> 00:08:58.090 align:start position:0% agenda this is the oral communications 00:08:58.090 --> 00:09:00.780 align:start position:0% agenda this is the oral communications or<00:08:58.300> a<00:08:58.330> public<00:08:58.720> comment<00:08:58.990> time<00:08:59.980> for<00:09:00.280> our<00:09:00.430> our 00:09:00.780 --> 00:09:00.790 align:start position:0% or a public comment time for our our 00:09:00.790 --> 00:09:03.620 align:start position:0% or a public comment time for our our meeting<00:09:01.390> this<00:09:01.990> is<00:09:02.050> a<00:09:02.260> period<00:09:02.680> where<00:09:02.890> any<00:09:03.160> item 00:09:03.620 --> 00:09:03.630 align:start position:0% meeting this is a period where any item 00:09:03.630 --> 00:09:06.780 align:start position:0% meeting this is a period where any item that<00:09:04.630> is<00:09:04.780> of<00:09:04.930> interest<00:09:05.230> to<00:09:05.350> the<00:09:05.500> public<00:09:05.790> except 00:09:06.780 --> 00:09:06.790 align:start position:0% that is of interest to the public except 00:09:06.790 --> 00:09:08.790 align:start position:0% that is of interest to the public except the<00:09:07.030> ones<00:09:07.270> that<00:09:07.600> are<00:09:07.690> actually<00:09:07.840> on<00:09:08.110> the<00:09:08.290> agenda 00:09:08.790 --> 00:09:08.800 align:start position:0% the ones that are actually on the agenda 00:09:08.800 --> 00:09:10.990 align:start position:0% the ones that are actually on the agenda are 00:09:10.990 --> 00:09:11.000 align:start position:0% are 00:09:11.000 --> 00:09:12.730 align:start position:0% are so<00:09:11.269> we're<00:09:11.569> very<00:09:11.600> interested<00:09:12.139> in<00:09:12.230> hearing<00:09:12.410> from 00:09:12.730 --> 00:09:12.740 align:start position:0% so we're very interested in hearing from 00:09:12.740 --> 00:09:14.259 align:start position:0% so we're very interested in hearing from you<00:09:12.889> about<00:09:13.129> so<00:09:13.370> if<00:09:13.459> you<00:09:13.579> have<00:09:13.759> an<00:09:13.879> item<00:09:14.000> you 00:09:14.259 --> 00:09:14.269 align:start position:0% you about so if you have an item you 00:09:14.269 --> 00:09:15.819 align:start position:0% you about so if you have an item you would<00:09:14.360> like<00:09:14.540> to<00:09:14.689> address<00:09:15.079> to<00:09:15.230> the<00:09:15.350> Commission 00:09:15.819 --> 00:09:15.829 align:start position:0% would like to address to the Commission 00:09:15.829 --> 00:09:18.850 align:start position:0% would like to address to the Commission that<00:09:16.459> is<00:09:16.610> not<00:09:16.910> the<00:09:17.420> study<00:09:18.079> session<00:09:18.589> for 00:09:18.850 --> 00:09:18.860 align:start position:0% that is not the study session for 00:09:18.860 --> 00:09:21.759 align:start position:0% that is not the study session for short-term<00:09:19.310> vacation<00:09:19.490> rentals<00:09:20.620> this<00:09:21.620> would 00:09:21.759 --> 00:09:21.769 align:start position:0% short-term vacation rentals this would 00:09:21.769 --> 00:09:23.290 align:start position:0% short-term vacation rentals this would be<00:09:21.889> the<00:09:22.009> right<00:09:22.160> time<00:09:22.459> to<00:09:22.759> have<00:09:23.240> that 00:09:23.290 --> 00:09:23.300 align:start position:0% be the right time to have that 00:09:23.300 --> 00:09:27.040 align:start position:0% be the right time to have that conversation<00:09:24.550> so<00:09:25.550> I'm<00:09:25.819> going<00:09:26.000> to<00:09:26.060> open<00:09:26.389> the 00:09:27.040 --> 00:09:27.050 align:start position:0% conversation so I'm going to open the 00:09:27.050 --> 00:09:29.499 align:start position:0% conversation so I'm going to open the oral<00:09:27.470> communications<00:09:28.160> seeing<00:09:29.120> none<00:09:29.329> I'm 00:09:29.499 --> 00:09:29.509 align:start position:0% oral communications seeing none I'm 00:09:29.509 --> 00:09:30.639 align:start position:0% oral communications seeing none I'm going<00:09:29.689> to<00:09:29.750> close<00:09:30.050> the<00:09:30.290> oral<00:09:30.500> communication 00:09:30.639 --> 00:09:30.649 align:start position:0% going to close the oral communication 00:09:30.649 --> 00:09:34.210 align:start position:0% going to close the oral communication and<00:09:31.839> we'll<00:09:32.839> continue<00:09:33.170> with<00:09:33.500> the<00:09:33.589> next<00:09:33.740> item<00:09:33.949> on 00:09:34.210 --> 00:09:34.220 align:start position:0% and we'll continue with the next item on 00:09:34.220 --> 00:09:37.269 align:start position:0% and we'll continue with the next item on our<00:09:34.250> agenda<00:09:34.449> which<00:09:35.449> is<00:09:35.779> the<00:09:36.079> study<00:09:36.829> session 00:09:37.269 --> 00:09:37.279 align:start position:0% our agenda which is the study session 00:09:37.279 --> 00:09:39.490 align:start position:0% our agenda which is the study session for<00:09:37.550> short-term<00:09:37.910> vacation<00:09:38.149> rental<00:09:38.870> land<00:09:39.350> use 00:09:39.490 --> 00:09:39.500 align:start position:0% for short-term vacation rental land use 00:09:39.500 --> 00:09:41.710 align:start position:0% for short-term vacation rental land use regulation<00:09:40.129> and<00:09:40.370> the<00:09:40.759> staff<00:09:40.970> report<00:09:41.420> will<00:09:41.569> be 00:09:41.710 --> 00:09:41.720 align:start position:0% regulation and the staff report will be 00:09:41.720 --> 00:09:47.170 align:start position:0% regulation and the staff report will be given<00:09:42.019> by<00:09:42.819> scott<00:09:43.819> and<00:09:44.089> jill<00:09:44.360> team<00:09:45.910> butcher<00:09:46.910> all 00:09:47.170 --> 00:09:47.180 align:start position:0% given by scott and jill team butcher all 00:09:47.180 --> 00:09:50.530 align:start position:0% given by scott and jill team butcher all right<00:09:47.449> good<00:09:47.750> evening<00:09:47.779> we<00:09:48.560> have<00:09:48.829> a<00:09:49.540> technology 00:09:50.530 --> 00:09:50.540 align:start position:0% right good evening we have a technology 00:09:50.540 --> 00:09:52.090 align:start position:0% right good evening we have a technology glitch<00:09:50.779> and<00:09:51.139> they're<00:09:51.259> gonna<00:09:51.350> keep<00:09:51.589> working<00:09:51.769> on 00:09:52.090 --> 00:09:52.100 align:start position:0% glitch and they're gonna keep working on 00:09:52.100 --> 00:09:54.249 align:start position:0% glitch and they're gonna keep working on it<00:09:52.250> but<00:09:52.459> we<00:09:52.519> can<00:09:52.910> begin<00:09:53.120> without<00:09:54.019> the 00:09:54.249 --> 00:09:54.259 align:start position:0% it but we can begin without the 00:09:54.259 --> 00:09:56.769 align:start position:0% it but we can begin without the presentation<00:09:55.009> and<00:09:55.220> just<00:09:55.569> introduce<00:09:56.569> this 00:09:56.769 --> 00:09:56.779 align:start position:0% presentation and just introduce this 00:09:56.779 --> 00:10:01.540 align:start position:0% presentation and just introduce this item<00:09:57.879> this<00:09:58.879> is<00:09:58.939> a<00:09:59.509> study<00:10:00.319> session<00:10:00.649> this<00:10:01.069> is<00:10:01.129> not 00:10:01.540 --> 00:10:01.550 align:start position:0% item this is a study session this is not 00:10:01.550 --> 00:10:04.480 align:start position:0% item this is a study session this is not meant<00:10:02.120> to<00:10:02.240> be<00:10:02.569> coming<00:10:03.199> forward<00:10:03.500> with<00:10:03.829> a<00:10:03.860> fully 00:10:04.480 --> 00:10:04.490 align:start position:0% meant to be coming forward with a fully 00:10:04.490 --> 00:10:07.449 align:start position:0% meant to be coming forward with a fully cooked<00:10:04.819> ordinance<00:10:05.360> whatsoever<00:10:06.259> we've<00:10:06.649> wanted 00:10:07.449 --> 00:10:07.459 align:start position:0% cooked ordinance whatsoever we've wanted 00:10:07.459 --> 00:10:09.999 align:start position:0% cooked ordinance whatsoever we've wanted to<00:10:07.730> make<00:10:07.910> a<00:10:07.939> note<00:10:08.209> that<00:10:08.240> we've<00:10:08.660> received<00:10:09.009> four 00:10:09.999 --> 00:10:10.009 align:start position:0% to make a note that we've received four 00:10:10.009 --> 00:10:12.850 align:start position:0% to make a note that we've received four written<00:10:10.459> comment<00:10:10.910> letters<00:10:11.680> different<00:10:12.680> kinds 00:10:12.850 --> 00:10:12.860 align:start position:0% written comment letters different kinds 00:10:12.860 --> 00:10:14.559 align:start position:0% written comment letters different kinds of<00:10:12.949> communications<00:10:13.759> in<00:10:13.970> advance<00:10:14.300> of<00:10:14.480> this 00:10:14.559 --> 00:10:14.569 align:start position:0% of communications in advance of this 00:10:14.569 --> 00:10:15.009 align:start position:0% of communications in advance of this meeting 00:10:15.009 --> 00:10:15.019 align:start position:0% meeting 00:10:15.019 --> 00:10:16.720 align:start position:0% meeting they've<00:10:15.500> all<00:10:15.740> been<00:10:15.769> provided<00:10:16.459> to<00:10:16.610> the 00:10:16.720 --> 00:10:16.730 align:start position:0% they've all been provided to the 00:10:16.730 --> 00:10:19.030 align:start position:0% they've all been provided to the Planning<00:10:17.089> Commission<00:10:17.569> if<00:10:17.779> anyone<00:10:18.589> else<00:10:18.740> had 00:10:19.030 --> 00:10:19.040 align:start position:0% Planning Commission if anyone else had 00:10:19.040 --> 00:10:20.650 align:start position:0% Planning Commission if anyone else had anything<00:10:19.459> in<00:10:19.579> writing<00:10:19.759> that<00:10:19.970> they<00:10:20.329> wanted<00:10:20.600> to 00:10:20.650 --> 00:10:20.660 align:start position:0% anything in writing that they wanted to 00:10:20.660 --> 00:10:23.530 align:start position:0% anything in writing that they wanted to plant<00:10:21.019> prepare<00:10:21.920> or<00:10:22.339> convey<00:10:23.000> to<00:10:23.059> the<00:10:23.240> Planning 00:10:23.530 --> 00:10:23.540 align:start position:0% plant prepare or convey to the Planning 00:10:23.540 --> 00:10:24.819 align:start position:0% plant prepare or convey to the Planning Commission<00:10:23.870> just<00:10:24.079> let<00:10:24.230> us<00:10:24.350> know<00:10:24.379> and<00:10:24.589> we'll 00:10:24.819 --> 00:10:24.829 align:start position:0% Commission just let us know and we'll 00:10:24.829 --> 00:10:29.369 align:start position:0% Commission just let us know and we'll make<00:10:24.889> sure<00:10:25.220> they<00:10:25.370> have<00:10:25.550> it<00:10:27.279> just<00:10:28.279> a<00:10:28.459> few<00:10:28.790> quick 00:10:29.369 --> 00:10:29.379 align:start position:0% make sure they have it just a few quick 00:10:29.379 --> 00:10:32.860 align:start position:0% make sure they have it just a few quick thoughts<00:10:30.379> before<00:10:31.129> we<00:10:31.430> dive<00:10:32.000> into<00:10:32.300> the<00:10:32.600> land 00:10:32.860 --> 00:10:32.870 align:start position:0% thoughts before we dive into the land 00:10:32.870 --> 00:10:37.119 align:start position:0% thoughts before we dive into the land use<00:10:33.110> side<00:10:33.410> of<00:10:33.559> this<00:10:33.709> topic<00:10:35.889> what's<00:10:36.889> the 00:10:37.119 --> 00:10:37.129 align:start position:0% use side of this topic what's the 00:10:37.129 --> 00:10:39.189 align:start position:0% use side of this topic what's the current<00:10:37.339> city<00:10:37.819> practice<00:10:38.449> what's<00:10:38.720> the<00:10:38.870> status 00:10:39.189 --> 00:10:39.199 align:start position:0% current city practice what's the status 00:10:39.199 --> 00:10:42.759 align:start position:0% current city practice what's the status of<00:10:39.790> short-term<00:10:40.790> vacation<00:10:41.329> rentals<00:10:41.660> we<00:10:42.559> call 00:10:42.759 --> 00:10:42.769 align:start position:0% of short-term vacation rentals we call 00:10:42.769 --> 00:10:45.850 align:start position:0% of short-term vacation rentals we call them<00:10:42.920> STRs<00:10:43.879> you'll<00:10:44.660> see<00:10:44.870> that<00:10:44.990> abbreviation 00:10:45.850 --> 00:10:45.860 align:start position:0% them STRs you'll see that abbreviation 00:10:45.860 --> 00:10:49.360 align:start position:0% them STRs you'll see that abbreviation in<00:10:46.009> our<00:10:46.129> slides<00:10:46.540> in<00:10:47.540> my<00:10:48.110> hopes<00:10:48.410> that<00:10:48.559> they<00:10:49.160> pop 00:10:49.360 --> 00:10:49.370 align:start position:0% in our slides in my hopes that they pop 00:10:49.370 --> 00:10:52.119 align:start position:0% in our slides in my hopes that they pop up<00:10:49.399> eventually<00:10:50.230> and<00:10:51.230> they<00:10:51.350> will<00:10:51.559> all<00:10:51.889> right 00:10:52.119 --> 00:10:52.129 align:start position:0% up eventually and they will all right 00:10:52.129 --> 00:10:55.509 align:start position:0% up eventually and they will all right sounds<00:10:52.550> good<00:10:53.110> good<00:10:54.110> faith<00:10:54.680> is<00:10:54.920> good<00:10:55.129> all 00:10:55.509 --> 00:10:55.519 align:start position:0% sounds good good faith is good all 00:10:55.519 --> 00:10:59.079 align:start position:0% sounds good good faith is good all righty<00:10:55.759> then<00:10:56.029> so<00:10:57.069> currently<00:10:58.069> Half<00:10:58.699> Moon<00:10:58.879> Bay 00:10:59.079 --> 00:10:59.089 align:start position:0% righty then so currently Half Moon Bay 00:10:59.089 --> 00:11:01.960 align:start position:0% righty then so currently Half Moon Bay does<00:10:59.329> not<00:10:59.569> have<00:10:59.990> any<00:11:00.500> specific<00:11:01.160> land<00:11:01.790> use 00:11:01.960 --> 00:11:01.970 align:start position:0% does not have any specific land use 00:11:01.970 --> 00:11:04.650 align:start position:0% does not have any specific land use controls<00:11:02.480> for<00:11:02.779> short-term<00:11:03.290> vacation<00:11:03.470> rentals 00:11:04.650 --> 00:11:04.660 align:start position:0% controls for short-term vacation rentals 00:11:04.660 --> 00:11:08.499 align:start position:0% controls for short-term vacation rentals the<00:11:05.660> status<00:11:06.139> is<00:11:06.350> that<00:11:06.579> the<00:11:07.579> city<00:11:07.790> requires<00:11:08.180> a 00:11:08.499 --> 00:11:08.509 align:start position:0% the status is that the city requires a 00:11:08.509 --> 00:11:12.090 align:start position:0% the status is that the city requires a business<00:11:09.230> license<00:11:09.769> and<00:11:10.360> we<00:11:11.360> do<00:11:11.540> collect 00:11:12.090 --> 00:11:12.100 align:start position:0% business license and we do collect 00:11:12.100 --> 00:11:15.069 align:start position:0% business license and we do collect transient<00:11:13.100> occupancy<00:11:13.250> tax<00:11:13.910> which<00:11:14.509> we<00:11:14.750> refer 00:11:15.069 --> 00:11:15.079 align:start position:0% transient occupancy tax which we refer 00:11:15.079 --> 00:11:19.329 align:start position:0% transient occupancy tax which we refer to<00:11:15.110> as<00:11:15.290> T<00:11:15.709> ot<00:11:16.189> and<00:11:17.410> that<00:11:18.410> has<00:11:18.769> been<00:11:18.949> going<00:11:19.220> on 00:11:19.329 --> 00:11:19.339 align:start position:0% to as T ot and that has been going on 00:11:19.339 --> 00:11:23.259 align:start position:0% to as T ot and that has been going on for<00:11:19.670> several<00:11:19.880> years<00:11:21.550> folks<00:11:22.550> want<00:11:22.850> to<00:11:22.910> know<00:11:23.029> how 00:11:23.259 --> 00:11:23.269 align:start position:0% for several years folks want to know how 00:11:23.269 --> 00:11:24.180 align:start position:0% for several years folks want to know how many<00:11:23.329> short-term 00:11:24.180 --> 00:11:24.190 align:start position:0% many short-term 00:11:24.190 --> 00:11:26.670 align:start position:0% many short-term vacation<00:11:24.610> rentals<00:11:24.940> are<00:11:25.240> in<00:11:25.480> the<00:11:25.660> city<00:11:25.960> that's 00:11:26.670 --> 00:11:26.680 align:start position:0% vacation rentals are in the city that's 00:11:26.680 --> 00:11:28.650 align:start position:0% vacation rentals are in the city that's always<00:11:26.860> a<00:11:26.950> hard<00:11:27.040> question<00:11:27.700> to<00:11:28.060> answer<00:11:28.090> because 00:11:28.650 --> 00:11:28.660 align:start position:0% always a hard question to answer because 00:11:28.660 --> 00:11:30.750 align:start position:0% always a hard question to answer because they<00:11:29.110> go<00:11:29.320> up<00:11:29.530> and<00:11:29.650> down<00:11:29.800> from<00:11:30.280> time<00:11:30.520> to<00:11:30.730> time 00:11:30.750 --> 00:11:30.760 align:start position:0% they go up and down from time to time 00:11:30.760 --> 00:11:33.690 align:start position:0% they go up and down from time to time really<00:11:31.450> reflecting<00:11:32.050> on<00:11:32.290> how<00:11:32.890> flexible<00:11:33.430> the 00:11:33.690 --> 00:11:33.700 align:start position:0% really reflecting on how flexible the 00:11:33.700 --> 00:11:36.060 align:start position:0% really reflecting on how flexible the land<00:11:33.940> use<00:11:34.120> is<00:11:34.330> for<00:11:34.540> people<00:11:34.900> they<00:11:35.560> can<00:11:35.590> choose 00:11:36.060 --> 00:11:36.070 align:start position:0% land use is for people they can choose 00:11:36.070 --> 00:11:39.060 align:start position:0% land use is for people they can choose when<00:11:36.490> it's<00:11:37.330> a<00:11:37.450> good<00:11:37.570> time<00:11:37.630> for<00:11:38.110> them<00:11:38.260> to<00:11:38.590> to 00:11:39.060 --> 00:11:39.070 align:start position:0% when it's a good time for them to to 00:11:39.070 --> 00:11:41.130 align:start position:0% when it's a good time for them to to have<00:11:39.250> their<00:11:39.430> home<00:11:39.640> available<00:11:40.210> for<00:11:40.600> having<00:11:41.050> a 00:11:41.130 --> 00:11:41.140 align:start position:0% have their home available for having a 00:11:41.140 --> 00:11:43.380 align:start position:0% have their home available for having a guest<00:11:41.380> and<00:11:41.800> when<00:11:42.400> they<00:11:42.520> don't<00:11:42.640> want<00:11:42.850> to<00:11:43.060> do<00:11:43.210> it 00:11:43.380 --> 00:11:43.390 align:start position:0% guest and when they don't want to do it 00:11:43.390 --> 00:11:45.960 align:start position:0% guest and when they don't want to do it so<00:11:43.750> I<00:11:43.960> think<00:11:44.380> our<00:11:44.650> most<00:11:45.040> recent<00:11:45.220> spot-check 00:11:45.960 --> 00:11:45.970 align:start position:0% so I think our most recent spot-check 00:11:45.970 --> 00:11:48.180 align:start position:0% so I think our most recent spot-check was<00:11:46.180> only<00:11:46.450> about<00:11:46.660> forty<00:11:47.080> five<00:11:47.230> we've<00:11:47.770> had<00:11:47.950> a 00:11:48.180 --> 00:11:48.190 align:start position:0% was only about forty five we've had a 00:11:48.190 --> 00:11:50.610 align:start position:0% was only about forty five we've had a lot<00:11:48.490> more<00:11:48.520> in<00:11:49.150> other<00:11:49.420> times<00:11:50.260> that<00:11:50.380> we've 00:11:50.610 --> 00:11:50.620 align:start position:0% lot more in other times that we've 00:11:50.620 --> 00:11:52.770 align:start position:0% lot more in other times that we've checked<00:11:50.950> in<00:11:51.190> of<00:11:51.550> course<00:11:51.790> this<00:11:51.910> is<00:11:52.090> offseason 00:11:52.770 --> 00:11:52.780 align:start position:0% checked in of course this is offseason 00:11:52.780 --> 00:11:54.690 align:start position:0% checked in of course this is offseason so<00:11:53.080> we<00:11:53.200> wouldn't<00:11:53.440> expect<00:11:53.950> to<00:11:54.190> have<00:11:54.340> as<00:11:54.490> many 00:11:54.690 --> 00:11:54.700 align:start position:0% so we wouldn't expect to have as many 00:11:54.700 --> 00:11:58.830 align:start position:0% so we wouldn't expect to have as many right<00:11:55.030> now<00:11:55.920> and<00:11:56.970> people<00:11:57.970> also<00:11:58.420> want<00:11:58.600> to<00:11:58.660> know 00:11:58.830 --> 00:11:58.840 align:start position:0% right now and people also want to know 00:11:58.840 --> 00:12:01.530 align:start position:0% right now and people also want to know well<00:11:59.380> gosh<00:11:59.620> you're<00:11:59.980> collecting<00:12:00.490> that<00:12:00.670> Tod<00:12:01.300> how 00:12:01.530 --> 00:12:01.540 align:start position:0% well gosh you're collecting that Tod how 00:12:01.540 --> 00:12:04.110 align:start position:0% well gosh you're collecting that Tod how much<00:12:01.720> money<00:12:01.990> is<00:12:02.170> that<00:12:02.200> and<00:12:03.190> I<00:12:03.610> think<00:12:03.820> the<00:12:03.910> first 00:12:04.110 --> 00:12:04.120 align:start position:0% much money is that and I think the first 00:12:04.120 --> 00:12:07.680 align:start position:0% much money is that and I think the first year<00:12:04.330> that<00:12:04.630> we<00:12:04.810> were<00:12:05.710> really<00:12:06.130> able<00:12:07.090> to<00:12:07.390> dig 00:12:07.680 --> 00:12:07.690 align:start position:0% year that we were really able to dig 00:12:07.690 --> 00:12:09.930 align:start position:0% year that we were really able to dig into<00:12:07.870> that<00:12:08.020> and<00:12:08.260> track<00:12:08.500> it<00:12:08.710> we<00:12:08.920> we<00:12:09.490> only<00:12:09.700> got 00:12:09.930 --> 00:12:09.940 align:start position:0% into that and track it we we only got 00:12:09.940 --> 00:12:12.090 align:start position:0% into that and track it we we only got about<00:12:10.120> eighty<00:12:10.450> thousand<00:12:10.930> dollars<00:12:10.960> in<00:12:11.560> the 00:12:12.090 --> 00:12:12.100 align:start position:0% about eighty thousand dollars in the 00:12:12.100 --> 00:12:16.110 align:start position:0% about eighty thousand dollars in the last<00:12:12.340> fiscal<00:12:12.850> year<00:12:13.650> that<00:12:14.650> would<00:12:14.800> be<00:12:15.120> 2018-2019 00:12:16.110 --> 00:12:16.120 align:start position:0% last fiscal year that would be 2018-2019 00:12:16.120 --> 00:12:18.690 align:start position:0% last fiscal year that would be 2018-2019 it<00:12:16.900> was<00:12:17.050> on<00:12:17.290> the<00:12:17.830> order<00:12:17.980> of<00:12:18.160> two<00:12:18.520> hundred 00:12:18.690 --> 00:12:18.700 align:start position:0% it was on the order of two hundred 00:12:18.700 --> 00:12:22.350 align:start position:0% it was on the order of two hundred thousand<00:12:19.330> so<00:12:19.660> that<00:12:20.320> has<00:12:20.650> been<00:12:20.980> a<00:12:21.340> really<00:12:22.240> a 00:12:22.350 --> 00:12:22.360 align:start position:0% thousand so that has been a really a 00:12:22.360 --> 00:12:25.500 align:start position:0% thousand so that has been a really a result<00:12:22.630> not<00:12:23.280> necessarily<00:12:24.280> of<00:12:24.580> having<00:12:25.210> more 00:12:25.500 --> 00:12:25.510 align:start position:0% result not necessarily of having more 00:12:25.510 --> 00:12:27.480 align:start position:0% result not necessarily of having more short-term<00:12:26.350> rentals<00:12:26.680> so<00:12:26.890> much<00:12:27.040> is<00:12:27.220> just 00:12:27.480 --> 00:12:27.490 align:start position:0% short-term rentals so much is just 00:12:27.490 --> 00:12:30.720 align:start position:0% short-term rentals so much is just better<00:12:27.850> systems<00:12:28.740> communication<00:12:29.740> the<00:12:30.460> city 00:12:30.720 --> 00:12:30.730 align:start position:0% better systems communication the city 00:12:30.730 --> 00:12:33.540 align:start position:0% better systems communication the city now<00:12:30.970> has<00:12:31.240> an<00:12:31.690> agreement<00:12:32.080> with<00:12:32.380> Airbnb<00:12:32.980> which 00:12:33.540 --> 00:12:33.550 align:start position:0% now has an agreement with Airbnb which 00:12:33.550 --> 00:12:37.650 align:start position:0% now has an agreement with Airbnb which is<00:12:33.790> helpful<00:12:34.180> to<00:12:34.210> us<00:12:34.570> we<00:12:35.560> have<00:12:35.890> a<00:12:36.660> compliance 00:12:37.650 --> 00:12:37.660 align:start position:0% is helpful to us we have a compliance 00:12:37.660 --> 00:12:39.930 align:start position:0% is helpful to us we have a compliance specialist<00:12:38.290> who<00:12:38.500> tracks<00:12:38.860> our<00:12:39.340> short-term 00:12:39.930 --> 00:12:39.940 align:start position:0% specialist who tracks our short-term 00:12:39.940 --> 00:12:42.720 align:start position:0% specialist who tracks our short-term rentals<00:12:40.420> that's<00:12:40.720> really<00:12:41.320> common<00:12:41.620> almost<00:12:42.610> all 00:12:42.720 --> 00:12:42.730 align:start position:0% rentals that's really common almost all 00:12:42.730 --> 00:12:46.560 align:start position:0% rentals that's really common almost all the<00:12:42.850> cities<00:12:43.120> have<00:12:43.360> that<00:12:44.430> and<00:12:45.430> there's<00:12:46.270> there's 00:12:46.560 --> 00:12:46.570 align:start position:0% the cities have that and there's there's 00:12:46.570 --> 00:12:51.360 align:start position:0% the cities have that and there's there's a<00:12:46.630> number<00:12:46.960> of<00:12:47.200> firms<00:12:47.620> that<00:12:47.890> do<00:12:48.130> that<00:12:48.400> and<00:12:49.170> we<00:12:50.370> we 00:12:51.360 --> 00:12:51.370 align:start position:0% a number of firms that do that and we we 00:12:51.370 --> 00:12:53.820 align:start position:0% a number of firms that do that and we we believe<00:12:51.700> that<00:12:51.850> most<00:12:52.090> of<00:12:52.300> them<00:12:52.450> are<00:12:52.830> in 00:12:53.820 --> 00:12:53.830 align:start position:0% believe that most of them are in 00:12:53.830 --> 00:12:55.830 align:start position:0% believe that most of them are in compliance<00:12:54.340> with<00:12:54.520> those<00:12:54.760> requirements<00:12:55.420> of 00:12:55.830 --> 00:12:55.840 align:start position:0% compliance with those requirements of 00:12:55.840 --> 00:12:58.710 align:start position:0% compliance with those requirements of having<00:12:56.020> a<00:12:56.260> business<00:12:56.650> license<00:12:57.160> and<00:12:57.720> paying 00:12:58.710 --> 00:12:58.720 align:start position:0% having a business license and paying 00:12:58.720 --> 00:13:02.390 align:start position:0% having a business license and paying their<00:12:58.930> t<00:12:59.110> ot<00:12:59.500> now<00:13:00.480> putting<00:13:01.480> all<00:13:01.840> that<00:13:02.080> aside 00:13:02.390 --> 00:13:02.400 align:start position:0% their t ot now putting all that aside 00:13:02.400 --> 00:13:06.240 align:start position:0% their t ot now putting all that aside because<00:13:03.400> that's<00:13:03.880> not<00:13:04.170> lamb<00:13:05.170> juice<00:13:05.500> and<00:13:05.980> that's 00:13:06.240 --> 00:13:06.250 align:start position:0% because that's not lamb juice and that's 00:13:06.250 --> 00:13:07.829 align:start position:0% because that's not lamb juice and that's not<00:13:06.460> what<00:13:06.640> we're<00:13:06.790> focused<00:13:07.270> on<00:13:07.450> tonight 00:13:07.829 --> 00:13:07.839 align:start position:0% not what we're focused on tonight 00:13:07.839 --> 00:13:10.590 align:start position:0% not what we're focused on tonight tonight<00:13:08.170> we're<00:13:08.320> focused<00:13:08.770> on<00:13:09.600> short-term 00:13:10.590 --> 00:13:10.600 align:start position:0% tonight we're focused on short-term 00:13:10.600 --> 00:13:14.550 align:start position:0% tonight we're focused on short-term vacation<00:13:11.440> rentals<00:13:11.860> as<00:13:12.100> a<00:13:12.930> type<00:13:13.930> of<00:13:13.960> land<00:13:14.440> use 00:13:14.550 --> 00:13:14.560 align:start position:0% vacation rentals as a type of land use 00:13:14.560 --> 00:13:17.280 align:start position:0% vacation rentals as a type of land use that<00:13:14.980> could<00:13:15.520> happen<00:13:16.150> in<00:13:16.690> different 00:13:17.280 --> 00:13:17.290 align:start position:0% that could happen in different 00:13:17.290 --> 00:13:19.079 align:start position:0% that could happen in different neighborhoods<00:13:17.440> or<00:13:18.160> the<00:13:18.520> way<00:13:18.640> we<00:13:18.670> think<00:13:18.970> about 00:13:19.079 --> 00:13:19.089 align:start position:0% neighborhoods or the way we think about 00:13:19.089 --> 00:13:20.400 align:start position:0% neighborhoods or the way we think about it<00:13:19.270> with<00:13:19.480> our<00:13:19.510> Planning<00:13:19.960> Commission 00:13:20.400 --> 00:13:20.410 align:start position:0% it with our Planning Commission 00:13:20.410 --> 00:13:23.850 align:start position:0% it with our Planning Commission different<00:13:21.220> zoning<00:13:21.610> districts<00:13:22.120> and<00:13:22.450> this<00:13:23.290> is<00:13:23.530> a 00:13:23.850 --> 00:13:23.860 align:start position:0% different zoning districts and this is a 00:13:23.860 --> 00:13:27.750 align:start position:0% different zoning districts and this is a relationship<00:13:24.640> of<00:13:25.350> a<00:13:26.350> suite<00:13:27.130> of<00:13:27.339> land<00:13:27.580> uses 00:13:27.750 --> 00:13:27.760 align:start position:0% relationship of a suite of land uses 00:13:27.760 --> 00:13:30.630 align:start position:0% relationship of a suite of land uses that<00:13:28.089> you<00:13:28.240> might<00:13:28.450> see<00:13:28.750> for<00:13:28.990> example<00:13:29.110> in<00:13:29.770> we<00:13:30.370> are 00:13:30.630 --> 00:13:30.640 align:start position:0% that you might see for example in we are 00:13:30.640 --> 00:13:32.360 align:start position:0% that you might see for example in we are one<00:13:31.000> zone<00:13:31.390> which<00:13:31.720> is<00:13:31.870> going<00:13:32.080> to<00:13:32.170> emphasize 00:13:32.360 --> 00:13:32.370 align:start position:0% one zone which is going to emphasize 00:13:32.370 --> 00:13:35.380 align:start position:0% one zone which is going to emphasize single-family<00:13:33.370> residential<00:13:34.000> and 00:13:35.380 --> 00:13:35.390 align:start position:0% single-family residential and 00:13:35.390 --> 00:13:39.550 align:start position:0% single-family residential and um<00:13:35.570> a<00:13:36.200> pretty<00:13:36.890> tight<00:13:37.250> array<00:13:38.030> of<00:13:38.560> possibilities 00:13:39.550 --> 00:13:39.560 align:start position:0% um a pretty tight array of possibilities 00:13:39.560 --> 00:13:42.010 align:start position:0% um a pretty tight array of possibilities for<00:13:39.860> other<00:13:40.400> uses<00:13:40.910> in<00:13:41.060> that<00:13:41.090> zone<00:13:41.540> but<00:13:41.870> that 00:13:42.010 --> 00:13:42.020 align:start position:0% for other uses in that zone but that 00:13:42.020 --> 00:13:43.870 align:start position:0% for other uses in that zone but that zone<00:13:42.320> is<00:13:42.500> mostly<00:13:42.860> reserved<00:13:43.640> for 00:13:43.870 --> 00:13:43.880 align:start position:0% zone is mostly reserved for 00:13:43.880 --> 00:13:46.240 align:start position:0% zone is mostly reserved for single-family<00:13:44.360> housing<00:13:45.080> there's<00:13:46.070> other 00:13:46.240 --> 00:13:46.250 align:start position:0% single-family housing there's other 00:13:46.250 --> 00:13:48.190 align:start position:0% single-family housing there's other zones<00:13:46.610> that<00:13:46.910> where<00:13:47.090> short-term<00:13:47.600> rentals<00:13:47.930> can 00:13:48.190 --> 00:13:48.200 align:start position:0% zones that where short-term rentals can 00:13:48.200 --> 00:13:53.110 align:start position:0% zones that where short-term rentals can happen<00:13:48.560> look<00:13:48.860> at<00:13:49.160> that<00:13:49.840> absolutely<00:13:51.940> thank<00:13:52.940> you 00:13:53.110 --> 00:13:53.120 align:start position:0% happen look at that absolutely thank you 00:13:53.120 --> 00:13:55.540 align:start position:0% happen look at that absolutely thank you we<00:13:53.450> don't<00:13:53.480> know<00:13:53.720> what<00:13:53.840> happened<00:13:54.200> but<00:13:54.550> we 00:13:55.540 --> 00:13:55.550 align:start position:0% we don't know what happened but we 00:13:55.550 --> 00:14:00.070 align:start position:0% we don't know what happened but we appreciate<00:13:55.790> that<00:13:56.210> Bridget<00:13:56.720> very<00:13:57.110> much<00:13:59.080> we 00:14:00.070 --> 00:14:00.080 align:start position:0% appreciate that Bridget very much we 00:14:00.080 --> 00:14:01.960 align:start position:0% appreciate that Bridget very much we also<00:14:00.230> have<00:14:00.530> mixed<00:14:00.830> use<00:14:00.980> zones<00:14:01.280> where<00:14:01.760> this 00:14:01.960 --> 00:14:01.970 align:start position:0% also have mixed use zones where this 00:14:01.970 --> 00:14:04.930 align:start position:0% also have mixed use zones where this could<00:14:02.240> occur<00:14:02.510> and<00:14:02.960> you'll<00:14:03.620> have<00:14:04.040> a<00:14:04.070> much<00:14:04.190> much 00:14:04.930 --> 00:14:04.940 align:start position:0% could occur and you'll have a much much 00:14:04.940 --> 00:14:07.930 align:start position:0% could occur and you'll have a much much longer<00:14:05.330> list<00:14:05.840> of<00:14:06.140> uses<00:14:06.980> that<00:14:07.250> could<00:14:07.580> occur<00:14:07.820> in 00:14:07.930 --> 00:14:07.940 align:start position:0% longer list of uses that could occur in 00:14:07.940 --> 00:14:10.900 align:start position:0% longer list of uses that could occur in those<00:14:08.090> areas<00:14:08.570> so<00:14:09.220> there's<00:14:10.220> a<00:14:10.280> lot<00:14:10.520> to<00:14:10.730> think 00:14:10.900 --> 00:14:10.910 align:start position:0% those areas so there's a lot to think 00:14:10.910 --> 00:14:11.290 align:start position:0% those areas so there's a lot to think about 00:14:11.290 --> 00:14:11.300 align:start position:0% about 00:14:11.300 --> 00:14:15.990 align:start position:0% about from<00:14:12.260> from<00:14:12.710> that<00:14:12.860> land<00:14:13.100> use<00:14:13.280> perspective<00:14:13.670> and 00:14:15.990 --> 00:14:16.000 align:start position:0% from from that land use perspective and 00:14:16.000 --> 00:14:21.730 align:start position:0% from from that land use perspective and we<00:14:17.000> want<00:14:17.270> to<00:14:18.610> get<00:14:19.610> right<00:14:19.880> to<00:14:20.590> what<00:14:21.590> you're 00:14:21.730 --> 00:14:21.740 align:start position:0% we want to get right to what you're 00:14:21.740 --> 00:14:23.110 align:start position:0% we want to get right to what you're really<00:14:21.980> going<00:14:22.100> to<00:14:22.190> be<00:14:22.250> talking<00:14:22.700> about<00:14:22.790> tonight 00:14:23.110 --> 00:14:23.120 align:start position:0% really going to be talking about tonight 00:14:23.120 --> 00:14:26.770 align:start position:0% really going to be talking about tonight then<00:14:23.510> from<00:14:23.810> your<00:14:23.930> study<00:14:24.230> session<00:14:24.760> your<00:14:25.760> packet 00:14:26.770 --> 00:14:26.780 align:start position:0% then from your study session your packet 00:14:26.780 --> 00:14:29.620 align:start position:0% then from your study session your packet first<00:14:27.440> of<00:14:27.620> all<00:14:27.740> included<00:14:28.610> a<00:14:28.790> policy 00:14:29.620 --> 00:14:29.630 align:start position:0% first of all included a policy 00:14:29.630 --> 00:14:33.360 align:start position:0% first of all included a policy background<00:14:30.110> paper<00:14:30.410> that<00:14:30.740> was<00:14:30.920> your<00:14:31.760> March 00:14:33.360 --> 00:14:33.370 align:start position:0% background paper that was your March 00:14:33.370 --> 00:14:37.480 align:start position:0% background paper that was your March 2018<00:14:34.480> staff<00:14:35.480> report<00:14:36.020> that<00:14:36.260> covered<00:14:36.710> a<00:14:36.950> full 00:14:37.480 --> 00:14:37.490 align:start position:0% 2018 staff report that covered a full 00:14:37.490 --> 00:14:39.400 align:start position:0% 2018 staff report that covered a full range<00:14:37.730> of<00:14:37.880> policies<00:14:38.420> it's<00:14:38.780> taken<00:14:39.140> us<00:14:39.230> a<00:14:39.380> while 00:14:39.400 --> 00:14:39.410 align:start position:0% range of policies it's taken us a while 00:14:39.410 --> 00:14:41.020 align:start position:0% range of policies it's taken us a while to<00:14:39.560> get<00:14:39.800> back<00:14:40.010> to<00:14:40.220> you<00:14:40.280> because<00:14:40.460> we<00:14:40.730> have<00:14:40.850> been 00:14:41.020 --> 00:14:41.030 align:start position:0% to get back to you because we have been 00:14:41.030 --> 00:14:44.710 align:start position:0% to get back to you because we have been really<00:14:41.420> busy<00:14:41.780> with<00:14:42.760> Adu<00:14:43.760> ordinances<00:14:44.480> and 00:14:44.710 --> 00:14:44.720 align:start position:0% really busy with Adu ordinances and 00:14:44.720 --> 00:14:46.870 align:start position:0% really busy with Adu ordinances and other<00:14:44.930> codes<00:14:45.320> in<00:14:45.590> the<00:14:45.680> Land<00:14:45.860> Use<00:14:45.950> Plan<00:14:46.040> and<00:14:46.670> of 00:14:46.870 --> 00:14:46.880 align:start position:0% other codes in the Land Use Plan and of 00:14:46.880 --> 00:14:49.000 align:start position:0% other codes in the Land Use Plan and of course<00:14:47.090> other<00:14:47.300> applications<00:14:48.290> going<00:14:48.530> on<00:14:48.740> so 00:14:49.000 --> 00:14:49.010 align:start position:0% course other applications going on so 00:14:49.010 --> 00:14:51.820 align:start position:0% course other applications going on so we're<00:14:49.480> we're<00:14:50.480> glad<00:14:50.720> that<00:14:50.930> we<00:14:51.050> were<00:14:51.230> finally 00:14:51.820 --> 00:14:51.830 align:start position:0% we're we're glad that we were finally 00:14:51.830 --> 00:14:53.980 align:start position:0% we're we're glad that we were finally able<00:14:52.070> to<00:14:52.250> come<00:14:52.460> back<00:14:52.670> on<00:14:52.880> that<00:14:53.120> but<00:14:53.360> that<00:14:53.540> that 00:14:53.980 --> 00:14:53.990 align:start position:0% able to come back on that but that that 00:14:53.990 --> 00:14:57.340 align:start position:0% able to come back on that but that that paper<00:14:54.290> is<00:14:54.530> still<00:14:55.450> important<00:14:56.450> as<00:14:56.720> are<00:14:57.170> the 00:14:57.340 --> 00:14:57.350 align:start position:0% paper is still important as are the 00:14:57.350 --> 00:14:59.110 align:start position:0% paper is still important as are the Coastal<00:14:57.800> Commission<00:14:57.830> documents<00:14:58.820> that<00:14:59.000> were 00:14:59.110 --> 00:14:59.120 align:start position:0% Coastal Commission documents that were 00:14:59.120 --> 00:15:00.700 align:start position:0% Coastal Commission documents that were attached<00:14:59.480> to<00:14:59.690> your<00:14:59.810> report<00:15:00.200> one<00:15:00.500> is<00:15:00.680> a 00:15:00.700 --> 00:15:00.710 align:start position:0% attached to your report one is a 00:15:00.710 --> 00:15:02.650 align:start position:0% attached to your report one is a guidance<00:15:01.220> document<00:15:01.370> from<00:15:02.150> the<00:15:02.300> Coastal 00:15:02.650 --> 00:15:02.660 align:start position:0% guidance document from the Coastal 00:15:02.660 --> 00:15:05.590 align:start position:0% guidance document from the Coastal Commission<00:15:03.160> about<00:15:04.160> regulating<00:15:05.030> short-term 00:15:05.590 --> 00:15:05.600 align:start position:0% Commission about regulating short-term 00:15:05.600 --> 00:15:08.140 align:start position:0% Commission about regulating short-term rentals<00:15:05.960> in<00:15:06.230> the<00:15:06.620> coastal<00:15:07.070> zone<00:15:07.100> and<00:15:07.640> being 00:15:08.140 --> 00:15:08.150 align:start position:0% rentals in the coastal zone and being 00:15:08.150 --> 00:15:11.440 align:start position:0% rentals in the coastal zone and being mindful<00:15:08.420> of<00:15:09.700> responsibilities<00:15:10.700> around 00:15:11.440 --> 00:15:11.450 align:start position:0% mindful of responsibilities around 00:15:11.450 --> 00:15:14.560 align:start position:0% mindful of responsibilities around coastal<00:15:12.050> access<00:15:12.560> and<00:15:12.950> not<00:15:13.940> being<00:15:14.150> overly 00:15:14.560 --> 00:15:14.570 align:start position:0% coastal access and not being overly 00:15:14.570 --> 00:15:16.660 align:start position:0% coastal access and not being overly restrictive<00:15:15.350> while<00:15:15.650> also<00:15:15.920> at<00:15:16.280> the<00:15:16.400> same<00:15:16.610> time 00:15:16.660 --> 00:15:16.670 align:start position:0% restrictive while also at the same time 00:15:16.670 --> 00:15:20.440 align:start position:0% restrictive while also at the same time paying<00:15:17.240> attention<00:15:17.810> to<00:15:19.210> context<00:15:20.210> and 00:15:20.440 --> 00:15:20.450 align:start position:0% paying attention to context and 00:15:20.450 --> 00:15:25.090 align:start position:0% paying attention to context and compatibility<00:15:21.290> and<00:15:22.090> they<00:15:23.090> also<00:15:23.330> in<00:15:24.050> May<00:15:24.770> it 00:15:25.090 --> 00:15:25.100 align:start position:0% compatibility and they also in May it 00:15:25.100 --> 00:15:26.680 align:start position:0% compatibility and they also in May it was<00:15:25.250> great<00:15:25.550> that<00:15:25.760> they<00:15:25.880> did<00:15:26.030> this<00:15:26.180> you're<00:15:26.450> I 00:15:26.680 --> 00:15:26.690 align:start position:0% was great that they did this you're I 00:15:26.690 --> 00:15:30.990 align:start position:0% was great that they did this you're I think<00:15:26.870> it's<00:15:26.990> attachment<00:15:27.650> 3<00:15:28.540> there's<00:15:29.540> that 00:15:30.990 --> 00:15:31.000 align:start position:0% think it's attachment 3 there's that 00:15:31.000 --> 00:15:33.930 align:start position:0% think it's attachment 3 there's that table<00:15:32.000> of<00:15:32.240> all<00:15:32.750> of<00:15:33.230> the<00:15:33.380> Coastal<00:15:33.830> Commission 00:15:33.930 --> 00:15:33.940 align:start position:0% table of all of the Coastal Commission 00:15:33.940 --> 00:15:36.580 align:start position:0% table of all of the Coastal Commission actions<00:15:34.940> they<00:15:35.330> that<00:15:35.600> was<00:15:35.780> not<00:15:35.930> available<00:15:36.170> when 00:15:36.580 --> 00:15:36.590 align:start position:0% actions they that was not available when 00:15:36.590 --> 00:15:39.700 align:start position:0% actions they that was not available when we<00:15:36.890> saw<00:15:37.130> you<00:15:37.190> in<00:15:37.780> 2018<00:15:38.780> we<00:15:38.960> actually<00:15:39.410> clutched 00:15:39.700 --> 00:15:39.710 align:start position:0% we saw you in 2018 we actually clutched 00:15:39.710 --> 00:15:42.040 align:start position:0% we saw you in 2018 we actually clutched together<00:15:40.130> our<00:15:40.340> own<00:15:40.550> version<00:15:40.940> of<00:15:41.030> that<00:15:41.210> that's 00:15:42.040 --> 00:15:42.050 align:start position:0% together our own version of that that's 00:15:42.050 --> 00:15:43.750 align:start position:0% together our own version of that that's a<00:15:42.200> great<00:15:42.470> table<00:15:42.950> it<00:15:43.160> shows<00:15:43.340> everything 00:15:43.750 --> 00:15:43.760 align:start position:0% a great table it shows everything 00:15:43.760 --> 00:15:45.550 align:start position:0% a great table it shows everything they've<00:15:44.060> ever<00:15:44.180> looked<00:15:44.420> at<00:15:44.720> with<00:15:45.170> short-term 00:15:45.550 --> 00:15:45.560 align:start position:0% they've ever looked at with short-term 00:15:45.560 --> 00:15:46.460 align:start position:0% they've ever looked at with short-term rentals 00:15:46.460 --> 00:15:46.470 align:start position:0% rentals 00:15:46.470 --> 00:15:50.300 align:start position:0% rentals up<00:15:46.920> and<00:15:47.190> down<00:15:47.310> the<00:15:47.459> coastal<00:15:47.819> zone<00:15:47.850> and<00:15:49.310> we'd 00:15:50.300 --> 00:15:50.310 align:start position:0% up and down the coastal zone and we'd 00:15:50.310 --> 00:15:52.400 align:start position:0% up and down the coastal zone and we'd encourage<00:15:50.579> you<00:15:50.790> to<00:15:50.940> really<00:15:51.149> focus<00:15:51.389> in<00:15:51.839> on<00:15:52.050> the 00:15:52.400 --> 00:15:52.410 align:start position:0% encourage you to really focus in on the 00:15:52.410 --> 00:15:55.249 align:start position:0% encourage you to really focus in on the most<00:15:52.740> recent<00:15:53.339> probably<00:15:53.670> five<00:15:53.940> years<00:15:54.329> or 00:15:55.249 --> 00:15:55.259 align:start position:0% most recent probably five years or 00:15:55.259 --> 00:15:57.290 align:start position:0% most recent probably five years or they've<00:15:55.410> really<00:15:55.680> been<00:15:56.069> kind<00:15:56.519> of<00:15:56.610> developing 00:15:57.290 --> 00:15:57.300 align:start position:0% they've really been kind of developing 00:15:57.300 --> 00:16:00.920 align:start position:0% they've really been kind of developing their<00:15:58.290> intent<00:15:59.069> with<00:15:59.370> these<00:15:59.579> and<00:16:00.000> recognizing 00:16:00.920 --> 00:16:00.930 align:start position:0% their intent with these and recognizing 00:16:00.930 --> 00:16:02.929 align:start position:0% their intent with these and recognizing that<00:16:01.050> they<00:16:01.560> operate<00:16:02.310> differently<00:16:02.759> in 00:16:02.929 --> 00:16:02.939 align:start position:0% that they operate differently in 00:16:02.939 --> 00:16:04.280 align:start position:0% that they operate differently in different<00:16:03.240> cities<00:16:03.449> and<00:16:03.569> different<00:16:03.990> cities 00:16:04.280 --> 00:16:04.290 align:start position:0% different cities and different cities 00:16:04.290 --> 00:16:07.490 align:start position:0% different cities and different cities may<00:16:05.100> already<00:16:05.339> have<00:16:05.879> a<00:16:06.269> lot<00:16:06.569> of<00:16:06.600> lodging<00:16:07.259> or 00:16:07.490 --> 00:16:07.500 align:start position:0% may already have a lot of lodging or 00:16:07.500 --> 00:16:09.710 align:start position:0% may already have a lot of lodging or camping<00:16:08.100> or<00:16:08.339> other<00:16:08.519> kinds<00:16:08.819> of<00:16:08.850> options<00:16:09.089> and 00:16:09.710 --> 00:16:09.720 align:start position:0% camping or other kinds of options and 00:16:09.720 --> 00:16:12.290 align:start position:0% camping or other kinds of options and some<00:16:09.959> don't<00:16:10.319> and<00:16:10.649> so<00:16:11.009> this<00:16:11.189> is<00:16:11.339> an<00:16:11.490> this<00:16:12.029> is<00:16:12.209> an 00:16:12.290 --> 00:16:12.300 align:start position:0% some don't and so this is an this is an 00:16:12.300 --> 00:16:15.769 align:start position:0% some don't and so this is an this is an opportunity<00:16:12.779> for<00:16:12.959> a<00:16:13.970> type<00:16:14.970> of<00:16:15.000> lodging<00:16:15.600> that 00:16:15.769 --> 00:16:15.779 align:start position:0% opportunity for a type of lodging that 00:16:15.779 --> 00:16:18.740 align:start position:0% opportunity for a type of lodging that people<00:16:16.410> find<00:16:16.560> highly<00:16:16.860> desirable<00:16:17.279> and<00:16:17.519> it<00:16:18.300> it 00:16:18.740 --> 00:16:18.750 align:start position:0% people find highly desirable and it it 00:16:18.750 --> 00:16:20.660 align:start position:0% people find highly desirable and it it works<00:16:18.990> really<00:16:19.259> well<00:16:19.470> for<00:16:19.529> for<00:16:20.339> some<00:16:20.490> of<00:16:20.579> the 00:16:20.660 --> 00:16:20.670 align:start position:0% works really well for for some of the 00:16:20.670 --> 00:16:24.949 align:start position:0% works really well for for some of the hosts<00:16:22.430> and<00:16:23.430> we're<00:16:24.149> sorry<00:16:24.360> that<00:16:24.629> it's<00:16:24.779> like 00:16:24.949 --> 00:16:24.959 align:start position:0% hosts and we're sorry that it's like 00:16:24.959 --> 00:16:28.460 align:start position:0% hosts and we're sorry that it's like four<00:16:25.560> point<00:16:26.100> font<00:16:26.550> I<00:16:26.959> would<00:16:27.959> recommend<00:16:28.410> that 00:16:28.460 --> 00:16:28.470 align:start position:0% four point font I would recommend that 00:16:28.470 --> 00:16:30.619 align:start position:0% four point font I would recommend that you<00:16:28.560> look<00:16:28.649> at<00:16:28.860> it<00:16:29.040> online<00:16:29.250> we<00:16:30.089> have<00:16:30.120> it<00:16:30.420> posted 00:16:30.619 --> 00:16:30.629 align:start position:0% you look at it online we have it posted 00:16:30.629 --> 00:16:33.110 align:start position:0% you look at it online we have it posted on<00:16:31.050> the<00:16:31.170> city<00:16:31.379> website<00:16:31.560> so<00:16:32.129> it's<00:16:32.310> it's<00:16:32.790> a<00:16:32.939> lot 00:16:33.110 --> 00:16:33.120 align:start position:0% on the city website so it's it's a lot 00:16:33.120 --> 00:16:36.319 align:start position:0% on the city website so it's it's a lot easier<00:16:33.269> to<00:16:33.569> see<00:16:34.079> there<00:16:34.579> so<00:16:35.579> in<00:16:35.850> picking<00:16:36.180> this 00:16:36.319 --> 00:16:36.329 align:start position:0% easier to see there so in picking this 00:16:36.329 --> 00:16:40.939 align:start position:0% easier to see there so in picking this back<00:16:37.199> up<00:16:38.089> we<00:16:39.110> recognize<00:16:40.110> that<00:16:40.139> it's<00:16:40.529> there's 00:16:40.939 --> 00:16:40.949 align:start position:0% back up we recognize that it's there's 00:16:40.949 --> 00:16:42.999 align:start position:0% back up we recognize that it's there's been<00:16:41.129> a<00:16:41.160> gap<00:16:41.730> in<00:16:41.970> time<00:16:42.000> since<00:16:42.660> we've 00:16:42.999 --> 00:16:43.009 align:start position:0% been a gap in time since we've 00:16:43.009 --> 00:16:45.439 align:start position:0% been a gap in time since we've specifically<00:16:44.009> talked<00:16:44.850> about<00:16:44.939> this<00:16:45.240> item 00:16:45.439 --> 00:16:45.449 align:start position:0% specifically talked about this item 00:16:45.449 --> 00:16:49.040 align:start position:0% specifically talked about this item although<00:16:46.040> you've<00:16:47.040> discussed<00:16:47.730> it<00:16:48.060> in<00:16:48.329> policy 00:16:49.040 --> 00:16:49.050 align:start position:0% although you've discussed it in policy 00:16:49.050 --> 00:16:51.230 align:start position:0% although you've discussed it in policy discussions<00:16:49.649> for<00:16:49.920> the<00:16:49.949> land<00:16:50.220> use<00:16:50.430> plan<00:16:50.459> update 00:16:51.230 --> 00:16:51.240 align:start position:0% discussions for the land use plan update 00:16:51.240 --> 00:16:53.360 align:start position:0% discussions for the land use plan update it<00:16:51.449> came<00:16:51.689> up<00:16:51.870> in<00:16:52.110> the<00:16:52.230> coastal<00:16:52.620> access<00:16:53.130> and 00:16:53.360 --> 00:16:53.370 align:start position:0% it came up in the coastal access and 00:16:53.370 --> 00:16:55.280 align:start position:0% it came up in the coastal access and recreation<00:16:53.970> chapter<00:16:54.389> it<00:16:54.569> came<00:16:54.750> up<00:16:54.930> in<00:16:55.079> the 00:16:55.280 --> 00:16:55.290 align:start position:0% recreation chapter it came up in the 00:16:55.290 --> 00:16:57.129 align:start position:0% recreation chapter it came up in the development<00:16:55.529> chapter<00:16:56.189> of<00:16:56.279> the<00:16:56.370> land<00:16:56.550> use<00:16:56.730> plan 00:16:57.129 --> 00:16:57.139 align:start position:0% development chapter of the land use plan 00:16:57.139 --> 00:17:01.129 align:start position:0% development chapter of the land use plan it's<00:16:58.139> also<00:16:58.380> come<00:16:58.769> up<00:16:58.920> head-on<00:16:59.519> in<00:16:59.959> the<00:17:00.959> work 00:17:01.129 --> 00:17:01.139 align:start position:0% it's also come up head-on in the work 00:17:01.139 --> 00:17:02.689 align:start position:0% it's also come up head-on in the work that<00:17:01.380> we've<00:17:01.500> been<00:17:01.620> doing<00:17:01.800> on<00:17:02.069> the<00:17:02.220> accessory 00:17:02.689 --> 00:17:02.699 align:start position:0% that we've been doing on the accessory 00:17:02.699 --> 00:17:04.549 align:start position:0% that we've been doing on the accessory dwelling<00:17:03.060> unit<00:17:03.329> ordinances<00:17:03.990> so<00:17:04.140> it's<00:17:04.319> always 00:17:04.549 --> 00:17:04.559 align:start position:0% dwelling unit ordinances so it's always 00:17:04.559 --> 00:17:07.189 align:start position:0% dwelling unit ordinances so it's always sort<00:17:04.799> of<00:17:04.919> been<00:17:04.980> on<00:17:05.429> a<00:17:05.490> side<00:17:06.390> burner<00:17:06.659> so<00:17:07.140> to 00:17:07.189 --> 00:17:07.199 align:start position:0% sort of been on a side burner so to 00:17:07.199 --> 00:17:10.520 align:start position:0% sort of been on a side burner so to speak<00:17:07.559> as<00:17:07.829> opposed<00:17:08.339> to<00:17:08.429> a<00:17:08.549> back<00:17:08.730> burner<00:17:08.939> but<00:17:09.870> to 00:17:10.520 --> 00:17:10.530 align:start position:0% speak as opposed to a back burner but to 00:17:10.530 --> 00:17:13.189 align:start position:0% speak as opposed to a back burner but to reintroduce<00:17:11.010> this<00:17:11.549> to<00:17:11.970> our<00:17:12.240> community<00:17:12.870> and<00:17:13.169> to 00:17:13.189 --> 00:17:13.199 align:start position:0% reintroduce this to our community and to 00:17:13.199 --> 00:17:16.640 align:start position:0% reintroduce this to our community and to come<00:17:13.890> to<00:17:14.100> you<00:17:14.309> with<00:17:14.610> some<00:17:14.880> new<00:17:15.059> information<00:17:15.650> we 00:17:16.640 --> 00:17:16.650 align:start position:0% come to you with some new information we 00:17:16.650 --> 00:17:21.100 align:start position:0% come to you with some new information we wanted<00:17:16.919> to<00:17:17.240> engage<00:17:18.240> in<00:17:18.630> some<00:17:18.780> outreach<00:17:19.169> and 00:17:21.100 --> 00:17:21.110 align:start position:0% wanted to engage in some outreach and 00:17:21.110 --> 00:17:24.860 align:start position:0% wanted to engage in some outreach and recognizing<00:17:22.110> that<00:17:22.140> this<00:17:22.799> this<00:17:23.640> item<00:17:24.120> has<00:17:24.390> a 00:17:24.860 --> 00:17:24.870 align:start position:0% recognizing that this this item has a 00:17:24.870 --> 00:17:28.580 align:start position:0% recognizing that this this item has a lot<00:17:25.620> of<00:17:25.799> interest<00:17:26.309> across<00:17:26.850> town<00:17:27.299> and<00:17:27.720> there's 00:17:28.580 --> 00:17:28.590 align:start position:0% lot of interest across town and there's 00:17:28.590 --> 00:17:31.190 align:start position:0% lot of interest across town and there's no<00:17:28.799> one<00:17:29.309> perfect<00:17:29.700> way<00:17:30.120> to<00:17:30.150> get<00:17:30.659> everybody's 00:17:31.190 --> 00:17:31.200 align:start position:0% no one perfect way to get everybody's 00:17:31.200 --> 00:17:34.669 align:start position:0% no one perfect way to get everybody's opinion<00:17:32.990> workshops<00:17:33.990> are<00:17:34.200> great<00:17:34.409> but 00:17:34.669 --> 00:17:34.679 align:start position:0% opinion workshops are great but 00:17:34.679 --> 00:17:36.440 align:start position:0% opinion workshops are great but sometimes<00:17:35.070> we<00:17:35.220> can<00:17:35.370> only<00:17:35.549> as<00:17:35.970> hard<00:17:36.210> as<00:17:36.330> we<00:17:36.419> try 00:17:36.440 --> 00:17:36.450 align:start position:0% sometimes we can only as hard as we try 00:17:36.450 --> 00:17:39.649 align:start position:0% sometimes we can only as hard as we try to<00:17:36.720> get<00:17:36.960> 40<00:17:37.320> people<00:17:37.590> 50<00:17:38.159> people<00:17:38.370> so<00:17:39.150> we<00:17:39.270> decided 00:17:39.649 --> 00:17:39.659 align:start position:0% to get 40 people 50 people so we decided 00:17:39.659 --> 00:17:42.460 align:start position:0% to get 40 people 50 people so we decided to<00:17:39.780> do<00:17:40.020> a<00:17:40.049> survey<00:17:40.590> we<00:17:40.919> understand<00:17:41.669> it<00:17:42.000> is<00:17:42.120> not 00:17:42.460 --> 00:17:42.470 align:start position:0% to do a survey we understand it is not 00:17:42.470 --> 00:17:44.990 align:start position:0% to do a survey we understand it is not statistically<00:17:43.470> significant<00:17:44.340> we<00:17:44.640> aren't 00:17:44.990 --> 00:17:45.000 align:start position:0% statistically significant we aren't 00:17:45.000 --> 00:17:47.510 align:start position:0% statistically significant we aren't going<00:17:45.330> to<00:17:45.450> be<00:17:45.570> able<00:17:45.809> to<00:17:46.080> do<00:17:46.260> that<00:17:46.470> but<00:17:47.250> we<00:17:47.370> were 00:17:47.510 --> 00:17:47.520 align:start position:0% going to be able to do that but we were 00:17:47.520 --> 00:17:50.750 align:start position:0% going to be able to do that but we were happy<00:17:47.760> to<00:17:48.120> get<00:17:48.270> 175<00:17:49.049> responses<00:17:49.950> this<00:17:50.549> is 00:17:50.750 --> 00:17:50.760 align:start position:0% happy to get 175 responses this is 00:17:50.760 --> 00:17:52.610 align:start position:0% happy to get 175 responses this is similar<00:17:51.000> to<00:17:51.179> some<00:17:51.510> work<00:17:51.659> that<00:17:51.840> the<00:17:52.350> city's 00:17:52.610 --> 00:17:52.620 align:start position:0% similar to some work that the city's 00:17:52.620 --> 00:17:55.080 align:start position:0% similar to some work that the city's been<00:17:52.799> doing<00:17:53.039> recently<00:17:53.490> with<00:17:53.640> other<00:17:53.820> surveys 00:17:55.080 --> 00:17:55.090 align:start position:0% been doing recently with other surveys 00:17:55.090 --> 00:17:57.750 align:start position:0% been doing recently with other surveys on<00:17:55.150> Carter<00:17:55.780> Park<00:17:56.110> and<00:17:56.530> and<00:17:56.920> other<00:17:57.220> projects 00:17:57.750 --> 00:17:57.760 align:start position:0% on Carter Park and and other projects 00:17:57.760 --> 00:18:00.030 align:start position:0% on Carter Park and and other projects that<00:17:57.820> we've<00:17:58.060> been<00:17:58.090> doing<00:17:58.450> and<00:17:58.870> it's<00:17:59.500> it's<00:17:59.920> just 00:18:00.030 --> 00:18:00.040 align:start position:0% that we've been doing and it's it's just 00:18:00.040 --> 00:18:02.580 align:start position:0% that we've been doing and it's it's just a<00:18:00.220> good<00:18:00.370> start<00:18:00.790> it<00:18:01.030> gives<00:18:01.210> you<00:18:01.330> a<00:18:01.390> sense<00:18:02.230> it's 00:18:02.580 --> 00:18:02.590 align:start position:0% a good start it gives you a sense it's 00:18:02.590 --> 00:18:05.070 align:start position:0% a good start it gives you a sense it's taking<00:18:03.040> the<00:18:03.160> temperature<00:18:03.370> and<00:18:04.030> in<00:18:04.570> no<00:18:04.810> means 00:18:05.070 --> 00:18:05.080 align:start position:0% taking the temperature and in no means 00:18:05.080 --> 00:18:07.170 align:start position:0% taking the temperature and in no means is<00:18:05.320> it<00:18:05.350> the<00:18:05.860> whole<00:18:06.010> picture<00:18:06.250> and<00:18:06.520> everybody's 00:18:07.170 --> 00:18:07.180 align:start position:0% is it the whole picture and everybody's 00:18:07.180 --> 00:18:13.020 align:start position:0% is it the whole picture and everybody's opinion<00:18:08.850> we<00:18:09.850> also<00:18:11.310> wanted<00:18:12.310> you<00:18:12.370> just<00:18:12.880> know 00:18:13.020 --> 00:18:13.030 align:start position:0% opinion we also wanted you just know 00:18:13.030 --> 00:18:16.230 align:start position:0% opinion we also wanted you just know that<00:18:13.300> it<00:18:13.450> was<00:18:13.990> up<00:18:14.260> for<00:18:14.800> quite<00:18:15.040> a<00:18:15.100> while<00:18:15.370> and<00:18:15.790> the 00:18:16.230 --> 00:18:16.240 align:start position:0% that it was up for quite a while and the 00:18:16.240 --> 00:18:21.920 align:start position:0% that it was up for quite a while and the questions<00:18:16.810> were<00:18:19.230> meant<00:18:20.230> to<00:18:20.530> really<00:18:20.890> flesh<00:18:21.370> out 00:18:21.920 --> 00:18:21.930 align:start position:0% questions were meant to really flesh out 00:18:21.930 --> 00:18:25.380 align:start position:0% questions were meant to really flesh out some<00:18:22.930> some<00:18:23.590> components<00:18:24.340> of<00:18:24.490> short-term 00:18:25.380 --> 00:18:25.390 align:start position:0% some some components of short-term 00:18:25.390 --> 00:18:27.810 align:start position:0% some some components of short-term rentals<00:18:25.750> that<00:18:26.130> I'm<00:18:27.130> going<00:18:27.310> to<00:18:27.370> turn<00:18:27.490> this<00:18:27.640> over 00:18:27.810 --> 00:18:27.820 align:start position:0% rentals that I'm going to turn this over 00:18:27.820 --> 00:18:29.610 align:start position:0% rentals that I'm going to turn this over to<00:18:27.910> Jo<00:18:28.210> butcher<00:18:28.600> in<00:18:28.690> just<00:18:28.870> a<00:18:28.960> minute<00:18:29.080> he's<00:18:29.410> our 00:18:29.610 --> 00:18:29.620 align:start position:0% to Jo butcher in just a minute he's our 00:18:29.620 --> 00:18:32.490 align:start position:0% to Jo butcher in just a minute he's our community<00:18:30.160> preservation<00:18:30.850> specialist<00:18:31.480> Jo<00:18:32.290> and 00:18:32.490 --> 00:18:32.500 align:start position:0% community preservation specialist Jo and 00:18:32.500 --> 00:18:36.300 align:start position:0% community preservation specialist Jo and I<00:18:32.560> hear<00:18:32.800> most<00:18:33.070> of<00:18:33.250> the<00:18:33.370> complaints<00:18:33.700> and<00:18:34.470> so<00:18:35.470> we 00:18:36.300 --> 00:18:36.310 align:start position:0% I hear most of the complaints and so we 00:18:36.310 --> 00:18:38.310 align:start position:0% I hear most of the complaints and so we wanted<00:18:36.730> to<00:18:36.910> make<00:18:37.120> sure<00:18:37.150> that<00:18:37.540> we<00:18:37.690> understand 00:18:38.310 --> 00:18:38.320 align:start position:0% wanted to make sure that we understand 00:18:38.320 --> 00:18:40.080 align:start position:0% wanted to make sure that we understand the<00:18:38.500> complaint<00:18:38.890> so<00:18:39.190> you<00:18:39.280> can<00:18:39.400> figure<00:18:39.640> out<00:18:39.760> how 00:18:40.080 --> 00:18:40.090 align:start position:0% the complaint so you can figure out how 00:18:40.090 --> 00:18:44.760 align:start position:0% the complaint so you can figure out how to<00:18:40.120> facilitate<00:18:40.660> the<00:18:41.440> use<00:18:41.470> and<00:18:43.290> that's<00:18:44.290> that's 00:18:44.760 --> 00:18:44.770 align:start position:0% to facilitate the use and that's that's 00:18:44.770 --> 00:18:46.470 align:start position:0% to facilitate the use and that's that's where<00:18:45.010> the<00:18:45.130> questions<00:18:45.580> were<00:18:45.760> coming<00:18:46.120> from<00:18:46.300> and 00:18:46.470 --> 00:18:46.480 align:start position:0% where the questions were coming from and 00:18:46.480 --> 00:18:48.180 align:start position:0% where the questions were coming from and we<00:18:46.600> can<00:18:46.810> we<00:18:47.140> can<00:18:47.320> talk<00:18:47.530> about<00:18:47.710> them<00:18:48.010> a<00:18:48.040> little 00:18:48.180 --> 00:18:48.190 align:start position:0% we can we can talk about them a little 00:18:48.190 --> 00:18:50.040 align:start position:0% we can we can talk about them a little bit<00:18:48.430> more<00:18:48.460> in<00:18:48.790> the<00:18:48.940> intent<00:18:49.330> behind<00:18:49.510> them<00:18:49.900> if 00:18:50.040 --> 00:18:50.050 align:start position:0% bit more in the intent behind them if 00:18:50.050 --> 00:18:52.890 align:start position:0% bit more in the intent behind them if any<00:18:50.260> of<00:18:50.410> them<00:18:51.060> strike<00:18:52.060> a<00:18:52.090> chord<00:18:52.390> with<00:18:52.420> you<00:18:52.690> or 00:18:52.890 --> 00:18:52.900 align:start position:0% any of them strike a chord with you or 00:18:52.900 --> 00:18:54.560 align:start position:0% any of them strike a chord with you or you<00:18:53.020> had<00:18:53.170> questions<00:18:53.410> about<00:18:53.860> the<00:18:54.040> questions 00:18:54.560 --> 00:18:54.570 align:start position:0% you had questions about the questions 00:18:54.570 --> 00:18:58.950 align:start position:0% you had questions about the questions and<00:18:55.570> with<00:18:56.170> that<00:18:56.590> I<00:18:57.010> like<00:18:57.430> to<00:18:57.580> go<00:18:57.730> ahead<00:18:57.880> and<00:18:58.420> let 00:18:58.950 --> 00:18:58.960 align:start position:0% and with that I like to go ahead and let 00:18:58.960 --> 00:19:02.700 align:start position:0% and with that I like to go ahead and let Jo<00:18:59.610> present<00:19:00.610> just<00:19:01.480> a<00:19:01.570> high<00:19:01.720> overview<00:19:02.290> of<00:19:02.500> the 00:19:02.700 --> 00:19:02.710 align:start position:0% Jo present just a high overview of the 00:19:02.710 --> 00:19:09.000 align:start position:0% Jo present just a high overview of the results<00:19:03.100> of<00:19:03.190> the<00:19:03.310> survey<00:19:05.490> thank<00:19:06.490> you<00:19:07.500> as<00:19:08.500> Jill 00:19:09.000 --> 00:19:09.010 align:start position:0% results of the survey thank you as Jill 00:19:09.010 --> 00:19:11.730 align:start position:0% results of the survey thank you as Jill said<00:19:09.120> we<00:19:10.120> did<00:19:10.330> administer<00:19:11.080> a<00:19:11.110> survey<00:19:11.290> that<00:19:11.650> was 00:19:11.730 --> 00:19:11.740 align:start position:0% said we did administer a survey that was 00:19:11.740 --> 00:19:13.740 align:start position:0% said we did administer a survey that was out<00:19:11.890> there<00:19:12.040> for<00:19:12.160> about<00:19:12.280> a<00:19:12.370> month<00:19:12.640> and<00:19:13.420> time 00:19:13.740 --> 00:19:13.750 align:start position:0% out there for about a month and time 00:19:13.750 --> 00:19:16.500 align:start position:0% out there for about a month and time trying<00:19:14.080> to<00:19:14.140> get<00:19:14.230> as<00:19:14.350> broad<00:19:14.800> of<00:19:15.010> a<00:19:15.070> net<00:19:15.310> and<00:19:15.610> wide 00:19:16.500 --> 00:19:16.510 align:start position:0% trying to get as broad of a net and wide 00:19:16.510 --> 00:19:19.470 align:start position:0% trying to get as broad of a net and wide variety<00:19:17.050> of<00:19:17.080> responses<00:19:17.860> as<00:19:17.980> we<00:19:18.100> could<00:19:18.340> I'm<00:19:19.270> not 00:19:19.470 --> 00:19:19.480 align:start position:0% variety of responses as we could I'm not 00:19:19.480 --> 00:19:21.240 align:start position:0% variety of responses as we could I'm not going<00:19:19.630> to<00:19:19.690> go<00:19:19.780> over<00:19:20.050> all<00:19:20.200> 11<00:19:20.650> questions<00:19:21.100> I 00:19:21.240 --> 00:19:21.250 align:start position:0% going to go over all 11 questions I 00:19:21.250 --> 00:19:23.250 align:start position:0% going to go over all 11 questions I think<00:19:21.310> that's<00:19:21.670> low<00:19:21.850> unnecessary<00:19:22.570> we<00:19:22.780> do<00:19:22.960> have 00:19:23.250 --> 00:19:23.260 align:start position:0% think that's low unnecessary we do have 00:19:23.260 --> 00:19:25.680 align:start position:0% think that's low unnecessary we do have this<00:19:23.590> available<00:19:23.650> on<00:19:24.340> the<00:19:24.460> website<00:19:24.940> as<00:19:25.240> well<00:19:25.300> as 00:19:25.680 --> 00:19:25.690 align:start position:0% this available on the website as well as 00:19:25.690 --> 00:19:28.380 align:start position:0% this available on the website as well as in<00:19:25.810> our<00:19:25.900> planning<00:19:26.770> commission<00:19:27.100> packet<00:19:27.520> so<00:19:27.730> all 00:19:28.380 --> 00:19:28.390 align:start position:0% in our planning commission packet so all 00:19:28.390 --> 00:19:30.390 align:start position:0% in our planning commission packet so all the<00:19:28.630> survey<00:19:28.960> questions<00:19:29.440> and<00:19:29.620> results<00:19:30.040> can<00:19:30.190> be 00:19:30.390 --> 00:19:30.400 align:start position:0% the survey questions and results can be 00:19:30.400 --> 00:19:33.120 align:start position:0% the survey questions and results can be viewed<00:19:31.030> at<00:19:31.390> any<00:19:31.480> point<00:19:31.840> in<00:19:31.900> time<00:19:31.930> today<00:19:32.740> after 00:19:33.120 --> 00:19:33.130 align:start position:0% viewed at any point in time today after 00:19:33.130 --> 00:19:36.630 align:start position:0% viewed at any point in time today after the<00:19:33.220> meeting<00:19:34.830> going<00:19:35.830> forward<00:19:36.310> I<00:19:36.370> wanted<00:19:36.580> to 00:19:36.630 --> 00:19:36.640 align:start position:0% the meeting going forward I wanted to 00:19:36.640 --> 00:19:38.010 align:start position:0% the meeting going forward I wanted to look<00:19:36.790> at<00:19:36.880> our<00:19:36.970> first<00:19:37.180> question<00:19:37.300> it's<00:19:37.840> just 00:19:38.010 --> 00:19:38.020 align:start position:0% look at our first question it's just 00:19:38.020 --> 00:19:40.470 align:start position:0% look at our first question it's just kind<00:19:38.230> of<00:19:38.290> a<00:19:38.640> four<00:19:39.640> hour<00:19:39.760> summary<00:19:40.150> of<00:19:40.270> results 00:19:40.470 --> 00:19:40.480 align:start position:0% kind of a four hour summary of results 00:19:40.480 --> 00:19:42.750 align:start position:0% kind of a four hour summary of results is<00:19:40.990> just<00:19:41.620> talking<00:19:41.800> about<00:19:42.100> who's<00:19:42.400> who 00:19:42.750 --> 00:19:42.760 align:start position:0% is just talking about who's who 00:19:42.760 --> 00:19:44.940 align:start position:0% is just talking about who's who participated<00:19:43.690> in<00:19:43.900> this<00:19:44.140> and<00:19:44.410> we<00:19:44.620> found<00:19:44.740> it 00:19:44.940 --> 00:19:44.950 align:start position:0% participated in this and we found it 00:19:44.950 --> 00:19:46.620 align:start position:0% participated in this and we found it pretty<00:19:45.130> interesting<00:19:45.280> that<00:19:45.850> you<00:19:46.060> know<00:19:46.180> 90% 00:19:46.620 --> 00:19:46.630 align:start position:0% pretty interesting that you know 90% 00:19:46.630 --> 00:19:48.780 align:start position:0% pretty interesting that you know 90% approximately<00:19:47.620> 90%<00:19:47.980> of<00:19:48.310> the<00:19:48.400> people<00:19:48.670> that 00:19:48.780 --> 00:19:48.790 align:start position:0% approximately 90% of the people that 00:19:48.790 --> 00:19:51.150 align:start position:0% approximately 90% of the people that participated<00:19:49.360> are<00:19:49.690> Half<00:19:50.470> Moon<00:19:50.680> Bay<00:19:50.890> residents 00:19:51.150 --> 00:19:51.160 align:start position:0% participated are Half Moon Bay residents 00:19:51.160 --> 00:19:53.870 align:start position:0% participated are Half Moon Bay residents with<00:19:51.700> the<00:19:51.880> other<00:19:52.060> larger<00:19:52.690> number<00:19:53.080> being<00:19:53.320> that 00:19:53.870 --> 00:19:53.880 align:start position:0% with the other larger number being that 00:19:53.880 --> 00:19:58.260 align:start position:0% with the other larger number being that over<00:19:54.880> 70%<00:19:55.330> are<00:19:56.370> homeowners<00:19:57.370> here<00:19:57.880> in<00:19:58.030> town<00:19:58.240> so 00:19:58.260 --> 00:19:58.270 align:start position:0% over 70% are homeowners here in town so 00:19:58.270 --> 00:20:00.950 align:start position:0% over 70% are homeowners here in town so that's<00:19:58.750> pretty<00:19:59.110> significant<00:19:59.740> kind<00:20:00.460> of<00:20:00.550> shows 00:20:00.950 --> 00:20:00.960 align:start position:0% that's pretty significant kind of shows 00:20:00.960 --> 00:20:03.960 align:start position:0% that's pretty significant kind of shows you<00:20:01.960> know<00:20:02.140> that<00:20:02.430> for<00:20:03.430> those<00:20:03.640> that<00:20:03.820> have 00:20:03.960 --> 00:20:03.970 align:start position:0% you know that for those that have 00:20:03.970 --> 00:20:05.610 align:start position:0% you know that for those that have participated<00:20:04.300> they're<00:20:04.870> paying<00:20:05.110> attention 00:20:05.610 --> 00:20:05.620 align:start position:0% participated they're paying attention 00:20:05.620 --> 00:20:06.470 align:start position:0% participated they're paying attention and 00:20:06.470 --> 00:20:06.480 align:start position:0% and 00:20:06.480 --> 00:20:08.659 align:start position:0% and these<00:20:07.109> are<00:20:07.259> likely<00:20:07.859> people<00:20:08.009> that<00:20:08.399> are 00:20:08.659 --> 00:20:08.669 align:start position:0% these are likely people that are 00:20:08.669 --> 00:20:11.119 align:start position:0% these are likely people that are operator<00:20:09.389> or<00:20:09.749> interested<00:20:10.409> in<00:20:10.470> operating<00:20:10.830> one 00:20:11.119 --> 00:20:11.129 align:start position:0% operator or interested in operating one 00:20:11.129 --> 00:20:14.090 align:start position:0% operator or interested in operating one so<00:20:11.580> that's<00:20:12.539> a<00:20:12.690> pretty<00:20:13.259> substantial<00:20:13.470> number 00:20:14.090 --> 00:20:14.100 align:start position:0% so that's a pretty substantial number 00:20:14.100 --> 00:20:17.960 align:start position:0% so that's a pretty substantial number right<00:20:14.249> there<00:20:14.279> for<00:20:14.639> the<00:20:14.730> turnout<00:20:16.700> what's<00:20:17.700> not 00:20:17.960 --> 00:20:17.970 align:start position:0% right there for the turnout what's not 00:20:17.970 --> 00:20:20.799 align:start position:0% right there for the turnout what's not pictured<00:20:18.480> here<00:20:18.840> but<00:20:19.320> again<00:20:19.409> is<00:20:19.710> available 00:20:20.799 --> 00:20:20.809 align:start position:0% pictured here but again is available 00:20:20.809 --> 00:20:23.239 align:start position:0% pictured here but again is available what's<00:20:21.809> not<00:20:22.139> pictured<00:20:22.649> here<00:20:22.830> but<00:20:22.950> is<00:20:23.039> again 00:20:23.239 --> 00:20:23.249 align:start position:0% what's not pictured here but is again 00:20:23.249 --> 00:20:25.669 align:start position:0% what's not pictured here but is again available<00:20:23.759> on<00:20:23.850> our<00:20:23.879> website<00:20:24.149> is<00:20:24.539> uh<00:20:24.929> we<00:20:25.409> did 00:20:25.669 --> 00:20:25.679 align:start position:0% available on our website is uh we did 00:20:25.679 --> 00:20:28.099 align:start position:0% available on our website is uh we did kind<00:20:26.489> of<00:20:26.669> we<00:20:27.330> had<00:20:27.450> an<00:20:27.570> option<00:20:27.779> here<00:20:28.080> for 00:20:28.099 --> 00:20:28.109 align:start position:0% kind of we had an option here for 00:20:28.109 --> 00:20:29.629 align:start position:0% kind of we had an option here for question<00:20:28.559> two<00:20:28.739> to<00:20:28.919> go<00:20:29.039> over<00:20:29.340> all<00:20:29.489> the 00:20:29.629 --> 00:20:29.639 align:start position:0% question two to go over all the 00:20:29.639 --> 00:20:31.099 align:start position:0% question two to go over all the different<00:20:29.789> neighborhoods<00:20:30.119> in<00:20:30.629> which<00:20:30.929> you 00:20:31.099 --> 00:20:31.109 align:start position:0% different neighborhoods in which you 00:20:31.109 --> 00:20:32.659 align:start position:0% different neighborhoods in which you live<00:20:31.320> so<00:20:31.499> we<00:20:31.590> can<00:20:31.710> get<00:20:31.799> an<00:20:31.919> idea<00:20:32.249> of<00:20:32.399> who's 00:20:32.659 --> 00:20:32.669 align:start position:0% live so we can get an idea of who's 00:20:32.669 --> 00:20:35.269 align:start position:0% live so we can get an idea of who's taking<00:20:33.059> the<00:20:33.179> survey<00:20:33.539> and<00:20:33.889> we<00:20:34.889> got<00:20:35.039> a<00:20:35.070> little 00:20:35.269 --> 00:20:35.279 align:start position:0% taking the survey and we got a little 00:20:35.279 --> 00:20:37.159 align:start position:0% taking the survey and we got a little bit<00:20:35.489> of<00:20:35.609> participation<00:20:36.330> from<00:20:36.539> every<00:20:36.869> single 00:20:37.159 --> 00:20:37.169 align:start position:0% bit of participation from every single 00:20:37.169 --> 00:20:39.109 align:start position:0% bit of participation from every single one<00:20:37.230> of<00:20:37.289> the<00:20:37.440> neighborhoods<00:20:37.950> but<00:20:38.309> where<00:20:38.999> we 00:20:39.109 --> 00:20:39.119 align:start position:0% one of the neighborhoods but where we 00:20:39.119 --> 00:20:41.450 align:start position:0% one of the neighborhoods but where we got<00:20:39.269> the<00:20:39.480> most<00:20:39.659> turnout<00:20:40.200> wore<00:20:40.460> predominantly 00:20:41.450 --> 00:20:41.460 align:start position:0% got the most turnout wore predominantly 00:20:41.460 --> 00:20:44.060 align:start position:0% got the most turnout wore predominantly all<00:20:41.609> of<00:20:41.759> our<00:20:41.879> Western<00:20:42.359> neighborhoods<00:20:43.259> so<00:20:43.559> as 00:20:44.060 --> 00:20:44.070 align:start position:0% all of our Western neighborhoods so as 00:20:44.070 --> 00:20:49.700 align:start position:0% all of our Western neighborhoods so as you<00:20:44.249> can<00:20:44.399> see<00:20:44.609> a<00:20:44.820> pattern<00:20:45.059> there<00:20:47.899> moving<00:20:48.899> on<00:20:49.169> I 00:20:49.700 --> 00:20:49.710 align:start position:0% you can see a pattern there moving on I 00:20:49.710 --> 00:20:51.739 align:start position:0% you can see a pattern there moving on I just<00:20:50.100> kind<00:20:50.279> of<00:20:50.340> wanted<00:20:50.609> to<00:20:50.759> go<00:20:50.909> over<00:20:51.389> really 00:20:51.739 --> 00:20:51.749 align:start position:0% just kind of wanted to go over really 00:20:51.749 --> 00:20:55.729 align:start position:0% just kind of wanted to go over really quickly<00:20:53.600> just<00:20:54.600> a<00:20:54.690> quick<00:20:54.869> definition<00:20:55.529> of 00:20:55.729 --> 00:20:55.739 align:start position:0% quickly just a quick definition of 00:20:55.739 --> 00:20:58.129 align:start position:0% quickly just a quick definition of hosted<00:20:56.489> versus<00:20:56.909> non<00:20:57.090> hosted<00:20:57.629> and<00:20:57.809> we'll<00:20:57.989> get 00:20:58.129 --> 00:20:58.139 align:start position:0% hosted versus non hosted and we'll get 00:20:58.139 --> 00:20:59.599 align:start position:0% hosted versus non hosted and we'll get into<00:20:58.379> this<00:20:58.499> a<00:20:58.559> little<00:20:58.679> bit<00:20:58.889> later<00:20:59.039> whenever<00:20:59.519> I 00:20:59.599 --> 00:20:59.609 align:start position:0% into this a little bit later whenever I 00:20:59.609 --> 00:21:01.279 align:start position:0% into this a little bit later whenever I turn<00:20:59.850> it<00:20:59.970> over<00:21:00.029> to<00:21:00.179> Scott<00:21:00.330> a<00:21:00.720> little<00:21:00.899> bit<00:21:01.109> more 00:21:01.279 --> 00:21:01.289 align:start position:0% turn it over to Scott a little bit more 00:21:01.289 --> 00:21:05.779 align:start position:0% turn it over to Scott a little bit more in<00:21:01.499> detail<00:21:02.429> but<00:21:03.049> hosted<00:21:04.049> is<00:21:04.409> a<00:21:04.710> renter<00:21:05.609> will 00:21:05.779 --> 00:21:05.789 align:start position:0% in detail but hosted is a renter will 00:21:05.789 --> 00:21:07.789 align:start position:0% in detail but hosted is a renter will rent<00:21:06.119> out<00:21:06.269> a<00:21:06.330> room<00:21:06.450> or<00:21:06.869> multiple<00:21:07.289> rooms<00:21:07.529> of<00:21:07.739> a 00:21:07.789 --> 00:21:07.799 align:start position:0% rent out a room or multiple rooms of a 00:21:07.799 --> 00:21:10.279 align:start position:0% rent out a room or multiple rooms of a house<00:21:07.980> but<00:21:08.399> still<00:21:08.609> also<00:21:09.210> occupy<00:21:09.659> the<00:21:09.720> rest<00:21:10.139> of 00:21:10.279 --> 00:21:10.289 align:start position:0% house but still also occupy the rest of 00:21:10.289 --> 00:21:13.519 align:start position:0% house but still also occupy the rest of the<00:21:10.379> residency<00:21:11.179> on<00:21:12.179> hosted<00:21:12.779> typically<00:21:13.350> would 00:21:13.519 --> 00:21:13.529 align:start position:0% the residency on hosted typically would 00:21:13.529 --> 00:21:16.249 align:start position:0% the residency on hosted typically would be<00:21:13.710> whole<00:21:14.340> house<00:21:14.669> so<00:21:15.090> somebody<00:21:15.600> would<00:21:15.809> rent<00:21:16.049> an 00:21:16.249 --> 00:21:16.259 align:start position:0% be whole house so somebody would rent an 00:21:16.259 --> 00:21:17.960 align:start position:0% be whole house so somebody would rent an entire<00:21:16.619> home<00:21:16.950> where<00:21:17.340> there<00:21:17.460> isn't<00:21:17.639> somebody 00:21:17.960 --> 00:21:17.970 align:start position:0% entire home where there isn't somebody 00:21:17.970 --> 00:21:21.619 align:start position:0% entire home where there isn't somebody on<00:21:18.419> site<00:21:18.929> for<00:21:19.649> management<00:21:19.950> purposes<00:21:20.629> that 00:21:21.619 --> 00:21:21.629 align:start position:0% on site for management purposes that 00:21:21.629 --> 00:21:23.779 align:start position:0% on site for management purposes that being<00:21:21.840> said<00:21:22.169> with<00:21:22.950> what<00:21:23.190> we<00:21:23.309> found<00:21:23.460> in<00:21:23.669> these 00:21:23.779 --> 00:21:23.789 align:start position:0% being said with what we found in these 00:21:23.789 --> 00:21:25.879 align:start position:0% being said with what we found in these results<00:21:23.999> for<00:21:24.570> if<00:21:24.749> short-term<00:21:25.470> rentals<00:21:25.769> that 00:21:25.879 --> 00:21:25.889 align:start position:0% results for if short-term rentals that 00:21:25.889 --> 00:21:28.190 align:start position:0% results for if short-term rentals that were<00:21:25.950> allowed<00:21:26.600> where<00:21:27.600> is<00:21:27.749> it<00:21:27.929> the<00:21:28.019> most 00:21:28.190 --> 00:21:28.200 align:start position:0% were allowed where is it the most 00:21:28.200 --> 00:21:29.840 align:start position:0% were allowed where is it the most appropriate<00:21:28.529> use<00:21:28.919> and<00:21:28.950> it<00:21:29.309> was<00:21:29.399> interesting 00:21:29.840 --> 00:21:29.850 align:start position:0% appropriate use and it was interesting 00:21:29.850 --> 00:21:31.580 align:start position:0% appropriate use and it was interesting to<00:21:29.879> find<00:21:30.149> it<00:21:30.299> for<00:21:30.419> mixed<00:21:30.809> use<00:21:30.840> and<00:21:31.230> for 00:21:31.580 --> 00:21:31.590 align:start position:0% to find it for mixed use and for 00:21:31.590 --> 00:21:33.619 align:start position:0% to find it for mixed use and for downtown<00:21:32.159> we<00:21:32.669> seem<00:21:32.850> to<00:21:32.879> get<00:21:33.119> a<00:21:33.149> relatively 00:21:33.619 --> 00:21:33.629 align:start position:0% downtown we seem to get a relatively 00:21:33.629 --> 00:21:35.869 align:start position:0% downtown we seem to get a relatively positive<00:21:34.230> response<00:21:34.590> of<00:21:34.889> approximately 00:21:35.869 --> 00:21:35.879 align:start position:0% positive response of approximately 00:21:35.879 --> 00:21:39.529 align:start position:0% positive response of approximately almost<00:21:36.179> 65%<00:21:36.720> of<00:21:37.379> the<00:21:37.499> persons<00:21:37.999> are<00:21:38.999> supported 00:21:39.529 --> 00:21:39.539 align:start position:0% almost 65% of the persons are supported 00:21:39.539 --> 00:21:43.310 align:start position:0% almost 65% of the persons are supported to<00:21:39.779> hosted<00:21:40.409> as<00:21:40.679> well<00:21:41.009> as<00:21:41.159> over<00:21:41.820> 50%<00:21:42.179> of<00:21:42.629> persons 00:21:43.310 --> 00:21:43.320 align:start position:0% to hosted as well as over 50% of persons 00:21:43.320 --> 00:21:45.259 align:start position:0% to hosted as well as over 50% of persons are<00:21:43.529> supportive<00:21:44.220> of<00:21:44.369> unholstered<00:21:45.090> in<00:21:45.179> the 00:21:45.259 --> 00:21:45.269 align:start position:0% are supportive of unholstered in the 00:21:45.269 --> 00:21:48.470 align:start position:0% are supportive of unholstered in the downtown<00:21:45.690> mixed-use<00:21:46.200> area<00:21:46.769> so<00:21:47.359> that<00:21:48.359> was 00:21:48.470 --> 00:21:48.480 align:start position:0% downtown mixed-use area so that was 00:21:48.480 --> 00:21:50.629 align:start position:0% downtown mixed-use area so that was pretty<00:21:48.989> substantial<00:21:49.200> finding<00:21:49.950> that<00:21:50.399> being 00:21:50.629 --> 00:21:50.639 align:start position:0% pretty substantial finding that being 00:21:50.639 --> 00:21:53.720 align:start position:0% pretty substantial finding that being said<00:21:50.879> we<00:21:51.090> also<00:21:51.239> have<00:21:51.600> some<00:21:52.730> similar 00:21:53.720 --> 00:21:53.730 align:start position:0% said we also have some similar 00:21:53.730 --> 00:21:57.169 align:start position:0% said we also have some similar consistencies<00:21:54.509> here<00:21:54.809> for<00:21:55.019> for<00:21:55.919> mixed-use<00:21:56.460> and 00:21:57.169 --> 00:21:57.179 align:start position:0% consistencies here for for mixed-use and 00:21:57.179 --> 00:22:00.200 align:start position:0% consistencies here for for mixed-use and I'm<00:21:57.359> sorry<00:21:57.509> for<00:21:58.159> multifamily<00:21:59.210> duplexes 00:22:00.200 --> 00:22:00.210 align:start position:0% I'm sorry for multifamily duplexes 00:22:00.210 --> 00:22:04.330 align:start position:0% I'm sorry for multifamily duplexes condos<00:22:00.710> and<00:22:01.710> triplexes<00:22:01.980> you<00:22:02.850> can<00:22:02.940> see<00:22:03.109> 50 00:22:04.330 --> 00:22:04.340 align:start position:0% condos and triplexes you can see 50 00:22:04.340 --> 00:22:07.070 align:start position:0% condos and triplexes you can see 50 close<00:22:05.340> to<00:22:05.489> 60%<00:22:05.879> of<00:22:06.419> the<00:22:06.509> persons<00:22:06.929> are 00:22:07.070 --> 00:22:07.080 align:start position:0% close to 60% of the persons are 00:22:07.080 --> 00:22:11.479 align:start position:0% close to 60% of the persons are supportive<00:22:07.590> for<00:22:07.769> hosted<00:22:08.489> whereas<00:22:10.190> 35%<00:22:11.190> closer 00:22:11.479 --> 00:22:11.489 align:start position:0% supportive for hosted whereas 35% closer 00:22:11.489 --> 00:22:14.509 align:start position:0% supportive for hosted whereas 35% closer to<00:22:11.609> the<00:22:11.730> 40<00:22:12.029> percent<00:22:12.149> range<00:22:12.570> are<00:22:13.340> have<00:22:14.340> their 00:22:14.509 --> 00:22:14.519 align:start position:0% to the 40 percent range are have their 00:22:14.519 --> 00:22:16.580 align:start position:0% to the 40 percent range are have their reservations<00:22:15.210> about<00:22:15.359> on<00:22:15.659> hosted<00:22:16.169> but<00:22:16.379> are 00:22:16.580 --> 00:22:16.590 align:start position:0% reservations about on hosted but are 00:22:16.590 --> 00:22:17.970 align:start position:0% reservations about on hosted but are still<00:22:16.799> supportive 00:22:17.970 --> 00:22:17.980 align:start position:0% still supportive 00:22:17.980 --> 00:22:20.430 align:start position:0% still supportive as<00:22:18.130> well<00:22:18.340> as<00:22:18.490> in<00:22:18.970> a<00:22:19.090> single-family<00:22:19.480> home<00:22:19.840> we've 00:22:20.430 --> 00:22:20.440 align:start position:0% as well as in a single-family home we've 00:22:20.440 --> 00:22:22.500 align:start position:0% as well as in a single-family home we've got<00:22:20.559> over<00:22:20.710> 60%<00:22:21.160> that<00:22:21.669> are<00:22:21.790> supportive<00:22:22.270> for 00:22:22.500 --> 00:22:22.510 align:start position:0% got over 60% that are supportive for 00:22:22.510 --> 00:22:26.880 align:start position:0% got over 60% that are supportive for hosted<00:22:23.320> and<00:22:23.820> 39<00:22:24.820> close<00:22:25.120> to<00:22:25.240> 40<00:22:25.570> again<00:22:25.870> for<00:22:26.530> unn 00:22:26.880 --> 00:22:26.890 align:start position:0% hosted and 39 close to 40 again for unn 00:22:26.890 --> 00:22:32.840 align:start position:0% hosted and 39 close to 40 again for unn hosted<00:22:29.910> now<00:22:30.910> this<00:22:31.270> one<00:22:31.450> I<00:22:31.630> find<00:22:32.410> to<00:22:32.470> be<00:22:32.530> pretty 00:22:32.840 --> 00:22:32.850 align:start position:0% hosted now this one I find to be pretty 00:22:32.850 --> 00:22:36.120 align:start position:0% hosted now this one I find to be pretty significant<00:22:33.850> if<00:22:34.240> you're<00:22:34.870> not<00:22:35.200> supportive<00:22:35.890> and 00:22:36.120 --> 00:22:36.130 align:start position:0% significant if you're not supportive and 00:22:36.130 --> 00:22:38.330 align:start position:0% significant if you're not supportive and allowing<00:22:36.610> short-term<00:22:37.059> rentals<00:22:37.390> in<00:22:37.510> half<00:22:37.660> of<00:22:37.780> a 00:22:38.330 --> 00:22:38.340 align:start position:0% allowing short-term rentals in half of a 00:22:38.340 --> 00:22:40.500 align:start position:0% allowing short-term rentals in half of a would<00:22:39.340> you<00:22:39.429> be<00:22:39.610> more<00:22:39.760> supportive<00:22:40.240> if<00:22:40.360> they're 00:22:40.500 --> 00:22:40.510 align:start position:0% would you be more supportive if they're 00:22:40.510 --> 00:22:45.240 align:start position:0% would you be more supportive if they're hosted<00:22:41.010> now<00:22:42.010> we've<00:22:42.700> got<00:22:42.990> 30%<00:22:43.990> that<00:22:44.250> absolutely 00:22:45.240 --> 00:22:45.250 align:start position:0% hosted now we've got 30% that absolutely 00:22:45.250 --> 00:22:48.270 align:start position:0% hosted now we've got 30% that absolutely they're<00:22:45.520> supportive<00:22:46.030> and<00:22:46.210> we've<00:22:46.750> got<00:22:46.929> the<00:22:47.320> 27% 00:22:48.270 --> 00:22:48.280 align:start position:0% they're supportive and we've got the 27% 00:22:48.280 --> 00:22:51.510 align:start position:0% they're supportive and we've got the 27% that<00:22:48.610> are<00:22:48.880> just<00:22:49.590> against<00:22:50.590> they're<00:22:51.130> just<00:22:51.340> not 00:22:51.510 --> 00:22:51.520 align:start position:0% that are just against they're just not 00:22:51.520 --> 00:22:53.930 align:start position:0% that are just against they're just not supportive<00:22:52.000> for<00:22:52.390> it<00:22:52.480> but<00:22:53.350> then<00:22:53.470> we<00:22:53.590> have<00:22:53.770> the 00:22:53.930 --> 00:22:53.940 align:start position:0% supportive for it but then we have the 00:22:53.940 --> 00:22:58.169 align:start position:0% supportive for it but then we have the 40%<00:22:54.940> that<00:22:55.510> don't<00:22:56.470> really<00:22:56.790> they're<00:22:57.790> not<00:22:57.850> really 00:22:58.169 --> 00:22:58.179 align:start position:0% 40% that don't really they're not really 00:22:58.179 --> 00:22:59.760 align:start position:0% 40% that don't really they're not really picking<00:22:58.510> and<00:22:58.780> choosing<00:22:58.809> between<00:22:59.169> hosted<00:22:59.679> or 00:22:59.760 --> 00:22:59.770 align:start position:0% picking and choosing between hosted or 00:22:59.770 --> 00:23:00.930 align:start position:0% picking and choosing between hosted or on<00:22:59.830> hosted<00:23:00.190> because<00:23:00.400> generally<00:23:00.820> they're 00:23:00.930 --> 00:23:00.940 align:start position:0% on hosted because generally they're 00:23:00.940 --> 00:23:02.610 align:start position:0% on hosted because generally they're supportive<00:23:01.419> for<00:23:01.570> short-term<00:23:02.110> rentals<00:23:02.500> so<00:23:02.559> I 00:23:02.610 --> 00:23:02.620 align:start position:0% supportive for short-term rentals so I 00:23:02.620 --> 00:23:06.539 align:start position:0% supportive for short-term rentals so I mean<00:23:02.830> that's<00:23:03.400> about<00:23:03.610> 70%<00:23:04.179> of<00:23:04.809> the<00:23:05.549> surveyors 00:23:06.539 --> 00:23:06.549 align:start position:0% mean that's about 70% of the surveyors 00:23:06.549 --> 00:23:07.620 align:start position:0% mean that's about 70% of the surveyors the<00:23:06.700> people<00:23:06.910> that<00:23:07.030> have<00:23:07.120> taken<00:23:07.240> the<00:23:07.480> survey 00:23:07.620 --> 00:23:07.630 align:start position:0% the people that have taken the survey 00:23:07.630 --> 00:23:10.950 align:start position:0% the people that have taken the survey that<00:23:08.020> are<00:23:08.140> in<00:23:09.210> support<00:23:10.210> of<00:23:10.360> short-term 00:23:10.950 --> 00:23:10.960 align:start position:0% that are in support of short-term 00:23:10.960 --> 00:23:15.720 align:start position:0% that are in support of short-term rentals<00:23:13.830> this<00:23:14.830> next<00:23:15.160> slide<00:23:15.220> is<00:23:15.370> actually 00:23:15.720 --> 00:23:15.730 align:start position:0% rentals this next slide is actually 00:23:15.730 --> 00:23:17.549 align:start position:0% rentals this next slide is actually we're<00:23:16.000> not<00:23:16.150> going<00:23:16.299> to<00:23:16.360> dive<00:23:16.570> too<00:23:16.840> deeply<00:23:17.350> into 00:23:17.549 --> 00:23:17.559 align:start position:0% we're not going to dive too deeply into 00:23:17.559 --> 00:23:19.650 align:start position:0% we're not going to dive too deeply into this<00:23:17.830> this<00:23:18.070> is<00:23:18.250> just<00:23:18.490> kind<00:23:18.730> of<00:23:18.820> an<00:23:18.940> overview<00:23:19.299> of 00:23:19.650 --> 00:23:19.660 align:start position:0% this this is just kind of an overview of 00:23:19.660 --> 00:23:23.010 align:start position:0% this this is just kind of an overview of options<00:23:20.620> that<00:23:20.830> we<00:23:21.010> put<00:23:21.220> on<00:23:21.340> this<00:23:21.520> on<00:23:22.419> this 00:23:23.010 --> 00:23:23.020 align:start position:0% options that we put on this on this 00:23:23.020 --> 00:23:24.960 align:start position:0% options that we put on this on this survey<00:23:23.530> for<00:23:23.559> performance<00:23:24.400> standards<00:23:24.880> and 00:23:24.960 --> 00:23:24.970 align:start position:0% survey for performance standards and 00:23:24.970 --> 00:23:26.159 align:start position:0% survey for performance standards and it's<00:23:25.179> pretty<00:23:25.450> standard<00:23:25.750> with<00:23:26.110> all 00:23:26.159 --> 00:23:26.169 align:start position:0% it's pretty standard with all 00:23:26.169 --> 00:23:29.460 align:start position:0% it's pretty standard with all jurisdictions<00:23:27.130> that<00:23:27.400> have<00:23:28.290> regulations<00:23:29.290> for 00:23:29.460 --> 00:23:29.470 align:start position:0% jurisdictions that have regulations for 00:23:29.470 --> 00:23:31.710 align:start position:0% jurisdictions that have regulations for short-term<00:23:29.860> rentals<00:23:30.280> to<00:23:30.460> implement<00:23:31.390> some<00:23:31.690> of 00:23:31.710 --> 00:23:31.720 align:start position:0% short-term rentals to implement some of 00:23:31.720 --> 00:23:35.880 align:start position:0% short-term rentals to implement some of these<00:23:31.870> performance<00:23:32.410> standards<00:23:32.890> for<00:23:34.890> limits 00:23:35.880 --> 00:23:35.890 align:start position:0% these performance standards for limits 00:23:35.890 --> 00:23:37.650 align:start position:0% these performance standards for limits on<00:23:36.100> length<00:23:36.340> of<00:23:36.520> stay<00:23:36.730> again<00:23:37.299> we'll<00:23:37.510> get<00:23:37.600> into 00:23:37.650 --> 00:23:37.660 align:start position:0% on length of stay again we'll get into 00:23:37.660 --> 00:23:39.299 align:start position:0% on length of stay again we'll get into that<00:23:37.870> a<00:23:38.020> little<00:23:38.350> bit<00:23:38.470> later<00:23:38.770> into<00:23:39.160> this 00:23:39.299 --> 00:23:39.309 align:start position:0% that a little bit later into this 00:23:39.309 --> 00:23:41.220 align:start position:0% that a little bit later into this presentation<00:23:40.179> but<00:23:40.510> that's<00:23:40.750> something<00:23:41.080> that 00:23:41.220 --> 00:23:41.230 align:start position:0% presentation but that's something that 00:23:41.230 --> 00:23:43.200 align:start position:0% presentation but that's something that staff<00:23:41.470> is<00:23:41.620> not<00:23:41.830> going<00:23:42.040> to<00:23:42.100> recommend<00:23:42.610> and<00:23:42.820> it 00:23:43.200 --> 00:23:43.210 align:start position:0% staff is not going to recommend and it 00:23:43.210 --> 00:23:45.299 align:start position:0% staff is not going to recommend and it will<00:23:43.570> address<00:23:44.049> that<00:23:44.290> a<00:23:44.350> little<00:23:44.620> bit<00:23:44.740> more<00:23:45.010> but 00:23:45.299 --> 00:23:45.309 align:start position:0% will address that a little bit more but 00:23:45.309 --> 00:23:47.580 align:start position:0% will address that a little bit more but it's<00:23:46.090> pretty<00:23:46.390> standard<00:23:46.870> across<00:23:47.110> the<00:23:47.350> board 00:23:47.580 --> 00:23:47.590 align:start position:0% it's pretty standard across the board 00:23:47.590 --> 00:23:50.010 align:start position:0% it's pretty standard across the board for<00:23:48.100> the<00:23:48.700> regulations<00:23:49.360> to<00:23:49.480> take<00:23:49.660> into 00:23:50.010 --> 00:23:50.020 align:start position:0% for the regulations to take into 00:23:50.020 --> 00:23:55.100 align:start position:0% for the regulations to take into consideration<00:23:50.280> noise<00:23:51.280> parties<00:23:53.160> insurance 00:23:55.100 --> 00:23:55.110 align:start position:0% consideration noise parties insurance 00:23:55.110 --> 00:23:57.510 align:start position:0% consideration noise parties insurance things<00:23:56.110> like<00:23:56.320> that<00:23:56.559> we<00:23:56.770> just<00:23:57.160> have<00:23:57.309> it<00:23:57.340> on 00:23:57.510 --> 00:23:57.520 align:start position:0% things like that we just have it on 00:23:57.520 --> 00:23:59.370 align:start position:0% things like that we just have it on there<00:23:57.820> that<00:23:58.059> way<00:23:58.150> people<00:23:58.480> as<00:23:58.809> you<00:23:58.990> can<00:23:59.020> see 00:23:59.370 --> 00:23:59.380 align:start position:0% there that way people as you can see 00:23:59.380 --> 00:24:01.580 align:start position:0% there that way people as you can see where<00:23:59.890> people<00:23:59.919> were<00:24:00.250> mostly<00:24:00.640> interested<00:24:01.030> are 00:24:01.580 --> 00:24:01.590 align:start position:0% where people were mostly interested are 00:24:01.590 --> 00:24:04.550 align:start position:0% where people were mostly interested are pretty<00:24:02.590> standard 00:24:04.550 --> 00:24:04.560 align:start position:0% pretty standard 00:24:04.560 --> 00:24:09.570 align:start position:0% pretty standard and<00:24:06.720> lastly<00:24:07.720> this<00:24:08.680> is<00:24:08.830> just<00:24:09.010> an<00:24:09.130> overall 00:24:09.570 --> 00:24:09.580 align:start position:0% and lastly this is just an overall 00:24:09.580 --> 00:24:12.330 align:start position:0% and lastly this is just an overall summary<00:24:09.910> so<00:24:10.530> after<00:24:11.530> I<00:24:11.560> went<00:24:11.800> through<00:24:11.950> and 00:24:12.330 --> 00:24:12.340 align:start position:0% summary so after I went through and 00:24:12.340 --> 00:24:14.130 align:start position:0% summary so after I went through and checked<00:24:12.370> out<00:24:12.670> all<00:24:12.910> the<00:24:12.940> responses<00:24:13.690> and<00:24:13.870> we<00:24:13.960> got 00:24:14.130 --> 00:24:14.140 align:start position:0% checked out all the responses and we got 00:24:14.140 --> 00:24:16.020 align:start position:0% checked out all the responses and we got the<00:24:14.260> positive<00:24:14.440> than<00:24:14.890> negatives<00:24:15.340> we<00:24:15.460> also<00:24:15.640> had 00:24:16.020 --> 00:24:16.030 align:start position:0% the positive than negatives we also had 00:24:16.030 --> 00:24:17.970 align:start position:0% the positive than negatives we also had the<00:24:16.150> 88<00:24:16.570> comments<00:24:17.260> and<00:24:17.440> what<00:24:17.590> was<00:24:17.740> interesting 00:24:17.970 --> 00:24:17.980 align:start position:0% the 88 comments and what was interesting 00:24:17.980 --> 00:24:19.830 align:start position:0% the 88 comments and what was interesting about<00:24:18.310> the<00:24:18.580> comments<00:24:19.030> as<00:24:19.120> they<00:24:19.150> kind<00:24:19.510> of<00:24:19.570> went 00:24:19.830 --> 00:24:19.840 align:start position:0% about the comments as they kind of went 00:24:19.840 --> 00:24:21.690 align:start position:0% about the comments as they kind of went all<00:24:20.170> across<00:24:20.410> the<00:24:20.830> board<00:24:21.040> and<00:24:21.220> we<00:24:21.310> found<00:24:21.460> that 00:24:21.690 --> 00:24:21.700 align:start position:0% all across the board and we found that 00:24:21.700 --> 00:24:24.450 align:start position:0% all across the board and we found that about<00:24:21.880> 1/3<00:24:22.030> of<00:24:22.600> the<00:24:22.780> responders<00:24:23.470> are<00:24:23.710> in 00:24:24.450 --> 00:24:24.460 align:start position:0% about 1/3 of the responders are in 00:24:24.460 --> 00:24:26.790 align:start position:0% about 1/3 of the responders are in strong<00:24:25.180> support<00:24:25.420> there<00:24:25.990> there<00:24:26.290> was<00:24:26.440> little 00:24:26.790 --> 00:24:26.800 align:start position:0% strong support there there was little 00:24:26.800 --> 00:24:29.370 align:start position:0% strong support there there was little comment<00:24:27.220> -<00:24:27.310> no<00:24:27.490> comment<00:24:28.000> beyond<00:24:28.870> just<00:24:29.140> saying 00:24:29.370 --> 00:24:29.380 align:start position:0% comment - no comment beyond just saying 00:24:29.380 --> 00:24:31.530 align:start position:0% comment - no comment beyond just saying yes<00:24:29.680> and<00:24:30.310> about<00:24:30.580> a<00:24:30.610> third<00:24:30.880> of<00:24:31.000> those<00:24:31.150> on<00:24:31.450> the 00:24:31.530 --> 00:24:31.540 align:start position:0% yes and about a third of those on the 00:24:31.540 --> 00:24:32.790 align:start position:0% yes and about a third of those on the opposite<00:24:31.960> end<00:24:32.170> that<00:24:32.350> had<00:24:32.470> strong 00:24:32.790 --> 00:24:32.800 align:start position:0% opposite end that had strong 00:24:32.800 --> 00:24:35.580 align:start position:0% opposite end that had strong reservations<00:24:33.100> form<00:24:33.790> in<00:24:34.000> Half<00:24:34.150> Moon<00:24:34.330> Bay<00:24:34.590> but 00:24:35.580 --> 00:24:35.590 align:start position:0% reservations form in Half Moon Bay but 00:24:35.590 --> 00:24:37.950 align:start position:0% reservations form in Half Moon Bay but the<00:24:35.680> other<00:24:35.890> third<00:24:36.250> were<00:24:36.790> all<00:24:36.970> fairly 00:24:37.950 --> 00:24:37.960 align:start position:0% the other third were all fairly 00:24:37.960 --> 00:24:40.590 align:start position:0% the other third were all fairly supportive<00:24:38.620> still<00:24:38.950> with<00:24:39.310> just<00:24:39.610> taken<00:24:40.420> into 00:24:40.590 --> 00:24:40.600 align:start position:0% supportive still with just taken into 00:24:40.600 --> 00:24:42.800 align:start position:0% supportive still with just taken into consideration<00:24:40.780> some<00:24:41.650> varying<00:24:42.100> degrees<00:24:42.460> of 00:24:42.800 --> 00:24:42.810 align:start position:0% consideration some varying degrees of 00:24:42.810 --> 00:24:48.090 align:start position:0% consideration some varying degrees of regulations<00:24:44.940> again<00:24:45.940> all<00:24:46.840> 88<00:24:47.410> comments<00:24:48.010> are 00:24:48.090 --> 00:24:48.100 align:start position:0% regulations again all 88 comments are 00:24:48.100 --> 00:24:49.710 align:start position:0% regulations again all 88 comments are available<00:24:48.610> to<00:24:48.670> the<00:24:48.760> public<00:24:49.090> so<00:24:49.270> they're<00:24:49.570> on 00:24:49.710 --> 00:24:49.720 align:start position:0% available to the public so they're on 00:24:49.720 --> 00:24:52.350 align:start position:0% available to the public so they're on our<00:24:49.870> website<00:24:50.320> they're<00:24:50.980> in<00:24:51.370> the<00:24:51.610> packet<00:24:52.060> you're 00:24:52.350 --> 00:24:52.360 align:start position:0% our website they're in the packet you're 00:24:52.360 --> 00:24:55.020 align:start position:0% our website they're in the packet you're welcome<00:24:52.840> to<00:24:52.960> read<00:24:53.140> through<00:24:53.410> them<00:24:53.470> and<00:24:54.030> they're 00:24:55.020 --> 00:24:55.030 align:start position:0% welcome to read through them and they're 00:24:55.030 --> 00:24:56.220 align:start position:0% welcome to read through them and they're on<00:24:55.150> the<00:24:55.300> attachment<00:24:55.690> five<00:24:55.810> of<00:24:55.990> the<00:24:56.050> staff 00:24:56.220 --> 00:24:56.230 align:start position:0% on the attachment five of the staff 00:24:56.230 --> 00:24:58.590 align:start position:0% on the attachment five of the staff report<00:24:56.350> and<00:24:56.740> with<00:24:57.400> that<00:24:57.670> I'm<00:24:57.940> going<00:24:58.210> to<00:24:58.300> turn 00:24:58.590 --> 00:24:58.600 align:start position:0% report and with that I'm going to turn 00:24:58.600 --> 00:25:00.450 align:start position:0% report and with that I'm going to turn it<00:24:58.840> over<00:24:58.930> now<00:24:59.110> to<00:24:59.260> Scott<00:24:59.680> our<00:24:59.890> associate 00:25:00.450 --> 00:25:00.460 align:start position:0% it over now to Scott our associate 00:25:00.460 --> 00:25:02.760 align:start position:0% it over now to Scott our associate planner<00:25:00.640> who's<00:25:01.180> got<00:25:01.450> a<00:25:01.480> little<00:25:01.810> bit<00:25:01.930> more<00:25:02.380> into 00:25:02.760 --> 00:25:02.770 align:start position:0% planner who's got a little bit more into 00:25:02.770 --> 00:25:07.760 align:start position:0% planner who's got a little bit more into the<00:25:03.270> high-level<00:25:04.270> decision<00:25:05.230> matrix<00:25:05.440> thank<00:25:06.370> you 00:25:07.760 --> 00:25:07.770 align:start position:0% the high-level decision matrix thank you 00:25:07.770 --> 00:25:11.130 align:start position:0% the high-level decision matrix thank you thanks<00:25:08.770> Jo<00:25:08.980> and<00:25:09.280> let's<00:25:10.270> just<00:25:10.480> see<00:25:11.050> the 00:25:11.130 --> 00:25:11.140 align:start position:0% thanks Jo and let's just see the 00:25:11.140 --> 00:25:16.020 align:start position:0% thanks Jo and let's just see the Planning<00:25:11.410> Commission<00:25:11.740> this<00:25:11.890> evening<00:25:14.430> so<00:25:15.430> one 00:25:16.020 --> 00:25:16.030 align:start position:0% Planning Commission this evening so one 00:25:16.030 --> 00:25:17.910 align:start position:0% Planning Commission this evening so one key<00:25:16.450> thing<00:25:16.690> that<00:25:16.870> we<00:25:16.960> want<00:25:17.230> we<00:25:17.590> were<00:25:17.680> hoping<00:25:17.860> to 00:25:17.910 --> 00:25:17.920 align:start position:0% key thing that we want we were hoping to 00:25:17.920 --> 00:25:18.960 align:start position:0% key thing that we want we were hoping to get<00:25:18.040> feedback<00:25:18.250> from<00:25:18.580> the<00:25:18.670> Planning 00:25:18.960 --> 00:25:18.970 align:start position:0% get feedback from the Planning 00:25:18.970 --> 00:25:21.420 align:start position:0% get feedback from the Planning Commission<00:25:19.300> on<00:25:19.450> is<00:25:19.770> what<00:25:20.770> makes<00:25:20.950> sense<00:25:21.220> for 00:25:21.420 --> 00:25:21.430 align:start position:0% Commission on is what makes sense for 00:25:21.430 --> 00:25:23.940 align:start position:0% Commission on is what makes sense for short-term<00:25:21.880> rentals<00:25:22.270> and<00:25:22.600> what<00:25:23.200> land<00:25:23.440> use<00:25:23.680> in 00:25:23.940 --> 00:25:23.950 align:start position:0% short-term rentals and what land use in 00:25:23.950 --> 00:25:26.940 align:start position:0% short-term rentals and what land use in our<00:25:24.070> city<00:25:24.810> they're<00:25:25.810> you<00:25:26.200> know<00:25:26.230> generally 00:25:26.940 --> 00:25:26.950 align:start position:0% our city they're you know generally 00:25:26.950 --> 00:25:29.940 align:start position:0% our city they're you know generally speaking<00:25:26.980> people<00:25:28.110> view<00:25:29.110> short-term<00:25:29.620> rentals 00:25:29.940 --> 00:25:29.950 align:start position:0% speaking people view short-term rentals 00:25:29.950 --> 00:25:33.000 align:start position:0% speaking people view short-term rentals as<00:25:30.600> more<00:25:31.600> of<00:25:31.660> a<00:25:31.720> single-family<00:25:32.230> type<00:25:32.740> thing 00:25:33.000 --> 00:25:33.010 align:start position:0% as more of a single-family type thing 00:25:33.010 --> 00:25:36.060 align:start position:0% as more of a single-family type thing but<00:25:33.220> it's<00:25:33.430> it's<00:25:34.420> certainly<00:25:34.980> you<00:25:35.980> know 00:25:36.060 --> 00:25:36.070 align:start position:0% but it's it's certainly you know 00:25:36.070 --> 00:25:38.280 align:start position:0% but it's it's certainly you know possible<00:25:36.580> to<00:25:36.700> have<00:25:36.850> them<00:25:37.060> in<00:25:37.510> multifamily<00:25:38.050> and 00:25:38.280 --> 00:25:38.290 align:start position:0% possible to have them in multifamily and 00:25:38.290 --> 00:25:40.260 align:start position:0% possible to have them in multifamily and you<00:25:39.070> know<00:25:39.160> we've<00:25:39.280> talked<00:25:39.670> about<00:25:39.820> a<00:25:39.940> little<00:25:40.120> bit 00:25:40.260 --> 00:25:40.270 align:start position:0% you know we've talked about a little bit 00:25:40.270 --> 00:25:42.930 align:start position:0% you know we've talked about a little bit about<00:25:40.540> our<00:25:41.320> mixed-use<00:25:42.100> zoning<00:25:42.130> districts 00:25:42.930 --> 00:25:42.940 align:start position:0% about our mixed-use zoning districts 00:25:42.940 --> 00:25:45.840 align:start position:0% about our mixed-use zoning districts does<00:25:43.720> it<00:25:43.840> make<00:25:43.990> sense<00:25:44.230> to<00:25:44.380> allow<00:25:45.010> short-term 00:25:45.840 --> 00:25:45.850 align:start position:0% does it make sense to allow short-term 00:25:45.850 --> 00:25:48.090 align:start position:0% does it make sense to allow short-term rentals<00:25:46.240> within<00:25:47.170> our<00:25:47.290> mixed<00:25:47.560> use<00:25:47.740> zoning 00:25:48.090 --> 00:25:48.100 align:start position:0% rentals within our mixed use zoning 00:25:48.100 --> 00:25:50.370 align:start position:0% rentals within our mixed use zoning districts<00:25:48.580> downtown<00:25:49.060> commercial<00:25:49.900> visitors 00:25:50.370 --> 00:25:50.380 align:start position:0% districts downtown commercial visitors 00:25:50.380 --> 00:25:53.070 align:start position:0% districts downtown commercial visitors serving<00:25:51.300> possibly<00:25:52.300> even<00:25:52.420> commercial<00:25:52.870> general 00:25:53.070 --> 00:25:53.080 align:start position:0% serving possibly even commercial general 00:25:53.080 --> 00:25:57.180 align:start position:0% serving possibly even commercial general for<00:25:53.500> you<00:25:54.430> know<00:25:54.660> a<00:25:55.660> future<00:25:56.650> project<00:25:56.830> that<00:25:57.100> may 00:25:57.180 --> 00:25:57.190 align:start position:0% for you know a future project that may 00:25:57.190 --> 00:26:02.749 align:start position:0% for you know a future project that may have<00:25:57.400> a<00:25:57.730> residential<00:25:58.330> component<00:25:58.600> to<00:25:59.080> it 00:26:02.749 --> 00:26:02.759 align:start position:0% 00:26:02.759 --> 00:26:08.749 align:start position:0% and<00:26:02.849> then<00:26:06.409> what<00:26:07.409> type<00:26:07.709> of<00:26:07.739> residential<00:26:08.309> unit 00:26:08.749 --> 00:26:08.759 align:start position:0% and then what type of residential unit 00:26:08.759 --> 00:26:10.519 align:start position:0% and then what type of residential unit this<00:26:09.359> is<00:26:09.419> another<00:26:09.779> thing<00:26:09.989> that<00:26:10.049> the<00:26:10.229> Planning 00:26:10.519 --> 00:26:10.529 align:start position:0% this is another thing that the Planning 00:26:10.529 --> 00:26:12.199 align:start position:0% this is another thing that the Planning Commission<00:26:10.889> it<00:26:11.339> would<00:26:11.489> be<00:26:11.609> helpful<00:26:11.999> to<00:26:12.089> get 00:26:12.199 --> 00:26:12.209 align:start position:0% Commission it would be helpful to get 00:26:12.209 --> 00:26:15.949 align:start position:0% Commission it would be helpful to get feedback<00:26:12.899> on<00:26:13.729> what<00:26:14.729> type<00:26:14.940> of<00:26:15.089> units<00:26:15.419> you<00:26:15.839> know 00:26:15.949 --> 00:26:15.959 align:start position:0% feedback on what type of units you know 00:26:15.959 --> 00:26:21.319 align:start position:0% feedback on what type of units you know single<00:26:16.320> family<00:26:16.799> or<00:26:18.409> triplex<00:26:19.409> duplex<00:26:20.329> maybe 00:26:21.319 --> 00:26:21.329 align:start position:0% single family or triplex duplex maybe 00:26:21.329 --> 00:26:24.519 align:start position:0% single family or triplex duplex maybe even<00:26:21.719> within<00:26:22.349> our<00:26:22.529> mobile<00:26:22.829> home<00:26:22.979> parks 00:26:24.519 --> 00:26:24.529 align:start position:0% even within our mobile home parks 00:26:24.529 --> 00:26:27.709 align:start position:0% even within our mobile home parks mixed-use<00:26:25.849> Planning<00:26:26.849> Commission<00:26:27.149> did<00:26:27.179> touch 00:26:27.709 --> 00:26:27.719 align:start position:0% mixed-use Planning Commission did touch 00:26:27.719 --> 00:26:30.829 align:start position:0% mixed-use Planning Commission did touch upon<00:26:27.899> this<00:26:28.320> when<00:26:28.919> reviewing<00:26:29.219> the<00:26:29.579> draft<00:26:29.999> ATU 00:26:30.829 --> 00:26:30.839 align:start position:0% upon this when reviewing the draft ATU 00:26:30.839 --> 00:26:34.369 align:start position:0% upon this when reviewing the draft ATU ordinance<00:26:31.289> and<00:26:31.879> so<00:26:32.879> that's<00:26:33.119> really<00:26:33.570> not<00:26:34.229> up 00:26:34.369 --> 00:26:34.379 align:start position:0% ordinance and so that's really not up 00:26:34.379 --> 00:26:36.109 align:start position:0% ordinance and so that's really not up for<00:26:34.499> discussion<00:26:34.679> this<00:26:35.159> evening<00:26:35.339> as<00:26:35.729> far<00:26:35.940> as 00:26:36.109 --> 00:26:36.119 align:start position:0% for discussion this evening as far as 00:26:36.119 --> 00:26:39.949 align:start position:0% for discussion this evening as far as allowing<00:26:36.989> short-term<00:26:37.709> rental<00:26:38.099> in<00:26:38.959> accessory 00:26:39.949 --> 00:26:39.959 align:start position:0% allowing short-term rental in accessory 00:26:39.959 --> 00:26:41.959 align:start position:0% allowing short-term rental in accessory dwelling<00:26:40.319> units<00:26:40.349> that<00:26:41.279> that's<00:26:41.519> that's 00:26:41.959 --> 00:26:41.969 align:start position:0% dwelling units that that's that's 00:26:41.969 --> 00:26:45.409 align:start position:0% dwelling units that that's that's already<00:26:42.389> been<00:26:43.199> addressed<00:26:43.559> within<00:26:44.039> the<00:26:44.419> ATU 00:26:45.409 --> 00:26:45.419 align:start position:0% already been addressed within the ATU 00:26:45.419 --> 00:26:50.790 align:start position:0% already been addressed within the ATU ordinance 00:26:50.790 --> 00:26:50.800 align:start position:0% 00:26:50.800 --> 00:26:53.640 align:start position:0% now<00:26:51.370> as<00:26:51.790> far<00:26:52.060> as<00:26:52.120> the<00:26:52.750> types<00:26:53.020> of<00:26:53.200> short-term 00:26:53.640 --> 00:26:53.650 align:start position:0% now as far as the types of short-term 00:26:53.650 --> 00:26:56.010 align:start position:0% now as far as the types of short-term rentals<00:26:54.010> you<00:26:54.490> know<00:26:54.610> we<00:26:54.760> we've<00:26:55.210> kind<00:26:55.450> of<00:26:55.510> talked 00:26:56.010 --> 00:26:56.020 align:start position:0% rentals you know we we've kind of talked 00:26:56.020 --> 00:26:58.200 align:start position:0% rentals you know we we've kind of talked about<00:26:56.110> this<00:26:56.260> a<00:26:56.410> little<00:26:56.560> earlier<00:26:56.740> though<00:26:57.210> there 00:26:58.200 --> 00:26:58.210 align:start position:0% about this a little earlier though there 00:26:58.210 --> 00:27:00.840 align:start position:0% about this a little earlier though there are<00:26:58.330> two<00:26:58.540> major<00:26:59.110> distinctions<00:26:59.470> that<00:27:00.190> the 00:27:00.840 --> 00:27:00.850 align:start position:0% are two major distinctions that the 00:27:00.850 --> 00:27:04.980 align:start position:0% are two major distinctions that the hosted<00:27:01.450> where<00:27:02.260> you<00:27:02.380> have<00:27:02.650> a<00:27:03.900> homeowner<00:27:04.900> that 00:27:04.980 --> 00:27:04.990 align:start position:0% hosted where you have a homeowner that 00:27:04.990 --> 00:27:09.300 align:start position:0% hosted where you have a homeowner that actually<00:27:05.830> lives<00:27:06.160> on<00:27:06.430> site<00:27:06.730> and<00:27:08.220> you<00:27:09.220> know 00:27:09.300 --> 00:27:09.310 align:start position:0% actually lives on site and you know 00:27:09.310 --> 00:27:12.300 align:start position:0% actually lives on site and you know occupies<00:27:10.090> the<00:27:10.840> most<00:27:11.380> of<00:27:11.530> the<00:27:11.620> space<00:27:11.740> within<00:27:12.130> a 00:27:12.300 --> 00:27:12.310 align:start position:0% occupies the most of the space within a 00:27:12.310 --> 00:27:15.840 align:start position:0% occupies the most of the space within a within<00:27:12.970> a<00:27:13.210> home<00:27:13.420> and<00:27:13.780> then<00:27:14.380> rents<00:27:14.830> out<00:27:14.950> a<00:27:15.310> maybe 00:27:15.840 --> 00:27:15.850 align:start position:0% within a home and then rents out a maybe 00:27:15.850 --> 00:27:17.930 align:start position:0% within a home and then rents out a maybe a<00:27:15.880> bedroom<00:27:16.240> or<00:27:16.390> two<00:27:16.570> as<00:27:16.870> a<00:27:16.900> short-term<00:27:17.290> rental 00:27:17.930 --> 00:27:17.940 align:start position:0% a bedroom or two as a short-term rental 00:27:17.940 --> 00:27:21.720 align:start position:0% a bedroom or two as a short-term rental now<00:27:18.940> certainly<00:27:19.710> you<00:27:20.710> know<00:27:20.830> as<00:27:21.010> you<00:27:21.250> saw<00:27:21.460> in<00:27:21.610> the 00:27:21.720 --> 00:27:21.730 align:start position:0% now certainly you know as you saw in the 00:27:21.730 --> 00:27:22.980 align:start position:0% now certainly you know as you saw in the survey 00:27:22.980 --> 00:27:22.990 align:start position:0% survey 00:27:22.990 --> 00:27:27.440 align:start position:0% survey you<00:27:23.740> know<00:27:23.830> there's<00:27:24.040> general<00:27:26.310> hosted 00:27:27.440 --> 00:27:27.450 align:start position:0% you know there's general hosted 00:27:27.450 --> 00:27:29.100 align:start position:0% you know there's general hosted short-term<00:27:28.450> rentals<00:27:28.690> are<00:27:28.810> generally 00:27:29.100 --> 00:27:29.110 align:start position:0% short-term rentals are generally 00:27:29.110 --> 00:27:32.570 align:start position:0% short-term rentals are generally supportive<00:27:29.620> in<00:27:30.220> Half<00:27:30.460> Moon<00:27:30.610> Bay<00:27:30.670> and 00:27:32.570 --> 00:27:32.580 align:start position:0% supportive in Half Moon Bay and 00:27:32.580 --> 00:27:35.790 align:start position:0% supportive in Half Moon Bay and typically<00:27:33.580> you<00:27:34.000> know<00:27:34.120> in<00:27:34.630> our<00:27:34.870> survey<00:27:35.680> of 00:27:35.790 --> 00:27:35.800 align:start position:0% typically you know in our survey of 00:27:35.800 --> 00:27:39.000 align:start position:0% typically you know in our survey of other<00:27:35.980> cities<00:27:36.810> usually<00:27:37.810> not<00:27:38.140> a<00:27:38.170> limitation<00:27:38.710> on 00:27:39.000 --> 00:27:39.010 align:start position:0% other cities usually not a limitation on 00:27:39.010 --> 00:27:41.160 align:start position:0% other cities usually not a limitation on the<00:27:39.130> amount<00:27:39.220> of<00:27:39.460> nights<00:27:39.760> per<00:27:40.120> year<00:27:40.170> that 00:27:41.160 --> 00:27:41.170 align:start position:0% the amount of nights per year that 00:27:41.170 --> 00:27:43.800 align:start position:0% the amount of nights per year that someone<00:27:41.650> can<00:27:41.940> short-term<00:27:42.940> rental<00:27:43.330> as<00:27:43.510> as<00:27:43.750> a 00:27:43.800 --> 00:27:43.810 align:start position:0% someone can short-term rental as as a 00:27:43.810 --> 00:27:47.210 align:start position:0% someone can short-term rental as as a hosted<00:27:44.560> option<00:27:45.660> other<00:27:46.660> things<00:27:46.900> to<00:27:46.990> consider 00:27:47.210 --> 00:27:47.220 align:start position:0% hosted option other things to consider 00:27:47.220 --> 00:27:50.100 align:start position:0% hosted option other things to consider you<00:27:48.220> know<00:27:48.310> provides<00:27:48.670> supplemental<00:27:48.850> income<00:27:49.330> to 00:27:50.100 --> 00:27:50.110 align:start position:0% you know provides supplemental income to 00:27:50.110 --> 00:27:54.450 align:start position:0% you know provides supplemental income to the<00:27:50.770> homeowner<00:27:51.630> low-cost<00:27:52.630> housing<00:27:53.070> as<00:27:54.070> big<00:27:54.430> a 00:27:54.450 --> 00:27:54.460 align:start position:0% the homeowner low-cost housing as big a 00:27:54.460 --> 00:27:57.740 align:start position:0% the homeowner low-cost housing as big a vacation<00:27:55.150> rental<00:27:55.450> to<00:27:55.600> folks<00:27:55.960> coming<00:27:56.290> in<00:27:56.470> and 00:27:57.740 --> 00:27:57.750 align:start position:0% vacation rental to folks coming in and 00:27:57.750 --> 00:27:59.850 align:start position:0% vacation rental to folks coming in and we<00:27:58.750> haven't<00:27:59.020> really<00:27:59.110> received<00:27:59.440> any 00:27:59.850 --> 00:27:59.860 align:start position:0% we haven't really received any 00:27:59.860 --> 00:28:04.720 align:start position:0% we haven't really received any complaints<00:28:00.490> on<00:28:00.700> hosting 00:28:04.720 --> 00:28:04.730 align:start position:0% 00:28:04.730 --> 00:28:07.030 align:start position:0% now<00:28:05.330> the<00:28:05.390> other<00:28:05.570> flavor<00:28:05.870> unholstered<00:28:06.650> this<00:28:06.860> is 00:28:07.030 --> 00:28:07.040 align:start position:0% now the other flavor unholstered this is 00:28:07.040 --> 00:28:10.000 align:start position:0% now the other flavor unholstered this is where<00:28:07.570> you<00:28:08.570> know<00:28:08.690> a<00:28:08.720> homeowner<00:28:09.110> does<00:28:09.470> not<00:28:09.770> live 00:28:10.000 --> 00:28:10.010 align:start position:0% where you know a homeowner does not live 00:28:10.010 --> 00:28:14.010 align:start position:0% where you know a homeowner does not live on<00:28:10.040> the<00:28:10.250> site<00:28:10.490> and<00:28:10.850> rents<00:28:11.660> out<00:28:11.780> the<00:28:12.020> entire 00:28:14.010 --> 00:28:14.020 align:start position:0% on the site and rents out the entire 00:28:14.020 --> 00:28:17.490 align:start position:0% on the site and rents out the entire residential<00:28:15.020> unit<00:28:15.530> as<00:28:16.040> a<00:28:16.100> vacation<00:28:16.520> rental 00:28:17.490 --> 00:28:17.500 align:start position:0% residential unit as a vacation rental 00:28:17.500 --> 00:28:20.980 align:start position:0% residential unit as a vacation rental the<00:28:18.500> survey<00:28:18.890> we<00:28:19.250> did<00:28:19.820> receive<00:28:20.120> a<00:28:20.330> wide<00:28:20.720> range 00:28:20.980 --> 00:28:20.990 align:start position:0% the survey we did receive a wide range 00:28:20.990 --> 00:28:22.620 align:start position:0% the survey we did receive a wide range of<00:28:21.080> responses 00:28:22.620 --> 00:28:22.630 align:start position:0% of responses 00:28:22.630 --> 00:28:26.080 align:start position:0% of responses Jill<00:28:23.630> Jill<00:28:24.350> and<00:28:24.470> Joe<00:28:24.650> have<00:28:24.950> received<00:28:25.850> some 00:28:26.080 --> 00:28:26.090 align:start position:0% Jill Jill and Joe have received some 00:28:26.090 --> 00:28:28.930 align:start position:0% Jill Jill and Joe have received some complaints<00:28:26.450> you<00:28:27.320> know<00:28:27.440> here<00:28:27.860> and<00:28:27.980> there<00:28:28.160> on<00:28:28.430> uh 00:28:28.930 --> 00:28:28.940 align:start position:0% complaints you know here and there on uh 00:28:28.940 --> 00:28:32.560 align:start position:0% complaints you know here and there on uh no<00:28:29.930> stood<00:28:30.460> short-term<00:28:31.460> rentals<00:28:31.760> within<00:28:32.450> the 00:28:32.560 --> 00:28:32.570 align:start position:0% no stood short-term rentals within the 00:28:32.570 --> 00:28:37.720 align:start position:0% no stood short-term rentals within the city<00:28:32.780> and<00:28:35.980> regulations<00:28:36.980> vary<00:28:37.190> widely 00:28:37.720 --> 00:28:37.730 align:start position:0% city and regulations vary widely 00:28:37.730 --> 00:28:39.280 align:start position:0% city and regulations vary widely you<00:28:38.000> know<00:28:38.120> from<00:28:38.360> city<00:28:38.630> to<00:28:38.690> city<00:28:38.810> throughout 00:28:39.280 --> 00:28:39.290 align:start position:0% you know from city to city throughout 00:28:39.290 --> 00:28:41.410 align:start position:0% you know from city to city throughout California<00:28:39.950> you<00:28:40.400> know<00:28:40.490> we<00:28:40.610> we<00:28:40.910> see<00:28:41.090> everything 00:28:41.410 --> 00:28:41.420 align:start position:0% California you know we we see everything 00:28:41.420 --> 00:28:44.550 align:start position:0% California you know we we see everything from<00:28:42.020> you<00:28:42.920> know<00:28:42.950> prohibited<00:28:43.580> outright<00:28:43.970> to 00:28:44.550 --> 00:28:44.560 align:start position:0% from you know prohibited outright to 00:28:44.560 --> 00:28:48.550 align:start position:0% from you know prohibited outright to limiting<00:28:45.560> to<00:28:45.830> a<00:28:46.480> certain<00:28:47.480> number<00:28:47.840> of<00:28:47.960> days<00:28:48.170> per 00:28:48.550 --> 00:28:48.560 align:start position:0% limiting to a certain number of days per 00:28:48.560 --> 00:28:52.930 align:start position:0% limiting to a certain number of days per year<00:28:49.540> up<00:28:50.540> to<00:28:50.930> allowing<00:28:51.560> them<00:28:51.830> as<00:28:52.580> much<00:28:52.790> as 00:28:52.930 --> 00:28:52.940 align:start position:0% year up to allowing them as much as 00:28:52.940 --> 00:28:57.750 align:start position:0% year up to allowing them as much as possible 00:28:57.750 --> 00:28:57.760 align:start position:0% 00:28:57.760 --> 00:29:00.320 align:start position:0% so<00:28:58.300> some<00:28:58.540> other<00:28:58.690> regulations<00:28:59.290> to<00:28:59.440> consider 00:29:00.320 --> 00:29:00.330 align:start position:0% so some other regulations to consider 00:29:00.330 --> 00:29:04.410 align:start position:0% so some other regulations to consider you<00:29:01.330> know<00:29:01.390> the<00:29:01.570> primary<00:29:02.410> residence<00:29:02.950> you<00:29:03.910> know 00:29:04.410 --> 00:29:04.420 align:start position:0% you know the primary residence you know 00:29:04.420 --> 00:29:09.030 align:start position:0% you know the primary residence you know there<00:29:04.900> are<00:29:05.050> cities<00:29:05.410> that<00:29:05.530> allow<00:29:05.770> a<00:29:07.800> renter<00:29:08.800> to 00:29:09.030 --> 00:29:09.040 align:start position:0% there are cities that allow a renter to 00:29:09.040 --> 00:29:11.580 align:start position:0% there are cities that allow a renter to actually<00:29:09.460> sublease<00:29:09.940> you<00:29:10.630> know<00:29:10.750> a<00:29:10.780> room<00:29:11.110> as<00:29:11.530> a 00:29:11.580 --> 00:29:11.590 align:start position:0% actually sublease you know a room as a 00:29:11.590 --> 00:29:14.220 align:start position:0% actually sublease you know a room as a vacation<00:29:11.860> rental<00:29:12.390> that's<00:29:13.390> something<00:29:13.840> we're 00:29:14.220 --> 00:29:14.230 align:start position:0% vacation rental that's something we're 00:29:14.230 --> 00:29:16.020 align:start position:0% vacation rental that's something we're certainly<00:29:14.680> gonna<00:29:15.010> want<00:29:15.280> to<00:29:15.370> address<00:29:15.580> within 00:29:16.020 --> 00:29:16.030 align:start position:0% certainly gonna want to address within 00:29:16.030 --> 00:29:19.020 align:start position:0% certainly gonna want to address within the<00:29:16.120> new<00:29:16.240> ordinance<00:29:17.190> you<00:29:18.190> know<00:29:18.310> other<00:29:18.550> things 00:29:19.020 --> 00:29:19.030 align:start position:0% the new ordinance you know other things 00:29:19.030 --> 00:29:21.540 align:start position:0% the new ordinance you know other things you<00:29:19.480> know<00:29:19.570> you<00:29:20.380> know<00:29:20.500> T<00:29:20.740> ot<00:29:21.010> and<00:29:21.250> business 00:29:21.540 --> 00:29:21.550 align:start position:0% you know you know T ot and business 00:29:21.550 --> 00:29:25.610 align:start position:0% you know you know T ot and business license<00:29:21.850> that<00:29:21.940> we<00:29:22.120> currently<00:29:22.330> require<00:29:23.310> do<00:29:24.310> we 00:29:25.610 --> 00:29:25.620 align:start position:0% license that we currently require do we 00:29:25.620 --> 00:29:29.070 align:start position:0% license that we currently require do we have<00:29:26.620> a<00:29:26.680> limitation<00:29:27.070> on<00:29:27.690> the<00:29:28.690> on-call 00:29:29.070 --> 00:29:29.080 align:start position:0% have a limitation on the on-call 00:29:29.080 --> 00:29:32.580 align:start position:0% have a limitation on the on-call management<00:29:29.760> how<00:29:30.760> far<00:29:31.090> away<00:29:31.330> can<00:29:31.390> they<00:29:31.720> go<00:29:31.930> when 00:29:32.580 --> 00:29:32.590 align:start position:0% management how far away can they go when 00:29:32.590 --> 00:29:34.500 align:start position:0% management how far away can they go when their<00:29:32.800> short-term<00:29:33.160> renting<00:29:33.730> out<00:29:33.880> their 00:29:34.500 --> 00:29:34.510 align:start position:0% their short-term renting out their 00:29:34.510 --> 00:29:38.520 align:start position:0% their short-term renting out their residential<00:29:34.990> unit<00:29:36.570> it's<00:29:37.570> very<00:29:37.840> common<00:29:38.230> in<00:29:38.380> our 00:29:38.520 --> 00:29:38.530 align:start position:0% residential unit it's very common in our 00:29:38.530 --> 00:29:40.590 align:start position:0% residential unit it's very common in our survey<00:29:39.010> of<00:29:39.190> other<00:29:39.340> cities<00:29:39.640> to<00:29:40.000> limit<00:29:40.420> the 00:29:40.590 --> 00:29:40.600 align:start position:0% survey of other cities to limit the 00:29:40.600 --> 00:29:44.060 align:start position:0% survey of other cities to limit the amount<00:29:40.870> of<00:29:41.170> occupants<00:29:41.920> to<00:29:42.250> a<00:29:42.280> room<00:29:42.700> to<00:29:42.730> two 00:29:44.060 --> 00:29:44.070 align:start position:0% amount of occupants to a room to two 00:29:44.070 --> 00:29:46.320 align:start position:0% amount of occupants to a room to two that's<00:29:45.070> pretty<00:29:45.370> consistent<00:29:45.580> throughout<00:29:46.030> the 00:29:46.320 --> 00:29:46.330 align:start position:0% that's pretty consistent throughout the 00:29:46.330 --> 00:29:49.750 align:start position:0% that's pretty consistent throughout the city's 00:29:49.750 --> 00:29:49.760 align:start position:0% 00:29:49.760 --> 00:29:51.910 align:start position:0% and<00:29:49.880> then<00:29:50.480> performance<00:29:50.960> standards<00:29:51.410> you<00:29:51.830> know 00:29:51.910 --> 00:29:51.920 align:start position:0% and then performance standards you know 00:29:51.920 --> 00:29:53.590 align:start position:0% and then performance standards you know this<00:29:52.130> is<00:29:52.310> this<00:29:52.610> is<00:29:52.790> something<00:29:53.060> that<00:29:53.090> the<00:29:53.360> the 00:29:53.590 --> 00:29:53.600 align:start position:0% this is this is something that the the 00:29:53.600 --> 00:29:54.880 align:start position:0% this is this is something that the the new<00:29:53.720> ordinance<00:29:53.930> is<00:29:54.140> going<00:29:54.290> to<00:29:54.350> need<00:29:54.770> to 00:29:54.880 --> 00:29:54.890 align:start position:0% new ordinance is going to need to 00:29:54.890 --> 00:29:58.510 align:start position:0% new ordinance is going to need to address<00:29:55.130> as<00:29:55.400> well<00:29:56.080> you<00:29:57.080> know<00:29:57.520> noise 00:29:58.510 --> 00:29:58.520 align:start position:0% address as well you know noise 00:29:58.520 --> 00:30:01.510 align:start position:0% address as well you know noise limitations<00:29:59.210> do<00:30:00.170> we<00:30:00.350> increase<00:30:01.250> the<00:30:01.400> noise 00:30:01.510 --> 00:30:01.520 align:start position:0% limitations do we increase the noise 00:30:01.520 --> 00:30:04.090 align:start position:0% limitations do we increase the noise limitations<00:30:02.180> beyond<00:30:02.590> what<00:30:03.590> we<00:30:03.710> currently 00:30:04.090 --> 00:30:04.100 align:start position:0% limitations beyond what we currently 00:30:04.100 --> 00:30:08.980 align:start position:0% limitations beyond what we currently have<00:30:04.310> in<00:30:04.670> our<00:30:04.760> noise<00:30:04.970> noise<00:30:05.330> ordinance<00:30:07.990> we 00:30:08.980 --> 00:30:08.990 align:start position:0% have in our noise noise ordinance we 00:30:08.990 --> 00:30:11.880 align:start position:0% have in our noise noise ordinance we recommend<00:30:09.590> that<00:30:09.950> the<00:30:10.880> new<00:30:11.030> ordinance 00:30:11.880 --> 00:30:11.890 align:start position:0% recommend that the new ordinance 00:30:11.890 --> 00:30:15.960 align:start position:0% recommend that the new ordinance actually<00:30:12.890> require<00:30:13.250> parking<00:30:13.850> on<00:30:14.000> site<00:30:14.890> one 00:30:15.960 --> 00:30:15.970 align:start position:0% actually require parking on site one 00:30:15.970 --> 00:30:18.510 align:start position:0% actually require parking on site one parking<00:30:16.970> space<00:30:17.210> within<00:30:17.480> the<00:30:17.660> driveway 00:30:18.510 --> 00:30:18.520 align:start position:0% parking space within the driveway 00:30:18.520 --> 00:30:22.360 align:start position:0% parking space within the driveway certainly<00:30:19.520> wouldn't<00:30:19.930> you<00:30:20.930> know<00:30:21.370> wouldn't 00:30:22.360 --> 00:30:22.370 align:start position:0% certainly wouldn't you know wouldn't 00:30:22.370 --> 00:30:24.880 align:start position:0% certainly wouldn't you know wouldn't that<00:30:22.790> would<00:30:22.910> be<00:30:23.030> very<00:30:23.300> reasonable<00:30:23.510> to<00:30:24.020> require 00:30:24.880 --> 00:30:24.890 align:start position:0% that would be very reasonable to require 00:30:24.890 --> 00:30:31.370 align:start position:0% that would be very reasonable to require that<00:30:25.130> within<00:30:25.490> our<00:30:25.670> new<00:30:25.820> ordinance 00:30:31.370 --> 00:30:31.380 align:start position:0% 00:30:31.380 --> 00:30:35.010 align:start position:0% and<00:30:31.500> then<00:30:32.250> let's<00:30:32.880> see<00:30:33.090> I<00:30:33.120> think<00:30:33.570> this<00:30:33.780> is 00:30:35.010 --> 00:30:35.020 align:start position:0% and then let's see I think this is 00:30:35.020 --> 00:30:40.330 align:start position:0% and then let's see I think this is now<00:30:35.799> turn<00:30:36.039> it<00:30:36.130> back<00:30:36.250> to<00:30:36.279> Jill 00:30:40.330 --> 00:30:40.340 align:start position:0% 00:30:40.340 --> 00:30:45.070 align:start position:0% thank<00:30:40.970> you<00:30:41.210> a<00:30:41.420> couple<00:30:42.290> notes<00:30:42.770> on<00:30:43.750> the<00:30:44.750> slides 00:30:45.070 --> 00:30:45.080 align:start position:0% thank you a couple notes on the slides 00:30:45.080 --> 00:30:48.370 align:start position:0% thank you a couple notes on the slides that<00:30:45.370> God<00:30:46.370> was<00:30:46.850> just<00:30:47.090> covering<00:30:47.450> attachment 00:30:48.370 --> 00:30:48.380 align:start position:0% that God was just covering attachment 00:30:48.380 --> 00:30:50.710 align:start position:0% that God was just covering attachment seven<00:30:49.370> I<00:30:49.520> think<00:30:49.760> it<00:30:49.850> is<00:30:49.970> of<00:30:50.180> your<00:30:50.300> staff<00:30:50.570> report 00:30:50.710 --> 00:30:50.720 align:start position:0% seven I think it is of your staff report 00:30:50.720 --> 00:30:54.610 align:start position:0% seven I think it is of your staff report includes<00:30:51.470> a<00:30:51.560> matrix<00:30:52.070> within<00:30:52.430> a<00:30:53.440> column<00:30:54.440> with 00:30:54.610 --> 00:30:54.620 align:start position:0% includes a matrix within a column with 00:30:54.620 --> 00:30:57.370 align:start position:0% includes a matrix within a column with room<00:30:54.950> for<00:30:54.980> you<00:30:55.400> to<00:30:55.610> take<00:30:55.850> notes<00:30:56.270> on<00:30:56.720> these 00:30:57.370 --> 00:30:57.380 align:start position:0% room for you to take notes on these 00:30:57.380 --> 00:30:59.710 align:start position:0% room for you to take notes on these different<00:30:57.680> topics<00:30:58.280> if<00:30:58.760> it's<00:30:58.940> helpful<00:30:59.330> to<00:30:59.510> you 00:30:59.710 --> 00:30:59.720 align:start position:0% different topics if it's helpful to you 00:30:59.720 --> 00:31:03.190 align:start position:0% different topics if it's helpful to you it<00:31:00.580> we<00:31:01.580> found<00:31:01.790> it<00:31:02.000> to<00:31:02.270> be<00:31:02.300> helpful<00:31:02.630> in<00:31:02.810> previous 00:31:03.190 --> 00:31:03.200 align:start position:0% it we found it to be helpful in previous 00:31:03.200 --> 00:31:05.860 align:start position:0% it we found it to be helpful in previous sessions<00:31:03.650> when<00:31:03.860> we're<00:31:04.040> looking<00:31:04.910> at<00:31:05.090> different 00:31:05.860 --> 00:31:05.870 align:start position:0% sessions when we're looking at different 00:31:05.870 --> 00:31:09.520 align:start position:0% sessions when we're looking at different combinations<00:31:06.500> of<00:31:06.650> codes<00:31:07.990> so<00:31:08.990> I'm<00:31:09.050> taking<00:31:09.230> this 00:31:09.520 --> 00:31:09.530 align:start position:0% combinations of codes so I'm taking this 00:31:09.530 --> 00:31:12.970 align:start position:0% combinations of codes so I'm taking this slide<00:31:09.830> because<00:31:10.070> it's<00:31:10.880> really<00:31:11.840> important<00:31:12.800> for 00:31:12.970 --> 00:31:12.980 align:start position:0% slide because it's really important for 00:31:12.980 --> 00:31:15.420 align:start position:0% slide because it's really important for everybody<00:31:13.280> in<00:31:13.550> the<00:31:13.640> room<00:31:13.670> to<00:31:13.970> understand<00:31:14.510> that 00:31:15.420 --> 00:31:15.430 align:start position:0% everybody in the room to understand that 00:31:15.430 --> 00:31:18.130 align:start position:0% everybody in the room to understand that there<00:31:16.430> isn't<00:31:16.790> quite<00:31:16.850> a<00:31:17.120> few<00:31:17.450> short-term 00:31:18.130 --> 00:31:18.140 align:start position:0% there isn't quite a few short-term 00:31:18.140 --> 00:31:20.620 align:start position:0% there isn't quite a few short-term rentals<00:31:18.820> operating<00:31:19.820> in<00:31:19.940> Half<00:31:20.090> Moon<00:31:20.270> Bay<00:31:20.330> right 00:31:20.620 --> 00:31:20.630 align:start position:0% rentals operating in Half Moon Bay right 00:31:20.630 --> 00:31:23.890 align:start position:0% rentals operating in Half Moon Bay right now<00:31:20.690> and<00:31:21.290> this<00:31:22.100> is<00:31:22.280> just<00:31:22.610> a<00:31:22.940> discussion<00:31:23.480> about 00:31:23.890 --> 00:31:23.900 align:start position:0% now and this is just a discussion about 00:31:23.900 --> 00:31:27.010 align:start position:0% now and this is just a discussion about going<00:31:24.650> forward<00:31:25.280> into<00:31:25.640> the<00:31:26.390> world<00:31:26.420> of<00:31:26.810> having 00:31:27.010 --> 00:31:27.020 align:start position:0% going forward into the world of having 00:31:27.020 --> 00:31:29.700 align:start position:0% going forward into the world of having some<00:31:27.380> land<00:31:27.620> use<00:31:27.770> regulations<00:31:28.460> around<00:31:28.790> them 00:31:29.700 --> 00:31:29.710 align:start position:0% some land use regulations around them 00:31:29.710 --> 00:31:33.280 align:start position:0% some land use regulations around them with<00:31:30.910> what<00:31:31.910> staff<00:31:32.300> believes<00:31:32.810> is<00:31:32.990> that<00:31:33.170> the 00:31:33.280 --> 00:31:33.290 align:start position:0% with what staff believes is that the 00:31:33.290 --> 00:31:38.050 align:start position:0% with what staff believes is that the intent<00:31:33.770> is<00:31:34.130> to<00:31:34.570> allow<00:31:35.570> them<00:31:35.900> allow<00:31:36.620> them<00:31:36.650> to<00:31:37.220> be 00:31:38.050 --> 00:31:38.060 align:start position:0% intent is to allow them allow them to be 00:31:38.060 --> 00:31:41.800 align:start position:0% intent is to allow them allow them to be successful<00:31:38.110> and<00:31:39.110> to<00:31:39.920> be<00:31:40.490> compatible<00:31:40.940> and<00:31:41.510> a 00:31:41.800 --> 00:31:41.810 align:start position:0% successful and to be compatible and a 00:31:41.810 --> 00:31:44.170 align:start position:0% successful and to be compatible and a comfortable<00:31:42.740> use<00:31:42.980> throughout<00:31:43.550> Half<00:31:43.970> Moon 00:31:44.170 --> 00:31:44.180 align:start position:0% comfortable use throughout Half Moon 00:31:44.180 --> 00:31:47.710 align:start position:0% comfortable use throughout Half Moon Bay's<00:31:44.360> different<00:31:44.810> neighborhoods<00:31:46.570> but<00:31:47.570> if 00:31:47.710 --> 00:31:47.720 align:start position:0% Bay's different neighborhoods but if 00:31:47.720 --> 00:31:49.780 align:start position:0% Bay's different neighborhoods but if land<00:31:48.080> use<00:31:48.230> regulations<00:31:49.010> come<00:31:49.280> into<00:31:49.550> place 00:31:49.780 --> 00:31:49.790 align:start position:0% land use regulations come into place 00:31:49.790 --> 00:31:51.310 align:start position:0% land use regulations come into place it's<00:31:50.090> likely<00:31:50.510> that<00:31:50.540> some<00:31:50.900> of<00:31:50.990> the<00:31:51.050> ones<00:31:51.170> that 00:31:51.310 --> 00:31:51.320 align:start position:0% it's likely that some of the ones that 00:31:51.320 --> 00:31:54.550 align:start position:0% it's likely that some of the ones that are<00:31:51.500> operating<00:31:52.190> now<00:31:52.400> might<00:31:53.240> not<00:31:53.270> fit<00:31:54.260> within 00:31:54.550 --> 00:31:54.560 align:start position:0% are operating now might not fit within 00:31:54.560 --> 00:31:57.400 align:start position:0% are operating now might not fit within the<00:31:55.040> bounds<00:31:55.430> of<00:31:55.520> those<00:31:55.730> regulations<00:31:56.120> so<00:31:56.840> we're 00:31:57.400 --> 00:31:57.410 align:start position:0% the bounds of those regulations so we're 00:31:57.410 --> 00:31:58.570 align:start position:0% the bounds of those regulations so we're going<00:31:57.500> to<00:31:57.560> need<00:31:57.740> to<00:31:57.920> learn<00:31:58.070> more<00:31:58.250> about<00:31:58.400> that 00:31:58.570 --> 00:31:58.580 align:start position:0% going to need to learn more about that 00:31:58.580 --> 00:32:02.920 align:start position:0% going to need to learn more about that and<00:31:59.180> what<00:32:00.310> options<00:32:01.310> we<00:32:01.490> have<00:32:01.730> for<00:32:01.760> for<00:32:02.570> working 00:32:02.920 --> 00:32:02.930 align:start position:0% and what options we have for for working 00:32:02.930 --> 00:32:04.750 align:start position:0% and what options we have for for working with<00:32:03.110> folks<00:32:03.350> who<00:32:03.620> who<00:32:03.980> might<00:32:04.190> have<00:32:04.370> that<00:32:04.580> going 00:32:04.750 --> 00:32:04.760 align:start position:0% with folks who who might have that going 00:32:04.760 --> 00:32:07.480 align:start position:0% with folks who who might have that going on<00:32:05.200> this<00:32:06.200> is<00:32:06.350> speculation<00:32:06.650> right<00:32:07.310> now<00:32:07.430> we 00:32:07.480 --> 00:32:07.490 align:start position:0% on this is speculation right now we 00:32:07.490 --> 00:32:09.070 align:start position:0% on this is speculation right now we don't<00:32:07.700> know<00:32:07.880> if<00:32:08.060> you're<00:32:08.210> even<00:32:08.450> going<00:32:08.660> to<00:32:08.810> want 00:32:09.070 --> 00:32:09.080 align:start position:0% don't know if you're even going to want 00:32:09.080 --> 00:32:11.260 align:start position:0% don't know if you're even going to want to<00:32:09.230> adopt<00:32:09.530> a<00:32:09.860> short-term<00:32:10.280> rental<00:32:10.460> ordinance 00:32:11.260 --> 00:32:11.270 align:start position:0% to adopt a short-term rental ordinance 00:32:11.270 --> 00:32:13.720 align:start position:0% to adopt a short-term rental ordinance for<00:32:11.570> land<00:32:11.750> use<00:32:11.900> controls<00:32:12.320> but<00:32:12.590> if<00:32:12.680> you<00:32:12.770> do<00:32:12.980> we 00:32:13.720 --> 00:32:13.730 align:start position:0% for land use controls but if you do we 00:32:13.730 --> 00:32:15.280 align:start position:0% for land use controls but if you do we will<00:32:13.910> need<00:32:14.090> to<00:32:14.240> really<00:32:14.510> think<00:32:14.720> about<00:32:14.810> a<00:32:14.960> grace 00:32:15.280 --> 00:32:15.290 align:start position:0% will need to really think about a grace 00:32:15.290 --> 00:32:18.150 align:start position:0% will need to really think about a grace period<00:32:15.320> or<00:32:16.280> some<00:32:16.580> some<00:32:16.940> kind<00:32:17.150> of<00:32:17.270> a<00:32:17.390> transition 00:32:18.150 --> 00:32:18.160 align:start position:0% period or some some kind of a transition 00:32:18.160 --> 00:32:22.540 align:start position:0% period or some some kind of a transition time<00:32:19.160> for<00:32:19.580> that<00:32:19.730> and<00:32:20.570> we<00:32:21.500> would<00:32:21.680> also<00:32:21.890> need<00:32:22.280> to 00:32:22.540 --> 00:32:22.550 align:start position:0% time for that and we would also need to 00:32:22.550 --> 00:32:26.170 align:start position:0% time for that and we would also need to use<00:32:23.030> some<00:32:23.780> kind<00:32:23.990> of<00:32:24.110> a<00:32:24.200> grace<00:32:24.410> period<00:32:24.560> for<00:32:25.340> that 00:32:26.170 --> 00:32:26.180 align:start position:0% use some kind of a grace period for that 00:32:26.180 --> 00:32:28.150 align:start position:0% use some kind of a grace period for that after<00:32:26.600> the<00:32:26.720> fact<00:32:26.900> permitting<00:32:27.710> that<00:32:27.740> we 00:32:28.150 --> 00:32:28.160 align:start position:0% after the fact permitting that we 00:32:28.160 --> 00:32:30.790 align:start position:0% after the fact permitting that we imagine<00:32:29.000> would<00:32:29.570> need<00:32:29.810> to<00:32:29.990> happen<00:32:30.200> so<00:32:30.650> we'd 00:32:30.790 --> 00:32:30.800 align:start position:0% imagine would need to happen so we'd 00:32:30.800 --> 00:32:34.120 align:start position:0% imagine would need to happen so we'd really<00:32:31.190> want<00:32:31.490> to<00:32:31.760> have<00:32:32.590> everybody<00:32:33.590> come<00:32:33.890> in 00:32:34.120 --> 00:32:34.130 align:start position:0% really want to have everybody come in 00:32:34.130 --> 00:32:36.760 align:start position:0% really want to have everybody come in and<00:32:34.370> get<00:32:34.820> their<00:32:35.090> their<00:32:35.810> short-term<00:32:36.230> mental 00:32:36.760 --> 00:32:36.770 align:start position:0% and get their their short-term mental 00:32:36.770 --> 00:32:40.450 align:start position:0% and get their their short-term mental part<00:32:37.760> part<00:32:38.420> of<00:32:38.510> the<00:32:38.660> system<00:32:39.110> so<00:32:39.920> that<00:32:39.950> we<00:32:40.280> know 00:32:40.450 --> 00:32:40.460 align:start position:0% part part of the system so that we know 00:32:40.460 --> 00:32:43.420 align:start position:0% part part of the system so that we know where<00:32:40.670> it<00:32:40.790> is<00:32:40.970> and<00:32:41.330> everybody<00:32:42.230> can<00:32:42.710> show<00:32:43.250> us 00:32:43.420 --> 00:32:43.430 align:start position:0% where it is and everybody can show us 00:32:43.430 --> 00:32:46.630 align:start position:0% where it is and everybody can show us yes<00:32:43.880> we've<00:32:44.240> got<00:32:44.270> are<00:32:44.780> all<00:32:45.260> these<00:32:45.500> these<00:32:46.130> boxes 00:32:46.630 --> 00:32:46.640 align:start position:0% yes we've got are all these these boxes 00:32:46.640 --> 00:32:48.610 align:start position:0% yes we've got are all these these boxes checked<00:32:47.000> whatever<00:32:47.450> those<00:32:47.660> boxes<00:32:48.230> are<00:32:48.380> that 00:32:48.610 --> 00:32:48.620 align:start position:0% checked whatever those boxes are that 00:32:48.620 --> 00:32:51.910 align:start position:0% checked whatever those boxes are that you<00:32:48.800> would<00:32:48.950> set<00:32:49.460> up<00:32:49.580> in<00:32:49.730> your<00:32:49.850> code<00:32:50.590> and<00:32:51.590> just<00:32:51.830> a 00:32:51.910 --> 00:32:51.920 align:start position:0% you would set up in your code and just a 00:32:51.920 --> 00:32:53.800 align:start position:0% you would set up in your code and just a couple<00:32:52.070> notes<00:32:52.340> about<00:32:52.670> that<00:32:52.730> way<00:32:53.030> we 00:32:53.800 --> 00:32:53.810 align:start position:0% couple notes about that way we 00:32:53.810 --> 00:32:56.290 align:start position:0% couple notes about that way we not<00:32:54.020> interested<00:32:54.710> in<00:32:54.860> monitoring<00:32:55.580> short-term 00:32:56.290 --> 00:32:56.300 align:start position:0% not interested in monitoring short-term 00:32:56.300 --> 00:33:00.460 align:start position:0% not interested in monitoring short-term rentals<00:32:56.660> on<00:32:56.930> a<00:32:57.280> high-touch<00:32:58.780> way<00:32:59.780> we<00:33:00.230> aren't 00:33:00.460 --> 00:33:00.470 align:start position:0% rentals on a high-touch way we aren't 00:33:00.470 --> 00:33:02.380 align:start position:0% rentals on a high-touch way we aren't interested<00:33:00.620> in<00:33:01.040> inspecting<00:33:01.880> them<00:33:02.120> on<00:33:02.360> a 00:33:02.380 --> 00:33:02.390 align:start position:0% interested in inspecting them on a 00:33:02.390 --> 00:33:05.100 align:start position:0% interested in inspecting them on a regular<00:33:02.600> basis<00:33:03.290> this<00:33:03.500> is<00:33:03.560> about<00:33:03.950> starting<00:33:04.700> up 00:33:05.100 --> 00:33:05.110 align:start position:0% regular basis this is about starting up 00:33:05.110 --> 00:33:08.170 align:start position:0% regular basis this is about starting up I<00:33:06.110> have<00:33:06.650> seen<00:33:06.890> short-term<00:33:07.490> rentals<00:33:07.790> that<00:33:08.000> do 00:33:08.170 --> 00:33:08.180 align:start position:0% I have seen short-term rentals that do 00:33:08.180 --> 00:33:11.290 align:start position:0% I have seen short-term rentals that do not<00:33:08.360> meet<00:33:08.600> fire<00:33:08.990> codes<00:33:09.670> we<00:33:10.670> don't<00:33:10.880> want<00:33:11.120> that 00:33:11.290 --> 00:33:11.300 align:start position:0% not meet fire codes we don't want that 00:33:11.300 --> 00:33:13.390 align:start position:0% not meet fire codes we don't want that to<00:33:11.480> happen<00:33:11.690> we<00:33:12.110> want<00:33:12.260> to<00:33:12.350> catch<00:33:12.530> that<00:33:12.890> it<00:33:13.130> isn't 00:33:13.390 --> 00:33:13.400 align:start position:0% to happen we want to catch that it isn't 00:33:13.400 --> 00:33:15.460 align:start position:0% to happen we want to catch that it isn't to<00:33:13.520> shut<00:33:13.760> them<00:33:13.940> down<00:33:13.970> it's<00:33:14.450> to<00:33:14.660> correct<00:33:15.110> the 00:33:15.460 --> 00:33:15.470 align:start position:0% to shut them down it's to correct the 00:33:15.470 --> 00:33:16.900 align:start position:0% to shut them down it's to correct the conditions<00:33:16.070> so<00:33:16.340> that<00:33:16.370> they<00:33:16.700> can<00:33:16.880> operate 00:33:16.900 --> 00:33:16.910 align:start position:0% conditions so that they can operate 00:33:16.910 --> 00:33:19.750 align:start position:0% conditions so that they can operate safely<00:33:17.660> the<00:33:18.650> whole<00:33:18.920> intention<00:33:19.400> is<00:33:19.730> to 00:33:19.750 --> 00:33:19.760 align:start position:0% safely the whole intention is to 00:33:19.760 --> 00:33:22.450 align:start position:0% safely the whole intention is to facilitate<00:33:20.120> these<00:33:20.930> in<00:33:21.260> in<00:33:21.710> an<00:33:21.890> appropriate 00:33:22.450 --> 00:33:22.460 align:start position:0% facilitate these in in an appropriate 00:33:22.460 --> 00:33:25.120 align:start position:0% facilitate these in in an appropriate manner<00:33:22.490> so<00:33:23.180> that's<00:33:23.720> the<00:33:23.900> idea<00:33:24.230> about<00:33:24.440> a<00:33:24.860> grace 00:33:25.120 --> 00:33:25.130 align:start position:0% manner so that's the idea about a grace 00:33:25.130 --> 00:33:27.520 align:start position:0% manner so that's the idea about a grace period<00:33:25.670> and<00:33:25.880> after<00:33:26.090> the<00:33:26.330> fact<00:33:26.480> permitting<00:33:27.140> and 00:33:27.520 --> 00:33:27.530 align:start position:0% period and after the fact permitting and 00:33:27.530 --> 00:33:30.880 align:start position:0% period and after the fact permitting and thinking<00:33:27.890> of<00:33:28.010> a<00:33:28.100> a<00:33:28.400> really<00:33:29.500> business<00:33:30.500> friendly 00:33:30.880 --> 00:33:30.890 align:start position:0% thinking of a a really business friendly 00:33:30.890 --> 00:33:33.600 align:start position:0% thinking of a a really business friendly approach<00:33:31.430> to<00:33:31.880> helping<00:33:32.630> these<00:33:32.810> businesses 00:33:33.600 --> 00:33:33.610 align:start position:0% approach to helping these businesses 00:33:33.610 --> 00:33:37.030 align:start position:0% approach to helping these businesses kind<00:33:34.610> of<00:33:34.700> come<00:33:35.270> into<00:33:35.450> the<00:33:35.750> rowing<00:33:36.530> along<00:33:36.800> with 00:33:37.030 --> 00:33:37.040 align:start position:0% kind of come into the rowing along with 00:33:37.040 --> 00:33:41.590 align:start position:0% kind of come into the rowing along with whatever<00:33:37.280> ordinance<00:33:37.880> we<00:33:38.030> may<00:33:38.210> end<00:33:38.360> up<00:33:38.450> with<00:33:40.600> we 00:33:41.590 --> 00:33:41.600 align:start position:0% whatever ordinance we may end up with we 00:33:41.600 --> 00:33:43.480 align:start position:0% whatever ordinance we may end up with we will<00:33:41.870> also<00:33:42.170> need<00:33:42.560> to<00:33:42.620> have<00:33:42.890> some<00:33:43.160> kind<00:33:43.340> of 00:33:43.480 --> 00:33:43.490 align:start position:0% will also need to have some kind of 00:33:43.490 --> 00:33:46.420 align:start position:0% will also need to have some kind of process<00:33:44.060> for<00:33:44.420> how<00:33:44.720> to<00:33:44.780> deal<00:33:45.170> with<00:33:45.430> code 00:33:46.420 --> 00:33:46.430 align:start position:0% process for how to deal with code 00:33:46.430 --> 00:33:48.100 align:start position:0% process for how to deal with code violations<00:33:47.120> they<00:33:47.360> do<00:33:47.420> come<00:33:47.750> up<00:33:47.780> we've 00:33:48.100 --> 00:33:48.110 align:start position:0% violations they do come up we've 00:33:48.110 --> 00:33:51.040 align:start position:0% violations they do come up we've mentioned<00:33:48.350> it<00:33:48.680> a<00:33:48.770> few<00:33:49.010> times<00:33:49.250> there<00:33:49.610> we<00:33:50.420> we<00:33:50.900> do 00:33:51.040 --> 00:33:51.050 align:start position:0% mentioned it a few times there we we do 00:33:51.050 --> 00:33:52.780 align:start position:0% mentioned it a few times there we we do get<00:33:51.290> complaints<00:33:51.710> we<00:33:51.890> don't<00:33:52.070> get<00:33:52.160> a<00:33:52.190> lot<00:33:52.490> of 00:33:52.780 --> 00:33:52.790 align:start position:0% get complaints we don't get a lot of 00:33:52.790 --> 00:33:55.840 align:start position:0% get complaints we don't get a lot of complaints<00:33:53.300> I<00:33:53.480> don't<00:33:53.690> want<00:33:53.870> to<00:33:53.990> over<00:33:54.850> overplay 00:33:55.840 --> 00:33:55.850 align:start position:0% complaints I don't want to over overplay 00:33:55.850 --> 00:33:58.240 align:start position:0% complaints I don't want to over overplay that<00:33:56.150> yet<00:33:56.660> we<00:33:56.870> have<00:33:57.140> also<00:33:57.350> heard<00:33:57.710> people<00:33:57.740> talk 00:33:58.240 --> 00:33:58.250 align:start position:0% that yet we have also heard people talk 00:33:58.250 --> 00:34:01.600 align:start position:0% that yet we have also heard people talk to<00:33:58.430> us<00:33:58.460> about<00:33:59.230> their<00:34:00.230> concern<00:34:00.950> about<00:34:01.310> what 00:34:01.600 --> 00:34:01.610 align:start position:0% to us about their concern about what 00:34:01.610 --> 00:34:03.850 align:start position:0% to us about their concern about what they're<00:34:01.790> seen<00:34:02.150> with<00:34:02.510> short-term<00:34:03.200> rentals<00:34:03.680> in 00:34:03.850 --> 00:34:03.860 align:start position:0% they're seen with short-term rentals in 00:34:03.860 --> 00:34:05.680 align:start position:0% they're seen with short-term rentals in their<00:34:04.010> neighborhoods<00:34:04.550> and<00:34:04.700> they<00:34:04.880> won't<00:34:05.180> call 00:34:05.680 --> 00:34:05.690 align:start position:0% their neighborhoods and they won't call 00:34:05.690 --> 00:34:09.040 align:start position:0% their neighborhoods and they won't call anybody<00:34:06.050> out<00:34:06.500> because<00:34:07.510> neighbors<00:34:08.510> like<00:34:08.840> each 00:34:09.040 --> 00:34:09.050 align:start position:0% anybody out because neighbors like each 00:34:09.050 --> 00:34:10.570 align:start position:0% anybody out because neighbors like each other<00:34:09.320> and<00:34:09.680> they<00:34:09.830> want<00:34:10.040> to<00:34:10.130> keep<00:34:10.340> their 00:34:10.570 --> 00:34:10.580 align:start position:0% other and they want to keep their 00:34:10.580 --> 00:34:12.610 align:start position:0% other and they want to keep their neighborhoods<00:34:10.730> happy<00:34:11.660> with<00:34:11.810> each<00:34:11.990> other<00:34:12.260> and 00:34:12.610 --> 00:34:12.620 align:start position:0% neighborhoods happy with each other and 00:34:12.620 --> 00:34:14.710 align:start position:0% neighborhoods happy with each other and so<00:34:12.830> this<00:34:12.980> is<00:34:13.160> this<00:34:13.760> is<00:34:13.910> something<00:34:14.330> that<00:34:14.360> we 00:34:14.710 --> 00:34:14.720 align:start position:0% so this is this is something that we 00:34:14.720 --> 00:34:19.960 align:start position:0% so this is this is something that we recognizes<00:34:15.650> is<00:34:17.230> part<00:34:18.230> of<00:34:18.320> the<00:34:19.220> culture<00:34:19.670> here 00:34:19.960 --> 00:34:19.970 align:start position:0% recognizes is part of the culture here 00:34:19.970 --> 00:34:22.090 align:start position:0% recognizes is part of the culture here which<00:34:20.210> is<00:34:20.390> it's<00:34:20.690> it's<00:34:21.110> really<00:34:21.230> very<00:34:21.470> nice<00:34:21.680> but 00:34:22.090 --> 00:34:22.100 align:start position:0% which is it's it's really very nice but 00:34:22.100 --> 00:34:25.630 align:start position:0% which is it's it's really very nice but it<00:34:22.190> makes<00:34:22.340> it<00:34:22.460> hard<00:34:22.730> to<00:34:23.110> maybe<00:34:24.640> confront 00:34:25.630 --> 00:34:25.640 align:start position:0% it makes it hard to maybe confront 00:34:25.640 --> 00:34:27.580 align:start position:0% it makes it hard to maybe confront something<00:34:26.180> that's<00:34:26.420> been<00:34:26.660> a<00:34:26.690> problem<00:34:27.020> and<00:34:27.440> so 00:34:27.580 --> 00:34:27.590 align:start position:0% something that's been a problem and so 00:34:27.590 --> 00:34:30.070 align:start position:0% something that's been a problem and so we're<00:34:27.740> hoping<00:34:28.040> that<00:34:28.100> there's<00:34:28.550> these<00:34:29.330> kinds<00:34:29.990> of 00:34:30.070 --> 00:34:30.080 align:start position:0% we're hoping that there's these kinds of 00:34:30.080 --> 00:34:33.610 align:start position:0% we're hoping that there's these kinds of performance<00:34:30.710> standards<00:34:31.310> are<00:34:32.380> aligned<00:34:33.380> with 00:34:33.610 --> 00:34:33.620 align:start position:0% performance standards are aligned with 00:34:33.620 --> 00:34:36.550 align:start position:0% performance standards are aligned with people's<00:34:34.220> expectations<00:34:34.750> for<00:34:35.750> how<00:34:36.350> their 00:34:36.550 --> 00:34:36.560 align:start position:0% people's expectations for how their 00:34:36.560 --> 00:34:39.400 align:start position:0% people's expectations for how their neighborhood<00:34:37.010> would<00:34:37.220> be<00:34:37.900> affected<00:34:38.900> or<00:34:39.050> are 00:34:39.400 --> 00:34:39.410 align:start position:0% neighborhood would be affected or are 00:34:39.410 --> 00:34:42.910 align:start position:0% neighborhood would be affected or are hopefully<00:34:40.300> not<00:34:41.300> even<00:34:41.570> noticeable<00:34:42.140> to<00:34:42.740> have 00:34:42.910 --> 00:34:42.920 align:start position:0% hopefully not even noticeable to have 00:34:42.920 --> 00:34:46.660 align:start position:0% hopefully not even noticeable to have short<00:34:43.190> term<00:34:43.370> rentals<00:34:43.670> in<00:34:43.910> it<00:34:45.160> but<00:34:46.160> we<00:34:46.490> would 00:34:46.660 --> 00:34:46.670 align:start position:0% short term rentals in it but we would 00:34:46.670 --> 00:34:48.940 align:start position:0% short term rentals in it but we would have<00:34:46.820> to<00:34:47.030> have<00:34:47.210> some<00:34:47.480> kind<00:34:47.720> of<00:34:47.840> really<00:34:48.560> fair 00:34:48.940 --> 00:34:48.950 align:start position:0% have to have some kind of really fair 00:34:48.950 --> 00:34:52.690 align:start position:0% have to have some kind of really fair and<00:34:48.980> clear<00:34:49.520> process<00:34:50.350> what<00:34:51.350> Joe<00:34:51.650> and<00:34:51.950> I<00:34:52.190> like<00:34:52.460> to 00:34:52.690 --> 00:34:52.700 align:start position:0% and clear process what Joe and I like to 00:34:52.700 --> 00:34:56.940 align:start position:0% and clear process what Joe and I like to do<00:34:52.880> with<00:34:53.210> code<00:34:53.480> violations<00:34:54.200> is<00:34:54.560> we<00:34:54.950> seek 00:34:56.940 --> 00:34:56.950 align:start position:0% do with code violations is we seek 00:34:56.950 --> 00:34:59.620 align:start position:0% do with code violations is we seek voluntary<00:34:57.950> compliance<00:34:58.220> we<00:34:59.150> don't<00:34:59.300> even<00:34:59.450> like 00:34:59.620 --> 00:34:59.630 align:start position:0% voluntary compliance we don't even like 00:34:59.630 --> 00:35:01.450 align:start position:0% voluntary compliance we don't even like to<00:34:59.780> write<00:34:59.930> them<00:35:00.140> up<00:35:00.260> unless<00:35:00.470> we<00:35:00.680> have<00:35:00.920> to<00:35:01.160> we 00:35:01.450 --> 00:35:01.460 align:start position:0% to write them up unless we have to we 00:35:01.460 --> 00:35:04.570 align:start position:0% to write them up unless we have to we just<00:35:02.060> like<00:35:03.020> to<00:35:03.200> let<00:35:03.350> folks<00:35:03.620> know<00:35:03.860> what<00:35:04.340> needs 00:35:04.570 --> 00:35:04.580 align:start position:0% just like to let folks know what needs 00:35:04.580 --> 00:35:07.340 align:start position:0% just like to let folks know what needs to<00:35:04.760> get<00:35:05.000> fixed<00:35:05.300> and<00:35:05.660> 90%<00:35:06.590> of<00:35:06.920> the<00:35:07.010> time 00:35:07.340 --> 00:35:07.350 align:start position:0% to get fixed and 90% of the time 00:35:07.350 --> 00:35:09.890 align:start position:0% to get fixed and 90% of the time gets<00:35:07.500> fixed<00:35:07.950> and<00:35:08.100> that's<00:35:08.280> kind<00:35:09.060> of<00:35:09.120> great<00:35:09.330> so 00:35:09.890 --> 00:35:09.900 align:start position:0% gets fixed and that's kind of great so 00:35:09.900 --> 00:35:13.790 align:start position:0% gets fixed and that's kind of great so this<00:35:10.620> isn't<00:35:10.860> a<00:35:11.190> focus<00:35:12.120> on<00:35:12.390> that<00:35:12.900> negative<00:35:13.320> side 00:35:13.790 --> 00:35:13.800 align:start position:0% this isn't a focus on that negative side 00:35:13.800 --> 00:35:16.880 align:start position:0% this isn't a focus on that negative side but<00:35:14.930> we<00:35:15.930> know<00:35:16.050> some<00:35:16.260> people<00:35:16.380> are<00:35:16.560> worried 00:35:16.880 --> 00:35:16.890 align:start position:0% but we know some people are worried 00:35:16.890 --> 00:35:19.700 align:start position:0% but we know some people are worried about<00:35:16.950> that<00:35:17.130> and<00:35:17.730> you<00:35:18.480> will<00:35:18.660> if<00:35:18.960> a<00:35:19.290> coke<00:35:19.470> comes 00:35:19.700 --> 00:35:19.710 align:start position:0% about that and you will if a coke comes 00:35:19.710 --> 00:35:21.260 align:start position:0% about that and you will if a coke comes forward<00:35:20.040> you<00:35:20.220> will<00:35:20.370> see<00:35:20.550> some<00:35:20.730> language<00:35:21.120> about 00:35:21.260 --> 00:35:21.270 align:start position:0% forward you will see some language about 00:35:21.270 --> 00:35:22.850 align:start position:0% forward you will see some language about that<00:35:21.600> because<00:35:21.750> you<00:35:21.990> have<00:35:22.170> to<00:35:22.350> you<00:35:22.650> have<00:35:22.680> to 00:35:22.850 --> 00:35:22.860 align:start position:0% that because you have to you have to 00:35:22.860 --> 00:35:27.800 align:start position:0% that because you have to you have to have<00:35:23.010> that<00:35:23.250> kind<00:35:23.460> of<00:35:23.520> process<00:35:25.910> all<00:35:26.910> right<00:35:27.270> so 00:35:27.800 --> 00:35:27.810 align:start position:0% have that kind of process all right so 00:35:27.810 --> 00:35:34.460 align:start position:0% have that kind of process all right so then<00:35:28.080> we<00:35:31.130> also<00:35:32.130> were<00:35:32.870> hopeful<00:35:33.870> that<00:35:33.900> people 00:35:34.460 --> 00:35:34.470 align:start position:0% then we also were hopeful that people 00:35:34.470 --> 00:35:38.840 align:start position:0% then we also were hopeful that people noticed<00:35:35.340> that<00:35:35.460> in<00:35:36.240> a<00:35:36.390> staff<00:35:36.630> report<00:35:37.280> we<00:35:38.280> called 00:35:38.840 --> 00:35:38.850 align:start position:0% noticed that in a staff report we called 00:35:38.850 --> 00:35:41.960 align:start position:0% noticed that in a staff report we called all<00:35:39.000> of<00:35:39.150> these<00:35:39.300> initial<00:35:40.050> suggestions<00:35:40.920> and<00:35:41.400> we 00:35:41.960 --> 00:35:41.970 align:start position:0% all of these initial suggestions and we 00:35:41.970 --> 00:35:44.560 align:start position:0% all of these initial suggestions and we are<00:35:42.120> not<00:35:42.300> coming<00:35:43.170> in<00:35:43.380> this<00:35:43.560> room<00:35:43.860> with 00:35:44.560 --> 00:35:44.570 align:start position:0% are not coming in this room with 00:35:44.570 --> 00:35:47.480 align:start position:0% are not coming in this room with hard-sell<00:35:45.570> staff<00:35:46.080> recommendations<00:35:47.040> tonight 00:35:47.480 --> 00:35:47.490 align:start position:0% hard-sell staff recommendations tonight 00:35:47.490 --> 00:35:50.450 align:start position:0% hard-sell staff recommendations tonight so<00:35:47.790> again<00:35:48.120> reminding<00:35:48.870> kind<00:35:49.740> of<00:35:49.800> at<00:35:49.950> the<00:35:50.220> tone 00:35:50.450 --> 00:35:50.460 align:start position:0% so again reminding kind of at the tone 00:35:50.460 --> 00:35:54.220 align:start position:0% so again reminding kind of at the tone of<00:35:50.490> what<00:35:51.090> we<00:35:51.210> hope<00:35:51.360> this<00:35:51.510> discussion<00:35:52.110> is<00:35:52.230> about 00:35:54.220 --> 00:35:54.230 align:start position:0% of what we hope this discussion is about 00:35:54.230 --> 00:35:58.190 align:start position:0% of what we hope this discussion is about we<00:35:55.230> do<00:35:55.470> have<00:35:55.710> this<00:35:55.920> context<00:35:56.730> of<00:35:56.940> what<00:35:57.930> you've 00:35:58.190 --> 00:35:58.200 align:start position:0% we do have this context of what you've 00:35:58.200 --> 00:36:00.110 align:start position:0% we do have this context of what you've already<00:35:58.380> thought<00:35:58.650> about<00:35:58.890> in<00:35:59.340> your<00:35:59.820> staff 00:36:00.110 --> 00:36:00.120 align:start position:0% already thought about in your staff 00:36:00.120 --> 00:36:04.060 align:start position:0% already thought about in your staff report<00:36:00.570> and<00:36:00.840> coastal<00:36:01.470> commission<00:36:01.860> guidance 00:36:04.060 --> 00:36:04.070 align:start position:0% report and coastal commission guidance 00:36:04.070 --> 00:36:07.550 align:start position:0% report and coastal commission guidance we<00:36:05.070> talked<00:36:05.580> slightly<00:36:06.540> about<00:36:06.720> complaints<00:36:07.260> but 00:36:07.550 --> 00:36:07.560 align:start position:0% we talked slightly about complaints but 00:36:07.560 --> 00:36:10.510 align:start position:0% we talked slightly about complaints but we<00:36:07.710> do<00:36:07.920> want<00:36:08.160> to<00:36:08.280> remind<00:36:08.580> everybody<00:36:08.910> about 00:36:10.510 --> 00:36:10.520 align:start position:0% we do want to remind everybody about 00:36:10.520 --> 00:36:12.980 align:start position:0% we do want to remind everybody about kind<00:36:11.520> of<00:36:11.580> some<00:36:11.670> of<00:36:11.850> the<00:36:11.970> nuts<00:36:12.510> and<00:36:12.690> bolts<00:36:12.900> of 00:36:12.980 --> 00:36:12.990 align:start position:0% kind of some of the nuts and bolts of 00:36:12.990 --> 00:36:17.630 align:start position:0% kind of some of the nuts and bolts of Zoning<00:36:13.940> we<00:36:14.940> note<00:36:15.810> in<00:36:16.590> addition<00:36:17.040> to<00:36:17.190> a<00:36:17.220> couple 00:36:17.630 --> 00:36:17.640 align:start position:0% Zoning we note in addition to a couple 00:36:17.640 --> 00:36:19.940 align:start position:0% Zoning we note in addition to a couple people<00:36:17.970> who<00:36:18.240> didn't<00:36:18.810> who<00:36:19.410> took<00:36:19.590> the<00:36:19.770> survey 00:36:19.940 --> 00:36:19.950 align:start position:0% people who didn't who took the survey 00:36:19.950 --> 00:36:21.710 align:start position:0% people who didn't who took the survey and<00:36:20.310> didn't<00:36:20.550> like<00:36:20.700> the<00:36:20.880> survey<00:36:21.270> and<00:36:21.420> of<00:36:21.510> course 00:36:21.710 --> 00:36:21.720 align:start position:0% and didn't like the survey and of course 00:36:21.720 --> 00:36:24.590 align:start position:0% and didn't like the survey and of course the<00:36:21.870> survey<00:36:22.430> is<00:36:23.430> trying<00:36:23.760> to<00:36:23.820> get<00:36:23.940> opinions<00:36:24.180> and 00:36:24.590 --> 00:36:24.600 align:start position:0% the survey is trying to get opinions and 00:36:24.600 --> 00:36:26.750 align:start position:0% the survey is trying to get opinions and we<00:36:24.660> got<00:36:24.780> some<00:36:24.960> opinions<00:36:25.230> about<00:36:25.500> the<00:36:25.770> survey<00:36:26.220> in 00:36:26.750 --> 00:36:26.760 align:start position:0% we got some opinions about the survey in 00:36:26.760 --> 00:36:29.180 align:start position:0% we got some opinions about the survey in addition<00:36:27.420> to<00:36:27.660> about<00:36:27.930> short-term<00:36:28.530> rentals<00:36:28.890> and 00:36:29.180 --> 00:36:29.190 align:start position:0% addition to about short-term rentals and 00:36:29.190 --> 00:36:33.620 align:start position:0% addition to about short-term rentals and that's<00:36:29.370> okay<00:36:29.790> we<00:36:30.000> learned<00:36:30.240> from<00:36:30.480> that<00:36:30.690> too<00:36:32.630> but 00:36:33.620 --> 00:36:33.630 align:start position:0% that's okay we learned from that too but 00:36:33.630 --> 00:36:35.690 align:start position:0% that's okay we learned from that too but there<00:36:34.050> were<00:36:34.230> some<00:36:34.530> comments<00:36:34.830> about<00:36:35.160> well<00:36:35.460> gosh 00:36:35.690 --> 00:36:35.700 align:start position:0% there were some comments about well gosh 00:36:35.700 --> 00:36:38.840 align:start position:0% there were some comments about well gosh why<00:36:36.230> in<00:36:37.230> the<00:36:37.320> world<00:36:37.470> can<00:36:37.740> you<00:36:37.890> put<00:36:38.400> land<00:36:38.700> use 00:36:38.840 --> 00:36:38.850 align:start position:0% why in the world can you put land use 00:36:38.850 --> 00:36:41.450 align:start position:0% why in the world can you put land use controls<00:36:39.270> over<00:36:39.810> what<00:36:40.050> somebody<00:36:40.500> is<00:36:40.860> doing<00:36:41.190> in 00:36:41.450 --> 00:36:41.460 align:start position:0% controls over what somebody is doing in 00:36:41.460 --> 00:36:44.270 align:start position:0% controls over what somebody is doing in their<00:36:41.610> home<00:36:41.820> and<00:36:42.290> it's<00:36:43.290> a<00:36:43.380> great<00:36:43.530> question 00:36:44.270 --> 00:36:44.280 align:start position:0% their home and it's a great question 00:36:44.280 --> 00:36:47.420 align:start position:0% their home and it's a great question short-term<00:36:45.120> rentals<00:36:45.510> like<00:36:46.110> so<00:36:46.830> many<00:36:47.010> other 00:36:47.420 --> 00:36:47.430 align:start position:0% short-term rentals like so many other 00:36:47.430 --> 00:36:50.150 align:start position:0% short-term rentals like so many other home<00:36:47.850> we<00:36:48.270> we<00:36:48.960> see<00:36:49.140> them<00:36:49.290> as<00:36:49.470> akin<00:36:49.770> to<00:36:49.800> a<00:36:49.950> home 00:36:50.150 --> 00:36:50.160 align:start position:0% home we we see them as akin to a home 00:36:50.160 --> 00:36:53.960 align:start position:0% home we we see them as akin to a home occupation<00:36:51.170> require<00:36:52.170> a<00:36:52.650> business<00:36:53.250> license 00:36:53.960 --> 00:36:53.970 align:start position:0% occupation require a business license 00:36:53.970 --> 00:36:57.620 align:start position:0% occupation require a business license and<00:36:54.350> in<00:36:55.350> fact<00:36:55.710> home<00:36:56.460> occupation<00:36:57.150> standards 00:36:57.620 --> 00:36:57.630 align:start position:0% and in fact home occupation standards 00:36:57.630 --> 00:37:00.560 align:start position:0% and in fact home occupation standards are<00:36:57.810> codified<00:36:58.380> there<00:36:59.220> they're<00:36:59.910> actually 00:37:00.560 --> 00:37:00.570 align:start position:0% are codified there they're actually 00:37:00.570 --> 00:37:03.500 align:start position:0% are codified there they're actually really<00:37:01.140> really<00:37:01.470> strict<00:37:02.070> and<00:37:02.520> in<00:37:02.970> fact<00:37:03.180> I<00:37:03.330> think 00:37:03.500 --> 00:37:03.510 align:start position:0% really really strict and in fact I think 00:37:03.510 --> 00:37:05.270 align:start position:0% really really strict and in fact I think they're<00:37:03.630> a<00:37:03.660> little<00:37:03.780> too<00:37:04.110> strict<00:37:04.500> we've<00:37:04.770> we've 00:37:05.270 --> 00:37:05.280 align:start position:0% they're a little too strict we've we've 00:37:05.280 --> 00:37:07.190 align:start position:0% they're a little too strict we've we've talked<00:37:05.610> about<00:37:05.940> that<00:37:06.120> and<00:37:06.270> open<00:37:06.570> forum<00:37:06.930> a<00:37:07.050> few 00:37:07.190 --> 00:37:07.200 align:start position:0% talked about that and open forum a few 00:37:07.200 --> 00:37:10.360 align:start position:0% talked about that and open forum a few times<00:37:07.440> and<00:37:07.710> we'll<00:37:07.860> talk<00:37:08.640> about<00:37:08.880> it<00:37:09.000> again<00:37:09.270> but 00:37:10.360 --> 00:37:10.370 align:start position:0% times and we'll talk about it again but 00:37:10.370 --> 00:37:15.030 align:start position:0% times and we'll talk about it again but that's<00:37:11.200> part<00:37:12.200> of<00:37:12.440> how<00:37:12.940> businesses<00:37:13.990> are 00:37:15.030 --> 00:37:15.040 align:start position:0% that's part of how businesses are 00:37:15.040 --> 00:37:18.490 align:start position:0% that's part of how businesses are happening<00:37:16.040> in<00:37:16.250> neighborhoods<00:37:16.490> now<00:37:17.060> and<00:37:17.500> you 00:37:18.490 --> 00:37:18.500 align:start position:0% happening in neighborhoods now and you 00:37:18.500 --> 00:37:20.380 align:start position:0% happening in neighborhoods now and you might<00:37:18.740> not<00:37:18.920> realize<00:37:19.400> how<00:37:19.640> many<00:37:19.700> are<00:37:20.060> in<00:37:20.330> your 00:37:20.380 --> 00:37:20.390 align:start position:0% might not realize how many are in your 00:37:20.390 --> 00:37:24.100 align:start position:0% might not realize how many are in your neighborhood<00:37:21.140> and<00:37:21.530> I've<00:37:22.280> I've<00:37:22.790> had<00:37:22.850> two<00:37:23.330> I've 00:37:24.100 --> 00:37:24.110 align:start position:0% neighborhood and I've I've had two I've 00:37:24.110 --> 00:37:26.290 align:start position:0% neighborhood and I've I've had two I've been<00:37:24.710> a<00:37:24.740> contractor<00:37:24.980> working<00:37:25.820> out<00:37:25.940> of<00:37:25.970> my<00:37:26.180> own 00:37:26.290 --> 00:37:26.300 align:start position:0% been a contractor working out of my own 00:37:26.300 --> 00:37:28.060 align:start position:0% been a contractor working out of my own house<00:37:26.540> I<00:37:26.750> had<00:37:26.900> to<00:37:27.020> pull<00:37:27.200> a<00:37:27.230> business<00:37:27.650> license 00:37:28.060 --> 00:37:28.070 align:start position:0% house I had to pull a business license 00:37:28.070 --> 00:37:30.610 align:start position:0% house I had to pull a business license and<00:37:28.250> check<00:37:29.030> all<00:37:29.240> those<00:37:29.420> boxes<00:37:29.720> and<00:37:30.260> make<00:37:30.410> sure 00:37:30.610 --> 00:37:30.620 align:start position:0% and check all those boxes and make sure 00:37:30.620 --> 00:37:33.190 align:start position:0% and check all those boxes and make sure that<00:37:30.830> I<00:37:30.890> was<00:37:31.130> conforming<00:37:31.790> to<00:37:31.820> how<00:37:32.660> much<00:37:32.870> of<00:37:33.050> my 00:37:33.190 --> 00:37:33.200 align:start position:0% that I was conforming to how much of my 00:37:33.200 --> 00:37:35.860 align:start position:0% that I was conforming to how much of my home<00:37:33.380> I<00:37:33.410> was<00:37:33.590> using<00:37:34.160> and<00:37:34.370> all<00:37:34.460> of<00:37:34.640> that<00:37:34.670> so<00:37:35.180> this 00:37:35.860 --> 00:37:35.870 align:start position:0% home I was using and all of that so this 00:37:35.870 --> 00:37:38.800 align:start position:0% home I was using and all of that so this is<00:37:36.340> pretty<00:37:37.340> part<00:37:37.610> and<00:37:37.700> parcel<00:37:38.090> in<00:37:38.330> terms<00:37:38.570> of 00:37:38.800 --> 00:37:38.810 align:start position:0% is pretty part and parcel in terms of 00:37:38.810 --> 00:37:42.070 align:start position:0% is pretty part and parcel in terms of what<00:37:39.080> the<00:37:39.290> intent<00:37:39.770> of<00:37:40.010> a<00:37:40.940> particulars<00:37:41.570> owning 00:37:42.070 --> 00:37:42.080 align:start position:0% what the intent of a particulars owning 00:37:42.080 --> 00:37:45.270 align:start position:0% what the intent of a particulars owning district<00:37:42.590> is<00:37:42.830> for<00:37:43.250> and<00:37:43.730> so<00:37:44.240> this<00:37:44.420> is<00:37:44.570> really 00:37:45.270 --> 00:37:45.280 align:start position:0% district is for and so this is really 00:37:45.280 --> 00:37:48.460 align:start position:0% district is for and so this is really context<00:37:46.280> for<00:37:46.520> what<00:37:47.360> house<00:37:47.990> short-term 00:37:48.460 --> 00:37:48.470 align:start position:0% context for what house short-term 00:37:48.470 --> 00:37:51.840 align:start position:0% context for what house short-term rentals<00:37:48.800> might<00:37:49.010> fit<00:37:49.340> into<00:37:49.550> that<00:37:49.880> and<00:37:50.240> then 00:37:51.840 --> 00:37:51.850 align:start position:0% rentals might fit into that and then 00:37:51.850 --> 00:37:55.510 align:start position:0% rentals might fit into that and then your<00:37:52.850> staff<00:37:53.270> is<00:37:53.630> especially<00:37:54.400> interested<00:37:55.400> in 00:37:55.510 --> 00:37:55.520 align:start position:0% your staff is especially interested in 00:37:55.520 --> 00:38:01.420 align:start position:0% your staff is especially interested in how<00:37:55.850> short-term<00:37:56.600> rentals<00:37:56.960> can<00:37:58.810> do<00:37:59.810> some<00:38:00.430> they 00:38:01.420 --> 00:38:01.430 align:start position:0% how short-term rentals can do some they 00:38:01.430 --> 00:38:03.490 align:start position:0% how short-term rentals can do some they kind<00:38:01.640> of<00:38:01.700> have<00:38:01.850> a<00:38:01.880> tension<00:38:02.240> with<00:38:02.870> respect<00:38:03.380> to 00:38:03.490 --> 00:38:03.500 align:start position:0% kind of have a tension with respect to 00:38:03.500 --> 00:38:06.510 align:start position:0% kind of have a tension with respect to housing<00:38:04.390> they<00:38:05.390> can<00:38:05.630> really<00:38:06.110> help<00:38:06.290> people 00:38:06.510 --> 00:38:06.520 align:start position:0% housing they can really help people 00:38:06.520 --> 00:38:08.560 align:start position:0% housing they can really help people supplement<00:38:07.520> income<00:38:07.670> and<00:38:08.120> stay<00:38:08.330> in<00:38:08.450> their 00:38:08.560 --> 00:38:08.570 align:start position:0% supplement income and stay in their 00:38:08.570 --> 00:38:10.420 align:start position:0% supplement income and stay in their homes<00:38:08.780> we've<00:38:09.440> we've<00:38:09.770> heard<00:38:09.950> some<00:38:10.130> great 00:38:10.420 --> 00:38:10.430 align:start position:0% homes we've we've heard some great 00:38:10.430 --> 00:38:16.120 align:start position:0% homes we've we've heard some great stories<00:38:11.000> about<00:38:11.300> that<00:38:12.370> but<00:38:13.370> if<00:38:13.670> they<00:38:14.090> are<00:38:15.130> whole 00:38:16.120 --> 00:38:16.130 align:start position:0% stories about that but if they are whole 00:38:16.130 --> 00:38:20.110 align:start position:0% stories about that but if they are whole house<00:38:16.370> rentals<00:38:16.820> for<00:38:17.210> a<00:38:17.540> lot<00:38:18.440> of<00:38:18.760> weeks<00:38:19.760> of<00:38:20.000> the 00:38:20.110 --> 00:38:20.120 align:start position:0% house rentals for a lot of weeks of the 00:38:20.120 --> 00:38:24.970 align:start position:0% house rentals for a lot of weeks of the year<00:38:21.370> without<00:38:22.370> having<00:38:23.060> a<00:38:23.620> occupancy<00:38:24.620> where 00:38:24.970 --> 00:38:24.980 align:start position:0% year without having a occupancy where 00:38:24.980 --> 00:38:27.120 align:start position:0% year without having a occupancy where you<00:38:25.160> know<00:38:25.280> a<00:38:25.310> primary<00:38:25.790> residence<00:38:25.990> requirement 00:38:27.120 --> 00:38:27.130 align:start position:0% you know a primary residence requirement 00:38:27.130 --> 00:38:30.190 align:start position:0% you know a primary residence requirement often<00:38:28.130> times<00:38:28.340> that<00:38:28.550> that<00:38:28.940> unit<00:38:29.330> is<00:38:29.510> no<00:38:29.930> longer 00:38:30.190 --> 00:38:30.200 align:start position:0% often times that that unit is no longer 00:38:30.200 --> 00:38:31.960 align:start position:0% often times that that unit is no longer part<00:38:30.410> of<00:38:30.440> your<00:38:30.590> housing<00:38:30.920> stock<00:38:31.190> it's<00:38:31.550> really 00:38:31.960 --> 00:38:31.970 align:start position:0% part of your housing stock it's really 00:38:31.970 --> 00:38:34.780 align:start position:0% part of your housing stock it's really used<00:38:32.450> for<00:38:32.780> something<00:38:33.380> or<00:38:33.830> other<00:38:33.860> purposes<00:38:34.460> so 00:38:34.780 --> 00:38:34.790 align:start position:0% used for something or other purposes so 00:38:34.790 --> 00:38:41.200 align:start position:0% used for something or other purposes so um<00:38:35.560> we<00:38:36.560> just<00:38:36.770> we<00:38:37.250> just<00:38:37.280> note<00:38:38.020> this<00:38:39.670> taps<00:38:40.670> into 00:38:41.200 --> 00:38:41.210 align:start position:0% um we just we just note this taps into 00:38:41.210 --> 00:38:42.790 align:start position:0% um we just we just note this taps into all<00:38:41.360> kinds<00:38:41.750> of<00:38:41.810> things<00:38:41.870> that<00:38:42.170> that<00:38:42.620> you've 00:38:42.790 --> 00:38:42.800 align:start position:0% all kinds of things that that you've 00:38:42.800 --> 00:38:46.150 align:start position:0% all kinds of things that that you've been<00:38:42.950> working<00:38:43.280> on<00:38:43.430> through<00:38:43.670> land<00:38:43.880> use<00:38:45.040> some<00:38:46.040> of 00:38:46.150 --> 00:38:46.160 align:start position:0% been working on through land use some of 00:38:46.160 --> 00:38:48.460 align:start position:0% been working on through land use some of the<00:38:46.220> key<00:38:46.400> questions<00:38:46.940> the<00:38:47.180> variations<00:38:47.960> that<00:38:48.170> we 00:38:48.460 --> 00:38:48.470 align:start position:0% the key questions the variations that we 00:38:48.470 --> 00:38:51.640 align:start position:0% the key questions the variations that we see<00:38:48.800> that<00:38:49.100> are<00:38:49.280> really<00:38:50.020> all<00:38:51.020> over<00:38:51.080> the<00:38:51.380> board 00:38:51.640 --> 00:38:51.650 align:start position:0% see that are really all over the board 00:38:51.650 --> 00:38:53.710 align:start position:0% see that are really all over the board you<00:38:51.830> heard<00:38:52.010> scott<00:38:52.400> present<00:38:52.820> this<00:38:53.030> how<00:38:53.540> many 00:38:53.710 --> 00:38:53.720 align:start position:0% you heard scott present this how many 00:38:53.720 --> 00:38:56.350 align:start position:0% you heard scott present this how many nights<00:38:53.930> per<00:38:54.290> year<00:38:54.320> for<00:38:54.650> unholstered<00:38:55.460> san 00:38:56.350 --> 00:38:56.360 align:start position:0% nights per year for unholstered san 00:38:56.360 --> 00:38:58.510 align:start position:0% nights per year for unholstered san mateo<00:38:56.660> county<00:38:56.930> unincorporated<00:38:57.310> allows<00:38:58.310> a 00:38:58.510 --> 00:38:58.520 align:start position:0% mateo county unincorporated allows a 00:38:58.520 --> 00:39:01.690 align:start position:0% mateo county unincorporated allows a hundred<00:38:58.910> and<00:38:59.030> eighty<00:38:59.860> santa<00:39:00.860> cruz<00:39:01.070> allows<00:39:01.340> 30 00:39:01.690 --> 00:39:01.700 align:start position:0% hundred and eighty santa cruz allows 30 00:39:01.700 --> 00:39:05.410 align:start position:0% hundred and eighty santa cruz allows 30 we<00:39:02.000> saw<00:39:02.210> all<00:39:03.220> kinds<00:39:04.220> of<00:39:04.340> examples<00:39:04.910> you'll<00:39:05.150> see 00:39:05.410 --> 00:39:05.420 align:start position:0% we saw all kinds of examples you'll see 00:39:05.420 --> 00:39:07.030 align:start position:0% we saw all kinds of examples you'll see that<00:39:05.570> in<00:39:05.750> the<00:39:05.840> coastal<00:39:06.230> commission<00:39:06.650> summary 00:39:07.030 --> 00:39:07.040 align:start position:0% that in the coastal commission summary 00:39:07.040 --> 00:39:09.940 align:start position:0% that in the coastal commission summary table<00:39:07.550> and<00:39:07.910> so<00:39:08.660> that<00:39:08.810> that<00:39:09.110> tends<00:39:09.440> to<00:39:09.650> be 00:39:09.940 --> 00:39:09.950 align:start position:0% table and so that that tends to be 00:39:09.950 --> 00:39:12.640 align:start position:0% table and so that that tends to be something<00:39:10.610> that<00:39:10.810> folks<00:39:11.810> gravitate<00:39:12.530> around 00:39:12.640 --> 00:39:12.650 align:start position:0% something that folks gravitate around 00:39:12.650 --> 00:39:15.610 align:start position:0% something that folks gravitate around and<00:39:13.340> working<00:39:13.790> on<00:39:13.970> on<00:39:14.240> these<00:39:15.200> kinds<00:39:15.590> of 00:39:15.610 --> 00:39:15.620 align:start position:0% and working on on these kinds of 00:39:15.620 --> 00:39:19.990 align:start position:0% and working on on these kinds of regulations<00:39:17.080> requiring<00:39:18.220> primary<00:39:19.220> residency 00:39:19.990 --> 00:39:20.000 align:start position:0% regulations requiring primary residency 00:39:20.000 --> 00:39:21.070 align:start position:0% regulations requiring primary residency can 00:39:21.070 --> 00:39:21.080 align:start position:0% can 00:39:21.080 --> 00:39:26.410 align:start position:0% can kind<00:39:21.740> of<00:39:21.830> dull<00:39:22.160> the<00:39:22.760> need<00:39:23.119> to<00:39:23.890> do<00:39:24.890> that<00:39:25.420> if 00:39:26.410 --> 00:39:26.420 align:start position:0% kind of dull the need to do that if 00:39:26.420 --> 00:39:29.230 align:start position:0% kind of dull the need to do that if there's<00:39:27.080> concern<00:39:27.590> about<00:39:27.770> that<00:39:27.920> but<00:39:28.460> we<00:39:29.119> just 00:39:29.230 --> 00:39:29.240 align:start position:0% there's concern about that but we just 00:39:29.240 --> 00:39:32.680 align:start position:0% there's concern about that but we just we<00:39:29.810> just<00:39:29.990> want<00:39:30.170> to<00:39:30.260> note<00:39:30.410> about<00:39:30.560> that<00:39:30.680> I<00:39:31.690> we're 00:39:32.680 --> 00:39:32.690 align:start position:0% we just want to note about that I we're 00:39:32.690 --> 00:39:34.450 align:start position:0% we just want to note about that I we're interested<00:39:33.260> in<00:39:33.290> of<00:39:33.560> course<00:39:33.920> and<00:39:34.190> your 00:39:34.450 --> 00:39:34.460 align:start position:0% interested in of course and your 00:39:34.460 --> 00:39:35.730 align:start position:0% interested in of course and your thoughts<00:39:34.640> on<00:39:34.850> the<00:39:34.940> whole<00:39:35.030> thing<00:39:35.330> but 00:39:35.730 --> 00:39:35.740 align:start position:0% thoughts on the whole thing but 00:39:35.740 --> 00:39:39.190 align:start position:0% thoughts on the whole thing but variations<00:39:36.740> for<00:39:36.980> zoning<00:39:37.720> downtown<00:39:38.720> mixed-use 00:39:39.190 --> 00:39:39.200 align:start position:0% variations for zoning downtown mixed-use 00:39:39.200 --> 00:39:40.510 align:start position:0% variations for zoning downtown mixed-use we've<00:39:39.380> been<00:39:39.500> talking<00:39:39.890> about<00:39:39.950> mixed-use 00:39:40.510 --> 00:39:40.520 align:start position:0% we've been talking about mixed-use 00:39:40.520 --> 00:39:42.670 align:start position:0% we've been talking about mixed-use zoning<00:39:40.550> for<00:39:41.030> a<00:39:41.119> while<00:39:41.330> we<00:39:41.780> know<00:39:41.960> that<00:39:42.170> lots<00:39:42.470> of 00:39:42.670 --> 00:39:42.680 align:start position:0% zoning for a while we know that lots of 00:39:42.680 --> 00:39:44.410 align:start position:0% zoning for a while we know that lots of different<00:39:43.010> uses<00:39:43.340> can<00:39:43.610> work<00:39:44.240> together 00:39:44.410 --> 00:39:44.420 align:start position:0% different uses can work together 00:39:44.420 --> 00:39:47.200 align:start position:0% different uses can work together downtown<00:39:45.170> you<00:39:46.160> might<00:39:46.400> want<00:39:46.700> to<00:39:46.790> consider 00:39:47.200 --> 00:39:47.210 align:start position:0% downtown you might want to consider 00:39:47.210 --> 00:39:50.980 align:start position:0% downtown you might want to consider different<00:39:48.610> regulations<00:39:49.610> for<00:39:49.880> the<00:39:50.540> mixed<00:39:50.810> use 00:39:50.980 --> 00:39:50.990 align:start position:0% different regulations for the mixed use 00:39:50.990 --> 00:39:54.490 align:start position:0% different regulations for the mixed use areas<00:39:51.440> you<00:39:52.100> also<00:39:52.460> received<00:39:52.940> a<00:39:53.119> letter<00:39:53.500> about 00:39:54.490 --> 00:39:54.500 align:start position:0% areas you also received a letter about 00:39:54.500 --> 00:39:57.960 align:start position:0% areas you also received a letter about the<00:39:54.860> peds<00:39:55.580> and<00:39:56.030> you<00:39:56.630> know<00:39:56.750> pew<00:39:57.110> tees<00:39:57.260> have 00:39:57.960 --> 00:39:57.970 align:start position:0% the peds and you know pew tees have 00:39:57.970 --> 00:40:00.070 align:start position:0% the peds and you know pew tees have homeowners<00:39:58.970> associations 00:40:00.070 --> 00:40:00.080 align:start position:0% homeowners associations 00:40:00.080 --> 00:40:03.130 align:start position:0% homeowners associations I<00:40:00.290> believe<00:40:01.160> in<00:40:01.280> particular<00:40:01.850> Ocean<00:40:02.240> colony<00:40:02.810> has 00:40:03.130 --> 00:40:03.140 align:start position:0% I believe in particular Ocean colony has 00:40:03.140 --> 00:40:05.200 align:start position:0% I believe in particular Ocean colony has been<00:40:03.280> regulating<00:40:04.280> short-term<00:40:04.880> rentals 00:40:05.200 --> 00:40:05.210 align:start position:0% been regulating short-term rentals 00:40:05.210 --> 00:40:08.440 align:start position:0% been regulating short-term rentals through<00:40:05.480> their<00:40:05.660> CC<00:40:06.140> and<00:40:06.260> ours<00:40:06.500> and<00:40:07.240> they<00:40:08.240> like 00:40:08.440 --> 00:40:08.450 align:start position:0% through their CC and ours and they like 00:40:08.450 --> 00:40:10.240 align:start position:0% through their CC and ours and they like what<00:40:08.630> they're<00:40:08.780> doing<00:40:08.810> apparently<00:40:09.680> from<00:40:09.890> from 00:40:10.240 --> 00:40:10.250 align:start position:0% what they're doing apparently from from 00:40:10.250 --> 00:40:11.740 align:start position:0% what they're doing apparently from from the<00:40:10.340> letter<00:40:10.520> that<00:40:10.610> I've<00:40:10.820> seen<00:40:11.090> it's<00:40:11.330> a<00:40:11.480> little 00:40:11.740 --> 00:40:11.750 align:start position:0% the letter that I've seen it's a little 00:40:11.750 --> 00:40:13.600 align:start position:0% the letter that I've seen it's a little I've<00:40:12.020> heard<00:40:12.530> from<00:40:12.710> them<00:40:12.890> over<00:40:13.100> the<00:40:13.280> years<00:40:13.520> and 00:40:13.600 --> 00:40:13.610 align:start position:0% I've heard from them over the years and 00:40:13.610 --> 00:40:15.520 align:start position:0% I've heard from them over the years and I've<00:40:13.850> been<00:40:14.330> hearing<00:40:14.510> different<00:40:14.869> things<00:40:15.110> so 00:40:15.520 --> 00:40:15.530 align:start position:0% I've been hearing different things so 00:40:15.530 --> 00:40:17.320 align:start position:0% I've been hearing different things so it's<00:40:16.250> great<00:40:16.610> that<00:40:16.820> they've<00:40:16.940> come<00:40:17.150> out<00:40:17.270> and 00:40:17.320 --> 00:40:17.330 align:start position:0% it's great that they've come out and 00:40:17.330 --> 00:40:20.740 align:start position:0% it's great that they've come out and shared<00:40:18.020> this<00:40:18.140> information<00:40:18.350> with<00:40:19.010> you<00:40:19.250> and<00:40:19.750> it 00:40:20.740 --> 00:40:20.750 align:start position:0% shared this information with you and it 00:40:20.750 --> 00:40:24.160 align:start position:0% shared this information with you and it it's<00:40:21.619> if<00:40:22.369> they're<00:40:23.000> able<00:40:23.180> to<00:40:23.450> regulate<00:40:23.780> them 00:40:24.160 --> 00:40:24.170 align:start position:0% it's if they're able to regulate them 00:40:24.170 --> 00:40:26.290 align:start position:0% it's if they're able to regulate them without<00:40:24.590> Joe<00:40:25.280> and<00:40:25.430> me<00:40:25.550> getting<00:40:25.850> complaints 00:40:26.290 --> 00:40:26.300 align:start position:0% without Joe and me getting complaints 00:40:26.300 --> 00:40:28.870 align:start position:0% without Joe and me getting complaints and<00:40:26.540> having<00:40:26.840> to<00:40:26.930> go<00:40:27.050> code<00:40:27.290> enforce<00:40:27.590> them<00:40:27.880> we're 00:40:28.870 --> 00:40:28.880 align:start position:0% and having to go code enforce them we're 00:40:28.880 --> 00:40:31.150 align:start position:0% and having to go code enforce them we're pretty<00:40:29.060> happy<00:40:29.240> about<00:40:29.480> that<00:40:30.050> actually<00:40:30.290> so 00:40:31.150 --> 00:40:31.160 align:start position:0% pretty happy about that actually so 00:40:31.160 --> 00:40:33.070 align:start position:0% pretty happy about that actually so there's<00:40:31.460> we<00:40:32.000> have<00:40:32.030> a<00:40:32.150> really<00:40:32.420> open<00:40:32.720> mind<00:40:32.750> about 00:40:33.070 --> 00:40:33.080 align:start position:0% there's we have a really open mind about 00:40:33.080 --> 00:40:35.050 align:start position:0% there's we have a really open mind about how<00:40:33.500> you<00:40:33.560> might<00:40:33.830> might<00:40:34.430> consider<00:40:34.820> those 00:40:35.050 --> 00:40:35.060 align:start position:0% how you might might consider those 00:40:35.060 --> 00:40:39.010 align:start position:0% how you might might consider those things<00:40:36.640> there<00:40:37.640> were<00:40:37.790> a<00:40:37.820> few<00:40:38.030> regulations<00:40:38.510> that 00:40:39.010 --> 00:40:39.020 align:start position:0% things there were a few regulations that 00:40:39.020 --> 00:40:41.950 align:start position:0% things there were a few regulations that we<00:40:39.170> want<00:40:39.500> to<00:40:39.880> and<00:40:40.880> I'm<00:40:41.000> almost<00:40:41.180> done<00:40:41.480> but<00:40:41.869> we 00:40:41.950 --> 00:40:41.960 align:start position:0% we want to and I'm almost done but we 00:40:41.960 --> 00:40:43.599 align:start position:0% we want to and I'm almost done but we just<00:40:42.140> want<00:40:42.290> to<00:40:42.380> know<00:40:42.440> we<00:40:42.800> did<00:40:43.010> not<00:40:43.190> recommend 00:40:43.599 --> 00:40:43.609 align:start position:0% just want to know we did not recommend 00:40:43.609 --> 00:40:46.960 align:start position:0% just want to know we did not recommend these<00:40:43.940> three<00:40:44.240> things<00:40:44.540> and<00:40:45.250> there's<00:40:46.250> very 00:40:46.960 --> 00:40:46.970 align:start position:0% these three things and there's very 00:40:46.970 --> 00:40:50.349 align:start position:0% these three things and there's very specific<00:40:47.570> reasons<00:40:47.930> why<00:40:48.820> first<00:40:49.820> of<00:40:50.000> all<00:40:50.119> we're 00:40:50.349 --> 00:40:50.359 align:start position:0% specific reasons why first of all we're 00:40:50.359 --> 00:40:52.660 align:start position:0% specific reasons why first of all we're not<00:40:50.540> recommending<00:40:50.800> having<00:40:51.800> and<00:40:52.100> and<00:40:52.490> these 00:40:52.660 --> 00:40:52.670 align:start position:0% not recommending having and and these 00:40:52.670 --> 00:40:54.580 align:start position:0% not recommending having and and these are<00:40:52.850> recommendations<00:40:53.300> at<00:40:53.840> this<00:40:53.990> point<00:40:54.290> for 00:40:54.580 --> 00:40:54.590 align:start position:0% are recommendations at this point for 00:40:54.590 --> 00:40:56.859 align:start position:0% are recommendations at this point for for<00:40:54.920> us<00:40:55.070> and<00:40:55.490> we're<00:40:55.820> open-minded<00:40:56.330> and<00:40:56.720> we'll 00:40:56.859 --> 00:40:56.869 align:start position:0% for us and we're open-minded and we'll 00:40:56.869 --> 00:40:59.859 align:start position:0% for us and we're open-minded and we'll adjust<00:40:57.170> but<00:40:57.470> we<00:40:58.340> would<00:40:58.520> prefer<00:40:58.850> to<00:40:59.060> not<00:40:59.510> have<00:40:59.840> a 00:40:59.859 --> 00:40:59.869 align:start position:0% adjust but we would prefer to not have a 00:40:59.869 --> 00:41:02.770 align:start position:0% adjust but we would prefer to not have a discretionary<00:41:00.710> permit<00:41:01.310> process<00:41:02.119> for<00:41:02.390> this<00:41:02.540> we 00:41:02.770 --> 00:41:02.780 align:start position:0% discretionary permit process for this we 00:41:02.780 --> 00:41:06.820 align:start position:0% discretionary permit process for this we would<00:41:02.930> really<00:41:03.260> like<00:41:04.420> to<00:41:05.420> have<00:41:05.660> this<00:41:06.290> process 00:41:06.820 --> 00:41:06.830 align:start position:0% would really like to have this process 00:41:06.830 --> 00:41:12.490 align:start position:0% would really like to have this process set<00:41:07.100> up<00:41:07.310> in<00:41:07.490> a<00:41:07.580> way<00:41:07.609> that<00:41:08.950> it's<00:41:10.510> it's<00:41:11.510> easy<00:41:12.170> to 00:41:12.490 --> 00:41:12.500 align:start position:0% set up in a way that it's it's easy to 00:41:12.500 --> 00:41:14.800 align:start position:0% set up in a way that it's it's easy to be<00:41:12.650> successful<00:41:12.920> because<00:41:13.820> it's<00:41:14.000> so<00:41:14.150> clear<00:41:14.540> and 00:41:14.800 --> 00:41:14.810 align:start position:0% be successful because it's so clear and 00:41:14.810 --> 00:41:17.440 align:start position:0% be successful because it's so clear and and<00:41:15.320> you<00:41:15.410> can<00:41:15.590> comply<00:41:15.950> with<00:41:16.160> it 00:41:17.440 --> 00:41:17.450 align:start position:0% and you can comply with it 00:41:17.450 --> 00:41:20.130 align:start position:0% and you can comply with it the<00:41:17.780> other<00:41:17.930> two<00:41:18.260> are<00:41:18.650> really<00:41:19.070> interesting 00:41:20.130 --> 00:41:20.140 align:start position:0% the other two are really interesting 00:41:20.140 --> 00:41:23.020 align:start position:0% the other two are really interesting things<00:41:21.140> that<00:41:21.320> we've<00:41:21.950> seen<00:41:22.190> going<00:41:22.400> on<00:41:22.670> in<00:41:22.850> other 00:41:23.020 --> 00:41:23.030 align:start position:0% things that we've seen going on in other 00:41:23.030 --> 00:41:27.609 align:start position:0% things that we've seen going on in other cities<00:41:24.250> some<00:41:25.250> cities<00:41:25.640> try<00:41:26.480> to<00:41:26.540> limit<00:41:27.290> how<00:41:27.560> many 00:41:27.609 --> 00:41:27.619 align:start position:0% cities some cities try to limit how many 00:41:27.619 --> 00:41:29.480 align:start position:0% cities some cities try to limit how many they<00:41:28.070> have<00:41:28.430> in<00:41:28.850> their<00:41:29.060> city 00:41:29.480 --> 00:41:29.490 align:start position:0% they have in their city 00:41:29.490 --> 00:41:33.109 align:start position:0% they have in their city as<00:41:29.700> a<00:41:29.970> whole<00:41:30.450> or<00:41:30.780> they<00:41:31.530> try<00:41:31.980> to<00:41:32.040> have<00:41:32.700> a 00:41:33.109 --> 00:41:33.119 align:start position:0% as a whole or they try to have a 00:41:33.119 --> 00:41:36.680 align:start position:0% as a whole or they try to have a concentration<00:41:34.880> limitation<00:41:35.880> so<00:41:36.060> for<00:41:36.270> example 00:41:36.680 --> 00:41:36.690 align:start position:0% concentration limitation so for example 00:41:36.690 --> 00:41:39.620 align:start position:0% concentration limitation so for example they<00:41:36.810> require<00:41:37.200> a<00:41:37.589> certain<00:41:38.520> amount<00:41:38.700> of<00:41:38.849> spacing 00:41:39.620 --> 00:41:39.630 align:start position:0% they require a certain amount of spacing 00:41:39.630 --> 00:41:43.430 align:start position:0% they require a certain amount of spacing between<00:41:40.040> short-term<00:41:41.040> rentals<00:41:42.440> we're 00:41:43.430 --> 00:41:43.440 align:start position:0% between short-term rentals we're 00:41:43.440 --> 00:41:45.500 align:start position:0% between short-term rentals we're concerned<00:41:43.859> about<00:41:44.040> that<00:41:44.640> for<00:41:45.180> multiple 00:41:45.500 --> 00:41:45.510 align:start position:0% concerned about that for multiple 00:41:45.510 --> 00:41:48.320 align:start position:0% concerned about that for multiple reasons<00:41:45.930> one<00:41:46.800> is<00:41:47.010> I<00:41:47.310> I<00:41:47.550> just<00:41:47.640> don't<00:41:48.000> think<00:41:48.240> we 00:41:48.320 --> 00:41:48.330 align:start position:0% reasons one is I I just don't think we 00:41:48.330 --> 00:41:52.040 align:start position:0% reasons one is I I just don't think we can<00:41:48.560> monitor<00:41:49.560> and<00:41:49.890> enforce<00:41:50.040> it<00:41:50.490> and<00:41:50.810> two<00:41:51.810> is 00:41:52.040 --> 00:41:52.050 align:start position:0% can monitor and enforce it and two is 00:41:52.050 --> 00:41:54.470 align:start position:0% can monitor and enforce it and two is that<00:41:52.770> flexibility<00:41:53.700> that<00:41:54.030> we<00:41:54.150> talked<00:41:54.359> about 00:41:54.470 --> 00:41:54.480 align:start position:0% that flexibility that we talked about 00:41:54.480 --> 00:41:57.099 align:start position:0% that flexibility that we talked about early<00:41:54.960> on<00:41:54.990> where<00:41:55.500> hey<00:41:56.070> I<00:41:56.099> want<00:41:56.460> I<00:41:56.640> want<00:41:56.910> my 00:41:57.099 --> 00:41:57.109 align:start position:0% early on where hey I want I want my 00:41:57.109 --> 00:42:00.200 align:start position:0% early on where hey I want I want my short-term<00:41:58.109> rental<00:41:58.320> up<00:41:58.470> right<00:41:58.680> now<00:41:58.859> and<00:41:59.310> no 00:42:00.200 --> 00:42:00.210 align:start position:0% short-term rental up right now and no 00:42:00.210 --> 00:42:03.260 align:start position:0% short-term rental up right now and no actually<00:42:00.900> this<00:42:01.230> summer<00:42:01.530> I'm<00:42:01.890> gonna<00:42:02.270> garden 00:42:03.260 --> 00:42:03.270 align:start position:0% actually this summer I'm gonna garden 00:42:03.270 --> 00:42:04.790 align:start position:0% actually this summer I'm gonna garden all<00:42:03.390> summer<00:42:03.660> long<00:42:03.750> and<00:42:04.080> I<00:42:04.140> don't<00:42:04.200> want<00:42:04.470> anybody 00:42:04.790 --> 00:42:04.800 align:start position:0% all summer long and I don't want anybody 00:42:04.800 --> 00:42:08.960 align:start position:0% all summer long and I don't want anybody in<00:42:04.859> my<00:42:04.980> house<00:42:05.369> so<00:42:06.300> if<00:42:07.040> somebody's<00:42:08.040> choosing<00:42:08.790> to 00:42:08.960 --> 00:42:08.970 align:start position:0% in my house so if somebody's choosing to 00:42:08.970 --> 00:42:11.300 align:start position:0% in my house so if somebody's choosing to not<00:42:09.119> use<00:42:09.480> it<00:42:09.510> and<00:42:10.020> they've<00:42:10.410> taken<00:42:10.680> one<00:42:11.070> of<00:42:11.099> the 00:42:11.300 --> 00:42:11.310 align:start position:0% not use it and they've taken one of the 00:42:11.310 --> 00:42:15.140 align:start position:0% not use it and they've taken one of the spots<00:42:11.820> and<00:42:13.040> it's<00:42:14.040> it's<00:42:14.430> making<00:42:14.700> it<00:42:14.970> so 00:42:15.140 --> 00:42:15.150 align:start position:0% spots and it's it's making it so 00:42:15.150 --> 00:42:18.380 align:start position:0% spots and it's it's making it so somebody<00:42:15.480> else<00:42:15.540> who's<00:42:16.080> who's<00:42:17.119> available<00:42:18.119> to 00:42:18.380 --> 00:42:18.390 align:start position:0% somebody else who's who's available to 00:42:18.390 --> 00:42:20.570 align:start position:0% somebody else who's who's available to provide<00:42:18.990> that<00:42:19.290> and<00:42:19.589> might<00:42:20.099> need<00:42:20.280> the<00:42:20.430> income 00:42:20.570 --> 00:42:20.580 align:start position:0% provide that and might need the income 00:42:20.580 --> 00:42:22.760 align:start position:0% provide that and might need the income or<00:42:21.119> really<00:42:21.780> wants<00:42:22.080> to<00:42:22.230> have<00:42:22.410> that<00:42:22.560> business 00:42:22.760 --> 00:42:22.770 align:start position:0% or really wants to have that business 00:42:22.770 --> 00:42:26.480 align:start position:0% or really wants to have that business opportunity<00:42:23.900> they<00:42:24.900> can't<00:42:25.170> do<00:42:25.410> it<00:42:25.589> so<00:42:25.950> if<00:42:26.220> your 00:42:26.480 --> 00:42:26.490 align:start position:0% opportunity they can't do it so if your 00:42:26.490 --> 00:42:28.520 align:start position:0% opportunity they can't do it so if your regulations<00:42:27.089> are<00:42:27.240> working<00:42:27.630> well<00:42:27.780> enough<00:42:27.810> we 00:42:28.520 --> 00:42:28.530 align:start position:0% regulations are working well enough we 00:42:28.530 --> 00:42:32.420 align:start position:0% regulations are working well enough we would<00:42:28.680> hope<00:42:29.040> and<00:42:29.520> we<00:42:30.150> would<00:42:30.410> frankly<00:42:31.410> kind<00:42:32.280> of 00:42:32.420 --> 00:42:32.430 align:start position:0% would hope and we would frankly kind of 00:42:32.430 --> 00:42:35.420 align:start position:0% would hope and we would frankly kind of seems<00:42:32.640> like<00:42:32.760> it<00:42:33.000> is<00:42:33.119> working<00:42:33.540> out<00:42:33.690> that<00:42:34.470> the 00:42:35.420 --> 00:42:35.430 align:start position:0% seems like it is working out that the 00:42:35.430 --> 00:42:38.210 align:start position:0% seems like it is working out that the concentration<00:42:36.420> and<00:42:36.630> the<00:42:36.690> total<00:42:37.140> number<00:42:37.220> could 00:42:38.210 --> 00:42:38.220 align:start position:0% concentration and the total number could 00:42:38.220 --> 00:42:40.220 align:start position:0% concentration and the total number could be<00:42:38.400> managed<00:42:38.910> over<00:42:39.150> time<00:42:39.540> because<00:42:39.990> they 00:42:40.220 --> 00:42:40.230 align:start position:0% be managed over time because they 00:42:40.230 --> 00:42:43.579 align:start position:0% be managed over time because they they're<00:42:40.950> moving<00:42:41.310> around<00:42:41.609> and<00:42:42.410> we're<00:42:43.410> not 00:42:43.579 --> 00:42:43.589 align:start position:0% they're moving around and we're not 00:42:43.589 --> 00:42:47.210 align:start position:0% they're moving around and we're not seeing<00:42:43.950> I'm<00:42:44.280> super<00:42:45.089> super<00:42:45.240> concentrated<00:42:46.220> now 00:42:47.210 --> 00:42:47.220 align:start position:0% seeing I'm super super concentrated now 00:42:47.220 --> 00:42:49.010 align:start position:0% seeing I'm super super concentrated now we<00:42:47.280> may<00:42:47.550> hear<00:42:47.760> differently<00:42:48.119> tonight<00:42:48.390> that's 00:42:49.010 --> 00:42:49.020 align:start position:0% we may hear differently tonight that's 00:42:49.020 --> 00:42:51.710 align:start position:0% we may hear differently tonight that's that's<00:42:49.440> why<00:42:49.589> we're<00:42:49.740> here<00:42:49.950> so<00:42:50.450> that<00:42:51.450> was<00:42:51.599> our 00:42:51.710 --> 00:42:51.720 align:start position:0% that's why we're here so that was our 00:42:51.720 --> 00:42:54.349 align:start position:0% that's why we're here so that was our initial<00:42:51.930> take<00:42:52.290> there<00:42:52.560> and<00:42:52.770> then<00:42:53.460> minimum 00:42:54.349 --> 00:42:54.359 align:start position:0% initial take there and then minimum 00:42:54.359 --> 00:42:59.770 align:start position:0% initial take there and then minimum stays<00:42:55.200> this<00:42:56.070> is<00:42:57.260> this<00:42:58.260> is<00:42:58.470> a<00:42:58.500> concern<00:42:59.070> for 00:42:59.770 --> 00:42:59.780 align:start position:0% stays this is this is a concern for 00:42:59.780 --> 00:43:04.130 align:start position:0% stays this is this is a concern for staff<00:43:00.780> for<00:43:01.380> long<00:43:01.920> minimum<00:43:02.550> stays<00:43:02.970> some<00:43:03.810> cities 00:43:04.130 --> 00:43:04.140 align:start position:0% staff for long minimum stays some cities 00:43:04.140 --> 00:43:08.320 align:start position:0% staff for long minimum stays some cities have<00:43:04.170> wanted<00:43:05.010> seven<00:43:05.820> day<00:43:05.970> minimum<00:43:06.330> stays<00:43:06.780> and 00:43:08.320 --> 00:43:08.330 align:start position:0% have wanted seven day minimum stays and 00:43:08.330 --> 00:43:11.180 align:start position:0% have wanted seven day minimum stays and I<00:43:09.330> think<00:43:09.660> in<00:43:09.750> some<00:43:09.960> cases<00:43:09.990> maybe<00:43:10.680> longer<00:43:10.980> I'm 00:43:11.180 --> 00:43:11.190 align:start position:0% I think in some cases maybe longer I'm 00:43:11.190 --> 00:43:13.130 align:start position:0% I think in some cases maybe longer I'm not<00:43:11.339> sure<00:43:11.580> but<00:43:11.820> seven<00:43:12.270> is<00:43:12.390> one<00:43:12.750> that<00:43:12.930> keeps 00:43:13.130 --> 00:43:13.140 align:start position:0% not sure but seven is one that keeps 00:43:13.140 --> 00:43:16.900 align:start position:0% not sure but seven is one that keeps coming<00:43:13.320> up<00:43:14.030> that<00:43:15.030> just<00:43:15.270> doesn't<00:43:15.660> work<00:43:15.869> for<00:43:15.930> the 00:43:16.900 --> 00:43:16.910 align:start position:0% coming up that just doesn't work for the 00:43:16.910 --> 00:43:20.620 align:start position:0% coming up that just doesn't work for the intent<00:43:17.910> of<00:43:18.320> having<00:43:19.320> a<00:43:19.500> low-cost<00:43:20.010> option 00:43:20.620 --> 00:43:20.630 align:start position:0% intent of having a low-cost option 00:43:20.630 --> 00:43:24.620 align:start position:0% intent of having a low-cost option especially<00:43:21.630> in<00:43:22.080> the<00:43:22.200> hosted<00:43:22.710> type<00:43:23.270> family<00:43:24.270> who 00:43:24.620 --> 00:43:24.630 align:start position:0% especially in the hosted type family who 00:43:24.630 --> 00:43:28.760 align:start position:0% especially in the hosted type family who needs<00:43:24.930> a<00:43:25.410> low-cost<00:43:26.420> lodging<00:43:27.420> might<00:43:28.320> not<00:43:28.530> be 00:43:28.760 --> 00:43:28.770 align:start position:0% needs a low-cost lodging might not be 00:43:28.770 --> 00:43:32.540 align:start position:0% needs a low-cost lodging might not be able<00:43:28.950> to<00:43:29.130> afford<00:43:29.700> a<00:43:30.170> seven-night<00:43:31.170> vacation<00:43:32.099> we 00:43:32.540 --> 00:43:32.550 align:start position:0% able to afford a seven-night vacation we 00:43:32.550 --> 00:43:36.740 align:start position:0% able to afford a seven-night vacation we really<00:43:33.450> think<00:43:33.960> that<00:43:34.080> that<00:43:34.380> is<00:43:34.440> a<00:43:35.750> prohibitive 00:43:36.740 --> 00:43:36.750 align:start position:0% really think that that is a prohibitive 00:43:36.750 --> 00:43:39.740 align:start position:0% really think that that is a prohibitive kind<00:43:37.349> of<00:43:37.849> condition<00:43:38.849> and<00:43:39.180> it<00:43:39.359> would 00:43:39.740 --> 00:43:39.750 align:start position:0% kind of condition and it would 00:43:39.750 --> 00:43:41.670 align:start position:0% kind of condition and it would it<00:43:40.020> could<00:43:40.260> also<00:43:40.410> really<00:43:40.890> limit 00:43:41.670 --> 00:43:41.680 align:start position:0% it could also really limit 00:43:41.680 --> 00:43:46.140 align:start position:0% it could also really limit somebody<00:43:42.490> might<00:43:42.670> do<00:43:42.819> as<00:43:43.029> a<00:43:43.059> host<00:43:43.359> to<00:43:44.730> to<00:43:45.730> have 00:43:46.140 --> 00:43:46.150 align:start position:0% somebody might do as a host to to have 00:43:46.150 --> 00:43:47.910 align:start position:0% somebody might do as a host to to have have<00:43:46.690> folks<00:43:46.960> stay<00:43:47.200> in<00:43:47.319> their<00:43:47.470> home<00:43:47.619> over<00:43:47.890> a 00:43:47.910 --> 00:43:47.920 align:start position:0% have folks stay in their home over a 00:43:47.920 --> 00:43:51.210 align:start position:0% have folks stay in their home over a weekend<00:43:48.430> so<00:43:48.789> um<00:43:49.529> we're<00:43:50.529> not<00:43:50.680> we're<00:43:51.099> not 00:43:51.210 --> 00:43:51.220 align:start position:0% weekend so um we're not we're not 00:43:51.220 --> 00:43:53.010 align:start position:0% weekend so um we're not we're not encouraging<00:43:51.579> that<00:43:52.089> we're<00:43:52.240> happy<00:43:52.510> to<00:43:52.599> explore 00:43:53.010 --> 00:43:53.020 align:start position:0% encouraging that we're happy to explore 00:43:53.020 --> 00:43:54.720 align:start position:0% encouraging that we're happy to explore it<00:43:53.200> we're<00:43:53.440> happy<00:43:53.559> to<00:43:53.799> do<00:43:53.920> more<00:43:54.099> research<00:43:54.279> on<00:43:54.670> it 00:43:54.720 --> 00:43:54.730 align:start position:0% it we're happy to do more research on it 00:43:54.730 --> 00:43:57.690 align:start position:0% it we're happy to do more research on it but<00:43:54.880> we<00:43:55.119> just<00:43:55.270> we<00:43:55.720> think<00:43:55.930> it's<00:43:56.460> it's<00:43:57.460> pretty 00:43:57.690 --> 00:43:57.700 align:start position:0% but we just we think it's it's pretty 00:43:57.700 --> 00:43:58.980 align:start position:0% but we just we think it's it's pretty hard<00:43:58.000> and<00:43:58.059> it<00:43:58.119> would<00:43:58.270> be<00:43:58.390> really<00:43:58.660> hard<00:43:58.900> to 00:43:58.980 --> 00:43:58.990 align:start position:0% hard and it would be really hard to 00:43:58.990 --> 00:44:01.230 align:start position:0% hard and it would be really hard to track<00:43:59.289> and<00:43:59.470> enforce<00:43:59.829> and<00:44:00.069> I<00:44:00.130> just<00:44:00.339> we<00:44:01.119> don't 00:44:01.230 --> 00:44:01.240 align:start position:0% track and enforce and I just we don't 00:44:01.240 --> 00:44:02.670 align:start position:0% track and enforce and I just we don't know<00:44:01.510> that<00:44:01.539> it's<00:44:01.869> really<00:44:02.140> worth<00:44:02.170> it 00:44:02.670 --> 00:44:02.680 align:start position:0% know that it's really worth it 00:44:02.680 --> 00:44:07.109 align:start position:0% know that it's really worth it so<00:44:03.490> um<00:44:03.819> just<00:44:04.510> for<00:44:04.750> the<00:44:05.220> good<00:44:06.220> as<00:44:06.339> a<00:44:06.369> room<00:44:06.760> the 00:44:07.109 --> 00:44:07.119 align:start position:0% so um just for the good as a room the 00:44:07.119 --> 00:44:10.230 align:start position:0% so um just for the good as a room the way<00:44:07.270> that<00:44:07.510> we<00:44:07.660> have<00:44:08.440> study<00:44:08.920> sessions<00:44:09.430> in<00:44:09.760> Half 00:44:10.230 --> 00:44:10.240 align:start position:0% way that we have study sessions in Half 00:44:10.240 --> 00:44:14.339 align:start position:0% way that we have study sessions in Half Moon<00:44:10.390> Bay<00:44:10.450> is<00:44:10.900> our<00:44:12.569> our<00:44:13.569> Planning<00:44:13.990> Commission 00:44:14.339 --> 00:44:14.349 align:start position:0% Moon Bay is our our Planning Commission 00:44:14.349 --> 00:44:16.440 align:start position:0% Moon Bay is our our Planning Commission will<00:44:14.500> take<00:44:14.529> this<00:44:14.890> back<00:44:15.160> now<00:44:15.430> from<00:44:15.700> staff<00:44:16.059> and 00:44:16.440 --> 00:44:16.450 align:start position:0% will take this back now from staff and 00:44:16.450 --> 00:44:20.010 align:start position:0% will take this back now from staff and they<00:44:16.990> will<00:44:17.200> ask<00:44:17.440> us<00:44:18.150> clarifying<00:44:19.150> questions<00:44:19.690> if 00:44:20.010 --> 00:44:20.020 align:start position:0% they will ask us clarifying questions if 00:44:20.020 --> 00:44:22.500 align:start position:0% they will ask us clarifying questions if they<00:44:20.260> have<00:44:20.289> any<00:44:20.740> and<00:44:21.150> there'll<00:44:22.150> be<00:44:22.180> time 00:44:22.500 --> 00:44:22.510 align:start position:0% they have any and there'll be time 00:44:22.510 --> 00:44:25.010 align:start position:0% they have any and there'll be time plenty<00:44:23.049> of<00:44:23.230> time<00:44:23.440> for<00:44:23.470> a<00:44:23.740> public<00:44:24.039> comment<00:44:24.309> and 00:44:25.010 --> 00:44:25.020 align:start position:0% plenty of time for a public comment and 00:44:25.020 --> 00:44:26.760 align:start position:0% plenty of time for a public comment and discussion<00:44:26.020> and<00:44:26.289> then<00:44:26.410> we'll<00:44:26.529> talk<00:44:26.710> about 00:44:26.760 --> 00:44:26.770 align:start position:0% discussion and then we'll talk about 00:44:26.770 --> 00:44:30.299 align:start position:0% discussion and then we'll talk about next<00:44:27.190> steps<00:44:27.339> and<00:44:28.200> when<00:44:29.200> we're<00:44:29.410> when<00:44:29.859> we're<00:44:30.010> at 00:44:30.299 --> 00:44:30.309 align:start position:0% next steps and when we're when we're at 00:44:30.309 --> 00:44:32.670 align:start position:0% next steps and when we're when we're at that<00:44:30.490> point<00:44:30.760> and<00:44:30.970> done<00:44:31.119> so<00:44:31.750> thanks<00:44:32.529> for 00:44:32.670 --> 00:44:32.680 align:start position:0% that point and done so thanks for 00:44:32.680 --> 00:44:34.049 align:start position:0% that point and done so thanks for listening<00:44:32.799> and<00:44:33.190> we<00:44:33.279> appreciate<00:44:33.730> how<00:44:33.910> many 00:44:34.049 --> 00:44:34.059 align:start position:0% listening and we appreciate how many 00:44:34.059 --> 00:44:38.339 align:start position:0% listening and we appreciate how many people<00:44:34.359> turned<00:44:34.839> out<00:44:34.960> tonight<00:44:36.990> thank<00:44:37.990> you<00:44:38.109> for 00:44:38.339 --> 00:44:38.349 align:start position:0% people turned out tonight thank you for 00:44:38.349 --> 00:44:41.789 align:start position:0% people turned out tonight thank you for the<00:44:38.440> staff<00:44:38.859> report<00:44:39.299> so<00:44:40.299> so<00:44:41.230> we<00:44:41.349> have<00:44:41.500> a<00:44:41.529> large 00:44:41.789 --> 00:44:41.799 align:start position:0% the staff report so so we have a large 00:44:41.799 --> 00:44:43.859 align:start position:0% the staff report so so we have a large audience<00:44:42.039> for<00:44:42.430> this<00:44:42.640> evening<00:44:43.059> but<00:44:43.329> and<00:44:43.720> I<00:44:43.809> know 00:44:43.859 --> 00:44:43.869 align:start position:0% audience for this evening but and I know 00:44:43.869 --> 00:44:45.240 align:start position:0% audience for this evening but and I know we<00:44:44.109> all<00:44:44.230> want<00:44:44.260> to<00:44:44.529> hear<00:44:44.650> for<00:44:44.829> them<00:44:44.950> but<00:44:45.130> before 00:44:45.240 --> 00:44:45.250 align:start position:0% we all want to hear for them but before 00:44:45.250 --> 00:44:48.299 align:start position:0% we all want to hear for them but before we<00:44:45.609> do<00:44:45.789> do<00:44:46.480> any<00:44:46.990> of<00:44:47.170> my<00:44:47.410> colleagues<00:44:47.650> have<00:44:48.069> some 00:44:48.299 --> 00:44:48.309 align:start position:0% we do do any of my colleagues have some 00:44:48.309 --> 00:44:49.799 align:start position:0% we do do any of my colleagues have some clarifying<00:44:48.789> questions<00:44:49.299> that<00:44:49.480> they'd<00:44:49.599> like<00:44:49.750> to 00:44:49.799 --> 00:44:49.809 align:start position:0% clarifying questions that they'd like to 00:44:49.809 --> 00:44:52.710 align:start position:0% clarifying questions that they'd like to put<00:44:50.140> to<00:44:50.289> staff<00:44:50.640> Brian<00:44:51.640> I'm<00:44:51.970> just<00:44:52.480> a<00:44:52.539> quick 00:44:52.710 --> 00:44:52.720 align:start position:0% put to staff Brian I'm just a quick 00:44:52.720 --> 00:44:54.720 align:start position:0% put to staff Brian I'm just a quick question<00:44:52.869> there's<00:44:53.170> there's<00:44:53.470> a<00:44:53.710> couple<00:44:54.549> things 00:44:54.720 --> 00:44:54.730 align:start position:0% question there's there's a couple things 00:44:54.730 --> 00:44:57.900 align:start position:0% question there's there's a couple things in<00:44:54.940> here<00:44:55.059> regarding<00:44:55.539> ad<00:44:55.750> use<00:44:56.079> and<00:44:56.789> there<00:44:57.789> are 00:44:57.900 --> 00:44:57.910 align:start position:0% in here regarding ad use and there are 00:44:57.910 --> 00:45:01.620 align:start position:0% in here regarding ad use and there are recommendations<00:44:58.270> 0<00:44:59.260> nights<00:45:00.059> in<00:45:01.059> accessory 00:45:01.620 --> 00:45:01.630 align:start position:0% recommendations 0 nights in accessory 00:45:01.630 --> 00:45:03.750 align:start position:0% recommendations 0 nights in accessory dwelling<00:45:01.960> units<00:45:02.260> and<00:45:02.470> that's<00:45:02.619> that<00:45:03.549> comes 00:45:03.750 --> 00:45:03.760 align:start position:0% dwelling units and that's that comes 00:45:03.760 --> 00:45:05.339 align:start position:0% dwelling units and that's that comes from<00:45:04.000> our<00:45:04.150> accessory<00:45:04.660> dwelling<00:45:05.049> unit 00:45:05.339 --> 00:45:05.349 align:start position:0% from our accessory dwelling unit 00:45:05.349 --> 00:45:09.180 align:start position:0% from our accessory dwelling unit ordinance<00:45:05.799> correct<00:45:07.109> that's<00:45:08.109> right<00:45:08.319> and<00:45:08.680> in 00:45:09.180 --> 00:45:09.190 align:start position:0% ordinance correct that's right and in 00:45:09.190 --> 00:45:13.049 align:start position:0% ordinance correct that's right and in 2018<00:45:10.119> the<00:45:10.990> city<00:45:11.260> has<00:45:12.130> a<00:45:12.160> new<00:45:12.520> certified 00:45:13.049 --> 00:45:13.059 align:start position:0% 2018 the city has a new certified 00:45:13.059 --> 00:45:14.789 align:start position:0% 2018 the city has a new certified accessory<00:45:13.569> dwelling<00:45:13.900> unit<00:45:14.140> ordinance<00:45:14.559> and<00:45:14.710> of 00:45:14.789 --> 00:45:14.799 align:start position:0% accessory dwelling unit ordinance and of 00:45:14.799 --> 00:45:16.529 align:start position:0% accessory dwelling unit ordinance and of course<00:45:15.039> we're<00:45:15.220> working<00:45:15.460> on<00:45:15.910> an<00:45:16.059> update<00:45:16.180> as 00:45:16.529 --> 00:45:16.539 align:start position:0% course we're working on an update as 00:45:16.539 --> 00:45:20.620 align:start position:0% course we're working on an update as well<00:45:16.779> at<00:45:17.109> that<00:45:17.890> time 00:45:20.620 --> 00:45:20.630 align:start position:0% 00:45:20.630 --> 00:45:23.270 align:start position:0% those<00:45:21.630> short-term<00:45:22.260> rentals<00:45:22.860> that<00:45:23.130> were 00:45:23.270 --> 00:45:23.280 align:start position:0% those short-term rentals that were 00:45:23.280 --> 00:45:26.560 align:start position:0% those short-term rentals that were operating<00:45:24.060> in<00:45:24.210> compliance<00:45:24.960> with<00:45:25.260> the<00:45:25.650> city's 00:45:26.560 --> 00:45:26.570 align:start position:0% operating in compliance with the city's 00:45:26.570 --> 00:45:29.270 align:start position:0% operating in compliance with the city's Tod<00:45:27.570> requirement<00:45:28.320> and<00:45:28.440> business<00:45:28.830> license 00:45:29.270 --> 00:45:29.280 align:start position:0% Tod requirement and business license 00:45:29.280 --> 00:45:32.570 align:start position:0% Tod requirement and business license requirement<00:45:29.910> that<00:45:30.030> were<00:45:31.280> operating<00:45:32.280> out<00:45:32.520> of 00:45:32.570 --> 00:45:32.580 align:start position:0% requirement that were operating out of 00:45:32.580 --> 00:45:34.610 align:start position:0% requirement that were operating out of accessory<00:45:33.450> dwelling<00:45:33.840> units<00:45:34.140> were 00:45:34.610 --> 00:45:34.620 align:start position:0% accessory dwelling units were 00:45:34.620 --> 00:45:37.100 align:start position:0% accessory dwelling units were grandfathered<00:45:35.130> by<00:45:35.670> that<00:45:35.880> code<00:45:36.270> we<00:45:36.810> believe 00:45:37.100 --> 00:45:37.110 align:start position:0% grandfathered by that code we believe 00:45:37.110 --> 00:45:39.290 align:start position:0% grandfathered by that code we believe it's<00:45:37.260> fewer<00:45:37.560> than<00:45:37.740> 10<00:45:38.100> and<00:45:38.400> that 00:45:39.290 --> 00:45:39.300 align:start position:0% it's fewer than 10 and that 00:45:39.300 --> 00:45:40.760 align:start position:0% it's fewer than 10 and that grandfathering<00:45:39.990> Clause<00:45:40.170> has<00:45:40.410> stayed<00:45:40.740> in 00:45:40.760 --> 00:45:40.770 align:start position:0% grandfathering Clause has stayed in 00:45:40.770 --> 00:45:44.030 align:start position:0% grandfathering Clause has stayed in place<00:45:41.250> even<00:45:42.150> in<00:45:42.270> the<00:45:42.360> draft<00:45:42.630> code<00:45:42.900> but<00:45:43.770> other 00:45:44.030 --> 00:45:44.040 align:start position:0% place even in the draft code but other 00:45:44.040 --> 00:45:47.390 align:start position:0% place even in the draft code but other than<00:45:44.250> that<00:45:44.540> no<00:45:45.540> new<00:45:45.780> ones<00:45:46.080> and<00:45:46.560> none<00:45:47.190> of<00:45:47.310> the 00:45:47.390 --> 00:45:47.400 align:start position:0% than that no new ones and none of the 00:45:47.400 --> 00:45:49.430 align:start position:0% than that no new ones and none of the ones<00:45:47.580> that<00:45:47.820> hadn't<00:45:48.210> been<00:45:48.270> operated<00:45:48.900> before<00:45:49.050> as 00:45:49.430 --> 00:45:49.440 align:start position:0% ones that hadn't been operated before as 00:45:49.440 --> 00:45:51.350 align:start position:0% ones that hadn't been operated before as short-term<00:45:49.770> rentals<00:45:50.280> and<00:45:50.550> the<00:45:50.670> intent<00:45:51.060> was<00:45:51.330> of 00:45:51.350 --> 00:45:51.360 align:start position:0% short-term rentals and the intent was of 00:45:51.360 --> 00:45:55.190 align:start position:0% short-term rentals and the intent was of course<00:45:52.010> that<00:45:53.010> ad<00:45:53.880> use<00:45:54.240> were<00:45:54.480> accessory 00:45:55.190 --> 00:45:55.200 align:start position:0% course that ad use were accessory 00:45:55.200 --> 00:45:57.010 align:start position:0% course that ad use were accessory dwelling<00:45:55.530> units<00:45:55.800> were<00:45:56.010> meant<00:45:56.250> to<00:45:56.340> be 00:45:57.010 --> 00:45:57.020 align:start position:0% dwelling units were meant to be 00:45:57.020 --> 00:46:00.800 align:start position:0% dwelling units were meant to be supporting<00:45:58.040> housing<00:45:59.040> needs<00:45:59.310> and<00:45:59.670> they<00:46:00.390> are<00:46:00.570> a 00:46:00.800 --> 00:46:00.810 align:start position:0% supporting housing needs and they are a 00:46:00.810 --> 00:46:02.960 align:start position:0% supporting housing needs and they are a reaction<00:46:01.140> to<00:46:01.560> the<00:46:01.680> housing<00:46:02.010> crisis<00:46:02.550> in<00:46:02.760> terms 00:46:02.960 --> 00:46:02.970 align:start position:0% reaction to the housing crisis in terms 00:46:02.970 --> 00:46:06.320 align:start position:0% reaction to the housing crisis in terms of<00:46:03.180> how<00:46:03.950> liberal<00:46:04.950> this<00:46:05.430> the<00:46:05.730> standards<00:46:06.180> are 00:46:06.320 --> 00:46:06.330 align:start position:0% of how liberal this the standards are 00:46:06.330 --> 00:46:07.820 align:start position:0% of how liberal this the standards are and<00:46:06.630> the<00:46:06.720> standards<00:46:07.110> weren't<00:46:07.290> made<00:46:07.500> liberal 00:46:07.820 --> 00:46:07.830 align:start position:0% and the standards weren't made liberal 00:46:07.830 --> 00:46:10.220 align:start position:0% and the standards weren't made liberal to<00:46:08.070> provide<00:46:09.030> for<00:46:09.240> short-term<00:46:09.510> rentals<00:46:09.990> they 00:46:10.220 --> 00:46:10.230 align:start position:0% to provide for short-term rentals they 00:46:10.230 --> 00:46:17.140 align:start position:0% to provide for short-term rentals they were<00:46:10.290> to<00:46:10.710> be<00:46:10.860> housing 00:46:17.140 --> 00:46:17.150 align:start position:0% 00:46:17.150 --> 00:46:19.210 align:start position:0% Steve 00:46:19.210 --> 00:46:19.220 align:start position:0% Steve 00:46:19.220 --> 00:46:22.130 align:start position:0% Steve thank<00:46:19.819> you 00:46:22.130 --> 00:46:22.140 align:start position:0% 00:46:22.140 --> 00:46:24.560 align:start position:0% they<00:46:22.619> have<00:46:22.710> a<00:46:22.770> couple<00:46:23.460> of<00:46:23.550> questions<00:46:23.910> if<00:46:24.090> these 00:46:24.560 --> 00:46:24.570 align:start position:0% they have a couple of questions if these 00:46:24.570 --> 00:46:27.380 align:start position:0% they have a couple of questions if these go<00:46:25.320> beyond<00:46:25.680> clarifying<00:46:26.310> questions<00:46:26.850> in<00:46:27.060> scope 00:46:27.380 --> 00:46:27.390 align:start position:0% go beyond clarifying questions in scope 00:46:27.390 --> 00:46:29.470 align:start position:0% go beyond clarifying questions in scope let<00:46:27.660> me<00:46:27.750> know<00:46:27.900> and<00:46:28.050> I'll<00:46:28.170> hold<00:46:28.320> them<00:46:28.500> for<00:46:28.770> later 00:46:29.470 --> 00:46:29.480 align:start position:0% let me know and I'll hold them for later 00:46:29.480 --> 00:46:32.690 align:start position:0% let me know and I'll hold them for later does<00:46:30.480> the<00:46:30.720> the<00:46:31.560> process<00:46:32.100> of<00:46:32.310> getting<00:46:32.460> a 00:46:32.690 --> 00:46:32.700 align:start position:0% does the the process of getting a 00:46:32.700 --> 00:46:34.820 align:start position:0% does the the process of getting a business<00:46:32.940> license<00:46:33.600> today<00:46:33.960> is<00:46:34.410> it 00:46:34.820 --> 00:46:34.830 align:start position:0% business license today is it 00:46:34.830 --> 00:46:42.620 align:start position:0% business license today is it specifically<00:46:35.400> for<00:46:35.600> short-term<00:46:36.600> rental<00:46:41.630> so 00:46:42.620 --> 00:46:42.630 align:start position:0% specifically for short-term rental so 00:46:42.630 --> 00:46:45.530 align:start position:0% specifically for short-term rental so it's<00:46:42.810> actually<00:46:43.170> a<00:46:43.200> general<00:46:43.790> business<00:46:44.790> license 00:46:45.530 --> 00:46:45.540 align:start position:0% it's actually a general business license 00:46:45.540 --> 00:46:49.600 align:start position:0% it's actually a general business license so<00:46:46.530> no<00:46:47.100> it's<00:46:47.369> it's<00:46:47.910> not<00:46:48.060> specific<00:46:48.540> to<00:46:48.570> ad<00:46:48.840> or 00:46:49.600 --> 00:46:49.610 align:start position:0% so no it's it's not specific to ad or 00:46:49.610 --> 00:46:52.850 align:start position:0% so no it's it's not specific to ad or short-term<00:46:50.610> rentals<00:46:51.060> but<00:46:51.810> the<00:46:51.990> transit 00:46:52.850 --> 00:46:52.860 align:start position:0% short-term rentals but the transit 00:46:52.860 --> 00:46:56.900 align:start position:0% short-term rentals but the transit occupancy<00:46:53.250> tax<00:46:53.610> is<00:46:54.080> I<00:46:55.400> just<00:46:56.400> wondering<00:46:56.790> if 00:46:56.900 --> 00:46:56.910 align:start position:0% occupancy tax is I just wondering if 00:46:56.910 --> 00:46:59.120 align:start position:0% occupancy tax is I just wondering if that's<00:46:57.090> a<00:46:57.360> mechanism<00:46:57.750> for<00:46:58.170> more<00:46:58.590> accurately 00:46:59.120 --> 00:46:59.130 align:start position:0% that's a mechanism for more accurately 00:46:59.130 --> 00:47:01.700 align:start position:0% that's a mechanism for more accurately counting<00:46:59.790> the<00:47:00.780> number<00:47:01.110> of<00:47:01.140> short-term 00:47:01.700 --> 00:47:01.710 align:start position:0% counting the number of short-term 00:47:01.710 --> 00:47:07.010 align:start position:0% counting the number of short-term rentals<00:47:02.130> in<00:47:02.310> the<00:47:02.430> city<00:47:05.420> at<00:47:06.420> this<00:47:06.600> point<00:47:06.840> no 00:47:07.010 --> 00:47:07.020 align:start position:0% rentals in the city at this point no 00:47:07.020 --> 00:47:10.460 align:start position:0% rentals in the city at this point no because<00:47:07.380> oh<00:47:08.210> there<00:47:09.210> are<00:47:09.420> short-term<00:47:10.050> rentals 00:47:10.460 --> 00:47:10.470 align:start position:0% because oh there are short-term rentals 00:47:10.470 --> 00:47:12.380 align:start position:0% because oh there are short-term rentals out<00:47:10.650> there<00:47:10.860> that<00:47:11.190> don't<00:47:11.700> have<00:47:11.970> business 00:47:12.380 --> 00:47:12.390 align:start position:0% out there that don't have business 00:47:12.390 --> 00:47:18.140 align:start position:0% out there that don't have business licenses<00:47:13.110> so<00:47:14.119> not<00:47:15.119> yet<00:47:15.410> but<00:47:16.410> eventually<00:47:17.150> and 00:47:18.140 --> 00:47:18.150 align:start position:0% licenses so not yet but eventually and 00:47:18.150 --> 00:47:20.870 align:start position:0% licenses so not yet but eventually and the<00:47:18.540> term<00:47:19.050> after<00:47:19.440> the<00:47:19.590> fact<00:47:19.830> permitting<00:47:20.550> does 00:47:20.870 --> 00:47:20.880 align:start position:0% the term after the fact permitting does 00:47:20.880 --> 00:47:23.120 align:start position:0% the term after the fact permitting does that<00:47:21.060> mean<00:47:21.270> the<00:47:21.450> same<00:47:21.660> thing<00:47:21.900> as<00:47:22.110> getting<00:47:23.040> a 00:47:23.120 --> 00:47:23.130 align:start position:0% that mean the same thing as getting a 00:47:23.130 --> 00:47:26.540 align:start position:0% that mean the same thing as getting a business<00:47:23.340> license<00:47:25.160> sort<00:47:26.160> of<00:47:26.250> it<00:47:26.340> what<00:47:26.430> so 00:47:26.540 --> 00:47:26.550 align:start position:0% business license sort of it what so 00:47:26.550 --> 00:47:29.359 align:start position:0% business license sort of it what so business<00:47:26.940> licenses<00:47:27.420> attacks<00:47:27.900> as<00:47:28.290> opposed<00:47:29.280> to 00:47:29.359 --> 00:47:29.369 align:start position:0% business licenses attacks as opposed to 00:47:29.369 --> 00:47:37.250 align:start position:0% business licenses attacks as opposed to a<00:47:29.460> permit<00:47:30.050> so<00:47:31.400> it's<00:47:32.400> a<00:47:32.490> little<00:47:32.609> bit<00:47:32.790> different 00:47:37.250 --> 00:47:37.260 align:start position:0% 00:47:37.260 --> 00:47:39.740 align:start position:0% okay<00:47:37.980> thanks 00:47:39.740 --> 00:47:39.750 align:start position:0% okay thanks 00:47:39.750 --> 00:47:42.829 align:start position:0% okay thanks Sara 00:47:42.829 --> 00:47:42.839 align:start position:0% 00:47:42.839 --> 00:47:45.439 align:start position:0% nothing<00:47:43.229> right<00:47:43.380> now<00:47:43.439> so<00:47:44.189> a<00:47:44.609> couple<00:47:45.329> of 00:47:45.439 --> 00:47:45.449 align:start position:0% nothing right now so a couple of 00:47:45.449 --> 00:47:47.589 align:start position:0% nothing right now so a couple of questions<00:47:45.929> before<00:47:46.019> we<00:47:46.529> go<00:47:46.979> into<00:47:47.159> the<00:47:47.309> hearing 00:47:47.589 --> 00:47:47.599 align:start position:0% questions before we go into the hearing 00:47:47.599 --> 00:47:51.140 align:start position:0% questions before we go into the hearing I<00:47:48.599> if<00:47:49.529> I<00:47:49.769> understood<00:47:50.279> the<00:47:50.489> staff<00:47:50.729> report 00:47:51.140 --> 00:47:51.150 align:start position:0% I if I understood the staff report 00:47:51.150 --> 00:47:53.029 align:start position:0% I if I understood the staff report correctly<00:47:51.630> when<00:47:52.079> I<00:47:52.109> read<00:47:52.439> through<00:47:52.769> the 00:47:53.029 --> 00:47:53.039 align:start position:0% correctly when I read through the 00:47:53.039 --> 00:47:56.019 align:start position:0% correctly when I read through the Coastal<00:47:53.819> Commission<00:47:53.849> feedback<00:47:54.749> they<00:47:55.499> were 00:47:56.019 --> 00:47:56.029 align:start position:0% Coastal Commission feedback they were 00:47:56.029 --> 00:47:58.969 align:start position:0% Coastal Commission feedback they were reminding<00:47:57.029> us<00:47:57.209> that<00:47:57.239> they<00:47:57.539> regarded<00:47:58.199> the 00:47:58.969 --> 00:47:58.979 align:start position:0% reminding us that they regarded the 00:47:58.979 --> 00:48:00.679 align:start position:0% reminding us that they regarded the institution<00:47:59.669> of<00:47:59.759> short-term<00:48:00.209> Minerals<00:48:00.569> as<00:48:00.659> a 00:48:00.679 --> 00:48:00.689 align:start position:0% institution of short-term Minerals as a 00:48:00.689 --> 00:48:03.709 align:start position:0% institution of short-term Minerals as a change<00:48:01.079> in<00:48:01.319> the<00:48:01.469> intensity<00:48:02.459> of<00:48:02.669> use<00:48:02.909> and<00:48:03.239> that 00:48:03.709 --> 00:48:03.719 align:start position:0% change in the intensity of use and that 00:48:03.719 --> 00:48:05.630 align:start position:0% change in the intensity of use and that they<00:48:03.869> required<00:48:04.289> a<00:48:04.589> coastal<00:48:05.039> development 00:48:05.630 --> 00:48:05.640 align:start position:0% they required a coastal development 00:48:05.640 --> 00:48:09.979 align:start position:0% they required a coastal development permit<00:48:05.900> I<00:48:06.900> noticed<00:48:07.619> in<00:48:07.769> the<00:48:07.799> key<00:48:08.630> questions<00:48:09.630> or 00:48:09.979 --> 00:48:09.989 align:start position:0% permit I noticed in the key questions or 00:48:09.989 --> 00:48:12.649 align:start position:0% permit I noticed in the key questions or maybe<00:48:10.409> it<00:48:10.529> was<00:48:10.650> a<00:48:10.679> recommendation<00:48:11.069> that<00:48:11.849> we 00:48:12.649 --> 00:48:12.659 align:start position:0% maybe it was a recommendation that we 00:48:12.659 --> 00:48:16.069 align:start position:0% maybe it was a recommendation that we were<00:48:12.839> saying<00:48:13.109> we<00:48:13.650> would<00:48:14.209> you<00:48:15.209> were<00:48:15.329> suggesting 00:48:16.069 --> 00:48:16.079 align:start position:0% were saying we would you were suggesting 00:48:16.079 --> 00:48:18.949 align:start position:0% were saying we would you were suggesting as<00:48:16.199> an<00:48:16.319> opening<00:48:16.709> position<00:48:17.219> that<00:48:17.999> we<00:48:18.179> not<00:48:18.390> view 00:48:18.949 --> 00:48:18.959 align:start position:0% as an opening position that we not view 00:48:18.959 --> 00:48:21.229 align:start position:0% as an opening position that we not view these<00:48:19.140> as<00:48:19.199> discretionary<00:48:19.829> permits<00:48:20.640> and<00:48:20.999> I'm 00:48:21.229 --> 00:48:21.239 align:start position:0% these as discretionary permits and I'm 00:48:21.239 --> 00:48:22.669 align:start position:0% these as discretionary permits and I'm just<00:48:21.479> trying<00:48:21.689> to<00:48:21.779> figure<00:48:21.959> out<00:48:22.199> whether<00:48:22.409> those 00:48:22.669 --> 00:48:22.679 align:start position:0% just trying to figure out whether those 00:48:22.679 --> 00:48:24.620 align:start position:0% just trying to figure out whether those are<00:48:22.890> conflicting<00:48:23.519> recommendations<00:48:23.699> or 00:48:24.620 --> 00:48:24.630 align:start position:0% are conflicting recommendations or 00:48:24.630 --> 00:48:27.109 align:start position:0% are conflicting recommendations or there's<00:48:25.259> a<00:48:25.349> powerful<00:48:25.709> distinction<00:48:26.459> between 00:48:27.109 --> 00:48:27.119 align:start position:0% there's a powerful distinction between 00:48:27.119 --> 00:48:30.229 align:start position:0% there's a powerful distinction between the<00:48:27.749> coastal<00:48:28.140> development<00:48:28.650> permit<00:48:29.089> which<00:48:30.089> is 00:48:30.229 --> 00:48:30.239 align:start position:0% the coastal development permit which is 00:48:30.239 --> 00:48:32.029 align:start position:0% the coastal development permit which is not<00:48:30.390> ministerial<00:48:31.079> which<00:48:31.109> to<00:48:31.469> me<00:48:31.619> means<00:48:31.799> it's 00:48:32.029 --> 00:48:32.039 align:start position:0% not ministerial which to me means it's 00:48:32.039 --> 00:48:34.399 align:start position:0% not ministerial which to me means it's probably<00:48:32.219> discretionary<00:48:33.209> or<00:48:33.479> some<00:48:34.229> other 00:48:34.399 --> 00:48:34.409 align:start position:0% probably discretionary or some other 00:48:34.409 --> 00:48:44.610 align:start position:0% probably discretionary or some other kind<00:48:34.679> of<00:48:34.799> discretionary<00:48:35.400> permanent 00:48:44.610 --> 00:48:44.620 align:start position:0% 00:48:44.620 --> 00:48:46.890 align:start position:0% yeah<00:48:45.580> I<00:48:45.610> noticed<00:48:46.120> that<00:48:46.270> as<00:48:46.390> well<00:48:46.600> in<00:48:46.780> the 00:48:46.890 --> 00:48:46.900 align:start position:0% yeah I noticed that as well in the 00:48:46.900 --> 00:48:49.350 align:start position:0% yeah I noticed that as well in the Coastal<00:48:47.230> Commission<00:48:47.260> letter<00:48:47.860> and<00:48:48.360> my 00:48:49.350 --> 00:48:49.360 align:start position:0% Coastal Commission letter and my 00:48:49.360 --> 00:48:52.230 align:start position:0% Coastal Commission letter and my assumption<00:48:49.930> is<00:48:50.230> that<00:48:50.290> there<00:48:51.070> would<00:48:51.220> be<00:48:51.250> a<00:48:51.610> CDP 00:48:52.230 --> 00:48:52.240 align:start position:0% assumption is that there would be a CDP 00:48:52.240 --> 00:48:54.540 align:start position:0% assumption is that there would be a CDP that<00:48:52.480> would<00:48:52.600> be<00:48:52.720> required<00:48:53.200> for<00:48:53.500> a<00:48:53.560> program<00:48:54.160> for 00:48:54.540 --> 00:48:54.550 align:start position:0% that would be required for a program for 00:48:54.550 --> 00:48:57.270 align:start position:0% that would be required for a program for these<00:48:54.730> types<00:48:55.060> of<00:48:55.300> permits<00:48:55.870> but<00:48:56.860> I<00:48:56.920> think<00:48:57.190> we 00:48:57.270 --> 00:48:57.280 align:start position:0% these types of permits but I think we 00:48:57.280 --> 00:48:59.460 align:start position:0% these types of permits but I think we might<00:48:57.460> want<00:48:57.670> to<00:48:57.730> look<00:48:57.880> in<00:48:58.180> a<00:48:58.660> little<00:48:59.170> bit<00:48:59.290> more 00:48:59.460 --> 00:48:59.470 align:start position:0% might want to look in a little bit more 00:48:59.470 --> 00:49:00.960 align:start position:0% might want to look in a little bit more detail<00:48:59.920> to<00:48:59.950> whether<00:49:00.370> the<00:49:00.550> Coastal<00:49:00.940> Commission 00:49:00.960 --> 00:49:00.970 align:start position:0% detail to whether the Coastal Commission 00:49:00.970 --> 00:49:03.180 align:start position:0% detail to whether the Coastal Commission had<00:49:01.480> something<00:49:01.810> else<00:49:02.020> in<00:49:02.230> mind<00:49:02.410> in<00:49:02.680> terms<00:49:02.710> of 00:49:03.180 --> 00:49:03.190 align:start position:0% had something else in mind in terms of 00:49:03.190 --> 00:49:06.240 align:start position:0% had something else in mind in terms of actual<00:49:03.940> CDP's<00:49:04.660> every<00:49:05.110> time<00:49:05.380> someone<00:49:05.890> came<00:49:06.070> in 00:49:06.240 --> 00:49:06.250 align:start position:0% actual CDP's every time someone came in 00:49:06.250 --> 00:49:10.110 align:start position:0% actual CDP's every time someone came in in<00:49:06.400> order<00:49:06.610> to<00:49:07.260> authorize<00:49:08.260> an<00:49:08.590> individual<00:49:09.340> okay 00:49:10.110 --> 00:49:10.120 align:start position:0% in order to authorize an individual okay 00:49:10.120 --> 00:49:11.760 align:start position:0% in order to authorize an individual okay so<00:49:10.180> I<00:49:10.330> think<00:49:10.420> it's<00:49:10.660> a<00:49:10.750> good<00:49:11.200> question<00:49:11.410> that 00:49:11.760 --> 00:49:11.770 align:start position:0% so I think it's a good question that 00:49:11.770 --> 00:49:13.680 align:start position:0% so I think it's a good question that will<00:49:11.920> require<00:49:12.220> a<00:49:12.340> little<00:49:12.520> more<00:49:12.760> research<00:49:13.090> okay 00:49:13.680 --> 00:49:13.690 align:start position:0% will require a little more research okay 00:49:13.690 --> 00:49:18.120 align:start position:0% will require a little more research okay that's<00:49:14.170> a<00:49:14.260> great<00:49:14.410> answer<00:49:14.830> and<00:49:16.110> then<00:49:17.130> with 00:49:18.120 --> 00:49:18.130 align:start position:0% that's a great answer and then with 00:49:18.130 --> 00:49:20.100 align:start position:0% that's a great answer and then with respect<00:49:18.340> to<00:49:18.700> parking<00:49:19.300> I<00:49:19.420> appreciate<00:49:19.930> the 00:49:20.100 --> 00:49:20.110 align:start position:0% respect to parking I appreciate the 00:49:20.110 --> 00:49:22.920 align:start position:0% respect to parking I appreciate the recommendation<00:49:20.440> or<00:49:21.130> I'm<00:49:21.580> not<00:49:22.240> endorsing<00:49:22.540> I 00:49:22.920 --> 00:49:22.930 align:start position:0% recommendation or I'm not endorsing I 00:49:22.930 --> 00:49:27.390 align:start position:0% recommendation or I'm not endorsing I noticed<00:49:23.470> the<00:49:24.040> recommendation<00:49:25.890> with<00:49:26.890> respect 00:49:27.390 --> 00:49:27.400 align:start position:0% noticed the recommendation with respect 00:49:27.400 --> 00:49:29.460 align:start position:0% noticed the recommendation with respect to<00:49:27.610> providing<00:49:28.210> some<00:49:28.510> amount<00:49:28.990> of<00:49:29.080> off<00:49:29.320> street 00:49:29.460 --> 00:49:29.470 align:start position:0% to providing some amount of off street 00:49:29.470 --> 00:49:34.980 align:start position:0% to providing some amount of off street parking<00:49:29.880> associated<00:49:30.880> with<00:49:32.100> STRs<00:49:33.810> these<00:49:34.810> are 00:49:34.980 --> 00:49:34.990 align:start position:0% parking associated with STRs these are 00:49:34.990 --> 00:49:38.360 align:start position:0% parking associated with STRs these are visitors<00:49:35.530> and<00:49:36.750> public<00:49:37.750> streets<00:49:38.050> are 00:49:38.360 --> 00:49:38.370 align:start position:0% visitors and public streets are 00:49:38.370 --> 00:49:41.280 align:start position:0% visitors and public streets are especially<00:49:39.370> near<00:49:39.880> the<00:49:39.910> beach<00:49:40.180> are<00:49:40.420> considered 00:49:41.280 --> 00:49:41.290 align:start position:0% especially near the beach are considered 00:49:41.290 --> 00:49:43.770 align:start position:0% especially near the beach are considered fair<00:49:41.560> game<00:49:41.800> for<00:49:41.830> visitor<00:49:42.430> parking<00:49:42.700> and<00:49:43.120> so<00:49:43.750> I 00:49:43.770 --> 00:49:43.780 align:start position:0% fair game for visitor parking and so I 00:49:43.780 --> 00:49:47.010 align:start position:0% fair game for visitor parking and so I just<00:49:44.170> want<00:49:44.440> to<00:49:44.530> try<00:49:44.710> to<00:49:44.740> get<00:49:45.090> clarification<00:49:46.090> in 00:49:47.010 --> 00:49:47.020 align:start position:0% just want to try to get clarification in 00:49:47.020 --> 00:49:50.940 align:start position:0% just want to try to get clarification in my<00:49:47.260> mind<00:49:47.530> this<00:49:48.070> is<00:49:48.810> the<00:49:49.810> visitor<00:49:50.230> who's<00:49:50.530> in 00:49:50.940 --> 00:49:50.950 align:start position:0% my mind this is the visitor who's in 00:49:50.950 --> 00:49:52.740 align:start position:0% my mind this is the visitor who's in turn<00:49:51.130> STR<00:49:51.550> may<00:49:51.880> be<00:49:51.940> competing<00:49:52.510> with<00:49:52.630> the 00:49:52.740 --> 00:49:52.750 align:start position:0% turn STR may be competing with the 00:49:52.750 --> 00:49:54.780 align:start position:0% turn STR may be competing with the visitor<00:49:53.080> who<00:49:53.260> needs<00:49:53.470> daily<00:49:53.770> use<00:49:54.100> parking<00:49:54.640> and 00:49:54.780 --> 00:49:54.790 align:start position:0% visitor who needs daily use parking and 00:49:54.790 --> 00:49:56.160 align:start position:0% visitor who needs daily use parking and that's<00:49:54.970> the<00:49:55.180> reason<00:49:55.570> that<00:49:55.600> it<00:49:55.870> makes<00:49:56.080> sense 00:49:56.160 --> 00:49:56.170 align:start position:0% that's the reason that it makes sense 00:49:56.170 --> 00:50:00.030 align:start position:0% that's the reason that it makes sense for<00:49:56.560> us<00:49:56.620> to<00:49:57.630> advocate<00:49:58.630> for<00:49:58.660> some<00:49:59.050> off<00:49:59.290> street 00:50:00.030 --> 00:50:00.040 align:start position:0% for us to advocate for some off street 00:50:00.040 --> 00:50:02.640 align:start position:0% for us to advocate for some off street parking<00:50:00.070> or<00:50:00.790> am<00:50:01.570> I<00:50:01.750> not<00:50:01.780> do<00:50:02.200> I<00:50:02.260> not<00:50:02.470> have<00:50:02.500> the 00:50:02.640 --> 00:50:02.650 align:start position:0% parking or am I not do I not have the 00:50:02.650 --> 00:50:10.630 align:start position:0% parking or am I not do I not have the right<00:50:02.740> framework<00:50:03.340> for<00:50:03.550> thinking<00:50:03.700> about<00:50:03.970> this 00:50:10.630 --> 00:50:10.640 align:start position:0% 00:50:10.640 --> 00:50:13.330 align:start position:0% we<00:50:11.180> thought<00:50:11.420> about<00:50:11.780> quite<00:50:12.380> a<00:50:12.440> few<00:50:12.530> things<00:50:12.980> in 00:50:13.330 --> 00:50:13.340 align:start position:0% we thought about quite a few things in 00:50:13.340 --> 00:50:16.660 align:start position:0% we thought about quite a few things in the<00:50:14.330> parking<00:50:14.780> world<00:50:15.080> and<00:50:15.350> one<00:50:16.100> of<00:50:16.220> them<00:50:16.400> was 00:50:16.660 --> 00:50:16.670 align:start position:0% the parking world and one of them was 00:50:16.670 --> 00:50:19.570 align:start position:0% the parking world and one of them was also<00:50:17.630> because<00:50:18.110> of<00:50:18.260> all<00:50:18.410> accessory<00:50:19.220> dwelling 00:50:19.570 --> 00:50:19.580 align:start position:0% also because of all accessory dwelling 00:50:19.580 --> 00:50:21.790 align:start position:0% also because of all accessory dwelling units<00:50:19.610> we<00:50:20.090> can<00:50:20.120> hardly<00:50:20.540> require<00:50:21.140> parking<00:50:21.590> for 00:50:21.790 --> 00:50:21.800 align:start position:0% units we can hardly require parking for 00:50:21.800 --> 00:50:25.230 align:start position:0% units we can hardly require parking for them<00:50:21.950> anymore<00:50:22.390> that<00:50:23.390> we're<00:50:23.690> anticipating 00:50:25.230 --> 00:50:25.240 align:start position:0% them anymore that we're anticipating 00:50:25.240 --> 00:50:29.380 align:start position:0% them anymore that we're anticipating neighborhoods<00:50:26.240> to<00:50:26.540> be<00:50:27.910> struggling<00:50:28.910> a<00:50:29.090> little 00:50:29.380 --> 00:50:29.390 align:start position:0% neighborhoods to be struggling a little 00:50:29.390 --> 00:50:33.160 align:start position:0% neighborhoods to be struggling a little bit<00:50:29.480> more<00:50:29.690> with<00:50:29.870> parking<00:50:30.320> over<00:50:30.470> time<00:50:30.830> so<00:50:32.170> also 00:50:33.160 --> 00:50:33.170 align:start position:0% bit more with parking over time so also 00:50:33.170 --> 00:50:35.830 align:start position:0% bit more with parking over time so also akin<00:50:33.590> to<00:50:33.920> the<00:50:34.370> short<00:50:34.640> term<00:50:34.910> or<00:50:35.210> excuse<00:50:35.570> me<00:50:35.600> the 00:50:35.830 --> 00:50:35.840 align:start position:0% akin to the short term or excuse me the 00:50:35.840 --> 00:50:38.080 align:start position:0% akin to the short term or excuse me the home<00:50:35.990> occupation<00:50:36.740> ordinance<00:50:37.160> where<00:50:37.580> we're 00:50:38.080 --> 00:50:38.090 align:start position:0% home occupation ordinance where we're 00:50:38.090 --> 00:50:41.250 align:start position:0% home occupation ordinance where we're also<00:50:38.210> looking<00:50:39.170> at<00:50:39.530> being<00:50:40.010> consistent<00:50:40.700> about<00:50:40.820> a 00:50:41.250 --> 00:50:41.260 align:start position:0% also looking at being consistent about a 00:50:41.260 --> 00:50:45.100 align:start position:0% also looking at being consistent about a parking<00:50:42.260> for<00:50:42.560> for<00:50:43.070> this<00:50:43.220> kind<00:50:43.520> of<00:50:43.610> use<00:50:43.670> so<00:50:44.120> we 00:50:45.100 --> 00:50:45.110 align:start position:0% parking for for this kind of use so we 00:50:45.110 --> 00:50:47.560 align:start position:0% parking for for this kind of use so we also<00:50:45.320> thought<00:50:45.710> about<00:50:45.940> this<00:50:46.940> is<00:50:47.150> coastal 00:50:47.560 --> 00:50:47.570 align:start position:0% also thought about this is coastal 00:50:47.570 --> 00:50:51.070 align:start position:0% also thought about this is coastal access<00:50:48.020> that's<00:50:48.290> that's<00:50:48.680> true<00:50:48.980> too<00:50:50.050> there's<00:50:51.050> a 00:50:51.070 --> 00:50:51.080 align:start position:0% access that's that's true too there's a 00:50:51.080 --> 00:50:53.860 align:start position:0% access that's that's true too there's a lot<00:50:51.200> going<00:50:51.470> on<00:50:51.560> there<00:50:51.770> okay<00:50:52.310> um<00:50:53.120> so<00:50:53.600> if<00:50:53.720> there 00:50:53.860 --> 00:50:53.870 align:start position:0% lot going on there okay um so if there 00:50:53.870 --> 00:50:56.080 align:start position:0% lot going on there okay um so if there are<00:50:53.930> no<00:50:53.960> other<00:50:54.200> questions<00:50:54.440> I'd<00:50:55.220> like<00:50:55.430> to<00:50:55.700> hear 00:50:56.080 --> 00:50:56.090 align:start position:0% are no other questions I'd like to hear 00:50:56.090 --> 00:50:58.660 align:start position:0% are no other questions I'd like to hear from<00:50:56.150> the<00:50:56.450> public<00:50:56.740> probably<00:50:57.740> the<00:50:58.070> wisest<00:50:58.430> part 00:50:58.660 --> 00:50:58.670 align:start position:0% from the public probably the wisest part 00:50:58.670 --> 00:51:02.380 align:start position:0% from the public probably the wisest part of<00:50:58.790> our<00:50:58.880> team<00:50:59.620> the<00:51:00.620> way<00:51:00.770> it<00:51:00.890> works<00:51:01.100> is<00:51:01.460> there's 00:51:02.380 --> 00:51:02.390 align:start position:0% of our team the way it works is there's 00:51:02.390 --> 00:51:04.960 align:start position:0% of our team the way it works is there's a<00:51:02.510> podium<00:51:02.810> I<00:51:03.260> have<00:51:03.620> some<00:51:03.950> green<00:51:04.190> sheets<00:51:04.610> here 00:51:04.960 --> 00:51:04.970 align:start position:0% a podium I have some green sheets here 00:51:04.970 --> 00:51:08.290 align:start position:0% a podium I have some green sheets here that<00:51:05.750> people<00:51:06.710> fill<00:51:07.100> out<00:51:07.280> and<00:51:07.550> I<00:51:07.640> call<00:51:07.940> you<00:51:07.970> by 00:51:08.290 --> 00:51:08.300 align:start position:0% that people fill out and I call you by 00:51:08.300 --> 00:51:11.290 align:start position:0% that people fill out and I call you by name<00:51:08.360> you<00:51:08.810> go<00:51:08.990> to<00:51:09.050> the<00:51:09.320> the<00:51:09.860> podium<00:51:10.340> and<00:51:10.580> we<00:51:11.150> ask 00:51:11.290 --> 00:51:11.300 align:start position:0% name you go to the the podium and we ask 00:51:11.300 --> 00:51:13.390 align:start position:0% name you go to the the podium and we ask you<00:51:11.480> to<00:51:11.660> try<00:51:11.900> to<00:51:11.960> conclude<00:51:12.710> your<00:51:12.860> comments 00:51:13.390 --> 00:51:13.400 align:start position:0% you to try to conclude your comments 00:51:13.400 --> 00:51:16.990 align:start position:0% you to try to conclude your comments within<00:51:13.610> three<00:51:14.360> minutes<00:51:15.190> if<00:51:16.190> someone<00:51:16.640> has<00:51:16.790> said 00:51:16.990 --> 00:51:17.000 align:start position:0% within three minutes if someone has said 00:51:17.000 --> 00:51:18.820 align:start position:0% within three minutes if someone has said something<00:51:17.030> that<00:51:17.570> you<00:51:17.750> already<00:51:18.050> agree<00:51:18.650> with 00:51:18.820 --> 00:51:18.830 align:start position:0% something that you already agree with 00:51:18.830 --> 00:51:22.210 align:start position:0% something that you already agree with you<00:51:19.370> can<00:51:19.580> say<00:51:19.850> I<00:51:20.120> agree<00:51:20.570> with<00:51:20.780> mr.<00:51:21.560> Smith<00:51:21.980> or 00:51:22.210 --> 00:51:22.220 align:start position:0% you can say I agree with mr. Smith or 00:51:22.220 --> 00:51:25.720 align:start position:0% you can say I agree with mr. Smith or the<00:51:22.400> last<00:51:22.610> speaker<00:51:23.590> we<00:51:24.590> are<00:51:24.920> anxious<00:51:25.460> to<00:51:25.490> hear 00:51:25.720 --> 00:51:25.730 align:start position:0% the last speaker we are anxious to hear 00:51:25.730 --> 00:51:28.210 align:start position:0% the last speaker we are anxious to hear your<00:51:25.910> thoughts<00:51:26.150> if<00:51:26.510> you<00:51:26.990> want<00:51:27.560> to<00:51:27.740> speak<00:51:28.010> but 00:51:28.210 --> 00:51:28.220 align:start position:0% your thoughts if you want to speak but 00:51:28.220 --> 00:51:29.680 align:start position:0% your thoughts if you want to speak but you<00:51:28.340> haven't<00:51:28.700> filled<00:51:28.880> out<00:51:29.090> one<00:51:29.330> of<00:51:29.510> these 00:51:29.680 --> 00:51:29.690 align:start position:0% you haven't filled out one of these 00:51:29.690 --> 00:51:33.070 align:start position:0% you haven't filled out one of these that's<00:51:30.350> okay<00:51:30.830> you<00:51:31.370> can<00:51:31.400> come<00:51:32.270> speak<00:51:32.570> I'll<00:51:32.810> ask 00:51:33.070 --> 00:51:33.080 align:start position:0% that's okay you can come speak I'll ask 00:51:33.080 --> 00:51:34.780 align:start position:0% that's okay you can come speak I'll ask for<00:51:33.380> I'll<00:51:33.650> invite<00:51:33.890> anybody<00:51:34.190> who<00:51:34.460> wants<00:51:34.730> to 00:51:34.780 --> 00:51:34.790 align:start position:0% for I'll invite anybody who wants to 00:51:34.790 --> 00:51:36.700 align:start position:0% for I'll invite anybody who wants to speak<00:51:35.120> to<00:51:35.150> raise<00:51:36.020> their<00:51:36.230> hand<00:51:36.440> and<00:51:36.590> be 00:51:36.700 --> 00:51:36.710 align:start position:0% speak to raise their hand and be 00:51:36.710 --> 00:51:38.920 align:start position:0% speak to raise their hand and be recognized<00:51:37.310> at<00:51:37.580> the<00:51:37.910> end<00:51:38.240> if<00:51:38.390> you<00:51:38.420> could<00:51:38.720> fill 00:51:38.920 --> 00:51:38.930 align:start position:0% recognized at the end if you could fill 00:51:38.930 --> 00:51:40.270 align:start position:0% recognized at the end if you could fill out<00:51:39.080> one<00:51:39.260> of<00:51:39.290> these<00:51:39.470> green<00:51:39.800> sheets 00:51:40.270 --> 00:51:40.280 align:start position:0% out one of these green sheets 00:51:40.280 --> 00:51:42.220 align:start position:0% out one of these green sheets it'll<00:51:40.760> help<00:51:40.910> us<00:51:41.120> do<00:51:41.300> a<00:51:41.330> good<00:51:41.600> job<00:51:41.660> with<00:51:42.110> the 00:51:42.220 --> 00:51:42.230 align:start position:0% it'll help us do a good job with the 00:51:42.230 --> 00:51:45.340 align:start position:0% it'll help us do a good job with the minutes<00:51:42.620> okay<00:51:43.550> so<00:51:44.510> with<00:51:44.660> that<00:51:44.780> in<00:51:44.990> mind<00:51:45.020> I'm 00:51:45.340 --> 00:51:45.350 align:start position:0% minutes okay so with that in mind I'm 00:51:45.350 --> 00:51:47.560 align:start position:0% minutes okay so with that in mind I'm going<00:51:45.380> to<00:51:45.650> open<00:51:45.890> I<00:51:46.340> think<00:51:46.790> this<00:51:47.090> is<00:51:47.210> a<00:51:47.240> public 00:51:47.560 --> 00:51:47.570 align:start position:0% going to open I think this is a public 00:51:47.570 --> 00:51:48.730 align:start position:0% going to open I think this is a public hearing<00:51:47.810> so<00:51:47.900> I'm<00:51:47.990> going<00:51:48.140> to<00:51:48.200> open<00:51:48.320> the<00:51:48.560> public 00:51:48.730 --> 00:51:48.740 align:start position:0% hearing so I'm going to open the public 00:51:48.740 --> 00:51:51.280 align:start position:0% hearing so I'm going to open the public hearing<00:51:48.890> and<00:51:49.280> I'm<00:51:50.030> going<00:51:50.300> to<00:51:50.330> invite<00:51:50.600> the 00:51:51.280 --> 00:51:51.290 align:start position:0% hearing and I'm going to invite the 00:51:51.290 --> 00:51:54.660 align:start position:0% hearing and I'm going to invite the earth<00:51:51.440> while<00:51:51.770> Tim<00:51:52.340> pond<00:51:52.640> to<00:51:53.060> the<00:51:53.090> podium<00:51:53.330> and 00:51:54.660 --> 00:51:54.670 align:start position:0% earth while Tim pond to the podium and 00:51:54.670 --> 00:51:58.600 align:start position:0% earth while Tim pond to the podium and he<00:51:55.670> will<00:51:55.850> be<00:51:56.000> followed<00:51:56.210> by<00:51:56.540> Matt<00:51:57.230> de<00:51:57.920> Toma<00:51:58.220> I 00:51:58.600 --> 00:51:58.610 align:start position:0% he will be followed by Matt de Toma I 00:51:58.610 --> 00:52:00.940 align:start position:0% he will be followed by Matt de Toma I hope<00:51:58.820> I<00:51:58.970> did<00:51:59.150> not<00:51:59.180> massacre<00:51:59.810> that<00:51:59.840> my<00:52:00.440> name<00:52:00.770> is 00:52:00.940 --> 00:52:00.950 align:start position:0% hope I did not massacre that my name is 00:52:00.950 --> 00:52:03.240 align:start position:0% hope I did not massacre that my name is Tim<00:52:01.430> pond<00:52:01.670> and<00:52:01.850> I<00:52:01.880> live<00:52:02.090> over<00:52:02.240> on<00:52:02.360> Potter<00:52:02.780> and 00:52:03.240 --> 00:52:03.250 align:start position:0% Tim pond and I live over on Potter and 00:52:03.250 --> 00:52:05.770 align:start position:0% Tim pond and I live over on Potter and first<00:52:04.250> I'd<00:52:04.700> like<00:52:04.850> to<00:52:04.940> address<00:52:05.090> the<00:52:05.330> parking 00:52:05.770 --> 00:52:05.780 align:start position:0% first I'd like to address the parking 00:52:05.780 --> 00:52:08.410 align:start position:0% first I'd like to address the parking situation<00:52:05.900> I<00:52:06.470> really<00:52:06.980> I<00:52:07.220> live<00:52:07.910> in<00:52:08.030> probably 00:52:08.410 --> 00:52:08.420 align:start position:0% situation I really I live in probably 00:52:08.420 --> 00:52:11.980 align:start position:0% situation I really I live in probably one<00:52:08.570> of<00:52:08.600> the<00:52:08.720> busiest<00:52:08.900> Beach<00:52:09.500> areas<00:52:10.040> and<00:52:10.990> yes 00:52:11.980 --> 00:52:11.990 align:start position:0% one of the busiest Beach areas and yes 00:52:11.990 --> 00:52:14.080 align:start position:0% one of the busiest Beach areas and yes there's<00:52:12.290> a<00:52:12.380> crowd<00:52:12.710> coming<00:52:13.160> for<00:52:13.340> parking<00:52:13.790> but 00:52:14.080 --> 00:52:14.090 align:start position:0% there's a crowd coming for parking but 00:52:14.090 --> 00:52:17.050 align:start position:0% there's a crowd coming for parking but there<00:52:14.270> is<00:52:14.360> rarely<00:52:15.020> rarely<00:52:15.800> a<00:52:16.190> parking<00:52:16.700> problem 00:52:17.050 --> 00:52:17.060 align:start position:0% there is rarely rarely a parking problem 00:52:17.060 --> 00:52:17.760 align:start position:0% there is rarely rarely a parking problem in<00:52:17.240> our<00:52:17.360> name 00:52:17.760 --> 00:52:17.770 align:start position:0% in our name 00:52:17.770 --> 00:52:20.339 align:start position:0% in our name and<00:52:18.010> I<00:52:18.640> hear<00:52:19.060> calls<00:52:19.390> of<00:52:19.660> parking<00:52:20.109> parking 00:52:20.339 --> 00:52:20.349 align:start position:0% and I hear calls of parking parking 00:52:20.349 --> 00:52:22.490 align:start position:0% and I hear calls of parking parking parking<00:52:20.589> and<00:52:21.160> I<00:52:21.220> really<00:52:21.490> think<00:52:21.730> it's<00:52:21.970> a 00:52:22.490 --> 00:52:22.500 align:start position:0% parking and I really think it's a 00:52:22.500 --> 00:52:24.720 align:start position:0% parking and I really think it's a problem<00:52:23.500> that<00:52:23.650> at<00:52:23.859> this<00:52:24.010> point<00:52:24.310> does<00:52:24.550> not 00:52:24.720 --> 00:52:24.730 align:start position:0% problem that at this point does not 00:52:24.730 --> 00:52:28.020 align:start position:0% problem that at this point does not exist<00:52:25.210> and<00:52:25.599> that<00:52:26.430> people<00:52:27.430> that<00:52:27.550> don't<00:52:27.790> want 00:52:28.020 --> 00:52:28.030 align:start position:0% exist and that people that don't want 00:52:28.030 --> 00:52:29.820 align:start position:0% exist and that people that don't want parking<00:52:28.510> just<00:52:28.720> don't<00:52:28.960> want<00:52:29.170> people<00:52:29.230> to<00:52:29.650> come 00:52:29.820 --> 00:52:29.830 align:start position:0% parking just don't want people to come 00:52:29.830 --> 00:52:31.740 align:start position:0% parking just don't want people to come into<00:52:30.010> their<00:52:30.220> neighborhood<00:52:30.670> so<00:52:31.000> that's<00:52:31.240> just<00:52:31.570> a 00:52:31.740 --> 00:52:31.750 align:start position:0% into their neighborhood so that's just a 00:52:31.750 --> 00:52:34.020 align:start position:0% into their neighborhood so that's just a feeling<00:52:31.990> that<00:52:32.380> I<00:52:32.859> get<00:52:33.040> I<00:52:33.070> proposed<00:52:33.580> to<00:52:33.730> Airbnb 00:52:34.020 --> 00:52:34.030 align:start position:0% feeling that I get I proposed to Airbnb 00:52:34.030 --> 00:52:37.940 align:start position:0% feeling that I get I proposed to Airbnb for<00:52:34.540> three<00:52:34.900> years<00:52:35.200> or<00:52:35.440> so<00:52:35.619> had<00:52:35.859> probably<00:52:36.839> 1,500 00:52:37.940 --> 00:52:37.950 align:start position:0% for three years or so had probably 1,500 00:52:37.950 --> 00:52:40.980 align:start position:0% for three years or so had probably 1,500 guests<00:52:38.950> at<00:52:39.040> my<00:52:39.190> house<00:52:39.400> a<00:52:39.430> thousand<00:52:40.300> reviews 00:52:40.980 --> 00:52:40.990 align:start position:0% guests at my house a thousand reviews 00:52:40.990 --> 00:52:43.890 align:start position:0% guests at my house a thousand reviews most<00:52:41.589> of<00:52:41.740> them<00:52:41.859> positive<00:52:42.300> forward<00:52:43.300> some<00:52:43.630> -<00:52:43.780> my 00:52:43.890 --> 00:52:43.900 align:start position:0% most of them positive forward some - my 00:52:43.900 --> 00:52:47.609 align:start position:0% most of them positive forward some - my mother<00:52:44.140> she's<00:52:44.530> very<00:52:44.740> happy<00:52:45.130> with<00:52:45.280> them<00:52:45.490> too 00:52:47.609 --> 00:52:47.619 align:start position:0% mother she's very happy with them too 00:52:47.619 --> 00:52:49.920 align:start position:0% mother she's very happy with them too it<00:52:48.160> helps<00:52:48.550> my<00:52:48.730> house<00:52:48.940> be<00:52:49.180> affordable<00:52:49.630> I'm<00:52:49.839> a 00:52:49.920 --> 00:52:49.930 align:start position:0% it helps my house be affordable I'm a 00:52:49.930 --> 00:52:51.300 align:start position:0% it helps my house be affordable I'm a superintendent<00:52:50.290> for<00:52:50.680> a<00:52:50.740> construction 00:52:51.300 --> 00:52:51.310 align:start position:0% superintendent for a construction 00:52:51.310 --> 00:52:53.400 align:start position:0% superintendent for a construction company<00:52:51.430> I<00:52:51.730> design<00:52:52.300> accessory<00:52:53.050> dwelling 00:52:53.400 --> 00:52:53.410 align:start position:0% company I design accessory dwelling 00:52:53.410 --> 00:52:55.440 align:start position:0% company I design accessory dwelling units<00:52:53.440> as<00:52:53.770> well<00:52:53.920> as<00:52:54.190> a<00:52:54.220> side<00:52:54.520> business<00:52:54.790> and<00:52:55.240> it 00:52:55.440 --> 00:52:55.450 align:start position:0% units as well as a side business and it 00:52:55.450 --> 00:52:57.510 align:start position:0% units as well as a side business and it helps<00:52:55.839> me<00:52:56.050> live<00:52:56.440> in<00:52:56.589> this<00:52:56.710> neighborhood<00:52:57.280> with 00:52:57.510 --> 00:52:57.520 align:start position:0% helps me live in this neighborhood with 00:52:57.520 --> 00:53:00.300 align:start position:0% helps me live in this neighborhood with people<00:52:57.760> that<00:52:58.150> make<00:52:58.420> way<00:52:58.960> more<00:52:59.260> than<00:52:59.500> me<00:52:59.680> it 00:53:00.300 --> 00:53:00.310 align:start position:0% people that make way more than me it 00:53:00.310 --> 00:53:02.400 align:start position:0% people that make way more than me it provides<00:53:00.730> me<00:53:01.180> with<00:53:01.210> money<00:53:01.599> to<00:53:01.839> send<00:53:02.020> my<00:53:02.170> kids 00:53:02.400 --> 00:53:02.410 align:start position:0% provides me with money to send my kids 00:53:02.410 --> 00:53:04.920 align:start position:0% provides me with money to send my kids to<00:53:02.470> college<00:53:02.560> and<00:53:03.040> live<00:53:03.790> a<00:53:03.849> normal<00:53:04.150> life<00:53:04.570> and 00:53:04.920 --> 00:53:04.930 align:start position:0% to college and live a normal life and 00:53:04.930 --> 00:53:07.470 align:start position:0% to college and live a normal life and and<00:53:05.380> pay<00:53:05.740> my<00:53:05.920> taxes<00:53:06.670> on<00:53:06.790> my<00:53:06.940> house<00:53:07.119> which<00:53:07.359> are 00:53:07.470 --> 00:53:07.480 align:start position:0% and pay my taxes on my house which are 00:53:07.480 --> 00:53:09.329 align:start position:0% and pay my taxes on my house which are over<00:53:07.750> ten<00:53:07.960> thousand<00:53:08.410> dollars<00:53:08.680> a<00:53:08.740> year<00:53:08.830> since<00:53:09.190> I 00:53:09.329 --> 00:53:09.339 align:start position:0% over ten thousand dollars a year since I 00:53:09.339 --> 00:53:12.210 align:start position:0% over ten thousand dollars a year since I remodeled<00:53:09.880> it<00:53:10.530> I'd<00:53:11.530> like<00:53:11.740> you<00:53:11.859> to<00:53:11.950> think<00:53:12.010> of 00:53:12.210 --> 00:53:12.220 align:start position:0% remodeled it I'd like you to think of 00:53:12.220 --> 00:53:14.640 align:start position:0% remodeled it I'd like you to think of Airbnb<00:53:12.970> is<00:53:13.030> also<00:53:13.330> as<00:53:13.480> a<00:53:13.510> distributed<00:53:14.230> hotel 00:53:14.640 --> 00:53:14.650 align:start position:0% Airbnb is also as a distributed hotel 00:53:14.650 --> 00:53:15.780 align:start position:0% Airbnb is also as a distributed hotel there's<00:53:14.920> a<00:53:14.980> lot<00:53:15.099> of<00:53:15.190> people<00:53:15.280> that<00:53:15.430> are<00:53:15.520> against 00:53:15.780 --> 00:53:15.790 align:start position:0% there's a lot of people that are against 00:53:15.790 --> 00:53:17.339 align:start position:0% there's a lot of people that are against hotel<00:53:16.180> development<00:53:16.720> but<00:53:17.020> you<00:53:17.080> can<00:53:17.200> actually 00:53:17.339 --> 00:53:17.349 align:start position:0% hotel development but you can actually 00:53:17.349 --> 00:53:18.780 align:start position:0% hotel development but you can actually look<00:53:17.650> at<00:53:17.800> this<00:53:17.950> as<00:53:18.130> a<00:53:18.160> hotel<00:53:18.609> that's 00:53:18.780 --> 00:53:18.790 align:start position:0% look at this as a hotel that's 00:53:18.790 --> 00:53:20.430 align:start position:0% look at this as a hotel that's distributed<00:53:19.240> out<00:53:19.630> with<00:53:19.869> no<00:53:20.109> further 00:53:20.430 --> 00:53:20.440 align:start position:0% distributed out with no further 00:53:20.440 --> 00:53:22.680 align:start position:0% distributed out with no further infrastructure<00:53:21.280> involvement<00:53:21.940> and<00:53:22.420> it's<00:53:22.570> a 00:53:22.680 --> 00:53:22.690 align:start position:0% infrastructure involvement and it's a 00:53:22.690 --> 00:53:25.050 align:start position:0% infrastructure involvement and it's a very<00:53:22.990> and<00:53:23.650> then<00:53:23.830> the<00:53:24.369> final<00:53:24.760> thing<00:53:24.790> I'd<00:53:24.970> like 00:53:25.050 --> 00:53:25.060 align:start position:0% very and then the final thing I'd like 00:53:25.060 --> 00:53:26.640 align:start position:0% very and then the final thing I'd like to<00:53:25.119> say<00:53:25.359> is<00:53:25.480> just<00:53:25.510> about<00:53:25.900> the<00:53:26.080> people<00:53:26.260> that<00:53:26.470> I 00:53:26.640 --> 00:53:26.650 align:start position:0% to say is just about the people that I 00:53:26.650 --> 00:53:29.490 align:start position:0% to say is just about the people that I get<00:53:26.710> tonight<00:53:27.220> I<00:53:27.400> have<00:53:27.700> a<00:53:27.730> woman<00:53:28.720> who's<00:53:29.140> been<00:53:29.170> at 00:53:29.490 --> 00:53:29.500 align:start position:0% get tonight I have a woman who's been at 00:53:29.500 --> 00:53:32.250 align:start position:0% get tonight I have a woman who's been at my<00:53:29.650> house<00:53:29.859> for<00:53:30.099> about<00:53:30.280> 30<00:53:30.640> days<00:53:30.970> she's<00:53:31.839> taking 00:53:32.250 --> 00:53:32.260 align:start position:0% my house for about 30 days she's taking 00:53:32.260 --> 00:53:35.040 align:start position:0% my house for about 30 days she's taking her<00:53:32.349> medical<00:53:32.800> boards<00:53:33.160> she's<00:53:33.580> a<00:53:33.609> student<00:53:34.210> so 00:53:35.040 --> 00:53:35.050 align:start position:0% her medical boards she's a student so 00:53:35.050 --> 00:53:37.410 align:start position:0% her medical boards she's a student so she<00:53:35.200> can't<00:53:35.920> afford<00:53:36.220> to<00:53:36.820> come<00:53:37.030> to<00:53:37.089> California 00:53:37.410 --> 00:53:37.420 align:start position:0% she can't afford to come to California 00:53:37.420 --> 00:53:39.900 align:start position:0% she can't afford to come to California and<00:53:37.930> do<00:53:38.050> this<00:53:38.200> any<00:53:38.470> other<00:53:38.560> way<00:53:38.920> so<00:53:38.950> that's<00:53:39.609> like 00:53:39.900 --> 00:53:39.910 align:start position:0% and do this any other way so that's like 00:53:39.910 --> 00:53:42.180 align:start position:0% and do this any other way so that's like a<00:53:39.970> typical<00:53:40.450> guest<00:53:40.900> and<00:53:41.109> then<00:53:41.200> older<00:53:41.650> people<00:53:41.980> a 00:53:42.180 --> 00:53:42.190 align:start position:0% a typical guest and then older people a 00:53:42.190 --> 00:53:44.030 align:start position:0% a typical guest and then older people a lot<00:53:42.460> of<00:53:42.490> people<00:53:42.670> people<00:53:43.150> come<00:53:43.300> with<00:53:43.480> dogs 00:53:44.030 --> 00:53:44.040 align:start position:0% lot of people people come with dogs 00:53:44.040 --> 00:53:46.800 align:start position:0% lot of people people come with dogs people<00:53:45.040> that<00:53:45.190> are<00:53:45.310> financially<00:53:46.270> unable<00:53:46.420> to 00:53:46.800 --> 00:53:46.810 align:start position:0% people that are financially unable to 00:53:46.810 --> 00:53:49.290 align:start position:0% people that are financially unable to stay<00:53:47.170> in<00:53:47.349> hotels<00:53:47.830> and<00:53:48.369> don't<00:53:48.609> want<00:53:48.849> hotels 00:53:49.290 --> 00:53:49.300 align:start position:0% stay in hotels and don't want hotels 00:53:49.300 --> 00:53:51.960 align:start position:0% stay in hotels and don't want hotels they<00:53:49.570> want<00:53:49.810> they<00:53:50.530> want<00:53:50.710> a<00:53:50.859> softer<00:53:51.369> place<00:53:51.640> to 00:53:51.960 --> 00:53:51.970 align:start position:0% they want they want a softer place to 00:53:51.970 --> 00:53:58.530 align:start position:0% they want they want a softer place to live<00:53:52.150> in<00:53:52.420> a<00:53:52.660> nice<00:53:52.900> quiet<00:53:53.260> area<00:53:53.710> and<00:53:54.460> so<00:53:56.190> a<00:53:57.540> lot 00:53:58.530 --> 00:53:58.540 align:start position:0% live in a nice quiet area and so a lot 00:53:58.540 --> 00:54:01.650 align:start position:0% live in a nice quiet area and so a lot of<00:53:58.660> elderly<00:53:59.020> people<00:53:59.320> -<00:53:59.650> I'm<00:54:00.359> hosted<00:54:01.359> a<00:54:01.420> lot<00:54:01.599> of 00:54:01.650 --> 00:54:01.660 align:start position:0% of elderly people - I'm hosted a lot of 00:54:01.660 --> 00:54:03.750 align:start position:0% of elderly people - I'm hosted a lot of people<00:54:02.020> and<00:54:02.290> they're<00:54:02.410> you<00:54:02.770> know<00:54:02.920> my<00:54:03.310> age<00:54:03.339> and 00:54:03.750 --> 00:54:03.760 align:start position:0% people and they're you know my age and 00:54:03.760 --> 00:54:07.500 align:start position:0% people and they're you know my age and older<00:54:04.089> that<00:54:04.990> come<00:54:05.859> to<00:54:06.040> the<00:54:06.130> coast<00:54:06.400> and<00:54:06.760> really 00:54:07.500 --> 00:54:07.510 align:start position:0% older that come to the coast and really 00:54:07.510 --> 00:54:11.270 align:start position:0% older that come to the coast and really prefer<00:54:07.930> Airbnb<00:54:08.680> to<00:54:08.710> other<00:54:09.099> types<00:54:09.430> of<00:54:09.690> housing 00:54:11.270 --> 00:54:11.280 align:start position:0% prefer Airbnb to other types of housing 00:54:11.280 --> 00:54:15.570 align:start position:0% prefer Airbnb to other types of housing so<00:54:12.280> it's<00:54:12.990> and<00:54:13.990> the<00:54:14.680> dog<00:54:14.920> friendly<00:54:15.339> thing<00:54:15.490> is 00:54:15.570 --> 00:54:15.580 align:start position:0% so it's and the dog friendly thing is 00:54:15.580 --> 00:54:17.160 align:start position:0% so it's and the dog friendly thing is another<00:54:15.820> thing<00:54:15.970> -<00:54:16.119> a<00:54:16.150> lot<00:54:16.450> of<00:54:16.480> people<00:54:16.780> travel 00:54:17.160 --> 00:54:17.170 align:start position:0% another thing - a lot of people travel 00:54:17.170 --> 00:54:20.040 align:start position:0% another thing - a lot of people travel with<00:54:17.320> their<00:54:17.560> dogs<00:54:17.830> and<00:54:18.280> most<00:54:19.089> hotels<00:54:19.359> banned 00:54:20.040 --> 00:54:20.050 align:start position:0% with their dogs and most hotels banned 00:54:20.050 --> 00:54:22.079 align:start position:0% with their dogs and most hotels banned dogs<00:54:20.380> over<00:54:20.800> ten<00:54:21.010> pounds<00:54:21.490> if<00:54:21.609> they're<00:54:21.760> German 00:54:22.079 --> 00:54:22.089 align:start position:0% dogs over ten pounds if they're German 00:54:22.089 --> 00:54:23.849 align:start position:0% dogs over ten pounds if they're German Shepherds<00:54:22.510> or<00:54:22.690> you<00:54:22.960> know<00:54:23.080> any<00:54:23.320> other<00:54:23.530> kind<00:54:23.770> of 00:54:23.849 --> 00:54:23.859 align:start position:0% Shepherds or you know any other kind of 00:54:23.859 --> 00:54:26.070 align:start position:0% Shepherds or you know any other kind of dog<00:54:24.040> that's<00:54:24.310> they<00:54:24.970> can't<00:54:25.270> come<00:54:25.690> to<00:54:25.780> the<00:54:25.900> coast 00:54:26.070 --> 00:54:26.080 align:start position:0% dog that's they can't come to the coast 00:54:26.080 --> 00:54:27.810 align:start position:0% dog that's they can't come to the coast and<00:54:26.320> dogs<00:54:26.680> are<00:54:26.859> a<00:54:26.890> large<00:54:27.130> part<00:54:27.190> of<00:54:27.550> people's 00:54:27.810 --> 00:54:27.820 align:start position:0% and dogs are a large part of people's 00:54:27.820 --> 00:54:30.370 align:start position:0% and dogs are a large part of people's lives<00:54:28.060> and<00:54:28.920> you<00:54:29.920> know 00:54:30.370 --> 00:54:30.380 align:start position:0% lives and you know 00:54:30.380 --> 00:54:32.950 align:start position:0% lives and you know so<00:54:31.010> I<00:54:31.070> you<00:54:31.580> know<00:54:31.610> invite<00:54:32.060> pets<00:54:32.330> to<00:54:32.510> come<00:54:32.660> to<00:54:32.840> my 00:54:32.950 --> 00:54:32.960 align:start position:0% so I you know invite pets to come to my 00:54:32.960 --> 00:54:34.390 align:start position:0% so I you know invite pets to come to my house<00:54:33.140> too<00:54:33.440> and<00:54:33.650> they<00:54:33.770> find<00:54:34.010> it<00:54:34.100> really 00:54:34.390 --> 00:54:34.400 align:start position:0% house too and they find it really 00:54:34.400 --> 00:54:37.590 align:start position:0% house too and they find it really enjoying<00:54:35.000> but<00:54:35.150> I<00:54:35.300> say<00:54:36.170> that<00:54:36.410> unholstered 00:54:37.590 --> 00:54:37.600 align:start position:0% enjoying but I say that unholstered 00:54:37.600 --> 00:54:40.480 align:start position:0% enjoying but I say that unholstered Airbnb<00:54:38.600> 'z<00:54:38.630> primarily<00:54:39.410> do<00:54:39.650> not<00:54:39.860> need<00:54:40.220> to<00:54:40.370> be 00:54:40.480 --> 00:54:40.490 align:start position:0% Airbnb 'z primarily do not need to be 00:54:40.490 --> 00:54:42.130 align:start position:0% Airbnb 'z primarily do not need to be regulated<00:54:41.090> at<00:54:41.210> this<00:54:41.360> point<00:54:41.660> and<00:54:41.870> that<00:54:41.990> they're 00:54:42.130 --> 00:54:42.140 align:start position:0% regulated at this point and that they're 00:54:42.140 --> 00:54:44.320 align:start position:0% regulated at this point and that they're not<00:54:42.260> a<00:54:42.320> problem<00:54:42.590> and<00:54:43.040> that<00:54:43.640> the<00:54:43.790> specter<00:54:44.300> of 00:54:44.320 --> 00:54:44.330 align:start position:0% not a problem and that the specter of 00:54:44.330 --> 00:54:47.260 align:start position:0% not a problem and that the specter of hordes<00:54:45.080> of<00:54:45.290> Airbnb<00:54:45.740> hosts<00:54:46.520> coming<00:54:46.910> to<00:54:47.030> town 00:54:47.260 --> 00:54:47.270 align:start position:0% hordes of Airbnb hosts coming to town 00:54:47.270 --> 00:54:48.790 align:start position:0% hordes of Airbnb hosts coming to town and<00:54:47.630> turning<00:54:47.930> our<00:54:48.050> town<00:54:48.320> into<00:54:48.650> this 00:54:48.790 --> 00:54:48.800 align:start position:0% and turning our town into this 00:54:48.800 --> 00:54:50.920 align:start position:0% and turning our town into this nightmarish<00:54:49.490> place<00:54:50.090> where<00:54:50.480> people<00:54:50.690> are 00:54:50.920 --> 00:54:50.930 align:start position:0% nightmarish place where people are 00:54:50.930 --> 00:54:52.930 align:start position:0% nightmarish place where people are renting<00:54:51.350> out<00:54:51.470> every<00:54:51.860> room<00:54:52.190> and<00:54:52.430> turning<00:54:52.760> their 00:54:52.930 --> 00:54:52.940 align:start position:0% renting out every room and turning their 00:54:52.940 --> 00:54:55.570 align:start position:0% renting out every room and turning their houses<00:54:53.330> into<00:54:53.540> de-facto<00:54:53.990> hotels<00:54:54.580> hasn't 00:54:55.570 --> 00:54:55.580 align:start position:0% houses into de-facto hotels hasn't 00:54:55.580 --> 00:54:57.520 align:start position:0% houses into de-facto hotels hasn't happened<00:54:56.000> isn't<00:54:56.270> it<00:54:56.570> happening<00:54:56.750> and<00:54:57.140> won't 00:54:57.520 --> 00:54:57.530 align:start position:0% happened isn't it happening and won't 00:54:57.530 --> 00:55:00.490 align:start position:0% happened isn't it happening and won't happen<00:54:57.770> and<00:54:58.490> we're<00:54:59.390> gonna<00:54:59.510> maintain<00:55:00.020> a<00:55:00.050> small 00:55:00.490 --> 00:55:00.500 align:start position:0% happen and we're gonna maintain a small 00:55:00.500 --> 00:55:03.250 align:start position:0% happen and we're gonna maintain a small community<00:55:00.920> here<00:55:01.310> of<00:55:01.420> beach<00:55:02.420> rentals<00:55:02.960> like 00:55:03.250 --> 00:55:03.260 align:start position:0% community here of beach rentals like 00:55:03.260 --> 00:55:08.260 align:start position:0% community here of beach rentals like we've<00:55:04.160> had<00:55:04.370> for<00:55:04.730> a<00:55:04.910> thousand<00:55:05.660> years<00:55:07.090> thank<00:55:08.090> you 00:55:08.260 --> 00:55:08.270 align:start position:0% we've had for a thousand years thank you 00:55:08.270 --> 00:55:11.110 align:start position:0% we've had for a thousand years thank you the<00:55:08.660> next<00:55:08.900> speaker<00:55:09.230> is<00:55:09.260> Matt<00:55:09.650> de<00:55:10.220> Tom<00:55:10.490> or<00:55:10.820> desk 00:55:11.110 --> 00:55:11.120 align:start position:0% the next speaker is Matt de Tom or desk 00:55:11.120 --> 00:55:13.330 align:start position:0% the next speaker is Matt de Tom or desk Tom<00:55:11.390> I<00:55:11.420> apologize<00:55:12.410> if<00:55:12.680> I've<00:55:12.830> said<00:55:13.040> it<00:55:13.190> wrong 00:55:13.330 --> 00:55:13.340 align:start position:0% Tom I apologize if I've said it wrong 00:55:13.340 --> 00:55:15.960 align:start position:0% Tom I apologize if I've said it wrong either<00:55:14.500> all<00:55:15.500> right 00:55:15.960 --> 00:55:15.970 align:start position:0% either all right 00:55:15.970 --> 00:55:19.270 align:start position:0% either all right they<00:55:16.970> told<00:55:17.180> clay<00:55:17.510> yeah<00:55:17.750> they<00:55:17.990> told<00:55:18.230> thank<00:55:19.190> you 00:55:19.270 --> 00:55:19.280 align:start position:0% they told clay yeah they told thank you 00:55:19.280 --> 00:55:20.620 align:start position:0% they told clay yeah they told thank you very<00:55:19.400> much<00:55:19.520> my<00:55:19.640> name<00:55:19.670> is<00:55:19.880> Matt<00:55:20.060> de<00:55:20.210> Tom<00:55:20.420> I've 00:55:20.620 --> 00:55:20.630 align:start position:0% very much my name is Matt de Tom I've 00:55:20.630 --> 00:55:22.270 align:start position:0% very much my name is Matt de Tom I've been<00:55:20.780> here<00:55:20.960> for<00:55:21.200> 10<00:55:21.380> years 00:55:22.270 --> 00:55:22.280 align:start position:0% been here for 10 years 00:55:22.280 --> 00:55:23.860 align:start position:0% been here for 10 years friends<00:55:22.970> with<00:55:23.090> a<00:55:23.120> couple<00:55:23.270> people<00:55:23.540> on<00:55:23.750> the 00:55:23.860 --> 00:55:23.870 align:start position:0% friends with a couple people on the 00:55:23.870 --> 00:55:27.840 align:start position:0% friends with a couple people on the Planning<00:55:24.170> Commission<00:55:24.700> I've<00:55:25.700> been<00:55:25.940> renting<00:55:26.510> a 00:55:27.840 --> 00:55:27.850 align:start position:0% Planning Commission I've been renting a 00:55:27.850 --> 00:55:31.600 align:start position:0% Planning Commission I've been renting a small<00:55:29.380> 13<00:55:30.380> by<00:55:30.590> 20<00:55:30.890> foot<00:55:31.010> cottage<00:55:31.370> on<00:55:31.460> my 00:55:31.600 --> 00:55:31.610 align:start position:0% small 13 by 20 foot cottage on my 00:55:31.610 --> 00:55:35.560 align:start position:0% small 13 by 20 foot cottage on my property<00:55:31.880> for<00:55:32.330> about<00:55:32.620> half<00:55:33.620> four<00:55:33.860> years<00:55:34.570> and 00:55:35.560 --> 00:55:35.570 align:start position:0% property for about half four years and 00:55:35.570 --> 00:55:37.690 align:start position:0% property for about half four years and by<00:55:36.110> the<00:55:36.140> way<00:55:36.290> I'd<00:55:36.410> welcome<00:55:36.650> anybody<00:55:37.190> to<00:55:37.400> come 00:55:37.690 --> 00:55:37.700 align:start position:0% by the way I'd welcome anybody to come 00:55:37.700 --> 00:55:39.340 align:start position:0% by the way I'd welcome anybody to come to<00:55:38.000> that<00:55:38.360> property<00:55:38.840> if<00:55:38.960> the<00:55:39.050> Planning 00:55:39.340 --> 00:55:39.350 align:start position:0% to that property if the Planning 00:55:39.350 --> 00:55:40.750 align:start position:0% to that property if the Planning Commission<00:55:39.650> wants<00:55:39.890> to<00:55:39.980> talk<00:55:40.160> to<00:55:40.190> me<00:55:40.340> talk<00:55:40.730> to 00:55:40.750 --> 00:55:40.760 align:start position:0% Commission wants to talk to me talk to 00:55:40.760 --> 00:55:43.090 align:start position:0% Commission wants to talk to me talk to see<00:55:40.940> the<00:55:41.060> results<00:55:41.600> you<00:55:41.780> guys<00:55:42.530> are<00:55:42.740> welcome<00:55:42.950> to 00:55:43.090 --> 00:55:43.100 align:start position:0% see the results you guys are welcome to 00:55:43.100 --> 00:55:44.500 align:start position:0% see the results you guys are welcome to come<00:55:43.220> check<00:55:43.550> it<00:55:43.610> out<00:55:43.820> to<00:55:44.090> see<00:55:44.240> what<00:55:44.270> the 00:55:44.500 --> 00:55:44.510 align:start position:0% come check it out to see what the 00:55:44.510 --> 00:55:45.310 align:start position:0% come check it out to see what the situation<00:55:44.690> is 00:55:45.310 --> 00:55:45.320 align:start position:0% situation is 00:55:45.320 --> 00:55:48.570 align:start position:0% situation is I<00:55:45.400> own<00:55:46.400> that<00:55:46.700> house<00:55:46.970> I<00:55:47.210> also<00:55:47.360> have<00:55:47.570> -<00:55:47.840> I<00:55:47.870> have<00:55:48.170> a 00:55:48.570 --> 00:55:48.580 align:start position:0% I own that house I also have - I have a 00:55:48.580 --> 00:55:51.130 align:start position:0% I own that house I also have - I have a cottage<00:55:49.580> in<00:55:49.700> the<00:55:49.760> back<00:55:50.000> and<00:55:50.450> there's<00:55:50.750> a<00:55:50.840> three 00:55:51.130 --> 00:55:51.140 align:start position:0% cottage in the back and there's a three 00:55:51.140 --> 00:55:52.960 align:start position:0% cottage in the back and there's a three two-bedroom<00:55:51.740> in<00:55:51.890> front<00:55:52.190> that<00:55:52.430> I<00:55:52.490> rent<00:55:52.790> to 00:55:52.960 --> 00:55:52.970 align:start position:0% two-bedroom in front that I rent to 00:55:52.970 --> 00:55:54.090 align:start position:0% two-bedroom in front that I rent to Cynthia 00:55:54.090 --> 00:55:54.100 align:start position:0% Cynthia 00:55:54.100 --> 00:55:57.760 align:start position:0% Cynthia Cheryl<00:55:55.100> who<00:55:55.220> does<00:55:55.370> the<00:55:55.520> cert<00:55:55.730> so<00:55:56.600> I<00:55:56.630> chose<00:55:57.350> not 00:55:57.760 --> 00:55:57.770 align:start position:0% Cheryl who does the cert so I chose not 00:55:57.770 --> 00:56:01.040 align:start position:0% Cheryl who does the cert so I chose not to<00:55:57.830> rent<00:55:58.610> both<00:55:59.030> of<00:55:59.270> those 00:56:01.040 --> 00:56:01.050 align:start position:0% to rent both of those 00:56:01.050 --> 00:56:02.990 align:start position:0% to rent both of those my<00:56:01.530> short-term<00:56:01.770> rental<00:56:02.160> basis<00:56:02.550> because<00:56:02.790> I 00:56:02.990 --> 00:56:03.000 align:start position:0% my short-term rental basis because I 00:56:03.000 --> 00:56:04.760 align:start position:0% my short-term rental basis because I thought<00:56:03.270> it<00:56:03.420> would<00:56:03.540> be<00:56:03.720> over<00:56:03.990> burdensome<00:56:04.620> to 00:56:04.760 --> 00:56:04.770 align:start position:0% thought it would be over burdensome to 00:56:04.770 --> 00:56:07.790 align:start position:0% thought it would be over burdensome to my<00:56:04.860> neighbors<00:56:05.250> I<00:56:05.990> prioritized<00:56:06.990> my<00:56:07.320> neighbors 00:56:07.790 --> 00:56:07.800 align:start position:0% my neighbors I prioritized my neighbors 00:56:07.800 --> 00:56:11.480 align:start position:0% my neighbors I prioritized my neighbors before<00:56:08.760> my<00:56:09.060> guests<00:56:09.540> I<00:56:09.890> screen<00:56:10.890> every<00:56:11.190> single 00:56:11.480 --> 00:56:11.490 align:start position:0% before my guests I screen every single 00:56:11.490 --> 00:56:13.880 align:start position:0% before my guests I screen every single guest<00:56:11.670> that<00:56:11.940> comes<00:56:12.120> into<00:56:12.420> my<00:56:12.630> house<00:56:12.840> I<00:56:13.230> am 00:56:13.880 --> 00:56:13.890 align:start position:0% guest that comes into my house I am 00:56:13.890 --> 00:56:16.250 align:start position:0% guest that comes into my house I am friends<00:56:14.250> with<00:56:14.280> my<00:56:14.520> neighbors<00:56:14.910> on<00:56:15.090> all<00:56:15.420> corners 00:56:16.250 --> 00:56:16.260 align:start position:0% friends with my neighbors on all corners 00:56:16.260 --> 00:56:19.880 align:start position:0% friends with my neighbors on all corners and<00:56:17.250> I<00:56:17.550> love<00:56:17.790> my<00:56:17.970> neighbors<00:56:18.330> in<00:56:18.630> those<00:56:19.560> people 00:56:19.880 --> 00:56:19.890 align:start position:0% and I love my neighbors in those people 00:56:19.890 --> 00:56:21.800 align:start position:0% and I love my neighbors in those people come<00:56:20.130> first<00:56:20.430> before<00:56:20.790> my<00:56:21.180> guests<00:56:21.570> and<00:56:21.690> they 00:56:21.800 --> 00:56:21.810 align:start position:0% come first before my guests and they 00:56:21.810 --> 00:56:23.630 align:start position:0% come first before my guests and they will<00:56:21.990> always<00:56:22.170> come<00:56:22.500> first<00:56:22.530> before<00:56:22.920> my<00:56:23.220> guests 00:56:23.630 --> 00:56:23.640 align:start position:0% will always come first before my guests 00:56:23.640 --> 00:56:25.640 align:start position:0% will always come first before my guests um<00:56:24.110> let's<00:56:25.110> be<00:56:25.200> clear 00:56:25.640 --> 00:56:25.650 align:start position:0% um let's be clear 00:56:25.650 --> 00:56:27.920 align:start position:0% um let's be clear people<00:56:26.220> have<00:56:26.400> rented<00:56:26.820> homes<00:56:27.120> on<00:56:27.450> the<00:56:27.720> beach 00:56:27.920 --> 00:56:27.930 align:start position:0% people have rented homes on the beach 00:56:27.930 --> 00:56:30.770 align:start position:0% people have rented homes on the beach for<00:56:28.680> thousands<00:56:29.220> of<00:56:29.310> years<00:56:29.580> from<00:56:30.300> the<00:56:30.450> Roman 00:56:30.770 --> 00:56:30.780 align:start position:0% for thousands of years from the Roman 00:56:30.780 --> 00:56:34.190 align:start position:0% for thousands of years from the Roman ages<00:56:31.260> to<00:56:31.860> today<00:56:32.160> they've<00:56:32.700> rented<00:56:32.940> homes<00:56:33.300> it's 00:56:34.190 --> 00:56:34.200 align:start position:0% ages to today they've rented homes it's 00:56:34.200 --> 00:56:35.000 align:start position:0% ages to today they've rented homes it's not<00:56:34.350> a<00:56:34.380> new<00:56:34.590> thing 00:56:35.000 --> 00:56:35.010 align:start position:0% not a new thing 00:56:35.010 --> 00:56:38.800 align:start position:0% not a new thing right<00:56:35.550> VRBO<00:56:36.270> has<00:56:36.540> been<00:56:36.660> around<00:56:36.840> for<00:56:37.230> 20<00:56:38.160> years 00:56:38.800 --> 00:56:38.810 align:start position:0% right VRBO has been around for 20 years 00:56:38.810 --> 00:56:41.510 align:start position:0% right VRBO has been around for 20 years you<00:56:39.810> know<00:56:39.840> back<00:56:40.410> when<00:56:40.650> I<00:56:40.680> was<00:56:40.890> in<00:56:41.010> college<00:56:41.250> in 00:56:41.510 --> 00:56:41.520 align:start position:0% you know back when I was in college in 00:56:41.520 --> 00:56:43.250 align:start position:0% you know back when I was in college in high<00:56:41.550> school<00:56:42.030> we<00:56:42.180> rented<00:56:42.510> the<00:56:42.660> RB<00:56:42.900> O's<00:56:42.990> by<00:56:43.200> the 00:56:43.250 --> 00:56:43.260 align:start position:0% high school we rented the RB O's by the 00:56:43.260 --> 00:56:47.030 align:start position:0% high school we rented the RB O's by the beach<00:56:43.500> all<00:56:43.710> the<00:56:43.800> time<00:56:43.980> so<00:56:45.080> you<00:56:46.080> know<00:56:46.140> and<00:56:46.440> I<00:56:46.860> did 00:56:47.030 --> 00:56:47.040 align:start position:0% beach all the time so you know and I did 00:56:47.040 --> 00:56:49.100 align:start position:0% beach all the time so you know and I did the<00:56:47.160> math<00:56:47.190> when<00:56:48.090> Jill<00:56:48.360> said<00:56:48.630> that<00:56:48.810> there<00:56:48.960> was 00:56:49.100 --> 00:56:49.110 align:start position:0% the math when Jill said that there was 00:56:49.110 --> 00:56:51.380 align:start position:0% the math when Jill said that there was 45<00:56:49.740> units<00:56:50.190> here<00:56:50.610> we<00:56:50.730> have<00:56:50.850> about<00:56:50.970> twelve 00:56:51.380 --> 00:56:51.390 align:start position:0% 45 units here we have about twelve 00:56:51.390 --> 00:56:53.540 align:start position:0% 45 units here we have about twelve thousand<00:56:51.840> how<00:56:52.590> many<00:56:52.740> how<00:56:52.920> many<00:56:52.950> single-family 00:56:53.540 --> 00:56:53.550 align:start position:0% thousand how many how many single-family 00:56:53.550 --> 00:56:56.270 align:start position:0% thousand how many how many single-family homes<00:56:53.910> here<00:56:54.150> maybe<00:56:54.450> four<00:56:54.900> thousand<00:56:55.380> something 00:56:56.270 --> 00:56:56.280 align:start position:0% homes here maybe four thousand something 00:56:56.280 --> 00:56:57.980 align:start position:0% homes here maybe four thousand something like<00:56:56.580> that<00:56:56.790> I<00:56:56.820> mean<00:56:57.000> we're<00:56:57.180> in<00:56:57.330> the<00:56:57.480> less<00:56:57.720> than 00:56:57.980 --> 00:56:57.990 align:start position:0% like that I mean we're in the less than 00:56:57.990 --> 00:57:02.870 align:start position:0% like that I mean we're in the less than 1%<00:56:58.920> or<00:56:59.130> close<00:56:59.370> to<00:56:59.580> 1%<00:57:01.040> let's<00:57:02.040> be<00:57:02.250> clear<00:57:02.640> that 00:57:02.870 --> 00:57:02.880 align:start position:0% 1% or close to 1% let's be clear that 00:57:02.880 --> 00:57:05.270 align:start position:0% 1% or close to 1% let's be clear that we're<00:57:03.090> not<00:57:03.120> a<00:57:03.710> solution<00:57:04.710> looking<00:57:04.860> for<00:57:05.070> a 00:57:05.270 --> 00:57:05.280 align:start position:0% we're not a solution looking for a 00:57:05.280 --> 00:57:07.040 align:start position:0% we're not a solution looking for a problem<00:57:05.370> right<00:57:06.150> I<00:57:06.210> mean<00:57:06.480> I<00:57:06.540> don't<00:57:06.630> know<00:57:06.810> how 00:57:07.040 --> 00:57:07.050 align:start position:0% problem right I mean I don't know how 00:57:07.050 --> 00:57:08.810 align:start position:0% problem right I mean I don't know how many<00:57:07.110> complaints<00:57:07.890> but<00:57:08.010> we<00:57:08.160> should<00:57:08.370> quantify 00:57:08.810 --> 00:57:08.820 align:start position:0% many complaints but we should quantify 00:57:08.820 --> 00:57:11.330 align:start position:0% many complaints but we should quantify that<00:57:09.480> to<00:57:10.200> make<00:57:10.410> sure<00:57:10.620> that<00:57:10.920> we<00:57:11.100> are<00:57:11.190> actually 00:57:11.330 --> 00:57:11.340 align:start position:0% that to make sure that we are actually 00:57:11.340 --> 00:57:14.120 align:start position:0% that to make sure that we are actually addressing<00:57:11.970> things<00:57:12.180> I<00:57:12.620> think<00:57:13.620> I<00:57:13.770> think<00:57:13.950> that 00:57:14.120 --> 00:57:14.130 align:start position:0% addressing things I think I think that 00:57:14.130 --> 00:57:17.420 align:start position:0% addressing things I think I think that the<00:57:14.280> study<00:57:14.580> here<00:57:14.940> is<00:57:15.120> perfect<00:57:15.660> I<00:57:15.990> too<00:57:16.320> want<00:57:17.130> a 00:57:17.420 --> 00:57:17.430 align:start position:0% the study here is perfect I too want a 00:57:17.430 --> 00:57:20.960 align:start position:0% the study here is perfect I too want a neighborhood<00:57:17.760> I<00:57:18.330> too<00:57:19.020> don't<00:57:19.650> want<00:57:19.980> hordes<00:57:20.760> of 00:57:20.960 --> 00:57:20.970 align:start position:0% neighborhood I too don't want hordes of 00:57:20.970 --> 00:57:24.710 align:start position:0% neighborhood I too don't want hordes of you<00:57:21.330> know<00:57:21.420> Airbnb<00:57:21.600> guests<00:57:22.470> my<00:57:23.160> son<00:57:23.550> runs<00:57:24.360> and 00:57:24.710 --> 00:57:24.720 align:start position:0% you know Airbnb guests my son runs and 00:57:24.720 --> 00:57:26.180 align:start position:0% you know Airbnb guests my son runs and plays<00:57:24.930> in<00:57:25.290> the<00:57:25.350> neighborhood<00:57:25.740> that<00:57:25.890> we're<00:57:26.040> in 00:57:26.180 --> 00:57:26.190 align:start position:0% plays in the neighborhood that we're in 00:57:26.190 --> 00:57:29.080 align:start position:0% plays in the neighborhood that we're in right<00:57:26.220> now<00:57:26.430> I<00:57:26.610> know<00:57:26.850> that<00:57:27.150> all<00:57:27.300> of<00:57:27.330> our<00:57:27.510> kids<00:57:27.750> do 00:57:29.080 --> 00:57:29.090 align:start position:0% right now I know that all of our kids do 00:57:29.090 --> 00:57:31.520 align:start position:0% right now I know that all of our kids do so<00:57:30.090> I<00:57:30.150> think<00:57:30.210> the<00:57:30.420> common<00:57:30.780> sense<00:57:31.020> regulations 00:57:31.520 --> 00:57:31.530 align:start position:0% so I think the common sense regulations 00:57:31.530 --> 00:57:33.860 align:start position:0% so I think the common sense regulations that<00:57:32.070> you<00:57:32.280> know<00:57:32.370> we're<00:57:32.580> talking<00:57:32.760> about<00:57:33.000> let's 00:57:33.860 --> 00:57:33.870 align:start position:0% that you know we're talking about let's 00:57:33.870 --> 00:57:36.020 align:start position:0% that you know we're talking about let's root<00:57:34.050> out<00:57:34.200> the<00:57:34.320> bad<00:57:34.470> actors<00:57:34.890> maybe<00:57:35.550> even<00:57:35.820> put<00:57:36.000> a 00:57:36.020 --> 00:57:36.030 align:start position:0% root out the bad actors maybe even put a 00:57:36.030 --> 00:57:38.600 align:start position:0% root out the bad actors maybe even put a council<00:57:36.570> together<00:57:36.720> of<00:57:37.140> for<00:57:37.350> Airbnb<00:57:37.680> hosts 00:57:38.600 --> 00:57:38.610 align:start position:0% council together of for Airbnb hosts 00:57:38.610 --> 00:57:40.130 align:start position:0% council together of for Airbnb hosts that<00:57:38.730> have<00:57:38.790> been<00:57:38.940> around<00:57:39.150> for<00:57:39.450> a<00:57:39.480> while<00:57:39.540> plus 00:57:40.130 --> 00:57:40.140 align:start position:0% that have been around for a while plus 00:57:40.140 --> 00:57:43.130 align:start position:0% that have been around for a while plus you<00:57:40.770> know<00:57:40.890> one<00:57:41.130> person<00:57:41.550> from<00:57:41.700> staff<00:57:42.060> and<00:57:42.690> let's 00:57:43.130 --> 00:57:43.140 align:start position:0% you know one person from staff and let's 00:57:43.140 --> 00:57:44.960 align:start position:0% you know one person from staff and let's come<00:57:43.320> up<00:57:43.350> with<00:57:43.470> common<00:57:43.860> sense<00:57:44.160> kind<00:57:44.610> of<00:57:44.700> blocks 00:57:44.960 --> 00:57:44.970 align:start position:0% come up with common sense kind of blocks 00:57:44.970 --> 00:57:46.850 align:start position:0% come up with common sense kind of blocks and<00:57:45.150> tackles<00:57:45.630> so<00:57:45.780> we<00:57:45.930> can<00:57:46.080> all<00:57:46.200> continue<00:57:46.590> to 00:57:46.850 --> 00:57:46.860 align:start position:0% and tackles so we can all continue to 00:57:46.860 --> 00:57:50.000 align:start position:0% and tackles so we can all continue to enjoy<00:57:47.600> the<00:57:48.600> income<00:57:49.020> from<00:57:49.140> short-term<00:57:49.620> rentals 00:57:50.000 --> 00:57:50.010 align:start position:0% enjoy the income from short-term rentals 00:57:50.010 --> 00:57:51.980 align:start position:0% enjoy the income from short-term rentals my<00:57:50.250> wife<00:57:50.510> heads<00:57:51.510> up 00:57:51.980 --> 00:57:51.990 align:start position:0% my wife heads up 00:57:51.990 --> 00:57:53.540 align:start position:0% my wife heads up young<00:57:52.440> actors<00:57:52.800> workshop<00:57:53.070> she's<00:57:53.430> the 00:57:53.540 --> 00:57:53.550 align:start position:0% young actors workshop she's the 00:57:53.550 --> 00:57:54.920 align:start position:0% young actors workshop she's the president<00:57:54.000> of<00:57:54.120> the<00:57:54.210> young<00:57:54.390> actors<00:57:54.750> workshop 00:57:54.920 --> 00:57:54.930 align:start position:0% president of the young actors workshop 00:57:54.930 --> 00:57:58.310 align:start position:0% president of the young actors workshop here<00:57:55.550> volunteer<00:57:56.550> basis<00:57:57.060> she<00:57:57.780> does<00:57:57.930> a<00:57:57.960> lot<00:57:58.170> of 00:57:58.310 --> 00:57:58.320 align:start position:0% here volunteer basis she does a lot of 00:57:58.320 --> 00:58:00.380 align:start position:0% here volunteer basis she does a lot of stuff<00:57:58.560> in<00:57:58.740> the<00:57:58.830> community<00:57:59.340> supports<00:58:00.060> hatch 00:58:00.380 --> 00:58:00.390 align:start position:0% stuff in the community supports hatch 00:58:00.390 --> 00:58:03.500 align:start position:0% stuff in the community supports hatch and<00:58:00.870> Seacrest<00:58:01.650> auctions<00:58:02.280> she<00:58:03.060> does<00:58:03.300> this 00:58:03.500 --> 00:58:03.510 align:start position:0% and Seacrest auctions she does this 00:58:03.510 --> 00:58:07.650 align:start position:0% and Seacrest auctions she does this because<00:58:03.990> we<00:58:04.140> make<00:58:04.320> some<00:58:04.530> money 00:58:07.650 --> 00:58:07.660 align:start position:0% 00:58:07.660 --> 00:58:09.510 align:start position:0% I<00:58:07.690> think<00:58:08.109> all<00:58:08.260> in<00:58:08.410> all<00:58:08.500> it's<00:58:08.890> a<00:58:09.069> it's<00:58:09.400> an 00:58:09.510 --> 00:58:09.520 align:start position:0% I think all in all it's a it's an 00:58:09.520 --> 00:58:12.890 align:start position:0% I think all in all it's a it's an awesome<00:58:09.940> opportunity<00:58:10.329> for<00:58:10.720> us<00:58:11.020> to<00:58:11.260> make<00:58:11.799> money 00:58:12.890 --> 00:58:12.900 align:start position:0% awesome opportunity for us to make money 00:58:12.900 --> 00:58:16.650 align:start position:0% awesome opportunity for us to make money enjoy<00:58:14.069> the<00:58:15.069> coast<00:58:15.400> and<00:58:15.819> interact<00:58:16.390> with<00:58:16.480> me 00:58:16.650 --> 00:58:16.660 align:start position:0% enjoy the coast and interact with me 00:58:16.660 --> 00:58:19.319 align:start position:0% enjoy the coast and interact with me people<00:58:16.930> and<00:58:17.440> I<00:58:17.559> agree<00:58:17.799> with<00:58:17.920> what<00:58:18.099> Tim<00:58:18.280> says<00:58:18.520> my 00:58:19.319 --> 00:58:19.329 align:start position:0% people and I agree with what Tim says my 00:58:19.329 --> 00:58:21.210 align:start position:0% people and I agree with what Tim says my neighbors<00:58:19.690> down<00:58:19.839> the<00:58:19.869> street<00:58:20.020> that<00:58:20.530> have<00:58:20.799> to 00:58:21.210 --> 00:58:21.220 align:start position:0% neighbors down the street that have to 00:58:21.220 --> 00:58:24.480 align:start position:0% neighbors down the street that have to ad<00:58:21.460> use<00:58:21.819> have<00:58:22.569> six<00:58:23.020> cars<00:58:23.380> if<00:58:23.950> you<00:58:24.130> could<00:58:24.309> wrap 00:58:24.480 --> 00:58:24.490 align:start position:0% ad use have six cars if you could wrap 00:58:24.490 --> 00:58:28.500 align:start position:0% ad use have six cars if you could wrap up<00:58:24.549> your<00:58:24.849> comment<00:58:25.270> please<00:58:26.400> my<00:58:27.400> Airbnb<00:58:28.150> unit 00:58:28.500 --> 00:58:28.510 align:start position:0% up your comment please my Airbnb unit 00:58:28.510 --> 00:58:30.569 align:start position:0% up your comment please my Airbnb unit they<00:58:28.809> come<00:58:29.020> with<00:58:29.170> one<00:58:29.380> car<00:58:29.589> they<00:58:30.160> don't<00:58:30.309> come 00:58:30.569 --> 00:58:30.579 align:start position:0% they come with one car they don't come 00:58:30.579 --> 00:58:34.160 align:start position:0% they come with one car they don't come with<00:58:30.760> four<00:58:32.190> Thank<00:58:33.190> You<00:58:33.339> mr.<00:58:33.640> Dayton 00:58:34.160 --> 00:58:34.170 align:start position:0% with four Thank You mr. Dayton 00:58:34.170 --> 00:58:38.120 align:start position:0% with four Thank You mr. Dayton the<00:58:35.170> next<00:58:35.440> speaker<00:58:35.589> will<00:58:35.770> be<00:58:35.920> Dave<00:58:36.880> Wilson 00:58:38.120 --> 00:58:38.130 align:start position:0% the next speaker will be Dave Wilson 00:58:38.130 --> 00:58:43.309 align:start position:0% the next speaker will be Dave Wilson followed<00:58:39.130> by<00:58:39.460> Marta<00:58:40.000> Portobello<00:58:40.720> swagga 00:58:43.309 --> 00:58:43.319 align:start position:0% followed by Marta Portobello swagga 00:58:43.319 --> 00:58:46.559 align:start position:0% followed by Marta Portobello swagga welcome<00:58:44.319> mister<00:58:44.559> oils<00:58:44.710> thank<00:58:45.490> you<00:58:45.640> I'm<00:58:45.819> Dave 00:58:46.559 --> 00:58:46.569 align:start position:0% welcome mister oils thank you I'm Dave 00:58:46.569 --> 00:58:50.670 align:start position:0% welcome mister oils thank you I'm Dave Olson 00:58:50.670 --> 00:58:50.680 align:start position:0% 00:58:50.680 --> 00:58:53.960 align:start position:0% Council 00:58:53.960 --> 00:58:53.970 align:start position:0% 00:58:53.970 --> 00:58:55.910 align:start position:0% if<00:58:54.480> you<00:58:54.660> could<00:58:54.839> move<00:58:54.960> a<00:58:55.109> bit<00:58:55.290> closer<00:58:55.500> to<00:58:55.829> the 00:58:55.910 --> 00:58:55.920 align:start position:0% if you could move a bit closer to the 00:58:55.920 --> 00:58:57.470 align:start position:0% if you could move a bit closer to the microphone<00:58:56.400> at<00:58:56.550> all<00:58:56.640> a<00:58:56.670> little<00:58:57.000> bit<00:58:57.150> closer 00:58:57.470 --> 00:58:57.480 align:start position:0% microphone at all a little bit closer 00:58:57.480 --> 00:58:58.609 align:start position:0% microphone at all a little bit closer okay<00:58:57.900> perfect 00:58:58.609 --> 00:58:58.619 align:start position:0% okay perfect 00:58:58.619 --> 00:59:00.260 align:start position:0% okay perfect unfortunately<00:58:59.400> I<00:58:59.460> did<00:58:59.609> not<00:58:59.640> print<00:58:59.940> this<00:59:00.089> out 00:59:00.260 --> 00:59:00.270 align:start position:0% unfortunately I did not print this out 00:59:00.270 --> 00:59:01.520 align:start position:0% unfortunately I did not print this out on<00:59:00.390> a<00:59:00.420> piece<00:59:00.599> of<00:59:00.660> paper<00:59:00.869> so<00:59:01.200> I'm<00:59:01.260> gonna<00:59:01.380> have<00:59:01.500> to 00:59:01.520 --> 00:59:01.530 align:start position:0% on a piece of paper so I'm gonna have to 00:59:01.530 --> 00:59:05.059 align:start position:0% on a piece of paper so I'm gonna have to go<00:59:01.650> back<00:59:01.829> and<00:59:02.010> forth<00:59:02.280> I<00:59:03.240> worked<00:59:03.960> on<00:59:04.170> the<00:59:04.410> County 00:59:05.059 --> 00:59:05.069 align:start position:0% go back and forth I worked on the County 00:59:05.069 --> 00:59:08.710 align:start position:0% go back and forth I worked on the County of<00:59:05.160> San<00:59:05.339> Mateo<00:59:05.490> short-term<00:59:06.119> rental<00:59:06.420> ordinance 00:59:08.710 --> 00:59:08.720 align:start position:0% of San Mateo short-term rental ordinance 00:59:08.720 --> 00:59:11.089 align:start position:0% of San Mateo short-term rental ordinance you've<00:59:09.720> gotten<00:59:10.109> away<00:59:10.230> from<00:59:10.319> it<00:59:10.650> again<00:59:10.770> you<00:59:11.069> can 00:59:11.089 --> 00:59:11.099 align:start position:0% you've gotten away from it again you can 00:59:11.099 --> 00:59:13.730 align:start position:0% you've gotten away from it again you can bring<00:59:11.369> the<00:59:11.520> microphone<00:59:11.790> closer<00:59:12.180> to<00:59:12.450> you<00:59:12.740> that 00:59:13.730 --> 00:59:13.740 align:start position:0% bring the microphone closer to you that 00:59:13.740 --> 00:59:17.329 align:start position:0% bring the microphone closer to you that work<00:59:13.920> yes<00:59:14.400> okay<00:59:15.089> I<00:59:15.690> said<00:59:16.079> I<00:59:16.859> worked<00:59:17.130> on<00:59:17.220> the 00:59:17.329 --> 00:59:17.339 align:start position:0% work yes okay I said I worked on the 00:59:17.339 --> 00:59:18.829 align:start position:0% work yes okay I said I worked on the short-term<00:59:17.609> rental<00:59:18.119> rent<00:59:18.270> ordinance<00:59:18.599> from 00:59:18.829 --> 00:59:18.839 align:start position:0% short-term rental rent ordinance from 00:59:18.839 --> 00:59:20.960 align:start position:0% short-term rental rent ordinance from the<00:59:19.020> county<00:59:19.410> it<00:59:19.680> probably<00:59:20.160> wouldn't<00:59:20.460> exist<00:59:20.790> if 00:59:20.960 --> 00:59:20.970 align:start position:0% the county it probably wouldn't exist if 00:59:20.970 --> 00:59:25.160 align:start position:0% the county it probably wouldn't exist if I<00:59:21.150> and<00:59:21.359> my<00:59:21.450> friends<00:59:21.810> at<00:59:21.900> work<00:59:23.030> I<00:59:24.170> would 00:59:25.160 --> 00:59:25.170 align:start position:0% I and my friends at work I would 00:59:25.170 --> 00:59:27.290 align:start position:0% I and my friends at work I would recommend<00:59:25.589> everybody<00:59:25.920> look<00:59:26.160> at<00:59:26.280> the<00:59:26.460> Guardian 00:59:27.290 --> 00:59:27.300 align:start position:0% recommend everybody look at the Guardian 00:59:27.300 --> 00:59:30.200 align:start position:0% recommend everybody look at the Guardian article<00:59:27.450> of<00:59:27.780> January<00:59:28.170> 25th<00:59:28.880> what<00:59:29.880> this<00:59:30.030> has 00:59:30.200 --> 00:59:30.210 align:start position:0% article of January 25th what this has 00:59:30.210 --> 00:59:35.000 align:start position:0% article of January 25th what this has been<00:59:30.240> doing<00:59:30.630> to<00:59:30.780> cities<00:59:32.119> Europe<00:59:33.470> I<00:59:34.470> strongly 00:59:35.000 --> 00:59:35.010 align:start position:0% been doing to cities Europe I strongly 00:59:35.010 --> 00:59:38.750 align:start position:0% been doing to cities Europe I strongly suggest<00:59:35.720> that<00:59:36.720> you<00:59:37.140> do<00:59:37.380> in<00:59:37.560> fact<00:59:37.829> place<00:59:38.430> a 00:59:38.750 --> 00:59:38.760 align:start position:0% suggest that you do in fact place a 00:59:38.760 --> 00:59:44.660 align:start position:0% suggest that you do in fact place a limit<00:59:40.220> nights<00:59:41.990> on<00:59:42.990> hosted<00:59:43.650> because<00:59:44.190> of<00:59:44.550> the 00:59:44.660 --> 00:59:44.670 align:start position:0% limit nights on hosted because of the 00:59:44.670 --> 00:59:47.240 align:start position:0% limit nights on hosted because of the impact<00:59:45.150> on<00:59:45.359> neighborhoods<00:59:45.990> I<00:59:46.349> strongly 00:59:47.240 --> 00:59:47.250 align:start position:0% impact on neighborhoods I strongly 00:59:47.250 --> 00:59:50.650 align:start position:0% impact on neighborhoods I strongly suggest 00:59:50.650 --> 00:59:50.660 align:start position:0% 00:59:50.660 --> 00:59:53.920 align:start position:0% any<00:59:50.930> multi-family<00:59:51.890> dwelling<00:59:52.930> apartment 00:59:53.920 --> 00:59:53.930 align:start position:0% any multi-family dwelling apartment 00:59:53.930 --> 00:59:56.820 align:start position:0% any multi-family dwelling apartment buildings<00:59:54.289> etc<00:59:54.529> condos<00:59:55.369> because<00:59:55.670> the<00:59:56.029> impact 00:59:56.820 --> 00:59:56.830 align:start position:0% buildings etc condos because the impact 00:59:56.830 --> 01:00:00.300 align:start position:0% buildings etc condos because the impact the<00:59:57.160> addition<00:59:57.610> adjacent<00:59:59.100> residents<01:00:00.100> in<01:00:00.190> those 01:00:00.300 --> 01:00:00.310 align:start position:0% the addition adjacent residents in those 01:00:00.310 --> 01:00:04.080 align:start position:0% the addition adjacent residents in those buildings<01:00:00.580> I<01:00:02.370> suggest<01:00:03.370> no<01:00:03.580> more<01:00:03.820> than<01:00:03.970> one 01:00:04.080 --> 01:00:04.090 align:start position:0% buildings I suggest no more than one 01:00:04.090 --> 01:00:08.590 align:start position:0% buildings I suggest no more than one short-term<01:00:04.570> rental<01:00:04.900> or<01:00:05.490> parcel 01:00:08.590 --> 01:00:08.600 align:start position:0% 01:00:08.600 --> 01:00:11.800 align:start position:0% limited<01:00:09.230> time<01:00:09.500> to<01:00:10.430> grandfather<01:00:10.880> in<01:00:11.060> 80<01:00:11.510> years 01:00:11.800 --> 01:00:11.810 align:start position:0% limited time to grandfather in 80 years 01:00:11.810 --> 01:00:15.770 align:start position:0% limited time to grandfather in 80 years that<01:00:11.900> already<01:00:12.320> exists<01:00:12.800> two<01:00:13.040> to<01:00:13.190> three<01:00:13.430> years 01:00:15.770 --> 01:00:15.780 align:start position:0% 01:00:15.780 --> 01:00:18.050 align:start position:0% for<01:00:16.319> people<01:00:16.530> who<01:00:16.800> are<01:00:16.920> relying<01:00:17.280> on<01:00:17.550> short-term 01:00:18.050 --> 01:00:18.060 align:start position:0% for people who are relying on short-term 01:00:18.060 --> 01:00:20.270 align:start position:0% for people who are relying on short-term rental<01:00:18.450> income<01:00:18.930> to<01:00:19.260> pay<01:00:19.589> their<01:00:19.770> mortgages 01:00:20.270 --> 01:00:20.280 align:start position:0% rental income to pay their mortgages 01:00:20.280 --> 01:00:23.780 align:start position:0% rental income to pay their mortgages taxes<01:00:20.970> etc<01:00:21.119> I<01:00:21.839> suggest<01:00:22.589> they<01:00:22.770> go<01:00:22.980> to<01:00:23.040> long-term 01:00:23.780 --> 01:00:23.790 align:start position:0% taxes etc I suggest they go to long-term 01:00:23.790 --> 01:00:27.050 align:start position:0% taxes etc I suggest they go to long-term rentals<01:00:24.210> instead<01:00:24.920> because<01:00:25.920> we<01:00:26.400> have<01:00:26.550> a<01:00:26.579> severe 01:00:27.050 --> 01:00:27.060 align:start position:0% rentals instead because we have a severe 01:00:27.060 --> 01:00:29.630 align:start position:0% rentals instead because we have a severe shortage<01:00:27.359> of<01:00:27.690> housing<01:00:27.900> in<01:00:28.349> this<01:00:28.560> area<01:00:28.920> both 01:00:29.630 --> 01:00:29.640 align:start position:0% shortage of housing in this area both 01:00:29.640 --> 01:00:35.280 align:start position:0% shortage of housing in this area both full<01:00:30.140> units 01:00:35.280 --> 01:00:35.290 align:start position:0% 01:00:35.290 --> 01:00:37.410 align:start position:0% we<01:00:35.650> are<01:00:35.800> definitely<01:00:36.010> losing<01:00:36.580> housing<01:00:37.150> we've 01:00:37.410 --> 01:00:37.420 align:start position:0% we are definitely losing housing we've 01:00:37.420 --> 01:00:39.030 align:start position:0% we are definitely losing housing we've lost<01:00:37.630> housing<01:00:38.109> and<01:00:38.260> the<01:00:38.350> coast<01:00:38.619> we've<01:00:38.859> lost 01:00:39.030 --> 01:00:39.040 align:start position:0% lost housing and the coast we've lost 01:00:39.040 --> 01:00:42.960 align:start position:0% lost housing and the coast we've lost housing 01:00:42.960 --> 01:00:42.970 align:start position:0% 01:00:42.970 --> 01:00:45.870 align:start position:0% I<01:00:43.000> suggest<01:00:43.869> that<01:00:44.069> initial<01:00:45.069> application<01:00:45.759> you 01:00:45.870 --> 01:00:45.880 align:start position:0% I suggest that initial application you 01:00:45.880 --> 01:00:48.960 align:start position:0% I suggest that initial application you require<01:00:46.349> full<01:00:47.349> code<01:00:47.680> compliance<01:00:48.339> other<01:00:48.640> than 01:00:48.960 --> 01:00:48.970 align:start position:0% require full code compliance other than 01:00:48.970 --> 01:00:50.460 align:start position:0% require full code compliance other than fire<01:00:49.180> sprinklers<01:00:49.750> if<01:00:49.960> they<01:00:50.079> don't<01:00:50.259> already 01:00:50.460 --> 01:00:50.470 align:start position:0% fire sprinklers if they don't already 01:00:50.470 --> 01:00:53.069 align:start position:0% fire sprinklers if they don't already exist<01:00:51.009> in<01:00:51.069> the<01:00:51.220> building<01:00:51.630> that<01:00:52.630> included 01:00:53.069 --> 01:00:53.079 align:start position:0% exist in the building that included 01:00:53.079 --> 01:00:56.339 align:start position:0% exist in the building that included smoke<01:00:53.319> detectors<01:00:53.920> carbon<01:00:54.519> monoxide<01:00:55.349> clearly 01:00:56.339 --> 01:00:56.349 align:start position:0% smoke detectors carbon monoxide clearly 01:00:56.349 --> 01:00:59.309 align:start position:0% smoke detectors carbon monoxide clearly identified<01:00:56.859> exit<01:00:57.369> state<01:00:57.700> exits<01:00:58.319> fire 01:00:59.309 --> 01:00:59.319 align:start position:0% identified exit state exits fire 01:00:59.319 --> 01:01:06.530 align:start position:0% identified exit state exits fire extinguishers<01:01:00.009> etc 01:01:06.530 --> 01:01:06.540 align:start position:0% 01:01:06.540 --> 01:01:08.360 align:start position:0% Oh<01:01:06.570> an<01:01:07.200> answer<01:01:07.530> to<01:01:07.710> the<01:01:07.830> Coastal<01:01:08.190> Commission 01:01:08.360 --> 01:01:08.370 align:start position:0% Oh an answer to the Coastal Commission 01:01:08.370 --> 01:01:10.910 align:start position:0% Oh an answer to the Coastal Commission question<01:01:08.910> you<01:01:09.060> had<01:01:09.380> the<01:01:10.380> Coastal<01:01:10.740> Commission 01:01:10.910 --> 01:01:10.920 align:start position:0% question you had the Coastal Commission 01:01:10.920 --> 01:01:13.670 align:start position:0% question you had the Coastal Commission is<01:01:11.130> not<01:01:11.370> requiring<01:01:11.790> CDP<01:01:12.300> is<01:01:12.360> per<01:01:12.600> unit<01:01:12.780> they're 01:01:13.670 --> 01:01:13.680 align:start position:0% is not requiring CDP is per unit they're 01:01:13.680 --> 01:01:18.160 align:start position:0% is not requiring CDP is per unit they're requiring<01:01:14.600> LCP<01:01:15.600> amendments 01:01:18.160 --> 01:01:18.170 align:start position:0% requiring LCP amendments 01:01:18.170 --> 01:01:20.890 align:start position:0% requiring LCP amendments I<01:01:18.200> hadn't<01:01:18.800> seen<01:01:19.190> the<01:01:19.340> word<01:01:19.490> CDP<01:01:20.180> associated 01:01:20.890 --> 01:01:20.900 align:start position:0% I hadn't seen the word CDP associated 01:01:20.900 --> 01:01:22.480 align:start position:0% I hadn't seen the word CDP associated with<01:01:21.080> a<01:01:21.500> definite<01:01:21.890> that<01:01:22.070> he<01:01:22.130> had<01:01:22.220> a<01:01:22.250> short 01:01:22.480 --> 01:01:22.490 align:start position:0% with a definite that he had a short 01:01:22.490 --> 01:01:23.720 align:start position:0% with a definite that he had a short turnaround 01:01:23.720 --> 01:01:23.730 align:start position:0% turnaround 01:01:23.730 --> 01:01:27.690 align:start position:0% turnaround either<01:01:24.150> cosines<01:01:24.540> own<01:01:24.780> requires<01:01:25.230> in<01:01:25.440> Helsinki 01:01:27.690 --> 01:01:27.700 align:start position:0% either cosines own requires in Helsinki 01:01:27.700 --> 01:01:30.750 align:start position:0% either cosines own requires in Helsinki thank<01:01:28.240> you<01:01:28.330> very<01:01:28.360> much<01:01:28.720> mr.<01:01:29.050> Olsen<01:01:30.250> the<01:01:30.550> next 01:01:30.750 --> 01:01:30.760 align:start position:0% thank you very much mr. Olsen the next 01:01:30.760 --> 01:01:32.570 align:start position:0% thank you very much mr. Olsen the next comment<01:01:31.120> will<01:01:31.210> be<01:01:31.240> Maria<01:01:31.750> Portobello 01:01:32.570 --> 01:01:32.580 align:start position:0% comment will be Maria Portobello 01:01:32.580 --> 01:01:35.160 align:start position:0% comment will be Maria Portobello Portillo<01:01:33.580> I'm<01:01:33.880> so<01:01:34.180> sorry<01:01:34.450> I<01:01:34.540> was<01:01:34.780> thinking<01:01:35.080> too 01:01:35.160 --> 01:01:35.170 align:start position:0% Portillo I'm so sorry I was thinking too 01:01:35.170 --> 01:01:37.530 align:start position:0% Portillo I'm so sorry I was thinking too much<01:01:35.200> my<01:01:36.100> writing<01:01:36.460> is<01:01:36.580> really<01:01:36.730> not<01:01:37.000> you<01:01:37.300> it's 01:01:37.530 --> 01:01:37.540 align:start position:0% much my writing is really not you it's 01:01:37.540 --> 01:01:38.970 align:start position:0% much my writing is really not you it's really<01:01:37.870> badly<01:01:38.050> my<01:01:38.290> writing<01:01:38.530> is<01:01:38.590> terrible 01:01:38.970 --> 01:01:38.980 align:start position:0% really badly my writing is terrible 01:01:38.980 --> 01:01:42.780 align:start position:0% really badly my writing is terrible well<01:01:39.190> crying<01:01:39.520> um<01:01:40.150> hello<01:01:40.990> um<01:01:41.620> my<01:01:42.070> name<01:01:42.250> is<01:01:42.340> Maria 01:01:42.780 --> 01:01:42.790 align:start position:0% well crying um hello um my name is Maria 01:01:42.790 --> 01:01:44.910 align:start position:0% well crying um hello um my name is Maria Portela<01:01:43.240> swangle<01:01:43.720> I've<01:01:44.260> lived<01:01:44.500> on<01:01:44.620> the<01:01:44.740> coast 01:01:44.910 --> 01:01:44.920 align:start position:0% Portela swangle I've lived on the coast 01:01:44.920 --> 01:01:48.180 align:start position:0% Portela swangle I've lived on the coast about<01:01:45.160> 20<01:01:45.670> years<01:01:46.000> and<01:01:46.240> I've<01:01:46.830> I'm<01:01:47.830> a<01:01:47.980> teacher 01:01:48.180 --> 01:01:48.190 align:start position:0% about 20 years and I've I'm a teacher 01:01:48.190 --> 01:01:50.690 align:start position:0% about 20 years and I've I'm a teacher here<01:01:48.550> in<01:01:48.730> town<01:01:49.030> for<01:01:49.690> about<01:01:49.870> the<01:01:50.020> last<01:01:50.050> 20<01:01:50.500> years 01:01:50.690 --> 01:01:50.700 align:start position:0% here in town for about the last 20 years 01:01:50.700 --> 01:01:54.660 align:start position:0% here in town for about the last 20 years I<01:01:51.700> have<01:01:51.910> three<01:01:52.240> boys<01:01:52.740> who<01:01:53.740> have<01:01:53.860> been<01:01:53.890> raised 01:01:54.660 --> 01:01:54.670 align:start position:0% I have three boys who have been raised 01:01:54.670 --> 01:01:57.420 align:start position:0% I have three boys who have been raised on<01:01:55.060> the<01:01:55.120> coast<01:01:55.300> say<01:01:55.480> I<01:01:56.110> grew<01:01:56.650> up<01:01:56.710> in<01:01:56.980> southeast 01:01:57.420 --> 01:01:57.430 align:start position:0% on the coast say I grew up in southeast 01:01:57.430 --> 01:01:58.140 align:start position:0% on the coast say I grew up in southeast Alaska 01:01:58.140 --> 01:01:58.150 align:start position:0% Alaska 01:01:58.150 --> 01:02:00.360 align:start position:0% Alaska I'm<01:01:58.240> Sitka<01:01:58.780> and<01:01:59.260> I<01:01:59.500> always<01:01:59.740> wondered<01:02:00.130> if<01:02:00.250> I 01:02:00.360 --> 01:02:00.370 align:start position:0% I'm Sitka and I always wondered if I 01:02:00.370 --> 01:02:03.450 align:start position:0% I'm Sitka and I always wondered if I could<01:02:00.400> find<01:02:00.910> a<01:02:01.120> place<01:02:01.150> with<01:02:01.660> the<01:02:02.040> community 01:02:03.450 --> 01:02:03.460 align:start position:0% could find a place with the community 01:02:03.460 --> 01:02:05.820 align:start position:0% could find a place with the community character<01:02:04.180> of<01:02:04.390> Sitka<01:02:04.900> but<01:02:05.350> that<01:02:05.470> was<01:02:05.590> on<01:02:05.710> the 01:02:05.820 --> 01:02:05.830 align:start position:0% character of Sitka but that was on the 01:02:05.830 --> 01:02:07.410 align:start position:0% character of Sitka but that was on the road<01:02:05.980> to<01:02:06.190> a<01:02:06.220> major<01:02:06.490> city<01:02:06.850> because<01:02:07.120> it<01:02:07.210> was<01:02:07.330> all 01:02:07.410 --> 01:02:07.420 align:start position:0% road to a major city because it was all 01:02:07.420 --> 01:02:09.180 align:start position:0% road to a major city because it was all that<01:02:07.540> I<01:02:08.140> went<01:02:08.350> and<01:02:08.650> I<01:02:08.740> wanted<01:02:08.950> to<01:02:09.010> be<01:02:09.070> on<01:02:09.130> the 01:02:09.180 --> 01:02:09.190 align:start position:0% that I went and I wanted to be on the 01:02:09.190 --> 01:02:11.460 align:start position:0% that I went and I wanted to be on the road<01:02:09.340> to<01:02:09.430> a<01:02:09.490> major<01:02:09.670> city<01:02:09.910> and<01:02:10.540> I<01:02:10.660> think<01:02:11.020> I<01:02:11.230> found 01:02:11.460 --> 01:02:11.470 align:start position:0% road to a major city and I think I found 01:02:11.470 --> 01:02:13.110 align:start position:0% road to a major city and I think I found it<01:02:11.740> I<01:02:11.800> mean<01:02:11.980> I<01:02:12.070> think<01:02:12.250> I<01:02:12.340> found<01:02:12.490> this<01:02:12.700> magic 01:02:13.110 --> 01:02:13.120 align:start position:0% it I mean I think I found this magic 01:02:13.120 --> 01:02:15.210 align:start position:0% it I mean I think I found this magic place<01:02:13.330> that<01:02:13.840> reminds<01:02:14.320> me<01:02:14.470> and<01:02:14.680> has<01:02:14.860> that 01:02:15.210 --> 01:02:15.220 align:start position:0% place that reminds me and has that 01:02:15.220 --> 01:02:17.250 align:start position:0% place that reminds me and has that community<01:02:16.030> character<01:02:16.420> with<01:02:17.020> San<01:02:17.170> Francisco's 01:02:17.250 --> 01:02:17.260 align:start position:0% community character with San Francisco's 01:02:17.260 --> 01:02:19.520 align:start position:0% community character with San Francisco's right<01:02:17.770> there<01:02:17.980> as<01:02:18.160> well<01:02:18.490> as<01:02:18.580> many<01:02:18.760> other<01:02:18.940> places 01:02:19.520 --> 01:02:19.530 align:start position:0% right there as well as many other places 01:02:19.530 --> 01:02:23.490 align:start position:0% right there as well as many other places so<01:02:20.530> so<01:02:21.490> I'm<01:02:21.580> very<01:02:21.910> happy<01:02:22.120> here<01:02:22.540> I<01:02:22.750> intend<01:02:23.440> to 01:02:23.490 --> 01:02:23.500 align:start position:0% so so I'm very happy here I intend to 01:02:23.500 --> 01:02:29.100 align:start position:0% so so I'm very happy here I intend to stay<01:02:23.800> I<01:02:24.750> let's<01:02:25.750> see<01:02:26.370> we<01:02:27.370> are<01:02:27.520> renting<01:02:27.760> out<01:02:28.120> half 01:02:29.100 --> 01:02:29.110 align:start position:0% stay I let's see we are renting out half 01:02:29.110 --> 01:02:33.450 align:start position:0% stay I let's see we are renting out half of<01:02:29.440> our<01:02:31.560> 2,000<01:02:32.560> square<01:02:32.890> foot<01:02:33.070> house<01:02:33.220> so<01:02:33.400> were 01:02:33.450 --> 01:02:33.460 align:start position:0% of our 2,000 square foot house so were 01:02:33.460 --> 01:02:34.860 align:start position:0% of our 2,000 square foot house so were renting<01:02:33.790> out<01:02:33.880> the<01:02:34.000> bottom<01:02:34.240> floor<01:02:34.480> from<01:02:34.750> our 01:02:34.860 --> 01:02:34.870 align:start position:0% renting out the bottom floor from our 01:02:34.870 --> 01:02:37.110 align:start position:0% renting out the bottom floor from our house<01:02:35.020> so<01:02:35.500> why<01:02:35.620> I'm<01:02:35.770> in<01:02:35.890> a<01:02:35.950> hosted<01:02:36.430> situation 01:02:37.110 --> 01:02:37.120 align:start position:0% house so why I'm in a hosted situation 01:02:37.120 --> 01:02:39.060 align:start position:0% house so why I'm in a hosted situation so<01:02:37.600> I<01:02:37.630> think<01:02:37.750> that<01:02:37.990> may<01:02:38.140> not<01:02:38.290> be<01:02:38.350> such<01:02:38.650> a<01:02:38.680> debate 01:02:39.060 --> 01:02:39.070 align:start position:0% so I think that may not be such a debate 01:02:39.070 --> 01:02:40.620 align:start position:0% so I think that may not be such a debate but<01:02:39.400> that's<01:02:39.760> what<01:02:39.910> I<01:02:39.940> wanted<01:02:40.150> to<01:02:40.270> talk<01:02:40.450> to 01:02:40.620 --> 01:02:40.630 align:start position:0% but that's what I wanted to talk to 01:02:40.630 --> 01:02:42.240 align:start position:0% but that's what I wanted to talk to because<01:02:40.810> that's<01:02:40.960> where<01:02:41.320> where<01:02:41.620> I'm<01:02:41.770> coming 01:02:42.240 --> 01:02:42.250 align:start position:0% because that's where where I'm coming 01:02:42.250 --> 01:02:44.850 align:start position:0% because that's where where I'm coming from<01:02:42.280> I<01:02:42.700> don't<01:02:42.940> know<01:02:43.060> a<01:02:43.180> lot<01:02:43.330> of<01:02:43.710> thoughts<01:02:44.710> or 01:02:44.850 --> 01:02:44.860 align:start position:0% from I don't know a lot of thoughts or 01:02:44.860 --> 01:02:46.740 align:start position:0% from I don't know a lot of thoughts or exploration<01:02:45.520> on<01:02:45.640> the<01:02:45.820> on<01:02:46.030> the<01:02:46.180> UH<01:02:46.210> no<01:02:46.330> stick 01:02:46.740 --> 01:02:46.750 align:start position:0% exploration on the on the UH no stick 01:02:46.750 --> 01:02:48.330 align:start position:0% exploration on the on the UH no stick piece<01:02:46.930> which<01:02:47.140> I<01:02:47.260> think<01:02:47.440> maybe<01:02:47.650> the<01:02:48.100> bigger 01:02:48.330 --> 01:02:48.340 align:start position:0% piece which I think maybe the bigger 01:02:48.340 --> 01:02:54.420 align:start position:0% piece which I think maybe the bigger discussion<01:02:48.550> here<01:02:51.240> these<01:02:52.470> so<01:02:53.470> we<01:02:53.650> live<01:02:53.800> so<01:02:54.100> we 01:02:54.420 --> 01:02:54.430 align:start position:0% discussion here these so we live so we 01:02:54.430 --> 01:02:57.300 align:start position:0% discussion here these so we live so we rent<01:02:54.610> the<01:02:54.700> bottom<01:02:54.940> half<01:02:55.090> and<01:02:55.960> and<01:02:56.890> this<01:02:57.070> model 01:02:57.300 --> 01:02:57.310 align:start position:0% rent the bottom half and and this model 01:02:57.310 --> 01:02:59.280 align:start position:0% rent the bottom half and and this model is<01:02:57.550> making<01:02:58.150> it<01:02:58.240> affordable<01:02:58.420> for<01:02:58.690> us<01:02:58.870> to<01:02:58.960> live 01:02:59.280 --> 01:02:59.290 align:start position:0% is making it affordable for us to live 01:02:59.290 --> 01:03:02.190 align:start position:0% is making it affordable for us to live here<01:02:59.560> we<01:03:00.040> really<01:03:00.430> cater<01:03:00.730> to<01:03:00.970> families<01:03:01.150> we<01:03:02.080> have 01:03:02.190 --> 01:03:02.200 align:start position:0% here we really cater to families we have 01:03:02.200 --> 01:03:04.080 align:start position:0% here we really cater to families we have up<01:03:02.350> with<01:03:02.740> our<01:03:02.950> three<01:03:03.280> boys<01:03:03.400> have<01:03:03.760> a<01:03:03.790> really 01:03:04.080 --> 01:03:04.090 align:start position:0% up with our three boys have a really 01:03:04.090 --> 01:03:06.180 align:start position:0% up with our three boys have a really hard<01:03:04.270> time<01:03:04.420> when<01:03:05.260> we're<01:03:05.380> traveling<01:03:05.800> finding<01:03:06.130> a 01:03:06.180 --> 01:03:06.190 align:start position:0% hard time when we're traveling finding a 01:03:06.190 --> 01:03:08.010 align:start position:0% hard time when we're traveling finding a practical<01:03:06.370> place<01:03:06.790> to<01:03:07.030> stay<01:03:07.270> somebody 01:03:08.010 --> 01:03:08.020 align:start position:0% practical place to stay somebody 01:03:08.020 --> 01:03:10.110 align:start position:0% practical place to stay somebody invariably<01:03:08.530> needs<01:03:08.800> to<01:03:08.980> nap<01:03:09.160> five<01:03:09.670> people 01:03:10.110 --> 01:03:10.120 align:start position:0% invariably needs to nap five people 01:03:10.120 --> 01:03:11.580 align:start position:0% invariably needs to nap five people don't<01:03:10.330> fit<01:03:10.540> very<01:03:10.780> well<01:03:10.870> in<01:03:11.110> a<01:03:11.170> four-person 01:03:11.580 --> 01:03:11.590 align:start position:0% don't fit very well in a four-person 01:03:11.590 --> 01:03:13.350 align:start position:0% don't fit very well in a four-person hotel<01:03:12.040> room<01:03:12.250> we<01:03:12.430> usually<01:03:12.700> can't<01:03:12.880> afford<01:03:13.120> two 01:03:13.350 --> 01:03:13.360 align:start position:0% hotel room we usually can't afford two 01:03:13.360 --> 01:03:17.160 align:start position:0% hotel room we usually can't afford two hotel<01:03:13.750> rooms<01:03:13.780> so<01:03:14.910> we<01:03:15.910> thought<01:03:16.420> hey<01:03:16.720> what<01:03:16.960> do<01:03:17.110> we 01:03:17.160 --> 01:03:17.170 align:start position:0% hotel rooms so we thought hey what do we 01:03:17.170 --> 01:03:18.690 align:start position:0% hotel rooms so we thought hey what do we need<01:03:17.500> when<01:03:17.680> we<01:03:17.710> travel<01:03:18.190> and<01:03:18.310> we've<01:03:18.430> sort<01:03:18.610> of 01:03:18.690 --> 01:03:18.700 align:start position:0% need when we travel and we've sort of 01:03:18.700 --> 01:03:22.770 align:start position:0% need when we travel and we've sort of designed<01:03:19.090> our<01:03:19.620> Airbnb<01:03:20.620> to<01:03:21.220> be<01:03:21.790> as<01:03:22.000> such<01:03:22.330> so<01:03:22.750> we 01:03:22.770 --> 01:03:22.780 align:start position:0% designed our Airbnb to be as such so we 01:03:22.780 --> 01:03:25.050 align:start position:0% designed our Airbnb to be as such so we really<01:03:23.080> really<01:03:23.290> cater<01:03:23.500> to<01:03:23.680> families<01:03:23.940> in<01:03:24.940> our 01:03:25.050 --> 01:03:25.060 align:start position:0% really really cater to families in our 01:03:25.060 --> 01:03:27.450 align:start position:0% really really cater to families in our description<01:03:25.300> meet<01:03:26.020> lots<01:03:26.410> of<01:03:26.590> really<01:03:27.070> really 01:03:27.450 --> 01:03:27.460 align:start position:0% description meet lots of really really 01:03:27.460 --> 01:03:29.130 align:start position:0% description meet lots of really really interesting<01:03:27.550> families<01:03:28.420> so<01:03:28.660> I<01:03:28.720> kind<01:03:28.930> of<01:03:28.960> feel 01:03:29.130 --> 01:03:29.140 align:start position:0% interesting families so I kind of feel 01:03:29.140 --> 01:03:31.380 align:start position:0% interesting families so I kind of feel like<01:03:29.170> an<01:03:29.350> ambassador<01:03:29.980> a<01:03:30.130> bit<01:03:30.460> of<01:03:30.670> the<01:03:31.150> coast 01:03:31.380 --> 01:03:31.390 align:start position:0% like an ambassador a bit of the coast 01:03:31.390 --> 01:03:33.390 align:start position:0% like an ambassador a bit of the coast when<01:03:31.750> people<01:03:32.020> come<01:03:32.260> and<01:03:32.560> I<01:03:32.830> get<01:03:32.980> to<01:03:33.100> tell<01:03:33.220> them 01:03:33.390 --> 01:03:33.400 align:start position:0% when people come and I get to tell them 01:03:33.400 --> 01:03:35.010 align:start position:0% when people come and I get to tell them all<01:03:33.580> about<01:03:33.610> all<01:03:33.910> the<01:03:34.030> wonderful<01:03:34.180> places<01:03:34.600> I<01:03:34.840> get 01:03:35.010 --> 01:03:35.020 align:start position:0% all about all the wonderful places I get 01:03:35.020 --> 01:03:36.150 align:start position:0% all about all the wonderful places I get to<01:03:35.110> send<01:03:35.320> them<01:03:35.410> to<01:03:35.500> the<01:03:35.620> places<01:03:35.830> that<01:03:36.010> I 01:03:36.150 --> 01:03:36.160 align:start position:0% to send them to the places that I 01:03:36.160 --> 01:03:37.170 align:start position:0% to send them to the places that I support 01:03:37.170 --> 01:03:37.180 align:start position:0% support 01:03:37.180 --> 01:03:39.630 align:start position:0% support as<01:03:37.540> a<01:03:37.600> community<01:03:37.900> member<01:03:38.320> and<01:03:38.860> that<01:03:39.430> I<01:03:39.460> want 01:03:39.630 --> 01:03:39.640 align:start position:0% as a community member and that I want 01:03:39.640 --> 01:03:41.490 align:start position:0% as a community member and that I want them<01:03:39.790> them<01:03:40.150> to<01:03:40.300> go<01:03:40.390> to<01:03:40.450> to<01:03:40.690> support<01:03:40.840> our<01:03:41.170> our 01:03:41.490 --> 01:03:41.500 align:start position:0% them them to go to to support our our 01:03:41.500 --> 01:03:43.640 align:start position:0% them them to go to to support our our community<01:03:41.650> so<01:03:42.070> I<01:03:42.100> really<01:03:42.340> do<01:03:42.460> feel<01:03:42.730> that<01:03:43.330> and 01:03:43.640 --> 01:03:43.650 align:start position:0% community so I really do feel that and 01:03:43.650 --> 01:03:48.510 align:start position:0% community so I really do feel that and ambassador<01:03:44.650> pull<01:03:46.200> towards<01:03:47.200> that<01:03:47.380> and<01:03:48.070> in 01:03:48.510 --> 01:03:48.520 align:start position:0% ambassador pull towards that and in 01:03:48.520 --> 01:03:49.950 align:start position:0% ambassador pull towards that and in showing<01:03:48.820> folks<01:03:49.240> they<01:03:49.420> all<01:03:49.540> the<01:03:49.660> amazing 01:03:49.950 --> 01:03:49.960 align:start position:0% showing folks they all the amazing 01:03:49.960 --> 01:03:51.900 align:start position:0% showing folks they all the amazing things<01:03:50.140> the<01:03:50.230> coast<01:03:50.440> has<01:03:50.620> to<01:03:50.800> offer<01:03:50.950> it's<01:03:51.670> been 01:03:51.900 --> 01:03:51.910 align:start position:0% things the coast has to offer it's been 01:03:51.910 --> 01:03:53.430 align:start position:0% things the coast has to offer it's been a<01:03:51.940> really<01:03:52.210> fabulous<01:03:52.390> experience<01:03:52.930> this<01:03:53.290> whole 01:03:53.430 --> 01:03:53.440 align:start position:0% a really fabulous experience this whole 01:03:53.440 --> 01:03:56.850 align:start position:0% a really fabulous experience this whole thing<01:03:53.680> and<01:03:53.940> I<01:03:54.940> don't<01:03:55.210> think<01:03:56.110> we<01:03:56.590> could<01:03:56.770> afford 01:03:56.850 --> 01:03:56.860 align:start position:0% thing and I don't think we could afford 01:03:56.860 --> 01:03:58.950 align:start position:0% thing and I don't think we could afford to<01:03:57.130> live<01:03:57.310> here<01:03:57.520> otherwise<01:03:57.790> which<01:03:58.480> would<01:03:58.780> be 01:03:58.950 --> 01:03:58.960 align:start position:0% to live here otherwise which would be 01:03:58.960 --> 01:04:00.570 align:start position:0% to live here otherwise which would be which<01:03:59.320> would<01:03:59.440> be<01:03:59.560> lost<01:03:59.770> so<01:04:00.160> the<01:04:00.250> key<01:04:00.340> obviously 01:04:00.570 --> 01:04:00.580 align:start position:0% which would be lost so the key obviously 01:04:00.580 --> 01:04:02.190 align:start position:0% which would be lost so the key obviously for<01:04:01.030> me<01:04:01.150> to<01:04:01.360> not<01:04:01.480> be<01:04:01.510> able<01:04:01.690> to<01:04:01.780> be<01:04:01.870> a<01:04:01.900> part<01:04:02.140> of 01:04:02.190 --> 01:04:02.200 align:start position:0% for me to not be able to be a part of 01:04:02.200 --> 01:04:03.900 align:start position:0% for me to not be able to be a part of this<01:04:02.350> this<01:04:02.680> community<01:04:03.160> I<01:04:03.190> feel<01:04:03.310> so<01:04:03.640> strongly 01:04:03.900 --> 01:04:03.910 align:start position:0% this this community I feel so strongly 01:04:03.910 --> 01:04:05.340 align:start position:0% this this community I feel so strongly about<01:04:04.060> and<01:04:04.450> the<01:04:04.510> loss<01:04:04.690> loss<01:04:05.050> for<01:04:05.230> the 01:04:05.340 --> 01:04:05.350 align:start position:0% about and the loss loss for the 01:04:05.350 --> 01:04:07.440 align:start position:0% about and the loss loss for the community<01:04:05.470> not<01:04:05.950> to<01:04:06.130> get<01:04:06.280> to<01:04:06.430> have<01:04:06.610> have<01:04:07.210> my 01:04:07.440 --> 01:04:07.450 align:start position:0% community not to get to have have my 01:04:07.450 --> 01:04:10.650 align:start position:0% community not to get to have have my family<01:04:07.810> and<01:04:07.960> I<01:04:08.020> as<01:04:08.440> an<01:04:09.100> integral<01:04:09.430> piece<01:04:09.640> to<01:04:09.880> the 01:04:10.650 --> 01:04:10.660 align:start position:0% family and I as an integral piece to the 01:04:10.660 --> 01:04:12.870 align:start position:0% family and I as an integral piece to the big<01:04:10.840> things<01:04:11.200> I<01:04:11.590> hear<01:04:12.040> are<01:04:12.190> the<01:04:12.220> hosted<01:04:12.670> done 01:04:12.870 --> 01:04:12.880 align:start position:0% big things I hear are the hosted done 01:04:12.880 --> 01:04:17.070 align:start position:0% big things I hear are the hosted done hosted<01:04:13.300> so<01:04:13.540> -<01:04:13.840> hosted<01:04:14.260> and<01:04:14.940> the<01:04:15.940> you<01:04:16.810> know<01:04:16.900> as<01:04:16.990> I 01:04:17.070 --> 01:04:17.080 align:start position:0% hosted so - hosted and the you know as I 01:04:17.080 --> 01:04:18.900 align:start position:0% hosted so - hosted and the you know as I thought<01:04:17.230> about<01:04:17.470> it<01:04:17.650> over<01:04:17.770> time<01:04:18.400> the<01:04:18.580> idea<01:04:18.700> of 01:04:18.900 --> 01:04:18.910 align:start position:0% thought about it over time the idea of 01:04:18.910 --> 01:04:21.180 align:start position:0% thought about it over time the idea of hey<01:04:19.330> am<01:04:19.480> I<01:04:19.570> taking<01:04:19.810> a<01:04:20.020> rental<01:04:20.320> place<01:04:20.440> off<01:04:20.860> the 01:04:21.180 --> 01:04:21.190 align:start position:0% hey am I taking a rental place off the 01:04:21.190 --> 01:04:23.870 align:start position:0% hey am I taking a rental place off the market<01:04:21.520> before<01:04:22.090> we<01:04:22.510> had<01:04:22.660> kids<01:04:22.870> we<01:04:23.110> did<01:04:23.320> rent 01:04:23.870 --> 01:04:23.880 align:start position:0% market before we had kids we did rent 01:04:23.880 --> 01:04:25.800 align:start position:0% market before we had kids we did rent full-time<01:04:24.880> we<01:04:25.090> went<01:04:25.240> to<01:04:25.330> the<01:04:25.420> place<01:04:25.570> out<01:04:25.690> and 01:04:25.800 --> 01:04:25.810 align:start position:0% full-time we went to the place out and 01:04:25.810 --> 01:04:26.970 align:start position:0% full-time we went to the place out and we<01:04:25.960> rent<01:04:26.110> it<01:04:26.230> to<01:04:26.320> my<01:04:26.410> sister 01:04:26.970 --> 01:04:26.980 align:start position:0% we rent it to my sister 01:04:26.980 --> 01:04:29.160 align:start position:0% we rent it to my sister but<01:04:27.310> then<01:04:27.460> as<01:04:27.610> we<01:04:27.760> started<01:04:28.150> to<01:04:28.300> arrive<01:04:28.570> all<01:04:28.990> of 01:04:29.160 --> 01:04:29.170 align:start position:0% but then as we started to arrive all of 01:04:29.170 --> 01:04:31.650 align:start position:0% but then as we started to arrive all of us<01:04:29.320> all<01:04:29.560> five<01:04:29.830> of<01:04:29.860> us<01:04:30.130> in<01:04:30.370> our<01:04:30.490> top<01:04:31.060> half<01:04:31.450> of<01:04:31.540> our 01:04:31.650 --> 01:04:31.660 align:start position:0% us all five of us in our top half of our 01:04:31.660 --> 01:04:33.660 align:start position:0% us all five of us in our top half of our house<01:04:31.870> we<01:04:32.170> need<01:04:32.650> to<01:04:32.710> be<01:04:32.860> able<01:04:32.950> to<01:04:33.040> access<01:04:33.310> the 01:04:33.660 --> 01:04:33.670 align:start position:0% house we need to be able to access the 01:04:33.670 --> 01:04:35.310 align:start position:0% house we need to be able to access the bottom<01:04:33.910> half<01:04:34.300> of<01:04:34.420> our<01:04:34.510> house<01:04:34.660> sometimes<01:04:35.110> we<01:04:35.230> go 01:04:35.310 --> 01:04:35.320 align:start position:0% bottom half of our house sometimes we go 01:04:35.320 --> 01:04:37.800 align:start position:0% bottom half of our house sometimes we go over<01:04:35.410> the<01:04:35.500> whole<01:04:35.620> party<01:04:36.370> or<01:04:36.640> we<01:04:37.300> have<01:04:37.390> family 01:04:37.800 --> 01:04:37.810 align:start position:0% over the whole party or we have family 01:04:37.810 --> 01:04:39.270 align:start position:0% over the whole party or we have family that<01:04:37.960> needs<01:04:38.140> to<01:04:38.290> stay<01:04:38.470> right<01:04:38.680> now<01:04:38.890> due<01:04:38.950> to<01:04:39.160> a 01:04:39.270 --> 01:04:39.280 align:start position:0% that needs to stay right now due to a 01:04:39.280 --> 01:04:40.950 align:start position:0% that needs to stay right now due to a medical<01:04:39.520> issues<01:04:40.120> so<01:04:40.300> we<01:04:40.420> need<01:04:40.570> to<01:04:40.660> be<01:04:40.750> able<01:04:40.810> to 01:04:40.950 --> 01:04:40.960 align:start position:0% medical issues so we need to be able to 01:04:40.960 --> 01:04:43.410 align:start position:0% medical issues so we need to be able to have<01:04:41.110> that<01:04:41.290> flexibility<01:04:41.950> and<01:04:42.700> can't<01:04:43.030> rent 01:04:43.410 --> 01:04:43.420 align:start position:0% have that flexibility and can't rent 01:04:43.420 --> 01:04:47.190 align:start position:0% have that flexibility and can't rent full<01:04:43.690> time<01:04:44.160> so<01:04:45.160> and<01:04:45.640> you<01:04:45.790> know<01:04:45.880> that's<01:04:46.810> that's 01:04:47.190 --> 01:04:47.200 align:start position:0% full time so and you know that's that's 01:04:47.200 --> 01:04:49.200 align:start position:0% full time so and you know that's that's where<01:04:47.380> I'm<01:04:47.440> at<01:04:47.590> thank<01:04:47.800> you<01:04:48.000> thank<01:04:49.000> you<01:04:49.090> I 01:04:49.200 --> 01:04:49.210 align:start position:0% where I'm at thank you thank you I 01:04:49.210 --> 01:04:51.780 align:start position:0% where I'm at thank you thank you I volunteer<01:04:49.870> to<01:04:50.020> be<01:04:50.140> the<01:04:50.350> sitka<01:04:50.890> ambassador<01:04:51.580> and 01:04:51.780 --> 01:04:51.790 align:start position:0% volunteer to be the sitka ambassador and 01:04:51.790 --> 01:04:55.140 align:start position:0% volunteer to be the sitka ambassador and the<01:04:51.880> sister<01:04:52.240> city<01:04:52.540> program<01:04:53.640> the<01:04:54.640> next<01:04:54.910> speaker 01:04:55.140 --> 01:04:55.150 align:start position:0% the sister city program the next speaker 01:04:55.150 --> 01:04:59.640 align:start position:0% the sister city program the next speaker will<01:04:56.130> the<01:04:57.130> next<01:04:57.430> that<01:04:57.670> would<01:04:57.760> be<01:04:57.880> Akana 01:04:59.640 --> 01:04:59.650 align:start position:0% will the next that would be Akana 01:04:59.650 --> 01:05:02.430 align:start position:0% will the next that would be Akana the<01:04:59.860> next<01:05:00.130> speaker<01:05:00.280> would<01:05:00.610> be<01:05:00.790> Chris<01:05:01.440> Voigt 01:05:02.430 --> 01:05:02.440 align:start position:0% the next speaker would be Chris Voigt 01:05:02.440 --> 01:05:04.920 align:start position:0% the next speaker would be Chris Voigt our<01:05:02.680> tie<01:05:02.950> my<01:05:03.760> French<01:05:04.060> is<01:05:04.210> getting<01:05:04.240> challenged 01:05:04.920 --> 01:05:04.930 align:start position:0% our tie my French is getting challenged 01:05:04.930 --> 01:05:06.540 align:start position:0% our tie my French is getting challenged so<01:05:05.020> I<01:05:05.050> apologize<01:05:05.620> if<01:05:05.800> I<01:05:05.890> got<01:05:06.100> that<01:05:06.310> wrong 01:05:06.540 --> 01:05:06.550 align:start position:0% so I apologize if I got that wrong 01:05:06.550 --> 01:05:09.360 align:start position:0% so I apologize if I got that wrong followed<01:05:07.510> by<01:05:07.540> margarita<01:05:08.380> Vasquez<01:05:08.890> the<01:05:09.130> last 01:05:09.360 --> 01:05:09.370 align:start position:0% followed by margarita Vasquez the last 01:05:09.370 --> 01:05:12.780 align:start position:0% followed by margarita Vasquez the last green<01:05:09.670> card<01:05:09.940> that<01:05:10.120> I<01:05:10.150> have<01:05:10.240> tonight<01:05:10.720> welcome<01:05:11.790> I 01:05:12.780 --> 01:05:12.790 align:start position:0% green card that I have tonight welcome I 01:05:12.790 --> 01:05:17.780 align:start position:0% green card that I have tonight welcome I just<01:05:13.720> want<01:05:13.840> to<01:05:13.900> say<01:05:14.020> agree<01:05:14.320> with<01:05:14.530> Tim 01:05:17.780 --> 01:05:17.790 align:start position:0% 01:05:17.790 --> 01:05:21.110 align:start position:0% with<01:05:18.630> what<01:05:18.840> everything<01:05:19.260> he<01:05:19.380> said<01:05:19.650> um<01:05:20.430> I<01:05:20.820> think 01:05:21.110 --> 01:05:21.120 align:start position:0% with what everything he said um I think 01:05:21.120 --> 01:05:23.180 align:start position:0% with what everything he said um I think instead<01:05:21.330> of<01:05:21.480> focusing<01:05:21.660> on<01:05:21.990> hosted<01:05:22.590> versus<01:05:22.980> non 01:05:23.180 --> 01:05:23.190 align:start position:0% instead of focusing on hosted versus non 01:05:23.190 --> 01:05:25.160 align:start position:0% instead of focusing on hosted versus non hosted<01:05:23.700> Reynolds<01:05:24.120> the<01:05:24.270> regulation<01:05:24.840> should<01:05:24.990> be 01:05:25.160 --> 01:05:25.170 align:start position:0% hosted Reynolds the regulation should be 01:05:25.170 --> 01:05:28.130 align:start position:0% hosted Reynolds the regulation should be focusing<01:05:25.680> on<01:05:25.830> primary<01:05:26.430> or<01:05:26.610> sole<01:05:27.140> residents 01:05:28.130 --> 01:05:28.140 align:start position:0% focusing on primary or sole residents 01:05:28.140 --> 01:05:31.100 align:start position:0% focusing on primary or sole residents versus<01:05:28.560> a<01:05:28.590> dedicated<01:05:29.190> STR<01:05:29.810> hosted<01:05:30.810> a<01:05:30.840> nones 01:05:31.100 --> 01:05:31.110 align:start position:0% versus a dedicated STR hosted a nones 01:05:31.110 --> 01:05:33.290 align:start position:0% versus a dedicated STR hosted a nones hosted<01:05:31.800> are<01:05:32.010> not<01:05:32.190> clearly<01:05:32.550> defined<01:05:32.820> it<01:05:33.210> would 01:05:33.290 --> 01:05:33.300 align:start position:0% hosted are not clearly defined it would 01:05:33.300 --> 01:05:36.290 align:start position:0% hosted are not clearly defined it would be<01:05:33.450> impossible<01:05:33.750> to<01:05:34.080> enforce<01:05:34.580> the<01:05:35.580> definition 01:05:36.290 --> 01:05:36.300 align:start position:0% be impossible to enforce the definition 01:05:36.300 --> 01:05:38.540 align:start position:0% be impossible to enforce the definition of<01:05:36.540> hosts<01:05:37.020> eight<01:05:37.350> says<01:05:37.740> that<01:05:37.920> the<01:05:38.040> host<01:05:38.250> has<01:05:38.430> to 01:05:38.540 --> 01:05:38.550 align:start position:0% of hosts eight says that the host has to 01:05:38.550 --> 01:05:40.220 align:start position:0% of hosts eight says that the host has to be<01:05:38.670> on<01:05:38.760> the<01:05:38.880> property<01:05:39.390> does<01:05:39.690> that<01:05:39.840> mean<01:05:40.020> at<01:05:40.200> all 01:05:40.220 --> 01:05:40.230 align:start position:0% be on the property does that mean at all 01:05:40.230 --> 01:05:42.620 align:start position:0% be on the property does that mean at all times<01:05:40.740> use<01:05:41.550> a<01:05:41.580> hose<01:05:41.820> have<01:05:42.060> to<01:05:42.180> physically 01:05:42.620 --> 01:05:42.630 align:start position:0% times use a hose have to physically 01:05:42.630 --> 01:05:44.240 align:start position:0% times use a hose have to physically babysit<01:05:43.170> the<01:05:43.290> guests<01:05:43.560> can<01:05:43.740> they<01:05:43.890> leave<01:05:44.070> the 01:05:44.240 --> 01:05:44.250 align:start position:0% babysit the guests can they leave the 01:05:44.250 --> 01:05:45.830 align:start position:0% babysit the guests can they leave the property<01:05:44.460> for<01:05:44.880> and<01:05:45.060> for<01:05:45.210> how<01:05:45.300> long 01:05:45.830 --> 01:05:45.840 align:start position:0% property for and for how long 01:05:45.840 --> 01:05:49.190 align:start position:0% property for and for how long how<01:05:46.260> about<01:05:46.410> overnight<01:05:46.860> is<01:05:47.550> in<01:05:47.730> my<01:05:47.850> case<01:05:48.150> I<01:05:48.420> live 01:05:49.190 --> 01:05:49.200 align:start position:0% how about overnight is in my case I live 01:05:49.200 --> 01:05:53.090 align:start position:0% how about overnight is in my case I live in<01:05:49.380> my<01:05:49.530> house<01:05:49.740> and<01:05:50.270> if<01:05:51.270> I<01:05:51.510> Airbnb<01:05:52.350> I<01:05:52.560> leave<01:05:52.920> the 01:05:53.090 --> 01:05:53.100 align:start position:0% in my house and if I Airbnb I leave the 01:05:53.100 --> 01:05:54.920 align:start position:0% in my house and if I Airbnb I leave the premises<01:05:53.310> and<01:05:53.700> let<01:05:53.820> them<01:05:54.000> move<01:05:54.240> into<01:05:54.420> my<01:05:54.690> house 01:05:54.920 --> 01:05:54.930 align:start position:0% premises and let them move into my house 01:05:54.930 --> 01:05:58.280 align:start position:0% premises and let them move into my house with<01:05:55.350> all<01:05:55.500> my<01:05:55.680> things<01:05:56.660> the<01:05:57.660> survey<01:05:58.020> said 01:05:58.280 --> 01:05:58.290 align:start position:0% with all my things the survey said 01:05:58.290 --> 01:05:59.450 align:start position:0% with all my things the survey said occasionally<01:05:58.770> residents<01:05:59.220> want<01:05:59.400> to 01:05:59.450 --> 01:05:59.460 align:start position:0% occasionally residents want to 01:05:59.460 --> 01:06:01.400 align:start position:0% occasionally residents want to infrequently<01:06:00.150> use<01:06:00.450> their<01:06:00.660> property<01:06:00.870> as<01:06:01.260> an 01:06:01.400 --> 01:06:01.410 align:start position:0% infrequently use their property as an 01:06:01.410 --> 01:06:04.370 align:start position:0% infrequently use their property as an STR<01:06:01.770> when<01:06:02.100> they<01:06:02.190> are<01:06:02.250> aware<01:06:02.490> implication<01:06:03.380> what 01:06:04.370 --> 01:06:04.380 align:start position:0% STR when they are aware implication what 01:06:04.380 --> 01:06:05.810 align:start position:0% STR when they are aware implication what does<01:06:04.530> occasionally<01:06:04.830> and<01:06:05.220> then<01:06:05.310> frequently 01:06:05.810 --> 01:06:05.820 align:start position:0% does occasionally and then frequently 01:06:05.820 --> 01:06:07.640 align:start position:0% does occasionally and then frequently mean<01:06:06.060> what<01:06:06.450> if<01:06:06.540> a<01:06:06.600> person<01:06:06.960> goes<01:06:07.080> away<01:06:07.380> many 01:06:07.640 --> 01:06:07.650 align:start position:0% mean what if a person goes away many 01:06:07.650 --> 01:06:08.990 align:start position:0% mean what if a person goes away many weekends<01:06:08.100> to<01:06:08.250> take<01:06:08.430> care<01:06:08.640> of<01:06:08.700> their<01:06:08.820> sick 01:06:08.990 --> 01:06:09.000 align:start position:0% weekends to take care of their sick 01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:10.520 align:start position:0% weekends to take care of their sick father<01:06:09.270> should<01:06:09.660> they<01:06:09.720> not<01:06:09.840> be<01:06:10.020> allowed<01:06:10.230> to<01:06:10.260> the 01:06:10.520 --> 01:06:10.530 align:start position:0% father should they not be allowed to the 01:06:10.530 --> 01:06:13.940 align:start position:0% father should they not be allowed to the have<01:06:10.650> guests<01:06:10.920> during<01:06:11.190> that<01:06:11.400> time<01:06:12.740> primary<01:06:13.740> and 01:06:13.940 --> 01:06:13.950 align:start position:0% have guests during that time primary and 01:06:13.950 --> 01:06:16.130 align:start position:0% have guests during that time primary and sole<01:06:14.160> residents<01:06:14.730> rather<01:06:14.940> than<01:06:15.150> a<01:06:15.180> house<01:06:15.480> built 01:06:16.130 --> 01:06:16.140 align:start position:0% sole residents rather than a house built 01:06:16.140 --> 01:06:18.260 align:start position:0% sole residents rather than a house built specifically<01:06:17.010> for<01:06:17.130> Str<01:06:17.760> should<01:06:18.000> be<01:06:18.120> the 01:06:18.260 --> 01:06:18.270 align:start position:0% specifically for Str should be the 01:06:18.270 --> 01:06:20.150 align:start position:0% specifically for Str should be the differentiation<01:06:19.140> if<01:06:19.350> a<01:06:19.470> person<01:06:19.830> is<01:06:19.920> renting 01:06:20.150 --> 01:06:20.160 align:start position:0% differentiation if a person is renting 01:06:20.160 --> 01:06:21.620 align:start position:0% differentiation if a person is renting out<01:06:20.280> their<01:06:20.430> own<01:06:20.580> home<01:06:20.910> they're<01:06:21.210> not<01:06:21.240> going<01:06:21.600> to 01:06:21.620 --> 01:06:21.630 align:start position:0% out their own home they're not going to 01:06:21.630 --> 01:06:24.500 align:start position:0% out their own home they're not going to allow<01:06:21.810> too<01:06:22.020> many<01:06:22.350> people<01:06:22.680> inside<01:06:23.420> renting<01:06:24.420> the 01:06:24.500 --> 01:06:24.510 align:start position:0% allow too many people inside renting the 01:06:24.510 --> 01:06:25.550 align:start position:0% allow too many people inside renting the home<01:06:24.690> in<01:06:24.900> no<01:06:25.050> way 01:06:25.550 --> 01:06:25.560 align:start position:0% home in no way 01:06:25.560 --> 01:06:27.920 align:start position:0% home in no way ABB's<01:06:26.070> I<01:06:26.190> mean<01:06:26.490> adds<01:06:26.880> to<01:06:27.180> the<01:06:27.300> shortage<01:06:27.720> of 01:06:27.920 --> 01:06:27.930 align:start position:0% ABB's I mean adds to the shortage of 01:06:27.930 --> 01:06:30.290 align:start position:0% ABB's I mean adds to the shortage of rental<01:06:28.140> housing<01:06:28.770> and<01:06:28.890> trash<01:06:29.460> and<01:06:29.670> noise<01:06:29.850> would 01:06:30.290 --> 01:06:30.300 align:start position:0% rental housing and trash and noise would 01:06:30.300 --> 01:06:32.120 align:start position:0% rental housing and trash and noise would not<01:06:30.480> be<01:06:30.600> tolerated<01:06:30.780> because<01:06:31.200> homeowners<01:06:31.920> who 01:06:32.120 --> 01:06:32.130 align:start position:0% not be tolerated because homeowners who 01:06:32.130 --> 01:06:34.670 align:start position:0% not be tolerated because homeowners who live<01:06:32.280> in<01:06:32.490> their<01:06:32.670> houses<01:06:32.910> already<01:06:33.780> care<01:06:34.410> about 01:06:34.670 --> 01:06:34.680 align:start position:0% live in their houses already care about 01:06:34.680 --> 01:06:37.640 align:start position:0% live in their houses already care about them<01:06:35.300> and<01:06:36.300> a<01:06:36.690> lot<01:06:36.840> of<01:06:36.930> the<01:06:37.020> other<01:06:37.140> things<01:06:37.590> that 01:06:37.640 --> 01:06:37.650 align:start position:0% them and a lot of the other things that 01:06:37.650 --> 01:06:38.810 align:start position:0% them and a lot of the other things that are<01:06:37.800> mentioned<01:06:37.950> about<01:06:38.220> that<01:06:38.370> is<01:06:38.520> the<01:06:38.640> same 01:06:38.810 --> 01:06:38.820 align:start position:0% are mentioned about that is the same 01:06:38.820 --> 01:06:40.880 align:start position:0% are mentioned about that is the same thing<01:06:39.030> about<01:06:39.330> the<01:06:39.540> codes<01:06:39.870> of<01:06:40.260> course<01:06:40.740> our 01:06:40.880 --> 01:06:40.890 align:start position:0% thing about the codes of course our 01:06:40.890 --> 01:06:43.130 align:start position:0% thing about the codes of course our houses<01:06:41.220> are<01:06:41.310> already<01:06:41.460> built<01:06:41.790> to<01:06:41.970> code<01:06:42.150> I<01:06:42.480> don't 01:06:43.130 --> 01:06:43.140 align:start position:0% houses are already built to code I don't 01:06:43.140 --> 01:06:44.780 align:start position:0% houses are already built to code I don't think<01:06:43.530> that<01:06:43.680> we<01:06:43.800> need<01:06:43.980> to<01:06:44.100> have<01:06:44.250> our<01:06:44.400> private 01:06:44.780 --> 01:06:44.790 align:start position:0% think that we need to have our private 01:06:44.790 --> 01:06:48.970 align:start position:0% think that we need to have our private homes<01:06:44.970> inspected<01:06:45.720> for<01:06:45.980> we<01:06:46.980> already<01:06:47.310> have<01:06:47.520> fire 01:06:48.970 --> 01:06:48.980 align:start position:0% homes inspected for we already have fire 01:06:48.980 --> 01:06:52.880 align:start position:0% homes inspected for we already have fire co2<01:06:50.510> as<01:06:51.510> far<01:06:51.750> as<01:06:51.840> a<01:06:51.870> thirty<01:06:52.170> and<01:06:52.320> sixty<01:06:52.620> day 01:06:52.880 --> 01:06:52.890 align:start position:0% co2 as far as a thirty and sixty day 01:06:52.890 --> 01:06:55.820 align:start position:0% co2 as far as a thirty and sixty day limit<01:06:53.190> I<01:06:53.870> don't<01:06:54.870> understand<01:06:55.380> what<01:06:55.740> the 01:06:55.820 --> 01:06:55.830 align:start position:0% limit I don't understand what the 01:06:55.830 --> 01:06:58.880 align:start position:0% limit I don't understand what the purposes<01:06:56.340> of<01:06:56.520> limiting<01:06:56.730> and<01:06:57.560> why<01:06:58.560> are<01:06:58.740> those 01:06:58.880 --> 01:06:58.890 align:start position:0% purposes of limiting and why are those 01:06:58.890 --> 01:07:01.370 align:start position:0% purposes of limiting and why are those numbers<01:06:59.340> they<01:07:00.120> seem<01:07:00.360> arbitrary<01:07:00.570> 30<01:07:01.110> or<01:07:01.260> 60 01:07:01.370 --> 01:07:01.380 align:start position:0% numbers they seem arbitrary 30 or 60 01:07:01.380 --> 01:07:06.040 align:start position:0% numbers they seem arbitrary 30 or 60 days<01:07:01.790> how<01:07:02.790> would<01:07:02.910> it<01:07:02.970> be<01:07:03.120> enforced<01:07:03.540> and<01:07:03.720> why 01:07:06.040 --> 01:07:06.050 align:start position:0% 01:07:06.050 --> 01:07:09.170 align:start position:0% also<01:07:07.050> the<01:07:07.260> city<01:07:07.470> would<01:07:07.590> lose<01:07:07.740> out<01:07:07.890> on<01:07:08.130> the<01:07:08.430> top 01:07:09.170 --> 01:07:09.180 align:start position:0% also the city would lose out on the top 01:07:09.180 --> 01:07:14.180 align:start position:0% also the city would lose out on the top tax<01:07:09.450> that<01:07:09.690> they<01:07:09.870> are<01:07:10.490> now<01:07:12.890> getting<01:07:13.890> from<01:07:14.070> those 01:07:14.180 --> 01:07:14.190 align:start position:0% tax that they are now getting from those 01:07:14.190 --> 01:07:17.270 align:start position:0% tax that they are now getting from those I<01:07:15.020> feel<01:07:16.020> like<01:07:16.170> you<01:07:16.260> know<01:07:16.380> we're<01:07:16.530> not<01:07:16.620> Malibu<01:07:17.220> or 01:07:17.270 --> 01:07:17.280 align:start position:0% I feel like you know we're not Malibu or 01:07:17.280 --> 01:07:19.100 align:start position:0% I feel like you know we're not Malibu or New<01:07:17.400> Orleans<01:07:17.850> I'm<01:07:18.000> not<01:07:18.150> sure<01:07:18.390> what<01:07:18.630> why<01:07:18.900> we 01:07:19.100 --> 01:07:19.110 align:start position:0% New Orleans I'm not sure what why we 01:07:19.110 --> 01:07:21.020 align:start position:0% New Orleans I'm not sure what why we have<01:07:19.320> to<01:07:19.440> have<01:07:19.620> all<01:07:19.890> these<01:07:20.130> added<01:07:20.430> regulations 01:07:21.020 --> 01:07:21.030 align:start position:0% have to have all these added regulations 01:07:21.030 --> 01:07:23.210 align:start position:0% have to have all these added regulations control<01:07:21.480> paperwork<01:07:22.020> bureaucracy<01:07:22.650> and<01:07:22.770> costs 01:07:23.210 --> 01:07:23.220 align:start position:0% control paperwork bureaucracy and costs 01:07:23.220 --> 01:07:25.160 align:start position:0% control paperwork bureaucracy and costs if<01:07:23.700> it's<01:07:23.940> to<01:07:24.090> pay<01:07:24.300> the<01:07:24.480> way<01:07:24.570> and<01:07:24.720> justified 01:07:25.160 --> 01:07:25.170 align:start position:0% if it's to pay the way and justified 01:07:25.170 --> 01:07:27.200 align:start position:0% if it's to pay the way and justified more<01:07:25.350> hotels<01:07:25.740> the<01:07:26.340> Commission<01:07:26.760> city<01:07:27.000> should 01:07:27.200 --> 01:07:27.210 align:start position:0% more hotels the Commission city should 01:07:27.210 --> 01:07:30.140 align:start position:0% more hotels the Commission city should consider<01:07:27.540> the<01:07:28.080> citizens<01:07:28.560> over<01:07:28.770> big 01:07:30.140 --> 01:07:30.150 align:start position:0% consider the citizens over big 01:07:30.150 --> 01:07:34.200 align:start position:0% consider the citizens over big and<01:07:31.150> lastly<01:07:32.140> about<01:07:32.470> how<01:07:33.280> you<01:07:33.340> identify<01:07:33.670> the 01:07:34.200 --> 01:07:34.210 align:start position:0% and lastly about how you identify the 01:07:34.210 --> 01:07:36.390 align:start position:0% and lastly about how you identify the STRs<01:07:34.900> I've<01:07:35.290> already<01:07:35.620> talked<01:07:35.860> to<01:07:35.950> the<01:07:36.130> City 01:07:36.390 --> 01:07:36.400 align:start position:0% STRs I've already talked to the City 01:07:36.400 --> 01:07:38.160 align:start position:0% STRs I've already talked to the City Council<01:07:36.760> about<01:07:36.970> this<01:07:37.150> and<01:07:37.360> I'm<01:07:37.420> in<01:07:37.570> litigation 01:07:38.160 --> 01:07:38.170 align:start position:0% Council about this and I'm in litigation 01:07:38.170 --> 01:07:40.800 align:start position:0% Council about this and I'm in litigation about<01:07:38.350> the<01:07:39.040> way<01:07:39.220> HDL<01:07:39.880> has<01:07:40.120> formed<01:07:40.540> skipped 01:07:40.800 --> 01:07:40.810 align:start position:0% about the way HDL has formed skipped 01:07:40.810 --> 01:07:42.750 align:start position:0% about the way HDL has formed skipped traces<01:07:41.230> and<01:07:41.470> used<01:07:41.980> their<01:07:42.310> proprietary 01:07:42.750 --> 01:07:42.760 align:start position:0% traces and used their proprietary 01:07:42.760 --> 01:07:46.920 align:start position:0% traces and used their proprietary software<01:07:43.540> in<01:07:44.320> order<01:07:44.470> to<01:07:44.680> find<01:07:44.950> who<01:07:45.220> was<01:07:45.930> heir 01:07:46.920 --> 01:07:46.930 align:start position:0% software in order to find who was heir 01:07:46.930 --> 01:07:48.720 align:start position:0% software in order to find who was heir being<01:07:47.260> being<01:07:47.440> their<01:07:47.590> house<01:07:47.710> which<01:07:47.920> I<01:07:48.070> consider 01:07:48.720 --> 01:07:48.730 align:start position:0% being being their house which I consider 01:07:48.730 --> 01:07:54.780 align:start position:0% being being their house which I consider a<01:07:51.570> it's<01:07:52.570> this<01:07:52.990> company<01:07:53.380> is<01:07:53.440> is<01:07:53.860> writing<01:07:54.370> policy 01:07:54.780 --> 01:07:54.790 align:start position:0% a it's this company is is writing policy 01:07:54.790 --> 01:07:59.790 align:start position:0% a it's this company is is writing policy for<01:07:54.940> profit<01:07:55.360> and<01:07:58.470> it's<01:07:59.470> a<01:07:59.560> whole<01:07:59.680> another 01:07:59.790 --> 01:07:59.800 align:start position:0% for profit and it's a whole another 01:07:59.800 --> 01:08:02.580 align:start position:0% for profit and it's a whole another subject<01:08:00.370> to<01:08:00.430> get<01:08:00.580> into<01:08:00.880> but<01:08:01.150> if<01:08:01.930> not<01:08:02.200> for<01:08:02.260> them 01:08:02.580 --> 01:08:02.590 align:start position:0% subject to get into but if not for them 01:08:02.590 --> 01:08:04.470 align:start position:0% subject to get into but if not for them a<01:08:02.920> lot<01:08:03.580> of<01:08:03.700> these<01:08:03.820> people<01:08:04.030> that<01:08:04.180> have<01:08:04.300> gone 01:08:04.470 --> 01:08:04.480 align:start position:0% a lot of these people that have gone 01:08:04.480 --> 01:08:06.450 align:start position:0% a lot of these people that have gone unnoticed<01:08:04.690> under<01:08:05.200> the<01:08:05.290> radar<01:08:05.590> because<01:08:05.830> they 01:08:06.450 --> 01:08:06.460 align:start position:0% unnoticed under the radar because they 01:08:06.460 --> 01:08:08.280 align:start position:0% unnoticed under the radar because they are<01:08:06.550> not<01:08:06.700> impacting<01:08:07.180> the<01:08:07.270> neighborhood<01:08:07.720> the 01:08:08.280 --> 01:08:08.290 align:start position:0% are not impacting the neighborhood the 01:08:08.290 --> 01:08:11.220 align:start position:0% are not impacting the neighborhood the complaints<01:08:08.770> are<01:08:08.860> minimal<01:08:09.250> and<01:08:09.930> no<01:08:10.930> one<01:08:11.080> would 01:08:11.220 --> 01:08:11.230 align:start position:0% complaints are minimal and no one would 01:08:11.230 --> 01:08:12.630 align:start position:0% complaints are minimal and no one would even<01:08:11.350> have<01:08:11.590> known<01:08:11.800> that<01:08:12.010> we<01:08:12.130> were<01:08:12.280> them<01:08:12.460> there 01:08:12.630 --> 01:08:12.640 align:start position:0% even have known that we were them there 01:08:12.640 --> 01:08:15.570 align:start position:0% even have known that we were them there so<01:08:13.590> thank<01:08:14.590> you<01:08:14.710> for<01:08:14.890> your<01:08:15.010> comments<01:08:15.430> miss 01:08:15.570 --> 01:08:15.580 align:start position:0% so thank you for your comments miss 01:08:15.580 --> 01:08:18.060 align:start position:0% so thank you for your comments miss Bernard<01:08:15.910> and<01:08:16.120> margarita<01:08:16.990> Vasquez<01:08:17.590> the<01:08:17.620> last 01:08:18.060 --> 01:08:18.070 align:start position:0% Bernard and margarita Vasquez the last 01:08:18.070 --> 01:08:19.620 align:start position:0% Bernard and margarita Vasquez the last green<01:08:18.340> card<01:08:18.580> I<01:08:18.670> have<01:08:18.820> on<01:08:19.000> this<01:08:19.150> item<01:08:19.450> tonight 01:08:19.620 --> 01:08:19.630 align:start position:0% green card I have on this item tonight 01:08:19.630 --> 01:08:22.350 align:start position:0% green card I have on this item tonight welcome<01:08:20.530> good<01:08:21.520> evening<01:08:21.580> my<01:08:22.180> name<01:08:22.330> is 01:08:22.350 --> 01:08:22.360 align:start position:0% welcome good evening my name is 01:08:22.360 --> 01:08:24.360 align:start position:0% welcome good evening my name is margarita<01:08:22.840> Vasquez<01:08:23.320> and<01:08:23.530> I<01:08:23.590> am<01:08:23.710> also<01:08:23.890> a<01:08:24.100> half 01:08:24.360 --> 01:08:24.370 align:start position:0% margarita Vasquez and I am also a half 01:08:24.370 --> 01:08:27.000 align:start position:0% margarita Vasquez and I am also a half of<01:08:24.520> a<01:08:24.640> resident<01:08:25.150> and<01:08:25.390> today<01:08:26.050> I<01:08:26.410> come<01:08:26.710> here<01:08:26.920> to 01:08:27.000 --> 01:08:27.010 align:start position:0% of a resident and today I come here to 01:08:27.010 --> 01:08:29.190 align:start position:0% of a resident and today I come here to talk<01:08:27.190> about<01:08:27.550> the<01:08:27.850> importance<01:08:28.240> of<01:08:28.390> regulating 01:08:29.190 --> 01:08:29.200 align:start position:0% talk about the importance of regulating 01:08:29.200 --> 01:08:31.020 align:start position:0% talk about the importance of regulating and<01:08:29.410> possibly<01:08:30.010> limiting<01:08:30.520> the<01:08:30.640> short-term 01:08:31.020 --> 01:08:31.030 align:start position:0% and possibly limiting the short-term 01:08:31.030 --> 01:08:33.900 align:start position:0% and possibly limiting the short-term rentals<01:08:31.540> in<01:08:31.780> Half<01:08:31.930> Moon<01:08:31.960> Bay<01:08:32.370> first<01:08:33.370> I<01:08:33.610> believe 01:08:33.900 --> 01:08:33.910 align:start position:0% rentals in Half Moon Bay first I believe 01:08:33.910 --> 01:08:36.630 align:start position:0% rentals in Half Moon Bay first I believe that<01:08:34.300> having<01:08:34.960> too<01:08:35.230> many<01:08:35.350> rent<01:08:35.680> many<01:08:36.310> too<01:08:36.610> many 01:08:36.630 --> 01:08:36.640 align:start position:0% that having too many rent many too many 01:08:36.640 --> 01:08:39.690 align:start position:0% that having too many rent many too many short-term<01:08:37.210> rentals<01:08:37.600> may<01:08:38.050> not<01:08:38.290> may<01:08:39.160> not<01:08:39.190> only 01:08:39.690 --> 01:08:39.700 align:start position:0% short-term rentals may not may not only 01:08:39.700 --> 01:08:41.790 align:start position:0% short-term rentals may not may not only decrease<01:08:40.180> our<01:08:40.510> available<01:08:41.230> housing<01:08:41.380> in<01:08:41.650> Half 01:08:41.790 --> 01:08:41.800 align:start position:0% decrease our available housing in Half 01:08:41.800 --> 01:08:44.180 align:start position:0% decrease our available housing in Half Moon<01:08:41.830> Bay<01:08:42.010> but<01:08:42.640> also<01:08:42.760> artificially<01:08:43.540> inflate 01:08:44.180 --> 01:08:44.190 align:start position:0% Moon Bay but also artificially inflate 01:08:44.190 --> 01:08:47.820 align:start position:0% Moon Bay but also artificially inflate retcons<01:08:45.190> due<01:08:45.430> to<01:08:45.610> the<01:08:45.760> reality<01:08:46.720> of<01:08:46.750> supply<01:08:47.620> and 01:08:47.820 --> 01:08:47.830 align:start position:0% retcons due to the reality of supply and 01:08:47.830 --> 01:08:52.040 align:start position:0% retcons due to the reality of supply and demand<01:08:48.000> to<01:08:49.000> short-term<01:08:49.690> rentals<01:08:50.670> on<01:08:51.670> a 01:08:52.040 --> 01:08:52.050 align:start position:0% demand to short-term rentals on a 01:08:52.050 --> 01:08:54.990 align:start position:0% demand to short-term rentals on a short-term<01:08:53.050> rental<01:08:53.830> host<01:08:54.250> is<01:08:54.520> important 01:08:54.990 --> 01:08:55.000 align:start position:0% short-term rental host is important 01:08:55.000 --> 01:08:58.350 align:start position:0% short-term rental host is important because<01:08:55.600> to<01:08:56.200> live<01:08:56.380> in<01:08:56.530> the<01:08:56.890> community<01:08:57.340> is<01:08:57.580> it 01:08:58.350 --> 01:08:58.360 align:start position:0% because to live in the community is it 01:08:58.360 --> 01:09:00.030 align:start position:0% because to live in the community is it isn't<01:08:58.630> what<01:08:58.750> is<01:08:58.840> important<01:08:59.290> for<01:08:59.560> hosts<01:08:59.770> to 01:09:00.030 --> 01:09:00.040 align:start position:0% isn't what is important for hosts to 01:09:00.040 --> 01:09:01.740 align:start position:0% isn't what is important for hosts to live<01:09:00.160> in<01:09:00.280> the<01:09:00.370> community<01:09:00.790> in<01:09:01.000> order<01:09:01.240> to<01:09:01.480> ensure 01:09:01.740 --> 01:09:01.750 align:start position:0% live in the community in order to ensure 01:09:01.750 --> 01:09:04.020 align:start position:0% live in the community in order to ensure that<01:09:02.020> the<01:09:02.470> money<01:09:02.650> goes<01:09:02.860> back<01:09:03.070> to<01:09:03.310> the<01:09:03.430> economy 01:09:04.020 --> 01:09:04.030 align:start position:0% that the money goes back to the economy 01:09:04.030 --> 01:09:06.660 align:start position:0% that the money goes back to the economy and<01:09:04.360> three<01:09:05.170> I<01:09:05.380> think<01:09:05.680> it<01:09:05.800> is<01:09:05.950> important<01:09:06.460> to 01:09:06.660 --> 01:09:06.670 align:start position:0% and three I think it is important to 01:09:06.670 --> 01:09:09.180 align:start position:0% and three I think it is important to also<01:09:07.120> acknowledge<01:09:07.360> that<01:09:07.720> if<01:09:08.410> we<01:09:08.920> have 01:09:09.180 --> 01:09:09.190 align:start position:0% also acknowledge that if we have 01:09:09.190 --> 01:09:11.790 align:start position:0% also acknowledge that if we have short-term<01:09:09.820> rentals<01:09:10.210> in<01:09:10.450> duplex<01:09:11.170> triplex<01:09:11.380> and 01:09:11.790 --> 01:09:11.800 align:start position:0% short-term rentals in duplex triplex and 01:09:11.800 --> 01:09:13.260 align:start position:0% short-term rentals in duplex triplex and mobile<01:09:12.130> homes<01:09:12.310> this<01:09:12.700> will<01:09:12.880> also<01:09:13.150> be 01:09:13.260 --> 01:09:13.270 align:start position:0% mobile homes this will also be 01:09:13.270 --> 01:09:15.660 align:start position:0% mobile homes this will also be eliminated<01:09:13.780> the<01:09:13.870> community<01:09:14.350> and<01:09:14.670> not 01:09:15.660 --> 01:09:15.670 align:start position:0% eliminated the community and not 01:09:15.670 --> 01:09:17.280 align:start position:0% eliminated the community and not allowing<01:09:16.090> for<01:09:16.120> families<01:09:16.660> to<01:09:16.840> live<01:09:16.960> in<01:09:17.110> these 01:09:17.280 --> 01:09:17.290 align:start position:0% allowing for families to live in these 01:09:17.290 --> 01:09:19.770 align:start position:0% allowing for families to live in these thank<01:09:17.950> you<01:09:18.100> thank<01:09:18.970> you<01:09:19.030> very<01:09:19.240> much<01:09:19.510> miss 01:09:19.770 --> 01:09:19.780 align:start position:0% thank you thank you very much miss 01:09:19.780 --> 01:09:21.870 align:start position:0% thank you thank you very much miss Vasquez<01:09:20.260> is<01:09:20.740> there<01:09:21.040> anyone<01:09:21.370> else<01:09:21.520> in<01:09:21.850> the 01:09:21.870 --> 01:09:21.880 align:start position:0% Vasquez is there anyone else in the 01:09:21.880 --> 01:09:23.430 align:start position:0% Vasquez is there anyone else in the audience<01:09:22.120> tonight<01:09:22.570> who<01:09:22.720> would<01:09:22.930> like<01:09:23.080> to<01:09:23.110> speak 01:09:23.430 --> 01:09:23.440 align:start position:0% audience tonight who would like to speak 01:09:23.440 --> 01:09:25.410 align:start position:0% audience tonight who would like to speak okay<01:09:23.620> lots<01:09:24.010> of<01:09:24.130> hands<01:09:24.430> this<01:09:24.850> is<01:09:24.910> the<01:09:25.090> first 01:09:25.410 --> 01:09:25.420 align:start position:0% okay lots of hands this is the first 01:09:25.420 --> 01:09:27.300 align:start position:0% okay lots of hands this is the first hand<01:09:25.690> I<01:09:25.810> saw<01:09:26.020> that<01:09:26.230> General<01:09:26.530> Howe<01:09:26.650> ladies 01:09:27.300 --> 01:09:27.310 align:start position:0% hand I saw that General Howe ladies 01:09:27.310 --> 01:09:27.900 align:start position:0% hand I saw that General Howe ladies first 01:09:27.900 --> 01:09:27.910 align:start position:0% first 01:09:27.910 --> 01:09:30.750 align:start position:0% first if<01:09:28.450> you<01:09:29.080> could<01:09:29.320> please<01:09:29.920> when<01:09:30.370> you<01:09:30.460> finish 01:09:30.750 --> 01:09:30.760 align:start position:0% if you could please when you finish 01:09:30.760 --> 01:09:32.910 align:start position:0% if you could please when you finish speaking<01:09:31.180> just<01:09:31.360> grab<01:09:31.660> a<01:09:31.690> green<01:09:32.020> green<01:09:32.650> card 01:09:32.910 --> 01:09:32.920 align:start position:0% speaking just grab a green green card 01:09:32.920 --> 01:09:34.530 align:start position:0% speaking just grab a green green card from<01:09:33.160> the<01:09:33.250> back<01:09:33.430> and<01:09:33.700> help<01:09:33.880> us<01:09:34.060> if<01:09:34.240> you<01:09:34.360> would 01:09:34.530 --> 01:09:34.540 align:start position:0% from the back and help us if you would 01:09:34.540 --> 01:09:36.380 align:start position:0% from the back and help us if you would oh<01:09:34.750> good 01:09:36.380 --> 01:09:36.390 align:start position:0% oh good 01:09:36.390 --> 01:09:38.140 align:start position:0% oh good welcome 01:09:38.140 --> 01:09:38.150 align:start position:0% welcome 01:09:38.150 --> 01:09:41.629 align:start position:0% welcome hello<01:09:39.150> I'm<01:09:39.779> Susan<01:09:40.170> swear<01:09:40.650> I<01:09:40.679> live<01:09:41.039> it<01:09:41.130> 206 01:09:41.629 --> 01:09:41.639 align:start position:0% hello I'm Susan swear I live it 206 01:09:41.639 --> 01:09:44.209 align:start position:0% hello I'm Susan swear I live it 206 Washington<01:09:42.239> and<01:09:42.479> just<01:09:43.259> a<01:09:43.319> little<01:09:43.559> context<01:09:44.069> in 01:09:44.209 --> 01:09:44.219 align:start position:0% Washington and just a little context in 01:09:44.219 --> 01:09:46.149 align:start position:0% Washington and just a little context in terms<01:09:44.400> of<01:09:44.579> where<01:09:44.670> I'm<01:09:44.789> coming<01:09:44.819> from<01:09:45.119> for<01:09:45.839> the 01:09:46.149 --> 01:09:46.159 align:start position:0% terms of where I'm coming from for the 01:09:46.159 --> 01:09:50.419 align:start position:0% terms of where I'm coming from for the short-term<01:09:47.329> rental<01:09:48.329> policy<01:09:48.809> I<01:09:49.499> lived<01:09:50.309> in 01:09:50.419 --> 01:09:50.429 align:start position:0% short-term rental policy I lived in 01:09:50.429 --> 01:09:53.329 align:start position:0% short-term rental policy I lived in Halfin<01:09:50.729> Bay<01:09:50.849> 20<01:09:51.179> years<01:09:51.449> I'm<01:09:52.349> in<01:09:52.859> a<01:09:52.979> beach 01:09:53.329 --> 01:09:53.339 align:start position:0% Halfin Bay 20 years I'm in a beach 01:09:53.339 --> 01:09:58.089 align:start position:0% Halfin Bay 20 years I'm in a beach community<01:09:54.029> I've<01:09:54.900> been<01:09:55.530> a<01:09:56.489> landlord<01:09:57.300> myself 01:09:58.089 --> 01:09:58.099 align:start position:0% community I've been a landlord myself 01:09:58.099 --> 01:10:01.430 align:start position:0% community I've been a landlord myself for<01:09:59.099> long<01:09:59.280> with<01:09:59.610> a<01:09:59.639> with<01:10:00.239> long<01:10:00.479> term<01:10:00.749> tenants<01:10:01.050> I 01:10:01.430 --> 01:10:01.440 align:start position:0% for long with a with long term tenants I 01:10:01.440 --> 01:10:05.169 align:start position:0% for long with a with long term tenants I now<01:10:02.070> live<01:10:02.369> across<01:10:02.610> the<01:10:02.699> street<01:10:03.119> from<01:10:03.920> a 01:10:05.169 --> 01:10:05.179 align:start position:0% now live across the street from a 01:10:05.179 --> 01:10:08.000 align:start position:0% now live across the street from a property<01:10:06.179> that<01:10:06.209> is<01:10:06.780> investor<01:10:07.499> owned<01:10:07.709> by 01:10:08.000 --> 01:10:08.010 align:start position:0% property that is investor owned by 01:10:08.010 --> 01:10:10.790 align:start position:0% property that is investor owned by somebody<01:10:08.550> outside<01:10:08.940> of<01:10:09.269> Half<01:10:09.690> Moon<01:10:09.900> Bay<01:10:09.959> it's 01:10:10.790 --> 01:10:10.800 align:start position:0% somebody outside of Half Moon Bay it's 01:10:10.800 --> 01:10:14.449 align:start position:0% somebody outside of Half Moon Bay it's been<01:10:11.519> an<01:10:11.849> Airbnb<01:10:12.539> but<01:10:12.780> because<01:10:13.079> they<01:10:13.459> turn 01:10:14.449 --> 01:10:14.459 align:start position:0% been an Airbnb but because they turn 01:10:14.459 --> 01:10:18.020 align:start position:0% been an Airbnb but because they turn their<01:10:14.699> ad<01:10:14.940> you<01:10:15.269> into<01:10:15.979> Airbnb<01:10:16.979> also<01:10:17.400> that's<01:10:17.699> in 01:10:18.020 --> 01:10:18.030 align:start position:0% their ad you into Airbnb also that's in 01:10:18.030 --> 01:10:20.660 align:start position:0% their ad you into Airbnb also that's in the<01:10:18.119> process<01:10:18.300> of<01:10:18.630> being<01:10:18.809> reconciled<01:10:19.409> so<01:10:19.739> I 01:10:20.660 --> 01:10:20.670 align:start position:0% the process of being reconciled so I 01:10:20.670 --> 01:10:23.419 align:start position:0% the process of being reconciled so I have<01:10:20.909> seen<01:10:21.150> firsthand<01:10:21.539> the<01:10:21.809> trash<01:10:22.199> that<01:10:22.650> has 01:10:23.419 --> 01:10:23.429 align:start position:0% have seen firsthand the trash that has 01:10:23.429 --> 01:10:26.810 align:start position:0% have seen firsthand the trash that has been<01:10:23.699> scattered<01:10:24.209> as<01:10:25.130> tenants<01:10:26.130> have<01:10:26.249> left<01:10:26.519> I've 01:10:26.810 --> 01:10:26.820 align:start position:0% been scattered as tenants have left I've 01:10:26.820 --> 01:10:30.649 align:start position:0% been scattered as tenants have left I've seen<01:10:27.119> the<01:10:27.300> disruption<01:10:27.840> of<01:10:28.019> of<01:10:28.289> cars<01:10:29.389> I've<01:10:30.389> seen 01:10:30.649 --> 01:10:30.659 align:start position:0% seen the disruption of of cars I've seen 01:10:30.659 --> 01:10:33.799 align:start position:0% seen the disruption of of cars I've seen other<01:10:31.099> Airbnb<01:10:32.099> rentals<01:10:32.309> in<01:10:32.909> the<01:10:33.030> community<01:10:33.479> in 01:10:33.799 --> 01:10:33.809 align:start position:0% other Airbnb rentals in the community in 01:10:33.809 --> 01:10:35.930 align:start position:0% other Airbnb rentals in the community in in<01:10:34.559> the<01:10:34.709> immediate<01:10:35.099> neighborhood<01:10:35.610> where 01:10:35.930 --> 01:10:35.940 align:start position:0% in the immediate neighborhood where 01:10:35.940 --> 01:10:38.270 align:start position:0% in the immediate neighborhood where they've<01:10:36.119> had<01:10:36.329> large<01:10:36.630> parties<01:10:37.590> and<01:10:37.920> it's<01:10:38.039> been 01:10:38.270 --> 01:10:38.280 align:start position:0% they've had large parties and it's been 01:10:38.280 --> 01:10:41.419 align:start position:0% they've had large parties and it's been quite<01:10:38.519> disruptive<01:10:38.820> so<01:10:39.420> I<01:10:40.349> fully<01:10:41.039> support 01:10:41.419 --> 01:10:41.429 align:start position:0% quite disruptive so I fully support 01:10:41.429 --> 01:10:44.000 align:start position:0% quite disruptive so I fully support hosted<01:10:42.269> rentals<01:10:42.659> but<01:10:43.019> I<01:10:43.260> have<01:10:43.380> also<01:10:43.559> seen<01:10:43.860> the 01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:44.010 align:start position:0% hosted rentals but I have also seen the 01:10:44.010 --> 01:10:46.520 align:start position:0% hosted rentals but I have also seen the disruption<01:10:44.489> that<01:10:44.820> an<01:10:45.090> hosted<01:10:45.959> rentals<01:10:46.349> can 01:10:46.520 --> 01:10:46.530 align:start position:0% disruption that an hosted rentals can 01:10:46.530 --> 01:10:50.989 align:start position:0% disruption that an hosted rentals can have<01:10:46.709> I<01:10:47.929> also<01:10:48.929> did<01:10:49.409> a<01:10:49.440> survey<01:10:49.920> of<01:10:50.159> what<01:10:50.699> the 01:10:50.989 --> 01:10:50.999 align:start position:0% have I also did a survey of what the 01:10:50.999 --> 01:10:53.089 align:start position:0% have I also did a survey of what the Airbnb<01:10:51.360> guidelines<01:10:52.199> and<01:10:52.440> short<01:10:52.650> term<01:10:52.800> rental 01:10:53.089 --> 01:10:53.099 align:start position:0% Airbnb guidelines and short term rental 01:10:53.099 --> 01:10:54.529 align:start position:0% Airbnb guidelines and short term rental guidelines<01:10:53.459> are<01:10:53.639> in<01:10:53.909> a<01:10:53.999> number<01:10:54.239> of<01:10:54.269> cities 01:10:54.529 --> 01:10:54.539 align:start position:0% guidelines are in a number of cities 01:10:54.539 --> 01:10:57.469 align:start position:0% guidelines are in a number of cities probably<01:10:55.019> I<01:10:55.050> looked<01:10:55.860> at<01:10:56.010> 8<01:10:56.280> to<01:10:56.610> 10<01:10:56.820> cities<01:10:57.209> that 01:10:57.469 --> 01:10:57.479 align:start position:0% probably I looked at 8 to 10 cities that 01:10:57.479 --> 01:10:59.540 align:start position:0% probably I looked at 8 to 10 cities that are<01:10:57.599> very<01:10:57.929> tourist<01:10:58.380> oriented<01:10:58.619> some<01:10:59.280> of<01:10:59.400> which 01:10:59.540 --> 01:10:59.550 align:start position:0% are very tourist oriented some of which 01:10:59.550 --> 01:11:01.580 align:start position:0% are very tourist oriented some of which were<01:10:59.699> coastal<01:11:00.209> cities<01:11:00.959> and<01:11:01.170> I<01:11:01.199> think<01:11:01.469> there 01:11:01.580 --> 01:11:01.590 align:start position:0% were coastal cities and I think there 01:11:01.590 --> 01:11:03.439 align:start position:0% were coastal cities and I think there are<01:11:01.619> a<01:11:01.709> few<01:11:01.739> points<01:11:02.099> that<01:11:02.459> I<01:11:02.940> would<01:11:03.150> like<01:11:03.300> to 01:11:03.439 --> 01:11:03.449 align:start position:0% are a few points that I would like to 01:11:03.449 --> 01:11:07.359 align:start position:0% are a few points that I would like to see<01:11:03.630> considered<01:11:05.090> several<01:11:06.090> cities<01:11:06.570> actually 01:11:07.359 --> 01:11:07.369 align:start position:0% see considered several cities actually 01:11:07.369 --> 01:11:10.310 align:start position:0% see considered several cities actually develop<01:11:08.369> policy<01:11:08.849> objectives<01:11:09.389> specifically 01:11:10.310 --> 01:11:10.320 align:start position:0% develop policy objectives specifically 01:11:10.320 --> 01:11:12.739 align:start position:0% develop policy objectives specifically for<01:11:10.499> their<01:11:10.619> short-term<01:11:10.979> rentals<01:11:11.340> so<01:11:11.630> one<01:11:12.630> of 01:11:12.739 --> 01:11:12.749 align:start position:0% for their short-term rentals so one of 01:11:12.749 --> 01:11:14.810 align:start position:0% for their short-term rentals so one of those<01:11:12.900> is<01:11:13.170> generally<01:11:13.679> to<01:11:13.889> protect<01:11:14.369> quality<01:11:14.729> of 01:11:14.810 --> 01:11:14.820 align:start position:0% those is generally to protect quality of 01:11:14.820 --> 01:11:16.370 align:start position:0% those is generally to protect quality of life<01:11:14.969> in<01:11:15.179> residential<01:11:15.570> neighborhoods<01:11:15.719> and<01:11:16.349> I 01:11:16.370 --> 01:11:16.380 align:start position:0% life in residential neighborhoods and I 01:11:16.380 --> 01:11:17.989 align:start position:0% life in residential neighborhoods and I see<01:11:16.590> that<01:11:16.739> in<01:11:16.860> places<01:11:17.190> like<01:11:17.219> Manhattan<01:11:17.849> Beach 01:11:17.989 --> 01:11:17.999 align:start position:0% see that in places like Manhattan Beach 01:11:17.999 --> 01:11:18.979 align:start position:0% see that in places like Manhattan Beach and<01:11:18.239> Palm<01:11:18.539> Desert 01:11:18.979 --> 01:11:18.989 align:start position:0% and Palm Desert 01:11:18.989 --> 01:11:22.370 align:start position:0% and Palm Desert and<01:11:19.880> there's<01:11:20.880> also<01:11:21.360> often<01:11:21.690> an<01:11:21.809> explicit 01:11:22.370 --> 01:11:22.380 align:start position:0% and there's also often an explicit 01:11:22.380 --> 01:11:24.739 align:start position:0% and there's also often an explicit objective<01:11:22.499> to<01:11:23.099> limit<01:11:23.940> short-term<01:11:24.420> rental 01:11:24.739 --> 01:11:24.749 align:start position:0% objective to limit short-term rental 01:11:24.749 --> 01:11:26.629 align:start position:0% objective to limit short-term rental uses<01:11:25.110> while<01:11:25.380> preventing<01:11:26.010> the<01:11:26.130> loss<01:11:26.309> of 01:11:26.629 --> 01:11:26.639 align:start position:0% uses while preventing the loss of 01:11:26.639 --> 01:11:29.509 align:start position:0% uses while preventing the loss of housing<01:11:27.209> stock<01:11:27.239> and<01:11:27.840> so<01:11:28.499> I<01:11:28.530> would<01:11:28.949> like<01:11:29.159> us<01:11:29.369> as 01:11:29.509 --> 01:11:29.519 align:start position:0% housing stock and so I would like us as 01:11:29.519 --> 01:11:31.489 align:start position:0% housing stock and so I would like us as we're<01:11:29.699> thinking<01:11:29.849> about<01:11:30.150> our<01:11:30.659> policies<01:11:31.260> for 01:11:31.489 --> 01:11:31.499 align:start position:0% we're thinking about our policies for 01:11:31.499 --> 01:11:33.649 align:start position:0% we're thinking about our policies for short-term<01:11:31.889> rentals<01:11:32.309> to<01:11:32.820> be<01:11:32.969> very<01:11:33.209> explicit 01:11:33.649 --> 01:11:33.659 align:start position:0% short-term rentals to be very explicit 01:11:33.659 --> 01:11:35.509 align:start position:0% short-term rentals to be very explicit about<01:11:33.869> what<01:11:34.199> we're<01:11:34.349> trying<01:11:34.619> to<01:11:34.769> accomplish<01:11:35.099> I 01:11:35.509 --> 01:11:35.519 align:start position:0% about what we're trying to accomplish I 01:11:35.519 --> 01:11:38.540 align:start position:0% about what we're trying to accomplish I wholly<01:11:36.090> support<01:11:36.690> folks<01:11:37.650> needing<01:11:38.280> extra 01:11:38.540 --> 01:11:38.550 align:start position:0% wholly support folks needing extra 01:11:38.550 --> 01:11:41.509 align:start position:0% wholly support folks needing extra income<01:11:38.940> and<01:11:39.150> and<01:11:39.449> I<01:11:40.260> don't<01:11:40.679> want<01:11:41.039> to<01:11:41.159> see<01:11:41.309> that 01:11:41.509 --> 01:11:41.519 align:start position:0% income and and I don't want to see that 01:11:41.519 --> 01:11:43.580 align:start position:0% income and and I don't want to see that inhibited<01:11:42.059> in<01:11:42.209> any<01:11:42.389> way<01:11:42.570> but<01:11:42.900> I<01:11:43.050> do<01:11:43.170> want<01:11:43.499> to 01:11:43.580 --> 01:11:43.590 align:start position:0% inhibited in any way but I do want to 01:11:43.590 --> 01:11:47.029 align:start position:0% inhibited in any way but I do want to see<01:11:43.829> owners<01:11:44.760> take<01:11:45.030> responsibility<01:11:45.809> for<01:11:46.039> their 01:11:47.029 --> 01:11:47.039 align:start position:0% see owners take responsibility for their 01:11:47.039 --> 01:11:48.470 align:start position:0% see owners take responsibility for their property 01:11:48.470 --> 01:11:48.480 align:start position:0% property 01:11:48.480 --> 01:11:52.580 align:start position:0% property I'm<01:11:49.140> not<01:11:49.440> so<01:11:49.800> crazy<01:11:50.010> about<01:11:50.219> having<01:11:51.590> investors 01:11:52.580 --> 01:11:52.590 align:start position:0% I'm not so crazy about having investors 01:11:52.590 --> 01:11:55.550 align:start position:0% I'm not so crazy about having investors who<01:11:52.770> are<01:11:52.800> outside<01:11:53.250> of<01:11:53.280> the<01:11:53.460> area<01:11:54.140> have<01:11:55.140> no 01:11:55.550 --> 01:11:55.560 align:start position:0% who are outside of the area have no 01:11:55.560 --> 01:11:58.250 align:start position:0% who are outside of the area have no restrictions<01:11:56.190> on<01:11:56.310> them<01:11:56.520> so<01:11:57.300> I<01:11:57.719> don't<01:11:57.989> know<01:11:58.110> how 01:11:58.250 --> 01:11:58.260 align:start position:0% restrictions on them so I don't know how 01:11:58.260 --> 01:12:00.590 align:start position:0% restrictions on them so I don't know how we<01:11:58.320> how<01:11:59.100> address<01:11:59.790> up<01:11:59.969> but<01:12:00.120> I<01:12:00.180> would<01:12:00.330> like<01:12:00.420> to 01:12:00.590 --> 01:12:00.600 align:start position:0% we how address up but I would like to 01:12:00.600 --> 01:12:05.720 align:start position:0% we how address up but I would like to see<01:12:00.750> that<01:12:00.930> I<01:12:02.660> do<01:12:03.660> see<01:12:04.020> that<01:12:04.290> generally<01:12:05.219> speak<01:12:05.610> I 01:12:05.720 --> 01:12:05.730 align:start position:0% see that I do see that generally speak I 01:12:05.730 --> 01:12:07.280 align:start position:0% see that I do see that generally speak I think<01:12:05.760> in<01:12:06.060> contrast<01:12:06.480> to<01:12:06.600> what<01:12:06.719> Scott<01:12:06.989> said<01:12:07.020> I 01:12:07.280 --> 01:12:07.290 align:start position:0% think in contrast to what Scott said I 01:12:07.290 --> 01:12:09.979 align:start position:0% think in contrast to what Scott said I do<01:12:07.350> often<01:12:07.920> see<01:12:08.219> for<01:12:09.030> the<01:12:09.330> kinds<01:12:09.630> of<01:12:09.719> cities 01:12:09.979 --> 01:12:09.989 align:start position:0% do often see for the kinds of cities 01:12:09.989 --> 01:12:11.630 align:start position:0% do often see for the kinds of cities that<01:12:10.140> I<01:12:10.230> think<01:12:10.469> are<01:12:10.560> comparable<01:12:10.980> to<01:12:11.280> have<01:12:11.520> a 01:12:11.630 --> 01:12:11.640 align:start position:0% that I think are comparable to have a 01:12:11.640 --> 01:12:14.630 align:start position:0% that I think are comparable to have a that<01:12:11.850> there<01:12:12.000> are<01:12:12.120> limits<01:12:12.540> for<01:12:13.100> unn<01:12:14.100> hosted 01:12:14.630 --> 01:12:14.640 align:start position:0% that there are limits for unn hosted 01:12:14.640 --> 01:12:17.120 align:start position:0% that there are limits for unn hosted rentals<01:12:15.030> and<01:12:15.270> so<01:12:15.630> I'm<01:12:15.960> an<01:12:16.080> advocate<01:12:16.380> of<01:12:16.770> doing 01:12:17.120 --> 01:12:17.130 align:start position:0% rentals and so I'm an advocate of doing 01:12:17.130 --> 01:12:21.800 align:start position:0% rentals and so I'm an advocate of doing that<01:12:18.170> and<01:12:19.489> other<01:12:20.489> than<01:12:20.730> that<01:12:20.880> I<01:12:20.910> think<01:12:21.060> most<01:12:21.510> of 01:12:21.800 --> 01:12:21.810 align:start position:0% that and other than that I think most of 01:12:21.810 --> 01:12:26.870 align:start position:0% that and other than that I think most of the<01:12:22.110> guidelines<01:12:22.530> that<01:12:22.770> we've<01:12:25.580> that<01:12:26.580> have<01:12:26.730> been 01:12:26.870 --> 01:12:26.880 align:start position:0% the guidelines that we've that have been 01:12:26.880 --> 01:12:28.400 align:start position:0% the guidelines that we've that have been discussed<01:12:27.360> I<01:12:27.660> think<01:12:27.870> I've<01:12:27.989> already<01:12:28.200> been 01:12:28.400 --> 01:12:28.410 align:start position:0% discussed I think I've already been 01:12:28.410 --> 01:12:30.470 align:start position:0% discussed I think I've already been covered<01:12:28.790> thank<01:12:29.790> you<01:12:29.880> miss<01:12:30.030> square<01:12:30.300> if<01:12:30.390> you 01:12:30.470 --> 01:12:30.480 align:start position:0% covered thank you miss square if you 01:12:30.480 --> 01:12:33.140 align:start position:0% covered thank you miss square if you could<01:12:30.690> give<01:12:30.840> the<01:12:31.050> green<01:12:31.290> sheet<01:12:31.530> to<01:12:31.739> Joe<01:12:32.219> thank 01:12:33.140 --> 01:12:33.150 align:start position:0% could give the green sheet to Joe thank 01:12:33.150 --> 01:12:37.100 align:start position:0% could give the green sheet to Joe thank you<01:12:33.330> um<01:12:33.750> I<01:12:34.380> saw<01:12:34.830> other<01:12:35.040> hands<01:12:35.660> that<01:12:36.660> gentleman 01:12:37.100 --> 01:12:37.110 align:start position:0% you um I saw other hands that gentleman 01:12:37.110 --> 01:12:39.560 align:start position:0% you um I saw other hands that gentleman thank<01:12:37.469> you<01:12:37.620> and<01:12:37.860> then<01:12:38.370> this<01:12:38.820> gentleman<01:12:39.120> and 01:12:39.560 --> 01:12:39.570 align:start position:0% thank you and then this gentleman and 01:12:39.570 --> 01:12:46.040 align:start position:0% thank you and then this gentleman and then<01:12:39.930> that<01:12:40.230> young<01:12:40.440> lady<01:12:43.880> welcome<01:12:44.900> thank<01:12:45.900> you 01:12:46.040 --> 01:12:46.050 align:start position:0% then that young lady welcome thank you 01:12:46.050 --> 01:12:48.140 align:start position:0% then that young lady welcome thank you my<01:12:46.500> name<01:12:46.650> is<01:12:46.800> Scott<01:12:47.070> Frazier<01:12:47.370> and<01:12:47.730> lived<01:12:47.910> here 01:12:48.140 --> 01:12:48.150 align:start position:0% my name is Scott Frazier and lived here 01:12:48.150 --> 01:12:50.660 align:start position:0% my name is Scott Frazier and lived here in<01:12:48.480> why<01:12:48.840> the<01:12:48.900> six<01:12:49.260> couldn't<01:12:49.830> be<01:12:49.890> 48<01:12:50.340> so<01:12:50.520> makes 01:12:50.660 --> 01:12:50.670 align:start position:0% in why the six couldn't be 48 so makes 01:12:50.670 --> 01:12:53.240 align:start position:0% in why the six couldn't be 48 so makes me<01:12:50.820> a<01:12:50.850> 42<01:12:51.180> year<01:12:52.080> resident<01:12:52.620> here<01:12:52.770> of<01:12:52.860> the<01:12:53.010> coast 01:12:53.240 --> 01:12:53.250 align:start position:0% me a 42 year resident here of the coast 01:12:53.250 --> 01:12:55.340 align:start position:0% me a 42 year resident here of the coast I've<01:12:53.550> seen<01:12:53.730> the<01:12:53.850> place<01:12:54.060> changed<01:12:54.960> quite<01:12:55.170> a<01:12:55.230> bit 01:12:55.340 --> 01:12:55.350 align:start position:0% I've seen the place changed quite a bit 01:12:55.350 --> 01:12:57.080 align:start position:0% I've seen the place changed quite a bit from<01:12:55.530> when<01:12:55.890> I<01:12:55.920> grew<01:12:56.190> up<01:12:56.219> and<01:12:56.430> see<01:12:56.580> Haven<01:12:56.940> to 01:12:57.080 --> 01:12:57.090 align:start position:0% from when I grew up and see Haven to 01:12:57.090 --> 01:12:59.540 align:start position:0% from when I grew up and see Haven to where<01:12:57.210> I<01:12:57.239> now<01:12:57.450> live<01:12:57.690> in<01:12:57.750> West<01:12:58.020> Miramar<01:12:58.500> I'm<01:12:59.460> an 01:12:59.540 --> 01:12:59.550 align:start position:0% where I now live in West Miramar I'm an 01:12:59.550 --> 01:13:01.040 align:start position:0% where I now live in West Miramar I'm an attorney<01:12:59.820> here<01:13:00.060> on<01:13:00.210> the<01:13:00.330> coast<01:13:00.540> I<01:13:00.750> have<01:13:00.900> my 01:13:01.040 --> 01:13:01.050 align:start position:0% attorney here on the coast I have my 01:13:01.050 --> 01:13:03.410 align:start position:0% attorney here on the coast I have my office<01:13:01.260> on<01:13:01.530> Main<01:13:01.739> Street<01:13:01.880> lifelong<01:13:02.880> citizen 01:13:03.410 --> 01:13:03.420 align:start position:0% office on Main Street lifelong citizen 01:13:03.420 --> 01:13:05.030 align:start position:0% office on Main Street lifelong citizen plan<01:13:03.719> to<01:13:03.840> stay<01:13:03.989> that<01:13:04.170> way 01:13:05.030 --> 01:13:05.040 align:start position:0% plan to stay that way 01:13:05.040 --> 01:13:07.760 align:start position:0% plan to stay that way I<01:13:05.070> have<01:13:05.750> drafted<01:13:06.750> the<01:13:06.960> short-term<01:13:07.410> rental 01:13:07.760 --> 01:13:07.770 align:start position:0% I have drafted the short-term rental 01:13:07.770 --> 01:13:09.650 align:start position:0% I have drafted the short-term rental ordinance<01:13:08.250> for<01:13:08.520> Lake<01:13:08.790> Tullock<01:13:09.239> I've<01:13:09.480> been 01:13:09.650 --> 01:13:09.660 align:start position:0% ordinance for Lake Tullock I've been 01:13:09.660 --> 01:13:12.260 align:start position:0% ordinance for Lake Tullock I've been involved<01:13:10.020> in<01:13:10.680> several<01:13:11.040> other<01:13:11.400> counties<01:13:12.090> and 01:13:12.260 --> 01:13:12.270 align:start position:0% involved in several other counties and 01:13:12.270 --> 01:13:13.970 align:start position:0% involved in several other counties and areas<01:13:12.420> where<01:13:12.900> there<01:13:13.080> have<01:13:13.200> been<01:13:13.230> short-term 01:13:13.970 --> 01:13:13.980 align:start position:0% areas where there have been short-term 01:13:13.980 --> 01:13:16.610 align:start position:0% areas where there have been short-term rental<01:13:14.760> businesses<01:13:15.390> and<01:13:15.690> ordinances<01:13:16.410> and 01:13:16.610 --> 01:13:16.620 align:start position:0% rental businesses and ordinances and 01:13:16.620 --> 01:13:19.160 align:start position:0% rental businesses and ordinances and participated<01:13:17.310> in<01:13:17.370> the<01:13:17.430> drafting<01:13:18.110> there's<01:13:19.110> a 01:13:19.160 --> 01:13:19.170 align:start position:0% participated in the drafting there's a 01:13:19.170 --> 01:13:21.320 align:start position:0% participated in the drafting there's a place<01:13:19.440> that<01:13:19.739> does<01:13:19.920> not<01:13:20.130> need<01:13:20.400> an<01:13:20.700> ordinance 01:13:21.320 --> 01:13:21.330 align:start position:0% place that does not need an ordinance 01:13:21.330 --> 01:13:24.530 align:start position:0% place that does not need an ordinance it's<01:13:21.510> Half<01:13:21.719> Moon<01:13:21.930> Bay<01:13:21.989> at<01:13:22.770> less<01:13:23.219> than<01:13:23.250> 1/2<01:13:24.090> of<01:13:24.360> a 01:13:24.530 --> 01:13:24.540 align:start position:0% it's Half Moon Bay at less than 1/2 of a 01:13:24.540 --> 01:13:27.020 align:start position:0% it's Half Moon Bay at less than 1/2 of a percent<01:13:25.020> of<01:13:25.260> the<01:13:25.830> rental<01:13:26.160> of<01:13:26.280> the<01:13:26.489> property<01:13:26.969> is 01:13:27.020 --> 01:13:27.030 align:start position:0% percent of the rental of the property is 01:13:27.030 --> 01:13:29.600 align:start position:0% percent of the rental of the property is going<01:13:27.330> to<01:13:27.480> short<01:13:28.230> term<01:13:28.440> rentals<01:13:28.830> it<01:13:29.100> doesn't 01:13:29.600 --> 01:13:29.610 align:start position:0% going to short term rentals it doesn't 01:13:29.610 --> 01:13:31.840 align:start position:0% going to short term rentals it doesn't seem<01:13:29.820> like<01:13:30.030> it's<01:13:30.270> any<01:13:30.360> kind<01:13:30.750> of<01:13:30.840> a<01:13:30.960> problem 01:13:31.840 --> 01:13:31.850 align:start position:0% seem like it's any kind of a problem 01:13:31.850 --> 01:13:34.760 align:start position:0% seem like it's any kind of a problem enforcing<01:13:32.850> existing<01:13:33.210> noise<01:13:33.690> laws<01:13:34.050> density 01:13:34.760 --> 01:13:34.770 align:start position:0% enforcing existing noise laws density 01:13:34.770 --> 01:13:37.280 align:start position:0% enforcing existing noise laws density laws<01:13:35.010> trash<01:13:35.610> and<01:13:35.820> disruption<01:13:36.390> laws<01:13:36.570> will 01:13:37.280 --> 01:13:37.290 align:start position:0% laws trash and disruption laws will 01:13:37.290 --> 01:13:40.640 align:start position:0% laws trash and disruption laws will probably<01:13:38.010> easily<01:13:38.280> save<01:13:39.239> the<01:13:40.080> neighbors<01:13:40.440> for 01:13:40.640 --> 01:13:40.650 align:start position:0% probably easily save the neighbors for 01:13:40.650 --> 01:13:42.680 align:start position:0% probably easily save the neighbors for much<01:13:40.830> of<01:13:40.950> the<01:13:41.040> hassle<01:13:41.460> and<01:13:41.820> you<01:13:42.270> know<01:13:42.390> you<01:13:42.450> can 01:13:42.680 --> 01:13:42.690 align:start position:0% much of the hassle and you know you can 01:13:42.690 --> 01:13:44.150 align:start position:0% much of the hassle and you know you can always<01:13:42.840> get<01:13:43.140> on<01:13:43.230> a<01:13:43.260> neighbor's<01:13:43.650> case<01:13:43.920> that 01:13:44.150 --> 01:13:44.160 align:start position:0% always get on a neighbor's case that 01:13:44.160 --> 01:13:45.860 align:start position:0% always get on a neighbor's case that they're<01:13:44.250> not<01:13:44.400> being<01:13:44.700> a<01:13:44.790> responsible<01:13:45.090> renter 01:13:45.860 --> 01:13:45.870 align:start position:0% they're not being a responsible renter 01:13:45.870 --> 01:13:48.260 align:start position:0% they're not being a responsible renter where<01:13:46.530> I<01:13:46.560> live<01:13:46.920> by<01:13:47.100> the<01:13:47.160> beach<01:13:47.520> I<01:13:47.790> see<01:13:48.030> more 01:13:48.260 --> 01:13:48.270 align:start position:0% where I live by the beach I see more 01:13:48.270 --> 01:13:50.420 align:start position:0% where I live by the beach I see more trash<01:13:48.600> come<01:13:48.989> from<01:13:49.320> the<01:13:49.469> visitors<01:13:49.920> that<01:13:49.950> come 01:13:50.420 --> 01:13:50.430 align:start position:0% trash come from the visitors that come 01:13:50.430 --> 01:13:52.220 align:start position:0% trash come from the visitors that come during<01:13:50.850> the<01:13:51.000> summer<01:13:51.210> days<01:13:51.510> and<01:13:51.900> leave<01:13:52.080> their 01:13:52.220 --> 01:13:52.230 align:start position:0% during the summer days and leave their 01:13:52.230 --> 01:13:55.340 align:start position:0% during the summer days and leave their garbage<01:13:52.469> their<01:13:53.010> diapers<01:13:53.520> etc<01:13:54.360> right<01:13:54.989> there<01:13:55.230> on 01:13:55.340 --> 01:13:55.350 align:start position:0% garbage their diapers etc right there on 01:13:55.350 --> 01:13:57.890 align:start position:0% garbage their diapers etc right there on the<01:13:55.469> side<01:13:55.650> of<01:13:55.800> my<01:13:55.920> house<01:13:56.480> these<01:13:57.480> things<01:13:57.719> were 01:13:57.890 --> 01:13:57.900 align:start position:0% the side of my house these things were 01:13:57.900 --> 01:13:59.930 align:start position:0% the side of my house these things were enforced<01:13:58.410> we<01:13:58.680> wouldn't<01:13:58.980> see<01:13:59.130> them<01:13:59.310> that's 01:13:59.930 --> 01:13:59.940 align:start position:0% enforced we wouldn't see them that's 01:13:59.940 --> 01:14:00.979 align:start position:0% enforced we wouldn't see them that's neither<01:14:00.239> here<01:14:00.360> nor<01:14:00.570> there 01:14:00.979 --> 01:14:00.989 align:start position:0% neither here nor there 01:14:00.989 --> 01:14:01.670 align:start position:0% neither here nor there the 01:14:01.670 --> 01:14:01.680 align:start position:0% the 01:14:01.680 --> 01:14:03.200 align:start position:0% the they<01:14:01.980> do<01:14:02.040> want<01:14:02.340> to<01:14:02.370> talk<01:14:02.580> about<01:14:02.640> of<01:14:03.120> the 01:14:03.200 --> 01:14:03.210 align:start position:0% they do want to talk about of the 01:14:03.210 --> 01:14:05.660 align:start position:0% they do want to talk about of the business<01:14:03.600> of<01:14:03.750> short-term<01:14:04.200> rentals<01:14:04.640> what<01:14:05.640> a 01:14:05.660 --> 01:14:05.670 align:start position:0% business of short-term rentals what a 01:14:05.670 --> 01:14:07.910 align:start position:0% business of short-term rentals what a lot<01:14:05.850> of<01:14:05.970> people<01:14:06.240> don't<01:14:06.360> realize<01:14:06.600> is<01:14:07.290> that<01:14:07.350> the 01:14:07.910 --> 01:14:07.920 align:start position:0% lot of people don't realize is that the 01:14:07.920 --> 01:14:09.950 align:start position:0% lot of people don't realize is that the owners<01:14:08.310> of<01:14:08.340> the<01:14:08.550> short-term<01:14:09.540> rentals<01:14:09.870> are 01:14:09.950 --> 01:14:09.960 align:start position:0% owners of the short-term rentals are 01:14:09.960 --> 01:14:12.050 align:start position:0% owners of the short-term rentals are generally<01:14:10.500> doing<01:14:10.830> them<01:14:11.010> for<01:14:11.040> necessity<01:14:11.760> and 01:14:12.050 --> 01:14:12.060 align:start position:0% generally doing them for necessity and 01:14:12.060 --> 01:14:15.260 align:start position:0% generally doing them for necessity and they<01:14:12.810> are<01:14:12.990> not<01:14:13.350> even<01:14:13.890> usually<01:14:14.160> making<01:14:14.730> as<01:14:15.060> much 01:14:15.260 --> 01:14:15.270 align:start position:0% they are not even usually making as much 01:14:15.270 --> 01:14:17.060 align:start position:0% they are not even usually making as much as<01:14:15.450> they<01:14:15.600> live<01:14:15.840> with<01:14:15.960> a<01:14:15.990> full-time<01:14:16.290> renter<01:14:16.890> it 01:14:17.060 --> 01:14:17.070 align:start position:0% as they live with a full-time renter it 01:14:17.070 --> 01:14:19.520 align:start position:0% as they live with a full-time renter it is<01:14:17.250> for<01:14:17.460> the<01:14:17.580> flexibility<01:14:18.360> by<01:14:18.960> the<01:14:19.020> time<01:14:19.350> you 01:14:19.520 --> 01:14:19.530 align:start position:0% is for the flexibility by the time you 01:14:19.530 --> 01:14:21.590 align:start position:0% is for the flexibility by the time you ping<01:14:19.860> out<01:14:20.070> the<01:14:20.400> extra<01:14:20.820> utilities<01:14:21.360> you're 01:14:21.590 --> 01:14:21.600 align:start position:0% ping out the extra utilities you're 01:14:21.600 --> 01:14:23.630 align:start position:0% ping out the extra utilities you're paying<01:14:21.870> most<01:14:22.320> of<01:14:22.470> us<01:14:22.590> are<01:14:22.740> now<01:14:22.890> at<01:14:23.070> peak<01:14:23.280> demand 01:14:23.630 --> 01:14:23.640 align:start position:0% paying most of us are now at peak demand 01:14:23.640 --> 01:14:26.540 align:start position:0% paying most of us are now at peak demand pricing<01:14:24.240> so<01:14:24.540> running<01:14:24.780> the<01:14:25.010> dryer<01:14:26.010> and<01:14:26.490> the 01:14:26.540 --> 01:14:26.550 align:start position:0% pricing so running the dryer and the 01:14:26.550 --> 01:14:28.460 align:start position:0% pricing so running the dryer and the washing<01:14:26.790> machine<01:14:27.390> more<01:14:27.690> and<01:14:27.990> the<01:14:28.080> extra 01:14:28.460 --> 01:14:28.470 align:start position:0% washing machine more and the extra 01:14:28.470 --> 01:14:32.420 align:start position:0% washing machine more and the extra lights<01:14:28.740> etc<01:14:30.320> you're<01:14:31.320> not<01:14:31.530> coming<01:14:31.890> out<01:14:31.980> as<01:14:32.220> far 01:14:32.420 --> 01:14:32.430 align:start position:0% lights etc you're not coming out as far 01:14:32.430 --> 01:14:35.000 align:start position:0% lights etc you're not coming out as far ahead<01:14:32.580> as<01:14:32.730> a<01:14:32.910> lot<01:14:33.150> of<01:14:33.300> people<01:14:33.600> think<01:14:33.840> if<01:14:34.830> you're 01:14:35.000 --> 01:14:35.010 align:start position:0% ahead as a lot of people think if you're 01:14:35.010 --> 01:14:36.800 align:start position:0% ahead as a lot of people think if you're gonna<01:14:35.310> do<01:14:35.580> something<01:14:36.000> on<01:14:36.120> this<01:14:36.360> and<01:14:36.690> you're 01:14:36.800 --> 01:14:36.810 align:start position:0% gonna do something on this and you're 01:14:36.810 --> 01:14:39.650 align:start position:0% gonna do something on this and you're looking<01:14:37.020> at<01:14:37.350> parking<01:14:38.070> issues<01:14:38.460> I<01:14:38.760> highly 01:14:39.650 --> 01:14:39.660 align:start position:0% looking at parking issues I highly 01:14:39.660 --> 01:14:41.330 align:start position:0% looking at parking issues I highly suggest<01:14:39.900> you<01:14:40.230> stay<01:14:40.440> away<01:14:40.680> from<01:14:40.740> one<01:14:41.070> site 01:14:41.330 --> 01:14:41.340 align:start position:0% suggest you stay away from one site 01:14:41.340 --> 01:14:43.400 align:start position:0% suggest you stay away from one site parking<01:14:41.880> if<01:14:42.390> we're<01:14:42.630> going<01:14:42.840> to<01:14:42.960> encourage 01:14:43.400 --> 01:14:43.410 align:start position:0% parking if we're going to encourage 01:14:43.410 --> 01:14:46.040 align:start position:0% parking if we're going to encourage people<01:14:43.680> to<01:14:43.950> have<01:14:44.130> EVs<01:14:44.910> and<01:14:44.940> plug-in<01:14:45.480> hybrids 01:14:46.040 --> 01:14:46.050 align:start position:0% people to have EVs and plug-in hybrids 01:14:46.050 --> 01:14:48.740 align:start position:0% people to have EVs and plug-in hybrids then<01:14:46.320> you're<01:14:46.470> gonna<01:14:46.650> want<01:14:46.950> to<01:14:47.070> have<01:14:47.280> all<01:14:48.270> the 01:14:48.740 --> 01:14:48.750 align:start position:0% then you're gonna want to have all the 01:14:48.750 --> 01:14:50.840 align:start position:0% then you're gonna want to have all the space<01:14:49.050> on<01:14:49.410> the<01:14:49.830> house<01:14:50.010> available<01:14:50.370> for<01:14:50.790> the 01:14:50.840 --> 01:14:50.850 align:start position:0% space on the house available for the 01:14:50.850 --> 01:14:52.730 align:start position:0% space on the house available for the full-time<01:14:51.210> residents<01:14:51.840> who<01:14:51.960> do<01:14:52.140> live<01:14:52.350> there<01:14:52.500> if 01:14:52.730 --> 01:14:52.740 align:start position:0% full-time residents who do live there if 01:14:52.740 --> 01:14:54.350 align:start position:0% full-time residents who do live there if we're<01:14:52.890> gonna<01:14:53.010> do<01:14:53.220> hosted<01:14:53.670> so<01:14:53.880> that<01:14:54.060> they<01:14:54.180> can 01:14:54.350 --> 01:14:54.360 align:start position:0% we're gonna do hosted so that they can 01:14:54.360 --> 01:14:57.020 align:start position:0% we're gonna do hosted so that they can plug<01:14:54.600> in<01:14:54.780> their<01:14:54.960> cars<01:14:55.640> reducing<01:14:56.640> one<01:14:56.820> of<01:14:56.940> the 01:14:57.020 --> 01:14:57.030 align:start position:0% plug in their cars reducing one of the 01:14:57.030 --> 01:14:58.820 align:start position:0% plug in their cars reducing one of the spots<01:14:57.330> for<01:14:57.570> the<01:14:57.690> residents<01:14:58.200> is<01:14:58.320> it<01:14:58.440> isn't 01:14:58.820 --> 01:14:58.830 align:start position:0% spots for the residents is it isn't 01:14:58.830 --> 01:15:00.110 align:start position:0% spots for the residents is it isn't gonna<01:14:58.920> help<01:14:59.100> anything<01:14:59.400> and<01:14:59.730> it's<01:14:59.820> just<01:14:59.970> gonna 01:15:00.110 --> 01:15:00.120 align:start position:0% gonna help anything and it's just gonna 01:15:00.120 --> 01:15:02.630 align:start position:0% gonna help anything and it's just gonna cause<01:15:00.420> that<01:15:00.750> resident<01:15:01.320> to<01:15:02.010> push<01:15:02.250> their<01:15:02.400> car 01:15:02.630 --> 01:15:02.640 align:start position:0% cause that resident to push their car 01:15:02.640 --> 01:15:04.430 align:start position:0% cause that resident to push their car back<01:15:02.820> off<01:15:03.030> on<01:15:03.060> the<01:15:03.360> street<01:15:03.630> so<01:15:03.930> it's<01:15:04.110> not<01:15:04.230> gonna 01:15:04.430 --> 01:15:04.440 align:start position:0% back off on the street so it's not gonna 01:15:04.440 --> 01:15:05.450 align:start position:0% back off on the street so it's not gonna solve<01:15:04.740> anything 01:15:05.450 --> 01:15:05.460 align:start position:0% solve anything 01:15:05.460 --> 01:15:08.240 align:start position:0% solve anything finally<01:15:06.390> one<01:15:06.630> of<01:15:06.660> the<01:15:06.840> advantages<01:15:07.530> to<01:15:07.590> doing 01:15:08.240 --> 01:15:08.250 align:start position:0% finally one of the advantages to doing 01:15:08.250 --> 01:15:11.030 align:start position:0% finally one of the advantages to doing short-term<01:15:08.940> rentals<01:15:09.920> addition<01:15:10.920> to 01:15:11.030 --> 01:15:11.040 align:start position:0% short-term rentals addition to 01:15:11.040 --> 01:15:12.560 align:start position:0% short-term rentals addition to flexibility<01:15:11.700> is<01:15:11.850> the<01:15:12.000> faculty<01:15:12.360> you<01:15:12.420> don't 01:15:12.560 --> 01:15:12.570 align:start position:0% flexibility is the faculty you don't 01:15:12.570 --> 01:15:14.510 align:start position:0% flexibility is the faculty you don't have<01:15:12.720> to<01:15:12.870> fool<01:15:13.050> around<01:15:13.200> with<01:15:13.770> some<01:15:14.280> of<01:15:14.310> the 01:15:14.510 --> 01:15:14.520 align:start position:0% have to fool around with some of the 01:15:14.520 --> 01:15:16.460 align:start position:0% have to fool around with some of the tenants<01:15:14.850> rights<01:15:15.120> that<01:15:15.570> can<01:15:15.750> be<01:15:15.870> acquired<01:15:16.080> for 01:15:16.460 --> 01:15:16.470 align:start position:0% tenants rights that can be acquired for 01:15:16.470 --> 01:15:18.290 align:start position:0% tenants rights that can be acquired for people<01:15:16.740> who<01:15:16.860> stay<01:15:17.010> at<01:15:17.040> more<01:15:17.310> than<01:15:17.430> 30<01:15:17.730> days<01:15:17.970> and 01:15:18.290 --> 01:15:18.300 align:start position:0% people who stay at more than 30 days and 01:15:18.300 --> 01:15:20.540 align:start position:0% people who stay at more than 30 days and end<01:15:18.510> up<01:15:18.690> being<01:15:18.960> just<01:15:19.440> as<01:15:19.590> bad<01:15:19.800> if<01:15:19.980> a<01:15:20.040> tenant<01:15:20.400> to 01:15:20.540 --> 01:15:20.550 align:start position:0% end up being just as bad if a tenant to 01:15:20.550 --> 01:15:22.400 align:start position:0% end up being just as bad if a tenant to the<01:15:20.640> neighborhood<01:15:21.120> and<01:15:21.330> just<01:15:21.870> as<01:15:21.990> bad<01:15:22.170> of<01:15:22.320> a 01:15:22.400 --> 01:15:22.410 align:start position:0% the neighborhood and just as bad of a 01:15:22.410 --> 01:15:23.480 align:start position:0% the neighborhood and just as bad of a tenant<01:15:22.710> to<01:15:22.830> the<01:15:22.920> homeowner 01:15:23.480 --> 01:15:23.490 align:start position:0% tenant to the homeowner 01:15:23.490 --> 01:15:25.760 align:start position:0% tenant to the homeowner so<01:15:24.060> I<01:15:24.360> guess<01:15:24.690> my<01:15:24.840> clothes<01:15:25.110> and<01:15:25.350> I<01:15:25.410> want<01:15:25.620> to 01:15:25.760 --> 01:15:25.770 align:start position:0% so I guess my clothes and I want to 01:15:25.770 --> 01:15:28.190 align:start position:0% so I guess my clothes and I want to reiterate<01:15:26.280> I<01:15:26.850> don't<01:15:27.450> think<01:15:27.630> we<01:15:27.780> need<01:15:27.990> this 01:15:28.190 --> 01:15:28.200 align:start position:0% reiterate I don't think we need this 01:15:28.200 --> 01:15:30.020 align:start position:0% reiterate I don't think we need this here<01:15:28.500> at<01:15:28.620> this<01:15:28.770> time<01:15:29.010> and<01:15:29.310> I<01:15:29.580> hope<01:15:29.700> we<01:15:29.850> stay 01:15:30.020 --> 01:15:30.030 align:start position:0% here at this time and I hope we stay 01:15:30.030 --> 01:15:31.820 align:start position:0% here at this time and I hope we stay away<01:15:30.150> from<01:15:30.420> it<01:15:30.570> thank<01:15:30.840> you<01:15:30.990> thank<01:15:31.590> you<01:15:31.680> mr. 01:15:31.820 --> 01:15:31.830 align:start position:0% away from it thank you thank you mr. 01:15:31.830 --> 01:15:32.680 align:start position:0% away from it thank you thank you mr. Frasier 01:15:32.680 --> 01:15:32.690 align:start position:0% Frasier 01:15:32.690 --> 01:15:41.709 align:start position:0% Frasier another<01:15:33.690> speaker<01:15:34.020> sir 01:15:41.709 --> 01:15:41.719 align:start position:0% 01:15:41.719 --> 01:15:44.620 align:start position:0% welcome<01:15:42.530> thank<01:15:43.430> you<01:15:43.520> for<01:15:43.610> the<01:15:43.940> thank<01:15:44.270> you<01:15:44.449> for 01:15:44.620 --> 01:15:44.630 align:start position:0% welcome thank you for the thank you for 01:15:44.630 --> 01:15:47.500 align:start position:0% welcome thank you for the thank you for your<01:15:44.750> time<01:15:45.110> and<01:15:45.489> concern<01:15:46.489> for<01:15:46.790> the<01:15:46.910> issue<01:15:47.090> and 01:15:47.500 --> 01:15:47.510 align:start position:0% your time and concern for the issue and 01:15:47.510 --> 01:15:50.350 align:start position:0% your time and concern for the issue and the<01:15:48.080> opportunity<01:15:48.710> to<01:15:48.890> lend<01:15:49.610> my<01:15:49.760> voice<01:15:49.969> on<01:15:50.239> an 01:15:50.350 --> 01:15:50.360 align:start position:0% the opportunity to lend my voice on an 01:15:50.360 --> 01:15:53.080 align:start position:0% the opportunity to lend my voice on an ad<01:15:50.510> hoc<01:15:50.540> basis<01:15:51.320> my<01:15:51.830> name<01:15:52.010> is<01:15:52.160> Brian<01:15:52.580> Wilson 01:15:53.080 --> 01:15:53.090 align:start position:0% ad hoc basis my name is Brian Wilson 01:15:53.090 --> 01:15:55.450 align:start position:0% ad hoc basis my name is Brian Wilson I've<01:15:53.780> never<01:15:54.080> sung<01:15:54.410> with<01:15:54.590> the<01:15:54.739> Beach<01:15:54.890> Boys 01:15:55.450 --> 01:15:55.460 align:start position:0% I've never sung with the Beach Boys 01:15:55.460 --> 01:16:00.130 align:start position:0% I've never sung with the Beach Boys I'm<01:15:56.360> a<01:15:56.770> 15<01:15:57.770> year<01:15:58.100> one<01:15:58.760> five<01:15:59.030> year<01:15:59.360> resident<01:15:59.900> of 01:16:00.130 --> 01:16:00.140 align:start position:0% I'm a 15 year one five year resident of 01:16:00.140 --> 01:16:02.260 align:start position:0% I'm a 15 year one five year resident of the<01:16:00.320> beautiful<01:16:00.980> alsace-lorraine 01:16:02.260 --> 01:16:02.270 align:start position:0% the beautiful alsace-lorraine 01:16:02.270 --> 01:16:04.330 align:start position:0% the beautiful alsace-lorraine neighborhood<01:16:03.199> live<01:16:03.590> in<01:16:03.770> the<01:16:03.860> heart<01:16:04.100> on 01:16:04.330 --> 01:16:04.340 align:start position:0% neighborhood live in the heart on 01:16:04.340 --> 01:16:08.140 align:start position:0% neighborhood live in the heart on curious<01:16:05.440> where<01:16:06.440> we<01:16:06.590> have<01:16:06.800> several<01:16:07.120> Airbnb<01:16:08.120> zhh 01:16:08.140 --> 01:16:08.150 align:start position:0% curious where we have several Airbnb zhh 01:16:08.150 --> 01:16:12.070 align:start position:0% curious where we have several Airbnb zhh and<01:16:08.540> I<01:16:09.050> want<01:16:09.290> to<01:16:09.469> make<01:16:09.680> crystal<01:16:10.400> clear<01:16:10.430> that<01:16:11.120> my 01:16:12.070 --> 01:16:12.080 align:start position:0% and I want to make crystal clear that my 01:16:12.080 --> 01:16:15.340 align:start position:0% and I want to make crystal clear that my concern<01:16:12.680> and<01:16:13.449> several<01:16:14.449> of<01:16:14.600> my<01:16:14.630> neighbors<01:16:15.140> who 01:16:15.340 --> 01:16:15.350 align:start position:0% concern and several of my neighbors who 01:16:15.350 --> 01:16:18.100 align:start position:0% concern and several of my neighbors who I<01:16:15.380> speak<01:16:15.770> informally<01:16:16.040> for<01:16:16.790> we<01:16:17.449> have<01:16:17.630> no<01:16:17.840> issue 01:16:18.100 --> 01:16:18.110 align:start position:0% I speak informally for we have no issue 01:16:18.110 --> 01:16:21.520 align:start position:0% I speak informally for we have no issue with<01:16:18.440> Airbnb<01:16:19.000> we<01:16:20.000> don't<01:16:20.210> want<01:16:20.420> more<01:16:20.690> rules<01:16:21.260> and 01:16:21.520 --> 01:16:21.530 align:start position:0% with Airbnb we don't want more rules and 01:16:21.530 --> 01:16:24.160 align:start position:0% with Airbnb we don't want more rules and regs<01:16:21.770> but<01:16:22.760> something<01:16:23.330> needs<01:16:23.660> to<01:16:23.900> be<01:16:24.050> done 01:16:24.160 --> 01:16:24.170 align:start position:0% regs but something needs to be done 01:16:24.170 --> 01:16:29.459 align:start position:0% regs but something needs to be done about<01:16:24.890> the<01:16:25.219> heat<01:16:25.660> unholstered<01:16:27.850> absentee 01:16:29.459 --> 01:16:29.469 align:start position:0% about the heat unholstered absentee 01:16:29.469 --> 01:16:33.850 align:start position:0% about the heat unholstered absentee investor<01:16:30.469> owner<01:16:31.370> I<01:16:32.410> lost<01:16:33.410> a<01:16:33.739> wonderful 01:16:33.850 --> 01:16:33.860 align:start position:0% investor owner I lost a wonderful 01:16:33.860 --> 01:16:37.180 align:start position:0% investor owner I lost a wonderful neighbor<01:16:34.489> and<01:16:34.910> it<01:16:35.030> was<01:16:35.210> replaced<01:16:35.690> with<01:16:35.900> a<01:16:36.190> 14 01:16:37.180 --> 01:16:37.190 align:start position:0% neighbor and it was replaced with a 14 01:16:37.190 --> 01:16:41.820 align:start position:0% neighbor and it was replaced with a 14 bed<01:16:38.680> Airbnb<01:16:39.680> you<01:16:39.890> can<01:16:40.160> find<01:16:40.460> it<01:16:40.699> instantly<01:16:41.360> by 01:16:41.820 --> 01:16:41.830 align:start position:0% bed Airbnb you can find it instantly by 01:16:41.830 --> 01:16:44.620 align:start position:0% bed Airbnb you can find it instantly by googling<01:16:42.830> vacation<01:16:43.489> rental<01:16:43.969> Half<01:16:44.300> Moon<01:16:44.570> Bay 01:16:44.620 --> 01:16:44.630 align:start position:0% googling vacation rental Half Moon Bay 01:16:44.630 --> 01:16:50.709 align:start position:0% googling vacation rental Half Moon Bay and<01:16:45.190> zeroing<01:16:46.190> in<01:16:46.340> on<01:16:46.550> 14<01:16:47.420> beds<01:16:47.890> it's<01:16:48.890> absurd<01:16:49.719> he 01:16:50.709 --> 01:16:50.719 align:start position:0% and zeroing in on 14 beds it's absurd he 01:16:50.719 --> 01:16:53.800 align:start position:0% and zeroing in on 14 beds it's absurd he filled<01:16:51.050> each<01:16:51.320> bedroom<01:16:51.650> with<01:16:51.980> bunk<01:16:52.280> beds<01:16:52.810> it's 01:16:53.800 --> 01:16:53.810 align:start position:0% filled each bedroom with bunk beds it's 01:16:53.810 --> 01:16:56.140 align:start position:0% filled each bedroom with bunk beds it's not<01:16:53.989> my<01:16:54.230> idea<01:16:54.620> of<01:16:54.650> a<01:16:54.770> good<01:16:54.949> time<01:16:55.310> but<01:16:55.610> yeah<01:16:56.000> you 01:16:56.140 --> 01:16:56.150 align:start position:0% not my idea of a good time but yeah you 01:16:56.150 --> 01:16:58.209 align:start position:0% not my idea of a good time but yeah you know<01:16:56.300> the<01:16:56.660> possibilities<01:16:57.380> there<01:16:57.680> we've<01:16:57.949> we've 01:16:58.209 --> 01:16:58.219 align:start position:0% know the possibilities there we've we've 01:16:58.219 --> 01:17:01.030 align:start position:0% know the possibilities there we've we've seen<01:16:58.489> kegs<01:16:58.790> come<01:16:59.150> in<01:16:59.469> and<01:17:00.469> it's<01:17:00.739> frightening 01:17:01.030 --> 01:17:01.040 align:start position:0% seen kegs come in and it's frightening 01:17:01.040 --> 01:17:05.770 align:start position:0% seen kegs come in and it's frightening to<01:17:01.280> my<01:17:01.670> wife<01:17:01.880> and<01:17:03.280> frankly<01:17:04.280> their<01:17:05.060> that<01:17:05.630> the 01:17:05.770 --> 01:17:05.780 align:start position:0% to my wife and frankly their that the 01:17:05.780 --> 01:17:08.979 align:start position:0% to my wife and frankly their that the issue<01:17:05.960> is<01:17:06.260> in<01:17:06.440> parking<01:17:07.090> yeah<01:17:08.120> they<01:17:08.390> block<01:17:08.660> my 01:17:08.979 --> 01:17:08.989 align:start position:0% issue is in parking yeah they block my 01:17:08.989 --> 01:17:11.020 align:start position:0% issue is in parking yeah they block my walk<01:17:09.350> I<01:17:09.680> have<01:17:09.830> one<01:17:09.980> of<01:17:10.100> the<01:17:10.190> few<01:17:10.370> walks<01:17:10.670> that 01:17:11.020 --> 01:17:11.030 align:start position:0% walk I have one of the few walks that 01:17:11.030 --> 01:17:13.180 align:start position:0% walk I have one of the few walks that extends<01:17:11.570> to<01:17:11.630> the<01:17:11.780> street<01:17:12.170> they<01:17:12.590> block<01:17:12.890> my 01:17:13.180 --> 01:17:13.190 align:start position:0% extends to the street they block my 01:17:13.190 --> 01:17:16.689 align:start position:0% extends to the street they block my mailbox<01:17:13.670> I<01:17:14.030> look<01:17:14.630> the<01:17:14.780> other<01:17:14.900> way<01:17:15.190> my<01:17:16.190> concern 01:17:16.689 --> 01:17:16.699 align:start position:0% mailbox I look the other way my concern 01:17:16.699 --> 01:17:21.130 align:start position:0% mailbox I look the other way my concern is<01:17:16.910> the<01:17:17.150> trash<01:17:17.860> nearly<01:17:18.860> every<01:17:19.400> week<01:17:20.140> either 01:17:21.130 --> 01:17:21.140 align:start position:0% is the trash nearly every week either 01:17:21.140 --> 01:17:25.360 align:start position:0% is the trash nearly every week either the<01:17:21.469> wind<01:17:22.600> the<01:17:23.600> wildlife<01:17:24.380> and<01:17:24.800> I'm<01:17:24.890> talking 01:17:25.360 --> 01:17:25.370 align:start position:0% the wind the wildlife and I'm talking 01:17:25.370 --> 01:17:29.560 align:start position:0% the wind the wildlife and I'm talking the<01:17:25.400> big<01:17:25.670> black<01:17:26.030> scary<01:17:26.570> Ravens<01:17:27.489> or<01:17:28.570> yesterday 01:17:29.560 --> 01:17:29.570 align:start position:0% the big black scary Ravens or yesterday 01:17:29.570 --> 01:17:34.090 align:start position:0% the big black scary Ravens or yesterday a<01:17:29.810> stray<01:17:30.290> dog<01:17:31.330> dining<01:17:32.330> in<01:17:32.540> the<01:17:32.750> dumpster<01:17:33.199> so<01:17:34.040> to 01:17:34.090 --> 01:17:34.100 align:start position:0% a stray dog dining in the dumpster so to 01:17:34.100 --> 01:17:36.070 align:start position:0% a stray dog dining in the dumpster so to speak<01:17:34.489> except<01:17:34.969> there's<01:17:35.150> no<01:17:35.210> dumpster<01:17:35.810> it's 01:17:36.070 --> 01:17:36.080 align:start position:0% speak except there's no dumpster it's 01:17:36.080 --> 01:17:40.570 align:start position:0% speak except there's no dumpster it's just<01:17:36.350> the<01:17:36.530> standard<01:17:37.000> two<01:17:38.110> bins<01:17:39.110> for<01:17:39.620> compost 01:17:40.570 --> 01:17:40.580 align:start position:0% just the standard two bins for compost 01:17:40.580 --> 01:17:45.970 align:start position:0% just the standard two bins for compost and<01:17:41.030> recycling<01:17:41.810> and<01:17:42.170> garbage<01:17:43.660> so<01:17:44.660> the<01:17:45.500> tenants 01:17:45.970 --> 01:17:45.980 align:start position:0% and recycling and garbage so the tenants 01:17:45.980 --> 01:17:49.050 align:start position:0% and recycling and garbage so the tenants who<01:17:46.219> come<01:17:46.489> in<01:17:46.699> they<01:17:47.630> don't<01:17:47.750> care<01:17:48.290> about<01:17:48.530> this 01:17:49.050 --> 01:17:49.060 align:start position:0% who come in they don't care about this 01:17:49.060 --> 01:17:51.040 align:start position:0% who come in they don't care about this appearance<01:17:50.060> of<01:17:50.360> the<01:17:50.449> street<01:17:50.750> in<01:17:50.960> the 01:17:51.040 --> 01:17:51.050 align:start position:0% appearance of the street in the 01:17:51.050 --> 01:17:54.220 align:start position:0% appearance of the street in the neighborhood<01:17:51.590> like<01:17:51.830> the<01:17:52.640> residents<01:17:53.270> do<01:17:53.540> they 01:17:54.220 --> 01:17:54.230 align:start position:0% neighborhood like the residents do they 01:17:54.230 --> 01:17:55.690 align:start position:0% neighborhood like the residents do they routinely<01:17:54.679> leave 01:17:55.690 --> 01:17:55.700 align:start position:0% routinely leave 01:17:55.700 --> 01:18:00.440 align:start position:0% routinely leave overflowing<01:17:56.700> trash<01:17:57.150> and<01:17:57.860> the<01:17:58.860> owner<01:17:59.450> investor 01:18:00.440 --> 01:18:00.450 align:start position:0% overflowing trash and the owner investor 01:18:00.450 --> 01:18:05.420 align:start position:0% overflowing trash and the owner investor resides<01:18:01.350> in<01:18:01.650> Palo<01:18:02.100> Alto<01:18:02.390> I've<01:18:03.390> called<01:18:03.960> him<01:18:04.430> he 01:18:05.420 --> 01:18:05.430 align:start position:0% resides in Palo Alto I've called him he 01:18:05.430 --> 01:18:09.170 align:start position:0% resides in Palo Alto I've called him he does<01:18:05.700> not<01:18:05.730> come<01:18:06.360> running<01:18:06.840> in<01:18:07.130> one<01:18:08.130> case<01:18:08.430> there 01:18:09.170 --> 01:18:09.180 align:start position:0% does not come running in one case there 01:18:09.180 --> 01:18:13.190 align:start position:0% does not come running in one case there was<01:18:09.390> no<01:18:09.630> response<01:18:10.110> for<01:18:10.740> a<01:18:10.770> full<01:18:11.370> week<01:18:12.200> until 01:18:13.190 --> 01:18:13.200 align:start position:0% was no response for a full week until 01:18:13.200 --> 01:18:16.430 align:start position:0% was no response for a full week until Republic<01:18:13.890> came<01:18:14.310> through<01:18:14.730> again<01:18:15.440> meanwhile 01:18:16.430 --> 01:18:16.440 align:start position:0% Republic came through again meanwhile 01:18:16.440 --> 01:18:20.690 align:start position:0% Republic came through again meanwhile the<01:18:16.830> trash<01:18:17.160> is<01:18:17.550> defiling<01:18:19.160> the<01:18:20.160> neighborhood 01:18:20.690 --> 01:18:20.700 align:start position:0% the trash is defiling the neighborhood 01:18:20.700 --> 01:18:24.020 align:start position:0% the trash is defiling the neighborhood all<01:18:21.240> over<01:18:21.780> my<01:18:22.050> lawn<01:18:22.350> and<01:18:22.680> of<01:18:23.130> greater<01:18:23.730> concern 01:18:24.020 --> 01:18:24.030 align:start position:0% all over my lawn and of greater concern 01:18:24.030 --> 01:18:27.200 align:start position:0% all over my lawn and of greater concern to<01:18:24.540> my<01:18:24.690> wife<01:18:24.900> and<01:18:25.170> I<01:18:25.260> blowing<01:18:26.250> down<01:18:26.490> cariah's 01:18:27.200 --> 01:18:27.210 align:start position:0% to my wife and I blowing down cariah's 01:18:27.210 --> 01:18:31.610 align:start position:0% to my wife and I blowing down cariah's towards<01:18:27.660> the<01:18:27.930> ocean<01:18:28.640> so<01:18:29.640> I<01:18:30.630> don't<01:18:31.320> know<01:18:31.380> if<01:18:31.440> Tim 01:18:31.610 --> 01:18:31.620 align:start position:0% towards the ocean so I don't know if Tim 01:18:31.620 --> 01:18:34.640 align:start position:0% towards the ocean so I don't know if Tim Pond<01:18:31.860> still<01:18:32.250> here<01:18:32.810> want<01:18:33.810> to<01:18:33.900> be<01:18:33.990> real<01:18:34.230> clear 01:18:34.640 --> 01:18:34.650 align:start position:0% Pond still here want to be real clear 01:18:34.650 --> 01:18:39.620 align:start position:0% Pond still here want to be real clear we're<01:18:35.310> all<01:18:35.610> for<01:18:36.980> hosted<01:18:38.300> scenarios<01:18:39.300> with 01:18:39.620 --> 01:18:39.630 align:start position:0% we're all for hosted scenarios with 01:18:39.630 --> 01:18:42.380 align:start position:0% we're all for hosted scenarios with caring<01:18:40.490> attentive<01:18:41.490> owners 01:18:42.380 --> 01:18:42.390 align:start position:0% caring attentive owners 01:18:42.390 --> 01:18:46.460 align:start position:0% caring attentive owners it's<01:18:42.540> the<01:18:43.070> unholstered<01:18:44.870> he<01:18:45.870> hate<01:18:46.140> to<01:18:46.320> keep 01:18:46.460 --> 01:18:46.470 align:start position:0% it's the unholstered he hate to keep 01:18:46.470 --> 01:18:49.430 align:start position:0% it's the unholstered he hate to keep using<01:18:46.650> an<01:18:46.920> example<01:18:47.210> remote<01:18:48.210> investor<01:18:49.050> in<01:18:49.200> Palo 01:18:49.430 --> 01:18:49.440 align:start position:0% using an example remote investor in Palo 01:18:49.440 --> 01:18:52.640 align:start position:0% using an example remote investor in Palo Alto<01:18:49.760> that<01:18:50.760> is<01:18:50.970> at<01:18:51.210> issue<01:18:51.480> thanks<01:18:52.470> for 01:18:52.640 --> 01:18:52.650 align:start position:0% Alto that is at issue thanks for 01:18:52.650 --> 01:18:57.620 align:start position:0% Alto that is at issue thanks for listening<01:18:53.540> thank<01:18:54.540> you<01:18:54.690> mr.<01:18:55.080> Smith<01:18:55.320> and<01:18:56.630> yes 01:18:57.620 --> 01:18:57.630 align:start position:0% listening thank you mr. Smith and yes 01:18:57.630 --> 01:19:02.500 align:start position:0% listening thank you mr. Smith and yes sir<01:18:59.510> Wilson<01:19:00.510> I'm<01:19:00.690> sorry<01:19:00.780> mr.<01:19:01.350> Wilson 01:19:02.500 --> 01:19:02.510 align:start position:0% sir Wilson I'm sorry mr. Wilson 01:19:02.510 --> 01:19:06.770 align:start position:0% sir Wilson I'm sorry mr. Wilson not<01:19:03.510> a<01:19:03.540> big<01:19:03.780> beach<01:19:03.930> boy<01:19:04.140> man<01:19:05.360> should<01:19:06.360> be 01:19:06.770 --> 01:19:06.780 align:start position:0% not a big beach boy man should be 01:19:06.780 --> 01:19:10.630 align:start position:0% not a big beach boy man should be good<01:19:07.680> evening<01:19:07.830> I'm<01:19:08.160> David<01:19:08.460> Jerome<01:19:08.940> and<01:19:09.210> I<01:19:10.110> am 01:19:10.630 --> 01:19:10.640 align:start position:0% good evening I'm David Jerome and I am 01:19:10.640 --> 01:19:15.590 align:start position:0% good evening I'm David Jerome and I am one<01:19:11.750> hosted<01:19:12.800> Airbnb<01:19:13.800> owners<01:19:14.130> mr.<01:19:15.090> children<01:19:15.540> if 01:19:15.590 --> 01:19:15.600 align:start position:0% one hosted Airbnb owners mr. children if 01:19:15.600 --> 01:19:16.820 align:start position:0% one hosted Airbnb owners mr. children if you<01:19:15.690> could<01:19:15.840> move<01:19:15.960> just<01:19:16.170> a<01:19:16.260> little<01:19:16.290> bit<01:19:16.560> closer 01:19:16.820 --> 01:19:16.830 align:start position:0% you could move just a little bit closer 01:19:16.830 --> 01:19:19.940 align:start position:0% you could move just a little bit closer to<01:19:17.190> the<01:19:17.280> mic<01:19:17.460> sure<01:19:17.880> thank<01:19:18.270> you<01:19:18.420> so<01:19:18.600> much<01:19:18.810> I<01:19:19.050> just 01:19:19.940 --> 01:19:19.950 align:start position:0% to the mic sure thank you so much I just 01:19:19.950 --> 01:19:23.030 align:start position:0% to the mic sure thank you so much I just recently<01:19:20.430> purchased<01:19:20.700> this<01:19:21.360> house<01:19:21.630> I<01:19:22.080> expect 01:19:23.030 --> 01:19:23.040 align:start position:0% recently purchased this house I expect 01:19:23.040 --> 01:19:25.880 align:start position:0% recently purchased this house I expect it<01:19:23.160> to<01:19:23.190> be<01:19:23.340> a<01:19:23.370> a<01:19:24.320> retirement<01:19:25.320> house<01:19:25.500> for<01:19:25.740> myself 01:19:25.880 --> 01:19:25.890 align:start position:0% it to be a a retirement house for myself 01:19:25.890 --> 01:19:28.790 align:start position:0% it to be a a retirement house for myself and<01:19:26.280> my<01:19:26.340> wife<01:19:26.490> I'm<01:19:27.000> hoping<01:19:27.630> to<01:19:27.990> move<01:19:28.350> down<01:19:28.590> here 01:19:28.790 --> 01:19:28.800 align:start position:0% and my wife I'm hoping to move down here 01:19:28.800 --> 01:19:31.460 align:start position:0% and my wife I'm hoping to move down here in<01:19:28.890> a<01:19:28.950> year<01:19:29.220> or<01:19:29.280> two<01:19:29.450> but<01:19:30.450> in<01:19:30.600> the<01:19:30.690> meantime<01:19:30.870> we 01:19:31.460 --> 01:19:31.470 align:start position:0% in a year or two but in the meantime we 01:19:31.470 --> 01:19:34.490 align:start position:0% in a year or two but in the meantime we are<01:19:32.090> spending<01:19:33.090> as<01:19:33.270> much<01:19:33.300> time<01:19:33.420> as<01:19:33.750> we<01:19:33.780> can<01:19:34.110> and 01:19:34.490 --> 01:19:34.500 align:start position:0% are spending as much time as we can and 01:19:34.500 --> 01:19:37.310 align:start position:0% are spending as much time as we can and when<01:19:35.340> we're<01:19:35.520> not<01:19:35.670> living<01:19:36.630> in<01:19:36.720> the<01:19:36.780> house<01:19:36.930> we 01:19:37.310 --> 01:19:37.320 align:start position:0% when we're not living in the house we 01:19:37.320 --> 01:19:40.760 align:start position:0% when we're not living in the house we are<01:19:37.680> renting<01:19:37.890> it<01:19:38.130> and<01:19:39.260> it<01:19:40.260> seems<01:19:40.620> to<01:19:40.680> be 01:19:40.760 --> 01:19:40.770 align:start position:0% are renting it and it seems to be 01:19:40.770 --> 01:19:42.470 align:start position:0% are renting it and it seems to be working<01:19:40.920> out<01:19:41.190> well<01:19:41.430> for<01:19:41.610> us<01:19:41.790> it's<01:19:42.090> working<01:19:42.420> out 01:19:42.470 --> 01:19:42.480 align:start position:0% working out well for us it's working out 01:19:42.480 --> 01:19:45.170 align:start position:0% working out well for us it's working out well<01:19:42.690> for<01:19:42.810> our<01:19:42.930> neighbors<01:19:43.700> our<01:19:44.700> neighbors<01:19:45.030> are 01:19:45.170 --> 01:19:45.180 align:start position:0% well for our neighbors our neighbors are 01:19:45.180 --> 01:19:46.700 align:start position:0% well for our neighbors our neighbors are very<01:19:45.390> happy<01:19:45.600> with<01:19:45.870> us<01:19:46.020> at<01:19:46.170> the<01:19:46.260> moment<01:19:46.440> because 01:19:46.700 --> 01:19:46.710 align:start position:0% very happy with us at the moment because 01:19:46.710 --> 01:19:49.689 align:start position:0% very happy with us at the moment because we're<01:19:47.070> cleaning<01:19:47.430> the<01:19:47.520> place<01:19:47.670> up 01:19:49.689 --> 01:19:49.699 align:start position:0% we're cleaning the place up 01:19:49.699 --> 01:19:52.549 align:start position:0% we're cleaning the place up we<01:19:50.699> also<01:19:50.999> are<01:19:51.300> on<01:19:51.420> the<01:19:51.570> alsace-lorraine 01:19:52.549 --> 01:19:52.559 align:start position:0% we also are on the alsace-lorraine 01:19:52.559 --> 01:19:55.899 align:start position:0% we also are on the alsace-lorraine neighborhood<01:19:53.280> and<01:19:54.150> I<01:19:54.300> can<01:19:54.480> assure<01:19:54.599> you<01:19:54.780> that 01:19:55.899 --> 01:19:55.909 align:start position:0% neighborhood and I can assure you that 01:19:55.909 --> 01:19:58.609 align:start position:0% neighborhood and I can assure you that all<01:19:56.909> of<01:19:57.150> our<01:19:57.239> tenants<01:19:57.690> are<01:19:57.809> very<01:19:58.050> well<01:19:58.260> behaved 01:19:58.609 --> 01:19:58.619 align:start position:0% all of our tenants are very well behaved 01:19:58.619 --> 01:20:00.620 align:start position:0% all of our tenants are very well behaved and<01:19:58.860> clean<01:19:59.070> up<01:19:59.190> their<01:19:59.369> trash<01:19:59.699> because<01:20:00.179> we<01:20:00.420> care 01:20:00.620 --> 01:20:00.630 align:start position:0% and clean up their trash because we care 01:20:00.630 --> 01:20:03.470 align:start position:0% and clean up their trash because we care very<01:20:00.659> much<01:20:01.079> for<01:20:01.260> our<01:20:01.320> house<01:20:01.969> we<01:20:02.969> also<01:20:03.179> have 01:20:03.470 --> 01:20:03.480 align:start position:0% very much for our house we also have 01:20:03.480 --> 01:20:06.259 align:start position:0% very much for our house we also have another<01:20:03.780> house<01:20:04.019> on<01:20:04.199> the<01:20:04.320> property<01:20:05.090> which<01:20:06.090> is 01:20:06.259 --> 01:20:06.269 align:start position:0% another house on the property which is 01:20:06.269 --> 01:20:08.870 align:start position:0% another house on the property which is being<01:20:06.420> rented<01:20:06.659> as<01:20:06.900> a<01:20:06.929> full-time<01:20:07.880> full-time 01:20:08.870 --> 01:20:08.880 align:start position:0% being rented as a full-time full-time 01:20:08.880 --> 01:20:12.500 align:start position:0% being rented as a full-time full-time rental<01:20:09.420> that's<01:20:10.199> a<01:20:10.409> 500<01:20:11.400> square<01:20:11.670> foot<01:20:11.940> cottage 01:20:12.500 --> 01:20:12.510 align:start position:0% rental that's a 500 square foot cottage 01:20:12.510 --> 01:20:16.580 align:start position:0% rental that's a 500 square foot cottage and<01:20:12.809> when<01:20:13.769> we<01:20:13.949> move<01:20:14.190> down<01:20:14.400> here<01:20:14.570> full-time<01:20:15.590> we 01:20:16.580 --> 01:20:16.590 align:start position:0% and when we move down here full-time we 01:20:16.590 --> 01:20:18.410 align:start position:0% and when we move down here full-time we expect<01:20:17.039> that<01:20:17.190> we're<01:20:17.369> going<01:20:17.550> to<01:20:17.670> be<01:20:17.909> renting 01:20:18.410 --> 01:20:18.420 align:start position:0% expect that we're going to be renting 01:20:18.420 --> 01:20:20.899 align:start position:0% expect that we're going to be renting that<01:20:18.570> part-time<01:20:18.949> so<01:20:19.949> that<01:20:20.190> we<01:20:20.309> could<01:20:20.550> have<01:20:20.789> our 01:20:20.899 --> 01:20:20.909 align:start position:0% that part-time so that we could have our 01:20:20.909 --> 01:20:25.040 align:start position:0% that part-time so that we could have our children<01:20:21.150> come<01:20:21.449> and<01:20:21.510> visit<01:20:21.690> us<01:20:21.989> so<01:20:22.889> I<01:20:23.219> am<01:20:24.050> all 01:20:25.040 --> 01:20:25.050 align:start position:0% children come and visit us so I am all 01:20:25.050 --> 01:20:28.810 align:start position:0% children come and visit us so I am all in<01:20:25.289> favor<01:20:25.320> of<01:20:25.800> regulations<01:20:26.460> all<01:20:27.179> in<01:20:27.480> favor<01:20:27.749> of 01:20:28.810 --> 01:20:28.820 align:start position:0% in favor of regulations all in favor of 01:20:28.820 --> 01:20:32.839 align:start position:0% in favor of regulations all in favor of keeping<01:20:29.820> places<01:20:30.480> in<01:20:30.840> good<01:20:31.199> order<01:20:31.590> and<01:20:31.849> having 01:20:32.839 --> 01:20:32.849 align:start position:0% keeping places in good order and having 01:20:32.849 --> 01:20:38.600 align:start position:0% keeping places in good order and having the<01:20:33.059> the<01:20:33.780> owners<01:20:35.690> responsible<01:20:36.690> and<01:20:37.610> having 01:20:38.600 --> 01:20:38.610 align:start position:0% the the owners responsible and having 01:20:38.610 --> 01:20:43.220 align:start position:0% the the owners responsible and having local<01:20:38.789> management<01:20:39.449> but<01:20:41.599> restricting<01:20:42.599> the<01:20:42.809> the 01:20:43.220 --> 01:20:43.230 align:start position:0% local management but restricting the the 01:20:43.230 --> 01:20:45.799 align:start position:0% local management but restricting the the amount<01:20:44.159> of<01:20:44.369> days<01:20:44.699> that<01:20:44.730> I<01:20:45.059> could<01:20:45.420> rent<01:20:45.630> my 01:20:45.799 --> 01:20:45.809 align:start position:0% amount of days that I could rent my 01:20:45.809 --> 01:20:48.140 align:start position:0% amount of days that I could rent my place<01:20:46.110> I've<01:20:46.380> done<01:20:46.829> I'd<01:20:47.249> really<01:20:47.670> objective 01:20:48.140 --> 01:20:48.150 align:start position:0% place I've done I'd really objective 01:20:48.150 --> 01:20:53.540 align:start position:0% place I've done I'd really objective thank<01:20:48.960> you<01:20:49.999> thank<01:20:50.999> you<01:20:51.059> mr.<01:20:51.239> Jerome<01:20:52.400> was<01:20:53.400> there 01:20:53.540 --> 01:20:53.550 align:start position:0% thank you thank you mr. Jerome was there 01:20:53.550 --> 01:20:55.189 align:start position:0% thank you thank you mr. Jerome was there anyone<01:20:53.849> else<01:20:53.999> who<01:20:54.210> wanted<01:20:54.480> to<01:20:54.539> speak<01:20:54.840> on<01:20:55.050> this 01:20:55.189 --> 01:20:55.199 align:start position:0% anyone else who wanted to speak on this 01:20:55.199 --> 01:20:58.279 align:start position:0% anyone else who wanted to speak on this item<01:20:55.349> tonight<01:20:55.730> yes<01:20:56.730> sir 01:20:58.279 --> 01:20:58.289 align:start position:0% item tonight yes sir 01:20:58.289 --> 01:20:59.839 align:start position:0% item tonight yes sir mr.<01:20:58.739> Drumm<01:20:58.949> if<01:20:59.070> you<01:20:59.159> could<01:20:59.309> fill<01:20:59.489> out<01:20:59.639> one<01:20:59.760> of 01:20:59.839 --> 01:20:59.849 align:start position:0% mr. Drumm if you could fill out one of 01:20:59.849 --> 01:21:01.370 align:start position:0% mr. Drumm if you could fill out one of those<01:20:59.969> green<01:21:00.210> cards<01:21:00.599> either<01:21:00.749> we'd<01:21:01.170> appreciate 01:21:01.370 --> 01:21:01.380 align:start position:0% those green cards either we'd appreciate 01:21:01.380 --> 01:21:07.279 align:start position:0% those green cards either we'd appreciate it<01:21:01.800> thank<01:21:02.039> you 01:21:07.279 --> 01:21:07.289 align:start position:0% 01:21:07.289 --> 01:21:09.979 align:start position:0% my<01:21:07.860> name<01:21:08.039> is<01:21:08.159> Jim<01:21:08.429> Sue<01:21:08.670> crow<01:21:09.300> welcome<01:21:09.809> for 01:21:09.979 --> 01:21:09.989 align:start position:0% my name is Jim Sue crow welcome for 01:21:09.989 --> 01:21:14.270 align:start position:0% my name is Jim Sue crow welcome for downtown<01:21:11.780> much<01:21:12.780> to<01:21:13.050> be<01:21:13.199> said<01:21:13.440> the<01:21:13.860> only<01:21:14.099> thing 01:21:14.270 --> 01:21:14.280 align:start position:0% downtown much to be said the only thing 01:21:14.280 --> 01:21:17.060 align:start position:0% downtown much to be said the only thing I'm<01:21:14.429> going<01:21:15.090> to<01:21:15.150> speak<01:21:15.449> to<01:21:15.659> is<01:21:15.929> the<01:21:15.960> idea<01:21:16.500> of 01:21:17.060 --> 01:21:17.070 align:start position:0% I'm going to speak to is the idea of 01:21:17.070 --> 01:21:21.350 align:start position:0% I'm going to speak to is the idea of responsibility<01:21:19.429> we're<01:21:20.429> calling<01:21:20.789> it<01:21:20.940> hosted 01:21:21.350 --> 01:21:21.360 align:start position:0% responsibility we're calling it hosted 01:21:21.360 --> 01:21:25.640 align:start position:0% responsibility we're calling it hosted versus<01:21:21.809> on<01:21:21.989> hosted<01:21:22.500> I<01:21:23.719> like<01:21:24.719> the<01:21:24.929> concept<01:21:25.530> of 01:21:25.640 --> 01:21:25.650 align:start position:0% versus on hosted I like the concept of 01:21:25.650 --> 01:21:30.459 align:start position:0% versus on hosted I like the concept of having<01:21:25.860> an<01:21:26.389> individual<01:21:27.389> that<01:21:28.170> is<01:21:28.820> responsible 01:21:30.459 --> 01:21:30.469 align:start position:0% having an individual that is responsible 01:21:30.469 --> 01:21:33.350 align:start position:0% having an individual that is responsible will<01:21:31.469> be<01:21:31.500> responsive<01:21:32.369> to<01:21:32.429> the<01:21:32.699> neighbors<01:21:33.119> to 01:21:33.350 --> 01:21:33.360 align:start position:0% will be responsive to the neighbors to 01:21:33.360 --> 01:21:35.720 align:start position:0% will be responsive to the neighbors to the<01:21:33.389> police<01:21:33.900> to<01:21:34.260> the<01:21:34.489> anybody's<01:21:35.489> got<01:21:35.699> a 01:21:35.720 --> 01:21:35.730 align:start position:0% the police to the anybody's got a 01:21:35.730 --> 01:21:39.319 align:start position:0% the police to the anybody's got a problem<01:21:36.090> without<01:21:36.420> what's<01:21:36.719> going<01:21:36.989> on<01:21:38.119> they<01:21:39.119> got 01:21:39.319 --> 01:21:39.329 align:start position:0% problem without what's going on they got 01:21:39.329 --> 01:21:41.839 align:start position:0% problem without what's going on they got a<01:21:39.360> turn<01:21:39.659> to<01:21:39.900> and<01:21:40.110> deal<01:21:40.650> with<01:21:40.679> it 01:21:41.839 --> 01:21:41.849 align:start position:0% a turn to and deal with it 01:21:41.849 --> 01:21:43.580 align:start position:0% a turn to and deal with it the<01:21:42.300> idea<01:21:42.630> is<01:21:42.719> somebody's<01:21:43.110> not<01:21:43.320> going<01:21:43.530> to 01:21:43.580 --> 01:21:43.590 align:start position:0% the idea is somebody's not going to 01:21:43.590 --> 01:21:46.970 align:start position:0% the idea is somebody's not going to respond<01:21:44.070> for<01:21:44.489> a<01:21:44.519> week<01:21:45.559> and<01:21:46.559> it<01:21:46.739> going<01:21:46.889> to 01:21:46.970 --> 01:21:46.980 align:start position:0% respond for a week and it going to 01:21:46.980 --> 01:21:50.240 align:start position:0% respond for a week and it going to happen<01:21:47.130> at<01:21:47.400> my<01:21:47.579> unit<01:21:48.469> my<01:21:49.469> daughter<01:21:49.739> lives<01:21:50.070> in 01:21:50.240 --> 01:21:50.250 align:start position:0% happen at my unit my daughter lives in 01:21:50.250 --> 01:21:52.069 align:start position:0% happen at my unit my daughter lives in El<01:21:50.400> Granada<01:21:50.760> she'll<01:21:51.090> be<01:21:51.210> right<01:21:51.389> on<01:21:51.539> top<01:21:51.780> of<01:21:51.809> it 01:21:52.069 --> 01:21:52.079 align:start position:0% El Granada she'll be right on top of it 01:21:52.079 --> 01:21:53.629 align:start position:0% El Granada she'll be right on top of it I've<01:21:52.230> got<01:21:52.440> two<01:21:52.590> or<01:21:52.710> three<01:21:52.769> general 01:21:53.629 --> 01:21:53.639 align:start position:0% I've got two or three general 01:21:53.639 --> 01:21:56.419 align:start position:0% I've got two or three general contractors<01:21:54.420> handyman<01:21:54.929> repairman<01:21:55.500> if<01:21:56.159> I'm 01:21:56.419 --> 01:21:56.429 align:start position:0% contractors handyman repairman if I'm 01:21:56.429 --> 01:21:58.459 align:start position:0% contractors handyman repairman if I'm not<01:21:56.610> available<01:21:56.789> and<01:21:57.360> that's<01:21:57.869> the<01:21:57.989> only<01:21:58.230> time<01:21:58.440> I 01:21:58.459 --> 01:21:58.469 align:start position:0% not available and that's the only time I 01:21:58.469 --> 01:22:00.470 align:start position:0% not available and that's the only time I rent<01:21:58.800> my<01:21:58.860> house<01:21:59.130> is<01:21:59.369> when<01:21:59.579> I<01:21:59.610> go<01:21:59.880> away<01:22:00.239> on 01:22:00.470 --> 01:22:00.480 align:start position:0% rent my house is when I go away on 01:22:00.480 --> 01:22:03.650 align:start position:0% rent my house is when I go away on vacation 01:22:03.650 --> 01:22:03.660 align:start position:0% 01:22:03.660 --> 01:22:05.610 align:start position:0% somebody's<01:22:04.660> gonna<01:22:04.900> respond 01:22:05.610 --> 01:22:05.620 align:start position:0% somebody's gonna respond 01:22:05.620 --> 01:22:08.340 align:start position:0% somebody's gonna respond somebody<01:22:06.280> will<01:22:06.460> be<01:22:06.670> there<01:22:06.910> and<01:22:07.150> I<01:22:07.900> don't<01:22:07.960> want 01:22:08.340 --> 01:22:08.350 align:start position:0% somebody will be there and I don't want 01:22:08.350 --> 01:22:11.010 align:start position:0% somebody will be there and I don't want any<01:22:08.530> and<01:22:08.860> it's<01:22:09.280> my<01:22:09.430> home<01:22:09.640> I<01:22:09.940> bet<01:22:10.690> the<01:22:10.870> people 01:22:11.010 --> 01:22:11.020 align:start position:0% any and it's my home I bet the people 01:22:11.020 --> 01:22:13.560 align:start position:0% any and it's my home I bet the people that<01:22:11.380> that<01:22:12.010> stay<01:22:12.250> there<01:22:12.490> very<01:22:12.730> very<01:22:13.000> carefully 01:22:13.560 --> 01:22:13.570 align:start position:0% that that stay there very very carefully 01:22:13.570 --> 01:22:16.170 align:start position:0% that that stay there very very carefully because<01:22:13.950> I<01:22:14.950> don't<01:22:15.250> want<01:22:15.430> things<01:22:15.580> missing<01:22:16.030> I 01:22:16.170 --> 01:22:16.180 align:start position:0% because I don't want things missing I 01:22:16.180 --> 01:22:19.280 align:start position:0% because I don't want things missing I want<01:22:16.390> to<01:22:16.480> know<01:22:16.570> exactly<01:22:17.050> who's<01:22:17.230> in<01:22:17.260> my<01:22:17.530> house 01:22:19.280 --> 01:22:19.290 align:start position:0% want to know exactly who's in my house 01:22:19.290 --> 01:22:21.830 align:start position:0% want to know exactly who's in my house responsibility<01:22:20.290> that's<01:22:20.530> all<01:22:20.680> I<01:22:20.800> care<01:22:21.040> about 01:22:21.830 --> 01:22:21.840 align:start position:0% responsibility that's all I care about 01:22:21.840 --> 01:22:35.939 align:start position:0% responsibility that's all I care about thank<01:22:22.840> you<01:22:22.960> very<01:22:23.110> much<01:22:23.680> anyone<01:22:24.400> else<01:22:24.550> yes<01:22:25.030> sir 01:22:35.939 --> 01:22:35.949 align:start position:0% 01:22:35.949 --> 01:22:40.169 align:start position:0% hi<01:22:36.370> I'm<01:22:36.550> Matthew<01:22:36.910> barrace<01:22:37.420> welcome<01:22:38.230> so<01:22:39.040> I<01:22:39.460> love 01:22:40.169 --> 01:22:40.179 align:start position:0% hi I'm Matthew barrace welcome so I love 01:22:40.179 --> 01:22:41.640 align:start position:0% hi I'm Matthew barrace welcome so I love the<01:22:40.300> last<01:22:40.449> speakers<01:22:40.840> discussion<01:22:41.500> of 01:22:41.640 --> 01:22:41.650 align:start position:0% the last speakers discussion of 01:22:41.650 --> 01:22:44.490 align:start position:0% the last speakers discussion of responsibilities<01:22:42.640> I<01:22:42.820> also<01:22:43.390> like<01:22:43.750> flexibility 01:22:44.490 --> 01:22:44.500 align:start position:0% responsibilities I also like flexibility 01:22:44.500 --> 01:22:48.390 align:start position:0% responsibilities I also like flexibility I<01:22:44.730> don't<01:22:45.730> participate<01:22:46.420> in<01:22:46.840> hosting<01:22:47.679> or<01:22:47.920> on 01:22:48.390 --> 01:22:48.400 align:start position:0% I don't participate in hosting or on 01:22:48.400 --> 01:22:50.640 align:start position:0% I don't participate in hosting or on hosting<01:22:48.850> of<01:22:49.060> a<01:22:49.120> house<01:22:49.270> but<01:22:49.660> at<01:22:50.050> some<01:22:50.260> point<01:22:50.500> if 01:22:50.640 --> 01:22:50.650 align:start position:0% hosting of a house but at some point if 01:22:50.650 --> 01:22:52.620 align:start position:0% hosting of a house but at some point if I<01:22:50.739> want<01:22:50.920> to<01:22:50.980> travel<01:22:51.160> or<01:22:51.460> heaven<01:22:51.880> forbid<01:22:52.030> I<01:22:52.480> have 01:22:52.620 --> 01:22:52.630 align:start position:0% I want to travel or heaven forbid I have 01:22:52.630 --> 01:22:54.419 align:start position:0% I want to travel or heaven forbid I have to<01:22:52.719> go<01:22:52.870> stay<01:22:53.170> with<01:22:53.320> a<01:22:53.350> relative<01:22:53.440> somewhere<01:22:54.190> I 01:22:54.419 --> 01:22:54.429 align:start position:0% to go stay with a relative somewhere I 01:22:54.429 --> 01:22:56.400 align:start position:0% to go stay with a relative somewhere I really<01:22:54.940> like<01:22:55.090> the<01:22:55.179> idea<01:22:55.449> of<01:22:55.540> having<01:22:55.750> the 01:22:56.400 --> 01:22:56.410 align:start position:0% really like the idea of having the 01:22:56.410 --> 01:22:58.770 align:start position:0% really like the idea of having the flexibility<01:22:57.070> to<01:22:57.280> have<01:22:57.730> it<01:22:57.969> be<01:22:58.090> my<01:22:58.270> house<01:22:58.480> but 01:22:58.770 --> 01:22:58.780 align:start position:0% flexibility to have it be my house but 01:22:58.780 --> 01:23:01.260 align:start position:0% flexibility to have it be my house but also<01:22:58.929> to<01:22:59.080> pay<01:22:59.290> my<01:22:59.469> very<01:22:59.739> high<01:22:59.920> taxes<01:23:00.400> even<01:23:01.030> if 01:23:01.260 --> 01:23:01.270 align:start position:0% also to pay my very high taxes even if 01:23:01.270 --> 01:23:04.380 align:start position:0% also to pay my very high taxes even if it's<01:23:01.420> eight<01:23:01.570> months<01:23:01.900> um<01:23:02.320> and<01:23:03.250> in<01:23:03.699> that<01:23:04.000> vein<01:23:04.210> of 01:23:04.380 --> 01:23:04.390 align:start position:0% it's eight months um and in that vein of 01:23:04.390 --> 01:23:06.120 align:start position:0% it's eight months um and in that vein of responsibility<01:23:05.199> it<01:23:05.290> seems<01:23:05.500> like<01:23:05.620> there<01:23:05.920> may 01:23:06.120 --> 01:23:06.130 align:start position:0% responsibility it seems like there may 01:23:06.130 --> 01:23:08.700 align:start position:0% responsibility it seems like there may be<01:23:06.160> some<01:23:06.310> opportunities<01:23:06.699> to<01:23:07.449> think<01:23:07.600> about<01:23:07.929> for 01:23:08.700 --> 01:23:08.710 align:start position:0% be some opportunities to think about for 01:23:08.710 --> 01:23:10.050 align:start position:0% be some opportunities to think about for the<01:23:08.739> things<01:23:09.160> that<01:23:09.400> make<01:23:09.550> people<01:23:09.580> bad 01:23:10.050 --> 01:23:10.060 align:start position:0% the things that make people bad 01:23:10.060 --> 01:23:12.030 align:start position:0% the things that make people bad neighbors<01:23:10.480> I<01:23:10.840> believe<01:23:11.500> that<01:23:11.650> there<01:23:11.770> are<01:23:11.800> codes 01:23:12.030 --> 01:23:12.040 align:start position:0% neighbors I believe that there are codes 01:23:12.040 --> 01:23:14.100 align:start position:0% neighbors I believe that there are codes against<01:23:12.520> a<01:23:12.670> lot<01:23:12.880> of<01:23:12.910> those<01:23:13.120> right<01:23:13.330> now<01:23:13.360> if 01:23:14.100 --> 01:23:14.110 align:start position:0% against a lot of those right now if 01:23:14.110 --> 01:23:16.169 align:start position:0% against a lot of those right now if we're<01:23:14.320> looking<01:23:14.679> for<01:23:14.890> a<01:23:14.920> regulation<01:23:15.520> maybe<01:23:15.940> the 01:23:16.169 --> 01:23:16.179 align:start position:0% we're looking for a regulation maybe the 01:23:16.179 --> 01:23:18.419 align:start position:0% we're looking for a regulation maybe the regulation<01:23:16.690> and<01:23:16.870> of<01:23:16.989> itself<01:23:17.290> could<01:23:17.679> be<01:23:17.890> that 01:23:18.419 --> 01:23:18.429 align:start position:0% regulation and of itself could be that 01:23:18.429 --> 01:23:19.950 align:start position:0% regulation and of itself could be that the<01:23:18.610> fines<01:23:18.820> get<01:23:19.090> considerably<01:23:19.719> more 01:23:19.950 --> 01:23:19.960 align:start position:0% the fines get considerably more 01:23:19.960 --> 01:23:22.500 align:start position:0% the fines get considerably more expensive<01:23:20.250> if<01:23:21.250> something<01:23:21.820> is<01:23:21.910> registered<01:23:22.090> as 01:23:22.500 --> 01:23:22.510 align:start position:0% expensive if something is registered as 01:23:22.510 --> 01:23:24.060 align:start position:0% expensive if something is registered as a<01:23:22.540> short-term<01:23:22.900> rental<01:23:23.080> if<01:23:23.590> you<01:23:23.739> lived<01:23:23.949> there 01:23:24.060 --> 01:23:24.070 align:start position:0% a short-term rental if you lived there 01:23:24.070 --> 01:23:25.380 align:start position:0% a short-term rental if you lived there not<01:23:24.370> a<01:23:24.400> problem<01:23:24.670> because<01:23:24.910> you're<01:23:25.090> gonna<01:23:25.210> make 01:23:25.380 --> 01:23:25.390 align:start position:0% not a problem because you're gonna make 01:23:25.390 --> 01:23:26.820 align:start position:0% not a problem because you're gonna make sure<01:23:25.540> your<01:23:25.660> code<01:23:25.780> compliant<01:23:26.320> if<01:23:26.590> you're<01:23:26.739> a 01:23:26.820 --> 01:23:26.830 align:start position:0% sure your code compliant if you're a 01:23:26.830 --> 01:23:29.850 align:start position:0% sure your code compliant if you're a responsible<01:23:27.390> person<01:23:28.390> who<01:23:28.750> is<01:23:28.900> doing<01:23:29.080> non 01:23:29.850 --> 01:23:29.860 align:start position:0% responsible person who is doing non 01:23:29.860 --> 01:23:32.070 align:start position:0% responsible person who is doing non hosted<01:23:30.340> that's<01:23:30.910> great<01:23:31.270> if<01:23:31.510> you're<01:23:31.870> somebody 01:23:32.070 --> 01:23:32.080 align:start position:0% hosted that's great if you're somebody 01:23:32.080 --> 01:23:33.390 align:start position:0% hosted that's great if you're somebody who's<01:23:32.320> thinking<01:23:32.350> about<01:23:32.770> it<01:23:33.010> for<01:23:33.160> the<01:23:33.219> money 01:23:33.390 --> 01:23:33.400 align:start position:0% who's thinking about it for the money 01:23:33.400 --> 01:23:35.729 align:start position:0% who's thinking about it for the money which<01:23:34.000> I<01:23:34.120> would<01:23:34.300> think<01:23:34.330> that<01:23:34.630> the<01:23:34.900> 14<01:23:35.380> bed 01:23:35.729 --> 01:23:35.739 align:start position:0% which I would think that the 14 bed 01:23:35.739 --> 01:23:38.130 align:start position:0% which I would think that the 14 bed owner<01:23:36.070> and<01:23:36.400> Palo<01:23:36.610> Alto<01:23:36.670> is<01:23:37.150> if<01:23:37.570> they<01:23:38.080> were 01:23:38.130 --> 01:23:38.140 align:start position:0% owner and Palo Alto is if they were 01:23:38.140 --> 01:23:39.990 align:start position:0% owner and Palo Alto is if they were staring<01:23:38.440> down<01:23:38.620> the<01:23:38.770> barrel<01:23:39.040> at<01:23:39.160> like<01:23:39.310> 25k<01:23:39.969> a 01:23:39.990 --> 01:23:40.000 align:start position:0% staring down the barrel at like 25k a 01:23:40.000 --> 01:23:43.169 align:start position:0% staring down the barrel at like 25k a month<01:23:40.179> in<01:23:40.960> fines<01:23:41.199> for<01:23:41.620> filthy<01:23:42.370> garbage<01:23:42.760> for 01:23:43.169 --> 01:23:43.179 align:start position:0% month in fines for filthy garbage for 01:23:43.179 --> 01:23:44.669 align:start position:0% month in fines for filthy garbage for their<01:23:43.330> seventh<01:23:43.690> fine<01:23:43.929> in<01:23:44.080> a<01:23:44.170> year<01:23:44.410> or<01:23:44.500> whatever 01:23:44.669 --> 01:23:44.679 align:start position:0% their seventh fine in a year or whatever 01:23:44.679 --> 01:23:46.650 align:start position:0% their seventh fine in a year or whatever that<01:23:44.980> is<01:23:45.190> that's<01:23:45.880> a<01:23:45.969> really<01:23:46.150> good<01:23:46.300> way<01:23:46.480> to<01:23:46.510> use 01:23:46.650 --> 01:23:46.660 align:start position:0% that is that's a really good way to use 01:23:46.660 --> 01:23:49.410 align:start position:0% that is that's a really good way to use economics<01:23:47.500> with<01:23:48.310> a<01:23:48.340> reasonably<01:23:48.910> light<01:23:49.179> touch 01:23:49.410 --> 01:23:49.420 align:start position:0% economics with a reasonably light touch 01:23:49.420 --> 01:23:51.510 align:start position:0% economics with a reasonably light touch to<01:23:49.750> get<01:23:49.900> to<01:23:50.140> I<01:23:50.170> think<01:23:50.320> what<01:23:50.710> I've<01:23:50.949> heard<01:23:51.219> from<01:23:51.370> a 01:23:51.510 --> 01:23:51.520 align:start position:0% to get to I think what I've heard from a 01:23:51.520 --> 01:23:52.910 align:start position:0% to get to I think what I've heard from a lot<01:23:51.640> of<01:23:51.790> people<01:23:52.060> tonight<01:23:52.300> which<01:23:52.540> is 01:23:52.910 --> 01:23:52.920 align:start position:0% lot of people tonight which is 01:23:52.920 --> 01:23:56.970 align:start position:0% lot of people tonight which is responsibility<01:23:55.080> thank<01:23:56.080> you<01:23:56.230> very<01:23:56.380> much<01:23:56.710> are 01:23:56.970 --> 01:23:56.980 align:start position:0% responsibility thank you very much are 01:23:56.980 --> 01:23:59.669 align:start position:0% responsibility thank you very much are there<01:23:57.670> any<01:23:57.880> other<01:23:58.000> speakers<01:23:58.540> that<01:23:59.260> want<01:23:59.500> to 01:23:59.669 --> 01:23:59.679 align:start position:0% there any other speakers that want to 01:23:59.679 --> 01:24:01.520 align:start position:0% there any other speakers that want to address<01:24:00.010> us<01:24:00.280> tonight 01:24:01.520 --> 01:24:01.530 align:start position:0% address us tonight 01:24:01.530 --> 01:24:07.919 align:start position:0% address us tonight going<01:24:02.790> going<01:24:03.790> gone<01:24:05.820> so<01:24:06.820> we'll<01:24:07.540> close<01:24:07.719> the 01:24:07.919 --> 01:24:07.929 align:start position:0% going going gone so we'll close the 01:24:07.929 --> 01:24:10.200 align:start position:0% going going gone so we'll close the public<01:24:08.080> hearing<01:24:08.290> and<01:24:08.800> I'd<01:24:09.370> like<01:24:09.520> to<01:24:09.580> bring<01:24:10.030> it 01:24:10.200 --> 01:24:10.210 align:start position:0% public hearing and I'd like to bring it 01:24:10.210 --> 01:24:12.630 align:start position:0% public hearing and I'd like to bring it back<01:24:10.390> to<01:24:10.630> my<01:24:11.080> colleagues<01:24:11.620> to<01:24:12.160> distill<01:24:12.610> the 01:24:12.630 --> 01:24:12.640 align:start position:0% back to my colleagues to distill the 01:24:12.640 --> 01:24:14.700 align:start position:0% back to my colleagues to distill the wisdom<01:24:13.090> we<01:24:13.239> heard<01:24:13.480> for<01:24:14.020> which<01:24:14.140> we<01:24:14.320> thank<01:24:14.500> you 01:24:14.700 --> 01:24:14.710 align:start position:0% wisdom we heard for which we thank you 01:24:14.710 --> 01:24:16.100 align:start position:0% wisdom we heard for which we thank you all<01:24:14.739> very<01:24:15.070> much 01:24:16.100 --> 01:24:16.110 align:start position:0% all very much 01:24:16.110 --> 01:24:19.530 align:start position:0% all very much right<01:24:17.760> well<01:24:18.760> go<01:24:18.880> for<01:24:19.060> it<01:24:19.120> and<01:24:19.330> thank<01:24:19.510> you 01:24:19.530 --> 01:24:19.540 align:start position:0% right well go for it and thank you 01:24:19.540 --> 01:24:20.850 align:start position:0% right well go for it and thank you everybody<01:24:19.929> for<01:24:20.140> coming<01:24:20.469> out<01:24:20.530> and<01:24:20.679> speaking 01:24:20.850 --> 01:24:20.860 align:start position:0% everybody for coming out and speaking 01:24:20.860 --> 01:24:23.010 align:start position:0% everybody for coming out and speaking and<01:24:21.280> lots<01:24:21.940> of<01:24:22.060> good<01:24:22.179> points<01:24:22.360> on<01:24:22.570> both<01:24:22.719> sides<01:24:22.960> of 01:24:23.010 --> 01:24:23.020 align:start position:0% and lots of good points on both sides of 01:24:23.020 --> 01:24:27.600 align:start position:0% and lots of good points on both sides of the<01:24:23.110> issue<01:24:23.199> and<01:24:23.350> I<01:24:23.560> think<01:24:23.770> I<01:24:25.710> think<01:24:26.710> it's<01:24:26.860> one 01:24:27.600 --> 01:24:27.610 align:start position:0% the issue and I think I think it's one 01:24:27.610 --> 01:24:29.100 align:start position:0% the issue and I think I think it's one of<01:24:27.670> the<01:24:27.760> things<01:24:27.910> that's<01:24:28.120> important<01:24:28.660> to<01:24:28.690> keep 01:24:29.100 --> 01:24:29.110 align:start position:0% of the things that's important to keep 01:24:29.110 --> 01:24:30.840 align:start position:0% of the things that's important to keep in<01:24:29.230> context<01:24:29.710> here<01:24:29.800> is<01:24:29.890> sort<01:24:30.070> of<01:24:30.130> why<01:24:30.460> we're 01:24:30.840 --> 01:24:30.850 align:start position:0% in context here is sort of why we're 01:24:30.850 --> 01:24:32.010 align:start position:0% in context here is sort of why we're considering<01:24:31.210> this<01:24:31.480> I<01:24:31.630> think<01:24:31.690> there's<01:24:31.960> a 01:24:32.010 --> 01:24:32.020 align:start position:0% considering this I think there's a 01:24:32.020 --> 01:24:33.840 align:start position:0% considering this I think there's a number<01:24:32.260> of<01:24:32.320> different<01:24:32.560> things<01:24:32.650> once<01:24:32.949> you<01:24:33.730> know 01:24:33.840 --> 01:24:33.850 align:start position:0% number of different things once you know 01:24:33.850 --> 01:24:35.520 align:start position:0% number of different things once you know just<01:24:34.090> neighbor<01:24:34.390> compatibility<01:24:35.290> the 01:24:35.520 --> 01:24:35.530 align:start position:0% just neighbor compatibility the 01:24:35.530 --> 01:24:39.720 align:start position:0% just neighbor compatibility the character<01:24:35.890> of<01:24:36.040> our<01:24:36.130> town<01:24:36.400> and<01:24:37.050> think<01:24:38.730> concerns 01:24:39.720 --> 01:24:39.730 align:start position:0% character of our town and think concerns 01:24:39.730 --> 01:24:41.640 align:start position:0% character of our town and think concerns about<01:24:39.880> disruption<01:24:40.660> those<01:24:41.140> types<01:24:41.380> of<01:24:41.469> things 01:24:41.640 --> 01:24:41.650 align:start position:0% about disruption those types of things 01:24:41.650 --> 01:24:44.370 align:start position:0% about disruption those types of things those<01:24:41.830> are<01:24:41.860> all<01:24:42.070> legitimate<01:24:42.219> concerns<01:24:43.199> and<01:24:44.199> I 01:24:44.370 --> 01:24:44.380 align:start position:0% those are all legitimate concerns and I 01:24:44.380 --> 01:24:46.169 align:start position:0% those are all legitimate concerns and I think<01:24:44.410> the<01:24:45.100> housing<01:24:45.580> issue 01:24:46.169 --> 01:24:46.179 align:start position:0% think the housing issue 01:24:46.179 --> 01:24:48.569 align:start position:0% think the housing issue is<01:24:46.630> also<01:24:46.869> a<01:24:47.289> very<01:24:47.590> legitimate<01:24:47.949> concern<01:24:48.400> I 01:24:48.569 --> 01:24:48.579 align:start position:0% is also a very legitimate concern I 01:24:48.579 --> 01:24:51.179 align:start position:0% is also a very legitimate concern I think<01:24:48.789> that's<01:24:49.349> kind<01:24:50.349> of<01:24:50.439> there's<01:24:50.769> two<01:24:50.949> sides 01:24:51.179 --> 01:24:51.189 align:start position:0% think that's kind of there's two sides 01:24:51.189 --> 01:24:53.520 align:start position:0% think that's kind of there's two sides to<01:24:51.400> that<01:24:51.429> coin<01:24:51.579> when<01:24:52.119> there's<01:24:52.360> the<01:24:52.989> ability<01:24:53.409> of 01:24:53.520 --> 01:24:53.530 align:start position:0% to that coin when there's the ability of 01:24:53.530 --> 01:24:55.140 align:start position:0% to that coin when there's the ability of people<01:24:53.800> to<01:24:54.099> be<01:24:54.189> able<01:24:54.219> to<01:24:54.429> generate<01:24:54.760> revenue<01:24:55.119> to 01:24:55.140 --> 01:24:55.150 align:start position:0% people to be able to generate revenue to 01:24:55.150 --> 01:24:57.449 align:start position:0% people to be able to generate revenue to be<01:24:55.329> able<01:24:55.420> to<01:24:55.570> stay<01:24:55.809> in<01:24:55.840> their<01:24:56.050> homes<01:24:56.309> but<01:24:57.309> then 01:24:57.449 --> 01:24:57.459 align:start position:0% be able to stay in their homes but then 01:24:57.459 --> 01:24:58.859 align:start position:0% be able to stay in their homes but then there's<01:24:57.610> also<01:24:57.789> the<01:24:57.909> concern<01:24:58.239> about<01:24:58.510> taking 01:24:58.859 --> 01:24:58.869 align:start position:0% there's also the concern about taking 01:24:58.869 --> 01:25:01.949 align:start position:0% there's also the concern about taking housing<01:24:59.260> out<01:24:59.860> of<01:25:00.010> stock<01:25:00.219> I<01:25:00.489> think<01:25:01.449> this<01:25:01.809> is 01:25:01.949 --> 01:25:01.959 align:start position:0% housing out of stock I think this is 01:25:01.959 --> 01:25:03.629 align:start position:0% housing out of stock I think this is just<01:25:01.989> sort<01:25:02.320> of<01:25:02.409> one<01:25:02.679> thing<01:25:03.010> that<01:25:03.369> we're 01:25:03.629 --> 01:25:03.639 align:start position:0% just sort of one thing that we're 01:25:03.639 --> 01:25:05.790 align:start position:0% just sort of one thing that we're talking<01:25:03.969> about<01:25:04.239> in<01:25:04.659> relation<01:25:05.079> to<01:25:05.199> housing<01:25:05.349> and 01:25:05.790 --> 01:25:05.800 align:start position:0% talking about in relation to housing and 01:25:05.800 --> 01:25:06.929 align:start position:0% talking about in relation to housing and health<01:25:05.979> moonbase<01:25:06.309> oh<01:25:06.369> I<01:25:06.550> just<01:25:06.579> want<01:25:06.849> to 01:25:06.929 --> 01:25:06.939 align:start position:0% health moonbase oh I just want to 01:25:06.939 --> 01:25:08.160 align:start position:0% health moonbase oh I just want to highlight<01:25:07.090> that<01:25:07.239> that<01:25:07.599> there's<01:25:07.780> been<01:25:07.929> a<01:25:07.959> lot 01:25:08.160 --> 01:25:08.170 align:start position:0% highlight that that there's been a lot 01:25:08.170 --> 01:25:09.779 align:start position:0% highlight that that there's been a lot of<01:25:08.289> conversations<01:25:08.800> about<01:25:08.860> whether<01:25:09.610> it's 01:25:09.779 --> 01:25:09.789 align:start position:0% of conversations about whether it's 01:25:09.789 --> 01:25:13.049 align:start position:0% of conversations about whether it's accessory<01:25:10.239> dwelling<01:25:10.570> units<01:25:10.900> or<01:25:11.729> where<01:25:12.729> we<01:25:12.880> can 01:25:13.049 --> 01:25:13.059 align:start position:0% accessory dwelling units or where we can 01:25:13.059 --> 01:25:14.549 align:start position:0% accessory dwelling units or where we can provide<01:25:13.420> more<01:25:13.749> affordable<01:25:14.199> housing 01:25:14.549 --> 01:25:14.559 align:start position:0% provide more affordable housing 01:25:14.559 --> 01:25:16.140 align:start position:0% provide more affordable housing opportunities<01:25:15.219> and<01:25:15.459> I've<01:25:15.550> said<01:25:15.789> a<01:25:15.820> number<01:25:15.999> of 01:25:16.140 --> 01:25:16.150 align:start position:0% opportunities and I've said a number of 01:25:16.150 --> 01:25:19.469 align:start position:0% opportunities and I've said a number of times<01:25:16.449> that<01:25:16.920> my<01:25:17.920> primary<01:25:18.219> concern<01:25:18.789> is<01:25:18.969> not<01:25:19.179> so 01:25:19.469 --> 01:25:19.479 align:start position:0% times that my primary concern is not so 01:25:19.479 --> 01:25:21.239 align:start position:0% times that my primary concern is not so much<01:25:19.659> the<01:25:19.929> short-term<01:25:20.409> rentals<01:25:20.889> and<01:25:21.130> those 01:25:21.239 --> 01:25:21.249 align:start position:0% much the short-term rentals and those 01:25:21.249 --> 01:25:23.609 align:start position:0% much the short-term rentals and those who<01:25:21.400> are<01:25:21.459> trying<01:25:21.610> to<01:25:21.760> make<01:25:21.849> us<01:25:22.139> it's<01:25:23.139> the<01:25:23.349> the 01:25:23.609 --> 01:25:23.619 align:start position:0% who are trying to make us it's the the 01:25:23.619 --> 01:25:25.709 align:start position:0% who are trying to make us it's the the sort<01:25:23.829> of<01:25:23.889> absentee<01:25:24.550> homeowners<01:25:25.179> who<01:25:25.360> buy<01:25:25.689> a 01:25:25.709 --> 01:25:25.719 align:start position:0% sort of absentee homeowners who buy a 01:25:25.719 --> 01:25:28.049 align:start position:0% sort of absentee homeowners who buy a home<01:25:26.019> and<01:25:26.229> maybe<01:25:26.530> only<01:25:26.800> come<01:25:27.039> over<01:25:27.309> and<01:25:27.400> stay 01:25:28.049 --> 01:25:28.059 align:start position:0% home and maybe only come over and stay 01:25:28.059 --> 01:25:31.620 align:start position:0% home and maybe only come over and stay for<01:25:28.329> you<01:25:29.019> know<01:25:29.139> thirty<01:25:29.469> days<01:25:29.739> or<01:25:30.039> a<01:25:30.639> year<01:25:31.510> or 01:25:31.620 --> 01:25:31.630 align:start position:0% for you know thirty days or a year or 01:25:31.630 --> 01:25:33.449 align:start position:0% for you know thirty days or a year or something<01:25:31.959> like<01:25:32.019> that<01:25:32.079> and<01:25:32.499> and<01:25:32.739> and<01:25:33.280> then 01:25:33.449 --> 01:25:33.459 align:start position:0% something like that and and and then 01:25:33.459 --> 01:25:35.009 align:start position:0% something like that and and and then their<01:25:33.610> house<01:25:33.729> it's<01:25:33.999> dark<01:25:34.329> all<01:25:34.539> the<01:25:34.570> rest<01:25:34.929> of 01:25:35.009 --> 01:25:35.019 align:start position:0% their house it's dark all the rest of 01:25:35.019 --> 01:25:36.989 align:start position:0% their house it's dark all the rest of the<01:25:35.139> time<01:25:35.349> so<01:25:35.709> I<01:25:35.920> know<01:25:36.280> there's<01:25:36.550> a<01:25:36.610> handful<01:25:36.939> of 01:25:36.989 --> 01:25:36.999 align:start position:0% the time so I know there's a handful of 01:25:36.999 --> 01:25:38.819 align:start position:0% the time so I know there's a handful of houses<01:25:37.389> and<01:25:37.630> in<01:25:37.809> my<01:25:37.989> neighborhood<01:25:38.439> and<01:25:38.590> along 01:25:38.819 --> 01:25:38.829 align:start position:0% houses and in my neighborhood and along 01:25:38.829 --> 01:25:42.330 align:start position:0% houses and in my neighborhood and along the<01:25:38.979> coast<01:25:39.219> that<01:25:39.539> that<01:25:40.539> seem<01:25:40.929> to<01:25:41.110> just<01:25:41.349> just<01:25:42.189> be 01:25:42.330 --> 01:25:42.340 align:start position:0% the coast that that seem to just just be 01:25:42.340 --> 01:25:44.009 align:start position:0% the coast that that seem to just just be generally<01:25:42.880> unoccupied<01:25:43.269> and<01:25:43.749> not<01:25:43.900> available 01:25:44.009 --> 01:25:44.019 align:start position:0% generally unoccupied and not available 01:25:44.019 --> 01:25:46.199 align:start position:0% generally unoccupied and not available for<01:25:44.590> short-term<01:25:45.039> rental<01:25:45.579> or<01:25:45.760> long-term 01:25:46.199 --> 01:25:46.209 align:start position:0% for short-term rental or long-term 01:25:46.209 --> 01:25:48.299 align:start position:0% for short-term rental or long-term rental<01:25:46.539> and<01:25:46.689> it's<01:25:46.840> and<01:25:47.650> we've<01:25:47.769> actually<01:25:47.949> had<01:25:48.159> a 01:25:48.299 --> 01:25:48.309 align:start position:0% rental and it's and we've actually had a 01:25:48.309 --> 01:25:50.069 align:start position:0% rental and it's and we've actually had a couple<01:25:48.400> applicants<01:25:49.059> that<01:25:49.150> have<01:25:49.269> come<01:25:49.479> before 01:25:50.069 --> 01:25:50.079 align:start position:0% couple applicants that have come before 01:25:50.079 --> 01:25:51.719 align:start position:0% couple applicants that have come before us<01:25:50.260> for<01:25:50.559> different<01:25:50.860> houses<01:25:51.189> and<01:25:51.340> basically 01:25:51.719 --> 01:25:51.729 align:start position:0% us for different houses and basically 01:25:51.729 --> 01:25:53.669 align:start position:0% us for different houses and basically stated<01:25:52.209> that<01:25:52.300> that<01:25:52.510> they<01:25:52.659> want<01:25:52.780> to<01:25:52.929> build 01:25:53.669 --> 01:25:53.679 align:start position:0% stated that that they want to build 01:25:53.679 --> 01:25:54.989 align:start position:0% stated that that they want to build large<01:25:53.949> houses<01:25:54.369> to<01:25:54.489> be<01:25:54.579> able<01:25:54.670> to<01:25:54.760> come<01:25:54.969> and 01:25:54.989 --> 01:25:54.999 align:start position:0% large houses to be able to come and 01:25:54.999 --> 01:25:56.640 align:start position:0% large houses to be able to come and visit<01:25:55.150> on<01:25:55.510> a<01:25:55.539> weekend<01:25:55.959> every<01:25:56.199> now<01:25:56.349> and<01:25:56.559> then 01:25:56.640 --> 01:25:56.650 align:start position:0% visit on a weekend every now and then 01:25:56.650 --> 01:25:58.709 align:start position:0% visit on a weekend every now and then otherwise<01:25:57.219> the<01:25:57.550> house<01:25:57.639> that's<01:25:57.909> empty<01:25:58.150> that's 01:25:58.709 --> 01:25:58.719 align:start position:0% otherwise the house that's empty that's 01:25:58.719 --> 01:26:00.209 align:start position:0% otherwise the house that's empty that's taken<01:25:59.050> away<01:25:59.110> housing<01:25:59.559> from<01:25:59.739> people<01:25:59.979> who<01:26:00.070> could 01:26:00.209 --> 01:26:00.219 align:start position:0% taken away housing from people who could 01:26:00.219 --> 01:26:02.219 align:start position:0% taken away housing from people who could live<01:26:00.340> here<01:26:00.519> and<01:26:01.329> it's<01:26:01.510> taken<01:26:01.809> away<01:26:01.959> an 01:26:02.219 --> 01:26:02.229 align:start position:0% live here and it's taken away an 01:26:02.229 --> 01:26:05.129 align:start position:0% live here and it's taken away an opportunity<01:26:02.739> for<01:26:03.659> potentially<01:26:04.659> affordable 01:26:05.129 --> 01:26:05.139 align:start position:0% opportunity for potentially affordable 01:26:05.139 --> 01:26:06.989 align:start position:0% opportunity for potentially affordable short-term<01:26:05.709> rentals<01:26:06.099> so<01:26:06.189> I<01:26:06.280> think<01:26:06.579> I<01:26:06.760> think 01:26:06.989 --> 01:26:06.999 align:start position:0% short-term rentals so I think I think 01:26:06.999 --> 01:26:08.520 align:start position:0% short-term rentals so I think I think that's<01:26:07.090> a<01:26:07.300> problem<01:26:07.630> that<01:26:07.659> that<01:26:08.229> we<01:26:08.320> need<01:26:08.439> to 01:26:08.520 --> 01:26:08.530 align:start position:0% that's a problem that that we need to 01:26:08.530 --> 01:26:10.259 align:start position:0% that's a problem that that we need to consider<01:26:08.800> not<01:26:09.130> necessarily<01:26:09.699> as<01:26:09.849> part<01:26:10.059> of<01:26:10.090> this 01:26:10.259 --> 01:26:10.269 align:start position:0% consider not necessarily as part of this 01:26:10.269 --> 01:26:15.359 align:start position:0% consider not necessarily as part of this but<01:26:11.010> I<01:26:13.349> really<01:26:14.349> like<01:26:14.559> the<01:26:14.769> comments<01:26:15.159> about 01:26:15.359 --> 01:26:15.369 align:start position:0% but I really like the comments about 01:26:15.369 --> 01:26:17.250 align:start position:0% but I really like the comments about responsibility<01:26:16.090> and<01:26:16.150> flexibility<01:26:16.780> and<01:26:16.900> in<01:26:17.139> my 01:26:17.250 --> 01:26:17.260 align:start position:0% responsibility and flexibility and in my 01:26:17.260 --> 01:26:20.609 align:start position:0% responsibility and flexibility and in my perfect<01:26:17.650> world<01:26:18.360> you<01:26:19.360> know<01:26:19.479> we<01:26:19.780> all<01:26:20.139> just<01:26:20.199> work 01:26:20.609 --> 01:26:20.619 align:start position:0% perfect world you know we all just work 01:26:20.619 --> 01:26:22.949 align:start position:0% perfect world you know we all just work this<01:26:20.800> out<01:26:20.979> with<01:26:21.189> our<01:26:21.340> neighbors<01:26:21.729> we<01:26:22.539> make<01:26:22.719> sure 01:26:22.949 --> 01:26:22.959 align:start position:0% this out with our neighbors we make sure 01:26:22.959 --> 01:26:26.339 align:start position:0% this out with our neighbors we make sure we're<01:26:23.170> not<01:26:23.459> impeding<01:26:24.459> on<01:26:24.610> each<01:26:25.030> other<01:26:25.349> we're 01:26:26.339 --> 01:26:26.349 align:start position:0% we're not impeding on each other we're 01:26:26.349 --> 01:26:27.390 align:start position:0% we're not impeding on each other we're trying<01:26:26.559> to<01:26:26.619> make<01:26:26.769> sure<01:26:26.920> that<01:26:27.070> there's<01:26:27.309> enough 01:26:27.390 --> 01:26:27.400 align:start position:0% trying to make sure that there's enough 01:26:27.400 --> 01:26:30.390 align:start position:0% trying to make sure that there's enough housing<01:26:27.969> for<01:26:28.469> everybody<01:26:29.469> else<01:26:29.679> and<01:26:29.979> and<01:26:30.249> we 01:26:30.390 --> 01:26:30.400 align:start position:0% housing for everybody else and and we 01:26:30.400 --> 01:26:32.699 align:start position:0% housing for everybody else and and we all<01:26:30.519> get<01:26:30.670> along<01:26:30.789> I<01:26:31.349> know<01:26:32.349> it's<01:26:32.559> not 01:26:32.699 --> 01:26:32.709 align:start position:0% all get along I know it's not 01:26:32.709 --> 01:26:35.299 align:start position:0% all get along I know it's not necessarily<01:26:33.159> a<01:26:33.280> perfect<01:26:33.639> world<01:26:33.849> but<01:26:34.209> I<01:26:34.389> think 01:26:35.299 --> 01:26:35.309 align:start position:0% necessarily a perfect world but I think 01:26:35.309 --> 01:26:37.679 align:start position:0% necessarily a perfect world but I think to<01:26:36.309> the<01:26:36.400> extent<01:26:36.519> that<01:26:36.789> we<01:26:36.939> can<01:26:37.059> try<01:26:37.329> to<01:26:37.360> make 01:26:37.679 --> 01:26:37.689 align:start position:0% to the extent that we can try to make 01:26:37.689 --> 01:26:39.739 align:start position:0% to the extent that we can try to make sure<01:26:37.869> we're<01:26:38.019> building<01:26:38.139> in<01:26:38.439> that<01:26:38.650> you<01:26:39.280> know<01:26:39.369> the 01:26:39.739 --> 01:26:39.749 align:start position:0% sure we're building in that you know the 01:26:39.749 --> 01:26:41.729 align:start position:0% sure we're building in that you know the measures<01:26:40.749> of<01:26:40.900> responsibility<01:26:41.650> and 01:26:41.729 --> 01:26:41.739 align:start position:0% measures of responsibility and 01:26:41.739 --> 01:26:43.709 align:start position:0% measures of responsibility and flexibility<01:26:42.369> and<01:26:42.670> to<01:26:42.909> into<01:26:43.179> whatever<01:26:43.479> code 01:26:43.709 --> 01:26:43.719 align:start position:0% flexibility and to into whatever code 01:26:43.719 --> 01:26:46.290 align:start position:0% flexibility and to into whatever code that<01:26:43.900> we<01:26:43.989> have<01:26:44.139> that<01:26:44.439> and<01:26:45.249> we<01:26:45.670> don't<01:26:45.849> have<01:26:46.150> to 01:26:46.290 --> 01:26:46.300 align:start position:0% that we have that and we don't have to 01:26:46.300 --> 01:26:48.929 align:start position:0% that we have that and we don't have to have<01:26:46.479> this<01:26:47.039> heavy-handed<01:26:48.039> code<01:26:48.369> enforcement 01:26:48.929 --> 01:26:48.939 align:start position:0% have this heavy-handed code enforcement 01:26:48.939 --> 01:26:52.229 align:start position:0% have this heavy-handed code enforcement sort<01:26:49.869> of<01:26:49.959> situation<01:26:50.499> to<01:26:50.530> where<01:26:50.999> anybody<01:26:51.999> who 01:26:52.229 --> 01:26:52.239 align:start position:0% sort of situation to where anybody who 01:26:52.239 --> 01:26:54.149 align:start position:0% sort of situation to where anybody who happens<01:26:52.449> to<01:26:52.719> have<01:26:52.840> an<01:26:53.409> issue<01:26:53.679> with<01:26:54.010> their 01:26:54.149 --> 01:26:54.159 align:start position:0% happens to have an issue with their 01:26:54.159 --> 01:26:56.549 align:start position:0% happens to have an issue with their neighbor<01:26:54.429> is<01:26:54.880> suddenly<01:26:55.420> calling<01:26:55.840> up<01:26:55.989> Scot<01:26:56.349> or 01:26:56.549 --> 01:26:56.559 align:start position:0% neighbor is suddenly calling up Scot or 01:26:56.559 --> 01:26:58.750 align:start position:0% neighbor is suddenly calling up Scot or Jill<01:26:57.119> constantly 01:26:58.750 --> 01:26:58.760 align:start position:0% Jill constantly 01:26:58.760 --> 01:27:00.910 align:start position:0% Jill constantly to<01:26:59.000> get<01:26:59.150> enforcement<01:26:59.750> to<01:26:59.870> bail<01:26:59.989> every<01:27:00.440> little 01:27:00.910 --> 01:27:00.920 align:start position:0% to get enforcement to bail every little 01:27:00.920 --> 01:27:02.770 align:start position:0% to get enforcement to bail every little detail<01:27:01.130> and<01:27:01.370> if<01:27:01.730> they're<01:27:01.910> in<01:27:02.030> compliance<01:27:02.450> and 01:27:02.770 --> 01:27:02.780 align:start position:0% detail and if they're in compliance and 01:27:02.780 --> 01:27:07.540 align:start position:0% detail and if they're in compliance and I<01:27:03.620> think<01:27:03.890> isn't<01:27:04.580> critical<01:27:04.900> I<01:27:06.280> think<01:27:07.280> you<01:27:07.430> know 01:27:07.540 --> 01:27:07.550 align:start position:0% I think isn't critical I think you know 01:27:07.550 --> 01:27:09.520 align:start position:0% I think isn't critical I think you know we<01:27:07.670> stuff's<01:27:08.540> done<01:27:08.690> a<01:27:08.750> good<01:27:08.930> job<01:27:08.989> of<01:27:09.200> trying<01:27:09.410> to 01:27:09.520 --> 01:27:09.530 align:start position:0% we stuff's done a good job of trying to 01:27:09.530 --> 01:27:11.680 align:start position:0% we stuff's done a good job of trying to put<01:27:09.739> these<01:27:09.920> into<01:27:10.160> into<01:27:10.580> clear<01:27:10.820> buckets<01:27:11.210> hosted 01:27:11.680 --> 01:27:11.690 align:start position:0% put these into into clear buckets hosted 01:27:11.690 --> 01:27:14.440 align:start position:0% put these into into clear buckets hosted on<01:27:11.840> hosted<01:27:12.260> but<01:27:12.530> and<01:27:12.800> I<01:27:13.489> don't<01:27:14.060> think<01:27:14.270> there's 01:27:14.440 --> 01:27:14.450 align:start position:0% on hosted but and I don't think there's 01:27:14.450 --> 01:27:16.450 align:start position:0% on hosted but and I don't think there's a<01:27:14.560> there's<01:27:15.560> a<01:27:15.650> lot<01:27:15.800> of<01:27:15.950> different<01:27:16.220> situations 01:27:16.450 --> 01:27:16.460 align:start position:0% a there's a lot of different situations 01:27:16.460 --> 01:27:18.400 align:start position:0% a there's a lot of different situations and<01:27:17.120> variations<01:27:17.660> that<01:27:17.840> can<01:27:17.989> happen<01:27:18.140> on<01:27:18.350> the 01:27:18.400 --> 01:27:18.410 align:start position:0% and variations that can happen on the 01:27:18.410 --> 01:27:23.530 align:start position:0% and variations that can happen on the coast<01:27:18.710> and<01:27:19.030> I<01:27:20.030> can<01:27:20.330> think<01:27:20.480> of<01:27:20.660> you<01:27:21.020> know<01:27:22.540> yeah 01:27:23.530 --> 01:27:23.540 align:start position:0% coast and I can think of you know yeah 01:27:23.540 --> 01:27:25.060 align:start position:0% coast and I can think of you know yeah just<01:27:23.780> a<01:27:23.870> number<01:27:24.110> of<01:27:24.200> situations<01:27:24.770> that<01:27:24.890> might 01:27:25.060 --> 01:27:25.070 align:start position:0% just a number of situations that might 01:27:25.070 --> 01:27:27.220 align:start position:0% just a number of situations that might not<01:27:25.310> fit<01:27:25.550> perfectly<01:27:26.420> within<01:27:26.630> the<01:27:26.810> code<01:27:26.989> that<01:27:27.170> I 01:27:27.220 --> 01:27:27.230 align:start position:0% not fit perfectly within the code that I 01:27:27.230 --> 01:27:29.880 align:start position:0% not fit perfectly within the code that I think<01:27:27.470> we'll<01:27:27.590> need<01:27:27.739> to<01:27:28.150> think<01:27:29.150> about<01:27:29.270> how<01:27:29.630> we 01:27:29.880 --> 01:27:29.890 align:start position:0% think we'll need to think about how we 01:27:29.890 --> 01:27:33.310 align:start position:0% think we'll need to think about how we how<01:27:30.890> he<01:27:30.950> addresses<01:27:31.960> one<01:27:32.960> of<01:27:32.989> them<01:27:33.140> being 01:27:33.310 --> 01:27:33.320 align:start position:0% how he addresses one of them being 01:27:33.320 --> 01:27:36.310 align:start position:0% how he addresses one of them being raised<01:27:33.830> by<01:27:34.040> I<01:27:34.070> think<01:27:34.220> Miss<01:27:35.180> Portello<01:27:35.570> who 01:27:36.310 --> 01:27:36.320 align:start position:0% raised by I think Miss Portello who 01:27:36.320 --> 01:27:39.729 align:start position:0% raised by I think Miss Portello who mentioned<01:27:36.680> that<01:27:37.720> she<01:27:38.720> used<01:27:39.080> to<01:27:39.260> rent<01:27:39.590> her 01:27:39.729 --> 01:27:39.739 align:start position:0% mentioned that she used to rent her 01:27:39.739 --> 01:27:42.729 align:start position:0% mentioned that she used to rent her bottom<01:27:40.190> floor<01:27:40.430> full-time<01:27:41.420> which<01:27:41.780> would<01:27:42.170> lead 01:27:42.729 --> 01:27:42.739 align:start position:0% bottom floor full-time which would lead 01:27:42.739 --> 01:27:44.260 align:start position:0% bottom floor full-time which would lead me<01:27:42.770> to<01:27:43.070> assume<01:27:43.370> that<01:27:43.550> there's<01:27:43.760> full<01:27:43.910> kitchen 01:27:44.260 --> 01:27:44.270 align:start position:0% me to assume that there's full kitchen 01:27:44.270 --> 01:27:46.180 align:start position:0% me to assume that there's full kitchen facilities<01:27:44.750> and<01:27:44.930> that<01:27:45.020> definitely<01:27:45.290> my 01:27:46.180 --> 01:27:46.190 align:start position:0% facilities and that definitely my 01:27:46.190 --> 01:27:47.979 align:start position:0% facilities and that definitely my reading<01:27:46.730> of<01:27:46.910> what's<01:27:47.150> here<01:27:47.510> is<01:27:47.660> that<01:27:47.810> that 01:27:47.979 --> 01:27:47.989 align:start position:0% reading of what's here is that that 01:27:47.989 --> 01:27:51.400 align:start position:0% reading of what's here is that that wouldn't<01:27:48.650> be<01:27:48.830> a<01:27:49.190> hosted<01:27:49.790> rental<01:27:50.210> that<01:27:50.420> would 01:27:51.400 --> 01:27:51.410 align:start position:0% wouldn't be a hosted rental that would 01:27:51.410 --> 01:27:54.610 align:start position:0% wouldn't be a hosted rental that would be<01:27:51.560> a<01:27:51.770> separate<01:27:52.220> ad<01:27:52.610> you<01:27:52.970> I<01:27:53.750> don't<01:27:54.320> know<01:27:54.470> if 01:27:54.610 --> 01:27:54.620 align:start position:0% be a separate ad you I don't know if 01:27:54.620 --> 01:27:58.930 align:start position:0% be a separate ad you I don't know if that's<01:27:55.070> correct<01:27:55.460> or<01:27:55.760> not<01:27:55.790> but<01:27:56.680> and<01:27:57.680> that<01:27:57.940> would 01:27:58.930 --> 01:27:58.940 align:start position:0% that's correct or not but and that would 01:27:58.940 --> 01:28:01.660 align:start position:0% that's correct or not but and that would be<01:27:59.060> I'm<01:27:59.270> not<01:27:59.420> I<01:27:59.720> think<01:28:00.230> your<01:28:00.470> situations<01:28:01.070> that 01:28:01.660 --> 01:28:01.670 align:start position:0% be I'm not I think your situations that 01:28:01.670 --> 01:28:03.790 align:start position:0% be I'm not I think your situations that situation<01:28:02.210> is<01:28:02.360> something<01:28:02.540> that<01:28:02.780> you<01:28:03.680> know<01:28:03.770> I 01:28:03.790 --> 01:28:03.800 align:start position:0% situation is something that you know I 01:28:03.800 --> 01:28:05.140 align:start position:0% situation is something that you know I would<01:28:04.010> be<01:28:04.100> supportive<01:28:04.250> of<01:28:04.520> that<01:28:04.670> continuing 01:28:05.140 --> 01:28:05.150 align:start position:0% would be supportive of that continuing 01:28:05.150 --> 01:28:07.720 align:start position:0% would be supportive of that continuing its<01:28:05.300> and<01:28:05.510> within<01:28:06.140> the<01:28:06.230> house<01:28:06.380> and<01:28:06.710> that<01:28:07.520> sort 01:28:07.720 --> 01:28:07.730 align:start position:0% its and within the house and that sort 01:28:07.730 --> 01:28:10.180 align:start position:0% its and within the house and that sort of<01:28:07.760> thing<01:28:07.910> but<01:28:08.120> but<01:28:08.989> falls<01:28:09.440> within<01:28:09.710> maybe<01:28:10.070> a 01:28:10.180 --> 01:28:10.190 align:start position:0% of thing but but falls within maybe a 01:28:10.190 --> 01:28:11.800 align:start position:0% of thing but but falls within maybe a different<01:28:10.550> category<01:28:10.700> so<01:28:11.180> something<01:28:11.690> to 01:28:11.800 --> 01:28:11.810 align:start position:0% different category so something to 01:28:11.810 --> 01:28:18.040 align:start position:0% different category so something to something<01:28:12.380> to<01:28:12.530> consider<01:28:12.920> there<01:28:13.510> I<01:28:17.050> fully 01:28:18.040 --> 01:28:18.050 align:start position:0% something to consider there I fully 01:28:18.050 --> 01:28:20.020 align:start position:0% something to consider there I fully agree<01:28:18.530> with<01:28:18.890> a<01:28:19.130> lot<01:28:19.220> of<01:28:19.370> the<01:28:19.489> concerns<01:28:19.850> about 01:28:20.020 --> 01:28:20.030 align:start position:0% agree with a lot of the concerns about 01:28:20.030 --> 01:28:23.590 align:start position:0% agree with a lot of the concerns about the<01:28:20.180> the<01:28:20.720> investor<01:28:21.700> acquired<01:28:22.700> properties<01:28:23.300> and 01:28:23.590 --> 01:28:23.600 align:start position:0% the the investor acquired properties and 01:28:23.600 --> 01:28:26.770 align:start position:0% the the investor acquired properties and hosted<01:28:24.230> Airbnb<01:28:24.920> owners<01:28:25.850> I'm<01:28:26.480> more 01:28:26.770 --> 01:28:26.780 align:start position:0% hosted Airbnb owners I'm more 01:28:26.780 --> 01:28:29.590 align:start position:0% hosted Airbnb owners I'm more comfortable<01:28:26.960> with<01:28:27.470> you<01:28:28.310> know<01:28:28.400> if<01:28:28.580> if<01:28:29.210> a<01:28:29.390> host 01:28:29.590 --> 01:28:29.600 align:start position:0% comfortable with you know if if a host 01:28:29.600 --> 01:28:31.960 align:start position:0% comfortable with you know if if a host is<01:28:29.930> within<01:28:30.380> proximity<01:28:30.739> to<01:28:31.430> their<01:28:31.580> rental 01:28:31.960 --> 01:28:31.970 align:start position:0% is within proximity to their rental 01:28:31.970 --> 01:28:34.150 align:start position:0% is within proximity to their rental maybe<01:28:32.660> they're<01:28:32.900> not<01:28:33.050> exactly<01:28:33.650> right<01:28:33.890> on<01:28:34.040> the 01:28:34.150 --> 01:28:34.160 align:start position:0% maybe they're not exactly right on the 01:28:34.160 --> 01:28:35.979 align:start position:0% maybe they're not exactly right on the property<01:28:34.580> but<01:28:34.730> if<01:28:35.000> they<01:28:35.420> happen<01:28:35.750> to<01:28:35.780> live 01:28:35.979 --> 01:28:35.989 align:start position:0% property but if they happen to live 01:28:35.989 --> 01:28:38.140 align:start position:0% property but if they happen to live around<01:28:36.110> the<01:28:36.350> corner<01:28:36.380> or<01:28:36.980> somewhere<01:28:37.790> else<01:28:37.910> in 01:28:38.140 --> 01:28:38.150 align:start position:0% around the corner or somewhere else in 01:28:38.150 --> 01:28:39.729 align:start position:0% around the corner or somewhere else in town<01:28:38.330> that<01:28:38.570> there's<01:28:38.930> I<01:28:39.110> think<01:28:39.320> there<01:28:39.470> was<01:28:39.530> sort 01:28:39.729 --> 01:28:39.739 align:start position:0% town that there's I think there was sort 01:28:39.739 --> 01:28:41.740 align:start position:0% town that there's I think there was sort of<01:28:39.800> a<01:28:39.920> 20<01:28:40.489> minute<01:28:40.730> response<01:28:40.850> time<01:28:41.210> list<01:28:41.570> in 01:28:41.740 --> 01:28:41.750 align:start position:0% of a 20 minute response time list in 01:28:41.750 --> 01:28:44.290 align:start position:0% of a 20 minute response time list in there<01:28:41.989> I<01:28:42.590> think<01:28:42.890> that's<01:28:43.250> that's<01:28:44.060> worth 01:28:44.290 --> 01:28:44.300 align:start position:0% there I think that's that's worth 01:28:44.300 --> 01:28:45.729 align:start position:0% there I think that's that's worth considering<01:28:44.840> and<01:28:45.020> something<01:28:45.290> to<01:28:45.380> canvas<01:28:45.620> to 01:28:45.729 --> 01:28:45.739 align:start position:0% considering and something to canvas to 01:28:45.739 --> 01:28:49.780 align:start position:0% considering and something to canvas to put<01:28:45.980> in<01:28:46.130> there<01:28:47.440> but<01:28:48.440> I<01:28:48.470> thought<01:28:48.710> the<01:28:49.400> comments 01:28:49.780 --> 01:28:49.790 align:start position:0% put in there but I thought the comments 01:28:49.790 --> 01:28:53.980 align:start position:0% put in there but I thought the comments from<01:28:50.320> margarita<01:28:51.320> I<01:28:51.440> think<01:28:51.770> were<01:28:51.890> really 01:28:53.980 --> 01:28:53.990 align:start position:0% from margarita I think were really 01:28:53.990 --> 01:28:58.030 align:start position:0% from margarita I think were really I<01:28:55.150> would<01:28:56.150> be<01:28:57.050> interested<01:28:57.290> in<01:28:57.560> seeing<01:28:57.830> if 01:28:58.030 --> 01:28:58.040 align:start position:0% I would be interested in seeing if 01:28:58.040 --> 01:29:01.240 align:start position:0% I would be interested in seeing if there's<01:28:58.250> research<01:28:59.180> out<01:28:59.420> there<01:28:59.770> or<01:29:00.770> other<01:29:00.920> data 01:29:01.240 --> 01:29:01.250 align:start position:0% there's research out there or other data 01:29:01.250 --> 01:29:04.090 align:start position:0% there's research out there or other data about<01:29:01.580> how<01:29:02.110> short-term<01:29:03.110> rentals<01:29:03.470> potentially 01:29:04.090 --> 01:29:04.100 align:start position:0% about how short-term rentals potentially 01:29:04.100 --> 01:29:06.850 align:start position:0% about how short-term rentals potentially impact<01:29:04.750> rental<01:29:05.750> rates<01:29:05.930> and<01:29:06.260> the<01:29:06.320> city<01:29:06.560> and<01:29:06.740> if 01:29:06.850 --> 01:29:06.860 align:start position:0% impact rental rates and the city and if 01:29:06.860 --> 01:29:11.530 align:start position:0% impact rental rates and the city and if it<01:29:07.070> has<01:29:07.900> artificially<01:29:08.900> inflate<01:29:10.150> rental<01:29:11.150> costs 01:29:11.530 --> 01:29:11.540 align:start position:0% it has artificially inflate rental costs 01:29:11.540 --> 01:29:14.920 align:start position:0% it has artificially inflate rental costs and<01:29:12.290> if<01:29:12.680> that's<01:29:12.860> something<01:29:13.190> that<01:29:13.720> impacts<01:29:14.720> our 01:29:14.920 --> 01:29:14.930 align:start position:0% and if that's something that impacts our 01:29:14.930 --> 01:29:16.840 align:start position:0% and if that's something that impacts our existing<01:29:15.410> rental<01:29:15.710> stock<01:29:15.920> I<01:29:16.130> think<01:29:16.370> I<01:29:16.580> think 01:29:16.840 --> 01:29:16.850 align:start position:0% existing rental stock I think I think 01:29:16.850 --> 01:29:23.610 align:start position:0% existing rental stock I think I think would<01:29:17.150> be<01:29:17.350> of<01:29:18.350> concern 01:29:23.610 --> 01:29:23.620 align:start position:0% 01:29:23.620 --> 01:29:28.170 align:start position:0% so<01:29:24.190> I<01:29:24.220> guess<01:29:24.700> you<01:29:25.210> know<01:29:25.240> you<01:29:26.130> know<01:29:27.130> I<01:29:27.160> I<01:29:27.580> share 01:29:28.170 --> 01:29:28.180 align:start position:0% so I guess you know you know I I share 01:29:28.180 --> 01:29:29.850 align:start position:0% so I guess you know you know I I share the<01:29:28.360> concerns<01:29:28.690> that<01:29:28.870> you<01:29:29.290> know<01:29:29.410> we<01:29:29.530> don't<01:29:29.650> want 01:29:29.850 --> 01:29:29.860 align:start position:0% the concerns that you know we don't want 01:29:29.860 --> 01:29:31.980 align:start position:0% the concerns that you know we don't want to<01:29:29.920> generate<01:29:30.880> a<01:29:30.940> solution<01:29:31.510> and<01:29:31.660> look<01:29:31.780> for<01:29:31.960> a 01:29:31.980 --> 01:29:31.990 align:start position:0% to generate a solution and look for a 01:29:31.990 --> 01:29:34.460 align:start position:0% to generate a solution and look for a problem<01:29:32.440> and<01:29:32.710> I<01:29:33.370> don't<01:29:33.550> want<01:29:34.000> us<01:29:34.150> to 01:29:34.460 --> 01:29:34.470 align:start position:0% problem and I don't want us to 01:29:34.470 --> 01:29:37.050 align:start position:0% problem and I don't want us to necessarily<01:29:35.470> be<01:29:35.680> responding<01:29:36.280> to<01:29:36.310> you<01:29:36.940> know<01:29:37.030> a 01:29:37.050 --> 01:29:37.060 align:start position:0% necessarily be responding to you know a 01:29:37.060 --> 01:29:41.580 align:start position:0% necessarily be responding to you know a few<01:29:37.180> squeaky<01:29:38.170> wheels<01:29:38.440> or<01:29:39.060> and<01:29:40.230> and<01:29:41.230> if<01:29:41.350> there's 01:29:41.580 --> 01:29:41.590 align:start position:0% few squeaky wheels or and and if there's 01:29:41.590 --> 01:29:43.950 align:start position:0% few squeaky wheels or and and if there's if<01:29:41.890> you<01:29:42.490> know<01:29:42.580> we're<01:29:42.760> sort<01:29:42.970> of<01:29:43.090> jumping<01:29:43.630> on<01:29:43.750> the 01:29:43.950 --> 01:29:43.960 align:start position:0% if you know we're sort of jumping on the 01:29:43.960 --> 01:29:46.740 align:start position:0% if you know we're sort of jumping on the the<01:29:44.530> concerns<01:29:44.920> that<01:29:45.070> these<01:29:45.910> short-term 01:29:46.740 --> 01:29:46.750 align:start position:0% the concerns that these short-term 01:29:46.750 --> 01:29:48.240 align:start position:0% the concerns that these short-term rentals<01:29:47.140> have<01:29:47.260> been<01:29:47.410> a<01:29:47.470> problem<01:29:47.650> in<01:29:47.920> places 01:29:48.240 --> 01:29:48.250 align:start position:0% rentals have been a problem in places 01:29:48.250 --> 01:29:49.530 align:start position:0% rentals have been a problem in places like<01:29:48.280> Tahoe<01:29:48.670> and<01:29:48.850> other<01:29:49.000> places<01:29:49.240> where<01:29:49.510> you 01:29:49.530 --> 01:29:49.540 align:start position:0% like Tahoe and other places where you 01:29:49.540 --> 01:29:52.050 align:start position:0% like Tahoe and other places where you virtually<01:29:49.810> have<01:29:50.080> no<01:29:50.640> existing<01:29:51.640> residents 01:29:52.050 --> 01:29:52.060 align:start position:0% virtually have no existing residents 01:29:52.060 --> 01:29:54.930 align:start position:0% virtually have no existing residents that<01:29:52.240> are<01:29:52.360> there<01:29:52.510> and<01:29:53.130> it's<01:29:54.130> possible<01:29:54.730> and 01:29:54.930 --> 01:29:54.940 align:start position:0% that are there and it's possible and 01:29:54.940 --> 01:29:56.100 align:start position:0% that are there and it's possible and it's<01:29:55.090> feasible<01:29:55.510> to<01:29:55.660> think<01:29:55.840> that<01:29:55.990> that 01:29:56.100 --> 01:29:56.110 align:start position:0% it's feasible to think that that 01:29:56.110 --> 01:29:57.390 align:start position:0% it's feasible to think that that situation<01:29:56.320> would<01:29:56.590> happen<01:29:56.920> in<01:29:57.040> Half<01:29:57.190> Moon<01:29:57.340> Bay 01:29:57.390 --> 01:29:57.400 align:start position:0% situation would happen in Half Moon Bay 01:29:57.400 --> 01:29:58.830 align:start position:0% situation would happen in Half Moon Bay where<01:29:57.820> you<01:29:58.180> know<01:29:58.300> a<01:29:58.330> beautiful<01:29:58.690> community 01:29:58.830 --> 01:29:58.840 align:start position:0% where you know a beautiful community 01:29:58.840 --> 01:30:00.720 align:start position:0% where you know a beautiful community that<01:29:59.140> people<01:29:59.380> like<01:29:59.530> with<01:29:59.710> right<01:30:00.250> now<01:30:00.490> that 01:30:00.720 --> 01:30:00.730 align:start position:0% that people like with right now that 01:30:00.730 --> 01:30:02.580 align:start position:0% that people like with right now that situation<01:30:01.240> doesn't<01:30:01.540> necessarily<01:30:01.930> seem<01:30:02.320> to<01:30:02.500> be 01:30:02.580 --> 01:30:02.590 align:start position:0% situation doesn't necessarily seem to be 01:30:02.590 --> 01:30:06.330 align:start position:0% situation doesn't necessarily seem to be here<01:30:02.770> so<01:30:03.010> I<01:30:03.220> think<01:30:03.670> I<01:30:04.320> think<01:30:05.320> having<01:30:05.860> something 01:30:06.330 --> 01:30:06.340 align:start position:0% here so I think I think having something 01:30:06.340 --> 01:30:07.980 align:start position:0% here so I think I think having something there<01:30:06.490> but<01:30:06.730> may<01:30:06.970> ensuring<01:30:07.450> that<01:30:07.480> we<01:30:07.690> have<01:30:07.780> some 01:30:07.980 --> 01:30:07.990 align:start position:0% there but may ensuring that we have some 01:30:07.990 --> 01:30:10.530 align:start position:0% there but may ensuring that we have some responsibility<01:30:08.680> and<01:30:08.710> flexibility<01:30:09.540> and 01:30:10.530 --> 01:30:10.540 align:start position:0% responsibility and flexibility and 01:30:10.540 --> 01:30:13.710 align:start position:0% responsibility and flexibility and making<01:30:11.170> sure<01:30:11.380> that<01:30:11.530> we're<01:30:12.570> avoiding<01:30:13.570> any 01:30:13.710 --> 01:30:13.720 align:start position:0% making sure that we're avoiding any 01:30:13.720 --> 01:30:19.230 align:start position:0% making sure that we're avoiding any unintended<01:30:14.910> consequences<01:30:16.050> is<01:30:17.520> is<01:30:18.520> a<01:30:18.970> good 01:30:19.230 --> 01:30:19.240 align:start position:0% unintended consequences is is a good 01:30:19.240 --> 01:30:24.290 align:start position:0% unintended consequences is is a good approach<01:30:19.510> to<01:30:19.750> go<01:30:20.460> without<01:30:21.840> comments<01:30:22.840> for<01:30:22.990> now 01:30:24.290 --> 01:30:24.300 align:start position:0% approach to go without comments for now 01:30:24.300 --> 01:30:30.240 align:start position:0% approach to go without comments for now reload<01:30:25.300> um<01:30:26.310> Chris<01:30:27.310> your<01:30:27.460> Pulgar<01:30:29.010> you're<01:30:30.010> still 01:30:30.240 --> 01:30:30.250 align:start position:0% reload um Chris your Pulgar you're still 01:30:30.250 --> 01:30:35.450 align:start position:0% reload um Chris your Pulgar you're still courting<01:30:30.700> her<01:30:32.340> so<01:30:33.340> I<01:30:33.850> very<01:30:34.600> much<01:30:34.720> appreciate 01:30:35.450 --> 01:30:35.460 align:start position:0% courting her so I very much appreciate 01:30:35.460 --> 01:30:39.030 align:start position:0% courting her so I very much appreciate Commissioner<01:30:36.460> Holt's<01:30:37.770> comments<01:30:38.770> I<01:30:38.830> was<01:30:38.950> very 01:30:39.030 --> 01:30:39.040 align:start position:0% Commissioner Holt's comments I was very 01:30:39.040 --> 01:30:41.400 align:start position:0% Commissioner Holt's comments I was very eloquently<01:30:39.580> put<01:30:39.790> and<01:30:40.030> I<01:30:40.300> would<01:30:40.510> echo<01:30:41.020> a<01:30:41.050> lot<01:30:41.350> of 01:30:41.400 --> 01:30:41.410 align:start position:0% eloquently put and I would echo a lot of 01:30:41.410 --> 01:30:44.280 align:start position:0% eloquently put and I would echo a lot of that<01:30:41.740> and<01:30:42.100> I<01:30:42.160> think<01:30:42.940> that<01:30:43.150> one<01:30:43.750> of<01:30:43.900> the<01:30:44.050> things 01:30:44.280 --> 01:30:44.290 align:start position:0% that and I think that one of the things 01:30:44.290 --> 01:30:46.230 align:start position:0% that and I think that one of the things that<01:30:44.560> I<01:30:44.740> can<01:30:45.190> reading<01:30:45.970> all<01:30:46.090> the<01:30:46.210> information 01:30:46.230 --> 01:30:46.240 align:start position:0% that I can reading all the information 01:30:46.240 --> 01:30:48.210 align:start position:0% that I can reading all the information and<01:30:46.870> then<01:30:47.020> hearing<01:30:47.380> the<01:30:47.530> comments<01:30:47.740> tonight 01:30:48.210 --> 01:30:48.220 align:start position:0% and then hearing the comments tonight 01:30:48.220 --> 01:30:51.570 align:start position:0% and then hearing the comments tonight and<01:30:48.550> thank<01:30:48.880> you<01:30:49.030> all<01:30:49.210> i<01:30:49.440> it<01:30:50.440> really<01:30:50.470> helps<01:30:50.980> me 01:30:51.570 --> 01:30:51.580 align:start position:0% and thank you all i it really helps me 01:30:51.580 --> 01:30:54.510 align:start position:0% and thank you all i it really helps me understand<01:30:52.090> the<01:30:52.240> scope<01:30:52.450> of<01:30:52.570> the<01:30:52.720> the<01:30:53.520> issues 01:30:54.510 --> 01:30:54.520 align:start position:0% understand the scope of the the issues 01:30:54.520 --> 01:30:56.760 align:start position:0% understand the scope of the the issues in<01:30:54.670> front<01:30:54.760> of<01:30:54.880> us<01:30:55.030> is<01:30:55.270> what<01:30:56.140> I'm<01:30:56.230> still 01:30:56.760 --> 01:30:56.770 align:start position:0% in front of us is what I'm still 01:30:56.770 --> 01:30:59.110 align:start position:0% in front of us is what I'm still confused<01:30:57.310> about<01:30:57.610> the 01:30:59.110 --> 01:30:59.120 align:start position:0% confused about the 01:30:59.120 --> 01:31:02.650 align:start position:0% confused about the kind<01:30:59.960> of<01:30:59.990> concept<01:31:00.710> of<01:31:00.950> how<01:31:01.510> defining<01:31:02.510> like 01:31:02.650 --> 01:31:02.660 align:start position:0% kind of concept of how defining like 01:31:02.660 --> 01:31:05.410 align:start position:0% kind of concept of how defining like unholstered<01:31:03.290> and<01:31:03.440> hosted<01:31:03.830> I<01:31:04.240> there<01:31:05.240> was<01:31:05.360> a 01:31:05.410 --> 01:31:05.420 align:start position:0% unholstered and hosted I there was a 01:31:05.420 --> 01:31:07.420 align:start position:0% unholstered and hosted I there was a comment<01:31:05.720> brought<01:31:06.200> up<01:31:06.350> about<01:31:06.500> how<01:31:06.890> whether 01:31:07.420 --> 01:31:07.430 align:start position:0% comment brought up about how whether 01:31:07.430 --> 01:31:09.840 align:start position:0% comment brought up about how whether maybe<01:31:07.730> it's<01:31:07.940> more<01:31:08.180> the<01:31:08.390> question<01:31:08.690> of<01:31:09.020> the 01:31:09.840 --> 01:31:09.850 align:start position:0% maybe it's more the question of the 01:31:09.850 --> 01:31:12.720 align:start position:0% maybe it's more the question of the primary<01:31:10.850> and<01:31:11.030> sole<01:31:11.210> residents<01:31:11.870> versus 01:31:12.720 --> 01:31:12.730 align:start position:0% primary and sole residents versus 01:31:12.730 --> 01:31:15.760 align:start position:0% primary and sole residents versus dedicated<01:31:13.730> for<01:31:14.360> a<01:31:14.750> short-term<01:31:15.110> rental<01:31:15.320> I 01:31:15.760 --> 01:31:15.770 align:start position:0% dedicated for a short-term rental I 01:31:15.770 --> 01:31:18.160 align:start position:0% dedicated for a short-term rental I think<01:31:16.040> that's<01:31:16.190> a<01:31:16.310> you<01:31:16.940> know<01:31:17.060> a<01:31:17.150> different<01:31:17.750> kind 01:31:18.160 --> 01:31:18.170 align:start position:0% think that's a you know a different kind 01:31:18.170 --> 01:31:19.990 align:start position:0% think that's a you know a different kind of<01:31:18.230> way<01:31:18.380> of<01:31:18.410> thinking<01:31:18.530> about<01:31:18.920> it<01:31:19.070> but<01:31:19.670> also<01:31:19.820> I 01:31:19.990 --> 01:31:20.000 align:start position:0% of way of thinking about it but also I 01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:23.410 align:start position:0% of way of thinking about it but also I see<01:31:20.450> the<01:31:20.600> value<01:31:20.870> of<01:31:21.080> being<01:31:21.710> able<01:31:21.950> to<01:31:22.390> have<01:31:23.390> a 01:31:23.410 --> 01:31:23.420 align:start position:0% see the value of being able to have a 01:31:23.420 --> 01:31:25.300 align:start position:0% see the value of being able to have a short-term<01:31:23.930> rental<01:31:24.230> where<01:31:25.010> you're<01:31:25.190> not 01:31:25.300 --> 01:31:25.310 align:start position:0% short-term rental where you're not 01:31:25.310 --> 01:31:28.270 align:start position:0% short-term rental where you're not necessarily<01:31:26.230> immediately<01:31:27.230> on<01:31:27.620> the<01:31:27.770> property 01:31:28.270 --> 01:31:28.280 align:start position:0% necessarily immediately on the property 01:31:28.280 --> 01:31:30.820 align:start position:0% necessarily immediately on the property but<01:31:29.060> you're<01:31:29.210> you<01:31:29.540> are<01:31:29.690> nearby<01:31:30.050> like<01:31:30.560> you<01:31:30.650> are<01:31:30.800> a 01:31:30.820 --> 01:31:30.830 align:start position:0% but you're you are nearby like you are a 01:31:30.830 --> 01:31:32.590 align:start position:0% but you're you are nearby like you are a block<01:31:31.130> away<01:31:31.280> or<01:31:31.400> something<01:31:31.700> if<01:31:31.940> there<01:31:32.450> are<01:31:32.570> I 01:31:32.590 --> 01:31:32.600 align:start position:0% block away or something if there are I 01:31:32.600 --> 01:31:34.090 align:start position:0% block away or something if there are I mean<01:31:32.780> I<01:31:32.990> do<01:31:33.050> think<01:31:33.170> that<01:31:33.440> that<01:31:33.650> is<01:31:33.920> the 01:31:34.090 --> 01:31:34.100 align:start position:0% mean I do think that that is the 01:31:34.100 --> 01:31:35.470 align:start position:0% mean I do think that that is the flexibility<01:31:34.700> that<01:31:34.790> would<01:31:35.000> be<01:31:35.090> nice<01:31:35.270> to 01:31:35.470 --> 01:31:35.480 align:start position:0% flexibility that would be nice to 01:31:35.480 --> 01:31:39.360 align:start position:0% flexibility that would be nice to include<01:31:36.460> so<01:31:37.460> it's<01:31:37.790> it<01:31:38.120> that<01:31:38.510> to<01:31:38.750> me<01:31:38.900> is<01:31:39.050> a<01:31:39.080> very 01:31:39.360 --> 01:31:39.370 align:start position:0% include so it's it that to me is a very 01:31:39.370 --> 01:31:41.740 align:start position:0% include so it's it that to me is a very difficult<01:31:40.370> even<01:31:40.850> in<01:31:41.030> looking<01:31:41.300> it<01:31:41.390> through<01:31:41.630> the 01:31:41.740 --> 01:31:41.750 align:start position:0% difficult even in looking it through the 01:31:41.750 --> 01:31:43.720 align:start position:0% difficult even in looking it through the table<01:31:42.170> of<01:31:42.350> examples<01:31:42.950> that<01:31:43.100> had<01:31:43.400> been<01:31:43.550> pulled 01:31:43.720 --> 01:31:43.730 align:start position:0% table of examples that had been pulled 01:31:43.730 --> 01:31:44.830 align:start position:0% table of examples that had been pulled together<01:31:43.850> asked<01:31:44.210> by<01:31:44.300> the<01:31:44.360> Coastal<01:31:44.810> Commission 01:31:44.830 --> 01:31:44.840 align:start position:0% together asked by the Coastal Commission 01:31:44.840 --> 01:31:47.530 align:start position:0% together asked by the Coastal Commission of<01:31:45.290> other<01:31:45.560> It<01:31:46.100> was<01:31:46.160> as<01:31:46.310> if<01:31:46.460> unholstered<01:31:47.390> and 01:31:47.530 --> 01:31:47.540 align:start position:0% of other It was as if unholstered and 01:31:47.540 --> 01:31:50.260 align:start position:0% of other It was as if unholstered and hosted<01:31:47.840> was<01:31:48.020> clear<01:31:48.470> to<01:31:48.770> everybody<01:31:49.070> and<01:31:49.580> I 01:31:50.260 --> 01:31:50.270 align:start position:0% hosted was clear to everybody and I 01:31:50.270 --> 01:31:52.540 align:start position:0% hosted was clear to everybody and I didn't<01:31:50.750> feel<01:31:50.900> that<01:31:50.930> way<01:31:51.140> and<01:31:52.040> then<01:31:52.250> I<01:31:52.280> also 01:31:52.540 --> 01:31:52.550 align:start position:0% didn't feel that way and then I also 01:31:52.550 --> 01:31:54.550 align:start position:0% didn't feel that way and then I also think<01:31:52.790> it<01:31:53.090> doesn't<01:31:53.690> quite<01:31:53.960> I<01:31:54.020> don't<01:31:54.200> quite 01:31:54.550 --> 01:31:54.560 align:start position:0% think it doesn't quite I don't quite 01:31:54.560 --> 01:31:57.060 align:start position:0% think it doesn't quite I don't quite understand<01:31:54.980> how<01:31:55.100> it<01:31:55.130> gels<01:31:55.550> with<01:31:55.850> the<01:31:56.090> ad<01:31:56.240> you 01:31:57.060 --> 01:31:57.070 align:start position:0% understand how it gels with the ad you 01:31:57.070 --> 01:31:59.410 align:start position:0% understand how it gels with the ad you because<01:31:58.070> it<01:31:58.310> seems<01:31:58.580> to<01:31:58.760> me<01:31:58.910> for<01:31:59.120> instance 01:31:59.410 --> 01:31:59.420 align:start position:0% because it seems to me for instance 01:31:59.420 --> 01:32:02.950 align:start position:0% because it seems to me for instance where<01:31:59.780> if<01:32:00.080> somebody<01:32:00.470> is<01:32:00.820> going<01:32:01.820> to<01:32:01.970> be<01:32:02.510> able<01:32:02.810> to 01:32:02.950 --> 01:32:02.960 align:start position:0% where if somebody is going to be able to 01:32:02.960 --> 01:32:06.550 align:start position:0% where if somebody is going to be able to like<01:32:03.230> move<01:32:03.470> into<01:32:03.920> an<01:32:04.460> ad<01:32:04.640> you<01:32:04.940> then<01:32:05.900> are<01:32:06.350> they 01:32:06.550 --> 01:32:06.560 align:start position:0% like move into an ad you then are they 01:32:06.560 --> 01:32:08.350 align:start position:0% like move into an ad you then are they and<01:32:07.070> maybe<01:32:07.640> I<01:32:07.730> don't<01:32:07.910> know<01:32:08.090> if<01:32:08.180> that's 01:32:08.350 --> 01:32:08.360 align:start position:0% and maybe I don't know if that's 01:32:08.360 --> 01:32:10.390 align:start position:0% and maybe I don't know if that's attached<01:32:08.990> or<01:32:09.290> not<01:32:09.410> attached<01:32:09.770> and<01:32:10.100> then<01:32:10.190> how 01:32:10.390 --> 01:32:10.400 align:start position:0% attached or not attached and then how 01:32:10.400 --> 01:32:13.150 align:start position:0% attached or not attached and then how does<01:32:10.460> that<01:32:10.730> reflect<01:32:11.060> a<01:32:11.300> bear<01:32:11.720> on<01:32:12.160> renting 01:32:13.150 --> 01:32:13.160 align:start position:0% does that reflect a bear on renting 01:32:13.160 --> 01:32:16.690 align:start position:0% does that reflect a bear on renting their<01:32:13.600> house<01:32:14.630> the<01:32:15.530> primary<01:32:15.980> residence<01:32:16.460> the 01:32:16.690 --> 01:32:16.700 align:start position:0% their house the primary residence the 01:32:16.700 --> 01:32:19.330 align:start position:0% their house the primary residence the for<01:32:17.180> as<01:32:17.510> a<01:32:17.540> short-term<01:32:18.470> rental<01:32:18.650> versus<01:32:19.310> a 01:32:19.330 --> 01:32:19.340 align:start position:0% for as a short-term rental versus a 01:32:19.340 --> 01:32:20.950 align:start position:0% for as a short-term rental versus a long-term<01:32:19.700> rental<01:32:20.000> I<01:32:20.150> think<01:32:20.510> there's<01:32:20.660> a<01:32:20.750> lot 01:32:20.950 --> 01:32:20.960 align:start position:0% long-term rental I think there's a lot 01:32:20.960 --> 01:32:24.430 align:start position:0% long-term rental I think there's a lot of<01:32:21.010> canoe<01:32:22.010> it<01:32:22.070> gets<01:32:22.490> to<01:32:22.730> me<01:32:22.850> very<01:32:23.030> confusing<01:32:23.480> I 01:32:24.430 --> 01:32:24.440 align:start position:0% of canoe it gets to me very confusing I 01:32:24.440 --> 01:32:29.170 align:start position:0% of canoe it gets to me very confusing I am<01:32:25.280> very<01:32:25.760> much<01:32:26.060> in<01:32:26.420> favor<01:32:26.510> of<01:32:27.080> having<01:32:27.940> for<01:32:28.940> sure 01:32:29.170 --> 01:32:29.180 align:start position:0% am very much in favor of having for sure 01:32:29.180 --> 01:32:30.490 align:start position:0% am very much in favor of having for sure what<01:32:29.540> where<01:32:29.690> I<01:32:29.720> think<01:32:29.990> we're<01:32:30.110> calling<01:32:30.380> the 01:32:30.490 --> 01:32:30.500 align:start position:0% what where I think we're calling the 01:32:30.500 --> 01:32:33.060 align:start position:0% what where I think we're calling the hosted<01:32:31.040> rental<01:32:31.760> in<01:32:32.000> the<01:32:32.150> sense<01:32:32.390> that<01:32:32.480> the 01:32:33.060 --> 01:32:33.070 align:start position:0% hosted rental in the sense that the 01:32:33.070 --> 01:32:38.940 align:start position:0% hosted rental in the sense that the having<01:32:34.070> that<01:32:34.610> responsible<01:32:35.450> not<01:32:36.290> absentee<01:32:37.330> a 01:32:38.940 --> 01:32:38.950 align:start position:0% having that responsible not absentee a 01:32:38.950 --> 01:32:42.220 align:start position:0% having that responsible not absentee a short-term<01:32:39.950> rental<01:32:40.130> and<01:32:40.720> because<01:32:41.720> of<01:32:41.930> the 01:32:42.220 --> 01:32:42.230 align:start position:0% short-term rental and because of the 01:32:42.230 --> 01:32:47.050 align:start position:0% short-term rental and because of the flexibility<01:32:42.860> it<01:32:43.010> offers<01:32:44.290> residents<01:32:45.290> and<01:32:46.060> to 01:32:47.050 --> 01:32:47.060 align:start position:0% flexibility it offers residents and to 01:32:47.060 --> 01:32:49.660 align:start position:0% flexibility it offers residents and to be<01:32:47.210> able<01:32:47.420> to<01:32:47.600> afford<01:32:47.960> to<01:32:48.200> live<01:32:48.380> here<01:32:48.710> but<01:32:49.370> also 01:32:49.660 --> 01:32:49.670 align:start position:0% be able to afford to live here but also 01:32:49.670 --> 01:32:52.060 align:start position:0% be able to afford to live here but also I'm<01:32:50.330> always<01:32:50.840> talking<01:32:51.320> about<01:32:51.740> having 01:32:52.060 --> 01:32:52.070 align:start position:0% I'm always talking about having 01:32:52.070 --> 01:32:55.680 align:start position:0% I'm always talking about having affordable<01:32:52.940> of<01:32:53.290> visitors<01:32:54.290> serving 01:32:55.680 --> 01:32:55.690 align:start position:0% affordable of visitors serving 01:32:55.690 --> 01:32:58.840 align:start position:0% affordable of visitors serving accommodations<01:32:56.690> on<01:32:56.990> the<01:32:57.370> coast<01:32:58.370> I'm<01:32:58.670> the 01:32:58.840 --> 01:32:58.850 align:start position:0% accommodations on the coast I'm the 01:32:58.850 --> 01:33:00.760 align:start position:0% accommodations on the coast I'm the coastal<01:32:59.270> access<01:32:59.660> person<01:33:00.050> I<01:33:00.140> love<01:33:00.350> that<01:33:00.560> you 01:33:00.760 --> 01:33:00.770 align:start position:0% coastal access person I love that you 01:33:00.770 --> 01:33:04.900 align:start position:0% coastal access person I love that you know<01:33:00.890> and<01:33:01.190> so<01:33:01.460> I<01:33:01.760> do<01:33:02.210> think<01:33:02.780> that<01:33:02.870> the<01:33:03.910> having 01:33:04.900 --> 01:33:04.910 align:start position:0% know and so I do think that the having 01:33:04.910 --> 01:33:08.170 align:start position:0% know and so I do think that the having short-term<01:33:05.330> rentals<01:33:05.750> is<01:33:06.400> very<01:33:07.400> important<01:33:08.000> as 01:33:08.170 --> 01:33:08.180 align:start position:0% short-term rentals is very important as 01:33:08.180 --> 01:33:10.120 align:start position:0% short-term rentals is very important as another<01:33:08.690> way<01:33:08.930> of<01:33:09.080> providing<01:33:09.380> especially 01:33:10.120 --> 01:33:10.130 align:start position:0% another way of providing especially 01:33:10.130 --> 01:33:11.440 align:start position:0% another way of providing especially families 01:33:11.440 --> 01:33:11.450 align:start position:0% families 01:33:11.450 --> 01:33:13.450 align:start position:0% families others<01:33:11.720> who<01:33:11.900> just<01:33:12.140> can't<01:33:12.440> afford<01:33:12.590> to<01:33:13.160> stay<01:33:13.340> in 01:33:13.450 --> 01:33:13.460 align:start position:0% others who just can't afford to stay in 01:33:13.460 --> 01:33:16.660 align:start position:0% others who just can't afford to stay in a<01:33:13.490> hotel<01:33:13.810> for<01:33:14.810> you<01:33:15.620> know<01:33:15.740> that<01:33:15.980> it<01:33:16.190> can<01:33:16.430> and 01:33:16.660 --> 01:33:16.670 align:start position:0% a hotel for you know that it can and 01:33:16.670 --> 01:33:18.430 align:start position:0% a hotel for you know that it can and especially<01:33:17.000> when<01:33:17.300> it's<01:33:17.450> a<01:33:17.540> if<01:33:17.960> it's<01:33:18.080> kind<01:33:18.380> of 01:33:18.430 --> 01:33:18.440 align:start position:0% especially when it's a if it's kind of 01:33:18.440 --> 01:33:19.930 align:start position:0% especially when it's a if it's kind of what<01:33:18.590> we're<01:33:18.740> calling<01:33:18.920> this<01:33:19.220> hosted<01:33:19.700> where 01:33:19.930 --> 01:33:19.940 align:start position:0% what we're calling this hosted where 01:33:19.940 --> 01:33:21.910 align:start position:0% what we're calling this hosted where there's<01:33:20.150> a<01:33:20.210> presence<01:33:20.780> there<01:33:20.900> and<01:33:21.290> so<01:33:21.470> I<01:33:21.680> think 01:33:21.910 --> 01:33:21.920 align:start position:0% there's a presence there and so I think 01:33:21.920 --> 01:33:25.450 align:start position:0% there's a presence there and so I think you<01:33:22.610> know<01:33:22.760> that<01:33:23.030> will<01:33:23.500> offer<01:33:24.500> that<01:33:24.830> option<01:33:25.040> I 01:33:25.450 --> 01:33:25.460 align:start position:0% you know that will offer that option I 01:33:25.460 --> 01:33:27.310 align:start position:0% you know that will offer that option I also<01:33:26.060> think<01:33:26.330> that<01:33:26.360> those<01:33:26.600> tend<01:33:26.870> to<01:33:26.930> be<01:33:27.020> lower 01:33:27.310 --> 01:33:27.320 align:start position:0% also think that those tend to be lower 01:33:27.320 --> 01:33:32.290 align:start position:0% also think that those tend to be lower cost<01:33:27.680> when<01:33:28.490> you<01:33:28.610> look<01:33:28.760> at<01:33:28.850> Airbnb<01:33:29.290> listings<01:33:31.300> so 01:33:32.290 --> 01:33:32.300 align:start position:0% cost when you look at Airbnb listings so 01:33:32.300 --> 01:33:34.720 align:start position:0% cost when you look at Airbnb listings so as<01:33:32.720> opposed<01:33:33.200> to<01:33:33.350> somebody<01:33:33.950> who's<01:33:34.190> renting<01:33:34.400> or 01:33:34.720 --> 01:33:34.730 align:start position:0% as opposed to somebody who's renting or 01:33:34.730 --> 01:33:38.680 align:start position:0% as opposed to somebody who's renting or like<01:33:34.850> a<01:33:34.880> fourteen<01:33:35.450> bed<01:33:35.690> or<01:33:36.050> like<01:33:36.560> party<01:33:37.250> house 01:33:38.680 --> 01:33:38.690 align:start position:0% like a fourteen bed or like party house 01:33:38.690 --> 01:33:42.880 align:start position:0% like a fourteen bed or like party house so<01:33:39.970> that<01:33:40.970> I<01:33:41.000> I'm<01:33:41.450> very<01:33:41.480> strongly<01:33:42.200> want<01:33:42.590> you 01:33:42.880 --> 01:33:42.890 align:start position:0% so that I I'm very strongly want you 01:33:42.890 --> 01:33:44.920 align:start position:0% so that I I'm very strongly want you know<01:33:42.980> do<01:33:43.160> not<01:33:43.310> want<01:33:43.490> to<01:33:43.580> see<01:33:43.730> this<01:33:43.930> regulate 01:33:44.920 --> 01:33:44.930 align:start position:0% know do not want to see this regulate 01:33:44.930 --> 01:33:47.020 align:start position:0% know do not want to see this regulate that<01:33:45.140> to<01:33:45.710> the<01:33:45.830> point<01:33:45.980> that<01:33:46.190> it's<01:33:46.370> it<01:33:46.610> makes<01:33:46.880> it 01:33:47.020 --> 01:33:47.030 align:start position:0% that to the point that it's it makes it 01:33:47.030 --> 01:33:48.520 align:start position:0% that to the point that it's it makes it hard<01:33:47.240> for<01:33:47.300> residents<01:33:47.840> to<01:33:47.990> do<01:33:48.140> that<01:33:48.320> I<01:33:48.350> think 01:33:48.520 --> 01:33:48.530 align:start position:0% hard for residents to do that I think 01:33:48.530 --> 01:33:51.700 align:start position:0% hard for residents to do that I think that's<01:33:48.740> really<01:33:48.830> important<01:33:49.220> I<01:33:50.560> would<01:33:51.560> be 01:33:51.700 --> 01:33:51.710 align:start position:0% that's really important I would be 01:33:51.710 --> 01:33:55.630 align:start position:0% that's really important I would be interested<01:33:51.980> as<01:33:52.990> like<01:33:53.990> the<01:33:54.110> second<01:33:54.640> Brian's 01:33:55.630 --> 01:33:55.640 align:start position:0% interested as like the second Brian's 01:33:55.640 --> 01:33:57.460 align:start position:0% interested as like the second Brian's comment<01:33:56.360> about<01:33:56.570> being<01:33:56.780> interested<01:33:57.140> to<01:33:57.200> see<01:33:57.380> if 01:33:57.460 --> 01:33:57.470 align:start position:0% comment about being interested to see if 01:33:57.470 --> 01:33:59.770 align:start position:0% comment about being interested to see if there<01:33:57.650> are<01:33:57.680> any<01:33:58.280> there's<01:33:59.240> information<01:33:59.480> about 01:33:59.770 --> 01:33:59.780 align:start position:0% there are any there's information about 01:33:59.780 --> 01:34:02.500 align:start position:0% there are any there's information about the<01:34:00.020> impacts<01:34:00.350> of<01:34:00.940> short-term<01:34:01.940> rentals<01:34:02.330> on 01:34:02.500 --> 01:34:02.510 align:start position:0% the impacts of short-term rentals on 01:34:02.510 --> 01:34:05.560 align:start position:0% the impacts of short-term rentals on rental<01:34:03.320> long-term<01:34:04.250> rental<01:34:04.670> rates<01:34:04.940> I<01:34:05.300> don't 01:34:05.560 --> 01:34:05.570 align:start position:0% rental long-term rental rates I don't 01:34:05.570 --> 01:34:07.060 align:start position:0% rental long-term rental rates I don't know<01:34:05.690> if<01:34:05.810> that<01:34:05.990> is<01:34:06.020> something<01:34:06.170> that<01:34:06.530> has<01:34:06.920> been 01:34:07.060 --> 01:34:07.070 align:start position:0% know if that is something that has been 01:34:07.070 --> 01:34:09.400 align:start position:0% know if that is something that has been seen<01:34:07.250> in<01:34:07.370> other<01:34:07.490> places<01:34:07.730> but<01:34:08.240> um<01:34:08.780> and<01:34:09.140> then 01:34:09.400 --> 01:34:09.410 align:start position:0% seen in other places but um and then 01:34:09.410 --> 01:34:11.430 align:start position:0% seen in other places but um and then there<01:34:09.920> was<01:34:10.100> the<01:34:10.250> thing<01:34:10.700> I<01:34:10.820> was<01:34:10.940> the<01:34:11.030> last 01:34:11.430 --> 01:34:11.440 align:start position:0% there was the thing I was the last 01:34:11.440 --> 01:34:13.600 align:start position:0% there was the thing I was the last comment<01:34:12.440> was<01:34:12.620> about<01:34:13.070> thinking<01:34:13.490> about 01:34:13.600 --> 01:34:13.610 align:start position:0% comment was about thinking about 01:34:13.610 --> 01:34:18.220 align:start position:0% comment was about thinking about mechanisms<01:34:14.420> for<01:34:15.460> making<01:34:16.460> sure<01:34:16.670> that<01:34:16.730> the<01:34:17.450> the 01:34:18.220 --> 01:34:18.230 align:start position:0% mechanisms for making sure that the the 01:34:18.230 --> 01:34:20.880 align:start position:0% mechanisms for making sure that the the really<01:34:18.440> bad<01:34:18.620> actors<01:34:19.100> the<01:34:19.460> that<01:34:20.150> out<01:34:20.360> you<01:34:20.690> know 01:34:20.880 --> 01:34:20.890 align:start position:0% really bad actors the that out you know 01:34:20.890 --> 01:34:23.170 align:start position:0% really bad actors the that out you know absentee<01:34:21.890> kind<01:34:22.310> of<01:34:22.370> party<01:34:22.640> house<01:34:22.790> where 01:34:23.170 --> 01:34:23.180 align:start position:0% absentee kind of party house where 01:34:23.180 --> 01:34:25.110 align:start position:0% absentee kind of party house where that's<01:34:23.390> and<01:34:23.750> there's<01:34:23.960> no<01:34:24.230> responsibility 01:34:25.110 --> 01:34:25.120 align:start position:0% that's and there's no responsibility 01:34:25.120 --> 01:34:29.950 align:start position:0% that's and there's no responsibility thinking<01:34:26.120> about<01:34:26.330> ways<01:34:26.600> to<01:34:27.040> address<01:34:28.040> that<01:34:28.960> so 01:34:29.950 --> 01:34:29.960 align:start position:0% thinking about ways to address that so 01:34:29.960 --> 01:34:32.530 align:start position:0% thinking about ways to address that so essentially<01:34:30.500> let's<01:34:31.340> let's<01:34:31.730> target<01:34:32.120> the 01:34:32.530 --> 01:34:32.540 align:start position:0% essentially let's let's target the 01:34:32.540 --> 01:34:36.400 align:start position:0% essentially let's let's target the problem<01:34:33.380> as<01:34:33.650> opposed<01:34:34.070> to<01:34:34.250> the<01:34:34.670> average<01:34:35.410> like 01:34:36.400 --> 01:34:36.410 align:start position:0% problem as opposed to the average like 01:34:36.410 --> 01:34:37.510 align:start position:0% problem as opposed to the average like the<01:34:36.560> outliers 01:34:37.510 --> 01:34:37.520 align:start position:0% the outliers 01:34:37.520 --> 01:34:41.530 align:start position:0% the outliers yeah<01:34:37.760> I<01:34:38.570> do<01:34:38.990> think<01:34:39.470> it<01:34:40.370> is<01:34:40.580> that's<01:34:41.330> not 01:34:41.530 --> 01:34:41.540 align:start position:0% yeah I do think it is that's not 01:34:41.540 --> 01:34:42.910 align:start position:0% yeah I do think it is that's not necessarily<01:34:41.810> easy<01:34:41.960> enforcement<01:34:42.590> as<01:34:42.650> always 01:34:42.910 --> 01:34:42.920 align:start position:0% necessarily easy enforcement as always 01:34:42.920 --> 01:34:46.270 align:start position:0% necessarily easy enforcement as always the<01:34:43.220> tricky<01:34:43.760> part<01:34:44.110> but<01:34:45.110> I<01:34:45.170> will<01:34:45.500> say<01:34:45.740> that<01:34:46.040> that 01:34:46.270 --> 01:34:46.280 align:start position:0% the tricky part but I will say that that 01:34:46.280 --> 01:34:49.510 align:start position:0% the tricky part but I will say that that may<01:34:46.520> be<01:34:46.550> easier<01:34:47.270> than<01:34:47.720> trying<01:34:48.020> to<01:34:48.200> say<01:34:48.590> we're 01:34:49.510 --> 01:34:49.520 align:start position:0% may be easier than trying to say we're 01:34:49.520 --> 01:34:53.050 align:start position:0% may be easier than trying to say we're gonna<01:34:49.670> enforce<01:34:50.680> 90<01:34:51.680> days<01:34:51.890> a<01:34:51.920> year<01:34:52.460> I<01:34:52.670> mean<01:34:52.790> I'm 01:34:53.050 --> 01:34:53.060 align:start position:0% gonna enforce 90 days a year I mean I'm 01:34:53.060 --> 01:34:54.670 align:start position:0% gonna enforce 90 days a year I mean I'm not<01:34:53.180> exactly<01:34:53.360> sure<01:34:53.600> how<01:34:53.900> the<01:34:53.960> city<01:34:54.350> would 01:34:54.670 --> 01:34:54.680 align:start position:0% not exactly sure how the city would 01:34:54.680 --> 01:34:57.190 align:start position:0% not exactly sure how the city would enforce<01:34:55.100> the<01:34:55.460> like<01:34:55.850> a<01:34:55.880> day<01:34:56.120> limit<01:34:56.450> I'm<01:34:56.900> not 01:34:57.190 --> 01:34:57.200 align:start position:0% enforce the like a day limit I'm not 01:34:57.200 --> 01:34:59.260 align:start position:0% enforce the like a day limit I'm not saying<01:34:57.380> I'm<01:34:57.470> not<01:34:57.620> like<01:34:58.250> I<01:34:58.370> want<01:34:58.760> to<01:34:58.820> explore<01:34:59.120> it 01:34:59.260 --> 01:34:59.270 align:start position:0% saying I'm not like I want to explore it 01:34:59.270 --> 01:35:00.640 align:start position:0% saying I'm not like I want to explore it more<01:34:59.300> but<01:34:59.660> I'm<01:34:59.750> just<01:34:59.900> saying<01:35:00.110> I<01:35:00.320> just<01:35:00.350> don't 01:35:00.640 --> 01:35:00.650 align:start position:0% more but I'm just saying I just don't 01:35:00.650 --> 01:35:02.740 align:start position:0% more but I'm just saying I just don't know<01:35:00.920> that<01:35:00.950> that's<01:35:01.220> of<01:35:01.520> the<01:35:01.700> best<01:35:01.910> mechanism 01:35:02.740 --> 01:35:02.750 align:start position:0% know that that's of the best mechanism 01:35:02.750 --> 01:35:06.310 align:start position:0% know that that's of the best mechanism for<01:35:03.560> achieving<01:35:04.460> this<01:35:05.390> kind<01:35:05.690> of<01:35:05.780> let's<01:35:06.110> address 01:35:06.310 --> 01:35:06.320 align:start position:0% for achieving this kind of let's address 01:35:06.320 --> 01:35:08.860 align:start position:0% for achieving this kind of let's address these<01:35:06.560> problems<01:35:06.890> kind<01:35:07.490> of<01:35:07.610> at<01:35:07.730> the<01:35:07.820> tail<01:35:08.030> as 01:35:08.860 --> 01:35:08.870 align:start position:0% these problems kind of at the tail as 01:35:08.870 --> 01:35:13.530 align:start position:0% these problems kind of at the tail as well<01:35:08.930> so<01:35:10.360> yes 01:35:13.530 --> 01:35:13.540 align:start position:0% 01:35:13.540 --> 01:35:19.710 align:start position:0% thank<01:35:14.540> you<01:35:14.690> Steve<01:35:16.540> thanks<01:35:17.540> good<01:35:18.350> think<01:35:18.950> Thanks 01:35:19.710 --> 01:35:19.720 align:start position:0% thank you Steve thanks good think Thanks 01:35:19.720 --> 01:35:23.710 align:start position:0% thank you Steve thanks good think Thanks excuse<01:35:20.720> me<01:35:20.930> mm-hmm<01:35:22.240> thank<01:35:23.240> you<01:35:23.420> to<01:35:23.540> everybody 01:35:23.710 --> 01:35:23.720 align:start position:0% excuse me mm-hmm thank you to everybody 01:35:23.720 --> 01:35:25.900 align:start position:0% excuse me mm-hmm thank you to everybody who<01:35:23.960> came<01:35:24.170> out<01:35:24.230> tonight<01:35:24.770> it's<01:35:25.040> a<01:35:25.130> it's 01:35:25.900 --> 01:35:25.910 align:start position:0% who came out tonight it's a it's 01:35:25.910 --> 01:35:28.720 align:start position:0% who came out tonight it's a it's obviously<01:35:26.330> a<01:35:26.450> lively<01:35:26.930> topic<01:35:27.440> that<01:35:27.710> the<01:35:28.310> survey 01:35:28.720 --> 01:35:28.730 align:start position:0% obviously a lively topic that the survey 01:35:28.730 --> 01:35:32.050 align:start position:0% obviously a lively topic that the survey I<01:35:29.000> think<01:35:29.060> with<01:35:29.740> approaching<01:35:30.740> 200<01:35:31.060> respondents 01:35:32.050 --> 01:35:32.060 align:start position:0% I think with approaching 200 respondents 01:35:32.060 --> 01:35:35.380 align:start position:0% I think with approaching 200 respondents to<01:35:32.750> the<01:35:32.870> survey<01:35:32.900> which<01:35:33.560> as<01:35:33.830> Joe<01:35:34.820> pointed<01:35:35.060> out<01:35:35.360> a 01:35:35.380 --> 01:35:35.390 align:start position:0% to the survey which as Joe pointed out a 01:35:35.390 --> 01:35:37.270 align:start position:0% to the survey which as Joe pointed out a third<01:35:35.930> of<01:35:35.960> them<01:35:36.170> were<01:35:36.800> in<01:35:36.920> favor<01:35:37.160> of 01:35:37.270 --> 01:35:37.280 align:start position:0% third of them were in favor of 01:35:37.280 --> 01:35:39.100 align:start position:0% third of them were in favor of short-term<01:35:37.730> rentals<01:35:38.120> a<01:35:38.300> third<01:35:38.510> violently 01:35:39.100 --> 01:35:39.110 align:start position:0% short-term rentals a third violently 01:35:39.110 --> 01:35:41.830 align:start position:0% short-term rentals a third violently opposed<01:35:39.530> and<01:35:39.950> another<01:35:40.430> third<01:35:40.760> okay<01:35:41.480> as<01:35:41.690> long 01:35:41.830 --> 01:35:41.840 align:start position:0% opposed and another third okay as long 01:35:41.840 --> 01:35:44.140 align:start position:0% opposed and another third okay as long as<01:35:41.900> they're<01:35:42.200> right<01:35:42.470> limit<01:35:42.920> so<01:35:43.190> it<01:35:43.340> it<01:35:43.700> makes<01:35:43.970> it 01:35:44.140 --> 01:35:44.150 align:start position:0% as they're right limit so it it makes it 01:35:44.150 --> 01:35:48.610 align:start position:0% as they're right limit so it it makes it a<01:35:44.240> lively<01:35:44.960> debate<01:35:47.110> whenever<01:35:48.110> I<01:35:48.170> think<01:35:48.320> about 01:35:48.610 --> 01:35:48.620 align:start position:0% a lively debate whenever I think about 01:35:48.620 --> 01:35:51.120 align:start position:0% a lively debate whenever I think about Airbnb<01:35:49.130> these<01:35:49.670> days<01:35:49.940> I'm<01:35:50.360> reminded<01:35:50.870> of<01:35:50.990> this 01:35:51.120 --> 01:35:51.130 align:start position:0% Airbnb these days I'm reminded of this 01:35:51.130 --> 01:35:55.240 align:start position:0% Airbnb these days I'm reminded of this thing<01:35:52.130> I<01:35:52.220> read<01:35:52.430> about<01:35:52.970> a<01:35:53.120> year<01:35:53.720> ago<01:35:53.810> online<01:35:54.250> and 01:35:55.240 --> 01:35:55.250 align:start position:0% thing I read about a year ago online and 01:35:55.250 --> 01:35:56.770 align:start position:0% thing I read about a year ago online and maybe<01:35:55.520> you<01:35:55.670> all<01:35:55.850> have<01:35:56.030> heard<01:35:56.180> this<01:35:56.420> but<01:35:56.630> the 01:35:56.770 --> 01:35:56.780 align:start position:0% maybe you all have heard this but the 01:35:56.780 --> 01:35:59.860 align:start position:0% maybe you all have heard this but the guy<01:35:56.900> said<01:35:57.580> if<01:35:58.580> you<01:35:58.820> doubt<01:35:59.060> the<01:35:59.300> power<01:35:59.330> of<01:35:59.660> the 01:35:59.860 --> 01:35:59.870 align:start position:0% guy said if you doubt the power of the 01:35:59.870 --> 01:36:02.440 align:start position:0% guy said if you doubt the power of the Internet<01:36:00.290> in<01:36:00.560> today's<01:36:00.860> world<01:36:01.250> the<01:36:01.640> world's 01:36:02.440 --> 01:36:02.450 align:start position:0% Internet in today's world the world's 01:36:02.450 --> 01:36:05.500 align:start position:0% Internet in today's world the world's largest<01:36:02.660> transportation<01:36:03.470> company<01:36:04.370> uber<01:36:04.580> has 01:36:05.500 --> 01:36:05.510 align:start position:0% largest transportation company uber has 01:36:05.510 --> 01:36:08.850 align:start position:0% largest transportation company uber has no<01:36:05.750> vehicles<01:36:06.290> the<01:36:07.100> world's<01:36:07.430> largest<01:36:07.780> retailer 01:36:08.850 --> 01:36:08.860 align:start position:0% no vehicles the world's largest retailer 01:36:08.860 --> 01:36:11.380 align:start position:0% no vehicles the world's largest retailer eBay<01:36:09.860> has<01:36:10.130> no<01:36:10.310> stores<01:36:10.700> and<01:36:11.090> the<01:36:11.150> world's 01:36:11.380 --> 01:36:11.390 align:start position:0% eBay has no stores and the world's 01:36:11.390 --> 01:36:14.140 align:start position:0% eBay has no stores and the world's largest<01:36:11.570> provider<01:36:12.050> lodging<01:36:12.920> Airbnb<01:36:13.910> has 01:36:14.140 --> 01:36:14.150 align:start position:0% largest provider lodging Airbnb has 01:36:14.150 --> 01:36:17.140 align:start position:0% largest provider lodging Airbnb has known<01:36:14.450> as<01:36:14.690> as<01:36:14.900> no<01:36:15.440> facilities<01:36:16.160> of<01:36:16.340> its<01:36:16.430> own<01:36:16.670> so 01:36:17.140 --> 01:36:17.150 align:start position:0% known as as no facilities of its own so 01:36:17.150 --> 01:36:21.210 align:start position:0% known as as no facilities of its own so I<01:36:17.450> think<01:36:18.020> that's<01:36:18.320> here<01:36:18.620> to<01:36:18.830> stay<01:36:18.860> I<01:36:19.550> think<01:36:20.030> that 01:36:21.210 --> 01:36:21.220 align:start position:0% I think that's here to stay I think that 01:36:21.220 --> 01:36:23.950 align:start position:0% I think that's here to stay I think that I'm<01:36:22.220> in<01:36:22.520> strong<01:36:23.030> agreement<01:36:23.780> with 01:36:23.950 --> 01:36:23.960 align:start position:0% I'm in strong agreement with 01:36:23.960 --> 01:36:27.720 align:start position:0% I'm in strong agreement with commissioners<01:36:24.590> polgár<01:36:25.220> and<01:36:25.430> and<01:36:25.670> hold<01:36:26.570> that 01:36:27.720 --> 01:36:27.730 align:start position:0% commissioners polgár and and hold that 01:36:27.730 --> 01:36:31.090 align:start position:0% commissioners polgár and and hold that you<01:36:28.730> know<01:36:28.850> I'm<01:36:28.910> very<01:36:29.360> sympathetic<01:36:29.810> to<01:36:30.290> to 01:36:31.090 --> 01:36:31.100 align:start position:0% you know I'm very sympathetic to to 01:36:31.100 --> 01:36:32.950 align:start position:0% you know I'm very sympathetic to to folks<01:36:31.370> who've<01:36:31.550> had<01:36:31.760> bad<01:36:31.970> experiences<01:36:32.900> with 01:36:32.950 --> 01:36:32.960 align:start position:0% folks who've had bad experiences with 01:36:32.960 --> 01:36:35.680 align:start position:0% folks who've had bad experiences with with<01:36:33.950> folks<01:36:34.280> in<01:36:34.550> the<01:36:34.730> in<01:36:35.060> the<01:36:35.330> short-term 01:36:35.680 --> 01:36:35.690 align:start position:0% with folks in the in the short-term 01:36:35.690 --> 01:36:37.800 align:start position:0% with folks in the in the short-term rentals<01:36:36.200> especially<01:36:36.890> it<01:36:37.010> seems<01:36:37.310> the 01:36:37.800 --> 01:36:37.810 align:start position:0% rentals especially it seems the 01:36:37.810 --> 01:36:40.510 align:start position:0% rentals especially it seems the unholstered<01:36:38.810> ones<01:36:39.020> I<01:36:39.380> live<01:36:40.340> in<01:36:40.460> a 01:36:40.510 --> 01:36:40.520 align:start position:0% unholstered ones I live in a 01:36:40.520 --> 01:36:42.490 align:start position:0% unholstered ones I live in a neighborhood<01:36:40.670> where<01:36:41.240> litter<01:36:42.080> and<01:36:42.290> noise 01:36:42.490 --> 01:36:42.500 align:start position:0% neighborhood where litter and noise 01:36:42.500 --> 01:36:45.870 align:start position:0% neighborhood where litter and noise pollution<01:36:42.860> are<01:36:43.520> are<01:36:44.140> sometimes<01:36:45.140> a<01:36:45.350> problem 01:36:45.870 --> 01:36:45.880 align:start position:0% pollution are are sometimes a problem 01:36:45.880 --> 01:36:48.730 align:start position:0% pollution are are sometimes a problem especially<01:36:46.880> in<01:36:46.970> the<01:36:47.060> summer<01:36:47.330> after<01:36:47.840> hours<01:36:48.380> and 01:36:48.730 --> 01:36:48.740 align:start position:0% especially in the summer after hours and 01:36:48.740 --> 01:36:51.250 align:start position:0% especially in the summer after hours and it<01:36:49.010> has<01:36:49.190> I'm<01:36:49.610> pretty<01:36:50.210> certain<01:36:50.480> nothing<01:36:50.960> to<01:36:51.080> do 01:36:51.250 --> 01:36:51.260 align:start position:0% it has I'm pretty certain nothing to do 01:36:51.260 --> 01:36:52.840 align:start position:0% it has I'm pretty certain nothing to do with<01:36:51.470> people<01:36:51.920> staying<01:36:52.190> in<01:36:52.370> short-term 01:36:52.840 --> 01:36:52.850 align:start position:0% with people staying in short-term 01:36:52.850 --> 01:36:55.480 align:start position:0% with people staying in short-term rentals<01:36:53.330> but<01:36:53.630> just<01:36:54.320> other<01:36:54.500> forms<01:36:55.160> of<01:36:55.310> young 01:36:55.480 --> 01:36:55.490 align:start position:0% rentals but just other forms of young 01:36:55.490 --> 01:37:00.490 align:start position:0% rentals but just other forms of young people<01:36:55.850> visiting<01:36:56.300> the<01:36:56.510> beaches<01:36:57.380> so<01:36:57.620> I'm<01:36:57.770> I<01:36:59.500> as 01:37:00.490 --> 01:37:00.500 align:start position:0% people visiting the beaches so I'm I as 01:37:00.500 --> 01:37:03.790 align:start position:0% people visiting the beaches so I'm I as I<01:37:00.710> manage<01:37:01.160> my<01:37:01.370> own<01:37:01.400> response<01:37:02.210> to<01:37:02.720> what<01:37:03.410> you<01:37:03.620> all 01:37:03.790 --> 01:37:03.800 align:start position:0% I manage my own response to what you all 01:37:03.800 --> 01:37:05.260 align:start position:0% I manage my own response to what you all have<01:37:04.010> said<01:37:04.250> and<01:37:04.520> what<01:37:04.610> I've<01:37:04.760> read<01:37:04.940> in<01:37:05.180> the 01:37:05.260 --> 01:37:05.270 align:start position:0% have said and what I've read in the 01:37:05.270 --> 01:37:10.480 align:start position:0% have said and what I've read in the survey<01:37:05.690> I<01:37:05.720> try<01:37:06.710> to<01:37:06.770> not<01:37:07.270> get<01:37:08.270> to<01:37:08.660> get<01:37:09.490> to 01:37:10.480 --> 01:37:10.490 align:start position:0% survey I try to not get to get to 01:37:10.490 --> 01:37:13.030 align:start position:0% survey I try to not get to get to overreact<01:37:11.300> to<01:37:11.600> the<01:37:11.720> anecdotes<01:37:12.350> about<01:37:12.650> those 01:37:13.030 --> 01:37:13.040 align:start position:0% overreact to the anecdotes about those 01:37:13.040 --> 01:37:15.850 align:start position:0% overreact to the anecdotes about those bad<01:37:13.280> experiences<01:37:13.520> I<01:37:14.330> think<01:37:14.510> it's<01:37:14.930> it<01:37:15.650> seems 01:37:15.850 --> 01:37:15.860 align:start position:0% bad experiences I think it's it seems 01:37:15.860 --> 01:37:18.400 align:start position:0% bad experiences I think it's it seems clear<01:37:16.280> to<01:37:16.310> me<01:37:16.580> that<01:37:16.610> a<01:37:17.090> small<01:37:17.720> number<01:37:18.140> of<01:37:18.170> those 01:37:18.400 --> 01:37:18.410 align:start position:0% clear to me that a small number of those 01:37:18.410 --> 01:37:19.990 align:start position:0% clear to me that a small number of those so-called<01:37:18.770> bad<01:37:19.310> actor 01:37:19.990 --> 01:37:20.000 align:start position:0% so-called bad actor 01:37:20.000 --> 01:37:22.690 align:start position:0% so-called bad actor can<01:37:20.240> can<01:37:20.930> influence<01:37:21.260> people's<01:37:21.890> perception<01:37:22.670> of 01:37:22.690 --> 01:37:22.700 align:start position:0% can can influence people's perception of 01:37:22.700 --> 01:37:25.510 align:start position:0% can can influence people's perception of how<01:37:23.510> it's<01:37:23.750> working<01:37:24.070> certainly<01:37:25.070> we've<01:37:25.250> read 01:37:25.510 --> 01:37:25.520 align:start position:0% how it's working certainly we've read 01:37:25.520 --> 01:37:28.180 align:start position:0% how it's working certainly we've read and<01:37:25.760> heard<01:37:25.970> good<01:37:26.240> things<01:37:26.300> about<01:37:26.750> the<01:37:27.190> what 01:37:28.180 --> 01:37:28.190 align:start position:0% and heard good things about the what 01:37:28.190 --> 01:37:32.080 align:start position:0% and heard good things about the what hosted<01:37:29.140> short-term<01:37:30.140> rentals<01:37:30.620> bring<01:37:30.980> to<01:37:31.340> the 01:37:32.080 --> 01:37:32.090 align:start position:0% hosted short-term rentals bring to the 01:37:32.090 --> 01:37:34.230 align:start position:0% hosted short-term rentals bring to the residents<01:37:32.630> of<01:37:32.750> the<01:37:32.810> city<01:37:33.170> some<01:37:33.800> of<01:37:33.830> whom 01:37:34.230 --> 01:37:34.240 align:start position:0% residents of the city some of whom 01:37:34.240 --> 01:37:37.270 align:start position:0% residents of the city some of whom probably<01:37:35.240> couldn't<01:37:35.510> afford<01:37:35.690> to<01:37:36.230> be<01:37:36.830> coastal 01:37:37.270 --> 01:37:37.280 align:start position:0% probably couldn't afford to be coastal 01:37:37.280 --> 01:37:39.460 align:start position:0% probably couldn't afford to be coastal residents<01:37:37.460> without<01:37:38.090> that<01:37:38.390> they<01:37:39.080> bring<01:37:39.260> in 01:37:39.460 --> 01:37:39.470 align:start position:0% residents without that they bring in 01:37:39.470 --> 01:37:42.310 align:start position:0% residents without that they bring in revenue<01:37:39.890> to<01:37:40.100> the<01:37:40.220> city<01:37:40.400> and<01:37:40.790> Sara<01:37:41.750> said<01:37:42.080> they 01:37:42.310 --> 01:37:42.320 align:start position:0% revenue to the city and Sara said they 01:37:42.320 --> 01:37:45.430 align:start position:0% revenue to the city and Sara said they they<01:37:42.650> provide<01:37:43.070> a<01:37:43.100> very<01:37:44.000> real<01:37:44.360> mechanism<01:37:45.290> for 01:37:45.430 --> 01:37:45.440 align:start position:0% they provide a very real mechanism for 01:37:45.440 --> 01:37:46.900 align:start position:0% they provide a very real mechanism for some<01:37:45.650> people<01:37:45.950> to<01:37:46.040> visit<01:37:46.190> the<01:37:46.370> coast<01:37:46.670> who 01:37:46.900 --> 01:37:46.910 align:start position:0% some people to visit the coast who 01:37:46.910 --> 01:37:50.770 align:start position:0% some people to visit the coast who otherwise<01:37:47.180> could<01:37:47.690> not<01:37:48.400> like<01:37:49.400> I<01:37:49.430> guess<01:37:50.090> my<01:37:50.300> my 01:37:50.770 --> 01:37:50.780 align:start position:0% otherwise could not like I guess my my 01:37:50.780 --> 01:37:54.190 align:start position:0% otherwise could not like I guess my my concern<01:37:51.260> going<01:37:51.560> forward<01:37:51.680> is<01:37:52.250> I'd<01:37:52.960> like<01:37:53.960> us<01:37:54.170> to 01:37:54.190 --> 01:37:54.200 align:start position:0% concern going forward is I'd like us to 01:37:54.200 --> 01:37:57.250 align:start position:0% concern going forward is I'd like us to think<01:37:54.950> clearly<01:37:55.220> about<01:37:55.820> the<01:37:56.150> the<01:37:56.780> so-called 01:37:57.250 --> 01:37:57.260 align:start position:0% think clearly about the the so-called 01:37:57.260 --> 01:38:00.550 align:start position:0% think clearly about the the so-called unholstered<01:37:58.130> or<01:37:58.490> or<01:37:59.150> rentals<01:37:59.750> without<01:38:00.140> clear 01:38:00.550 --> 01:38:00.560 align:start position:0% unholstered or or rentals without clear 01:38:00.560 --> 01:38:03.070 align:start position:0% unholstered or or rentals without clear responsible<01:38:01.340> parties<01:38:01.790> to<01:38:02.600> think<01:38:02.840> carefully 01:38:03.070 --> 01:38:03.080 align:start position:0% responsible parties to think carefully 01:38:03.080 --> 01:38:05.470 align:start position:0% responsible parties to think carefully about<01:38:03.320> that<01:38:03.740> and<01:38:04.010> think<01:38:04.250> what<01:38:04.460> what<01:38:05.150> could<01:38:05.330> be 01:38:05.470 --> 01:38:05.480 align:start position:0% about that and think what what could be 01:38:05.480 --> 01:38:10.890 align:start position:0% about that and think what what could be done<01:38:05.660> to<01:38:05.690> manage<01:38:06.080> that<01:38:08.320> yeah<01:38:09.320> I<01:38:09.350> think<01:38:09.770> that<01:38:10.010> I 01:38:10.890 --> 01:38:10.900 align:start position:0% done to manage that yeah I think that I 01:38:10.900 --> 01:38:14.050 align:start position:0% done to manage that yeah I think that I think<01:38:11.900> Matt<01:38:12.650> made<01:38:12.920> the<01:38:13.070> comment<01:38:13.490> at<01:38:13.730> the<01:38:13.850> very 01:38:14.050 --> 01:38:14.060 align:start position:0% think Matt made the comment at the very 01:38:14.060 --> 01:38:15.790 align:start position:0% think Matt made the comment at the very end<01:38:14.300> something<01:38:15.260> that<01:38:15.500> I've<01:38:15.620> been<01:38:15.740> thinking 01:38:15.790 --> 01:38:15.800 align:start position:0% end something that I've been thinking 01:38:15.800 --> 01:38:18.880 align:start position:0% end something that I've been thinking about<01:38:16.220> myself<01:38:16.580> is<01:38:17.150> that<01:38:17.180> if<01:38:18.050> there<01:38:18.380> are<01:38:18.500> repeat 01:38:18.880 --> 01:38:18.890 align:start position:0% about myself is that if there are repeat 01:38:18.890 --> 01:38:21.730 align:start position:0% about myself is that if there are repeat offenders<01:38:19.460> in<01:38:19.790> this<01:38:19.970> space<01:38:20.300> I<01:38:20.750> think<01:38:21.290> it<01:38:21.590> is 01:38:21.730 --> 01:38:21.740 align:start position:0% offenders in this space I think it is 01:38:21.740 --> 01:38:24.130 align:start position:0% offenders in this space I think it is appropriate<01:38:21.890> to<01:38:22.700> bring<01:38:22.820> a<01:38:23.090> pretty<01:38:23.870> heavy 01:38:24.130 --> 01:38:24.140 align:start position:0% appropriate to bring a pretty heavy 01:38:24.140 --> 01:38:27.670 align:start position:0% appropriate to bring a pretty heavy hammer<01:38:24.560> down<01:38:24.950> on<01:38:25.310> those<01:38:26.180> folks<01:38:26.570> I<01:38:26.840> I<01:38:27.140> suppose 01:38:27.670 --> 01:38:27.680 align:start position:0% hammer down on those folks I I suppose 01:38:27.680 --> 01:38:30.610 align:start position:0% hammer down on those folks I I suppose it's<01:38:28.090> legally<01:38:29.090> not<01:38:29.270> possible<01:38:29.840> to<01:38:30.020> find<01:38:30.260> air 01:38:30.610 --> 01:38:30.620 align:start position:0% it's legally not possible to find air 01:38:30.620 --> 01:38:33.130 align:start position:0% it's legally not possible to find air and<01:38:30.800> be<01:38:30.920> an<01:38:31.040> air<01:38:31.400> B&B<01:38:31.670> itself<01:38:32.360> in<01:38:32.660> a<01:38:32.750> case<01:38:32.960> like 01:38:33.130 --> 01:38:33.140 align:start position:0% and be an air B&B itself in a case like 01:38:33.140 --> 01:38:36.520 align:start position:0% and be an air B&B itself in a case like this<01:38:33.560> but<01:38:34.430> I<01:38:34.910> think<01:38:35.810> we<01:38:35.930> should<01:38:36.170> think<01:38:36.350> about 01:38:36.520 --> 01:38:36.530 align:start position:0% this but I think we should think about 01:38:36.530 --> 01:38:40.090 align:start position:0% this but I think we should think about depriving<01:38:37.430> the<01:38:37.720> folks<01:38:38.720> who<01:38:38.930> abuse<01:38:39.350> this<01:38:39.800> the 01:38:40.090 --> 01:38:40.100 align:start position:0% depriving the folks who abuse this the 01:38:40.100 --> 01:38:43.350 align:start position:0% depriving the folks who abuse this the folks<01:38:41.080> if<01:38:42.080> it<01:38:42.260> comes<01:38:42.470> to<01:38:42.620> pass<01:38:42.650> there<01:38:43.130> are 01:38:43.350 --> 01:38:43.360 align:start position:0% folks if it comes to pass there are 01:38:43.360 --> 01:38:45.790 align:start position:0% folks if it comes to pass there are rentals<01:38:44.360> where<01:38:44.630> there<01:38:44.810> isn't<01:38:45.080> a<01:38:45.170> responsible 01:38:45.790 --> 01:38:45.800 align:start position:0% rentals where there isn't a responsible 01:38:45.800 --> 01:38:48.430 align:start position:0% rentals where there isn't a responsible party<01:38:46.220> when<01:38:46.400> when<01:38:46.850> bad<01:38:47.510> incidents<01:38:48.230> take<01:38:48.380> place 01:38:48.430 --> 01:38:48.440 align:start position:0% party when when bad incidents take place 01:38:48.440 --> 01:38:51.340 align:start position:0% party when when bad incidents take place I<01:38:48.980> think<01:38:49.040> that<01:38:49.280> the<01:38:49.970> fines<01:38:50.240> should<01:38:50.480> be<01:38:50.810> severe 01:38:51.340 --> 01:38:51.350 align:start position:0% I think that the fines should be severe 01:38:51.350 --> 01:38:54.070 align:start position:0% I think that the fines should be severe I<01:38:51.650> think<01:38:52.250> that<01:38:52.460> people<01:38:53.090> should<01:38:53.240> lose<01:38:53.660> the 01:38:54.070 --> 01:38:54.080 align:start position:0% I think that people should lose the 01:38:54.080 --> 01:38:56.770 align:start position:0% I think that people should lose the business<01:38:54.950> license<01:38:55.430> and<01:38:55.610> the<01:38:55.760> right<01:38:55.910> to<01:38:56.240> to 01:38:56.770 --> 01:38:56.780 align:start position:0% business license and the right to to 01:38:56.780 --> 01:38:58.600 align:start position:0% business license and the right to to host<01:38:57.020> those<01:38:57.260> things<01:38:57.560> if<01:38:57.770> there's<01:38:57.980> abuse<01:38:58.340> of 01:38:58.600 --> 01:38:58.610 align:start position:0% host those things if there's abuse of 01:38:58.610 --> 01:38:59.890 align:start position:0% host those things if there's abuse of that 01:38:59.890 --> 01:38:59.900 align:start position:0% that 01:38:59.900 --> 01:39:02.080 align:start position:0% that and<01:39:00.050> and<01:39:00.409> and<01:39:00.739> this<01:39:00.920> way<01:39:01.130> we<01:39:01.280> can<01:39:01.460> focus<01:39:01.670> on<01:39:01.969> the 01:39:02.080 --> 01:39:02.090 align:start position:0% and and and this way we can focus on the 01:39:02.090 --> 01:39:05.649 align:start position:0% and and and this way we can focus on the true<01:39:02.270> problems<01:39:02.869> and<01:39:03.110> not<01:39:03.830> blanket<01:39:04.460> not<01:39:04.730> cast<01:39:05.360> a 01:39:05.649 --> 01:39:05.659 align:start position:0% true problems and not blanket not cast a 01:39:05.659 --> 01:39:12.689 align:start position:0% true problems and not blanket not cast a blanket<01:39:06.170> of<01:39:06.730> negativity<01:39:07.730> around<01:39:07.909> every<01:39:08.510> host 01:39:12.689 --> 01:39:12.699 align:start position:0% 01:39:12.699 --> 01:39:20.169 align:start position:0% I'm<01:39:15.099> yeah<01:39:16.099> I<01:39:16.190> think<01:39:16.520> that<01:39:18.610> that<01:39:19.610> I'm<01:39:19.760> okay<01:39:20.150> with 01:39:20.169 --> 01:39:20.179 align:start position:0% I'm yeah I think that that I'm okay with 01:39:20.179 --> 01:39:24.370 align:start position:0% I'm yeah I think that that I'm okay with the<01:39:20.540> concept<01:39:21.080> of<01:39:22.900> short-term<01:39:23.900> rentals 01:39:24.370 --> 01:39:24.380 align:start position:0% the concept of short-term rentals 01:39:24.380 --> 01:39:26.680 align:start position:0% the concept of short-term rentals everywhere<01:39:24.920> that<01:39:25.159> there's<01:39:25.690> residential 01:39:26.680 --> 01:39:26.690 align:start position:0% everywhere that there's residential 01:39:26.690 --> 01:39:28.720 align:start position:0% everywhere that there's residential zoning<01:39:27.020> the<01:39:27.260> staff<01:39:27.830> had<01:39:28.070> asked<01:39:28.400> for<01:39:28.460> feedback 01:39:28.720 --> 01:39:28.730 align:start position:0% zoning the staff had asked for feedback 01:39:28.730 --> 01:39:31.720 align:start position:0% zoning the staff had asked for feedback on<01:39:29.290> whether<01:39:30.290> we<01:39:30.530> wanted<01:39:30.949> maybe<01:39:31.190> some<01:39:31.460> special 01:39:31.720 --> 01:39:31.730 align:start position:0% on whether we wanted maybe some special 01:39:31.730 --> 01:39:35.260 align:start position:0% on whether we wanted maybe some special emphasis<01:39:32.090> on<01:39:32.949> allowing<01:39:33.949> non<01:39:34.130> hosted<01:39:34.760> in<01:39:34.909> the<01:39:35.060> C 01:39:35.260 --> 01:39:35.270 align:start position:0% emphasis on allowing non hosted in the C 01:39:35.270 --> 01:39:37.959 align:start position:0% emphasis on allowing non hosted in the C D<01:39:35.449> and<01:39:35.480> C<01:39:35.989> our<01:39:36.170> zoning<01:39:36.560> I<01:39:36.980> I<01:39:37.310> don't<01:39:37.699> have<01:39:37.909> a 01:39:37.959 --> 01:39:37.969 align:start position:0% D and C our zoning I I don't have a 01:39:37.969 --> 01:39:39.399 align:start position:0% D and C our zoning I I don't have a problem<01:39:38.210> with<01:39:38.420> that<01:39:38.630> I<01:39:38.690> don't<01:39:38.989> know<01:39:39.230> whether 01:39:39.399 --> 01:39:39.409 align:start position:0% problem with that I don't know whether 01:39:39.409 --> 01:39:41.649 align:start position:0% problem with that I don't know whether it's<01:39:39.679> worth<01:39:39.920> the<01:39:39.949> trouble<01:39:40.580> of<01:39:40.909> doing<01:39:41.090> it<01:39:41.389> today 01:39:41.649 --> 01:39:41.659 align:start position:0% it's worth the trouble of doing it today 01:39:41.659 --> 01:39:43.689 align:start position:0% it's worth the trouble of doing it today I<01:39:41.810> don't<01:39:42.230> know<01:39:42.349> whether<01:39:42.530> the<01:39:42.770> return<01:39:43.310> on 01:39:43.689 --> 01:39:43.699 align:start position:0% I don't know whether the return on 01:39:43.699 --> 01:39:46.359 align:start position:0% I don't know whether the return on investment<01:39:44.389> of<01:39:44.599> the<01:39:45.199> hours<01:39:45.530> needed<01:39:45.800> to<01:39:46.040> codify 01:39:46.359 --> 01:39:46.369 align:start position:0% investment of the hours needed to codify 01:39:46.369 --> 01:39:48.220 align:start position:0% investment of the hours needed to codify that<01:39:46.520> would<01:39:46.940> be<01:39:47.060> there<01:39:47.270> you<01:39:47.420> you<01:39:47.840> could<01:39:48.020> argue 01:39:48.220 --> 01:39:48.230 align:start position:0% that would be there you you could argue 01:39:48.230 --> 01:39:49.600 align:start position:0% that would be there you you could argue that<01:39:48.380> that<01:39:48.560> might<01:39:48.949> be<01:39:48.980> a<01:39:49.190> little<01:39:49.460> more 01:39:49.600 --> 01:39:49.610 align:start position:0% that that might be a little more 01:39:49.610 --> 01:39:52.330 align:start position:0% that that might be a little more important<01:39:50.000> in<01:39:50.090> the<01:39:50.179> future<01:39:50.599> as<01:39:50.869> as<01:39:51.139> a<01:39:51.650> as 01:39:52.330 --> 01:39:52.340 align:start position:0% important in the future as as a as 01:39:52.340 --> 01:39:54.970 align:start position:0% important in the future as as a as downtown<01:39:52.730> evolves<01:39:53.599> I'd<01:39:53.780> I<01:39:54.290> wouldn't<01:39:54.770> be 01:39:54.970 --> 01:39:54.980 align:start position:0% downtown evolves I'd I wouldn't be 01:39:54.980 --> 01:39:59.830 align:start position:0% downtown evolves I'd I wouldn't be opposed<01:39:55.310> to<01:39:55.580> that<01:39:57.880> I'll<01:39:58.880> catch<01:39:59.210> my<01:39:59.420> breath<01:39:59.599> at 01:39:59.830 --> 01:39:59.840 align:start position:0% opposed to that I'll catch my breath at 01:39:59.840 --> 01:40:04.060 align:start position:0% opposed to that I'll catch my breath at this<01:40:00.020> point<01:40:00.320> and<01:40:00.619> ask<01:40:01.250> the<01:40:02.440> okay<01:40:03.440> thank<01:40:03.860> you 01:40:04.060 --> 01:40:04.070 align:start position:0% this point and ask the okay thank you 01:40:04.070 --> 01:40:08.169 align:start position:0% this point and ask the okay thank you have<01:40:04.280> you<01:40:04.429> reloaded<01:40:05.020> Brian<01:40:06.820> sure<01:40:07.820> just<01:40:08.119> a 01:40:08.169 --> 01:40:08.179 align:start position:0% have you reloaded Brian sure just a 01:40:08.179 --> 01:40:11.490 align:start position:0% have you reloaded Brian sure just a couple<01:40:08.330> other<01:40:08.599> thoughts<01:40:08.840> and<01:40:09.280> yeah<01:40:10.280> I<01:40:10.310> think 01:40:11.490 --> 01:40:11.500 align:start position:0% couple other thoughts and yeah I think 01:40:11.500 --> 01:40:14.500 align:start position:0% couple other thoughts and yeah I think actually<01:40:12.500> has<01:40:12.770> sort<01:40:13.280> of<01:40:13.369> struck<01:40:13.880> by<01:40:14.030> I<01:40:14.060> read<01:40:14.389> an 01:40:14.500 --> 01:40:14.510 align:start position:0% actually has sort of struck by I read an 01:40:14.510 --> 01:40:16.540 align:start position:0% actually has sort of struck by I read an article<01:40:14.599> recently<01:40:15.369> which<01:40:16.369> I<01:40:16.460> don't 01:40:16.540 --> 01:40:16.550 align:start position:0% article recently which I don't 01:40:16.550 --> 01:40:18.310 align:start position:0% article recently which I don't necessarily<01:40:16.760> entirely<01:40:17.420> agree<01:40:17.750> with<01:40:17.929> in<01:40:18.050> total 01:40:18.310 --> 01:40:18.320 align:start position:0% necessarily entirely agree with in total 01:40:18.320 --> 01:40:19.450 align:start position:0% necessarily entirely agree with in total but<01:40:18.469> it<01:40:18.500> was<01:40:18.650> sort<01:40:18.800> of<01:40:18.830> a<01:40:18.949> provocative 01:40:19.450 --> 01:40:19.460 align:start position:0% but it was sort of a provocative 01:40:19.460 --> 01:40:21.760 align:start position:0% but it was sort of a provocative headline<01:40:20.449> and<01:40:20.960> that<01:40:21.080> you<01:40:21.380> know<01:40:21.500> we<01:40:21.619> don't 01:40:21.760 --> 01:40:21.770 align:start position:0% headline and that you know we don't 01:40:21.770 --> 01:40:23.680 align:start position:0% headline and that you know we don't necessarily<01:40:22.190> have<01:40:22.610> a<01:40:22.639> housing<01:40:23.030> crisis<01:40:23.420> but<01:40:23.599> we 01:40:23.680 --> 01:40:23.690 align:start position:0% necessarily have a housing crisis but we 01:40:23.690 --> 01:40:26.140 align:start position:0% necessarily have a housing crisis but we have<01:40:23.780> a<01:40:23.810> sharing<01:40:24.199> crisis<01:40:24.639> and<01:40:25.639> it<01:40:25.760> was<01:40:25.849> really 01:40:26.140 --> 01:40:26.150 align:start position:0% have a sharing crisis and it was really 01:40:26.150 --> 01:40:27.839 align:start position:0% have a sharing crisis and it was really kind<01:40:26.389> of<01:40:26.449> going<01:40:26.630> into<01:40:26.960> the<01:40:27.050> fact<01:40:27.290> that<01:40:27.380> we're 01:40:27.839 --> 01:40:27.849 align:start position:0% kind of going into the fact that we're 01:40:27.849 --> 01:40:31.839 align:start position:0% kind of going into the fact that we're at<01:40:28.849> this<01:40:29.030> point<01:40:29.360> now<01:40:29.679> with<01:40:30.679> baby<01:40:31.489> boomers 01:40:31.839 --> 01:40:31.849 align:start position:0% at this point now with baby boomers 01:40:31.849 --> 01:40:34.660 align:start position:0% at this point now with baby boomers getting<01:40:32.210> older<01:40:32.540> and<01:40:32.840> prop<01:40:33.139> 13<01:40:33.650> where<01:40:34.040> we<01:40:34.580> have 01:40:34.660 --> 01:40:34.670 align:start position:0% getting older and prop 13 where we have 01:40:34.670 --> 01:40:36.250 align:start position:0% getting older and prop 13 where we have a<01:40:34.699> lot<01:40:34.880> of<01:40:35.000> people<01:40:35.210> occupying<01:40:35.630> much<01:40:35.869> larger 01:40:36.250 --> 01:40:36.260 align:start position:0% a lot of people occupying much larger 01:40:36.260 --> 01:40:39.430 align:start position:0% a lot of people occupying much larger houses<01:40:36.650> but<01:40:36.800> with<01:40:36.980> much<01:40:37.460> smaller<01:40:37.989> with<01:40:38.989> much 01:40:39.430 --> 01:40:39.440 align:start position:0% houses but with much smaller with much 01:40:39.440 --> 01:40:41.979 align:start position:0% houses but with much smaller with much smaller<01:40:39.590> households<01:40:40.400> and<01:40:41.330> I<01:40:41.540> know<01:40:41.599> I've<01:40:41.810> seen 01:40:41.979 --> 01:40:41.989 align:start position:0% smaller households and I know I've seen 01:40:41.989 --> 01:40:43.930 align:start position:0% smaller households and I know I've seen that<01:40:42.050> in<01:40:42.320> a<01:40:42.349> number<01:40:42.500> places<01:40:42.949> where<01:40:43.130> either 01:40:43.930 --> 01:40:43.940 align:start position:0% that in a number places where either 01:40:43.940 --> 01:40:47.859 align:start position:0% that in a number places where either single<01:40:44.710> single<01:40:45.710> or<01:40:45.980> just<01:40:46.550> a<01:40:46.639> couple<01:40:46.790> I<01:40:47.150> can 01:40:47.859 --> 01:40:47.869 align:start position:0% single single or just a couple I can 01:40:47.869 --> 01:40:49.750 align:start position:0% single single or just a couple I can think<01:40:48.050> of<01:40:48.170> my<01:40:48.290> in-laws<01:40:48.560> actually<01:40:49.040> who<01:40:49.190> live 01:40:49.750 --> 01:40:49.760 align:start position:0% think of my in-laws actually who live 01:40:49.760 --> 01:40:51.550 align:start position:0% think of my in-laws actually who live right<01:40:50.000> near<01:40:50.179> transit<01:40:50.510> in<01:40:50.780> downtown<01:40:51.170> Redwood 01:40:51.550 --> 01:40:51.560 align:start position:0% right near transit in downtown Redwood 01:40:51.560 --> 01:40:53.290 align:start position:0% right near transit in downtown Redwood City<01:40:51.590> and<01:40:51.980> occupying<01:40:52.400> a<01:40:52.639> pretty<01:40:53.119> large 01:40:53.290 --> 01:40:53.300 align:start position:0% City and occupying a pretty large 01:40:53.300 --> 01:40:56.080 align:start position:0% City and occupying a pretty large single-family<01:40:53.719> home<01:40:54.139> and<01:40:54.460> much<01:40:55.460> of<01:40:55.639> it<01:40:55.760> sits 01:40:56.080 --> 01:40:56.090 align:start position:0% single-family home and much of it sits 01:40:56.090 --> 01:40:58.479 align:start position:0% single-family home and much of it sits empty<01:40:56.270> all<01:40:57.050> the<01:40:57.110> time 01:40:58.479 --> 01:40:58.489 align:start position:0% empty all the time 01:40:58.489 --> 01:41:00.530 align:start position:0% empty all the time they're<01:40:59.489> not<01:40:59.639> watching<01:41:00.000> tonight<01:41:00.239> but<01:41:00.420> it 01:41:00.530 --> 01:41:00.540 align:start position:0% they're not watching tonight but it 01:41:00.540 --> 01:41:04.280 align:start position:0% they're not watching tonight but it hurts<01:41:00.690> the<01:41:00.900> hell<01:41:01.020> out<01:41:01.170> of<01:41:01.199> me<01:41:02.690> so<01:41:03.690> I<01:41:03.719> think<01:41:03.989> you 01:41:04.280 --> 01:41:04.290 align:start position:0% hurts the hell out of me so I think you 01:41:04.290 --> 01:41:06.800 align:start position:0% hurts the hell out of me so I think you know<01:41:04.409> I<01:41:04.440> think<01:41:04.699> and<01:41:05.699> and<01:41:06.060> then<01:41:06.210> I'm<01:41:06.360> struck 01:41:06.800 --> 01:41:06.810 align:start position:0% know I think and and then I'm struck 01:41:06.810 --> 01:41:08.959 align:start position:0% know I think and and then I'm struck with<01:41:06.960> a<01:41:07.070> conversation<01:41:08.070> I<01:41:08.429> had<01:41:08.460> with<01:41:08.579> another 01:41:08.959 --> 01:41:08.969 align:start position:0% with a conversation I had with another 01:41:08.969 --> 01:41:15.410 align:start position:0% with a conversation I had with another woman<01:41:10.099> who<01:41:11.099> lived<01:41:11.400> downtown<01:41:13.400> during<01:41:14.400> some<01:41:15.329> of 01:41:15.410 --> 01:41:15.420 align:start position:0% woman who lived downtown during some of 01:41:15.420 --> 01:41:17.180 align:start position:0% woman who lived downtown during some of the<01:41:15.510> affordable<01:41:16.079> housing<01:41:16.170> workshops<01:41:16.860> where 01:41:17.180 --> 01:41:17.190 align:start position:0% the affordable housing workshops where 01:41:17.190 --> 01:41:19.939 align:start position:0% the affordable housing workshops where she<01:41:18.150> was<01:41:18.270> an<01:41:18.389> older<01:41:18.599> woman<01:41:18.800> occupied<01:41:19.800> a<01:41:19.829> large 01:41:19.939 --> 01:41:19.949 align:start position:0% she was an older woman occupied a large 01:41:19.949 --> 01:41:22.700 align:start position:0% she was an older woman occupied a large house<01:41:20.310> by<01:41:20.579> herself<01:41:21.110> and<01:41:22.110> really<01:41:22.500> said<01:41:22.679> you 01:41:22.700 --> 01:41:22.710 align:start position:0% house by herself and really said you 01:41:22.710 --> 01:41:24.319 align:start position:0% house by herself and really said you know<01:41:22.889> she'd<01:41:23.070> like<01:41:23.219> to<01:41:23.280> have<01:41:23.520> more<01:41:23.730> flexibility 01:41:24.319 --> 01:41:24.329 align:start position:0% know she'd like to have more flexibility 01:41:24.329 --> 01:41:26.629 align:start position:0% know she'd like to have more flexibility to<01:41:24.540> do<01:41:24.659> something<01:41:25.159> she<01:41:26.159> can't<01:41:26.369> necessarily 01:41:26.629 --> 01:41:26.639 align:start position:0% to do something she can't necessarily 01:41:26.639 --> 01:41:29.450 align:start position:0% to do something she can't necessarily leave<01:41:27.300> and<01:41:27.690> and<01:41:28.050> buy<01:41:28.619> a<01:41:28.650> smaller<01:41:29.250> house 01:41:29.450 --> 01:41:29.460 align:start position:0% leave and and buy a smaller house 01:41:29.460 --> 01:41:31.160 align:start position:0% leave and and buy a smaller house somewhere<01:41:29.790> else<01:41:29.909> because<01:41:30.090> suddenly<01:41:30.690> her 01:41:31.160 --> 01:41:31.170 align:start position:0% somewhere else because suddenly her 01:41:31.170 --> 01:41:33.919 align:start position:0% somewhere else because suddenly her taxes<01:41:31.560> are<01:41:31.710> gonna<01:41:31.770> go<01:41:32.010> up<01:41:32.389> so<01:41:33.389> she's<01:41:33.659> really 01:41:33.919 --> 01:41:33.929 align:start position:0% taxes are gonna go up so she's really 01:41:33.929 --> 01:41:36.709 align:start position:0% taxes are gonna go up so she's really locked<01:41:34.320> into<01:41:34.560> staying<01:41:34.920> in<01:41:35.130> her<01:41:35.219> home<01:41:35.570> but<01:41:36.570> you 01:41:36.709 --> 01:41:36.719 align:start position:0% locked into staying in her home but you 01:41:36.719 --> 01:41:38.600 align:start position:0% locked into staying in her home but you know<01:41:36.750> she<01:41:36.929> said<01:41:37.170> hey<01:41:37.290> I<01:41:37.380> get<01:41:37.590> lonely<01:41:37.770> you<01:41:38.489> know 01:41:38.600 --> 01:41:38.610 align:start position:0% know she said hey I get lonely you know 01:41:38.610 --> 01:41:40.490 align:start position:0% know she said hey I get lonely you know I<01:41:38.790> wouldn't<01:41:39.030> mind<01:41:39.239> you<01:41:39.810> know<01:41:39.929> being<01:41:40.290> able<01:41:40.349> to 01:41:40.490 --> 01:41:40.500 align:start position:0% I wouldn't mind you know being able to 01:41:40.500 --> 01:41:42.709 align:start position:0% I wouldn't mind you know being able to rent<01:41:40.739> out<01:41:40.920> a<01:41:41.250> portion<01:41:41.940> of<01:41:42.030> it<01:41:42.179> or<01:41:42.329> something 01:41:42.709 --> 01:41:42.719 align:start position:0% rent out a portion of it or something 01:41:42.719 --> 01:41:44.030 align:start position:0% rent out a portion of it or something like<01:41:42.780> that<01:41:42.960> so<01:41:43.050> I<01:41:43.110> think<01:41:43.199> you<01:41:43.739> know<01:41:43.860> those 01:41:44.030 --> 01:41:44.040 align:start position:0% like that so I think you know those 01:41:44.040 --> 01:41:45.800 align:start position:0% like that so I think you know those opportunities<01:41:44.460> are<01:41:44.880> good<01:41:45.300> and<01:41:45.480> we<01:41:45.540> should<01:41:45.570> be 01:41:45.800 --> 01:41:45.810 align:start position:0% opportunities are good and we should be 01:41:45.810 --> 01:41:47.629 align:start position:0% opportunities are good and we should be encouraged<01:41:46.280> encouraging<01:41:47.280> some<01:41:47.460> of<01:41:47.550> that 01:41:47.629 --> 01:41:47.639 align:start position:0% encouraged encouraging some of that 01:41:47.639 --> 01:41:49.550 align:start position:0% encouraged encouraging some of that sharing<01:41:48.060> and<01:41:48.239> really<01:41:48.480> making<01:41:49.020> the<01:41:49.230> best<01:41:49.409> use 01:41:49.550 --> 01:41:49.560 align:start position:0% sharing and really making the best use 01:41:49.560 --> 01:41:52.370 align:start position:0% sharing and really making the best use of<01:41:49.829> our<01:41:49.949> existing<01:41:50.010> housing<01:41:50.790> stock<01:41:50.820> and<01:41:51.420> and 01:41:52.370 --> 01:41:52.380 align:start position:0% of our existing housing stock and and 01:41:52.380 --> 01:41:53.990 align:start position:0% of our existing housing stock and and our<01:41:52.500> existing<01:41:52.949> developed<01:41:53.340> footprint<01:41:53.730> as<01:41:53.820> much 01:41:53.990 --> 01:41:54.000 align:start position:0% our existing developed footprint as much 01:41:54.000 --> 01:41:56.810 align:start position:0% our existing developed footprint as much as<01:41:54.150> we<01:41:54.270> can<01:41:54.449> and<01:41:55.159> and<01:41:56.159> then<01:41:56.310> I<01:41:56.429> just<01:41:56.610> want<01:41:56.760> to 01:41:56.810 --> 01:41:56.820 align:start position:0% as we can and and then I just want to 01:41:56.820 --> 01:41:58.010 align:start position:0% as we can and and then I just want to touch<01:41:56.909> on<01:41:57.060> you<01:41:57.210> know<01:41:57.329> the<01:41:57.510> the<01:41:57.989> other 01:41:58.010 --> 01:41:58.020 align:start position:0% touch on you know the the other 01:41:58.020 --> 01:41:59.899 align:start position:0% touch on you know the the other boogeyman<01:41:58.650> in<01:41:59.010> Half<01:41:59.250> Moon<01:41:59.280> Bay<01:41:59.489> which<01:41:59.880> is 01:41:59.899 --> 01:41:59.909 align:start position:0% boogeyman in Half Moon Bay which is 01:41:59.909 --> 01:42:04.700 align:start position:0% boogeyman in Half Moon Bay which is which<01:42:00.840> is<01:42:00.989> often<01:42:01.290> parking<01:42:01.760> and<01:42:02.760> I<01:42:03.710> actually 01:42:04.700 --> 01:42:04.710 align:start position:0% which is often parking and I actually 01:42:04.710 --> 01:42:08.060 align:start position:0% which is often parking and I actually live<01:42:05.070> on<01:42:05.099> a<01:42:05.250> street<01:42:05.369> that<01:42:05.849> that<01:42:06.179> I<01:42:06.420> think<01:42:06.929> in<01:42:07.530> in 01:42:08.060 --> 01:42:08.070 align:start position:0% live on a street that that I think in in 01:42:08.070 --> 01:42:10.370 align:start position:0% live on a street that that I think in in our<01:42:08.489> neighborhood<01:42:08.940> and<01:42:09.090> also<01:42:09.239> and<01:42:09.599> our<01:42:10.170> leader 01:42:10.370 --> 01:42:10.380 align:start position:0% our neighborhood and also and our leader 01:42:10.380 --> 01:42:12.770 align:start position:0% our neighborhood and also and our leader Park<01:42:10.679> is<01:42:10.829> probably<01:42:11.130> the<01:42:11.940> most<01:42:12.090> heavily<01:42:12.329> part 01:42:12.770 --> 01:42:12.780 align:start position:0% Park is probably the most heavily part 01:42:12.780 --> 01:42:17.450 align:start position:0% Park is probably the most heavily part street<01:42:13.250> and<01:42:14.389> and<01:42:15.389> it's<01:42:15.599> fine<01:42:15.810> you<01:42:16.320> know<01:42:16.460> I 01:42:17.450 --> 01:42:17.460 align:start position:0% street and and it's fine you know I 01:42:17.460 --> 01:42:21.410 align:start position:0% street and and it's fine you know I don't<01:42:18.420> I<01:42:18.659> don't<01:42:18.750> think<01:42:18.960> I<01:42:19.710> think<01:42:20.250> parking<01:42:20.760> it's 01:42:21.410 --> 01:42:21.420 align:start position:0% don't I don't think I think parking it's 01:42:21.420 --> 01:42:22.580 align:start position:0% don't I don't think I think parking it's one<01:42:21.570> of<01:42:21.659> those<01:42:21.719> things<01:42:21.960> that<01:42:22.079> really<01:42:22.139> irks 01:42:22.580 --> 01:42:22.590 align:start position:0% one of those things that really irks 01:42:22.590 --> 01:42:24.740 align:start position:0% one of those things that really irks some<01:42:22.949> people<01:42:23.280> if<01:42:23.429> they<01:42:23.579> have<01:42:23.730> to<01:42:23.880> walk<01:42:24.090> you 01:42:24.740 --> 01:42:24.750 align:start position:0% some people if they have to walk you 01:42:24.750 --> 01:42:26.569 align:start position:0% some people if they have to walk you know<01:42:24.780> an<01:42:25.020> extra<01:42:25.380> little<01:42:25.679> bit<01:42:25.949> to<01:42:26.159> get<01:42:26.280> to<01:42:26.460> their 01:42:26.569 --> 01:42:26.579 align:start position:0% know an extra little bit to get to their 01:42:26.579 --> 01:42:28.490 align:start position:0% know an extra little bit to get to their house<01:42:26.760> or<01:42:27.000> something<01:42:27.360> like<01:42:27.420> that<01:42:27.480> but<01:42:27.780> by<01:42:28.320> and 01:42:28.490 --> 01:42:28.500 align:start position:0% house or something like that but by and 01:42:28.500 --> 01:42:30.290 align:start position:0% house or something like that but by and large<01:42:28.560> as<01:42:29.040> I<01:42:29.159> go<01:42:29.310> through<01:42:29.550> all<01:42:29.579> such<01:42:29.909> Lorraine 01:42:30.290 --> 01:42:30.300 align:start position:0% large as I go through all such Lorraine 01:42:30.300 --> 01:42:32.390 align:start position:0% large as I go through all such Lorraine and<01:42:30.599> and<01:42:30.750> in<01:42:31.110> other<01:42:31.290> places<01:42:31.560> and<01:42:32.130> you<01:42:32.280> know<01:42:32.369> I 01:42:32.390 --> 01:42:32.400 align:start position:0% and and in other places and you know I 01:42:32.400 --> 01:42:34.129 align:start position:0% and and in other places and you know I don't<01:42:32.670> I<01:42:32.820> don't<01:42:32.880> think<01:42:33.210> there's<01:42:33.420> a<01:42:33.630> whole<01:42:33.960> lot 01:42:34.129 --> 01:42:34.139 align:start position:0% don't I don't think there's a whole lot 01:42:34.139 --> 01:42:36.169 align:start position:0% don't I don't think there's a whole lot of<01:42:34.170> parking<01:42:34.530> if<01:42:34.650> Tim<01:42:34.889> Tim<01:42:35.550> was<01:42:35.699> here<01:42:35.880> I'd<01:42:36.000> say 01:42:36.169 --> 01:42:36.179 align:start position:0% of parking if Tim Tim was here I'd say 01:42:36.179 --> 01:42:37.160 align:start position:0% of parking if Tim Tim was here I'd say you<01:42:36.239> know<01:42:36.360> maybe<01:42:36.510> you<01:42:36.630> should<01:42:36.780> get<01:42:36.869> his<01:42:36.960> fire 01:42:37.160 --> 01:42:37.170 align:start position:0% you know maybe you should get his fire 01:42:37.170 --> 01:42:40.220 align:start position:0% you know maybe you should get his fire truck<01:42:37.349> off<01:42:37.590> and<01:42:38.570> that's<01:42:39.570> a<01:42:39.690> whole<01:42:39.840> separate 01:42:40.220 --> 01:42:40.230 align:start position:0% truck off and that's a whole separate 01:42:40.230 --> 01:42:47.390 align:start position:0% truck off and that's a whole separate conversation<01:42:43.070> but<01:42:44.070> a<01:42:45.679> other<01:42:46.679> that<01:42:46.920> I<01:42:46.949> think 01:42:47.390 --> 01:42:47.400 align:start position:0% conversation but a other that I think 01:42:47.400 --> 01:42:49.310 align:start position:0% conversation but a other that I think one<01:42:48.239> of<01:42:48.270> the<01:42:48.389> things<01:42:48.540> that<01:42:48.690> did<01:42:48.810> come<01:42:48.960> up<01:42:49.110> was 01:42:49.310 --> 01:42:49.320 align:start position:0% one of the things that did come up was 01:42:49.320 --> 01:42:52.129 align:start position:0% one of the things that did come up was the<01:42:50.130> inclusion<01:42:50.670> of<01:42:50.969> mobile<01:42:51.270> home<01:42:51.420> parks<01:42:51.780> and 01:42:52.129 --> 01:42:52.139 align:start position:0% the inclusion of mobile home parks and 01:42:52.139 --> 01:42:54.770 align:start position:0% the inclusion of mobile home parks and and<01:42:52.500> some<01:42:52.710> of<01:42:52.739> those<01:42:52.889> and<01:42:53.099> I<01:42:53.159> think<01:42:53.630> you<01:42:54.630> know 01:42:54.770 --> 01:42:54.780 align:start position:0% and some of those and I think you know 01:42:54.780 --> 01:42:56.629 align:start position:0% and some of those and I think you know look<01:42:55.380> at<01:42:55.500> those<01:42:55.679> areas<01:42:55.889> that<01:42:56.040> really<01:42:56.369> provide 01:42:56.629 --> 01:42:56.639 align:start position:0% look at those areas that really provide 01:42:56.639 --> 01:42:58.430 align:start position:0% look at those areas that really provide a<01:42:56.670> really<01:42:57.179> unique<01:42:57.389> affordable<01:42:58.079> housing 01:42:58.430 --> 01:42:58.440 align:start position:0% a really unique affordable housing 01:42:58.440 --> 01:43:01.459 align:start position:0% a really unique affordable housing option<01:42:58.829> I<01:42:59.699> think<01:42:59.969> we<01:43:00.300> should<01:43:00.570> specifically 01:43:01.459 --> 01:43:01.469 align:start position:0% option I think we should specifically 01:43:01.469 --> 01:43:03.680 align:start position:0% option I think we should specifically look<01:43:01.679> at<01:43:01.770> those<01:43:02.070> areas<01:43:02.550> as 01:43:03.680 --> 01:43:03.690 align:start position:0% look at those areas as 01:43:03.690 --> 01:43:06.260 align:start position:0% look at those areas as is<01:43:03.870> not<01:43:04.200> not<01:43:04.680> allowing<01:43:05.370> for<01:43:05.580> short-term 01:43:06.260 --> 01:43:06.270 align:start position:0% is not not allowing for short-term 01:43:06.270 --> 01:43:07.970 align:start position:0% is not not allowing for short-term rentals<01:43:06.660> and<01:43:06.870> in<01:43:07.080> those<01:43:07.410> areas<01:43:07.800> that<01:43:07.830> are 01:43:07.970 --> 01:43:07.980 align:start position:0% rentals and in those areas that are 01:43:07.980 --> 01:43:10.220 align:start position:0% rentals and in those areas that are really<01:43:08.370> like<01:43:09.000> I<01:43:09.030> say<01:43:09.240> whether<01:43:09.810> it's<01:43:10.020> a<01:43:10.080> mobile 01:43:10.220 --> 01:43:10.230 align:start position:0% really like I say whether it's a mobile 01:43:10.230 --> 01:43:11.930 align:start position:0% really like I say whether it's a mobile home<01:43:10.470> parks<01:43:10.800> I<01:43:10.920> think<01:43:11.130> I<01:43:11.310> know<01:43:11.370> I<01:43:11.460> had<01:43:11.610> noticed 01:43:11.930 --> 01:43:11.940 align:start position:0% home parks I think I know I had noticed 01:43:11.940 --> 01:43:15.260 align:start position:0% home parks I think I know I had noticed in<01:43:12.090> some<01:43:12.270> of<01:43:12.360> the<01:43:12.420> other<01:43:13.520> cities<01:43:14.520> ordinances 01:43:15.260 --> 01:43:15.270 align:start position:0% in some of the other cities ordinances 01:43:15.270 --> 01:43:17.060 align:start position:0% in some of the other cities ordinances that<01:43:15.300> specifically<01:43:16.050> exempted<01:43:16.500> farmworker 01:43:17.060 --> 01:43:17.070 align:start position:0% that specifically exempted farmworker 01:43:17.070 --> 01:43:19.520 align:start position:0% that specifically exempted farmworker housing<01:43:17.630> some<01:43:18.630> of<01:43:18.720> the<01:43:18.810> some<01:43:19.170> of<01:43:19.260> those<01:43:19.320> other 01:43:19.520 --> 01:43:19.530 align:start position:0% housing some of the some of those other 01:43:19.530 --> 01:43:20.810 align:start position:0% housing some of the some of those other types<01:43:19.740> of<01:43:19.890> things<01:43:20.010> I<01:43:20.220> think<01:43:20.250> we<01:43:20.430> really<01:43:20.700> need 01:43:20.810 --> 01:43:20.820 align:start position:0% types of things I think we really need 01:43:20.820 --> 01:43:24.500 align:start position:0% types of things I think we really need to<01:43:20.970> continue<01:43:21.750> to<01:43:22.140> try<01:43:22.320> to<01:43:22.350> encourage<01:43:23.510> those 01:43:24.500 --> 01:43:24.510 align:start position:0% to continue to try to encourage those 01:43:24.510 --> 01:43:27.410 align:start position:0% to continue to try to encourage those types<01:43:24.870> of<01:43:24.990> uses<01:43:25.380> to<01:43:25.560> be<01:43:25.710> to<01:43:26.460> be<01:43:26.580> available<01:43:27.180> for 01:43:27.410 --> 01:43:27.420 align:start position:0% types of uses to be to be available for 01:43:27.420 --> 01:43:32.570 align:start position:0% types of uses to be to be available for for<01:43:27.810> the<01:43:27.930> people<01:43:28.230> who<01:43:28.320> need<01:43:28.440> it<01:43:30.980> okay 01:43:32.570 --> 01:43:32.580 align:start position:0% for the people who need it okay 01:43:32.580 --> 01:43:35.180 align:start position:0% for the people who need it okay I'll<01:43:33.480> jump<01:43:33.810> on<01:43:33.930> the<01:43:34.080> carousel<01:43:34.500> after<01:43:34.800> the<01:43:34.980> next 01:43:35.180 --> 01:43:35.190 align:start position:0% I'll jump on the carousel after the next 01:43:35.190 --> 01:43:35.810 align:start position:0% I'll jump on the carousel after the next round 01:43:35.810 --> 01:43:35.820 align:start position:0% round 01:43:35.820 --> 01:43:40.880 align:start position:0% round go<01:43:36.090> ahead<01:43:36.560> Sarah<01:43:38.570> yeah<01:43:39.570> I<01:43:39.600> forgot<01:43:40.590> to<01:43:40.740> give<01:43:40.860> you 01:43:40.880 --> 01:43:40.890 align:start position:0% go ahead Sarah yeah I forgot to give you 01:43:40.890 --> 01:43:43.520 align:start position:0% go ahead Sarah yeah I forgot to give you some<01:43:41.190> input<01:43:41.850> on<01:43:41.880> the<01:43:42.240> kind<01:43:42.960> of<01:43:42.990> types<01:43:43.350> of 01:43:43.520 --> 01:43:43.530 align:start position:0% some input on the kind of types of 01:43:43.530 --> 01:43:46.870 align:start position:0% some input on the kind of types of residential<01:43:44.040> uses<01:43:44.250> and<01:43:44.700> and<01:43:45.120> I<01:43:45.180> would<01:43:45.560> agree 01:43:46.870 --> 01:43:46.880 align:start position:0% residential uses and and I would agree 01:43:46.880 --> 01:43:49.370 align:start position:0% residential uses and and I would agree with<01:43:47.880> the<01:43:48.000> recommendation<01:43:48.720> that<01:43:48.960> it<01:43:49.140> not<01:43:49.350> be 01:43:49.370 --> 01:43:49.380 align:start position:0% with the recommendation that it not be 01:43:49.380 --> 01:43:53.020 align:start position:0% with the recommendation that it not be something<01:43:50.130> that's<01:43:50.370> appropriate<01:43:51.030> for<01:43:51.060> the 01:43:53.020 --> 01:43:53.030 align:start position:0% something that's appropriate for the 01:43:53.030 --> 01:43:57.310 align:start position:0% something that's appropriate for the duplex<01:43:54.030> triplex<01:43:54.270> and<01:43:55.310> xxx<01:43:56.310> sorry<01:43:56.520> and 01:43:57.310 --> 01:43:57.320 align:start position:0% duplex triplex and xxx sorry and 01:43:57.320 --> 01:44:01.970 align:start position:0% duplex triplex and xxx sorry and multifamily<01:43:59.150> and<01:44:00.150> I<01:44:00.210> think<01:44:00.780> that<01:44:01.110> if<01:44:01.440> I'm 01:44:01.970 --> 01:44:01.980 align:start position:0% multifamily and I think that if I'm 01:44:01.980 --> 01:44:04.670 align:start position:0% multifamily and I think that if I'm understanding<01:44:02.280> it<01:44:02.670> correctly<01:44:02.730> so<01:44:03.540> I<01:44:04.200> think 01:44:04.670 --> 01:44:04.680 align:start position:0% understanding it correctly so I think 01:44:04.680 --> 01:44:08.600 align:start position:0% understanding it correctly so I think that<01:44:04.800> that's<01:44:05.690> you<01:44:06.690> know<01:44:06.810> probably<01:44:07.320> in<01:44:08.250> you 01:44:08.600 --> 01:44:08.610 align:start position:0% that that's you know probably in you 01:44:08.610 --> 01:44:09.800 align:start position:0% that that's you know probably in you know<01:44:08.730> one<01:44:09.030> thing<01:44:09.180> that<01:44:09.300> I<01:44:09.330> wouldn't<01:44:09.570> want<01:44:09.750> to 01:44:09.800 --> 01:44:09.810 align:start position:0% know one thing that I wouldn't want to 01:44:09.810 --> 01:44:11.470 align:start position:0% know one thing that I wouldn't want to see<01:44:09.990> is<01:44:10.140> that<01:44:10.170> the<01:44:10.620> housing<01:44:10.830> that<01:44:11.130> is 01:44:11.470 --> 01:44:11.480 align:start position:0% see is that the housing that is 01:44:11.480 --> 01:44:13.520 align:start position:0% see is that the housing that is definitely<01:44:12.480> what<01:44:12.630> I<01:44:12.660> want<01:44:12.810> to<01:44:12.900> see<01:44:12.990> any<01:44:13.260> kind 01:44:13.520 --> 01:44:13.530 align:start position:0% definitely what I want to see any kind 01:44:13.530 --> 01:44:14.930 align:start position:0% definitely what I want to see any kind of<01:44:13.680> housing<01:44:14.040> that<01:44:14.070> would<01:44:14.250> be<01:44:14.400> more<01:44:14.700> affordable 01:44:14.930 --> 01:44:14.940 align:start position:0% of housing that would be more affordable 01:44:14.940 --> 01:44:17.870 align:start position:0% of housing that would be more affordable being<01:44:15.450> then<01:44:16.080> put<01:44:16.380> into<01:44:16.530> short-term<01:44:16.890> rental<01:44:17.370> so 01:44:17.870 --> 01:44:17.880 align:start position:0% being then put into short-term rental so 01:44:17.880 --> 01:44:20.810 align:start position:0% being then put into short-term rental so that<01:44:18.030> would<01:44:18.150> be<01:44:18.300> a<01:44:18.830> very<01:44:19.830> important<01:44:20.310> to<01:44:20.700> avoid 01:44:20.810 --> 01:44:20.820 align:start position:0% that would be a very important to avoid 01:44:20.820 --> 01:44:26.570 align:start position:0% that would be a very important to avoid I<01:44:21.540> also<01:44:22.410> I<01:44:24.230> I<01:44:25.230> don't<01:44:25.440> know<01:44:25.740> about<01:44:25.920> in<01:44:26.250> terms<01:44:26.430> of 01:44:26.570 --> 01:44:26.580 align:start position:0% I also I I don't know about in terms of 01:44:26.580 --> 01:44:30.250 align:start position:0% I also I I don't know about in terms of the<01:44:26.700> parking<01:44:27.120> i<01:44:27.630> I<01:44:28.320> understand<01:44:29.010> the<01:44:29.190> currently 01:44:30.250 --> 01:44:30.260 align:start position:0% the parking i I understand the currently 01:44:30.260 --> 01:44:32.570 align:start position:0% the parking i I understand the currently kind<01:44:31.260> of<01:44:31.380> rationale<01:44:31.830> of<01:44:32.040> thinking<01:44:32.400> about 01:44:32.570 --> 01:44:32.580 align:start position:0% kind of rationale of thinking about 01:44:32.580 --> 01:44:35.180 align:start position:0% kind of rationale of thinking about because<01:44:33.330> we<01:44:33.540> have<01:44:33.570> such<01:44:33.960> a<01:44:33.990> limit<01:44:34.410> having<01:44:35.070> gone 01:44:35.180 --> 01:44:35.190 align:start position:0% because we have such a limit having gone 01:44:35.190 --> 01:44:38.870 align:start position:0% because we have such a limit having gone through<01:44:35.250> this<01:44:35.610> Adu<01:44:37.130> process<01:44:38.130> and<01:44:38.370> know<01:44:38.580> that 01:44:38.870 --> 01:44:38.880 align:start position:0% through this Adu process and know that 01:44:38.880 --> 01:44:41.360 align:start position:0% through this Adu process and know that it<01:44:39.180> from<01:44:39.510> based<01:44:39.720> on<01:44:39.870> the<01:44:39.960> state<01:44:40.170> law<01:44:40.620> we<01:44:41.130> just 01:44:41.360 --> 01:44:41.370 align:start position:0% it from based on the state law we just 01:44:41.370 --> 01:44:43.760 align:start position:0% it from based on the state law we just have<01:44:41.520> no<01:44:42.030> say<01:44:42.330> we<01:44:42.600> cannot<01:44:42.930> require<01:44:43.260> parking 01:44:43.760 --> 01:44:43.770 align:start position:0% have no say we cannot require parking 01:44:43.770 --> 01:44:47.150 align:start position:0% have no say we cannot require parking and<01:44:43.950> when<01:44:44.880> you<01:44:45.000> have<01:44:45.270> the<01:44:45.600> number<01:44:46.230> of<01:44:46.260> you<01:44:47.070> know 01:44:47.150 --> 01:44:47.160 align:start position:0% and when you have the number of you know 01:44:47.160 --> 01:44:50.150 align:start position:0% and when you have the number of you know additional<01:44:47.960> units<01:44:48.960> that<01:44:49.260> could<01:44:49.470> be<01:44:49.590> added<01:44:49.770> and 01:44:50.150 --> 01:44:50.160 align:start position:0% additional units that could be added and 01:44:50.160 --> 01:44:54.170 align:start position:0% additional units that could be added and we're<01:44:50.970> with<01:44:51.360> no<01:44:51.570> additional<01:44:52.110> parking<01:44:52.880> I'm<01:44:53.880> not 01:44:54.170 --> 01:44:54.180 align:start position:0% we're with no additional parking I'm not 01:44:54.180 --> 01:44:57.320 align:start position:0% we're with no additional parking I'm not sure<01:44:54.510> that<01:44:54.540> I<01:44:54.900> would<01:44:55.110> agree<01:44:55.710> necessarily<01:44:56.430> that 01:44:57.320 --> 01:44:57.330 align:start position:0% sure that I would agree necessarily that 01:44:57.330 --> 01:44:59.150 align:start position:0% sure that I would agree necessarily that parking<01:44:58.290> won't<01:44:58.530> be<01:44:58.680> an<01:44:58.770> issue 01:44:59.150 --> 01:44:59.160 align:start position:0% parking won't be an issue 01:44:59.160 --> 01:45:01.430 align:start position:0% parking won't be an issue I<01:44:59.280> may<01:45:00.120> be<01:45:00.180> right<01:45:00.450> now<01:45:00.600> it<01:45:00.780> isn't<01:45:01.080> but<01:45:01.230> I<01:45:01.290> do 01:45:01.430 --> 01:45:01.440 align:start position:0% I may be right now it isn't but I do 01:45:01.440 --> 01:45:03.970 align:start position:0% I may be right now it isn't but I do think<01:45:01.770> that<01:45:01.920> there<01:45:02.610> comes<01:45:02.820> a<01:45:02.910> point<01:45:03.090> where 01:45:03.970 --> 01:45:03.980 align:start position:0% think that there comes a point where 01:45:03.980 --> 01:45:06.410 align:start position:0% think that there comes a point where with<01:45:04.980> the<01:45:05.100> number<01:45:05.370> of<01:45:05.460> ad<01:45:05.610> use<01:45:05.820> that<01:45:06.000> could<01:45:06.150> be 01:45:06.410 --> 01:45:06.420 align:start position:0% with the number of ad use that could be 01:45:06.420 --> 01:45:09.980 align:start position:0% with the number of ad use that could be added<01:45:07.080> in<01:45:07.520> neighborhoods<01:45:08.520> that<01:45:09.210> it<01:45:09.690> won't 01:45:09.980 --> 01:45:09.990 align:start position:0% added in neighborhoods that it won't 01:45:09.990 --> 01:45:11.600 align:start position:0% added in neighborhoods that it won't just<01:45:10.290> be<01:45:10.440> a<01:45:10.470> matter<01:45:10.650> of<01:45:10.800> like<01:45:11.040> walking<01:45:11.280> a<01:45:11.490> block 01:45:11.600 --> 01:45:11.610 align:start position:0% just be a matter of like walking a block 01:45:11.610 --> 01:45:14.030 align:start position:0% just be a matter of like walking a block it<01:45:12.030> could<01:45:12.450> be<01:45:12.660> that<01:45:12.990> you<01:45:13.230> just<01:45:13.500> can't<01:45:13.860> find 01:45:14.030 --> 01:45:14.040 align:start position:0% it could be that you just can't find 01:45:14.040 --> 01:45:15.190 align:start position:0% it could be that you just can't find parking 01:45:15.190 --> 01:45:15.200 align:start position:0% parking 01:45:15.200 --> 01:45:18.520 align:start position:0% parking and<01:45:15.290> you<01:45:15.440> know<01:45:15.560> in<01:45:15.770> in<01:45:16.210> that<01:45:17.210> I<01:45:17.870> also<01:45:18.260> don't 01:45:18.520 --> 01:45:18.530 align:start position:0% and you know in in that I also don't 01:45:18.530 --> 01:45:22.420 align:start position:0% and you know in in that I also don't want<01:45:18.710> to<01:45:18.770> see<01:45:18.830> our<01:45:20.860> you<01:45:21.860> know<01:45:21.890> neighborhoods 01:45:22.420 --> 01:45:22.430 align:start position:0% want to see our you know neighborhoods 01:45:22.430 --> 01:45:24.850 align:start position:0% want to see our you know neighborhoods just<01:45:22.640> become<01:45:22.970> completely<01:45:23.480> parking<01:45:24.380> lots<01:45:24.560> I 01:45:24.850 --> 01:45:24.860 align:start position:0% just become completely parking lots I 01:45:24.860 --> 01:45:26.920 align:start position:0% just become completely parking lots I think<01:45:25.130> that<01:45:25.250> just<01:45:25.670> does<01:45:25.850> not<01:45:25.880> support<01:45:26.690> the 01:45:26.920 --> 01:45:26.930 align:start position:0% think that just does not support the 01:45:26.930 --> 01:45:28.330 align:start position:0% think that just does not support the community<01:45:27.560> care<01:45:27.740> like<01:45:27.950> neighborhood 01:45:28.330 --> 01:45:28.340 align:start position:0% community care like neighborhood 01:45:28.340 --> 01:45:33.160 align:start position:0% community care like neighborhood character<01:45:29.800> so<01:45:30.800> that<01:45:31.580> one<01:45:31.820> I<01:45:31.940> I<01:45:31.970> would<01:45:32.840> want<01:45:33.020> to 01:45:33.160 --> 01:45:33.170 align:start position:0% character so that one I I would want to 01:45:33.170 --> 01:45:36.100 align:start position:0% character so that one I I would want to think<01:45:33.580> long<01:45:34.580> and<01:45:34.610> hard<01:45:34.790> about<01:45:35.060> that<01:45:35.360> because<01:45:35.960> I 01:45:36.100 --> 01:45:36.110 align:start position:0% think long and hard about that because I 01:45:36.110 --> 01:45:37.930 align:start position:0% think long and hard about that because I think<01:45:36.230> it's<01:45:36.470> also<01:45:36.620> is<01:45:36.950> reasonable<01:45:37.550> in<01:45:37.730> many 01:45:37.930 --> 01:45:37.940 align:start position:0% think it's also is reasonable in many 01:45:37.940 --> 01:45:41.500 align:start position:0% think it's also is reasonable in many cases<01:45:39.100> to<01:45:40.100> expect<01:45:40.880> that<01:45:40.970> a<01:45:41.000> parking<01:45:41.330> space 01:45:41.500 --> 01:45:41.510 align:start position:0% cases to expect that a parking space 01:45:41.510 --> 01:45:43.480 align:start position:0% cases to expect that a parking space could<01:45:41.780> be<01:45:41.930> provided<01:45:42.740> especially<01:45:43.070> if 01:45:43.480 --> 01:45:43.490 align:start position:0% could be provided especially if 01:45:43.490 --> 01:45:45.760 align:start position:0% could be provided especially if somebody's<01:45:44.060> gonna<01:45:44.240> be<01:45:44.390> not<01:45:44.660> the<01:45:44.960> owner<01:45:45.470> is<01:45:45.680> not 01:45:45.760 --> 01:45:45.770 align:start position:0% somebody's gonna be not the owner is not 01:45:45.770 --> 01:45:47.500 align:start position:0% somebody's gonna be not the owner is not going<01:45:45.950> to<01:45:46.010> be<01:45:46.070> there<01:45:46.280> than<01:45:46.460> likely<01:45:47.090> often 01:45:47.500 --> 01:45:47.510 align:start position:0% going to be there than likely often 01:45:47.510 --> 01:45:49.200 align:start position:0% going to be there than likely often there<01:45:47.660> could<01:45:47.810> be<01:45:47.840> a<01:45:47.960> parking<01:45:48.320> space<01:45:48.500> available 01:45:49.200 --> 01:45:49.210 align:start position:0% there could be a parking space available 01:45:49.210 --> 01:45:52.570 align:start position:0% there could be a parking space available on-site<01:45:50.210> but<01:45:50.870> that's<01:45:51.470> one<01:45:51.740> where<01:45:51.920> I'm<01:45:52.070> still 01:45:52.570 --> 01:45:52.580 align:start position:0% on-site but that's one where I'm still 01:45:52.580 --> 01:45:55.330 align:start position:0% on-site but that's one where I'm still kind<01:45:53.000> of<01:45:53.200> not<01:45:54.200> not<01:45:54.440> sure<01:45:54.710> that<01:45:54.980> I<01:45:55.010> would<01:45:55.190> just 01:45:55.330 --> 01:45:55.340 align:start position:0% kind of not not sure that I would just 01:45:55.340 --> 01:45:57.820 align:start position:0% kind of not not sure that I would just be<01:45:55.460> okay<01:45:55.670> with<01:45:55.700> saying<01:45:56.060> oh<01:45:56.300> yeah<01:45:56.540> no<01:45:57.470> parking 01:45:57.820 --> 01:45:57.830 align:start position:0% be okay with saying oh yeah no parking 01:45:57.830 --> 01:46:00.640 align:start position:0% be okay with saying oh yeah no parking requirement<01:45:58.340> or<01:45:58.520> anything<01:45:58.700> like<01:45:58.910> that<01:45:59.650> thank 01:46:00.640 --> 01:46:00.650 align:start position:0% requirement or anything like that thank 01:46:00.650 --> 01:46:00.850 align:start position:0% requirement or anything like that thank you 01:46:00.850 --> 01:46:00.860 align:start position:0% you 01:46:00.860 --> 01:46:04.180 align:start position:0% you Steve<01:46:01.820> you<01:46:01.970> ready<01:46:02.180> to<01:46:02.300> have<01:46:02.480> another<01:46:02.660> go<01:46:03.190> Thank 01:46:04.180 --> 01:46:04.190 align:start position:0% Steve you ready to have another go Thank 01:46:04.190 --> 01:46:05.730 align:start position:0% Steve you ready to have another go Thank You<01:46:04.310> mr.<01:46:04.580> chairman 01:46:05.730 --> 01:46:05.740 align:start position:0% You mr. chairman 01:46:05.740 --> 01:46:08.860 align:start position:0% You mr. chairman yeah<01:46:06.740> I<01:46:06.770> I<01:46:06.920> agree<01:46:07.160> with<01:46:07.700> Commissioner<01:46:08.270> polgár 01:46:08.860 --> 01:46:08.870 align:start position:0% yeah I I agree with Commissioner polgár 01:46:08.870 --> 01:46:11.140 align:start position:0% yeah I I agree with Commissioner polgár on<01:46:09.020> the<01:46:09.170> on<01:46:09.320> the<01:46:09.500> parking<01:46:09.860> thing<01:46:10.040> I<01:46:10.190> think<01:46:10.430> the 01:46:11.140 --> 01:46:11.150 align:start position:0% on the on the parking thing I think the 01:46:11.150 --> 01:46:15.010 align:start position:0% on the on the parking thing I think the day<01:46:11.510> when<01:46:11.950> Evy<01:46:12.950> charging<01:46:13.580> is<01:46:13.730> is<01:46:14.030> is 01:46:15.010 --> 01:46:15.020 align:start position:0% day when Evy charging is is is 01:46:15.020 --> 01:46:16.930 align:start position:0% day when Evy charging is is is widespread<01:46:15.560> enough<01:46:16.040> that<01:46:16.250> that<01:46:16.280> becomes<01:46:16.760> an 01:46:16.930 --> 01:46:16.940 align:start position:0% widespread enough that that becomes an 01:46:16.940 --> 01:46:19.330 align:start position:0% widespread enough that that becomes an issue<01:46:17.090> I<01:46:17.540> think<01:46:18.050> will<01:46:18.230> be<01:46:18.350> a<01:46:18.380> great<01:46:18.710> day<01:46:18.980> I 01:46:19.330 --> 01:46:19.340 align:start position:0% issue I think will be a great day I 01:46:19.340 --> 01:46:22.210 align:start position:0% issue I think will be a great day I think<01:46:20.150> in<01:46:20.240> the<01:46:20.360> meantime<01:46:20.600> it<01:46:21.200> makes<01:46:21.440> sense<01:46:21.740> for 01:46:22.210 --> 01:46:22.220 align:start position:0% think in the meantime it makes sense for 01:46:22.220 --> 01:46:25.990 align:start position:0% think in the meantime it makes sense for for<01:46:23.180> us<01:46:23.330> to<01:46:23.600> think<01:46:23.990> about<01:46:24.110> requiring<01:46:24.790> hosts<01:46:25.790> to 01:46:25.990 --> 01:46:26.000 align:start position:0% for us to think about requiring hosts to 01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:28.390 align:start position:0% for us to think about requiring hosts to provide<01:46:26.360> at<01:46:26.570> least<01:46:26.630> one<01:46:27.020> space<01:46:27.350> off<01:46:27.770> the 01:46:28.390 --> 01:46:28.400 align:start position:0% provide at least one space off the 01:46:28.400 --> 01:46:34.890 align:start position:0% provide at least one space off the street<01:46:28.960> it<01:46:29.960> can<01:46:30.290> excuse<01:46:30.980> me<01:46:31.190> I<01:46:32.350> wanted<01:46:33.350> to<01:46:33.560> also 01:46:34.890 --> 01:46:34.900 align:start position:0% street it can excuse me I wanted to also 01:46:34.900 --> 01:46:38.200 align:start position:0% street it can excuse me I wanted to also support<01:46:35.900> what<01:46:36.200> Commissioner<01:46:36.710> Holt<01:46:36.950> said<01:46:37.340> not 01:46:38.200 --> 01:46:38.210 align:start position:0% support what Commissioner Holt said not 01:46:38.210 --> 01:46:41.350 align:start position:0% support what Commissioner Holt said not long<01:46:38.480> ago<01:46:38.690> I<01:46:38.810> I<01:46:39.350> have<01:46:39.740> noticed<01:46:40.190> that<01:46:40.310> the<01:46:40.640> the 01:46:41.350 --> 01:46:41.360 align:start position:0% long ago I I have noticed that the the 01:46:41.360 --> 01:46:43.390 align:start position:0% long ago I I have noticed that the the question<01:46:41.810> of<01:46:41.930> short-term<01:46:42.770> rentals<01:46:43.190> is 01:46:43.390 --> 01:46:43.400 align:start position:0% question of short-term rentals is 01:46:43.400 --> 01:46:46.660 align:start position:0% question of short-term rentals is actually<01:46:43.820> a<01:46:44.080> subset<01:46:45.080> of<01:46:45.140> a<01:46:45.320> bigger<01:46:45.530> issue<01:46:46.340> in 01:46:46.660 --> 01:46:46.670 align:start position:0% actually a subset of a bigger issue in 01:46:46.670 --> 01:46:49.030 align:start position:0% actually a subset of a bigger issue in Half<01:46:46.850> Moon<01:46:47.030> Bay<01:46:47.090> which<01:46:47.510> is<01:46:47.720> that<01:46:48.530> of<01:46:48.740> empty 01:46:49.030 --> 01:46:49.040 align:start position:0% Half Moon Bay which is that of empty 01:46:49.040 --> 01:46:51.820 align:start position:0% Half Moon Bay which is that of empty houses<01:46:49.280> in<01:46:49.700> general<01:46:50.150> I<01:46:50.180> know<01:46:50.390> of<01:46:50.800> at<01:46:51.800> least 01:46:51.820 --> 01:46:51.830 align:start position:0% houses in general I know of at least 01:46:51.830 --> 01:46:54.520 align:start position:0% houses in general I know of at least three<01:46:52.490> houses<01:46:52.910> in<01:46:53.210> our<01:46:54.020> leader<01:46:54.200> Park 01:46:54.520 --> 01:46:54.530 align:start position:0% three houses in our leader Park 01:46:54.530 --> 01:46:58.270 align:start position:0% three houses in our leader Park neighborhood<01:46:55.130> not<01:46:55.880> far<01:46:55.910> from<01:46:56.360> me<01:46:56.600> that<01:46:57.280> that 01:46:58.270 --> 01:46:58.280 align:start position:0% neighborhood not far from me that that 01:46:58.280 --> 01:47:00.580 align:start position:0% neighborhood not far from me that that stand<01:46:58.610> empty<01:46:59.060> the<01:46:59.210> first<01:46:59.420> one<01:46:59.660> was<01:46:59.870> used<01:47:00.170> as<01:47:00.440> an 01:47:00.580 --> 01:47:00.590 align:start position:0% stand empty the first one was used as an 01:47:00.590 --> 01:47:03.240 align:start position:0% stand empty the first one was used as an Airbnb<01:47:01.160> property<01:47:01.670> for<01:47:01.880> about<01:47:01.970> six<01:47:02.510> months<01:47:02.720> and 01:47:03.240 --> 01:47:03.250 align:start position:0% Airbnb property for about six months and 01:47:03.250 --> 01:47:06.430 align:start position:0% Airbnb property for about six months and and<01:47:04.250> never<01:47:04.490> again<01:47:04.730> that<01:47:05.360> was<01:47:05.450> probably<01:47:06.170> two 01:47:06.430 --> 01:47:06.440 align:start position:0% and never again that was probably two 01:47:06.440 --> 01:47:10.150 align:start position:0% and never again that was probably two years<01:47:06.680> ago<01:47:06.920> and<01:47:07.130> the<01:47:07.640> two<01:47:08.120> others<01:47:08.420> I<01:47:08.660> I've<01:47:09.260> I've 01:47:10.150 --> 01:47:10.160 align:start position:0% years ago and the two others I I've I've 01:47:10.160 --> 01:47:11.920 align:start position:0% years ago and the two others I I've I've never<01:47:10.460> seen<01:47:10.760> a<01:47:10.790> person<01:47:11.270> in<01:47:11.420> there<01:47:11.600> even<01:47:11.780> though 01:47:11.920 --> 01:47:11.930 align:start position:0% never seen a person in there even though 01:47:11.930 --> 01:47:13.180 align:start position:0% never seen a person in there even though they're<01:47:12.230> like<01:47:12.410> new 01:47:13.180 --> 01:47:13.190 align:start position:0% they're like new 01:47:13.190 --> 01:47:16.860 align:start position:0% they're like new I<01:47:13.220> guess<01:47:13.880> it's<01:47:14.120> I<01:47:14.480> guess<01:47:15.050> it's<01:47:15.260> a<01:47:15.350> case<01:47:15.560> of<01:47:15.800> the 01:47:16.860 --> 01:47:16.870 align:start position:0% I guess it's I guess it's a case of the 01:47:16.870 --> 01:47:19.620 align:start position:0% I guess it's I guess it's a case of the homeowners<01:47:17.870> have<01:47:18.470> the<01:47:18.680> financial 01:47:19.620 --> 01:47:19.630 align:start position:0% homeowners have the financial 01:47:19.630 --> 01:47:21.970 align:start position:0% homeowners have the financial flexibility<01:47:20.630> to<01:47:20.870> live<01:47:21.080> somewhere<01:47:21.470> else<01:47:21.530> and 01:47:21.970 --> 01:47:21.980 align:start position:0% flexibility to live somewhere else and 01:47:21.980 --> 01:47:25.780 align:start position:0% flexibility to live somewhere else and keep<01:47:22.760> those<01:47:22.970> houses<01:47:23.500> for<01:47:24.500> for<01:47:25.130> a<01:47:25.160> rainy<01:47:25.460> day<01:47:25.760> or 01:47:25.780 --> 01:47:25.790 align:start position:0% keep those houses for for a rainy day or 01:47:25.790 --> 01:47:29.110 align:start position:0% keep those houses for for a rainy day or so<01:47:26.240> our<01:47:26.360> retirement<01:47:27.020> on<01:47:27.200> the<01:47:27.710> coast<01:47:27.950> that<01:47:28.250> it's 01:47:29.110 --> 01:47:29.120 align:start position:0% so our retirement on the coast that it's 01:47:29.120 --> 01:47:31.360 align:start position:0% so our retirement on the coast that it's a<01:47:29.270> shame<01:47:29.450> went<01:47:29.750> well<01:47:29.930> I<01:47:29.960> it's<01:47:30.740> a<01:47:30.860> you<01:47:31.130> know<01:47:31.220> it's 01:47:31.360 --> 01:47:31.370 align:start position:0% a shame went well I it's a you know it's 01:47:31.370 --> 01:47:33.280 align:start position:0% a shame went well I it's a you know it's the<01:47:31.520> American<01:47:31.940> Way<01:47:31.970> in<01:47:32.450> a<01:47:32.540> lot<01:47:32.690> of<01:47:32.720> ways<01:47:32.990> I 01:47:33.280 --> 01:47:33.290 align:start position:0% the American Way in a lot of ways I 01:47:33.290 --> 01:47:35.020 align:start position:0% the American Way in a lot of ways I guess<01:47:33.350> but<01:47:33.680> it's<01:47:33.830> a<01:47:33.950> shame<01:47:34.160> when<01:47:34.340> you<01:47:34.430> think 01:47:35.020 --> 01:47:35.030 align:start position:0% guess but it's a shame when you think 01:47:35.030 --> 01:47:37.390 align:start position:0% guess but it's a shame when you think about<01:47:35.270> that<01:47:35.450> impact<01:47:35.930> on<01:47:36.110> our<01:47:36.260> housing<01:47:36.740> stock<01:47:36.920> I 01:47:37.390 --> 01:47:37.400 align:start position:0% about that impact on our housing stock I 01:47:37.400 --> 01:47:40.360 align:start position:0% about that impact on our housing stock I I<01:47:37.670> don't<01:47:37.970> have<01:47:38.540> a<01:47:38.570> proposal<01:47:39.440> for<01:47:39.830> how<01:47:39.950> to<01:47:40.010> deal 01:47:40.360 --> 01:47:40.370 align:start position:0% I don't have a proposal for how to deal 01:47:40.370 --> 01:47:43.270 align:start position:0% I don't have a proposal for how to deal with<01:47:40.400> that<01:47:40.790> but<01:47:41.560> it<01:47:42.560> might<01:47:42.800> be<01:47:42.980> an<01:47:43.100> interesting 01:47:43.270 --> 01:47:43.280 align:start position:0% with that but it might be an interesting 01:47:43.280 --> 01:47:46.300 align:start position:0% with that but it might be an interesting thing<01:47:43.850> for<01:47:43.910> the<01:47:44.240> city<01:47:45.110> to<01:47:45.320> explore<01:47:45.710> at<01:47:46.070> some 01:47:46.300 --> 01:47:46.310 align:start position:0% thing for the city to explore at some 01:47:46.310 --> 01:47:50.290 align:start position:0% thing for the city to explore at some point<01:47:46.550> the<01:47:46.760> empty<01:47:47.300> housing<01:47:47.720> issue<01:47:48.790> in<01:47:49.790> general 01:47:50.290 --> 01:47:50.300 align:start position:0% point the empty housing issue in general 01:47:50.300 --> 01:47:53.500 align:start position:0% point the empty housing issue in general on<01:47:50.450> short-term<01:47:50.780> rentals<01:47:51.380> you<01:47:51.470> know<01:47:51.710> I<01:47:52.390> I'm<01:47:53.390> a 01:47:53.500 --> 01:47:53.510 align:start position:0% on short-term rentals you know I I'm a 01:47:53.510 --> 01:47:58.150 align:start position:0% on short-term rentals you know I I'm a fan<01:47:53.900> of<01:47:54.290> of<01:47:56.050> having<01:47:57.050> faith<01:47:57.320> in<01:47:57.620> the<01:47:57.950> free 01:47:58.150 --> 01:47:58.160 align:start position:0% fan of of having faith in the free 01:47:58.160 --> 01:48:00.820 align:start position:0% fan of of having faith in the free market<01:47:58.430> in<01:47:58.790> general<01:47:59.240> working<01:47:59.990> that<01:48:00.410> the<01:48:00.530> the 01:48:00.820 --> 01:48:00.830 align:start position:0% market in general working that the the 01:48:00.830 --> 01:48:03.460 align:start position:0% market in general working that the the right<01:48:01.040> number<01:48:01.460> of<01:48:01.640> those<01:48:01.790> things<01:48:02.630> will<01:48:03.020> match 01:48:03.460 --> 01:48:03.470 align:start position:0% right number of those things will match 01:48:03.470 --> 01:48:06.010 align:start position:0% right number of those things will match up<01:48:03.500> with<01:48:04.010> what<01:48:04.190> the<01:48:04.310> demand<01:48:04.760> is<01:48:05.060> in<01:48:05.540> Half<01:48:05.990> Moon 01:48:06.010 --> 01:48:06.020 align:start position:0% up with what the demand is in Half Moon 01:48:06.020 --> 01:48:08.380 align:start position:0% up with what the demand is in Half Moon Bay<01:48:06.260> with<01:48:06.740> a<01:48:06.770> little<01:48:07.160> bit<01:48:07.310> of<01:48:07.430> flexibility<01:48:08.060> you 01:48:08.380 --> 01:48:08.390 align:start position:0% Bay with a little bit of flexibility you 01:48:08.390 --> 01:48:11.800 align:start position:0% Bay with a little bit of flexibility you know<01:48:08.990> we<01:48:09.110> heard<01:48:09.320> that<01:48:09.620> our<01:48:09.790> best<01:48:10.790> best<01:48:11.360> ability 01:48:11.800 --> 01:48:11.810 align:start position:0% know we heard that our best best ability 01:48:11.810 --> 01:48:13.660 align:start position:0% know we heard that our best best ability to<01:48:11.960> count<01:48:12.230> them<01:48:12.530> today<01:48:12.740> we<01:48:13.130> might<01:48:13.340> be<01:48:13.520> looking 01:48:13.660 --> 01:48:13.670 align:start position:0% to count them today we might be looking 01:48:13.670 --> 01:48:16.690 align:start position:0% to count them today we might be looking at<01:48:14.030> a<01:48:14.270> small<01:48:15.080> percent<01:48:15.980> two<01:48:16.220> or<01:48:16.340> three<01:48:16.520> percent 01:48:16.690 --> 01:48:16.700 align:start position:0% at a small percent two or three percent 01:48:16.700 --> 01:48:21.130 align:start position:0% at a small percent two or three percent maybe<01:48:17.150> at<01:48:17.390> most<01:48:17.690> of<01:48:18.020> torille<01:48:18.980> housing<01:48:19.460> so<01:48:19.670> I<01:48:20.140> to 01:48:21.130 --> 01:48:21.140 align:start position:0% maybe at most of torille housing so I to 01:48:21.140 --> 01:48:22.810 align:start position:0% maybe at most of torille housing so I to me<01:48:21.260> that<01:48:21.500> means<01:48:21.680> that<01:48:21.980> we<01:48:22.100> don't<01:48:22.250> need<01:48:22.550> to 01:48:22.810 --> 01:48:22.820 align:start position:0% me that means that we don't need to 01:48:22.820 --> 01:48:24.990 align:start position:0% me that means that we don't need to invest<01:48:23.210> in<01:48:23.450> an<01:48:23.570> awful<01:48:23.900> lot<01:48:24.050> of<01:48:24.080> legislation 01:48:24.990 --> 01:48:25.000 align:start position:0% invest in an awful lot of legislation 01:48:25.000 --> 01:48:27.700 align:start position:0% invest in an awful lot of legislation above<01:48:26.000> and<01:48:26.180> beyond<01:48:26.420> what<01:48:26.690> we<01:48:26.810> have<01:48:26.990> today<01:48:27.260> I 01:48:27.700 --> 01:48:27.710 align:start position:0% above and beyond what we have today I 01:48:27.710 --> 01:48:31.000 align:start position:0% above and beyond what we have today I think<01:48:28.340> that<01:48:28.610> our<01:48:28.910> residents<01:48:30.010> absolutely 01:48:31.000 --> 01:48:31.010 align:start position:0% think that our residents absolutely 01:48:31.010 --> 01:48:33.580 align:start position:0% think that our residents absolutely deserve<01:48:31.430> to<01:48:31.730> have<01:48:31.940> the<01:48:32.210> the<01:48:32.870> character<01:48:33.350> of<01:48:33.470> the 01:48:33.580 --> 01:48:33.590 align:start position:0% deserve to have the the character of the 01:48:33.590 --> 01:48:36.220 align:start position:0% deserve to have the the character of the neighborhood<01:48:34.060> preserved<01:48:35.060> but<01:48:35.600> but<01:48:35.900> we<01:48:36.020> have 01:48:36.220 --> 01:48:36.230 align:start position:0% neighborhood preserved but but we have 01:48:36.230 --> 01:48:38.530 align:start position:0% neighborhood preserved but but we have the<01:48:36.560> if<01:48:37.040> we<01:48:37.220> can<01:48:37.400> figure<01:48:37.580> out<01:48:37.700> how<01:48:37.940> to<01:48:38.000> enforce 01:48:38.530 --> 01:48:38.540 align:start position:0% the if we can figure out how to enforce 01:48:38.540 --> 01:48:41.610 align:start position:0% the if we can figure out how to enforce our<01:48:38.810> noise<01:48:39.110> and<01:48:39.440> parking<01:48:39.950> and<01:48:40.130> and<01:48:40.340> garbage 01:48:41.610 --> 01:48:41.620 align:start position:0% our noise and parking and and garbage 01:48:41.620 --> 01:48:44.920 align:start position:0% our noise and parking and and garbage code<01:48:42.620> that<01:48:42.890> exists<01:48:43.310> today<01:48:43.460> if<01:48:43.850> we<01:48:44.000> can<01:48:44.210> we<01:48:44.810> can 01:48:44.920 --> 01:48:44.930 align:start position:0% code that exists today if we can we can 01:48:44.930 --> 01:48:46.870 align:start position:0% code that exists today if we can we can enforce<01:48:45.290> that<01:48:45.470> then<01:48:45.710> we'll<01:48:45.890> we'll<01:48:46.250> be<01:48:46.310> going 01:48:46.870 --> 01:48:46.880 align:start position:0% enforce that then we'll we'll be going 01:48:46.880 --> 01:48:49.780 align:start position:0% enforce that then we'll we'll be going most<01:48:47.120> of<01:48:47.300> the<01:48:47.360> way<01:48:47.480> to<01:48:47.510> preserving<01:48:48.260> that<01:48:48.980> that 01:48:49.780 --> 01:48:49.790 align:start position:0% most of the way to preserving that that 01:48:49.790 --> 01:48:52.450 align:start position:0% most of the way to preserving that that neighborhood<01:48:50.270> flavor<01:48:50.600> I<01:48:51.250> realize<01:48:52.250> that's 01:48:52.450 --> 01:48:52.460 align:start position:0% neighborhood flavor I realize that's 01:48:52.460 --> 01:48:57.250 align:start position:0% neighborhood flavor I realize that's easier<01:48:52.880> said<01:48:52.970> than<01:48:53.420> done<01:48:53.480> but<01:48:54.050> but<01:48:54.800> I<01:48:55.330> I<01:48:56.330> know 01:48:57.250 --> 01:48:57.260 align:start position:0% easier said than done but but I I know 01:48:57.260 --> 01:48:59.320 align:start position:0% easier said than done but but I I know we'll<01:48:57.440> look<01:48:57.620> at<01:48:57.830> what<01:48:58.310> the<01:48:58.340> enforcement<01:48:59.240> of 01:48:59.320 --> 01:48:59.330 align:start position:0% we'll look at what the enforcement of 01:48:59.330 --> 01:49:02.060 align:start position:0% we'll look at what the enforcement of the<01:48:59.450> code<01:48:59.810> will<01:49:00.050> require 01:49:02.060 --> 01:49:02.070 align:start position:0% the code will require 01:49:02.070 --> 01:49:04.070 align:start position:0% the code will require I<01:49:02.100> also<01:49:02.760> think<01:49:03.120> going<01:49:03.360> forward<01:49:03.719> it<01:49:03.930> would<01:49:04.020> be 01:49:04.070 --> 01:49:04.080 align:start position:0% I also think going forward it would be 01:49:04.080 --> 01:49:07.610 align:start position:0% I also think going forward it would be great<01:49:04.440> to<01:49:04.820> to<01:49:05.820> invest<01:49:06.810> a<01:49:06.930> little<01:49:07.170> bit<01:49:07.290> more<01:49:07.469> in 01:49:07.610 --> 01:49:07.620 align:start position:0% great to to invest a little bit more in 01:49:07.620 --> 01:49:09.920 align:start position:0% great to to invest a little bit more in the<01:49:07.739> our<01:49:07.890> ability<01:49:08.340> to<01:49:08.520> count<01:49:08.820> and<01:49:09.150> report<01:49:09.630> on 01:49:09.920 --> 01:49:09.930 align:start position:0% the our ability to count and report on 01:49:09.930 --> 01:49:12.920 align:start position:0% the our ability to count and report on on<01:49:10.170> the<01:49:10.800> numbers<01:49:11.190> and<01:49:11.219> the<01:49:11.610> issues<01:49:12.030> and<01:49:12.540> I 01:49:12.920 --> 01:49:12.930 align:start position:0% on the numbers and the issues and I 01:49:12.930 --> 01:49:15.770 align:start position:0% on the numbers and the issues and I would<01:49:13.140> I<01:49:13.320> would<01:49:13.790> you<01:49:14.790> know<01:49:14.910> reserve<01:49:15.330> the<01:49:15.630> right 01:49:15.770 --> 01:49:15.780 align:start position:0% would I would you know reserve the right 01:49:15.780 --> 01:49:18.620 align:start position:0% would I would you know reserve the right to<01:49:15.840> maybe<01:49:16.290> change<01:49:16.620> my<01:49:16.980> mind<01:49:17.250> on<01:49:17.610> the<01:49:17.850> on<01:49:18.060> the 01:49:18.620 --> 01:49:18.630 align:start position:0% to maybe change my mind on the on the 01:49:18.630 --> 01:49:21.860 align:start position:0% to maybe change my mind on the on the impact<01:49:19.050> of<01:49:19.320> the<01:49:19.500> un--<01:49:19.739> hosted<01:49:20.640> rentals<01:49:21.090> if<01:49:21.360> if 01:49:21.860 --> 01:49:21.870 align:start position:0% impact of the un-- hosted rentals if if 01:49:21.870 --> 01:49:24.110 align:start position:0% impact of the un-- hosted rentals if if for<01:49:22.140> some<01:49:22.170> reason<01:49:22.710> this<01:49:22.860> can<01:49:23.100> this<01:49:23.370> became<01:49:24.060> a 01:49:24.110 --> 01:49:24.120 align:start position:0% for some reason this can this became a 01:49:24.120 --> 01:49:26.600 align:start position:0% for some reason this can this became a problem<01:49:24.690> that<01:49:24.840> was<01:49:24.960> getting<01:49:25.290> worse<01:49:25.610> beyond 01:49:26.600 --> 01:49:26.610 align:start position:0% problem that was getting worse beyond 01:49:26.610 --> 01:49:32.540 align:start position:0% problem that was getting worse beyond the<01:49:26.820> scope<01:49:27.060> of<01:49:27.270> it<01:49:27.390> today<01:49:29.960> okay<01:49:31.070> my<01:49:32.070> turn 01:49:32.540 --> 01:49:32.550 align:start position:0% the scope of it today okay my turn 01:49:32.550 --> 01:49:35.840 align:start position:0% the scope of it today okay my turn so<01:49:33.270> thank<01:49:33.780> you<01:49:33.840> for<01:49:33.930> the<01:49:34.610> comments<01:49:35.610> again 01:49:35.840 --> 01:49:35.850 align:start position:0% so thank you for the comments again 01:49:35.850 --> 01:49:37.190 align:start position:0% so thank you for the comments again thank<01:49:36.060> you<01:49:36.180> to<01:49:36.300> the<01:49:36.390> public<01:49:36.540> for<01:49:36.930> what<01:49:37.080> you 01:49:37.190 --> 01:49:37.200 align:start position:0% thank you to the public for what you 01:49:37.200 --> 01:49:41.380 align:start position:0% thank you to the public for what you guys<01:49:37.380> had<01:49:38.130> said<01:49:38.430> I<01:49:38.670> have<01:49:39.660> some<01:49:40.100> reflections<01:49:41.100> on 01:49:41.380 --> 01:49:41.390 align:start position:0% guys had said I have some reflections on 01:49:41.390 --> 01:49:45.110 align:start position:0% guys had said I have some reflections on the<01:49:42.390> ordinance<01:49:42.810> as<01:49:42.989> well<01:49:43.260> and<01:49:43.790> while<01:49:44.790> I<01:49:44.820> agree 01:49:45.110 --> 01:49:45.120 align:start position:0% the ordinance as well and while I agree 01:49:45.120 --> 01:49:46.790 align:start position:0% the ordinance as well and while I agree in<01:49:45.510> many<01:49:45.719> respects<01:49:46.260> with<01:49:46.469> all<01:49:46.620> of<01:49:46.739> my 01:49:46.790 --> 01:49:46.800 align:start position:0% in many respects with all of my 01:49:46.800 --> 01:49:52.760 align:start position:0% in many respects with all of my colleagues<01:49:47.900> where<01:49:48.900> as<01:49:50.870> Steve<01:49:51.870> was<01:49:52.200> talking 01:49:52.760 --> 01:49:52.770 align:start position:0% colleagues where as Steve was talking 01:49:52.770 --> 01:49:54.290 align:start position:0% colleagues where as Steve was talking about<01:49:52.830> the<01:49:53.130> free<01:49:53.310> market<01:49:53.670> I<01:49:53.760> am<01:49:53.790> less<01:49:54.090> of<01:49:54.239> a 01:49:54.290 --> 01:49:54.300 align:start position:0% about the free market I am less of a 01:49:54.300 --> 01:49:58.010 align:start position:0% about the free market I am less of a libertarian<01:49:54.719> perhaps<01:49:55.880> and<01:49:56.880> I<01:49:57.120> am<01:49:57.450> concerned 01:49:58.010 --> 01:49:58.020 align:start position:0% libertarian perhaps and I am concerned 01:49:58.020 --> 01:50:00.440 align:start position:0% libertarian perhaps and I am concerned that<01:49:58.200> we<01:49:58.500> will<01:49:58.739> if<01:49:59.400> we<01:49:59.550> allow<01:49:59.730> the<01:49:59.790> free<01:50:00.090> market 01:50:00.440 --> 01:50:00.450 align:start position:0% that we will if we allow the free market 01:50:00.450 --> 01:50:05.600 align:start position:0% that we will if we allow the free market to<01:50:00.480> operate<01:50:00.660> we<01:50:01.170> will<01:50:01.440> have<01:50:04.610> careful 01:50:05.600 --> 01:50:05.610 align:start position:0% to operate we will have careful 01:50:05.610 --> 01:50:08.570 align:start position:0% to operate we will have careful preservation<01:50:06.510> of<01:50:06.590> the<01:50:07.590> community<01:50:08.190> character 01:50:08.570 --> 01:50:08.580 align:start position:0% preservation of the community character 01:50:08.580 --> 01:50:11.150 align:start position:0% preservation of the community character until<01:50:09.000> we<01:50:09.180> don't<01:50:09.390> anymore<01:50:09.840> that<01:50:10.680> is<01:50:10.920> the 01:50:11.150 --> 01:50:11.160 align:start position:0% until we don't anymore that is the 01:50:11.160 --> 01:50:13.430 align:start position:0% until we don't anymore that is the tragedy<01:50:11.370> of<01:50:11.760> the<01:50:11.880> Commons<01:50:12.290> argument<01:50:13.290> in 01:50:13.430 --> 01:50:13.440 align:start position:0% tragedy of the Commons argument in 01:50:13.440 --> 01:50:16.970 align:start position:0% tragedy of the Commons argument in libertarian<01:50:14.130> parlance<01:50:14.550> and<01:50:14.880> so<01:50:15.810> I<01:50:16.290> do<01:50:16.590> believe 01:50:16.970 --> 01:50:16.980 align:start position:0% libertarian parlance and so I do believe 01:50:16.980 --> 01:50:21.640 align:start position:0% libertarian parlance and so I do believe that<01:50:17.780> regulation<01:50:18.780> for<01:50:19.110> the<01:50:19.140> volume<01:50:19.739> of 01:50:21.640 --> 01:50:21.650 align:start position:0% that regulation for the volume of 01:50:21.650 --> 01:50:24.920 align:start position:0% that regulation for the volume of short-term<01:50:22.650> rentals<01:50:23.010> is<01:50:23.550> actually<01:50:24.150> important 01:50:24.920 --> 01:50:24.930 align:start position:0% short-term rentals is actually important 01:50:24.930 --> 01:50:27.290 align:start position:0% short-term rentals is actually important and<01:50:25.170> I<01:50:25.560> don't<01:50:26.100> pretend<01:50:26.550> to<01:50:26.640> know<01:50:26.730> what<01:50:26.850> the 01:50:27.290 --> 01:50:27.300 align:start position:0% and I don't pretend to know what the 01:50:27.300 --> 01:50:31.190 align:start position:0% and I don't pretend to know what the number<01:50:27.660> is<01:50:28.700> what<01:50:29.700> I<01:50:29.730> think<01:50:29.850> we<01:50:30.150> need<01:50:30.180> is<01:50:30.750> a<01:50:30.780> big 01:50:31.190 --> 01:50:31.200 align:start position:0% number is what I think we need is a big 01:50:31.200 --> 01:50:33.979 align:start position:0% number is what I think we need is a big stick<01:50:31.650> that<01:50:32.520> we<01:50:32.790> can<01:50:33.030> use<01:50:33.270> so<01:50:33.510> that<01:50:33.690> we<01:50:33.810> have 01:50:33.979 --> 01:50:33.989 align:start position:0% stick that we can use so that we have 01:50:33.989 --> 01:50:36.860 align:start position:0% stick that we can use so that we have not<01:50:34.140> opened<01:50:34.350> the<01:50:34.650> door<01:50:34.890> to<01:50:35.730> lose<01:50:36.120> the<01:50:36.390> ability 01:50:36.860 --> 01:50:36.870 align:start position:0% not opened the door to lose the ability 01:50:36.870 --> 01:50:39.620 align:start position:0% not opened the door to lose the ability to<01:50:36.900> manage<01:50:37.410> it<01:50:37.739> the<01:50:38.190> way<01:50:38.370> we<01:50:38.610> have<01:50:38.820> lost<01:50:39.300> the 01:50:39.620 --> 01:50:39.630 align:start position:0% to manage it the way we have lost the 01:50:39.630 --> 01:50:42.320 align:start position:0% to manage it the way we have lost the ability<01:50:39.719> to<01:50:40.230> manage<01:50:40.560> ad<01:50:40.800> use<01:50:41.130> do<01:50:41.700> no<01:50:41.910> fault<01:50:42.180> of 01:50:42.320 --> 01:50:42.330 align:start position:0% ability to manage ad use do no fault of 01:50:42.330 --> 01:50:47.209 align:start position:0% ability to manage ad use do no fault of our<01:50:42.480> horrible<01:50:43.110> I<01:50:43.230> think<01:50:43.820> and<01:50:44.820> so<01:50:45.800> so<01:50:46.800> this<01:50:47.010> does 01:50:47.209 --> 01:50:47.219 align:start position:0% our horrible I think and so so this does 01:50:47.219 --> 01:50:52.220 align:start position:0% our horrible I think and so so this does concern<01:50:47.670> me<01:50:49.760> in<01:50:50.760> terms<01:50:51.090> of<01:50:51.270> impacts<01:50:51.780> I<01:50:51.989> can 01:50:52.220 --> 01:50:52.230 align:start position:0% concern me in terms of impacts I can 01:50:52.230 --> 01:50:55.310 align:start position:0% concern me in terms of impacts I can speak<01:50:52.650> from<01:50:53.010> personal<01:50:53.070> experience<01:50:54.060> to<01:50:54.870> some 01:50:55.310 --> 01:50:55.320 align:start position:0% speak from personal experience to some 01:50:55.320 --> 01:50:58.760 align:start position:0% speak from personal experience to some just<01:50:55.710> as<01:50:55.920> an<01:50:56.040> anecdote<01:50:56.400> to<01:50:56.640> try<01:50:56.969> to<01:50:57.530> spice<01:50:58.530> up 01:50:58.760 --> 01:50:58.770 align:start position:0% just as an anecdote to try to spice up 01:50:58.770 --> 01:51:00.520 align:start position:0% just as an anecdote to try to spice up your<01:50:58.800> thinking<01:50:59.310> about<01:50:59.610> this<01:50:59.820> a<01:50:59.850> little<01:51:00.060> bit 01:51:00.520 --> 01:51:00.530 align:start position:0% your thinking about this a little bit 01:51:00.530 --> 01:51:04.250 align:start position:0% your thinking about this a little bit one<01:51:01.530> of<01:51:01.650> my<01:51:01.800> neighbors<01:51:02.310> has<01:51:03.180> a 01:51:04.250 --> 01:51:04.260 align:start position:0% one of my neighbors has a 01:51:04.260 --> 01:51:07.040 align:start position:0% one of my neighbors has a a<01:51:04.290> short-term<01:51:05.070> rental<01:51:05.430> it<01:51:06.240> was<01:51:06.420> unholstered 01:51:07.040 --> 01:51:07.050 align:start position:0% a short-term rental it was unholstered 01:51:07.050 --> 01:51:09.080 align:start position:0% a short-term rental it was unholstered they<01:51:07.320> moved<01:51:07.590> to<01:51:07.770> a<01:51:07.800> less<01:51:08.280> expensive<01:51:08.550> place<01:51:09.060> in 01:51:09.080 --> 01:51:09.090 align:start position:0% they moved to a less expensive place in 01:51:09.090 --> 01:51:13.100 align:start position:0% they moved to a less expensive place in El<01:51:09.360> Granada<01:51:10.040> and<01:51:11.090> that<01:51:12.090> the<01:51:12.600> people<01:51:12.780> who<01:51:12.990> rent 01:51:13.100 --> 01:51:13.110 align:start position:0% El Granada and that the people who rent 01:51:13.110 --> 01:51:15.230 align:start position:0% El Granada and that the people who rent are<01:51:13.260> very<01:51:13.410> nice<01:51:13.620> but<01:51:14.310> in<01:51:14.430> the<01:51:14.550> morning<01:51:14.910> I<01:51:15.000> come 01:51:15.230 --> 01:51:15.240 align:start position:0% are very nice but in the morning I come 01:51:15.240 --> 01:51:17.180 align:start position:0% are very nice but in the morning I come out<01:51:15.360> and<01:51:15.480> I<01:51:15.570> find<01:51:15.840> raccoons<01:51:16.320> eating<01:51:16.650> from<01:51:17.040> the 01:51:17.180 --> 01:51:17.190 align:start position:0% out and I find raccoons eating from the 01:51:17.190 --> 01:51:20.090 align:start position:0% out and I find raccoons eating from the garbage<01:51:17.640> and<01:51:18.170> you<01:51:19.170> know<01:51:19.260> I<01:51:19.290> knock<01:51:19.560> on<01:51:19.770> the<01:51:19.920> door 01:51:20.090 --> 01:51:20.100 align:start position:0% garbage and you know I knock on the door 01:51:20.100 --> 01:51:21.560 align:start position:0% garbage and you know I knock on the door and<01:51:20.250> say<01:51:20.490> you<01:51:20.520> know<01:51:20.790> you<01:51:20.850> need<01:51:21.120> to<01:51:21.240> pick<01:51:21.390> that 01:51:21.560 --> 01:51:21.570 align:start position:0% and say you know you need to pick that 01:51:21.570 --> 01:51:25.250 align:start position:0% and say you know you need to pick that up<01:51:22.640> if<01:51:23.640> I<01:51:23.850> were<01:51:24.000> a<01:51:24.030> more<01:51:24.330> timid<01:51:24.600> neighbor<01:51:24.930> that 01:51:25.250 --> 01:51:25.260 align:start position:0% up if I were a more timid neighbor that 01:51:25.260 --> 01:51:29.570 align:start position:0% up if I were a more timid neighbor that would<01:51:25.410> never<01:51:25.620> happen<01:51:26.150> and<01:51:27.150> I<01:51:28.370> you<01:51:29.370> know<01:51:29.460> of 01:51:29.570 --> 01:51:29.580 align:start position:0% would never happen and I you know of 01:51:29.580 --> 01:51:32.420 align:start position:0% would never happen and I you know of course<01:51:29.820> the<01:51:30.500> owner<01:51:31.500> of<01:51:31.740> the<01:51:31.830> property<01:51:32.280> was 01:51:32.420 --> 01:51:32.430 align:start position:0% course the owner of the property was 01:51:32.430 --> 01:51:36.530 align:start position:0% course the owner of the property was mortified<01:51:33.000> and<01:51:33.270> anxious<01:51:34.140> to<01:51:34.320> take<01:51:34.740> steps<01:51:35.540> they 01:51:36.530 --> 01:51:36.540 align:start position:0% mortified and anxious to take steps they 01:51:36.540 --> 01:51:39.590 align:start position:0% mortified and anxious to take steps they had<01:51:36.720> others<01:51:37.350> had<01:51:37.560> parties<01:51:38.010> I<01:51:38.400> think<01:51:39.270> we're<01:51:39.420> all 01:51:39.590 --> 01:51:39.600 align:start position:0% had others had parties I think we're all 01:51:39.600 --> 01:51:41.750 align:start position:0% had others had parties I think we're all aware<01:51:39.840> of<01:51:40.110> the<01:51:40.230> potential<01:51:40.620> catastrophes<01:51:41.490> not 01:51:41.750 --> 01:51:41.760 align:start position:0% aware of the potential catastrophes not 01:51:41.760 --> 01:51:43.940 align:start position:0% aware of the potential catastrophes not that<01:51:41.970> they're<01:51:42.120> the<01:51:42.270> every<01:51:42.600> case<01:51:42.840> but<01:51:43.650> I 01:51:43.940 --> 01:51:43.950 align:start position:0% that they're the every case but I 01:51:43.950 --> 01:51:46.040 align:start position:0% that they're the every case but I believe<01:51:44.460> it<01:51:44.610> was<01:51:44.760> what<01:51:45.000> in<01:51:45.180> or<01:51:45.330> Minda<01:51:45.690> in<01:51:45.900> the 01:51:46.040 --> 01:51:46.050 align:start position:0% believe it was what in or Minda in the 01:51:46.050 --> 01:51:48.980 align:start position:0% believe it was what in or Minda in the East<01:51:46.200> Bay<01:51:46.440> were<01:51:46.710> that<01:51:46.970> nightmare<01:51:47.990> scenario 01:51:48.980 --> 01:51:48.990 align:start position:0% East Bay were that nightmare scenario 01:51:48.990 --> 01:51:52.490 align:start position:0% East Bay were that nightmare scenario happened<01:51:49.530> so<01:51:50.370> I'm<01:51:51.330> interested<01:51:51.840> in<01:51:52.230> the<01:51:52.350> public 01:51:52.490 --> 01:51:52.500 align:start position:0% happened so I'm interested in the public 01:51:52.500 --> 01:51:55.280 align:start position:0% happened so I'm interested in the public safety<01:51:52.980> angle<01:51:53.550> and<01:51:53.700> I<01:51:54.540> don't<01:51:54.630> know<01:51:54.930> what 01:51:55.280 --> 01:51:55.290 align:start position:0% safety angle and I don't know what 01:51:55.290 --> 01:51:57.680 align:start position:0% safety angle and I don't know what lessons<01:51:55.800> we<01:51:56.010> can<01:51:56.160> learn<01:51:56.220> and<01:51:56.730> apply<01:51:56.940> from<01:51:57.420> the 01:51:57.680 --> 01:51:57.690 align:start position:0% lessons we can learn and apply from the 01:51:57.690 --> 01:52:00.620 align:start position:0% lessons we can learn and apply from the Orenda<01:51:58.410> nightmare<01:51:58.830> but<01:51:59.070> I'm<01:51:59.220> conscious<01:51:59.760> and<01:52:00.540> I 01:52:00.620 --> 01:52:00.630 align:start position:0% Orenda nightmare but I'm conscious and I 01:52:00.630 --> 01:52:02.210 align:start position:0% Orenda nightmare but I'm conscious and I think<01:52:00.900> as<01:52:01.020> a<01:52:01.050> matter<01:52:01.290> of<01:52:01.380> public<01:52:01.590> safety<01:52:01.830> all 01:52:02.210 --> 01:52:02.220 align:start position:0% think as a matter of public safety all 01:52:02.220 --> 01:52:04.160 align:start position:0% think as a matter of public safety all of<01:52:02.400> us<01:52:02.520> should<01:52:02.730> be<01:52:02.880> conscious<01:52:03.150> of<01:52:03.540> those 01:52:04.160 --> 01:52:04.170 align:start position:0% of us should be conscious of those 01:52:04.170 --> 01:52:09.710 align:start position:0% of us should be conscious of those potential<01:52:05.030> hazards<01:52:06.860> the<01:52:07.860> staff<01:52:08.130> report<01:52:08.690> did<01:52:09.690> a 01:52:09.710 --> 01:52:09.720 align:start position:0% potential hazards the staff report did a 01:52:09.720 --> 01:52:13.190 align:start position:0% potential hazards the staff report did a nice<01:52:09.990> job<01:52:10.020> of<01:52:10.850> introducing<01:52:11.850> in<01:52:12.450> some<01:52:12.960> of<01:52:13.080> the 01:52:13.190 --> 01:52:13.200 align:start position:0% nice job of introducing in some of the 01:52:13.200 --> 01:52:15.260 align:start position:0% nice job of introducing in some of the examples<01:52:13.770> the<01:52:14.280> notion<01:52:14.640> of<01:52:14.730> a<01:52:14.820> good<01:52:15.060> neighbor 01:52:15.260 --> 01:52:15.270 align:start position:0% examples the notion of a good neighbor 01:52:15.270 --> 01:52:18.380 align:start position:0% examples the notion of a good neighbor policy<01:52:15.620> the<01:52:16.620> idea<01:52:17.040> that<01:52:17.280> we<01:52:17.490> lay<01:52:17.820> out<01:52:17.970> in<01:52:18.240> our 01:52:18.380 --> 01:52:18.390 align:start position:0% policy the idea that we lay out in our 01:52:18.390 --> 01:52:22.430 align:start position:0% policy the idea that we lay out in our in<01:52:19.080> our<01:52:19.580> program<01:52:20.580> for<01:52:20.940> short-term<01:52:21.930> rentals<01:52:22.230> a 01:52:22.430 --> 01:52:22.440 align:start position:0% in our program for short-term rentals a 01:52:22.440 --> 01:52:24.940 align:start position:0% in our program for short-term rentals a policy<01:52:23.400> that<01:52:23.610> would<01:52:23.850> be<01:52:24.060> that<01:52:24.570> would<01:52:24.690> lay<01:52:24.870> out 01:52:24.940 --> 01:52:24.950 align:start position:0% policy that would be that would lay out 01:52:24.950 --> 01:52:28.430 align:start position:0% policy that would be that would lay out expectations<01:52:26.600> not<01:52:27.600> just<01:52:27.930> in<01:52:28.080> a<01:52:28.140> cold 01:52:28.430 --> 01:52:28.440 align:start position:0% expectations not just in a cold 01:52:28.440 --> 01:52:30.440 align:start position:0% expectations not just in a cold regulated<01:52:29.130> way<01:52:29.310> in<01:52:29.580> addition<01:52:30.180> to<01:52:30.330> the 01:52:30.440 --> 01:52:30.450 align:start position:0% regulated way in addition to the 01:52:30.450 --> 01:52:32.570 align:start position:0% regulated way in addition to the regulations<01:52:31.080> that<01:52:31.250> constitute<01:52:32.250> the<01:52:32.400> big 01:52:32.570 --> 01:52:32.580 align:start position:0% regulations that constitute the big 01:52:32.580 --> 01:52:34.190 align:start position:0% regulations that constitute the big stick<01:52:32.880> that<01:52:33.090> we<01:52:33.210> hope<01:52:33.360> we<01:52:33.510> never<01:52:33.540> have<01:52:33.900> to<01:52:34.050> take 01:52:34.190 --> 01:52:34.200 align:start position:0% stick that we hope we never have to take 01:52:34.200 --> 01:52:36.440 align:start position:0% stick that we hope we never have to take out<01:52:34.470> you'd<01:52:35.430> have<01:52:35.580> a<01:52:35.610> good<01:52:35.910> neighbor<01:52:36.150> policy 01:52:36.440 --> 01:52:36.450 align:start position:0% out you'd have a good neighbor policy 01:52:36.450 --> 01:52:38.450 align:start position:0% out you'd have a good neighbor policy that<01:52:36.990> communicates<01:52:37.560> to<01:52:37.770> the<01:52:37.890> owner<01:52:38.070> of<01:52:38.220> the 01:52:38.450 --> 01:52:38.460 align:start position:0% that communicates to the owner of the 01:52:38.460 --> 01:52:40.400 align:start position:0% that communicates to the owner of the rental<01:52:38.850> that<01:52:39.270> they<01:52:39.420> communicate<01:52:39.660> to<01:52:40.290> the 01:52:40.400 --> 01:52:40.410 align:start position:0% rental that they communicate to the 01:52:40.410 --> 01:52:42.560 align:start position:0% rental that they communicate to the potential<01:52:40.980> client<01:52:41.460> that<01:52:42.090> they<01:52:42.300> communicate 01:52:42.560 --> 01:52:42.570 align:start position:0% potential client that they communicate 01:52:42.570 --> 01:52:46.970 align:start position:0% potential client that they communicate to<01:52:43.380> the<01:52:43.500> neighbors<01:52:43.890> that<01:52:44.520> say<01:52:44.850> this<01:52:45.510> is<01:52:45.720> how<01:52:45.980> we 01:52:46.970 --> 01:52:46.980 align:start position:0% to the neighbors that say this is how we 01:52:46.980 --> 01:52:48.740 align:start position:0% to the neighbors that say this is how we expected<01:52:47.550> to<01:52:47.670> operate<01:52:47.790> and<01:52:48.240> of<01:52:48.300> course<01:52:48.540> I<01:52:48.690> know 01:52:48.740 --> 01:52:48.750 align:start position:0% expected to operate and of course I know 01:52:48.750 --> 01:52:51.350 align:start position:0% expected to operate and of course I know that<01:52:49.080> the<01:52:49.250> Airbnb<01:52:50.250> program<01:52:50.880> has<01:52:51.090> its<01:52:51.240> own 01:52:51.350 --> 01:52:51.360 align:start position:0% that the Airbnb program has its own 01:52:51.360 --> 01:52:54.140 align:start position:0% that the Airbnb program has its own version<01:52:51.780> of<01:52:51.870> that<01:52:52.080> but<01:52:52.800> Half<01:52:52.980> Moon<01:52:53.190> Bay<01:52:53.250> could 01:52:54.140 --> 01:52:54.150 align:start position:0% version of that but Half Moon Bay could 01:52:54.150 --> 01:52:56.990 align:start position:0% version of that but Half Moon Bay could tailor<01:52:54.450> it<01:52:54.750> because<01:52:55.560> we<01:52:55.830> know<01:52:56.040> where<01:52:56.850> our 01:52:56.990 --> 01:52:57.000 align:start position:0% tailor it because we know where our 01:52:57.000 --> 01:52:58.940 align:start position:0% tailor it because we know where our problems<01:52:57.450> are<01:52:57.660> we<01:52:57.930> know<01:52:58.080> where<01:52:58.320> the<01:52:58.470> raccoons 01:52:58.940 --> 01:52:58.950 align:start position:0% problems are we know where the raccoons 01:52:58.950 --> 01:53:02.900 align:start position:0% problems are we know where the raccoons come<01:52:59.250> up<01:52:59.430> any<01:52:59.700> trash<01:53:00.030> we<01:53:00.690> know<01:53:00.900> where 01:53:02.900 --> 01:53:02.910 align:start position:0% come up any trash we know where 01:53:02.910 --> 01:53:06.439 align:start position:0% come up any trash we know where and<01:53:03.480> Airbnb<01:53:04.440> or<01:53:04.710> sorry<01:53:05.219> a<01:53:05.610> short-term<01:53:06.270> rental 01:53:06.439 --> 01:53:06.449 align:start position:0% and Airbnb or sorry a short-term rental 01:53:06.449 --> 01:53:09.500 align:start position:0% and Airbnb or sorry a short-term rental might<01:53:07.320> be<01:53:07.530> adjacent<01:53:07.949> to<01:53:08.429> sensitive<01:53:09.000> habitats 01:53:09.500 --> 01:53:09.510 align:start position:0% might be adjacent to sensitive habitats 01:53:09.510 --> 01:53:12.550 align:start position:0% might be adjacent to sensitive habitats in<01:53:09.900> a<01:53:10.110> visitor<01:53:10.500> might<01:53:10.710> not<01:53:10.949> know<01:53:11.190> about<01:53:11.340> that 01:53:12.550 --> 01:53:12.560 align:start position:0% in a visitor might not know about that 01:53:12.560 --> 01:53:15.350 align:start position:0% in a visitor might not know about that they<01:53:13.560> might<01:53:13.800> not<01:53:14.130> be<01:53:14.370> aware<01:53:14.460> of<01:53:14.670> the<01:53:14.880> rules<01:53:15.060> for 01:53:15.350 --> 01:53:15.360 align:start position:0% they might not be aware of the rules for 01:53:15.360 --> 01:53:17.630 align:start position:0% they might not be aware of the rules for how<01:53:15.540> we<01:53:15.600> separate<01:53:16.290> garbage<01:53:17.100> and<01:53:17.250> recycling 01:53:17.630 --> 01:53:17.640 align:start position:0% how we separate garbage and recycling 01:53:17.640 --> 01:53:20.060 align:start position:0% how we separate garbage and recycling how<01:53:18.210> frequently<01:53:18.780> do<01:53:18.989> you<01:53:19.020> see<01:53:19.320> a<01:53:19.350> recycling 01:53:20.060 --> 01:53:20.070 align:start position:0% how frequently do you see a recycling 01:53:20.070 --> 01:53:22.490 align:start position:0% how frequently do you see a recycling can<01:53:20.730> that<01:53:20.940> has<01:53:21.090> become<01:53:21.300> an<01:53:21.570> auxiliary<01:53:21.960> garbage 01:53:22.490 --> 01:53:22.500 align:start position:0% can that has become an auxiliary garbage 01:53:22.500 --> 01:53:26.630 align:start position:0% can that has become an auxiliary garbage can<01:53:23.780> and<01:53:24.780> you<01:53:25.530> know<01:53:25.590> if<01:53:25.860> there<01:53:26.219> were<01:53:26.340> a<01:53:26.370> problem 01:53:26.630 --> 01:53:26.640 align:start position:0% can and you know if there were a problem 01:53:26.640 --> 01:53:29.360 align:start position:0% can and you know if there were a problem just<01:53:27.150> a<01:53:27.270> neighbor<01:53:27.480> know<01:53:27.900> who<01:53:28.080> to<01:53:28.230> call<01:53:28.530> how<01:53:29.310> do 01:53:29.360 --> 01:53:29.370 align:start position:0% just a neighbor know who to call how do 01:53:29.370 --> 01:53:31.130 align:start position:0% just a neighbor know who to call how do we<01:53:29.550> make<01:53:29.760> it<01:53:29.790> safe<01:53:30.270> and<01:53:30.480> easy<01:53:30.690> for<01:53:31.050> that 01:53:31.130 --> 01:53:31.140 align:start position:0% we make it safe and easy for that 01:53:31.140 --> 01:53:36.350 align:start position:0% we make it safe and easy for that neighbor<01:53:31.760> to<01:53:32.760> do<01:53:32.940> that<01:53:34.460> so<01:53:35.460> I<01:53:35.489> think<01:53:35.730> that<01:53:36.210> in 01:53:36.350 --> 01:53:36.360 align:start position:0% neighbor to do that so I think that in 01:53:36.360 --> 01:53:38.840 align:start position:0% neighbor to do that so I think that in terms<01:53:36.630> of<01:53:36.810> our<01:53:36.929> policy<01:53:37.400> this<01:53:38.400> good<01:53:38.699> neighbor 01:53:38.840 --> 01:53:38.850 align:start position:0% terms of our policy this good neighbor 01:53:38.850 --> 01:53:42.020 align:start position:0% terms of our policy this good neighbor policy<01:53:39.179> is<01:53:39.719> the<01:53:39.929> ounce<01:53:40.140> of<01:53:40.350> prevention<01:53:41.030> but 01:53:42.020 --> 01:53:42.030 align:start position:0% policy is the ounce of prevention but 01:53:42.030 --> 01:53:43.340 align:start position:0% policy is the ounce of prevention but that<01:53:42.239> doesn't<01:53:42.600> mean<01:53:42.719> that<01:53:42.750> we<01:53:43.050> don't<01:53:43.080> still 01:53:43.340 --> 01:53:43.350 align:start position:0% that doesn't mean that we don't still 01:53:43.350 --> 01:53:47.080 align:start position:0% that doesn't mean that we don't still need<01:53:43.710> a<01:53:43.739> pound<01:53:43.980> of<01:53:44.160> cure<01:53:44.540> in<01:53:45.540> my<01:53:45.780> in<01:53:46.110> my<01:53:46.290> opinion 01:53:47.080 --> 01:53:47.090 align:start position:0% need a pound of cure in my in my opinion 01:53:47.090 --> 01:53:50.900 align:start position:0% need a pound of cure in my in my opinion after<01:53:48.090> hearing<01:53:48.800> the<01:53:49.800> deputy<01:53:50.580> city<01:53:50.820> attorney 01:53:50.900 --> 01:53:50.910 align:start position:0% after hearing the deputy city attorney 01:53:50.910 --> 01:53:53.750 align:start position:0% after hearing the deputy city attorney talk<01:53:51.540> about<01:53:51.810> the<01:53:51.929> CDP<01:53:52.260> issue<01:53:52.620> of<01:53:52.949> course<01:53:53.550> the 01:53:53.750 --> 01:53:53.760 align:start position:0% talk about the CDP issue of course the 01:53:53.760 --> 01:53:55.729 align:start position:0% talk about the CDP issue of course the bell<01:53:53.940> went<01:53:54.210> off<01:53:54.360> and<01:53:54.690> you<01:53:55.350> know<01:53:55.440> we<01:53:55.590> have 01:53:55.729 --> 01:53:55.739 align:start position:0% bell went off and you know we have 01:53:55.739 --> 01:53:57.650 align:start position:0% bell went off and you know we have coastal<01:53:56.160> development<01:53:56.730> permits<01:53:57.060> for<01:53:57.239> citywide 01:53:57.650 --> 01:53:57.660 align:start position:0% coastal development permits for citywide 01:53:57.660 --> 01:54:00.200 align:start position:0% coastal development permits for citywide programs<01:53:58.199> we<01:53:58.380> did<01:53:58.530> it<01:53:58.620> for<01:53:58.739> drainage<01:53:59.190> so<01:53:59.760> it<01:54:00.060> is 01:54:00.200 --> 01:54:00.210 align:start position:0% programs we did it for drainage so it is 01:54:00.210 --> 01:54:02.350 align:start position:0% programs we did it for drainage so it is not<01:54:00.420> it<01:54:01.230> is<01:54:01.290> not<01:54:01.560> an<01:54:01.679> either/or<01:54:02.010> proposition 01:54:02.350 --> 01:54:02.360 align:start position:0% not it is not an either/or proposition 01:54:02.360 --> 01:54:06.620 align:start position:0% not it is not an either/or proposition the<01:54:03.360> amendments<01:54:03.900> could<01:54:04.850> be<01:54:05.850> reflected<01:54:06.150> in 01:54:06.620 --> 01:54:06.630 align:start position:0% the amendments could be reflected in 01:54:06.630 --> 01:54:09.470 align:start position:0% the amendments could be reflected in some<01:54:07.500> combination<01:54:08.100> of<01:54:08.190> those<01:54:08.340> things<01:54:08.640> I'll<01:54:09.300> be 01:54:09.470 --> 01:54:09.480 align:start position:0% some combination of those things I'll be 01:54:09.480 --> 01:54:12.080 align:start position:0% some combination of those things I'll be interested<01:54:09.840> in<01:54:10.170> how<01:54:10.320> it<01:54:10.350> is<01:54:10.620> that<01:54:10.860> we<01:54:11.010> how<01:54:11.910> it 01:54:12.080 --> 01:54:12.090 align:start position:0% interested in how it is that we how it 01:54:12.090 --> 01:54:14.030 align:start position:0% interested in how it is that we how it is<01:54:12.210> that<01:54:12.390> again<01:54:12.630> laid<01:54:12.929> out<01:54:13.110> of<01:54:13.530> course<01:54:13.770> if<01:54:13.890> it's 01:54:14.030 --> 01:54:14.040 align:start position:0% is that again laid out of course if it's 01:54:14.040 --> 01:54:16.160 align:start position:0% is that again laid out of course if it's in<01:54:14.160> those<01:54:14.310> owning<01:54:14.640> ordinance<01:54:15.060> in<01:54:15.300> part<01:54:15.570> that's 01:54:16.160 --> 01:54:16.170 align:start position:0% in those owning ordinance in part that's 01:54:16.170 --> 01:54:19.400 align:start position:0% in those owning ordinance in part that's clearly<01:54:16.650> an<01:54:16.830> lcbi<01:54:17.160> update<01:54:18.199> but<01:54:19.199> perhaps 01:54:19.400 --> 01:54:19.410 align:start position:0% clearly an lcbi update but perhaps 01:54:19.410 --> 01:54:21.910 align:start position:0% clearly an lcbi update but perhaps there's<01:54:19.830> another<01:54:20.100> angle<01:54:20.370> as<01:54:20.730> well<01:54:21.000> I 01:54:21.910 --> 01:54:21.920 align:start position:0% there's another angle as well I 01:54:21.920 --> 01:54:25.430 align:start position:0% there's another angle as well I appreciated<01:54:22.920> all<01:54:23.699> of<01:54:23.969> the<01:54:24.090> comments<01:54:24.330> many<01:54:25.320> of 01:54:25.430 --> 01:54:25.440 align:start position:0% appreciated all of the comments many of 01:54:25.440 --> 01:54:27.380 align:start position:0% appreciated all of the comments many of them<01:54:25.560> were<01:54:25.860> addressed<01:54:26.250> by<01:54:26.429> my<01:54:26.640> colleagues<01:54:27.150> I 01:54:27.380 --> 01:54:27.390 align:start position:0% them were addressed by my colleagues I 01:54:27.390 --> 01:54:29.600 align:start position:0% them were addressed by my colleagues I just<01:54:27.900> want<01:54:28.110> to<01:54:28.260> speak<01:54:28.500> to<01:54:28.739> mr.<01:54:29.070> Olsen's 01:54:29.600 --> 01:54:29.610 align:start position:0% just want to speak to mr. Olsen's 01:54:29.610 --> 01:54:32.630 align:start position:0% just want to speak to mr. Olsen's comment<01:54:30.179> because<01:54:30.780> there<01:54:31.560> is<01:54:31.710> a<01:54:31.739> principle<01:54:32.190> in 01:54:32.630 --> 01:54:32.640 align:start position:0% comment because there is a principle in 01:54:32.640 --> 01:54:34.880 align:start position:0% comment because there is a principle in planning<01:54:33.270> for<01:54:33.510> new<01:54:33.660> and<01:54:33.900> unexpected<01:54:34.410> things 01:54:34.880 --> 01:54:34.890 align:start position:0% planning for new and unexpected things 01:54:34.890 --> 01:54:37.370 align:start position:0% planning for new and unexpected things that<01:54:35.489> it<01:54:35.640> makes<01:54:35.790> a<01:54:35.940> lot<01:54:36.060> of<01:54:36.120> sense<01:54:36.480> to<01:54:36.719> look<01:54:37.260> at 01:54:37.370 --> 01:54:37.380 align:start position:0% that it makes a lot of sense to look at 01:54:37.380 --> 01:54:40.400 align:start position:0% that it makes a lot of sense to look at people<01:54:38.070> who<01:54:38.100> have<01:54:38.400> gone<01:54:38.580> there<01:54:38.640> first<01:54:39.179> and<01:54:39.449> ask 01:54:40.400 --> 01:54:40.410 align:start position:0% people who have gone there first and ask 01:54:40.410 --> 01:54:43.729 align:start position:0% people who have gone there first and ask what<01:54:40.800> happened<01:54:41.250> with<01:54:41.429> them<01:54:41.699> so<01:54:42.390> if<01:54:42.929> there<01:54:43.290> he 01:54:43.729 --> 01:54:43.739 align:start position:0% what happened with them so if there he 01:54:43.739 --> 01:54:46.610 align:start position:0% what happened with them so if there he is<01:54:43.770> advocating<01:54:44.520> that<01:54:44.670> there<01:54:44.880> are<01:54:45.620> experiences 01:54:46.610 --> 01:54:46.620 align:start position:0% is advocating that there are experiences 01:54:46.620 --> 01:54:50.300 align:start position:0% is advocating that there are experiences in<01:54:46.920> other<01:54:47.699> places<01:54:48.230> and<01:54:49.230> that<01:54:49.530> we<01:54:49.679> should<01:54:49.890> climb 01:54:50.300 --> 01:54:50.310 align:start position:0% in other places and that we should climb 01:54:50.310 --> 01:54:53.419 align:start position:0% in other places and that we should climb that<01:54:50.580> experience<01:54:51.120> curve<01:54:51.420> I<01:54:52.380> realized<01:54:53.130> that 01:54:53.419 --> 01:54:53.429 align:start position:0% that experience curve I realized that 01:54:53.429 --> 01:54:56.330 align:start position:0% that experience curve I realized that California<01:54:54.179> is<01:54:54.270> its<01:54:54.510> own<01:54:54.660> unique<01:54:54.690> place<01:54:55.320> and<01:54:55.590> I 01:54:56.330 --> 01:54:56.340 align:start position:0% California is its own unique place and I 01:54:56.340 --> 01:54:58.550 align:start position:0% California is its own unique place and I think<01:54:56.400> this<01:54:56.760> represents<01:54:56.969> our<01:54:57.630> efforts<01:54:58.320> to 01:54:58.550 --> 01:54:58.560 align:start position:0% think this represents our efforts to 01:54:58.560 --> 01:55:00.669 align:start position:0% think this represents our efforts to think<01:54:59.190> about<01:54:59.460> this<01:54:59.640> in<01:54:59.820> terms<01:54:59.969> of<01:55:00.150> California 01:55:00.669 --> 01:55:00.679 align:start position:0% think about this in terms of California 01:55:00.679 --> 01:55:04.050 align:start position:0% think about this in terms of California my<01:55:01.679> understanding<01:55:02.489> from 01:55:04.050 --> 01:55:04.060 align:start position:0% my understanding from 01:55:04.060 --> 01:55:06.330 align:start position:0% my understanding from mr.<01:55:04.870> Olsen's<01:55:05.260> comments<01:55:05.740> and<01:55:06.070> my<01:55:06.220> own 01:55:06.330 --> 01:55:06.340 align:start position:0% mr. Olsen's comments and my own 01:55:06.340 --> 01:55:08.340 align:start position:0% mr. Olsen's comments and my own experience<01:55:06.850> living<01:55:07.060> in<01:55:07.270> Grenoble<01:55:07.750> France<01:55:07.780> for 01:55:08.340 --> 01:55:08.350 align:start position:0% experience living in Grenoble France for 01:55:08.350 --> 01:55:13.800 align:start position:0% experience living in Grenoble France for some<01:55:08.740> years<01:55:09.210> is<01:55:10.210> that<01:55:11.940> those<01:55:12.940> places<01:55:13.390> have 01:55:13.800 --> 01:55:13.810 align:start position:0% some years is that those places have 01:55:13.810 --> 01:55:15.660 align:start position:0% some years is that those places have dealt<01:55:14.080> with<01:55:14.170> this<01:55:14.380> tourism<01:55:14.950> problem<01:55:15.430> and<01:55:15.610> the 01:55:15.660 --> 01:55:15.670 align:start position:0% dealt with this tourism problem and the 01:55:15.670 --> 01:55:17.460 align:start position:0% dealt with this tourism problem and the demand<01:55:16.060> for<01:55:16.270> housing<01:55:16.420> over<01:55:16.900> a<01:55:16.930> longer<01:55:17.290> period 01:55:17.460 --> 01:55:17.470 align:start position:0% demand for housing over a longer period 01:55:17.470 --> 01:55:19.830 align:start position:0% demand for housing over a longer period of<01:55:17.890> time<01:55:18.160> in<01:55:18.580> some<01:55:18.820> cases<01:55:19.030> a<01:55:19.180> much<01:55:19.450> longer 01:55:19.830 --> 01:55:19.840 align:start position:0% of time in some cases a much longer 01:55:19.840 --> 01:55:21.930 align:start position:0% of time in some cases a much longer period<01:55:20.200> of<01:55:20.290> time<01:55:20.470> and<01:55:20.800> they<01:55:21.370> have<01:55:21.730> had<01:55:21.910> a 01:55:21.930 --> 01:55:21.940 align:start position:0% period of time and they have had a 01:55:21.940 --> 01:55:24.570 align:start position:0% period of time and they have had a chance<01:55:22.030> to<01:55:22.450> try<01:55:23.380> different<01:55:23.620> solutions<01:55:24.370> and 01:55:24.570 --> 01:55:24.580 align:start position:0% chance to try different solutions and 01:55:24.580 --> 01:55:26.880 align:start position:0% chance to try different solutions and run<01:55:24.880> into<01:55:25.150> brick<01:55:25.420> walls<01:55:25.450> and<01:55:26.080> it<01:55:26.530> does<01:55:26.680> make 01:55:26.880 --> 01:55:26.890 align:start position:0% run into brick walls and it does make 01:55:26.890 --> 01:55:29.070 align:start position:0% run into brick walls and it does make sense<01:55:27.100> to<01:55:27.250> kind<01:55:27.580> of<01:55:27.700> you<01:55:28.150> know<01:55:28.240> look<01:55:28.840> at<01:55:28.960> the 01:55:29.070 --> 01:55:29.080 align:start position:0% sense to kind of you know look at the 01:55:29.080 --> 01:55:31.530 align:start position:0% sense to kind of you know look at the article<01:55:29.500> that<01:55:29.680> that<01:55:29.890> mr.<01:55:30.400> Olsen<01:55:30.790> benches<01:55:31.240> I'm 01:55:31.530 --> 01:55:31.540 align:start position:0% article that that mr. Olsen benches I'm 01:55:31.540 --> 01:55:34.260 align:start position:0% article that that mr. Olsen benches I'm not<01:55:31.810> advocating<01:55:32.170> that<01:55:32.500> we<01:55:32.680> go<01:55:32.950> out<01:55:32.980> and<01:55:33.270> you 01:55:34.260 --> 01:55:34.270 align:start position:0% not advocating that we go out and you 01:55:34.270 --> 01:55:37.770 align:start position:0% not advocating that we go out and you know<01:55:34.320> hire<01:55:35.320> a<01:55:35.830> researcher<01:55:36.820> to<01:55:37.030> think<01:55:37.540> about 01:55:37.770 --> 01:55:37.780 align:start position:0% know hire a researcher to think about 01:55:37.780 --> 01:55:39.630 align:start position:0% know hire a researcher to think about this<01:55:37.990> but<01:55:38.740> you<01:55:38.860> know<01:55:38.980> where<01:55:39.160> we<01:55:39.310> can<01:55:39.490> get 01:55:39.630 --> 01:55:39.640 align:start position:0% this but you know where we can get 01:55:39.640 --> 01:55:42.330 align:start position:0% this but you know where we can get information<01:55:40.420> that's<01:55:40.990> low<01:55:41.590> hanging<01:55:41.800> fruit<01:55:42.310> to 01:55:42.330 --> 01:55:42.340 align:start position:0% information that's low hanging fruit to 01:55:42.340 --> 01:55:45.060 align:start position:0% information that's low hanging fruit to help<01:55:42.700> us<01:55:42.910> learn<01:55:43.150> I<01:55:43.480> think<01:55:43.750> that<01:55:44.110> makes<01:55:44.350> quite<01:55:45.040> a 01:55:45.060 --> 01:55:45.070 align:start position:0% help us learn I think that makes quite a 01:55:45.070 --> 01:55:49.620 align:start position:0% help us learn I think that makes quite a bit<01:55:45.280> of<01:55:45.400> sense<01:55:46.800> with<01:55:47.800> respect<01:55:48.310> to<01:55:48.550> ad<01:55:49.180> use<01:55:49.450> I'm 01:55:49.620 --> 01:55:49.630 align:start position:0% bit of sense with respect to ad use I'm 01:55:49.630 --> 01:55:51.240 align:start position:0% bit of sense with respect to ad use I'm fully<01:55:49.870> in<01:55:50.020> support<01:55:50.440> of<01:55:50.500> protecting<01:55:51.070> them<01:55:51.220> from 01:55:51.240 --> 01:55:51.250 align:start position:0% fully in support of protecting them from 01:55:51.250 --> 01:55:53.130 align:start position:0% fully in support of protecting them from being<01:55:51.820> converted<01:55:52.120> your<01:55:52.360> short-term<01:55:52.660> rentals 01:55:53.130 --> 01:55:53.140 align:start position:0% being converted your short-term rentals 01:55:53.140 --> 01:55:55.830 align:start position:0% being converted your short-term rentals with<01:55:53.830> respect<01:55:54.340> to<01:55:54.520> multi-family<01:55:55.360> residential 01:55:55.830 --> 01:55:55.840 align:start position:0% with respect to multi-family residential 01:55:55.840 --> 01:56:00.180 align:start position:0% with respect to multi-family residential mobile<01:55:56.620> home<01:55:56.770> parks<01:55:57.220> I<01:55:57.790> am<01:55:58.360> also<01:55:59.190> believed 01:56:00.180 --> 01:56:00.190 align:start position:0% mobile home parks I am also believed 01:56:00.190 --> 01:56:01.530 align:start position:0% mobile home parks I am also believed that<01:56:00.280> they<01:56:00.400> should<01:56:00.430> not<01:56:00.730> become<01:56:00.970> short-term 01:56:01.530 --> 01:56:01.540 align:start position:0% that they should not become short-term 01:56:01.540 --> 01:56:03.750 align:start position:0% that they should not become short-term rentals<01:56:01.900> I<01:56:02.110> see<01:56:02.530> this<01:56:02.740> as<01:56:02.950> valuable<01:56:03.310> housing 01:56:03.750 --> 01:56:03.760 align:start position:0% rentals I see this as valuable housing 01:56:03.760 --> 01:56:08.160 align:start position:0% rentals I see this as valuable housing stock<01:56:04.530> I<01:56:05.850> will<01:56:06.850> tread<01:56:07.150> lightly<01:56:07.480> in<01:56:07.930> the 01:56:08.160 --> 01:56:08.170 align:start position:0% stock I will tread lightly in the 01:56:08.170 --> 01:56:09.750 align:start position:0% stock I will tread lightly in the commercial<01:56:08.770> in<01:56:09.040> the<01:56:09.220> mixed-use<01:56:09.730> zoning 01:56:09.750 --> 01:56:09.760 align:start position:0% commercial in the mixed-use zoning 01:56:09.760 --> 01:56:14.730 align:start position:0% commercial in the mixed-use zoning because<01:56:10.450> they<01:56:10.990> have<01:56:12.930> residences<01:56:13.930> and<01:56:14.140> the 01:56:14.730 --> 01:56:14.740 align:start position:0% because they have residences and the 01:56:14.740 --> 01:56:16.470 align:start position:0% because they have residences and the idea<01:56:15.070> that<01:56:15.280> those<01:56:15.430> residences<01:56:16.240> could 01:56:16.470 --> 01:56:16.480 align:start position:0% idea that those residences could 01:56:16.480 --> 01:56:21.540 align:start position:0% idea that those residences could suddenly<01:56:16.870> become<01:56:18.360> unholstered<01:56:20.490> represents<01:56:21.490> a 01:56:21.540 --> 01:56:21.550 align:start position:0% suddenly become unholstered represents a 01:56:21.550 --> 01:56:24.110 align:start position:0% suddenly become unholstered represents a change<01:56:21.850> in<01:56:22.150> the<01:56:22.270> intended<01:56:22.600> use<01:56:22.930> in<01:56:23.260> some<01:56:23.650> ways 01:56:24.110 --> 01:56:24.120 align:start position:0% change in the intended use in some ways 01:56:24.120 --> 01:56:27.630 align:start position:0% change in the intended use in some ways just<01:56:25.120> as<01:56:25.300> we<01:56:25.510> expect<01:56:25.960> ADA<01:56:26.170> used<01:56:26.500> to<01:56:27.370> behave 01:56:27.630 --> 01:56:27.640 align:start position:0% just as we expect ADA used to behave 01:56:27.640 --> 01:56:30.180 align:start position:0% just as we expect ADA used to behave like<01:56:27.820> a<01:56:27.880> to<01:56:28.090> use<01:56:28.390> I<01:56:28.720> want<01:56:29.320> to<01:56:29.380> be<01:56:29.530> sure<01:56:29.710> that<01:56:30.040> we 01:56:30.180 --> 01:56:30.190 align:start position:0% like a to use I want to be sure that we 01:56:30.190 --> 01:56:31.950 align:start position:0% like a to use I want to be sure that we have<01:56:30.220> a<01:56:30.370> clear<01:56:30.730> view<01:56:30.910> of<01:56:30.970> what<01:56:31.300> the<01:56:31.450> intention 01:56:31.950 --> 01:56:31.960 align:start position:0% have a clear view of what the intention 01:56:31.960 --> 01:56:34.680 align:start position:0% have a clear view of what the intention is<01:56:32.140> and<01:56:32.610> that<01:56:33.610> that's<01:56:33.760> the<01:56:33.970> intention<01:56:34.450> that<01:56:34.480> we 01:56:34.680 --> 01:56:34.690 align:start position:0% is and that that's the intention that we 01:56:34.690 --> 01:56:38.970 align:start position:0% is and that that's the intention that we get<01:56:36.900> you<01:56:37.900> know<01:56:37.930> that<01:56:38.200> area<01:56:38.500> is<01:56:38.620> already 01:56:38.970 --> 01:56:38.980 align:start position:0% get you know that area is already 01:56:38.980 --> 01:56:43.200 align:start position:0% get you know that area is already experiencing<01:56:39.700> a<01:56:39.820> crisis<01:56:40.300> about<01:56:41.490> retail<01:56:42.490> and 01:56:43.200 --> 01:56:43.210 align:start position:0% experiencing a crisis about retail and 01:56:43.210 --> 01:56:47.190 align:start position:0% experiencing a crisis about retail and adding<01:56:44.160> more<01:56:45.240> may<01:56:46.240> or<01:56:46.360> may<01:56:46.480> not<01:56:46.510> help<01:56:46.810> maybe 01:56:47.190 --> 01:56:47.200 align:start position:0% adding more may or may not help maybe 01:56:47.200 --> 01:56:50.280 align:start position:0% adding more may or may not help maybe the<01:56:47.560> demand<01:56:48.030> would<01:56:49.030> be<01:56:49.210> created<01:56:49.660> by<01:56:49.810> visitors 01:56:50.280 --> 01:56:50.290 align:start position:0% the demand would be created by visitors 01:56:50.290 --> 01:56:52.020 align:start position:0% the demand would be created by visitors in<01:56:50.530> that<01:56:50.710> area<01:56:51.010> that<01:56:51.190> would<01:56:51.370> liven<01:56:51.850> up 01:56:52.020 --> 01:56:52.030 align:start position:0% in that area that would liven up 01:56:52.030 --> 01:56:55.250 align:start position:0% in that area that would liven up businesses<01:56:52.570> I<01:56:52.750> don't<01:56:53.020> know<01:56:53.110> but<01:56:54.040> I<01:56:54.520> would<01:56:55.030> be 01:56:55.250 --> 01:56:55.260 align:start position:0% businesses I don't know but I would be 01:56:55.260 --> 01:57:00.000 align:start position:0% businesses I don't know but I would be hesitant<01:56:56.260> to<01:56:56.770> see<01:56:57.730> it<01:56:57.850> as<01:56:58.030> a<01:56:59.010> substantial 01:57:00.000 --> 01:57:00.010 align:start position:0% hesitant to see it as a substantial 01:57:00.010 --> 01:57:03.520 align:start position:0% hesitant to see it as a substantial period<01:57:00.340> of<01:57:00.370> time<01:57:00.610> in<01:57:00.910> a<01:57:01.540> CDR<01:57:01.930> area 01:57:03.520 --> 01:57:03.530 align:start position:0% period of time in a CDR area 01:57:03.530 --> 01:57:05.620 align:start position:0% period of time in a CDR area which<01:57:04.159> brings<01:57:04.460> me<01:57:04.639> to<01:57:04.880> the<01:57:05.120> question<01:57:05.300> of 01:57:05.620 --> 01:57:05.630 align:start position:0% which brings me to the question of 01:57:05.630 --> 01:57:10.330 align:start position:0% which brings me to the question of limits<01:57:05.960> on<01:57:06.080> the<01:57:06.230> number<01:57:06.260> of<01:57:06.650> days<01:57:06.889> to<01:57:08.050> me<01:57:09.340> that 01:57:10.330 --> 01:57:10.340 align:start position:0% limits on the number of days to me that 01:57:10.340 --> 01:57:13.450 align:start position:0% limits on the number of days to me that is<01:57:10.580> a<01:57:10.610> defining<01:57:11.210> feature<01:57:12.050> of<01:57:12.230> what<01:57:13.010> makes<01:57:13.250> a 01:57:13.450 --> 01:57:13.460 align:start position:0% is a defining feature of what makes a 01:57:13.460 --> 01:57:15.340 align:start position:0% is a defining feature of what makes a neighborhood<01:57:14.000> a<01:57:14.030> neighborhood<01:57:14.270> is<01:57:14.989> that 01:57:15.340 --> 01:57:15.350 align:start position:0% neighborhood a neighborhood is that 01:57:15.350 --> 01:57:19.450 align:start position:0% neighborhood a neighborhood is that people<01:57:16.000> live<01:57:17.000> there<01:57:17.239> and<01:57:17.770> if<01:57:18.770> they're<01:57:19.010> moving 01:57:19.450 --> 01:57:19.460 align:start position:0% people live there and if they're moving 01:57:19.460 --> 01:57:21.370 align:start position:0% people live there and if they're moving in<01:57:19.760> and<01:57:20.030> out 01:57:21.370 --> 01:57:21.380 align:start position:0% in and out 01:57:21.380 --> 01:57:23.919 align:start position:0% in and out it<01:57:21.679> changes<01:57:22.219> the<01:57:22.460> it<01:57:22.969> changes<01:57:23.360> the<01:57:23.480> character 01:57:23.919 --> 01:57:23.929 align:start position:0% it changes the it changes the character 01:57:23.929 --> 01:57:25.629 align:start position:0% it changes the it changes the character of<01:57:24.110> the<01:57:24.230> neighborhood<01:57:24.260> I've<01:57:25.130> lived<01:57:25.370> in<01:57:25.520> the 01:57:25.629 --> 01:57:25.639 align:start position:0% of the neighborhood I've lived in the 01:57:25.639 --> 01:57:29.320 align:start position:0% of the neighborhood I've lived in the same<01:57:25.820> house<01:57:26.090> for<01:57:26.889> 23<01:57:27.889> years<01:57:28.130> now<01:57:28.340> something 01:57:29.320 --> 01:57:29.330 align:start position:0% same house for 23 years now something 01:57:29.330 --> 01:57:32.890 align:start position:0% same house for 23 years now something like<01:57:29.480> that<01:57:30.460> and<01:57:31.460> my<01:57:32.000> parents<01:57:32.420> still<01:57:32.570> live<01:57:32.719> in<01:57:32.810> a 01:57:32.890 --> 01:57:32.900 align:start position:0% like that and my parents still live in a 01:57:32.900 --> 01:57:35.020 align:start position:0% like that and my parents still live in a house<01:57:33.020> they've<01:57:33.590> been<01:57:33.800> in<01:57:33.949> for<01:57:34.219> 60<01:57:34.550> years 01:57:35.020 --> 01:57:35.030 align:start position:0% house they've been in for 60 years 01:57:35.030 --> 01:57:38.260 align:start position:0% house they've been in for 60 years so<01:57:35.600> I<01:57:36.250> admit<01:57:37.250> that<01:57:37.370> I'm<01:57:37.489> probably<01:57:37.730> an<01:57:38.090> outlier 01:57:38.260 --> 01:57:38.270 align:start position:0% so I admit that I'm probably an outlier 01:57:38.270 --> 01:57:41.410 align:start position:0% so I admit that I'm probably an outlier in<01:57:38.570> today's<01:57:39.080> society<01:57:39.400> I'm<01:57:40.400> probably<01:57:41.000> not<01:57:41.360> the 01:57:41.410 --> 01:57:41.420 align:start position:0% in today's society I'm probably not the 01:57:41.420 --> 01:57:45.700 align:start position:0% in today's society I'm probably not the kind<01:57:41.659> of<01:57:41.780> person<01:57:42.139> that<01:57:44.139> advocates<01:57:45.139> for<01:57:45.199> quick 01:57:45.700 --> 01:57:45.710 align:start position:0% kind of person that advocates for quick 01:57:45.710 --> 01:57:49.600 align:start position:0% kind of person that advocates for quick change<01:57:45.980> in<01:57:46.130> these<01:57:46.250> areas<01:57:46.610> but<01:57:47.449> I<01:57:48.580> believe<01:57:49.580> that 01:57:49.600 --> 01:57:49.610 align:start position:0% change in these areas but I believe that 01:57:49.610 --> 01:57:51.700 align:start position:0% change in these areas but I believe that some<01:57:49.790> change<01:57:50.239> is<01:57:50.420> good<01:57:50.750> some<01:57:51.260> change<01:57:51.530> is 01:57:51.700 --> 01:57:51.710 align:start position:0% some change is good some change is 01:57:51.710 --> 01:57:54.550 align:start position:0% some change is good some change is helpful<01:57:52.219> too<01:57:52.760> much<01:57:52.969> change<01:57:53.360> can<01:57:53.690> be 01:57:54.550 --> 01:57:54.560 align:start position:0% helpful too much change can be 01:57:54.560 --> 01:57:57.540 align:start position:0% helpful too much change can be disruptive<01:57:55.400> to<01:57:55.429> a<01:57:55.639> neighborhood 01:57:57.540 --> 01:57:57.550 align:start position:0% disruptive to a neighborhood 01:57:57.550 --> 01:57:59.530 align:start position:0% disruptive to a neighborhood specifically<01:57:58.550> within<01:57:58.790> residential 01:57:59.530 --> 01:57:59.540 align:start position:0% specifically within residential 01:57:59.540 --> 01:58:03.399 align:start position:0% specifically within residential neighborhoods<01:58:00.050> I<01:58:00.320> support<01:58:01.870> some<01:58:02.870> language 01:58:03.399 --> 01:58:03.409 align:start position:0% neighborhoods I support some language 01:58:03.409 --> 01:58:06.340 align:start position:0% neighborhoods I support some language that<01:58:03.710> reflects<01:58:04.610> an<01:58:04.909> occupancy<01:58:05.510> limit<01:58:05.989> I<01:58:06.139> saw 01:58:06.340 --> 01:58:06.350 align:start position:0% that reflects an occupancy limit I saw 01:58:06.350 --> 01:58:08.890 align:start position:0% that reflects an occupancy limit I saw several<01:58:06.679> examples<01:58:07.300> in<01:58:08.300> the<01:58:08.510> staff<01:58:08.719> report 01:58:08.890 --> 01:58:08.900 align:start position:0% several examples in the staff report 01:58:08.900 --> 01:58:10.950 align:start position:0% several examples in the staff report that<01:58:09.350> talked<01:58:09.530> about<01:58:09.650> the<01:58:09.980> number<01:58:10.280> of<01:58:10.400> homes 01:58:10.950 --> 01:58:10.960 align:start position:0% that talked about the number of homes 01:58:10.960 --> 01:58:13.840 align:start position:0% that talked about the number of homes sorry<01:58:11.960> the<01:58:12.199> number<01:58:12.320> of<01:58:12.620> residents<01:58:13.520> that<01:58:13.670> could 01:58:13.840 --> 01:58:13.850 align:start position:0% sorry the number of residents that could 01:58:13.850 --> 01:58:16.750 align:start position:0% sorry the number of residents that could be<01:58:13.969> good<01:58:14.570> occupy<01:58:15.080> a<01:58:15.110> home<01:58:15.380> that<01:58:16.100> was<01:58:16.280> related 01:58:16.750 --> 01:58:16.760 align:start position:0% be good occupy a home that was related 01:58:16.760 --> 01:58:20.169 align:start position:0% be good occupy a home that was related to<01:58:16.880> the<01:58:17.000> number<01:58:17.150> of<01:58:17.389> bedrooms<01:58:18.130> you<01:58:19.179> know 01:58:20.169 --> 01:58:20.179 align:start position:0% to the number of bedrooms you know 01:58:20.179 --> 01:58:22.120 align:start position:0% to the number of bedrooms you know unless<01:58:20.420> they<01:58:20.600> were<01:58:20.690> having<01:58:21.020> a<01:58:21.110> party<01:58:21.290> for<01:58:21.739> you 01:58:22.120 --> 01:58:22.130 align:start position:0% unless they were having a party for you 01:58:22.130 --> 01:58:24.490 align:start position:0% unless they were having a party for you know<01:58:22.219> a<01:58:22.250> phalanx<01:58:22.880> of<01:58:23.239> three-year-olds<01:58:24.020> that 01:58:24.490 --> 01:58:24.500 align:start position:0% know a phalanx of three-year-olds that 01:58:24.500 --> 01:58:25.720 align:start position:0% know a phalanx of three-year-olds that looks<01:58:24.679> like<01:58:24.830> it<01:58:25.040> could<01:58:25.159> cover<01:58:25.370> a<01:58:25.489> lot<01:58:25.699> of 01:58:25.720 --> 01:58:25.730 align:start position:0% looks like it could cover a lot of 01:58:25.730 --> 01:58:29.919 align:start position:0% looks like it could cover a lot of ground<01:58:27.070> so<01:58:28.070> I'm<01:58:28.429> guessing<01:58:29.210> that<01:58:29.239> that'll<01:58:29.600> that 01:58:29.919 --> 01:58:29.929 align:start position:0% ground so I'm guessing that that'll that 01:58:29.929 --> 01:58:33.189 align:start position:0% ground so I'm guessing that that'll that would<01:58:30.080> probably<01:58:30.320> be<01:58:30.620> helpful 01:58:33.189 --> 01:58:33.199 align:start position:0% would probably be helpful 01:58:33.199 --> 01:58:37.450 align:start position:0% would probably be helpful I<01:58:33.230> think<01:58:34.630> to<01:58:35.630> summarize<01:58:36.080> in<01:58:36.770> addition<01:58:37.190> to<01:58:37.310> the 01:58:37.450 --> 01:58:37.460 align:start position:0% I think to summarize in addition to the 01:58:37.460 --> 01:58:39.729 align:start position:0% I think to summarize in addition to the thoughtful<01:58:38.270> comments<01:58:38.690> of<01:58:38.810> my<01:58:38.960> colleagues<01:58:39.469> I 01:58:39.729 --> 01:58:39.739 align:start position:0% thoughtful comments of my colleagues I 01:58:39.739 --> 01:58:42.609 align:start position:0% thoughtful comments of my colleagues I think<01:58:40.310> it's<01:58:40.460> important<01:58:40.969> to<01:58:41.570> pick<01:58:41.989> an<01:58:42.139> asset 01:58:42.609 --> 01:58:42.619 align:start position:0% think it's important to pick an asset 01:58:42.619 --> 01:58:44.350 align:start position:0% think it's important to pick an asset test<01:58:42.949> when<01:58:43.159> you<01:58:43.280> look<01:58:43.489> at<01:58:43.610> it<01:58:43.760> when<01:58:44.090> you<01:58:44.179> look 01:58:44.350 --> 01:58:44.360 align:start position:0% test when you look at it when you look 01:58:44.360 --> 01:58:46.390 align:start position:0% test when you look at it when you look at<01:58:44.449> a<01:58:44.480> draft<01:58:44.929> idea<01:58:45.770> about<01:58:45.949> how<01:58:46.100> we're<01:58:46.280> gonna 01:58:46.390 --> 01:58:46.400 align:start position:0% at a draft idea about how we're gonna 01:58:46.400 --> 01:58:48.490 align:start position:0% at a draft idea about how we're gonna regulate<01:58:46.790> this<01:58:47.119> and<01:58:47.300> then<01:58:47.869> you<01:58:48.050> look<01:58:48.080> at<01:58:48.350> a 01:58:48.490 --> 01:58:48.500 align:start position:0% regulate this and then you look at a 01:58:48.500 --> 01:58:51.840 align:start position:0% regulate this and then you look at a situation<01:58:48.739> that<01:58:49.730> could<01:58:49.909> occur<01:58:50.270> right<01:58:51.050> a 01:58:51.840 --> 01:58:51.850 align:start position:0% situation that could occur right a 01:58:51.850 --> 01:58:56.950 align:start position:0% situation that could occur right a plumbing<01:58:52.850> disaster<01:58:53.260> or<01:58:55.480> you<01:58:56.480> know<01:58:56.570> we<01:58:56.780> have<01:58:56.929> a 01:58:56.950 --> 01:58:56.960 align:start position:0% plumbing disaster or you know we have a 01:58:56.960 --> 01:59:02.680 align:start position:0% plumbing disaster or you know we have a power<01:58:57.230> outage<01:58:58.000> or<01:59:00.219> god<01:59:01.219> forbid<01:59:01.690> something 01:59:02.680 --> 01:59:02.690 align:start position:0% power outage or god forbid something 01:59:02.690 --> 01:59:05.399 align:start position:0% power outage or god forbid something like<01:59:02.929> what<01:59:03.110> happened<01:59:03.230> in<01:59:03.530> Orinda 01:59:05.399 --> 01:59:05.409 align:start position:0% like what happened in Orinda 01:59:05.409 --> 01:59:08.020 align:start position:0% like what happened in Orinda or<01:59:06.409> maybe<01:59:06.739> just<01:59:07.070> the<01:59:07.250> annual<01:59:07.639> Pumpkin 01:59:08.020 --> 01:59:08.030 align:start position:0% or maybe just the annual Pumpkin 01:59:08.030 --> 01:59:11.140 align:start position:0% or maybe just the annual Pumpkin Festival<01:59:08.389> and<01:59:08.810> we<01:59:09.440> ask<01:59:09.619> ourselves<01:59:10.150> whether 01:59:11.140 --> 01:59:11.150 align:start position:0% Festival and we ask ourselves whether 01:59:11.150 --> 01:59:14.200 align:start position:0% Festival and we ask ourselves whether it's<01:59:12.070> whatever<01:59:13.070> how<01:59:13.460> do<01:59:13.520> how<01:59:13.880> does<01:59:13.940> the 01:59:14.200 --> 01:59:14.210 align:start position:0% it's whatever how do how does the 01:59:14.210 --> 01:59:16.959 align:start position:0% it's whatever how do how does the community<01:59:15.159> effectively<01:59:16.159> address<01:59:16.730> the 01:59:16.959 --> 01:59:16.969 align:start position:0% community effectively address the 01:59:16.969 --> 01:59:20.050 align:start position:0% community effectively address the concerns<01:59:17.389> at<01:59:17.570> that<01:59:17.750> one<01:59:18.020> home<01:59:18.290> or<01:59:18.760> what<01:59:19.760> is<01:59:19.909> the 01:59:20.050 --> 01:59:20.060 align:start position:0% concerns at that one home or what is the 01:59:20.060 --> 01:59:23.109 align:start position:0% concerns at that one home or what is the effect<01:59:20.480> of<01:59:20.690> that<01:59:21.219> macro<01:59:22.219> event<01:59:22.730> like<01:59:23.000> the 01:59:23.109 --> 01:59:23.119 align:start position:0% effect of that macro event like the 01:59:23.119 --> 01:59:25.390 align:start position:0% effect of that macro event like the Pumpkin<01:59:23.480> Festival<01:59:23.840> if<01:59:24.409> everybody<01:59:25.100> in<01:59:25.280> the 01:59:25.390 --> 01:59:25.400 align:start position:0% Pumpkin Festival if everybody in the 01:59:25.400 --> 01:59:26.890 align:start position:0% Pumpkin Festival if everybody in the neighborhood<01:59:25.790> decides<01:59:26.210> this<01:59:26.420> is<01:59:26.570> a<01:59:26.600> great 01:59:26.890 --> 01:59:26.900 align:start position:0% neighborhood decides this is a great 01:59:26.900 --> 01:59:29.200 align:start position:0% neighborhood decides this is a great chance<01:59:27.139> to<01:59:27.290> not<01:59:27.560> only<01:59:27.739> cut<01:59:28.070> $10<01:59:28.610> for<01:59:29.150> parking 01:59:29.200 --> 01:59:29.210 align:start position:0% chance to not only cut $10 for parking 01:59:29.210 --> 01:59:32.140 align:start position:0% chance to not only cut $10 for parking but<01:59:30.199> to<01:59:30.350> collect<01:59:30.560> let's<01:59:31.340> say<01:59:31.489> three<01:59:31.760> digits 01:59:32.140 --> 01:59:32.150 align:start position:0% but to collect let's say three digits 01:59:32.150 --> 01:59:34.149 align:start position:0% but to collect let's say three digits for<01:59:32.659> a<01:59:32.690> couple<01:59:33.110> of<01:59:33.199> days<01:59:33.350> of<01:59:33.469> the<01:59:33.590> weekend<01:59:33.949> what 01:59:34.149 --> 01:59:34.159 align:start position:0% for a couple of days of the weekend what 01:59:34.159 --> 01:59:35.919 align:start position:0% for a couple of days of the weekend what is<01:59:34.310> the<01:59:34.429> neighborhood<01:59:34.909> like<01:59:35.119> does<01:59:35.719> that 01:59:35.919 --> 01:59:35.929 align:start position:0% is the neighborhood like does that 01:59:35.929 --> 01:59:40.030 align:start position:0% is the neighborhood like does that really<01:59:36.170> capture<01:59:37.119> have<01:59:38.119> we<01:59:38.300> have<01:59:38.659> we<01:59:39.040> protected 01:59:40.030 --> 01:59:40.040 align:start position:0% really capture have we have we protected 01:59:40.040 --> 01:59:42.100 align:start position:0% really capture have we have we protected the<01:59:40.130> neighborhood<01:59:40.580> character<01:59:41.060> or<01:59:41.420> is<01:59:41.869> any 01:59:42.100 --> 01:59:42.110 align:start position:0% the neighborhood character or is any 01:59:42.110 --> 01:59:44.290 align:start position:0% the neighborhood character or is any restriction<01:59:42.739> represented<01:59:43.429> departure<01:59:43.940> from<01:59:44.150> a 01:59:44.290 --> 01:59:44.300 align:start position:0% restriction represented departure from a 01:59:44.300 --> 01:59:46.990 align:start position:0% restriction represented departure from a welcoming<01:59:44.840> town<01:59:45.520> personally<01:59:46.520> I<01:59:46.639> think<01:59:46.699> it's 01:59:46.990 --> 01:59:47.000 align:start position:0% welcoming town personally I think it's 01:59:47.000 --> 01:59:49.120 align:start position:0% welcoming town personally I think it's too<01:59:47.179> much<01:59:47.389> and<01:59:47.719> I<01:59:48.230> think<01:59:48.290> we<01:59:48.530> have<01:59:48.710> to<01:59:48.860> scape 01:59:49.120 --> 01:59:49.130 align:start position:0% too much and I think we have to scape 01:59:49.130 --> 01:59:51.160 align:start position:0% too much and I think we have to scape toward<01:59:49.460> where<01:59:50.060> the<01:59:50.090> puck<01:59:50.420> will<01:59:50.600> be<01:59:50.780> and<01:59:51.020> that 01:59:51.160 --> 01:59:51.170 align:start position:0% toward where the puck will be and that 01:59:51.170 --> 01:59:53.470 align:start position:0% toward where the puck will be and that day<01:59:51.380> of<01:59:51.560> more<01:59:51.800> ad<01:59:52.010> use<01:59:52.400> we<01:59:53.030> clearly 01:59:53.470 --> 01:59:53.480 align:start position:0% day of more ad use we clearly 01:59:53.480 --> 01:59:55.990 align:start position:0% day of more ad use we clearly underestimated<01:59:54.199> the<01:59:54.380> enthusiasm<01:59:54.920> of<01:59:55.340> ad<01:59:55.670> use 01:59:55.990 --> 01:59:56.000 align:start position:0% underestimated the enthusiasm of ad use 01:59:56.000 --> 01:59:59.790 align:start position:0% underestimated the enthusiasm of ad use so<01:59:56.960> I<01:59:57.380> think<01:59:57.920> it<01:59:58.159> makes<01:59:58.340> sense<01:59:58.429> to<01:59:58.639> be<01:59:58.880> cautious 01:59:59.790 --> 01:59:59.800 align:start position:0% so I think it makes sense to be cautious 01:59:59.800 --> 02:00:03.479 align:start position:0% so I think it makes sense to be cautious and<02:00:00.800> that's<02:00:01.280> why<02:00:01.550> just<02:00:02.330> as<02:00:02.449> we<02:00:02.630> proposed 02:00:03.479 --> 02:00:03.489 align:start position:0% and that's why just as we proposed 02:00:03.489 --> 02:00:07.209 align:start position:0% and that's why just as we proposed experimentation<02:00:04.630> with<02:00:05.630> the<02:00:06.500> park<02:00:06.770> would<02:00:06.949> at 02:00:07.209 --> 02:00:07.219 align:start position:0% experimentation with the park would at 02:00:07.219 --> 02:00:09.399 align:start position:0% experimentation with the park would at our<02:00:07.400> last<02:00:07.639> Planning<02:00:08.540> Commission<02:00:08.960> meeting<02:00:08.989> I 02:00:09.399 --> 02:00:09.409 align:start position:0% our last Planning Commission meeting I 02:00:09.409 --> 02:00:11.439 align:start position:0% our last Planning Commission meeting I think<02:00:09.949> it<02:00:10.219> makes<02:00:10.400> sense<02:00:10.550> to<02:00:10.790> move<02:00:11.030> forward 02:00:11.439 --> 02:00:11.449 align:start position:0% think it makes sense to move forward 02:00:11.449 --> 02:00:13.120 align:start position:0% think it makes sense to move forward with<02:00:11.600> an<02:00:11.750> ordinance<02:00:12.139> but<02:00:12.380> to<02:00:12.500> do<02:00:12.650> it<02:00:12.679> in<02:00:12.860> a<02:00:12.949> way 02:00:13.120 --> 02:00:13.130 align:start position:0% with an ordinance but to do it in a way 02:00:13.130 --> 02:00:17.740 align:start position:0% with an ordinance but to do it in a way that<02:00:13.880> we<02:00:14.210> don't<02:00:15.250> leave<02:00:16.250> the<02:00:16.520> barn<02:00:16.760> door<02:00:16.969> wide 02:00:17.740 --> 02:00:17.750 align:start position:0% that we don't leave the barn door wide 02:00:17.750 --> 02:00:20.620 align:start position:0% that we don't leave the barn door wide open<02:00:17.780> and<02:00:18.320> find<02:00:19.310> ourselves<02:00:19.820> without<02:00:19.969> tools<02:00:20.360> to 02:00:20.620 --> 02:00:20.630 align:start position:0% open and find ourselves without tools to 02:00:20.630 --> 02:00:24.669 align:start position:0% open and find ourselves without tools to manage<02:00:20.810> it<02:00:21.139> later<02:00:21.380> so<02:00:21.739> I<02:00:22.929> probably<02:00:23.929> advocate<02:00:24.650> a 02:00:24.669 --> 02:00:24.679 align:start position:0% manage it later so I probably advocate a 02:00:24.679 --> 02:00:27.129 align:start position:0% manage it later so I probably advocate a slightly<02:00:25.100> more<02:00:25.400> cautious<02:00:25.820> approach<02:00:25.969> I<02:00:26.540> don't 02:00:27.129 --> 02:00:27.139 align:start position:0% slightly more cautious approach I don't 02:00:27.139 --> 02:00:28.780 align:start position:0% slightly more cautious approach I don't know<02:00:27.230> if<02:00:27.350> any<02:00:27.500> of<02:00:27.619> my<02:00:27.770> colleagues<02:00:28.219> feel<02:00:28.639> like 02:00:28.780 --> 02:00:28.790 align:start position:0% know if any of my colleagues feel like 02:00:28.790 --> 02:00:30.310 align:start position:0% know if any of my colleagues feel like that's<02:00:29.000> a<02:00:29.090> mistake<02:00:29.449> if<02:00:29.659> they<02:00:29.719> don't<02:00:30.020> I'd<02:00:30.139> love 02:00:30.310 --> 02:00:30.320 align:start position:0% that's a mistake if they don't I'd love 02:00:30.320 --> 02:00:32.359 align:start position:0% that's a mistake if they don't I'd love to<02:00:30.469> get<02:00:30.560> agreement 02:00:32.359 --> 02:00:32.369 align:start position:0% to get agreement 02:00:32.369 --> 02:00:35.750 align:start position:0% to get agreement I<02:00:33.860> think<02:00:34.860> those<02:00:35.010> are<02:00:35.040> the<02:00:35.219> things<02:00:35.429> that<02:00:35.580> I 02:00:35.750 --> 02:00:35.760 align:start position:0% I think those are the things that I 02:00:35.760 --> 02:00:39.979 align:start position:0% I think those are the things that I specifically<02:00:36.510> wanted<02:00:36.900> to<02:00:37.020> comment<02:00:37.260> on<02:00:38.960> let<02:00:39.960> me 02:00:39.979 --> 02:00:39.989 align:start position:0% specifically wanted to comment on let me 02:00:39.989 --> 02:00:43.970 align:start position:0% specifically wanted to comment on let me just<02:00:40.080> double-check 02:00:43.970 --> 02:00:43.980 align:start position:0% 02:00:43.980 --> 02:00:46.100 align:start position:0% I<02:00:44.010> don't<02:00:44.730> think<02:00:44.790> that<02:00:45.120> an<02:00:45.239> inspection<02:00:45.690> isn't 02:00:46.100 --> 02:00:46.110 align:start position:0% I don't think that an inspection isn't 02:00:46.110 --> 02:00:49.939 align:start position:0% I don't think that an inspection isn't unreasonable<02:00:46.489> regime<02:00:47.840> when<02:00:48.840> we<02:00:49.080> initially 02:00:49.939 --> 02:00:49.949 align:start position:0% unreasonable regime when we initially 02:00:49.949 --> 02:00:52.010 align:start position:0% unreasonable regime when we initially license<02:00:50.520> obviously<02:00:51.030> we<02:00:51.179> don't<02:00:51.330> want<02:00:51.570> people 02:00:52.010 --> 02:00:52.020 align:start position:0% license obviously we don't want people 02:00:52.020 --> 02:00:55.010 align:start position:0% license obviously we don't want people wandering<02:00:52.410> around<02:00:52.530> saying<02:00:53.010> hey<02:00:53.760> I'm<02:00:54.000> the<02:00:54.270> you 02:00:55.010 --> 02:00:55.020 align:start position:0% wandering around saying hey I'm the you 02:00:55.020 --> 02:00:57.530 align:start position:0% wandering around saying hey I'm the you know<02:00:55.140> the<02:00:55.590> city<02:00:55.860> I'm<02:00:56.790> here<02:00:57.000> for<02:00:57.150> my<02:00:57.300> monthly 02:00:57.530 --> 02:00:57.540 align:start position:0% know the city I'm here for my monthly 02:00:57.540 --> 02:01:00.050 align:start position:0% know the city I'm here for my monthly inspection<02:00:58.350> but<02:00:59.010> you<02:00:59.190> know<02:00:59.310> the<02:00:59.670> standards 02:01:00.050 --> 02:01:00.060 align:start position:0% inspection but you know the standards 02:01:00.060 --> 02:01:02.000 align:start position:0% inspection but you know the standards that<02:01:00.179> we<02:01:00.449> uphold<02:01:00.570> for<02:01:01.020> visitors<02:01:01.500> who<02:01:01.590> may<02:01:01.890> not 02:01:02.000 --> 02:01:02.010 align:start position:0% that we uphold for visitors who may not 02:01:02.010 --> 02:01:03.860 align:start position:0% that we uphold for visitors who may not be<02:01:02.070> familiar<02:01:02.219> with<02:01:02.850> the<02:01:03.000> area<02:01:03.330> who<02:01:03.540> may<02:01:03.750> not 02:01:03.860 --> 02:01:03.870 align:start position:0% be familiar with the area who may not 02:01:03.870 --> 02:01:06.800 align:start position:0% be familiar with the area who may not know<02:01:04.110> the<02:01:04.140> rules<02:01:05.150> they're<02:01:06.150> exposed<02:01:06.600> to<02:01:06.719> a 02:01:06.800 --> 02:01:06.810 align:start position:0% know the rules they're exposed to a 02:01:06.810 --> 02:01:08.600 align:start position:0% know the rules they're exposed to a greater<02:01:07.199> sense<02:01:07.560> of<02:01:07.710> you<02:01:08.250> know<02:01:08.280> there's<02:01:08.550> a 02:01:08.600 --> 02:01:08.610 align:start position:0% greater sense of you know there's a 02:01:08.610 --> 02:01:11.720 align:start position:0% greater sense of you know there's a greater<02:01:08.880> risk<02:01:09.120> there<02:01:09.449> and<02:01:10.130> to<02:01:11.130> the<02:01:11.280> extent 02:01:11.720 --> 02:01:11.730 align:start position:0% greater risk there and to the extent 02:01:11.730 --> 02:01:14.479 align:start position:0% greater risk there and to the extent that<02:01:11.850> our<02:01:12.590> permitting<02:01:13.590> processes<02:01:14.100> could 02:01:14.479 --> 02:01:14.489 align:start position:0% that our permitting processes could 02:01:14.489 --> 02:01:17.120 align:start position:0% that our permitting processes could expose<02:01:14.850> the<02:01:15.150> city<02:01:15.390> to<02:01:15.630> liability<02:01:16.350> I'm<02:01:16.830> not 02:01:17.120 --> 02:01:17.130 align:start position:0% expose the city to liability I'm not 02:01:17.130 --> 02:01:18.950 align:start position:0% expose the city to liability I'm not here<02:01:17.340> to<02:01:17.460> prescribe<02:01:17.940> that<02:01:17.969> the<02:01:18.390> homeowner 02:01:18.950 --> 02:01:18.960 align:start position:0% here to prescribe that the homeowner 02:01:18.960 --> 02:01:21.620 align:start position:0% here to prescribe that the homeowner have<02:01:19.290> or<02:01:19.500> not<02:01:19.620> have<02:01:20.000> liability<02:01:21.000> insurance<02:01:21.120> I'm 02:01:21.620 --> 02:01:21.630 align:start position:0% have or not have liability insurance I'm 02:01:21.630 --> 02:01:22.990 align:start position:0% have or not have liability insurance I'm guessing<02:01:22.020> that<02:01:22.140> a<02:01:22.199> lot<02:01:22.410> of<02:01:22.440> the<02:01:22.650> Airbnb 02:01:22.990 --> 02:01:23.000 align:start position:0% guessing that a lot of the Airbnb 02:01:23.000 --> 02:01:25.760 align:start position:0% guessing that a lot of the Airbnb organizations<02:01:24.000> impose<02:01:24.390> that<02:01:24.630> but<02:01:25.350> I<02:01:25.380> do<02:01:25.500> think 02:01:25.760 --> 02:01:25.770 align:start position:0% organizations impose that but I do think 02:01:25.770 --> 02:01:28.610 align:start position:0% organizations impose that but I do think it's<02:01:25.980> important<02:01:26.429> for<02:01:26.460> the<02:01:26.699> city's<02:01:27.620> posterior 02:01:28.610 --> 02:01:28.620 align:start position:0% it's important for the city's posterior 02:01:28.620 --> 02:01:31.100 align:start position:0% it's important for the city's posterior to<02:01:28.830> be<02:01:28.980> covered<02:01:29.370> and<02:01:29.580> so<02:01:30.179> regulations<02:01:30.960> that 02:01:31.100 --> 02:01:31.110 align:start position:0% to be covered and so regulations that 02:01:31.110 --> 02:01:34.430 align:start position:0% to be covered and so regulations that require<02:01:31.850> the<02:01:32.850> city<02:01:33.120> to<02:01:33.330> be<02:01:33.480> held<02:01:33.690> harmless<02:01:33.989> in 02:01:34.430 --> 02:01:34.440 align:start position:0% require the city to be held harmless in 02:01:34.440 --> 02:01:37.400 align:start position:0% require the city to be held harmless in the<02:01:34.530> event<02:01:34.800> of<02:01:34.860> a<02:01:35.010> problem<02:01:35.820> that<02:01:36.630> was<02:01:36.750> I<02:01:36.989> saw<02:01:37.230> in 02:01:37.400 --> 02:01:37.410 align:start position:0% the event of a problem that was I saw in 02:01:37.410 --> 02:01:40.490 align:start position:0% the event of a problem that was I saw in some<02:01:37.770> of<02:01:37.920> the<02:01:38.360> examples<02:01:39.360> that<02:01:40.050> were<02:01:40.199> presented 02:01:40.490 --> 02:01:40.500 align:start position:0% some of the examples that were presented 02:01:40.500 --> 02:01:43.040 align:start position:0% some of the examples that were presented to<02:01:40.739> us<02:01:40.770> feels<02:01:41.550> like<02:01:41.940> something<02:01:42.390> that<02:01:42.420> we<02:01:42.840> need 02:01:43.040 --> 02:01:43.050 align:start position:0% to us feels like something that we need 02:01:43.050 --> 02:01:45.950 align:start position:0% to us feels like something that we need since<02:01:43.440> we've<02:01:43.590> had<02:01:43.800> experience<02:01:44.429> with<02:01:45.330> being<02:01:45.780> on 02:01:45.950 --> 02:01:45.960 align:start position:0% since we've had experience with being on 02:01:45.960 --> 02:01:49.490 align:start position:0% since we've had experience with being on the<02:01:46.080> wrong<02:01:46.260> end<02:01:46.290> of<02:01:46.590> lawsuits<02:01:48.020> so<02:01:49.020> more 02:01:49.490 --> 02:01:49.500 align:start position:0% the wrong end of lawsuits so more 02:01:49.500 --> 02:01:54.620 align:start position:0% the wrong end of lawsuits so more comments<02:01:49.980> colleagues<02:01:52.010> Brian<02:01:53.010> I<02:01:53.370> don't<02:01:54.360> have 02:01:54.620 --> 02:01:54.630 align:start position:0% comments colleagues Brian I don't have 02:01:54.630 --> 02:01:56.660 align:start position:0% comments colleagues Brian I don't have much<02:01:54.840> other<02:01:55.050> than<02:01:55.290> to<02:01:55.469> support<02:01:56.040> here<02:01:56.250> sort<02:01:56.580> of 02:01:56.660 --> 02:01:56.670 align:start position:0% much other than to support here sort of 02:01:56.670 --> 02:02:00.350 align:start position:0% much other than to support here sort of the<02:01:57.330> notion<02:01:57.510> of<02:01:58.640> one<02:01:59.640> I<02:01:59.670> like<02:01:59.880> the<02:02:00.000> idea<02:02:00.239> the 02:02:00.350 --> 02:02:00.360 align:start position:0% the notion of one I like the idea the 02:02:00.360 --> 02:02:03.130 align:start position:0% the notion of one I like the idea the good<02:02:00.510> neighbor<02:02:00.690> policy<02:02:00.929> but<02:02:01.320> the<02:02:01.440> idea<02:02:01.710> that 02:02:03.130 --> 02:02:03.140 align:start position:0% good neighbor policy but the idea that 02:02:03.140 --> 02:02:06.830 align:start position:0% good neighbor policy but the idea that you<02:02:04.140> know<02:02:04.230> this<02:02:04.530> is<02:02:05.040> going<02:02:05.969> to<02:02:06.060> evolve<02:02:06.390> and 02:02:06.830 --> 02:02:06.840 align:start position:0% you know this is going to evolve and 02:02:06.840 --> 02:02:09.169 align:start position:0% you know this is going to evolve and change<02:02:06.870> over<02:02:07.650> time<02:02:07.980> and<02:02:08.460> having<02:02:08.730> a<02:02:08.820> way<02:02:08.940> to<02:02:09.000> be 02:02:09.169 --> 02:02:09.179 align:start position:0% change over time and having a way to be 02:02:09.179 --> 02:02:12.659 align:start position:0% change over time and having a way to be responsive<02:02:09.840> to<02:02:10.170> those<02:02:10.469> changes<02:02:10.739> whether<02:02:11.219> it's 02:02:12.659 --> 02:02:12.669 align:start position:0% responsive to those changes whether it's 02:02:12.669 --> 02:02:14.909 align:start position:0% responsive to those changes whether it's or<02:02:12.880> review<02:02:13.389> or<02:02:13.599> having<02:02:13.899> data<02:02:14.260> or<02:02:14.619> you<02:02:14.800> know 02:02:14.909 --> 02:02:14.919 align:start position:0% or review or having data or you know 02:02:14.919 --> 02:02:17.609 align:start position:0% or review or having data or you know doing<02:02:15.219> those<02:02:15.340> types<02:02:15.639> of<02:02:15.729> things<02:02:15.969> -<02:02:16.209> where<02:02:16.619> - 02:02:17.609 --> 02:02:17.619 align:start position:0% doing those types of things - where - 02:02:17.619 --> 02:02:19.379 align:start position:0% doing those types of things - where - where<02:02:17.739> we<02:02:17.919> can<02:02:18.099> you<02:02:18.699> know<02:02:18.820> if<02:02:18.939> we<02:02:19.059> have<02:02:19.149> to<02:02:19.269> put 02:02:19.379 --> 02:02:19.389 align:start position:0% where we can you know if we have to put 02:02:19.389 --> 02:02:24.529 align:start position:0% where we can you know if we have to put the<02:02:19.510> screws<02:02:19.780> down<02:02:19.809> a<02:02:20.050> little<02:02:20.409> bit<02:02:20.499> harder<02:02:20.889> or 02:02:24.529 --> 02:02:24.539 align:start position:0% 02:02:24.539 --> 02:02:27.899 align:start position:0% about<02:02:25.539> just<02:02:26.079> so<02:02:26.169> we<02:02:26.320> have<02:02:26.409> that<02:02:26.590> flexibility<02:02:27.159> I 02:02:27.899 --> 02:02:27.909 align:start position:0% about just so we have that flexibility I 02:02:27.909 --> 02:02:32.450 align:start position:0% about just so we have that flexibility I support<02:02:28.479> that<02:02:28.630> notion 02:02:32.450 --> 02:02:32.460 align:start position:0% 02:02:32.460 --> 02:02:35.899 align:start position:0% anybody<02:02:33.210> else 02:02:35.899 --> 02:02:35.909 align:start position:0% 02:02:35.909 --> 02:02:39.050 align:start position:0% I<02:02:35.940> would<02:02:36.690> yeah<02:02:37.080> echo<02:02:37.820> Commissioner<02:02:38.820> Holt's 02:02:39.050 --> 02:02:39.060 align:start position:0% I would yeah echo Commissioner Holt's 02:02:39.060 --> 02:02:41.990 align:start position:0% I would yeah echo Commissioner Holt's comments<02:02:39.690> as<02:02:39.780> well<02:02:39.929> about<02:02:40.440> I<02:02:40.800> think<02:02:41.310> that<02:02:41.580> you 02:02:41.990 --> 02:02:42.000 align:start position:0% comments as well about I think that you 02:02:42.000 --> 02:02:45.080 align:start position:0% comments as well about I think that you raised<02:02:42.270> some<02:02:42.480> really<02:02:42.570> good<02:02:42.780> points<02:02:43.139> about<02:02:44.090> the 02:02:45.080 --> 02:02:45.090 align:start position:0% raised some really good points about the 02:02:45.090 --> 02:02:49.669 align:start position:0% raised some really good points about the ability<02:02:45.900> to<02:02:47.150> refine<02:02:48.150> over<02:02:48.929> time<02:02:49.139> as<02:02:49.350> we<02:02:49.500> see 02:02:49.669 --> 02:02:49.679 align:start position:0% ability to refine over time as we see 02:02:49.679 --> 02:02:52.760 align:start position:0% ability to refine over time as we see what<02:02:49.830> happens<02:02:50.219> and<02:02:50.940> I<02:02:51.270> I<02:02:51.300> really<02:02:52.110> do<02:02:52.409> like<02:02:52.590> the 02:02:52.760 --> 02:02:52.770 align:start position:0% what happens and I I really do like the 02:02:52.770 --> 02:02:54.229 align:start position:0% what happens and I I really do like the idea<02:02:53.070> the<02:02:53.340> concept<02:02:53.370> of<02:02:53.790> the<02:02:53.909> good<02:02:54.030> neighbor 02:02:54.229 --> 02:02:54.239 align:start position:0% idea the concept of the good neighbor 02:02:54.239 --> 02:02:57.530 align:start position:0% idea the concept of the good neighbor policy<02:02:55.159> and<02:02:56.159> I<02:02:56.610> do<02:02:56.670> think<02:02:57.000> that<02:02:57.030> the<02:02:57.210> limit<02:02:57.449> on 02:02:57.530 --> 02:02:57.540 align:start position:0% policy and I do think that the limit on 02:02:57.540 --> 02:02:59.030 align:start position:0% policy and I do think that the limit on number<02:02:57.810> of<02:02:57.840> guests<02:02:58.230> I<02:02:58.350> didn't<02:02:58.710> mention<02:02:58.830> that 02:02:59.030 --> 02:02:59.040 align:start position:0% number of guests I didn't mention that 02:02:59.040 --> 02:03:00.560 align:start position:0% number of guests I didn't mention that but<02:02:59.190> I<02:02:59.250> kind<02:02:59.400> of<02:02:59.489> it<02:02:59.610> was<02:02:59.850> under<02:03:00.480> the 02:03:00.560 --> 02:03:00.570 align:start position:0% but I kind of it was under the 02:03:00.570 --> 02:03:01.640 align:start position:0% but I kind of it was under the assumption<02:03:00.960> that<02:03:00.989> that<02:03:01.139> would<02:03:01.350> be<02:03:01.440> something 02:03:01.640 --> 02:03:01.650 align:start position:0% assumption that that would be something 02:03:01.650 --> 02:03:03.050 align:start position:0% assumption that that would be something that<02:03:01.770> would<02:03:01.980> be<02:03:02.130> looked<02:03:02.370> at<02:03:02.489> and<02:03:02.670> considered 02:03:03.050 --> 02:03:03.060 align:start position:0% that would be looked at and considered 02:03:03.060 --> 02:03:04.640 align:start position:0% that would be looked at and considered because<02:03:03.540> I<02:03:03.630> think<02:03:03.780> that's<02:03:03.929> a<02:03:04.020> value<02:03:04.260> very 02:03:04.640 --> 02:03:04.650 align:start position:0% because I think that's a value very 02:03:04.650 --> 02:03:09.470 align:start position:0% because I think that's a value very important<02:03:05.239> aspect<02:03:06.239> as<02:03:06.360> well<02:03:06.650> and<02:03:07.650> to<02:03:08.520> I<02:03:08.880> would 02:03:09.470 --> 02:03:09.480 align:start position:0% important aspect as well and to I would 02:03:09.480 --> 02:03:13.250 align:start position:0% important aspect as well and to I would also<02:03:09.659> want<02:03:10.320> to<02:03:10.460> think<02:03:11.460> explore<02:03:12.300> the<02:03:12.630> as<02:03:12.870> I<02:03:13.080> said 02:03:13.250 --> 02:03:13.260 align:start position:0% also want to think explore the as I said 02:03:13.260 --> 02:03:16.220 align:start position:0% also want to think explore the as I said before<02:03:13.409> the<02:03:14.060> really<02:03:15.060> what<02:03:15.210> we<02:03:15.330> mean<02:03:15.510> by<02:03:15.570> hosted 02:03:16.220 --> 02:03:16.230 align:start position:0% before the really what we mean by hosted 02:03:16.230 --> 02:03:18.110 align:start position:0% before the really what we mean by hosted an<02:03:16.350> done<02:03:16.500> hosted<02:03:16.920> I<02:03:17.100> think<02:03:17.790> that<02:03:17.940> there<02:03:18.090> needs 02:03:18.110 --> 02:03:18.120 align:start position:0% an done hosted I think that there needs 02:03:18.120 --> 02:03:20.209 align:start position:0% an done hosted I think that there needs to<02:03:18.360> be<02:03:18.449> a<02:03:18.540> little<02:03:18.690> bit<02:03:18.929> more<02:03:19.139> clarity<02:03:19.679> on<02:03:20.040> that 02:03:20.209 --> 02:03:20.219 align:start position:0% to be a little bit more clarity on that 02:03:20.219 --> 02:03:22.640 align:start position:0% to be a little bit more clarity on that and<02:03:20.489> so<02:03:21.389> that<02:03:21.540> we<02:03:21.630> can<02:03:21.750> allow<02:03:21.929> for<02:03:21.960> flexibility 02:03:22.640 --> 02:03:22.650 align:start position:0% and so that we can allow for flexibility 02:03:22.650 --> 02:03:25.850 align:start position:0% and so that we can allow for flexibility so<02:03:23.520> that's<02:03:24.389> just<02:03:24.810> kind<02:03:25.380> of<02:03:25.440> throwing<02:03:25.679> that<02:03:25.800> out 02:03:25.850 --> 02:03:25.860 align:start position:0% so that's just kind of throwing that out 02:03:25.860 --> 02:03:32.000 align:start position:0% so that's just kind of throwing that out there<02:03:26.190> again<02:03:26.460> oh<02:03:29.690> and<02:03:30.690> I<02:03:30.929> would<02:03:31.260> also<02:03:31.380> like<02:03:31.980> to 02:03:32.000 --> 02:03:32.010 align:start position:0% there again oh and I would also like to 02:03:32.010 --> 02:03:34.280 align:start position:0% there again oh and I would also like to echo<02:03:32.400> the<02:03:32.429> concept<02:03:33.210> of<02:03:33.389> the<02:03:33.540> concerns<02:03:34.080> about 02:03:34.280 --> 02:03:34.290 align:start position:0% echo the concept of the concerns about 02:03:34.290 --> 02:03:36.709 align:start position:0% echo the concept of the concerns about the<02:03:34.469> empty<02:03:34.889> houses<02:03:35.420> just<02:03:36.420> I've<02:03:36.690> never 02:03:36.709 --> 02:03:36.719 align:start position:0% the empty houses just I've never 02:03:36.719 --> 02:03:38.090 align:start position:0% the empty houses just I've never actually<02:03:37.139> have<02:03:37.440> you<02:03:37.530> heard<02:03:37.710> it<02:03:37.830> and<02:03:37.920> I<02:03:37.980> always 02:03:38.090 --> 02:03:38.100 align:start position:0% actually have you heard it and I always 02:03:38.100 --> 02:03:39.620 align:start position:0% actually have you heard it and I always nod<02:03:38.370> but<02:03:38.670> I'm<02:03:38.760> gonna<02:03:38.969> put<02:03:39.179> it<02:03:39.300> on<02:03:39.389> the<02:03:39.480> record 02:03:39.620 --> 02:03:39.630 align:start position:0% nod but I'm gonna put it on the record 02:03:39.630 --> 02:03:41.870 align:start position:0% nod but I'm gonna put it on the record that<02:03:39.810> that<02:03:40.139> very<02:03:40.620> much<02:03:41.070> concerns<02:03:41.250> me<02:03:41.610> I<02:03:41.639> happen 02:03:41.870 --> 02:03:41.880 align:start position:0% that that very much concerns me I happen 02:03:41.880 --> 02:03:43.760 align:start position:0% that that very much concerns me I happen to<02:03:41.909> know<02:03:42.150> that<02:03:42.510> right<02:03:42.870> around<02:03:43.110> the<02:03:43.320> I<02:03:43.350> have 02:03:43.760 --> 02:03:43.770 align:start position:0% to know that right around the I have 02:03:43.770 --> 02:03:51.220 align:start position:0% to know that right around the I have that<02:03:43.949> issue<02:03:44.070> as<02:03:44.429> well<02:03:44.639> so<02:03:44.969> yeah 02:03:51.220 --> 02:03:51.230 align:start position:0% 02:03:51.230 --> 02:03:55.900 align:start position:0% yeah<02:03:51.770> your<02:03:53.170> to<02:03:54.170> the<02:03:54.199> chair<02:03:54.560> your<02:03:54.770> your<02:03:55.489> idea 02:03:55.900 --> 02:03:55.910 align:start position:0% yeah your to the chair your your idea 02:03:55.910 --> 02:03:57.189 align:start position:0% yeah your to the chair your your idea and<02:03:56.060> the<02:03:56.150> good<02:03:56.300> neighbor<02:03:56.540> policy<02:03:56.810> I<02:03:57.110> think 02:03:57.189 --> 02:03:57.199 align:start position:0% and the good neighbor policy I think 02:03:57.199 --> 02:04:01.169 align:start position:0% and the good neighbor policy I think makes<02:03:57.590> a<02:03:57.710> lot<02:03:57.739> of<02:03:57.890> sense<02:03:58.250> there<02:03:59.150> are<02:03:59.920> there<02:04:00.920> are 02:04:01.169 --> 02:04:01.179 align:start position:0% makes a lot of sense there are there are 02:04:01.179 --> 02:04:04.030 align:start position:0% makes a lot of sense there are there are specific<02:04:02.179> and<02:04:02.330> unique<02:04:02.510> and<02:04:02.870> special<02:04:03.040> aspects 02:04:04.030 --> 02:04:04.040 align:start position:0% specific and unique and special aspects 02:04:04.040 --> 02:04:06.220 align:start position:0% specific and unique and special aspects to<02:04:04.219> so<02:04:04.820> many<02:04:04.940> locations<02:04:05.390> in<02:04:05.840> Half<02:04:06.020> Moon<02:04:06.170> Bay 02:04:06.220 --> 02:04:06.230 align:start position:0% to so many locations in Half Moon Bay 02:04:06.230 --> 02:04:07.990 align:start position:0% to so many locations in Half Moon Bay where<02:04:06.590> it<02:04:06.679> would<02:04:06.830> be<02:04:07.070> wonderful<02:04:07.610> to<02:04:07.760> have<02:04:07.940> that 02:04:07.990 --> 02:04:08.000 align:start position:0% where it would be wonderful to have that 02:04:08.000 --> 02:04:11.020 align:start position:0% where it would be wonderful to have that written<02:04:08.960> up<02:04:09.199> for<02:04:09.530> the<02:04:09.710> for<02:04:10.370> the<02:04:10.460> owners<02:04:10.790> for 02:04:11.020 --> 02:04:11.030 align:start position:0% written up for the for the owners for 02:04:11.030 --> 02:04:14.350 align:start position:0% written up for the for the owners for the<02:04:11.060> guests<02:04:11.510> and<02:04:11.660> the<02:04:11.780> neighbors<02:04:12.140> I<02:04:12.640> also<02:04:13.640> was 02:04:14.350 --> 02:04:14.360 align:start position:0% the guests and the neighbors I also was 02:04:14.360 --> 02:04:16.959 align:start position:0% the guests and the neighbors I also was okay<02:04:14.870> with<02:04:15.170> the<02:04:15.460> limits<02:04:16.460> on<02:04:16.580> the<02:04:16.699> number<02:04:16.730> of 02:04:16.959 --> 02:04:16.969 align:start position:0% okay with the limits on the number of 02:04:16.969 --> 02:04:18.910 align:start position:0% okay with the limits on the number of guests<02:04:17.330> it<02:04:17.420> seems<02:04:17.660> to<02:04:17.810> be<02:04:17.929> pretty<02:04:18.080> universal 02:04:18.910 --> 02:04:18.920 align:start position:0% guests it seems to be pretty universal 02:04:18.920 --> 02:04:21.550 align:start position:0% guests it seems to be pretty universal in<02:04:19.100> other<02:04:19.250> jurisdictions<02:04:19.550> so<02:04:20.480> no<02:04:21.170> quarrel 02:04:21.550 --> 02:04:21.560 align:start position:0% in other jurisdictions so no quarrel 02:04:21.560 --> 02:04:25.780 align:start position:0% in other jurisdictions so no quarrel with<02:04:21.739> that<02:04:22.060> just<02:04:23.110> one<02:04:24.110> question<02:04:24.320> to<02:04:24.790> chair 02:04:25.780 --> 02:04:25.790 align:start position:0% with that just one question to chair 02:04:25.790 --> 02:04:27.910 align:start position:0% with that just one question to chair Benjamin<02:04:26.270> I'm<02:04:26.600> a<02:04:26.840> little<02:04:27.230> fuzzy<02:04:27.410> on<02:04:27.560> whether 02:04:27.910 --> 02:04:27.920 align:start position:0% Benjamin I'm a little fuzzy on whether 02:04:27.920 --> 02:04:30.760 align:start position:0% Benjamin I'm a little fuzzy on whether you're<02:04:28.330> advocating<02:04:29.330> us<02:04:29.840> to<02:04:30.050> go<02:04:30.170> forward<02:04:30.590> with 02:04:30.760 --> 02:04:30.770 align:start position:0% you're advocating us to go forward with 02:04:30.770 --> 02:04:34.330 align:start position:0% you're advocating us to go forward with flexibility<02:04:31.460> to<02:04:31.730> impose<02:04:32.469> caps<02:04:33.469> on<02:04:33.830> numbers<02:04:34.190> or 02:04:34.330 --> 02:04:34.340 align:start position:0% flexibility to impose caps on numbers or 02:04:34.340 --> 02:04:38.260 align:start position:0% flexibility to impose caps on numbers or you'd<02:04:34.699> like<02:04:34.880> to<02:04:35.030> see<02:04:35.179> us<02:04:35.330> adopt<02:04:35.690> that<02:04:37.270> this 02:04:38.260 --> 02:04:38.270 align:start position:0% you'd like to see us adopt that this 02:04:38.270 --> 02:04:43.479 align:start position:0% you'd like to see us adopt that this year<02:04:38.690> this<02:04:38.989> sometimes<02:04:39.410> I<02:04:40.929> had<02:04:41.929> you<02:04:42.890> I<02:04:42.920> may<02:04:43.429> have 02:04:43.479 --> 02:04:43.489 align:start position:0% year this sometimes I had you I may have 02:04:43.489 --> 02:04:44.770 align:start position:0% year this sometimes I had you I may have given<02:04:43.640> you<02:04:43.820> the<02:04:44.000> impression<02:04:44.120> that<02:04:44.540> my 02:04:44.770 --> 02:04:44.780 align:start position:0% given you the impression that my 02:04:44.780 --> 02:04:46.810 align:start position:0% given you the impression that my thinking<02:04:45.199> is<02:04:45.320> more<02:04:45.560> evolved<02:04:46.040> than<02:04:46.190> it<02:04:46.310> is<02:04:46.489> I 02:04:46.810 --> 02:04:46.820 align:start position:0% thinking is more evolved than it is I 02:04:46.820 --> 02:04:49.720 align:start position:0% thinking is more evolved than it is I feel<02:04:47.449> like<02:04:47.690> a<02:04:47.719> cap<02:04:48.080> is<02:04:48.290> appropriate<02:04:48.920> I<02:04:49.100> feel 02:04:49.720 --> 02:04:49.730 align:start position:0% feel like a cap is appropriate I feel 02:04:49.730 --> 02:04:53.800 align:start position:0% feel like a cap is appropriate I feel like<02:04:50.000> at<02:04:50.780> some<02:04:51.110> point<02:04:51.140> bringing<02:04:52.000> I<02:04:53.000> would<02:04:53.660> like 02:04:53.800 --> 02:04:53.810 align:start position:0% like at some point bringing I would like 02:04:53.810 --> 02:04:59.220 align:start position:0% like at some point bringing I would like to<02:04:53.989> resolve<02:04:54.350> that<02:04:54.620> the<02:04:55.580> 14<02:04:56.590> the<02:04:57.590> barracks 02:04:59.220 --> 02:04:59.230 align:start position:0% to resolve that the 14 the barracks 02:04:59.230 --> 02:05:03.160 align:start position:0% to resolve that the 14 the barracks rental<02:05:00.230> that<02:05:00.469> doesn't<02:05:01.040> strike<02:05:01.250> me<02:05:01.310> as<02:05:01.520> in<02:05:02.170> the 02:05:03.160 --> 02:05:03.170 align:start position:0% rental that doesn't strike me as in the 02:05:03.170 --> 02:05:04.900 align:start position:0% rental that doesn't strike me as in the that<02:05:03.530> doesn't<02:05:03.860> feel<02:05:04.010> like<02:05:04.070> a<02:05:04.280> neighborhood<02:05:04.730> to 02:05:04.900 --> 02:05:04.910 align:start position:0% that doesn't feel like a neighborhood to 02:05:04.910 --> 02:05:06.610 align:start position:0% that doesn't feel like a neighborhood to me<02:05:05.179> I<02:05:05.210> know<02:05:05.390> there's<02:05:05.690> a<02:05:05.750> place<02:05:06.020> for<02:05:06.290> it<02:05:06.469> and 02:05:06.610 --> 02:05:06.620 align:start position:0% me I know there's a place for it and 02:05:06.620 --> 02:05:09.760 align:start position:0% me I know there's a place for it and it's<02:05:07.100> probably<02:05:07.370> low<02:05:07.820> cost<02:05:08.120> housing<02:05:08.660> but<02:05:09.350> I<02:05:09.590> can 02:05:09.760 --> 02:05:09.770 align:start position:0% it's probably low cost housing but I can 02:05:09.770 --> 02:05:11.919 align:start position:0% it's probably low cost housing but I can see<02:05:10.010> adverse<02:05:10.489> consequences<02:05:11.300> but<02:05:11.719> not 02:05:11.919 --> 02:05:11.929 align:start position:0% see adverse consequences but not 02:05:11.929 --> 02:05:14.229 align:start position:0% see adverse consequences but not independently<02:05:12.620> of<02:05:12.890> that<02:05:12.920> I<02:05:13.280> think<02:05:13.910> it<02:05:14.030> makes 02:05:14.229 --> 02:05:14.239 align:start position:0% independently of that I think it makes 02:05:14.239 --> 02:05:16.030 align:start position:0% independently of that I think it makes sense<02:05:14.449> for<02:05:14.630> staff<02:05:14.900> to<02:05:15.110> have<02:05:15.230> a<02:05:15.260> chance<02:05:15.590> to<02:05:15.710> chew 02:05:16.030 --> 02:05:16.040 align:start position:0% sense for staff to have a chance to chew 02:05:16.040 --> 02:05:18.490 align:start position:0% sense for staff to have a chance to chew on<02:05:16.250> it<02:05:16.429> and<02:05:16.660> you<02:05:17.660> know<02:05:17.750> obviously<02:05:17.900> we're<02:05:18.380> not 02:05:18.490 --> 02:05:18.500 align:start position:0% on it and you know obviously we're not 02:05:18.500 --> 02:05:21.010 align:start position:0% on it and you know obviously we're not making<02:05:18.830> any<02:05:19.040> decisions<02:05:19.190> tonight<02:05:19.940> if<02:05:20.600> they<02:05:20.810> can 02:05:21.010 --> 02:05:21.020 align:start position:0% making any decisions tonight if they can 02:05:21.020 --> 02:05:23.200 align:start position:0% making any decisions tonight if they can bring<02:05:21.260> back<02:05:21.560> a<02:05:21.590> proposal<02:05:22.280> that<02:05:22.400> does<02:05:22.670> have 02:05:23.200 --> 02:05:23.210 align:start position:0% bring back a proposal that does have 02:05:23.210 --> 02:05:25.360 align:start position:0% bring back a proposal that does have those<02:05:23.449> limits<02:05:23.929> I'm<02:05:24.530> certainly<02:05:24.949> open<02:05:25.100> to 02:05:25.360 --> 02:05:25.370 align:start position:0% those limits I'm certainly open to 02:05:25.370 --> 02:05:27.400 align:start position:0% those limits I'm certainly open to hearing<02:05:25.580> them<02:05:25.850> but<02:05:26.360> I<02:05:26.390> want<02:05:26.660> I<02:05:26.780> want<02:05:27.110> them<02:05:27.380> to 02:05:27.400 --> 02:05:27.410 align:start position:0% hearing them but I want I want them to 02:05:27.410 --> 02:05:28.930 align:start position:0% hearing them but I want I want them to know<02:05:27.710> that<02:05:27.920> we're<02:05:28.070> thinking<02:05:28.340> it's<02:05:28.790> a<02:05:28.910> good 02:05:28.930 --> 02:05:28.940 align:start position:0% know that we're thinking it's a good 02:05:28.940 --> 02:05:32.709 align:start position:0% know that we're thinking it's a good idea<02:05:29.360> if<02:05:29.960> we<02:05:30.080> do<02:05:30.429> Sarah<02:05:31.429> are<02:05:32.239> we<02:05:32.360> talking 02:05:32.709 --> 02:05:32.719 align:start position:0% idea if we do Sarah are we talking 02:05:32.719 --> 02:05:36.090 align:start position:0% idea if we do Sarah are we talking limits<02:05:33.620> on<02:05:33.800> number<02:05:34.250> total<02:05:34.730> number<02:05:35.239> of 02:05:36.090 --> 02:05:36.100 align:start position:0% limits on number total number of 02:05:36.100 --> 02:05:38.890 align:start position:0% limits on number total number of short-term<02:05:37.100> rentals<02:05:37.460> or<02:05:37.760> are<02:05:37.969> you<02:05:38.060> talking<02:05:38.390> so 02:05:38.890 --> 02:05:38.900 align:start position:0% short-term rentals or are you talking so 02:05:38.900 --> 02:05:42.070 align:start position:0% short-term rentals or are you talking so I<02:05:38.929> so<02:05:39.380> I<02:05:39.410> I<02:05:39.739> interpreted<02:05:40.489> Steve's<02:05:41.420> question<02:05:41.660> to 02:05:42.070 --> 02:05:42.080 align:start position:0% I so I I interpreted Steve's question to 02:05:42.080 --> 02:05:44.370 align:start position:0% I so I I interpreted Steve's question to be<02:05:42.260> with<02:05:42.469> respect<02:05:42.650> to<02:05:43.010> occupancy<02:05:43.670> limits 02:05:44.370 --> 02:05:44.380 align:start position:0% be with respect to occupancy limits 02:05:44.380 --> 02:05:49.540 align:start position:0% be with respect to occupancy limits maybe<02:05:45.380> I<02:05:45.500> misunderstood<02:05:47.590> in<02:05:48.590> in<02:05:48.920> your<02:05:49.130> remarks 02:05:49.540 --> 02:05:49.550 align:start position:0% maybe I misunderstood in in your remarks 02:05:49.550 --> 02:05:51.880 align:start position:0% maybe I misunderstood in in your remarks a<02:05:49.699> few<02:05:49.880> minutes<02:05:50.150> ago<02:05:50.270> I<02:05:50.390> I<02:05:50.840> thought<02:05:51.500> you<02:05:51.770> were 02:05:51.880 --> 02:05:51.890 align:start position:0% a few minutes ago I I thought you were 02:05:51.890 --> 02:05:54.850 align:start position:0% a few minutes ago I I thought you were going<02:05:52.130> towards<02:05:52.699> wanting<02:05:52.940> a<02:05:53.239> cap<02:05:53.540> on<02:05:54.020> the 02:05:54.850 --> 02:05:54.860 align:start position:0% going towards wanting a cap on the 02:05:54.860 --> 02:05:56.650 align:start position:0% going towards wanting a cap on the number<02:05:54.890> of<02:05:55.219> short-term<02:05:55.699> rentals<02:05:56.090> in<02:05:56.270> the<02:05:56.390> city 02:05:56.650 --> 02:05:56.660 align:start position:0% number of short-term rentals in the city 02:05:56.660 --> 02:05:59.350 align:start position:0% number of short-term rentals in the city or<02:05:57.050> the<02:05:57.080> or<02:05:57.500> a<02:05:57.560> cap<02:05:58.040> on<02:05:58.340> the<02:05:58.520> number<02:05:58.790> of 02:05:59.350 --> 02:05:59.360 align:start position:0% or the or a cap on the number of 02:05:59.360 --> 02:06:00.410 align:start position:0% or the or a cap on the number of unhoused 02:06:00.410 --> 02:06:00.420 align:start position:0% unhoused 02:06:00.420 --> 02:06:02.630 align:start position:0% unhoused rentals<02:06:00.870> in<02:06:01.080> the<02:06:01.199> city<02:06:01.440> I<02:06:01.739> don't<02:06:02.310> know<02:06:02.460> the 02:06:02.630 --> 02:06:02.640 align:start position:0% rentals in the city I don't know the 02:06:02.640 --> 02:06:05.300 align:start position:0% rentals in the city I don't know the answer<02:06:02.969> yet<02:06:03.210> my<02:06:03.449> gut<02:06:03.780> feeling<02:06:04.290> is<02:06:04.590> that<02:06:04.620> there 02:06:05.300 --> 02:06:05.310 align:start position:0% answer yet my gut feeling is that there 02:06:05.310 --> 02:06:07.790 align:start position:0% answer yet my gut feeling is that there is<02:06:05.489> some<02:06:05.730> number<02:06:05.910> that<02:06:06.270> is<02:06:06.420> too<02:06:06.660> many<02:06:06.840> and<02:06:07.170> I 02:06:07.790 --> 02:06:07.800 align:start position:0% is some number that is too many and I 02:06:07.800 --> 02:06:09.680 align:start position:0% is some number that is too many and I understand<02:06:08.460> that<02:06:08.699> that<02:06:08.820> seems<02:06:09.150> impossible 02:06:09.680 --> 02:06:09.690 align:start position:0% understand that that seems impossible 02:06:09.690 --> 02:06:13.189 align:start position:0% understand that that seems impossible today<02:06:10.880> you<02:06:11.880> look<02:06:12.060> around<02:06:12.390> and<02:06:12.540> say<02:06:12.780> how<02:06:12.989> could 02:06:13.189 --> 02:06:13.199 align:start position:0% today you look around and say how could 02:06:13.199 --> 02:06:16.370 align:start position:0% today you look around and say how could there<02:06:13.380> be<02:06:13.410> that<02:06:13.770> many<02:06:14.120> in<02:06:15.120> the<02:06:15.360> future<02:06:15.540> but<02:06:16.110> you 02:06:16.370 --> 02:06:16.380 align:start position:0% there be that many in the future but you 02:06:16.380 --> 02:06:18.590 align:start position:0% there be that many in the future but you know<02:06:16.739> we<02:06:16.860> could<02:06:17.040> say<02:06:17.190> that<02:06:17.370> about<02:06:17.489> ad<02:06:17.820> use<02:06:18.179> we 02:06:18.590 --> 02:06:18.600 align:start position:0% know we could say that about ad use we 02:06:18.600 --> 02:06:20.300 align:start position:0% know we could say that about ad use we could<02:06:18.780> be<02:06:18.900> surprised<02:06:19.320> by<02:06:19.530> the<02:06:19.590> number<02:06:19.770> of<02:06:20.040> AD 02:06:20.300 --> 02:06:20.310 align:start position:0% could be surprised by the number of AD 02:06:20.310 --> 02:06:27.110 align:start position:0% could be surprised by the number of AD news<02:06:21.380> there<02:06:22.380> was<02:06:22.969> adequate<02:06:24.469> examples<02:06:25.469> in<02:06:26.120> the 02:06:27.110 --> 02:06:27.120 align:start position:0% news there was adequate examples in the 02:06:27.120 --> 02:06:29.780 align:start position:0% news there was adequate examples in the Coastal<02:06:27.690> Commission<02:06:27.929> approved<02:06:28.610> short<02:06:29.610> term 02:06:29.780 --> 02:06:29.790 align:start position:0% Coastal Commission approved short term 02:06:29.790 --> 02:06:32.030 align:start position:0% Coastal Commission approved short term rental<02:06:30.030> policies<02:06:30.540> that<02:06:31.260> laid<02:06:31.500> out<02:06:31.679> some 02:06:32.030 --> 02:06:32.040 align:start position:0% rental policies that laid out some 02:06:32.040 --> 02:06:34.939 align:start position:0% rental policies that laid out some grounds<02:06:32.580> for<02:06:33.380> changes<02:06:34.380> in<02:06:34.410> community 02:06:34.939 --> 02:06:34.949 align:start position:0% grounds for changes in community 02:06:34.949 --> 02:06:39.340 align:start position:0% grounds for changes in community character<02:06:35.840> infrastructure<02:06:37.910> saturation<02:06:38.910> I 02:06:39.340 --> 02:06:39.350 align:start position:0% character infrastructure saturation I 02:06:39.350 --> 02:06:41.750 align:start position:0% character infrastructure saturation I forget<02:06:40.350> what<02:06:40.500> the<02:06:40.620> others<02:06:40.890> are<02:06:41.070> but<02:06:41.640> we 02:06:41.750 --> 02:06:41.760 align:start position:0% forget what the others are but we 02:06:41.760 --> 02:06:44.150 align:start position:0% forget what the others are but we certainly<02:06:41.969> have<02:06:42.179> roadway<02:06:42.780> issues<02:06:43.199> we<02:06:43.980> have 02:06:44.150 --> 02:06:44.160 align:start position:0% certainly have roadway issues we have 02:06:44.160 --> 02:06:47.720 align:start position:0% certainly have roadway issues we have sewage<02:06:44.580> issues<02:06:45.440> and<02:06:46.440> I<02:06:47.340> think<02:06:47.370> there<02:06:47.699> are 02:06:47.720 --> 02:06:47.730 align:start position:0% sewage issues and I think there are 02:06:47.730 --> 02:06:49.700 align:start position:0% sewage issues and I think there are reasonable<02:06:48.420> neighborhood<02:06:48.960> character<02:06:49.410> issues 02:06:49.700 --> 02:06:49.710 align:start position:0% reasonable neighborhood character issues 02:06:49.710 --> 02:06:53.450 align:start position:0% reasonable neighborhood character issues but<02:06:50.520> I<02:06:51.449> don't<02:06:52.380> pretend<02:06:52.739> to<02:06:52.860> know<02:06:53.010> what<02:06:53.040> those 02:06:53.450 --> 02:06:53.460 align:start position:0% but I don't pretend to know what those 02:06:53.460 --> 02:06:55.970 align:start position:0% but I don't pretend to know what those numbers<02:06:53.699> are<02:06:54.090> and<02:06:54.420> I<02:06:55.050> think<02:06:55.080> that<02:06:55.530> having<02:06:55.770> a 02:06:55.970 --> 02:06:55.980 align:start position:0% numbers are and I think that having a 02:06:55.980 --> 02:06:58.250 align:start position:0% numbers are and I think that having a framework<02:06:56.280> for<02:06:56.489> thinking<02:06:56.760> about<02:06:57.179> them<02:06:57.660> so 02:06:58.250 --> 02:06:58.260 align:start position:0% framework for thinking about them so 02:06:58.260 --> 02:07:00.410 align:start position:0% framework for thinking about them so that<02:06:58.500> we<02:06:58.650> can<02:06:58.860> adapt<02:06:59.250> is<02:06:59.489> the<02:06:59.670> most<02:06:59.880> important 02:07:00.410 --> 02:07:00.420 align:start position:0% that we can adapt is the most important 02:07:00.420 --> 02:07:02.419 align:start position:0% that we can adapt is the most important thing<02:07:00.600> once<02:07:01.170> we<02:07:01.350> have<02:07:01.530> that<02:07:01.560> then<02:07:02.070> we<02:07:02.100> can 02:07:02.419 --> 02:07:02.429 align:start position:0% thing once we have that then we can 02:07:02.429 --> 02:07:04.939 align:start position:0% thing once we have that then we can decide<02:07:02.760> you<02:07:03.660> know<02:07:03.719> I<02:07:03.960> guess<02:07:04.380> I<02:07:04.500> would<02:07:04.560> put<02:07:04.860> it 02:07:04.939 --> 02:07:04.949 align:start position:0% decide you know I guess I would put it 02:07:04.949 --> 02:07:06.979 align:start position:0% decide you know I guess I would put it this<02:07:05.100> way<02:07:05.370> I<02:07:05.610> would<02:07:06.030> hope<02:07:06.239> that<02:07:06.270> staff<02:07:06.719> could 02:07:06.979 --> 02:07:06.989 align:start position:0% this way I would hope that staff could 02:07:06.989 --> 02:07:10.790 align:start position:0% this way I would hope that staff could help<02:07:07.170> us<02:07:08.270> adopt<02:07:09.270> a<02:07:09.420> futurist<02:07:10.020> perspective 02:07:10.790 --> 02:07:10.800 align:start position:0% help us adopt a futurist perspective 02:07:10.800 --> 02:07:14.209 align:start position:0% help us adopt a futurist perspective about<02:07:11.750> how<02:07:12.750> many<02:07:12.989> short-term<02:07:13.350> rentals<02:07:13.800> there 02:07:14.209 --> 02:07:14.219 align:start position:0% about how many short-term rentals there 02:07:14.219 --> 02:07:17.930 align:start position:0% about how many short-term rentals there should<02:07:14.489> be<02:07:14.699> so<02:07:15.560> before<02:07:16.560> we<02:07:17.310> get<02:07:17.520> to<02:07:17.730> where 02:07:17.930 --> 02:07:17.940 align:start position:0% should be so before we get to where 02:07:17.940 --> 02:07:20.209 align:start position:0% should be so before we get to where we've<02:07:18.179> damaged<02:07:18.780> community<02:07:19.350> character<02:07:19.800> what 02:07:20.209 --> 02:07:20.219 align:start position:0% we've damaged community character what 02:07:20.219 --> 02:07:23.090 align:start position:0% we've damaged community character what are<02:07:20.340> the<02:07:20.460> signposts<02:07:21.390> that<02:07:21.600> tell<02:07:22.560> us<02:07:22.710> we're<02:07:22.920> on 02:07:23.090 --> 02:07:23.100 align:start position:0% are the signposts that tell us we're on 02:07:23.100 --> 02:07:25.850 align:start position:0% are the signposts that tell us we're on that<02:07:23.400> road<02:07:23.810> to<02:07:24.810> damaging<02:07:25.350> communicator 02:07:25.850 --> 02:07:25.860 align:start position:0% that road to damaging communicator 02:07:25.860 --> 02:07:28.040 align:start position:0% that road to damaging communicator that's<02:07:26.250> the<02:07:26.550> trigger<02:07:26.820> that<02:07:27.179> should<02:07:27.660> tell<02:07:27.870> me 02:07:28.040 --> 02:07:28.050 align:start position:0% that's the trigger that should tell me 02:07:28.050 --> 02:07:30.530 align:start position:0% that's the trigger that should tell me we<02:07:28.230> need<02:07:28.260> to<02:07:29.100> have<02:07:29.250> a<02:07:29.280> limit<02:07:29.670> but<02:07:30.090> I<02:07:30.150> don't<02:07:30.420> know 02:07:30.530 --> 02:07:30.540 align:start position:0% we need to have a limit but I don't know 02:07:30.540 --> 02:07:32.780 align:start position:0% we need to have a limit but I don't know what<02:07:30.750> that<02:07:30.929> is<02:07:30.960> that's<02:07:31.920> my<02:07:32.250> thinking<02:07:32.520> about 02:07:32.780 --> 02:07:32.790 align:start position:0% what that is that's my thinking about 02:07:32.790 --> 02:07:35.240 align:start position:0% what that is that's my thinking about this<02:07:33.060> at<02:07:33.270> the<02:07:33.360> moment<02:07:33.390> but<02:07:34.199> you<02:07:34.469> know<02:07:34.830> it's<02:07:35.070> as 02:07:35.240 --> 02:07:35.250 align:start position:0% this at the moment but you know it's as 02:07:35.250 --> 02:07:37.010 align:start position:0% this at the moment but you know it's as evolved<02:07:35.699> as<02:07:35.790> it<02:07:35.969> sounds<02:07:36.330> which<02:07:36.510> is<02:07:36.630> not<02:07:36.810> very 02:07:37.010 --> 02:07:37.020 align:start position:0% evolved as it sounds which is not very 02:07:37.020 --> 02:07:42.950 align:start position:0% evolved as it sounds which is not very far<02:07:37.250> Sarah<02:07:38.340> Oh<02:07:39.140> Steve<02:07:40.969> well<02:07:41.969> that's<02:07:42.360> it<02:07:42.600> it's 02:07:42.950 --> 02:07:42.960 align:start position:0% far Sarah Oh Steve well that's it it's 02:07:42.960 --> 02:07:44.870 align:start position:0% far Sarah Oh Steve well that's it it's all<02:07:43.110> interesting<02:07:43.500> I<02:07:43.860> had<02:07:44.610> the<02:07:44.760> impression 02:07:44.870 --> 02:07:44.880 align:start position:0% all interesting I had the impression 02:07:44.880 --> 02:07:47.240 align:start position:0% all interesting I had the impression that<02:07:45.300> staff<02:07:45.780> is<02:07:46.080> looking<02:07:46.440> to<02:07:46.590> the<02:07:46.620> Commission 02:07:47.240 --> 02:07:47.250 align:start position:0% that staff is looking to the Commission 02:07:47.250 --> 02:07:50.120 align:start position:0% that staff is looking to the Commission for<02:07:47.489> some<02:07:47.730> guidance<02:07:48.179> on<02:07:48.449> on<02:07:49.050> what<02:07:49.800> we<02:07:49.920> want 02:07:50.120 --> 02:07:50.130 align:start position:0% for some guidance on on what we want 02:07:50.130 --> 02:07:52.880 align:start position:0% for some guidance on on what we want those<02:07:50.310> things<02:07:50.580> to<02:07:50.820> do<02:07:50.969> so<02:07:51.360> so<02:07:52.050> maybe<02:07:52.500> we<02:07:52.710> both 02:07:52.880 --> 02:07:52.890 align:start position:0% those things to do so so maybe we both 02:07:52.890 --> 02:07:56.090 align:start position:0% those things to do so so maybe we both have<02:07:53.130> to<02:07:53.280> show<02:07:53.460> some<02:07:53.730> leadership<02:07:54.710> if<02:07:55.710> I<02:07:55.890> could 02:07:56.090 --> 02:07:56.100 align:start position:0% have to show some leadership if I could 02:07:56.100 --> 02:07:58.910 align:start position:0% have to show some leadership if I could ask<02:07:56.310> of<02:07:56.670> staff<02:07:57.140> the<02:07:58.140> question<02:07:58.530> about<02:07:58.710> the 02:07:58.910 --> 02:07:58.920 align:start position:0% ask of staff the question about the 02:07:58.920 --> 02:08:01.610 align:start position:0% ask of staff the question about the Coastal<02:07:59.340> Commission<02:07:59.670> limits<02:08:00.390> I<02:08:00.810> was<02:08:01.260> struck 02:08:01.610 --> 02:08:01.620 align:start position:0% Coastal Commission limits I was struck 02:08:01.620 --> 02:08:06.709 align:start position:0% Coastal Commission limits I was struck by<02:08:01.650> the<02:08:01.949> the<02:08:02.850> fact<02:08:03.540> that<02:08:04.940> there<02:08:05.940> are<02:08:06.090> it's<02:08:06.449> very 02:08:06.709 --> 02:08:06.719 align:start position:0% by the the fact that there are it's very 02:08:06.719 --> 02:08:08.810 align:start position:0% by the the fact that there are it's very common<02:08:07.290> it<02:08:07.410> seems<02:08:07.710> to<02:08:08.040> have 02:08:08.810 --> 02:08:08.820 align:start position:0% common it seems to have 02:08:08.820 --> 02:08:11.900 align:start position:0% common it seems to have caps<02:08:09.540> on<02:08:09.870> the<02:08:10.050> numbers<02:08:10.410> of<02:08:10.910> short-term 02:08:11.900 --> 02:08:11.910 align:start position:0% caps on the numbers of short-term 02:08:11.910 --> 02:08:16.310 align:start position:0% caps on the numbers of short-term rentals<02:08:12.500> per<02:08:13.500> permit<02:08:14.340> II<02:08:14.520> and<02:08:14.820> per<02:08:15.030> parcel<02:08:15.630> but 02:08:16.310 --> 02:08:16.320 align:start position:0% rentals per permit II and per parcel but 02:08:16.320 --> 02:08:19.100 align:start position:0% rentals per permit II and per parcel but very<02:08:16.650> rare<02:08:16.950> to<02:08:17.370> find<02:08:17.400> one<02:08:17.850> for<02:08:18.180> the<02:08:18.390> for<02:08:18.990> the 02:08:19.100 --> 02:08:19.110 align:start position:0% very rare to find one for the for the 02:08:19.110 --> 02:08:21.500 align:start position:0% very rare to find one for the for the city<02:08:19.350> in<02:08:19.560> general<02:08:19.590> I<02:08:20.100> think<02:08:20.130> I<02:08:20.370> found<02:08:20.640> Pismo 02:08:21.500 --> 02:08:21.510 align:start position:0% city in general I think I found Pismo 02:08:21.510 --> 02:08:23.840 align:start position:0% city in general I think I found Pismo Beach<02:08:21.540> and<02:08:22.080> one<02:08:22.200> other<02:08:22.410> thing<02:08:23.340> that<02:08:23.370> had<02:08:23.670> that 02:08:23.840 --> 02:08:23.850 align:start position:0% Beach and one other thing that had that 02:08:23.850 --> 02:08:26.630 align:start position:0% Beach and one other thing that had that to<02:08:24.000> it<02:08:24.660> is<02:08:25.380> it<02:08:25.590> appropriate<02:08:25.830> to<02:08:26.100> ask<02:08:26.310> you<02:08:26.460> folks 02:08:26.630 --> 02:08:26.640 align:start position:0% to it is it appropriate to ask you folks 02:08:26.640 --> 02:08:30.170 align:start position:0% to it is it appropriate to ask you folks what<02:08:26.910> your<02:08:27.090> perspective<02:08:27.450> is<02:08:27.870> on<02:08:27.900> that<02:08:28.970> if<02:08:29.970> you 02:08:30.170 --> 02:08:30.180 align:start position:0% what your perspective is on that if you 02:08:30.180 --> 02:08:34.780 align:start position:0% what your perspective is on that if you wonder<02:08:30.450> know<02:08:30.570> a<02:08:30.600> sure<02:08:30.960> is 02:08:34.780 --> 02:08:34.790 align:start position:0% 02:08:34.790 --> 02:08:38.290 align:start position:0% alright<02:08:35.790> through<02:08:36.030> the<02:08:36.210> chair<02:08:36.600> we<02:08:37.500> looked<02:08:37.830> at 02:08:38.290 --> 02:08:38.300 align:start position:0% alright through the chair we looked at 02:08:38.300 --> 02:08:40.490 align:start position:0% alright through the chair we looked at also<02:08:39.300> Pacific<02:08:39.960> Grove 02:08:40.490 --> 02:08:40.500 align:start position:0% also Pacific Grove 02:08:40.500 --> 02:08:43.340 align:start position:0% also Pacific Grove I<02:08:40.530> believe<02:08:41.270> tangled<02:08:42.270> with<02:08:42.510> trying<02:08:43.080> to<02:08:43.140> put<02:08:43.320> a 02:08:43.340 --> 02:08:43.350 align:start position:0% I believe tangled with trying to put a 02:08:43.350 --> 02:08:46.810 align:start position:0% I believe tangled with trying to put a cap<02:08:43.650> on<02:08:43.980> the<02:08:44.430> number<02:08:44.460> of<02:08:44.760> short-term<02:08:45.300> rentals 02:08:46.810 --> 02:08:46.820 align:start position:0% cap on the number of short-term rentals 02:08:46.820 --> 02:08:51.230 align:start position:0% cap on the number of short-term rentals it's<02:08:47.820> it's<02:08:48.630> a<02:08:48.780> hard<02:08:49.020> one<02:08:49.350> to<02:08:49.410> enforce<02:08:50.130> and<02:08:50.610> I 02:08:51.230 --> 02:08:51.240 align:start position:0% it's it's a hard one to enforce and I 02:08:51.240 --> 02:08:53.810 align:start position:0% it's it's a hard one to enforce and I like<02:08:51.480> the<02:08:51.950> question<02:08:52.950> about<02:08:53.220> what<02:08:53.580> would<02:08:53.760> be 02:08:53.810 --> 02:08:53.820 align:start position:0% like the question about what would be 02:08:53.820 --> 02:08:56.840 align:start position:0% like the question about what would be indicators<02:08:54.690> for<02:08:55.190> when<02:08:56.190> you<02:08:56.310> might<02:08:56.460> need<02:08:56.700> to 02:08:56.840 --> 02:08:56.850 align:start position:0% indicators for when you might need to 02:08:56.850 --> 02:09:00.200 align:start position:0% indicators for when you might need to consider<02:08:56.940> it<02:08:57.920> we<02:08:58.920> think<02:08:59.160> of<02:08:59.250> be<02:08:59.460> probably 02:09:00.200 --> 02:09:00.210 align:start position:0% consider it we think of be probably 02:09:00.210 --> 02:09:02.690 align:start position:0% consider it we think of be probably despite<02:09:01.170> looking<02:09:01.470> futuristically<02:09:02.310> and 02:09:02.690 --> 02:09:02.700 align:start position:0% despite looking futuristically and 02:09:02.700 --> 02:09:04.640 align:start position:0% despite looking futuristically and that's<02:09:03.330> what<02:09:03.600> we<02:09:03.780> are<02:09:03.810> trying<02:09:04.200> to<02:09:04.380> do<02:09:04.500> with 02:09:04.640 --> 02:09:04.650 align:start position:0% that's what we are trying to do with 02:09:04.650 --> 02:09:07.160 align:start position:0% that's what we are trying to do with some<02:09:04.860> of<02:09:04.950> this<02:09:05.070> I<02:09:05.480> don't<02:09:06.480> think<02:09:06.690> you<02:09:06.810> need<02:09:07.020> it 02:09:07.160 --> 02:09:07.170 align:start position:0% some of this I don't think you need it 02:09:07.170 --> 02:09:09.980 align:start position:0% some of this I don't think you need it especially<02:09:08.160> in<02:09:08.640> considering<02:09:09.150> the<02:09:09.510> community 02:09:09.980 --> 02:09:09.990 align:start position:0% especially in considering the community 02:09:09.990 --> 02:09:11.660 align:start position:0% especially in considering the community comment<02:09:10.440> that<02:09:10.590> we<02:09:10.710> heard<02:09:10.920> at<02:09:11.130> least<02:09:11.280> at<02:09:11.520> this 02:09:11.660 --> 02:09:11.670 align:start position:0% comment that we heard at least at this 02:09:11.670 --> 02:09:18.560 align:start position:0% comment that we heard at least at this time<02:09:12.740> but<02:09:13.740> the<02:09:13.920> empty<02:09:14.430> house<02:09:16.610> notion<02:09:17.610> the 02:09:18.560 --> 02:09:18.570 align:start position:0% time but the empty house notion the 02:09:18.570 --> 02:09:21.940 align:start position:0% time but the empty house notion the reality<02:09:19.080> of<02:09:19.110> that<02:09:19.470> it<02:09:20.340> is<02:09:20.730> something<02:09:21.420> that 02:09:21.940 --> 02:09:21.950 align:start position:0% reality of that it is something that 02:09:21.950 --> 02:09:25.100 align:start position:0% reality of that it is something that we've<02:09:22.950> heard<02:09:23.220> from<02:09:23.460> your<02:09:23.700> city<02:09:24.510> council<02:09:24.720> about 02:09:25.100 --> 02:09:25.110 align:start position:0% we've heard from your city council about 02:09:25.110 --> 02:09:27.950 align:start position:0% we've heard from your city council about as<02:09:25.290> well<02:09:25.530> I<02:09:26.030> don't<02:09:27.030> know<02:09:27.300> how<02:09:27.570> to<02:09:27.630> get<02:09:27.780> an 02:09:27.950 --> 02:09:27.960 align:start position:0% as well I don't know how to get an 02:09:27.960 --> 02:09:29.810 align:start position:0% as well I don't know how to get an inventory<02:09:28.380> of<02:09:28.800> that<02:09:29.010> but<02:09:29.220> I<02:09:29.250> think<02:09:29.370> it<02:09:29.640> has<02:09:29.790> a 02:09:29.810 --> 02:09:29.820 align:start position:0% inventory of that but I think it has a 02:09:29.820 --> 02:09:32.510 align:start position:0% inventory of that but I think it has a relationship<02:09:30.390> so<02:09:30.990> we<02:09:31.620> we<02:09:31.920> need<02:09:32.100> to<02:09:32.220> do<02:09:32.340> some 02:09:32.510 --> 02:09:32.520 align:start position:0% relationship so we we need to do some 02:09:32.520 --> 02:09:35.330 align:start position:0% relationship so we we need to do some more<02:09:32.610> thinking<02:09:32.970> on<02:09:33.270> that<02:09:33.780> your<02:09:34.770> council<02:09:35.190> has 02:09:35.330 --> 02:09:35.340 align:start position:0% more thinking on that your council has 02:09:35.340 --> 02:09:37.970 align:start position:0% more thinking on that your council has even<02:09:35.640> asked<02:09:36.030> us<02:09:36.120> to<02:09:36.260> think<02:09:37.260> about<02:09:37.470> empty<02:09:37.800> house 02:09:37.970 --> 02:09:37.980 align:start position:0% even asked us to think about empty house 02:09:37.980 --> 02:09:42.070 align:start position:0% even asked us to think about empty house taxes<02:09:38.670> and<02:09:39.000> Coover<02:09:39.870> BC<02:09:40.290> has<02:09:40.560> one<02:09:40.800> of<02:09:40.920> those 02:09:42.070 --> 02:09:42.080 align:start position:0% taxes and Coover BC has one of those 02:09:42.080 --> 02:09:44.810 align:start position:0% taxes and Coover BC has one of those we're<02:09:43.080> not<02:09:43.260> up<02:09:43.410> to<02:09:43.440> the<02:09:43.770> up<02:09:44.250> to<02:09:44.430> that<02:09:44.580> game 02:09:44.810 --> 02:09:44.820 align:start position:0% we're not up to the up to that game 02:09:44.820 --> 02:09:47.810 align:start position:0% we're not up to the up to that game right<02:09:45.090> now<02:09:45.120> but<02:09:45.690> we<02:09:46.440> know<02:09:46.590> that<02:09:46.620> you're<02:09:46.950> you're 02:09:47.810 --> 02:09:47.820 align:start position:0% right now but we know that you're you're 02:09:47.820 --> 02:09:50.030 align:start position:0% right now but we know that you're you're bringing<02:09:48.810> it<02:09:48.900> up<02:09:49.020> pretty<02:09:49.260> strongly<02:09:49.590> tonight 02:09:50.030 --> 02:09:50.040 align:start position:0% bringing it up pretty strongly tonight 02:09:50.040 --> 02:09:53.600 align:start position:0% bringing it up pretty strongly tonight so<02:09:50.400> we<02:09:50.700> appreciate<02:09:50.970> that<02:09:51.210> I<02:09:51.830> do<02:09:52.830> have<02:09:53.130> summary 02:09:53.600 --> 02:09:53.610 align:start position:0% so we appreciate that I do have summary 02:09:53.610 --> 02:09:58.190 align:start position:0% so we appreciate that I do have summary of<02:09:53.910> what<02:09:54.150> we<02:09:54.530> think<02:09:55.530> your<02:09:56.040> direction<02:09:57.200> mostly 02:09:58.190 --> 02:09:58.200 align:start position:0% of what we think your direction mostly 02:09:58.200 --> 02:10:01.460 align:start position:0% of what we think your direction mostly is<02:09:58.380> and<02:09:58.890> where<02:09:59.790> we're<02:09:59.970> not<02:10:00.150> quite<02:10:00.390> sure<02:10:00.470> when 02:10:01.460 --> 02:10:01.470 align:start position:0% is and where we're not quite sure when 02:10:01.470 --> 02:10:02.780 align:start position:0% is and where we're not quite sure when you're<02:10:01.620> done<02:10:01.800> though<02:10:02.010> we<02:10:02.250> don't<02:10:02.610> want<02:10:02.730> to 02:10:02.780 --> 02:10:02.790 align:start position:0% you're done though we don't want to 02:10:02.790 --> 02:10:05.570 align:start position:0% you're done though we don't want to interrupt<02:10:02.940> you<02:10:03.980> you<02:10:04.980> guys<02:10:05.130> want<02:10:05.370> to<02:10:05.430> hold 02:10:05.570 --> 02:10:05.580 align:start position:0% interrupt you you guys want to hold 02:10:05.580 --> 02:10:06.980 align:start position:0% interrupt you you guys want to hold forth<02:10:05.880> some<02:10:06.030> more<02:10:06.150> you<02:10:06.270> want<02:10:06.480> the<02:10:06.600> summary 02:10:06.980 --> 02:10:06.990 align:start position:0% forth some more you want the summary 02:10:06.990 --> 02:10:08.709 align:start position:0% forth some more you want the summary today 02:10:08.709 --> 02:10:08.719 align:start position:0% today 02:10:08.719 --> 02:10:15.680 align:start position:0% today what<02:10:09.719> do<02:10:09.809> you<02:10:09.869> got<02:10:11.360> okay<02:10:12.360> we've<02:10:12.809> got<02:10:13.079> uh<02:10:14.690> some 02:10:15.680 --> 02:10:15.690 align:start position:0% what do you got okay we've got uh some 02:10:15.690 --> 02:10:19.459 align:start position:0% what do you got okay we've got uh some clarity<02:10:16.260> on<02:10:16.290> zoning<02:10:17.099> districts<02:10:17.880> I<02:10:18.139> yes 02:10:19.459 --> 02:10:19.469 align:start position:0% clarity on zoning districts I yes 02:10:19.469 --> 02:10:21.950 align:start position:0% clarity on zoning districts I yes single-family<02:10:20.130> zones<02:10:20.960> appropriate 02:10:21.950 --> 02:10:21.960 align:start position:0% single-family zones appropriate 02:10:21.960 --> 02:10:24.020 align:start position:0% single-family zones appropriate absolutely<02:10:22.949> not<02:10:23.130> the<02:10:23.309> mobile<02:10:23.610> home<02:10:23.760> park 02:10:24.020 --> 02:10:24.030 align:start position:0% absolutely not the mobile home park 02:10:24.030 --> 02:10:25.819 align:start position:0% absolutely not the mobile home park zones<02:10:24.329> we<02:10:24.599> have<02:10:24.750> seen<02:10:24.989> bands<02:10:25.320> and<02:10:25.710> other 02:10:25.819 --> 02:10:25.829 align:start position:0% zones we have seen bands and other 02:10:25.829 --> 02:10:28.850 align:start position:0% zones we have seen bands and other cities<02:10:26.730> from<02:10:26.969> mobile<02:10:27.239> home<02:10:27.360> parks<02:10:27.750> zones<02:10:28.380> and 02:10:28.850 --> 02:10:28.860 align:start position:0% cities from mobile home parks zones and 02:10:28.860 --> 02:10:32.410 align:start position:0% cities from mobile home parks zones and unit<02:10:29.820> type<02:10:30.090> and<02:10:30.449> we<02:10:31.139> understand<02:10:31.619> why<02:10:31.829> and<02:10:32.070> we 02:10:32.410 --> 02:10:32.420 align:start position:0% unit type and we understand why and we 02:10:32.420 --> 02:10:34.850 align:start position:0% unit type and we understand why and we respect<02:10:33.420> your<02:10:33.659> direction<02:10:34.020> on<02:10:34.320> that<02:10:34.530> we<02:10:34.650> think 02:10:34.850 --> 02:10:34.860 align:start position:0% respect your direction on that we think 02:10:34.860 --> 02:10:38.629 align:start position:0% respect your direction on that we think it's<02:10:34.980> a<02:10:35.099> good<02:10:35.250> choice<02:10:37.639> multi-family 02:10:38.629 --> 02:10:38.639 align:start position:0% it's a good choice multi-family 02:10:38.639 --> 02:10:42.680 align:start position:0% it's a good choice multi-family residential<02:10:39.469> duplex<02:10:40.469> triplex<02:10:41.030> we<02:10:42.030> heard<02:10:42.329> I 02:10:42.680 --> 02:10:42.690 align:start position:0% residential duplex triplex we heard I 02:10:42.690 --> 02:10:45.379 align:start position:0% residential duplex triplex we heard I think<02:10:43.230> mostly<02:10:44.130> no<02:10:44.489> although<02:10:45.000> I'm<02:10:45.150> not<02:10:45.329> sure 02:10:45.379 --> 02:10:45.389 align:start position:0% think mostly no although I'm not sure 02:10:45.389 --> 02:10:50.260 align:start position:0% think mostly no although I'm not sure about<02:10:46.400> hosted<02:10:47.400> like<02:10:47.790> if<02:10:47.909> somebody<02:10:48.239> had<02:10:48.480> a<02:10:48.780> room 02:10:50.260 --> 02:10:50.270 align:start position:0% about hosted like if somebody had a room 02:10:50.270 --> 02:10:54.950 align:start position:0% about hosted like if somebody had a room there<02:10:51.270> so<02:10:52.199> think<02:10:52.650> about<02:10:52.800> that<02:10:53.190> that's<02:10:53.809> one<02:10:54.809> way 02:10:54.950 --> 02:10:54.960 align:start position:0% there so think about that that's one way 02:10:54.960 --> 02:10:59.379 align:start position:0% there so think about that that's one way to<02:10:55.020> help<02:10:55.320> people<02:10:55.790> afford<02:10:56.790> their<02:10:57.030> unit<02:10:57.389> and 02:10:59.379 --> 02:10:59.389 align:start position:0% to help people afford their unit and 02:10:59.389 --> 02:11:02.689 align:start position:0% to help people afford their unit and then<02:11:00.389> mixed-use<02:11:01.380> is<02:11:01.770> sort<02:11:02.369> of<02:11:02.460> interesting 02:11:02.689 --> 02:11:02.699 align:start position:0% then mixed-use is sort of interesting 02:11:02.699 --> 02:11:06.910 align:start position:0% then mixed-use is sort of interesting because<02:11:03.119> really<02:11:03.840> the<02:11:04.110> type<02:11:04.349> of<02:11:04.380> housing<02:11:05.219> units 02:11:06.910 --> 02:11:06.920 align:start position:0% because really the type of housing units 02:11:06.920 --> 02:11:10.129 align:start position:0% because really the type of housing units they<02:11:07.920> vary<02:11:08.280> a<02:11:08.579> lot<02:11:08.880> in<02:11:09.270> the<02:11:09.510> mixed<02:11:09.750> use<02:11:09.900> zones 02:11:10.129 --> 02:11:10.139 align:start position:0% they vary a lot in the mixed use zones 02:11:10.139 --> 02:11:11.750 align:start position:0% they vary a lot in the mixed use zones they<02:11:10.349> could<02:11:10.530> be<02:11:10.619> single-family<02:11:11.130> homes<02:11:11.489> they 02:11:11.750 --> 02:11:11.760 align:start position:0% they could be single-family homes they 02:11:11.760 --> 02:11:14.569 align:start position:0% they could be single-family homes they could<02:11:11.940> be<02:11:12.059> duplexes<02:11:12.659> triplexes<02:11:13.579> multifamily 02:11:14.569 --> 02:11:14.579 align:start position:0% could be duplexes triplexes multifamily 02:11:14.579 --> 02:11:19.729 align:start position:0% could be duplexes triplexes multifamily or<02:11:15.409> units<02:11:16.409> with<02:11:16.650> commercials<02:11:17.340> so<02:11:18.409> maybe<02:11:19.409> where 02:11:19.729 --> 02:11:19.739 align:start position:0% or units with commercials so maybe where 02:11:19.739 --> 02:11:21.530 align:start position:0% or units with commercials so maybe where you<02:11:19.949> should<02:11:20.280> think<02:11:20.550> less<02:11:20.849> about<02:11:20.880> the<02:11:21.329> zoning 02:11:21.530 --> 02:11:21.540 align:start position:0% you should think less about the zoning 02:11:21.540 --> 02:11:25.689 align:start position:0% you should think less about the zoning district<02:11:22.079> and<02:11:22.260> more<02:11:22.409> about<02:11:22.619> the<02:11:22.829> unit<02:11:23.219> type<02:11:23.809> is 02:11:25.689 --> 02:11:25.699 align:start position:0% district and more about the unit type is 02:11:25.699 --> 02:11:28.700 align:start position:0% district and more about the unit type is where<02:11:26.699> I<02:11:26.730> think<02:11:26.849> it's<02:11:27.780> a<02:11:27.929> little<02:11:28.050> bit<02:11:28.320> clearer 02:11:28.700 --> 02:11:28.710 align:start position:0% where I think it's a little bit clearer 02:11:28.710 --> 02:11:33.049 align:start position:0% where I think it's a little bit clearer so<02:11:29.070> then<02:11:29.219> we<02:11:29.340> go<02:11:29.489> to<02:11:29.520> the<02:11:29.699> next<02:11:29.880> page<02:11:30.239> and<02:11:32.059> that 02:11:33.049 --> 02:11:33.059 align:start position:0% so then we go to the next page and that 02:11:33.059 --> 02:11:35.870 align:start position:0% so then we go to the next page and that that<02:11:33.780> kind<02:11:34.050> of<02:11:34.139> shakes<02:11:34.380> out<02:11:34.710> depending<02:11:35.550> on<02:11:35.699> how 02:11:35.870 --> 02:11:35.880 align:start position:0% that kind of shakes out depending on how 02:11:35.880 --> 02:11:39.919 align:start position:0% that kind of shakes out depending on how you<02:11:35.940> feel<02:11:36.300> about<02:11:38.030> hosted<02:11:39.030> in<02:11:39.329> some<02:11:39.719> of<02:11:39.840> those 02:11:39.919 --> 02:11:39.929 align:start position:0% you feel about hosted in some of those 02:11:39.929 --> 02:11:46.609 align:start position:0% you feel about hosted in some of those multifamily<02:11:40.590> types<02:11:42.559> then<02:11:44.239> moving<02:11:45.239> on<02:11:45.570> to<02:11:46.230> page 02:11:46.609 --> 02:11:46.619 align:start position:0% multifamily types then moving on to page 02:11:46.619 --> 02:11:49.850 align:start position:0% multifamily types then moving on to page three<02:11:47.570> hosted<02:11:48.570> on<02:11:48.719> hosted<02:11:49.230> we<02:11:49.380> heard<02:11:49.650> very 02:11:49.850 --> 02:11:49.860 align:start position:0% three hosted on hosted we heard very 02:11:49.860 --> 02:11:53.169 align:start position:0% three hosted on hosted we heard very clearly<02:11:50.280> that<02:11:50.550> you<02:11:50.610> need<02:11:50.940> more<02:11:51.619> kind<02:11:52.619> of 02:11:53.169 --> 02:11:53.179 align:start position:0% clearly that you need more kind of 02:11:53.179 --> 02:11:56.560 align:start position:0% clearly that you need more kind of definition<02:11:54.179> of<02:11:54.420> what<02:11:55.320> these<02:11:55.500> two<02:11:55.800> things<02:11:56.099> are 02:11:56.560 --> 02:11:56.570 align:start position:0% definition of what these two things are 02:11:56.570 --> 02:12:03.290 align:start position:0% definition of what these two things are we<02:11:57.570> heard<02:11:57.809> broad<02:11:58.699> support<02:11:59.699> for<02:12:01.940> hosted<02:12:02.940> just 02:12:03.290 --> 02:12:03.300 align:start position:0% we heard broad support for hosted just 02:12:03.300 --> 02:12:05.359 align:start position:0% we heard broad support for hosted just kind<02:12:03.570> of<02:12:03.630> across<02:12:03.960> the<02:12:03.989> board<02:12:04.230> that's<02:12:04.800> that's 02:12:05.359 --> 02:12:05.369 align:start position:0% kind of across the board that's that's 02:12:05.369 --> 02:12:06.830 align:start position:0% kind of across the board that's that's working<02:12:05.880> well<02:12:06.090> for<02:12:06.420> lots<02:12:06.599> of<02:12:06.780> different 02:12:06.830 --> 02:12:06.840 align:start position:0% working well for lots of different 02:12:06.840 --> 02:12:11.209 align:start position:0% working well for lots of different reasons<02:12:07.199> and<02:12:09.380> that's<02:12:10.380> that's<02:12:10.829> great 02:12:11.209 --> 02:12:11.219 align:start position:0% reasons and that's that's great 02:12:11.219 --> 02:12:14.510 align:start position:0% reasons and that's that's great with<02:12:11.659> unholstered<02:12:13.099> what<02:12:14.099> we<02:12:14.250> heard<02:12:14.460> from 02:12:14.510 --> 02:12:14.520 align:start position:0% with unholstered what we heard from 02:12:14.520 --> 02:12:16.990 align:start position:0% with unholstered what we heard from community<02:12:15.480> comment<02:12:15.929> tonight 02:12:16.990 --> 02:12:17.000 align:start position:0% community comment tonight 02:12:17.000 --> 02:12:18.610 align:start position:0% community comment tonight I<02:12:17.030> think<02:12:17.570> it's<02:12:17.720> really<02:12:17.930> important<02:12:18.380> and<02:12:18.530> we 02:12:18.610 --> 02:12:18.620 align:start position:0% I think it's really important and we 02:12:18.620 --> 02:12:20.470 align:start position:0% I think it's really important and we would<02:12:19.100> like<02:12:19.280> to<02:12:19.430> do<02:12:19.550> some<02:12:19.760> more<02:12:19.910> research<02:12:20.090> and 02:12:20.470 --> 02:12:20.480 align:start position:0% would like to do some more research and 02:12:20.480 --> 02:12:22.360 align:start position:0% would like to do some more research and I<02:12:20.600> think<02:12:20.630> it<02:12:20.900> goes<02:12:21.080> along<02:12:21.260> the<02:12:21.530> lines<02:12:21.560> of<02:12:21.980> what 02:12:22.360 --> 02:12:22.370 align:start position:0% I think it goes along the lines of what 02:12:22.370 --> 02:12:24.880 align:start position:0% I think it goes along the lines of what some<02:12:22.970> of<02:12:23.000> the<02:12:23.150> commissioners<02:12:23.890> discussion 02:12:24.880 --> 02:12:24.890 align:start position:0% some of the commissioners discussion 02:12:24.890 --> 02:12:28.990 align:start position:0% some of the commissioners discussion about<02:12:25.100> flexibility<02:12:26.290> if<02:12:27.400> primary<02:12:28.400> residence 02:12:28.990 --> 02:12:29.000 align:start position:0% about flexibility if primary residence 02:12:29.000 --> 02:12:33.370 align:start position:0% about flexibility if primary residence is<02:12:29.450> a<02:12:30.320> requirement<02:12:30.920> that<02:12:31.550> can<02:12:32.540> be<02:12:32.660> incredibly 02:12:33.370 --> 02:12:33.380 align:start position:0% is a requirement that can be incredibly 02:12:33.380 --> 02:12:35.290 align:start position:0% is a requirement that can be incredibly helpful<02:12:33.500> for<02:12:34.100> that<02:12:34.160> flexibility<02:12:35.090> that<02:12:35.240> you 02:12:35.290 --> 02:12:35.300 align:start position:0% helpful for that flexibility that you 02:12:35.300 --> 02:12:37.810 align:start position:0% helpful for that flexibility that you were<02:12:35.480> talking<02:12:35.900> about<02:12:35.960> where<02:12:36.700> somebody's<02:12:37.700> on 02:12:37.810 --> 02:12:37.820 align:start position:0% were talking about where somebody's on 02:12:37.820 --> 02:12:41.640 align:start position:0% were talking about where somebody's on call<02:12:38.090> right<02:12:38.600> around<02:12:38.750> the<02:12:38.900> corner<02:12:39.700> this<02:12:40.700> is 02:12:41.640 --> 02:12:41.650 align:start position:0% call right around the corner this is 02:12:41.650 --> 02:12:43.360 align:start position:0% call right around the corner this is where<02:12:42.650> they<02:12:42.800> live 02:12:43.360 --> 02:12:43.370 align:start position:0% where they live 02:12:43.370 --> 02:12:45.970 align:start position:0% where they live for<02:12:43.730> the<02:12:43.820> most<02:12:43.970> part<02:12:44.120> and<02:12:44.600> maybe<02:12:45.380> they<02:12:45.590> travel 02:12:45.970 --> 02:12:45.980 align:start position:0% for the most part and maybe they travel 02:12:45.980 --> 02:12:48.610 align:start position:0% for the most part and maybe they travel a<02:12:46.100> lot<02:12:46.280> and<02:12:46.550> they<02:12:47.480> want<02:12:47.720> some<02:12:47.900> flexibility<02:12:48.590> to 02:12:48.610 --> 02:12:48.620 align:start position:0% a lot and they want some flexibility to 02:12:48.620 --> 02:12:50.590 align:start position:0% a lot and they want some flexibility to be<02:12:48.980> able<02:12:49.190> to<02:12:49.280> have<02:12:49.460> a<02:12:49.490> none<02:12:49.760> hosted<02:12:50.240> rental 02:12:50.590 --> 02:12:50.600 align:start position:0% be able to have a none hosted rental 02:12:50.600 --> 02:12:52.210 align:start position:0% be able to have a none hosted rental when<02:12:50.780> they're<02:12:50.930> when<02:12:51.500> they're<02:12:51.530> traveling<02:12:51.860> and 02:12:52.210 --> 02:12:52.220 align:start position:0% when they're when they're traveling and 02:12:52.220 --> 02:12:53.980 align:start position:0% when they're when they're traveling and by<02:12:52.310> the<02:12:52.370> way<02:12:52.520> I'm<02:12:52.670> sorry<02:12:53.240> that<02:12:53.390> the<02:12:53.510> woman<02:12:53.810> has 02:12:53.980 --> 02:12:53.990 align:start position:0% by the way I'm sorry that the woman has 02:12:53.990 --> 02:12:58.000 align:start position:0% by the way I'm sorry that the woman has left<02:12:54.290> but<02:12:54.620> that<02:12:55.490> survey<02:12:55.970> question<02:12:56.630> about<02:12:57.200> I 02:12:58.000 --> 02:12:58.010 align:start position:0% left but that survey question about I 02:12:58.010 --> 02:13:00.940 align:start position:0% left but that survey question about I just<02:12:58.880> want<02:12:59.600> to<02:12:59.780> be<02:12:59.840> clear<02:13:00.110> about<02:13:00.140> why<02:13:00.440> we<02:13:00.590> why 02:13:00.940 --> 02:13:00.950 align:start position:0% just want to be clear about why we why 02:13:00.950 --> 02:13:03.910 align:start position:0% just want to be clear about why we why we<02:13:01.160> put<02:13:01.400> that<02:13:01.430> in<02:13:01.730> there<02:13:01.880> we<02:13:02.750> knew<02:13:03.110> going<02:13:03.470> into 02:13:03.910 --> 02:13:03.920 align:start position:0% we put that in there we knew going into 02:13:03.920 --> 02:13:06.490 align:start position:0% we put that in there we knew going into this<02:13:04.280> that<02:13:04.340> there<02:13:05.000> were<02:13:05.270> people<02:13:05.570> who<02:13:05.780> are<02:13:05.990> very 02:13:06.490 --> 02:13:06.500 align:start position:0% this that there were people who are very 02:13:06.500 --> 02:13:08.530 align:start position:0% this that there were people who are very very<02:13:06.800> concerned<02:13:07.040> about<02:13:07.540> unholstered 02:13:08.530 --> 02:13:08.540 align:start position:0% very concerned about unholstered 02:13:08.540 --> 02:13:10.480 align:start position:0% very concerned about unholstered short-term<02:13:09.020> rentals<02:13:09.440> and<02:13:09.620> in<02:13:09.740> fact<02:13:09.950> about<02:13:10.220> all 02:13:10.480 --> 02:13:10.490 align:start position:0% short-term rentals and in fact about all 02:13:10.490 --> 02:13:14.170 align:start position:0% short-term rentals and in fact about all of<02:13:10.820> them<02:13:11.150> and<02:13:11.680> so<02:13:12.680> we<02:13:12.950> added<02:13:13.160> that<02:13:13.490> question 02:13:14.170 --> 02:13:14.180 align:start position:0% of them and so we added that question 02:13:14.180 --> 02:13:16.570 align:start position:0% of them and so we added that question after<02:13:14.540> the<02:13:14.990> if<02:13:15.410> you<02:13:15.680> if<02:13:15.980> you<02:13:16.250> don't<02:13:16.370> like 02:13:16.570 --> 02:13:16.580 align:start position:0% after the if you if you don't like 02:13:16.580 --> 02:13:21.100 align:start position:0% after the if you if you don't like unholstered<02:13:18.310> how<02:13:19.310> do<02:13:19.370> you<02:13:19.550> feel<02:13:19.880> about<02:13:20.030> if<02:13:20.870> you 02:13:21.100 --> 02:13:21.110 align:start position:0% unholstered how do you feel about if you 02:13:21.110 --> 02:13:25.120 align:start position:0% unholstered how do you feel about if you go<02:13:21.230> on<02:13:21.380> vacation<02:13:22.040> and<02:13:23.020> happen<02:13:24.020> to<02:13:24.260> have 02:13:25.120 --> 02:13:25.130 align:start position:0% go on vacation and happen to have 02:13:25.130 --> 02:13:26.590 align:start position:0% go on vacation and happen to have somebody<02:13:25.550> stay<02:13:25.820> in<02:13:25.910> your<02:13:26.030> house<02:13:26.180> and<02:13:26.480> it 02:13:26.590 --> 02:13:26.600 align:start position:0% somebody stay in your house and it 02:13:26.600 --> 02:13:28.060 align:start position:0% somebody stay in your house and it happened<02:13:26.900> to<02:13:26.960> be<02:13:27.020> through<02:13:27.590> a<02:13:27.650> short-term 02:13:28.060 --> 02:13:28.070 align:start position:0% happened to be through a short-term 02:13:28.070 --> 02:13:31.390 align:start position:0% happened to be through a short-term rental<02:13:28.660> approach<02:13:29.860> well<02:13:30.860> then<02:13:31.010> people<02:13:31.160> were 02:13:31.390 --> 02:13:31.400 align:start position:0% rental approach well then people were 02:13:31.400 --> 02:13:32.830 align:start position:0% rental approach well then people were more<02:13:31.580> comfortable<02:13:31.820> with<02:13:32.180> that<02:13:32.330> we<02:13:32.510> were<02:13:32.630> just 02:13:32.830 --> 02:13:32.840 align:start position:0% more comfortable with that we were just 02:13:32.840 --> 02:13:34.450 align:start position:0% more comfortable with that we were just trying<02:13:33.020> to<02:13:33.050> help<02:13:33.170> people<02:13:33.500> visualize<02:13:33.680> it<02:13:34.220> and 02:13:34.450 --> 02:13:34.460 align:start position:0% trying to help people visualize it and 02:13:34.460 --> 02:13:37.300 align:start position:0% trying to help people visualize it and so<02:13:35.300> it<02:13:35.480> wasn't<02:13:35.690> a<02:13:35.960> trick<02:13:36.290> question<02:13:36.470> it<02:13:37.070> was 02:13:37.300 --> 02:13:37.310 align:start position:0% so it wasn't a trick question it was 02:13:37.310 --> 02:13:40.630 align:start position:0% so it wasn't a trick question it was very<02:13:38.470> we<02:13:39.470> thought<02:13:39.650> it<02:13:39.740> was<02:13:39.830> transparent<02:13:40.490> I'm 02:13:40.630 --> 02:13:40.640 align:start position:0% very we thought it was transparent I'm 02:13:40.640 --> 02:13:43.480 align:start position:0% very we thought it was transparent I'm sorry<02:13:40.910> if<02:13:41.060> it<02:13:41.210> didn't<02:13:41.750> feel<02:13:41.840> okay<02:13:42.230> to<02:13:42.310> -<02:13:43.310> that 02:13:43.480 --> 02:13:43.490 align:start position:0% sorry if it didn't feel okay to - that 02:13:43.490 --> 02:13:45.130 align:start position:0% sorry if it didn't feel okay to - that person<02:13:43.820> will<02:13:44.180> turn<02:13:44.360> we'll<02:13:44.510> try<02:13:44.720> to<02:13:44.780> find<02:13:45.050> her 02:13:45.130 --> 02:13:45.140 align:start position:0% person will turn we'll try to find her 02:13:45.140 --> 02:13:48.040 align:start position:0% person will turn we'll try to find her and<02:13:45.320> talk<02:13:45.470> to<02:13:45.590> her<02:13:45.650> about<02:13:45.740> it<02:13:45.890> but<02:13:46.240> and<02:13:47.240> the 02:13:48.040 --> 02:13:48.050 align:start position:0% and talk to her about it but and the 02:13:48.050 --> 02:13:50.740 align:start position:0% and talk to her about it but and the response<02:13:48.500> it<02:13:48.770> people<02:13:49.220> responded<02:13:49.790> to<02:13:49.820> it<02:13:50.120> they 02:13:50.740 --> 02:13:50.750 align:start position:0% response it people responded to it they 02:13:50.750 --> 02:13:52.780 align:start position:0% response it people responded to it they were<02:13:50.810> more<02:13:51.170> comfortable<02:13:51.350> with<02:13:51.890> that<02:13:52.040> idea<02:13:52.400> so 02:13:52.780 --> 02:13:52.790 align:start position:0% were more comfortable with that idea so 02:13:52.790 --> 02:13:55.390 align:start position:0% were more comfortable with that idea so we<02:13:53.330> just<02:13:53.570> thought<02:13:54.260> it<02:13:54.440> brought<02:13:54.800> some<02:13:55.040> nuance 02:13:55.390 --> 02:13:55.400 align:start position:0% we just thought it brought some nuance 02:13:55.400 --> 02:13:57.280 align:start position:0% we just thought it brought some nuance out<02:13:55.670> and<02:13:55.820> we<02:13:55.910> hope<02:13:56.360> that<02:13:56.600> was<02:13:56.750> helpful 02:13:57.280 --> 02:13:57.290 align:start position:0% out and we hope that was helpful 02:13:57.290 --> 02:14:02.860 align:start position:0% out and we hope that was helpful anyway<02:13:57.920> that<02:13:58.100> relates<02:13:58.490> to<02:14:01.420> primary<02:14:02.420> residence 02:14:02.860 --> 02:14:02.870 align:start position:0% anyway that relates to primary residence 02:14:02.870 --> 02:14:06.520 align:start position:0% anyway that relates to primary residence again<02:14:03.230> and<02:14:03.560> whether<02:14:03.770> or<02:14:03.980> not<02:14:04.100> we<02:14:04.460> would<02:14:05.350> we<02:14:06.350> did 02:14:06.520 --> 02:14:06.530 align:start position:0% again and whether or not we would we did 02:14:06.530 --> 02:14:08.530 align:start position:0% again and whether or not we would we did we<02:14:06.710> did<02:14:06.860> not<02:14:06.950> hear<02:14:07.220> clear<02:14:07.580> definition<02:14:08.330> our 02:14:08.530 --> 02:14:08.540 align:start position:0% we did not hear clear definition our 02:14:08.540 --> 02:14:11.620 align:start position:0% we did not hear clear definition our direction<02:14:09.080> about<02:14:10.090> limiting<02:14:11.090> numbers<02:14:11.450> of 02:14:11.620 --> 02:14:11.630 align:start position:0% direction about limiting numbers of 02:14:11.630 --> 02:14:16.950 align:start position:0% direction about limiting numbers of nights<02:14:11.900> we<02:14:12.680> agree<02:14:13.070> it<02:14:13.340> is<02:14:13.370> hard<02:14:13.760> to<02:14:13.940> enforce<02:14:15.910> if 02:14:16.950 --> 02:14:16.960 align:start position:0% nights we agree it is hard to enforce if 02:14:16.960 --> 02:14:20.860 align:start position:0% nights we agree it is hard to enforce if we<02:14:17.980> didn't<02:14:18.980> have<02:14:19.190> primary<02:14:19.820> residency<02:14:20.630> though 02:14:20.860 --> 02:14:20.870 align:start position:0% we didn't have primary residency though 02:14:20.870 --> 02:14:24.190 align:start position:0% we didn't have primary residency though we<02:14:21.440> probably<02:14:22.130> would<02:14:22.700> want<02:14:23.630> you<02:14:23.840> to<02:14:23.960> think 02:14:24.190 --> 02:14:24.200 align:start position:0% we probably would want you to think 02:14:24.200 --> 02:14:26.620 align:start position:0% we probably would want you to think about<02:14:24.500> a<02:14:24.740> number<02:14:25.250> of<02:14:25.370> night<02:14:25.580> limitation<02:14:26.330> on 02:14:26.620 --> 02:14:26.630 align:start position:0% about a number of night limitation on 02:14:26.630 --> 02:14:28.130 align:start position:0% about a number of night limitation on because<02:14:27.500> a 02:14:28.130 --> 02:14:28.140 align:start position:0% because a 02:14:28.140 --> 02:14:29.600 align:start position:0% because a that<02:14:28.230> point<02:14:28.560> you're<02:14:28.740> you<02:14:29.040> really<02:14:29.070> don't<02:14:29.460> have 02:14:29.600 --> 02:14:29.610 align:start position:0% that point you're you really don't have 02:14:29.610 --> 02:14:39.650 align:start position:0% that point you're you really don't have a<02:14:29.640> house<02:14:31.190> okay 02:14:39.650 --> 02:14:39.660 align:start position:0% 02:14:39.660 --> 02:14:41.960 align:start position:0% am<02:14:40.050> I<02:14:40.170> getting<02:14:40.230> it<02:14:40.560> they're<02:14:41.310> gonna<02:14:41.430> tell<02:14:41.730> me<02:14:41.880> if 02:14:41.960 --> 02:14:41.970 align:start position:0% am I getting it they're gonna tell me if 02:14:41.970 --> 02:14:45.650 align:start position:0% am I getting it they're gonna tell me if I'm<02:14:42.090> wrong<02:14:42.270> okay<02:14:42.810> at<02:14:43.560> page<02:14:44.030> five 02:14:45.650 --> 02:14:45.660 align:start position:0% I'm wrong okay at page five 02:14:45.660 --> 02:14:49.070 align:start position:0% I'm wrong okay at page five so<02:14:46.230> this<02:14:46.440> is<02:14:46.590> five<02:14:47.040> and<02:14:47.280> six<02:14:47.670> these<02:14:48.480> lists 02:14:49.070 --> 02:14:49.080 align:start position:0% so this is five and six these lists 02:14:49.080 --> 02:14:51.830 align:start position:0% so this is five and six these lists remind<02:14:49.620> me<02:14:49.830> of<02:14:49.860> how<02:14:50.400> your<02:14:51.090> zoning<02:14:51.510> code 02:14:51.830 --> 02:14:51.840 align:start position:0% remind me of how your zoning code 02:14:51.840 --> 02:14:55.130 align:start position:0% remind me of how your zoning code already<02:14:52.050> works<02:14:52.500> for<02:14:53.000> home<02:14:54.000> occupations<02:14:54.840> in 02:14:55.130 --> 02:14:55.140 align:start position:0% already works for home occupations in 02:14:55.140 --> 02:14:58.220 align:start position:0% already works for home occupations in the<02:14:55.220> single-family<02:14:56.220> residential<02:14:57.230> zoning 02:14:58.220 --> 02:14:58.230 align:start position:0% the single-family residential zoning 02:14:58.230 --> 02:15:02.570 align:start position:0% the single-family residential zoning district<02:14:59.330> what<02:15:00.650> what<02:15:01.650> we<02:15:01.800> were<02:15:01.980> hearing<02:15:02.280> and 02:15:02.570 --> 02:15:02.580 align:start position:0% district what what we were hearing and 02:15:02.580 --> 02:15:05.780 align:start position:0% district what what we were hearing and we<02:15:02.700> are<02:15:03.210> not<02:15:03.360> trying<02:15:03.630> to<02:15:03.780> make<02:15:03.960> a<02:15:04.440> whole<02:15:05.430> big 02:15:05.780 --> 02:15:05.790 align:start position:0% we are not trying to make a whole big 02:15:05.790 --> 02:15:09.170 align:start position:0% we are not trying to make a whole big hard-code<02:15:06.480> and<02:15:07.020> it<02:15:07.920> sounds<02:15:08.220> like<02:15:08.280> we<02:15:08.460> we<02:15:08.970> could 02:15:09.170 --> 02:15:09.180 align:start position:0% hard-code and it sounds like we we could 02:15:09.180 --> 02:15:12.770 align:start position:0% hard-code and it sounds like we we could have<02:15:09.360> a<02:15:09.390> light<02:15:09.630> hand<02:15:09.960> with<02:15:10.830> this<02:15:11.100> and<02:15:11.780> looking 02:15:12.770 --> 02:15:12.780 align:start position:0% have a light hand with this and looking 02:15:12.780 --> 02:15:16.100 align:start position:0% have a light hand with this and looking at<02:15:12.900> how<02:15:13.080> home<02:15:13.740> occupations<02:15:14.520> are<02:15:15.110> codified 02:15:16.100 --> 02:15:16.110 align:start position:0% at how home occupations are codified 02:15:16.110 --> 02:15:18.440 align:start position:0% at how home occupations are codified here<02:15:16.470> is<02:15:16.650> very<02:15:16.980> simple<02:15:17.490> and<02:15:17.730> how<02:15:18.180> they<02:15:18.330> are 02:15:18.440 --> 02:15:18.450 align:start position:0% here is very simple and how they are 02:15:18.450 --> 02:15:20.900 align:start position:0% here is very simple and how they are processed<02:15:19.170> at<02:15:19.410> City<02:15:19.710> Hall<02:15:20.010> is<02:15:20.340> also<02:15:20.670> very 02:15:20.900 --> 02:15:20.910 align:start position:0% processed at City Hall is also very 02:15:20.910 --> 02:15:23.390 align:start position:0% processed at City Hall is also very simple<02:15:21.270> through<02:15:21.690> a<02:15:21.950> business<02:15:22.950> license 02:15:23.390 --> 02:15:23.400 align:start position:0% simple through a business license 02:15:23.400 --> 02:15:25.040 align:start position:0% simple through a business license process<02:15:23.640> and<02:15:24.060> of<02:15:24.150> course<02:15:24.360> this<02:15:24.480> also<02:15:24.720> would 02:15:25.040 --> 02:15:25.050 align:start position:0% process and of course this also would 02:15:25.050 --> 02:15:29.180 align:start position:0% process and of course this also would require<02:15:25.500> the<02:15:26.340> the<02:15:26.880> t<02:15:27.090> OT<02:15:27.470> site<02:15:28.470> of<02:15:28.650> that<02:15:28.800> but 02:15:29.180 --> 02:15:29.190 align:start position:0% require the the t OT site of that but 02:15:29.190 --> 02:15:34.130 align:start position:0% require the the t OT site of that but there's<02:15:30.030> there's<02:15:30.510> ways<02:15:30.720> to<02:15:32.270> have<02:15:33.270> these<02:15:33.690> kinds 02:15:34.130 --> 02:15:34.140 align:start position:0% there's there's ways to have these kinds 02:15:34.140 --> 02:15:36.890 align:start position:0% there's there's ways to have these kinds of<02:15:34.200> performance<02:15:34.770> standards<02:15:35.250> be<02:15:35.550> put<02:15:36.480> into<02:15:36.630> the 02:15:36.890 --> 02:15:36.900 align:start position:0% of performance standards be put into the 02:15:36.900 --> 02:15:38.960 align:start position:0% of performance standards be put into the code<02:15:37.110> in<02:15:37.380> a<02:15:37.500> in<02:15:37.860> a<02:15:37.950> pretty<02:15:38.190> simple<02:15:38.550> way<02:15:38.730> that's 02:15:38.960 --> 02:15:38.970 align:start position:0% code in a in a pretty simple way that's 02:15:38.970 --> 02:15:40.580 align:start position:0% code in a in a pretty simple way that's that's<02:15:39.390> part<02:15:39.690> of<02:15:39.750> the<02:15:39.870> checklist<02:15:40.380> for 02:15:40.580 --> 02:15:40.590 align:start position:0% that's part of the checklist for 02:15:40.590 --> 02:15:44.480 align:start position:0% that's part of the checklist for forgetting<02:15:41.400> your<02:15:41.700> business<02:15:42.120> proved<02:15:42.600> so<02:15:43.140> I<02:15:43.490> I 02:15:44.480 --> 02:15:44.490 align:start position:0% forgetting your business proved so I I 02:15:44.490 --> 02:15:46.940 align:start position:0% forgetting your business proved so I I think<02:15:44.610> we're<02:15:45.090> kind<02:15:45.990> of<02:15:46.050> seeing<02:15:46.320> clear<02:15:46.770> to 02:15:46.940 --> 02:15:46.950 align:start position:0% think we're kind of seeing clear to 02:15:46.950 --> 02:15:49.810 align:start position:0% think we're kind of seeing clear to something<02:15:47.460> that<02:15:47.490> it<02:15:48.270> does<02:15:48.870> not<02:15:49.050> need<02:15:49.320> to<02:15:49.380> be 02:15:49.810 --> 02:15:49.820 align:start position:0% something that it does not need to be 02:15:49.820 --> 02:15:52.610 align:start position:0% something that it does not need to be too<02:15:50.820> complex<02:15:51.300> and<02:15:51.690> then<02:15:51.900> spending<02:15:52.350> a<02:15:52.440> lot<02:15:52.590> of 02:15:52.610 --> 02:15:52.620 align:start position:0% too complex and then spending a lot of 02:15:52.620 --> 02:15:54.770 align:start position:0% too complex and then spending a lot of time<02:15:52.740> trying<02:15:53.220> to<02:15:53.340> code<02:15:53.550> for<02:15:53.850> a<02:15:53.880> few<02:15:54.120> bad<02:15:54.300> actors 02:15:54.770 --> 02:15:54.780 align:start position:0% time trying to code for a few bad actors 02:15:54.780 --> 02:15:59.660 align:start position:0% time trying to code for a few bad actors it<02:15:55.260> would<02:15:55.710> be<02:15:55.890> a<02:15:56.180> good<02:15:57.180> way<02:15:57.450> though<02:15:57.750> to<02:15:58.130> have<02:15:59.130> on 02:15:59.660 --> 02:15:59.670 align:start position:0% it would be a good way though to have on 02:15:59.670 --> 02:16:03.440 align:start position:0% it would be a good way though to have on the<02:16:00.300> record<02:16:00.770> all<02:16:01.770> of<02:16:02.010> those<02:16:02.390> kinds<02:16:03.390> of 02:16:03.440 --> 02:16:03.450 align:start position:0% the record all of those kinds of 02:16:03.450 --> 02:16:05.690 align:start position:0% the record all of those kinds of nuisance<02:16:03.930> issues<02:16:04.380> that<02:16:04.710> the<02:16:04.890> city's<02:16:05.220> code<02:16:05.490> may 02:16:05.690 --> 02:16:05.700 align:start position:0% nuisance issues that the city's code may 02:16:05.700 --> 02:16:07.640 align:start position:0% nuisance issues that the city's code may already<02:16:05.850> address<02:16:06.600> in<02:16:06.780> different<02:16:07.080> directions 02:16:07.640 --> 02:16:07.650 align:start position:0% already address in different directions 02:16:07.650 --> 02:16:10.850 align:start position:0% already address in different directions but<02:16:07.860> really<02:16:08.370> have<02:16:08.610> it<02:16:08.870> compiled<02:16:09.870> specifically 02:16:10.850 --> 02:16:10.860 align:start position:0% but really have it compiled specifically 02:16:10.860 --> 02:16:14.330 align:start position:0% but really have it compiled specifically to<02:16:11.070> this<02:16:11.250> use<02:16:11.610> and<02:16:12.320> could<02:16:13.320> include<02:16:13.500> the<02:16:14.130> good 02:16:14.330 --> 02:16:14.340 align:start position:0% to this use and could include the good 02:16:14.340 --> 02:16:16.310 align:start position:0% to this use and could include the good neighbor<02:16:14.550> policy<02:16:15.140> neighborhood<02:16:16.140> note 02:16:16.310 --> 02:16:16.320 align:start position:0% neighbor policy neighborhood note 02:16:16.320 --> 02:16:18.200 align:start position:0% neighbor policy neighborhood note neighbor<02:16:16.680> notification<02:16:17.430> we<02:16:17.520> think<02:16:17.700> is<02:16:17.790> really 02:16:18.200 --> 02:16:18.210 align:start position:0% neighbor notification we think is really 02:16:18.210 --> 02:16:20.630 align:start position:0% neighbor notification we think is really important<02:16:18.780> and<02:16:19.050> having<02:16:19.620> a<02:16:19.800> point<02:16:20.040> of<02:16:20.130> contact 02:16:20.630 --> 02:16:20.640 align:start position:0% important and having a point of contact 02:16:20.640 --> 02:16:23.600 align:start position:0% important and having a point of contact in<02:16:20.850> those<02:16:21.000> kinds<02:16:21.360> of<02:16:21.420> things<02:16:21.660> so<02:16:22.340> that's<02:16:23.340> where 02:16:23.600 --> 02:16:23.610 align:start position:0% in those kinds of things so that's where 02:16:23.610 --> 02:16:25.910 align:start position:0% in those kinds of things so that's where insurance<02:16:23.730> comes<02:16:24.420> in<02:16:24.750> that's<02:16:25.530> where 02:16:25.910 --> 02:16:25.920 align:start position:0% insurance comes in that's where 02:16:25.920 --> 02:16:30.860 align:start position:0% insurance comes in that's where occupancy<02:16:26.700> limit<02:16:27.300> of<02:16:28.760> people<02:16:29.760> per<02:16:30.030> per<02:16:30.630> room 02:16:30.860 --> 02:16:30.870 align:start position:0% occupancy limit of people per per room 02:16:30.870 --> 02:16:33.770 align:start position:0% occupancy limit of people per per room not<02:16:31.440> numbers<02:16:32.219> of<02:16:32.429> short-term<02:16:33.330> rentals<02:16:33.660> but 02:16:33.770 --> 02:16:33.780 align:start position:0% not numbers of short-term rentals but 02:16:33.780 --> 02:16:38.360 align:start position:0% not numbers of short-term rentals but people<02:16:34.139> per<02:16:34.650> room<02:16:35.060> so<02:16:36.060> these<02:16:36.210> things<02:16:36.740> seem<02:16:37.740> to 02:16:38.360 --> 02:16:38.370 align:start position:0% people per room so these things seem to 02:16:38.370 --> 02:16:40.790 align:start position:0% people per room so these things seem to me<02:16:38.969> for<02:16:39.240> any<02:16:39.389> of<02:16:39.570> the<02:16:39.690> speakers<02:16:40.139> things<02:16:40.590> that 02:16:40.790 --> 02:16:40.800 align:start position:0% me for any of the speakers things that 02:16:40.800 --> 02:16:43.970 align:start position:0% me for any of the speakers things that they<02:16:40.950> could<02:16:41.520> accomplish<02:16:42.480> and<02:16:43.110> and<02:16:43.530> have<02:16:43.770> their 02:16:43.970 --> 02:16:43.980 align:start position:0% they could accomplish and and have their 02:16:43.980 --> 02:16:46.060 align:start position:0% they could accomplish and and have their unit<02:16:44.310> work 02:16:46.060 --> 02:16:46.070 align:start position:0% unit work 02:16:46.070 --> 02:16:50.650 align:start position:0% unit work which<02:16:46.880> is<02:16:47.030> part<02:16:47.690> of<02:16:47.750> the<02:16:47.840> goal<02:16:48.040> and<02:16:49.300> mama<02:16:50.300> Sara 02:16:50.650 --> 02:16:50.660 align:start position:0% which is part of the goal and mama Sara 02:16:50.660 --> 02:16:53.049 align:start position:0% which is part of the goal and mama Sara and<02:16:51.020> as<02:16:51.260> the<02:16:51.469> already<02:16:52.309> talked<02:16:52.520> about<02:16:52.610> empty 02:16:53.049 --> 02:16:53.059 align:start position:0% and as the already talked about empty 02:16:53.059 --> 02:16:58.419 align:start position:0% and as the already talked about empty house<02:16:53.240> tax<02:16:55.960> counting<02:16:56.960> and<02:16:57.170> reporting<02:16:57.860> we're 02:16:58.419 --> 02:16:58.429 align:start position:0% house tax counting and reporting we're 02:16:58.429 --> 02:17:01.089 align:start position:0% house tax counting and reporting we're talking<02:16:58.940> with<02:16:59.360> our<02:16:59.590> Administrative<02:17:00.590> Services 02:17:01.089 --> 02:17:01.099 align:start position:0% talking with our Administrative Services 02:17:01.099 --> 02:17:03.339 align:start position:0% talking with our Administrative Services Department<02:17:01.309> just<02:17:01.940> about<02:17:02.240> how<02:17:02.510> how<02:17:03.139> that's 02:17:03.339 --> 02:17:03.349 align:start position:0% Department just about how how that's 02:17:03.349 --> 02:17:05.290 align:start position:0% Department just about how how that's being<02:17:03.590> done<02:17:03.889> now<02:17:04.190> and<02:17:04.490> what<02:17:04.700> the<02:17:04.820> future<02:17:05.120> could 02:17:05.290 --> 02:17:05.300 align:start position:0% being done now and what the future could 02:17:05.300 --> 02:17:08.430 align:start position:0% being done now and what the future could look<02:17:05.360> like<02:17:05.540> for<02:17:05.990> that<02:17:06.110> and<02:17:06.349> if<02:17:06.530> if<02:17:06.770> there's 02:17:08.430 --> 02:17:08.440 align:start position:0% look like for that and if if there's 02:17:08.440 --> 02:17:12.430 align:start position:0% look like for that and if if there's more<02:17:09.440> options<02:17:09.980> for<02:17:10.160> for<02:17:11.000> having<02:17:11.420> better<02:17:12.110> data 02:17:12.430 --> 02:17:12.440 align:start position:0% more options for for having better data 02:17:12.440 --> 02:17:16.589 align:start position:0% more options for for having better data over<02:17:12.800> time<02:17:13.010> and<02:17:13.309> I'm<02:17:13.429> sure<02:17:13.460> that<02:17:13.880> there<02:17:14.059> are 02:17:16.589 --> 02:17:16.599 align:start position:0% 02:17:16.599 --> 02:17:21.820 align:start position:0% and<02:17:17.740> that's<02:17:18.740> about<02:17:18.889> it<02:17:19.040> I<02:17:19.580> don't<02:17:20.030> know<02:17:20.830> if 02:17:21.820 --> 02:17:21.830 align:start position:0% and that's about it I don't know if 02:17:21.830 --> 02:17:24.520 align:start position:0% and that's about it I don't know if that's<02:17:22.130> enough<02:17:22.550> and<02:17:22.940> if<02:17:23.210> you<02:17:23.389> have<02:17:23.570> conflicts 02:17:24.520 --> 02:17:24.530 align:start position:0% that's enough and if you have conflicts 02:17:24.530 --> 02:17:26.020 align:start position:0% that's enough and if you have conflicts that<02:17:24.740> you<02:17:24.800> want<02:17:25.099> to<02:17:25.190> talk<02:17:25.370> about<02:17:25.550> a<02:17:25.700> little<02:17:25.910> bit 02:17:26.020 --> 02:17:26.030 align:start position:0% that you want to talk about a little bit 02:17:26.030 --> 02:17:27.610 align:start position:0% that you want to talk about a little bit more<02:17:26.179> tonight<02:17:26.540> or<02:17:26.750> if<02:17:26.840> you<02:17:26.960> want<02:17:27.139> us<02:17:27.230> to<02:17:27.290> come 02:17:27.610 --> 02:17:27.620 align:start position:0% more tonight or if you want us to come 02:17:27.620 --> 02:17:28.959 align:start position:0% more tonight or if you want us to come back<02:17:27.800> with<02:17:28.010> some<02:17:28.160> choices 02:17:28.959 --> 02:17:28.969 align:start position:0% back with some choices 02:17:28.969 --> 02:17:32.680 align:start position:0% back with some choices I<02:17:29.290> appreciate<02:17:30.290> the<02:17:31.389> clarifications<02:17:32.389> and<02:17:32.599> the 02:17:32.680 --> 02:17:32.690 align:start position:0% I appreciate the clarifications and the 02:17:32.690 --> 02:17:34.750 align:start position:0% I appreciate the clarifications and the reminder<02:17:33.230> that<02:17:33.440> maybe<02:17:33.650> we<02:17:33.920> didn't<02:17:34.219> make<02:17:34.730> a 02:17:34.750 --> 02:17:34.760 align:start position:0% reminder that maybe we didn't make a 02:17:34.760 --> 02:17:39.730 align:start position:0% reminder that maybe we didn't make a clear<02:17:35.530> reference<02:17:36.530> to<02:17:36.860> how<02:17:37.670> we<02:17:37.730> feel<02:17:38.090> about<02:17:38.740> the 02:17:39.730 --> 02:17:39.740 align:start position:0% clear reference to how we feel about the 02:17:39.740 --> 02:17:42.700 align:start position:0% clear reference to how we feel about the number<02:17:40.040> of<02:17:40.190> days<02:17:40.400> of<02:17:40.429> limitation<02:17:41.240> per<02:17:41.510> year<02:17:41.900> I 02:17:42.700 --> 02:17:42.710 align:start position:0% number of days of limitation per year I 02:17:42.710 --> 02:17:46.990 align:start position:0% number of days of limitation per year I heard<02:17:43.280> a<02:17:43.520> sort<02:17:44.090> of<02:17:44.179> a<02:17:44.300> gently<02:17:44.809> framed<02:17:46.000> notion 02:17:46.990 --> 02:17:47.000 align:start position:0% heard a sort of a gently framed notion 02:17:47.000 --> 02:17:50.890 align:start position:0% heard a sort of a gently framed notion that<02:17:47.980> it<02:17:48.980> becomes<02:17:49.400> extremely<02:17:49.670> sensitive<02:17:50.360> or 02:17:50.890 --> 02:17:50.900 align:start position:0% that it becomes extremely sensitive or 02:17:50.900 --> 02:17:53.830 align:start position:0% that it becomes extremely sensitive or relatively<02:17:51.650> more<02:17:51.860> sensitive<02:17:52.490> if<02:17:53.150> there's<02:17:53.660> an 02:17:53.830 --> 02:17:53.840 align:start position:0% relatively more sensitive if there's an 02:17:53.840 --> 02:17:57.410 align:start position:0% relatively more sensitive if there's an unfit 02:17:57.410 --> 02:17:57.420 align:start position:0% 02:17:57.420 --> 02:18:00.580 align:start position:0% Str 02:18:00.580 --> 02:18:00.590 align:start position:0% 02:18:00.590 --> 02:18:04.690 align:start position:0% in<02:18:00.680> the<02:18:01.220> presence<02:18:01.640> of<02:18:01.790> the<02:18:02.890> the<02:18:03.890> owner<02:18:04.070> if<02:18:04.460> they 02:18:04.690 --> 02:18:04.700 align:start position:0% in the presence of the the owner if they 02:18:04.700 --> 02:18:07.720 align:start position:0% in the presence of the the owner if they are<02:18:04.790> living<02:18:05.270> in<02:18:05.420> the<02:18:05.570> place<02:18:06.220> perhaps<02:18:07.220> it<02:18:07.520> takes 02:18:07.720 --> 02:18:07.730 align:start position:0% are living in the place perhaps it takes 02:18:07.730 --> 02:18:09.490 align:start position:0% are living in the place perhaps it takes on<02:18:07.910> the<02:18:08.030> quality<02:18:08.450> of<02:18:08.480> a<02:18:08.660> houseguest 02:18:09.490 --> 02:18:09.500 align:start position:0% on the quality of a houseguest 02:18:09.500 --> 02:18:12.760 align:start position:0% on the quality of a houseguest from<02:18:09.830> the<02:18:09.920> point<02:18:10.160> of<02:18:10.220> view<02:18:10.370> of<02:18:10.430> the<02:18:11.230> of<02:18:12.230> their 02:18:12.760 --> 02:18:12.770 align:start position:0% from the point of view of the of their 02:18:12.770 --> 02:18:15.970 align:start position:0% from the point of view of the of their neighbors<02:18:13.250> I<02:18:13.550> don't<02:18:13.880> know<02:18:14.030> I<02:18:14.320> will<02:18:15.320> say<02:18:15.620> that<02:18:15.950> I 02:18:15.970 --> 02:18:15.980 align:start position:0% neighbors I don't know I will say that I 02:18:15.980 --> 02:18:18.160 align:start position:0% neighbors I don't know I will say that I think<02:18:16.130> that<02:18:16.430> home<02:18:17.090> business<02:18:17.510> occupation 02:18:18.160 --> 02:18:18.170 align:start position:0% think that home business occupation 02:18:18.170 --> 02:18:22.030 align:start position:0% think that home business occupation license<02:18:18.620> is<02:18:19.190> a<02:18:19.250> really<02:18:19.640> nice<02:18:20.570> model<02:18:21.170> point<02:18:21.920> of 02:18:22.030 --> 02:18:22.040 align:start position:0% license is a really nice model point of 02:18:22.040 --> 02:18:23.530 align:start position:0% license is a really nice model point of departure<02:18:22.340> for<02:18:22.700> thinking<02:18:23.000> about<02:18:23.090> this 02:18:23.530 --> 02:18:23.540 align:start position:0% departure for thinking about this 02:18:23.540 --> 02:18:25.990 align:start position:0% departure for thinking about this because<02:18:24.170> the<02:18:24.680> model<02:18:25.370> for<02:18:25.580> that<02:18:25.670> says 02:18:25.990 --> 02:18:26.000 align:start position:0% because the model for that says 02:18:26.000 --> 02:18:28.210 align:start position:0% because the model for that says basically<02:18:26.240> that<02:18:27.140> your<02:18:27.320> neighbors<02:18:27.680> are<02:18:27.860> happy 02:18:28.210 --> 02:18:28.220 align:start position:0% basically that your neighbors are happy 02:18:28.220 --> 02:18:28.780 align:start position:0% basically that your neighbors are happy with<02:18:28.400> you 02:18:28.780 --> 02:18:28.790 align:start position:0% with you 02:18:28.790 --> 02:18:31.180 align:start position:0% with you you're<02:18:29.090> not<02:18:29.270> impacting<02:18:29.960> and<02:18:30.260> if<02:18:30.890> you<02:18:31.010> are 02:18:31.180 --> 02:18:31.190 align:start position:0% you're not impacting and if you are 02:18:31.190 --> 02:18:35.200 align:start position:0% you're not impacting and if you are impacting<02:18:31.820> them<02:18:31.970> it<02:18:32.690> makes<02:18:32.990> it<02:18:33.640> an<02:18:34.640> open<02:18:35.060> issue 02:18:35.200 --> 02:18:35.210 align:start position:0% impacting them it makes it an open issue 02:18:35.210 --> 02:18:38.440 align:start position:0% impacting them it makes it an open issue when<02:18:36.170> it's<02:18:36.350> time<02:18:36.560> to<02:18:36.590> renew<02:18:36.890> your<02:18:37.130> license<02:18:37.580> so 02:18:38.440 --> 02:18:38.450 align:start position:0% when it's time to renew your license so 02:18:38.450 --> 02:18:40.780 align:start position:0% when it's time to renew your license so you<02:18:39.440> know<02:18:39.530> it's<02:18:39.740> a<02:18:39.860> as<02:18:40.130> a<02:18:40.160> framework<02:18:40.430> for 02:18:40.780 --> 02:18:40.790 align:start position:0% you know it's a as a framework for 02:18:40.790 --> 02:18:42.580 align:start position:0% you know it's a as a framework for thinking<02:18:40.910> about<02:18:41.210> it<02:18:41.600> I<02:18:41.720> see<02:18:41.960> why<02:18:42.170> they<02:18:42.350> took 02:18:42.580 --> 02:18:42.590 align:start position:0% thinking about it I see why they took 02:18:42.590 --> 02:18:45.160 align:start position:0% thinking about it I see why they took that<02:18:42.860> I've<02:18:43.490> had<02:18:43.760> one<02:18:43.970> of<02:18:44.000> those<02:18:44.210> for<02:18:44.600> I<02:18:44.840> don't 02:18:45.160 --> 02:18:45.170 align:start position:0% that I've had one of those for I don't 02:18:45.170 --> 02:18:47.410 align:start position:0% that I've had one of those for I don't know<02:18:45.320> a<02:18:45.380> dozen<02:18:45.710> years<02:18:46.010> maybe<02:18:46.340> my<02:18:47.060> neighbors 02:18:47.410 --> 02:18:47.420 align:start position:0% know a dozen years maybe my neighbors 02:18:47.420 --> 02:18:49.720 align:start position:0% know a dozen years maybe my neighbors are<02:18:47.660> as<02:18:48.110> far<02:18:48.320> as<02:18:48.350> I<02:18:48.500> know<02:18:48.560> unaware<02:18:49.190> of<02:18:49.400> the<02:18:49.580> fact 02:18:49.720 --> 02:18:49.730 align:start position:0% are as far as I know unaware of the fact 02:18:49.730 --> 02:18:51.100 align:start position:0% are as far as I know unaware of the fact that<02:18:49.940> I<02:18:49.970> operate<02:18:50.330> a<02:18:50.360> business<02:18:50.570> out<02:18:50.900> of<02:18:50.930> my<02:18:51.020> home 02:18:51.100 --> 02:18:51.110 align:start position:0% that I operate a business out of my home 02:18:51.110 --> 02:18:55.090 align:start position:0% that I operate a business out of my home and<02:18:51.830> that's<02:18:52.460> the<02:18:52.670> way<02:18:52.820> I<02:18:52.850> want<02:18:53.240> it<02:18:53.590> and<02:18:54.590> I<02:18:54.830> hope 02:18:55.090 --> 02:18:55.100 align:start position:0% and that's the way I want it and I hope 02:18:55.100 --> 02:18:57.850 align:start position:0% and that's the way I want it and I hope that<02:18:55.510> we<02:18:56.510> especially<02:18:56.930> in<02:18:57.230> the<02:18:57.320> case<02:18:57.500> of<02:18:57.530> a 02:18:57.850 --> 02:18:57.860 align:start position:0% that we especially in the case of a 02:18:57.860 --> 02:19:00.970 align:start position:0% that we especially in the case of a hosted<02:18:58.400> that<02:18:58.880> it<02:18:59.090> feels<02:18:59.420> that<02:19:00.020> way<02:19:00.290> in<02:19:00.860> the 02:19:00.970 --> 02:19:00.980 align:start position:0% hosted that it feels that way in the 02:19:00.980 --> 02:19:02.620 align:start position:0% hosted that it feels that way in the case<02:19:01.160> of<02:19:01.310> on<02:19:01.460> hosted<02:19:01.880> it's<02:19:02.030> hard<02:19:02.210> to<02:19:02.360> imagine 02:19:02.620 --> 02:19:02.630 align:start position:0% case of on hosted it's hard to imagine 02:19:02.630 --> 02:19:05.800 align:start position:0% case of on hosted it's hard to imagine that<02:19:02.900> they<02:19:03.170> would<02:19:03.590> actually<02:19:03.740> not<02:19:04.160> know<02:19:04.460> but<02:19:05.270> to 02:19:05.800 --> 02:19:05.810 align:start position:0% that they would actually not know but to 02:19:05.810 --> 02:19:07.420 align:start position:0% that they would actually not know but to the<02:19:05.930> extent<02:19:06.020> that<02:19:06.290> we<02:19:06.470> could<02:19:06.680> really<02:19:06.890> minimize 02:19:07.420 --> 02:19:07.430 align:start position:0% the extent that we could really minimize 02:19:07.430 --> 02:19:08.770 align:start position:0% the extent that we could really minimize the<02:19:07.670> impact<02:19:08.030> I<02:19:08.180> think<02:19:08.390> that<02:19:08.510> would<02:19:08.630> be<02:19:08.750> a 02:19:08.770 --> 02:19:08.780 align:start position:0% the impact I think that would be a 02:19:08.780 --> 02:19:12.280 align:start position:0% the impact I think that would be a really<02:19:09.110> good<02:19:09.380> thing<02:19:09.650> right<02:19:10.360> well<02:19:11.360> I<02:19:11.390> just<02:19:11.420> want 02:19:12.280 --> 02:19:12.290 align:start position:0% really good thing right well I just want 02:19:12.290 --> 02:19:13.870 align:start position:0% really good thing right well I just want to<02:19:12.380> support<02:19:12.590> Jill's<02:19:12.980> notion<02:19:13.340> of<02:19:13.460> the<02:19:13.520> primary 02:19:13.870 --> 02:19:13.880 align:start position:0% to support Jill's notion of the primary 02:19:13.880 --> 02:19:17.710 align:start position:0% to support Jill's notion of the primary residence<02:19:14.360> I<02:19:14.540> think<02:19:14.750> that's<02:19:15.430> I<02:19:16.450> think<02:19:17.450> that's 02:19:17.710 --> 02:19:17.720 align:start position:0% residence I think that's I think that's 02:19:17.720 --> 02:19:19.030 align:start position:0% residence I think that's I think that's a<02:19:17.900> good<02:19:18.050> way<02:19:18.170> to<02:19:18.200> think<02:19:18.320> about<02:19:18.530> it<02:19:18.710> I<02:19:18.770> mean<02:19:18.890> I've 02:19:19.030 --> 02:19:19.040 align:start position:0% a good way to think about it I mean I've 02:19:19.040 --> 02:19:20.730 align:start position:0% a good way to think about it I mean I've rented<02:19:19.280> out<02:19:19.520> my<02:19:19.550> house<02:19:19.880> when<02:19:20.150> we've<02:19:20.300> gone<02:19:20.480> out 02:19:20.730 --> 02:19:20.740 align:start position:0% rented out my house when we've gone out 02:19:20.740 --> 02:19:23.331 align:start position:0% rented out my house when we've gone out vacation<02:19:21.740> or<02:19:21.890> something<02:19:22.040> like<02:19:22.280> that<02:19:22.340> and 02:19:23.331 --> 02:19:23.341 align:start position:0% vacation or something like that and 02:19:23.341 --> 02:19:25.340 align:start position:0% vacation or something like that and I<02:19:23.370> wouldn't<02:19:23.791> necessarily<02:19:24.001> want<02:19:24.421> to<02:19:24.570> overly 02:19:25.340 --> 02:19:25.350 align:start position:0% I wouldn't necessarily want to overly 02:19:25.350 --> 02:19:27.081 align:start position:0% I wouldn't necessarily want to overly restrict<02:19:25.830> somebody<02:19:26.160> from<02:19:26.341> being<02:19:26.610> able<02:19:26.730> to<02:19:26.881> do 02:19:27.081 --> 02:19:27.091 align:start position:0% restrict somebody from being able to do 02:19:27.091 --> 02:19:30.951 align:start position:0% restrict somebody from being able to do that<02:19:27.530> and<02:19:28.551> and<02:19:29.551> so<02:19:29.610> I<02:19:29.820> think<02:19:29.881> that's<02:19:30.180> have<02:19:30.841> a 02:19:30.951 --> 02:19:30.961 align:start position:0% that and and so I think that's have a 02:19:30.961 --> 02:19:34.430 align:start position:0% that and and so I think that's have a good<02:19:31.470> way<02:19:31.620> to<02:19:31.680> approach<02:19:32.541> your<02:19:33.541> concerns<02:19:34.260> about 02:19:34.430 --> 02:19:34.440 align:start position:0% good way to approach your concerns about 02:19:34.440 --> 02:19:36.860 align:start position:0% good way to approach your concerns about how<02:19:34.711> do<02:19:34.770> you<02:19:35.060> monitor<02:19:36.060> and<02:19:36.091> regulate<02:19:36.510> the 02:19:36.860 --> 02:19:36.870 align:start position:0% how do you monitor and regulate the 02:19:36.870 --> 02:19:39.081 align:start position:0% how do you monitor and regulate the number<02:19:36.900> of<02:19:37.440> number<02:19:37.890> of<02:19:37.921> days<02:19:38.251> and<02:19:38.671> that<02:19:38.820> sort 02:19:39.081 --> 02:19:39.091 align:start position:0% number of number of days and that sort 02:19:39.091 --> 02:19:41.380 align:start position:0% number of number of days and that sort of<02:19:39.150> thing<02:19:39.360> but<02:19:39.600> but<02:19:40.440> if<02:19:40.560> it's<02:19:40.711> somebody's 02:19:41.380 --> 02:19:41.390 align:start position:0% of thing but but if it's somebody's 02:19:41.390 --> 02:19:43.670 align:start position:0% of thing but but if it's somebody's somebody's<02:19:42.390> primary<02:19:42.751> residence<02:19:43.230> I<02:19:43.440> think 02:19:43.670 --> 02:19:43.680 align:start position:0% somebody's primary residence I think 02:19:43.680 --> 02:19:46.701 align:start position:0% somebody's primary residence I think there's<02:19:43.860> generally<02:19:44.341> a<02:19:44.570> inherent<02:19:45.570> interest<02:19:46.530> to 02:19:46.701 --> 02:19:46.711 align:start position:0% there's generally a inherent interest to 02:19:46.711 --> 02:19:48.440 align:start position:0% there's generally a inherent interest to make<02:19:46.860> sure<02:19:46.890> that<02:19:47.280> you<02:19:47.850> know<02:19:47.970> somebody's<02:19:48.330> now 02:19:48.440 --> 02:19:48.450 align:start position:0% make sure that you know somebody's now 02:19:48.450 --> 02:19:49.970 align:start position:0% make sure that you know somebody's now coming<02:19:48.690> in<02:19:48.900> and<02:19:49.051> thrashing<02:19:49.351> their<02:19:49.620> primary 02:19:49.970 --> 02:19:49.980 align:start position:0% coming in and thrashing their primary 02:19:49.980 --> 02:19:51.531 align:start position:0% coming in and thrashing their primary residence<02:19:50.131> or<02:19:50.580> is<02:19:50.641> it<02:19:50.730> like<02:19:50.910> that<02:19:50.940> I<02:19:51.120> mean<02:19:51.181> I 02:19:51.531 --> 02:19:51.541 align:start position:0% residence or is it like that I mean I 02:19:51.541 --> 02:19:55.161 align:start position:0% residence or is it like that I mean I think<02:19:52.320> I<02:19:52.711> support<02:19:53.341> that<02:19:53.990> thank<02:19:54.990> you 02:19:55.161 --> 02:19:55.171 align:start position:0% think I support that thank you 02:19:55.171 --> 02:19:59.450 align:start position:0% think I support that thank you other<02:19:55.771> comments 02:19:59.450 --> 02:19:59.460 align:start position:0% 02:19:59.460 --> 02:20:02.301 align:start position:0% no<02:19:59.970> I<02:20:00.000> think<02:20:00.150> you<02:20:00.420> summed<02:20:00.750> it<02:20:00.840> up<02:20:00.960> well<02:20:01.200> I<02:20:01.311> am 02:20:02.301 --> 02:20:02.311 align:start position:0% no I think you summed it up well I am 02:20:02.311 --> 02:20:05.570 align:start position:0% no I think you summed it up well I am just<02:20:02.840> in<02:20:03.840> listening<02:20:04.021> to<02:20:04.320> Jill's<02:20:04.830> iteration<02:20:05.490> of 02:20:05.570 --> 02:20:05.580 align:start position:0% just in listening to Jill's iteration of 02:20:05.580 --> 02:20:08.330 align:start position:0% just in listening to Jill's iteration of that<02:20:06.230> just<02:20:07.230> to<02:20:07.351> make<02:20:07.470> sure<02:20:07.530> that<02:20:07.860> the<02:20:08.101> things 02:20:08.330 --> 02:20:08.340 align:start position:0% that just to make sure that the things 02:20:08.340 --> 02:20:10.730 align:start position:0% that just to make sure that the things that<02:20:08.640> I<02:20:08.940> cared<02:20:09.720> about<02:20:09.840> tonight<02:20:10.260> get<02:20:10.470> the<02:20:10.590> right 02:20:10.730 --> 02:20:10.740 align:start position:0% that I cared about tonight get the right 02:20:10.740 --> 02:20:15.710 align:start position:0% that I cared about tonight get the right emphasis<02:20:12.530> yes<02:20:13.530> that<02:20:13.890> the<02:20:14.130> the<02:20:14.480> existing<02:20:15.480> code 02:20:15.710 --> 02:20:15.720 align:start position:0% emphasis yes that the the existing code 02:20:15.720 --> 02:20:18.230 align:start position:0% emphasis yes that the the existing code beefed<02:20:16.170> up<02:20:16.410> for<02:20:16.800> the<02:20:16.920> right<02:20:17.580> amount<02:20:17.730> of<02:20:17.940> fines 02:20:18.230 --> 02:20:18.240 align:start position:0% beefed up for the right amount of fines 02:20:18.240 --> 02:20:21.830 align:start position:0% beefed up for the right amount of fines and<02:20:18.720> ultimately<02:20:19.580> depriving<02:20:20.580> the<02:20:21.150> operator<02:20:21.601> of 02:20:21.830 --> 02:20:21.840 align:start position:0% and ultimately depriving the operator of 02:20:21.840 --> 02:20:23.960 align:start position:0% and ultimately depriving the operator of their<02:20:22.050> business<02:20:22.860> license<02:20:23.311> is<02:20:23.490> something<02:20:23.851> I'd 02:20:23.960 --> 02:20:23.970 align:start position:0% their business license is something I'd 02:20:23.970 --> 02:20:29.030 align:start position:0% their business license is something I'd like<02:20:24.000> to<02:20:24.180> see<02:20:25.910> and<02:20:26.910> the<02:20:27.900> the<02:20:28.110> concept<02:20:28.650> of<02:20:28.800> the 02:20:29.030 --> 02:20:29.040 align:start position:0% like to see and the the concept of the 02:20:29.040 --> 02:20:31.610 align:start position:0% like to see and the the concept of the responsible<02:20:29.820> party<02:20:30.271> as<02:20:30.960> part<02:20:31.351> of<02:20:31.470> the 02:20:31.610 --> 02:20:31.620 align:start position:0% responsible party as part of the 02:20:31.620 --> 02:20:35.270 align:start position:0% responsible party as part of the definition<02:20:31.980> of<02:20:33.561> unholstered<02:20:34.561> would<02:20:34.800> would<02:20:35.101> I 02:20:35.270 --> 02:20:35.280 align:start position:0% definition of unholstered would would I 02:20:35.280 --> 02:20:37.640 align:start position:0% definition of unholstered would would I think<02:20:35.521> go<02:20:35.790> a<02:20:35.820> long<02:20:36.090> way<02:20:36.330> to<02:20:36.390> solving<02:20:37.230> some<02:20:37.440> of 02:20:37.640 --> 02:20:37.650 align:start position:0% think go a long way to solving some of 02:20:37.650 --> 02:20:39.730 align:start position:0% think go a long way to solving some of those<02:20:37.800> problems<02:20:38.311> that<02:20:38.521> is<02:20:39.030> you<02:20:39.180> might<02:20:39.390> have<02:20:39.630> a 02:20:39.730 --> 02:20:39.740 align:start position:0% those problems that is you might have a 02:20:39.740 --> 02:20:42.710 align:start position:0% those problems that is you might have a what<02:20:40.740> what<02:20:41.160> what<02:20:41.880> we've<02:20:42.061> been<02:20:42.210> calling<02:20:42.570> on 02:20:42.710 --> 02:20:42.720 align:start position:0% what what what we've been calling on 02:20:42.720 --> 02:20:44.930 align:start position:0% what what what we've been calling on hosted<02:20:43.170> but<02:20:43.320> if<02:20:43.440> there<02:20:43.680> is<02:20:43.830> a<02:20:43.940> truly 02:20:44.930 --> 02:20:44.940 align:start position:0% hosted but if there is a truly 02:20:44.940 --> 02:20:48.770 align:start position:0% hosted but if there is a truly responsible<02:20:45.750> party<02:20:46.110> within<02:20:46.320> minutes<02:20:47.690> even<02:20:48.690> if 02:20:48.770 --> 02:20:48.780 align:start position:0% responsible party within minutes even if 02:20:48.780 --> 02:20:50.000 align:start position:0% responsible party within minutes even if it's<02:20:48.900> not<02:20:49.050> the<02:20:49.290> owner<02:20:49.440> of<02:20:49.590> the<02:20:49.740> place<02:20:49.980> that 02:20:50.000 --> 02:20:50.010 align:start position:0% it's not the owner of the place that 02:20:50.010 --> 02:20:52.700 align:start position:0% it's not the owner of the place that that<02:20:50.460> I<02:20:50.851> think<02:20:51.240> could<02:20:51.420> be<02:20:51.570> productive<02:20:51.900> good 02:20:52.700 --> 02:20:52.710 align:start position:0% that I think could be productive good 02:20:52.710 --> 02:20:58.640 align:start position:0% that I think could be productive good work<02:20:52.890> for<02:20:53.160> me<02:20:53.250> I<02:20:54.771> think<02:20:55.771> that<02:20:55.920> oh<02:20:56.690> yes<02:20:57.690> we 02:20:58.640 --> 02:20:58.650 align:start position:0% work for me I think that oh yes we 02:20:58.650 --> 02:21:03.710 align:start position:0% work for me I think that oh yes we forgot<02:20:58.860> one<02:20:59.311> one<02:20:59.790> thing<02:21:01.940> we<02:21:02.940> wanted<02:21:03.601> to 02:21:03.710 --> 02:21:03.720 align:start position:0% forgot one one thing we wanted to 02:21:03.720 --> 02:21:05.450 align:start position:0% forgot one one thing we wanted to address<02:21:03.960> the<02:21:04.290> parking<02:21:04.800> again<02:21:05.130> you<02:21:05.280> guys 02:21:05.450 --> 02:21:05.460 align:start position:0% address the parking again you guys 02:21:05.460 --> 02:21:08.720 align:start position:0% address the parking again you guys talked<02:21:05.940> a<02:21:06.061> few<02:21:06.240> times<02:21:06.300> about<02:21:07.250> it<02:21:08.250> kind<02:21:08.550> of<02:21:08.580> went 02:21:08.720 --> 02:21:08.730 align:start position:0% talked a few times about it kind of went 02:21:08.730 --> 02:21:11.180 align:start position:0% talked a few times about it kind of went across<02:21:09.000> the<02:21:09.210> board<02:21:09.450> about<02:21:09.630> some<02:21:10.190> public 02:21:11.180 --> 02:21:11.190 align:start position:0% across the board about some public 02:21:11.190 --> 02:21:13.280 align:start position:0% across the board about some public comment<02:21:11.550> as<02:21:11.640> well<02:21:11.790> that<02:21:12.120> parking<02:21:12.900> is<02:21:12.990> not<02:21:13.140> an 02:21:13.280 --> 02:21:13.290 align:start position:0% comment as well that parking is not an 02:21:13.290 --> 02:21:15.290 align:start position:0% comment as well that parking is not an issue<02:21:13.440> in<02:21:13.800> some<02:21:14.040> place<02:21:14.220> parking<02:21:14.670> is<02:21:14.851> an<02:21:15.120> issue 02:21:15.290 --> 02:21:15.300 align:start position:0% issue in some place parking is an issue 02:21:15.300 --> 02:21:17.060 align:start position:0% issue in some place parking is an issue and<02:21:15.660> which<02:21:15.960> is<02:21:16.140> why<02:21:16.320> we're<02:21:16.590> looking<02:21:16.830> to<02:21:16.950> you 02:21:17.060 --> 02:21:17.070 align:start position:0% and which is why we're looking to you 02:21:17.070 --> 02:21:18.830 align:start position:0% and which is why we're looking to you for<02:21:17.250> consideration<02:21:17.311> and<02:21:18.180> why<02:21:18.420> we<02:21:18.601> originally 02:21:18.830 --> 02:21:18.840 align:start position:0% for consideration and why we originally 02:21:18.840 --> 02:21:22.370 align:start position:0% for consideration and why we originally offered<02:21:19.830> up<02:21:19.980> a<02:21:20.130> recommendation<02:21:20.311> for<02:21:21.380> one 02:21:22.370 --> 02:21:22.380 align:start position:0% offered up a recommendation for one 02:21:22.380 --> 02:21:24.801 align:start position:0% offered up a recommendation for one parking<02:21:22.771> spot<02:21:23.040> in<02:21:23.370> the<02:21:23.970> driveway<02:21:24.240> only 02:21:24.801 --> 02:21:24.811 align:start position:0% parking spot in the driveway only 02:21:24.811 --> 02:21:28.220 align:start position:0% parking spot in the driveway only because<02:21:26.061> throughout<02:21:27.061> the<02:21:27.210> research<02:21:27.540> of<02:21:27.900> a<02:21:28.080> lot 02:21:28.220 --> 02:21:28.230 align:start position:0% because throughout the research of a lot 02:21:28.230 --> 02:21:30.710 align:start position:0% because throughout the research of a lot of<02:21:28.351> jurisdictions<02:21:28.950> they<02:21:29.220> some<02:21:29.970> places<02:21:30.271> don't 02:21:30.710 --> 02:21:30.720 align:start position:0% of jurisdictions they some places don't 02:21:30.720 --> 02:21:32.360 align:start position:0% of jurisdictions they some places don't have<02:21:30.870> restriction<02:21:31.530> for<02:21:31.650> parking<02:21:32.070> some 02:21:32.360 --> 02:21:32.370 align:start position:0% have restriction for parking some 02:21:32.370 --> 02:21:35.630 align:start position:0% have restriction for parking some actually<02:21:32.851> allow<02:21:33.360> for<02:21:33.561> one<02:21:34.561> vehicle<02:21:34.920> per<02:21:35.370> two 02:21:35.630 --> 02:21:35.640 align:start position:0% actually allow for one vehicle per two 02:21:35.640 --> 02:21:40.100 align:start position:0% actually allow for one vehicle per two persons<02:21:36.180> per<02:21:37.550> unit<02:21:38.550> so<02:21:39.061> if<02:21:39.210> you<02:21:39.330> have<02:21:39.510> a<02:21:39.540> you 02:21:40.100 --> 02:21:40.110 align:start position:0% persons per unit so if you have a you 02:21:40.110 --> 02:21:42.710 align:start position:0% persons per unit so if you have a you know<02:21:40.460> whole<02:21:41.460> house<02:21:41.760> or<02:21:42.030> whatnot<02:21:42.480> that's 02:21:42.710 --> 02:21:42.720 align:start position:0% know whole house or whatnot that's 02:21:42.720 --> 02:21:44.720 align:start position:0% know whole house or whatnot that's renting<02:21:43.500> out<02:21:43.620> three<02:21:43.950> different<02:21:44.070> rooms<02:21:44.430> with 02:21:44.720 --> 02:21:44.730 align:start position:0% renting out three different rooms with 02:21:44.730 --> 02:21:46.070 align:start position:0% renting out three different rooms with two<02:21:44.940> different<02:21:45.090> persons<02:21:45.570> you've<02:21:45.720> got<02:21:45.870> three 02:21:46.070 --> 02:21:46.080 align:start position:0% two different persons you've got three 02:21:46.080 --> 02:21:50.210 align:start position:0% two different persons you've got three different<02:21:46.380> cars<02:21:46.580> so<02:21:47.580> in<02:21:48.480> which<02:21:48.660> case<02:21:48.900> you<02:21:49.220> you 02:21:50.210 --> 02:21:50.220 align:start position:0% different cars so in which case you you 02:21:50.220 --> 02:21:52.310 align:start position:0% different cars so in which case you you know<02:21:50.311> couldn't<02:21:50.700> limit<02:21:51.480> a<02:21:51.540> lot<02:21:51.750> of<02:21:51.840> the<02:21:51.960> on 02:21:52.310 --> 02:21:52.320 align:start position:0% know couldn't limit a lot of the on 02:21:52.320 --> 02:21:55.341 align:start position:0% know couldn't limit a lot of the on street<02:21:52.620> parking<02:21:53.010> and<02:21:54.050> residential<02:21:55.050> parking 02:21:55.341 --> 02:21:55.351 align:start position:0% street parking and residential parking 02:21:55.351 --> 02:21:57.200 align:start position:0% street parking and residential parking so<02:21:55.530> that's<02:21:55.680> why<02:21:55.800> we<02:21:55.950> looked<02:21:56.160> to<02:21:56.220> you<02:21:56.370> for<02:21:56.670> what 02:21:57.200 --> 02:21:57.210 align:start position:0% so that's why we looked to you for what 02:21:57.210 --> 02:21:59.930 align:start position:0% so that's why we looked to you for what we<02:21:57.360> can<02:21:57.570> go<02:21:57.990> for<02:21:58.370> moving<02:21:59.370> forward<02:21:59.820> with<02:21:59.910> that 02:21:59.930 --> 02:21:59.940 align:start position:0% we can go for moving forward with that 02:21:59.940 --> 02:22:03.051 align:start position:0% we can go for moving forward with that but<02:22:00.300> why<02:22:00.450> we<02:22:00.630> recommended<02:22:01.230> maybe<02:22:01.410> one<02:22:02.190> spot<02:22:02.730> in 02:22:03.051 --> 02:22:03.061 align:start position:0% but why we recommended maybe one spot in 02:22:03.061 --> 02:22:06.710 align:start position:0% but why we recommended maybe one spot in the<02:22:03.630> driveway<02:22:04.140> to<02:22:04.460> to<02:22:05.460> limit<02:22:06.150> that<02:22:06.271> on<02:22:06.450> street 02:22:06.710 --> 02:22:06.720 align:start position:0% the driveway to to limit that on street 02:22:06.720 --> 02:22:08.630 align:start position:0% the driveway to to limit that on street parking<02:22:07.110> and<02:22:07.230> taken<02:22:07.650> away<02:22:07.740> visitor<02:22:08.280> serving 02:22:08.630 --> 02:22:08.640 align:start position:0% parking and taken away visitor serving 02:22:08.640 --> 02:22:10.070 align:start position:0% parking and taken away visitor serving parking<02:22:09.000> for<02:22:09.120> those<02:22:09.240> that<02:22:09.480> are<02:22:09.570> coming<02:22:09.690> in<02:22:09.960> to 02:22:10.070 --> 02:22:10.080 align:start position:0% parking for those that are coming in to 02:22:10.080 --> 02:22:11.940 align:start position:0% parking for those that are coming in to just<02:22:10.290> mark<02:22:10.830> and<02:22:10.980> walk<02:22:11.160> to 02:22:11.940 --> 02:22:11.950 align:start position:0% just mark and walk to 02:22:11.950 --> 02:22:14.280 align:start position:0% just mark and walk to pablor<02:22:12.340> so<02:22:12.880> to<02:22:13.000> speak<02:22:13.210> thank<02:22:13.870> you<02:22:14.021> for<02:22:14.200> the 02:22:14.280 --> 02:22:14.290 align:start position:0% pablor so to speak thank you for the 02:22:14.290 --> 02:22:16.381 align:start position:0% pablor so to speak thank you for the reminder<02:22:14.410> it<02:22:14.710> sounds<02:22:14.950> like<02:22:15.101> right<02:22:15.970> I<02:22:16.210> was<02:22:16.360> just 02:22:16.381 --> 02:22:16.391 align:start position:0% reminder it sounds like right I was just 02:22:16.391 --> 02:22:18.960 align:start position:0% reminder it sounds like right I was just I<02:22:16.780> can<02:22:16.990> think<02:22:17.200> of<02:22:17.440> and<02:22:17.891> from<02:22:18.521> some<02:22:18.760> of<02:22:18.790> our 02:22:18.960 --> 02:22:18.970 align:start position:0% I can think of and from some of our 02:22:18.970 --> 02:22:21.330 align:start position:0% I can think of and from some of our speakers<02:22:19.391> who<02:22:19.601> were<02:22:19.720> here<02:22:19.960> tonight<02:22:20.320> some<02:22:21.220> of 02:22:21.330 --> 02:22:21.340 align:start position:0% speakers who were here tonight some of 02:22:21.340 --> 02:22:23.131 align:start position:0% speakers who were here tonight some of our<02:22:21.460> older<02:22:21.700> homes<02:22:21.910> and<02:22:22.271> our<02:22:22.601> leader<02:22:22.780> park<02:22:23.021> that 02:22:23.131 --> 02:22:23.141 align:start position:0% our older homes and our leader park that 02:22:23.141 --> 02:22:24.600 align:start position:0% our older homes and our leader park that don't<02:22:23.320> have<02:22:23.470> a<02:22:23.500> driveway<02:22:23.771> they<02:22:24.311> don't<02:22:24.490> have 02:22:24.600 --> 02:22:24.610 align:start position:0% don't have a driveway they don't have 02:22:24.610 --> 02:22:28.320 align:start position:0% don't have a driveway they don't have any<02:22:24.820> on-site<02:22:25.271> parking<02:22:25.450> now<02:22:27.240> for<02:22:28.240> the 02:22:28.320 --> 02:22:28.330 align:start position:0% any on-site parking now for the 02:22:28.330 --> 02:22:30.750 align:start position:0% any on-site parking now for the residents<02:22:28.840> and<02:22:29.021> I<02:22:29.830> can<02:22:30.010> think<02:22:30.220> of<02:22:30.370> a<02:22:30.460> number<02:22:30.580> of 02:22:30.750 --> 02:22:30.760 align:start position:0% residents and I can think of a number of 02:22:30.760 --> 02:22:33.091 align:start position:0% residents and I can think of a number of situations<02:22:31.030> like<02:22:31.510> that<02:22:31.570> and<02:22:32.320> actually<02:22:32.800> where 02:22:33.091 --> 02:22:33.101 align:start position:0% situations like that and actually where 02:22:33.101 --> 02:22:34.051 align:start position:0% situations like that and actually where in<02:22:33.190> those<02:22:33.280> neighborhoods<02:22:33.521> where<02:22:33.910> the 02:22:34.051 --> 02:22:34.061 align:start position:0% in those neighborhoods where the 02:22:34.061 --> 02:22:35.790 align:start position:0% in those neighborhoods where the on-street<02:22:34.450> parking<02:22:34.480> isn't<02:22:35.080> isn't<02:22:35.470> a<02:22:35.500> concern 02:22:35.790 --> 02:22:35.800 align:start position:0% on-street parking isn't isn't a concern 02:22:35.800 --> 02:22:37.440 align:start position:0% on-street parking isn't isn't a concern it's<02:22:36.101> not<02:22:36.250> necessarily<02:22:36.700> really<02:22:36.940> an<02:22:37.061> issue<02:22:37.210> if 02:22:37.440 --> 02:22:37.450 align:start position:0% it's not necessarily really an issue if 02:22:37.450 --> 02:22:39.540 align:start position:0% it's not necessarily really an issue if you<02:22:37.570> had<02:22:37.660> you<02:22:38.230> know<02:22:38.260> another<02:22:38.620> car<02:22:38.980> on<02:22:39.340> the 02:22:39.540 --> 02:22:39.550 align:start position:0% you had you know another car on the 02:22:39.550 --> 02:22:44.330 align:start position:0% you had you know another car on the streets<02:22:39.940> so<02:22:40.530> so<02:22:41.530> I<02:22:41.561> I<02:22:42.391> appreciate<02:22:43.391> the<02:22:43.570> notion 02:22:44.330 --> 02:22:44.340 align:start position:0% streets so so I I appreciate the notion 02:22:44.340 --> 02:22:47.011 align:start position:0% streets so so I I appreciate the notion and<02:22:45.340> support<02:22:46.150> the<02:22:46.271> idea<02:22:46.510> of<02:22:46.570> being<02:22:46.750> able<02:22:46.900> to 02:22:47.011 --> 02:22:47.021 align:start position:0% and support the idea of being able to 02:22:47.021 --> 02:22:48.720 align:start position:0% and support the idea of being able to provide<02:22:47.200> from<02:22:47.590> one<02:22:47.800> on<02:22:47.980> three<02:22:48.190> part<02:22:48.400> I<02:22:48.580> can 02:22:48.720 --> 02:22:48.730 align:start position:0% provide from one on three part I can 02:22:48.730 --> 02:22:50.220 align:start position:0% provide from one on three part I can just<02:22:48.910> think<02:22:49.030> of<02:22:49.210> a<02:22:49.271> number<02:22:49.420> of<02:22:49.660> situations 02:22:50.220 --> 02:22:50.230 align:start position:0% just think of a number of situations 02:22:50.230 --> 02:22:54.171 align:start position:0% just think of a number of situations that<02:22:50.790> isn't<02:22:51.790> gonna<02:22:51.880> comply<02:22:52.300> with<02:22:52.510> that 02:22:54.171 --> 02:22:54.181 align:start position:0% that isn't gonna comply with that 02:22:54.181 --> 02:22:59.160 align:start position:0% that isn't gonna comply with that so<02:22:55.181> it's<02:22:55.360> an<02:22:55.480> exception<02:22:56.610> potentially<02:22:57.990> so<02:22:58.990> it's 02:22:59.160 --> 02:22:59.170 align:start position:0% so it's an exception potentially so it's 02:22:59.170 --> 02:23:01.110 align:start position:0% so it's an exception potentially so it's a<02:22:59.260> desirable<02:22:59.620> idea<02:23:00.130> but<02:23:00.431> maybe<02:23:00.580> if<02:23:00.910> there 02:23:01.110 --> 02:23:01.120 align:start position:0% a desirable idea but maybe if there 02:23:01.120 --> 02:23:06.320 align:start position:0% a desirable idea but maybe if there there's<02:23:01.391> no<02:23:01.870> place<02:23:02.940> back<02:23:03.940> to<02:23:04.120> exception<02:23:04.690> land 02:23:06.320 --> 02:23:06.330 align:start position:0% there's no place back to exception land 02:23:06.330 --> 02:23:08.551 align:start position:0% there's no place back to exception land and<02:23:07.330> we<02:23:07.420> tried<02:23:07.660> so<02:23:07.900> hard<02:23:07.931> to<02:23:08.170> get<02:23:08.290> away<02:23:08.380> from 02:23:08.551 --> 02:23:08.561 align:start position:0% and we tried so hard to get away from 02:23:08.561 --> 02:23:13.020 align:start position:0% and we tried so hard to get away from that<02:23:09.840> speaking<02:23:10.840> so<02:23:11.320> I<02:23:11.561> I<02:23:11.891> love<02:23:12.550> the<02:23:12.790> neighbor 02:23:13.020 --> 02:23:13.030 align:start position:0% that speaking so I I love the neighbor 02:23:13.030 --> 02:23:16.080 align:start position:0% that speaking so I I love the neighbor that<02:23:13.540> has<02:23:13.750> the<02:23:14.590> short<02:23:15.400> term<02:23:15.580> rental<02:23:15.851> and<02:23:15.910> money 02:23:16.080 --> 02:23:16.090 align:start position:0% that has the short term rental and money 02:23:16.090 --> 02:23:19.560 align:start position:0% that has the short term rental and money over<02:23:16.300> I<02:23:16.330> really<02:23:16.780> love<02:23:17.050> them<02:23:17.320> but<02:23:17.740> you<02:23:18.641> know<02:23:18.760> all 02:23:19.560 --> 02:23:19.570 align:start position:0% over I really love them but you know all 02:23:19.570 --> 02:23:24.780 align:start position:0% over I really love them but you know all situations<02:23:20.320> have<02:23:23.190> complexities<02:23:24.190> and<02:23:24.431> I<02:23:24.521> just 02:23:24.780 --> 02:23:24.790 align:start position:0% situations have complexities and I just 02:23:24.790 --> 02:23:29.370 align:start position:0% situations have complexities and I just as<02:23:25.391> a<02:23:25.450> cautionary<02:23:26.080> tale<02:23:27.690> this<02:23:28.690> protect<02:23:29.170> what 02:23:29.370 --> 02:23:29.380 align:start position:0% as a cautionary tale this protect what 02:23:29.380 --> 02:23:32.220 align:start position:0% as a cautionary tale this protect what in<02:23:29.561> one<02:23:29.860> case<02:23:30.101> they<02:23:30.340> rented<02:23:30.820> and<02:23:31.090> they<02:23:31.601> did<02:23:32.080> not 02:23:32.220 --> 02:23:32.230 align:start position:0% in one case they rented and they did not 02:23:32.230 --> 02:23:33.870 align:start position:0% in one case they rented and they did not have<02:23:32.440> that<02:23:32.650> many<02:23:32.860> people<02:23:33.070> in<02:23:33.340> the<02:23:33.400> house<02:23:33.610> they 02:23:33.870 --> 02:23:33.880 align:start position:0% have that many people in the house they 02:23:33.880 --> 02:23:35.790 align:start position:0% have that many people in the house they brought<02:23:34.150> in<02:23:34.360> an<02:23:34.480> RV<02:23:34.630> that<02:23:35.200> sat<02:23:35.470> in<02:23:35.500> the 02:23:35.790 --> 02:23:35.800 align:start position:0% brought in an RV that sat in the 02:23:35.800 --> 02:23:38.520 align:start position:0% brought in an RV that sat in the driveway<02:23:36.070> it<02:23:36.370> was<02:23:36.490> off<02:23:36.641> street<02:23:37.351> but<02:23:38.351> there 02:23:38.520 --> 02:23:38.530 align:start position:0% driveway it was off street but there 02:23:38.530 --> 02:23:42.120 align:start position:0% driveway it was off street but there were<02:23:38.620> a<02:23:38.650> heck<02:23:38.860> of<02:23:38.950> a<02:23:39.070> lot<02:23:39.190> of<02:23:39.340> people<02:23:40.771> the<02:23:41.771> party 02:23:42.120 --> 02:23:42.130 align:start position:0% were a heck of a lot of people the party 02:23:42.130 --> 02:23:45.030 align:start position:0% were a heck of a lot of people the party ran<02:23:42.340> pretty<02:23:42.700> late<02:23:43.230> I'm<02:23:44.230> thinking<02:23:44.710> it<02:23:44.860> might 02:23:45.030 --> 02:23:45.040 align:start position:0% ran pretty late I'm thinking it might 02:23:45.040 --> 02:23:47.640 align:start position:0% ran pretty late I'm thinking it might have<02:23:45.220> been<02:23:45.400> within<02:23:45.910> the<02:23:46.210> noise<02:23:46.360> ordinance<02:23:46.750> but 02:23:47.640 --> 02:23:47.650 align:start position:0% have been within the noise ordinance but 02:23:47.650 --> 02:23:50.940 align:start position:0% have been within the noise ordinance but it<02:23:48.010> was<02:23:48.220> lit<02:23:48.990> the<02:23:49.990> neighbor<02:23:50.230> who's<02:23:50.561> used<02:23:50.830> to 02:23:50.940 --> 02:23:50.950 align:start position:0% it was lit the neighbor who's used to 02:23:50.950 --> 02:23:55.320 align:start position:0% it was lit the neighbor who's used to having<02:23:51.010> a<02:23:51.610> quiet<02:23:53.550> relatively<02:23:54.550> quiet<02:23:54.820> evening 02:23:55.320 --> 02:23:55.330 align:start position:0% having a quiet relatively quiet evening 02:23:55.330 --> 02:24:00.480 align:start position:0% having a quiet relatively quiet evening when<02:23:55.720> the<02:23:56.141> neighbor<02:23:56.351> comes<02:23:56.710> home<02:23:57.960> found<02:23:59.490> that 02:24:00.480 --> 02:24:00.490 align:start position:0% when the neighbor comes home found that 02:24:00.490 --> 02:24:01.980 align:start position:0% when the neighbor comes home found that instead<02:24:00.790> of<02:24:00.910> being<02:24:01.090> able<02:24:01.210> to<02:24:01.391> relax<02:24:01.660> and 02:24:01.980 --> 02:24:01.990 align:start position:0% instead of being able to relax and 02:24:01.990 --> 02:24:06.270 align:start position:0% instead of being able to relax and jacuzzi<02:24:02.830> she<02:24:03.840> had<02:24:04.840> attention<02:24:05.260> from 02:24:06.270 --> 02:24:06.280 align:start position:0% jacuzzi she had attention from 02:24:06.280 --> 02:24:08.490 align:start position:0% jacuzzi she had attention from our<02:24:06.490> tears<02:24:06.700> so<02:24:07.300> they're<02:24:07.990> you<02:24:08.140> know<02:24:08.170> it's<02:24:08.320> not 02:24:08.490 --> 02:24:08.500 align:start position:0% our tears so they're you know it's not 02:24:08.500 --> 02:24:12.000 align:start position:0% our tears so they're you know it's not hard<02:24:08.680> to<02:24:08.890> visualize<02:24:09.040> war<02:24:09.610> stories<02:24:10.800> about<02:24:11.800> how 02:24:12.000 --> 02:24:12.010 align:start position:0% hard to visualize war stories about how 02:24:12.010 --> 02:24:13.830 align:start position:0% hard to visualize war stories about how these<02:24:12.190> things<02:24:12.250> work<02:24:12.760> and<02:24:13.000> this<02:24:13.180> is<02:24:13.330> I'm<02:24:13.660> not 02:24:13.830 --> 02:24:13.840 align:start position:0% these things work and this is I'm not 02:24:13.840 --> 02:24:16.740 align:start position:0% these things work and this is I'm not sure<02:24:14.020> we<02:24:14.350> can<02:24:14.530> codify<02:24:14.830> a<02:24:15.100> lot<02:24:15.370> of<02:24:15.520> this<02:24:15.700> but<02:24:16.390> you 02:24:16.740 --> 02:24:16.750 align:start position:0% sure we can codify a lot of this but you 02:24:16.750 --> 02:24:18.810 align:start position:0% sure we can codify a lot of this but you know<02:24:16.870> one<02:24:17.230> way<02:24:17.380> to<02:24:17.410> characterize<02:24:18.100> it<02:24:18.130> is<02:24:18.430> if 02:24:18.810 --> 02:24:18.820 align:start position:0% know one way to characterize it is if 02:24:18.820 --> 02:24:21.360 align:start position:0% know one way to characterize it is if you've<02:24:19.060> upset<02:24:19.480> your<02:24:19.660> neighbors<02:24:20.110> then<02:24:21.010> there's 02:24:21.360 --> 02:24:21.370 align:start position:0% you've upset your neighbors then there's 02:24:21.370 --> 02:24:23.460 align:start position:0% you've upset your neighbors then there's something<02:24:21.610> wrong<02:24:21.810> unless<02:24:22.810> your<02:24:22.990> neighbor<02:24:23.200> is 02:24:23.460 --> 02:24:23.470 align:start position:0% something wrong unless your neighbor is 02:24:23.470 --> 02:24:27.630 align:start position:0% something wrong unless your neighbor is just<02:24:23.800> you<02:24:24.790> know<02:24:25.440> it<02:24:26.440> really<02:24:26.740> difficult<02:24:27.100> and<02:24:27.580> in 02:24:27.630 --> 02:24:27.640 align:start position:0% just you know it really difficult and in 02:24:27.640 --> 02:24:29.940 align:start position:0% just you know it really difficult and in this<02:24:27.730> case<02:24:28.030> I<02:24:28.330> don't<02:24:28.690> I<02:24:28.960> don't<02:24:29.080> think<02:24:29.380> that 02:24:29.940 --> 02:24:29.950 align:start position:0% this case I don't I don't think that 02:24:29.950 --> 02:24:32.460 align:start position:0% this case I don't I don't think that that<02:24:30.190> was<02:24:30.400> the<02:24:30.430> situation<02:24:31.210> and<02:24:31.360> it<02:24:31.810> got<02:24:31.960> fixed 02:24:32.460 --> 02:24:32.470 align:start position:0% that was the situation and it got fixed 02:24:32.470 --> 02:24:34.500 align:start position:0% that was the situation and it got fixed in<02:24:32.620> later<02:24:32.650> versions<02:24:33.430> so<02:24:33.700> there<02:24:33.910> are<02:24:34.030> ways<02:24:34.210> that 02:24:34.500 --> 02:24:34.510 align:start position:0% in later versions so there are ways that 02:24:34.510 --> 02:24:36.390 align:start position:0% in later versions so there are ways that you<02:24:35.050> you<02:24:35.260> know<02:24:35.350> sometimes<02:24:35.800> you<02:24:36.010> just<02:24:36.040> have<02:24:36.280> to 02:24:36.390 --> 02:24:36.400 align:start position:0% you you know sometimes you just have to 02:24:36.400 --> 02:24:39.360 align:start position:0% you you know sometimes you just have to have<02:24:36.640> these<02:24:36.880> experiences<02:24:37.690> and<02:24:38.370> everybody 02:24:39.360 --> 02:24:39.370 align:start position:0% have these experiences and everybody 02:24:39.370 --> 02:24:41.280 align:start position:0% have these experiences and everybody smiles<02:24:39.850> and<02:24:40.180> at<02:24:40.330> some<02:24:40.510> point<02:24:40.780> they<02:24:41.020> say<02:24:41.260> oh 02:24:41.280 --> 02:24:41.290 align:start position:0% smiles and at some point they say oh 02:24:41.290 --> 02:24:43.890 align:start position:0% smiles and at some point they say oh well<02:24:41.680> chalk<02:24:42.610> it<02:24:42.760> up<02:24:42.850> to<02:24:42.910> experience<02:24:43.270> and 02:24:43.890 --> 02:24:43.900 align:start position:0% well chalk it up to experience and 02:24:43.900 --> 02:24:46.290 align:start position:0% well chalk it up to experience and things<02:24:44.080> get<02:24:44.290> better<02:24:44.640> and<02:24:45.640> if<02:24:46.090> there<02:24:46.270> are 02:24:46.290 --> 02:24:46.300 align:start position:0% things get better and if there are 02:24:46.300 --> 02:24:47.490 align:start position:0% things get better and if there are ruffled<02:24:46.660> feathers<02:24:46.870> in<02:24:47.230> the<02:24:47.320> meantime 02:24:47.490 --> 02:24:47.500 align:start position:0% ruffled feathers in the meantime 02:24:47.500 --> 02:24:50.100 align:start position:0% ruffled feathers in the meantime everybody<02:24:48.310> is<02:24:48.850> responsible<02:24:49.240> for<02:24:49.600> getting<02:24:49.990> it 02:24:50.100 --> 02:24:50.110 align:start position:0% everybody is responsible for getting it 02:24:50.110 --> 02:24:51.630 align:start position:0% everybody is responsible for getting it fixed<02:24:50.350> that's<02:24:50.590> what<02:24:50.770> it<02:24:50.860> means<02:24:50.980> to<02:24:51.130> be<02:24:51.310> part<02:24:51.610> of 02:24:51.630 --> 02:24:51.640 align:start position:0% fixed that's what it means to be part of 02:24:51.640 --> 02:24:54.330 align:start position:0% fixed that's what it means to be part of the<02:24:51.730> community<02:24:51.940> but<02:24:52.810> you<02:24:53.530> know<02:24:53.620> part<02:24:54.250> of 02:24:54.330 --> 02:24:54.340 align:start position:0% the community but you know part of 02:24:54.340 --> 02:24:56.460 align:start position:0% the community but you know part of avoiding<02:24:55.180> the<02:24:55.270> situation<02:24:55.420> where<02:24:56.110> there's<02:24:56.290> no 02:24:56.460 --> 02:24:56.470 align:start position:0% avoiding the situation where there's no 02:24:56.470 --> 02:24:59.010 align:start position:0% avoiding the situation where there's no reaction<02:24:57.040> is<02:24:57.400> to<02:24:57.580> have<02:24:57.730> the<02:24:57.880> big<02:24:58.090> stick<02:24:58.450> that 02:24:59.010 --> 02:24:59.020 align:start position:0% reaction is to have the big stick that 02:24:59.020 --> 02:25:01.800 align:start position:0% reaction is to have the big stick that you<02:24:59.140> were<02:24:59.290> talking<02:24:59.710> about<02:24:59.820> so<02:25:00.820> with<02:25:01.630> respect 02:25:01.800 --> 02:25:01.810 align:start position:0% you were talking about so with respect 02:25:01.810 --> 02:25:05.870 align:start position:0% you were talking about so with respect to<02:25:02.220> parking<02:25:03.220> I<02:25:03.340> I<02:25:03.550> support<02:25:04.060> the<02:25:04.180> idea<02:25:04.210> I<02:25:04.750> think 02:25:05.870 --> 02:25:05.880 align:start position:0% to parking I I support the idea I think 02:25:05.880 --> 02:25:09.660 align:start position:0% to parking I I support the idea I think you<02:25:06.880> know<02:25:06.940> the<02:25:07.300> more<02:25:07.540> you<02:25:07.570> can<02:25:07.780> a<02:25:08.670> good 02:25:09.660 --> 02:25:09.670 align:start position:0% you know the more you can a good 02:25:09.670 --> 02:25:12.750 align:start position:0% you know the more you can a good neighbor<02:25:09.940> policy<02:25:10.950> indicates<02:25:11.950> that<02:25:12.250> we<02:25:12.520> should 02:25:12.750 --> 02:25:12.760 align:start position:0% neighbor policy indicates that we should 02:25:12.760 --> 02:25:17.730 align:start position:0% neighbor policy indicates that we should try<02:25:13.270> to<02:25:13.300> accommodate<02:25:15.960> visitors<02:25:16.960> with<02:25:17.500> off 02:25:17.730 --> 02:25:17.740 align:start position:0% try to accommodate visitors with off 02:25:17.740 --> 02:25:19.920 align:start position:0% try to accommodate visitors with off street<02:25:18.010> parking<02:25:18.040> to<02:25:19.030> the<02:25:19.180> maximum<02:25:19.720> extent 02:25:19.920 --> 02:25:19.930 align:start position:0% street parking to the maximum extent 02:25:19.930 --> 02:25:24.150 align:start position:0% street parking to the maximum extent possible<02:25:21.120> that's<02:25:22.170> that's<02:25:23.170> not<02:25:23.440> just<02:25:23.680> law<02:25:23.860> it's 02:25:24.150 --> 02:25:24.160 align:start position:0% possible that's that's not just law it's 02:25:24.160 --> 02:25:26.340 align:start position:0% possible that's that's not just law it's being<02:25:24.400> a<02:25:24.490> good<02:25:24.700> neighbor<02:25:24.880> and<02:25:25.210> a<02:25:25.750> failing<02:25:26.050> to 02:25:26.340 --> 02:25:26.350 align:start position:0% being a good neighbor and a failing to 02:25:26.350 --> 02:25:29.880 align:start position:0% being a good neighbor and a failing to do<02:25:26.500> that<02:25:27.210> on<02:25:28.210> a<02:25:28.330> consistent<02:25:28.570> basis<02:25:29.440> bothers 02:25:29.880 --> 02:25:29.890 align:start position:0% do that on a consistent basis bothers 02:25:29.890 --> 02:25:32.690 align:start position:0% do that on a consistent basis bothers your<02:25:30.040> neighbor<02:25:30.280> then<02:25:31.210> that's<02:25:31.810> an<02:25:32.080> issue<02:25:32.230> that 02:25:32.690 --> 02:25:32.700 align:start position:0% your neighbor then that's an issue that 02:25:32.700 --> 02:25:36.300 align:start position:0% your neighbor then that's an issue that could<02:25:33.700> be<02:25:33.760> resolved<02:25:34.300> administratively<02:25:34.920> so<02:25:35.920> I 02:25:36.300 --> 02:25:36.310 align:start position:0% could be resolved administratively so I 02:25:36.310 --> 02:25:38.160 align:start position:0% could be resolved administratively so I think<02:25:36.700> it<02:25:36.790> makes<02:25:37.000> sense<02:25:37.090> to<02:25:37.360> have<02:25:37.540> a<02:25:37.600> big<02:25:37.870> stick 02:25:38.160 --> 02:25:38.170 align:start position:0% think it makes sense to have a big stick 02:25:38.170 --> 02:25:44.520 align:start position:0% think it makes sense to have a big stick and<02:25:38.200> not<02:25:38.500> necessarily<02:25:39.010> to<02:25:39.160> use<02:25:39.460> it<02:25:42.930> if<02:25:43.930> someone 02:25:44.520 --> 02:25:44.530 align:start position:0% and not necessarily to use it if someone 02:25:44.530 --> 02:25:46.950 align:start position:0% and not necessarily to use it if someone has<02:25:44.770> no<02:25:45.040> driveway<02:25:45.640> they<02:25:46.510> should<02:25:46.720> be<02:25:46.870> allowed 02:25:46.950 --> 02:25:46.960 align:start position:0% has no driveway they should be allowed 02:25:46.960 --> 02:25:48.990 align:start position:0% has no driveway they should be allowed to<02:25:47.140> contribute<02:25:48.100> a<02:25:48.160> hundred<02:25:48.460> bucks<02:25:48.670> to<02:25:48.850> the 02:25:48.990 --> 02:25:49.000 align:start position:0% to contribute a hundred bucks to the 02:25:49.000 --> 02:25:52.310 align:start position:0% to contribute a hundred bucks to the jewel<02:25:49.330> so<02:25:49.630> for<02:25:49.900> a<02:25:49.930> parking<02:25:50.350> garage<02:25:50.380> project<02:25:51.300> an 02:25:52.310 --> 02:25:52.320 align:start position:0% jewel so for a parking garage project an 02:25:52.320 --> 02:25:57.929 align:start position:0% jewel so for a parking garage project an in<02:25:53.320> lieu<02:25:53.530> fee<02:25:53.800> nice<02:25:54.750> nice 02:25:57.929 --> 02:25:57.939 align:start position:0% 02:25:57.939 --> 02:25:59.760 align:start position:0% so<02:25:58.539> there<02:25:58.929> was<02:25:59.049> another<02:25:59.259> one<02:25:59.469> that<02:25:59.560> you<02:25:59.619> were 02:25:59.760 --> 02:25:59.770 align:start position:0% so there was another one that you were 02:25:59.770 --> 02:26:02.550 align:start position:0% so there was another one that you were looking<02:26:00.069> for<02:26:00.279> did<02:26:00.459> we<02:26:00.579> get<02:26:00.729> them<02:26:01.560> colleagues 02:26:02.550 --> 02:26:02.560 align:start position:0% looking for did we get them colleagues 02:26:02.560 --> 02:26:04.499 align:start position:0% looking for did we get them colleagues yeoman's<02:26:03.310> work<02:26:03.399> tonight<02:26:03.879> thank<02:26:04.239> you<02:26:04.329> very 02:26:04.499 --> 02:26:04.509 align:start position:0% yeoman's work tonight thank you very 02:26:04.509 --> 02:26:07.229 align:start position:0% yeoman's work tonight thank you very much<02:26:04.749> for<02:26:04.989> the<02:26:05.109> attention<02:26:05.489> public<02:26:06.489> yeoman's 02:26:07.229 --> 02:26:07.239 align:start position:0% much for the attention public yeoman's 02:26:07.239 --> 02:26:08.939 align:start position:0% much for the attention public yeoman's work<02:26:07.299> tonight<02:26:07.779> thank<02:26:08.109> you<02:26: