View Post [edit]
Poster: | Jack Hardway | Date: | Aug 18, 2011 6:55pm |
Forum: | oldtimeradio | Subject: | Re: Sam aSpade et al. pulled |
That aside, any trademarks would be protected as long as the owners actively assert them; the trademark/patent website can tell you if a trademark is live or dead.
Other than these considerations, it seems to me that it would be unlikely that many of these old shows are still under copyright. Everything created before 1963 would have had to be renewed during the 28th year of its initial term, and I doubt that occurred for these shows. Nonrenewal of copyright in this 1923-1963 period is the reason you can buy those 20-packs o monster movies or $9, and why you can find old TV shows here at IA. they're in the public domain.
It seems highly unlikely that these old shows were renewed. There are some special considerations for music, which is why you don't see any old rock 'n roll songs here, and music might be construed to mean radio shows, but even if somebody were making a claim based on a trademark or an unpublished script or as music, that party would have to show that it owned the script or music copyright or the trademark. Wouldn't it?
Copyright was originally conceived to ultimately enhance the public domain, not to stifle it.
Reply [edit]
Poster: | Lum Edwards | Date: | Aug 19, 2011 6:25pm |
Forum: | oldtimeradio | Subject: | Re: Sam aSpade et al. pulled |
Hopefully someone will have working knowledge of how this all works and feel like sharing with us. We are at the one year mark since this happened.
Reply [edit]
Poster: | R Pal | Date: | Oct 29, 2011 4:17am |
Forum: | oldtimeradio | Subject: | Re: Sam aSpade et al. pulled |
I would be willing to contribute a small amount to fund legal actions that might resolve the issue. I do not have the knowledge to do such a thing. Is there any such action ongoing?