WEBVTT Kind: captions Language: en Style: ::cue(c.colorCCCCCC) { color: rgb(204,204,204); } ::cue(c.colorE5E5E5) { color: rgb(229,229,229); } ## 00:00:01.380 --> 00:00:52.390 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:00:52.390 --> 00:00:52.400 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:00:52.400 --> 00:01:06.550 align:start position:0% [Music] you<00:00:53.030> have<00:00:53.360> a<00:00:53.390> dark<00:00:54.250> black<00:00:55.250> heart 00:01:06.550 --> 00:01:06.560 align:start position:0% 00:01:06.560 --> 00:02:04.510 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:02:04.510 --> 00:02:04.520 align:start position:0% 00:02:04.520 --> 00:02:15.170 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:02:15.170 --> 00:02:15.180 align:start position:0% 00:02:15.180 --> 00:02:35.250 align:start position:0% I'm<00:02:16.180> here<00:02:28.590> here<00:02:29.590> okay<00:02:33.600> are<00:02:34.600> there<00:02:34.720> any<00:02:34.780> counsel 00:02:35.250 --> 00:02:35.260 align:start position:0% I'm here here okay are there any counsel 00:02:35.260 --> 00:02:44.220 align:start position:0% I'm here here okay are there any counsel comments<00:02:40.290> I've<00:02:41.290> just<00:02:41.590> got<00:02:41.860> one<00:02:42.370> or<00:02:42.910> two<00:02:43.230> quick 00:02:44.220 --> 00:02:44.230 align:start position:0% comments I've just got one or two quick 00:02:44.230 --> 00:02:46.620 align:start position:0% comments I've just got one or two quick things<00:02:44.470> I<00:02:44.770> just<00:02:44.890> wanted<00:02:45.280> to<00:02:45.490> note<00:02:45.730> that<00:02:45.760> the 00:02:46.620 --> 00:02:46.630 align:start position:0% things I just wanted to note that the 00:02:46.630 --> 00:02:48.780 align:start position:0% things I just wanted to note that the police<00:02:47.170> department<00:02:47.620> had<00:02:47.740> their<00:02:47.920> Awards 00:02:48.780 --> 00:02:48.790 align:start position:0% police department had their Awards 00:02:48.790 --> 00:02:50.610 align:start position:0% police department had their Awards annual<00:02:49.180> awards<00:02:49.480> banquet<00:02:49.660> on<00:02:50.080> Friday<00:02:50.380> night 00:02:50.610 --> 00:02:50.620 align:start position:0% annual awards banquet on Friday night 00:02:50.620 --> 00:02:54.540 align:start position:0% annual awards banquet on Friday night and<00:02:52.140> among<00:02:53.140> the<00:02:53.350> I<00:02:53.380> guess<00:02:53.740> about<00:02:54.070> close<00:02:54.340> to<00:02:54.370> a 00:02:54.540 --> 00:02:54.550 align:start position:0% and among the I guess about close to a 00:02:54.550 --> 00:02:57.450 align:start position:0% and among the I guess about close to a hundred<00:02:54.730> people<00:02:55.240> who<00:02:55.390> were<00:02:55.540> there<00:02:56.250> which<00:02:57.250> was 00:02:57.450 --> 00:02:57.460 align:start position:0% hundred people who were there which was 00:02:57.460 --> 00:03:00.960 align:start position:0% hundred people who were there which was I<00:02:57.610> think<00:02:57.640> the<00:02:57.970> largest<00:02:58.240> turnout<00:02:58.750> ever<00:02:59.970> council 00:03:00.960 --> 00:03:00.970 align:start position:0% I think the largest turnout ever council 00:03:00.970 --> 00:03:02.940 align:start position:0% I think the largest turnout ever council member<00:03:01.240> right<00:03:01.420> and<00:03:01.570> I<00:03:01.630> were<00:03:01.990> honored<00:03:02.590> to<00:03:02.800> be 00:03:02.940 --> 00:03:02.950 align:start position:0% member right and I were honored to be 00:03:02.950 --> 00:03:05.700 align:start position:0% member right and I were honored to be there<00:03:03.160> as<00:03:03.400> with<00:03:03.610> the<00:03:04.080> city<00:03:05.080> manager<00:03:05.530> and<00:03:05.650> the 00:03:05.700 --> 00:03:05.710 align:start position:0% there as with the city manager and the 00:03:05.710 --> 00:03:08.070 align:start position:0% there as with the city manager and the deputy<00:03:06.040> city<00:03:06.250> manager<00:03:06.310> and<00:03:06.910> it<00:03:07.450> was<00:03:07.600> a<00:03:07.630> very 00:03:08.070 --> 00:03:08.080 align:start position:0% deputy city manager and it was a very 00:03:08.080 --> 00:03:08.730 align:start position:0% deputy city manager and it was a very nice<00:03:08.260> event 00:03:08.730 --> 00:03:08.740 align:start position:0% nice event 00:03:08.740 --> 00:03:11.550 align:start position:0% nice event chief<00:03:09.100> did<00:03:09.280> a<00:03:09.340> great<00:03:09.520> job<00:03:10.030> and<00:03:10.350> I<00:03:11.350> think 00:03:11.550 --> 00:03:11.560 align:start position:0% chief did a great job and I think 00:03:11.560 --> 00:03:13.470 align:start position:0% chief did a great job and I think everybody<00:03:12.100> enjoyed<00:03:12.430> themselves<00:03:12.460> and<00:03:13.270> a 00:03:13.470 --> 00:03:13.480 align:start position:0% everybody enjoyed themselves and a 00:03:13.480 --> 00:03:15.870 align:start position:0% everybody enjoyed themselves and a number<00:03:13.660> of<00:03:14.040> members<00:03:15.040> of<00:03:15.310> the<00:03:15.370> department<00:03:15.790> were 00:03:15.870 --> 00:03:15.880 align:start position:0% number of members of the department were 00:03:15.880 --> 00:03:17.670 align:start position:0% number of members of the department were honored<00:03:16.240> for<00:03:16.540> some<00:03:16.810> pretty<00:03:17.440> outstanding 00:03:17.670 --> 00:03:17.680 align:start position:0% honored for some pretty outstanding 00:03:17.680 --> 00:03:21.390 align:start position:0% honored for some pretty outstanding service<00:03:18.340> in<00:03:18.520> 2008<00:03:19.270> and<00:03:19.630> I<00:03:20.620> just<00:03:20.860> wanted<00:03:21.070> to<00:03:21.160> say 00:03:21.390 --> 00:03:21.400 align:start position:0% service in 2008 and I just wanted to say 00:03:21.400 --> 00:03:24.270 align:start position:0% service in 2008 and I just wanted to say that<00:03:21.750> it<00:03:22.750> was<00:03:22.930> a<00:03:22.959> wonderful<00:03:23.650> event<00:03:23.740> and<00:03:24.040> it<00:03:24.160> was 00:03:24.270 --> 00:03:24.280 align:start position:0% that it was a wonderful event and it was 00:03:24.280 --> 00:03:27.960 align:start position:0% that it was a wonderful event and it was good<00:03:24.459> to<00:03:24.580> see<00:03:24.610> the<00:03:25.480> department<00:03:26.970> recognizing 00:03:27.960 --> 00:03:27.970 align:start position:0% good to see the department recognizing 00:03:27.970 --> 00:03:32.190 align:start position:0% good to see the department recognizing its<00:03:28.120> own<00:03:28.390> in<00:03:28.810> such<00:03:29.050> a<00:03:29.080> fine<00:03:29.320> fashion<00:03:30.540> and<00:03:31.540> I 00:03:32.190 --> 00:03:32.200 align:start position:0% its own in such a fine fashion and I 00:03:32.200 --> 00:03:37.020 align:start position:0% its own in such a fine fashion and I also<00:03:32.410> just<00:03:32.650> wanted<00:03:32.950> to<00:03:35.459> point<00:03:36.459> out<00:03:36.610> a<00:03:36.640> figure 00:03:37.020 --> 00:03:37.030 align:start position:0% also just wanted to point out a figure 00:03:37.030 --> 00:03:41.340 align:start position:0% also just wanted to point out a figure that<00:03:37.060> I<00:03:37.270> saw<00:03:37.600> in<00:03:37.930> my<00:03:38.730> cog<00:03:39.730> board<00:03:40.330> packet<00:03:41.080> for 00:03:41.340 --> 00:03:41.350 align:start position:0% that I saw in my cog board packet for 00:03:41.350 --> 00:03:44.100 align:start position:0% that I saw in my cog board packet for the<00:03:41.470> board<00:03:41.800> meeting<00:03:42.130> this<00:03:42.280> week<00:03:42.900> we've<00:03:43.900> got<00:03:43.930> a 00:03:44.100 --> 00:03:44.110 align:start position:0% the board meeting this week we've got a 00:03:44.110 --> 00:03:46.860 align:start position:0% the board meeting this week we've got a copy<00:03:44.410> of<00:03:44.620> the<00:03:44.800> third<00:03:45.400> quarter<00:03:46.270> financial 00:03:46.860 --> 00:03:46.870 align:start position:0% copy of the third quarter financial 00:03:46.870 --> 00:03:49.020 align:start position:0% copy of the third quarter financial report<00:03:47.290> and<00:03:47.590> it<00:03:47.800> was<00:03:47.890> interesting<00:03:48.400> to<00:03:48.640> me<00:03:48.670> that 00:03:49.020 --> 00:03:49.030 align:start position:0% report and it was interesting to me that 00:03:49.030 --> 00:03:51.930 align:start position:0% report and it was interesting to me that the<00:03:49.690> I<00:03:50.230> always<00:03:50.590> knew<00:03:50.739> that<00:03:50.770> the<00:03:51.040> cog<00:03:51.400> budget 00:03:51.930 --> 00:03:51.940 align:start position:0% the I always knew that the cog budget 00:03:51.940 --> 00:03:54.810 align:start position:0% the I always knew that the cog budget was<00:03:52.120> about<00:03:52.510> like<00:03:52.900> the<00:03:53.140> city's<00:03:53.500> budget<00:03:53.820> cog 00:03:54.810 --> 00:03:54.820 align:start position:0% was about like the city's budget cog 00:03:54.820 --> 00:03:57.059 align:start position:0% was about like the city's budget cog budget<00:03:55.270> is<00:03:55.420> about<00:03:55.540> 28<00:03:56.140> or<00:03:56.290> 29 00:03:57.059 --> 00:03:57.069 align:start position:0% budget is about 28 or 29 00:03:57.069 --> 00:04:01.349 align:start position:0% budget is about 28 or 29 dollars<00:03:57.549> per<00:03:57.849> year<00:03:58.150> and<00:03:58.409> their<00:04:00.060> general<00:04:01.060> fund 00:04:01.349 --> 00:04:01.359 align:start position:0% dollars per year and their general fund 00:04:01.359 --> 00:04:04.920 align:start position:0% dollars per year and their general fund balance<00:04:01.980> increased<00:04:02.980> to<00:04:03.400> 9<00:04:03.909> million<00:04:04.299> and<00:04:04.629> small 00:04:04.920 --> 00:04:04.930 align:start position:0% balance increased to 9 million and small 00:04:04.930 --> 00:04:07.949 align:start position:0% balance increased to 9 million and small change<00:04:05.260> in<00:04:05.560> the<00:04:05.680> third<00:04:05.889> quarter<00:04:06.269> so<00:04:07.269> they're 00:04:07.949 --> 00:04:07.959 align:start position:0% change in the third quarter so they're 00:04:07.959 --> 00:04:11.160 align:start position:0% change in the third quarter so they're not<00:04:08.109> ACOG<00:04:08.739> isn't<00:04:09.099> exactly<00:04:09.400> like<00:04:10.170> city 00:04:11.160 --> 00:04:11.170 align:start position:0% not ACOG isn't exactly like city 00:04:11.170 --> 00:04:12.839 align:start position:0% not ACOG isn't exactly like city government<00:04:11.709> but<00:04:11.980> it<00:04:12.219> was<00:04:12.370> interesting<00:04:12.609> to 00:04:12.839 --> 00:04:12.849 align:start position:0% government but it was interesting to 00:04:12.849 --> 00:04:17.430 align:start position:0% government but it was interesting to find<00:04:13.120> that<00:04:13.389> a<00:04:14.189> public<00:04:15.189> entity<00:04:15.690> that<00:04:16.690> had<00:04:17.320> the 00:04:17.430 --> 00:04:17.440 align:start position:0% find that a public entity that had the 00:04:17.440 --> 00:04:19.909 align:start position:0% find that a public entity that had the same<00:04:17.620> budget<00:04:17.829> had<00:04:18.370> the<00:04:19.150> same<00:04:19.389> or<00:04:19.630> more 00:04:19.909 --> 00:04:19.919 align:start position:0% same budget had the same or more 00:04:19.919 --> 00:04:21.810 align:start position:0% same budget had the same or more unbalanced<00:04:20.919> so<00:04:21.130> I<00:04:21.160> just<00:04:21.340> thought<00:04:21.549> that<00:04:21.609> was 00:04:21.810 --> 00:04:21.820 align:start position:0% unbalanced so I just thought that was 00:04:21.820 --> 00:04:26.040 align:start position:0% unbalanced so I just thought that was working<00:04:22.090> noting<00:04:24.449> about<00:04:25.449> the<00:04:25.630> same<00:04:25.810> as<00:04:25.930> the 00:04:26.040 --> 00:04:26.050 align:start position:0% working noting about the same as the 00:04:26.050 --> 00:04:31.230 align:start position:0% working noting about the same as the city<00:04:26.289> about<00:04:27.039> 125<00:04:27.849> full<00:04:28.419> cup<00:04:29.849> cups<00:04:30.849> never<00:04:31.090> seen 00:04:31.230 --> 00:04:31.240 align:start position:0% city about 125 full cup cups never seen 00:04:31.240 --> 00:04:33.330 align:start position:0% city about 125 full cup cups never seen this<00:04:31.360> Thank<00:04:31.840> You<00:04:31.900> mayor<00:04:32.080> I<00:04:32.349> didn't<00:04:33.099> want<00:04:33.250> to 00:04:33.330 --> 00:04:33.340 align:start position:0% this Thank You mayor I didn't want to 00:04:33.340 --> 00:04:35.760 align:start position:0% this Thank You mayor I didn't want to let<00:04:33.460> the<00:04:33.699> community<00:04:33.910> know<00:04:34.180> that<00:04:34.330> Ward<00:04:35.259> 4<00:04:35.590> is 00:04:35.760 --> 00:04:35.770 align:start position:0% let the community know that Ward 4 is 00:04:35.770 --> 00:04:37.650 align:start position:0% let the community know that Ward 4 is hosting<00:04:36.220> a<00:04:36.340> party<00:04:36.729> at<00:04:36.970> the<00:04:37.150> Pawnee<00:04:37.389> branch 00:04:37.650 --> 00:04:37.660 align:start position:0% hosting a party at the Pawnee branch 00:04:37.660 --> 00:04:41.460 align:start position:0% hosting a party at the Pawnee branch pool<00:04:37.990> this<00:04:38.259> Sunday<00:04:38.710> from<00:04:39.310> 3<00:04:39.580> to<00:04:39.729> 5<00:04:39.940> p.m.<00:04:40.479> and<00:04:40.750> we 00:04:41.460 --> 00:04:41.470 align:start position:0% pool this Sunday from 3 to 5 p.m. and we 00:04:41.470 --> 00:04:50.670 align:start position:0% pool this Sunday from 3 to 5 p.m. and we invite<00:04:41.770> everyone<00:04:42.070> to<00:04:42.370> come<00:04:43.349> we<00:04:44.349> will<00:04:49.410> join<00:04:50.410> us 00:04:50.670 --> 00:04:50.680 align:start position:0% invite everyone to come we will join us 00:04:50.680 --> 00:05:02.790 align:start position:0% invite everyone to come we will join us at<00:04:50.860> the<00:04:50.949> pool<00:05:00.780> and<00:05:01.780> it<00:05:01.960> was<00:05:02.080> three<00:05:02.289> to<00:05:02.380> five<00:05:02.620> on 00:05:02.790 --> 00:05:02.800 align:start position:0% at the pool and it was three to five on 00:05:02.800 --> 00:05:04.279 align:start position:0% at the pool and it was three to five on Sunday 00:05:04.279 --> 00:05:04.289 align:start position:0% Sunday 00:05:04.289 --> 00:05:07.300 align:start position:0% Sunday anybody<00:05:05.289> else 00:05:07.300 --> 00:05:07.310 align:start position:0% anybody else 00:05:07.310 --> 00:05:12.559 align:start position:0% anybody else okay<00:05:08.659> the<00:05:09.659> next<00:05:09.779> item<00:05:10.050> is<00:05:11.300> there<00:05:12.300> are<00:05:12.419> no 00:05:12.559 --> 00:05:12.569 align:start position:0% okay the next item is there are no 00:05:12.569 --> 00:05:15.200 align:start position:0% okay the next item is there are no additional<00:05:13.050> agenda<00:05:13.469> items<00:05:13.849> just<00:05:14.849> a<00:05:14.969> quick 00:05:15.200 --> 00:05:15.210 align:start position:0% additional agenda items just a quick 00:05:15.210 --> 00:05:20.540 align:start position:0% additional agenda items just a quick agenda<00:05:15.930> scheduling<00:05:16.590> update<00:05:18.439> the<00:05:19.439> meeting<00:05:20.370> a 00:05:20.540 --> 00:05:20.550 align:start position:0% agenda scheduling update the meeting a 00:05:20.550 --> 00:05:23.689 align:start position:0% agenda scheduling update the meeting a week<00:05:20.729> from<00:05:20.909> tonight<00:05:21.090> may<00:05:21.419> 18th<00:05:22.490> we<00:05:23.490> have<00:05:23.669> a 00:05:23.689 --> 00:05:23.699 align:start position:0% week from tonight may 18th we have a 00:05:23.699 --> 00:05:25.999 align:start position:0% week from tonight may 18th we have a resolution<00:05:24.599> adopting<00:05:25.169> the<00:05:25.259> strategic<00:05:25.740> plan 00:05:25.999 --> 00:05:26.009 align:start position:0% resolution adopting the strategic plan 00:05:26.009 --> 00:05:29.119 align:start position:0% resolution adopting the strategic plan and<00:05:26.340> we<00:05:26.430> have<00:05:26.580> the<00:05:27.289> first<00:05:28.289> reading<00:05:28.560> ordinances 00:05:29.119 --> 00:05:29.129 align:start position:0% and we have the first reading ordinances 00:05:29.129 --> 00:05:32.510 align:start position:0% and we have the first reading ordinances of<00:05:29.310> the<00:05:30.110> adopting<00:05:31.110> these<00:05:31.259> various<00:05:31.620> budget 00:05:32.510 --> 00:05:32.520 align:start position:0% of the adopting these various budget 00:05:32.520 --> 00:05:37.909 align:start position:0% of the adopting these various budget ordinances<00:05:33.120> and<00:05:33.360> pay<00:05:34.289> plans<00:05:34.680> and<00:05:36.529> the<00:05:37.529> second 00:05:37.909 --> 00:05:37.919 align:start position:0% ordinances and pay plans and the second 00:05:37.919 --> 00:05:39.999 align:start position:0% ordinances and pay plans and the second reading<00:05:38.039> of<00:05:38.189> those<00:05:38.340> the<00:05:38.610> following<00:05:39.060> Tuesday 00:05:39.999 --> 00:05:40.009 align:start position:0% reading of those the following Tuesday 00:05:40.009 --> 00:05:47.749 align:start position:0% reading of those the following Tuesday May<00:05:41.009> 26<00:05:41.729> and<00:05:42.620> then<00:05:43.620> on<00:05:45.379> Monday<00:05:46.379> June<00:05:46.830> 1st<00:05:47.339> I 00:05:47.749 --> 00:05:47.759 align:start position:0% May 26 and then on Monday June 1st I 00:05:47.759 --> 00:05:49.999 align:start position:0% May 26 and then on Monday June 1st I would<00:05:48.689> point<00:05:48.900> out<00:05:49.050> to<00:05:49.169> my<00:05:49.289> colleagues<00:05:49.740> that<00:05:49.919> we 00:05:49.999 --> 00:05:50.009 align:start position:0% would point out to my colleagues that we 00:05:50.009 --> 00:05:51.290 align:start position:0% would point out to my colleagues that we have<00:05:50.129> discussion<00:05:50.610> of<00:05:50.699> the<00:05:50.759> legislative 00:05:51.290 --> 00:05:51.300 align:start position:0% have discussion of the legislative 00:05:51.300 --> 00:05:53.329 align:start position:0% have discussion of the legislative action<00:05:51.629> requests<00:05:51.990> to<00:05:52.080> be<00:05:52.199> submitted<00:05:52.589> to<00:05:52.620> FML 00:05:53.329 --> 00:05:53.339 align:start position:0% action requests to be submitted to FML 00:05:53.339 --> 00:05:56.779 align:start position:0% action requests to be submitted to FML so<00:05:54.120> if<00:05:54.360> you<00:05:54.509> have<00:05:54.719> any<00:05:54.979> input<00:05:55.979> on<00:05:56.310> that<00:05:56.520> any 00:05:56.779 --> 00:05:56.789 align:start position:0% so if you have any input on that any 00:05:56.789 --> 00:05:59.659 align:start position:0% so if you have any input on that any ideas<00:05:57.319> be<00:05:58.319> sure<00:05:58.349> to<00:05:58.650> get<00:05:58.800> them<00:05:59.009> too<00:05:59.249> I<00:05:59.279> assume 00:05:59.659 --> 00:05:59.669 align:start position:0% ideas be sure to get them too I assume 00:05:59.669 --> 00:06:03.589 align:start position:0% ideas be sure to get them too I assume Suzanne<00:06:00.449> Ludlow<00:06:01.879> in<00:06:02.879> the<00:06:03.029> remainder<00:06:03.389> of<00:06:03.419> this 00:06:03.589 --> 00:06:03.599 align:start position:0% Suzanne Ludlow in the remainder of this 00:06:03.599 --> 00:06:06.140 align:start position:0% Suzanne Ludlow in the remainder of this month<00:06:03.839> just<00:06:04.050> with<00:06:04.259> me<00:06:04.409> to<00:06:04.759> discuss<00:06:05.759> those<00:06:05.909> on 00:06:06.140 --> 00:06:06.150 align:start position:0% month just with me to discuss those on 00:06:06.150 --> 00:06:07.670 align:start position:0% month just with me to discuss those on the<00:06:06.240> first<00:06:06.479> to<00:06:06.659> be<00:06:06.810> ready<00:06:07.020> to<00:06:07.169> submit<00:06:07.469> those<00:06:07.650> to 00:06:07.670 --> 00:06:07.680 align:start position:0% the first to be ready to submit those to 00:06:07.680 --> 00:06:12.439 align:start position:0% the first to be ready to submit those to FML<00:06:08.159> later<00:06:08.370> in<00:06:08.550> June<00:06:10.310> and<00:06:11.310> the<00:06:11.909> next<00:06:12.149> item<00:06:12.389> on 00:06:12.439 --> 00:06:12.449 align:start position:0% FML later in June and the next item on 00:06:12.449 --> 00:06:14.240 align:start position:0% FML later in June and the next item on our<00:06:12.569> agenda<00:06:12.629> is<00:06:12.960> adoption<00:06:13.500> minutes<00:06:13.860> we<00:06:14.069> have 00:06:14.240 --> 00:06:14.250 align:start position:0% our agenda is adoption minutes we have 00:06:14.250 --> 00:06:15.920 align:start position:0% our agenda is adoption minutes we have minutes<00:06:14.580> from<00:06:14.699> March<00:06:14.969> 9th<00:06:15.300> when<00:06:15.569> somebody 00:06:15.920 --> 00:06:15.930 align:start position:0% minutes from March 9th when somebody 00:06:15.930 --> 00:06:19.429 align:start position:0% minutes from March 9th when somebody like<00:06:16.110> to<00:06:16.259> move<00:06:16.379> adoption<00:06:16.620> of<00:06:16.919> those<00:06:18.439> they've 00:06:19.429 --> 00:06:19.439 align:start position:0% like to move adoption of those they've 00:06:19.439 --> 00:06:20.839 align:start position:0% like to move adoption of those they've been<00:06:19.560> moving<00:06:19.740> second<00:06:20.129> at<00:06:20.219> all<00:06:20.370> in<00:06:20.520> favor 00:06:20.839 --> 00:06:20.849 align:start position:0% been moving second at all in favor 00:06:20.849 --> 00:06:26.869 align:start position:0% been moving second at all in favor they<00:06:21.029> say<00:06:21.240> I<00:06:22.729> the<00:06:24.979> minutes<00:06:25.979> are<00:06:26.129> adopted<00:06:26.699> oh 00:06:26.869 --> 00:06:26.879 align:start position:0% they say I the minutes are adopted oh 00:06:26.879 --> 00:06:30.290 align:start position:0% they say I the minutes are adopted oh and<00:06:27.770> hearing<00:06:28.770> council<00:06:29.069> members<00:06:29.310> nipper<00:06:29.639> pipe 00:06:30.290 --> 00:06:30.300 align:start position:0% and hearing council members nipper pipe 00:06:30.300 --> 00:06:33.679 align:start position:0% and hearing council members nipper pipe up<00:06:30.479> from<00:06:30.779> the<00:06:31.159> from<00:06:32.159> the<00:06:32.279> microphone<00:06:32.939> from<00:06:33.449> the 00:06:33.679 --> 00:06:33.689 align:start position:0% up from the from the microphone from the 00:06:33.689 --> 00:06:35.689 align:start position:0% up from the from the microphone from the phone<00:06:34.110> whatever<00:06:34.620> it<00:06:34.770> is 00:06:35.689 --> 00:06:35.699 align:start position:0% phone whatever it is 00:06:35.699 --> 00:06:39.139 align:start position:0% phone whatever it is am<00:06:36.419> I<00:06:36.599> correct<00:06:36.659> in<00:06:37.560> thinking<00:06:38.249> that<00:06:38.669> you<00:06:38.729> may<00:06:39.089> be 00:06:39.139 --> 00:06:39.149 align:start position:0% am I correct in thinking that you may be 00:06:39.149 --> 00:06:44.350 align:start position:0% am I correct in thinking that you may be rejoining<00:06:39.810> us<00:06:40.050> in<00:06:40.259> a<00:06:40.349> week<00:06:41.330> is<00:06:42.330> that<00:06:42.449> possible 00:06:44.350 --> 00:06:44.360 align:start position:0% rejoining us in a week is that possible 00:06:44.360 --> 00:06:50.149 align:start position:0% rejoining us in a week is that possible councilmember<00:06:45.360> snipper<00:06:45.689> but<00:06:48.169> maybe<00:06:49.169> not<00:06:49.499> wake 00:06:50.149 --> 00:06:50.159 align:start position:0% councilmember snipper but maybe not wake 00:06:50.159 --> 00:07:00.769 align:start position:0% councilmember snipper but maybe not wake up<00:06:57.740> and<00:06:58.740> I<00:06:58.949> just<00:06:59.339> really<00:06:59.669> do<00:06:59.909> ask<00:07:00.120> the<00:07:00.330> question 00:07:00.769 --> 00:07:00.779 align:start position:0% up and I just really do ask the question 00:07:00.779 --> 00:07:03.260 align:start position:0% up and I just really do ask the question while<00:07:00.930> I<00:07:00.960> was<00:07:01.289> trying<00:07:01.589> to<00:07:01.699> put<00:07:02.699> this<00:07:02.819> mute 00:07:03.260 --> 00:07:03.270 align:start position:0% while I was trying to put this mute 00:07:03.270 --> 00:07:07.519 align:start position:0% while I was trying to put this mute button<00:07:03.629> I'm<00:07:04.310> sorry<00:07:05.310> I<00:07:05.939> said<00:07:06.449> am<00:07:06.689> I<00:07:06.870> correct<00:07:07.110> in 00:07:07.519 --> 00:07:07.529 align:start position:0% button I'm sorry I said am I correct in 00:07:07.529 --> 00:07:09.769 align:start position:0% button I'm sorry I said am I correct in thinking<00:07:07.919> that<00:07:08.279> you<00:07:08.339> may<00:07:08.610> be<00:07:08.669> rejoining<00:07:09.330> us<00:07:09.539> in 00:07:09.769 --> 00:07:09.779 align:start position:0% thinking that you may be rejoining us in 00:07:09.779 --> 00:07:17.800 align:start position:0% thinking that you may be rejoining us in a<00:07:09.839> week<00:07:13.969> okay 00:07:17.800 --> 00:07:17.810 align:start position:0% 00:07:17.810 --> 00:07:22.090 align:start position:0% nevermind<00:07:18.740> sorry<00:07:19.070> I<00:07:19.160> brought<00:07:19.400> it<00:07:19.550> up<00:07:21.100> next 00:07:22.090 --> 00:07:22.100 align:start position:0% nevermind sorry I brought it up next 00:07:22.100 --> 00:07:23.830 align:start position:0% nevermind sorry I brought it up next item<00:07:22.430> is<00:07:22.610> the<00:07:22.880> public<00:07:23.150> comment<00:07:23.480> period<00:07:23.630> for 00:07:23.830 --> 00:07:23.840 align:start position:0% item is the public comment period for 00:07:23.840 --> 00:07:25.330 align:start position:0% item is the public comment period for anybody<00:07:24.320> who<00:07:24.470> would<00:07:24.590> like<00:07:24.800> to<00:07:24.830> make<00:07:25.130> any 00:07:25.330 --> 00:07:25.340 align:start position:0% anybody who would like to make any 00:07:25.340 --> 00:07:29.020 align:start position:0% anybody who would like to make any comments<00:07:25.850> on<00:07:26.260> anything<00:07:27.260> that<00:07:27.710> is<00:07:28.340> not<00:07:28.730> on<00:07:28.910> the 00:07:29.020 --> 00:07:29.030 align:start position:0% comments on anything that is not on the 00:07:29.030 --> 00:07:30.730 align:start position:0% comments on anything that is not on the agenda<00:07:29.120> or<00:07:29.630> anything<00:07:29.930> that<00:07:30.080> is<00:07:30.200> on<00:07:30.410> our<00:07:30.440> work 00:07:30.730 --> 00:07:30.740 align:start position:0% agenda or anything that is on our work 00:07:30.740 --> 00:07:32.890 align:start position:0% agenda or anything that is on our work session<00:07:30.980> agenda<00:07:31.400> if<00:07:31.940> you<00:07:32.120> have<00:07:32.270> any<00:07:32.420> comments 00:07:32.890 --> 00:07:32.900 align:start position:0% session agenda if you have any comments 00:07:32.900 --> 00:07:35.020 align:start position:0% session agenda if you have any comments to<00:07:32.930> make<00:07:33.110> at<00:07:33.350> the<00:07:33.560> budget<00:07:34.100> public<00:07:34.280> hearing<00:07:34.820> or 00:07:35.020 --> 00:07:35.030 align:start position:0% to make at the budget public hearing or 00:07:35.030 --> 00:07:37.120 align:start position:0% to make at the budget public hearing or any<00:07:35.240> of<00:07:35.450> the<00:07:35.540> regular<00:07:36.010> resolutions<00:07:37.010> or 00:07:37.120 --> 00:07:37.130 align:start position:0% any of the regular resolutions or 00:07:37.130 --> 00:07:38.920 align:start position:0% any of the regular resolutions or ordinances<00:07:37.580> in<00:07:37.730> the<00:07:38.120> regular<00:07:38.420> meeting<00:07:38.720> please 00:07:38.920 --> 00:07:38.930 align:start position:0% ordinances in the regular meeting please 00:07:38.930 --> 00:07:41.350 align:start position:0% ordinances in the regular meeting please hold<00:07:39.200> your<00:07:39.350> comments<00:07:39.530> for<00:07:40.220> that<00:07:40.370> time<00:07:41.060> that 00:07:41.350 --> 00:07:41.360 align:start position:0% hold your comments for that time that 00:07:41.360 --> 00:07:43.020 align:start position:0% hold your comments for that time that anybody<00:07:41.570> would<00:07:41.810> like<00:07:41.930> to<00:07:41.990> make<00:07:42.170> any<00:07:42.320> comments 00:07:43.020 --> 00:07:43.030 align:start position:0% anybody would like to make any comments 00:07:43.030 --> 00:07:45.370 align:start position:0% anybody would like to make any comments you're<00:07:44.030> welcome<00:07:44.390> to<00:07:44.480> come<00:07:44.570> up<00:07:44.690> and<00:07:44.900> identify 00:07:45.370 --> 00:07:45.380 align:start position:0% you're welcome to come up and identify 00:07:45.380 --> 00:07:55.970 align:start position:0% you're welcome to come up and identify yourself<00:07:45.710> and<00:07:45.890> speak<00:07:46.820> for<00:07:47.000> three<00:07:47.090> minutes 00:07:55.970 --> 00:07:55.980 align:start position:0% 00:07:55.980 --> 00:08:01.040 align:start position:0% I<00:07:56.760> wasn't<00:07:57.180> sure<00:07:57.450> if<00:07:57.540> I'd<00:07:57.690> be<00:07:57.720> here<00:07:59.270> in<00:08:00.270> time<00:08:00.600> for 00:08:01.040 --> 00:08:01.050 align:start position:0% I wasn't sure if I'd be here in time for 00:08:01.050 --> 00:08:03.290 align:start position:0% I wasn't sure if I'd be here in time for this<00:08:01.680> or<00:08:01.920> not<00:08:02.070> but<00:08:02.370> maybe<00:08:02.610> this<00:08:02.850> time<00:08:02.910> might 00:08:03.290 --> 00:08:03.300 align:start position:0% this or not but maybe this time might 00:08:03.300 --> 00:08:07.010 align:start position:0% this or not but maybe this time might have<00:08:03.420> passed<00:08:03.660> and<00:08:05.540> wasn't<00:08:06.540> sure<00:08:06.750> that<00:08:06.780> I 00:08:07.010 --> 00:08:07.020 align:start position:0% have passed and wasn't sure that I 00:08:07.020 --> 00:08:09.170 align:start position:0% have passed and wasn't sure that I wanted<00:08:07.830> to<00:08:08.010> make<00:08:08.160> any<00:08:08.370> comments<00:08:08.940> but<00:08:09.150> I 00:08:09.170 --> 00:08:09.180 align:start position:0% wanted to make any comments but I 00:08:09.180 --> 00:08:11.830 align:start position:0% wanted to make any comments but I believe<00:08:09.480> you<00:08:09.600> may<00:08:09.750> have<00:08:09.780> a<00:08:09.960> handout<00:08:10.950> that 00:08:11.830 --> 00:08:11.840 align:start position:0% believe you may have a handout that 00:08:11.840 --> 00:08:16.940 align:start position:0% believe you may have a handout that represented<00:08:12.840> a<00:08:13.310> supplement<00:08:14.310> to<00:08:14.670> the<00:08:15.950> health 00:08:16.940 --> 00:08:16.950 align:start position:0% represented a supplement to the health 00:08:16.950 --> 00:08:20.300 align:start position:0% represented a supplement to the health services<00:08:17.400> impact<00:08:17.790> committee<00:08:18.090> report<00:08:19.310> okay 00:08:20.300 --> 00:08:20.310 align:start position:0% services impact committee report okay 00:08:20.310 --> 00:08:24.650 align:start position:0% services impact committee report okay and<00:08:21.290> are<00:08:22.290> you<00:08:22.440> going<00:08:22.620> to<00:08:22.680> comment<00:08:23.250> on<00:08:23.550> the<00:08:23.910> on 00:08:24.650 --> 00:08:24.660 align:start position:0% and are you going to comment on the on 00:08:24.660 --> 00:08:28.070 align:start position:0% and are you going to comment on the on the<00:08:24.840> report<00:08:25.260> or<00:08:25.860> the<00:08:26.100> the<00:08:26.810> acceptance<00:08:27.810> of<00:08:27.960> the 00:08:28.070 --> 00:08:28.080 align:start position:0% the report or the the acceptance of the 00:08:28.080 --> 00:08:34.190 align:start position:0% the report or the the acceptance of the report<00:08:30.230> let's<00:08:31.230> say<00:08:32.600> let<00:08:33.600> me<00:08:33.690> speak<00:08:33.930> to<00:08:34.080> the 00:08:34.190 --> 00:08:34.200 align:start position:0% report let's say let me speak to the 00:08:34.200 --> 00:08:36.380 align:start position:0% report let's say let me speak to the acceptance<00:08:34.650> just<00:08:35.490> because<00:08:35.940> I'm<00:08:36.090> thinking 00:08:36.380 --> 00:08:36.390 align:start position:0% acceptance just because I'm thinking 00:08:36.390 --> 00:08:37.909 align:start position:0% acceptance just because I'm thinking we're<00:08:36.570> going<00:08:36.690> to<00:08:36.750> take<00:08:36.930> that<00:08:37.110> item<00:08:37.260> up<00:08:37.530> after 00:08:37.909 --> 00:08:37.919 align:start position:0% we're going to take that item up after 00:08:37.919 --> 00:08:39.740 align:start position:0% we're going to take that item up after the<00:08:38.040> budget<00:08:38.520> hearing<00:08:38.850> and<00:08:39.270> you<00:08:39.360> could<00:08:39.540> comment 00:08:39.740 --> 00:08:39.750 align:start position:0% the budget hearing and you could comment 00:08:39.750 --> 00:08:43.219 align:start position:0% the budget hearing and you could comment then<00:08:40.110> okay<00:08:40.620> it's<00:08:41.430> kind<00:08:41.700> of<00:08:42.020> interrelated<00:08:43.020> a 00:08:43.219 --> 00:08:43.229 align:start position:0% then okay it's kind of interrelated a 00:08:43.229 --> 00:08:45.710 align:start position:0% then okay it's kind of interrelated a bit<00:08:43.440> but<00:08:43.979> I<00:08:44.010> think<00:08:44.400> the<00:08:44.610> focus<00:08:45.210> of<00:08:45.510> what<00:08:45.690> I 00:08:45.710 --> 00:08:45.720 align:start position:0% bit but I think the focus of what I 00:08:45.720 --> 00:08:48.290 align:start position:0% bit but I think the focus of what I would<00:08:46.560> like<00:08:46.740> to<00:08:46.800> say<00:08:47.160> has<00:08:47.670> to<00:08:47.850> do<00:08:47.970> with<00:08:48.120> the 00:08:48.290 --> 00:08:48.300 align:start position:0% would like to say has to do with the 00:08:48.300 --> 00:08:53.690 align:start position:0% would like to say has to do with the acceptance<00:08:48.720> of<00:08:48.840> the<00:08:48.960> report<00:08:49.350> so<00:08:51.260> if<00:08:52.550> if<00:08:53.550> you 00:08:53.690 --> 00:08:53.700 align:start position:0% acceptance of the report so if if you 00:08:53.700 --> 00:08:55.460 align:start position:0% acceptance of the report so if if you feel<00:08:53.880> be<00:08:54.090> more<00:08:54.270> appropriate<00:08:54.810> than<00:08:54.960> happy<00:08:55.440> to 00:08:55.460 --> 00:08:55.470 align:start position:0% feel be more appropriate than happy to 00:08:55.470 --> 00:08:59.150 align:start position:0% feel be more appropriate than happy to be<00:08:56.400> would<00:08:56.970> that<00:08:57.090> be<00:08:57.240> over<00:08:57.960> in<00:08:58.230> just<00:08:58.440> a<00:08:58.890> couple 00:08:59.150 --> 00:08:59.160 align:start position:0% be would that be over in just a couple 00:08:59.160 --> 00:09:02.390 align:start position:0% be would that be over in just a couple minutes<00:08:59.310> okay<00:08:59.910> yeah<00:09:00.480> let<00:09:00.870> me<00:09:01.250> let<00:09:02.250> me<00:09:02.280> just 00:09:02.390 --> 00:09:02.400 align:start position:0% minutes okay yeah let me let me just 00:09:02.400 --> 00:09:07.640 align:start position:0% minutes okay yeah let me let me just wait<00:09:03.090> until<00:09:03.600> that<00:09:03.720> time<00:09:03.930> okay<00:09:06.350> anybody<00:09:07.350> who'd 00:09:07.640 --> 00:09:07.650 align:start position:0% wait until that time okay anybody who'd 00:09:07.650 --> 00:09:21.879 align:start position:0% wait until that time okay anybody who'd like<00:09:07.680> to<00:09:07.860> speak<00:09:08.070> at<00:09:08.370> public<00:09:08.850> comment 00:09:21.879 --> 00:09:21.889 align:start position:0% 00:09:21.889 --> 00:09:24.889 align:start position:0% then<00:09:22.889> we'll<00:09:23.519> move<00:09:23.670> to<00:09:23.970> the<00:09:24.209> city<00:09:24.509> managers 00:09:24.889 --> 00:09:24.899 align:start position:0% then we'll move to the city managers 00:09:24.899 --> 00:09:30.590 align:start position:0% then we'll move to the city managers convinced<00:09:26.870> she<00:09:27.870> has<00:09:28.079> none<00:09:28.320> so<00:09:29.209> we<00:09:30.209> will<00:09:30.420> move 00:09:30.590 --> 00:09:30.600 align:start position:0% convinced she has none so we will move 00:09:30.600 --> 00:09:33.350 align:start position:0% convinced she has none so we will move to<00:09:31.079> the<00:09:31.440> public<00:09:31.980> hearing<00:09:32.459> this<00:09:32.550> is<00:09:32.730> it<00:09:32.880> our 00:09:33.350 --> 00:09:33.360 align:start position:0% to the public hearing this is it our 00:09:33.360 --> 00:09:35.199 align:start position:0% to the public hearing this is it our second<00:09:33.810> public<00:09:33.930> hearing<00:09:34.380> on<00:09:34.589> the<00:09:34.769> fiscal<00:09:34.980> year 00:09:35.199 --> 00:09:35.209 align:start position:0% second public hearing on the fiscal year 00:09:35.209 --> 00:09:49.120 align:start position:0% second public hearing on the fiscal year 2010<00:09:36.209> budget<00:09:36.920> is<00:09:37.920> there<00:09:38.220> a<00:09:38.250> sign-up<00:09:38.699> sheet 00:09:49.120 --> 00:09:49.130 align:start position:0% 00:09:49.130 --> 00:09:50.629 align:start position:0% okay 00:09:50.629 --> 00:09:50.639 align:start position:0% okay 00:09:50.639 --> 00:09:52.639 align:start position:0% okay would<00:09:51.060> anybody<00:09:51.269> like<00:09:51.480> to<00:09:51.720> make<00:09:52.139> any<00:09:52.319> comments 00:09:52.639 --> 00:09:52.649 align:start position:0% would anybody like to make any comments 00:09:52.649 --> 00:09:55.879 align:start position:0% would anybody like to make any comments at<00:09:53.370> the<00:09:53.550> public<00:09:53.850> hearing<00:09:54.120> on<00:09:54.300> the<00:09:54.569> FY<00:09:54.959> 2010 00:09:55.879 --> 00:09:55.889 align:start position:0% at the public hearing on the FY 2010 00:09:55.889 --> 00:10:03.290 align:start position:0% at the public hearing on the FY 2010 budget<00:10:00.800> if<00:10:01.800> you<00:10:02.040> can<00:10:02.250> identify<00:10:02.430> yourself<00:10:02.759> and 00:10:03.290 --> 00:10:03.300 align:start position:0% budget if you can identify yourself and 00:10:03.300 --> 00:10:04.879 align:start position:0% budget if you can identify yourself and please<00:10:03.959> keep<00:10:04.139> your<00:10:04.259> comments<00:10:04.470> to<00:10:04.740> three 00:10:04.879 --> 00:10:04.889 align:start position:0% please keep your comments to three 00:10:04.889 --> 00:10:08.210 align:start position:0% please keep your comments to three months<00:10:05.600> okay<00:10:06.600> I'm<00:10:06.779> Katherine<00:10:07.259> Gibney<00:10:07.589> 315 00:10:08.210 --> 00:10:08.220 align:start position:0% months okay I'm Katherine Gibney 315 00:10:08.220 --> 00:10:09.860 align:start position:0% months okay I'm Katherine Gibney 315 Lincoln<00:10:08.550> Avenue<00:10:08.730> this<00:10:09.089> is<00:10:09.240> my<00:10:09.389> third<00:10:09.630> visit 00:10:09.860 --> 00:10:09.870 align:start position:0% Lincoln Avenue this is my third visit 00:10:09.870 --> 00:10:13.790 align:start position:0% Lincoln Avenue this is my third visit here<00:10:10.199> as<00:10:10.380> some<00:10:10.800> of<00:10:10.920> you<00:10:11.009> know<00:10:11.300> I<00:10:12.410> would<00:10:13.410> like<00:10:13.620> to 00:10:13.790 --> 00:10:13.800 align:start position:0% here as some of you know I would like to 00:10:13.800 --> 00:10:17.240 align:start position:0% here as some of you know I would like to propose<00:10:14.220> in<00:10:14.880> the<00:10:15.449> budget<00:10:16.040> regarding<00:10:17.040> the 00:10:17.240 --> 00:10:17.250 align:start position:0% propose in the budget regarding the 00:10:17.250 --> 00:10:19.850 align:start position:0% propose in the budget regarding the constant<00:10:17.880> yield<00:10:18.149> that's<00:10:18.540> right<00:10:18.870> I<00:10:19.110> got<00:10:19.680> that 00:10:19.850 --> 00:10:19.860 align:start position:0% constant yield that's right I got that 00:10:19.860 --> 00:10:23.900 align:start position:0% constant yield that's right I got that right<00:10:20.480> that<00:10:21.480> that<00:10:21.839> the<00:10:22.139> rollback<00:10:22.889> enough<00:10:23.459> that 00:10:23.900 --> 00:10:23.910 align:start position:0% right that that the rollback enough that 00:10:23.910 --> 00:10:28.370 align:start position:0% right that that the rollback enough that there<00:10:24.480> be<00:10:24.720> no<00:10:25.130> property<00:10:26.130> tax<00:10:26.910> increase<00:10:27.720> this 00:10:28.370 --> 00:10:28.380 align:start position:0% there be no property tax increase this 00:10:28.380 --> 00:10:31.309 align:start position:0% there be no property tax increase this year<00:10:29.089> you<00:10:30.089> know<00:10:30.180> I<00:10:30.209> guess<00:10:30.510> I<00:10:30.660> could<00:10:30.839> go<00:10:30.959> on<00:10:31.139> and 00:10:31.309 --> 00:10:31.319 align:start position:0% year you know I guess I could go on and 00:10:31.319 --> 00:10:33.470 align:start position:0% year you know I guess I could go on and on<00:10:31.380> but<00:10:31.709> I<00:10:31.769> just<00:10:31.829> want<00:10:32.279> to<00:10:32.339> say<00:10:32.519> I<00:10:32.730> am<00:10:33.029> a<00:10:33.149> senior 00:10:33.470 --> 00:10:33.480 align:start position:0% on but I just want to say I am a senior 00:10:33.480 --> 00:10:37.370 align:start position:0% on but I just want to say I am a senior citizen<00:10:34.760> you<00:10:35.760> know<00:10:35.880> this<00:10:36.060> is<00:10:36.480> just<00:10:36.540> really<00:10:36.990> a 00:10:37.370 --> 00:10:37.380 align:start position:0% citizen you know this is just really a 00:10:37.380 --> 00:10:40.819 align:start position:0% citizen you know this is just really a killer<00:10:37.889> for<00:10:38.220> someone<00:10:38.490> like<00:10:38.639> myself<00:10:39.440> and<00:10:40.440> I 00:10:40.819 --> 00:10:40.829 align:start position:0% killer for someone like myself and I 00:10:40.829 --> 00:10:43.519 align:start position:0% killer for someone like myself and I know<00:10:40.920> there<00:10:41.579> I'm<00:10:42.510> also<00:10:42.779> representing 00:10:43.519 --> 00:10:43.529 align:start position:0% know there I'm also representing 00:10:43.529 --> 00:10:45.920 align:start position:0% know there I'm also representing a<00:10:43.740> friend<00:10:44.010> who<00:10:44.100> came<00:10:44.339> with<00:10:44.490> me<00:10:44.550> last<00:10:44.850> year<00:10:45.269> last 00:10:45.920 --> 00:10:45.930 align:start position:0% a friend who came with me last year last 00:10:45.930 --> 00:10:47.480 align:start position:0% a friend who came with me last year last week<00:10:46.260> Maria<00:10:46.949> aguado 00:10:47.480 --> 00:10:47.490 align:start position:0% week Maria aguado 00:10:47.490 --> 00:10:49.759 align:start position:0% week Maria aguado organelle<00:10:48.029> is<00:10:48.149> on<00:10:48.420> Carroll<00:10:48.839> she<00:10:49.470> is 00:10:49.759 --> 00:10:49.769 align:start position:0% organelle is on Carroll she is 00:10:49.769 --> 00:10:51.710 align:start position:0% organelle is on Carroll she is recovering<00:10:50.370> as<00:10:50.519> you<00:10:50.670> may<00:10:50.819> have<00:10:51.000> noticed<00:10:51.360> that 00:10:51.710 --> 00:10:51.720 align:start position:0% recovering as you may have noticed that 00:10:51.720 --> 00:10:55.189 align:start position:0% recovering as you may have noticed that night<00:10:52.560> from<00:10:52.860> breast<00:10:53.639> cancer<00:10:54.060> and<00:10:54.600> then<00:10:54.990> just 00:10:55.189 --> 00:10:55.199 align:start position:0% night from breast cancer and then just 00:10:55.199 --> 00:10:56.720 align:start position:0% night from breast cancer and then just couldn't<00:10:55.560> make<00:10:55.680> it<00:10:55.709> tonight<00:10:55.949> but<00:10:56.310> she<00:10:56.579> would 00:10:56.720 --> 00:10:56.730 align:start position:0% couldn't make it tonight but she would 00:10:56.730 --> 00:10:58.400 align:start position:0% couldn't make it tonight but she would like<00:10:56.940> to<00:10:57.180> throw<00:10:57.360> her<00:10:57.600> hat<00:10:57.810> in<00:10:58.050> the<00:10:58.199> ring 00:10:58.400 --> 00:10:58.410 align:start position:0% like to throw her hat in the ring 00:10:58.410 --> 00:11:03.199 align:start position:0% like to throw her hat in the ring regarding<00:10:59.310> that<00:10:59.430> too<00:10:59.699> I<00:11:01.550> would<00:11:02.550> like<00:11:02.760> to<00:11:02.910> ask 00:11:03.199 --> 00:11:03.209 align:start position:0% regarding that too I would like to ask 00:11:03.209 --> 00:11:04.879 align:start position:0% regarding that too I would like to ask something<00:11:03.630> that<00:11:03.959> I'm<00:11:04.079> sorry<00:11:04.290> I<00:11:04.439> did<00:11:04.620> not<00:11:04.649> know 00:11:04.879 --> 00:11:04.889 align:start position:0% something that I'm sorry I did not know 00:11:04.889 --> 00:11:06.170 align:start position:0% something that I'm sorry I did not know about<00:11:04.980> I<00:11:05.130> came<00:11:05.339> to<00:11:05.459> right<00:11:05.579> this<00:11:05.760> minute<00:11:05.910> is 00:11:06.170 --> 00:11:06.180 align:start position:0% about I came to right this minute is 00:11:06.180 --> 00:11:08.300 align:start position:0% about I came to right this minute is this<00:11:06.329> is<00:11:06.480> proposal<00:11:07.050> to<00:11:07.139> increase<00:11:07.560> the<00:11:07.920> rental 00:11:08.300 --> 00:11:08.310 align:start position:0% this is proposal to increase the rental 00:11:08.310 --> 00:11:10.639 align:start position:0% this is proposal to increase the rental fee<00:11:08.579> license<00:11:09.360> by<00:11:09.569> eighty<00:11:09.750> six<00:11:10.019> dollars<00:11:10.199> each 00:11:10.639 --> 00:11:10.649 align:start position:0% fee license by eighty six dollars each 00:11:10.649 --> 00:11:13.069 align:start position:0% fee license by eighty six dollars each remarried<00:11:11.250> in<00:11:11.459> that<00:11:11.579> realm<00:11:11.760> does<00:11:11.939> does<00:11:12.870> their 00:11:13.069 --> 00:11:13.079 align:start position:0% remarried in that realm does does their 00:11:13.079 --> 00:11:15.530 align:start position:0% remarried in that realm does does their proposal<00:11:13.649> to<00:11:13.769> increase<00:11:14.519> that<00:11:14.880> there<00:11:15.360> was<00:11:15.510> a 00:11:15.530 --> 00:11:15.540 align:start position:0% proposal to increase that there was a 00:11:15.540 --> 00:11:17.300 align:start position:0% proposal to increase that there was a proposal<00:11:15.990> but<00:11:16.230> that's<00:11:16.410> not<00:11:16.649> included<00:11:17.130> in<00:11:17.250> the 00:11:17.300 --> 00:11:17.310 align:start position:0% proposal but that's not included in the 00:11:17.310 --> 00:11:18.949 align:start position:0% proposal but that's not included in the budget<00:11:17.430> it's<00:11:18.089> not<00:11:18.209> leaving<00:11:18.569> the<00:11:18.630> budget 00:11:18.949 --> 00:11:18.959 align:start position:0% budget it's not leaving the budget 00:11:18.959 --> 00:11:24.300 align:start position:0% budget it's not leaving the budget correct<00:11:19.350> okay<00:11:19.889> so<00:11:19.920> my<00:11:20.699> comment<00:11:21.139> okay 00:11:24.300 --> 00:11:24.310 align:start position:0% 00:11:24.310 --> 00:11:26.550 align:start position:0% get<00:11:24.430> into<00:11:24.640> this<00:11:24.820> in<00:11:25.060> that<00:11:25.270> room<00:11:25.630> you<00:11:26.290> know<00:11:26.410> how 00:11:26.550 --> 00:11:26.560 align:start position:0% get into this in that room you know how 00:11:26.560 --> 00:11:28.380 align:start position:0% get into this in that room you know how sure<00:11:26.740> but<00:11:27.010> I<00:11:27.070> feel<00:11:27.310> just<00:11:27.550> deeply<00:11:28.000> and<00:11:28.180> very 00:11:28.380 --> 00:11:28.390 align:start position:0% sure but I feel just deeply and very 00:11:28.390 --> 00:11:29.970 align:start position:0% sure but I feel just deeply and very strongly<00:11:28.720> about<00:11:28.990> this<00:11:29.170> and<00:11:29.230> I<00:11:29.440> really<00:11:29.770> feel 00:11:29.970 --> 00:11:29.980 align:start position:0% strongly about this and I really feel 00:11:29.980 --> 00:11:33.000 align:start position:0% strongly about this and I really feel like<00:11:30.040> people<00:11:30.610> because<00:11:31.180> that<00:11:31.690> notice<00:11:32.620> in<00:11:32.830> the 00:11:33.000 --> 00:11:33.010 align:start position:0% like people because that notice in the 00:11:33.010 --> 00:11:34.890 align:start position:0% like people because that notice in the newsletter<00:11:33.430> was<00:11:33.670> so<00:11:33.940> hard<00:11:34.210> to<00:11:34.330> decipher<00:11:34.690> what 00:11:34.890 --> 00:11:34.900 align:start position:0% newsletter was so hard to decipher what 00:11:34.900 --> 00:11:38.820 align:start position:0% newsletter was so hard to decipher what it<00:11:35.140> meant<00:11:35.380> that<00:11:35.680> I<00:11:36.750> really<00:11:37.750> understand<00:11:38.410> that 00:11:38.820 --> 00:11:38.830 align:start position:0% it meant that I really understand that 00:11:38.830 --> 00:11:42.600 align:start position:0% it meant that I really understand that there<00:11:39.220> could<00:11:39.460> be<00:11:39.839> 9.8%<00:11:40.839> priests<00:11:41.500> in<00:11:42.100> property 00:11:42.600 --> 00:11:42.610 align:start position:0% there could be 9.8% priests in property 00:11:42.610 --> 00:11:47.670 align:start position:0% there could be 9.8% priests in property tax<00:11:42.930> you<00:11:43.930> know<00:11:44.800> I<00:11:45.270> know<00:11:46.270> next<00:11:46.660> year<00:11:46.810> when<00:11:47.500> the 00:11:47.670 --> 00:11:47.680 align:start position:0% tax you know I know next year when the 00:11:47.680 --> 00:11:50.040 align:start position:0% tax you know I know next year when the assessments<00:11:48.220> go<00:11:48.370> down<00:11:48.610> that's<00:11:49.420> probably<00:11:49.810> a 00:11:50.040 --> 00:11:50.050 align:start position:0% assessments go down that's probably a 00:11:50.050 --> 00:11:52.740 align:start position:0% assessments go down that's probably a very<00:11:50.440> big<00:11:50.680> problem<00:11:51.400> for<00:11:51.550> the<00:11:51.760> city<00:11:52.029> but<00:11:52.330> I<00:11:52.540> mean 00:11:52.740 --> 00:11:52.750 align:start position:0% very big problem for the city but I mean 00:11:52.750 --> 00:11:55.710 align:start position:0% very big problem for the city but I mean I<00:11:52.900> just<00:11:52.930> don't<00:11:53.440> think<00:11:53.680> at<00:11:53.890> this<00:11:53.950> point<00:11:54.720> you 00:11:55.710 --> 00:11:55.720 align:start position:0% I just don't think at this point you 00:11:55.720 --> 00:11:57.450 align:start position:0% I just don't think at this point you know<00:11:55.839> I<00:11:56.110> mean<00:11:56.560> I<00:11:56.650> guess<00:11:56.830> I'm<00:11:57.010> worried<00:11:57.430> that 00:11:57.450 --> 00:11:57.460 align:start position:0% know I mean I guess I'm worried that 00:11:57.460 --> 00:11:59.160 align:start position:0% know I mean I guess I'm worried that there's<00:11:57.790> an<00:11:57.910> attempt<00:11:58.210> to<00:11:58.300> like<00:11:58.630> push<00:11:58.900> up<00:11:59.050> the 00:11:59.160 --> 00:11:59.170 align:start position:0% there's an attempt to like push up the 00:11:59.170 --> 00:12:00.990 align:start position:0% there's an attempt to like push up the property<00:11:59.500> taxes<00:11:59.890> and<00:12:00.070> lieu<00:12:00.250> of<00:12:00.279> that<00:12:00.400> for<00:12:00.790> next 00:12:00.990 --> 00:12:01.000 align:start position:0% property taxes and lieu of that for next 00:12:01.000 --> 00:12:02.730 align:start position:0% property taxes and lieu of that for next year<00:12:01.270> and<00:12:01.510> you<00:12:01.990> know<00:12:02.110> it<00:12:02.290> needs<00:12:02.470> to<00:12:02.529> come<00:12:02.710> up 00:12:02.730 --> 00:12:02.740 align:start position:0% year and you know it needs to come up 00:12:02.740 --> 00:12:04.170 align:start position:0% year and you know it needs to come up with<00:12:02.830> someplace<00:12:03.190> else<00:12:03.430> it<00:12:03.640> needs<00:12:03.700> to<00:12:04.000> come 00:12:04.170 --> 00:12:04.180 align:start position:0% with someplace else it needs to come 00:12:04.180 --> 00:12:11.400 align:start position:0% with someplace else it needs to come from<00:12:04.270> someplace<00:12:04.540> else<00:12:09.510> good<00:12:10.510> placer<00:12:10.810> question 00:12:11.400 --> 00:12:11.410 align:start position:0% from someplace else good placer question 00:12:11.410 --> 00:12:14.280 align:start position:0% from someplace else good placer question I<00:12:12.300> really<00:12:13.300> appreciate<00:12:13.779> you<00:12:13.960> coming 00:12:14.280 --> 00:12:14.290 align:start position:0% I really appreciate you coming 00:12:14.290 --> 00:12:17.130 align:start position:0% I really appreciate you coming expressing<00:12:14.770> your<00:12:14.890> opinion<00:12:15.450> and<00:12:16.450> I<00:12:16.870> think<00:12:17.050> it 00:12:17.130 --> 00:12:17.140 align:start position:0% expressing your opinion and I think it 00:12:17.140 --> 00:12:18.510 align:start position:0% expressing your opinion and I think it is<00:12:17.260> a<00:12:17.290> very<00:12:17.500> hard<00:12:17.800> thing<00:12:17.860> we're<00:12:18.220> dealing<00:12:18.339> with 00:12:18.510 --> 00:12:18.520 align:start position:0% is a very hard thing we're dealing with 00:12:18.520 --> 00:12:21.810 align:start position:0% is a very hard thing we're dealing with in<00:12:18.760> terms<00:12:18.790> of<00:12:19.410> increasing<00:12:20.410> the<00:12:20.620> taxes<00:12:21.100> I'm 00:12:21.810 --> 00:12:21.820 align:start position:0% in terms of increasing the taxes I'm 00:12:21.820 --> 00:12:23.790 align:start position:0% in terms of increasing the taxes I'm just<00:12:22.060> curious<00:12:22.270> I<00:12:22.630> do<00:12:22.690> like<00:12:23.020> to<00:12:23.200> hear<00:12:23.500> from 00:12:23.790 --> 00:12:23.800 align:start position:0% just curious I do like to hear from 00:12:23.800 --> 00:12:27.000 align:start position:0% just curious I do like to hear from citizens<00:12:24.720> if<00:12:25.720> you're<00:12:26.410> proposing<00:12:26.710> that<00:12:26.890> we 00:12:27.000 --> 00:12:27.010 align:start position:0% citizens if you're proposing that we 00:12:27.010 --> 00:12:28.770 align:start position:0% citizens if you're proposing that we have<00:12:27.220> no<00:12:27.400> tax<00:12:27.670> increase<00:12:28.089> what<00:12:28.360> do<00:12:28.420> you<00:12:28.510> think 00:12:28.770 --> 00:12:28.780 align:start position:0% have no tax increase what do you think 00:12:28.780 --> 00:12:35.670 align:start position:0% have no tax increase what do you think in<00:12:28.990> our<00:12:29.290> budget<00:12:29.680> we<00:12:29.800> should<00:12:29.830> cut<00:12:34.380> but<00:12:35.380> I<00:12:35.410> also 00:12:35.670 --> 00:12:35.680 align:start position:0% in our budget we should cut but I also 00:12:35.680 --> 00:12:41.940 align:start position:0% in our budget we should cut but I also feel<00:12:36.010> like<00:12:36.270> you<00:12:37.270> know<00:12:37.470> primarily<00:12:40.890> it<00:12:41.890> is 00:12:41.940 --> 00:12:41.950 align:start position:0% feel like you know primarily it is 00:12:41.950 --> 00:12:45.000 align:start position:0% feel like you know primarily it is something<00:12:42.990> I<00:12:43.990> mean<00:12:44.140> I<00:12:44.320> personally<00:12:44.770> feel<00:12:44.950> like 00:12:45.000 --> 00:12:45.010 align:start position:0% something I mean I personally feel like 00:12:45.010 --> 00:12:49.700 align:start position:0% something I mean I personally feel like it's<00:12:45.670> time<00:12:45.880> to<00:12:45.910> start<00:12:46.210> making<00:12:46.510> it<00:12:46.630> personnel 00:12:49.700 --> 00:12:49.710 align:start position:0% 00:12:49.710 --> 00:12:52.850 align:start position:0% losing<00:12:50.710> their<00:12:50.890> jobs<00:12:51.130> etcetera<00:12:51.370> so<00:12:51.970> you<00:12:52.240> know 00:12:52.850 --> 00:12:52.860 align:start position:0% losing their jobs etcetera so you know 00:12:52.860 --> 00:12:58.200 align:start position:0% losing their jobs etcetera so you know that's<00:12:53.860> where<00:12:54.310> I<00:12:54.339> think<00:12:54.610> we<00:12:56.760> wants<00:12:57.760> to<00:12:57.820> do<00:12:57.970> that 00:12:58.200 --> 00:12:58.210 align:start position:0% that's where I think we wants to do that 00:12:58.210 --> 00:13:03.030 align:start position:0% that's where I think we wants to do that but<00:13:00.480> since<00:13:01.480> we<00:13:01.690> have<00:13:01.930> the<00:13:02.080> highest<00:13:02.350> taxes<00:13:02.890> as 00:13:03.030 --> 00:13:03.040 align:start position:0% but since we have the highest taxes as 00:13:03.040 --> 00:13:06.150 align:start position:0% but since we have the highest taxes as we<00:13:03.160> all<00:13:03.339> know<00:13:03.550> in<00:13:03.970> the<00:13:04.630> county<00:13:05.020> it's<00:13:05.650> time<00:13:05.950> to 00:13:06.150 --> 00:13:06.160 align:start position:0% we all know in the county it's time to 00:13:06.160 --> 00:13:11.060 align:start position:0% we all know in the county it's time to stop<00:13:06.610> burning<00:13:07.360> the 00:13:11.060 --> 00:13:11.070 align:start position:0% 00:13:11.070 --> 00:13:13.040 align:start position:0% and<00:13:11.459> you<00:13:11.550> know<00:13:11.670> I<00:13:11.699> heard<00:13:12.420> through<00:13:13.019> the 00:13:13.040 --> 00:13:13.050 align:start position:0% and you know I heard through the 00:13:13.050 --> 00:13:14.569 align:start position:0% and you know I heard through the grapevine<00:13:13.139> that<00:13:13.560> there<00:13:13.920> was<00:13:14.009> repulsive<00:13:14.459> to 00:13:14.569 --> 00:13:14.579 align:start position:0% grapevine that there was repulsive to 00:13:14.579 --> 00:13:17.509 align:start position:0% grapevine that there was repulsive to many<00:13:14.790> drop<00:13:15.120> it<00:13:15.300> from<00:13:15.420> 9/8<00:13:16.050> like<00:13:16.440> two<00:13:16.889> five<00:13:17.190> I 00:13:17.509 --> 00:13:17.519 align:start position:0% many drop it from 9/8 like two five I 00:13:17.519 --> 00:13:21.530 align:start position:0% many drop it from 9/8 like two five I mean<00:13:17.970> I'm<00:13:18.120> for<00:13:18.389> it<00:13:18.570> being<00:13:19.339> enough<00:13:20.339> below<00:13:20.910> the 00:13:21.530 --> 00:13:21.540 align:start position:0% mean I'm for it being enough below the 00:13:21.540 --> 00:13:32.590 align:start position:0% mean I'm for it being enough below the rate<00:13:21.810> that<00:13:25.910> like<00:13:26.910> down<00:13:29.389> just<00:13:30.389> to<00:13:31.380> two<00:13:31.980> comments 00:13:32.590 --> 00:13:32.600 align:start position:0% rate that like down just to two comments 00:13:32.600 --> 00:13:36.939 align:start position:0% rate that like down just to two comments the<00:13:34.040> proposed<00:13:35.040> budget<00:13:35.339> that<00:13:35.819> we<00:13:35.940> started<00:13:36.360> with 00:13:36.939 --> 00:13:36.949 align:start position:0% the proposed budget that we started with 00:13:36.949 --> 00:13:40.490 align:start position:0% the proposed budget that we started with was<00:13:37.949> leaving<00:13:38.550> the<00:13:38.699> rate<00:13:38.910> at<00:13:39.209> sixty<00:13:40.139> point<00:13:40.410> five 00:13:40.490 --> 00:13:40.500 align:start position:0% was leaving the rate at sixty point five 00:13:40.500 --> 00:13:45.189 align:start position:0% was leaving the rate at sixty point five cents<00:13:41.130> and<00:13:41.279> the<00:13:41.370> constant<00:13:41.850> yield<00:13:42.089> rate<00:13:42.329> was<00:13:43.370> 55 00:13:45.189 --> 00:13:45.199 align:start position:0% cents and the constant yield rate was 55 00:13:45.199 --> 00:13:49.550 align:start position:0% cents and the constant yield rate was 55 0.0<00:13:46.199> 0.1<00:13:46.769> and<00:13:47.250> the<00:13:47.940> the<00:13:48.240> proposal<00:13:48.990> where<00:13:49.440> we 00:13:49.550 --> 00:13:49.560 align:start position:0% 0.0 0.1 and the the proposal where we 00:13:49.560 --> 00:13:51.439 align:start position:0% 0.0 0.1 and the the proposal where we are<00:13:49.740> now<00:13:49.980> after<00:13:50.279> the<00:13:50.550> various<00:13:50.819> work<00:13:51.000> sessions 00:13:51.439 --> 00:13:51.449 align:start position:0% are now after the various work sessions 00:13:51.449 --> 00:13:54.100 align:start position:0% are now after the various work sessions is<00:13:51.660> to<00:13:51.930> drop<00:13:52.170> it<00:13:52.410> to<00:13:52.440> fifty<00:13:52.860> eight<00:13:53.190> point<00:13:53.579> five 00:13:54.100 --> 00:13:54.110 align:start position:0% is to drop it to fifty eight point five 00:13:54.110 --> 00:14:00.800 align:start position:0% is to drop it to fifty eight point five so<00:13:55.110> that's<00:13:56.899> it's<00:13:57.899> it's<00:13:58.769> getting<00:13:58.949> toward<00:13:59.810> but 00:14:00.800 --> 00:14:00.810 align:start position:0% so that's it's it's getting toward but 00:14:00.810 --> 00:14:05.780 align:start position:0% so that's it's it's getting toward but not<00:14:01.050> reaching<00:14:01.649> half<00:14:02.040> of<00:14:02.690> of<00:14:03.690> the<00:14:04.550> increase<00:14:05.550> in 00:14:05.780 --> 00:14:05.790 align:start position:0% not reaching half of of the increase in 00:14:05.790 --> 00:14:10.249 align:start position:0% not reaching half of of the increase in the<00:14:07.490> difference<00:14:08.490> between<00:14:08.670> the<00:14:09.259> constant 00:14:10.249 --> 00:14:10.259 align:start position:0% the difference between the constant 00:14:10.259 --> 00:14:47.960 align:start position:0% the difference between the constant yield<00:14:10.560> rate<00:14:10.740> and<00:14:11.009> the<00:14:11.550> proposed<00:14:46.279> where<00:14:47.279> we 00:14:47.960 --> 00:14:47.970 align:start position:0% yield rate and the proposed where we 00:14:47.970 --> 00:14:49.879 align:start position:0% yield rate and the proposed where we have<00:14:48.149> to<00:14:48.329> finish<00:14:48.690> that<00:14:48.839> after<00:14:49.500> the<00:14:49.589> public 00:14:49.879 --> 00:14:49.889 align:start position:0% have to finish that after the public 00:14:49.889 --> 00:14:52.910 align:start position:0% have to finish that after the public hearing<00:14:49.920> we<00:14:50.339> have<00:14:50.490> one<00:14:51.060> item<00:14:51.209> to<00:14:51.600> to<00:14:52.470> discuss 00:14:52.910 --> 00:14:52.920 align:start position:0% hearing we have one item to to discuss 00:14:52.920 --> 00:14:55.759 align:start position:0% hearing we have one item to to discuss and<00:14:53.190> then<00:14:54.000> we'll<00:14:54.269> know<00:14:54.449> exactly<00:14:55.110> where<00:14:55.649> it's 00:14:55.759 --> 00:14:55.769 align:start position:0% and then we'll know exactly where it's 00:14:55.769 --> 00:14:58.579 align:start position:0% and then we'll know exactly where it's going<00:14:56.029> okay<00:14:57.029> there's<00:14:57.630> one<00:14:58.019> more<00:14:58.199> public 00:14:58.579 --> 00:14:58.589 align:start position:0% going okay there's one more public 00:14:58.589 --> 00:15:01.970 align:start position:0% going okay there's one more public hearing<00:14:58.889> on<00:14:58.980> the<00:14:59.790> budget<00:15:00.019> and<00:15:01.019> there<00:15:01.260> there 00:15:01.970 --> 00:15:01.980 align:start position:0% hearing on the budget and there there 00:15:01.980 --> 00:15:03.860 align:start position:0% hearing on the budget and there there are<00:15:02.160> there<00:15:02.610> this<00:15:02.880> is<00:15:03.060> the<00:15:03.180> last<00:15:03.420> public 00:15:03.860 --> 00:15:03.870 align:start position:0% are there this is the last public 00:15:03.870 --> 00:15:07.550 align:start position:0% are there this is the last public hearing<00:15:04.170> but<00:15:04.319> then<00:15:04.500> we<00:15:04.680> have<00:15:05.120> we<00:15:06.120> have<00:15:06.560> next 00:15:07.550 --> 00:15:07.560 align:start position:0% hearing but then we have we have next 00:15:07.560 --> 00:15:09.889 align:start position:0% hearing but then we have we have next Monday<00:15:07.920> and<00:15:08.100> the<00:15:08.220> following<00:15:08.579> Monday<00:15:08.910> we<00:15:09.630> have 00:15:09.889 --> 00:15:09.899 align:start position:0% Monday and the following Monday we have 00:15:09.899 --> 00:15:11.660 align:start position:0% Monday and the following Monday we have first<00:15:10.500> reading<00:15:10.829> and<00:15:10.920> second<00:15:11.279> reading<00:15:11.339> of<00:15:11.579> the 00:15:11.660 --> 00:15:11.670 align:start position:0% first reading and second reading of the 00:15:11.670 --> 00:15:12.210 align:start position:0% first reading and second reading of the ordinance 00:15:12.210 --> 00:15:12.220 align:start position:0% ordinance 00:15:12.220 --> 00:15:15.300 align:start position:0% ordinance with<00:15:12.370> another<00:15:12.670> chance<00:15:12.940> to<00:15:13.090> come<00:15:13.890> so<00:15:14.890> there<00:15:15.040> so 00:15:15.300 --> 00:15:15.310 align:start position:0% with another chance to come so there so 00:15:15.310 --> 00:15:17.460 align:start position:0% with another chance to come so there so there<00:15:15.460> are<00:15:15.580> you<00:15:16.090> anybody<00:15:16.690> can<00:15:16.870> comment<00:15:17.110> on<00:15:17.410> any 00:15:17.460 --> 00:15:17.470 align:start position:0% there are you anybody can comment on any 00:15:17.470 --> 00:15:19.620 align:start position:0% there are you anybody can comment on any of<00:15:17.890> the<00:15:17.950> budget<00:15:18.280> items<00:15:18.610> the<00:15:18.970> next<00:15:19.270> two<00:15:19.390> Monday 00:15:19.620 --> 00:15:19.630 align:start position:0% of the budget items the next two Monday 00:15:19.630 --> 00:15:22.320 align:start position:0% of the budget items the next two Monday nights<00:15:19.810> okay<00:15:20.410> and<00:15:21.370> I<00:15:21.520> also<00:15:21.700> wanted<00:15:22.060> to<00:15:22.120> make 00:15:22.320 --> 00:15:22.330 align:start position:0% nights okay and I also wanted to make 00:15:22.330 --> 00:15:24.420 align:start position:0% nights okay and I also wanted to make sure<00:15:22.360> that<00:15:22.720> you're<00:15:22.900> aware<00:15:23.110> of<00:15:23.170> the<00:15:23.530> state 00:15:24.420 --> 00:15:24.430 align:start position:0% sure that you're aware of the state 00:15:24.430 --> 00:15:27.000 align:start position:0% sure that you're aware of the state program<00:15:24.910> and<00:15:25.360> has<00:15:25.900> the<00:15:26.140> which<00:15:26.350> has<00:15:26.530> the<00:15:26.710> county 00:15:27.000 --> 00:15:27.010 align:start position:0% program and has the which has the county 00:15:27.010 --> 00:15:28.910 align:start position:0% program and has the which has the county piggyback<00:15:27.490> on<00:15:27.730> it<00:15:27.880> and<00:15:28.000> the<00:15:28.060> city<00:15:28.300> program 00:15:28.910 --> 00:15:28.920 align:start position:0% piggyback on it and the city program 00:15:28.920 --> 00:15:33.290 align:start position:0% piggyback on it and the city program which<00:15:29.920> can<00:15:30.280> be<00:15:31.000> for<00:15:31.960> possible<00:15:32.440> reductions<00:15:32.980> in 00:15:33.290 --> 00:15:33.300 align:start position:0% which can be for possible reductions in 00:15:33.300 --> 00:15:38.460 align:start position:0% which can be for possible reductions in homeowner<00:15:34.300> property<00:15:34.720> taxes<00:15:35.310> for<00:15:36.310> all<00:15:37.470> those 00:15:38.460 --> 00:15:38.470 align:start position:0% homeowner property taxes for all those 00:15:38.470 --> 00:15:41.790 align:start position:0% homeowner property taxes for all those tax<00:15:38.830> credits<00:15:39.250> yes<00:15:39.490> yes<00:15:40.000> yes<00:15:40.600> I<00:15:40.810> am<00:15:40.960> I<00:15:41.230> mean 00:15:41.790 --> 00:15:41.800 align:start position:0% tax credits yes yes yes I am I mean 00:15:41.800 --> 00:15:43.590 align:start position:0% tax credits yes yes yes I am I mean quite<00:15:42.430> frankly<00:15:42.490> I'm<00:15:42.910> in<00:15:43.090> also<00:15:43.420> in<00:15:43.570> a 00:15:43.590 --> 00:15:43.600 align:start position:0% quite frankly I'm in also in a 00:15:43.600 --> 00:15:45.510 align:start position:0% quite frankly I'm in also in a prevention<00:15:44.110> foreclosure<00:15:44.740> programs<00:15:45.100> through 00:15:45.510 --> 00:15:45.520 align:start position:0% prevention foreclosure programs through 00:15:45.520 --> 00:15:47.130 align:start position:0% prevention foreclosure programs through the<00:15:45.640> county<00:15:45.970> and<00:15:46.570> you<00:15:46.630> know<00:15:46.750> I<00:15:46.780> just<00:15:46.960> wonder 00:15:47.130 --> 00:15:47.140 align:start position:0% the county and you know I just wonder 00:15:47.140 --> 00:15:48.960 align:start position:0% the county and you know I just wonder know<00:15:47.320> any<00:15:47.470> people<00:15:47.590> in<00:15:47.770> here<00:15:48.070> in<00:15:48.250> this<00:15:48.490> how<00:15:48.730> many 00:15:48.960 --> 00:15:48.970 align:start position:0% know any people in here in this how many 00:15:48.970 --> 00:15:50.280 align:start position:0% know any people in here in this how many foreclosures<00:15:49.300> have<00:15:49.660> there<00:15:49.810> been<00:15:49.930> to<00:15:50.140> come 00:15:50.280 --> 00:15:50.290 align:start position:0% foreclosures have there been to come 00:15:50.290 --> 00:15:51.740 align:start position:0% foreclosures have there been to come apart 00:15:51.740 --> 00:15:51.750 align:start position:0% apart 00:15:51.750 --> 00:15:57.120 align:start position:0% apart anybody<00:15:52.750> know<00:15:52.870> I<00:15:53.140> think<00:15:53.970> thirty<00:15:55.950> how<00:15:56.950> many 00:15:57.120 --> 00:15:57.130 align:start position:0% anybody know I think thirty how many 00:15:57.130 --> 00:15:58.980 align:start position:0% anybody know I think thirty how many other<00:15:57.370> people<00:15:57.760> are<00:15:58.000> like<00:15:58.300> get<00:15:58.480> a<00:15:58.510> provision 00:15:58.980 --> 00:15:58.990 align:start position:0% other people are like get a provision 00:15:58.990 --> 00:16:03.270 align:start position:0% other people are like get a provision program<00:16:01.230> okay<00:16:02.230> thank<00:16:02.500> you<00:16:02.650> thanks<00:16:03.100> for<00:16:03.190> your 00:16:03.270 --> 00:16:03.280 align:start position:0% program okay thank you thanks for your 00:16:03.280 --> 00:16:06.570 align:start position:0% program okay thank you thanks for your comments<00:16:04.650> is<00:16:05.650> there<00:16:05.800> anybody<00:16:05.950> else<00:16:06.310> would 00:16:06.570 --> 00:16:06.580 align:start position:0% comments is there anybody else would 00:16:06.580 --> 00:16:08.190 align:start position:0% comments is there anybody else would like<00:16:06.610> to<00:16:06.730> speak<00:16:07.060> at<00:16:07.270> the<00:16:07.480> budget<00:16:07.900> public 00:16:08.190 --> 00:16:08.200 align:start position:0% like to speak at the budget public 00:16:08.200 --> 00:16:23.010 align:start position:0% like to speak at the budget public hearing<00:16:10.620> not<00:16:11.620> you<00:16:11.800> Rach<00:16:21.660> give<00:16:22.660> you<00:16:22.750> a<00:16:22.810> chance 00:16:23.010 --> 00:16:23.020 align:start position:0% hearing not you Rach give you a chance 00:16:23.020 --> 00:16:26.280 align:start position:0% hearing not you Rach give you a chance of<00:16:23.200> a<00:16:23.290> second<00:16:24.510> anybody<00:16:25.510> else<00:16:25.690> for<00:16:25.870> the<00:16:25.930> budget 00:16:26.280 --> 00:16:26.290 align:start position:0% of a second anybody else for the budget 00:16:26.290 --> 00:16:33.210 align:start position:0% of a second anybody else for the budget public<00:16:26.620> hearing<00:16:28.860> okay<00:16:30.000> then<00:16:31.000> I<00:16:31.270> will<00:16:32.220> close 00:16:33.210 --> 00:16:33.220 align:start position:0% public hearing okay then I will close 00:16:33.220 --> 00:16:37.410 align:start position:0% public hearing okay then I will close the<00:16:33.550> budget<00:16:33.760> public<00:16:34.300> hearing<00:16:34.740> and<00:16:36.240> we<00:16:37.240> have 00:16:37.410 --> 00:16:37.420 align:start position:0% the budget public hearing and we have 00:16:37.420 --> 00:16:39.960 align:start position:0% the budget public hearing and we have one<00:16:37.630> item<00:16:37.780> to<00:16:38.080> discuss<00:16:38.350> with<00:16:38.740> that<00:16:39.010> but<00:16:39.640> mr. 00:16:39.960 --> 00:16:39.970 align:start position:0% one item to discuss with that but mr. 00:16:39.970 --> 00:16:44.670 align:start position:0% one item to discuss with that but mr. Wylie<00:16:40.360> is<00:16:40.390> here<00:16:40.840> to<00:16:41.760> make<00:16:42.760> a<00:16:42.990> public<00:16:43.990> comment<00:16:44.380> I 00:16:44.670 --> 00:16:44.680 align:start position:0% Wylie is here to make a public comment I 00:16:44.680 --> 00:16:47.490 align:start position:0% Wylie is here to make a public comment I believe<00:16:45.190> and<00:16:45.520> I<00:16:46.510> wanted<00:16:46.960> to<00:16:47.050> give<00:16:47.200> you<00:16:47.320> the 00:16:47.490 --> 00:16:47.500 align:start position:0% believe and I wanted to give you the 00:16:47.500 --> 00:16:49.610 align:start position:0% believe and I wanted to give you the chance<00:16:47.710> to<00:16:47.980> do<00:16:48.160> that<00:16:48.370> and<00:16:48.550> then<00:16:48.670> we'll<00:16:48.880> go<00:16:48.910> on 00:16:49.610 --> 00:16:49.620 align:start position:0% chance to do that and then we'll go on 00:16:49.620 --> 00:16:55.749 align:start position:0% chance to do that and then we'll go on item<00:16:50.620> we<00:16:50.740> have<00:16:50.860> to<00:16:50.950> discuss<00:16:51.310> on<00:16:51.490> the<00:16:51.700> budget 00:16:55.749 --> 00:16:55.759 align:start position:0% 00:16:55.759 --> 00:17:00.889 align:start position:0% thank<00:16:56.759> you<00:16:56.819> very<00:16:56.850> much<00:16:57.499> I<00:16:59.360> want<00:17:00.360> to<00:17:00.449> thank<00:17:00.720> each 00:17:00.889 --> 00:17:00.899 align:start position:0% thank you very much I want to thank each 00:17:00.899 --> 00:17:04.760 align:start position:0% thank you very much I want to thank each of<00:17:00.959> you<00:17:01.139> for<00:17:01.290> the<00:17:02.509> commitment<00:17:03.509> to<00:17:03.839> the<00:17:03.990> pool 00:17:04.760 --> 00:17:04.770 align:start position:0% of you for the commitment to the pool 00:17:04.770 --> 00:17:11.840 align:start position:0% of you for the commitment to the pool that's<00:17:05.039> made<00:17:06.650> $10,000<00:17:10.039> the<00:17:11.039> second<00:17:11.429> thing<00:17:11.640> is 00:17:11.840 --> 00:17:11.850 align:start position:0% that's made $10,000 the second thing is 00:17:11.850 --> 00:17:15.710 align:start position:0% that's made $10,000 the second thing is that<00:17:11.880> I<00:17:12.030> wanted<00:17:13.640> to<00:17:14.640> let<00:17:14.850> you<00:17:14.880> know<00:17:15.030> that<00:17:15.480> we've 00:17:15.710 --> 00:17:15.720 align:start position:0% that I wanted to let you know that we've 00:17:15.720 --> 00:17:23.569 align:start position:0% that I wanted to let you know that we've got<00:17:15.750> some<00:17:16.169> good<00:17:16.380> news<00:17:16.819> as<00:17:17.819> of<00:17:18.120> today<00:17:22.579> yesterday 00:17:23.569 --> 00:17:23.579 align:start position:0% got some good news as of today yesterday 00:17:23.579 --> 00:17:28.659 align:start position:0% got some good news as of today yesterday as<00:17:23.760> I<00:17:23.939> thought<00:17:24.150> about<00:17:24.299> the<00:17:24.630> situation<00:17:24.839> I 00:17:28.659 --> 00:17:28.669 align:start position:0% 00:17:28.669 --> 00:17:31.539 align:start position:0% considered<00:17:29.669> the<00:17:29.820> admonishment<00:17:30.659> of<00:17:31.260> the 00:17:31.539 --> 00:17:31.549 align:start position:0% considered the admonishment of the 00:17:31.549 --> 00:17:36.980 align:start position:0% considered the admonishment of the 1960's<00:17:32.809> ask<00:17:33.809> not<00:17:34.880> what<00:17:35.880> my<00:17:36.179> gummy<00:17:36.480> county 00:17:36.980 --> 00:17:36.990 align:start position:0% 1960's ask not what my gummy county 00:17:36.990 --> 00:17:40.730 align:start position:0% 1960's ask not what my gummy county council<00:17:37.500> can<00:17:38.250> do<00:17:38.429> for<00:17:38.700> you<00:17:39.080> ask<00:17:40.080> what<00:17:40.409> you<00:17:40.559> can 00:17:40.730 --> 00:17:40.740 align:start position:0% council can do for you ask what you can 00:17:40.740 --> 00:17:43.630 align:start position:0% council can do for you ask what you can do<00:17:41.070> for<00:17:41.970> the<00:17:42.090> Montgomery<00:17:42.390> County<00:17:42.840> Council 00:17:43.630 --> 00:17:43.640 align:start position:0% do for the Montgomery County Council 00:17:43.640 --> 00:17:46.039 align:start position:0% do for the Montgomery County Council they<00:17:44.640> said<00:17:44.880> there<00:17:45.059> was<00:17:45.179> a<00:17:45.210> line<00:17:45.450> they<00:17:45.659> hadn't 00:17:46.039 --> 00:17:46.049 align:start position:0% they said there was a line they hadn't 00:17:46.049 --> 00:17:52.909 align:start position:0% they said there was a line they hadn't heard<00:17:46.340> previously<00:17:49.820> with<00:17:50.820> the<00:17:50.940> help<00:17:51.210> of<00:17:51.919> the 00:17:52.909 --> 00:17:52.919 align:start position:0% heard previously with the help of the 00:17:52.919 --> 00:17:55.730 align:start position:0% heard previously with the help of the good<00:17:53.130> chairman<00:17:53.669> of<00:17:53.850> our<00:17:54.090> public<00:17:55.080> advisory 00:17:55.730 --> 00:17:55.740 align:start position:0% good chairman of our public advisory 00:17:55.740 --> 00:17:58.669 align:start position:0% good chairman of our public advisory committee<00:17:56.100> Jerry<00:17:56.970> Siemens<00:17:57.539> we<00:17:58.260> put<00:17:58.500> together 00:17:58.669 --> 00:17:58.679 align:start position:0% committee Jerry Siemens we put together 00:17:58.679 --> 00:18:02.840 align:start position:0% committee Jerry Siemens we put together what<00:17:59.220> I<00:17:59.690> referred<00:18:00.690> to<00:18:00.809> today<00:18:01.080> as<00:18:01.850> midnight 00:18:02.840 --> 00:18:02.850 align:start position:0% what I referred to today as midnight 00:18:02.850 --> 00:18:09.529 align:start position:0% what I referred to today as midnight memo<00:18:05.750> we<00:18:06.750> had<00:18:07.049> with<00:18:07.320> your<00:18:07.530> 10,000<00:18:08.429> we<00:18:09.240> had<00:18:09.390> the 00:18:09.529 --> 00:18:09.539 align:start position:0% memo we had with your 10,000 we had the 00:18:09.539 --> 00:18:14.330 align:start position:0% memo we had with your 10,000 we had the situation<00:18:10.200> down<00:18:10.409> to<00:18:11.600> 83,000<00:18:12.690> we<00:18:13.649> also<00:18:13.890> that 00:18:14.330 --> 00:18:14.340 align:start position:0% situation down to 83,000 we also that 00:18:14.340 --> 00:18:18.789 align:start position:0% situation down to 83,000 we also that calculated<00:18:15.140> that<00:18:16.140> we<00:18:16.350> would<00:18:16.530> have<00:18:17.360> 27,000 00:18:18.789 --> 00:18:18.799 align:start position:0% calculated that we would have 27,000 00:18:18.799 --> 00:18:24.010 align:start position:0% calculated that we would have 27,000 from<00:18:19.799> revenues<00:18:20.690> generated<00:18:21.690> this<00:18:22.289> year 00:18:24.010 --> 00:18:24.020 align:start position:0% from revenues generated this year 00:18:24.020 --> 00:18:27.950 align:start position:0% from revenues generated this year probably<00:18:25.020> about<00:18:25.530> 17<00:18:26.340> News<00:18:26.700> 15<00:18:27.299> at<00:18:27.480> the<00:18:27.510> end<00:18:27.780> of 00:18:27.950 --> 00:18:27.960 align:start position:0% probably about 17 News 15 at the end of 00:18:27.960 --> 00:18:32.060 align:start position:0% probably about 17 News 15 at the end of April<00:18:28.730> 15,000<00:18:29.730> and<00:18:30.030> based<00:18:31.020> on<00:18:31.289> that<00:18:31.500> projected 00:18:32.060 --> 00:18:32.070 align:start position:0% April 15,000 and based on that projected 00:18:32.070 --> 00:18:33.139 align:start position:0% April 15,000 and based on that projected for<00:18:32.280> the<00:18:32.340> last<00:18:32.549> few<00:18:32.789> months 00:18:33.139 --> 00:18:33.149 align:start position:0% for the last few months 00:18:33.149 --> 00:18:41.360 align:start position:0% for the last few months we<00:18:33.809> got<00:18:34.340> 27,000<00:18:35.340> that<00:18:36.090> rapid<00:18:37.039> 256<00:18:40.100> we<00:18:41.100> then 00:18:41.360 --> 00:18:41.370 align:start position:0% we got 27,000 that rapid 256 we then 00:18:41.370 --> 00:18:44.960 align:start position:0% we got 27,000 that rapid 256 we then made 00:18:44.960 --> 00:18:44.970 align:start position:0% 00:18:44.970 --> 00:18:57.500 align:start position:0% to<00:18:47.059> 50%<00:18:53.299> to<00:18:54.299> 50%<00:18:54.750> cuts<00:18:55.640> into<00:18:56.640> items<00:18:57.210> in<00:18:57.390> the 00:18:57.500 --> 00:18:57.510 align:start position:0% to 50% to 50% cuts into items in the 00:18:57.510 --> 00:19:02.649 align:start position:0% to 50% to 50% cuts into items in the budget<00:18:57.919> which<00:18:58.919> got<00:18:59.220> it<00:18:59.429> down<00:18:59.700> to<00:19:00.000> under<00:19:01.250> 38,000 00:19:02.649 --> 00:19:02.659 align:start position:0% budget which got it down to under 38,000 00:19:02.659 --> 00:19:08.330 align:start position:0% budget which got it down to under 38,000 which<00:19:04.400> man<00:19:05.809> that<00:19:06.809> in<00:19:07.140> this<00:19:07.320> was<00:19:07.530> the<00:19:07.710> big<00:19:07.980> point 00:19:08.330 --> 00:19:08.340 align:start position:0% which man that in this was the big point 00:19:08.340 --> 00:19:13.630 align:start position:0% which man that in this was the big point that<00:19:09.179> we<00:19:09.360> made<00:19:09.950> that<00:19:10.950> we<00:19:11.250> are<00:19:11.460> giving<00:19:11.940> back 00:19:13.630 --> 00:19:13.640 align:start position:0% that we made that we are giving back 00:19:13.640 --> 00:19:17.810 align:start position:0% that we made that we are giving back 40,000<00:19:14.730> that's<00:19:15.510> unused<00:19:16.669> from<00:19:17.669> the 00:19:17.810 --> 00:19:17.820 align:start position:0% 40,000 that's unused from the 00:19:17.820 --> 00:19:20.270 align:start position:0% 40,000 that's unused from the appropriation<00:19:18.750> for<00:19:19.020> the<00:19:19.770> four<00:19:20.070> and<00:19:20.190> a<00:19:20.220> half 00:19:20.270 --> 00:19:20.280 align:start position:0% appropriation for the four and a half 00:19:20.280 --> 00:19:28.149 align:start position:0% appropriation for the four and a half months<00:19:20.960> and<00:19:21.960> so<00:19:23.059> this<00:19:24.059> amount<00:19:25.159> then<00:19:26.360> would<00:19:27.360> be 00:19:28.149 --> 00:19:28.159 align:start position:0% months and so this amount then would be 00:19:28.159 --> 00:19:30.529 align:start position:0% months and so this amount then would be less<00:19:29.159> than<00:19:29.580> 40 00:19:30.529 --> 00:19:30.539 align:start position:0% less than 40 00:19:30.539 --> 00:19:32.840 align:start position:0% less than 40 in<00:19:30.720> fact<00:19:31.289> when<00:19:31.559> this<00:19:31.740> went<00:19:31.980> to<00:19:32.130> the<00:19:32.280> Treasury 00:19:32.840 --> 00:19:32.850 align:start position:0% in fact when this went to the Treasury 00:19:32.850 --> 00:19:37.760 align:start position:0% in fact when this went to the Treasury they<00:19:33.720> would<00:19:33.990> have<00:19:34.730> 2000<00:19:35.730> left<00:19:35.789> over<00:19:36.440> they<00:19:37.440> saw 00:19:37.760 --> 00:19:37.770 align:start position:0% they would have 2000 left over they saw 00:19:37.770 --> 00:19:41.899 align:start position:0% they would have 2000 left over they saw that<00:19:38.100> and<00:19:38.940> they<00:19:39.419> voted<00:19:39.890> the<00:19:40.890> final<00:19:41.340> decision 00:19:41.899 --> 00:19:41.909 align:start position:0% that and they voted the final decision 00:19:41.909 --> 00:19:44.870 align:start position:0% that and they voted the final decision today<00:19:42.840> hit<00:19:43.470> him<00:19:43.850> recommended<00:19:44.850> for 00:19:44.870 --> 00:19:44.880 align:start position:0% today hit him recommended for 00:19:44.880 --> 00:19:48.159 align:start position:0% today hit him recommended for reconciliation<00:19:46.070> that<00:19:47.070> would<00:19:47.309> have<00:19:47.429> been<00:19:47.610> a 00:19:48.159 --> 00:19:48.169 align:start position:0% reconciliation that would have been a 00:19:48.169 --> 00:19:55.039 align:start position:0% reconciliation that would have been a good<00:19:49.169> step<00:19:49.669> because<00:19:50.669> the<00:19:50.909> committee<00:19:52.970> had<00:19:54.049> not 00:19:55.039 --> 00:19:55.049 align:start position:0% good step because the committee had not 00:19:55.049 --> 00:19:59.270 align:start position:0% good step because the committee had not recommended<00:19:55.919> for<00:19:57.169> reconciliation<00:19:58.169> but<00:19:58.919> today 00:19:59.270 --> 00:19:59.280 align:start position:0% recommended for reconciliation but today 00:19:59.280 --> 00:20:05.120 align:start position:0% recommended for reconciliation but today using<00:20:00.270> the<00:20:01.549> $40,000<00:20:02.549> when<00:20:03.030> you<00:20:03.350> give<00:20:04.350> us<00:20:04.500> a 00:20:05.120 --> 00:20:05.130 align:start position:0% using the $40,000 when you give us a 00:20:05.130 --> 00:20:07.370 align:start position:0% using the $40,000 when you give us a final<00:20:05.820> and<00:20:06.360> I<00:20:06.450> want<00:20:06.630> to<00:20:06.720> share<00:20:06.929> that<00:20:07.110> with<00:20:07.320> you 00:20:07.370 --> 00:20:07.380 align:start position:0% final and I want to share that with you 00:20:07.380 --> 00:20:11.510 align:start position:0% final and I want to share that with you I<00:20:07.799> feel<00:20:08.549> very<00:20:08.789> confident<00:20:09.559> given<00:20:10.559> our 00:20:11.510 --> 00:20:11.520 align:start position:0% I feel very confident given our 00:20:11.520 --> 00:20:15.010 align:start position:0% I feel very confident given our experience<00:20:11.580> thus<00:20:12.419> far<00:20:12.559> and<00:20:13.559> some<00:20:13.860> other 00:20:15.010 --> 00:20:15.020 align:start position:0% experience thus far and some other 00:20:15.020 --> 00:20:18.590 align:start position:0% experience thus far and some other revenue<00:20:16.429> generating<00:20:17.429> kinds<00:20:17.909> of<00:20:18.030> things<00:20:18.270> I 00:20:18.590 --> 00:20:18.600 align:start position:0% revenue generating kinds of things I 00:20:18.600 --> 00:20:22.940 align:start position:0% revenue generating kinds of things I feel<00:20:19.200> very<00:20:19.530> confident<00:20:20.220> that<00:20:20.460> assures<00:20:21.950> the 00:20:22.940 --> 00:20:22.950 align:start position:0% feel very confident that assures the 00:20:22.950 --> 00:20:26.360 align:start position:0% feel very confident that assures the pool<00:20:23.220> for<00:20:23.610> yet<00:20:24.360> another<00:20:24.570> year<00:20:25.049> and<00:20:25.409> we<00:20:26.130> did 00:20:26.360 --> 00:20:26.370 align:start position:0% pool for yet another year and we did 00:20:26.370 --> 00:20:29.060 align:start position:0% pool for yet another year and we did indicate<00:20:26.870> and<00:20:27.870> I<00:20:27.990> don't<00:20:28.049> think<00:20:28.289> this<00:20:28.590> is<00:20:28.799> brash 00:20:29.060 --> 00:20:29.070 align:start position:0% indicate and I don't think this is brash 00:20:29.070 --> 00:20:34.909 align:start position:0% indicate and I don't think this is brash we<00:20:30.000> did<00:20:30.179> indicate<00:20:30.539> that<00:20:30.750> the<00:20:31.470> goal<00:20:33.919> achievable 00:20:34.909 --> 00:20:34.919 align:start position:0% we did indicate that the goal achievable 00:20:34.919 --> 00:20:42.200 align:start position:0% we did indicate that the goal achievable in<00:20:35.820> which<00:20:39.110> committed<00:20:40.110> you<00:20:40.380> is<00:20:41.190> that<00:20:41.520> we<00:20:42.000> can 00:20:42.200 --> 00:20:42.210 align:start position:0% in which committed you is that we can 00:20:42.210 --> 00:20:44.630 align:start position:0% in which committed you is that we can make<00:20:42.360> it<00:20:42.600> self<00:20:43.320> sustained 00:20:44.630 --> 00:20:44.640 align:start position:0% make it self sustained 00:20:44.640 --> 00:20:53.440 align:start position:0% make it self sustained for<00:20:44.790> fiscal<00:20:45.240> year<00:20:45.480> 11<00:20:46.850> and<00:20:47.850> I<00:20:48.030> want<00:20:48.270> to<00:20:48.390> thank 00:20:53.440 --> 00:20:53.450 align:start position:0% 00:20:53.450 --> 00:20:59.680 align:start position:0% at<00:20:54.450> Miller<00:20:54.780> was<00:20:55.050> there<00:20:55.350> today<00:20:58.040> okay 00:20:59.680 --> 00:20:59.690 align:start position:0% at Miller was there today okay 00:20:59.690 --> 00:21:05.510 align:start position:0% at Miller was there today okay Daniel's<00:21:00.690> coming<00:21:04.010> Deborah<00:21:05.010> from<00:21:05.280> our 00:21:05.510 --> 00:21:05.520 align:start position:0% Daniel's coming Deborah from our 00:21:05.520 --> 00:21:22.040 align:start position:0% Daniel's coming Deborah from our Recreation<00:21:06.920> Department<00:21:20.810> thank<00:21:21.810> you<00:21:21.900> very 00:21:22.040 --> 00:21:22.050 align:start position:0% Recreation Department thank you very 00:21:22.050 --> 00:21:24.350 align:start position:0% Recreation Department thank you very much<00:21:22.290> good<00:21:23.190> thank<00:21:23.520> you<00:21:23.610> for<00:21:23.760> bringing<00:21:23.940> a<00:21:24.150> good 00:21:24.350 --> 00:21:24.360 align:start position:0% much good thank you for bringing a good 00:21:24.360 --> 00:21:30.320 align:start position:0% much good thank you for bringing a good news<00:21:26.060> and<00:21:27.060> I<00:21:27.300> hope<00:21:27.480> that<00:21:27.830> the<00:21:28.830> pool<00:21:29.670> operations 00:21:30.320 --> 00:21:30.330 align:start position:0% news and I hope that the pool operations 00:21:30.330 --> 00:21:33.710 align:start position:0% news and I hope that the pool operations over<00:21:31.020> the<00:21:31.050> coming<00:21:31.710> period<00:21:31.980> of<00:21:32.190> time<00:21:32.480> meet<00:21:33.480> and 00:21:33.710 --> 00:21:33.720 align:start position:0% over the coming period of time meet and 00:21:33.720 --> 00:21:37.400 align:start position:0% over the coming period of time meet and exceed<00:21:34.050> your<00:21:34.620> expectations<00:21:35.310> of<00:21:36.410> revenue 00:21:37.400 --> 00:21:37.410 align:start position:0% exceed your expectations of revenue 00:21:37.410 --> 00:21:39.620 align:start position:0% exceed your expectations of revenue generation<00:21:37.800> so<00:21:38.280> that<00:21:38.390> everything<00:21:39.390> can 00:21:39.620 --> 00:21:39.630 align:start position:0% generation so that everything can 00:21:39.630 --> 00:21:52.150 align:start position:0% generation so that everything can continue<00:21:49.220> Thanks 00:21:52.150 --> 00:21:52.160 align:start position:0% continue Thanks 00:21:52.160 --> 00:21:56.540 align:start position:0% continue Thanks so<00:21:53.160> now<00:21:53.310> we'll<00:21:53.550> go<00:21:53.730> back<00:21:53.940> to<00:21:54.270> the<00:21:55.280> kind<00:21:56.280> of<00:21:56.400> the 00:21:56.540 --> 00:21:56.550 align:start position:0% so now we'll go back to the kind of the 00:21:56.550 --> 00:21:59.690 align:start position:0% so now we'll go back to the kind of the one<00:21:56.760> item<00:21:57.000> that<00:21:57.240> was<00:21:57.800> left<00:21:58.800> hanging<00:21:59.070> from<00:21:59.490> our 00:21:59.690 --> 00:21:59.700 align:start position:0% one item that was left hanging from our 00:21:59.700 --> 00:22:01.820 align:start position:0% one item that was left hanging from our reconciliation<00:22:00.360> discussion<00:22:01.290> on<00:22:01.410> Thursday 00:22:01.820 --> 00:22:01.830 align:start position:0% reconciliation discussion on Thursday 00:22:01.830 --> 00:22:04.100 align:start position:0% reconciliation discussion on Thursday night<00:22:02.010> just<00:22:02.220> to<00:22:02.310> make<00:22:02.460> sure<00:22:02.670> I<00:22:03.000> believe<00:22:03.810> we<00:22:03.960> had 00:22:04.100 --> 00:22:04.110 align:start position:0% night just to make sure I believe we had 00:22:04.110 --> 00:22:07.220 align:start position:0% night just to make sure I believe we had some<00:22:04.260> information<00:22:05.120> from<00:22:06.120> the<00:22:06.450> city<00:22:06.660> manager 00:22:07.220 --> 00:22:07.230 align:start position:0% some information from the city manager 00:22:07.230 --> 00:22:10.940 align:start position:0% some information from the city manager about<00:22:07.590> the<00:22:08.450> possible<00:22:09.450> paving<00:22:10.170> of<00:22:10.260> Palmer<00:22:10.590> Lane 00:22:10.940 --> 00:22:10.950 align:start position:0% about the possible paving of Palmer Lane 00:22:10.950 --> 00:22:14.570 align:start position:0% about the possible paving of Palmer Lane and<00:22:11.370> I<00:22:11.820> think<00:22:12.450> that<00:22:12.630> was<00:22:12.840> the<00:22:13.800> estimate<00:22:14.280> from 00:22:14.570 --> 00:22:14.580 align:start position:0% and I think that was the estimate from 00:22:14.580 --> 00:22:17.860 align:start position:0% and I think that was the estimate from the<00:22:14.640> city<00:22:14.910> engineer<00:22:15.060> was<00:22:15.630> 20<00:22:16.020> or<00:22:16.190> 25,000<00:22:17.190> and 00:22:17.860 --> 00:22:17.870 align:start position:0% the city engineer was 20 or 25,000 and 00:22:17.870 --> 00:22:21.740 align:start position:0% the city engineer was 20 or 25,000 and if<00:22:18.870> you<00:22:19.110> could<00:22:19.350> just<00:22:19.550> if<00:22:20.550> the<00:22:21.180> city<00:22:21.360> manager 00:22:21.740 --> 00:22:21.750 align:start position:0% if you could just if the city manager 00:22:21.750 --> 00:22:24.800 align:start position:0% if you could just if the city manager could<00:22:21.990> just<00:22:22.200> kind<00:22:22.770> of<00:22:22.830> share<00:22:23.580> with<00:22:23.760> us<00:22:23.880> where 00:22:24.800 --> 00:22:24.810 align:start position:0% could just kind of share with us where 00:22:24.810 --> 00:22:27.680 align:start position:0% could just kind of share with us where the<00:22:25.020> has<00:22:25.860> whether<00:22:26.220> that<00:22:26.400> was<00:22:26.580> included<00:22:27.270> in<00:22:27.510> the 00:22:27.680 --> 00:22:27.690 align:start position:0% the has whether that was included in the 00:22:27.690 --> 00:22:29.330 align:start position:0% the has whether that was included in the all<00:22:27.960> of<00:22:27.990> the<00:22:28.200> figures<00:22:28.410> that<00:22:28.590> you<00:22:28.920> gave<00:22:29.160> us 00:22:29.330 --> 00:22:29.340 align:start position:0% all of the figures that you gave us 00:22:29.340 --> 00:22:32.270 align:start position:0% all of the figures that you gave us behind<00:22:30.210> the<00:22:30.360> cover<00:22:30.630> sheet<00:22:30.930> or<00:22:31.200> how<00:22:31.860> that<00:22:32.100> would 00:22:32.270 --> 00:22:32.280 align:start position:0% behind the cover sheet or how that would 00:22:32.280 --> 00:22:34.150 align:start position:0% behind the cover sheet or how that would change<00:22:32.310> weather<00:22:32.940> or<00:22:33.330> how<00:22:33.660> that<00:22:33.720> would<00:22:34.050> change 00:22:34.150 --> 00:22:34.160 align:start position:0% change weather or how that would change 00:22:34.160 --> 00:22:37.010 align:start position:0% change weather or how that would change any<00:22:35.160> of<00:22:35.400> the<00:22:35.520> figures<00:22:35.820> their<00:22:36.060> pending 00:22:37.010 --> 00:22:37.020 align:start position:0% any of the figures their pending 00:22:37.020 --> 00:22:38.810 align:start position:0% any of the figures their pending direction<00:22:37.530> from<00:22:37.650> the<00:22:37.770> council<00:22:38.310> that 00:22:38.810 --> 00:22:38.820 align:start position:0% direction from the council that 00:22:38.820 --> 00:22:41.210 align:start position:0% direction from the council that additional<00:22:39.410> expenditure<00:22:40.410> has<00:22:40.590> not<00:22:40.950> been 00:22:41.210 --> 00:22:41.220 align:start position:0% additional expenditure has not been 00:22:41.220 --> 00:22:42.800 align:start position:0% additional expenditure has not been incorporated<00:22:41.490> into<00:22:42.000> the<00:22:42.240> figures<00:22:42.510> that<00:22:42.540> are 00:22:42.800 --> 00:22:42.810 align:start position:0% incorporated into the figures that are 00:22:42.810 --> 00:22:44.320 align:start position:0% incorporated into the figures that are before<00:22:42.960> you<00:22:43.380> so<00:22:43.800> my<00:22:44.010> hope 00:22:44.320 --> 00:22:44.330 align:start position:0% before you so my hope 00:22:44.330 --> 00:22:45.669 align:start position:0% before you so my hope was<00:22:44.419> that<00:22:44.539> if<00:22:44.630> the<00:22:44.720> council<00:22:45.110> wants<00:22:45.440> to<00:22:45.559> move 00:22:45.669 --> 00:22:45.679 align:start position:0% was that if the council wants to move 00:22:45.679 --> 00:22:47.799 align:start position:0% was that if the council wants to move forward<00:22:45.919> with<00:22:46.340> paving<00:22:46.760> Palmer<00:22:47.120> Lane<00:22:47.419> in<00:22:47.570> FY 00:22:47.799 --> 00:22:47.809 align:start position:0% forward with paving Palmer Lane in FY 00:22:47.809 --> 00:22:49.750 align:start position:0% forward with paving Palmer Lane in FY 2010<00:22:48.470> that<00:22:48.649> that<00:22:48.769> direction<00:22:49.100> could<00:22:49.340> be<00:22:49.460> given 00:22:49.750 --> 00:22:49.760 align:start position:0% 2010 that that direction could be given 00:22:49.760 --> 00:22:52.029 align:start position:0% 2010 that that direction could be given tonight<00:22:50.090> so<00:22:51.019> we<00:22:51.140> can<00:22:51.169> incorporate<00:22:51.590> those 00:22:52.029 --> 00:22:52.039 align:start position:0% tonight so we can incorporate those 00:22:52.039 --> 00:22:54.490 align:start position:0% tonight so we can incorporate those figures<00:22:52.490> into<00:22:52.970> the<00:22:53.210> budget<00:22:53.720> ordinances<00:22:54.350> that 00:22:54.490 --> 00:22:54.500 align:start position:0% figures into the budget ordinances that 00:22:54.500 --> 00:22:56.889 align:start position:0% figures into the budget ordinances that will<00:22:54.590> be<00:22:54.679> presented<00:22:55.130> next<00:22:55.159> Monday<00:22:55.640> okay<00:22:56.330> can 00:22:56.889 --> 00:22:56.899 align:start position:0% will be presented next Monday okay can 00:22:56.899 --> 00:23:04.570 align:start position:0% will be presented next Monday okay can be<00:22:57.140> I<00:22:59.230> guess<00:23:00.230> maybe<00:23:01.039> first<00:23:01.429> I'll<00:23:03.039> ask<00:23:04.039> friend 00:23:04.570 --> 00:23:04.580 align:start position:0% be I guess maybe first I'll ask friend 00:23:04.580 --> 00:23:06.960 align:start position:0% be I guess maybe first I'll ask friend comments<00:23:05.090> for<00:23:05.360> many<00:23:05.510> to<00:23:05.659> council<00:23:06.080> about 00:23:06.960 --> 00:23:06.970 align:start position:0% comments for many to council about 00:23:06.970 --> 00:23:10.029 align:start position:0% comments for many to council about whether<00:23:07.970> to<00:23:08.179> include<00:23:08.480> that<00:23:08.840> or<00:23:09.289> whether<00:23:09.860> we 00:23:10.029 --> 00:23:10.039 align:start position:0% whether to include that or whether we 00:23:10.039 --> 00:23:11.380 align:start position:0% whether to include that or whether we need<00:23:10.070> a<00:23:10.250> discussion<00:23:10.789> or<00:23:11.029> whether<00:23:11.179> we<00:23:11.360> just 00:23:11.380 --> 00:23:11.390 align:start position:0% need a discussion or whether we just 00:23:11.390 --> 00:23:17.019 align:start position:0% need a discussion or whether we just want<00:23:11.779> to<00:23:12.789> indicate<00:23:15.549> where<00:23:16.549> we<00:23:16.669> want<00:23:16.820> to<00:23:16.850> go<00:23:17.000> on 00:23:17.019 --> 00:23:17.029 align:start position:0% want to indicate where we want to go on 00:23:17.029 --> 00:23:20.139 align:start position:0% want to indicate where we want to go on that<00:23:17.179> comes<00:23:17.570> memory<00:23:18.190> I'm<00:23:19.190> okay<00:23:19.549> including<00:23:19.789> it 00:23:20.139 --> 00:23:20.149 align:start position:0% that comes memory I'm okay including it 00:23:20.149 --> 00:23:21.879 align:start position:0% that comes memory I'm okay including it with<00:23:20.690> the<00:23:20.779> understanding<00:23:20.990> that<00:23:21.470> it<00:23:21.710> wasn't 00:23:21.879 --> 00:23:21.889 align:start position:0% with the understanding that it wasn't 00:23:21.889 --> 00:23:23.230 align:start position:0% with the understanding that it wasn't the<00:23:22.250> reason<00:23:22.399> is<00:23:22.730> because<00:23:22.970> it<00:23:23.210> wasn't 00:23:23.230 --> 00:23:23.240 align:start position:0% the reason is because it wasn't 00:23:23.240 --> 00:23:28.120 align:start position:0% the reason is because it wasn't originally<00:23:24.019> in<00:23:24.769> the<00:23:25.340> street<00:23:25.820> assessment<00:23:26.649> so<00:23:27.649> I 00:23:28.120 --> 00:23:28.130 align:start position:0% originally in the street assessment so I 00:23:28.130 --> 00:23:30.159 align:start position:0% originally in the street assessment so I view<00:23:28.789> this<00:23:28.940> as<00:23:29.000> a<00:23:29.149> special<00:23:29.600> case<00:23:29.779> because<00:23:29.990> I 00:23:30.159 --> 00:23:30.169 align:start position:0% view this as a special case because I 00:23:30.169 --> 00:23:32.379 align:start position:0% view this as a special case because I think<00:23:30.200> we've<00:23:30.500> been<00:23:30.710> stuck<00:23:31.399> very<00:23:31.669> strongly<00:23:32.029> to 00:23:32.379 --> 00:23:32.389 align:start position:0% think we've been stuck very strongly to 00:23:32.389 --> 00:23:34.659 align:start position:0% think we've been stuck very strongly to the<00:23:32.510> that<00:23:32.840> original<00:23:33.200> assessment<00:23:33.470> and<00:23:33.860> done 00:23:34.659 --> 00:23:34.669 align:start position:0% the that original assessment and done 00:23:34.669 --> 00:23:35.950 align:start position:0% the that original assessment and done that<00:23:34.789> in<00:23:34.909> priority<00:23:35.419> order<00:23:35.450> but<00:23:35.840> my 00:23:35.950 --> 00:23:35.960 align:start position:0% that in priority order but my 00:23:35.960 --> 00:23:38.950 align:start position:0% that in priority order but my understanding<00:23:36.760> from<00:23:37.760> the<00:23:38.000> works<00:23:38.539> director 00:23:38.950 --> 00:23:38.960 align:start position:0% understanding from the works director 00:23:38.960 --> 00:23:40.269 align:start position:0% understanding from the works director was<00:23:39.139> that<00:23:39.289> it<00:23:39.380> wasn't<00:23:39.559> in<00:23:39.769> that<00:23:39.830> original 00:23:40.269 --> 00:23:40.279 align:start position:0% was that it wasn't in that original 00:23:40.279 --> 00:23:41.409 align:start position:0% was that it wasn't in that original assessment<00:23:40.490> so<00:23:40.850> for<00:23:41.000> that<00:23:41.090> reason<00:23:41.149> I'm 00:23:41.409 --> 00:23:41.419 align:start position:0% assessment so for that reason I'm 00:23:41.419 --> 00:23:43.539 align:start position:0% assessment so for that reason I'm willing<00:23:41.600> to<00:23:41.659> put<00:23:41.809> it<00:23:41.899> in<00:23:42.159> and<00:23:43.159> I<00:23:43.250> would<00:23:43.309> suggest 00:23:43.539 --> 00:23:43.549 align:start position:0% willing to put it in and I would suggest 00:23:43.549 --> 00:23:45.720 align:start position:0% willing to put it in and I would suggest that<00:23:43.909> it<00:23:44.029> would<00:23:44.120> come<00:23:44.330> out<00:23:44.360> that<00:23:45.320> we<00:23:45.440> wouldn't 00:23:45.720 --> 00:23:45.730 align:start position:0% that it would come out that we wouldn't 00:23:45.730 --> 00:23:48.850 align:start position:0% that it would come out that we wouldn't raise<00:23:46.730> taxes<00:23:47.419> any<00:23:48.080> more<00:23:48.320> than<00:23:48.500> we<00:23:48.590> already<00:23:48.620> are 00:23:48.850 --> 00:23:48.860 align:start position:0% raise taxes any more than we already are 00:23:48.860 --> 00:23:51.190 align:start position:0% raise taxes any more than we already are but<00:23:49.220> it<00:23:49.340> would<00:23:49.429> just<00:23:49.610> come<00:23:49.760> out<00:23:49.909> from<00:23:50.200> reserve 00:23:51.190 --> 00:23:51.200 align:start position:0% but it would just come out from reserve 00:23:51.200 --> 00:23:54.789 align:start position:0% but it would just come out from reserve funds<00:23:51.470> I<00:23:52.659> wanted<00:23:53.659> to<00:23:53.750> get<00:23:53.870> a<00:23:53.899> clarification<00:23:54.200> on 00:23:54.789 --> 00:23:54.799 align:start position:0% funds I wanted to get a clarification on 00:23:54.799 --> 00:23:56.259 align:start position:0% funds I wanted to get a clarification on that<00:23:54.830> once<00:23:55.159> I<00:23:55.279> had<00:23:55.429> an<00:23:55.519> indication<00:23:55.880> of<00:23:56.090> where 00:23:56.259 --> 00:23:56.269 align:start position:0% that once I had an indication of where 00:23:56.269 --> 00:23:58.750 align:start position:0% that once I had an indication of where the<00:23:56.389> council<00:23:56.600> want<00:23:56.899> to<00:23:56.960> go<00:23:57.279> my<00:23:58.279> sense<00:23:58.549> is<00:23:58.700> that 00:23:58.750 --> 00:23:58.760 align:start position:0% the council want to go my sense is that 00:23:58.760 --> 00:24:01.389 align:start position:0% the council want to go my sense is that people<00:23:58.970> wanted<00:23:59.630> to<00:23:59.690> include<00:24:00.230> that<00:24:00.500> is<00:24:01.220> there 00:24:01.389 --> 00:24:01.399 align:start position:0% people wanted to include that is there 00:24:01.399 --> 00:24:03.070 align:start position:0% people wanted to include that is there anybody<00:24:01.580> who<00:24:02.059> would<00:24:02.240> not<00:24:02.450> like<00:24:02.659> to<00:24:02.690> include 00:24:03.070 --> 00:24:03.080 align:start position:0% anybody who would not like to include 00:24:03.080 --> 00:24:09.940 align:start position:0% anybody who would not like to include that<00:24:06.070> I'm<00:24:07.070> unclear<00:24:07.460> why<00:24:08.350> this<00:24:09.350> was<00:24:09.559> a<00:24:09.590> street 00:24:09.940 --> 00:24:09.950 align:start position:0% that I'm unclear why this was a street 00:24:09.950 --> 00:24:11.259 align:start position:0% that I'm unclear why this was a street that<00:24:10.100> was<00:24:10.220> overlooked<00:24:10.700> when<00:24:10.820> we<00:24:11.000> did<00:24:11.149> the 00:24:11.259 --> 00:24:11.269 align:start position:0% that was overlooked when we did the 00:24:11.269 --> 00:24:14.409 align:start position:0% that was overlooked when we did the assessment<00:24:12.130> why<00:24:13.130> we<00:24:13.399> wouldn't<00:24:13.610> just<00:24:13.760> insert 00:24:14.409 --> 00:24:14.419 align:start position:0% assessment why we wouldn't just insert 00:24:14.419 --> 00:24:16.779 align:start position:0% assessment why we wouldn't just insert it<00:24:14.450> in<00:24:14.720> the<00:24:14.809> list<00:24:15.019> the<00:24:15.529> places<00:24:16.070> where<00:24:16.340> it<00:24:16.519> would 00:24:16.779 --> 00:24:16.789 align:start position:0% it in the list the places where it would 00:24:16.789 --> 00:24:22.750 align:start position:0% it in the list the places where it would have<00:24:16.970> fallen<00:24:19.840> I<00:24:20.840> believe<00:24:21.830> that<00:24:22.159> point<00:24:22.580> would 00:24:22.750 --> 00:24:22.760 align:start position:0% have fallen I believe that point would 00:24:22.760 --> 00:24:24.779 align:start position:0% have fallen I believe that point would have<00:24:22.789> passed<00:24:23.090> about<00:24:23.330> two<00:24:23.510> years<00:24:23.659> ago 00:24:24.779 --> 00:24:24.789 align:start position:0% have passed about two years ago 00:24:24.789 --> 00:24:27.149 align:start position:0% have passed about two years ago council<00:24:25.789> member<00:24:25.970> seaman's<00:24:26.269> I<00:24:26.510> think<00:24:26.750> it<00:24:26.870> was 00:24:27.149 --> 00:24:27.159 align:start position:0% council member seaman's I think it was 00:24:27.159 --> 00:24:28.990 align:start position:0% council member seaman's I think it was overlooked<00:24:28.159> because<00:24:28.610> I<00:24:28.669> think<00:24:28.730> it<00:24:28.909> was 00:24:28.990 --> 00:24:29.000 align:start position:0% overlooked because I think it was 00:24:29.000 --> 00:24:31.539 align:start position:0% overlooked because I think it was believed<00:24:29.960> to<00:24:30.110> be<00:24:30.230> a<00:24:30.260> private<00:24:30.590> alley<00:24:30.919> and<00:24:31.340> when 00:24:31.539 --> 00:24:31.549 align:start position:0% believed to be a private alley and when 00:24:31.549 --> 00:24:32.799 align:start position:0% believed to be a private alley and when the<00:24:31.639> issue<00:24:31.789> was<00:24:31.970> raised<00:24:32.360> I<00:24:32.510> believe<00:24:32.720> by 00:24:32.799 --> 00:24:32.809 align:start position:0% the issue was raised I believe by 00:24:32.809 --> 00:24:35.710 align:start position:0% the issue was raised I believe by councilmember<00:24:33.260> clay<00:24:33.679> as<00:24:33.980> I<00:24:34.159> recall<00:24:34.720> the 00:24:35.710 --> 00:24:35.720 align:start position:0% councilmember clay as I recall the 00:24:35.720 --> 00:24:37.240 align:start position:0% councilmember clay as I recall the Public<00:24:35.960> Works<00:24:35.990> Department<00:24:36.260> went<00:24:36.769> back<00:24:36.950> and 00:24:37.240 --> 00:24:37.250 align:start position:0% Public Works Department went back and 00:24:37.250 --> 00:24:38.830 align:start position:0% Public Works Department went back and reviewed<00:24:37.580> the<00:24:37.669> inventory<00:24:38.269> that<00:24:38.330> was<00:24:38.659> done 00:24:38.830 --> 00:24:38.840 align:start position:0% reviewed the inventory that was done 00:24:38.840 --> 00:24:41.320 align:start position:0% reviewed the inventory that was done back<00:24:39.080> and<00:24:39.380> his<00:24:39.830> 2004<00:24:40.610> just<00:24:40.789> prior<00:24:41.059> to<00:24:41.210> my 00:24:41.320 --> 00:24:41.330 align:start position:0% back and his 2004 just prior to my 00:24:41.330 --> 00:24:42.900 align:start position:0% back and his 2004 just prior to my starting<00:24:41.659> with<00:24:41.779> the<00:24:41.870> city 00:24:42.900 --> 00:24:42.910 align:start position:0% starting with the city 00:24:42.910 --> 00:24:45.250 align:start position:0% starting with the city so<00:24:43.910> that's<00:24:44.090> why<00:24:44.240> it<00:24:44.330> was<00:24:44.390> not<00:24:44.480> included<00:24:45.110> I 00:24:45.250 --> 00:24:45.260 align:start position:0% so that's why it was not included I 00:24:45.260 --> 00:24:48.070 align:start position:0% so that's why it was not included I think<00:24:45.290> Darrell<00:24:46.250> and<00:24:46.490> Ally<00:24:47.120> had<00:24:47.420> planned<00:24:47.720> to<00:24:47.930> do 00:24:48.070 --> 00:24:48.080 align:start position:0% think Darrell and Ally had planned to do 00:24:48.080 --> 00:24:51.310 align:start position:0% think Darrell and Ally had planned to do it<00:24:48.110> in<00:24:48.950> 2012<00:24:50.000> originally<00:24:50.540> essentially<00:24:51.140> to 00:24:51.310 --> 00:24:51.320 align:start position:0% it in 2012 originally essentially to 00:24:51.320 --> 00:24:53.020 align:start position:0% it in 2012 originally essentially to stick<00:24:51.950> it<00:24:52.070> at<00:24:52.160> the<00:24:52.250> end<00:24:52.370> of<00:24:52.490> the<00:24:52.550> list<00:24:52.730> if<00:24:52.880> you 00:24:53.020 --> 00:24:53.030 align:start position:0% stick it at the end of the list if you 00:24:53.030 --> 00:24:55.510 align:start position:0% stick it at the end of the list if you will<00:24:53.210> I<00:24:53.480> did<00:24:54.050> asked<00:24:54.440> the<00:24:55.160> public<00:24:55.400> works 00:24:55.510 --> 00:24:55.520 align:start position:0% will I did asked the public works 00:24:55.520 --> 00:24:58.120 align:start position:0% will I did asked the public works director<00:24:55.670> to<00:24:55.940> drive<00:24:56.180> the<00:24:56.330> street<00:24:56.660> on<00:24:57.130> Friday 00:24:58.120 --> 00:24:58.130 align:start position:0% director to drive the street on Friday 00:24:58.130 --> 00:25:00.160 align:start position:0% director to drive the street on Friday just<00:24:58.400> to<00:24:58.520> try<00:24:58.730> to<00:24:58.790> get<00:24:58.970> a<00:24:59.000> sense<00:24:59.300> of<00:24:59.600> our 00:25:00.160 --> 00:25:00.170 align:start position:0% just to try to get a sense of our 00:25:00.170 --> 00:25:01.810 align:start position:0% just to try to get a sense of our assessment<00:25:00.680> of<00:25:00.710> the<00:25:00.770> condition<00:25:00.920> obviously<00:25:01.700> it 00:25:01.810 --> 00:25:01.820 align:start position:0% assessment of the condition obviously it 00:25:01.820 --> 00:25:04.120 align:start position:0% assessment of the condition obviously it was<00:25:02.000> not<00:25:02.030> rated<00:25:02.600> in<00:25:03.260> the<00:25:03.320> same<00:25:03.710> manner<00:25:04.010> that 00:25:04.120 --> 00:25:04.130 align:start position:0% was not rated in the same manner that 00:25:04.130 --> 00:25:06.400 align:start position:0% was not rated in the same manner that other<00:25:04.430> streets<00:25:05.240> in<00:25:05.390> the<00:25:05.480> city<00:25:05.690> were<00:25:05.930> back<00:25:06.260> in 00:25:06.400 --> 00:25:06.410 align:start position:0% other streets in the city were back in 00:25:06.410 --> 00:25:09.250 align:start position:0% other streets in the city were back in 2004<00:25:07.130> she<00:25:07.160> did<00:25:07.460> indicate<00:25:07.730> that<00:25:07.910> it<00:25:08.150> was<00:25:08.260> in 00:25:09.250 --> 00:25:09.260 align:start position:0% 2004 she did indicate that it was in 00:25:09.260 --> 00:25:11.680 align:start position:0% 2004 she did indicate that it was in poor<00:25:09.500> shape<00:25:10.300> obviously<00:25:11.300> there<00:25:11.420> are<00:25:11.510> some 00:25:11.680 --> 00:25:11.690 align:start position:0% poor shape obviously there are some 00:25:11.690 --> 00:25:13.450 align:start position:0% poor shape obviously there are some private<00:25:12.140> areas<00:25:12.500> of<00:25:12.620> the<00:25:12.740> street<00:25:13.040> that<00:25:13.310> would 00:25:13.450 --> 00:25:13.460 align:start position:0% private areas of the street that would 00:25:13.460 --> 00:25:15.160 align:start position:0% private areas of the street that would not<00:25:13.640> be<00:25:13.790> paved<00:25:14.030> as<00:25:14.210> part<00:25:14.450> of<00:25:14.480> this<00:25:14.570> project<00:25:14.840> as 00:25:15.160 --> 00:25:15.170 align:start position:0% not be paved as part of this project as 00:25:15.170 --> 00:25:17.350 align:start position:0% not be paved as part of this project as noted<00:25:15.500> on<00:25:15.560> the<00:25:15.710> cover<00:25:15.920> sheet<00:25:16.040> but<00:25:16.550> I<00:25:16.850> don't 00:25:17.350 --> 00:25:17.360 align:start position:0% noted on the cover sheet but I don't 00:25:17.360 --> 00:25:18.850 align:start position:0% noted on the cover sheet but I don't know<00:25:17.450> that<00:25:17.600> she<00:25:18.020> had<00:25:18.200> an<00:25:18.290> opinion<00:25:18.530> as<00:25:18.830> to 00:25:18.850 --> 00:25:18.860 align:start position:0% know that she had an opinion as to 00:25:18.860 --> 00:25:20.680 align:start position:0% know that she had an opinion as to whether<00:25:19.100> or<00:25:19.190> not<00:25:19.250> it<00:25:19.430> should<00:25:19.460> be<00:25:19.640> in<00:25:19.730> 2011<00:25:20.600> or 00:25:20.680 --> 00:25:20.690 align:start position:0% whether or not it should be in 2011 or 00:25:20.690 --> 00:25:22.960 align:start position:0% whether or not it should be in 2011 or 2012<00:25:21.380> but<00:25:21.740> she<00:25:21.920> was<00:25:22.160> comfortable<00:25:22.670> saying<00:25:22.880> that 00:25:22.960 --> 00:25:22.970 align:start position:0% 2012 but she was comfortable saying that 00:25:22.970 --> 00:25:24.430 align:start position:0% 2012 but she was comfortable saying that it<00:25:23.150> was<00:25:23.240> not<00:25:23.420> in<00:25:23.570> great<00:25:23.750> shape<00:25:23.780> and<00:25:24.020> should<00:25:24.350> be 00:25:24.430 --> 00:25:24.440 align:start position:0% it was not in great shape and should be 00:25:24.440 --> 00:25:26.410 align:start position:0% it was not in great shape and should be done<00:25:24.620> sometime<00:25:25.070> either<00:25:25.790> next<00:25:26.120> year<00:25:26.240> or<00:25:26.330> the 00:25:26.410 --> 00:25:26.420 align:start position:0% done sometime either next year or the 00:25:26.420 --> 00:25:29.290 align:start position:0% done sometime either next year or the year<00:25:26.450> after<00:25:26.570> that<00:25:26.840> I<00:25:27.230> guess<00:25:27.500> my<00:25:27.710> question<00:25:28.300> more 00:25:29.290 --> 00:25:29.300 align:start position:0% year after that I guess my question more 00:25:29.300 --> 00:25:31.210 align:start position:0% year after that I guess my question more succinctly<00:25:29.810> is<00:25:30.200> rather<00:25:30.470> than<00:25:30.710> cluded<00:25:31.010> at<00:25:31.100> the 00:25:31.210 --> 00:25:31.220 align:start position:0% succinctly is rather than cluded at the 00:25:31.220 --> 00:25:31.840 align:start position:0% succinctly is rather than cluded at the end<00:25:31.400> of<00:25:31.520> the<00:25:31.580> list 00:25:31.840 --> 00:25:31.850 align:start position:0% end of the list 00:25:31.850 --> 00:25:40.750 align:start position:0% end of the list why<00:25:32.000> not<00:25:39.070> that<00:25:40.070> would<00:25:40.160> be<00:25:40.250> a<00:25:40.280> great<00:25:40.490> question 00:25:40.750 --> 00:25:40.760 align:start position:0% why not that would be a great question 00:25:40.760 --> 00:25:41.770 align:start position:0% why not that would be a great question for<00:25:40.880> the<00:25:40.940> public<00:25:41.180> works<00:25:41.270> director<00:25:41.480> who 00:25:41.770 --> 00:25:41.780 align:start position:0% for the public works director who 00:25:41.780 --> 00:25:43.390 align:start position:0% for the public works director who unfortunately<00:25:41.990> is<00:25:42.320> not<00:25:42.470> here<00:25:42.530> I<00:25:42.800> think<00:25:43.160> part 00:25:43.390 --> 00:25:43.400 align:start position:0% unfortunately is not here I think part 00:25:43.400 --> 00:25:45.520 align:start position:0% unfortunately is not here I think part of<00:25:43.490> this<00:25:43.670> is<00:25:43.880> that<00:25:44.350> there<00:25:45.350> have<00:25:45.440> obviously 00:25:45.520 --> 00:25:45.530 align:start position:0% of this is that there have obviously 00:25:45.530 --> 00:25:47.770 align:start position:0% of this is that there have obviously been<00:25:46.060> residents<00:25:47.060> living<00:25:47.240> on<00:25:47.420> the<00:25:47.510> streets 00:25:47.770 --> 00:25:47.780 align:start position:0% been residents living on the streets 00:25:47.780 --> 00:25:49.060 align:start position:0% been residents living on the streets that<00:25:47.870> were<00:25:48.050> scheduled<00:25:48.410> to<00:25:48.440> go<00:25:48.530> forward<00:25:48.950> in 00:25:49.060 --> 00:25:49.070 align:start position:0% that were scheduled to go forward in 00:25:49.070 --> 00:25:52.330 align:start position:0% that were scheduled to go forward in 2011<00:25:50.060> who<00:25:50.300> have<00:25:50.570> been<00:25:50.890> essentially<00:25:51.890> promised 00:25:52.330 --> 00:25:52.340 align:start position:0% 2011 who have been essentially promised 00:25:52.340 --> 00:25:54.340 align:start position:0% 2011 who have been essentially promised that<00:25:52.550> or<00:25:52.700> told<00:25:53.000> that<00:25:53.240> so<00:25:53.510> I<00:25:53.540> think<00:25:53.810> her<00:25:53.960> thought 00:25:54.340 --> 00:25:54.350 align:start position:0% that or told that so I think her thought 00:25:54.350 --> 00:25:57.280 align:start position:0% that or told that so I think her thought was<00:25:54.590> that<00:25:54.620> she<00:25:54.920> did<00:25:55.100> not<00:25:55.130> want<00:25:55.520> to<00:25:56.290> disappoint 00:25:57.280 --> 00:25:57.290 align:start position:0% was that she did not want to disappoint 00:25:57.290 --> 00:25:59.320 align:start position:0% was that she did not want to disappoint those<00:25:57.770> residents<00:25:58.580> who<00:25:58.700> live<00:25:58.880> on<00:25:58.970> the<00:25:59.090> streets 00:25:59.320 --> 00:25:59.330 align:start position:0% those residents who live on the streets 00:25:59.330 --> 00:26:00.730 align:start position:0% those residents who live on the streets that<00:25:59.510> were<00:25:59.630> scheduled<00:26:00.110> to<00:26:00.200> come<00:26:00.320> forward<00:26:00.560> in 00:26:00.730 --> 00:26:00.740 align:start position:0% that were scheduled to come forward in 00:26:00.740 --> 00:26:04.480 align:start position:0% that were scheduled to come forward in 2011<00:26:01.720> thank<00:26:02.720> you<00:26:02.840> and<00:26:03.650> if<00:26:03.770> I<00:26:04.100> could<00:26:04.310> just 00:26:04.480 --> 00:26:04.490 align:start position:0% 2011 thank you and if I could just 00:26:04.490 --> 00:26:06.460 align:start position:0% 2011 thank you and if I could just reiterate<00:26:04.970> my<00:26:05.000> point<00:26:05.480> of<00:26:05.570> a<00:26:05.660> min<00:26:05.810> ago<00:26:05.900> that<00:26:06.260> I 00:26:06.460 --> 00:26:06.470 align:start position:0% reiterate my point of a min ago that I 00:26:06.470 --> 00:26:09.910 align:start position:0% reiterate my point of a min ago that I believe<00:26:07.280> that<00:26:07.580> if<00:26:07.730> the<00:26:07.940> street<00:26:08.930> had<00:26:09.140> been<00:26:09.350> in 00:26:09.910 --> 00:26:09.920 align:start position:0% believe that if the street had been in 00:26:09.920 --> 00:26:12.370 align:start position:0% believe that if the street had been in the<00:26:10.160> list<00:26:10.370> and<00:26:10.640> waited<00:26:11.570> as<00:26:11.810> all<00:26:12.020> of<00:26:12.140> the<00:26:12.260> other 00:26:12.370 --> 00:26:12.380 align:start position:0% the list and waited as all of the other 00:26:12.380 --> 00:26:14.440 align:start position:0% the list and waited as all of the other ones<00:26:12.620> were<00:26:12.830> it<00:26:13.550> would<00:26:13.760> have<00:26:13.880> been<00:26:14.210> done 00:26:14.440 --> 00:26:14.450 align:start position:0% ones were it would have been done 00:26:14.450 --> 00:26:18.280 align:start position:0% ones were it would have been done already<00:26:16.300> probably<00:26:17.300> a<00:26:17.570> couple<00:26:17.780> of<00:26:17.990> years<00:26:18.140> ago 00:26:18.280 --> 00:26:18.290 align:start position:0% already probably a couple of years ago 00:26:18.290 --> 00:26:20.110 align:start position:0% already probably a couple of years ago because<00:26:18.920> it<00:26:19.220> was<00:26:19.250> in<00:26:19.490> a<00:26:19.550> lot<00:26:19.670> worse<00:26:19.820> shape<00:26:19.880> than 00:26:20.110 --> 00:26:20.120 align:start position:0% because it was in a lot worse shape than 00:26:20.120 --> 00:26:26.560 align:start position:0% because it was in a lot worse shape than the<00:26:20.360> ones<00:26:20.540> that<00:26:20.750> were<00:26:20.840> getting<00:26:20.960> to<00:26:21.230> now<00:26:22.990> I<00:26:25.570> was 00:26:26.560 --> 00:26:26.570 align:start position:0% the ones that were getting to now I was 00:26:26.570 --> 00:26:27.940 align:start position:0% the ones that were getting to now I was just<00:26:26.780> trying<00:26:27.020> to<00:26:27.050> answer<00:26:27.440> the<00:26:27.590> world<00:26:27.770> why 00:26:27.940 --> 00:26:27.950 align:start position:0% just trying to answer the world why 00:26:27.950 --> 00:26:29.230 align:start position:0% just trying to answer the world why don't<00:26:28.130> we<00:26:28.190> put<00:26:28.370> it<00:26:28.460> where<00:26:28.550> it<00:26:28.610> belongs<00:26:28.910> in<00:26:29.150> the 00:26:29.230 --> 00:26:29.240 align:start position:0% don't we put it where it belongs in the 00:26:29.240 --> 00:26:32.450 align:start position:0% don't we put it where it belongs in the list<00:26:29.450> and<00:26:29.780> it's<00:26:29.960> we<00:26:30.380> already<00:26:30.650> went<00:26:30.830> faster 00:26:32.450 --> 00:26:32.460 align:start position:0% list and it's we already went faster 00:26:32.460 --> 00:26:34.669 align:start position:0% list and it's we already went faster and<00:26:32.760> so<00:26:33.390> then<00:26:33.900> if<00:26:34.049> I<00:26:34.140> can<00:26:34.350> get<00:26:34.500> some 00:26:34.669 --> 00:26:34.679 align:start position:0% and so then if I can get some 00:26:34.679 --> 00:26:36.890 align:start position:0% and so then if I can get some clarification<00:26:34.980> from<00:26:35.520> the<00:26:35.610> city<00:26:35.880> manager<00:26:36.330> when 00:26:36.890 --> 00:26:36.900 align:start position:0% clarification from the city manager when 00:26:36.900 --> 00:26:39.860 align:start position:0% clarification from the city manager when I<00:26:36.929> was<00:26:37.200> doing<00:26:37.470> my<00:26:37.679> calculations<00:26:38.610> last<00:26:39.450> week 00:26:39.860 --> 00:26:39.870 align:start position:0% I was doing my calculations last week 00:26:39.870 --> 00:26:42.560 align:start position:0% I was doing my calculations last week about<00:26:40.789> where<00:26:41.789> we<00:26:41.940> ended<00:26:42.210> up<00:26:42.330> with<00:26:42.510> the 00:26:42.560 --> 00:26:42.570 align:start position:0% about where we ended up with the 00:26:42.570 --> 00:26:47.090 align:start position:0% about where we ended up with the reconciliation<00:26:43.500> and<00:26:43.710> we<00:26:43.770> had<00:26:45.679> we<00:26:46.679> didn't<00:26:46.950> we 00:26:47.090 --> 00:26:47.100 align:start position:0% reconciliation and we had we didn't we 00:26:47.100 --> 00:26:49.250 align:start position:0% reconciliation and we had we didn't we didn't<00:26:47.340> we<00:26:47.460> weren't<00:26:47.610> sure<00:26:47.820> about<00:26:48.260> dollar 00:26:49.250 --> 00:26:49.260 align:start position:0% didn't we weren't sure about dollar 00:26:49.260 --> 00:26:51.020 align:start position:0% didn't we weren't sure about dollar figure<00:26:49.710> for<00:26:49.740> palmer<00:26:50.159> lane<00:26:50.429> and<00:26:50.669> i<00:26:50.700> think<00:26:50.940> at 00:26:51.020 --> 00:26:51.030 align:start position:0% figure for palmer lane and i think at 00:26:51.030 --> 00:26:54.110 align:start position:0% figure for palmer lane and i think at that<00:26:51.150> point<00:26:51.210> we<00:26:51.480> were<00:26:51.659> talking<00:26:51.860> 40,000<00:26:53.059> as<00:26:54.059> a 00:26:54.110 --> 00:26:54.120 align:start position:0% that point we were talking 40,000 as a 00:26:54.120 --> 00:26:59.799 align:start position:0% that point we were talking 40,000 as a as<00:26:54.600> a<00:26:54.630> just<00:26:55.110> as<00:26:55.710> a<00:26:55.740> figure<00:26:56.100> to<00:26:56.130> put<00:26:56.490> on<00:26:56.610> it<00:26:56.789> and 00:26:59.799 --> 00:26:59.809 align:start position:0% 00:26:59.809 --> 00:27:03.169 align:start position:0% I'm<00:27:00.809> not<00:27:01.049> sure<00:27:01.409> but<00:27:01.710> what<00:27:02.100> I<00:27:02.130> thought<00:27:02.850> was<00:27:03.150> that 00:27:03.169 --> 00:27:03.179 align:start position:0% I'm not sure but what I thought was that 00:27:03.179 --> 00:27:04.970 align:start position:0% I'm not sure but what I thought was that we<00:27:03.480> were<00:27:03.600> kind<00:27:03.870> of<00:27:03.960> somewhere<00:27:04.289> between<00:27:04.470> two 00:27:04.970 --> 00:27:04.980 align:start position:0% we were kind of somewhere between two 00:27:04.980 --> 00:27:07.039 align:start position:0% we were kind of somewhere between two cents<00:27:05.309> and<00:27:05.490> two<00:27:05.669> and<00:27:05.820> a<00:27:05.850> quarter<00:27:06.120> cents<00:27:06.510> on<00:27:06.780> the 00:27:07.039 --> 00:27:07.049 align:start position:0% cents and two and a quarter cents on the 00:27:07.049 --> 00:27:10.610 align:start position:0% cents and two and a quarter cents on the tax<00:27:07.350> rate<00:27:07.679> and<00:27:08.010> I<00:27:08.640> thought<00:27:08.970> think<00:27:09.299> we<00:27:09.720> that<00:27:10.440> we 00:27:10.610 --> 00:27:10.620 align:start position:0% tax rate and I thought think we that we 00:27:10.620 --> 00:27:13.990 align:start position:0% tax rate and I thought think we that we were<00:27:10.650> there<00:27:11.070> including<00:27:11.730> a<00:27:12.299> placeholder<00:27:12.870> for 00:27:13.990 --> 00:27:14.000 align:start position:0% were there including a placeholder for 00:27:14.000 --> 00:27:16.909 align:start position:0% were there including a placeholder for 40,000<00:27:15.000> for<00:27:15.150> Palmer<00:27:15.419> Lane<00:27:15.750> so<00:27:16.409> I<00:27:16.440> didn't<00:27:16.740> know 00:27:16.909 --> 00:27:16.919 align:start position:0% 40,000 for Palmer Lane so I didn't know 00:27:16.919 --> 00:27:20.870 align:start position:0% 40,000 for Palmer Lane so I didn't know if<00:27:18.620> putting<00:27:19.620> it<00:27:19.740> and<00:27:19.919> we<00:27:20.070> and<00:27:20.280> we<00:27:20.340> said<00:27:20.610> okay 00:27:20.870 --> 00:27:20.880 align:start position:0% if putting it and we and we said okay 00:27:20.880 --> 00:27:23.360 align:start position:0% if putting it and we and we said okay we'll<00:27:21.030> advertise<00:27:21.539> two<00:27:22.289> cents<00:27:22.650> for<00:27:22.860> the<00:27:22.980> public 00:27:23.360 --> 00:27:23.370 align:start position:0% we'll advertise two cents for the public 00:27:23.370 --> 00:27:26.060 align:start position:0% we'll advertise two cents for the public hearing<00:27:23.580> whether<00:27:24.240> Palmer<00:27:24.750> laying<00:27:25.200> at<00:27:25.500> 20<00:27:25.950> or 00:27:26.060 --> 00:27:26.070 align:start position:0% hearing whether Palmer laying at 20 or 00:27:26.070 --> 00:27:29.720 align:start position:0% hearing whether Palmer laying at 20 or 25<00:27:27.140> into<00:27:28.140> the<00:27:28.289> into<00:27:28.679> the<00:27:28.770> figures<00:27:29.159> effect 00:27:29.720 --> 00:27:29.730 align:start position:0% 25 into the into the figures effect 00:27:29.730 --> 00:27:31.909 align:start position:0% 25 into the into the figures effect where<00:27:30.299> we<00:27:30.450> are<00:27:30.630> on<00:27:30.870> that<00:27:30.900> do<00:27:31.530> you<00:27:31.620> have<00:27:31.770> any 00:27:31.909 --> 00:27:31.919 align:start position:0% where we are on that do you have any 00:27:31.919 --> 00:27:34.880 align:start position:0% where we are on that do you have any figures<00:27:32.100> on<00:27:32.429> that<00:27:32.690> if<00:27:33.690> you<00:27:33.900> look<00:27:34.080> at<00:27:34.289> I<00:27:34.500> guess 00:27:34.880 --> 00:27:34.890 align:start position:0% figures on that if you look at I guess 00:27:34.890 --> 00:27:36.950 align:start position:0% figures on that if you look at I guess one<00:27:35.159> comment<00:27:35.580> is<00:27:35.669> also<00:27:36.360> noted<00:27:36.690> under<00:27:36.870> the 00:27:36.950 --> 00:27:36.960 align:start position:0% one comment is also noted under the 00:27:36.960 --> 00:27:39.289 align:start position:0% one comment is also noted under the special<00:27:37.320> consideration<00:27:38.059> section<00:27:39.059> of<00:27:39.150> your 00:27:39.289 --> 00:27:39.299 align:start position:0% special consideration section of your 00:27:39.299 --> 00:27:40.789 align:start position:0% special consideration section of your cover<00:27:39.539> she's<00:27:39.809> I<00:27:39.960> didn't<00:27:40.110> want<00:27:40.230> to<00:27:40.320> fly<00:27:40.470> for<00:27:40.770> the 00:27:40.789 --> 00:27:40.799 align:start position:0% cover she's I didn't want to fly for the 00:27:40.799 --> 00:27:42.980 align:start position:0% cover she's I didn't want to fly for the council<00:27:41.370> is<00:27:41.730> that<00:27:42.059> I<00:27:42.090> adjusted<00:27:42.929> the 00:27:42.980 --> 00:27:42.990 align:start position:0% council is that I adjusted the 00:27:42.990 --> 00:27:44.630 align:start position:0% council is that I adjusted the projection<00:27:43.710> for<00:27:43.980> the<00:27:44.100> non-departmental 00:27:44.630 --> 00:27:44.640 align:start position:0% projection for the non-departmental 00:27:44.640 --> 00:27:47.230 align:start position:0% projection for the non-departmental budgetary<00:27:45.510> unit<00:27:45.830> decreasing<00:27:46.830> that<00:27:46.950> by 00:27:47.230 --> 00:27:47.240 align:start position:0% budgetary unit decreasing that by 00:27:47.240 --> 00:27:49.730 align:start position:0% budgetary unit decreasing that by $40,000<00:27:48.240> for<00:27:48.539> the<00:27:49.020> current<00:27:49.320> fiscal<00:27:49.500> year 00:27:49.730 --> 00:27:49.740 align:start position:0% $40,000 for the current fiscal year 00:27:49.740 --> 00:27:52.130 align:start position:0% $40,000 for the current fiscal year which<00:27:50.520> essentially<00:27:51.030> bumps<00:27:51.390> up<00:27:51.570> the<00:27:51.720> year-end 00:27:52.130 --> 00:27:52.140 align:start position:0% which essentially bumps up the year-end 00:27:52.140 --> 00:27:53.930 align:start position:0% which essentially bumps up the year-end fun<00:27:52.799> balance<00:27:53.159> by<00:27:53.309> that<00:27:53.490> amount 00:27:53.930 --> 00:27:53.940 align:start position:0% fun balance by that amount 00:27:53.940 --> 00:27:56.750 align:start position:0% fun balance by that amount so<00:27:54.480> between<00:27:55.440> what<00:27:55.620> you<00:27:55.740> did<00:27:55.890> last<00:27:56.130> week<00:27:56.490> and 00:27:56.750 --> 00:27:56.760 align:start position:0% so between what you did last week and 00:27:56.760 --> 00:27:59.360 align:start position:0% so between what you did last week and that<00:27:57.030> change<00:27:57.419> if<00:27:57.780> you<00:27:57.960> go<00:27:58.890> back<00:27:59.070> to<00:27:59.250> my 00:27:59.360 --> 00:27:59.370 align:start position:0% that change if you go back to my 00:27:59.370 --> 00:28:01.250 align:start position:0% that change if you go back to my original<00:27:59.490> proposed<00:28:00.000> budget<00:28:00.419> and<00:28:00.510> you<00:28:00.900> look<00:28:01.080> at 00:28:01.250 --> 00:28:01.260 align:start position:0% original proposed budget and you look at 00:28:01.260 --> 00:28:04.399 align:start position:0% original proposed budget and you look at the<00:28:01.970> unrestricted<00:28:02.970> fund<00:28:03.179> balance<00:28:03.570> it<00:28:04.200> is 00:28:04.399 --> 00:28:04.409 align:start position:0% the unrestricted fund balance it is 00:28:04.409 --> 00:28:07.310 align:start position:0% the unrestricted fund balance it is actually<00:28:04.860> higher<00:28:05.549> in<00:28:05.940> the<00:28:06.750> materials<00:28:07.230> that 00:28:07.310 --> 00:28:07.320 align:start position:0% actually higher in the materials that 00:28:07.320 --> 00:28:09.049 align:start position:0% actually higher in the materials that are<00:28:07.470> before<00:28:07.559> the<00:28:07.799> council<00:28:08.190> this<00:28:08.280> evening<00:28:08.490> than 00:28:09.049 --> 00:28:09.059 align:start position:0% are before the council this evening than 00:28:09.059 --> 00:28:13.970 align:start position:0% are before the council this evening than what<00:28:09.360> I<00:28:09.390> originally<00:28:09.539> proposed<00:28:11.179> that<00:28:12.179> helps<00:28:12.980> so 00:28:13.970 --> 00:28:13.980 align:start position:0% what I originally proposed that helps so 00:28:13.980 --> 00:28:15.500 align:start position:0% what I originally proposed that helps so in<00:28:14.070> other<00:28:14.190> words<00:28:14.429> you<00:28:14.580> could<00:28:14.730> add<00:28:14.880> Palmer<00:28:15.299> Lane 00:28:15.500 --> 00:28:15.510 align:start position:0% in other words you could add Palmer Lane 00:28:15.510 --> 00:28:17.180 align:start position:0% in other words you could add Palmer Lane and<00:28:15.780> you're<00:28:15.840> still<00:28:16.110> at<00:28:16.289> an<00:28:16.409> unrestricted<00:28:16.799> fund 00:28:17.180 --> 00:28:17.190 align:start position:0% and you're still at an unrestricted fund 00:28:17.190 --> 00:28:19.190 align:start position:0% and you're still at an unrestricted fund balance<00:28:17.549> that<00:28:17.669> is<00:28:17.789> higher<00:28:18.030> than<00:28:18.169> what<00:28:19.169> I 00:28:19.190 --> 00:28:19.200 align:start position:0% balance that is higher than what I 00:28:19.200 --> 00:28:24.289 align:start position:0% balance that is higher than what I originally<00:28:19.580> proposed<00:28:20.580> and<00:28:21.710> if<00:28:22.710> we<00:28:23.100> take<00:28:24.000> that 00:28:24.289 --> 00:28:24.299 align:start position:0% originally proposed and if we take that 00:28:24.299 --> 00:28:27.649 align:start position:0% originally proposed and if we take that into<00:28:24.360> consideration<00:28:24.740> with<00:28:25.740> the<00:28:26.070> with<00:28:26.970> where 00:28:27.649 --> 00:28:27.659 align:start position:0% into consideration with the with where 00:28:27.659 --> 00:28:29.149 align:start position:0% into consideration with the with where everything<00:28:28.080> else<00:28:28.200> ended<00:28:28.559> up<00:28:28.679> and<00:28:28.890> the<00:28:28.980> fact 00:28:29.149 --> 00:28:29.159 align:start position:0% everything else ended up and the fact 00:28:29.159 --> 00:28:31.310 align:start position:0% everything else ended up and the fact that<00:28:29.250> we<00:28:29.400> were<00:28:29.520> between<00:28:29.880> two<00:28:30.270> and<00:28:30.450> two<00:28:31.049> cents 00:28:31.310 --> 00:28:31.320 align:start position:0% that we were between two and two cents 00:28:31.320 --> 00:28:33.020 align:start position:0% that we were between two and two cents on<00:28:31.409> two<00:28:31.559> and<00:28:31.679> a<00:28:31.710> quarter<00:28:31.860> cents<00:28:32.220> if<00:28:32.640> we<00:28:32.820> were<00:28:32.909> to 00:28:33.020 --> 00:28:33.030 align:start position:0% on two and a quarter cents if we were to 00:28:33.030 --> 00:28:35.299 align:start position:0% on two and a quarter cents if we were to go<00:28:33.150> to<00:28:33.179> two<00:28:33.480> and<00:28:33.659> a<00:28:33.690> quarter<00:28:33.870> cents<00:28:34.260> would<00:28:35.070> that 00:28:35.299 --> 00:28:35.309 align:start position:0% go to two and a quarter cents would that 00:28:35.309 --> 00:28:36.110 align:start position:0% go to two and a quarter cents would that work 00:28:36.110 --> 00:28:36.120 align:start position:0% work 00:28:36.120 --> 00:28:39.019 align:start position:0% work the<00:28:36.210> numbers<00:28:36.510> that<00:28:36.659> we've<00:28:36.809> got<00:28:37.549> yes<00:28:38.549> it<00:28:38.820> would 00:28:39.019 --> 00:28:39.029 align:start position:0% the numbers that we've got yes it would 00:28:39.029 --> 00:28:41.120 align:start position:0% the numbers that we've got yes it would I<00:28:39.169> may<00:28:40.169> ask<00:28:40.320> a<00:28:40.409> question<00:28:40.679> of<00:28:40.770> the<00:28:40.830> finance 00:28:41.120 --> 00:28:41.130 align:start position:0% I may ask a question of the finance 00:28:41.130 --> 00:28:42.500 align:start position:0% I may ask a question of the finance director<00:28:41.250> I<00:28:41.429> believe<00:28:41.700> the<00:28:41.820> county<00:28:42.240> when<00:28:42.390> we 00:28:42.500 --> 00:28:42.510 align:start position:0% director I believe the county when we 00:28:42.510 --> 00:28:45.350 align:start position:0% director I believe the county when we submit<00:28:42.840> the<00:28:42.870> tax<00:28:43.200> rate<00:28:43.640> only<00:28:44.640> allows<00:28:44.880> three 00:28:45.350 --> 00:28:45.360 align:start position:0% submit the tax rate only allows three 00:28:45.360 --> 00:28:48.500 align:start position:0% submit the tax rate only allows three digits<00:28:45.779> is<00:28:45.960> that<00:28:46.140> correct<00:28:46.529> or<00:28:47.240> they<00:28:48.240> do<00:28:48.299> they 00:28:48.500 --> 00:28:48.510 align:start position:0% digits is that correct or they do they 00:28:48.510 --> 00:28:53.090 align:start position:0% digits is that correct or they do they round<00:28:50.720> yeah<00:28:51.720> we<00:28:51.929> have<00:28:52.140> typically<00:28:52.470> tried<00:28:52.799> to 00:28:53.090 --> 00:28:53.100 align:start position:0% round yeah we have typically tried to 00:28:53.100 --> 00:28:57.140 align:start position:0% round yeah we have typically tried to keep<00:28:53.820> the<00:28:54.150> tax<00:28:55.080> rate<00:28:55.350> to<00:28:55.730> three<00:28:56.730> digits 00:28:57.140 --> 00:28:57.150 align:start position:0% keep the tax rate to three digits 00:28:57.150 --> 00:28:58.279 align:start position:0% keep the tax rate to three digits basically<00:28:57.600> so<00:28:57.690> I<00:28:57.750> guess<00:28:57.900> what<00:28:58.020> I'm<00:28:58.110> suggesting 00:28:58.279 --> 00:28:58.289 align:start position:0% basically so I guess what I'm suggesting 00:28:58.289 --> 00:29:00.380 align:start position:0% basically so I guess what I'm suggesting is<00:28:58.860> if<00:28:59.070> the<00:28:59.159> council<00:28:59.580> wants<00:28:59.850> to<00:28:59.970> adjust<00:29:00.270> the 00:29:00.380 --> 00:29:00.390 align:start position:0% is if the council wants to adjust the 00:29:00.390 --> 00:29:04.039 align:start position:0% is if the council wants to adjust the tax<00:29:00.539> rate<00:29:00.929> from<00:29:01.130> tax<00:29:02.130> rate<00:29:03.000> decrease<00:29:03.570> from<00:29:03.809> two 00:29:04.039 --> 00:29:04.049 align:start position:0% tax rate from tax rate decrease from two 00:29:04.049 --> 00:29:06.440 align:start position:0% tax rate from tax rate decrease from two cents<00:29:04.500> you<00:29:04.710> may<00:29:04.890> want<00:29:05.130> to<00:29:05.190> consider<00:29:05.640> doing 00:29:06.440 --> 00:29:06.450 align:start position:0% cents you may want to consider doing 00:29:06.450 --> 00:29:07.789 align:start position:0% cents you may want to consider doing something<00:29:06.840> other<00:29:06.990> than<00:29:07.200> two<00:29:07.350> and<00:29:07.529> a<00:29:07.559> quarter 00:29:07.789 --> 00:29:07.799 align:start position:0% something other than two and a quarter 00:29:07.799 --> 00:29:10.010 align:start position:0% something other than two and a quarter graph<00:29:08.760> going<00:29:09.029> to<00:29:09.210> two<00:29:09.360> and<00:29:09.539> a<00:29:09.600> half<00:29:09.779> because 00:29:10.010 --> 00:29:10.020 align:start position:0% graph going to two and a half because 00:29:10.020 --> 00:29:12.260 align:start position:0% graph going to two and a half because I'm<00:29:10.200> not<00:29:10.320> sure<00:29:10.590> that<00:29:10.890> the<00:29:11.700> county<00:29:12.000> doesn't 00:29:12.260 --> 00:29:12.270 align:start position:0% I'm not sure that the county doesn't 00:29:12.270 --> 00:29:14.019 align:start position:0% I'm not sure that the county doesn't limit<00:29:12.360> the<00:29:12.510> number<00:29:12.750> of<00:29:12.809> digits<00:29:12.990> you<00:29:13.289> can<00:29:13.440> have 00:29:14.019 --> 00:29:14.029 align:start position:0% limit the number of digits you can have 00:29:14.029 --> 00:29:18.470 align:start position:0% limit the number of digits you can have that<00:29:15.029> makes<00:29:15.179> us<00:29:15.380> or<00:29:16.380> we<00:29:16.559> could<00:29:16.740> go<00:29:16.919> to<00:29:17.480> two 00:29:18.470 --> 00:29:18.480 align:start position:0% that makes us or we could go to two 00:29:18.480 --> 00:29:20.779 align:start position:0% that makes us or we could go to two point<00:29:18.750> three<00:29:19.370> whatever<00:29:20.370> you<00:29:20.460> would<00:29:20.549> like<00:29:20.669> to 00:29:20.779 --> 00:29:20.789 align:start position:0% point three whatever you would like to 00:29:20.789 --> 00:29:25.940 align:start position:0% point three whatever you would like to do<00:29:22.130> I<00:29:23.130> guess<00:29:23.820> I'll<00:29:23.970> propose<00:29:24.299> that<00:29:24.570> we<00:29:24.919> that<00:29:25.919> we 00:29:25.940 --> 00:29:25.950 align:start position:0% do I guess I'll propose that we that we 00:29:25.950 --> 00:29:34.090 align:start position:0% do I guess I'll propose that we that we go<00:29:26.610> forward<00:29:27.000> with<00:29:27.360> our<00:29:31.850> items<00:29:32.850> for<00:29:33.029> next<00:29:33.270> week 00:29:34.090 --> 00:29:34.100 align:start position:0% go forward with our items for next week 00:29:34.100 --> 00:29:38.299 align:start position:0% go forward with our items for next week reflecting<00:29:35.100> a<00:29:35.250> two<00:29:36.000> point<00:29:36.390> three<00:29:36.750> percent<00:29:37.309> two 00:29:38.299 --> 00:29:38.309 align:start position:0% reflecting a two point three percent two 00:29:38.309 --> 00:29:40.279 align:start position:0% reflecting a two point three percent two point<00:29:38.549> three<00:29:38.730> cent<00:29:39.179> reduction<00:29:39.750> for<00:29:39.960> sixty 00:29:40.279 --> 00:29:40.289 align:start position:0% point three cent reduction for sixty 00:29:40.289 --> 00:29:42.680 align:start position:0% point three cent reduction for sixty point<00:29:40.500> five<00:29:40.559> so<00:29:41.100> it<00:29:41.159> would<00:29:41.309> be<00:29:41.460> what<00:29:42.419> is<00:29:42.539> that 00:29:42.680 --> 00:29:42.690 align:start position:0% point five so it would be what is that 00:29:42.690 --> 00:29:51.260 align:start position:0% point five so it would be what is that fifty<00:29:43.080> eight<00:29:43.260> point<00:29:43.830> two<00:29:49.309> trying<00:29:50.309> to<00:29:50.549> I<00:29:50.880> was 00:29:51.260 --> 00:29:51.270 align:start position:0% fifty eight point two trying to I was 00:29:51.270 --> 00:29:54.440 align:start position:0% fifty eight point two trying to I was trying<00:29:51.510> to<00:29:51.570> get<00:29:51.960> it<00:29:52.110> lower<00:29:52.350> but<00:29:52.710> not<00:29:52.909> go<00:29:53.909> way 00:29:54.440 --> 00:29:54.450 align:start position:0% trying to get it lower but not go way 00:29:54.450 --> 00:29:56.330 align:start position:0% trying to get it lower but not go way beyond<00:29:54.809> kind<00:29:55.140> of<00:29:55.260> the<00:29:55.470> parameters<00:29:55.980> of<00:29:56.010> where 00:29:56.330 --> 00:29:56.340 align:start position:0% beyond kind of the parameters of where 00:29:56.340 --> 00:29:59.570 align:start position:0% beyond kind of the parameters of where we<00:29:56.520> were<00:29:56.700> I<00:29:57.919> don't<00:29:58.919> know<00:29:59.100> that<00:29:59.279> it<00:29:59.399> would<00:29:59.520> be 00:29:59.570 --> 00:29:59.580 align:start position:0% we were I don't know that it would be 00:29:59.580 --> 00:30:02.570 align:start position:0% we were I don't know that it would be entirely<00:30:00.529> that<00:30:01.529> problematic<00:30:02.190> to<00:30:02.279> deal<00:30:02.429> with 00:30:02.570 --> 00:30:02.580 align:start position:0% entirely that problematic to deal with 00:30:02.580 --> 00:30:03.919 align:start position:0% entirely that problematic to deal with councilmember<00:30:02.970> Rome's<00:30:03.360> and<00:30:03.659> it's<00:30:03.779> suggesting 00:30:03.919 --> 00:30:03.929 align:start position:0% councilmember Rome's and it's suggesting 00:30:03.929 --> 00:30:06.110 align:start position:0% councilmember Rome's and it's suggesting as<00:30:04.590> they<00:30:04.710> mentioned<00:30:05.100> I<00:30:05.490> don't<00:30:05.549> have<00:30:05.760> the<00:30:05.850> exact 00:30:06.110 --> 00:30:06.120 align:start position:0% as they mentioned I don't have the exact 00:30:06.120 --> 00:30:07.340 align:start position:0% as they mentioned I don't have the exact figure<00:30:06.390> I<00:30:06.450> did<00:30:06.600> look<00:30:06.779> at<00:30:06.870> them<00:30:07.020> before<00:30:07.260> the 00:30:07.340 --> 00:30:07.350 align:start position:0% figure I did look at them before the 00:30:07.350 --> 00:30:09.889 align:start position:0% figure I did look at them before the meeting<00:30:07.679> but<00:30:08.210> we<00:30:09.210> collected<00:30:09.779> in<00:30:09.870> your 00:30:09.889 --> 00:30:09.899 align:start position:0% meeting but we collected in your 00:30:09.899 --> 00:30:11.389 align:start position:0% meeting but we collected in your materials<00:30:10.470> is<00:30:10.620> essentially<00:30:10.980> an<00:30:11.039> unrestricted 00:30:11.389 --> 00:30:11.399 align:start position:0% materials is essentially an unrestricted 00:30:11.399 --> 00:30:12.980 align:start position:0% materials is essentially an unrestricted fund<00:30:11.760> balance<00:30:12.029> that<00:30:12.120> is<00:30:12.270> about<00:30:12.510> roughly<00:30:12.960> a 00:30:12.980 --> 00:30:12.990 align:start position:0% fund balance that is about roughly a 00:30:12.990 --> 00:30:15.409 align:start position:0% fund balance that is about roughly a hundred<00:30:13.140> thousand<00:30:13.649> dollars<00:30:14.059> ninety<00:30:15.059> thousand 00:30:15.409 --> 00:30:15.419 align:start position:0% hundred thousand dollars ninety thousand 00:30:15.419 --> 00:30:17.570 align:start position:0% hundred thousand dollars ninety thousand dollars<00:30:15.720> more<00:30:16.470> than<00:30:16.710> what<00:30:16.890> my<00:30:17.070> original 00:30:17.570 --> 00:30:17.580 align:start position:0% dollars more than what my original 00:30:17.580 --> 00:30:20.240 align:start position:0% dollars more than what my original budget<00:30:17.760> assumed<00:30:18.750> so<00:30:19.440> basically<00:30:19.770> do<00:30:19.950> you<00:30:20.039> seem 00:30:20.240 --> 00:30:20.250 align:start position:0% budget assumed so basically do you seem 00:30:20.250 --> 00:30:21.710 align:start position:0% budget assumed so basically do you seem that<00:30:20.399> every<00:30:20.610> half<00:30:20.789> cent<00:30:21.000> on<00:30:21.059> the<00:30:21.149> tax<00:30:21.419> rate<00:30:21.690> is 00:30:21.710 --> 00:30:21.720 align:start position:0% that every half cent on the tax rate is 00:30:21.720 --> 00:30:23.680 align:start position:0% that every half cent on the tax rate is roughly<00:30:22.020> nine<00:30:22.380> to<00:30:22.529> five<00:30:22.710> thousand<00:30:23.250> even<00:30:23.490> if 00:30:23.680 --> 00:30:23.690 align:start position:0% roughly nine to five thousand even if 00:30:23.690 --> 00:30:25.990 align:start position:0% roughly nine to five thousand even if in<00:30:23.990> Palmer<00:30:24.320> Lane<00:30:24.560> it's<00:30:24.950> basically<00:30:25.730> going<00:30:25.940> to 00:30:25.990 --> 00:30:26.000 align:start position:0% in Palmer Lane it's basically going to 00:30:26.000 --> 00:30:28.000 align:start position:0% in Palmer Lane it's basically going to be<00:30:26.060> a<00:30:26.150> decrease<00:30:26.570> of<00:30:26.690> about<00:30:26.800> 25,000<00:30:27.800> from<00:30:27.890> when 00:30:28.000 --> 00:30:28.010 align:start position:0% be a decrease of about 25,000 from when 00:30:28.010 --> 00:30:31.390 align:start position:0% be a decrease of about 25,000 from when I<00:30:28.040> originally<00:30:28.280> proposed<00:30:29.230> that<00:30:30.230> was<00:30:30.470> the<00:30:30.830> most 00:30:31.390 --> 00:30:31.400 align:start position:0% I originally proposed that was the most 00:30:31.400 --> 00:30:33.190 align:start position:0% I originally proposed that was the most current<00:30:32.090> budget<00:30:32.450> news<00:30:32.600> I've<00:30:32.810> heard<00:30:32.990> recently 00:30:33.190 --> 00:30:33.200 align:start position:0% current budget news I've heard recently 00:30:33.200 --> 00:30:41.380 align:start position:0% current budget news I've heard recently that<00:30:33.500> it<00:30:33.710> wasn't<00:30:33.860> a<00:30:34.010> problem<00:30:34.220> two<00:30:40.120> three 00:30:41.380 --> 00:30:41.390 align:start position:0% that it wasn't a problem two three 00:30:41.390 --> 00:30:44.710 align:start position:0% that it wasn't a problem two three I<00:30:42.670> could<00:30:43.670> joke<00:30:43.880> and<00:30:44.030> we<00:30:44.090> say<00:30:44.240> don't<00:30:44.390> push<00:30:44.600> your 00:30:44.710 --> 00:30:44.720 align:start position:0% I could joke and we say don't push your 00:30:44.720 --> 00:30:46.000 align:start position:0% I could joke and we say don't push your luck<00:30:44.780> but<00:30:45.050> that's<00:30:45.200> all<00:30:45.320> your<00:30:45.500> decision<00:30:45.890> not 00:30:46.000 --> 00:30:46.010 align:start position:0% luck but that's all your decision not 00:30:46.010 --> 00:30:53.050 align:start position:0% luck but that's all your decision not mine<00:30:46.070> I<00:30:48.610> guess<00:30:49.610> I<00:30:49.820> guess<00:30:50.000> I'll<00:30:50.180> propose<00:30:52.060> two 00:30:53.050 --> 00:30:53.060 align:start position:0% mine I guess I guess I'll propose two 00:30:53.060 --> 00:30:58.280 align:start position:0% mine I guess I guess I'll propose two and<00:30:53.180> a<00:30:53.210> half 00:30:58.280 --> 00:30:58.290 align:start position:0% 00:30:58.290 --> 00:31:02.990 align:start position:0% I<00:30:58.320> see<00:30:59.070> a<00:30:59.100> couple<00:30:59.550> of<00:30:59.640> nods<00:31:00.150> yes<00:31:01.790> okay 00:31:02.990 --> 00:31:03.000 align:start position:0% I see a couple of nods yes okay 00:31:03.000 --> 00:31:05.420 align:start position:0% I see a couple of nods yes okay oh<00:31:03.030> let's<00:31:03.900> do<00:31:04.110> one<00:31:04.290> more<00:31:04.320> struggle<00:31:04.950> in<00:31:05.190> honor 00:31:05.420 --> 00:31:05.430 align:start position:0% oh let's do one more struggle in honor 00:31:05.430 --> 00:31:06.800 align:start position:0% oh let's do one more struggle in honor of<00:31:05.460> last<00:31:05.730> Thursday<00:31:06.120> night<00:31:06.300> two<00:31:06.570> and<00:31:06.690> a<00:31:06.720> half 00:31:06.800 --> 00:31:06.810 align:start position:0% of last Thursday night two and a half 00:31:06.810 --> 00:31:07.340 align:start position:0% of last Thursday night two and a half cents 00:31:07.340 --> 00:31:07.350 align:start position:0% cents 00:31:07.350 --> 00:31:18.650 align:start position:0% cents I<00:31:10.190> see<00:31:15.020> dad<00:31:16.050> all<00:31:16.590> right<00:31:16.800> it<00:31:17.580> is<00:31:17.670> unclear<00:31:18.090> I<00:31:18.360> will 00:31:18.650 --> 00:31:18.660 align:start position:0% I see dad all right it is unclear I will 00:31:18.660 --> 00:31:21.350 align:start position:0% I see dad all right it is unclear I will add<00:31:18.930> Palmer<00:31:19.560> Lane<00:31:19.860> and<00:31:20.700> I<00:31:20.790> would<00:31:20.910> suggest<00:31:21.090> if 00:31:21.350 --> 00:31:21.360 align:start position:0% add Palmer Lane and I would suggest if 00:31:21.360 --> 00:31:22.940 align:start position:0% add Palmer Lane and I would suggest if you're<00:31:21.420> going<00:31:21.570> to<00:31:21.690> add<00:31:21.810> Palmer<00:31:22.050> Lane<00:31:22.350> that<00:31:22.770> you 00:31:22.940 --> 00:31:22.950 align:start position:0% you're going to add Palmer Lane that you 00:31:22.950 --> 00:31:24.860 align:start position:0% you're going to add Palmer Lane that you we<00:31:23.070> include<00:31:23.400> 25,000<00:31:24.180> and<00:31:24.270> the<00:31:24.330> budget<00:31:24.630> given 00:31:24.860 --> 00:31:24.870 align:start position:0% we include 25,000 and the budget given 00:31:24.870 --> 00:31:26.720 align:start position:0% we include 25,000 and the budget given some<00:31:24.990> of<00:31:25.050> the<00:31:25.170> uncertainty<00:31:25.830> right<00:31:26.280> and<00:31:26.520> then<00:31:26.640> I 00:31:26.720 --> 00:31:26.730 align:start position:0% some of the uncertainty right and then I 00:31:26.730 --> 00:31:31.630 align:start position:0% some of the uncertainty right and then I will<00:31:26.880> reflect<00:31:27.120> a<00:31:27.360> tax<00:31:27.660> rate<00:31:27.960> of<00:31:28.100> 58<00:31:29.100> cents<00:31:29.520> yes 00:31:31.630 --> 00:31:31.640 align:start position:0% will reflect a tax rate of 58 cents yes 00:31:31.640 --> 00:31:41.000 align:start position:0% will reflect a tax rate of 58 cents yes okay 00:31:41.000 --> 00:31:41.010 align:start position:0% 00:31:41.010 --> 00:31:42.620 align:start position:0% any<00:31:41.549> other<00:31:41.760> comments<00:31:42.299> from<00:31:42.360> the<00:31:42.480> council 00:31:42.620 --> 00:31:42.630 align:start position:0% any other comments from the council 00:31:42.630 --> 00:31:46.370 align:start position:0% any other comments from the council before<00:31:43.139> we<00:31:43.260> move<00:31:44.220> on<00:31:44.840> all<00:31:45.840> right<00:31:46.019> we'll<00:31:46.200> move 00:31:46.370 --> 00:31:46.380 align:start position:0% before we move on all right we'll move 00:31:46.380 --> 00:31:48.680 align:start position:0% before we move on all right we'll move to<00:31:46.440> our<00:31:46.649> regular<00:31:46.980> meeting<00:31:47.309> and<00:31:47.460> the<00:31:48.419> first 00:31:48.680 --> 00:31:48.690 align:start position:0% to our regular meeting and the first 00:31:48.690 --> 00:31:52.279 align:start position:0% to our regular meeting and the first item<00:31:49.190> is<00:31:50.190> a<00:31:50.850> resolution<00:31:51.659> acknowledging 00:31:52.279 --> 00:31:52.289 align:start position:0% item is a resolution acknowledging 00:31:52.289 --> 00:31:53.509 align:start position:0% item is a resolution acknowledging receipt<00:31:52.320> of<00:31:52.649> the<00:31:52.710> final<00:31:52.980> report<00:31:53.070> of<00:31:53.460> the 00:31:53.509 --> 00:31:53.519 align:start position:0% receipt of the final report of the 00:31:53.519 --> 00:31:56.060 align:start position:0% receipt of the final report of the health<00:31:53.760> services<00:31:54.210> impact<00:31:54.659> committee<00:31:55.070> it's 00:31:56.060 --> 00:31:56.070 align:start position:0% health services impact committee it's 00:31:56.070 --> 00:32:00.970 align:start position:0% health services impact committee it's somebody<00:31:56.490> like<00:31:56.669> to<00:31:56.880> move<00:31:57.029> that<00:31:57.240> resolution 00:32:00.970 --> 00:32:00.980 align:start position:0% 00:32:00.980 --> 00:32:07.730 align:start position:0% okay<00:32:05.480> do<00:32:06.480> you<00:32:06.570> have<00:32:06.779> anything<00:32:07.019> that<00:32:07.230> you<00:32:07.500> want 00:32:07.730 --> 00:32:07.740 align:start position:0% okay do you have anything that you want 00:32:07.740 --> 00:32:18.440 align:start position:0% okay do you have anything that you want to<00:32:09.769> convey<00:32:10.769> to<00:32:10.799> us<00:32:11.070> on<00:32:11.250> this<00:32:17.179> recommend<00:32:18.179> that 00:32:18.440 --> 00:32:18.450 align:start position:0% to convey to us on this recommend that 00:32:18.450 --> 00:32:23.539 align:start position:0% to convey to us on this recommend that the<00:32:19.110> council<00:32:20.570> accept<00:32:21.570> the<00:32:21.659> resolution<00:32:22.350> of<00:32:22.649> not 00:32:23.539 --> 00:32:23.549 align:start position:0% the council accept the resolution of not 00:32:23.549 --> 00:32:26.149 align:start position:0% the council accept the resolution of not necessarily<00:32:23.880> accept<00:32:24.659> every<00:32:25.380> suggestion<00:32:25.830> in 00:32:26.149 --> 00:32:26.159 align:start position:0% necessarily accept every suggestion in 00:32:26.159 --> 00:32:27.950 align:start position:0% necessarily accept every suggestion in the<00:32:26.279> resolution<00:32:26.850> I<00:32:27.059> think<00:32:27.389> it's<00:32:27.539> going<00:32:27.870> to 00:32:27.950 --> 00:32:27.960 align:start position:0% the resolution I think it's going to 00:32:27.960 --> 00:33:00.860 align:start position:0% the resolution I think it's going to serve<00:32:28.830> as<00:32:29.159> a<00:32:29.360> valuable<00:32:30.360> starting<00:32:59.630> there<00:33:00.630> any 00:33:00.860 --> 00:33:00.870 align:start position:0% serve as a valuable starting there any 00:33:00.870 --> 00:33:03.049 align:start position:0% serve as a valuable starting there any public<00:33:01.409> comment<00:33:01.950> on<00:33:02.039> this<00:33:02.669> resolution 00:33:03.049 --> 00:33:03.059 align:start position:0% public comment on this resolution 00:33:03.059 --> 00:33:04.759 align:start position:0% public comment on this resolution acknowledging<00:33:04.019> receipt<00:33:04.049> of<00:33:04.409> the<00:33:04.500> final 00:33:04.759 --> 00:33:04.769 align:start position:0% acknowledging receipt of the final 00:33:04.769 --> 00:33:16.649 align:start position:0% acknowledging receipt of the final report<00:33:04.860> health<00:33:05.250> services<00:33:05.610> impact<00:33:05.970> committee 00:33:16.649 --> 00:33:16.659 align:start position:0% 00:33:16.659 --> 00:33:21.269 align:start position:0% I'll<00:33:17.659> sneak<00:33:18.279> primarily<00:33:19.279> to<00:33:19.580> the<00:33:20.200> resolution 00:33:21.269 --> 00:33:21.279 align:start position:0% I'll sneak primarily to the resolution 00:33:21.279 --> 00:33:24.820 align:start position:0% I'll sneak primarily to the resolution because<00:33:22.929> anything<00:33:23.929> else<00:33:24.200> that<00:33:24.350> I<00:33:24.409> have<00:33:24.529> to<00:33:24.649> say 00:33:24.820 --> 00:33:24.830 align:start position:0% because anything else that I have to say 00:33:24.830 --> 00:33:29.080 align:start position:0% because anything else that I have to say kind<00:33:25.190> of<00:33:25.370> falls<00:33:26.230> under<00:33:27.230> that<00:33:27.610> away<00:33:28.610> from<00:33:28.850> it<00:33:29.000> or 00:33:29.080 --> 00:33:29.090 align:start position:0% kind of falls under that away from it or 00:33:29.090 --> 00:33:33.639 align:start position:0% kind of falls under that away from it or whatever<00:33:29.740> I<00:33:30.740> don't<00:33:31.730> really<00:33:32.270> have<00:33:32.510> any<00:33:32.960> problem 00:33:33.639 --> 00:33:33.649 align:start position:0% whatever I don't really have any problem 00:33:33.649 --> 00:33:37.899 align:start position:0% whatever I don't really have any problem with<00:33:33.970> the<00:33:34.970> resolution<00:33:35.419> I<00:33:35.899> was<00:33:36.110> able<00:33:36.289> to<00:33:36.909> look 00:33:37.899 --> 00:33:37.909 align:start position:0% with the resolution I was able to look 00:33:37.909 --> 00:33:43.600 align:start position:0% with the resolution I was able to look through<00:33:38.149> it<00:33:39.279> last<00:33:40.279> day<00:33:40.580> or<00:33:40.700> so<00:33:42.490> received<00:33:43.490> a 00:33:43.600 --> 00:33:43.610 align:start position:0% through it last day or so received a 00:33:43.610 --> 00:33:46.330 align:start position:0% through it last day or so received a copy<00:33:43.880> of<00:33:44.149> it<00:33:44.299> and<00:33:44.450> and<00:33:44.809> I<00:33:45.289> don't<00:33:45.350> have<00:33:45.679> a<00:33:45.710> real 00:33:46.330 --> 00:33:46.340 align:start position:0% copy of it and and I don't have a real 00:33:46.340 --> 00:33:51.100 align:start position:0% copy of it and and I don't have a real problem<00:33:46.580> with<00:33:46.940> the<00:33:47.179> with<00:33:47.539> the<00:33:47.659> resolution<00:33:48.230> I<00:33:50.110> I 00:33:51.100 --> 00:33:51.110 align:start position:0% problem with the with the resolution I I 00:33:51.110 --> 00:33:57.330 align:start position:0% problem with the with the resolution I I don't<00:33:51.350> have<00:33:52.250> anything<00:33:53.260> against<00:33:54.260> the<00:33:55.330> city 00:33:57.330 --> 00:33:57.340 align:start position:0% don't have anything against the city 00:33:57.340 --> 00:33:59.139 align:start position:0% don't have anything against the city addressing<00:33:58.340> the<00:33:58.490> question<00:33:58.880> of<00:33:58.940> health 00:33:59.139 --> 00:33:59.149 align:start position:0% addressing the question of health 00:33:59.149 --> 00:34:02.529 align:start position:0% addressing the question of health financing<00:33:59.840> and<00:34:00.110> the<00:34:01.070> resolution<00:34:01.700> kind<00:34:02.360> of 00:34:02.529 --> 00:34:02.539 align:start position:0% financing and the resolution kind of 00:34:02.539 --> 00:34:05.320 align:start position:0% financing and the resolution kind of rules<00:34:02.840> that<00:34:03.080> out<00:34:03.289> I<00:34:03.529> am<00:34:03.649> I'm<00:34:04.070> neutral<00:34:04.549> on<00:34:04.880> that 00:34:05.320 --> 00:34:05.330 align:start position:0% rules that out I am I'm neutral on that 00:34:05.330 --> 00:34:07.889 align:start position:0% rules that out I am I'm neutral on that I'm<00:34:05.659> a<00:34:06.140> member<00:34:06.320> of<00:34:06.470> the<00:34:06.559> committee<00:34:06.919> and<00:34:07.250> and 00:34:07.889 --> 00:34:07.899 align:start position:0% I'm a member of the committee and and 00:34:07.899 --> 00:34:12.399 align:start position:0% I'm a member of the committee and and I'm<00:34:08.980> very<00:34:09.980> much<00:34:10.129> aware<00:34:10.310> of<00:34:10.490> the<00:34:11.409> discussion 00:34:12.399 --> 00:34:12.409 align:start position:0% I'm very much aware of the discussion 00:34:12.409 --> 00:34:18.099 align:start position:0% I'm very much aware of the discussion about<00:34:13.089> the<00:34:16.210> financial<00:34:17.210> aspects<00:34:17.899> of<00:34:18.050> the 00:34:18.099 --> 00:34:18.109 align:start position:0% about the financial aspects of the 00:34:18.109 --> 00:34:20.800 align:start position:0% about the financial aspects of the health<00:34:18.379> crisis<00:34:19.070> and<00:34:19.099> and<00:34:19.550> much<00:34:20.060> of<00:34:20.089> our<00:34:20.629> health 00:34:20.800 --> 00:34:20.810 align:start position:0% health crisis and and much of our health 00:34:20.810 --> 00:34:24.430 align:start position:0% health crisis and and much of our health crisis<00:34:21.619> health<00:34:21.859> has<00:34:22.730> to<00:34:23.000> do<00:34:23.149> with<00:34:23.450> with 00:34:24.430 --> 00:34:24.440 align:start position:0% crisis health has to do with with 00:34:24.440 --> 00:34:28.450 align:start position:0% crisis health has to do with with finance<00:34:24.950> so<00:34:25.879> I'm<00:34:26.210> kind<00:34:26.869> of<00:34:26.929> neutral<00:34:27.379> on<00:34:27.589> on 00:34:28.450 --> 00:34:28.460 align:start position:0% finance so I'm kind of neutral on on 00:34:28.460 --> 00:34:34.629 align:start position:0% finance so I'm kind of neutral on on that<00:34:30.070> the<00:34:31.210> the<00:34:32.210> other<00:34:32.389> major<00:34:33.190> that<00:34:34.190> was<00:34:34.280> one<00:34:34.609> of 00:34:34.629 --> 00:34:34.639 align:start position:0% that the the other major that was one of 00:34:34.639 --> 00:34:36.490 align:start position:0% that the the other major that was one of the<00:34:35.089> several<00:34:35.659> there<00:34:35.810> weren't<00:34:35.990> a<00:34:36.050> lot<00:34:36.080> of 00:34:36.490 --> 00:34:36.500 align:start position:0% the several there weren't a lot of 00:34:36.500 --> 00:34:42.240 align:start position:0% the several there weren't a lot of recommendations<00:34:36.859> that<00:34:37.429> the<00:34:37.550> committee<00:34:37.879> may 00:34:42.240 --> 00:34:42.250 align:start position:0% 00:34:42.250 --> 00:34:45.010 align:start position:0% possibility<00:34:43.250> of<00:34:43.369> providing<00:34:44.020> municipal 00:34:45.010 --> 00:34:45.020 align:start position:0% possibility of providing municipal 00:34:45.020 --> 00:34:50.159 align:start position:0% possibility of providing municipal funding<00:34:45.830> for<00:34:46.899> citizen<00:34:47.950> healthcare<00:34:48.950> needs<00:34:49.369> as 00:34:50.159 --> 00:34:50.169 align:start position:0% funding for citizen healthcare needs as 00:34:50.169 --> 00:34:53.619 align:start position:0% funding for citizen healthcare needs as particularly<00:34:51.169> the<00:34:51.700> underserved<00:34:52.700> and<00:34:52.909> so<00:34:53.510> on 00:34:53.619 --> 00:34:53.629 align:start position:0% particularly the underserved and so on 00:34:53.629 --> 00:34:56.619 align:start position:0% particularly the underserved and so on the<00:34:54.349> other<00:34:55.030> recommendation<00:34:56.030> and<00:34:56.210> I<00:34:56.300> really 00:34:56.619 --> 00:34:56.629 align:start position:0% the other recommendation and I really 00:34:56.629 --> 00:34:58.900 align:start position:0% the other recommendation and I really don't<00:34:56.869> have<00:34:56.990> I'm<00:34:57.830> kind<00:34:58.099> of<00:34:58.190> neutral<00:34:58.580> on<00:34:58.670> that 00:34:58.900 --> 00:34:58.910 align:start position:0% don't have I'm kind of neutral on that 00:34:58.910 --> 00:35:01.829 align:start position:0% don't have I'm kind of neutral on that even<00:34:59.210> though<00:34:59.330> the<00:34:59.510> the<00:34:59.839> committee<00:35:00.170> did 00:35:01.829 --> 00:35:01.839 align:start position:0% even though the the committee did 00:35:01.839 --> 00:35:05.880 align:start position:0% even though the the committee did recommend<00:35:02.839> that<00:35:03.530> the<00:35:04.160> city<00:35:04.640> consider 00:35:05.880 --> 00:35:05.890 align:start position:0% recommend that the city consider 00:35:05.890 --> 00:35:09.060 align:start position:0% recommend that the city consider establishing<00:35:06.890> as<00:35:07.730> a<00:35:07.760> city<00:35:08.210> effort<00:35:08.630> an 00:35:09.060 --> 00:35:09.070 align:start position:0% establishing as a city effort an 00:35:09.070 --> 00:35:13.540 align:start position:0% establishing as a city effort an integrated<00:35:10.070> clinic<00:35:10.780> as<00:35:11.780> as<00:35:12.410> the<00:35:13.010> committee 00:35:13.540 --> 00:35:13.550 align:start position:0% integrated clinic as as the committee 00:35:13.550 --> 00:35:17.500 align:start position:0% integrated clinic as as the committee chose<00:35:13.940> to<00:35:14.300> do<00:35:15.080> not<00:35:15.349> speak<00:35:15.650> of<00:35:15.830> it<00:35:15.859> and<00:35:16.670> I'm<00:35:17.330> kind 00:35:17.500 --> 00:35:17.510 align:start position:0% chose to do not speak of it and I'm kind 00:35:17.510 --> 00:35:21.420 align:start position:0% chose to do not speak of it and I'm kind of<00:35:17.630> neutral<00:35:18.020> on<00:35:18.140> that<00:35:18.320> as<00:35:18.740> well 00:35:21.420 --> 00:35:21.430 align:start position:0% 00:35:21.430 --> 00:35:26.760 align:start position:0% but<00:35:22.430> and<00:35:23.390> so<00:35:24.070> the<00:35:25.070> essentially<00:35:25.820> the 00:35:26.760 --> 00:35:26.770 align:start position:0% but and so the essentially the 00:35:26.770 --> 00:35:31.060 align:start position:0% but and so the essentially the resolution<00:35:28.990> suggests<00:35:29.990> that<00:35:30.170> the<00:35:30.530> city<00:35:30.770> not 00:35:31.060 --> 00:35:31.070 align:start position:0% resolution suggests that the city not 00:35:31.070 --> 00:35:35.190 align:start position:0% resolution suggests that the city not get<00:35:31.430> involved<00:35:31.700> with<00:35:31.940> financing<00:35:32.690> but<00:35:33.070> that<00:35:34.070> the 00:35:35.190 --> 00:35:35.200 align:start position:0% get involved with financing but that the 00:35:35.200 --> 00:35:38.080 align:start position:0% get involved with financing but that the the<00:35:36.200> rest<00:35:36.410> of<00:35:36.590> the<00:35:36.710> report<00:35:37.130> be<00:35:37.760> made<00:35:37.940> available 00:35:38.080 --> 00:35:38.090 align:start position:0% the rest of the report be made available 00:35:38.090 --> 00:35:41.380 align:start position:0% the rest of the report be made available to<00:35:38.630> the<00:35:39.349> appropriate<00:35:39.920> entities<00:35:40.400> and<00:35:40.670> I'm<00:35:40.849> very 00:35:41.380 --> 00:35:41.390 align:start position:0% to the appropriate entities and I'm very 00:35:41.390 --> 00:35:45.460 align:start position:0% to the appropriate entities and I'm very comfortable<00:35:41.570> with<00:35:41.930> that<00:35:43.480> and<00:35:44.480> that<00:35:44.660> brings<00:35:45.290> me 00:35:45.460 --> 00:35:45.470 align:start position:0% comfortable with that and that brings me 00:35:45.470 --> 00:35:49.920 align:start position:0% comfortable with that and that brings me to<00:35:45.619> the<00:35:46.099> supplement<00:35:47.000> to<00:35:47.119> the<00:35:47.210> report<00:35:47.630> that<00:35:48.230> I 00:35:49.920 --> 00:35:49.930 align:start position:0% to the supplement to the report that I 00:35:49.930 --> 00:35:52.930 align:start position:0% to the supplement to the report that I submitted<00:35:50.930> and<00:35:51.290> which<00:35:51.650> you<00:35:52.400> should<00:35:52.609> have<00:35:52.790> in 00:35:52.930 --> 00:35:52.940 align:start position:0% submitted and which you should have in 00:35:52.940 --> 00:35:55.330 align:start position:0% submitted and which you should have in your<00:35:52.970> in<00:35:53.450> your<00:35:53.630> packet<00:35:54.080> and<00:35:54.290> I<00:35:54.770> like<00:35:54.980> to<00:35:55.099> say 00:35:55.330 --> 00:35:55.340 align:start position:0% your in your packet and I like to say 00:35:55.340 --> 00:36:00.010 align:start position:0% your in your packet and I like to say just<00:35:55.369> a<00:35:55.760> word<00:35:56.000> or<00:35:56.119> two<00:35:56.300> about<00:35:56.330> that<00:35:56.570> because<00:35:59.020> if 00:36:00.010 --> 00:36:00.020 align:start position:0% just a word or two about that because if 00:36:00.020 --> 00:36:02.140 align:start position:0% just a word or two about that because if I<00:36:00.200> had<00:36:00.320> had<00:36:00.500> my<00:36:00.650> brother's<00:36:01.220> the<00:36:01.550> report<00:36:01.970> would 00:36:02.140 --> 00:36:02.150 align:start position:0% I had had my brother's the report would 00:36:02.150 --> 00:36:04.589 align:start position:0% I had had my brother's the report would have<00:36:02.180> been<00:36:02.359> a<00:36:02.390> little<00:36:02.690> different<00:36:02.810> then 00:36:04.589 --> 00:36:04.599 align:start position:0% have been a little different then 00:36:04.599 --> 00:36:07.390 align:start position:0% have been a little different then although<00:36:05.599> much<00:36:05.930> of<00:36:05.960> it<00:36:06.320> I'm<00:36:06.619> in<00:36:06.859> agreement 00:36:07.390 --> 00:36:07.400 align:start position:0% although much of it I'm in agreement 00:36:07.400 --> 00:36:11.410 align:start position:0% although much of it I'm in agreement with<00:36:07.730> but<00:36:08.830> much<00:36:09.830> of<00:36:09.859> what<00:36:10.010> you<00:36:10.280> have<00:36:10.520> in<00:36:11.210> the 00:36:11.410 --> 00:36:11.420 align:start position:0% with but much of what you have in the 00:36:11.420 --> 00:36:15.280 align:start position:0% with but much of what you have in the form<00:36:11.660> of<00:36:11.780> a<00:36:11.869> supplement<00:36:12.849> is<00:36:13.849> material<00:36:14.810> not<00:36:15.020> all 00:36:15.280 --> 00:36:15.290 align:start position:0% form of a supplement is material not all 00:36:15.290 --> 00:36:18.599 align:start position:0% form of a supplement is material not all of<00:36:15.410> it<00:36:15.560> but<00:36:15.830> much<00:36:16.160> of<00:36:16.190> it<00:36:16.430> is<00:36:16.580> material<00:36:17.150> that 00:36:18.599 --> 00:36:18.609 align:start position:0% of it but much of it is material that 00:36:18.609 --> 00:36:21.550 align:start position:0% of it but much of it is material that it's<00:36:19.609> submitted<00:36:20.119> to<00:36:20.270> the<00:36:20.480> to<00:36:20.930> the<00:36:21.050> committee 00:36:21.550 --> 00:36:21.560 align:start position:0% it's submitted to the to the committee 00:36:21.560 --> 00:36:23.080 align:start position:0% it's submitted to the to the committee and<00:36:21.770> hoping<00:36:22.070> that<00:36:22.250> it<00:36:22.340> could<00:36:22.490> get<00:36:22.609> into<00:36:22.910> the 00:36:23.080 --> 00:36:23.090 align:start position:0% and hoping that it could get into the 00:36:23.090 --> 00:36:26.140 align:start position:0% and hoping that it could get into the committee<00:36:23.750> report<00:36:24.200> they<00:36:25.190> saw<00:36:25.490> fit<00:36:25.550> to<00:36:25.760> go<00:36:26.000> with 00:36:26.140 --> 00:36:26.150 align:start position:0% committee report they saw fit to go with 00:36:26.150 --> 00:36:28.089 align:start position:0% committee report they saw fit to go with their<00:36:26.300> recommendations<00:36:27.170> the<00:36:27.440> part<00:36:27.710> that<00:36:27.920> what 00:36:28.089 --> 00:36:28.099 align:start position:0% their recommendations the part that what 00:36:28.099 --> 00:36:30.910 align:start position:0% their recommendations the part that what I<00:36:28.130> have<00:36:28.369> tried<00:36:28.670> to<00:36:28.700> do<00:36:29.030> is<00:36:29.869> something<00:36:30.109> that<00:36:30.440> at 00:36:30.910 --> 00:36:30.920 align:start position:0% I have tried to do is something that at 00:36:30.920 --> 00:36:32.800 align:start position:0% I have tried to do is something that at one<00:36:31.160> point<00:36:31.430> we<00:36:31.760> had<00:36:31.849> talked<00:36:32.119> about<00:36:32.240> doing<00:36:32.660> as<00:36:32.780> a 00:36:32.800 --> 00:36:32.810 align:start position:0% one point we had talked about doing as a 00:36:32.810 --> 00:36:35.380 align:start position:0% one point we had talked about doing as a committee<00:36:33.230> but<00:36:33.700> ended<00:36:34.700> up<00:36:34.820> going<00:36:35.060> with<00:36:35.210> our 00:36:35.380 --> 00:36:35.390 align:start position:0% committee but ended up going with our 00:36:35.390 --> 00:36:37.810 align:start position:0% committee but ended up going with our own<00:36:35.540> recommendations<00:36:36.380> what<00:36:37.310> I<00:36:37.339> have<00:36:37.520> tried<00:36:37.790> to 00:36:37.810 --> 00:36:37.820 align:start position:0% own recommendations what I have tried to 00:36:37.820 --> 00:36:39.849 align:start position:0% own recommendations what I have tried to do<00:36:38.060> is<00:36:38.180> something<00:36:38.420> that<00:36:38.750> the<00:36:38.900> mayor<00:36:39.080> and<00:36:39.440> a 00:36:39.849 --> 00:36:39.859 align:start position:0% do is something that the mayor and a 00:36:39.859 --> 00:36:41.740 align:start position:0% do is something that the mayor and a conversation<00:36:40.550> that<00:36:40.670> several<00:36:41.060> a<00:36:41.180> couple<00:36:41.540> of<00:36:41.630> us 00:36:41.740 --> 00:36:41.750 align:start position:0% conversation that several a couple of us 00:36:41.750 --> 00:36:44.410 align:start position:0% conversation that several a couple of us had<00:36:41.930> with<00:36:42.170> with<00:36:42.530> you<00:36:43.119> asked<00:36:44.119> that<00:36:44.150> our 00:36:44.410 --> 00:36:44.420 align:start position:0% had with with you asked that our 00:36:44.420 --> 00:36:46.359 align:start position:0% had with with you asked that our committee<00:36:44.839> do<00:36:45.080> which<00:36:45.320> we<00:36:45.530> really<00:36:45.859> did<00:36:46.040> not<00:36:46.190> do 00:36:46.359 --> 00:36:46.369 align:start position:0% committee do which we really did not do 00:36:46.369 --> 00:36:48.760 align:start position:0% committee do which we really did not do in<00:36:46.460> the<00:36:46.550> report<00:36:46.940> and<00:36:47.089> that<00:36:47.240> is<00:36:47.390> he<00:36:48.230> had<00:36:48.410> asked 00:36:48.760 --> 00:36:48.770 align:start position:0% in the report and that is he had asked 00:36:48.770 --> 00:36:51.960 align:start position:0% in the report and that is he had asked that<00:36:48.830> we<00:36:49.250> look<00:36:49.970> at<00:36:50.150> the<00:36:50.300> wall<00:36:50.650> proposal 00:36:51.960 --> 00:36:51.970 align:start position:0% that we look at the wall proposal 00:36:51.970 --> 00:36:56.290 align:start position:0% that we look at the wall proposal instead<00:36:52.970> we<00:36:53.330> went<00:36:53.510> with<00:36:53.599> our<00:36:53.780> own<00:36:53.930> and<00:36:54.609> I<00:36:55.609> felt 00:36:56.290 --> 00:36:56.300 align:start position:0% instead we went with our own and I felt 00:36:56.300 --> 00:36:58.150 align:start position:0% instead we went with our own and I felt that<00:36:56.480> we<00:36:56.660> I<00:36:56.900> would<00:36:57.170> like<00:36:57.349> to<00:36:57.530> have<00:36:57.680> seen<00:36:57.920> us 00:36:58.150 --> 00:36:58.160 align:start position:0% that we I would like to have seen us 00:36:58.160 --> 00:37:00.880 align:start position:0% that we I would like to have seen us look<00:36:58.400> at<00:36:58.550> the<00:36:58.670> wall<00:36:58.880> proposal<00:36:59.540> and<00:36:59.990> give<00:37:00.500> you 00:37:00.880 --> 00:37:00.890 align:start position:0% look at the wall proposal and give you 00:37:00.890 --> 00:37:04.810 align:start position:0% look at the wall proposal and give you some<00:37:02.050> benefit<00:37:03.050> of<00:37:03.200> the<00:37:03.710> time<00:37:04.160> that<00:37:04.369> we'd<00:37:04.520> spent 00:37:04.810 --> 00:37:04.820 align:start position:0% some benefit of the time that we'd spent 00:37:04.820 --> 00:37:08.950 align:start position:0% some benefit of the time that we'd spent on<00:37:04.940> this<00:37:05.119> subject<00:37:05.359> and<00:37:06.339> some<00:37:07.339> of<00:37:07.490> that<00:37:07.960> we 00:37:08.950 --> 00:37:08.960 align:start position:0% on this subject and some of that we 00:37:08.960 --> 00:37:10.780 align:start position:0% on this subject and some of that we spent<00:37:09.230> time<00:37:09.470> on<00:37:09.740> but<00:37:10.010> it<00:37:10.130> does<00:37:10.220> not<00:37:10.369> make<00:37:10.550> its 00:37:10.780 --> 00:37:10.790 align:start position:0% spent time on but it does not make its 00:37:10.790 --> 00:37:12.760 align:start position:0% spent time on but it does not make its way<00:37:10.970> into<00:37:11.150> our<00:37:11.240> report<00:37:11.720> so<00:37:12.080> the<00:37:12.230> supplement 00:37:12.760 --> 00:37:12.770 align:start position:0% way into our report so the supplement 00:37:12.770 --> 00:37:14.859 align:start position:0% way into our report so the supplement I've<00:37:12.859> tried<00:37:13.190> to<00:37:13.369> do<00:37:13.520> some<00:37:13.790> of<00:37:13.910> that<00:37:14.060> I've<00:37:14.690> not 00:37:14.859 --> 00:37:14.869 align:start position:0% I've tried to do some of that I've not 00:37:14.869 --> 00:37:16.870 align:start position:0% I've tried to do some of that I've not taken<00:37:15.140> a<00:37:15.349> strong<00:37:15.650> position<00:37:15.950> in<00:37:16.280> one<00:37:16.490> way<00:37:16.670> the 00:37:16.870 --> 00:37:16.880 align:start position:0% taken a strong position in one way the 00:37:16.880 --> 00:37:20.380 align:start position:0% taken a strong position in one way the other<00:37:17.080> as<00:37:18.080> far<00:37:18.470> as<00:37:18.589> war<00:37:18.859> versus<00:37:19.400> the<00:37:20.089> committee 00:37:20.380 --> 00:37:20.390 align:start position:0% other as far as war versus the committee 00:37:20.390 --> 00:37:22.390 align:start position:0% other as far as war versus the committee recommendations<00:37:21.230> but<00:37:21.440> I've<00:37:21.589> tried<00:37:21.859> to<00:37:22.220> give 00:37:22.390 --> 00:37:22.400 align:start position:0% recommendations but I've tried to give 00:37:22.400 --> 00:37:24.940 align:start position:0% recommendations but I've tried to give you<00:37:22.430> something<00:37:22.849> which<00:37:23.270> gives<00:37:24.050> pros<00:37:24.440> and<00:37:24.680> cons 00:37:24.940 --> 00:37:24.950 align:start position:0% you something which gives pros and cons 00:37:24.950 --> 00:37:26.430 align:start position:0% you something which gives pros and cons both 00:37:26.430 --> 00:37:26.440 align:start position:0% both 00:37:26.440 --> 00:37:28.680 align:start position:0% both the<00:37:26.619> wall<00:37:26.829> and<00:37:27.130> some<00:37:27.579> comparison<00:37:28.240> with<00:37:28.480> the 00:37:28.680 --> 00:37:28.690 align:start position:0% the wall and some comparison with the 00:37:28.690 --> 00:37:33.510 align:start position:0% the wall and some comparison with the city<00:37:29.730> recommendations<00:37:30.750> I<00:37:31.750> think<00:37:32.500> my<00:37:33.160> time<00:37:33.339> is 00:37:33.510 --> 00:37:33.520 align:start position:0% city recommendations I think my time is 00:37:33.520 --> 00:37:38.460 align:start position:0% city recommendations I think my time is up<00:37:34.020> so<00:37:35.020> I'll<00:37:35.200> stop<00:37:35.470> there<00:37:36.240> I<00:37:37.240> would<00:37:38.170> like<00:37:38.200> to 00:37:38.460 --> 00:37:38.470 align:start position:0% up so I'll stop there I would like to 00:37:38.470 --> 00:37:41.300 align:start position:0% up so I'll stop there I would like to just<00:37:38.650> say<00:37:38.920> in<00:37:39.220> closing<00:37:39.369> though<00:37:39.880> that<00:37:40.240> the 00:37:41.300 --> 00:37:41.310 align:start position:0% just say in closing though that the 00:37:41.310 --> 00:37:45.170 align:start position:0% just say in closing though that the supplement<00:37:42.480> represents<00:37:43.480> a<00:37:43.569> reworking<00:37:44.140> of<00:37:44.530> the 00:37:45.170 --> 00:37:45.180 align:start position:0% supplement represents a reworking of the 00:37:45.180 --> 00:37:49.260 align:start position:0% supplement represents a reworking of the committee<00:37:46.180> report<00:37:46.660> and<00:37:47.490> I<00:37:48.490> was<00:37:49.089> actually 00:37:49.260 --> 00:37:49.270 align:start position:0% committee report and I was actually 00:37:49.270 --> 00:37:51.329 align:start position:0% committee report and I was actually working<00:37:49.510> with<00:37:50.079> our<00:37:50.260> document 00:37:51.329 --> 00:37:51.339 align:start position:0% working with our document 00:37:51.339 --> 00:37:55.380 align:start position:0% working with our document in<00:37:52.020> so<00:37:53.020> doing<00:37:53.050> I<00:37:53.470> tried<00:37:53.740> to<00:37:53.890> delete<00:37:54.390> footnotes 00:37:55.380 --> 00:37:55.390 align:start position:0% in so doing I tried to delete footnotes 00:37:55.390 --> 00:37:57.329 align:start position:0% in so doing I tried to delete footnotes I<00:37:55.690> noticed<00:37:56.079> when<00:37:56.230> Jesse<00:37:56.680> helped<00:37:56.920> me<00:37:57.010> put<00:37:57.220> it 00:37:57.329 --> 00:37:57.339 align:start position:0% I noticed when Jesse helped me put it 00:37:57.339 --> 00:37:58.859 align:start position:0% I noticed when Jesse helped me put it out<00:37:57.460> the<00:37:57.640> other<00:37:57.760> day<00:37:57.970> that<00:37:58.000> it<00:37:58.480> did<00:37:58.630> it 00:37:58.859 --> 00:37:58.869 align:start position:0% out the other day that it did it 00:37:58.869 --> 00:38:01.589 align:start position:0% out the other day that it did it disallowed<00:37:59.349> that<00:37:59.680> so<00:38:00.579> there<00:38:00.819> there<00:38:01.180> is<00:38:01.300> part 00:38:01.589 --> 00:38:01.599 align:start position:0% disallowed that so there there is part 00:38:01.599 --> 00:38:03.270 align:start position:0% disallowed that so there there is part of<00:38:01.690> the<00:38:01.780> footnoting<00:38:02.349> from<00:38:02.560> the<00:38:02.650> original 00:38:03.270 --> 00:38:03.280 align:start position:0% of the footnoting from the original 00:38:03.280 --> 00:38:06.690 align:start position:0% of the footnoting from the original report<00:38:04.270> and<00:38:04.859> it<00:38:05.859> wasn't<00:38:06.040> supposed<00:38:06.280> to<00:38:06.550> be 00:38:06.690 --> 00:38:06.700 align:start position:0% report and it wasn't supposed to be 00:38:06.700 --> 00:38:08.760 align:start position:0% report and it wasn't supposed to be there<00:38:06.940> and<00:38:07.599> I<00:38:07.810> think<00:38:08.020> the<00:38:08.140> appendix<00:38:08.619> is 00:38:08.760 --> 00:38:08.770 align:start position:0% there and I think the appendix is 00:38:08.770 --> 00:38:12.329 align:start position:0% there and I think the appendix is repeated<00:38:09.339> I<00:38:10.060> also<00:38:10.660> wanted<00:38:11.200> to<00:38:11.260> talk<00:38:11.619> to<00:38:11.800> sue<00:38:12.069> a 00:38:12.329 --> 00:38:12.339 align:start position:0% repeated I also wanted to talk to sue a 00:38:12.339 --> 00:38:15.510 align:start position:0% repeated I also wanted to talk to sue a silver<00:38:13.440> tried<00:38:14.440> to<00:38:14.589> see<00:38:14.740> her<00:38:14.890> today<00:38:15.069> but<00:38:15.369> she 00:38:15.510 --> 00:38:15.520 align:start position:0% silver tried to see her today but she 00:38:15.520 --> 00:38:17.569 align:start position:0% silver tried to see her today but she was<00:38:15.640> not<00:38:15.819> in<00:38:16.000> her<00:38:16.150> office 00:38:17.569 --> 00:38:17.579 align:start position:0% was not in her office 00:38:17.579 --> 00:38:19.740 align:start position:0% was not in her office Jesse<00:38:18.579> and<00:38:18.640> I<00:38:18.730> talked<00:38:19.060> about<00:38:19.180> this<00:38:19.480> a<00:38:19.540> little 00:38:19.740 --> 00:38:19.750 align:start position:0% Jesse and I talked about this a little 00:38:19.750 --> 00:38:24.300 align:start position:0% Jesse and I talked about this a little bit<00:38:19.900> but<00:38:20.410> I<00:38:21.210> I<00:38:22.210> may<00:38:23.020> ask<00:38:23.230> her<00:38:23.589> she'd<00:38:23.980> be<00:38:24.099> willing 00:38:24.300 --> 00:38:24.310 align:start position:0% bit but I I may ask her she'd be willing 00:38:24.310 --> 00:38:27.240 align:start position:0% bit but I I may ask her she'd be willing after<00:38:24.910> talking<00:38:25.119> to<00:38:25.270> sue<00:38:25.540> to<00:38:26.200> see<00:38:26.380> if<00:38:26.859> I<00:38:27.040> can 00:38:27.240 --> 00:38:27.250 align:start position:0% after talking to sue to see if I can 00:38:27.250 --> 00:38:28.829 align:start position:0% after talking to sue to see if I can give<00:38:27.579> you<00:38:27.670> another<00:38:27.790> version<00:38:28.240> that's<00:38:28.599> cleaned 00:38:28.829 --> 00:38:28.839 align:start position:0% give you another version that's cleaned 00:38:28.839 --> 00:38:30.990 align:start position:0% give you another version that's cleaned up<00:38:29.020> a<00:38:29.140> little<00:38:29.230> bit<00:38:29.500> and<00:38:29.859> I<00:38:30.430> also<00:38:30.550> had<00:38:30.849> a<00:38:30.880> little 00:38:30.990 --> 00:38:31.000 align:start position:0% up a little bit and I also had a little 00:38:31.000 --> 00:38:33.059 align:start position:0% up a little bit and I also had a little question<00:38:31.510> about<00:38:31.720> the<00:38:31.869> wording<00:38:32.109> and<00:38:32.410> Jessie 00:38:33.059 --> 00:38:33.069 align:start position:0% question about the wording and Jessie 00:38:33.069 --> 00:38:36.059 align:start position:0% question about the wording and Jessie helped<00:38:33.310> me<00:38:33.430> with<00:38:33.550> that<00:38:33.700> a<00:38:33.730> bit<00:38:34.210> but<00:38:34.829> we<00:38:35.829> wanted 00:38:36.059 --> 00:38:36.069 align:start position:0% helped me with that a bit but we wanted 00:38:36.069 --> 00:38:37.970 align:start position:0% helped me with that a bit but we wanted to<00:38:36.130> make<00:38:36.220> clear<00:38:36.579> that<00:38:36.609> since<00:38:36.970> the<00:38:37.150> committee 00:38:37.970 --> 00:38:37.980 align:start position:0% to make clear that since the committee 00:38:37.980 --> 00:38:42.089 align:start position:0% to make clear that since the committee life<00:38:38.980> expectancy<00:38:39.730> is<00:38:40.050> ended<00:38:41.050> that<00:38:41.710> this<00:38:41.920> is 00:38:42.089 --> 00:38:42.099 align:start position:0% life expectancy is ended that this is 00:38:42.099 --> 00:38:44.970 align:start position:0% life expectancy is ended that this is not<00:38:42.339> a<00:38:43.290> product<00:38:44.290> of<00:38:44.410> the<00:38:44.500> committee<00:38:44.800> even 00:38:44.970 --> 00:38:44.980 align:start position:0% not a product of the committee even 00:38:44.980 --> 00:38:47.339 align:start position:0% not a product of the committee even though<00:38:45.190> it's<00:38:45.339> a<00:38:45.430> supplement<00:38:45.940> but<00:38:46.750> by<00:38:47.050> the<00:38:47.109> same 00:38:47.339 --> 00:38:47.349 align:start position:0% though it's a supplement but by the same 00:38:47.349 --> 00:38:49.290 align:start position:0% though it's a supplement but by the same token<00:38:47.410> I<00:38:47.890> want<00:38:48.099> to<00:38:48.220> make<00:38:48.369> clear<00:38:48.700> that<00:38:48.760> there<00:38:49.180> is 00:38:49.290 --> 00:38:49.300 align:start position:0% token I want to make clear that there is 00:38:49.300 --> 00:38:52.079 align:start position:0% token I want to make clear that there is a<00:38:49.329> connection<00:38:49.900> with<00:38:50.470> the<00:38:50.950> committee<00:38:51.579> report 00:38:52.079 --> 00:38:52.089 align:start position:0% a connection with the committee report 00:38:52.089 --> 00:38:53.790 align:start position:0% a connection with the committee report and<00:38:52.329> so<00:38:52.510> I'd<00:38:52.660> like<00:38:52.810> to<00:38:52.960> talk<00:38:53.109> to<00:38:53.260> sue<00:38:53.470> and<00:38:53.650> see 00:38:53.790 --> 00:38:53.800 align:start position:0% and so I'd like to talk to sue and see 00:38:53.800 --> 00:38:56.460 align:start position:0% and so I'd like to talk to sue and see if<00:38:53.859> we<00:38:54.010> can<00:38:54.160> can<00:38:54.910> clarify<00:38:55.630> that<00:38:55.990> a<00:38:56.050> little<00:38:56.319> bit 00:38:56.460 --> 00:38:56.470 align:start position:0% if we can can clarify that a little bit 00:38:56.470 --> 00:39:01.850 align:start position:0% if we can can clarify that a little bit as<00:38:56.589> far<00:38:56.740> as<00:38:56.800> a<00:38:56.890> title<00:38:57.400> and<00:38:57.609> so<00:38:58.329> on 00:39:01.850 --> 00:39:01.860 align:start position:0% 00:39:01.860 --> 00:39:04.380 align:start position:0% Thanks<00:39:02.950> thanks<00:39:03.220> very<00:39:03.370> much<00:39:03.460> for<00:39:03.610> your<00:39:03.970> work<00:39:04.180> on 00:39:04.380 --> 00:39:04.390 align:start position:0% Thanks thanks very much for your work on 00:39:04.390 --> 00:39:06.210 align:start position:0% Thanks thanks very much for your work on the<00:39:04.480> committee<00:39:04.750> and<00:39:04.810> your<00:39:05.620> continued<00:39:06.010> to<00:39:06.100> work 00:39:06.210 --> 00:39:06.220 align:start position:0% the committee and your continued to work 00:39:06.220 --> 00:39:10.770 align:start position:0% the committee and your continued to work on<00:39:06.370> the<00:39:06.460> supplement<00:39:06.940> thank<00:39:07.360> you<00:39:07.540> appreciate<00:39:09.780> I 00:39:10.770 --> 00:39:10.780 align:start position:0% on the supplement thank you appreciate I 00:39:10.780 --> 00:39:16.380 align:start position:0% on the supplement thank you appreciate I want<00:39:11.290> to<00:39:11.380> thank<00:39:11.590> the<00:39:11.860> council<00:39:14.190> for<00:39:15.390> helping 00:39:16.380 --> 00:39:16.390 align:start position:0% want to thank the council for helping 00:39:16.390 --> 00:39:21.920 align:start position:0% want to thank the council for helping fund<00:39:16.660> what<00:39:17.410> I<00:39:17.440> feel<00:39:17.800> was<00:39:18.100> a<00:39:18.130> very<00:39:20.730> substantial 00:39:21.920 --> 00:39:21.930 align:start position:0% fund what I feel was a very substantial 00:39:21.930 --> 00:39:30.200 align:start position:0% fund what I feel was a very substantial survey<00:39:23.340> city<00:39:24.340> preferences<00:39:25.330> and<00:39:26.850> the<00:39:27.850> site 00:39:30.200 --> 00:39:30.210 align:start position:0% 00:39:30.210 --> 00:39:32.910 align:start position:0% you're<00:39:31.210> to<00:39:31.330> be<00:39:31.450> commended<00:39:31.630> for<00:39:31.990> putting<00:39:32.770> out 00:39:32.910 --> 00:39:32.920 align:start position:0% you're to be commended for putting out 00:39:32.920 --> 00:39:37.470 align:start position:0% you're to be commended for putting out that<00:39:33.690> expenditure<00:39:35.190> and<00:39:36.250> and<00:39:36.580> I<00:39:36.730> believe<00:39:37.090> that 00:39:37.470 --> 00:39:37.480 align:start position:0% that expenditure and and I believe that 00:39:37.480 --> 00:39:38.760 align:start position:0% that expenditure and and I believe that at<00:39:37.750> the<00:39:37.840> beginning<00:39:38.170> you<00:39:38.260> didn't<00:39:38.590> identify 00:39:38.760 --> 00:39:38.770 align:start position:0% at the beginning you didn't identify 00:39:38.770 --> 00:39:40.470 align:start position:0% at the beginning you didn't identify yourself<00:39:39.400> so<00:39:39.550> just<00:39:39.580> for<00:39:39.850> the<00:39:39.940> record<00:39:40.060> if<00:39:40.390> you 00:39:40.470 --> 00:39:40.480 align:start position:0% yourself so just for the record if you 00:39:40.480 --> 00:39:45.270 align:start position:0% yourself so just for the record if you can<00:39:40.660> identify<00:39:40.870> yourself<00:39:41.260> yes<00:39:42.420> and<00:39:44.100> one<00:39:45.100> of<00:39:45.190> the 00:39:45.270 --> 00:39:45.280 align:start position:0% can identify yourself yes and one of the 00:39:45.280 --> 00:39:49.710 align:start position:0% can identify yourself yes and one of the five<00:39:46.140> final<00:39:47.790> standing<00:39:48.790> members<00:39:49.240> of<00:39:49.510> the 00:39:49.710 --> 00:39:49.720 align:start position:0% five final standing members of the 00:39:49.720 --> 00:39:51.690 align:start position:0% five final standing members of the health<00:39:49.960> services<00:39:50.380> it<00:39:50.560> thank<00:39:50.770> you<00:39:50.860> thanks<00:39:51.640> very 00:39:51.690 --> 00:39:51.700 align:start position:0% health services it thank you thanks very 00:39:51.700 --> 00:39:55.590 align:start position:0% health services it thank you thanks very much<00:39:53.580> is<00:39:54.580> there<00:39:54.760> any<00:39:54.880> other<00:39:54.970> public<00:39:55.180> comment 00:39:55.590 --> 00:39:55.600 align:start position:0% much is there any other public comment 00:39:55.600 --> 00:39:57.270 align:start position:0% much is there any other public comment on<00:39:55.900> the<00:39:56.050> resolution<00:39:56.500> acknowledging<00:39:56.980> receive 00:39:57.270 --> 00:39:57.280 align:start position:0% on the resolution acknowledging receive 00:39:57.280 --> 00:39:58.530 align:start position:0% on the resolution acknowledging receive the<00:39:57.370> final<00:39:57.670> report<00:39:57.970> of<00:39:58.000> health<00:39:58.180> services 00:39:58.530 --> 00:39:58.540 align:start position:0% the final report of health services 00:39:58.540 --> 00:40:05.010 align:start position:0% the final report of health services impact<00:39:58.900> to<00:39:59.020> it<00:40:01.440> okay<00:40:02.790> final<00:40:03.790> council<00:40:04.720> coming 00:40:05.010 --> 00:40:05.020 align:start position:0% impact to it okay final council coming 00:40:05.020 --> 00:40:06.630 align:start position:0% impact to it okay final council coming all<00:40:05.680> those<00:40:05.950> in<00:40:06.070> favor<00:40:06.250> of<00:40:06.340> the<00:40:06.550> resolution 00:40:06.630 --> 00:40:06.640 align:start position:0% all those in favor of the resolution 00:40:06.640 --> 00:40:09.530 align:start position:0% all those in favor of the resolution please<00:40:07.270> say<00:40:07.450> aye 00:40:09.530 --> 00:40:09.540 align:start position:0% 00:40:09.540 --> 00:40:11.330 align:start position:0% Ruben<00:40:10.570> aye 00:40:11.330 --> 00:40:11.340 align:start position:0% Ruben aye 00:40:11.340 --> 00:40:16.700 align:start position:0% Ruben aye any<00:40:12.340> opposed<00:40:13.620> okay<00:40:14.620> that's<00:40:14.980> as<00:40:15.130> unanimously 00:40:16.700 --> 00:40:16.710 align:start position:0% any opposed okay that's as unanimously 00:40:16.710 --> 00:40:20.190 align:start position:0% any opposed okay that's as unanimously the<00:40:17.710> next<00:40:18.250> item<00:40:18.580> on<00:40:18.700> the<00:40:18.760> agenda<00:40:18.850> is<00:40:19.420> a<00:40:19.810> single 00:40:20.190 --> 00:40:20.200 align:start position:0% the next item on the agenda is a single 00:40:20.200 --> 00:40:21.840 align:start position:0% the next item on the agenda is a single reading<00:40:20.380> word<00:40:20.620> and<00:40:20.800> so<00:40:20.920> authorizing<00:40:21.340> contract 00:40:21.840 --> 00:40:21.850 align:start position:0% reading word and so authorizing contract 00:40:21.850 --> 00:40:23.580 align:start position:0% reading word and so authorizing contract word<00:40:22.060> for<00:40:22.270> development<00:40:22.720> of<00:40:22.870> specifications 00:40:23.580 --> 00:40:23.590 align:start position:0% word for development of specifications 00:40:23.590 --> 00:40:25.500 align:start position:0% word for development of specifications and<00:40:23.770> construction<00:40:24.370> drawings<00:40:24.700> the<00:40:25.210> Linden 00:40:25.500 --> 00:40:25.510 align:start position:0% and construction drawings the Linden 00:40:25.510 --> 00:40:27.060 align:start position:0% and construction drawings the Linden Avenue<00:40:25.630> of<00:40:25.870> water<00:40:26.020> quality<00:40:26.200> retrofit<00:40:26.950> a 00:40:27.060 --> 00:40:27.070 align:start position:0% Avenue of water quality retrofit a 00:40:27.070 --> 00:40:33.830 align:start position:0% Avenue of water quality retrofit a retaining<00:40:27.460> wall<00:40:27.580> respuesta<00:40:31.530> there<00:40:32.530> any 00:40:33.830 --> 00:40:33.840 align:start position:0% retaining wall respuesta there any 00:40:33.840 --> 00:40:37.650 align:start position:0% retaining wall respuesta there any comments<00:40:34.840> or<00:40:34.900> questions<00:40:34.960> on<00:40:35.650> the<00:40:35.770> ordinance 00:40:37.650 --> 00:40:37.660 align:start position:0% comments or questions on the ordinance 00:40:37.660 --> 00:40:43.890 align:start position:0% comments or questions on the ordinance and<00:40:37.750> public<00:40:38.680> comment<00:40:40.619> this<00:40:41.619> is<00:40:41.799> a<00:40:42.900> ordinance 00:40:43.890 --> 00:40:43.900 align:start position:0% and public comment this is a ordinance 00:40:43.900 --> 00:40:49.499 align:start position:0% and public comment this is a ordinance to<00:40:45.630> design<00:40:46.630> a<00:40:47.609> project<00:40:48.609> for<00:40:49.119> which<00:40:49.299> we 00:40:49.499 --> 00:40:49.509 align:start position:0% to design a project for which we 00:40:49.509 --> 00:40:53.849 align:start position:0% to design a project for which we received<00:40:50.019> stimulus<00:40:50.980> funding<00:40:51.990> over<00:40:52.990> on<00:40:53.650> the 00:40:53.849 --> 00:40:53.859 align:start position:0% received stimulus funding over on the 00:40:53.859 --> 00:40:55.440 align:start position:0% received stimulus funding over on the other<00:40:53.890> side<00:40:54.279> of<00:40:54.309> New<00:40:54.549> Hampshire<00:40:54.849> Avenue<00:40:55.000> and 00:40:55.440 --> 00:40:55.450 align:start position:0% other side of New Hampshire Avenue and 00:40:55.450 --> 00:40:57.749 align:start position:0% other side of New Hampshire Avenue and there<00:40:55.660> were<00:40:55.750> pictures<00:40:56.289> on<00:40:56.319> the<00:40:56.799> of<00:40:57.250> the 00:40:57.749 --> 00:40:57.759 align:start position:0% there were pictures on the of the 00:40:57.759 --> 00:40:59.970 align:start position:0% there were pictures on the of the particular<00:40:58.750> needs<00:40:59.049> that<00:40:59.319> are<00:40:59.440> a<00:40:59.470> part<00:40:59.859> of<00:40:59.890> the 00:40:59.970 --> 00:40:59.980 align:start position:0% particular needs that are a part of the 00:40:59.980 --> 00:41:02.400 align:start position:0% particular needs that are a part of the packet<00:41:00.400> for<00:41:01.029> anybody<00:41:01.450> who's<00:41:01.599> wondering<00:41:01.990> what 00:41:02.400 --> 00:41:02.410 align:start position:0% packet for anybody who's wondering what 00:41:02.410 --> 00:41:07.799 align:start position:0% packet for anybody who's wondering what it<00:41:02.529> is<00:41:03.359> I<00:41:04.980> guess<00:41:05.980> we<00:41:06.759> are<00:41:06.789> ready<00:41:07.240> for<00:41:07.480> a<00:41:07.539> roll 00:41:07.799 --> 00:41:07.809 align:start position:0% it is I guess we are ready for a roll 00:41:07.809 --> 00:41:09.390 align:start position:0% it is I guess we are ready for a roll call<00:41:08.079> votes<00:41:08.349> this<00:41:08.589> is<00:41:08.769> a<00:41:08.799> single<00:41:09.250> reading 00:41:09.390 --> 00:41:09.400 align:start position:0% call votes this is a single reading 00:41:09.400 --> 00:41:10.799 align:start position:0% call votes this is a single reading ordinance<00:41:09.819> will<00:41:10.000> the<00:41:10.089> court<00:41:10.299> please<00:41:10.509> call<00:41:10.690> the 00:41:10.799 --> 00:41:10.809 align:start position:0% ordinance will the court please call the 00:41:10.809 --> 00:41:29.279 align:start position:0% ordinance will the court please call the roll<00:41:10.990> I<00:41:24.509> have<00:41:25.509> it<00:41:27.150> next<00:41:28.150> item<00:41:28.509> on<00:41:28.720> our<00:41:28.779> agenda 00:41:29.279 --> 00:41:29.289 align:start position:0% roll I have it next item on our agenda 00:41:29.289 --> 00:41:31.259 align:start position:0% roll I have it next item on our agenda is<00:41:29.829> a<00:41:29.950> first<00:41:30.250> reading<00:41:30.430> ordinance<00:41:30.819> amending<00:41:31.150> it 00:41:31.259 --> 00:41:31.269 align:start position:0% is a first reading ordinance amending it 00:41:31.269 --> 00:41:40.910 align:start position:0% is a first reading ordinance amending it to<00:41:31.359> come<00:41:31.509> apart<00:41:31.779> code<00:41:32.049> title<00:41:32.500> five<00:41:32.710> elections 00:41:40.910 --> 00:41:40.920 align:start position:0% 00:41:40.920 --> 00:41:49.349 align:start position:0% and<00:41:42.329> I<00:41:44.460> see<00:41:45.460> that<00:41:45.670> the<00:41:45.849> chair<00:41:46.119> of<00:41:46.240> the<00:41:48.210> I'm<00:41:49.210> not 00:41:49.349 --> 00:41:49.359 align:start position:0% and I see that the chair of the I'm not 00:41:49.359 --> 00:41:50.249 align:start position:0% and I see that the chair of the I'm not going<00:41:49.480> to<00:41:49.569> get<00:41:49.660> this<00:41:49.750> name<00:41:49.960> right<00:41:49.990> the 00:41:50.249 --> 00:41:50.259 align:start position:0% going to get this name right the 00:41:50.259 --> 00:41:54.120 align:start position:0% going to get this name right the Elections<00:41:51.660> Board<00:41:52.660> of<00:41:52.869> Elections<00:41:53.319> is<00:41:53.559> here<00:41:53.890> and 00:41:54.120 --> 00:41:54.130 align:start position:0% Elections Board of Elections is here and 00:41:54.130 --> 00:42:01.999 align:start position:0% Elections Board of Elections is here and if<00:41:54.519> you'd<00:41:54.670> like<00:41:54.700> to<00:41:55.059> make<00:41:55.450> any<00:41:55.660> comments<00:41:56.259> on 00:42:01.999 --> 00:42:02.009 align:start position:0% 00:42:02.009 --> 00:42:04.109 align:start position:0% good<00:42:03.009> evening<00:42:03.279> I<00:42:03.430> just<00:42:03.460> wanted<00:42:03.789> to<00:42:03.940> run 00:42:04.109 --> 00:42:04.119 align:start position:0% good evening I just wanted to run 00:42:04.119 --> 00:42:05.490 align:start position:0% good evening I just wanted to run through<00:42:04.359> really<00:42:04.599> quickly<00:42:05.019> and<00:42:05.200> I'm<00:42:05.319> an 00:42:05.490 --> 00:42:05.500 align:start position:0% through really quickly and I'm an 00:42:05.500 --> 00:42:07.049 align:start position:0% through really quickly and I'm an Sargeant<00:42:05.980> chair<00:42:06.220> of<00:42:06.279> the<00:42:06.369> Takoma<00:42:06.640> Park<00:42:06.700> Board 00:42:07.049 --> 00:42:07.059 align:start position:0% Sargeant chair of the Takoma Park Board 00:42:07.059 --> 00:42:08.640 align:start position:0% Sargeant chair of the Takoma Park Board of<00:42:07.119> Elections<00:42:07.480> I<00:42:07.720> just<00:42:08.170> wanted<00:42:08.380> to<00:42:08.500> run 00:42:08.640 --> 00:42:08.650 align:start position:0% of Elections I just wanted to run 00:42:08.650 --> 00:42:10.380 align:start position:0% of Elections I just wanted to run through<00:42:08.710> quickly<00:42:09.039> in<00:42:09.400> case<00:42:09.670> people<00:42:09.940> had<00:42:10.210> not 00:42:10.380 --> 00:42:10.390 align:start position:0% through quickly in case people had not 00:42:10.390 --> 00:42:13.259 align:start position:0% through quickly in case people had not had<00:42:10.539> a<00:42:10.569> chance<00:42:10.660> to<00:42:11.109> review<00:42:11.849> and<00:42:12.849> we've<00:42:13.089> made<00:42:13.240> a 00:42:13.259 --> 00:42:13.269 align:start position:0% had a chance to review and we've made a 00:42:13.269 --> 00:42:16.410 align:start position:0% had a chance to review and we've made a number<00:42:13.480> of<00:42:13.660> changes<00:42:13.869> to<00:42:14.140> the<00:42:14.680> city<00:42:15.490> code<00:42:15.789> title 00:42:16.410 --> 00:42:16.420 align:start position:0% number of changes to the city code title 00:42:16.420 --> 00:42:19.769 align:start position:0% number of changes to the city code title five<00:42:17.490> one<00:42:18.490> part<00:42:18.730> is<00:42:18.910> we<00:42:19.119> clarify<00:42:19.630> in 00:42:19.769 --> 00:42:19.779 align:start position:0% five one part is we clarify in 00:42:19.779 --> 00:42:23.190 align:start position:0% five one part is we clarify in definitions<00:42:20.349> what<00:42:20.680> the<00:42:21.339> ballot<00:42:22.180> is<00:42:22.480> and<00:42:22.900> we 00:42:23.190 --> 00:42:23.200 align:start position:0% definitions what the ballot is and we 00:42:23.200 --> 00:42:25.319 align:start position:0% definitions what the ballot is and we also<00:42:23.410> add<00:42:23.829> the<00:42:24.069> term<00:42:24.250> provisional<00:42:24.910> ballot<00:42:25.240> we 00:42:25.319 --> 00:42:25.329 align:start position:0% also add the term provisional ballot we 00:42:25.329 --> 00:42:26.880 align:start position:0% also add the term provisional ballot we haven't<00:42:25.569> had<00:42:25.660> provisional<00:42:26.170> ballot<00:42:26.440> in<00:42:26.529> before 00:42:26.880 --> 00:42:26.890 align:start position:0% haven't had provisional ballot in before 00:42:26.890 --> 00:42:29.880 align:start position:0% haven't had provisional ballot in before in<00:42:27.130> Takoma<00:42:27.430> Park<00:42:28.109> the<00:42:29.109> next<00:42:29.349> part<00:42:29.559> is<00:42:29.710> we 00:42:29.880 --> 00:42:29.890 align:start position:0% in Takoma Park the next part is we 00:42:29.890 --> 00:42:33.990 align:start position:0% in Takoma Park the next part is we simplified<00:42:30.670> voting<00:42:31.210> systems<00:42:32.369> just<00:42:33.369> to<00:42:33.609> make 00:42:33.990 --> 00:42:34.000 align:start position:0% simplified voting systems just to make 00:42:34.000 --> 00:42:35.730 align:start position:0% simplified voting systems just to make it<00:42:34.119> simpler<00:42:34.420> and<00:42:34.690> also<00:42:34.809> so<00:42:35.200> we're<00:42:35.349> not<00:42:35.470> dead 00:42:35.730 --> 00:42:35.740 align:start position:0% it simpler and also so we're not dead 00:42:35.740 --> 00:42:37.650 align:start position:0% it simpler and also so we're not dead nailed<00:42:36.069> down<00:42:36.279> to<00:42:36.460> using<00:42:36.730> one<00:42:37.000> system<00:42:37.480> or 00:42:37.650 --> 00:42:37.660 align:start position:0% nailed down to using one system or 00:42:37.660 --> 00:42:39.210 align:start position:0% nailed down to using one system or another<00:42:37.690> it<00:42:38.140> gives<00:42:38.289> us<00:42:38.440> flexibility<00:42:39.009> in<00:42:39.130> the 00:42:39.210 --> 00:42:39.220 align:start position:0% another it gives us flexibility in the 00:42:39.220 --> 00:42:42.660 align:start position:0% another it gives us flexibility in the future<00:42:40.589> instruction<00:42:41.589> and<00:42:42.009> assistance<00:42:42.460> in 00:42:42.660 --> 00:42:42.670 align:start position:0% future instruction and assistance in 00:42:42.670 --> 00:42:45.690 align:start position:0% future instruction and assistance in voting<00:42:42.880> is<00:42:43.210> something<00:42:43.569> we<00:42:43.660> also<00:42:43.809> covered<00:42:44.700> we 00:42:45.690 --> 00:42:45.700 align:start position:0% voting is something we also covered we 00:42:45.700 --> 00:42:47.770 align:start position:0% voting is something we also covered we updated<00:42:46.059> it<00:42:46.210> and<00:42:46.329> clarified<00:42:46.960> it 00:42:47.770 --> 00:42:47.780 align:start position:0% updated it and clarified it 00:42:47.780 --> 00:42:50.180 align:start position:0% updated it and clarified it closing<00:42:48.780> of<00:42:48.870> polls<00:42:49.110> &<00:42:49.380> tabulation<00:42:49.920> of<00:42:49.980> votes 00:42:50.180 --> 00:42:50.190 align:start position:0% closing of polls & tabulation of votes 00:42:50.190 --> 00:42:53.240 align:start position:0% closing of polls & tabulation of votes are<00:42:50.490> also<00:42:50.700> clarified<00:42:51.300> and<00:42:51.830> we've<00:42:52.830> simplified 00:42:53.240 --> 00:42:53.250 align:start position:0% are also clarified and we've simplified 00:42:53.250 --> 00:42:54.980 align:start position:0% are also clarified and we've simplified them<00:42:53.610> and<00:42:53.700> we<00:42:53.790> so<00:42:54.150> it<00:42:54.270> matches<00:42:54.480> better<00:42:54.780> with 00:42:54.980 --> 00:42:54.990 align:start position:0% them and we so it matches better with 00:42:54.990 --> 00:42:57.980 align:start position:0% them and we so it matches better with using<00:42:55.260> paper<00:42:55.470> ballots<00:42:56.330> and<00:42:57.330> also<00:42:57.780> that<00:42:57.930> we 00:42:57.980 --> 00:42:57.990 align:start position:0% using paper ballots and also that we 00:42:57.990 --> 00:42:59.510 align:start position:0% using paper ballots and also that we have<00:42:58.140> Instant<00:42:58.530> Runoff<00:42:58.590> voting<00:42:58.830> in<00:42:59.220> Takoma 00:42:59.510 --> 00:42:59.520 align:start position:0% have Instant Runoff voting in Takoma 00:42:59.520 --> 00:43:02.450 align:start position:0% have Instant Runoff voting in Takoma Park<00:43:00.200> now<00:43:01.200> see<00:43:01.470> we're<00:43:01.680> so<00:43:01.950> far<00:43:02.130> ahead<00:43:02.190> of 00:43:02.450 --> 00:43:02.460 align:start position:0% Park now see we're so far ahead of 00:43:02.460 --> 00:43:06.050 align:start position:0% Park now see we're so far ahead of Minnesota<00:43:03.710> the<00:43:04.710> next<00:43:05.340> part<00:43:05.520> is<00:43:05.580> election 00:43:06.050 --> 00:43:06.060 align:start position:0% Minnesota the next part is election 00:43:06.060 --> 00:43:09.140 align:start position:0% Minnesota the next part is election context<00:43:06.710> contests<00:43:07.710> and<00:43:07.890> appeals<00:43:08.730> it 00:43:09.140 --> 00:43:09.150 align:start position:0% context contests and appeals it 00:43:09.150 --> 00:43:11.750 align:start position:0% context contests and appeals it transfers<00:43:10.020> Authority<00:43:10.560> to<00:43:11.250> the<00:43:11.490> Board<00:43:11.700> of 00:43:11.750 --> 00:43:11.760 align:start position:0% transfers Authority to the Board of 00:43:11.760 --> 00:43:14.630 align:start position:0% transfers Authority to the Board of Elections<00:43:12.270> to<00:43:12.570> decide<00:43:12.930> on<00:43:13.080> those<00:43:13.640> contests 00:43:14.630 --> 00:43:14.640 align:start position:0% Elections to decide on those contests 00:43:14.640 --> 00:43:18.350 align:start position:0% Elections to decide on those contests and<00:43:15.050> appeals<00:43:16.050> and<00:43:16.680> the<00:43:17.580> right<00:43:17.730> to<00:43:17.850> appeal<00:43:18.150> is 00:43:18.350 --> 00:43:18.360 align:start position:0% and appeals and the right to appeal is 00:43:18.360 --> 00:43:20.990 align:start position:0% and appeals and the right to appeal is Delhi<00:43:18.630> is<00:43:18.870> updated<00:43:19.290> also<00:43:19.700> next<00:43:20.700> part<00:43:20.880> is 00:43:20.990 --> 00:43:21.000 align:start position:0% Delhi is updated also next part is 00:43:21.000 --> 00:43:22.910 align:start position:0% Delhi is updated also next part is inspection<00:43:21.510> of<00:43:21.720> ballots<00:43:22.080> in<00:43:22.260> the<00:43:22.290> event<00:43:22.650> of<00:43:22.830> an 00:43:22.910 --> 00:43:22.920 align:start position:0% inspection of ballots in the event of an 00:43:22.920 --> 00:43:27.050 align:start position:0% inspection of ballots in the event of an election<00:43:23.190> contests<00:43:24.350> contest<00:43:25.350> or<00:43:25.740> appeal<00:43:26.370> and 00:43:27.050 --> 00:43:27.060 align:start position:0% election contests contest or appeal and 00:43:27.060 --> 00:43:29.090 align:start position:0% election contests contest or appeal and we<00:43:27.510> remove<00:43:27.870> specific<00:43:28.140> reference<00:43:28.680> to<00:43:28.740> voting 00:43:29.090 --> 00:43:29.100 align:start position:0% we remove specific reference to voting 00:43:29.100 --> 00:43:30.620 align:start position:0% we remove specific reference to voting machines<00:43:29.460> because<00:43:29.880> we<00:43:30.030> may<00:43:30.150> or<00:43:30.270> may<00:43:30.360> not<00:43:30.390> be 00:43:30.620 --> 00:43:30.630 align:start position:0% machines because we may or may not be 00:43:30.630 --> 00:43:31.910 align:start position:0% machines because we may or may not be using<00:43:30.780> voting<00:43:31.140> machines<00:43:31.440> and<00:43:31.680> I<00:43:31.740> have 00:43:31.910 --> 00:43:31.920 align:start position:0% using voting machines and I have 00:43:31.920 --> 00:43:37.000 align:start position:0% using voting machines and I have scanners<00:43:32.370> we<00:43:32.550> might<00:43:32.730> have<00:43:33.000> other<00:43:33.240> systems<00:43:35.990> and 00:43:37.000 --> 00:43:37.010 align:start position:0% scanners we might have other systems and 00:43:37.010 --> 00:43:42.770 align:start position:0% scanners we might have other systems and absentee<00:43:38.010> voting<00:43:38.250> is<00:43:38.580> route<00:43:40.490> revised<00:43:41.490> to<00:43:42.030> be 00:43:42.770 --> 00:43:42.780 align:start position:0% absentee voting is route revised to be 00:43:42.780 --> 00:43:44.720 align:start position:0% absentee voting is route revised to be consistent<00:43:43.560> with<00:43:43.650> a<00:43:43.680> charter<00:43:44.100> amendment<00:43:44.130> to 00:43:44.720 --> 00:43:44.730 align:start position:0% consistent with a charter amendment to 00:43:44.730 --> 00:43:46.790 align:start position:0% consistent with a charter amendment to allow<00:43:44.970> anybody<00:43:45.330> to<00:43:45.690> vote<00:43:46.140> by<00:43:46.320> absentee<00:43:46.470> ballot 00:43:46.790 --> 00:43:46.800 align:start position:0% allow anybody to vote by absentee ballot 00:43:46.800 --> 00:43:48.950 align:start position:0% allow anybody to vote by absentee ballot it's<00:43:47.250> more<00:43:48.030> or<00:43:48.090> less<00:43:48.180> the<00:43:48.300> same<00:43:48.420> as<00:43:48.570> no-fault 00:43:48.950 --> 00:43:48.960 align:start position:0% it's more or less the same as no-fault 00:43:48.960 --> 00:43:51.980 align:start position:0% it's more or less the same as no-fault absentee<00:43:49.500> voting<00:43:50.570> emergency<00:43:51.570> absentee 00:43:51.980 --> 00:43:51.990 align:start position:0% absentee voting emergency absentee 00:43:51.990 --> 00:43:54.580 align:start position:0% absentee voting emergency absentee balloting<00:43:52.380> is<00:43:52.530> changed<00:43:53.100> to<00:43:53.190> late<00:43:53.580> absentee 00:43:54.580 --> 00:43:54.590 align:start position:0% balloting is changed to late absentee 00:43:54.590 --> 00:43:57.020 align:start position:0% balloting is changed to late absentee just<00:43:55.590> kind<00:43:55.830> of<00:43:55.890> a<00:43:55.980> clarification<00:43:56.250> and<00:43:56.880> it 00:43:57.020 --> 00:43:57.030 align:start position:0% just kind of a clarification and it 00:43:57.030 --> 00:43:58.880 align:start position:0% just kind of a clarification and it allows<00:43:57.300> people<00:43:57.330> to<00:43:57.690> stop<00:43:57.990> in<00:43:58.200> and<00:43:58.350> pick<00:43:58.650> up<00:43:58.800> an 00:43:58.880 --> 00:43:58.890 align:start position:0% allows people to stop in and pick up an 00:43:58.890 --> 00:44:01.070 align:start position:0% allows people to stop in and pick up an absentee<00:43:59.310> ballot<00:43:59.370> from<00:44:00.210> Jesse<00:44:00.570> or<00:44:00.720> whoever 00:44:01.070 --> 00:44:01.080 align:start position:0% absentee ballot from Jesse or whoever 00:44:01.080 --> 00:44:03.760 align:start position:0% absentee ballot from Jesse or whoever else<00:44:01.170> is<00:44:01.440> the<00:44:01.560> city<00:44:01.800> clerk<00:44:01.950> at<00:44:02.130> the<00:44:02.220> time 00:44:03.760 --> 00:44:03.770 align:start position:0% else is the city clerk at the time 00:44:03.770 --> 00:44:05.810 align:start position:0% else is the city clerk at the time determination<00:44:04.770> of<00:44:04.860> absentee<00:44:05.340> voters 00:44:05.810 --> 00:44:05.820 align:start position:0% determination of absentee voters 00:44:05.820 --> 00:44:07.940 align:start position:0% determination of absentee voters eligibility<00:44:06.690> and<00:44:06.840> delivery<00:44:07.170> of<00:44:07.230> ballots<00:44:07.740> we 00:44:07.940 --> 00:44:07.950 align:start position:0% eligibility and delivery of ballots we 00:44:07.950 --> 00:44:11.570 align:start position:0% eligibility and delivery of ballots we clarified<00:44:09.500> absentee<00:44:10.500> ballots<00:44:10.890> is<00:44:11.040> simplified 00:44:11.570 --> 00:44:11.580 align:start position:0% clarified absentee ballots is simplified 00:44:11.580 --> 00:44:14.210 align:start position:0% clarified absentee ballots is simplified to<00:44:12.080> give<00:44:13.080> us<00:44:13.200> more<00:44:13.410> authority<00:44:13.800> regarding<00:44:13.920> the 00:44:14.210 --> 00:44:14.220 align:start position:0% to give us more authority regarding the 00:44:14.220 --> 00:44:16.540 align:start position:0% to give us more authority regarding the form<00:44:14.490> and<00:44:14.760> just<00:44:14.910> what<00:44:15.120> the<00:44:15.240> ballot<00:44:15.750> looks<00:44:15.930> like 00:44:16.540 --> 00:44:16.550 align:start position:0% form and just what the ballot looks like 00:44:16.550 --> 00:44:18.710 align:start position:0% form and just what the ballot looks like tabulation<00:44:17.550> of<00:44:17.610> absentee<00:44:18.000> ballots<00:44:18.360> also 00:44:18.710 --> 00:44:18.720 align:start position:0% tabulation of absentee ballots also 00:44:18.720 --> 00:44:24.710 align:start position:0% tabulation of absentee ballots also clarified<00:44:19.790> contests<00:44:20.790> appeals<00:44:23.240> ok<00:44:24.240> penalties 00:44:24.710 --> 00:44:24.720 align:start position:0% clarified contests appeals ok penalties 00:44:24.720 --> 00:44:26.720 align:start position:0% clarified contests appeals ok penalties is<00:44:25.140> a<00:44:25.200> municipal<00:44:25.830> infraction<00:44:26.340> instead<00:44:26.610> of<00:44:26.670> a 00:44:26.720 --> 00:44:26.730 align:start position:0% is a municipal infraction instead of a 00:44:26.730 --> 00:44:28.730 align:start position:0% is a municipal infraction instead of a civil<00:44:27.000> offense<00:44:27.270> and<00:44:27.570> provisional<00:44:28.380> voting<00:44:28.650> is 00:44:28.730 --> 00:44:28.740 align:start position:0% civil offense and provisional voting is 00:44:28.740 --> 00:44:30.350 align:start position:0% civil offense and provisional voting is a<00:44:28.770> news<00:44:29.040> section<00:44:29.370> added<00:44:29.730> we<00:44:29.970> haven't<00:44:30.210> had<00:44:30.330> that 00:44:30.350 --> 00:44:30.360 align:start position:0% a news section added we haven't had that 00:44:30.360 --> 00:44:33.950 align:start position:0% a news section added we haven't had that before<00:44:30.630> it<00:44:31.500> has<00:44:31.920> sometimes<00:44:32.430> been<00:44:33.210> possible<00:44:33.810> to 00:44:33.950 --> 00:44:33.960 align:start position:0% before it has sometimes been possible to 00:44:33.960 --> 00:44:35.420 align:start position:0% before it has sometimes been possible to make<00:44:34.110> arrangements<00:44:34.620> for<00:44:34.680> somebody<00:44:35.130> to<00:44:35.280> vote 00:44:35.420 --> 00:44:35.430 align:start position:0% make arrangements for somebody to vote 00:44:35.430 --> 00:44:37.610 align:start position:0% make arrangements for somebody to vote provisionally<00:44:35.610> if<00:44:36.180> there's<00:44:36.900> an<00:44:37.350> error 00:44:37.610 --> 00:44:37.620 align:start position:0% provisionally if there's an error 00:44:37.620 --> 00:44:39.590 align:start position:0% provisionally if there's an error someplace<00:44:38.190> in<00:44:38.520> the<00:44:38.670> rolls<00:44:38.850> but<00:44:39.000> now<00:44:39.270> we<00:44:39.330> have<00:44:39.570> a 00:44:39.590 --> 00:44:39.600 align:start position:0% someplace in the rolls but now we have a 00:44:39.600 --> 00:44:41.990 align:start position:0% someplace in the rolls but now we have a specific<00:44:40.080> provision<00:44:40.350> for<00:44:40.830> it<00:44:40.950> and<00:44:41.130> in<00:44:41.820> case 00:44:41.990 --> 00:44:42.000 align:start position:0% specific provision for it and in case 00:44:42.000 --> 00:44:43.850 align:start position:0% specific provision for it and in case anybody's<00:44:42.570> wondering<00:44:42.600> provisional<00:44:43.440> voting 00:44:43.850 --> 00:44:43.860 align:start position:0% anybody's wondering provisional voting 00:44:43.860 --> 00:44:46.760 align:start position:0% anybody's wondering provisional voting means<00:44:44.130> vote<00:44:45.030> now<00:44:45.270> if<00:44:45.690> it<00:44:45.900> went<00:44:46.050> in<00:44:46.200> doubt<00:44:46.350> vote 00:44:46.760 --> 00:44:46.770 align:start position:0% means vote now if it went in doubt vote 00:44:46.770 --> 00:44:48.110 align:start position:0% means vote now if it went in doubt vote now<00:44:46.920> and<00:44:47.280> sort<00:44:47.550> it<00:44:47.670> out<00:44:47.760> later 00:44:48.110 --> 00:44:48.120 align:start position:0% now and sort it out later 00:44:48.120 --> 00:44:50.300 align:start position:0% now and sort it out later so<00:44:48.630> that<00:44:48.780> doesn't<00:44:49.230> the<00:44:49.470> attempt<00:44:49.920> is<00:44:50.070> to 00:44:50.300 --> 00:44:50.310 align:start position:0% so that doesn't the attempt is to 00:44:50.310 --> 00:44:54.590 align:start position:0% so that doesn't the attempt is to enfranchise<00:44:50.850> as<00:44:51.480> many<00:44:51.720> people<00:44:52.080> as<00:44:52.230> possible 00:44:54.590 --> 00:44:54.600 align:start position:0% 00:44:54.600 --> 00:45:01.020 align:start position:0% any<00:44:55.600> questions<00:44:56.110> about<00:44:56.320> that<00:44:56.500> or<00:44:57.090> those<00:44:59.640> I<00:45:00.640> am 00:45:01.020 --> 00:45:01.030 align:start position:0% any questions about that or those I am 00:45:01.030 --> 00:45:03.600 align:start position:0% any questions about that or those I am I'll<00:45:01.600> just<00:45:01.810> say<00:45:01.990> that<00:45:02.230> I'm<00:45:03.130> looking<00:45:03.310> at<00:45:03.550> the 00:45:03.600 --> 00:45:03.610 align:start position:0% I'll just say that I'm looking at the 00:45:03.610 --> 00:45:05.310 align:start position:0% I'll just say that I'm looking at the number<00:45:03.910> of<00:45:04.000> words<00:45:04.180> that<00:45:04.360> are<00:45:04.420> have<00:45:04.990> lines 00:45:05.310 --> 00:45:05.320 align:start position:0% number of words that are have lines 00:45:05.320 --> 00:45:07.080 align:start position:0% number of words that are have lines through<00:45:05.650> them<00:45:05.770> and<00:45:05.980> the<00:45:06.550> number<00:45:06.850> of<00:45:06.940> words 00:45:07.080 --> 00:45:07.090 align:start position:0% through them and the number of words 00:45:07.090 --> 00:45:10.020 align:start position:0% through them and the number of words that<00:45:07.240> are<00:45:07.390> in<00:45:07.480> that<00:45:08.410> are<00:45:08.500> included<00:45:08.830> or<00:45:09.640> added 00:45:10.020 --> 00:45:10.030 align:start position:0% that are in that are included or added 00:45:10.030 --> 00:45:12.840 align:start position:0% that are in that are included or added and<00:45:10.900> I<00:45:10.960> commend<00:45:11.320> you<00:45:11.410> for<00:45:11.460> taking<00:45:12.460> out<00:45:12.580> many 00:45:12.840 --> 00:45:12.850 align:start position:0% and I commend you for taking out many 00:45:12.850 --> 00:45:16.860 align:start position:0% and I commend you for taking out many more<00:45:13.030> words<00:45:13.240> than<00:45:13.480> you've<00:45:13.600> added<00:45:13.810> I<00:45:15.600> will<00:45:16.600> put 00:45:16.860 --> 00:45:16.870 align:start position:0% more words than you've added I will put 00:45:16.870 --> 00:45:18.990 align:start position:0% more words than you've added I will put that<00:45:16.900> back<00:45:17.080> to<00:45:17.380> the<00:45:17.470> group<00:45:17.620> okay<00:45:18.280> and<00:45:18.550> just<00:45:18.880> in 00:45:18.990 --> 00:45:19.000 align:start position:0% that back to the group okay and just in 00:45:19.000 --> 00:45:20.940 align:start position:0% that back to the group okay and just in some<00:45:19.330> simple<00:45:19.840> in<00:45:20.080> a<00:45:20.170> couple<00:45:20.560> of<00:45:20.620> instances 00:45:20.940 --> 00:45:20.950 align:start position:0% some simple in a couple of instances 00:45:20.950 --> 00:45:22.770 align:start position:0% some simple in a couple of instances it's<00:45:21.280> much<00:45:21.490> clearer<00:45:21.820> what<00:45:22.060> you've<00:45:22.210> done<00:45:22.420> with 00:45:22.770 --> 00:45:22.780 align:start position:0% it's much clearer what you've done with 00:45:22.780 --> 00:45:26.190 align:start position:0% it's much clearer what you've done with fewer<00:45:23.050> words<00:45:23.320> so<00:45:23.650> I'm<00:45:23.860> all<00:45:24.490> for<00:45:24.520> rough<00:45:25.200> clear 00:45:26.190 --> 00:45:26.200 align:start position:0% fewer words so I'm all for rough clear 00:45:26.200 --> 00:45:28.260 align:start position:0% fewer words so I'm all for rough clear language<00:45:26.740> actually<00:45:27.250> I<00:45:27.460> should<00:45:27.910> give<00:45:28.060> full 00:45:28.260 --> 00:45:28.270 align:start position:0% language actually I should give full 00:45:28.270 --> 00:45:29.610 align:start position:0% language actually I should give full credit<00:45:28.390> Jesse<00:45:28.870> had<00:45:28.990> a<00:45:29.020> lot<00:45:29.200> to<00:45:29.230> do<00:45:29.440> with<00:45:29.560> that 00:45:29.610 --> 00:45:29.620 align:start position:0% credit Jesse had a lot to do with that 00:45:29.620 --> 00:45:32.900 align:start position:0% credit Jesse had a lot to do with that Thank<00:45:30.190> You<00:45:30.310> Jesse 00:45:32.900 --> 00:45:32.910 align:start position:0% 00:45:32.910 --> 00:45:36.690 align:start position:0% and<00:45:33.910> if<00:45:34.060> I<00:45:34.180> can<00:45:34.390> add<00:45:34.570> that<00:45:34.860> it's<00:45:35.860> been<00:45:36.250> very 00:45:36.690 --> 00:45:36.700 align:start position:0% and if I can add that it's been very 00:45:36.700 --> 00:45:39.810 align:start position:0% and if I can add that it's been very helpful<00:45:37.090> to<00:45:37.270> have<00:45:37.690> an<00:45:38.680> elections<00:45:39.220> board<00:45:39.430> Board 00:45:39.810 --> 00:45:39.820 align:start position:0% helpful to have an elections board Board 00:45:39.820 --> 00:45:43.440 align:start position:0% helpful to have an elections board Board of<00:45:39.910> Elections<00:45:40.860> because<00:45:41.860> up<00:45:42.100> until<00:45:42.250> about<00:45:42.580> what 00:45:43.440 --> 00:45:43.450 align:start position:0% of Elections because up until about what 00:45:43.450 --> 00:45:46.890 align:start position:0% of Elections because up until about what the<00:45:44.140> year<00:45:44.350> or<00:45:44.440> two<00:45:44.530> ago<00:45:44.650> we<00:45:45.640> never<00:45:46.180> had<00:45:46.360> one<00:45:46.390> and 00:45:46.890 --> 00:45:46.900 align:start position:0% the year or two ago we never had one and 00:45:46.900 --> 00:45:52.530 align:start position:0% the year or two ago we never had one and it's<00:45:47.800> kind<00:45:48.040> of<00:45:48.480> by<00:45:49.480> default<00:45:49.680> fell<00:45:50.680> to<00:45:51.540> council 00:45:52.530 --> 00:45:52.540 align:start position:0% it's kind of by default fell to council 00:45:52.540 --> 00:45:54.060 align:start position:0% it's kind of by default fell to council to<00:45:52.570> have<00:45:52.900> to<00:45:53.080> do<00:45:53.290> something<00:45:53.740> if<00:45:53.860> something 00:45:54.060 --> 00:45:54.070 align:start position:0% to have to do something if something 00:45:54.070 --> 00:45:56.520 align:start position:0% to have to do something if something needed<00:45:54.460> to<00:45:54.550> be<00:45:54.670> changed<00:45:54.910> and<00:45:55.870> yet<00:45:56.260> that<00:45:56.470> was 00:45:56.520 --> 00:45:56.530 align:start position:0% needed to be changed and yet that was 00:45:56.530 --> 00:45:58.380 align:start position:0% needed to be changed and yet that was kind<00:45:56.890> of<00:45:56.980> uncomfortable<00:45:57.430> because<00:45:58.090> it<00:45:58.240> was 00:45:58.380 --> 00:45:58.390 align:start position:0% kind of uncomfortable because it was 00:45:58.390 --> 00:46:01.200 align:start position:0% kind of uncomfortable because it was affecting<00:45:58.900> our<00:45:59.620> elections<00:46:00.130> and<00:46:00.310> so<00:46:01.000> it<00:46:01.060> was 00:46:01.200 --> 00:46:01.210 align:start position:0% affecting our elections and so it was 00:46:01.210 --> 00:46:04.260 align:start position:0% affecting our elections and so it was very<00:46:02.050> helpful<00:46:02.260> to<00:46:02.440> to<00:46:02.980> have<00:46:03.220> the<00:46:03.730> board<00:46:03.970> and 00:46:04.260 --> 00:46:04.270 align:start position:0% very helpful to to have the board and 00:46:04.270 --> 00:46:07.080 align:start position:0% very helpful to to have the board and then<00:46:04.450> to<00:46:04.660> have<00:46:04.840> the<00:46:05.800> excellent<00:46:06.580> volunteers 00:46:07.080 --> 00:46:07.090 align:start position:0% then to have the excellent volunteers 00:46:07.090 --> 00:46:09.570 align:start position:0% then to have the excellent volunteers that<00:46:07.450> came<00:46:07.990> forward<00:46:08.260> to<00:46:08.590> comprise<00:46:09.070> the<00:46:09.340> board 00:46:09.570 --> 00:46:09.580 align:start position:0% that came forward to comprise the board 00:46:09.580 --> 00:46:12.660 align:start position:0% that came forward to comprise the board and<00:46:10.080> we<00:46:11.080> really<00:46:11.380> appreciate<00:46:11.770> appreciate<00:46:12.460> your 00:46:12.660 --> 00:46:12.670 align:start position:0% and we really appreciate appreciate your 00:46:12.670 --> 00:46:15.690 align:start position:0% and we really appreciate appreciate your efforts<00:46:13.030> to<00:46:13.330> chair<00:46:14.320> the<00:46:14.470> board<00:46:14.620> and<00:46:15.010> to<00:46:15.250> move 00:46:15.690 --> 00:46:15.700 align:start position:0% efforts to chair the board and to move 00:46:15.700 --> 00:46:19.160 align:start position:0% efforts to chair the board and to move these<00:46:15.970> changes<00:46:16.450> forward<00:46:16.900> and<00:46:17.820> investigate 00:46:19.160 --> 00:46:19.170 align:start position:0% these changes forward and investigate 00:46:19.170 --> 00:46:21.840 align:start position:0% these changes forward and investigate better<00:46:20.170> ways<00:46:20.380> to<00:46:20.410> do<00:46:20.710> elections<00:46:21.190> and<00:46:21.490> come 00:46:21.840 --> 00:46:21.850 align:start position:0% better ways to do elections and come 00:46:21.850 --> 00:46:23.790 align:start position:0% better ways to do elections and come forward<00:46:22.090> with<00:46:22.270> proposals<00:46:22.570> and<00:46:23.200> really 00:46:23.790 --> 00:46:23.800 align:start position:0% forward with proposals and really 00:46:23.800 --> 00:46:24.900 align:start position:0% forward with proposals and really appreciate<00:46:24.190> all<00:46:24.310> your<00:46:24.460> work 00:46:24.900 --> 00:46:24.910 align:start position:0% appreciate all your work 00:46:24.910 --> 00:46:26.940 align:start position:0% appreciate all your work thanks<00:46:25.720> and<00:46:25.960> I'll<00:46:26.050> convey<00:46:26.350> that<00:46:26.500> to<00:46:26.560> the<00:46:26.770> Board 00:46:26.940 --> 00:46:26.950 align:start position:0% thanks and I'll convey that to the Board 00:46:26.950 --> 00:46:31.890 align:start position:0% thanks and I'll convey that to the Board of<00:46:26.980> Elections<00:46:27.340> -<00:46:29.640> any<00:46:30.640> other<00:46:30.820> questions<00:46:31.180> on 00:46:31.890 --> 00:46:31.900 align:start position:0% of Elections - any other questions on 00:46:31.900 --> 00:46:33.510 align:start position:0% of Elections - any other questions on the<00:46:32.050> council<00:46:32.470> is<00:46:32.710> there<00:46:32.920> anybody<00:46:33.160> who<00:46:33.460> would 00:46:33.510 --> 00:46:33.520 align:start position:0% the council is there anybody who would 00:46:33.520 --> 00:46:36.150 align:start position:0% the council is there anybody who would like<00:46:33.640> to<00:46:34.020> provide<00:46:35.020> any<00:46:35.230> public<00:46:35.530> comments<00:46:35.950> on 00:46:36.150 --> 00:46:36.160 align:start position:0% like to provide any public comments on 00:46:36.160 --> 00:46:39.420 align:start position:0% like to provide any public comments on this<00:46:37.200> frustrating<00:46:38.200> ordinance<00:46:38.560> amending<00:46:39.220> our 00:46:39.420 --> 00:46:39.430 align:start position:0% this frustrating ordinance amending our 00:46:39.430 --> 00:46:45.780 align:start position:0% this frustrating ordinance amending our elections<00:46:40.090> code<00:46:42.600> okay<00:46:44.130> all<00:46:45.130> those<00:46:45.370> in<00:46:45.430> favor 00:46:45.780 --> 00:46:45.790 align:start position:0% elections code okay all those in favor 00:46:45.790 --> 00:46:46.440 align:start position:0% elections code okay all those in favor please<00:46:45.910> say<00:46:46.300> aye 00:46:46.440 --> 00:46:46.450 align:start position:0% please say aye 00:46:46.450 --> 00:46:55.309 align:start position:0% please say aye aye<00:46:47.560> any<00:46:47.890> opposed<00:46:51.630> thank<00:46:52.630> you<00:46:53.010> Thanks 00:46:55.309 --> 00:46:55.319 align:start position:0% aye any opposed thank you Thanks 00:46:55.319 --> 00:46:57.539 align:start position:0% aye any opposed thank you Thanks next<00:46:56.319> item<00:46:56.439> is<00:46:56.709> a<00:46:56.769> first<00:46:57.009> reading<00:46:57.130> or<00:46:57.400> dance 00:46:57.539 --> 00:46:57.549 align:start position:0% next item is a first reading or dance 00:46:57.549 --> 00:47:01.729 align:start position:0% next item is a first reading or dance adapting<00:46:57.999> revised<00:46:58.599> fyo<00:46:59.199> nine<00:46:59.739> that's<00:47:00.369> the 00:47:01.729 --> 00:47:01.739 align:start position:0% adapting revised fyo nine that's the 00:47:01.739 --> 00:47:19.469 align:start position:0% adapting revised fyo nine that's the cupboard<00:47:07.739> and<00:47:08.739> I<00:47:09.189> heard<00:47:09.400> it<00:47:17.429> yes<00:47:18.429> it's<00:47:18.699> handy 00:47:19.469 --> 00:47:19.479 align:start position:0% cupboard and I heard it yes it's handy 00:47:19.479 --> 00:47:59.459 align:start position:0% cupboard and I heard it yes it's handy to<00:47:19.509> do<00:47:19.719> it<00:47:41.069> as<00:47:42.069> well<00:47:57.599> project<00:47:58.599> manager<00:47:59.049> was 00:47:59.459 --> 00:47:59.469 align:start position:0% to do it as well project manager was 00:47:59.469 --> 00:48:03.029 align:start position:0% to do it as well project manager was here<00:47:59.859> in<00:48:00.489> March<00:48:00.939> and<00:48:01.619> presented<00:48:02.619> you<00:48:02.739> with<00:48:02.769> her 00:48:03.029 --> 00:48:03.039 align:start position:0% here in March and presented you with her 00:48:03.039 --> 00:48:05.249 align:start position:0% here in March and presented you with her findings<00:48:03.579> and<00:48:03.819> recommendations<00:48:04.259> and 00:48:05.249 --> 00:48:05.259 align:start position:0% findings and recommendations and 00:48:05.259 --> 00:48:08.909 align:start position:0% findings and recommendations and basically<00:48:06.189> she<00:48:06.489> said<00:48:06.759> that<00:48:07.089> in<00:48:07.929> general<00:48:07.989> the 00:48:08.909 --> 00:48:08.919 align:start position:0% basically she said that in general the 00:48:08.919 --> 00:48:11.789 align:start position:0% basically she said that in general the low-level<00:48:09.279> jobs<00:48:09.669> were<00:48:10.059> above<00:48:10.359> market<00:48:10.839> and<00:48:11.259> the 00:48:11.789 --> 00:48:11.799 align:start position:0% low-level jobs were above market and the 00:48:11.799 --> 00:48:14.729 align:start position:0% low-level jobs were above market and the higher-level<00:48:12.130> jobs<00:48:12.699> were<00:48:13.419> below<00:48:13.929> market<00:48:14.259> and 00:48:14.729 --> 00:48:14.739 align:start position:0% higher-level jobs were below market and 00:48:14.739 --> 00:48:17.880 align:start position:0% higher-level jobs were below market and so<00:48:15.009> to<00:48:15.249> correct<00:48:15.669> those<00:48:15.819> inequities<00:48:16.890> she 00:48:17.880 --> 00:48:17.890 align:start position:0% so to correct those inequities she 00:48:17.890 --> 00:48:19.469 align:start position:0% so to correct those inequities she devised<00:48:18.219> to<00:48:18.249> pay<00:48:18.640> skills<00:48:18.999> under 00:48:19.469 --> 00:48:19.479 align:start position:0% devised to pay skills under 00:48:19.479 --> 00:48:22.289 align:start position:0% devised to pay skills under classification<00:48:20.349> and<00:48:20.529> the<00:48:21.519> pay<00:48:21.699> scale<00:48:21.999> is<00:48:22.029> what 00:48:22.289 --> 00:48:22.299 align:start position:0% classification and the pay scale is what 00:48:22.299 --> 00:48:26.009 align:start position:0% classification and the pay scale is what I'm<00:48:22.390> presenting<00:48:22.569> to<00:48:23.140> you<00:48:23.259> today<00:48:24.869> we<00:48:25.869> don't 00:48:26.009 --> 00:48:26.019 align:start position:0% I'm presenting to you today we don't 00:48:26.019 --> 00:48:28.229 align:start position:0% I'm presenting to you today we don't have<00:48:26.259> a<00:48:26.289> pay<00:48:26.589> scale<00:48:26.859> for<00:48:26.890> asking<00:48:27.579> at<00:48:27.729> this<00:48:27.939> time 00:48:28.229 --> 00:48:28.239 align:start position:0% have a pay scale for asking at this time 00:48:28.239 --> 00:48:32.039 align:start position:0% have a pay scale for asking at this time we're<00:48:28.959> still<00:48:29.169> in<00:48:29.319> discussions<00:48:29.439> with 00:48:32.039 --> 00:48:32.049 align:start position:0% 00:48:32.049 --> 00:48:41.079 align:start position:0% by<00:48:33.049> the<00:48:33.109> enemy<00:48:37.630> thank<00:48:38.630> you<00:48:38.750> and<00:48:39.230> I<00:48:40.000> point<00:48:41.000> out 00:48:41.079 --> 00:48:41.089 align:start position:0% by the enemy thank you and I point out 00:48:41.089 --> 00:48:44.260 align:start position:0% by the enemy thank you and I point out everybody<00:48:41.569> that<00:48:41.809> these<00:48:42.770> changes<00:48:43.040> don't<00:48:43.849> take 00:48:44.260 --> 00:48:44.270 align:start position:0% everybody that these changes don't take 00:48:44.270 --> 00:48:47.740 align:start position:0% everybody that these changes don't take effect<00:48:44.630> until<00:48:44.930> they<00:48:45.770> are<00:48:45.980> enacted<00:48:46.880> so<00:48:47.569> there's 00:48:47.740 --> 00:48:47.750 align:start position:0% effect until they are enacted so there's 00:48:47.750 --> 00:48:49.930 align:start position:0% effect until they are enacted so there's no<00:48:47.930> retroactive<00:48:48.890> provision<00:48:49.099> on<00:48:49.520> any<00:48:49.760> of<00:48:49.819> this 00:48:49.930 --> 00:48:49.940 align:start position:0% no retroactive provision on any of this 00:48:49.940 --> 00:48:53.319 align:start position:0% no retroactive provision on any of this it's<00:48:50.180> just<00:48:50.270> whenever<00:48:51.109> we<00:48:51.380> do<00:48:51.530> it<00:48:51.700> then<00:48:52.700> it<00:48:53.150> has 00:48:53.319 --> 00:48:53.329 align:start position:0% it's just whenever we do it then it has 00:48:53.329 --> 00:48:57.190 align:start position:0% it's just whenever we do it then it has an<00:48:53.480> effective<00:48:53.839> date<00:48:54.020> and<00:48:54.380> so<00:48:55.569> if<00:48:56.569> the<00:48:56.839> action 00:48:57.190 --> 00:48:57.200 align:start position:0% an effective date and so if the action 00:48:57.200 --> 00:48:59.650 align:start position:0% an effective date and so if the action one<00:48:57.500> comes<00:48:58.309> back<00:48:58.579> it'll<00:48:58.849> have<00:48:59.089> an<00:48:59.240> effective 00:48:59.650 --> 00:48:59.660 align:start position:0% one comes back it'll have an effective 00:48:59.660 --> 00:49:02.079 align:start position:0% one comes back it'll have an effective date<00:48:59.809> but<00:49:00.140> it<00:49:00.230> won't<00:49:00.440> you<00:49:01.160> know<00:49:01.280> the<00:49:01.700> longer<00:49:02.000> it 00:49:02.079 --> 00:49:02.089 align:start position:0% date but it won't you know the longer it 00:49:02.089 --> 00:49:06.240 align:start position:0% date but it won't you know the longer it delays<00:49:02.359> the<00:49:02.809> longer<00:49:03.140> the<00:49:04.130> change<00:49:04.880> is<00:49:05.299> delayed 00:49:06.240 --> 00:49:06.250 align:start position:0% delays the longer the change is delayed 00:49:06.250 --> 00:49:08.710 align:start position:0% delays the longer the change is delayed any<00:49:07.250> questions<00:49:07.640> or<00:49:07.760> comments<00:49:07.940> remember<00:49:08.420> right 00:49:08.710 --> 00:49:08.720 align:start position:0% any questions or comments remember right 00:49:08.720 --> 00:49:18.860 align:start position:0% any questions or comments remember right I<00:49:15.970> don't<00:49:16.970> have<00:49:17.180> it<00:49:17.329> broken<00:49:17.510> out<00:49:17.869> between 00:49:18.860 --> 00:49:18.870 align:start position:0% I don't have it broken out between 00:49:18.870 --> 00:49:40.259 align:start position:0% I don't have it broken out between [Music] 00:49:40.259 --> 00:49:40.269 align:start position:0% 00:49:40.269 --> 00:49:42.660 align:start position:0% there<00:49:41.269> it<00:49:41.390> is 00:49:42.660 --> 00:49:42.670 align:start position:0% there it is 00:49:42.670 --> 00:49:47.380 align:start position:0% there it is for<00:49:43.670> those<00:49:43.849> that<00:49:44.180> are<00:49:45.640> not<00:49:46.640> represented<00:49:46.940> by 00:49:47.380 --> 00:49:47.390 align:start position:0% for those that are not represented by 00:49:47.390 --> 00:49:49.779 align:start position:0% for those that are not represented by have<00:49:48.319> asked<00:49:48.739> me<00:49:48.890> that<00:49:48.920> are<00:49:49.160> not<00:49:49.309> in<00:49:49.430> the<00:49:49.489> police 00:49:49.779 --> 00:49:49.789 align:start position:0% have asked me that are not in the police 00:49:49.789 --> 00:49:51.160 align:start position:0% have asked me that are not in the police paid<00:49:50.029> plane<00:49:50.329> that<00:49:50.539> are<00:49:50.569> not<00:49:50.749> in<00:49:50.839> the<00:49:50.900> police 00:49:51.160 --> 00:49:51.170 align:start position:0% paid plane that are not in the police 00:49:51.170 --> 00:49:54.960 align:start position:0% paid plane that are not in the police union<00:49:51.650> its<00:49:52.190> 37<00:49:52.849> employees<00:49:52.940> and<00:49:53.779> then<00:49:54.589> there's 00:49:54.960 --> 00:49:54.970 align:start position:0% union its 37 employees and then there's 00:49:54.970 --> 00:50:34.559 align:start position:0% union its 37 employees and then there's 31<00:49:55.970> in<00:49:56.150> the<00:49:56.380> covered<00:49:57.380> by<00:49:57.499> the<00:49:57.559> police<00:49:57.920> pay<00:49:58.220> plan 00:50:34.559 --> 00:50:34.569 align:start position:0% 00:50:34.569 --> 00:50:45.470 align:start position:0% hopefully<00:50:35.569> will 00:50:45.470 --> 00:50:45.480 align:start position:0% 00:50:45.480 --> 00:50:50.810 align:start position:0% um<00:50:45.990> we<00:50:46.410> made<00:50:46.500> a<00:50:46.560> comment<00:50:46.859> that<00:50:47.070> a<00:50:49.220> scale<00:50:50.220> for 00:50:50.810 --> 00:50:50.820 align:start position:0% um we made a comment that a scale for 00:50:50.820 --> 00:50:54.740 align:start position:0% um we made a comment that a scale for the<00:50:50.940> lower<00:50:51.530> level<00:50:52.530> positions<00:50:53.040> were<00:50:53.750> above 00:50:54.740 --> 00:50:54.750 align:start position:0% the lower level positions were above 00:50:54.750 --> 00:50:59.839 align:start position:0% the lower level positions were above market<00:50:56.660> the<00:50:57.660> wage<00:50:57.839> study<00:50:58.230> showed<00:50:58.560> that<00:50:58.849> the 00:50:59.839 --> 00:50:59.849 align:start position:0% market the wage study showed that the 00:50:59.849 --> 00:51:04.089 align:start position:0% market the wage study showed that the lower<00:51:00.420> level<00:51:00.810> positions<00:51:01.290> were<00:51:02.510> above<00:51:03.510> market 00:51:04.089 --> 00:51:04.099 align:start position:0% lower level positions were above market 00:51:04.099 --> 00:51:07.849 align:start position:0% lower level positions were above market but<00:51:05.099> the<00:51:05.220> pay<00:51:05.430> brackets<00:51:05.970> for<00:51:06.210> those<00:51:06.859> so 00:51:07.849 --> 00:51:07.859 align:start position:0% but the pay brackets for those so 00:51:07.859 --> 00:51:30.740 align:start position:0% but the pay brackets for those so looking<00:51:08.250> at<00:51:08.369> this<00:51:10.940> there's<00:51:11.940> 22<00:51:12.570> grades<00:51:29.750> only 00:51:30.740 --> 00:51:30.750 align:start position:0% looking at this there's 22 grades only 00:51:30.750 --> 00:51:35.150 align:start position:0% looking at this there's 22 grades only 28<00:51:31.200> I<00:51:32.210> don't<00:51:33.210> see<00:51:33.359> anywhere<00:51:33.690> this<00:51:34.010> where<00:51:35.010> the 00:51:35.150 --> 00:51:35.160 align:start position:0% 28 I don't see anywhere this where the 00:51:35.160 --> 00:51:40.640 align:start position:0% 28 I don't see anywhere this where the market<00:51:35.640> rate<00:51:35.820> is<00:51:38.540> it's<00:51:39.540> less<00:51:39.780> than<00:51:40.020> one<00:51:40.230> hour 00:51:40.640 --> 00:51:40.650 align:start position:0% market rate is it's less than one hour 00:51:40.650 --> 00:51:42.589 align:start position:0% market rate is it's less than one hour step<00:51:40.980> 3<00:51:41.190> is<00:51:41.220> so<00:51:41.550> where<00:51:41.730> our<00:51:41.849> pay<00:51:42.180> grade<00:51:42.450> would 00:51:42.589 --> 00:51:42.599 align:start position:0% step 3 is so where our pay grade would 00:51:42.599 --> 00:51:48.950 align:start position:0% step 3 is so where our pay grade would be<00:51:42.630> above<00:51:44.210> the<00:51:45.210> market<00:51:46.460> so<00:51:47.540> this<00:51:48.540> is<00:51:48.750> some 00:51:48.950 --> 00:51:48.960 align:start position:0% be above the market so this is some 00:51:48.960 --> 00:51:50.960 align:start position:0% be above the market so this is some comparison<00:51:49.589> to<00:51:49.740> the<00:51:49.859> pre<00:51:50.069> to<00:51:50.490> the<00:51:50.609> previous 00:51:50.960 --> 00:51:50.970 align:start position:0% comparison to the pre to the previous 00:51:50.970 --> 00:52:03.559 align:start position:0% comparison to the pre to the previous pink<00:51:51.240> read<00:52:01.339> the<00:52:02.339> paper<00:52:02.670> it<00:52:02.910> gets<00:52:03.150> the<00:52:03.390> pay 00:52:03.559 --> 00:52:03.569 align:start position:0% pink read the paper it gets the pay 00:52:03.569 --> 00:52:04.880 align:start position:0% pink read the paper it gets the pay brackets<00:52:04.079> change 00:52:04.880 --> 00:52:04.890 align:start position:0% brackets change 00:52:04.890 --> 00:52:08.900 align:start position:0% brackets change no<00:52:05.520> no<00:52:06.060> employee<00:52:06.710> has<00:52:07.710> reduced<00:52:08.130> fine<00:52:08.430> you<00:52:08.790> know 00:52:08.900 --> 00:52:08.910 align:start position:0% no no employee has reduced fine you know 00:52:08.910 --> 00:52:14.890 align:start position:0% no no employee has reduced fine you know ends<00:52:09.750> up<00:52:09.869> being<00:52:10.500> reduce<00:52:10.890> reduce<00:52:11.310> okay<00:52:11.880> thanks 00:52:14.890 --> 00:52:14.900 align:start position:0% 00:52:14.900 --> 00:52:19.730 align:start position:0% for<00:52:15.900> singing<00:52:16.069> Thank<00:52:17.069> You<00:52:17.160> mayor<00:52:17.339> I<00:52:18.740> continue 00:52:19.730 --> 00:52:19.740 align:start position:0% for singing Thank You mayor I continue 00:52:19.740 --> 00:52:23.370 align:start position:0% for singing Thank You mayor I continue to<00:52:19.829> feel<00:52:20.040> that<00:52:20.660> market<00:52:21.660> rate<00:52:21.810> adjustments 00:52:23.370 --> 00:52:23.380 align:start position:0% to feel that market rate adjustments 00:52:23.380 --> 00:52:26.500 align:start position:0% to feel that market rate adjustments not<00:52:24.380> a<00:52:24.410> good<00:52:24.650> idea<00:52:24.830> during<00:52:25.310> this<00:52:25.580> difficult 00:52:26.500 --> 00:52:26.510 align:start position:0% not a good idea during this difficult 00:52:26.510 --> 00:52:34.270 align:start position:0% not a good idea during this difficult economic<00:52:26.930> time<00:52:27.500> and<00:52:30.580> I<00:52:32.440> guess<00:52:33.440> it<00:52:33.590> reinforces 00:52:34.270 --> 00:52:34.280 align:start position:0% economic time and I guess it reinforces 00:52:34.280 --> 00:52:35.800 align:start position:0% economic time and I guess it reinforces my<00:52:34.310> feeling<00:52:34.790> to<00:52:34.880> think<00:52:35.030> that<00:52:35.240> it<00:52:35.360> is<00:52:35.510> the 00:52:35.800 --> 00:52:35.810 align:start position:0% my feeling to think that it is the 00:52:35.810 --> 00:52:37.690 align:start position:0% my feeling to think that it is the people<00:52:36.440> at<00:52:36.500> the<00:52:36.590> higher<00:52:36.770> grades<00:52:37.190> that<00:52:37.490> are<00:52:37.550> the 00:52:37.690 --> 00:52:37.700 align:start position:0% people at the higher grades that are the 00:52:37.700 --> 00:52:40.960 align:start position:0% people at the higher grades that are the ones<00:52:37.880> that<00:52:38.030> are<00:52:38.860> actually<00:52:39.860> going<00:52:40.130> to<00:52:40.340> have<00:52:40.700> the 00:52:40.960 --> 00:52:40.970 align:start position:0% ones that are actually going to have the 00:52:40.970 --> 00:52:48.670 align:start position:0% ones that are actually going to have the pay<00:52:41.240> grade<00:52:41.480> increases<00:52:43.870> lower<00:52:44.870> grades<00:52:47.530> so<00:52:48.530> I<00:52:48.560> do 00:52:48.670 --> 00:52:48.680 align:start position:0% pay grade increases lower grades so I do 00:52:48.680 --> 00:52:57.680 align:start position:0% pay grade increases lower grades so I do not<00:52:48.920> support<00:52:49.340> this<00:52:53.200> any<00:52:54.200> other<00:52:54.320> comments 00:52:57.680 --> 00:52:57.690 align:start position:0% 00:52:57.690 --> 00:53:02.140 align:start position:0% I'll<00:52:58.170> just<00:52:58.440> say<00:52:58.619> that<00:52:58.859> this<00:52:59.849> is<00:53:00.059> -<00:53:00.410> this<00:53:01.410> is<00:53:01.470> a 00:53:02.140 --> 00:53:02.150 align:start position:0% I'll just say that this is - this is a 00:53:02.150 --> 00:53:05.839 align:start position:0% I'll just say that this is - this is a process<00:53:03.150> that's<00:53:03.180> built<00:53:03.779> into<00:53:04.019> our<00:53:04.849> pace 00:53:05.839 --> 00:53:05.849 align:start position:0% process that's built into our pace 00:53:05.849 --> 00:53:11.509 align:start position:0% process that's built into our pace system<00:53:06.299> and<00:53:06.779> how<00:53:07.619> long<00:53:07.799> is<00:53:07.950> it<00:53:09.319> it<00:53:10.319> was<00:53:10.470> 99<00:53:10.980> so 00:53:11.509 --> 00:53:11.519 align:start position:0% system and how long is it it was 99 so 00:53:11.519 --> 00:53:16.039 align:start position:0% system and how long is it it was 99 so that<00:53:11.700> if<00:53:12.480> there<00:53:12.720> were<00:53:12.839> potential<00:53:15.049> problems 00:53:16.039 --> 00:53:16.049 align:start position:0% that if there were potential problems 00:53:16.049 --> 00:53:17.990 align:start position:0% that if there were potential problems that<00:53:16.170> needed<00:53:16.589> to<00:53:16.619> be<00:53:16.799> fixed<00:53:17.099> as<00:53:17.460> part<00:53:17.819> of<00:53:17.849> a 00:53:17.990 --> 00:53:18.000 align:start position:0% that needed to be fixed as part of a 00:53:18.000 --> 00:53:20.599 align:start position:0% that needed to be fixed as part of a market-based<00:53:18.809> system<00:53:19.289> that<00:53:19.799> this<00:53:20.309> is<00:53:20.460> the 00:53:20.599 --> 00:53:20.609 align:start position:0% market-based system that this is the 00:53:20.609 --> 00:53:23.990 align:start position:0% market-based system that this is the chance<00:53:20.849> -<00:53:21.089> to<00:53:21.420> fix<00:53:22.019> those<00:53:22.319> and<00:53:22.589> then<00:53:23.400> going 00:53:23.990 --> 00:53:24.000 align:start position:0% chance - to fix those and then going 00:53:24.000 --> 00:53:29.509 align:start position:0% chance - to fix those and then going forward<00:53:25.430> we<00:53:26.430> have<00:53:26.640> the<00:53:27.920> hopefully<00:53:28.920> the<00:53:29.069> proper 00:53:29.509 --> 00:53:29.519 align:start position:0% forward we have the hopefully the proper 00:53:29.519 --> 00:53:32.900 align:start position:0% forward we have the hopefully the proper pay<00:53:29.789> for<00:53:30.240> the<00:53:30.329> job<00:53:30.720> being<00:53:31.019> done<00:53:31.319> so<00:53:31.710> that<00:53:31.910> we 00:53:32.900 --> 00:53:32.910 align:start position:0% pay for the job being done so that we 00:53:32.910 --> 00:53:35.569 align:start position:0% pay for the job being done so that we don't<00:53:33.029> have<00:53:33.240> problems<00:53:33.660> with<00:53:33.990> trying<00:53:34.859> to<00:53:35.009> fill 00:53:35.569 --> 00:53:35.579 align:start position:0% don't have problems with trying to fill 00:53:35.579 --> 00:53:43.069 align:start position:0% don't have problems with trying to fill a<00:53:35.609> job<00:53:35.880> and<00:53:36.589> what's<00:53:37.589> put<00:53:37.799> out<00:53:37.920> there<00:53:41.930> and<00:53:42.930> it's 00:53:43.069 --> 00:53:43.079 align:start position:0% a job and what's put out there and it's 00:53:43.079 --> 00:53:45.430 align:start position:0% a job and what's put out there and it's also<00:53:43.230> retention<00:53:43.829> and<00:53:44.339> I'd<00:53:44.460> also<00:53:44.609> like<00:53:44.849> to 00:53:45.430 --> 00:53:45.440 align:start position:0% also retention and I'd also like to 00:53:45.440 --> 00:53:48.339 align:start position:0% also retention and I'd also like to comment<00:53:46.440> that<00:53:46.740> even<00:53:46.980> though<00:53:47.130> it's<00:53:47.490> in<00:53:47.789> general 00:53:48.339 --> 00:53:48.349 align:start position:0% comment that even though it's in general 00:53:48.349 --> 00:53:51.289 align:start position:0% comment that even though it's in general there<00:53:49.349> was<00:53:49.440> an<00:53:49.829> equities<00:53:50.220> based<00:53:50.490> on<00:53:50.730> kind<00:53:51.240> of 00:53:51.289 --> 00:53:51.299 align:start position:0% there was an equities based on kind of 00:53:51.299 --> 00:53:52.460 align:start position:0% there was an equities based on kind of where<00:53:51.509> they<00:53:51.690> were<00:53:51.750> on<00:53:51.930> the<00:53:52.019> scale 00:53:52.460 --> 00:53:52.470 align:start position:0% where they were on the scale 00:53:52.470 --> 00:53:56.089 align:start position:0% where they were on the scale it<00:53:52.740> varies<00:53:53.490> tremendously<00:53:53.940> by<00:53:54.630> title<00:53:55.109> and<00:53:55.319> so 00:53:56.089 --> 00:53:56.099 align:start position:0% it varies tremendously by title and so 00:53:56.099 --> 00:53:57.529 align:start position:0% it varies tremendously by title and so that's<00:53:56.339> what's<00:53:56.549> very<00:53:56.759> helpful<00:53:57.119> about<00:53:57.180> having 00:53:57.529 --> 00:53:57.539 align:start position:0% that's what's very helpful about having 00:53:57.539 --> 00:53:59.509 align:start position:0% that's what's very helpful about having a<00:53:57.599> market<00:53:57.930> study<00:53:58.200> is<00:53:58.380> that<00:53:58.410> for<00:53:59.400> the 00:53:59.509 --> 00:53:59.519 align:start position:0% a market study is that for the 00:53:59.519 --> 00:54:01.160 align:start position:0% a market study is that for the individual<00:54:00.059> titles<00:54:00.480> they<00:54:00.630> can<00:54:00.779> see<00:54:00.960> what's 00:54:01.160 --> 00:54:01.170 align:start position:0% individual titles they can see what's 00:54:01.170 --> 00:54:07.849 align:start position:0% individual titles they can see what's the<00:54:01.319> correct<00:54:01.500> market<00:54:02.039> bracket<00:54:02.430> I<00:54:06.740> just<00:54:07.740> have 00:54:07.849 --> 00:54:07.859 align:start position:0% the correct market bracket I just have 00:54:07.859 --> 00:54:10.759 align:start position:0% the correct market bracket I just have one<00:54:08.009> follow<00:54:08.309> up<00:54:08.369> comment<00:54:09.210> to<00:54:09.450> Bruce's<00:54:09.839> to<00:54:10.319> sort 00:54:10.759 --> 00:54:10.769 align:start position:0% one follow up comment to Bruce's to sort 00:54:10.769 --> 00:54:13.609 align:start position:0% one follow up comment to Bruce's to sort of<00:54:10.829> support<00:54:11.009> Bruce's<00:54:11.700> point<00:54:12.000> in<00:54:12.210> that<00:54:12.619> you 00:54:13.609 --> 00:54:13.619 align:start position:0% of support Bruce's point in that you 00:54:13.619 --> 00:54:14.509 align:start position:0% of support Bruce's point in that you think<00:54:13.829> about<00:54:13.890> it<00:54:14.069> from<00:54:14.160> an<00:54:14.309> economic 00:54:14.509 --> 00:54:14.519 align:start position:0% think about it from an economic 00:54:14.519 --> 00:54:17.809 align:start position:0% think about it from an economic perspective<00:54:15.440> if<00:54:16.440> we<00:54:16.529> you<00:54:17.190> don't<00:54:17.369> do<00:54:17.519> this<00:54:17.670> we 00:54:17.809 --> 00:54:17.819 align:start position:0% perspective if we you don't do this we 00:54:17.819 --> 00:54:20.059 align:start position:0% perspective if we you don't do this we don't<00:54:17.940> remain<00:54:18.210> competitive<00:54:18.569> what<00:54:19.470> happens<00:54:19.829> is 00:54:20.059 --> 00:54:20.069 align:start position:0% don't remain competitive what happens is 00:54:20.069 --> 00:54:22.759 align:start position:0% don't remain competitive what happens is people<00:54:20.430> will<00:54:21.210> eventually<00:54:21.450> leave<00:54:21.960> and<00:54:22.380> the 00:54:22.759 --> 00:54:22.769 align:start position:0% people will eventually leave and the 00:54:22.769 --> 00:54:24.349 align:start position:0% people will eventually leave and the best<00:54:22.980> people<00:54:23.369> will<00:54:23.490> likely<00:54:23.700> leave<00:54:24.029> because 00:54:24.349 --> 00:54:24.359 align:start position:0% best people will likely leave because 00:54:24.359 --> 00:54:28.269 align:start position:0% best people will likely leave because they're<00:54:24.569> able<00:54:24.839> to<00:54:24.930> get<00:54:25.220> other<00:54:26.220> jobs<00:54:26.609> in<00:54:27.119> other 00:54:28.269 --> 00:54:28.279 align:start position:0% they're able to get other jobs in other 00:54:28.279 --> 00:54:31.700 align:start position:0% they're able to get other jobs in other governments<00:54:29.279> and<00:54:29.720> the<00:54:30.720> way<00:54:30.869> that<00:54:31.140> we<00:54:31.319> have 00:54:31.700 --> 00:54:31.710 align:start position:0% governments and the way that we have 00:54:31.710 --> 00:54:34.849 align:start position:0% governments and the way that we have generally<00:54:32.220> we<00:54:32.789> dealt<00:54:33.359> with<00:54:33.680> reducing<00:54:34.680> budgets 00:54:34.849 --> 00:54:34.859 align:start position:0% generally we dealt with reducing budgets 00:54:34.859 --> 00:54:37.039 align:start position:0% generally we dealt with reducing budgets in<00:54:35.130> any<00:54:35.279> way<00:54:35.430> is<00:54:35.759> not<00:54:36.029> to<00:54:36.089> refill<00:54:36.569> physicians 00:54:37.039 --> 00:54:37.049 align:start position:0% in any way is not to refill physicians 00:54:37.049 --> 00:54:39.740 align:start position:0% in any way is not to refill physicians you<00:54:37.380> don't<00:54:37.700> cut<00:54:38.700> position<00:54:38.910> so<00:54:39.390> it's<00:54:39.539> going<00:54:39.690> to 00:54:39.740 --> 00:54:39.750 align:start position:0% you don't cut position so it's going to 00:54:39.750 --> 00:54:40.910 align:start position:0% you don't cut position so it's going to happen<00:54:39.930> is<00:54:40.200> you're<00:54:40.319> going<00:54:40.440> to<00:54:40.500> lose<00:54:40.619> your<00:54:40.740> best 00:54:40.910 --> 00:54:40.920 align:start position:0% happen is you're going to lose your best 00:54:40.920 --> 00:54:43.460 align:start position:0% happen is you're going to lose your best people<00:54:41.160> and<00:54:41.549> then<00:54:42.359> not<00:54:42.869> fill<00:54:43.140> those<00:54:43.289> positions 00:54:43.460 --> 00:54:43.470 align:start position:0% people and then not fill those positions 00:54:43.470 --> 00:54:45.769 align:start position:0% people and then not fill those positions and<00:54:44.160> have<00:54:44.609> the<00:54:44.730> people<00:54:45.029> who<00:54:45.059> are<00:54:45.240> not<00:54:45.390> as<00:54:45.599> good 00:54:45.769 --> 00:54:45.779 align:start position:0% and have the people who are not as good 00:54:45.779 --> 00:54:47.809 align:start position:0% and have the people who are not as good I<00:54:45.839> don't<00:54:46.049> call<00:54:46.200> them<00:54:46.349> not<00:54:46.829> good<00:54:47.099> but<00:54:47.309> not<00:54:47.549> as 00:54:47.809 --> 00:54:47.819 align:start position:0% I don't call them not good but not as 00:54:47.819 --> 00:54:50.690 align:start position:0% I don't call them not good but not as good<00:54:47.970> as<00:54:48.210> the<00:54:48.329> best<00:54:48.539> people<00:54:48.920> so<00:54:49.920> I<00:54:49.980> would<00:54:50.250> have 00:54:50.690 --> 00:54:50.700 align:start position:0% good as the best people so I would have 00:54:50.700 --> 00:54:54.160 align:start position:0% good as the best people so I would have in<00:54:50.819> a<00:54:50.910> favor<00:54:51.150> of<00:54:51.890> passing<00:54:52.890> this<00:54:53.069> and<00:54:53.400> if<00:54:53.549> we 00:54:54.160 --> 00:54:54.170 align:start position:0% in a favor of passing this and if we 00:54:54.170 --> 00:54:56.720 align:start position:0% in a favor of passing this and if we need<00:54:55.170> to<00:54:55.289> deal<00:54:55.500> with<00:54:55.740> the<00:54:56.069> budget<00:54:56.250> side<00:54:56.579> of 00:54:56.720 --> 00:54:56.730 align:start position:0% need to deal with the budget side of 00:54:56.730 --> 00:55:00.799 align:start position:0% need to deal with the budget side of things<00:54:56.940> we<00:54:57.180> should<00:54:58.369> cut<00:54:59.369> positions<00:54:59.849> partially 00:55:00.799 --> 00:55:00.809 align:start position:0% things we should cut positions partially 00:55:00.809 --> 00:55:03.860 align:start position:0% things we should cut positions partially based<00:55:00.990> on<00:55:01.170> performance 00:55:03.860 --> 00:55:03.870 align:start position:0% 00:55:03.870 --> 00:55:07.740 align:start position:0% and<00:55:04.870> I<00:55:04.990> and<00:55:05.290> I<00:55:05.380> would<00:55:05.440> add<00:55:05.680> that<00:55:06.750> attracting 00:55:07.740 --> 00:55:07.750 align:start position:0% and I and I would add that attracting 00:55:07.750 --> 00:55:10.830 align:start position:0% and I and I would add that attracting and<00:55:07.900> retaining<00:55:09.120> hopefully<00:55:10.120> the<00:55:10.360> best<00:55:10.570> and<00:55:10.780> the 00:55:10.830 --> 00:55:10.840 align:start position:0% and retaining hopefully the best and the 00:55:10.840 --> 00:55:14.640 align:start position:0% and retaining hopefully the best and the brightest<00:55:11.230> will<00:55:12.480> pay<00:55:13.480> us<00:55:13.600> much<00:55:14.470> better 00:55:14.640 --> 00:55:14.650 align:start position:0% brightest will pay us much better 00:55:14.650 --> 00:55:18.300 align:start position:0% brightest will pay us much better dividends<00:55:15.130> in<00:55:15.340> the<00:55:15.370> long<00:55:15.460> run<00:55:17.130> this<00:55:18.130> any 00:55:18.300 --> 00:55:18.310 align:start position:0% dividends in the long run this any 00:55:18.310 --> 00:55:21.780 align:start position:0% dividends in the long run this any public<00:55:18.640> comment<00:55:19.030> on<00:55:19.210> this<00:55:20.400> first<00:55:21.400> reading<00:55:21.610> of 00:55:21.780 --> 00:55:21.790 align:start position:0% public comment on this first reading of 00:55:21.790 --> 00:55:26.340 align:start position:0% public comment on this first reading of the<00:55:21.880> ordinance<00:55:22.290> revising<00:55:23.290> pay<00:55:23.500> scale<00:55:25.350> okay 00:55:26.340 --> 00:55:26.350 align:start position:0% the ordinance revising pay scale okay 00:55:26.350 --> 00:55:28.620 align:start position:0% the ordinance revising pay scale okay since<00:55:27.160> it's<00:55:27.340> a<00:55:27.430> first<00:55:27.730> reading<00:55:28.000> although<00:55:28.450> the 00:55:28.620 --> 00:55:28.630 align:start position:0% since it's a first reading although the 00:55:28.630 --> 00:55:31.520 align:start position:0% since it's a first reading although the people<00:55:28.840> in<00:55:29.290> favor<00:55:29.470> please<00:55:29.710> say<00:55:29.980> aye 00:55:31.520 --> 00:55:31.530 align:start position:0% people in favor please say aye 00:55:31.530 --> 00:55:39.300 align:start position:0% people in favor please say aye all<00:55:32.530> those<00:55:32.680> opposed<00:55:32.980> no<00:55:36.720> so<00:55:37.720> we<00:55:38.440> will<00:55:38.620> have 00:55:39.300 --> 00:55:39.310 align:start position:0% all those opposed no so we will have 00:55:39.310 --> 00:55:40.650 align:start position:0% all those opposed no so we will have that<00:55:39.490> come<00:55:39.640> back<00:55:39.790> at<00:55:39.970> second<00:55:40.300> reading<00:55:40.390> I'm 00:55:40.650 --> 00:55:40.660 align:start position:0% that come back at second reading I'm 00:55:40.660 --> 00:55:42.870 align:start position:0% that come back at second reading I'm assuming<00:55:41.110> councilmembers<00:55:41.800> snipper<00:55:42.310> was<00:55:42.550> an<00:55:42.700> i 00:55:42.870 --> 00:55:42.880 align:start position:0% assuming councilmembers snipper was an i 00:55:42.880 --> 00:55:53.880 align:start position:0% assuming councilmembers snipper was an i but<00:55:43.510> i<00:55:47.940> and<00:55:48.940> the<00:55:49.300> next<00:55:49.720> item<00:55:52.260> did<00:55:53.260> you<00:55:53.380> do<00:55:53.560> five 00:55:53.880 --> 00:55:53.890 align:start position:0% but i and the next item did you do five 00:55:53.890 --> 00:55:57.180 align:start position:0% but i and the next item did you do five and<00:55:53.920> six<00:55:54.310> together<00:55:54.490> no<00:55:55.620> we<00:55:56.620> only<00:55:56.740> did<00:55:56.950> five 00:55:57.180 --> 00:55:57.190 align:start position:0% and six together no we only did five 00:55:57.190 --> 00:56:06.150 align:start position:0% and six together no we only did five okay<00:55:58.350> I<00:56:03.480> can't<00:56:04.480> remember<00:56:04.630> like<00:56:05.170> my<00:56:05.710> caps<00:56:06.040> my 00:56:06.150 --> 00:56:06.160 align:start position:0% okay I can't remember like my caps my 00:56:06.160 --> 00:56:07.950 align:start position:0% okay I can't remember like my caps my look<00:56:06.310> clay<00:56:06.550> this<00:56:07.240> is<00:56:07.300> the<00:56:07.540> first<00:56:07.780> reading 00:56:07.950 --> 00:56:07.960 align:start position:0% look clay this is the first reading 00:56:07.960 --> 00:56:10.560 align:start position:0% look clay this is the first reading woman's<00:56:08.380> adopting<00:56:09.310> a<00:56:09.400> revised<00:56:09.700> at<00:56:09.970> 109<00:56:10.390> pay 00:56:10.560 --> 00:56:10.570 align:start position:0% woman's adopting a revised at 109 pay 00:56:10.570 --> 00:56:12.390 align:start position:0% woman's adopting a revised at 109 pay scale<00:56:10.840> for<00:56:10.870> police<00:56:11.260> officers<00:56:11.800> we've<00:56:12.160> heard 00:56:12.390 --> 00:56:12.400 align:start position:0% scale for police officers we've heard 00:56:12.400 --> 00:56:15.540 align:start position:0% scale for police officers we've heard the<00:56:12.580> same<00:56:12.970> discussions<00:56:14.160> does<00:56:15.160> anybody<00:56:15.370> else 00:56:15.540 --> 00:56:15.550 align:start position:0% the same discussions does anybody else 00:56:15.550 --> 00:56:18.450 align:start position:0% the same discussions does anybody else have<00:56:15.700> any<00:56:15.880> comments<00:56:16.120> on<00:56:16.360> these<00:56:17.010> does<00:56:18.010> anybody 00:56:18.450 --> 00:56:18.460 align:start position:0% have any comments on these does anybody 00:56:18.460 --> 00:56:20.700 align:start position:0% have any comments on these does anybody in<00:56:18.670> public<00:56:19.210> have<00:56:19.360> any<00:56:19.540> comment<00:56:19.900> on<00:56:20.020> this<00:56:20.230> one 00:56:20.700 --> 00:56:20.710 align:start position:0% in public have any comment on this one 00:56:20.710 --> 00:56:24.890 align:start position:0% in public have any comment on this one all<00:56:21.550> those<00:56:21.820> in<00:56:21.970> favor<00:56:22.630> please<00:56:22.750> say<00:56:23.110> aye<00:56:23.140> aye 00:56:24.890 --> 00:56:24.900 align:start position:0% all those in favor please say aye aye 00:56:24.900 --> 00:56:31.260 align:start position:0% all those in favor please say aye aye now<00:56:26.160> the<00:56:27.160> same<00:56:27.490> result<00:56:27.820> as<00:56:27.940> a<00:56:28.000> previous<00:56:28.270> one 00:56:31.260 --> 00:56:31.270 align:start position:0% 00:56:31.270 --> 00:56:37.319 align:start position:0% next<00:56:31.839> item<00:56:31.960> on<00:56:32.170> our<00:56:32.290> agenda<00:56:32.349> is<00:56:32.950> the<00:56:36.030> is<00:56:37.030> the 00:56:37.319 --> 00:56:37.329 align:start position:0% next item on our agenda is the is the 00:56:37.329 --> 00:56:41.430 align:start position:0% next item on our agenda is the is the consent<00:56:38.079> agenda<00:56:38.170> we<00:56:38.740> have<00:56:39.960> two<00:56:40.960> items<00:56:41.079> on<00:56:41.380> the 00:56:41.430 --> 00:56:41.440 align:start position:0% consent agenda we have two items on the 00:56:41.440 --> 00:56:42.839 align:start position:0% consent agenda we have two items on the consent<00:56:41.560> agenda<00:56:41.920> that's<00:56:42.400> a<00:56:42.520> resolution 00:56:42.839 --> 00:56:42.849 align:start position:0% consent agenda that's a resolution 00:56:42.849 --> 00:56:44.609 align:start position:0% consent agenda that's a resolution recognizing<00:56:43.060> national<00:56:43.869> public<00:56:44.140> work<00:56:44.320> week 00:56:44.609 --> 00:56:44.619 align:start position:0% recognizing national public work week 00:56:44.619 --> 00:56:47.339 align:start position:0% recognizing national public work week May<00:56:44.829> 17th<00:56:45.490> to<00:56:45.640> 23rd<00:56:46.119> and<00:56:46.390> single<00:56:47.170> reading 00:56:47.339 --> 00:56:47.349 align:start position:0% May 17th to 23rd and single reading 00:56:47.349 --> 00:56:48.839 align:start position:0% May 17th to 23rd and single reading ordinance<00:56:47.710> authorizing<00:56:48.250> extension<00:56:48.760> for 00:56:48.839 --> 00:56:48.849 align:start position:0% ordinance authorizing extension for 00:56:48.849 --> 00:56:50.990 align:start position:0% ordinance authorizing extension for contract<00:56:49.240> for<00:56:49.390> services<00:56:49.780> for<00:56:49.930> bresenham's 00:56:50.990 --> 00:56:51.000 align:start position:0% contract for services for bresenham's 00:56:51.000 --> 00:56:52.800 align:start position:0% contract for services for bresenham's everybody<00:56:52.000> like<00:56:52.119> to<00:56:52.150> move<00:56:52.359> the<00:56:52.480> consent 00:56:52.800 --> 00:56:52.810 align:start position:0% everybody like to move the consent 00:56:52.810 --> 00:56:54.020 align:start position:0% everybody like to move the consent agenda 00:56:54.020 --> 00:56:54.030 align:start position:0% agenda 00:56:54.030 --> 00:56:57.359 align:start position:0% agenda comes<00:56:55.030> from<00:56:55.210> somebody<00:56:55.780> moved<00:56:56.589> it<00:56:56.710> customary 00:56:57.359 --> 00:56:57.369 align:start position:0% comes from somebody moved it customary 00:56:57.369 --> 00:57:00.349 align:start position:0% comes from somebody moved it customary second<00:56:57.820> all<00:56:58.089> those<00:56:58.270> in<00:56:58.329> favor<00:56:58.660> please<00:56:58.750> say<00:56:59.109> aye 00:57:00.349 --> 00:57:00.359 align:start position:0% second all those in favor please say aye 00:57:00.359 --> 00:57:23.460 align:start position:0% second all those in favor please say aye I<00:57:06.420> guess<00:57:07.420> we'll<00:57:07.599> let<00:57:07.780> you<00:57:22.109> see<00:57:23.109> it's<00:57:23.230> hard<00:57:23.410> to 00:57:23.460 --> 00:57:23.470 align:start position:0% I guess we'll let you see it's hard to 00:57:23.470 --> 00:57:28.550 align:start position:0% I guess we'll let you see it's hard to do<00:57:23.589> a<00:57:23.619> roll<00:57:23.859> call<00:57:23.890> when<00:57:24.339> you're<00:57:24.490> on<00:57:24.579> a<00:57:24.609> roll<00:57:24.849> and 00:57:28.550 --> 00:57:28.560 align:start position:0% 00:57:28.560 --> 00:57:31.170 align:start position:0% we're<00:57:29.560> a<00:57:29.589> little<00:57:29.980> ahead<00:57:30.130> of<00:57:30.369> schedule<00:57:30.490> but<00:57:31.119> I 00:57:31.170 --> 00:57:31.180 align:start position:0% we're a little ahead of schedule but I 00:57:31.180 --> 00:57:32.849 align:start position:0% we're a little ahead of schedule but I think<00:57:31.540> we<00:57:31.720> will<00:57:31.900> take<00:57:32.200> our<00:57:32.349> break<00:57:32.530> and<00:57:32.740> we'll 00:57:32.849 --> 00:57:32.859 align:start position:0% think we will take our break and we'll 00:57:32.859 --> 00:57:34.170 align:start position:0% think we will take our break and we'll come<00:57:32.890> back<00:57:33.040> for<00:57:33.400> our<00:57:33.490> last<00:57:33.640> two<00:57:33.790> items<00:57:34.089> which 00:57:34.170 --> 00:57:34.180 align:start position:0% come back for our last two items which 00:57:34.180 --> 00:57:38.170 align:start position:0% come back for our last two items which are<00:57:34.329> work<00:57:34.510> section 00:57:38.170 --> 00:57:38.180 align:start position:0% 00:57:38.180 --> 00:57:51.610 align:start position:0% you 00:57:51.610 --> 00:57:51.620 align:start position:0% 00:57:51.620 --> 00:57:59.220 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:57:59.220 --> 00:57:59.230 align:start position:0% 00:57:59.230 --> 00:58:01.779 align:start position:0% we're<00:58:00.230> just<00:58:00.410> dumpsters<00:58:00.950> and<00:58:01.130> storage<00:58:01.460> units 00:58:01.779 --> 00:58:01.789 align:start position:0% we're just dumpsters and storage units 00:58:01.789 --> 00:58:05.890 align:start position:0% we're just dumpsters and storage units in<00:58:01.940> the<00:58:02.029> right-of-way<00:58:02.390> and<00:58:04.779> customer<00:58:05.779> BER 00:58:05.890 --> 00:58:05.900 align:start position:0% in the right-of-way and customer BER 00:58:05.900 --> 00:58:09.640 align:start position:0% in the right-of-way and customer BER clave<00:58:06.380> wanted<00:58:06.829> to<00:58:08.079> bring<00:58:09.079> this<00:58:09.200> up<00:58:09.410> and 00:58:09.640 --> 00:58:09.650 align:start position:0% clave wanted to bring this up and 00:58:09.650 --> 00:58:14.620 align:start position:0% clave wanted to bring this up and discuss<00:58:10.190> it<00:58:10.369> and<00:58:10.579> the<00:58:11.859> directors<00:58:12.859> here<00:58:13.309> and<00:58:13.630> if 00:58:14.620 --> 00:58:14.630 align:start position:0% discuss it and the directors here and if 00:58:14.630 --> 00:58:18.819 align:start position:0% discuss it and the directors here and if you<00:58:14.749> want<00:58:14.989> to<00:58:15.789> tell<00:58:16.789> us<00:58:16.819> that<00:58:17.650> all<00:58:18.650> the 00:58:18.819 --> 00:58:18.829 align:start position:0% you want to tell us that all the 00:58:18.829 --> 00:58:20.200 align:start position:0% you want to tell us that all the important<00:58:19.190> things<00:58:19.369> we<00:58:19.519> need<00:58:19.700> to<00:58:19.730> know<00:58:19.999> and 00:58:20.200 --> 00:58:20.210 align:start position:0% important things we need to know and 00:58:20.210 --> 00:58:22.120 align:start position:0% important things we need to know and then<00:58:20.390> we'll<00:58:20.509> pepper<00:58:21.079> you<00:58:21.319> with<00:58:21.410> questions<00:58:21.859> and 00:58:22.120 --> 00:58:22.130 align:start position:0% then we'll pepper you with questions and 00:58:22.130 --> 00:58:23.470 align:start position:0% then we'll pepper you with questions and we'll<00:58:22.249> make<00:58:22.430> you<00:58:22.460> change<00:58:22.789> everything<00:58:23.119> and 00:58:23.470 --> 00:58:23.480 align:start position:0% we'll make you change everything and 00:58:23.480 --> 00:58:26.499 align:start position:0% we'll make you change everything and we'll<00:58:23.660> go<00:58:24.559> from<00:58:24.710> there<00:58:24.799> well<00:58:25.549> we<00:58:25.670> thought<00:58:25.849> as<00:58:26.089> a 00:58:26.499 --> 00:58:26.509 align:start position:0% we'll go from there well we thought as a 00:58:26.509 --> 00:58:28.390 align:start position:0% we'll go from there well we thought as a novel<00:58:26.960> exerciser<00:58:27.499> at<00:58:27.739> least<00:58:27.890> I<00:58:28.009> thought<00:58:28.220> as<00:58:28.369> a 00:58:28.390 --> 00:58:28.400 align:start position:0% novel exerciser at least I thought as a 00:58:28.400 --> 00:58:30.400 align:start position:0% novel exerciser at least I thought as a novel<00:58:28.730> exercise<00:58:29.150> this<00:58:29.329> time<00:58:29.390> around<00:58:29.749> as<00:58:29.989> we'd 00:58:30.400 --> 00:58:30.410 align:start position:0% novel exercise this time around as we'd 00:58:30.410 --> 00:58:32.019 align:start position:0% novel exercise this time around as we'd really<00:58:30.680> have<00:58:30.799> the<00:58:30.950> discussion<00:58:31.489> so<00:58:31.759> I<00:58:31.789> could 00:58:32.019 --> 00:58:32.029 align:start position:0% really have the discussion so I could 00:58:32.029 --> 00:58:33.430 align:start position:0% really have the discussion so I could get<00:58:32.119> a<00:58:32.180> better<00:58:32.359> sense<00:58:32.630> of<00:58:32.809> what<00:58:32.989> you'd<00:58:33.140> like<00:58:33.289> to 00:58:33.430 --> 00:58:33.440 align:start position:0% get a better sense of what you'd like to 00:58:33.440 --> 00:58:35.410 align:start position:0% get a better sense of what you'd like to see<00:58:33.619> in<00:58:33.710> the<00:58:33.829> ordinance<00:58:34.160> if<00:58:34.339> anything<00:58:34.789> rather 00:58:35.410 --> 00:58:35.420 align:start position:0% see in the ordinance if anything rather 00:58:35.420 --> 00:58:36.940 align:start position:0% see in the ordinance if anything rather than<00:58:35.690> though<00:58:35.989> sometimes<00:58:36.410> it's<00:58:36.589> easier<00:58:36.920> to 00:58:36.940 --> 00:58:36.950 align:start position:0% than though sometimes it's easier to 00:58:36.950 --> 00:58:39.759 align:start position:0% than though sometimes it's easier to comment<00:58:37.519> on<00:58:37.700> an<00:58:37.819> existing<00:58:38.269> document<00:58:38.450> so<00:58:39.349> we're 00:58:39.759 --> 00:58:39.769 align:start position:0% comment on an existing document so we're 00:58:39.769 --> 00:58:41.140 align:start position:0% comment on an existing document so we're taking<00:58:39.890> this<00:58:40.160> new<00:58:40.309> approach<00:58:40.519> on<00:58:40.880> this 00:58:41.140 --> 00:58:41.150 align:start position:0% taking this new approach on this 00:58:41.150 --> 00:58:44.950 align:start position:0% taking this new approach on this particular<00:58:41.839> issue<00:58:43.059> the<00:58:44.059> city<00:58:44.269> does<00:58:44.509> permit 00:58:44.950 --> 00:58:44.960 align:start position:0% particular issue the city does permit 00:58:44.960 --> 00:58:47.349 align:start position:0% particular issue the city does permit they<00:58:45.380> use<00:58:45.559> their<00:58:45.799> right<00:58:45.980> away<00:58:46.220> for<00:58:46.640> storage 00:58:47.349 --> 00:58:47.359 align:start position:0% they use their right away for storage 00:58:47.359 --> 00:58:50.380 align:start position:0% they use their right away for storage dumpsters<00:58:48.079> or<00:58:48.410> what<00:58:48.589> we<00:58:48.710> call<00:58:49.309> storage<00:58:50.029> pods 00:58:50.380 --> 00:58:50.390 align:start position:0% dumpsters or what we call storage pods 00:58:50.390 --> 00:58:53.170 align:start position:0% dumpsters or what we call storage pods or<00:58:50.720> construction<00:58:51.259> dumpsters<00:58:51.940> the<00:58:52.940> current 00:58:53.170 --> 00:58:53.180 align:start position:0% or construction dumpsters the current 00:58:53.180 --> 00:58:54.970 align:start position:0% or construction dumpsters the current process<00:58:53.569> is<00:58:53.779> that<00:58:54.049> someone<00:58:54.349> applies<00:58:54.650> for<00:58:54.950> a 00:58:54.970 --> 00:58:54.980 align:start position:0% process is that someone applies for a 00:58:54.980 --> 00:58:56.769 align:start position:0% process is that someone applies for a permit<00:58:55.249> we<00:58:55.519> go<00:58:55.700> out<00:58:55.849> take<00:58:56.119> a<00:58:56.150> look<00:58:56.329> at<00:58:56.480> the<00:58:56.539> site 00:58:56.769 --> 00:58:56.779 align:start position:0% permit we go out take a look at the site 00:58:56.779 --> 00:58:59.229 align:start position:0% permit we go out take a look at the site if<00:58:57.619> it<00:58:57.739> meets<00:58:57.920> our<00:58:58.069> requirements<00:58:58.130> which<00:58:58.910> means 00:58:59.229 --> 00:58:59.239 align:start position:0% if it meets our requirements which means 00:58:59.239 --> 00:59:01.150 align:start position:0% if it meets our requirements which means if<00:58:59.450> it's<00:58:59.630> not<00:58:59.809> too<00:59:00.319> close<00:59:00.529> to<00:59:00.559> an<00:59:00.769> intersection 00:59:01.150 --> 00:59:01.160 align:start position:0% if it's not too close to an intersection 00:59:01.160 --> 00:59:03.309 align:start position:0% if it's not too close to an intersection if<00:59:01.730> it's<00:59:01.910> not<00:59:02.089> on<00:59:02.239> a<00:59:02.269> no-parking<00:59:02.809> side<00:59:03.140> of<00:59:03.230> the 00:59:03.309 --> 00:59:03.319 align:start position:0% if it's not on a no-parking side of the 00:59:03.319 --> 00:59:06.670 align:start position:0% if it's not on a no-parking side of the street<00:59:03.650> we<00:59:04.609> allow<00:59:05.059> the<00:59:05.140> resident<00:59:06.140> to<00:59:06.410> get<00:59:06.650> a 00:59:06.670 --> 00:59:06.680 align:start position:0% street we allow the resident to get a 00:59:06.680 --> 00:59:08.410 align:start position:0% street we allow the resident to get a permit<00:59:07.130> to<00:59:07.160> store<00:59:07.519> the<00:59:07.670> dumpster<00:59:08.150> for<00:59:08.180> a 00:59:08.410 --> 00:59:08.420 align:start position:0% permit to store the dumpster for a 00:59:08.420 --> 00:59:11.049 align:start position:0% permit to store the dumpster for a period<00:59:08.749> of<00:59:08.869> up<00:59:09.049> to<00:59:09.079> six<00:59:09.470> months<00:59:09.849> there's<00:59:10.849> been 00:59:11.049 --> 00:59:11.059 align:start position:0% period of up to six months there's been 00:59:11.059 --> 00:59:13.150 align:start position:0% period of up to six months there's been a<00:59:11.089> number<00:59:11.329> of<00:59:11.450> issues<00:59:11.660> that<00:59:12.440> have<00:59:13.039> occurred 00:59:13.150 --> 00:59:13.160 align:start position:0% a number of issues that have occurred 00:59:13.160 --> 00:59:15.940 align:start position:0% a number of issues that have occurred over<00:59:13.609> the<00:59:13.730> past<00:59:13.779> year<00:59:14.779> or<00:59:14.809> so<00:59:14.930> one<00:59:15.739> of<00:59:15.769> the 00:59:15.940 --> 00:59:15.950 align:start position:0% over the past year or so one of the 00:59:15.950 --> 00:59:17.200 align:start position:0% over the past year or so one of the things<00:59:16.160> is<00:59:16.369> that<00:59:16.579> we're<00:59:16.730> getting<00:59:16.849> more<00:59:16.999> and 00:59:17.200 --> 00:59:17.210 align:start position:0% things is that we're getting more and 00:59:17.210 --> 00:59:19.450 align:start position:0% things is that we're getting more and more<00:59:17.390> requests<00:59:17.989> for<00:59:18.200> storage<00:59:18.680> dumpsters<00:59:19.220> and 00:59:19.450 --> 00:59:19.460 align:start position:0% more requests for storage dumpsters and 00:59:19.460 --> 00:59:21.009 align:start position:0% more requests for storage dumpsters and we're<00:59:20.210> also<00:59:20.299> getting<00:59:20.539> more<00:59:20.869> and<00:59:20.960> more 00:59:21.009 --> 00:59:21.019 align:start position:0% we're also getting more and more 00:59:21.019 --> 00:59:23.499 align:start position:0% we're also getting more and more complaints<00:59:21.680> from<00:59:21.829> residents<00:59:22.059> driving<00:59:23.059> by<00:59:23.239> or 00:59:23.499 --> 00:59:23.509 align:start position:0% complaints from residents driving by or 00:59:23.509 --> 00:59:25.239 align:start position:0% complaints from residents driving by or seeing<00:59:23.779> a<00:59:23.869> dumpster<00:59:24.319> and<00:59:24.440> getting<00:59:24.680> irritated 00:59:25.239 --> 00:59:25.249 align:start position:0% seeing a dumpster and getting irritated 00:59:25.249 --> 00:59:27.960 align:start position:0% seeing a dumpster and getting irritated that<00:59:25.279> it's<00:59:25.519> been<00:59:25.730> there<00:59:25.849> for<00:59:26.059> a<00:59:26.089> long<00:59:26.299> time 00:59:27.960 --> 00:59:27.970 align:start position:0% that it's been there for a long time 00:59:27.970 --> 00:59:30.099 align:start position:0% that it's been there for a long time internally<00:59:28.970> we've<00:59:29.299> also<00:59:29.509> been<00:59:29.839> quite 00:59:30.099 --> 00:59:30.109 align:start position:0% internally we've also been quite 00:59:30.109 --> 00:59:32.470 align:start position:0% internally we've also been quite concerned<00:59:30.559> with<00:59:30.829> some<00:59:31.039> of<00:59:31.220> the<00:59:31.400> damage<00:59:32.210> that's 00:59:32.470 --> 00:59:32.480 align:start position:0% concerned with some of the damage that's 00:59:32.480 --> 00:59:34.539 align:start position:0% concerned with some of the damage that's been<00:59:32.630> done<00:59:32.809> to<00:59:33.289> the<00:59:33.410> city<00:59:33.650> right-of-way<00:59:34.369> as<00:59:34.519> a 00:59:34.539 --> 00:59:34.549 align:start position:0% been done to the city right-of-way as a 00:59:34.549 --> 00:59:36.460 align:start position:0% been done to the city right-of-way as a result<00:59:34.970> of<00:59:35.119> construction<00:59:35.720> dumpsters<00:59:36.170> either 00:59:36.460 --> 00:59:36.470 align:start position:0% result of construction dumpsters either 00:59:36.470 --> 00:59:38.979 align:start position:0% result of construction dumpsters either chips<00:59:36.920> or<00:59:37.190> gouges<00:59:37.609> in<00:59:37.640> the<00:59:37.910> curb<00:59:38.180> gouges<00:59:38.960> in 00:59:38.979 --> 00:59:38.989 align:start position:0% chips or gouges in the curb gouges in 00:59:38.989 --> 00:59:41.380 align:start position:0% chips or gouges in the curb gouges in the<00:59:39.200> road<00:59:39.380> surface<00:59:39.650> and<00:59:40.190> once<00:59:40.849> the<00:59:41.029> dumpster 00:59:41.380 --> 00:59:41.390 align:start position:0% the road surface and once the dumpster 00:59:41.390 --> 00:59:43.960 align:start position:0% the road surface and once the dumpster company<00:59:41.749> leaves<00:59:41.989> they<00:59:42.589> leave<00:59:42.829> behind<00:59:43.009> the 00:59:43.960 --> 00:59:43.970 align:start position:0% company leaves they leave behind the 00:59:43.970 --> 00:59:46.229 align:start position:0% company leaves they leave behind the damage<00:59:44.450> and<00:59:44.630> the<00:59:44.749> city<00:59:44.960> is<00:59:45.109> then<00:59:45.380> left<00:59:45.680> with 00:59:46.229 --> 00:59:46.239 align:start position:0% damage and the city is then left with 00:59:46.239 --> 00:59:48.460 align:start position:0% damage and the city is then left with doing<00:59:47.239> that<00:59:47.359> repair<00:59:47.809> when<00:59:47.989> it<00:59:48.109> does<00:59:48.259> its 00:59:48.460 --> 00:59:48.470 align:start position:0% doing that repair when it does its 00:59:48.470 --> 00:59:50.710 align:start position:0% doing that repair when it does its street<00:59:49.369> or<00:59:49.489> curb<00:59:49.789> or<00:59:49.999> gutter<00:59:50.239> work<00:59:50.480> in<00:59:50.660> the 00:59:50.710 --> 00:59:50.720 align:start position:0% street or curb or gutter work in the 00:59:50.720 --> 00:59:53.289 align:start position:0% street or curb or gutter work in the future<00:59:50.900> so<00:59:51.799> I<00:59:52.279> know<00:59:52.400> that<00:59:52.640> councilman<00:59:52.999> clothes 00:59:53.289 --> 00:59:53.299 align:start position:0% future so I know that councilman clothes 00:59:53.299 --> 00:59:55.450 align:start position:0% future so I know that councilman clothes have<00:59:53.630> an<00:59:53.779> interest<00:59:54.259> in<00:59:54.440> this<00:59:54.559> issue<00:59:54.799> and<00:59:55.249> so 00:59:55.450 --> 00:59:55.460 align:start position:0% have an interest in this issue and so 00:59:55.460 --> 00:59:58.660 align:start position:0% have an interest in this issue and so we've<00:59:55.640> just<00:59:55.910> sort<00:59:56.119> of<00:59:56.559> pros<00:59:57.559> put<00:59:58.190> before<00:59:58.309> you<00:59:58.640> a 00:59:58.660 --> 00:59:58.670 align:start position:0% we've just sort of pros put before you a 00:59:58.670 --> 00:59:59.690 align:start position:0% we've just sort of pros put before you a list<00:59:58.910> of<00:59:59.029> potential 00:59:59.690 --> 00:59:59.700 align:start position:0% list of potential 00:59:59.700 --> 01:00:00.859 align:start position:0% list of potential changes<01:00:00.030> that<01:00:00.180> we<01:00:00.270> could<01:00:00.420> make<01:00:00.599> to<01:00:00.630> the 01:00:00.859 --> 01:00:00.869 align:start position:0% changes that we could make to the 01:00:00.869 --> 01:00:06.069 align:start position:0% changes that we could make to the ordinance<01:00:02.420> most<01:00:03.420> of<01:00:03.599> these<01:00:03.750> things<01:00:04.079> have<01:00:04.440> a<01:00:04.470> I 01:00:06.069 --> 01:00:06.079 align:start position:0% ordinance most of these things have a I 01:00:06.079 --> 01:00:08.450 align:start position:0% ordinance most of these things have a I have<01:00:07.079> we<01:00:07.349> have<01:00:07.440> some<01:00:07.619> experience<01:00:08.099> with<01:00:08.250> and 01:00:08.450 --> 01:00:08.460 align:start position:0% have we have some experience with and 01:00:08.460 --> 01:00:10.700 align:start position:0% have we have some experience with and other<01:00:08.670> ordinances<01:00:09.180> so<01:00:10.020> you<01:00:10.140> see<01:00:10.320> some<01:00:10.560> of<01:00:10.589> the 01:00:10.700 --> 01:00:10.710 align:start position:0% other ordinances so you see some of the 01:00:10.710 --> 01:00:12.650 align:start position:0% other ordinances so you see some of the suggestions<01:00:11.160> like<01:00:11.640> for<01:00:11.849> instance<01:00:11.940> a<01:00:12.300> public 01:00:12.650 --> 01:00:12.660 align:start position:0% suggestions like for instance a public 01:00:12.660 --> 01:00:14.839 align:start position:0% suggestions like for instance a public comment<01:00:12.900> period<01:00:13.170> we<01:00:14.130> have<01:00:14.280> that<01:00:14.490> currently 01:00:14.839 --> 01:00:14.849 align:start position:0% comment period we have that currently 01:00:14.849 --> 01:00:16.760 align:start position:0% comment period we have that currently now<01:00:15.089> as<01:00:15.329> a<01:00:15.359> process<01:00:15.839> in<01:00:16.050> the<01:00:16.079> tree<01:00:16.380> permit 01:00:16.760 --> 01:00:16.770 align:start position:0% now as a process in the tree permit 01:00:16.770 --> 01:00:20.690 align:start position:0% now as a process in the tree permit process<01:00:17.960> providing<01:00:18.960> a<01:00:18.990> bond<01:00:19.770> or<01:00:20.190> a<01:00:20.220> security 01:00:20.690 --> 01:00:20.700 align:start position:0% process providing a bond or a security 01:00:20.700 --> 01:00:23.810 align:start position:0% process providing a bond or a security we<01:00:21.030> have<01:00:21.060> that<01:00:21.420> and<01:00:21.570> a<01:00:21.599> number<01:00:21.810> of<01:00:22.820> permit 01:00:23.810 --> 01:00:23.820 align:start position:0% we have that and a number of permit 01:00:23.820 --> 01:00:26.089 align:start position:0% we have that and a number of permit process<01:00:24.300> primarily<01:00:25.050> related<01:00:25.560> to<01:00:25.589> stormwater 01:00:26.089 --> 01:00:26.099 align:start position:0% process primarily related to stormwater 01:00:26.099 --> 01:00:28.640 align:start position:0% process primarily related to stormwater or<01:00:26.730> construction<01:00:27.720> when<01:00:27.900> a<01:00:27.930> construction 01:00:28.640 --> 01:00:28.650 align:start position:0% or construction when a construction 01:00:28.650 --> 01:00:30.560 align:start position:0% or construction when a construction company<01:00:29.070> is<01:00:29.400> doing<01:00:29.700> something<01:00:29.940> the<01:00:30.180> right<01:00:30.329> way 01:00:30.560 --> 01:00:30.570 align:start position:0% company is doing something the right way 01:00:30.570 --> 01:00:32.150 align:start position:0% company is doing something the right way we<01:00:30.750> have<01:00:30.900> the<01:00:31.050> ability<01:00:31.079> to<01:00:31.440> ask<01:00:31.650> them<01:00:31.920> for<01:00:32.099> a 01:00:32.150 --> 01:00:32.160 align:start position:0% we have the ability to ask them for a 01:00:32.160 --> 01:00:34.280 align:start position:0% we have the ability to ask them for a bond<01:00:32.369> or<01:00:32.609> security<01:00:33.180> to<01:00:33.300> cover<01:00:33.510> the<01:00:33.720> cost<01:00:33.960> in 01:00:34.280 --> 01:00:34.290 align:start position:0% bond or security to cover the cost in 01:00:34.290 --> 01:00:35.930 align:start position:0% bond or security to cover the cost in the<01:00:34.470> event<01:00:34.710> it's<01:00:34.890> not<01:00:35.099> done<01:00:35.280> correctly<01:00:35.490> then 01:00:35.930 --> 01:00:35.940 align:start position:0% the event it's not done correctly then 01:00:35.940 --> 01:00:37.670 align:start position:0% the event it's not done correctly then the<01:00:35.970> city<01:00:36.270> would<01:00:36.390> have<01:00:36.570> the<01:00:36.720> funds<01:00:36.960> to<01:00:37.200> to<01:00:37.530> do 01:00:37.670 --> 01:00:37.680 align:start position:0% the city would have the funds to to do 01:00:37.680 --> 01:00:40.640 align:start position:0% the city would have the funds to to do that<01:00:38.660> there's<01:00:39.660> also<01:00:39.869> been<01:00:40.079> the<01:00:40.200> interest<01:00:40.530> of 01:00:40.640 --> 01:00:40.650 align:start position:0% that there's also been the interest of 01:00:40.650 --> 01:00:41.960 align:start position:0% that there's also been the interest of limiting<01:00:41.040> the<01:00:41.130> time<01:00:41.369> at<01:00:41.640> a<01:00:41.670> construction 01:00:41.960 --> 01:00:41.970 align:start position:0% limiting the time at a construction 01:00:41.970 --> 01:00:45.200 align:start position:0% limiting the time at a construction don't<01:00:42.480> simply<01:00:42.839> get<01:00:43.050> could<01:00:43.890> get<01:00:44.070> set<01:00:44.310> three 01:00:45.200 --> 01:00:45.210 align:start position:0% don't simply get could get set three 01:00:45.210 --> 01:00:46.760 align:start position:0% don't simply get could get set three months<01:00:45.480> that's<01:00:45.660> an<01:00:45.780> idea<01:00:46.079> that's<01:00:46.320> been<01:00:46.500> tossed 01:00:46.760 --> 01:00:46.770 align:start position:0% months that's an idea that's been tossed 01:00:46.770 --> 01:00:48.980 align:start position:0% months that's an idea that's been tossed around<01:00:46.980> I<01:00:47.430> was<01:00:48.030> also<01:00:48.329> looking<01:00:48.480> at<01:00:48.750> some<01:00:48.900> other 01:00:48.980 --> 01:00:48.990 align:start position:0% around I was also looking at some other 01:00:48.990 --> 01:00:50.780 align:start position:0% around I was also looking at some other jurisdictions<01:00:49.770> laws<01:00:50.010> and<01:00:50.280> some<01:00:50.430> have<01:00:50.670> an 01:00:50.780 --> 01:00:50.790 align:start position:0% jurisdictions laws and some have an 01:00:50.790 --> 01:00:53.240 align:start position:0% jurisdictions laws and some have an absolute<01:00:51.150> limit<01:00:51.510> on<01:00:51.630> you<01:00:51.810> cannot<01:00:52.170> go<01:00:52.440> beyond<01:00:52.859> X 01:00:53.240 --> 01:00:53.250 align:start position:0% absolute limit on you cannot go beyond X 01:00:53.250 --> 01:00:55.520 align:start position:0% absolute limit on you cannot go beyond X number<01:00:53.730> of<01:00:53.760> months<01:00:54.210> and<01:00:54.329> if<01:00:54.510> you<01:00:54.660> if<01:00:55.140> you<01:00:55.320> need 01:00:55.520 --> 01:00:55.530 align:start position:0% number of months and if you if you need 01:00:55.530 --> 01:00:56.750 align:start position:0% number of months and if you if you need to<01:00:55.710> then<01:00:55.859> you've<01:00:56.040> got<01:00:56.190> to<01:00:56.310> come<01:00:56.460> up<01:00:56.490> with<01:00:56.730> a 01:00:56.750 --> 01:00:56.760 align:start position:0% to then you've got to come up with a 01:00:56.760 --> 01:00:58.609 align:start position:0% to then you've got to come up with a different<01:00:57.150> solution<01:00:57.300> and<01:00:57.930> there<01:00:58.470> are 01:00:58.609 --> 01:00:58.619 align:start position:0% different solution and there are 01:00:58.619 --> 01:01:00.380 align:start position:0% different solution and there are different<01:00:59.040> solutions<01:00:59.579> that<01:00:59.700> exist<01:00:59.940> though 01:01:00.380 --> 01:01:00.390 align:start position:0% different solutions that exist though 01:01:00.390 --> 01:01:02.030 align:start position:0% different solutions that exist though they<01:01:00.540> potentially<01:01:00.930> could<01:01:01.230> be<01:01:01.410> more<01:01:01.710> expensive 01:01:02.030 --> 01:01:02.040 align:start position:0% they potentially could be more expensive 01:01:02.040 --> 01:01:05.660 align:start position:0% they potentially could be more expensive one<01:01:02.490> is<01:01:02.640> off-site<01:01:03.089> storage<01:01:03.680> at<01:01:04.680> any<01:01:05.010> location 01:01:05.660 --> 01:01:05.670 align:start position:0% one is off-site storage at any location 01:01:05.670 --> 01:01:07.910 align:start position:0% one is off-site storage at any location the<01:01:06.420> other<01:01:06.540> is<01:01:06.810> some<01:01:07.020> of<01:01:07.170> the<01:01:07.319> the<01:01:07.680> pod 01:01:07.910 --> 01:01:07.920 align:start position:0% the other is some of the the pod 01:01:07.920 --> 01:01:10.130 align:start position:0% the other is some of the the pod companies<01:01:08.460> will<01:01:08.640> actually<01:01:08.720> take<01:01:09.720> the<01:01:09.930> pod 01:01:10.130 --> 01:01:10.140 align:start position:0% companies will actually take the pod 01:01:10.140 --> 01:01:13.280 align:start position:0% companies will actually take the pod away<01:01:10.440> and<01:01:10.800> store<01:01:11.460> it<01:01:11.579> so<01:01:11.760> there's<01:01:11.970> the<01:01:12.290> storage 01:01:13.280 --> 01:01:13.290 align:start position:0% away and store it so there's the storage 01:01:13.290 --> 01:01:16.390 align:start position:0% away and store it so there's the storage garage<01:01:13.560> approach<01:01:14.220> there's<01:01:14.579> also<01:01:14.790> the<01:01:15.180> pod 01:01:16.390 --> 01:01:16.400 align:start position:0% garage approach there's also the pod 01:01:16.400 --> 01:01:19.250 align:start position:0% garage approach there's also the pod delivery<01:01:17.420> so<01:01:18.420> there's<01:01:18.599> some<01:01:18.780> options<01:01:19.170> for 01:01:19.250 --> 01:01:19.260 align:start position:0% delivery so there's some options for 01:01:19.260 --> 01:01:21.620 align:start position:0% delivery so there's some options for people<01:01:19.530> off-site<01:01:20.250> so<01:01:20.910> those<01:01:21.089> that<01:01:21.329> are<01:01:21.480> the 01:01:21.620 --> 01:01:21.630 align:start position:0% people off-site so those that are the 01:01:21.630 --> 01:01:23.089 align:start position:0% people off-site so those that are the suggestions<01:01:22.050> that<01:01:22.319> we<01:01:22.380> had<01:01:22.560> in<01:01:22.680> front<01:01:22.890> of<01:01:22.980> you 01:01:23.089 --> 01:01:23.099 align:start position:0% suggestions that we had in front of you 01:01:23.099 --> 01:01:25.250 align:start position:0% suggestions that we had in front of you any<01:01:23.640> change<01:01:24.000> to<01:01:24.150> the<01:01:24.180> code<01:01:24.450> requires<01:01:24.900> a<01:01:25.020> two 01:01:25.250 --> 01:01:25.260 align:start position:0% any change to the code requires a two 01:01:25.260 --> 01:01:28.870 align:start position:0% any change to the code requires a two reading<01:01:25.819> of<01:01:26.819> decision<01:01:27.329> of<01:01:27.420> the<01:01:27.480> council<01:01:27.930> so 01:01:28.870 --> 01:01:28.880 align:start position:0% reading of decision of the council so 01:01:28.880 --> 01:01:32.030 align:start position:0% reading of decision of the council so whenever<01:01:29.880> we<01:01:30.540> get<01:01:30.750> a<01:01:30.810> draft<01:01:31.290> of<01:01:31.560> a<01:01:31.740> first 01:01:32.030 --> 01:01:32.040 align:start position:0% whenever we get a draft of a first 01:01:32.040 --> 01:01:34.309 align:start position:0% whenever we get a draft of a first reading<01:01:32.400> based<01:01:33.390> on<01:01:33.569> the<01:01:33.720> comments<01:01:34.140> tonight 01:01:34.309 --> 01:01:34.319 align:start position:0% reading based on the comments tonight 01:01:34.319 --> 01:01:35.870 align:start position:0% reading based on the comments tonight then<01:01:34.650> we<01:01:34.680> can<01:01:34.890> bring<01:01:35.040> that<01:01:35.190> back<01:01:35.430> and<01:01:35.700> and 01:01:35.870 --> 01:01:35.880 align:start position:0% then we can bring that back and and 01:01:35.880 --> 01:01:40.069 align:start position:0% then we can bring that back and and tweak<01:01:36.660> it<01:01:36.780> as<01:01:36.930> you<01:01:37.079> as<01:01:37.260> you<01:01:37.410> need<01:01:38.960> that's<01:01:39.960> my 01:01:40.069 --> 01:01:40.079 align:start position:0% tweak it as you as you need that's my 01:01:40.079 --> 01:01:58.730 align:start position:0% tweak it as you as you need that's my weekly<01:01:40.609> questions<01:01:41.609> or<01:01:41.730> comments 01:01:58.730 --> 01:01:58.740 align:start position:0% 01:01:58.740 --> 01:02:01.250 align:start position:0% in<01:01:59.490> the<01:01:59.550> last<01:01:59.760> couple<01:01:59.970> of<01:02:00.090> years<01:02:00.260> I've 01:02:01.250 --> 01:02:01.260 align:start position:0% in the last couple of years I've 01:02:01.260 --> 01:02:03.500 align:start position:0% in the last couple of years I've received<01:02:01.710> a<01:02:02.010> lot<01:02:02.580> of<01:02:02.640> complaints<01:02:03.090> from 01:02:03.500 --> 01:02:03.510 align:start position:0% received a lot of complaints from 01:02:03.510 --> 01:02:07.460 align:start position:0% received a lot of complaints from residents<01:02:04.110> who<01:02:04.830> live<01:02:05.640> around<01:02:06.570> areas<01:02:07.080> where 01:02:07.460 --> 01:02:07.470 align:start position:0% residents who live around areas where 01:02:07.470 --> 01:02:10.570 align:start position:0% residents who live around areas where someone<01:02:07.800> has<01:02:07.950> a<01:02:07.980> dumpster<01:02:08.430> or<01:02:08.730> a<01:02:08.760> pod<01:02:09.030> and 01:02:10.570 --> 01:02:10.580 align:start position:0% someone has a dumpster or a pod and 01:02:10.580 --> 01:02:13.670 align:start position:0% someone has a dumpster or a pod and other<01:02:11.580> folks<01:02:12.030> who<01:02:12.150> who<01:02:12.660> don't<01:02:12.900> live<01:02:13.170> like 01:02:13.670 --> 01:02:13.680 align:start position:0% other folks who who don't live like 01:02:13.680 --> 01:02:15.800 align:start position:0% other folks who who don't live like right<01:02:14.040> around<01:02:14.160> it<01:02:14.550> if<01:02:14.940> I<01:02:15.060> have<01:02:15.210> to<01:02:15.330> drive<01:02:15.480> past 01:02:15.800 --> 01:02:15.810 align:start position:0% right around it if I have to drive past 01:02:15.810 --> 01:02:18.230 align:start position:0% right around it if I have to drive past it<01:02:15.990> and<01:02:16.110> find<01:02:16.320> it<01:02:16.410> to<01:02:16.470> be<01:02:16.650> a<01:02:17.240> significant 01:02:18.230 --> 01:02:18.240 align:start position:0% it and find it to be a significant 01:02:18.240 --> 01:02:20.570 align:start position:0% it and find it to be a significant safety<01:02:18.450> hazard<01:02:18.900> they're<01:02:19.470> wider<01:02:20.220> than<01:02:20.490> your 01:02:20.570 --> 01:02:20.580 align:start position:0% safety hazard they're wider than your 01:02:20.580 --> 01:02:23.980 align:start position:0% safety hazard they're wider than your average<01:02:20.760> car<01:02:21.210> is<01:02:21.480> and<01:02:22.170> I<01:02:22.650> would<01:02:23.100> say<01:02:23.340> that<01:02:23.580> the 01:02:23.980 --> 01:02:23.990 align:start position:0% average car is and I would say that the 01:02:23.990 --> 01:02:26.300 align:start position:0% average car is and I would say that the majority<01:02:24.990> of<01:02:25.170> complaints<01:02:25.620> that<01:02:25.890> I've<01:02:26.010> gotten 01:02:26.300 --> 01:02:26.310 align:start position:0% majority of complaints that I've gotten 01:02:26.310 --> 01:02:29.450 align:start position:0% majority of complaints that I've gotten has<01:02:26.460> actually<01:02:26.820> been<01:02:26.970> about<01:02:27.360> the<01:02:27.630> pots<01:02:28.380> and<01:02:28.740> not 01:02:29.450 --> 01:02:29.460 align:start position:0% has actually been about the pots and not 01:02:29.460 --> 01:02:35.030 align:start position:0% has actually been about the pots and not so<01:02:29.760> much<01:02:29.910> about<01:02:30.090> the<01:02:30.980> dumpsters<01:02:32.120> so<01:02:33.950> thank<01:02:34.950> you 01:02:35.030 --> 01:02:35.040 align:start position:0% so much about the dumpsters so thank you 01:02:35.040 --> 01:02:36.860 align:start position:0% so much about the dumpsters so thank you for<01:02:35.190> this<01:02:35.340> some<01:02:35.910> suggestions<01:02:36.420> that<01:02:36.540> I<01:02:36.690> would 01:02:36.860 --> 01:02:36.870 align:start position:0% for this some suggestions that I would 01:02:36.870 --> 01:02:40.070 align:start position:0% for this some suggestions that I would have<01:02:37.020> is<01:02:37.260> that<01:02:38.210> being<01:02:39.210> able<01:02:39.390> to<01:02:39.540> put<01:02:39.840> something 01:02:40.070 --> 01:02:40.080 align:start position:0% have is that being able to put something 01:02:40.080 --> 01:02:42.440 align:start position:0% have is that being able to put something in<01:02:40.320> the<01:02:40.410> roadway<01:02:40.590> be<01:02:41.040> conditional<01:02:41.760> on<01:02:42.030> someone 01:02:42.440 --> 01:02:42.450 align:start position:0% in the roadway be conditional on someone 01:02:42.450 --> 01:02:44.750 align:start position:0% in the roadway be conditional on someone so<01:02:43.160> demonstrating<01:02:44.160> that<01:02:44.280> they<01:02:44.430> actually 01:02:44.750 --> 01:02:44.760 align:start position:0% so demonstrating that they actually 01:02:44.760 --> 01:02:48.500 align:start position:0% so demonstrating that they actually cannot<01:02:45.150> put<01:02:45.390> it<01:02:45.480> on<01:02:45.570> their<01:02:45.750> property<01:02:47.180> I've<01:02:48.180> had 01:02:48.500 --> 01:02:48.510 align:start position:0% cannot put it on their property I've had 01:02:48.510 --> 01:02:52.310 align:start position:0% cannot put it on their property I've had two<01:02:49.380> dumpsters<01:02:50.190> at<01:02:50.550> my<01:02:50.640> house<01:02:50.820> I<01:02:51.270> had<01:02:51.900> one<01:02:52.140> in 01:02:52.310 --> 01:02:52.320 align:start position:0% two dumpsters at my house I had one in 01:02:52.320 --> 01:02:55.900 align:start position:0% two dumpsters at my house I had one in the<01:02:52.350> street<01:02:53.190> when<01:02:53.490> I<01:02:53.520> when<01:02:54.030> I<01:02:54.060> first<01:02:54.150> moved<01:02:54.840> in 01:02:55.900 --> 01:02:55.910 align:start position:0% the street when I when I first moved in 01:02:55.910 --> 01:02:59.690 align:start position:0% the street when I when I first moved in primarily<01:02:56.910> because<01:02:57.180> I<01:02:57.360> was<01:02:57.890> I<01:02:58.890> had<01:02:59.610> to 01:02:59.690 --> 01:02:59.700 align:start position:0% primarily because I was I had to 01:02:59.700 --> 01:03:01.580 align:start position:0% primarily because I was I had to disassemble<01:03:00.030> my<01:03:00.510> basement<01:03:00.780> so<01:03:01.290> I<01:03:01.350> needed 01:03:01.580 --> 01:03:01.590 align:start position:0% disassemble my basement so I needed 01:03:01.590 --> 01:03:03.410 align:start position:0% disassemble my basement so I needed actually<01:03:02.010> to<01:03:02.100> have<01:03:02.190> the<01:03:02.340> garage<01:03:02.430> clear<01:03:03.150> so 01:03:03.410 --> 01:03:03.420 align:start position:0% actually to have the garage clear so 01:03:03.420 --> 01:03:05.210 align:start position:0% actually to have the garage clear so they<01:03:03.510> can<01:03:03.660> call<01:03:03.870> this<01:03:04.050> stuff<01:03:04.260> out<01:03:04.470> the<01:03:04.890> second 01:03:05.210 --> 01:03:05.220 align:start position:0% they can call this stuff out the second 01:03:05.220 --> 01:03:08.120 align:start position:0% they can call this stuff out the second one<01:03:05.250> I<01:03:05.340> put<01:03:05.640> in<01:03:06.300> my<01:03:06.420> driveway<01:03:06.830> because<01:03:07.830> I<01:03:07.950> have 01:03:08.120 --> 01:03:08.130 align:start position:0% one I put in my driveway because I have 01:03:08.130 --> 01:03:09.200 align:start position:0% one I put in my driveway because I have a<01:03:08.160> driveway<01:03:08.430> and<01:03:08.610> I<01:03:08.700> don't<01:03:08.760> need<01:03:09.000> to<01:03:09.090> be 01:03:09.200 --> 01:03:09.210 align:start position:0% a driveway and I don't need to be 01:03:09.210 --> 01:03:10.700 align:start position:0% a driveway and I don't need to be putting<01:03:09.480> some<01:03:09.600> straw<01:03:09.930> in<01:03:09.990> the<01:03:10.050> street<01:03:10.080> and<01:03:10.530> I 01:03:10.700 --> 01:03:10.710 align:start position:0% putting some straw in the street and I 01:03:10.710 --> 01:03:12.740 align:start position:0% putting some straw in the street and I think<01:03:11.010> if<01:03:11.340> somebody<01:03:11.670> has<01:03:11.850> a<01:03:11.880> place<01:03:12.150> to<01:03:12.300> put<01:03:12.450> a 01:03:12.740 --> 01:03:12.750 align:start position:0% think if somebody has a place to put a 01:03:12.750 --> 01:03:15.110 align:start position:0% think if somebody has a place to put a dumpster<01:03:13.260> or<01:03:13.290> a<01:03:13.470> pot<01:03:13.680> on<01:03:14.250> their<01:03:14.580> property<01:03:14.970> that 01:03:15.110 --> 01:03:15.120 align:start position:0% dumpster or a pot on their property that 01:03:15.120 --> 01:03:19.460 align:start position:0% dumpster or a pot on their property that that's<01:03:15.330> where<01:03:15.510> it<01:03:15.600> should<01:03:15.660> have<01:03:16.230> to<01:03:16.380> be<01:03:18.470> the 01:03:19.460 --> 01:03:19.470 align:start position:0% that's where it should have to be the 01:03:19.470 --> 01:03:22.010 align:start position:0% that's where it should have to be the other<01:03:19.590> thing<01:03:19.830> is<01:03:20.070> that<01:03:20.390> I<01:03:21.390> don't<01:03:21.570> think<01:03:21.900> that 01:03:22.010 --> 01:03:22.020 align:start position:0% other thing is that I don't think that 01:03:22.020 --> 01:03:25.010 align:start position:0% other thing is that I don't think that we<01:03:22.140> should<01:03:22.320> allow<01:03:22.500> people<01:03:22.530> to<01:03:23.720> put<01:03:24.720> storage 01:03:25.010 --> 01:03:25.020 align:start position:0% we should allow people to put storage 01:03:25.020 --> 01:03:28.430 align:start position:0% we should allow people to put storage pots<01:03:25.350> in<01:03:26.280> the<01:03:26.550> public<01:03:26.940> right-of-way<01:03:27.180> for<01:03:27.810> any 01:03:28.430 --> 01:03:28.440 align:start position:0% pots in the public right-of-way for any 01:03:28.440 --> 01:03:30.230 align:start position:0% pots in the public right-of-way for any longer<01:03:28.710> than<01:03:28.830> it<01:03:29.070> takes<01:03:29.280> to<01:03:29.460> load<01:03:30.000> them 01:03:30.230 --> 01:03:30.240 align:start position:0% longer than it takes to load them 01:03:30.240 --> 01:03:32.930 align:start position:0% longer than it takes to load them because<01:03:30.840> the<01:03:31.110> fact<01:03:31.530> is<01:03:31.740> that<01:03:31.770> all<01:03:32.610> of<01:03:32.820> those 01:03:32.930 --> 01:03:32.940 align:start position:0% because the fact is that all of those 01:03:32.940 --> 01:03:35.840 align:start position:0% because the fact is that all of those places<01:03:33.210> do<01:03:33.600> take<01:03:34.140> the<01:03:34.380> fully<01:03:34.620> loaded<01:03:34.950> pods 01:03:35.840 --> 01:03:35.850 align:start position:0% places do take the fully loaded pods 01:03:35.850 --> 01:03:38.030 align:start position:0% places do take the fully loaded pods away<01:03:36.300> and<01:03:36.660> they<01:03:36.810> and<01:03:37.200> they<01:03:37.410> store<01:03:37.650> them<01:03:37.860> that's 01:03:38.030 --> 01:03:38.040 align:start position:0% away and they and they store them that's 01:03:38.040 --> 01:03:39.950 align:start position:0% away and they and they store them that's a<01:03:38.160> service<01:03:38.400> that<01:03:38.520> they<01:03:38.820> provide<01:03:39.330> and<01:03:39.570> the<01:03:39.630> idea 01:03:39.950 --> 01:03:39.960 align:start position:0% a service that they provide and the idea 01:03:39.960 --> 01:03:41.990 align:start position:0% a service that they provide and the idea that<01:03:40.020> we're<01:03:40.950> going<01:03:41.040> to<01:03:41.100> provide<01:03:41.310> storage<01:03:41.880> for 01:03:41.990 --> 01:03:42.000 align:start position:0% that we're going to provide storage for 01:03:42.000 --> 01:03:44.150 align:start position:0% that we're going to provide storage for people's<01:03:42.510> belongings<01:03:42.840> on<01:03:43.260> on<01:03:43.680> the<01:03:43.860> street 01:03:44.150 --> 01:03:44.160 align:start position:0% people's belongings on on the street 01:03:44.160 --> 01:03:46.550 align:start position:0% people's belongings on on the street that's<01:03:44.880> just<01:03:45.090> not<01:03:45.240> a<01:03:45.270> necessity<01:03:45.480> there's<01:03:46.410> an 01:03:46.550 --> 01:03:46.560 align:start position:0% that's just not a necessity there's an 01:03:46.560 --> 01:03:49.400 align:start position:0% that's just not a necessity there's an alternative<01:03:47.040> for<01:03:47.280> that<01:03:47.310> and<01:03:47.670> it<01:03:48.450> is<01:03:48.750> you<01:03:49.320> know 01:03:49.400 --> 01:03:49.410 align:start position:0% alternative for that and it is you know 01:03:49.410 --> 01:03:51.020 align:start position:0% alternative for that and it is you know on-site<01:03:49.770> storage<01:03:49.980> there<01:03:50.580> isn't<01:03:50.940> an 01:03:51.020 --> 01:03:51.030 align:start position:0% on-site storage there isn't an 01:03:51.030 --> 01:03:53.000 align:start position:0% on-site storage there isn't an alternative<01:03:51.230> necessarily<01:03:52.230> for<01:03:52.440> the<01:03:52.560> for<01:03:52.920> the 01:03:53.000 --> 01:03:53.010 align:start position:0% alternative necessarily for the for the 01:03:53.010 --> 01:03:55.700 align:start position:0% alternative necessarily for the for the dumpsters<01:03:53.900> as<01:03:54.900> you're<01:03:55.410> doing<01:03:55.620> in 01:03:55.700 --> 01:03:55.710 align:start position:0% dumpsters as you're doing in 01:03:55.710 --> 01:03:57.530 align:start position:0% dumpsters as you're doing in construction 01:03:57.530 --> 01:03:57.540 align:start position:0% construction 01:03:57.540 --> 01:04:00.080 align:start position:0% construction and<01:03:58.500> I<01:03:58.620> think<01:03:58.860> that<01:03:59.310> you<01:03:59.430> know<01:03:59.520> she's<01:03:59.760> pointed 01:04:00.080 --> 01:04:00.090 align:start position:0% and I think that you know she's pointed 01:04:00.090 --> 01:04:01.100 align:start position:0% and I think that you know she's pointed out<01:04:00.180> last<01:04:00.300> time<01:04:00.540> you<01:04:00.630> were<01:04:00.690> here<01:04:00.810> the<01:04:00.960> most 01:04:01.100 --> 01:04:01.110 align:start position:0% out last time you were here the most 01:04:01.110 --> 01:04:02.840 align:start position:0% out last time you were here the most egregious<01:04:01.410> case<01:04:01.800> was<01:04:02.070> somebody<01:04:02.430> who<01:04:02.550> actually 01:04:02.840 --> 01:04:02.850 align:start position:0% egregious case was somebody who actually 01:04:02.850 --> 01:04:07.970 align:start position:0% egregious case was somebody who actually was<01:04:03.780> using<01:04:04.470> a<01:04:04.710> pod<01:04:05.460> as<01:04:06.020> their<01:04:07.020> construction 01:04:07.970 --> 01:04:07.980 align:start position:0% was using a pod as their construction 01:04:07.980 --> 01:04:11.860 align:start position:0% was using a pod as their construction box<01:04:08.810> that<01:04:09.810> was<01:04:09.990> storing<01:04:10.380> stuff<01:04:10.650> for<01:04:11.040> another 01:04:11.860 --> 01:04:11.870 align:start position:0% box that was storing stuff for another 01:04:11.870 --> 01:04:14.240 align:start position:0% box that was storing stuff for another another<01:04:12.870> entity<01:04:13.230> not<01:04:13.620> even<01:04:13.860> for<01:04:14.160> the 01:04:14.240 --> 01:04:14.250 align:start position:0% another entity not even for the 01:04:14.250 --> 01:04:16.010 align:start position:0% another entity not even for the homeowners<01:04:14.700> but<01:04:14.880> he<01:04:15.000> was<01:04:15.120> essentially<01:04:15.480> just<01:04:15.660> I 01:04:16.010 --> 01:04:16.020 align:start position:0% homeowners but he was essentially just I 01:04:16.020 --> 01:04:17.870 align:start position:0% homeowners but he was essentially just I mean<01:04:16.470> I<01:04:16.710> suppose<01:04:16.860> you<01:04:17.190> could<01:04:17.340> make<01:04:17.370> money<01:04:17.670> off 01:04:17.870 --> 01:04:17.880 align:start position:0% mean I suppose you could make money off 01:04:17.880 --> 01:04:19.370 align:start position:0% mean I suppose you could make money off of<01:04:17.910> that<01:04:18.150> you<01:04:18.180> can<01:04:18.360> get<01:04:18.510> a<01:04:18.540> city<01:04:18.810> permit<01:04:19.110> and 01:04:19.370 --> 01:04:19.380 align:start position:0% of that you can get a city permit and 01:04:19.380 --> 01:04:21.080 align:start position:0% of that you can get a city permit and then<01:04:19.440> you<01:04:19.590> could<01:04:19.770> offer<01:04:19.920> you<01:04:20.490> know<01:04:20.610> the<01:04:20.730> local 01:04:21.080 --> 01:04:21.090 align:start position:0% then you could offer you know the local 01:04:21.090 --> 01:04:24.740 align:start position:0% then you could offer you know the local storage<01:04:21.300> to<01:04:21.540> people<01:04:21.840> but<01:04:22.020> I<01:04:23.240> just<01:04:24.240> don't<01:04:24.630> think 01:04:24.740 --> 01:04:24.750 align:start position:0% storage to people but I just don't think 01:04:24.750 --> 01:04:28.100 align:start position:0% storage to people but I just don't think that's<01:04:24.960> appropriate<01:04:25.370> so<01:04:26.370> I<01:04:26.820> would<01:04:27.630> recommend 01:04:28.100 --> 01:04:28.110 align:start position:0% that's appropriate so I would recommend 01:04:28.110 --> 01:04:30.500 align:start position:0% that's appropriate so I would recommend that<01:04:28.380> we<01:04:29.070> come<01:04:29.670> up<01:04:29.760> with<01:04:29.880> a<01:04:29.940> time<01:04:30.210> frame<01:04:30.480> that 01:04:30.500 --> 01:04:30.510 align:start position:0% that we come up with a time frame that 01:04:30.510 --> 01:04:33.080 align:start position:0% that we come up with a time frame that just<01:04:30.960> allows<01:04:31.260> people<01:04:31.560> to<01:04:31.740> load<01:04:32.520> and<01:04:32.880> unload 01:04:33.080 --> 01:04:33.090 align:start position:0% just allows people to load and unload 01:04:33.090 --> 01:04:39.890 align:start position:0% just allows people to load and unload the<01:04:33.990> storage<01:04:38.030> the<01:04:39.030> last<01:04:39.390> point<01:04:39.660> I<01:04:39.720> would<01:04:39.870> like 01:04:39.890 --> 01:04:39.900 align:start position:0% the storage the last point I would like 01:04:39.900 --> 01:04:42.260 align:start position:0% the storage the last point I would like to<01:04:40.140> make<01:04:40.260> is<01:04:40.580> you<01:04:41.580> know<01:04:41.640> a<01:04:41.790> lot<01:04:41.970> of<01:04:42.000> this<01:04:42.120> is 01:04:42.260 --> 01:04:42.270 align:start position:0% to make is you know a lot of this is 01:04:42.270 --> 01:04:44.560 align:start position:0% to make is you know a lot of this is about<01:04:42.390> visibility<01:04:43.110> as<01:04:43.200> well<01:04:43.230> as<01:04:43.440> just<01:04:43.770> what<01:04:44.220> it 01:04:44.560 --> 01:04:44.570 align:start position:0% about visibility as well as just what it 01:04:44.570 --> 01:04:48.470 align:start position:0% about visibility as well as just what it looks<01:04:45.570> like<01:04:46.430> you<01:04:47.430> know<01:04:47.520> we<01:04:48.000> don't<01:04:48.030> let<01:04:48.300> people 01:04:48.470 --> 01:04:48.480 align:start position:0% looks like you know we don't let people 01:04:48.480 --> 01:04:50.810 align:start position:0% looks like you know we don't let people in<01:04:48.720> a<01:04:48.840> corner<01:04:49.440> have<01:04:49.980> their<01:04:50.160> bushes<01:04:50.340> I<01:04:50.610> think 01:04:50.810 --> 01:04:50.820 align:start position:0% in a corner have their bushes I think 01:04:50.820 --> 01:04:52.910 align:start position:0% in a corner have their bushes I think over<01:04:51.060> over<01:04:51.660> three<01:04:51.870> feet<01:04:52.020> tall<01:04:52.380> so<01:04:52.590> you<01:04:52.680> can't 01:04:52.910 --> 01:04:52.920 align:start position:0% over over three feet tall so you can't 01:04:52.920 --> 01:04:54.620 align:start position:0% over over three feet tall so you can't see<01:04:53.160> around<01:04:53.190> them<01:04:53.520> in<01:04:53.640> it<01:04:53.760> I<01:04:53.970> think<01:04:54.330> the<01:04:54.390> reason 01:04:54.620 --> 01:04:54.630 align:start position:0% see around them in it I think the reason 01:04:54.630 --> 01:04:55.760 align:start position:0% see around them in it I think the reason why<01:04:54.720> I<01:04:54.780> get<01:04:54.960> more<01:04:55.080> complaints<01:04:55.440> about<01:04:55.500> the 01:04:55.760 --> 01:04:55.770 align:start position:0% why I get more complaints about the 01:04:55.770 --> 01:04:58.430 align:start position:0% why I get more complaints about the pause<01:04:56.190> than<01:04:56.640> the<01:04:56.790> bins<01:04:57.150> a<01:04:57.450> lot<01:04:57.840> of<01:04:57.960> the<01:04:58.020> bins 01:04:58.430 --> 01:04:58.440 align:start position:0% pause than the bins a lot of the bins 01:04:58.440 --> 01:05:01.430 align:start position:0% pause than the bins a lot of the bins are<01:04:58.740> you<01:04:59.580> know<01:04:59.700> four<01:05:00.120> feet<01:05:00.360> high<01:05:00.720> maybe<01:05:01.140> five 01:05:01.430 --> 01:05:01.440 align:start position:0% are you know four feet high maybe five 01:05:01.440 --> 01:05:05.270 align:start position:0% are you know four feet high maybe five feet<01:05:02.720> but<01:05:03.720> the<01:05:03.960> storage<01:05:04.260> spots<01:05:04.590> are<01:05:04.830> eight<01:05:05.070> to 01:05:05.270 --> 01:05:05.280 align:start position:0% feet but the storage spots are eight to 01:05:05.280 --> 01:05:07.280 align:start position:0% feet but the storage spots are eight to ten<01:05:05.490> feet<01:05:05.520> high<01:05:06.150> they're<01:05:06.450> really<01:05:06.720> eyes<01:05:06.900> can't 01:05:07.280 --> 01:05:07.290 align:start position:0% ten feet high they're really eyes can't 01:05:07.290 --> 01:05:12.280 align:start position:0% ten feet high they're really eyes can't see<01:05:07.500> you<01:05:08.460> can't<01:05:08.700> see<01:05:08.760> around<01:05:09.030> them<01:05:09.150> at<01:05:09.270> all<01:05:10.700> so 01:05:12.280 --> 01:05:12.290 align:start position:0% see you can't see around them at all so 01:05:12.290 --> 01:05:16.730 align:start position:0% see you can't see around them at all so I<01:05:14.360> feel<01:05:15.360> more<01:05:15.480> flexible<01:05:15.960> about<01:05:16.080> the<01:05:16.320> dumpsters 01:05:16.730 --> 01:05:16.740 align:start position:0% I feel more flexible about the dumpsters 01:05:16.740 --> 01:05:17.900 align:start position:0% I feel more flexible about the dumpsters and<01:05:16.890> I<01:05:16.950> think<01:05:17.130> we're<01:05:17.370> gonna<01:05:17.520> do<01:05:17.610> something 01:05:17.900 --> 01:05:17.910 align:start position:0% and I think we're gonna do something 01:05:17.910 --> 01:05:19.610 align:start position:0% and I think we're gonna do something about<01:05:17.970> the<01:05:18.210> dumpsters<01:05:18.600> maybe<01:05:18.870> asking<01:05:19.440> people 01:05:19.610 --> 01:05:19.620 align:start position:0% about the dumpsters maybe asking people 01:05:19.620 --> 01:05:21.500 align:start position:0% about the dumpsters maybe asking people who<01:05:19.830> store<01:05:20.100> them<01:05:20.250> on<01:05:20.370> the<01:05:20.460> street<01:05:20.700> to<01:05:20.910> use<01:05:21.150> the 01:05:21.500 --> 01:05:21.510 align:start position:0% who store them on the street to use the 01:05:21.510 --> 01:05:32.900 align:start position:0% who store them on the street to use the the<01:05:22.200> lowest 01:05:32.900 --> 01:05:32.910 align:start position:0% 01:05:32.910 --> 01:05:36.309 align:start position:0% that's<01:05:33.150> why<01:05:33.299> we're<01:05:33.450> back<01:05:33.630> I<01:05:33.960> would<01:05:34.619> agree 01:05:36.309 --> 01:05:36.319 align:start position:0% that's why we're back I would agree 01:05:36.319 --> 01:05:39.589 align:start position:0% that's why we're back I would agree slightly<01:05:37.319> different<01:05:37.529> reasons<01:05:38.039> I<01:05:38.250> think<01:05:38.599> these 01:05:39.589 --> 01:05:39.599 align:start position:0% slightly different reasons I think these 01:05:39.599 --> 01:05:43.269 align:start position:0% slightly different reasons I think these pods<01:05:40.319> are<01:05:40.619> horrible<01:05:41.160> i<01:05:41.369> source<01:05:41.849> they're<01:05:42.359> ugly 01:05:43.269 --> 01:05:43.279 align:start position:0% pods are horrible i source they're ugly 01:05:43.279 --> 01:05:47.230 align:start position:0% pods are horrible i source they're ugly they<01:05:44.279> sit<01:05:44.549> there<01:05:44.730> for<01:05:45.059> weeks<01:05:45.210> at<01:05:45.509> a<01:05:45.599> time<01:05:45.630> and 01:05:47.230 --> 01:05:47.240 align:start position:0% they sit there for weeks at a time and 01:05:47.240 --> 01:05:49.789 align:start position:0% they sit there for weeks at a time and they<01:05:48.240> may<01:05:48.420> be<01:05:48.480> traffic<01:05:48.779> hazards<01:05:49.380> but<01:05:49.680> they 01:05:49.789 --> 01:05:49.799 align:start position:0% they may be traffic hazards but they 01:05:49.799 --> 01:05:53.289 align:start position:0% they may be traffic hazards but they also<01:05:50.059> they're<01:05:51.059> just<01:05:51.329> they're<01:05:52.109> just<01:05:52.140> hideous 01:05:53.289 --> 01:05:53.299 align:start position:0% also they're just they're just hideous 01:05:53.299 --> 01:05:58.730 align:start position:0% also they're just they're just hideous and<01:05:54.299> they<01:05:54.450> also<01:05:55.339> advertise<01:05:56.690> the<01:05:57.690> services<01:05:58.559> of 01:05:58.730 --> 01:05:58.740 align:start position:0% and they also advertise the services of 01:05:58.740 --> 01:06:03.529 align:start position:0% and they also advertise the services of the<01:05:58.890> pod<01:05:59.099> company<01:05:59.549> that<01:06:00.049> is<01:06:01.970> etched<01:06:02.970> all<01:06:03.329> over 01:06:03.529 --> 01:06:03.539 align:start position:0% the pod company that is etched all over 01:06:03.539 --> 01:06:05.079 align:start position:0% the pod company that is etched all over the<01:06:03.630> front<01:06:03.839> of<01:06:03.869> it<01:06:04.049> so<01:06:04.259> it's<01:06:04.710> an<01:06:04.799> ongoing 01:06:05.079 --> 01:06:05.089 align:start position:0% the front of it so it's an ongoing 01:06:05.089 --> 01:06:07.160 align:start position:0% the front of it so it's an ongoing advertisement<01:06:06.089> sitting<01:06:06.690> right<01:06:06.990> in<01:06:07.079> the 01:06:07.160 --> 01:06:07.170 align:start position:0% advertisement sitting right in the 01:06:07.170 --> 01:06:08.480 align:start position:0% advertisement sitting right in the middle<01:06:07.319> of<01:06:07.500> some<01:06:07.920> of<01:06:08.009> our<01:06:08.130> busier 01:06:08.480 --> 01:06:08.490 align:start position:0% middle of some of our busier 01:06:08.490 --> 01:06:10.999 align:start position:0% middle of some of our busier thoroughfares<01:06:09.170> so<01:06:10.170> I<01:06:10.200> think<01:06:10.349> it's<01:06:10.589> the<01:06:10.769> time 01:06:10.999 --> 01:06:11.009 align:start position:0% thoroughfares so I think it's the time 01:06:11.009 --> 01:06:15.890 align:start position:0% thoroughfares so I think it's the time as<01:06:11.549> councilmember<01:06:12.299> clay<01:06:13.170> alluded<01:06:13.589> to<01:06:14.900> these 01:06:15.890 --> 01:06:15.900 align:start position:0% as councilmember clay alluded to these 01:06:15.900 --> 01:06:18.799 align:start position:0% as councilmember clay alluded to these should<01:06:16.079> be<01:06:16.109> for<01:06:16.950> a<01:06:16.980> very<01:06:17.160> short<01:06:17.250> term<01:06:17.819> fixed 01:06:18.799 --> 01:06:18.809 align:start position:0% should be for a very short term fixed 01:06:18.809 --> 01:06:21.440 align:start position:0% should be for a very short term fixed period<01:06:19.319> they<01:06:19.950> are<01:06:20.069> a<01:06:20.099> convenience<01:06:20.849> to<01:06:21.180> the 01:06:21.440 --> 01:06:21.450 align:start position:0% period they are a convenience to the 01:06:21.450 --> 01:06:24.769 align:start position:0% period they are a convenience to the person<01:06:21.839> who<01:06:21.990> is<01:06:22.200> moving<01:06:22.500> and<01:06:23.130> therefore<01:06:24.119> they 01:06:24.769 --> 01:06:24.779 align:start position:0% person who is moving and therefore they 01:06:24.779 --> 01:06:26.299 align:start position:0% person who is moving and therefore they should<01:06:24.809> be<01:06:25.230> there<01:06:25.410> only<01:06:25.650> for<01:06:25.980> the<01:06:26.039> time<01:06:26.279> that 01:06:26.299 --> 01:06:26.309 align:start position:0% should be there only for the time that 01:06:26.309 --> 01:06:28.549 align:start position:0% should be there only for the time that it<01:06:26.640> takes<01:06:26.819> to<01:06:27.119> move<01:06:27.299> stuff<01:06:27.660> into<01:06:28.140> them<01:06:28.289> which 01:06:28.549 --> 01:06:28.559 align:start position:0% it takes to move stuff into them which 01:06:28.559 --> 01:06:33.410 align:start position:0% it takes to move stuff into them which is<01:06:28.740> not<01:06:28.890> weeks<01:06:29.329> hours<01:06:30.440> and<01:06:31.440> to<01:06:32.250> arrange<01:06:32.640> for 01:06:33.410 --> 01:06:33.420 align:start position:0% is not weeks hours and to arrange for 01:06:33.420 --> 01:06:37.039 align:start position:0% is not weeks hours and to arrange for the<01:06:34.250> pod<01:06:35.250> company<01:06:35.849> to<01:06:35.970> come<01:06:36.210> and<01:06:36.480> take<01:06:36.690> it<01:06:36.869> to 01:06:37.039 --> 01:06:37.049 align:start position:0% the pod company to come and take it to 01:06:37.049 --> 01:06:39.529 align:start position:0% the pod company to come and take it to the<01:06:37.170> next<01:06:37.500> location<01:06:38.190> it<01:06:38.880> was<01:06:39.059> never<01:06:39.299> intended 01:06:39.529 --> 01:06:39.539 align:start position:0% the next location it was never intended 01:06:39.539 --> 01:06:44.630 align:start position:0% the next location it was never intended to<01:06:39.900> be<01:06:40.049> a<01:06:40.380> long-term<01:06:41.099> solution<01:06:42.980> the<01:06:43.980> benefit 01:06:44.630 --> 01:06:44.640 align:start position:0% to be a long-term solution the benefit 01:06:44.640 --> 01:06:48.109 align:start position:0% to be a long-term solution the benefit of<01:06:44.819> the<01:06:45.259> property<01:06:46.259> owner<01:06:46.470> or<01:06:46.799> the<01:06:46.950> renter<01:06:47.309> it's 01:06:48.109 --> 01:06:48.119 align:start position:0% of the property owner or the renter it's 01:06:48.119 --> 01:06:50.539 align:start position:0% of the property owner or the renter it's really<01:06:48.509> for<01:06:48.720> a<01:06:48.750> very<01:06:49.019> short-term<01:06:49.470> purpose<01:06:50.250> and 01:06:50.539 --> 01:06:50.549 align:start position:0% really for a very short-term purpose and 01:06:50.549 --> 01:06:52.370 align:start position:0% really for a very short-term purpose and I<01:06:50.640> would<01:06:50.970> like<01:06:51.119> to<01:06:51.299> see<01:06:51.539> the<01:06:51.839> ordinance 01:06:52.370 --> 01:06:52.380 align:start position:0% I would like to see the ordinance 01:06:52.380 --> 01:06:55.490 align:start position:0% I would like to see the ordinance modified<01:06:53.369> so<01:06:54.089> it<01:06:54.210> makes<01:06:54.420> that<01:06:54.599> very<01:06:54.660> clear<01:06:54.869> so 01:06:55.490 --> 01:06:55.500 align:start position:0% modified so it makes that very clear so 01:06:55.500 --> 01:06:57.049 align:start position:0% modified so it makes that very clear so everyone<01:06:55.890> knows<01:06:56.130> that<01:06:56.190> it<01:06:56.700> is<01:06:56.849> not<01:06:57.029> a 01:06:57.049 --> 01:06:57.059 align:start position:0% everyone knows that it is not a 01:06:57.059 --> 01:07:00.049 align:start position:0% everyone knows that it is not a substitute<01:06:57.470> or<01:06:58.470> taking<01:06:58.890> your<01:06:59.069> belongings<01:06:59.670> to 01:07:00.049 --> 01:07:00.059 align:start position:0% substitute or taking your belongings to 01:07:00.059 --> 01:07:03.109 align:start position:0% substitute or taking your belongings to one<01:07:00.660> of<01:07:00.809> the<01:07:00.930> many<01:07:01.400> storage<01:07:02.400> facilities<01:07:03.089> in 01:07:03.109 --> 01:07:03.119 align:start position:0% one of the many storage facilities in 01:07:03.119 --> 01:07:07.400 align:start position:0% one of the many storage facilities in the<01:07:03.359> area<01:07:04.099> regarding<01:07:05.099> the<01:07:05.490> dumpsters<01:07:06.480> it<01:07:07.109> may 01:07:07.400 --> 01:07:07.410 align:start position:0% the area regarding the dumpsters it may 01:07:07.410 --> 01:07:10.640 align:start position:0% the area regarding the dumpsters it may be<01:07:07.470> especially<01:07:08.460> in<01:07:09.119> the<01:07:09.210> case<01:07:09.359> where<01:07:10.079> it's<01:07:10.440> on 01:07:10.640 --> 01:07:10.650 align:start position:0% be especially in the case where it's on 01:07:10.650 --> 01:07:12.620 align:start position:0% be especially in the case where it's on the<01:07:10.680> street<01:07:11.009> and<01:07:11.369> causing<01:07:11.819> damage<01:07:11.970> or<01:07:12.359> could 01:07:12.620 --> 01:07:12.630 align:start position:0% the street and causing damage or could 01:07:12.630 --> 01:07:14.509 align:start position:0% the street and causing damage or could cause<01:07:12.839> damage<01:07:13.079> that<01:07:13.740> there<01:07:13.920> ought<01:07:14.039> to<01:07:14.069> be<01:07:14.220> some 01:07:14.509 --> 01:07:14.519 align:start position:0% cause damage that there ought to be some 01:07:14.519 --> 01:07:18.799 align:start position:0% cause damage that there ought to be some reasonable<01:07:15.000> bond<01:07:15.470> posted<01:07:16.670> so<01:07:17.670> that<01:07:17.700> if<01:07:18.180> there 01:07:18.799 --> 01:07:18.809 align:start position:0% reasonable bond posted so that if there 01:07:18.809 --> 01:07:21.380 align:start position:0% reasonable bond posted so that if there is<01:07:18.990> damage<01:07:19.259> to<01:07:19.440> the<01:07:19.650> street<01:07:20.039> afterwards<01:07:20.640> there 01:07:21.380 --> 01:07:21.390 align:start position:0% is damage to the street afterwards there 01:07:21.390 --> 01:07:23.269 align:start position:0% is damage to the street afterwards there is<01:07:21.599> monies<01:07:21.960> that<01:07:21.990> have<01:07:22.259> been<01:07:22.349> deposited<01:07:22.769> with 01:07:23.269 --> 01:07:23.279 align:start position:0% is monies that have been deposited with 01:07:23.279 --> 01:07:27.680 align:start position:0% is monies that have been deposited with the<01:07:23.460> city<01:07:23.700> that<01:07:24.390> can<01:07:24.900> then<01:07:25.079> be<01:07:25.319> used<01:07:26.119> to<01:07:27.119> fix 01:07:27.680 --> 01:07:27.690 align:start position:0% the city that can then be used to fix 01:07:27.690 --> 01:07:30.380 align:start position:0% the city that can then be used to fix whatever<01:07:28.109> damage<01:07:28.589> the<01:07:29.369> dumpster<01:07:29.789> causes 01:07:30.380 --> 01:07:30.390 align:start position:0% whatever damage the dumpster causes 01:07:30.390 --> 01:07:32.210 align:start position:0% whatever damage the dumpster causes hopefully<01:07:31.170> that<01:07:31.349> won't<01:07:31.500> be<01:07:31.650> an<01:07:31.769> accounting 01:07:32.210 --> 01:07:32.220 align:start position:0% hopefully that won't be an accounting 01:07:32.220 --> 01:07:32.870 align:start position:0% hopefully that won't be an accounting nightmare 01:07:32.870 --> 01:07:32.880 align:start position:0% nightmare 01:07:32.880 --> 01:07:34.050 align:start position:0% nightmare I<01:07:32.910> don't<01:07:33.390> know<01:07:33.539> that<01:07:33.750> there 01:07:34.050 --> 01:07:34.060 align:start position:0% I don't know that there 01:07:34.060 --> 01:07:35.640 align:start position:0% I don't know that there that<01:07:34.180> many<01:07:34.420> of<01:07:34.600> them<01:07:34.780> around<01:07:34.900> to<01:07:35.260> tell<01:07:35.440> you<01:07:35.530> the 01:07:35.640 --> 01:07:35.650 align:start position:0% that many of them around to tell you the 01:07:35.650 --> 01:07:39.150 align:start position:0% that many of them around to tell you the truth<01:07:35.890> I<01:07:36.270> see<01:07:37.270> them<01:07:37.480> in<01:07:37.570> my<01:07:37.780> ward<01:07:38.560> from<01:07:38.770> time<01:07:39.010> to 01:07:39.150 --> 01:07:39.160 align:start position:0% truth I see them in my ward from time to 01:07:39.160 --> 01:07:40.320 align:start position:0% truth I see them in my ward from time to time<01:07:39.190> but<01:07:39.520> I<01:07:39.580> think<01:07:39.760> it<01:07:39.850> would<01:07:39.970> be<01:07:40.060> completely 01:07:40.320 --> 01:07:40.330 align:start position:0% time but I think it would be completely 01:07:40.330 --> 01:07:43.920 align:start position:0% time but I think it would be completely manageable<01:07:41.020> and<01:07:41.920> it<01:07:42.070> might<01:07:42.700> go<01:07:43.480> a<01:07:43.510> long<01:07:43.750> way 01:07:43.920 --> 01:07:43.930 align:start position:0% manageable and it might go a long way 01:07:43.930 --> 01:07:45.240 align:start position:0% manageable and it might go a long way toward<01:07:44.200> solving<01:07:44.470> the<01:07:44.680> problem<01:07:45.070> of 01:07:45.240 --> 01:07:45.250 align:start position:0% toward solving the problem of 01:07:45.250 --> 01:07:49.020 align:start position:0% toward solving the problem of uncompensated<01:07:46.230> damage<01:07:47.790> responsible<01:07:48.790> for 01:07:49.020 --> 01:07:49.030 align:start position:0% uncompensated damage responsible for 01:07:49.030 --> 01:07:55.260 align:start position:0% uncompensated damage responsible for fixing<01:07:49.980> that's<01:07:50.980> what<01:07:51.220> we're<01:07:51.370> on<01:07:51.490> listen<01:07:51.760> I<01:07:54.270> I 01:07:55.260 --> 01:07:55.270 align:start position:0% fixing that's what we're on listen I I 01:07:55.270 --> 01:07:58.710 align:start position:0% fixing that's what we're on listen I I agree<01:07:55.660> that<01:07:56.320> this<01:07:56.500> is<01:07:56.650> a<01:07:56.680> good<01:07:57.400> thing<01:07:57.460> to<01:07:57.970> to 01:07:58.710 --> 01:07:58.720 align:start position:0% agree that this is a good thing to to 01:07:58.720 --> 01:08:02.070 align:start position:0% agree that this is a good thing to to work<01:07:58.870> on<01:07:59.080> to<01:07:59.380> control<01:08:00.330> I<01:08:01.330> see<01:08:01.720> a<01:08:01.750> difference 01:08:02.070 --> 01:08:02.080 align:start position:0% work on to control I see a difference 01:08:02.080 --> 01:08:05.670 align:start position:0% work on to control I see a difference between<01:08:02.140> pods<01:08:02.590> and<01:08:02.830> dumpsters<01:08:03.240> I<01:08:04.560> think<01:08:05.560> we 01:08:05.670 --> 01:08:05.680 align:start position:0% between pods and dumpsters I think we 01:08:05.680 --> 01:08:09.150 align:start position:0% between pods and dumpsters I think we are<01:08:05.860> concerned<01:08:06.820> about<01:08:06.880> enforcement<01:08:08.070> and<01:08:09.070> I'm 01:08:09.150 --> 01:08:09.160 align:start position:0% are concerned about enforcement and I'm 01:08:09.160 --> 01:08:10.170 align:start position:0% are concerned about enforcement and I'm trying<01:08:09.370> to<01:08:09.430> think<01:08:09.550> about<01:08:09.820> how<01:08:09.940> to<01:08:10.000> do 01:08:10.170 --> 01:08:10.180 align:start position:0% trying to think about how to do 01:08:10.180 --> 01:08:13.020 align:start position:0% trying to think about how to do enforcement<01:08:10.810> correctly<01:08:11.290> I<01:08:11.500> think<01:08:12.490> we<01:08:12.850> oughta 01:08:13.020 --> 01:08:13.030 align:start position:0% enforcement correctly I think we oughta 01:08:13.030 --> 01:08:15.360 align:start position:0% enforcement correctly I think we oughta leave<01:08:13.210> oughta<01:08:14.080> allowed<01:08:14.410> two<01:08:14.650> weeks<01:08:14.860> for<01:08:15.100> a<01:08:15.160> pod 01:08:15.360 --> 01:08:15.370 align:start position:0% leave oughta allowed two weeks for a pod 01:08:15.370 --> 01:08:18.360 align:start position:0% leave oughta allowed two weeks for a pod and<01:08:15.730> put<01:08:16.330> a<01:08:16.359> big<01:08:16.630> orange<01:08:16.990> sign<01:08:17.530> on<01:08:17.890> the<01:08:18.160> pod 01:08:18.360 --> 01:08:18.370 align:start position:0% and put a big orange sign on the pod 01:08:18.370 --> 01:08:21.270 align:start position:0% and put a big orange sign on the pod sticky<01:08:19.060> sign<01:08:19.420> which<01:08:19.839> has<01:08:20.140> the<01:08:20.350> end<01:08:20.680> date<01:08:20.980> and 01:08:21.270 --> 01:08:21.280 align:start position:0% sticky sign which has the end date and 01:08:21.280 --> 01:08:24.540 align:start position:0% sticky sign which has the end date and when<01:08:22.120> that<01:08:22.240> end<01:08:22.480> date<01:08:22.600> has<01:08:22.780> passed<01:08:23.339> allow<01:08:24.339> our 01:08:24.540 --> 01:08:24.550 align:start position:0% when that end date has passed allow our 01:08:24.550 --> 01:08:28.920 align:start position:0% when that end date has passed allow our officers<01:08:25.390> to<01:08:25.440> give<01:08:26.440> them<01:08:26.530> a<01:08:26.589> $50<01:08:27.040> ticket<01:08:27.930> but 01:08:28.920 --> 01:08:28.930 align:start position:0% officers to give them a $50 ticket but 01:08:28.930 --> 01:08:30.360 align:start position:0% officers to give them a $50 ticket but have<01:08:29.109> no<01:08:29.319> charge<01:08:29.740> for<01:08:29.980> it<01:08:30.069> during<01:08:30.250> that 01:08:30.360 --> 01:08:30.370 align:start position:0% have no charge for it during that 01:08:30.370 --> 01:08:33.390 align:start position:0% have no charge for it during that two-week<01:08:30.700> period<01:08:31.270> and<01:08:31.480> on<01:08:32.290> the<01:08:32.530> dumpster<01:08:33.130> I 01:08:33.390 --> 01:08:33.400 align:start position:0% two-week period and on the dumpster I 01:08:33.400 --> 01:08:36.570 align:start position:0% two-week period and on the dumpster I think<01:08:33.730> that<01:08:33.910> there<01:08:34.060> ought<01:08:34.150> to<01:08:34.180> be<01:08:34.270> a<01:08:34.359> $50<01:08:35.580> per 01:08:36.570 --> 01:08:36.580 align:start position:0% think that there ought to be a $50 per 01:08:36.580 --> 01:08:40.640 align:start position:0% think that there ought to be a $50 per month<01:08:36.609> charge<01:08:37.300> with<01:08:37.660> a<01:08:37.690> two<01:08:37.900> month<01:08:39.060> limit<01:08:40.060> and 01:08:40.640 --> 01:08:40.650 align:start position:0% month charge with a two month limit and 01:08:40.650 --> 01:08:43.829 align:start position:0% month charge with a two month limit and again<01:08:41.650> a<01:08:41.680> $50<01:08:42.190> ticket<01:08:42.640> after<01:08:43.000> two<01:08:43.359> months<01:08:43.690> and 01:08:43.829 --> 01:08:43.839 align:start position:0% again a $50 ticket after two months and 01:08:43.839 --> 01:08:46.950 align:start position:0% again a $50 ticket after two months and again<01:08:44.020> a<01:08:44.380> big<01:08:44.650> old<01:08:44.800> orange<01:08:45.580> sign<01:08:46.510> which<01:08:46.780> has 01:08:46.950 --> 01:08:46.960 align:start position:0% again a big old orange sign which has 01:08:46.960 --> 01:08:51.110 align:start position:0% again a big old orange sign which has the<01:08:47.140> end<01:08:47.290> date 01:08:51.110 --> 01:08:51.120 align:start position:0% 01:08:51.120 --> 01:08:55.059 align:start position:0% customer<01:08:51.960> Simmons<01:08:52.290> Thank<01:08:53.220> You<01:08:53.280> mayor<01:08:53.490> I<01:08:53.730> would 01:08:55.059 --> 01:08:55.069 align:start position:0% customer Simmons Thank You mayor I would 01:08:55.069 --> 01:08:59.480 align:start position:0% customer Simmons Thank You mayor I would we<01:08:56.390> doubled<01:08:57.390> with<01:08:57.859> councilmember<01:08:58.859> clay<01:08:59.220> has 01:08:59.480 --> 01:08:59.490 align:start position:0% we doubled with councilmember clay has 01:08:59.490 --> 01:09:02.450 align:start position:0% we doubled with councilmember clay has said<01:08:59.760> I<01:09:00.350> hardly<01:09:01.350> with<01:09:01.620> her<01:09:01.800> assessment 01:09:02.450 --> 01:09:02.460 align:start position:0% said I hardly with her assessment 01:09:02.460 --> 01:09:07.930 align:start position:0% said I hardly with her assessment situation<01:09:02.819> i<01:09:03.980> I<01:09:05.150> can't<01:09:06.150> foresee<01:09:06.690> that<01:09:06.930> some 01:09:07.930 --> 01:09:07.940 align:start position:0% situation i I can't foresee that some 01:09:07.940 --> 01:09:11.470 align:start position:0% situation i I can't foresee that some residents<01:09:08.940> may<01:09:09.089> be<01:09:09.150> using<01:09:09.450> the<01:09:09.690> cogs<01:09:09.960> to<01:09:10.500> store 01:09:11.470 --> 01:09:11.480 align:start position:0% residents may be using the cogs to store 01:09:11.480 --> 01:09:13.730 align:start position:0% residents may be using the cogs to store construction<01:09:12.480> materials<01:09:12.990> during 01:09:13.730 --> 01:09:13.740 align:start position:0% construction materials during 01:09:13.740 --> 01:09:15.380 align:start position:0% construction materials during construction<01:09:14.010> so<01:09:14.609> in<01:09:14.730> addition<01:09:15.060> to<01:09:15.180> moving 01:09:15.380 --> 01:09:15.390 align:start position:0% construction so in addition to moving 01:09:15.390 --> 01:09:29.420 align:start position:0% construction so in addition to moving they<01:09:16.290> might<01:09:16.500> use<01:09:16.650> a<01:09:16.700> construction<01:09:17.700> storage<01:09:28.430> on 01:09:29.420 --> 01:09:29.430 align:start position:0% they might use a construction storage on 01:09:29.430 --> 01:09:45.410 align:start position:0% they might use a construction storage on the<01:09:29.550> street<01:09:42.500> number<01:09:43.500> right<01:09:44.000> just<01:09:45.000> have<01:09:45.150> a<01:09:45.180> few 01:09:45.410 --> 01:09:45.420 align:start position:0% the street number right just have a few 01:09:45.420 --> 01:09:47.000 align:start position:0% the street number right just have a few questions<01:09:45.600> one<01:09:46.080> we're<01:09:46.410> not<01:09:46.560> talking<01:09:46.830> about<01:09:46.859> us 01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:47.010 align:start position:0% questions one we're not talking about us 01:09:47.010 --> 01:09:49.849 align:start position:0% questions one we're not talking about us applying<01:09:47.550> to<01:09:47.910> a<01:09:48.210> Potter<01:09:48.930> dumpster<01:09:49.560> that<01:09:49.680> goes 01:09:49.849 --> 01:09:49.859 align:start position:0% applying to a Potter dumpster that goes 01:09:49.859 --> 01:09:52.250 align:start position:0% applying to a Potter dumpster that goes on<01:09:50.040> someone's<01:09:50.430> own<01:09:50.670> property<01:09:51.240> right<01:09:51.480> well 01:09:52.250 --> 01:09:52.260 align:start position:0% on someone's own property right well 01:09:52.260 --> 01:09:54.440 align:start position:0% on someone's own property right well that<01:09:52.440> is<01:09:52.650> certainly<01:09:53.220> up<01:09:53.730> to<01:09:53.790> the<01:09:53.970> council 01:09:54.440 --> 01:09:54.450 align:start position:0% that is certainly up to the council 01:09:54.450 --> 01:09:57.590 align:start position:0% that is certainly up to the council currently<01:09:54.870> our<01:09:55.100> code<01:09:56.100> just<01:09:56.850> deals<01:09:57.120> with<01:09:57.270> the 01:09:57.590 --> 01:09:57.600 align:start position:0% currently our code just deals with the 01:09:57.600 --> 01:09:59.060 align:start position:0% currently our code just deals with the right<01:09:57.780> away<01:09:57.990> there<01:09:58.200> are<01:09:58.230> some<01:09:58.680> cities<01:09:58.950> that 01:09:59.060 --> 01:09:59.070 align:start position:0% right away there are some cities that 01:09:59.070 --> 01:10:02.990 align:start position:0% right away there are some cities that regulate<01:09:59.730> the<01:09:59.910> use<01:09:59.940> of<01:10:00.110> permits<01:10:01.110> permit<01:10:02.000> pods 01:10:02.990 --> 01:10:03.000 align:start position:0% regulate the use of permits permit pods 01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:04.940 align:start position:0% regulate the use of permits permit pods or<01:10:03.420> construction<01:10:03.930> dumpsters<01:10:04.440> on<01:10:04.590> private 01:10:04.940 --> 01:10:04.950 align:start position:0% or construction dumpsters on private 01:10:04.950 --> 01:10:06.170 align:start position:0% or construction dumpsters on private property<01:10:05.310> as<01:10:05.370> well<01:10:05.520> but<01:10:05.730> we<01:10:05.850> don't<01:10:06.000> currently 01:10:06.170 --> 01:10:06.180 align:start position:0% property as well but we don't currently 01:10:06.180 --> 01:10:10.250 align:start position:0% property as well but we don't currently have<01:10:06.510> that<01:10:06.690> in<01:10:06.870> our<01:10:06.990> code<01:10:08.720> hmm<01:10:09.720> I<01:10:09.810> might<01:10:10.050> be 01:10:10.250 --> 01:10:10.260 align:start position:0% have that in our code hmm I might be 01:10:10.260 --> 01:10:14.120 align:start position:0% have that in our code hmm I might be interested<01:10:10.590> in<01:10:12.470> somehow<01:10:13.470> trying<01:10:13.800> to<01:10:13.890> deal 01:10:14.120 --> 01:10:14.130 align:start position:0% interested in somehow trying to deal 01:10:14.130 --> 01:10:18.560 align:start position:0% interested in somehow trying to deal with<01:10:16.100> pods<01:10:17.100> in<01:10:17.370> particular<01:10:17.670> they're<01:10:18.090> in<01:10:18.270> place 01:10:18.560 --> 01:10:18.570 align:start position:0% with pods in particular they're in place 01:10:18.570 --> 01:10:20.590 align:start position:0% with pods in particular they're in place on<01:10:18.810> people's<01:10:19.110> properties<01:10:19.560> for<01:10:19.800> a<01:10:19.830> long<01:10:20.040> time 01:10:20.590 --> 01:10:20.600 align:start position:0% on people's properties for a long time 01:10:20.600 --> 01:10:23.150 align:start position:0% on people's properties for a long time not<01:10:21.600> in<01:10:21.780> my<01:10:21.930> ward<01:10:22.230> now<01:10:22.560> but<01:10:22.770> when<01:10:22.890> I<01:10:22.920> live 01:10:23.150 --> 01:10:23.160 align:start position:0% not in my ward now but when I live 01:10:23.160 --> 01:10:24.590 align:start position:0% not in my ward now but when I live didn't<01:10:23.460> council<01:10:23.820> member<01:10:24.030> of<01:10:24.120> Robinson's 01:10:24.590 --> 01:10:24.600 align:start position:0% didn't council member of Robinson's 01:10:24.600 --> 01:10:28.940 align:start position:0% didn't council member of Robinson's award<01:10:25.250> before<01:10:27.080> there<01:10:28.080> was<01:10:28.170> a<01:10:28.200> pod<01:10:28.530> that<01:10:28.560> was<01:10:28.860> in 01:10:28.940 --> 01:10:28.950 align:start position:0% award before there was a pod that was in 01:10:28.950 --> 01:10:30.710 align:start position:0% award before there was a pod that was in someone's<01:10:29.280> front<01:10:29.400> yard<01:10:29.580> for<01:10:30.090> on<01:10:30.510> their 01:10:30.710 --> 01:10:30.720 align:start position:0% someone's front yard for on their 01:10:30.720 --> 01:10:37.540 align:start position:0% someone's front yard for on their driveway<01:10:31.050> for<01:10:31.610> nine<01:10:32.610> months<01:10:34.310> or<01:10:35.310> a<01:10:35.370> year<01:10:35.550> and 01:10:37.540 --> 01:10:37.550 align:start position:0% driveway for nine months or a year and 01:10:37.550 --> 01:10:40.130 align:start position:0% driveway for nine months or a year and you<01:10:38.550> know<01:10:38.670> -<01:10:38.880> councilmember<01:10:39.360> Barry's<01:10:39.630> when<01:10:40.110> I 01:10:40.130 --> 01:10:40.140 align:start position:0% you know - councilmember Barry's when I 01:10:40.140 --> 01:10:43.880 align:start position:0% you know - councilmember Barry's when I think<01:10:40.380> it's<01:10:40.470> just<01:10:40.590> unsightly<01:10:41.340> and<01:10:41.850> I<01:10:42.890> can 01:10:43.880 --> 01:10:43.890 align:start position:0% think it's just unsightly and I can 01:10:43.890 --> 01:10:45.410 align:start position:0% think it's just unsightly and I can understand<01:10:44.280> someone<01:10:44.490> may<01:10:44.700> need<01:10:44.850> it<01:10:45.000> for<01:10:45.180> some 01:10:45.410 --> 01:10:45.420 align:start position:0% understand someone may need it for some 01:10:45.420 --> 01:10:50.180 align:start position:0% understand someone may need it for some period<01:10:45.750> of<01:10:45.900> time<01:10:45.960> but<01:10:46.350> it<01:10:46.470> seems<01:10:47.960> like<01:10:49.190> six 01:10:50.180 --> 01:10:50.190 align:start position:0% period of time but it seems like six 01:10:50.190 --> 01:10:51.560 align:start position:0% period of time but it seems like six months<01:10:50.490> would<01:10:50.580> be<01:10:50.700> a<01:10:50.730> reasonable<01:10:51.240> period<01:10:51.390> of 01:10:51.560 --> 01:10:51.570 align:start position:0% months would be a reasonable period of 01:10:51.570 --> 01:10:53.060 align:start position:0% months would be a reasonable period of time<01:10:51.630> for<01:10:52.200> something<01:10:52.350> to<01:10:52.470> be<01:10:52.650> on<01:10:52.740> someone's 01:10:53.060 --> 01:10:53.070 align:start position:0% time for something to be on someone's 01:10:53.070 --> 01:10:57.110 align:start position:0% time for something to be on someone's private<01:10:53.790> property<01:10:55.160> are<01:10:56.160> there<01:10:56.340> solutions<01:10:56.580> if 01:10:57.110 --> 01:10:57.120 align:start position:0% private property are there solutions if 01:10:57.120 --> 01:10:58.890 align:start position:0% private property are there solutions if a<01:10:57.210> dumpster 01:10:58.890 --> 01:10:58.900 align:start position:0% a dumpster 01:10:58.900 --> 01:11:00.570 align:start position:0% a dumpster other<01:10:59.230> our<01:10:59.440> solution<01:10:59.860> you<01:10:59.950> know<01:11:00.070> some 01:11:00.570 --> 01:11:00.580 align:start position:0% other our solution you know some 01:11:00.580 --> 01:11:02.400 align:start position:0% other our solution you know some construction<01:11:01.150> projects<01:11:01.480> are<01:11:01.630> very<01:11:01.660> large<01:11:02.110> and 01:11:02.400 --> 01:11:02.410 align:start position:0% construction projects are very large and 01:11:02.410 --> 01:11:05.729 align:start position:0% construction projects are very large and can<01:11:02.590> take<01:11:02.710> a<01:11:02.800> long<01:11:02.980> time<01:11:04.200> and<01:11:05.200> so<01:11:05.380> we're<01:11:05.500> saying 01:11:05.729 --> 01:11:05.739 align:start position:0% can take a long time and so we're saying 01:11:05.739 --> 01:11:07.410 align:start position:0% can take a long time and so we're saying after<01:11:06.250> six<01:11:06.520> months<01:11:06.700> you<01:11:06.910> can't<01:11:07.150> have<01:11:07.330> the 01:11:07.410 --> 01:11:07.420 align:start position:0% after six months you can't have the 01:11:07.420 --> 01:11:14.280 align:start position:0% after six months you can't have the dumpster<01:11:11.520> right<01:11:12.520> put<01:11:13.450> are<01:11:13.540> there<01:11:13.720> solutions 01:11:14.280 --> 01:11:14.290 align:start position:0% dumpster right put are there solutions 01:11:14.290 --> 01:11:15.630 align:start position:0% dumpster right put are there solutions and<01:11:14.590> Bruce<01:11:14.770> may<01:11:14.920> not<01:11:15.100> know<01:11:15.250> the<01:11:15.310> answers 01:11:15.630 --> 01:11:15.640 align:start position:0% and Bruce may not know the answers 01:11:15.640 --> 01:11:17.130 align:start position:0% and Bruce may not know the answers question<01:11:16.030> are<01:11:16.120> there<01:11:16.239> solutions<01:11:16.780> that<01:11:17.020> get 01:11:17.130 --> 01:11:17.140 align:start position:0% question are there solutions that get 01:11:17.140 --> 01:11:18.720 align:start position:0% question are there solutions that get around<01:11:17.260> that<01:11:17.710> if<01:11:17.920> you<01:11:18.070> go<01:11:18.400> beyond<01:11:18.700> the 01:11:18.720 --> 01:11:18.730 align:start position:0% around that if you go beyond the 01:11:18.730 --> 01:11:22.320 align:start position:0% around that if you go beyond the six-month<01:11:19.620> timeframe<01:11:20.620> for<01:11:21.070> a<01:11:21.100> dumpster<01:11:21.489> well 01:11:22.320 --> 01:11:22.330 align:start position:0% six-month timeframe for a dumpster well 01:11:22.330 --> 01:11:23.970 align:start position:0% six-month timeframe for a dumpster well I<01:11:22.360> mean<01:11:22.510> Bruce<01:11:22.900> may<01:11:23.080> want<01:11:23.260> to<01:11:23.320> speak<01:11:23.530> to<01:11:23.680> it<01:11:23.800> but 01:11:23.970 --> 01:11:23.980 align:start position:0% I mean Bruce may want to speak to it but 01:11:23.980 --> 01:11:27.900 align:start position:0% I mean Bruce may want to speak to it but and<01:11:24.310> my<01:11:24.730> own<01:11:24.880> sense<01:11:25.660> of<01:11:25.840> the<01:11:26.140> issue<01:11:27.100> is<01:11:27.489> that<01:11:27.520> it 01:11:27.900 --> 01:11:27.910 align:start position:0% and my own sense of the issue is that it 01:11:27.910 --> 01:11:30.030 align:start position:0% and my own sense of the issue is that it really<01:11:28.060> has<01:11:28.989> to<01:11:29.290> do<01:11:29.440> with<01:11:29.470> how<01:11:29.710> well<01:11:29.890> the 01:11:30.030 --> 01:11:30.040 align:start position:0% really has to do with how well the 01:11:30.040 --> 01:11:33.360 align:start position:0% really has to do with how well the contractor<01:11:30.670> schedules<01:11:31.180> and<01:11:32.100> plans<01:11:33.100> their 01:11:33.360 --> 01:11:33.370 align:start position:0% contractor schedules and plans their 01:11:33.370 --> 01:11:37.410 align:start position:0% contractor schedules and plans their work<01:11:33.610> in<01:11:34.450> in<01:11:34.660> fact<01:11:35.730> depending<01:11:36.730> on<01:11:36.880> the<01:11:37.030> cost<01:11:37.270> of 01:11:37.410 --> 01:11:37.420 align:start position:0% work in in fact depending on the cost of 01:11:37.420 --> 01:11:39.330 align:start position:0% work in in fact depending on the cost of the<01:11:37.540> dumpster<01:11:37.930> and<01:11:38.020> what's<01:11:38.260> the<01:11:38.560> benefit<01:11:39.010> cost 01:11:39.330 --> 01:11:39.340 align:start position:0% the dumpster and what's the benefit cost 01:11:39.340 --> 01:11:41.580 align:start position:0% the dumpster and what's the benefit cost benefit<01:11:39.910> to<01:11:40.090> the<01:11:40.210> to<01:11:40.600> the<01:11:40.720> contractor<01:11:41.380> just 01:11:41.580 --> 01:11:41.590 align:start position:0% benefit to the to the contractor just 01:11:41.590 --> 01:11:44.520 align:start position:0% benefit to the to the contractor just using<01:11:42.370> a<01:11:42.430> truck<01:11:42.730> to<01:11:43.210> haul<01:11:43.360> debris<01:11:43.780> away<01:11:43.900> daily 01:11:44.520 --> 01:11:44.530 align:start position:0% using a truck to haul debris away daily 01:11:44.530 --> 01:11:47.010 align:start position:0% using a truck to haul debris away daily is<01:11:44.680> sometimes<01:11:45.190> more<01:11:45.580> cost<01:11:45.880> efficient<01:11:46.480> than<01:11:46.750> a 01:11:47.010 --> 01:11:47.020 align:start position:0% is sometimes more cost efficient than a 01:11:47.020 --> 01:11:48.900 align:start position:0% is sometimes more cost efficient than a dumpster<01:11:47.739> just<01:11:47.950> sort<01:11:48.100> of<01:11:48.160> depends<01:11:48.550> on<01:11:48.640> if<01:11:48.760> they 01:11:48.900 --> 01:11:48.910 align:start position:0% dumpster just sort of depends on if they 01:11:48.910 --> 01:11:50.640 align:start position:0% dumpster just sort of depends on if they have<01:11:49.090> it<01:11:49.239> in<01:11:49.330> their<01:11:49.480> repertoire<01:11:49.690> or<01:11:50.110> not<01:11:50.320> if 01:11:50.640 --> 01:11:50.650 align:start position:0% have it in their repertoire or not if 01:11:50.650 --> 01:11:52.260 align:start position:0% have it in their repertoire or not if you're<01:11:50.860> bringing<01:11:51.250> in<01:11:51.370> a<01:11:51.460> dumpster<01:11:51.760> from<01:11:52.180> an 01:11:52.260 --> 01:11:52.270 align:start position:0% you're bringing in a dumpster from an 01:11:52.270 --> 01:11:54.240 align:start position:0% you're bringing in a dumpster from an outside<01:11:52.630> source<01:11:52.840> it's<01:11:53.170> a<01:11:53.290> guaranteed<01:11:53.739> 500 01:11:54.240 --> 01:11:54.250 align:start position:0% outside source it's a guaranteed 500 01:11:54.250 --> 01:11:57.260 align:start position:0% outside source it's a guaranteed 500 bucks<01:11:54.780> you<01:11:55.780> know<01:11:55.900> for<01:11:56.110> each<01:11:56.230> siding<01:11:56.770> and<01:11:56.920> pull 01:11:57.260 --> 01:11:57.270 align:start position:0% bucks you know for each siding and pull 01:11:57.270 --> 01:11:59.580 align:start position:0% bucks you know for each siding and pull and<01:11:58.270> then<01:11:58.450> if<01:11:58.570> you<01:11:58.660> go<01:11:58.810> overweight<01:11:59.260> you<01:11:59.470> have 01:11:59.580 --> 01:11:59.590 align:start position:0% and then if you go overweight you have 01:11:59.590 --> 01:12:01.850 align:start position:0% and then if you go overweight you have to<01:11:59.710> pay<01:11:59.890> for<01:12:00.190> the<01:12:00.280> additional<01:12:00.340> money<01:12:01.180> for<01:12:01.480> that 01:12:01.850 --> 01:12:01.860 align:start position:0% to pay for the additional money for that 01:12:01.860 --> 01:12:04.680 align:start position:0% to pay for the additional money for that so<01:12:02.860> a<01:12:03.250> lot<01:12:03.430> of<01:12:03.489> it<01:12:03.640> depends<01:12:03.970> on<01:12:04.000> the<01:12:04.150> contractor 01:12:04.680 --> 01:12:04.690 align:start position:0% so a lot of it depends on the contractor 01:12:04.690 --> 01:12:05.820 align:start position:0% so a lot of it depends on the contractor themselves<01:12:05.200> and<01:12:05.320> the<01:12:05.380> work<01:12:05.560> they're<01:12:05.800> doing 01:12:05.820 --> 01:12:05.830 align:start position:0% themselves and the work they're doing 01:12:05.830 --> 01:12:09.090 align:start position:0% themselves and the work they're doing the<01:12:06.400> level<01:12:06.730> of<01:12:06.850> debris<01:12:07.350> we<01:12:08.350> have<01:12:08.530> worked<01:12:08.980> with 01:12:09.090 --> 01:12:09.100 align:start position:0% the level of debris we have worked with 01:12:09.100 --> 01:12:11.850 align:start position:0% the level of debris we have worked with some<01:12:09.630> contractors<01:12:10.630> to<01:12:10.960> try<01:12:11.170> to<01:12:11.230> encourage 01:12:11.850 --> 01:12:11.860 align:start position:0% some contractors to try to encourage 01:12:11.860 --> 01:12:14.460 align:start position:0% some contractors to try to encourage them<01:12:12.100> to<01:12:12.130> use<01:12:12.310> trucks<01:12:12.820> instead<01:12:13.330> of<01:12:13.470> dumpsters 01:12:14.460 --> 01:12:14.470 align:start position:0% them to use trucks instead of dumpsters 01:12:14.470 --> 01:12:16.530 align:start position:0% them to use trucks instead of dumpsters and<01:12:14.800> you<01:12:15.340> get<01:12:15.520> mixed<01:12:15.700> response<01:12:16.180> it<01:12:16.360> just 01:12:16.530 --> 01:12:16.540 align:start position:0% and you get mixed response it just 01:12:16.540 --> 01:12:18.660 align:start position:0% and you get mixed response it just depends<01:12:16.930> on<01:12:17.050> the<01:12:17.440> convenience<01:12:17.950> issue<01:12:18.160> for<01:12:18.550> the 01:12:18.660 --> 01:12:18.670 align:start position:0% depends on the convenience issue for the 01:12:18.670 --> 01:12:20.940 align:start position:0% depends on the convenience issue for the contractor<01:12:19.300> but<01:12:19.900> there's<01:12:20.110> any<01:12:20.440> number<01:12:20.830> of 01:12:20.940 --> 01:12:20.950 align:start position:0% contractor but there's any number of 01:12:20.950 --> 01:12:23.130 align:start position:0% contractor but there's any number of ways<01:12:21.040> you<01:12:21.100> could<01:12:21.370> also<01:12:21.580> store<01:12:22.540> construction 01:12:23.130 --> 01:12:23.140 align:start position:0% ways you could also store construction 01:12:23.140 --> 01:12:24.900 align:start position:0% ways you could also store construction debris<01:12:23.260> on<01:12:23.530> the<01:12:23.680> lawn<01:12:23.860> of<01:12:24.130> a<01:12:24.220> property<01:12:24.730> and 01:12:24.900 --> 01:12:24.910 align:start position:0% debris on the lawn of a property and 01:12:24.910 --> 01:12:27.540 align:start position:0% debris on the lawn of a property and then<01:12:25.120> you<01:12:25.390> know<01:12:25.810> arrange<01:12:26.140> for<01:12:26.470> a<01:12:26.500> large<01:12:27.220> truck 01:12:27.540 --> 01:12:27.550 align:start position:0% then you know arrange for a large truck 01:12:27.550 --> 01:12:29.430 align:start position:0% then you know arrange for a large truck to<01:12:27.700> come<01:12:27.940> and<01:12:28.210> load<01:12:28.390> it<01:12:28.570> in<01:12:28.750> and<01:12:28.989> haul<01:12:29.140> it<01:12:29.350> away 01:12:29.430 --> 01:12:29.440 align:start position:0% to come and load it in and haul it away 01:12:29.440 --> 01:12:31.410 align:start position:0% to come and load it in and haul it away so<01:12:29.620> there's<01:12:30.040> there's<01:12:30.430> alternatives<01:12:31.090> it<01:12:31.210> just 01:12:31.410 --> 01:12:31.420 align:start position:0% so there's there's alternatives it just 01:12:31.420 --> 01:12:35.550 align:start position:0% so there's there's alternatives it just happens<01:12:31.810> to<01:12:32.110> deal<01:12:32.890> with<01:12:33.160> the<01:12:34.170> efficiency<01:12:35.170> and 01:12:35.550 --> 01:12:35.560 align:start position:0% happens to deal with the efficiency and 01:12:35.560 --> 01:12:37.470 align:start position:0% happens to deal with the efficiency and the<01:12:35.620> equipment<01:12:36.220> level<01:12:36.520> of<01:12:36.640> the<01:12:36.790> contractor 01:12:37.470 --> 01:12:37.480 align:start position:0% the equipment level of the contractor 01:12:37.480 --> 01:12:40.890 align:start position:0% the equipment level of the contractor and<01:12:38.440> do<01:12:38.739> do<01:12:39.220> other<01:12:39.400> places<01:12:39.610> require<01:12:40.030> a<01:12:40.300> bond<01:12:40.630> of 01:12:40.890 --> 01:12:40.900 align:start position:0% and do do other places require a bond of 01:12:40.900 --> 01:12:42.770 align:start position:0% and do do other places require a bond of this<01:12:41.020> wondering<01:12:41.380> about<01:12:41.470> this<01:12:41.650> practice<01:12:42.220> I 01:12:42.770 --> 01:12:42.780 align:start position:0% this wondering about this practice I 01:12:42.780 --> 01:12:45.330 align:start position:0% this wondering about this practice I haven't<01:12:43.780> I<01:12:44.080> didn't<01:12:44.590> spend<01:12:44.739> well<01:12:44.890> across<01:12:45.130> any 01:12:45.330 --> 01:12:45.340 align:start position:0% haven't I didn't spend well across any 01:12:45.340 --> 01:12:47.220 align:start position:0% haven't I didn't spend well across any in<01:12:45.520> the<01:12:45.670> in<01:12:45.910> the<01:12:46.030> Quick<01:12:46.270> Looks<01:12:46.480> I<01:12:46.720> get<01:12:46.960> through 01:12:47.220 --> 01:12:47.230 align:start position:0% in the in the Quick Looks I get through 01:12:47.230 --> 01:12:49.140 align:start position:0% in the in the Quick Looks I get through some<01:12:47.470> of<01:12:47.560> the<01:12:47.650> other<01:12:47.800> jurisdictions<01:12:48.670> because 01:12:49.140 --> 01:12:49.150 align:start position:0% some of the other jurisdictions because 01:12:49.150 --> 01:12:51.060 align:start position:0% some of the other jurisdictions because we<01:12:49.480> have<01:12:49.660> bond<01:12:49.930> requirements<01:12:50.590> for<01:12:50.710> some<01:12:50.920> other 01:12:51.060 --> 01:12:51.070 align:start position:0% we have bond requirements for some other 01:12:51.070 --> 01:12:53.760 align:start position:0% we have bond requirements for some other things<01:12:51.340> that<01:12:51.520> just<01:12:51.700> came<01:12:51.910> to<01:12:51.970> mind<01:12:52.360> to<01:12:52.690> us<01:12:52.870> as<01:12:53.710> a 01:12:53.760 --> 01:12:53.770 align:start position:0% things that just came to mind to us as a 01:12:53.770 --> 01:12:55.740 align:start position:0% things that just came to mind to us as a way<01:12:54.040> to<01:12:54.100> deal<01:12:54.310> with<01:12:54.489> the<01:12:54.580> damage<01:12:54.970> I'm 01:12:55.740 --> 01:12:55.750 align:start position:0% way to deal with the damage I'm 01:12:55.750 --> 01:12:57.180 align:start position:0% way to deal with the damage I'm supportive<01:12:56.290> of<01:12:56.380> all<01:12:56.530> it<01:12:56.650> comes<01:12:56.800> from<01:12:56.980> or 01:12:57.180 --> 01:12:57.190 align:start position:0% supportive of all it comes from or 01:12:57.190 --> 01:13:00.570 align:start position:0% supportive of all it comes from or Clay's<01:12:57.400> ideas<01:12:57.880> oh<01:12:59.280> that's<01:13:00.280> where<01:13:00.489> were 01:13:00.570 --> 01:13:00.580 align:start position:0% Clay's ideas oh that's where were 01:13:00.580 --> 01:13:07.530 align:start position:0% Clay's ideas oh that's where were snipper<01:13:00.850> do<01:13:01.000> you<01:13:01.060> have<01:13:01.150> any<01:13:01.239> comments<01:13:05.700> I<01:13:06.700> do 01:13:07.530 --> 01:13:07.540 align:start position:0% snipper do you have any comments I do 01:13:07.540 --> 01:13:09.000 align:start position:0% snipper do you have any comments I do think<01:13:07.930> that 01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:09.010 align:start position:0% think that 01:13:09.010 --> 01:13:12.060 align:start position:0% think that the<01:13:09.130> time<01:13:09.550> limit<01:13:09.760> should<01:13:10.120> be<01:13:10.680> longer<01:13:11.680> though 01:13:12.060 --> 01:13:12.070 align:start position:0% the time limit should be longer though 01:13:12.070 --> 01:13:14.960 align:start position:0% the time limit should be longer though because<01:13:12.640> I<01:13:12.940> can<01:13:13.120> easily<01:13:13.450> imagine<01:13:13.800> somebody 01:13:14.960 --> 01:13:14.970 align:start position:0% because I can easily imagine somebody 01:13:14.970 --> 01:13:17.790 align:start position:0% because I can easily imagine somebody painting<01:13:15.970> their<01:13:16.150> house<01:13:16.420> and<01:13:16.840> having<01:13:17.440> it<01:13:17.590> take 01:13:17.790 --> 01:13:17.800 align:start position:0% painting their house and having it take 01:13:17.800 --> 01:13:20.910 align:start position:0% painting their house and having it take three<01:13:18.130> or<01:13:18.250> four<01:13:18.489> weeks<01:13:19.290> for<01:13:20.290> that<01:13:20.440> to<01:13:20.650> happen 01:13:20.910 --> 01:13:20.920 align:start position:0% three or four weeks for that to happen 01:13:20.920 --> 01:13:25.740 align:start position:0% three or four weeks for that to happen so<01:13:21.400> I<01:13:23.010> can<01:13:24.010> imagine<01:13:24.250> using<01:13:25.090> those<01:13:25.420> storage 01:13:25.740 --> 01:13:25.750 align:start position:0% so I can imagine using those storage 01:13:25.750 --> 01:13:28.740 align:start position:0% so I can imagine using those storage things<01:13:26.140> for<01:13:26.790> you<01:13:27.790> know<01:13:27.970> somewhat<01:13:28.390> longer 01:13:28.740 --> 01:13:28.750 align:start position:0% things for you know somewhat longer 01:13:28.750 --> 01:13:31.470 align:start position:0% things for you know somewhat longer periods<01:13:29.200> than<01:13:29.320> just<01:13:29.680> loading<01:13:30.040> it<01:13:30.130> up<01:13:30.220> and<01:13:30.480> they 01:13:31.470 --> 01:13:31.480 align:start position:0% periods than just loading it up and they 01:13:31.480 --> 01:13:33.120 align:start position:0% periods than just loading it up and they don't<01:13:31.600> want<01:13:31.840> to<01:13:31.930> have<01:13:32.260> people<01:13:32.500> try<01:13:33.070> the 01:13:33.120 --> 01:13:33.130 align:start position:0% don't want to have people try the 01:13:33.130 --> 01:13:35.460 align:start position:0% don't want to have people try the schedules<01:13:33.850> a<01:13:34.120> guy<01:13:34.330> to<01:13:34.390> come<01:13:34.750> and<01:13:34.810> take<01:13:35.110> the<01:13:35.260> pot 01:13:35.460 --> 01:13:35.470 align:start position:0% schedules a guy to come and take the pot 01:13:35.470 --> 01:13:36.960 align:start position:0% schedules a guy to come and take the pot away<01:13:35.590> or<01:13:35.860> some<01:13:36.040> similar<01:13:36.280> thing<01:13:36.640> so<01:13:36.850> I<01:13:36.940> can 01:13:36.960 --> 01:13:36.970 align:start position:0% away or some similar thing so I can 01:13:36.970 --> 01:13:39.990 align:start position:0% away or some similar thing so I can easily<01:13:37.239> imagine<01:13:37.480> that<01:13:38.400> somewhat<01:13:39.400> longer<01:13:39.760> time 01:13:39.990 --> 01:13:40.000 align:start position:0% easily imagine that somewhat longer time 01:13:40.000 --> 01:13:42.060 align:start position:0% easily imagine that somewhat longer time frame<01:13:40.270> for<01:13:40.450> that<01:13:40.600> I<01:13:40.630> feel<01:13:40.930> like<01:13:41.080> the<01:13:41.680> idea<01:13:42.010> of 01:13:42.060 --> 01:13:42.070 align:start position:0% frame for that I feel like the idea of 01:13:42.070 --> 01:13:45.090 align:start position:0% frame for that I feel like the idea of having<01:13:42.250> a<01:13:42.460> bond<01:13:43.110> something<01:13:44.110> security<01:13:44.860> by<01:13:45.040> the 01:13:45.090 --> 01:13:45.100 align:start position:0% having a bond something security by the 01:13:45.100 --> 01:13:54.090 align:start position:0% having a bond something security by the kind<01:13:45.520> of<01:13:45.610> idea<01:13:46.200> for<01:13:47.200> the<01:13:47.290> damage<01:13:50.010> and<01:13:51.330> I<01:13:53.100> do 01:13:54.090 --> 01:13:54.100 align:start position:0% kind of idea for the damage and I do 01:13:54.100 --> 01:13:56.340 align:start position:0% kind of idea for the damage and I do wonder<01:13:54.670> if<01:13:55.060> there<01:13:55.270> is<01:13:55.480> a<01:13:55.510> way<01:13:55.840> to<01:13:55.900> encourage 01:13:56.340 --> 01:13:56.350 align:start position:0% wonder if there is a way to encourage 01:13:56.350 --> 01:13:59.250 align:start position:0% wonder if there is a way to encourage people<01:13:56.890> to<01:13:57.070> use<01:13:57.220> it<01:13:57.640> to<01:13:57.880> place<01:13:58.720> it<01:13:58.900> on<01:13:59.020> their 01:13:59.250 --> 01:13:59.260 align:start position:0% people to use it to place it on their 01:13:59.260 --> 01:14:01.890 align:start position:0% people to use it to place it on their property<01:13:59.880> instead<01:14:00.880> of<01:14:01.000> in<01:14:01.120> the<01:14:01.210> roadway<01:14:01.420> but 01:14:01.890 --> 01:14:01.900 align:start position:0% property instead of in the roadway but 01:14:01.900 --> 01:14:05.850 align:start position:0% property instead of in the roadway but it<01:14:02.080> does<01:14:02.290> create<01:14:02.860> the<01:14:04.020> similar<01:14:05.020> problem<01:14:05.500> of<01:14:05.680> an 01:14:05.850 --> 01:14:05.860 align:start position:0% it does create the similar problem of an 01:14:05.860 --> 01:14:08.130 align:start position:0% it does create the similar problem of an unsightly<01:14:06.250> dumpster<01:14:06.940> regardless<01:14:07.570> of<01:14:07.780> whether 01:14:08.130 --> 01:14:08.140 align:start position:0% unsightly dumpster regardless of whether 01:14:08.140 --> 01:14:10.020 align:start position:0% unsightly dumpster regardless of whether it's<01:14:08.320> located<01:14:08.739> in<01:14:08.920> the<01:14:09.040> driveway<01:14:09.550> or<01:14:09.730> on<01:14:09.850> the 01:14:10.020 --> 01:14:10.030 align:start position:0% it's located in the driveway or on the 01:14:10.030 --> 01:14:13.500 align:start position:0% it's located in the driveway or on the street<01:14:10.390> a<01:14:11.430> number<01:14:12.430> of<01:14:12.520> years<01:14:12.730> ago<01:14:12.880> when<01:14:13.180> we<01:14:13.330> did 01:14:13.500 --> 01:14:13.510 align:start position:0% street a number of years ago when we did 01:14:13.510 --> 01:14:16.080 align:start position:0% street a number of years ago when we did our<01:14:13.660> renovation<01:14:14.560> it<01:14:15.460> took<01:14:15.670> an<01:14:15.790> enormous 01:14:16.080 --> 01:14:16.090 align:start position:0% our renovation it took an enormous 01:14:16.090 --> 01:14:17.970 align:start position:0% our renovation it took an enormous amount<01:14:16.570> of<01:14:16.750> time<01:14:16.960> as<01:14:17.320> you<01:14:17.350> all<01:14:17.590> know<01:14:17.800> these 01:14:17.970 --> 01:14:17.980 align:start position:0% amount of time as you all know these 01:14:17.980 --> 01:14:19.860 align:start position:0% amount of time as you all know these renovations<01:14:18.340> take<01:14:18.880> longer<01:14:19.150> than<01:14:19.420> they<01:14:19.600> you 01:14:19.860 --> 01:14:19.870 align:start position:0% renovations take longer than they you 01:14:19.870 --> 01:14:21.720 align:start position:0% renovations take longer than they you think<01:14:20.110> they're<01:14:20.260> going<01:14:20.440> to<01:14:20.560> and<01:14:21.460> we<01:14:21.580> had<01:14:21.700> a 01:14:21.720 --> 01:14:21.730 align:start position:0% think they're going to and we had a 01:14:21.730 --> 01:14:24.030 align:start position:0% think they're going to and we had a dumpster<01:14:22.210> in<01:14:22.360> a<01:14:22.420> driveway<01:14:22.720> for<01:14:22.989> it<01:14:23.680> must<01:14:23.860> have 01:14:24.030 --> 01:14:24.040 align:start position:0% dumpster in a driveway for it must have 01:14:24.040 --> 01:14:27.060 align:start position:0% dumpster in a driveway for it must have been<01:14:24.190> six<01:14:24.580> or<01:14:24.730> eight<01:14:24.850> months<01:14:25.680> and<01:14:26.680> the<01:14:26.830> thing 01:14:27.060 --> 01:14:27.070 align:start position:0% been six or eight months and the thing 01:14:27.070 --> 01:14:33.090 align:start position:0% been six or eight months and the thing was<01:14:27.310> incredibly<01:14:28.090> unsightly<01:14:31.410> so<01:14:32.410> I<01:14:32.470> do<01:14:32.590> wonder 01:14:33.090 --> 01:14:33.100 align:start position:0% was incredibly unsightly so I do wonder 01:14:33.100 --> 01:14:37.430 align:start position:0% was incredibly unsightly so I do wonder if<01:14:33.130> a<01:14:33.489> little<01:14:33.820> effort<01:14:34.000> to<01:14:34.330> thinking<01:14:34.720> about<01:14:36.270> the 01:14:37.430 --> 01:14:37.440 align:start position:0% if a little effort to thinking about the 01:14:37.440 --> 01:14:39.990 align:start position:0% if a little effort to thinking about the storage<01:14:38.440> of<01:14:38.680> these<01:14:38.860> things<01:14:39.190> the<01:14:39.489> placement<01:14:39.940> of 01:14:39.990 --> 01:14:40.000 align:start position:0% storage of these things the placement of 01:14:40.000 --> 01:14:41.880 align:start position:0% storage of these things the placement of these<01:14:40.150> things<01:14:40.480> on<01:14:40.720> the<01:14:41.050> property<01:14:41.530> itself 01:14:41.880 --> 01:14:41.890 align:start position:0% these things on the property itself 01:14:41.890 --> 01:14:44.040 align:start position:0% these things on the property itself might<01:14:42.310> be<01:14:42.340> an<01:14:42.580> issue<01:14:42.730> we<01:14:43.000> want<01:14:43.150> to<01:14:43.330> think<01:14:43.780> about 01:14:44.040 --> 01:14:44.050 align:start position:0% might be an issue we want to think about 01:14:44.050 --> 01:14:51.830 align:start position:0% might be an issue we want to think about -<01:14:44.970> good<01:14:46.200> okay<01:14:47.200> I<01:14:47.620> got<01:14:48.250> a<01:14:48.280> couple<01:14:48.520> thoughts<01:14:50.610> I'm 01:14:51.830 --> 01:14:51.840 align:start position:0% - good okay I got a couple thoughts I'm 01:14:51.840 --> 01:14:53.880 align:start position:0% - good okay I got a couple thoughts I'm generally<01:14:52.840> going<01:14:52.870> in<01:14:53.260> the<01:14:53.350> direction<01:14:53.440> that<01:14:53.770> my 01:14:53.880 --> 01:14:53.890 align:start position:0% generally going in the direction that my 01:14:53.890 --> 01:14:56.970 align:start position:0% generally going in the direction that my colleagues<01:14:54.370> are<01:14:54.520> going<01:14:54.750> I<01:14:55.890> think<01:14:56.890> we 01:14:56.970 --> 01:14:56.980 align:start position:0% colleagues are going I think we 01:14:56.980 --> 01:14:58.410 align:start position:0% colleagues are going I think we definitely<01:14:57.130> need<01:14:57.610> a<01:14:57.640> bond<01:14:57.910> for<01:14:58.239> anything 01:14:58.410 --> 01:14:58.420 align:start position:0% definitely need a bond for anything 01:14:58.420 --> 01:15:01.860 align:start position:0% definitely need a bond for anything that's<01:14:58.720> placed<01:14:58.960> in<01:14:59.140> the<01:14:59.230> street<01:15:00.600> whether<01:15:01.600> it's 01:15:01.860 --> 01:15:01.870 align:start position:0% that's placed in the street whether it's 01:15:01.870 --> 01:15:05.040 align:start position:0% that's placed in the street whether it's the<01:15:02.310> construction<01:15:03.310> debris 01:15:05.040 --> 01:15:05.050 align:start position:0% the construction debris 01:15:05.050 --> 01:15:08.260 align:start position:0% the construction debris or<01:15:06.050> a<01:15:06.650> pod 01:15:08.260 --> 01:15:08.270 align:start position:0% or a pod 01:15:08.270 --> 01:15:10.690 align:start position:0% or a pod I<01:15:08.300> wasn't<01:15:09.200> sure<01:15:09.620> as<01:15:09.980> I<01:15:10.070> looked<01:15:10.310> at<01:15:10.400> what<01:15:10.580> you 01:15:10.690 --> 01:15:10.700 align:start position:0% I wasn't sure as I looked at what you 01:15:10.700 --> 01:15:12.730 align:start position:0% I wasn't sure as I looked at what you gave<01:15:10.910> us<01:15:11.120> that<01:15:11.420> what<01:15:11.780> we<01:15:11.810> have<01:15:12.200> currently 01:15:12.730 --> 01:15:12.740 align:start position:0% gave us that what we have currently 01:15:12.740 --> 01:15:15.490 align:start position:0% gave us that what we have currently really<01:15:13.010> addresses<01:15:13.640> pods<01:15:13.970> I<01:15:14.450> can<01:15:15.080> see<01:15:15.230> that<01:15:15.410> it 01:15:15.490 --> 01:15:15.500 align:start position:0% really addresses pods I can see that it 01:15:15.500 --> 01:15:17.230 align:start position:0% really addresses pods I can see that it definitely<01:15:15.710> addresses<01:15:16.490> dumpsters<01:15:16.970> maybe 01:15:17.230 --> 01:15:17.240 align:start position:0% definitely addresses dumpsters maybe 01:15:17.240 --> 01:15:18.640 align:start position:0% definitely addresses dumpsters maybe there<01:15:17.450> were<01:15:17.570> sections<01:15:17.870> that<01:15:18.110> she<01:15:18.230> didn't<01:15:18.440> give 01:15:18.640 --> 01:15:18.650 align:start position:0% there were sections that she didn't give 01:15:18.650 --> 01:15:20.830 align:start position:0% there were sections that she didn't give us<01:15:18.770> but<01:15:18.980> it<01:15:19.070> didn't<01:15:19.280> look<01:15:19.430> like<01:15:19.600> the<01:15:20.600> language 01:15:20.830 --> 01:15:20.840 align:start position:0% us but it didn't look like the language 01:15:20.840 --> 01:15:24.010 align:start position:0% us but it didn't look like the language addressed<01:15:21.680> Paulo<01:15:22.010> just<01:15:23.000> really<01:15:23.270> was<01:15:23.450> was 01:15:24.010 --> 01:15:24.020 align:start position:0% addressed Paulo just really was was 01:15:24.020 --> 01:15:26.920 align:start position:0% addressed Paulo just really was was geared<01:15:24.560> for<01:15:25.280> construction<01:15:26.180> dumpsters<01:15:26.660> pots 01:15:26.920 --> 01:15:26.930 align:start position:0% geared for construction dumpsters pots 01:15:26.930 --> 01:15:30.970 align:start position:0% geared for construction dumpsters pots didn't<01:15:27.290> exist<01:15:27.590> when<01:15:27.890> they're<01:15:28.850> fairly<01:15:29.470> I<01:15:30.470> think 01:15:30.970 --> 01:15:30.980 align:start position:0% didn't exist when they're fairly I think 01:15:30.980 --> 01:15:33.730 align:start position:0% didn't exist when they're fairly I think as<01:15:31.370> far<01:15:31.550> as<01:15:31.670> the<01:15:31.910> construction<01:15:32.780> dumpsters<01:15:33.560> go 01:15:33.730 --> 01:15:33.740 align:start position:0% as far as the construction dumpsters go 01:15:33.740 --> 01:15:36.690 align:start position:0% as far as the construction dumpsters go I<01:15:33.770> think<01:15:33.980> yes<01:15:34.490> we<01:15:34.700> should<01:15:34.910> have<01:15:34.940> language<01:15:35.510> that 01:15:36.690 --> 01:15:36.700 align:start position:0% I think yes we should have language that 01:15:36.700 --> 01:15:40.060 align:start position:0% I think yes we should have language that makes<01:15:37.700> it<01:15:37.910> clear<01:15:38.270> that<01:15:38.300> if<01:15:38.720> they<01:15:38.930> can<01:15:39.140> go<01:15:39.380> if 01:15:40.060 --> 01:15:40.070 align:start position:0% makes it clear that if they can go if 01:15:40.070 --> 01:15:42.100 align:start position:0% makes it clear that if they can go if there's<01:15:40.340> any<01:15:40.490> way<01:15:40.670> that<01:15:40.880> they<01:15:41.000> can<01:15:41.060> go<01:15:41.390> on<01:15:41.600> the 01:15:42.100 --> 01:15:42.110 align:start position:0% there's any way that they can go on the 01:15:42.110 --> 01:15:44.080 align:start position:0% there's any way that they can go on the property<01:15:42.320> they<01:15:42.980> need<01:15:43.160> to<01:15:43.280> be<01:15:43.400> on<01:15:43.550> the<01:15:43.670> property 01:15:44.080 --> 01:15:44.090 align:start position:0% property they need to be on the property 01:15:44.090 --> 01:15:45.670 align:start position:0% property they need to be on the property that<01:15:44.390> there<01:15:44.570> needs<01:15:44.780> to<01:15:44.900> be<01:15:44.990> a<01:15:45.110> demonstration 01:15:45.670 --> 01:15:45.680 align:start position:0% that there needs to be a demonstration 01:15:45.680 --> 01:15:47.620 align:start position:0% that there needs to be a demonstration of<01:15:46.190> need<01:15:46.370> that<01:15:46.400> it<01:15:46.700> has<01:15:46.910> to<01:15:47.090> be<01:15:47.210> in<01:15:47.270> the<01:15:47.360> street 01:15:47.620 --> 01:15:47.630 align:start position:0% of need that it has to be in the street 01:15:47.630 --> 01:15:49.540 align:start position:0% of need that it has to be in the street because<01:15:48.380> the<01:15:48.530> street<01:15:48.560> is<01:15:48.890> for<01:15:49.070> the<01:15:49.160> use<01:15:49.280> of<01:15:49.460> the 01:15:49.540 --> 01:15:49.550 align:start position:0% because the street is for the use of the 01:15:49.550 --> 01:15:52.390 align:start position:0% because the street is for the use of the public<01:15:49.730> and<01:15:50.210> it's<01:15:51.140> this<01:15:51.650> is<01:15:51.800> essentially 01:15:52.390 --> 01:15:52.400 align:start position:0% public and it's this is essentially 01:15:52.400 --> 01:15:56.830 align:start position:0% public and it's this is essentially taking<01:15:52.940> it<01:15:53.060> up<01:15:53.180> for<01:15:53.920> private<01:15:54.920> use<01:15:55.660> so<01:15:56.660> I<01:15:56.690> think 01:15:56.830 --> 01:15:56.840 align:start position:0% taking it up for private use so I think 01:15:56.840 --> 01:15:59.200 align:start position:0% taking it up for private use so I think that<01:15:57.260> if<01:15:57.500> it's<01:15:57.650> on<01:15:57.800> the<01:15:57.920> street<01:15:58.190> it<01:15:58.760> not<01:15:58.970> only 01:15:59.200 --> 01:15:59.210 align:start position:0% that if it's on the street it not only 01:15:59.210 --> 01:16:02.140 align:start position:0% that if it's on the street it not only needs<01:15:59.420> a<01:15:59.540> bond<01:15:59.750> it<01:16:00.140> they<01:16:00.560> need<01:16:00.770> to<01:16:00.920> be<01:16:01.150> charged 01:16:02.140 --> 01:16:02.150 align:start position:0% needs a bond it they need to be charged 01:16:02.150 --> 01:16:06.100 align:start position:0% needs a bond it they need to be charged for<01:16:02.600> the<01:16:03.410> time<01:16:03.620> that<01:16:03.830> there's<01:16:05.110> monopolizing 01:16:06.100 --> 01:16:06.110 align:start position:0% for the time that there's monopolizing 01:16:06.110 --> 01:16:08.440 align:start position:0% for the time that there's monopolizing that<01:16:06.260> spot<01:16:06.500> on<01:16:06.650> the<01:16:06.740> street<01:16:07.010> and<01:16:07.610> I<01:16:07.820> I<01:16:08.090> thought 01:16:08.440 --> 01:16:08.450 align:start position:0% that spot on the street and I I thought 01:16:08.450 --> 01:16:11.980 align:start position:0% that spot on the street and I I thought about<01:16:08.660> it<01:16:08.840> in<01:16:08.960> terms<01:16:09.200> of<01:16:09.970> not<01:16:10.970> necessarily<01:16:11.810> a 01:16:11.980 --> 01:16:11.990 align:start position:0% about it in terms of not necessarily a 01:16:11.990 --> 01:16:14.770 align:start position:0% about it in terms of not necessarily a trying<01:16:12.860> to<01:16:12.950> pick<01:16:13.190> a<01:16:13.220> time<01:16:13.640> frame<01:16:14.030> saying<01:16:14.570> you 01:16:14.770 --> 01:16:14.780 align:start position:0% trying to pick a time frame saying you 01:16:14.780 --> 01:16:16.270 align:start position:0% trying to pick a time frame saying you know<01:16:14.900> a<01:16:14.930> month<01:16:15.380> or<01:16:15.560> three<01:16:15.680> months<01:16:15.980> or<01:16:16.070> six 01:16:16.270 --> 01:16:16.280 align:start position:0% know a month or three months or six 01:16:16.280 --> 01:16:18.040 align:start position:0% know a month or three months or six months<01:16:16.340> or<01:16:16.610> whatever<01:16:16.760> it<01:16:16.970> might<01:16:17.090> be<01:16:17.150> but<01:16:17.870> to 01:16:18.040 --> 01:16:18.050 align:start position:0% months or whatever it might be but to 01:16:18.050 --> 01:16:24.190 align:start position:0% months or whatever it might be but to say<01:16:18.290> okay<01:16:19.600> for<01:16:20.890> for<01:16:21.890> whatever<01:16:22.760> like<01:16:23.540> say<01:16:23.990> a 01:16:24.190 --> 01:16:24.200 align:start position:0% say okay for for whatever like say a 01:16:24.200 --> 01:16:27.850 align:start position:0% say okay for for whatever like say a 30-day<01:16:24.710> period<01:16:25.120> an<01:16:26.120> ability<01:16:26.960> to<01:16:27.290> put<01:16:27.470> one<01:16:27.710> in 01:16:27.850 --> 01:16:27.860 align:start position:0% 30-day period an ability to put one in 01:16:27.860 --> 01:16:30.700 align:start position:0% 30-day period an ability to put one in that<01:16:27.890> spot<01:16:28.420> for<01:16:29.420> that<01:16:29.540> 30-day<01:16:29.990> period<01:16:30.200> or<01:16:30.560> any 01:16:30.700 --> 01:16:30.710 align:start position:0% that spot for that 30-day period or any 01:16:30.710 --> 01:16:33.940 align:start position:0% that spot for that 30-day period or any part<01:16:30.980> of<01:16:31.070> that<01:16:31.130> 30-day<01:16:31.610> period<01:16:31.690> is<01:16:32.710> X<01:16:33.710> amount 01:16:33.940 --> 01:16:33.950 align:start position:0% part of that 30-day period is X amount 01:16:33.950 --> 01:16:36.640 align:start position:0% part of that 30-day period is X amount of<01:16:34.100> money<01:16:34.690> if<01:16:35.690> you<01:16:35.810> want<01:16:35.960> to<01:16:36.020> go<01:16:36.110> second<01:16:36.500> month 01:16:36.640 --> 01:16:36.650 align:start position:0% of money if you want to go second month 01:16:36.650 --> 01:16:39.630 align:start position:0% of money if you want to go second month you<01:16:37.520> go<01:16:37.640> pay<01:16:37.820> again<01:16:38.030> third<01:16:38.690> month<01:16:38.930> pay<01:16:39.260> again 01:16:39.630 --> 01:16:39.640 align:start position:0% you go pay again third month pay again 01:16:39.640 --> 01:16:44.020 align:start position:0% you go pay again third month pay again and<01:16:40.640> I<01:16:40.730> think<01:16:40.790> that<01:16:42.010> we'd<01:16:43.010> take<01:16:43.310> care<01:16:43.340> of<01:16:43.790> the 01:16:44.020 --> 01:16:44.030 align:start position:0% and I think that we'd take care of the 01:16:44.030 --> 01:16:46.960 align:start position:0% and I think that we'd take care of the construction<01:16:44.840> dumpster<01:16:45.290> question<01:16:45.970> fairly 01:16:46.960 --> 01:16:46.970 align:start position:0% construction dumpster question fairly 01:16:46.970 --> 01:16:48.310 align:start position:0% construction dumpster question fairly quickly<01:16:47.360> because<01:16:47.600> then<01:16:47.900> you've<01:16:48.050> got<01:16:48.200> an 01:16:48.310 --> 01:16:48.320 align:start position:0% quickly because then you've got an 01:16:48.320 --> 01:16:50.430 align:start position:0% quickly because then you've got an economic<01:16:48.500> incentive<01:16:48.920> to<01:16:49.250> minimize<01:16:49.700> the<01:16:49.910> time 01:16:50.430 --> 01:16:50.440 align:start position:0% economic incentive to minimize the time 01:16:50.440 --> 01:16:53.380 align:start position:0% economic incentive to minimize the time but<01:16:51.440> you've<01:16:51.710> got<01:16:51.980> the<01:16:52.100> ability<01:16:52.190> to<01:16:52.730> extend<01:16:53.120> if 01:16:53.380 --> 01:16:53.390 align:start position:0% but you've got the ability to extend if 01:16:53.390 --> 01:16:56.320 align:start position:0% but you've got the ability to extend if the<01:16:53.540> project<01:16:53.990> is<01:16:54.140> larger<01:16:54.860> I<01:16:55.160> think<01:16:55.940> for<01:16:56.180> the 01:16:56.320 --> 01:16:56.330 align:start position:0% the project is larger I think for the 01:16:56.330 --> 01:16:59.290 align:start position:0% the project is larger I think for the pods<01:16:56.630> I<01:16:57.140> see<01:16:58.040> them<01:16:58.220> as<01:16:58.430> different<01:16:59.000> in<01:16:59.090> many 01:16:59.290 --> 01:16:59.300 align:start position:0% pods I see them as different in many 01:16:59.300 --> 01:17:03.880 align:start position:0% pods I see them as different in many ways<01:16:59.480> I<01:17:00.010> see<01:17:01.010> them<01:17:01.250> as<01:17:01.780> if<01:17:02.780> they're<01:17:03.080> on<01:17:03.680> the 01:17:03.880 --> 01:17:03.890 align:start position:0% ways I see them as if they're on the 01:17:03.890 --> 01:17:05.380 align:start position:0% ways I see them as if they're on the street<01:17:04.160> and<01:17:04.370> occupying<01:17:04.790> the<01:17:04.940> space<01:17:05.060> that's 01:17:05.380 --> 01:17:05.390 align:start position:0% street and occupying the space that's 01:17:05.390 --> 01:17:07.300 align:start position:0% street and occupying the space that's essentially<01:17:05.990> in<01:17:06.140> lieu<01:17:06.380> of 01:17:07.300 --> 01:17:07.310 align:start position:0% essentially in lieu of 01:17:07.310 --> 01:17:09.670 align:start position:0% essentially in lieu of the<01:17:07.730> company<01:17:08.150> or<01:17:08.360> the<01:17:08.390> storage<01:17:08.810> facility<01:17:09.410> or 01:17:09.670 --> 01:17:09.680 align:start position:0% the company or the storage facility or 01:17:09.680 --> 01:17:11.620 align:start position:0% the company or the storage facility or the<01:17:09.890> storage<01:17:10.310> locker<01:17:10.640> or<01:17:11.000> whoever<01:17:11.330> it<01:17:11.480> might 01:17:11.620 --> 01:17:11.630 align:start position:0% the storage locker or whoever it might 01:17:11.630 --> 01:17:15.100 align:start position:0% the storage locker or whoever it might be<01:17:11.690> for<01:17:12.560> that<01:17:12.710> space<01:17:13.010> and<01:17:13.310> the<01:17:14.300> kind<01:17:14.540> of<01:17:14.630> spaces 01:17:15.100 --> 01:17:15.110 align:start position:0% be for that space and the kind of spaces 01:17:15.110 --> 01:17:17.950 align:start position:0% be for that space and the kind of spaces that<01:17:15.440> get<01:17:15.650> charged<01:17:16.130> for<01:17:16.430> the<01:17:17.060> for<01:17:17.540> the<01:17:17.660> space 01:17:17.950 --> 01:17:17.960 align:start position:0% that get charged for the for the space 01:17:17.960 --> 01:17:19.930 align:start position:0% that get charged for the for the space that<01:17:18.140> those<01:17:18.320> pods<01:17:18.590> take<01:17:18.890> up<01:17:19.070> runs<01:17:19.550> into<01:17:19.850> the 01:17:19.930 --> 01:17:19.940 align:start position:0% that those pods take up runs into the 01:17:19.940 --> 01:17:22.900 align:start position:0% that those pods take up runs into the hundreds<01:17:20.330> of<01:17:20.420> dollars<01:17:20.810> per<01:17:21.080> month<01:17:21.230> and<01:17:21.560> so<01:17:22.550> I 01:17:22.900 --> 01:17:22.910 align:start position:0% hundreds of dollars per month and so I 01:17:22.910 --> 01:17:24.790 align:start position:0% hundreds of dollars per month and so I think<01:17:23.090> if<01:17:23.420> there<01:17:23.600> are<01:17:23.690> pods<01:17:23.960> we<01:17:24.350> ought<01:17:24.530> to<01:17:24.650> say 01:17:24.790 --> 01:17:24.800 align:start position:0% think if there are pods we ought to say 01:17:24.800 --> 01:17:29.230 align:start position:0% think if there are pods we ought to say okay<01:17:26.050> if<01:17:27.050> it's<01:17:27.290> on<01:17:27.440> the<01:17:27.530> street<01:17:28.210> provide<01:17:29.210> a 01:17:29.230 --> 01:17:29.240 align:start position:0% okay if it's on the street provide a 01:17:29.240 --> 01:17:32.020 align:start position:0% okay if it's on the street provide a bond<01:17:29.570> as<01:17:29.780> well<01:17:29.810> and<01:17:30.460> make<01:17:31.460> it<01:17:31.580> for<01:17:31.730> a<01:17:31.790> short 01:17:32.020 --> 01:17:32.030 align:start position:0% bond as well and make it for a short 01:17:32.030 --> 01:17:35.200 align:start position:0% bond as well and make it for a short period<01:17:32.240> of<01:17:32.480> time<01:17:32.540> like<01:17:32.720> I<01:17:33.230> don't<01:17:34.190> know<01:17:34.340> two 01:17:35.200 --> 01:17:35.210 align:start position:0% period of time like I don't know two 01:17:35.210 --> 01:17:38.950 align:start position:0% period of time like I don't know two weeks<01:17:35.360> to<01:17:35.720> to<01:17:36.350> load<01:17:36.560> it<01:17:36.680> up<01:17:37.480> if<01:17:38.480> you<01:17:38.540> can't<01:17:38.840> get 01:17:38.950 --> 01:17:38.960 align:start position:0% weeks to to load it up if you can't get 01:17:38.960 --> 01:17:40.810 align:start position:0% weeks to to load it up if you can't get yourself<01:17:39.050> organized<01:17:39.710> to<01:17:39.950> fill<01:17:40.460> one<01:17:40.610> of<01:17:40.700> those 01:17:40.810 --> 01:17:40.820 align:start position:0% yourself organized to fill one of those 01:17:40.820 --> 01:17:41.800 align:start position:0% yourself organized to fill one of those things<01:17:41.060> in<01:17:41.240> two<01:17:41.390> weeks 01:17:41.800 --> 01:17:41.810 align:start position:0% things in two weeks 01:17:41.810 --> 01:17:45.100 align:start position:0% things in two weeks you're<01:17:42.530> not<01:17:42.680> very<01:17:43.220> organized<01:17:43.670> and<01:17:44.110> there 01:17:45.100 --> 01:17:45.110 align:start position:0% you're not very organized and there 01:17:45.110 --> 01:17:46.780 align:start position:0% you're not very organized and there oughta<01:17:45.260> be<01:17:45.350> oh<01:17:45.500> you<01:17:45.980> know<01:17:46.070> you<01:17:46.250> shouldn't<01:17:46.730> be 01:17:46.780 --> 01:17:46.790 align:start position:0% oughta be oh you know you shouldn't be 01:17:46.790 --> 01:17:49.630 align:start position:0% oughta be oh you know you shouldn't be able<01:17:46.970> to<01:17:47.030> do<01:17:47.150> it<01:17:47.270> and<01:17:47.870> that<01:17:48.320> there<01:17:49.040> should<01:17:49.070> be<01:17:49.250> a 01:17:49.630 --> 01:17:49.640 align:start position:0% able to do it and that there should be a 01:17:49.640 --> 01:17:53.770 align:start position:0% able to do it and that there should be a charge<01:17:50.240> for<01:17:50.450> that<01:17:50.570> time<01:17:50.810> as<01:17:51.020> well<01:17:52.420> and<01:17:53.420> I'm<01:17:53.750> not 01:17:53.770 --> 01:17:53.780 align:start position:0% charge for that time as well and I'm not 01:17:53.780 --> 01:17:56.830 align:start position:0% charge for that time as well and I'm not sure<01:17:54.260> what<01:17:55.250> those<01:17:55.460> charges<01:17:55.910> should<01:17:56.240> be<01:17:56.300> I 01:17:56.830 --> 01:17:56.840 align:start position:0% sure what those charges should be I 01:17:56.840 --> 01:17:58.240 align:start position:0% sure what those charges should be I don't<01:17:57.080> know<01:17:57.230> whether<01:17:57.380> they<01:17:57.590> should<01:17:57.620> be<01:17:57.950> tied 01:17:58.240 --> 01:17:58.250 align:start position:0% don't know whether they should be tied 01:17:58.250 --> 01:18:00.280 align:start position:0% don't know whether they should be tied to<01:17:58.520> a<01:17:58.550> municipal<01:17:59.180> infraction<01:17:59.780> or<01:17:59.900> whether<01:18:00.110> it 01:18:00.280 --> 01:18:00.290 align:start position:0% to a municipal infraction or whether it 01:18:00.290 --> 01:18:03.640 align:start position:0% to a municipal infraction or whether it should<01:18:00.320> be<01:18:00.470> essentially<01:18:01.070> rent<01:18:01.990> and<01:18:02.990> and<01:18:03.290> if<01:18:03.530> it 01:18:03.640 --> 01:18:03.650 align:start position:0% should be essentially rent and and if it 01:18:03.650 --> 01:18:05.800 align:start position:0% should be essentially rent and and if it goes<01:18:03.860> over<01:18:04.100> whether<01:18:04.640> there<01:18:05.030> is<01:18:05.180> a<01:18:05.210> municipal 01:18:05.800 --> 01:18:05.810 align:start position:0% goes over whether there is a municipal 01:18:05.810 --> 01:18:08.410 align:start position:0% goes over whether there is a municipal infraction<01:18:06.320> in<01:18:06.470> addition<01:18:06.920> to<01:18:07.040> the<01:18:07.160> rent<01:18:07.400> and<01:18:08.120> I 01:18:08.410 --> 01:18:08.420 align:start position:0% infraction in addition to the rent and I 01:18:08.420 --> 01:18:11.260 align:start position:0% infraction in addition to the rent and I think<01:18:08.690> that<01:18:08.960> in<01:18:09.610> certainly<01:18:10.610> in<01:18:10.700> the<01:18:10.820> case<01:18:11.000> of<01:18:11.210> a 01:18:11.260 --> 01:18:11.270 align:start position:0% think that in certainly in the case of a 01:18:11.270 --> 01:18:15.190 align:start position:0% think that in certainly in the case of a construction<01:18:11.720> dumpster<01:18:12.760> the<01:18:13.810> sticker<01:18:14.810> on<01:18:14.930> it 01:18:15.190 --> 01:18:15.200 align:start position:0% construction dumpster the sticker on it 01:18:15.200 --> 01:18:17.200 align:start position:0% construction dumpster the sticker on it wouldn't<01:18:15.470> work<01:18:15.650> because<01:18:15.890> you<01:18:16.760> can<01:18:16.940> have<01:18:17.090> the 01:18:17.200 --> 01:18:17.210 align:start position:0% wouldn't work because you can have the 01:18:17.210 --> 01:18:18.930 align:start position:0% wouldn't work because you can have the case<01:18:17.390> where<01:18:17.600> the<01:18:17.660> dumpster<01:18:18.050> gets<01:18:18.230> filled<01:18:18.500> and 01:18:18.930 --> 01:18:18.940 align:start position:0% case where the dumpster gets filled and 01:18:18.940 --> 01:18:21.850 align:start position:0% case where the dumpster gets filled and they<01:18:19.940> bring<01:18:20.180> an<01:18:20.300> empty<01:18:20.420> and<01:18:20.780> on<01:18:21.140> the<01:18:21.290> on<01:18:21.710> the 01:18:21.850 --> 01:18:21.860 align:start position:0% they bring an empty and on the on the 01:18:21.860 --> 01:18:23.260 align:start position:0% they bring an empty and on the on the truck<01:18:22.100> and<01:18:22.310> they<01:18:22.430> take<01:18:22.640> away<01:18:22.760> the<01:18:22.850> full<01:18:23.120> one 01:18:23.260 --> 01:18:23.270 align:start position:0% truck and they take away the full one 01:18:23.270 --> 01:18:24.580 align:start position:0% truck and they take away the full one and<01:18:23.420> leave<01:18:23.540> the<01:18:23.660> empty<01:18:23.930> one<01:18:24.080> and<01:18:24.110> you're<01:18:24.320> spend 01:18:24.580 --> 01:18:24.590 align:start position:0% and leave the empty one and you're spend 01:18:24.590 --> 01:18:28.150 align:start position:0% and leave the empty one and you're spend your<01:18:24.710> sticker<01:18:24.920> is<01:18:25.100> gone<01:18:25.340> so<01:18:26.060> I<01:18:26.450> think<01:18:26.980> in<01:18:27.980> the 01:18:28.150 --> 01:18:28.160 align:start position:0% your sticker is gone so I think in the 01:18:28.160 --> 01:18:32.020 align:start position:0% your sticker is gone so I think in the case<01:18:28.310> of<01:18:28.520> a<01:18:28.640> dumpster<01:18:29.360> it<01:18:29.480> might<01:18:29.660> be<01:18:30.910> that<01:18:31.910> it 01:18:32.020 --> 01:18:32.030 align:start position:0% case of a dumpster it might be that it 01:18:32.030 --> 01:18:34.540 align:start position:0% case of a dumpster it might be that it would<01:18:32.150> need<01:18:32.270> to<01:18:32.330> be<01:18:32.480> either<01:18:33.080> you<01:18:34.010> know<01:18:34.130> a<01:18:34.220> stake 01:18:34.540 --> 01:18:34.550 align:start position:0% would need to be either you know a stake 01:18:34.550 --> 01:18:37.000 align:start position:0% would need to be either you know a stake in<01:18:34.700> the<01:18:34.820> yard<01:18:35.090> or<01:18:35.450> applied<01:18:35.870> somar<01:18:36.350> on<01:18:36.470> building 01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:37.010 align:start position:0% in the yard or applied somar on building 01:18:37.010 --> 01:18:39.130 align:start position:0% in the yard or applied somar on building something<01:18:37.400> that<01:18:37.610> that<01:18:38.180> stays<01:18:38.480> there<01:18:38.750> and<01:18:38.900> says 01:18:39.130 --> 01:18:39.140 align:start position:0% something that that stays there and says 01:18:39.140 --> 01:18:40.870 align:start position:0% something that that stays there and says there<01:18:39.380> is<01:18:39.530> this<01:18:39.710> permit<01:18:40.130> to<01:18:40.250> do<01:18:40.400> this<01:18:40.580> for<01:18:40.790> this 01:18:40.870 --> 01:18:40.880 align:start position:0% there is this permit to do this for this 01:18:40.880 --> 01:18:44.380 align:start position:0% there is this permit to do this for this period<01:18:41.150> of<01:18:41.270> time<01:18:42.010> and<01:18:43.010> of<01:18:43.880> course<01:18:44.090> the<01:18:44.270> more 01:18:44.380 --> 01:18:44.390 align:start position:0% period of time and of course the more 01:18:44.390 --> 01:18:46.000 align:start position:0% period of time and of course the more prominent<01:18:44.750> bigger<01:18:45.050> those<01:18:45.260> are<01:18:45.500> they<01:18:45.680> can<01:18:45.860> get 01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:46.010 align:start position:0% prominent bigger those are they can get 01:18:46.010 --> 01:18:49.030 align:start position:0% prominent bigger those are they can get ugly<01:18:46.130> too<01:18:46.460> but<01:18:46.760> I<01:18:47.570> think<01:18:48.440> I<01:18:48.620> think<01:18:48.860> there<01:18:49.010> are 01:18:49.030 --> 01:18:49.040 align:start position:0% ugly too but I think I think there are 01:18:49.040 --> 01:18:50.890 align:start position:0% ugly too but I think I think there are ways<01:18:49.250> to<01:18:49.280> address<01:18:49.760> this<01:18:50.000> and<01:18:50.270> incentivize 01:18:50.890 --> 01:18:50.900 align:start position:0% ways to address this and incentivize 01:18:50.900 --> 01:18:52.089 align:start position:0% ways to address this and incentivize good<01:18:51.380> behavior 01:18:52.089 --> 01:18:52.099 align:start position:0% good behavior 01:18:52.099 --> 01:18:55.600 align:start position:0% good behavior and<01:18:52.280> I<01:18:53.060> hadn't<01:18:53.630> given<01:18:53.750> much<01:18:54.020> thought<01:18:54.079> to<01:18:54.610> what 01:18:55.600 --> 01:18:55.610 align:start position:0% and I hadn't given much thought to what 01:18:55.610 --> 01:19:01.209 align:start position:0% and I hadn't given much thought to what we<01:18:56.210> might<01:18:56.389> do<01:18:56.719> to<01:18:58.239> control<01:18:59.239> it<01:18:59.420> on<01:19:00.219> private 01:19:01.209 --> 01:19:01.219 align:start position:0% we might do to control it on private 01:19:01.219 --> 01:19:04.149 align:start position:0% we might do to control it on private property<01:19:01.429> I<01:19:01.909> know<01:19:02.119> in<01:19:02.659> my<01:19:02.810> own<01:19:02.840> case<01:19:03.020> I<01:19:03.290> have<01:19:04.130> a 01:19:04.149 --> 01:19:04.159 align:start position:0% property I know in my own case I have a 01:19:04.159 --> 01:19:06.430 align:start position:0% property I know in my own case I have a dump<01:19:04.400> truck<01:19:04.520> and<01:19:04.820> that's<01:19:05.119> what<01:19:05.270> I<01:19:05.300> use<01:19:05.599> and<01:19:06.199> it 01:19:06.430 --> 01:19:06.440 align:start position:0% dump truck and that's what I use and it 01:19:06.440 --> 01:19:07.839 align:start position:0% dump truck and that's what I use and it gets<01:19:06.619> parked<01:19:06.860> on<01:19:06.980> the<01:19:07.010> property<01:19:07.520> it<01:19:07.610> never 01:19:07.839 --> 01:19:07.849 align:start position:0% gets parked on the property it never 01:19:07.849 --> 01:19:09.010 align:start position:0% gets parked on the property it never gets<01:19:08.000> parked<01:19:08.389> on<01:19:08.480> the<01:19:08.510> street 01:19:09.010 --> 01:19:09.020 align:start position:0% gets parked on the street 01:19:09.020 --> 01:19:11.319 align:start position:0% gets parked on the street because<01:19:09.560> if<01:19:09.679> I<01:19:09.800> did<01:19:10.010> I<01:19:10.280> would<01:19:11.119> get<01:19:11.239> the 01:19:11.319 --> 01:19:11.329 align:start position:0% because if I did I would get the 01:19:11.329 --> 01:19:13.750 align:start position:0% because if I did I would get the neighbors<01:19:11.599> upset<01:19:11.929> and<01:19:12.619> I<01:19:12.770> would<01:19:12.980> get<01:19:13.190> the 01:19:13.750 --> 01:19:13.760 align:start position:0% neighbors upset and I would get the 01:19:13.760 --> 01:19:15.720 align:start position:0% neighbors upset and I would get the authorities<01:19:14.210> upset<01:19:14.599> and<01:19:14.810> I'd<01:19:14.900> get<01:19:15.050> a<01:19:15.110> ticket 01:19:15.720 --> 01:19:15.730 align:start position:0% authorities upset and I'd get a ticket 01:19:15.730 --> 01:19:19.660 align:start position:0% authorities upset and I'd get a ticket because<01:19:16.730> you<01:19:17.030> can't<01:19:17.270> park<01:19:18.670> commercial 01:19:19.660 --> 01:19:19.670 align:start position:0% because you can't park commercial 01:19:19.670 --> 01:19:22.330 align:start position:0% because you can't park commercial vehicles<01:19:20.000> on<01:19:20.270> the<01:19:20.449> street<01:19:20.690> and<01:19:20.929> I<01:19:21.800> look<01:19:22.159> on 01:19:22.330 --> 01:19:22.340 align:start position:0% vehicles on the street and I look on 01:19:22.340 --> 01:19:24.520 align:start position:0% vehicles on the street and I look on pods<01:19:22.909> and<01:19:23.239> construction<01:19:24.170> dumpsters 01:19:24.520 --> 01:19:24.530 align:start position:0% pods and construction dumpsters 01:19:24.530 --> 01:19:26.200 align:start position:0% pods and construction dumpsters dumpsters<01:19:25.159> I<01:19:25.280> use<01:19:25.369> commercial<01:19:25.730> vehicles<01:19:26.090> you 01:19:26.200 --> 01:19:26.210 align:start position:0% dumpsters I use commercial vehicles you 01:19:26.210 --> 01:19:29.379 align:start position:0% dumpsters I use commercial vehicles you can't<01:19:26.480> park<01:19:26.719> the<01:19:26.810> ministry<01:19:28.179> another<01:19:29.179> thing 01:19:29.379 --> 01:19:29.389 align:start position:0% can't park the ministry another thing 01:19:29.389 --> 01:19:30.939 align:start position:0% can't park the ministry another thing I'll<01:19:29.510> need<01:19:29.659> to<01:19:29.810> check<01:19:30.020> with<01:19:30.230> the<01:19:30.409> City 01:19:30.939 --> 01:19:30.949 align:start position:0% I'll need to check with the City 01:19:30.949 --> 01:19:32.709 align:start position:0% I'll need to check with the City Attorney's<01:19:30.980> Office<01:19:31.699> I<01:19:31.880> mean<01:19:32.030> clearly<01:19:32.360> we<01:19:32.570> have 01:19:32.709 --> 01:19:32.719 align:start position:0% Attorney's Office I mean clearly we have 01:19:32.719 --> 01:19:34.899 align:start position:0% Attorney's Office I mean clearly we have the<01:19:32.840> ability<01:19:33.199> to<01:19:33.320> charge<01:19:33.590> a<01:19:33.730> application<01:19:34.730> fee 01:19:34.899 --> 01:19:34.909 align:start position:0% the ability to charge a application fee 01:19:34.909 --> 01:19:36.609 align:start position:0% the ability to charge a application fee which<01:19:35.150> is<01:19:35.329> what's<01:19:35.570> currently<01:19:35.960> charged<01:19:36.380> based 01:19:36.609 --> 01:19:36.619 align:start position:0% which is what's currently charged based 01:19:36.619 --> 01:19:39.189 align:start position:0% which is what's currently charged based on<01:19:36.860> you<01:19:37.070> know<01:19:37.190> do<01:19:37.579> you<01:19:38.510> know<01:19:38.599> rule<01:19:38.900> of<01:19:39.020> thumb 01:19:39.189 --> 01:19:39.199 align:start position:0% on you know do you know rule of thumb 01:19:39.199 --> 01:19:40.510 align:start position:0% on you know do you know rule of thumb there<01:19:39.409> is<01:19:39.440> amount<01:19:39.770> of<01:19:39.860> time<01:19:40.040> it<01:19:40.190> would<01:19:40.310> take<01:19:40.340> to 01:19:40.510 --> 01:19:40.520 align:start position:0% there is amount of time it would take to 01:19:40.520 --> 01:19:42.430 align:start position:0% there is amount of time it would take to administer<01:19:41.150> the<01:19:41.270> process<01:19:41.750> right<01:19:42.079> now<01:19:42.230> it's<01:19:42.380> a 01:19:42.430 --> 01:19:42.440 align:start position:0% administer the process right now it's a 01:19:42.440 --> 01:19:45.910 align:start position:0% administer the process right now it's a 25<01:19:42.920> dollar<01:19:43.099> application<01:19:43.880> fee<01:19:44.409> the<01:19:45.409> bond<01:19:45.619> we 01:19:45.910 --> 01:19:45.920 align:start position:0% 25 dollar application fee the bond we 01:19:45.920 --> 01:19:47.859 align:start position:0% 25 dollar application fee the bond we can<01:19:46.040> justify<01:19:46.400> based<01:19:46.760> on<01:19:47.000> you<01:19:47.360> know<01:19:47.480> protection 01:19:47.859 --> 01:19:47.869 align:start position:0% can justify based on you know protection 01:19:47.869 --> 01:19:49.720 align:start position:0% can justify based on you know protection of<01:19:48.050> city<01:19:48.260> assets<01:19:48.469> and<01:19:48.980> potential<01:19:49.550> damage 01:19:49.720 --> 01:19:49.730 align:start position:0% of city assets and potential damage 01:19:49.730 --> 01:19:50.680 align:start position:0% of city assets and potential damage there<01:19:50.179> right<01:19:50.360> away 01:19:50.680 --> 01:19:50.690 align:start position:0% there right away 01:19:50.690 --> 01:19:52.959 align:start position:0% there right away I<01:19:50.719> don't<01:19:51.110> know<01:19:51.230> about<01:19:51.469> the<01:19:51.679> the<01:19:52.159> rent<01:19:52.369> concept 01:19:52.959 --> 01:19:52.969 align:start position:0% I don't know about the the rent concept 01:19:52.969 --> 01:19:55.270 align:start position:0% I don't know about the the rent concept we'll<01:19:53.599> have<01:19:53.750> to<01:19:53.960> get<01:19:54.170> a<01:19:54.230> read<01:19:54.679> from<01:19:54.710> them<01:19:55.099> as 01:19:55.270 --> 01:19:55.280 align:start position:0% we'll have to get a read from them as 01:19:55.280 --> 01:19:58.390 align:start position:0% we'll have to get a read from them as well<01:19:55.489> American<01:19:56.179> Chinese<01:19:56.420> we<01:19:57.409> charge<01:19:57.710> for<01:19:58.099> use 01:19:58.390 --> 01:19:58.400 align:start position:0% well American Chinese we charge for use 01:19:58.400 --> 01:20:01.770 align:start position:0% well American Chinese we charge for use of<01:19:58.550> the<01:19:58.610> public<01:19:58.880> right-of-way<01:19:59.060> for<01:20:00.280> calm 01:20:01.770 --> 01:20:01.780 align:start position:0% of the public right-of-way for calm 01:20:01.780 --> 01:20:06.280 align:start position:0% of the public right-of-way for calm stuff<01:20:02.889> and<01:20:03.889> it's<01:20:04.040> partly<01:20:04.400> on<01:20:04.579> what<01:20:05.420> you<01:20:05.659> can<01:20:06.170> do 01:20:06.280 --> 01:20:06.290 align:start position:0% stuff and it's partly on what you can do 01:20:06.290 --> 01:20:09.250 align:start position:0% stuff and it's partly on what you can do potential<01:20:06.770> damage<01:20:07.070> to<01:20:07.099> the<01:20:07.250> street<01:20:07.639> or<01:20:08.260> city 01:20:09.250 --> 01:20:09.260 align:start position:0% potential damage to the street or city 01:20:09.260 --> 01:20:11.979 align:start position:0% potential damage to the street or city infrastructure<01:20:09.800> and<01:20:10.159> have<01:20:10.670> that<01:20:10.849> same<01:20:11.060> ya 01:20:11.979 --> 01:20:11.989 align:start position:0% infrastructure and have that same ya 01:20:11.989 --> 01:20:13.689 align:start position:0% infrastructure and have that same ya know<01:20:12.199> work<01:20:12.440> in<01:20:12.650> the<01:20:12.679> work<01:20:13.070> in<01:20:13.250> the<01:20:13.340> right<01:20:13.489> away 01:20:13.689 --> 01:20:13.699 align:start position:0% know work in the work in the right away 01:20:13.699 --> 01:20:19.500 align:start position:0% know work in the work in the right away for<01:20:13.940> utility<01:20:14.420> companies<01:20:15.849> it's<01:20:16.849> based<01:20:17.150> on<01:20:17.389> the 01:20:19.500 --> 01:20:19.510 align:start position:0% for utility companies it's based on the 01:20:19.510 --> 01:20:24.010 align:start position:0% for utility companies it's based on the linear<01:20:20.510> foot<01:20:20.900> of<01:20:20.929> the<01:20:22.030> you<01:20:23.030> know<01:20:23.090> excavation 01:20:24.010 --> 01:20:24.020 align:start position:0% linear foot of the you know excavation 01:20:24.020 --> 01:20:25.569 align:start position:0% linear foot of the you know excavation that<01:20:24.199> they're<01:20:24.409> doing<01:20:24.679> that<01:20:25.010> generally<01:20:25.460> the 01:20:25.569 --> 01:20:25.579 align:start position:0% that they're doing that generally the 01:20:25.579 --> 01:20:28.629 align:start position:0% that they're doing that generally the charge<01:20:25.880> is<01:20:26.060> related<01:20:26.540> to<01:20:26.570> that<01:20:27.340> I'll<01:20:28.340> have<01:20:28.489> to 01:20:28.629 --> 01:20:28.639 align:start position:0% charge is related to that I'll have to 01:20:28.639 --> 01:20:35.890 align:start position:0% charge is related to that I'll have to take<01:20:28.760> a<01:20:28.820> look<01:20:29.000> at<01:20:29.150> that<01:20:33.849> and<01:20:34.849> and<01:20:35.570> I<01:20:35.719> was 01:20:35.890 --> 01:20:35.900 align:start position:0% take a look at that and and I was 01:20:35.900 --> 01:20:39.040 align:start position:0% take a look at that and and I was thinking<01:20:36.079> in<01:20:36.409> terms<01:20:36.650> of<01:20:36.889> like<01:20:37.130> for<01:20:38.030> uh<01:20:38.060> for<01:20:39.020> a 01:20:39.040 --> 01:20:39.050 align:start position:0% thinking in terms of like for uh for a 01:20:39.050 --> 01:20:41.229 align:start position:0% thinking in terms of like for uh for a construction<01:20:39.710> dumpster<01:20:40.280> if<01:20:40.790> they're<01:20:41.030> paying 01:20:41.229 --> 01:20:41.239 align:start position:0% construction dumpster if they're paying 01:20:41.239 --> 01:20:44.520 align:start position:0% construction dumpster if they're paying five<01:20:41.480> hundred<01:20:41.840> dollars<01:20:42.170> for<01:20:42.500> for<01:20:43.460> a<01:20:43.489> dumpster 01:20:44.520 --> 01:20:44.530 align:start position:0% five hundred dollars for for a dumpster 01:20:44.530 --> 01:20:48.760 align:start position:0% five hundred dollars for for a dumpster it<01:20:45.790> seems<01:20:46.790> reasonable<01:20:47.060> to<01:20:47.329> say<01:20:47.630> that<01:20:47.659> if<01:20:48.440> we 01:20:48.760 --> 01:20:48.770 align:start position:0% it seems reasonable to say that if we 01:20:48.770 --> 01:20:49.270 align:start position:0% it seems reasonable to say that if we could 01:20:49.270 --> 01:20:49.280 align:start position:0% could 01:20:49.280 --> 01:20:52.089 align:start position:0% could charge<01:20:49.909> for<01:20:50.329> a<01:20:50.360> period<01:20:51.230> of<01:20:51.320> time<01:20:51.530> for<01:20:51.860> the<01:20:51.980> use 01:20:52.089 --> 01:20:52.099 align:start position:0% charge for a period of time for the use 01:20:52.099 --> 01:20:54.310 align:start position:0% charge for a period of time for the use of<01:20:52.280> the<01:20:52.369> street<01:20:52.610> for<01:20:52.789> that<01:20:52.940> it<01:20:53.659> should<01:20:53.869> be<01:20:54.050> like 01:20:54.310 --> 01:20:54.320 align:start position:0% of the street for that it should be like 01:20:54.320 --> 01:20:58.089 align:start position:0% of the street for that it should be like one<01:20:54.800> or<01:20:54.889> two<01:20:54.920> hundred<01:20:55.099> dollars<01:20:55.489> a<01:20:55.550> month<01:20:57.099> I'll 01:20:58.089 --> 01:20:58.099 align:start position:0% one or two hundred dollars a month I'll 01:20:58.099 --> 01:20:59.890 align:start position:0% one or two hundred dollars a month I'll explore<01:20:58.639> that<01:20:58.820> don't<01:20:59.090> know<01:20:59.360> the<01:20:59.510> thing<01:20:59.719> that<01:20:59.869> I 01:20:59.890 --> 01:20:59.900 align:start position:0% explore that don't know the thing that I 01:20:59.900 --> 01:21:02.049 align:start position:0% explore that don't know the thing that I had<01:21:00.110> a<01:21:00.139> thought<01:21:00.409> just<01:21:01.369> knowing<01:21:01.730> the<01:21:01.820> way<01:21:01.909> these 01:21:02.049 --> 01:21:02.059 align:start position:0% had a thought just knowing the way these 01:21:02.059 --> 01:21:04.660 align:start position:0% had a thought just knowing the way these things<01:21:02.270> tend<01:21:02.659> to<01:21:02.719> work<01:21:02.840> is<01:21:03.409> I<01:21:04.219> would<01:21:04.639> encourage 01:21:04.660 --> 01:21:04.670 align:start position:0% things tend to work is I would encourage 01:21:04.670 --> 01:21:07.770 align:start position:0% things tend to work is I would encourage the<01:21:05.270> council<01:21:05.719> to<01:21:05.929> move<01:21:06.110> to<01:21:06.380> rather<01:21:06.920> than<01:21:07.099> a 01:21:07.770 --> 01:21:07.780 align:start position:0% the council to move to rather than a 01:21:07.780 --> 01:21:11.109 align:start position:0% the council to move to rather than a citation<01:21:08.780> municipal<01:21:09.650> infractions<01:21:10.280> and<01:21:10.610> we 01:21:11.109 --> 01:21:11.119 align:start position:0% citation municipal infractions and we 01:21:11.119 --> 01:21:13.240 align:start position:0% citation municipal infractions and we got<01:21:11.270> to<01:21:11.360> get<01:21:11.420> somebody<01:21:11.659> to<01:21:11.840> write<01:21:12.050> a<01:21:12.079> ticket<01:21:12.530> if 01:21:13.240 --> 01:21:13.250 align:start position:0% got to get somebody to write a ticket if 01:21:13.250 --> 01:21:14.979 align:start position:0% got to get somebody to write a ticket if they<01:21:13.460> don't<01:21:13.639> pay<01:21:13.820> the<01:21:13.969> ticket<01:21:14.389> then<01:21:14.719> we<01:21:14.809> have 01:21:14.979 --> 01:21:14.989 align:start position:0% they don't pay the ticket then we have 01:21:14.989 --> 01:21:16.810 align:start position:0% they don't pay the ticket then we have to<01:21:15.199> send<01:21:15.860> it<01:21:15.949> over<01:21:16.039> to<01:21:16.190> City<01:21:16.489> Attorney's 01:21:16.810 --> 01:21:16.820 align:start position:0% to send it over to City Attorney's 01:21:16.820 --> 01:21:18.250 align:start position:0% to send it over to City Attorney's Office<01:21:17.119> somebody's<01:21:17.480> got<01:21:17.630> to<01:21:17.659> go<01:21:17.840> to<01:21:17.900> court 01:21:18.250 --> 01:21:18.260 align:start position:0% Office somebody's got to go to court 01:21:18.260 --> 01:21:20.290 align:start position:0% Office somebody's got to go to court it's<01:21:18.739> just<01:21:18.889> this<01:21:19.010> long<01:21:19.280> process<01:21:19.880> I<01:21:20.030> mean<01:21:20.179> I 01:21:20.290 --> 01:21:20.300 align:start position:0% it's just this long process I mean I 01:21:20.300 --> 01:21:22.240 align:start position:0% it's just this long process I mean I found<01:21:20.480> it<01:21:20.659> make<01:21:21.110> it<01:21:21.230> make<01:21:21.409> it<01:21:21.469> rent<01:21:21.920> ahead<01:21:22.130> of 01:21:22.240 --> 01:21:22.250 align:start position:0% found it make it make it rent ahead of 01:21:22.250 --> 01:21:24.490 align:start position:0% found it make it make it rent ahead of time<01:21:22.400> well<01:21:23.000> I<01:21:23.270> find<01:21:23.599> it<01:21:23.659> far<01:21:23.869> more<01:21:24.050> effective 01:21:24.490 --> 01:21:24.500 align:start position:0% time well I find it far more effective 01:21:24.500 --> 01:21:27.760 align:start position:0% time well I find it far more effective just<01:21:24.710> the<01:21:25.610> threat<01:21:25.880> of<01:21:25.909> impound<01:21:26.770> that 01:21:27.760 --> 01:21:27.770 align:start position:0% just the threat of impound that 01:21:27.770 --> 01:21:30.279 align:start position:0% just the threat of impound that companies<01:21:28.219> show<01:21:28.550> up<01:21:28.730> quite<01:21:28.940> quick<01:21:29.270> and<01:21:29.539> so<01:21:29.989> you 01:21:30.279 --> 01:21:30.289 align:start position:0% companies show up quite quick and so you 01:21:30.289 --> 01:21:31.629 align:start position:0% companies show up quite quick and so you know<01:21:30.409> we<01:21:30.530> could<01:21:30.650> just<01:21:30.800> make<01:21:30.949> that<01:21:31.099> clear<01:21:31.159> and 01:21:31.629 --> 01:21:31.639 align:start position:0% know we could just make that clear and 01:21:31.639 --> 01:21:34.060 align:start position:0% know we could just make that clear and in<01:21:32.059> the<01:21:32.239> application<01:21:32.809> process<01:21:32.929> if<01:21:33.349> you've<01:21:33.559> if 01:21:34.060 --> 01:21:34.070 align:start position:0% in the application process if you've if 01:21:34.070 --> 01:21:36.399 align:start position:0% in the application process if you've if you've<01:21:34.190> passed<01:21:34.969> your<01:21:35.300> date<01:21:35.480> where<01:21:35.869> the<01:21:36.139> time 01:21:36.399 --> 01:21:36.409 align:start position:0% you've passed your date where the time 01:21:36.409 --> 01:21:38.200 align:start position:0% you've passed your date where the time is<01:21:36.559> no<01:21:36.679> longer<01:21:37.070> applied<01:21:37.400> you<01:21:37.789> know<01:21:37.909> the<01:21:38.030> city 01:21:38.200 --> 01:21:38.210 align:start position:0% is no longer applied you know the city 01:21:38.210 --> 01:21:39.490 align:start position:0% is no longer applied you know the city has<01:21:38.300> the<01:21:38.539> authority<01:21:38.599> since<01:21:39.110> it's<01:21:39.289> in<01:21:39.409> the 01:21:39.490 --> 01:21:39.500 align:start position:0% has the authority since it's in the 01:21:39.500 --> 01:21:40.270 align:start position:0% has the authority since it's in the public<01:21:39.829> right<01:21:39.980> away 01:21:40.270 --> 01:21:40.280 align:start position:0% public right away 01:21:40.280 --> 01:21:43.359 align:start position:0% public right away don't<01:21:40.940> to<01:21:41.300> tow<01:21:41.510> and<01:21:41.809> to<01:21:42.500> impound<01:21:42.860> it<01:21:43.099> and<01:21:43.280> then 01:21:43.359 --> 01:21:43.369 align:start position:0% don't to tow and to impound it and then 01:21:43.369 --> 01:21:45.939 align:start position:0% don't to tow and to impound it and then that's<01:21:43.579> a<01:21:43.760> that's<01:21:44.300> a<01:21:44.420> cost<01:21:44.690> of<01:21:44.900> the<01:21:45.020> company 01:21:45.939 --> 01:21:45.949 align:start position:0% that's a that's a cost of the company 01:21:45.949 --> 01:21:55.839 align:start position:0% that's a that's a cost of the company that<01:21:46.130> has<01:21:46.340> to<01:21:46.369> cover<01:21:47.329> to<01:21:47.719> release<01:21:48.139> fair<01:21:54.849> market 01:21:55.839 --> 01:21:55.849 align:start position:0% that has to cover to release fair market 01:21:55.849 --> 01:21:56.979 align:start position:0% that has to cover to release fair market they<01:21:56.030> can't<01:21:56.270> get<01:21:56.420> to<01:21:56.570> it<01:21:56.599> they<01:21:56.780> don't<01:21:56.869> have 01:21:56.979 --> 01:21:56.989 align:start position:0% they can't get to it they don't have 01:21:56.989 --> 01:21:58.270 align:start position:0% they can't get to it they don't have their<01:21:57.170> asset<01:21:57.500> anymore<01:21:57.829> and<01:21:57.949> therefore<01:21:58.070> they 01:21:58.270 --> 01:21:58.280 align:start position:0% their asset anymore and therefore they 01:21:58.280 --> 01:22:01.000 align:start position:0% their asset anymore and therefore they can't<01:21:58.460> make<01:21:58.579> money<01:21:58.849> I<01:21:59.210> mean<01:22:00.050> it<01:22:00.199> you<01:22:00.619> would<01:22:00.800> I 01:22:01.000 --> 01:22:01.010 align:start position:0% can't make money I mean it you would I 01:22:01.010 --> 01:22:03.160 align:start position:0% can't make money I mean it you would I mean<01:22:01.429> there's<01:22:01.639> issues<01:22:02.420> there<01:22:02.690> that<01:22:02.900> you<01:22:03.020> have 01:22:03.160 --> 01:22:03.170 align:start position:0% mean there's issues there that you have 01:22:03.170 --> 01:22:05.379 align:start position:0% mean there's issues there that you have to<01:22:03.320> be<01:22:03.440> prepared<01:22:03.800> for<01:22:03.920> certainly<01:22:04.429> the<01:22:04.520> company 01:22:05.379 --> 01:22:05.389 align:start position:0% to be prepared for certainly the company 01:22:05.389 --> 01:22:06.790 align:start position:0% to be prepared for certainly the company that<01:22:05.539> owns<01:22:05.659> a<01:22:05.809> dumpster<01:22:06.199> will<01:22:06.349> have<01:22:06.440> lost<01:22:06.650> the 01:22:06.790 --> 01:22:06.800 align:start position:0% that owns a dumpster will have lost the 01:22:06.800 --> 01:22:09.129 align:start position:0% that owns a dumpster will have lost the asset<01:22:07.159> the<01:22:07.190> resin<01:22:07.610> for<01:22:08.420> whatever<01:22:08.690> is<01:22:08.809> in<01:22:08.929> there 01:22:09.129 --> 01:22:09.139 align:start position:0% asset the resin for whatever is in there 01:22:09.139 --> 01:22:10.510 align:start position:0% asset the resin for whatever is in there now<01:22:09.170> course<01:22:09.530> if<01:22:09.679> it's<01:22:09.800> construction<01:22:10.400> debris 01:22:10.510 --> 01:22:10.520 align:start position:0% now course if it's construction debris 01:22:10.520 --> 01:22:14.470 align:start position:0% now course if it's construction debris is<01:22:10.730> just<01:22:11.000> trash<01:22:12.309> it's<01:22:13.309> gone<01:22:13.520> and<01:22:13.880> if<01:22:14.000> it<01:22:14.179> said 01:22:14.470 --> 01:22:14.480 align:start position:0% is just trash it's gone and if it said 01:22:14.480 --> 01:22:16.359 align:start position:0% is just trash it's gone and if it said you<01:22:14.690> know<01:22:14.809> someone's<01:22:15.199> household<01:22:16.130> belongings 01:22:16.359 --> 01:22:16.369 align:start position:0% you know someone's household belongings 01:22:16.369 --> 01:22:18.970 align:start position:0% you know someone's household belongings that<01:22:17.090> you've<01:22:17.270> impounded<01:22:17.960> in<01:22:18.110> this<01:22:18.320> in<01:22:18.860> the 01:22:18.970 --> 01:22:18.980 align:start position:0% that you've impounded in this in the 01:22:18.980 --> 01:22:20.709 align:start position:0% that you've impounded in this in the dumpster<01:22:19.130> you<01:22:19.579> could<01:22:19.820> potentially<01:22:20.300> create 01:22:20.709 --> 01:22:20.719 align:start position:0% dumpster you could potentially create 01:22:20.719 --> 01:22:23.049 align:start position:0% dumpster you could potentially create away<01:22:21.559> we're<01:22:21.800> treated<01:22:22.309> like<01:22:22.520> a<01:22:22.550> vehicle 01:22:23.049 --> 01:22:23.059 align:start position:0% away we're treated like a vehicle 01:22:23.059 --> 01:22:24.540 align:start position:0% away we're treated like a vehicle without<01:22:23.480> deals 01:22:24.540 --> 01:22:24.550 align:start position:0% without deals 01:22:24.550 --> 01:22:27.700 align:start position:0% without deals therefore<01:22:25.550> it's<01:22:25.760> subject<01:22:26.239> to<01:22:26.380> licenses<01:22:27.380> tags 01:22:27.700 --> 01:22:27.710 align:start position:0% therefore it's subject to licenses tags 01:22:27.710 --> 01:22:37.359 align:start position:0% therefore it's subject to licenses tags and<01:22:28.190> other<01:22:28.309> kinds<01:22:28.760> of<01:22:28.880> fees<01:22:34.659> yes<01:22:35.659> I<01:22:36.500> I<01:22:37.130> have<01:22:37.280> a 01:22:37.359 --> 01:22:37.369 align:start position:0% and other kinds of fees yes I I have a 01:22:37.369 --> 01:22:40.479 align:start position:0% and other kinds of fees yes I I have a concern<01:22:37.760> about<01:22:37.880> these<01:22:38.210> storage<01:22:38.960> pod<01:22:39.320> which<01:22:40.280> is 01:22:40.479 --> 01:22:40.489 align:start position:0% concern about these storage pod which is 01:22:40.489 --> 01:22:42.069 align:start position:0% concern about these storage pod which is that<01:22:40.789> I<01:22:40.820> can<01:22:41.150> easily<01:22:41.329> imagine<01:22:41.539> them<01:22:42.050> being 01:22:42.069 --> 01:22:42.079 align:start position:0% that I can easily imagine them being 01:22:42.079 --> 01:22:46.470 align:start position:0% that I can easily imagine them being used<01:22:42.679> for<01:22:43.539> rotating<01:22:44.539> storage<01:22:45.050> if<01:22:45.230> somebody<01:22:45.619> is 01:22:46.470 --> 01:22:46.480 align:start position:0% used for rotating storage if somebody is 01:22:46.480 --> 01:22:48.700 align:start position:0% used for rotating storage if somebody is renovating<01:22:47.480> a<01:22:47.570> house<01:22:47.780> or<01:22:48.079> painting<01:22:48.440> a<01:22:48.530> house 01:22:48.700 --> 01:22:48.710 align:start position:0% renovating a house or painting a house 01:22:48.710 --> 01:22:52.029 align:start position:0% renovating a house or painting a house or<01:22:48.980> something<01:22:49.190> similar<01:22:50.170> they<01:22:51.170> rotate<01:22:51.710> a<01:22:51.739> room 01:22:52.029 --> 01:22:52.039 align:start position:0% or something similar they rotate a room 01:22:52.039 --> 01:22:54.700 align:start position:0% or something similar they rotate a room into<01:22:52.460> that<01:22:52.610> you<01:22:53.510> know<01:22:53.630> storage<01:22:54.079> space<01:22:54.380> while 01:22:54.700 --> 01:22:54.710 align:start position:0% into that you know storage space while 01:22:54.710 --> 01:22:55.910 align:start position:0% into that you know storage space while it<01:22:54.860> was<01:22:54.949> being<01:22:55.159> painted 01:22:55.910 --> 01:22:55.920 align:start position:0% it was being painted 01:22:55.920 --> 01:22:58.610 align:start position:0% it was being painted being<01:22:56.280> renovated<01:22:56.489> I<01:22:57.120> can<01:22:57.810> eat<01:22:57.929> so<01:22:58.410> I<01:22:58.469> can 01:22:58.610 --> 01:22:58.620 align:start position:0% being renovated I can eat so I can 01:22:58.620 --> 01:23:01.760 align:start position:0% being renovated I can eat so I can imagine<01:22:58.860> that<01:22:59.130> situation<01:22:59.910> in<01:23:00.090> which<01:23:00.300> the<01:23:00.770> hive 01:23:01.760 --> 01:23:01.770 align:start position:0% imagine that situation in which the hive 01:23:01.770 --> 01:23:06.169 align:start position:0% imagine that situation in which the hive would<01:23:02.250> be<01:23:03.469> temporary<01:23:04.469> storage<01:23:04.770> space<01:23:05.179> and 01:23:06.169 --> 01:23:06.179 align:start position:0% would be temporary storage space and 01:23:06.179 --> 01:23:10.250 align:start position:0% would be temporary storage space and you'd<01:23:06.330> want<01:23:06.540> it<01:23:06.719> on<01:23:06.900> the<01:23:07.170> property<01:23:07.860> because<01:23:09.260> of 01:23:10.250 --> 01:23:10.260 align:start position:0% you'd want it on the property because of 01:23:10.260 --> 01:23:12.050 align:start position:0% you'd want it on the property because of the<01:23:10.530> quick<01:23:10.770> turnover<01:23:11.310> you<01:23:11.400> wouldn't<01:23:11.760> you 01:23:12.050 --> 01:23:12.060 align:start position:0% the quick turnover you wouldn't you 01:23:12.060 --> 01:23:13.580 align:start position:0% the quick turnover you wouldn't you wouldn't<01:23:12.300> want<01:23:12.510> it<01:23:12.630> take<01:23:12.840> the<01:23:13.050> furniture<01:23:13.500> away 01:23:13.580 --> 01:23:13.590 align:start position:0% wouldn't want it take the furniture away 01:23:13.590 --> 01:23:16.220 align:start position:0% wouldn't want it take the furniture away in<01:23:14.280> two<01:23:14.640> days<01:23:14.820> later<01:23:15.150> three<01:23:15.480> days<01:23:15.630> later<01:23:15.929> bring 01:23:16.220 --> 01:23:16.230 align:start position:0% in two days later three days later bring 01:23:16.230 --> 01:23:18.680 align:start position:0% in two days later three days later bring it<01:23:16.350> back<01:23:16.560> so<01:23:16.949> I<01:23:17.580> think<01:23:17.699> we<01:23:18.000> do<01:23:18.150> need<01:23:18.330> to<01:23:18.360> think 01:23:18.680 --> 01:23:18.690 align:start position:0% it back so I think we do need to think 01:23:18.690 --> 01:23:21.350 align:start position:0% it back so I think we do need to think about<01:23:18.780> those<01:23:19.739> pods<01:23:20.130> sitting<01:23:20.580> around<01:23:20.790> for<01:23:21.150> some 01:23:21.350 --> 01:23:21.360 align:start position:0% about those pods sitting around for some 01:23:21.360 --> 01:23:24.979 align:start position:0% about those pods sitting around for some period<01:23:21.630> of<01:23:21.900> time<01:23:22.110> although<01:23:22.440> I<01:23:23.630> know<01:23:24.630> in<01:23:24.870> New 01:23:24.979 --> 01:23:24.989 align:start position:0% period of time although I know in New 01:23:24.989 --> 01:23:26.330 align:start position:0% period of time although I know in New York<01:23:25.140> City<01:23:25.410> when<01:23:25.590> they<01:23:25.679> sometimes<01:23:26.160> when 01:23:26.330 --> 01:23:26.340 align:start position:0% York City when they sometimes when 01:23:26.340 --> 01:23:28.970 align:start position:0% York City when they sometimes when people<01:23:26.370> have<01:23:26.610> a<01:23:26.730> party<01:23:27.120> they<01:23:27.840> load<01:23:28.199> all<01:23:28.739> of<01:23:28.890> the 01:23:28.970 --> 01:23:28.980 align:start position:0% people have a party they load all of the 01:23:28.980 --> 01:23:30.800 align:start position:0% people have a party they load all of the extra<01:23:29.340> stuff<01:23:29.370> from<01:23:29.969> their<01:23:30.150> apartment<01:23:30.600> into 01:23:30.800 --> 01:23:30.810 align:start position:0% extra stuff from their apartment into 01:23:30.810 --> 01:23:32.300 align:start position:0% extra stuff from their apartment into abandoned<01:23:31.050> driving<01:23:31.650> around<01:23:31.800> the<01:23:31.949> city<01:23:32.070> wall 01:23:32.300 --> 01:23:32.310 align:start position:0% abandoned driving around the city wall 01:23:32.310 --> 01:24:20.810 align:start position:0% abandoned driving around the city wall parties<01:23:32.699> I<01:24:18.770> think<01:24:19.770> we<01:24:20.130> have<01:24:20.250> to<01:24:20.370> think<01:24:20.400> things 01:24:20.810 --> 01:24:20.820 align:start position:0% parties I think we have to think things 01:24:20.820 --> 01:24:23.780 align:start position:0% parties I think we have to think things out<01:24:21.620> because<01:24:22.620> the<01:24:22.890> other<01:24:23.010> side<01:24:23.280> of<01:24:23.429> it<01:24:23.489> is<01:24:23.640> they 01:24:23.780 --> 01:24:23.790 align:start position:0% out because the other side of it is they 01:24:23.790 --> 01:24:25.220 align:start position:0% out because the other side of it is they don't<01:24:23.880> necessarily<01:24:24.570> think<01:24:24.600> your<01:24:24.929> neighbors 01:24:25.220 --> 01:24:25.230 align:start position:0% don't necessarily think your neighbors 01:24:25.230 --> 01:24:27.740 align:start position:0% don't necessarily think your neighbors should<01:24:25.380> be<01:24:25.560> able<01:24:25.770> to<01:24:25.920> stop<01:24:26.760> you<01:24:26.969> from<01:24:27.239> having 01:24:27.740 --> 01:24:27.750 align:start position:0% should be able to stop you from having 01:24:27.750 --> 01:24:30.770 align:start position:0% should be able to stop you from having the<01:24:28.140> use<01:24:28.350> of<01:24:28.620> a<01:24:28.710> dumpster<01:24:29.040> in<01:24:29.880> your<01:24:30.120> yard<01:24:30.390> or<01:24:30.719> a 01:24:30.770 --> 01:24:30.780 align:start position:0% the use of a dumpster in your yard or a 01:24:30.780 --> 01:24:33.080 align:start position:0% the use of a dumpster in your yard or a pods<01:24:31.110> in<01:24:31.980> your<01:24:32.190> yard<01:24:32.400> that's<01:24:32.760> what<01:24:32.940> we're 01:24:33.080 --> 01:24:33.090 align:start position:0% pods in your yard that's what we're 01:24:33.090 --> 01:24:36.200 align:start position:0% pods in your yard that's what we're going<01:24:33.270> to<01:24:33.390> allow<01:24:34.230> people<01:24:34.500> to<01:24:34.949> do<01:24:35.699> I<01:24:35.850> suppose 01:24:36.200 --> 01:24:36.210 align:start position:0% going to allow people to do I suppose 01:24:36.210 --> 01:24:38.870 align:start position:0% going to allow people to do I suppose the<01:24:36.330> public<01:24:36.630> comment<01:24:37.230> period<01:24:37.880> could 01:24:38.870 --> 01:24:38.880 align:start position:0% the public comment period could 01:24:38.880 --> 01:24:41.120 align:start position:0% the public comment period could encourage<01:24:39.300> their<01:24:39.630> neighbor<01:24:39.870> to<01:24:40.230> make 01:24:41.120 --> 01:24:41.130 align:start position:0% encourage their neighbor to make 01:24:41.130 --> 01:24:48.729 align:start position:0% encourage their neighbor to make modifications<01:24:41.520> to<01:24:42.030> their<01:24:42.270> plans<01:24:42.570> that<01:24:42.989> might 01:24:48.729 --> 01:24:48.739 align:start position:0% 01:24:48.739 --> 01:24:53.259 align:start position:0% I'm<01:24:49.249> thinking<01:24:51.579> one<01:24:52.579> of<01:24:52.730> the<01:24:52.789> things<01:24:53.030> that<01:24:53.150> we 01:24:53.259 --> 01:24:53.269 align:start position:0% I'm thinking one of the things that we 01:24:53.269 --> 01:24:54.549 align:start position:0% I'm thinking one of the things that we don't<01:24:53.480> know<01:24:53.630> of<01:24:53.659> course<01:24:53.749> when<01:24:54.079> we<01:24:54.110> go<01:24:54.289> out<01:24:54.440> to 01:24:54.549 --> 01:24:54.559 align:start position:0% don't know of course when we go out to 01:24:54.559 --> 01:24:57.069 align:start position:0% don't know of course when we go out to take<01:24:54.710> a<01:24:54.739> look<01:24:55.039> I<01:24:55.219> mean<01:24:55.369> clearly<01:24:55.670> we<01:24:55.820> are<01:24:56.079> well 01:24:57.069 --> 01:24:57.079 align:start position:0% take a look I mean clearly we are well 01:24:57.079 --> 01:24:59.080 align:start position:0% take a look I mean clearly we are well aware<01:24:57.349> of<01:24:57.409> the<01:24:57.650> sight<01:24:57.949> line<01:24:58.159> issues<01:24:58.639> and<01:24:58.999> we 01:24:59.080 --> 01:24:59.090 align:start position:0% aware of the sight line issues and we 01:24:59.090 --> 01:25:01.089 align:start position:0% aware of the sight line issues and we know<01:24:59.239> to<01:24:59.300> look<01:24:59.510> for<01:24:59.690> driveways<01:25:00.349> across<01:25:00.800> and 01:25:01.089 --> 01:25:01.099 align:start position:0% know to look for driveways across and 01:25:01.099 --> 01:25:03.399 align:start position:0% know to look for driveways across and make<01:25:01.219> sure<01:25:01.400> that<01:25:01.610> nobody's<01:25:02.420> has<01:25:02.599> to<01:25:02.809> back<01:25:03.019> into 01:25:03.399 --> 01:25:03.409 align:start position:0% make sure that nobody's has to back into 01:25:03.409 --> 01:25:05.529 align:start position:0% make sure that nobody's has to back into a<01:25:03.440> dumpster<01:25:04.369> do<01:25:04.550> that<01:25:04.789> but<01:25:04.999> there<01:25:05.210> are<01:25:05.329> a 01:25:05.529 --> 01:25:05.539 align:start position:0% a dumpster do that but there are a 01:25:05.539 --> 01:25:07.089 align:start position:0% a dumpster do that but there are a number<01:25:05.960> of<01:25:06.380> cars<01:25:06.650> in<01:25:06.860> the<01:25:06.949> neighborhood 01:25:07.089 --> 01:25:07.099 align:start position:0% number of cars in the neighborhood 01:25:07.099 --> 01:25:09.520 align:start position:0% number of cars in the neighborhood parking<01:25:07.849> kind<01:25:08.090> of<01:25:08.179> constraints<01:25:08.869> particular 01:25:09.520 --> 01:25:09.530 align:start position:0% parking kind of constraints particular 01:25:09.530 --> 01:25:11.709 align:start position:0% parking kind of constraints particular issues<01:25:10.010> that<01:25:10.309> we<01:25:10.969> just<01:25:11.179> start<01:25:11.389> going<01:25:11.449> to<01:25:11.599> know 01:25:11.709 --> 01:25:11.719 align:start position:0% issues that we just start going to know 01:25:11.719 --> 01:25:14.560 align:start position:0% issues that we just start going to know from<01:25:11.960> a<01:25:12.019> drive<01:25:12.230> by<01:25:12.469> as<01:25:12.769> the<01:25:13.389> street<01:25:14.389> though<01:25:14.539> I 01:25:14.560 --> 01:25:14.570 align:start position:0% from a drive by as the street though I 01:25:14.570 --> 01:25:17.169 align:start position:0% from a drive by as the street though I think<01:25:14.719> you<01:25:15.019> know<01:25:15.139> 99.9%<01:25:16.130> of<01:25:16.610> what<01:25:16.760> the<01:25:16.880> issues 01:25:17.169 --> 01:25:17.179 align:start position:0% think you know 99.9% of what the issues 01:25:17.179 --> 01:25:18.759 align:start position:0% think you know 99.9% of what the issues are<01:25:17.329> we're<01:25:17.510> going<01:25:17.659> to<01:25:17.719> be<01:25:17.869> able<01:25:17.989> to<01:25:18.199> identify 01:25:18.759 --> 01:25:18.769 align:start position:0% are we're going to be able to identify 01:25:18.769 --> 01:25:23.169 align:start position:0% are we're going to be able to identify this<01:25:19.369> from<01:25:19.579> a<01:25:19.610> site<01:25:19.849> visit<01:25:21.400> customer<01:25:22.400> might<01:25:23.059> be 01:25:23.169 --> 01:25:23.179 align:start position:0% this from a site visit customer might be 01:25:23.179 --> 01:25:24.669 align:start position:0% this from a site visit customer might be interesting<01:25:23.599> particularly<01:25:24.079> on<01:25:24.170> the<01:25:24.260> permits 01:25:24.669 --> 01:25:24.679 align:start position:0% interesting particularly on the permits 01:25:24.679 --> 01:25:26.140 align:start position:0% interesting particularly on the permits that<01:25:24.949> you<01:25:25.369> know<01:25:25.489> if<01:25:25.550> it's<01:25:25.699> a<01:25:25.760> three<01:25:25.969> month 01:25:26.140 --> 01:25:26.150 align:start position:0% that you know if it's a three month 01:25:26.150 --> 01:25:27.910 align:start position:0% that you know if it's a three month permit<01:25:26.480> and<01:25:26.599> then<01:25:26.659> has<01:25:26.840> to<01:25:26.989> be<01:25:27.050> renewed<01:25:27.289> to 01:25:27.910 --> 01:25:27.920 align:start position:0% permit and then has to be renewed to 01:25:27.920 --> 01:25:30.520 align:start position:0% permit and then has to be renewed to have<01:25:28.519> a<01:25:28.579> public<01:25:28.880> comment<01:25:29.599> upon<01:25:29.989> renewable 01:25:30.520 --> 01:25:30.530 align:start position:0% have a public comment upon renewable 01:25:30.530 --> 01:25:33.669 align:start position:0% have a public comment upon renewable because<01:25:30.679> in<01:25:31.010> people<01:25:31.369> with<01:25:31.550> if<01:25:32.360> you're<01:25:32.679> the 01:25:33.669 --> 01:25:33.679 align:start position:0% because in people with if you're the 01:25:33.679 --> 01:25:35.529 align:start position:0% because in people with if you're the contractor<01:25:33.920> however<01:25:34.550> wasn't<01:25:34.730> doing<01:25:35.329> a<01:25:35.389> good 01:25:35.529 --> 01:25:35.539 align:start position:0% contractor however wasn't doing a good 01:25:35.539 --> 01:25:37.660 align:start position:0% contractor however wasn't doing a good job<01:25:35.599> in<01:25:36.380> terms<01:25:36.440> of<01:25:36.889> how<01:25:37.070> they<01:25:37.219> manage<01:25:37.340> the 01:25:37.660 --> 01:25:37.670 align:start position:0% job in terms of how they manage the 01:25:37.670 --> 01:25:39.640 align:start position:0% job in terms of how they manage the dumpster<01:25:38.119> would<01:25:38.900> be<01:25:38.989> an<01:25:39.079> opportunity<01:25:39.590> for 01:25:39.640 --> 01:25:39.650 align:start position:0% dumpster would be an opportunity for 01:25:39.650 --> 01:25:42.520 align:start position:0% dumpster would be an opportunity for people<01:25:40.099> to<01:25:40.809> make<01:25:41.809> their<01:25:42.079> opinions<01:25:42.260> known 01:25:42.520 --> 01:25:42.530 align:start position:0% people to make their opinions known 01:25:42.530 --> 01:25:45.069 align:start position:0% people to make their opinions known about<01:25:42.889> that<01:25:43.150> and<01:25:44.150> I<01:25:44.239> would<01:25:44.420> argue<01:25:44.449> for<01:25:44.900> one 01:25:45.069 --> 01:25:45.079 align:start position:0% about that and I would argue for one 01:25:45.079 --> 01:25:48.970 align:start position:0% about that and I would argue for one month<01:25:45.349> period<01:25:46.010> with<01:25:46.369> renewal<01:25:46.820> not<01:25:47.360> longer<01:25:47.980> for 01:25:48.970 --> 01:25:48.980 align:start position:0% month period with renewal not longer for 01:25:48.980 --> 01:25:55.420 align:start position:0% month period with renewal not longer for the 01:25:55.420 --> 01:25:55.430 align:start position:0% 01:25:55.430 --> 01:25:58.570 align:start position:0% yai<01:25:56.300> yai<01:25:56.630> any<01:25:57.260> kind<01:25:57.500> of<01:25:57.530> surgery<01:25:57.800> two<01:25:58.220> weeks<01:25:58.250> on 01:25:58.570 --> 01:25:58.580 align:start position:0% yai yai any kind of surgery two weeks on 01:25:58.580 --> 01:26:04.720 align:start position:0% yai yai any kind of surgery two weeks on the<01:25:58.670> part<01:25:58.910> and<01:26:01.030> it's<01:26:02.030> limited<01:26:02.180> and<01:26:03.310> one<01:26:04.310> one 01:26:04.720 --> 01:26:04.730 align:start position:0% the part and it's limited and one one 01:26:04.730 --> 01:26:07.510 align:start position:0% the part and it's limited and one one month<01:26:04.940> on<01:26:05.090> the<01:26:05.270> construction<01:26:05.690> and<01:26:06.430> on<01:26:07.430> the 01:26:07.510 --> 01:26:07.520 align:start position:0% month on the construction and on the 01:26:07.520 --> 01:26:10.360 align:start position:0% month on the construction and on the construction<01:26:08.030> you<01:26:08.240> want<01:26:08.960> to<01:26:09.050> renew<01:26:09.260> it<01:26:09.380> fine 01:26:10.360 --> 01:26:10.370 align:start position:0% construction you want to renew it fine 01:26:10.370 --> 01:26:14.950 align:start position:0% construction you want to renew it fine and<01:26:10.580> I<01:26:10.730> like<01:26:10.940> the<01:26:11.120> idea<01:26:11.420> of<01:26:13.660> you<01:26:14.660> know<01:26:14.750> making 01:26:14.950 --> 01:26:14.960 align:start position:0% and I like the idea of you know making 01:26:14.960 --> 01:26:16.450 align:start position:0% and I like the idea of you know making it<01:26:15.110> clear<01:26:15.350> that<01:26:15.380> there's<01:26:15.740> a<01:26:15.800> that<01:26:16.250> there's 01:26:16.450 --> 01:26:16.460 align:start position:0% it clear that there's a that there's 01:26:16.460 --> 01:26:19.870 align:start position:0% it clear that there's a that there's that<01:26:17.390> it<01:26:17.840> is<01:26:18.050> something<01:26:19.010> like<01:26:19.130> one<01:26:19.400> month<01:26:19.580> and 01:26:19.870 --> 01:26:19.880 align:start position:0% that it is something like one month and 01:26:19.880 --> 01:26:21.940 align:start position:0% that it is something like one month and that<01:26:20.210> their<01:26:20.480> public<01:26:21.140> comment<01:26:21.500> is<01:26:21.590> welcome<01:26:21.710> so 01:26:21.940 --> 01:26:21.950 align:start position:0% that their public comment is welcome so 01:26:21.950 --> 01:26:23.950 align:start position:0% that their public comment is welcome so that<01:26:22.310> if<01:26:22.430> there's<01:26:22.670> a<01:26:22.730> question<01:26:23.000> about<01:26:23.300> how 01:26:23.950 --> 01:26:23.960 align:start position:0% that if there's a question about how 01:26:23.960 --> 01:26:25.690 align:start position:0% that if there's a question about how it's<01:26:24.170> working<01:26:24.380> that<01:26:25.160> that<01:26:25.340> might<01:26:25.550> be 01:26:25.690 --> 01:26:25.700 align:start position:0% it's working that that might be 01:26:25.700 --> 01:26:29.020 align:start position:0% it's working that that might be addressed<01:26:26.060> in<01:26:26.300> an<01:26:26.660> arena<01:26:27.400> we<01:26:28.400> are<01:26:28.550> talking<01:26:28.910> 20 01:26:29.020 --> 01:26:29.030 align:start position:0% addressed in an arena we are talking 20 01:26:29.030 --> 01:26:30.550 align:start position:0% addressed in an arena we are talking 20 these<01:26:29.300> a<01:26:29.330> years<01:26:29.630> so<01:26:29.810> I<01:26:29.840> think<01:26:30.260> it's 01:26:30.550 --> 01:26:30.560 align:start position:0% these a years so I think it's 01:26:30.560 --> 01:26:33.190 align:start position:0% these a years so I think it's potentially<01:26:31.520> we're<01:26:32.180> able<01:26:32.300> to<01:26:32.510> handle<01:26:32.840> it<01:26:32.990> but 01:26:33.190 --> 01:26:33.200 align:start position:0% potentially we're able to handle it but 01:26:33.200 --> 01:26:34.780 align:start position:0% potentially we're able to handle it but when<01:26:33.740> you<01:26:33.830> talk<01:26:34.070> you<01:26:34.370> know<01:26:34.460> when<01:26:34.610> we're 01:26:34.780 --> 01:26:34.790 align:start position:0% when you talk you know when we're 01:26:34.790 --> 01:26:36.310 align:start position:0% when you talk you know when we're looking<01:26:34.910> at<01:26:35.120> a<01:26:35.180> six<01:26:35.420> month<01:26:35.660> period<01:26:35.750> or<01:26:36.140> maybe 01:26:36.310 --> 01:26:36.320 align:start position:0% looking at a six month period or maybe 01:26:36.320 --> 01:26:37.780 align:start position:0% looking at a six month period or maybe down<01:26:36.500> to<01:26:36.530> three<01:26:36.800> months<01:26:37.040> now<01:26:37.190> you<01:26:37.220> talk<01:26:37.460> to<01:26:37.610> one 01:26:37.780 --> 01:26:37.790 align:start position:0% down to three months now you talk to one 01:26:37.790 --> 01:26:40.120 align:start position:0% down to three months now you talk to one month<01:26:38.000> if<01:26:38.180> we<01:26:38.330> have<01:26:38.480> two<01:26:38.690> prior<01:26:39.350> to<01:26:39.380> the<01:26:39.710> 30-day 01:26:40.120 --> 01:26:40.130 align:start position:0% month if we have two prior to the 30-day 01:26:40.130 --> 01:26:43.230 align:start position:0% month if we have two prior to the 30-day period<01:26:40.520> notify<01:26:41.240> the<01:26:41.300> contiguous<01:26:41.840> neighbors 01:26:43.230 --> 01:26:43.240 align:start position:0% period notify the contiguous neighbors 01:26:43.240 --> 01:26:46.390 align:start position:0% period notify the contiguous neighbors okay<01:26:44.240> I<01:26:44.480> can<01:26:44.690> I<01:26:44.930> can<01:26:45.110> see<01:26:45.350> where<01:26:45.560> it's<01:26:45.680> just<01:26:45.950> the 01:26:46.390 --> 01:26:46.400 align:start position:0% okay I can I can see where it's just the 01:26:46.400 --> 01:26:48.280 align:start position:0% okay I can I can see where it's just the process<01:26:46.670> and<01:26:47.120> there's<01:26:47.270> some<01:26:47.480> sign<01:26:47.780> that<01:26:48.020> says 01:26:48.280 --> 01:26:48.290 align:start position:0% process and there's some sign that says 01:26:48.290 --> 01:26:50.260 align:start position:0% process and there's some sign that says you<01:26:48.320> know<01:26:48.620> if<01:26:49.340> you<01:26:49.490> have<01:26:49.580> a<01:26:49.640> problem<01:26:50.030> with<01:26:50.150> this 01:26:50.260 --> 01:26:50.270 align:start position:0% you know if you have a problem with this 01:26:50.270 --> 01:26:53.670 align:start position:0% you know if you have a problem with this it's<01:26:50.480> a<01:26:50.570> 30-day<01:26:50.960> renewal<01:26:51.350> period<01:26:51.640> you<01:26:52.640> know 01:26:53.670 --> 01:26:53.680 align:start position:0% it's a 30-day renewal period you know 01:26:53.680 --> 01:26:56.920 align:start position:0% it's a 30-day renewal period you know send<01:26:54.680> us<01:26:54.740> your<01:26:54.890> comments<01:26:55.450> and<01:26:56.450> if<01:26:56.600> they<01:26:56.720> want 01:26:56.920 --> 01:26:56.930 align:start position:0% send us your comments and if they want 01:26:56.930 --> 01:26:59.050 align:start position:0% send us your comments and if they want to<01:26:56.960> renew<01:26:57.230> we'll<01:26:57.440> have<01:26:57.650> your<01:26:57.740> comments<01:26:58.160> but 01:26:59.050 --> 01:26:59.060 align:start position:0% to renew we'll have your comments but 01:26:59.060 --> 01:27:01.930 align:start position:0% to renew we'll have your comments but not<01:26:59.420> having<01:26:59.630> to<01:26:59.840> go<01:26:59.960> out<01:27:00.140> and<01:27:00.310> be<01:27:01.310> proactive 01:27:01.930 --> 01:27:01.940 align:start position:0% not having to go out and be proactive 01:27:01.940 --> 01:27:03.520 align:start position:0% not having to go out and be proactive and<01:27:02.060> soliciting<01:27:02.630> them<01:27:02.780> just<01:27:03.020> make<01:27:03.200> it<01:27:03.320> clear 01:27:03.520 --> 01:27:03.530 align:start position:0% and soliciting them just make it clear 01:27:03.530 --> 01:27:10.540 align:start position:0% and soliciting them just make it clear in<01:27:03.620> the<01:27:03.680> process<01:27:07.930> you<01:27:08.930> know<01:27:09.050> if<01:27:10.040> they've<01:27:10.340> got<01:27:10.520> a 01:27:10.540 --> 01:27:10.550 align:start position:0% in the process you know if they've got a 01:27:10.550 --> 01:27:12.460 align:start position:0% in the process you know if they've got a 30-day<01:27:11.000> period<01:27:11.240> this<01:27:11.810> is<01:27:11.960> something<01:27:12.200> about<01:27:12.350> it 01:27:12.460 --> 01:27:12.470 align:start position:0% 30-day period this is something about it 01:27:12.470 --> 01:27:13.990 align:start position:0% 30-day period this is something about it you<01:27:12.560> don't<01:27:12.620> like<01:27:12.830> and<01:27:13.460> they're<01:27:13.670> going<01:27:13.850> to<01:27:13.910> go 01:27:13.990 --> 01:27:14.000 align:start position:0% you don't like and they're going to go 01:27:14.000 --> 01:27:15.220 align:start position:0% you don't like and they're going to go for<01:27:14.210> another<01:27:14.270> do<01:27:14.510> you<01:27:14.600> think<01:27:14.780> they<01:27:14.900> might<01:27:15.080> go 01:27:15.220 --> 01:27:15.230 align:start position:0% for another do you think they might go 01:27:15.230 --> 01:27:21.440 align:start position:0% for another do you think they might go for<01:27:15.260> a<01:27:15.500> renewal<01:27:15.890> give<01:27:16.400> us<01:27:16.490> your<01:27:16.610> comments 01:27:21.440 --> 01:27:21.450 align:start position:0% 01:27:21.450 --> 01:27:25.370 align:start position:0% any<01:27:21.960> other<01:27:22.170> comments<01:27:23.150> do<01:27:24.150> you<01:27:24.240> have<01:27:24.420> enough<01:27:24.990> to 01:27:25.370 --> 01:27:25.380 align:start position:0% any other comments do you have enough to 01:27:25.380 --> 01:27:29.330 align:start position:0% any other comments do you have enough to go<01:27:26.840> come<01:27:27.840> back<01:27:28.020> with<01:27:28.230> some<01:27:28.410> actually<01:27:29.130> gonna 01:27:29.330 --> 01:27:29.340 align:start position:0% go come back with some actually gonna 01:27:29.340 --> 01:27:31.910 align:start position:0% go come back with some actually gonna come<01:27:29.550> back<01:27:29.640> with<01:27:29.790> some<01:27:29.850> options<01:27:30.150> maybe<01:27:30.920> you 01:27:31.910 --> 01:27:31.920 align:start position:0% come back with some options maybe you 01:27:31.920 --> 01:27:52.690 align:start position:0% come back with some options maybe you know<01:27:32.040> proposal<01:27:32.400> and<01:27:32.760> some<01:27:32.910> options<01:27:45.920> thank<01:27:46.920> you 01:27:52.690 --> 01:27:52.700 align:start position:0% 01:27:52.700 --> 01:27:56.090 align:start position:0% our<01:27:53.700> last<01:27:54.030> item<01:27:54.240> is<01:27:54.690> a<01:27:54.720> discussion<01:27:55.170> of<01:27:55.320> process 01:27:56.090 --> 01:27:56.100 align:start position:0% our last item is a discussion of process 01:27:56.100 --> 01:27:58.780 align:start position:0% our last item is a discussion of process reflection<01:27:56.670> of<01:27:56.820> a<01:27:56.910> vortex<01:27:57.390> council<01:27:57.780> member<01:27:58.020> so 01:27:58.780 --> 01:27:58.790 align:start position:0% reflection of a vortex council member so 01:27:58.790 --> 01:28:02.990 align:start position:0% reflection of a vortex council member so unexpired<01:27:59.790> term<01:28:00.000> of<01:28:00.570> our<01:28:01.070> so<01:28:02.070> far<01:28:02.310> and<01:28:02.580> expired 01:28:02.990 --> 01:28:03.000 align:start position:0% unexpired term of our so far and expired 01:28:03.000 --> 01:28:12.550 align:start position:0% unexpired term of our so far and expired belly<01:28:06.200> and<01:28:07.250> I<01:28:09.470> guess<01:28:10.470> I'll<01:28:10.650> just<01:28:10.830> reiterate 01:28:12.550 --> 01:28:12.560 align:start position:0% belly and I guess I'll just reiterate 01:28:12.560 --> 01:28:17.930 align:start position:0% belly and I guess I'll just reiterate the<01:28:13.560> last<01:28:14.870> couple<01:28:15.870> of<01:28:16.520> vacancies<01:28:17.520> that<01:28:17.730> we've 01:28:17.930 --> 01:28:17.940 align:start position:0% the last couple of vacancies that we've 01:28:17.940 --> 01:28:20.260 align:start position:0% the last couple of vacancies that we've had 01:28:20.260 --> 01:28:20.270 align:start position:0% 01:28:20.270 --> 01:28:23.570 align:start position:0% when<01:28:21.270> council<01:28:22.020> member<01:28:22.230> L<01:28:22.380> ritual<01:28:22.800> resigned 01:28:23.570 --> 01:28:23.580 align:start position:0% when council member L ritual resigned 01:28:23.580 --> 01:28:24.920 align:start position:0% when council member L ritual resigned because<01:28:23.820> he<01:28:24.030> got<01:28:24.210> elected<01:28:24.510> to<01:28:24.570> the<01:28:24.690> county 01:28:24.920 --> 01:28:24.930 align:start position:0% because he got elected to the county 01:28:24.930 --> 01:28:30.020 align:start position:0% because he got elected to the county council<01:28:25.170> councilmember<01:28:25.890> snipper<01:28:27.440> was<01:28:29.030> ran 01:28:30.020 --> 01:28:30.030 align:start position:0% council councilmember snipper was ran 01:28:30.030 --> 01:28:32.060 align:start position:0% council councilmember snipper was ran Tran<01:28:30.300> in<01:28:30.540> a<01:28:30.630> special<01:28:31.320> election<01:28:31.530> because<01:28:31.950> that 01:28:32.060 --> 01:28:32.070 align:start position:0% Tran in a special election because that 01:28:32.070 --> 01:28:34.910 align:start position:0% Tran in a special election because that was<01:28:32.220> more<01:28:32.430> than<01:28:32.550> 240<01:28:33.330> days<01:28:33.480> before<01:28:34.110> the<01:28:34.740> next 01:28:34.910 --> 01:28:34.920 align:start position:0% was more than 240 days before the next 01:28:34.920 --> 01:28:41.210 align:start position:0% was more than 240 days before the next election<01:28:36.230> the<01:28:37.230> one<01:28:37.440> prior<01:28:37.800> to<01:28:37.830> that<01:28:40.220> council 01:28:41.210 --> 01:28:41.220 align:start position:0% election the one prior to that council 01:28:41.220 --> 01:28:44.900 align:start position:0% election the one prior to that council member<01:28:41.490> mozi<01:28:41.700> er<01:28:42.090> moved<01:28:42.660> and<01:28:43.080> that<01:28:43.830> was<01:28:44.100> less 01:28:44.900 --> 01:28:44.910 align:start position:0% member mozi er moved and that was less 01:28:44.910 --> 01:28:47.060 align:start position:0% member mozi er moved and that was less than<01:28:45.180> the<01:28:45.300> 240<01:28:46.020> days<01:28:46.170> before<01:28:46.560> the<01:28:46.680> election 01:28:47.060 --> 01:28:47.070 align:start position:0% than the 240 days before the election 01:28:47.070 --> 01:28:49.850 align:start position:0% than the 240 days before the election and<01:28:47.280> the<01:28:47.850> council<01:28:48.240> at<01:28:48.360> that<01:28:48.540> point<01:28:48.900> said<01:28:49.620> that 01:28:49.850 --> 01:28:49.860 align:start position:0% and the council at that point said that 01:28:49.860 --> 01:28:55.190 align:start position:0% and the council at that point said that we<01:28:50.850> wanted<01:28:51.150> to<01:28:53.630> solicit<01:28:54.630> people<01:28:54.810> who<01:28:55.080> were 01:28:55.190 --> 01:28:55.200 align:start position:0% we wanted to solicit people who were 01:28:55.200 --> 01:28:58.400 align:start position:0% we wanted to solicit people who were interested<01:28:55.500> in<01:28:56.510> filling<01:28:57.510> that<01:28:57.810> seat<01:28:58.140> until 01:28:58.400 --> 01:28:58.410 align:start position:0% interested in filling that seat until 01:28:58.410 --> 01:29:00.620 align:start position:0% interested in filling that seat until the<01:28:58.830> next<01:28:58.980> election<01:28:59.220> and<01:28:59.730> that<01:28:59.940> we<01:29:00.030> and<01:29:00.210> we 01:29:00.620 --> 01:29:00.630 align:start position:0% the next election and that we and we 01:29:00.630 --> 01:29:03.980 align:start position:0% the next election and that we and we made<01:29:01.440> it<01:29:01.470> clear<01:29:01.800> that<01:29:01.830> we<01:29:02.540> would<01:29:03.540> appoint 01:29:03.980 --> 01:29:03.990 align:start position:0% made it clear that we would appoint 01:29:03.990 --> 01:29:07.400 align:start position:0% made it clear that we would appoint somebody<01:29:04.290> who<01:29:05.330> expressed<01:29:06.330> that<01:29:07.080> they<01:29:07.230> would 01:29:07.400 --> 01:29:07.410 align:start position:0% somebody who expressed that they would 01:29:07.410 --> 01:29:08.960 align:start position:0% somebody who expressed that they would not<01:29:07.560> be<01:29:07.770> running<01:29:08.010> in<01:29:08.130> that<01:29:08.250> election<01:29:08.520> because 01:29:08.960 --> 01:29:08.970 align:start position:0% not be running in that election because 01:29:08.970 --> 01:29:10.220 align:start position:0% not be running in that election because the<01:29:09.120> council<01:29:09.330> did<01:29:09.690> not<01:29:09.720> want 01:29:10.220 --> 01:29:10.230 align:start position:0% the council did not want 01:29:10.230 --> 01:29:12.470 align:start position:0% the council did not want to<01:29:10.320> be<01:29:10.890> in<01:29:10.980> the<01:29:11.100> position<01:29:11.520> of<01:29:11.700> anointing<01:29:12.330> a 01:29:12.470 --> 01:29:12.480 align:start position:0% to be in the position of anointing a 01:29:12.480 --> 01:29:14.479 align:start position:0% to be in the position of anointing a successor<01:29:13.050> who<01:29:13.470> wanted<01:29:13.770> to<01:29:13.950> let<01:29:14.130> the<01:29:14.340> voters 01:29:14.479 --> 01:29:14.489 align:start position:0% successor who wanted to let the voters 01:29:14.489 --> 01:29:20.450 align:start position:0% successor who wanted to let the voters of<01:29:14.880> that<01:29:15.750> ward<01:29:16.640> have<01:29:17.640> a<01:29:18.830> have<01:29:19.830> an<01:29:19.920> open<01:29:20.220> process 01:29:20.450 --> 01:29:20.460 align:start position:0% of that ward have a have an open process 01:29:20.460 --> 01:29:22.490 align:start position:0% of that ward have a have an open process without<01:29:20.910> an<01:29:21.300> incumbent<01:29:21.780> that<01:29:21.989> was<01:29:22.110> named<01:29:22.290> by 01:29:22.490 --> 01:29:22.500 align:start position:0% without an incumbent that was named by 01:29:22.500 --> 01:29:24.979 align:start position:0% without an incumbent that was named by the<01:29:22.560> current<01:29:22.920> council<01:29:23.600> and<01:29:24.600> I<01:29:24.750> would 01:29:24.979 --> 01:29:24.989 align:start position:0% the current council and I would 01:29:24.989 --> 01:29:29.380 align:start position:0% the current council and I would encourage<01:29:25.800> us<01:29:26.130> to<01:29:26.340> use<01:29:27.090> that<01:29:27.120> same<01:29:27.750> process 01:29:29.380 --> 01:29:29.390 align:start position:0% encourage us to use that same process 01:29:29.390 --> 01:29:32.240 align:start position:0% encourage us to use that same process I'm<01:29:30.390> trying<01:29:30.660> to<01:29:30.720> remember<01:29:30.989> if<01:29:31.830> there<01:29:32.130> was 01:29:32.240 --> 01:29:32.250 align:start position:0% I'm trying to remember if there was 01:29:32.250 --> 01:29:35.690 align:start position:0% I'm trying to remember if there was another<01:29:33.020> vacancy<01:29:34.020> in<01:29:34.350> my<01:29:34.530> memory<01:29:34.920> before<01:29:35.130> that 01:29:35.690 --> 01:29:35.700 align:start position:0% another vacancy in my memory before that 01:29:35.700 --> 01:29:37.100 align:start position:0% another vacancy in my memory before that I'm<01:29:35.880> not<01:29:36.060> thinking<01:29:36.270> of<01:29:36.540> it<01:29:36.630> at<01:29:36.750> the<01:29:36.870> moment 01:29:37.100 --> 01:29:37.110 align:start position:0% I'm not thinking of it at the moment 01:29:37.110 --> 01:29:46.700 align:start position:0% I'm not thinking of it at the moment there<01:29:37.410> may<01:29:37.530> have<01:29:37.650> been<01:29:37.710> one 01:29:46.700 --> 01:29:46.710 align:start position:0% 01:29:46.710 --> 01:29:49.890 align:start position:0% customer<01:29:47.710> Siemens<01:29:48.039> I<01:29:48.130> thought<01:29:48.460> the<01:29:48.900> process 01:29:49.890 --> 01:29:49.900 align:start position:0% customer Siemens I thought the process 01:29:49.900 --> 01:29:52.529 align:start position:0% customer Siemens I thought the process he<01:29:50.079> used<01:29:50.320> with<01:29:50.679> councilmember<01:29:51.670> miser<01:29:52.030> when 01:29:52.529 --> 01:29:52.539 align:start position:0% he used with councilmember miser when 01:29:52.539 --> 01:30:09.000 align:start position:0% he used with councilmember miser when she<01:29:52.690> left<01:30:04.170> in<01:30:05.170> the<01:30:05.260> comments<01:30:05.739> hey<01:30:06.190> yes<01:30:06.880> I<01:30:08.010> left 01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:09.010 align:start position:0% she left in the comments hey yes I left 01:30:09.010 --> 01:30:14.189 align:start position:0% she left in the comments hey yes I left that<01:30:09.280> I<01:30:09.489> think<01:30:10.889> coming<01:30:11.889> up<01:30:12.070> with<01:30:12.929> somebody<01:30:13.929> who 01:30:14.189 --> 01:30:14.199 align:start position:0% that I think coming up with somebody who 01:30:14.199 --> 01:30:16.529 align:start position:0% that I think coming up with somebody who would<01:30:14.349> sell<01:30:14.619> the<01:30:14.829> solar<01:30:15.670> position<01:30:16.329> but 01:30:16.529 --> 01:30:16.539 align:start position:0% would sell the solar position but 01:30:16.539 --> 01:30:18.959 align:start position:0% would sell the solar position but without<01:30:16.889> you<01:30:17.889> know<01:30:18.010> with<01:30:18.219> the<01:30:18.340> understanding 01:30:18.959 --> 01:30:18.969 align:start position:0% without you know with the understanding 01:30:18.969 --> 01:30:22.140 align:start position:0% without you know with the understanding that<01:30:19.030> they<01:30:19.679> wouldn't<01:30:20.679> wouldn't<01:30:21.130> run<01:30:21.909> I<01:30:21.940> think 01:30:22.140 --> 01:30:22.150 align:start position:0% that they wouldn't wouldn't run I think 01:30:22.150 --> 01:30:28.560 align:start position:0% that they wouldn't wouldn't run I think it's<01:30:22.449> a<01:30:22.539> great<01:30:22.780> option 01:30:28.560 --> 01:30:28.570 align:start position:0% 01:30:28.570 --> 01:30:32.839 align:start position:0% [Music] 01:30:32.839 --> 01:30:32.849 align:start position:0% 01:30:32.849 --> 01:30:37.049 align:start position:0% I<01:30:34.590> think<01:30:35.590> the<01:30:35.710> deadline<01:30:35.920> is<01:30:36.340> this<01:30:36.579> week<01:30:36.849> is 01:30:37.049 --> 01:30:37.059 align:start position:0% I think the deadline is this week is 01:30:37.059 --> 01:30:40.970 align:start position:0% I think the deadline is this week is that<01:30:37.090> correct<01:30:37.449> yes<01:30:37.690> or<01:30:38.530> next<01:30:38.860> Monday's<01:30:39.219> okay 01:30:40.970 --> 01:30:40.980 align:start position:0% that correct yes or next Monday's okay 01:30:40.980 --> 01:30:44.310 align:start position:0% that correct yes or next Monday's okay okay<01:30:41.980> so<01:30:42.039> that<01:30:42.460> that's<01:30:43.059> what<01:30:43.360> alert<01:30:44.050> folks 01:30:44.310 --> 01:30:44.320 align:start position:0% okay so that that's what alert folks 01:30:44.320 --> 01:30:51.180 align:start position:0% okay so that that's what alert folks could<01:30:44.679> go<01:30:44.800> into<01:30:45.039> the<01:30:45.570> June<01:30:48.269> the<01:30:50.070> timing<01:30:51.070> on 01:30:51.180 --> 01:30:51.190 align:start position:0% could go into the June the timing on 01:30:51.190 --> 01:30:53.899 align:start position:0% could go into the June the timing on this<01:30:51.369> I<01:30:51.550> believe<01:30:51.869> council<01:30:52.869> member<01:30:53.110> bearing 01:30:53.899 --> 01:30:53.909 align:start position:0% this I believe council member bearing 01:30:53.909 --> 01:30:58.319 align:start position:0% this I believe council member bearing will<01:30:54.909> be<01:30:56.159> vacating<01:30:57.159> his<01:30:57.190> seat<01:30:57.369> the<01:30:57.639> end<01:30:58.030> of<01:30:58.210> the 01:30:58.319 --> 01:30:58.329 align:start position:0% will be vacating his seat the end of the 01:30:58.329 --> 01:30:58.649 align:start position:0% will be vacating his seat the end of the month 01:30:58.649 --> 01:30:58.659 align:start position:0% month 01:30:58.659 --> 01:31:03.540 align:start position:0% month correct<01:30:59.250> and<01:31:01.139> we're<01:31:02.139> required<01:31:02.590> to<01:31:02.860> fill<01:31:03.159> it<01:31:03.309> I 01:31:03.540 --> 01:31:03.550 align:start position:0% correct and we're required to fill it I 01:31:03.550 --> 01:31:07.080 align:start position:0% correct and we're required to fill it I believe<01:31:04.000> may<01:31:04.780> 28th<01:31:05.230> is<01:31:05.440> the<01:31:05.590> date<01:31:05.769> and<01:31:06.090> so 01:31:07.080 --> 01:31:07.090 align:start position:0% believe may 28th is the date and so 01:31:07.090 --> 01:31:08.609 align:start position:0% believe may 28th is the date and so we're<01:31:07.269> required<01:31:07.659> to<01:31:07.719> fill<01:31:07.960> it<01:31:08.050> within<01:31:08.199> sixty 01:31:08.609 --> 01:31:08.619 align:start position:0% we're required to fill it within sixty 01:31:08.619 --> 01:31:09.930 align:start position:0% we're required to fill it within sixty days<01:31:08.650> and<01:31:09.159> that<01:31:09.250> would<01:31:09.429> mean<01:31:09.579> that<01:31:09.610> we<01:31:09.789> would 01:31:09.930 --> 01:31:09.940 align:start position:0% days and that would mean that we would 01:31:09.940 --> 01:31:13.020 align:start position:0% days and that would mean that we would need<01:31:10.690> to<01:31:10.869> fill<01:31:11.050> it<01:31:11.199> by<01:31:11.380> July<01:31:11.920> 27th<01:31:12.699> which<01:31:12.880> is<01:31:13.000> a 01:31:13.020 --> 01:31:13.030 align:start position:0% need to fill it by July 27th which is a 01:31:13.030 --> 01:31:15.689 align:start position:0% need to fill it by July 27th which is a Monday<01:31:13.559> and<01:31:14.559> my<01:31:14.739> hope<01:31:14.920> is<01:31:15.099> that<01:31:15.130> we<01:31:15.369> could<01:31:15.519> fill 01:31:15.689 --> 01:31:15.699 align:start position:0% Monday and my hope is that we could fill 01:31:15.699 --> 01:31:17.720 align:start position:0% Monday and my hope is that we could fill it<01:31:15.820> much<01:31:15.969> sooner<01:31:16.179> than<01:31:16.360> that 01:31:17.720 --> 01:31:17.730 align:start position:0% it much sooner than that 01:31:17.730 --> 01:31:21.419 align:start position:0% it much sooner than that and<01:31:18.840> essentially<01:31:19.840> what<01:31:20.590> we're<01:31:20.769> looking<01:31:21.039> at<01:31:21.190> is 01:31:21.419 --> 01:31:21.429 align:start position:0% and essentially what we're looking at is 01:31:21.429 --> 01:31:25.020 align:start position:0% and essentially what we're looking at is a<01:31:21.460> is<01:31:21.880> a<01:31:21.909> vacancy<01:31:22.389> of<01:31:23.099> June<01:31:24.099> through<01:31:24.730> the 01:31:25.020 --> 01:31:25.030 align:start position:0% a is a vacancy of June through the 01:31:25.030 --> 01:31:27.209 align:start position:0% a is a vacancy of June through the middle<01:31:25.360> of<01:31:25.480> November<01:31:26.110> and<01:31:26.349> considering<01:31:27.039> the 01:31:27.209 --> 01:31:27.219 align:start position:0% middle of November and considering the 01:31:27.219 --> 01:31:28.830 align:start position:0% middle of November and considering the council<01:31:27.579> takes<01:31:27.789> off<01:31:27.969> the<01:31:28.150> month<01:31:28.329> of<01:31:28.420> August 01:31:28.830 --> 01:31:28.840 align:start position:0% council takes off the month of August 01:31:28.840 --> 01:31:30.600 align:start position:0% council takes off the month of August we're<01:31:29.409> essentially<01:31:29.710> looking<01:31:29.980> at<01:31:30.219> somebody 01:31:30.600 --> 01:31:30.610 align:start position:0% we're essentially looking at somebody 01:31:30.610 --> 01:31:33.450 align:start position:0% we're essentially looking at somebody who<01:31:30.670> would<01:31:30.940> be<01:31:31.860> fulfilling<01:31:32.860> that<01:31:33.010> position 01:31:33.450 --> 01:31:33.460 align:start position:0% who would be fulfilling that position 01:31:33.460 --> 01:31:37.640 align:start position:0% who would be fulfilling that position for<01:31:33.670> about<01:31:33.760> four<01:31:34.239> and<01:31:34.269> a<01:31:34.360> half<01:31:34.389> months 01:31:37.640 --> 01:31:37.650 align:start position:0% 01:31:37.650 --> 01:31:41.630 align:start position:0% and<01:31:37.800> I<01:31:38.600> believe<01:31:39.600> we<01:31:39.900> after<01:31:40.770> we<01:31:40.800> advertised<01:31:41.340> the 01:31:41.630 --> 01:31:41.640 align:start position:0% and I believe we after we advertised the 01:31:41.640 --> 01:31:44.660 align:start position:0% and I believe we after we advertised the last<01:31:41.820> time<01:31:42.120> than<01:31:42.420> we<01:31:42.570> had<01:31:43.110> I<01:31:43.710> don't<01:31:44.460> know<01:31:44.550> at 01:31:44.660 --> 01:31:44.670 align:start position:0% last time than we had I don't know at 01:31:44.670 --> 01:31:47.000 align:start position:0% last time than we had I don't know at least<01:31:44.880> two<01:31:45.210> opportunities<01:31:45.570> for<01:31:46.440> rap<01:31:46.770> people 01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:47.010 align:start position:0% least two opportunities for rap people 01:31:47.010 --> 01:31:50.060 align:start position:0% least two opportunities for rap people to<01:31:47.220> come<01:31:47.460> and<01:31:47.760> talk<01:31:48.540> to<01:31:48.600> the<01:31:48.840> council<01:31:49.290> in<01:31:49.470> a 01:31:50.060 --> 01:31:50.070 align:start position:0% to come and talk to the council in a 01:31:50.070 --> 01:31:52.190 align:start position:0% to come and talk to the council in a council<01:31:50.460> meeting<01:31:50.580> and<01:31:51.000> talk<01:31:51.750> about<01:31:51.990> their 01:31:52.190 --> 01:31:52.200 align:start position:0% council meeting and talk about their 01:31:52.200 --> 01:31:55.760 align:start position:0% council meeting and talk about their interests<01:31:52.970> we<01:31:53.970> can<01:31:54.240> go<01:31:54.840> that<01:31:55.050> route<01:31:55.320> we<01:31:55.560> can 01:31:55.760 --> 01:31:55.770 align:start position:0% interests we can go that route we can 01:31:55.770 --> 01:31:57.800 align:start position:0% interests we can go that route we can come<01:31:55.950> up<01:31:55.980> with<01:31:56.130> something<01:31:56.580> else<01:31:56.700> it<01:31:57.630> would 01:31:57.800 --> 01:31:57.810 align:start position:0% come up with something else it would 01:31:57.810 --> 01:32:01.040 align:start position:0% come up with something else it would probably<01:31:58.020> be<01:31:58.260> helpful<01:31:58.740> to<01:31:58.950> let<01:31:59.700> people<01:31:59.910> know<01:32:00.060> a 01:32:01.040 --> 01:32:01.050 align:start position:0% probably be helpful to let people know a 01:32:01.050 --> 01:32:03.680 align:start position:0% probably be helpful to let people know a general<01:32:01.680> time<01:32:01.950> frame<01:32:01.980> and<01:32:02.580> a<01:32:02.670> general<01:32:03.060> process 01:32:03.680 --> 01:32:03.690 align:start position:0% general time frame and a general process 01:32:03.690 --> 01:32:05.960 align:start position:0% general time frame and a general process to<01:32:04.320> put<01:32:04.560> in<01:32:04.800> the<01:32:04.920> newsletter<01:32:05.220> so<01:32:05.640> that<01:32:05.670> they 01:32:05.960 --> 01:32:05.970 align:start position:0% to put in the newsletter so that they 01:32:05.970 --> 01:32:11.120 align:start position:0% to put in the newsletter so that they knew<01:32:06.470> that<01:32:07.470> people<01:32:07.800> feel<01:32:08.280> like<01:32:09.680> knowing<01:32:10.680> who 01:32:11.120 --> 01:32:11.130 align:start position:0% knew that people feel like knowing who 01:32:11.130 --> 01:32:13.250 align:start position:0% knew that people feel like knowing who who<01:32:11.850> has<01:32:12.180> expressed<01:32:12.630> an<01:32:12.780> interest 01:32:13.250 --> 01:32:13.260 align:start position:0% who has expressed an interest 01:32:13.260 --> 01:32:15.110 align:start position:0% who has expressed an interest I<01:32:13.380> guess<01:32:14.070> it<01:32:14.220> would<01:32:14.310> go<01:32:14.400> to<01:32:14.460> the<01:32:14.610> city<01:32:14.820> clerk 01:32:15.110 --> 01:32:15.120 align:start position:0% I guess it would go to the city clerk 01:32:15.120 --> 01:32:20.480 align:start position:0% I guess it would go to the city clerk and<01:32:16.730> that<01:32:17.730> we<01:32:17.850> would<01:32:18.030> have<01:32:18.180> some<01:32:18.480> maybe<01:32:19.490> two 01:32:20.480 --> 01:32:20.490 align:start position:0% and that we would have some maybe two 01:32:20.490 --> 01:32:25.270 align:start position:0% and that we would have some maybe two two<01:32:20.940> dates<01:32:21.210> and<01:32:21.420> council<01:32:21.750> meetings<01:32:22.730> maybe 01:32:25.270 --> 01:32:25.280 align:start position:0% two dates and council meetings maybe 01:32:25.280 --> 01:32:33.110 align:start position:0% two dates and council meetings maybe what<01:32:28.400> middle<01:32:29.400> the<01:32:29.490> end<01:32:29.670> of<01:32:29.820> June<01:32:31.100> to<01:32:32.120> interview 01:32:33.110 --> 01:32:33.120 align:start position:0% what middle the end of June to interview 01:32:33.120 --> 01:32:37.670 align:start position:0% what middle the end of June to interview folks<01:32:33.390> make<01:32:34.350> the<01:32:34.470> decision<01:32:34.890> and<01:32:36.530> let<01:32:37.530> them 01:32:37.670 --> 01:32:37.680 align:start position:0% folks make the decision and let them 01:32:37.680 --> 01:32:39.500 align:start position:0% folks make the decision and let them know<01:32:37.860> that<01:32:37.890> essentially<01:32:38.700> that<01:32:39.000> would<01:32:39.150> that 01:32:39.500 --> 01:32:39.510 align:start position:0% know that essentially that would that 01:32:39.510 --> 01:32:42.950 align:start position:0% know that essentially that would that would<01:32:39.570> take<01:32:40.140> one<01:32:40.560> of<01:32:40.590> those<01:32:40.820> months<01:32:41.820> and<01:32:42.630> make 01:32:42.950 --> 01:32:42.960 align:start position:0% would take one of those months and make 01:32:42.960 --> 01:32:44.650 align:start position:0% would take one of those months and make it<01:32:43.110> so<01:32:43.290> that<01:32:43.320> they<01:32:43.590> would<01:32:43.770> be<01:32:43.800> essentially 01:32:44.650 --> 01:32:44.660 align:start position:0% it so that they would be essentially 01:32:44.660 --> 01:32:48.140 align:start position:0% it so that they would be essentially acting<01:32:45.660> as<01:32:45.750> a<01:32:45.810> council<01:32:46.080> member<01:32:46.320> in<01:32:46.470> July<01:32:47.150> over 01:32:48.140 --> 01:32:48.150 align:start position:0% acting as a council member in July over 01:32:48.150 --> 01:32:49.490 align:start position:0% acting as a council member in July over the<01:32:48.240> recess<01:32:48.570> in<01:32:48.750> August<01:32:48.840> and<01:32:49.260> September 01:32:49.490 --> 01:32:49.500 align:start position:0% the recess in August and September 01:32:49.500 --> 01:32:54.110 align:start position:0% the recess in August and September October<01:32:49.950> and<01:32:50.310> half<01:32:50.820> of<01:32:50.940> November<01:32:53.120> any 01:32:54.110 --> 01:32:54.120 align:start position:0% October and half of November any 01:32:54.120 --> 01:32:57.710 align:start position:0% October and half of November any thoughts<01:32:55.050> or<01:32:55.200> reactions<01:32:55.350> on<01:32:55.950> on<01:32:56.790> how<01:32:57.060> we<01:32:57.120> on 01:32:57.710 --> 01:32:57.720 align:start position:0% thoughts or reactions on on how we on 01:32:57.720 --> 01:32:59.930 align:start position:0% thoughts or reactions on on how we on what<01:32:57.960> we<01:32:58.110> put<01:32:58.320> in<01:32:58.470> the<01:32:58.700> newsletter<01:32:59.700> or 01:32:59.930 --> 01:32:59.940 align:start position:0% what we put in the newsletter or 01:32:59.940 --> 01:33:02.960 align:start position:0% what we put in the newsletter or whatever<01:33:00.270> else<01:33:00.540> we<01:33:00.720> put<01:33:00.930> out<01:33:01.760> currently<01:33:02.760> so 01:33:02.960 --> 01:33:02.970 align:start position:0% whatever else we put out currently so 01:33:02.970 --> 01:33:04.340 align:start position:0% whatever else we put out currently so that<01:33:03.120> we<01:33:03.180> can<01:33:03.330> have<01:33:03.450> as<01:33:03.570> much<01:33:03.750> information<01:33:03.990> as 01:33:04.340 --> 01:33:04.350 align:start position:0% that we can have as much information as 01:33:04.350 --> 01:33:06.560 align:start position:0% that we can have as much information as possible<01:33:04.500> customer<01:33:05.160> right<01:33:05.400> I<01:33:05.670> didn't<01:33:06.450> have<01:33:06.540> a 01:33:06.560 --> 01:33:06.570 align:start position:0% possible customer right I didn't have a 01:33:06.570 --> 01:33:08.210 align:start position:0% possible customer right I didn't have a comment<01:33:06.900> on<01:33:06.990> that<01:33:07.020> I<01:33:07.110> just<01:33:07.410> wanted<01:33:07.860> to<01:33:07.980> hear 01:33:08.210 --> 01:33:08.220 align:start position:0% comment on that I just wanted to hear 01:33:08.220 --> 01:33:09.800 align:start position:0% comment on that I just wanted to hear from<01:33:08.340> councilmember<01:33:09.000> berry<01:33:09.210> I<01:33:09.510> think<01:33:09.720> he 01:33:09.800 --> 01:33:09.810 align:start position:0% from councilmember berry I think he 01:33:09.810 --> 01:33:11.510 align:start position:0% from councilmember berry I think he knows<01:33:09.990> best<01:33:10.290> what<01:33:10.500> would<01:33:10.770> serve<01:33:11.070> the<01:33:11.220> interest 01:33:11.510 --> 01:33:11.520 align:start position:0% knows best what would serve the interest 01:33:11.520 --> 01:33:14.060 align:start position:0% knows best what would serve the interest of<01:33:11.610> his<01:33:11.760> ward<01:33:12.090> so<01:33:12.810> I'd<01:33:12.900> be<01:33:13.560> interested<01:33:13.680> to<01:33:14.040> hear 01:33:14.060 --> 01:33:14.070 align:start position:0% of his ward so I'd be interested to hear 01:33:14.070 --> 01:33:16.520 align:start position:0% of his ward so I'd be interested to hear his<01:33:14.340> perspective<01:33:14.940> on<01:33:15.030> this<01:33:15.210> issue<01:33:15.390> well<01:33:16.320> thank 01:33:16.520 --> 01:33:16.530 align:start position:0% his perspective on this issue well thank 01:33:16.530 --> 01:33:26.570 align:start position:0% his perspective on this issue well thank you<01:33:16.680> I<01:33:17.040> think<01:33:23.660> I<01:33:24.660> think<01:33:25.320> the<01:33:25.470> idea<01:33:25.860> of<01:33:26.040> giving 01:33:26.570 --> 01:33:26.580 align:start position:0% you I think I think the idea of giving 01:33:26.580 --> 01:33:29.600 align:start position:0% you I think I think the idea of giving folks<01:33:27.060> and<01:33:27.450> the<01:33:27.510> board<01:33:27.780> a<01:33:27.930> chance<01:33:28.230> to<01:33:28.830> come 01:33:29.600 --> 01:33:29.610 align:start position:0% folks and the board a chance to come 01:33:29.610 --> 01:33:32.000 align:start position:0% folks and the board a chance to come down<01:33:29.820> and<01:33:29.970> talk<01:33:30.150> to<01:33:30.360> you<01:33:30.480> and<01:33:31.350> express<01:33:31.770> their 01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:32.010 align:start position:0% down and talk to you and express their 01:33:32.010 --> 01:33:35.919 align:start position:0% down and talk to you and express their interest<01:33:32.430> in<01:33:33.120> the<01:33:33.240> qualification 01:33:35.919 --> 01:33:35.929 align:start position:0% 01:33:35.929 --> 01:33:42.459 align:start position:0% way<01:33:36.019> to<01:33:36.079> go<01:33:36.289> I<01:33:37.090> would<01:33:38.090> endorse<01:33:38.389> that<01:33:41.170> and<01:33:42.170> I 01:33:42.459 --> 01:33:42.469 align:start position:0% way to go I would endorse that and I 01:33:42.469 --> 01:33:46.060 align:start position:0% way to go I would endorse that and I believe<01:33:42.530> that<01:33:44.320> what<01:33:45.320> the<01:33:45.469> newsletter<01:33:45.860> should 01:33:46.060 --> 01:33:46.070 align:start position:0% believe that what the newsletter should 01:33:46.070 --> 01:33:47.410 align:start position:0% believe that what the newsletter should be<01:33:46.189> coming<01:33:46.459> out<01:33:46.550> right<01:33:46.789> around<01:33:46.939> the<01:33:47.090> first<01:33:47.239> of 01:33:47.410 --> 01:33:47.420 align:start position:0% be coming out right around the first of 01:33:47.420 --> 01:33:55.359 align:start position:0% be coming out right around the first of the<01:33:47.510> month<01:33:48.670> and<01:33:50.769> the<01:33:53.679> we<01:33:54.679> have<01:33:54.829> a<01:33:54.860> with<01:33:55.219> the 01:33:55.359 --> 01:33:55.369 align:start position:0% the month and the we have a with the 01:33:55.369 --> 01:33:58.029 align:start position:0% the month and the we have a with the last<01:33:55.579> council<01:33:55.820> meeting<01:33:55.999> in<01:33:56.539> June<01:33:57.260> is<01:33:57.559> June 01:33:58.029 --> 01:33:58.039 align:start position:0% last council meeting in June is June 01:33:58.039 --> 01:34:00.310 align:start position:0% last council meeting in June is June 22nd<01:33:59.030> because<01:33:59.389> then<01:33:59.570> work<01:33:59.780> of<01:33:59.959> Maryland 01:34:00.310 --> 01:34:00.320 align:start position:0% 22nd because then work of Maryland 01:34:00.320 --> 01:34:03.370 align:start position:0% 22nd because then work of Maryland Municipal<01:34:00.739> League<01:34:01.510> the<01:34:02.510> following<01:34:02.959> week<01:34:03.170> on 01:34:03.370 --> 01:34:03.380 align:start position:0% Municipal League the following week on 01:34:03.380 --> 01:34:09.100 align:start position:0% Municipal League the following week on June<01:34:03.650> 29th<01:34:05.769> so<01:34:06.769> that<01:34:07.429> would<01:34:08.059> essentially<01:34:08.539> give 01:34:09.100 --> 01:34:09.110 align:start position:0% June 29th so that would essentially give 01:34:09.110 --> 01:34:12.640 align:start position:0% June 29th so that would essentially give it<01:34:09.229> the<01:34:10.070> the<01:34:10.340> first<01:34:10.610> is<01:34:10.939> a<01:34:11.139> Monday<01:34:12.139> so<01:34:12.170> there 01:34:12.640 --> 01:34:12.650 align:start position:0% it the the first is a Monday so there 01:34:12.650 --> 01:34:15.009 align:start position:0% it the the first is a Monday so there are<01:34:12.769> three<01:34:13.249> meetings<01:34:13.670> in<01:34:14.150> June<01:34:14.449> after<01:34:14.869> that 01:34:15.009 --> 01:34:15.019 align:start position:0% are three meetings in June after that 01:34:15.019 --> 01:34:19.209 align:start position:0% are three meetings in June after that the<01:34:15.170> 8th<01:34:15.289> 15th<01:34:15.530> and<01:34:15.949> 22nd<01:34:17.709> we<01:34:18.709> might<01:34:18.949> want<01:34:19.159> to 01:34:19.209 --> 01:34:19.219 align:start position:0% the 8th 15th and 22nd we might want to 01:34:19.219 --> 01:34:22.600 align:start position:0% the 8th 15th and 22nd we might want to say<01:34:19.459> that<01:34:20.229> we<01:34:21.229> will<01:34:21.499> we<01:34:22.039> would<01:34:22.219> like<01:34:22.429> to 01:34:22.600 --> 01:34:22.610 align:start position:0% say that we will we would like to 01:34:22.610 --> 01:34:25.600 align:start position:0% say that we will we would like to interview<01:34:22.820> people<01:34:23.179> on<01:34:23.570> June<01:34:24.340> 15th<01:34:25.340> and 01:34:25.600 --> 01:34:25.610 align:start position:0% interview people on June 15th and 01:34:25.610 --> 01:34:29.169 align:start position:0% interview people on June 15th and possibly<01:34:26.479> the<01:34:26.659> 22nd<01:34:27.320> as<01:34:27.409> well<01:34:27.619> and<01:34:28.099> that<01:34:28.789> might 01:34:29.169 --> 01:34:29.179 align:start position:0% possibly the 22nd as well and that might 01:34:29.179 --> 01:34:33.669 align:start position:0% possibly the 22nd as well and that might give<01:34:29.389> us<01:34:29.479> the<01:34:29.630> opportunity<01:34:30.289> to<01:34:32.110> have<01:34:33.110> two 01:34:33.669 --> 01:34:33.679 align:start position:0% give us the opportunity to have two 01:34:33.679 --> 01:34:35.169 align:start position:0% give us the opportunity to have two dates<01:34:33.889> available<01:34:34.159> for<01:34:34.610> those<01:34:34.699> who<01:34:34.760> can't<01:34:35.090> make 01:34:35.169 --> 01:34:35.179 align:start position:0% dates available for those who can't make 01:34:35.179 --> 01:34:39.609 align:start position:0% dates available for those who can't make it<01:34:35.389> on<01:34:35.510> one<01:34:36.409> of<01:34:36.439> them<01:34:36.619> and<01:34:37.780> then<01:34:38.780> hopefully<01:34:39.199> we 01:34:39.609 --> 01:34:39.619 align:start position:0% it on one of them and then hopefully we 01:34:39.619 --> 01:34:44.140 align:start position:0% it on one of them and then hopefully we could<01:34:39.860> maybe<01:34:40.670> decide<01:34:41.949> June<01:34:42.949> 22nd<01:34:43.639> and<01:34:43.789> if<01:34:43.909> not 01:34:44.140 --> 01:34:44.150 align:start position:0% could maybe decide June 22nd and if not 01:34:44.150 --> 01:34:47.709 align:start position:0% could maybe decide June 22nd and if not then<01:34:44.510> it<01:34:44.630> would<01:34:44.749> be<01:34:44.900> when<01:34:45.079> we<01:34:45.110> come<01:34:45.380> back<01:34:46.719> after 01:34:47.709 --> 01:34:47.719 align:start position:0% then it would be when we come back after 01:34:47.719 --> 01:34:51.040 align:start position:0% then it would be when we come back after MML<01:34:48.199> and<01:34:48.550> 4th<01:34:49.550> of<01:34:49.670> july<01:34:49.939> and<01:34:49.969> our<01:34:50.269> next<01:34:50.539> meeting 01:34:51.040 --> 01:34:51.050 align:start position:0% MML and 4th of july and our next meeting 01:34:51.050 --> 01:35:02.450 align:start position:0% MML and 4th of july and our next meeting is<01:34:51.380> to<01:34:52.249> our<01:34:52.369> 6th 01:35:02.450 --> 01:35:02.460 align:start position:0% 01:35:02.460 --> 01:35:06.420 align:start position:0% that's<01:35:03.460> a<01:35:03.550> little<01:35:03.730> right<01:35:04.980> if<01:35:05.980> we<01:35:06.130> could<01:35:06.310> also 01:35:06.420 --> 01:35:06.430 align:start position:0% that's a little right if we could also 01:35:06.430 --> 01:35:08.250 align:start position:0% that's a little right if we could also make<01:35:06.820> an<01:35:06.910> effort<01:35:07.150> to<01:35:07.330> publicize<01:35:07.930> it<01:35:08.140> in 01:35:08.250 --> 01:35:08.260 align:start position:0% make an effort to publicize it in 01:35:08.260 --> 01:35:09.000 align:start position:0% make an effort to publicize it in another 01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:09.010 align:start position:0% another 01:35:09.010 --> 01:35:10.710 align:start position:0% another besides<01:35:09.640> the<01:35:09.760> surrenders<01:35:10.150> later<01:35:10.420> in<01:35:10.600> the 01:35:10.710 --> 01:35:10.720 align:start position:0% besides the surrenders later in the 01:35:10.720 --> 01:35:13.800 align:start position:0% besides the surrenders later in the Kassadin<01:35:11.260> and<01:35:11.500> the<01:35:12.490> voice<01:35:13.030> maybe<01:35:13.330> our<01:35:13.540> fine 01:35:13.800 --> 01:35:13.810 align:start position:0% Kassadin and the voice maybe our fine 01:35:13.810 --> 01:35:17.670 align:start position:0% Kassadin and the voice maybe our fine because<01:35:14.170> that<01:35:14.320> reporter<01:35:14.830> but<01:35:15.010> I<01:35:16.380> do<01:35:17.380> a<01:35:17.410> feature 01:35:17.670 --> 01:35:17.680 align:start position:0% because that reporter but I do a feature 01:35:17.680 --> 01:35:20.790 align:start position:0% because that reporter but I do a feature article<01:35:17.890> on<01:35:18.220> the<01:35:18.310> topic<01:35:18.340> also<01:35:19.470> we<01:35:20.470> might<01:35:20.680> be 01:35:20.790 --> 01:35:20.800 align:start position:0% article on the topic also we might be 01:35:20.800 --> 01:35:23.630 align:start position:0% article on the topic also we might be able<01:35:20.920> to<01:35:21.040> contact<01:35:21.220> him<01:35:21.550> and<01:35:21.700> convince<01:35:22.090> him 01:35:23.630 --> 01:35:23.640 align:start position:0% able to contact him and convince him 01:35:23.640 --> 01:35:26.940 align:start position:0% able to contact him and convince him customer<01:35:24.640> was<01:35:24.850> a<01:35:25.500> question<01:35:26.500> about<01:35:26.590> the 01:35:26.940 --> 01:35:26.950 align:start position:0% customer was a question about the 01:35:26.950 --> 01:35:31.680 align:start position:0% customer was a question about the interim<01:35:27.960> wording<01:35:28.960> or<01:35:29.970> what<01:35:30.970> I<01:35:31.000> think<01:35:31.120> I've 01:35:31.680 --> 01:35:31.690 align:start position:0% interim wording or what I think I've 01:35:31.690 --> 01:35:34.400 align:start position:0% interim wording or what I think I've heard<01:35:31.930> is<01:35:32.050> that<01:35:32.260> we<01:35:32.590> would<01:35:32.710> ask<01:35:33.100> that<01:35:33.670> somebody 01:35:34.400 --> 01:35:34.410 align:start position:0% heard is that we would ask that somebody 01:35:34.410 --> 01:35:37.650 align:start position:0% heard is that we would ask that somebody serve<01:35:35.410> as<01:35:35.590> an<01:35:35.710> interim<01:35:36.190> council<01:35:36.610> member<01:35:37.120> yes 01:35:37.650 --> 01:35:37.660 align:start position:0% serve as an interim council member yes 01:35:37.660 --> 01:35:42.300 align:start position:0% serve as an interim council member yes and<01:35:38.500> that<01:35:39.430> has<01:35:39.580> been<01:35:39.790> done<01:35:39.970> before<01:35:40.360> and<01:35:41.310> we 01:35:42.300 --> 01:35:42.310 align:start position:0% and that has been done before and we 01:35:42.310 --> 01:35:47.460 align:start position:0% and that has been done before and we take<01:35:43.150> it<01:35:43.300> on<01:35:44.040> if<01:35:45.040> they<01:35:45.220> say<01:35:45.460> yes<01:35:45.730> I<01:35:46.030> will<01:35:46.720> only 01:35:47.460 --> 01:35:47.470 align:start position:0% take it on if they say yes I will only 01:35:47.470 --> 01:35:49.530 align:start position:0% take it on if they say yes I will only serve<01:35:47.980> in<01:35:48.220> this<01:35:48.370> position<01:35:48.880> as<01:35:49.000> an<01:35:49.120> interim 01:35:49.530 --> 01:35:49.540 align:start position:0% serve in this position as an interim 01:35:49.540 --> 01:35:51.240 align:start position:0% serve in this position as an interim thank<01:35:50.380> we<01:35:50.500> could<01:35:50.680> take<01:35:50.860> them<01:35:50.980> at<01:35:51.070> their<01:35:51.100> word 01:35:51.240 --> 01:35:51.250 align:start position:0% thank we could take them at their word 01:35:51.250 --> 01:35:54.540 align:start position:0% thank we could take them at their word and<01:35:51.670> that's<01:35:51.820> that<01:35:52.090> yep<01:35:52.740> and<01:35:53.740> if<01:35:53.890> they<01:35:54.070> change 01:35:54.540 --> 01:35:54.550 align:start position:0% and that's that yep and if they change 01:35:54.550 --> 01:35:55.890 align:start position:0% and that's that yep and if they change their<01:35:54.700> mind<01:35:54.760> and<01:35:55.030> say<01:35:55.150> oh<01:35:55.180> nevermind<01:35:55.810> I'm 01:35:55.890 --> 01:35:55.900 align:start position:0% their mind and say oh nevermind I'm 01:35:55.900 --> 01:35:57.270 align:start position:0% their mind and say oh nevermind I'm going<01:35:56.080> to<01:35:56.140> run<01:35:56.260> anyway<01:35:56.590> then<01:35:56.860> we<01:35:57.040> make<01:35:57.250> it 01:35:57.270 --> 01:35:57.280 align:start position:0% going to run anyway then we make it 01:35:57.280 --> 01:35:58.770 align:start position:0% going to run anyway then we make it clear<01:35:57.610> that<01:35:57.760> they<01:35:58.030> went<01:35:58.210> back<01:35:58.240> on<01:35:58.510> their<01:35:58.660> word 01:35:58.770 --> 01:35:58.780 align:start position:0% clear that they went back on their word 01:35:58.780 --> 01:36:01.680 align:start position:0% clear that they went back on their word doing<01:35:59.620> his<01:35:59.940> bullying<01:36:00.940> hiss<01:36:01.180> that's<01:36:01.480> right 01:36:01.680 --> 01:36:01.690 align:start position:0% doing his bullying hiss that's right 01:36:01.690 --> 01:36:03.120 align:start position:0% doing his bullying hiss that's right that's<01:36:01.930> about<01:36:02.200> as<01:36:02.470> far<01:36:02.620> as<01:36:02.770> it<01:36:02.890> goes 01:36:03.120 --> 01:36:03.130 align:start position:0% that's about as far as it goes 01:36:03.130 --> 01:36:06.720 align:start position:0% that's about as far as it goes yep<01:36:04.560> just<01:36:05.560> checking<01:36:05.980> he's<01:36:06.220> a<01:36:06.250> clerk<01:36:06.490> ever 01:36:06.720 --> 01:36:06.730 align:start position:0% yep just checking he's a clerk ever 01:36:06.730 --> 01:36:12.760 align:start position:0% yep just checking he's a clerk ever coming 01:36:12.760 --> 01:36:12.770 align:start position:0% 01:36:12.770 --> 01:36:15.670 align:start position:0% they<01:36:12.890> say<01:36:13.400> that<01:36:13.880> it's<01:36:14.720> because<01:36:14.930> his<01:36:15.320> intention 01:36:15.670 --> 01:36:15.680 align:start position:0% they say that it's because his intention 01:36:15.680 --> 01:36:18.580 align:start position:0% they say that it's because his intention which<01:36:16.100> you<01:36:16.360> select<01:36:17.360> someone<01:36:17.960> who<01:36:18.110> it's<01:36:18.320> not 01:36:18.580 --> 01:36:18.590 align:start position:0% which you select someone who it's not 01:36:18.590 --> 01:36:27.330 align:start position:0% which you select someone who it's not interested<01:36:19.400> in<01:36:19.520> money<01:36:20.260> yes 01:36:27.330 --> 01:36:27.340 align:start position:0% 01:36:27.340 --> 01:36:30.330 align:start position:0% and<01:36:27.610> that<01:36:28.120> we<01:36:28.240> will<01:36:28.680> attempt<01:36:29.680> to<01:36:29.740> interview 01:36:30.330 --> 01:36:30.340 align:start position:0% and that we will attempt to interview 01:36:30.340 --> 01:36:39.990 align:start position:0% and that we will attempt to interview people<01:36:30.580> in<01:36:36.420> in<01:36:37.420> June<01:36:37.840> and<01:36:38.200> name<01:36:38.590> the<01:36:39.400> person<01:36:39.790> in 01:36:39.990 --> 01:36:40.000 align:start position:0% people in in June and name the person in 01:36:40.000 --> 01:36:43.560 align:start position:0% people in in June and name the person in June<01:36:40.300> it<01:36:41.280> might<01:36:42.280> possibly<01:36:42.610> go<01:36:43.090> over<01:36:43.420> into 01:36:43.560 --> 01:36:43.570 align:start position:0% June it might possibly go over into 01:36:43.570 --> 01:37:05.340 align:start position:0% June it might possibly go over into early<01:36:43.900> July<01:36:58.860> 12<01:36:59.860> June<01:37:00.130> 12 01:37:05.340 --> 01:37:05.350 align:start position:0% 01:37:05.350 --> 01:37:10.250 align:start position:0% good<01:37:06.350> to<01:37:06.440> people 01:37:10.250 --> 01:37:10.260 align:start position:0% 01:37:10.260 --> 01:37:12.770 align:start position:0% I<01:37:10.290> may<01:37:10.890> go<01:37:11.280> to<01:37:11.310> they<01:37:11.730> don't<01:37:11.910> get<01:37:12.030> to<01:37:12.120> go<01:37:12.150> to<01:37:12.239> mmm 01:37:12.770 --> 01:37:12.780 align:start position:0% I may go to they don't get to go to mmm 01:37:12.780 --> 01:37:22.940 align:start position:0% I may go to they don't get to go to mmm no<01:37:13.730> no<01:37:14.730> oh<01:37:18.080> well<01:37:19.080> I<01:37:20.510> I<01:37:21.510> guess<01:37:21.960> it's<01:37:22.170> possible<01:37:22.830> if 01:37:22.940 --> 01:37:22.950 align:start position:0% no no oh well I I guess it's possible if 01:37:22.950 --> 01:37:25.370 align:start position:0% no no oh well I I guess it's possible if we<01:37:23.100> decided<01:37:23.430> on<01:37:23.640> the<01:37:23.760> 22nd<01:37:24.360> and<01:37:24.720> ever<01:37:25.080> space 01:37:25.370 --> 01:37:25.380 align:start position:0% we decided on the 22nd and ever space 01:37:25.380 --> 01:37:28.880 align:start position:0% we decided on the 22nd and ever space and<01:37:26.010> they<01:37:26.700> wanted<01:37:26.970> to<01:37:27.120> go<01:37:27.620> what<01:37:28.620> it<01:37:28.739> makes 01:37:28.880 --> 01:37:28.890 align:start position:0% and they wanted to go what it makes 01:37:28.890 --> 01:37:30.680 align:start position:0% and they wanted to go what it makes sense<01:37:29.190> to<01:37:29.520> I<01:37:29.730> don't<01:37:29.820> know<01:37:29.940> what<01:37:30.480> it<01:37:30.570> makes 01:37:30.680 --> 01:37:30.690 align:start position:0% sense to I don't know what it makes 01:37:30.690 --> 01:37:33.830 align:start position:0% sense to I don't know what it makes sense<01:37:30.870> to<01:37:31.020> have<01:37:31.050> them<01:37:31.470> go<01:37:31.739> to<01:37:31.770> experience<01:37:32.840> kind 01:37:33.830 --> 01:37:33.840 align:start position:0% sense to have them go to experience kind 01:37:33.840 --> 01:37:36.229 align:start position:0% sense to have them go to experience kind of<01:37:33.930> help<01:37:34.230> them<01:37:34.350> come<01:37:34.560> up<01:37:34.590> to<01:37:34.830> speed<01:37:35.100> and<01:37:35.730> if<01:37:35.970> so 01:37:36.229 --> 01:37:36.239 align:start position:0% of help them come up to speed and if so 01:37:36.239 --> 01:37:38.300 align:start position:0% of help them come up to speed and if so and<01:37:36.840> it<01:37:36.989> might<01:37:37.140> make<01:37:37.320> sense<01:37:37.590> for<01:37:37.710> us<01:37:37.890> to<01:37:37.950> make<01:37:38.280> a 01:37:38.300 --> 01:37:38.310 align:start position:0% and it might make sense for us to make a 01:37:38.310 --> 01:37:47.810 align:start position:0% and it might make sense for us to make a point<01:37:45.680> any<01:37:46.680> thoughts<01:37:46.950> from<01:37:47.100> the<01:37:47.220> city<01:37:47.400> manager 01:37:47.810 --> 01:37:47.820 align:start position:0% point any thoughts from the city manager 01:37:47.820 --> 01:37:51.770 align:start position:0% point any thoughts from the city manager in<01:37:47.910> terms<01:37:48.120> of<01:37:48.270> expenditures<01:37:48.870> I<01:37:50.690> think<01:37:51.690> the 01:37:51.770 --> 01:37:51.780 align:start position:0% in terms of expenditures I think the 01:37:51.780 --> 01:37:53.780 align:start position:0% in terms of expenditures I think the biggest<01:37:51.960> problem<01:37:52.440> is<01:37:52.530> just<01:37:52.710> that<01:37:52.860> I<01:37:53.160> don't<01:37:53.220> we 01:37:53.780 --> 01:37:53.790 align:start position:0% biggest problem is just that I don't we 01:37:53.790 --> 01:37:55.460 align:start position:0% biggest problem is just that I don't we would<01:37:53.940> have<01:37:54.030> either<01:37:54.420> had<01:37:54.750> to<01:37:54.780> commit<01:37:55.320> to 01:37:55.460 --> 01:37:55.470 align:start position:0% would have either had to commit to 01:37:55.470 --> 01:37:57.800 align:start position:0% would have either had to commit to paying<01:37:55.739> for<01:37:55.890> a<01:37:56.130> room<01:37:56.460> or<01:37:56.730> releasing<01:37:57.540> the<01:37:57.630> room 01:37:57.800 --> 01:37:57.810 align:start position:0% paying for a room or releasing the room 01:37:57.810 --> 01:38:01.130 align:start position:0% paying for a room or releasing the room reservation<01:37:58.020> far<01:37:58.890> before<01:37:59.340> that<01:37:59.550> date<01:37:59.820> I<01:38:00.180> think 01:38:01.130 --> 01:38:01.140 align:start position:0% reservation far before that date I think 01:38:01.140 --> 01:38:02.060 align:start position:0% reservation far before that date I think it's<01:38:01.260> probably<01:38:01.410> the<01:38:01.560> biggest<01:38:01.680> potential 01:38:02.060 --> 01:38:02.070 align:start position:0% it's probably the biggest potential 01:38:02.070 --> 01:38:04.960 align:start position:0% it's probably the biggest potential problem<01:38:02.580> well<01:38:03.060> why<01:38:03.450> don't<01:38:03.510> we<01:38:03.690> why<01:38:04.230> don't<01:38:04.260> we 01:38:04.960 --> 01:38:04.970 align:start position:0% problem well why don't we why don't we 01:38:04.970 --> 01:38:10.130 align:start position:0% problem well why don't we why don't we hold<01:38:05.970> in<01:38:06.270> reserve<01:38:06.590> that<01:38:07.590> if<01:38:07.920> we<01:38:08.450> if<01:38:09.450> we<01:38:09.720> do<01:38:09.930> name 01:38:10.130 --> 01:38:10.140 align:start position:0% hold in reserve that if we if we do name 01:38:10.140 --> 01:38:11.990 align:start position:0% hold in reserve that if we if we do name someone<01:38:10.620> before<01:38:10.830> that<01:38:11.340> and<01:38:11.610> they<01:38:11.760> are 01:38:11.990 --> 01:38:12.000 align:start position:0% someone before that and they are 01:38:12.000 --> 01:38:14.570 align:start position:0% someone before that and they are interested<01:38:12.690> we'll<01:38:13.500> find<01:38:13.890> a<01:38:14.010> way<01:38:14.190> to<01:38:14.250> make<01:38:14.550> it 01:38:14.570 --> 01:38:14.580 align:start position:0% interested we'll find a way to make it 01:38:14.580 --> 01:38:17.000 align:start position:0% interested we'll find a way to make it happen<01:38:14.910> they<01:38:15.600> can<01:38:15.780> double<01:38:15.989> up<01:38:16.230> something<01:38:16.830> can 01:38:17.000 --> 01:38:17.010 align:start position:0% happen they can double up something can 01:38:17.010 --> 01:38:19.340 align:start position:0% happen they can double up something can happen<01:38:17.220> they<01:38:18.090> can<01:38:18.150> come<01:38:18.510> down<01:38:18.540> for<01:38:18.989> a<01:38:19.050> day<01:38:19.230> or 01:38:19.340 --> 01:38:19.350 align:start position:0% happen they can come down for a day or 01:38:19.350 --> 01:38:25.010 align:start position:0% happen they can come down for a day or two<01:38:19.380> there's<01:38:19.890> on-site<01:38:20.310> registration<01:38:24.020> once 01:38:25.010 --> 01:38:25.020 align:start position:0% two there's on-site registration once 01:38:25.020 --> 01:38:26.660 align:start position:0% two there's on-site registration once they<01:38:25.230> see<01:38:25.290> all<01:38:25.710> the<01:38:25.890> excitement<01:38:26.460> of<01:38:26.489> them<01:38:26.640> I 01:38:26.660 --> 01:38:26.670 align:start position:0% they see all the excitement of them I 01:38:26.670 --> 01:38:28.490 align:start position:0% they see all the excitement of them I know<01:38:26.910> it's<01:38:27.480> going<01:38:27.660> to<01:38:27.720> make<01:38:27.840> them<01:38:27.989> go<01:38:28.110> back<01:38:28.320> on 01:38:28.490 --> 01:38:28.500 align:start position:0% know it's going to make them go back on 01:38:28.500 --> 01:38:34.520 align:start position:0% know it's going to make them go back on their<01:38:28.620> promise<01:38:29.010> not<01:38:29.160> to<01:38:29.220> run<01:38:33.350> any<01:38:34.350> other 01:38:34.520 --> 01:38:34.530 align:start position:0% their promise not to run any other 01:38:34.530 --> 01:38:39.020 align:start position:0% their promise not to run any other comments<01:38:35.400> any<01:38:36.180> other<01:38:36.510> questions<01:38:37.050> okay 01:38:39.020 --> 01:38:39.030 align:start position:0% comments any other questions okay 01:38:39.030 --> 01:39:00.990 align:start position:0% comments any other questions okay we're<01:38:39.420> trying 01:39:00.990 --> 01:39:01.000 align:start position:0% 01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:04.060 align:start position:0% you 01:39:04.060 --> 01:39:04.070 align:start position:0% 01:39:04.070 --> 01:39:12.880 align:start position:0% [Music]