Skip to main content

Full text of "DTIC ADP011831: Polymer-Layered Silicate Nanocomposites: Emerging Scientific Commercial Opportunities"

See other formats


UNCLASSIFIED 



Defense Technical Information Center 
Compilation Part Notice 

ADPO 11831 

TITLE: Polymer-Layered Silicate Nanocomposites: Emerging Scientific 
Commercial Opportunities 

DISTRIBUTION: Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 



This paper is part of the following report: 

TITLE: NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Nanostructured Films 
and Coatings. Series 3. High Technology - Volume 78 

To order the complete compilation report, use: ADA399041 

The component part is provided here to allow users access to individually authored sections 
of proceedings, annals, symposia, etc. However, the component should be considered within 
the context of the overall compilation report and not as a stand-alone technical report. 

The following component part numbers comprise the compilation report: 

ADP01 1800 thru ADPO 11 832 



UNCLASSIFIED 




POLYMER-LAYERED SILICATE NANOCOMPOSITES: 
EMERGING SCIENTIFIC AND COMMERCIAL OPPORTUNITIES 



Emmanuel P. Giannelis 

Department of Materials Science and Engineering 
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA 



ABSTRACT: Polymer nanocomposites represent a radical alternative to conventionally 
(macroscopically) filled polymers. Because of their nanometer-size dispersion the 
nanocomposites exhibit markedly improved properties when compared to the pure polymers 
or conventional composites. These include increased modulus and strength, outstanding 
barrier properties, increased solvent and heat resistance and decreased flammability. In this 
paper the physical and mechanical properties of nanocomposites are reviewed and discussed 
in terms of their static and dynamic properties. 



1. Introduction 

Polymer nanocomposites represent a radical alternative to conventionally filled polymers. 
Because of their nanometer-size dispersion the nanocomposites exhibit markedly improved 
properties when compared to the pure polymers or conventional composites [1], These 
include increased modulus and strength, decreased gas permeability, increased solvent and 
heat resistance and decreased flammability [2-11], For example, a doubling of the tensile 
modulus and strength without sacrificing impact resistance is achieved for nylon-layered 
silicate nanocomposites containing as little as 2 vol.% inorganics. In addition, the heat 
distortion temperature of the nanocomposites increases by up to 100 °C extending the use of 
the composite to higher temperature environments, such as automotive under-the-hood parts. 
Furthermore, the heat release rate in the nanocomposites is reduced by up to 63 % at heat 
fluxes of 50 kW/m 2 without an increase in the CO and soot produced during combustion. 
Applications include low-cost alternatives of high performance composites, food packaging, 
microelectronics and biotechnology. 



2. Synthesis of Nanocomposites 

Melt intercalation of high polymers is a powerful new approach to synthesize polymer- 
layered silicate nanocomposites [12], This method is quite general and is broadly applicable 
to a range of commodity polymers from essentially non-polar polystyrene, to weakly polar 
polyethylene terephthalate) to strongly polar nylon. The nanocomposites are, thus, 
processable using current technologies and easily scaled to manufacturing quantities. 

367 

G.M. Chow et al. (eds.), Nanostructured Films and Coalings, 367 - 372 . 

© 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 



368 



In general, two types of hybrids are possible: intercalated, in which a single, 
extended polymer chain is intercalated between the silicate layers resulting in well ordered 
polymer/inorganic multilayers, and dispersed or disordered, in which the silicate layers (1 
nm thick) are exfoliated and dispersed in a continuous polymer matrix (Fig 1). 

The silicates used belong to the general family of so-called 2:1 layered silicates. 
Their crystal structure consists of layers made up of two silica tetrahedra fused to an edge- 
shared octahedral sheet of either alumina or magnesia. Stacking of the layers leads to a 
regular van der Waals gap between the layers called the interlayer or gallery. Isomorphic 
substitution within the layers generates negative charges that are normally counterbalanced 
by cations residing in the interlayer. 



Pristine layered silicates usually 
contain hydrated Na + or K + ions. Ion 
exchange reactions with cationic surfactants 
including primary, tertiary and quaternary 
ammonium ions render the normally 
hydrophilic silicate surface organophilic, 
which makes intercalation of many 
engineering polymers possible. The role of 
the alkyl ammonium cations in the 
organosilicates is to lower the surface 
energy of the inorganic and improve the 
wetting characteristics with the polymer. 
Additionally, the alkyl ammonium cations 
can provide functional groups that can react 
with the polymer or initiate a 
polymerization of monomers to improve the 
strength of the interface between the 
inorganic and the polymer. 

Similarly to polymer blends any mixture of polymer and layered silicate does not 
necessarily lead to a nanocomposite [13]. In most cases the incompatibility of the 
hydrophobic polymer and the hydrophilic silicate leads to phase separation resulting in 
macroscopically filled systems. In contrast, by using surface modified silicates as noted 
earlier one can fine tune their surface energy and render them miscible (or compatible) with 
different polymers. The approach is based on a chemical (rather than a mechanical) driving 
force, which leads to nanoscopic dispersion. 




< a > Intercalated MEmed 



Figure 1 Schematic of composite structures obtained 
using layered silicates. The rectangular bars represent 
the silicate layers, (a) single polymer layers intercalated 
in the silicate galleries (intercalated); (b) composites 
obtained by delamination of the silicate particles and 



3. Structure and Dynamics of Polymer Nanocomposites 

The combination of enhanced modulus, strength and toughness is a unique feature of the 
nanocomposites. In conventionally-filled polymer systems increases in modulus typically 
compromise toughness. Additionally, the decrease in barrier properties of the 




369 



nanocomposites cannot be explained only on the high aspect ratio afforded by the exfoliation 
of the inorganic nanolayers. Alternatively we suggest that the polymer chains at the interface 
adopt a different structure and exhibit very different dynamics compared to the chains in the 
bulk. Due to the nanodispersion a very large fraction of the polymer is at the interface (close 
to 60%) even for a few percent inorganic. As a result these nanoscopically “confined” 
polymer chains contribute significantly and to a large extend control the properties of the 
hybrid. 

Even simple notions regarding the conformations of polymers confined in two 
dimensions are not yet fully understood. In three dimensions, it is well known that the 
individual molecules in long chain polymers overlap significantly. In two dimensions, it has 
been suggested that the different chains overlap only slightly. Therefore, the local and global 
conformations of polymers in the nanocomposites are expected to be dramatically different 
from those observed in the bulk, not only due to the confinement of the polymer chains but 
also due to specific polymer-inorganic surface interactions not normally present in the bulk. 

From our current theoretical and experimental studies on nanocomposites a new and 
quite unexpected picture is emerging [14]. Despite the presence of the “confining” inorganic 
layers, intercalated polymer chains exhibit substantial segmental motion even at temperatures 
where the polymer is normally in the glassy state. Thus, in contrast to the bulk polymers 
where chain mobility slows precipitously around T g , in the nanocomposites chain mobility 
persists well below the bulk Tg. This behavior is counterintuitive as “confinement” of the 
polymer chains within ~2 nm is expected to increase their solid-like character and decrease 
their mobility. 

We start with non-equilibrium dynamics present during polymer intercalation from 
the melt. The observation that polymer chains can undergo center of mass transport in 
essentially two dimensions is rather surprising because the unperturbed radius of gyration of 
the polymer is roughly an order of magnitude greater than the interlayer distance between the 
silicate layers. The ability of the polymer chains to undergo center of mass transport during 
intercalation is further evidence that the silicate layers do not completely restrict segmental 
motions, otherwise large-scale chain motion would not be possible. 

Using X-ray diffraction (which monitors the angular shift and integrated intensity 
of the silicate reflections) we have studied the intercalation kinetics of polystyrene into 
organically modified silicates (Fig. 2) [15]. The effective diffusion coefficient, D e ff, is much 
faster than the tracer diffusion coefficient of the bulk polymer or the diffusion coefficient of 
the polymer in a thin film. This is because during intercalation polymer chains are moving 
down a concentration gradient, whereas in the other two cases polymer motion is entropic in 
origin. Furthermore, die diffusion coefficient exhibits an inverse dependence on molecular 
weight. Although the diffusion coefficient of polymers near surfaces has been predicted to 
have an inverse molecular weight dependence (and not scaled as 1/N 2 , N is the chain length, 
characteristic of repetition) this represents the first experimental measurement of the 
diffusion of high molecular weight polymer melts in two dimensions. 

As the length of the surfactant molecules increases from twelve to eighteen carbon 
atoms, C12 to C18, respectively, the effective diffusion coefficient increases. This is because 
increasing the length of the surfactant chains effectively reduces the interaction with the 
silicate surfaces and thus decreases the stickiness to the surface. 



370 




Figure 2. Diffusion coefficient as a function of 
molecular weight of the polymer [15]. 



300 


o o o 

o 


° A 

A 


250- 


:** » 


6 


>> 200- 


ft A 

* $ 




© 


° A 




— 150- 


A fi A 






A O 


bulk d3PS 
bu!kd5PS 


100- 


A O 


intercalated d3PS 




g A 

* bulk Tg 


intercalated d5PS 



> 1 1 1 1 1 

0.0024 0.0026 0.0028 0.0030 0.0032 0.0034 

1 /T 

Figure 3. Spin-echo NMR of PS in bulk and 
nanocomposite [16]. 



We now turn our attention to 
equilibrium dynamics for the polymer 
chains after they have been intercalated. 
Local dynamics of chains “confined” 
between the silicate layers were probed by 
spin-echo NMR. In a spin-echo experiment 
complete refocusing of the signal is 
expected as long as there is no change in 
resonance frequency before and after the 
second pulse. Large intensity losses 
therefore take place when large amplitude 
dynamics commence as for example those 
associated with the liquid state (i.e. above 
the glass transition temperature, Tg). 

Figure 3 shows the results of the 
spin-echo experiment for polystyrene and 
polystyrene nanocomposites [16]. To 
follow the respective dynamics, polystyrene 
deuterated at the backbone, d3, and the ring, 
d5, was used. When d3 polystyrene is used, 
the intensity of the NMR signal (multiplied 
by temperature) remains constant in the 
glassy regime followed by a large decrease 
above Tg. This is expected as backbone 
dynamics are absent below Tg and 
commence at Tg. There is some mobility 
for the d5 polystyrene below Tg, since the 
rings can independently flip 180 ° but a 
substantial drop in intensity is found only 
above the Tg. In contrast, the 
nanocomposites show significant amount of 
mobility at least for part of the polymer 
even at temperatures well below the Tg. 
Additionally, there is no distinct change 
from solid-like to liquid-like behavior as in 
the bulk polymer. 




371 




all Carbon* 
PS backbone 




number density 



Figure 4. Computer simulation of PS nanocomposites [15]. 



Computer simulations offer an explanation for this behavior [15,16], When 
confined between the inorganic surfaces the polymer chains order into discrete subnanometer 
layers (Fig. 4). This layering, clearly seen in the density profiles, imparts strong density 
inhomogeneity in the direction normal to the surface. The fast dynamics arise from areas of 
low-density or high free volume, which compensates for the confinement between the 
inorganic layers. Neutron scattering measurements support the above structure. The polymer 
chains adopt a 2D random-walk structure. Additionally, in contrast to the bulk polymer the 
intercalated chains do not show a single characteristic length. 

4. Conclusions 

Mass transport of polymer chains into the silicate layers is faster than the corresponding self- 
diffusion. Thus hybrid formation requires no additional processing time than currently 
required for conventional polymer processing techniques such as extrusion. 

Despite the presence of the “confining” inorganic layers, intercalated polymer 
chains exhibit substantial segmental motion even at temperatures where the polymer is 
normally in the glassy state. Thus, in contrast to the bulk polymers where chain mobility 
slows precipitously around Tg, in the nanocomposites chain mobility persists well below the 
bulk Tg. This behavior is rationalized in terms of the new structure the polymer chains adopt 
at the interface. When confined between the inorganic surfaces the polymer chains order into 
discrete subnanometer layers. The fast dynamics arise from areas of low-density or high free 
volume, which compensates for the confinement between the inorganic layers. Neutron 
scattering measurements support the above structure. 



Acknowledgements 

This work was supported in part by the Cornell Center for Materials Research, AFOSR and 
ONR. I would like to thank my coworkers and collaborators S.D. Burnside, H. Chen, J.D. 




372 



Gilman, J. Genzer, T. Kashiwagi, E. Manias, P.B. Messersmith, E.J. Kramer, R. 
Krishnamoorti, R.A. Vaia and D.B. Zax. 



References 

1. Giannelis, E. P. (1996) Polymer layered silicate nanocomposites, Adv. Mater. 8, 29 . 

2. Usuki, A., Kawasumi, M., Kojima, Y., Okada, A., Kurauchi, T., Kamigaito, O. (1993) Synthesis of nylon 
6-clay hybrid, J. Mater. Res. 8, 1174 

3. Kojima, Y., Usuki, A., Kawasumi, M., Okada, A., Kurauchi, T., Kamigaito, O. (1993) Synthesis of nylon 6- 
clay hybrid by montmorillonite intercalated with e-caprolactam, J. Pofym. Sci.PartA: Potym. Chem. 31, 983. 

4. Yano, K. et al. (1993) Synthesis and properties of polymide-clay hybrid, J. Potym. Sci.: Part A: Potym. Chem. 
31,2493. 

5. Lan, T., Kaviratna, P. D., and Pinnavaia, T. J. (1995) Mechanism of clay tactoid exfoliation in epoxy-clay 
nanocomposites, Chem. Mater., 7, 2144. 

6. Lan, T. and Pinnavaia, T. J. (1994) Clay-reinforced epoxy nanocomposites, Chem. Mater., 6, 2216 

7. Messersmith, P. B. and Giannelis, E. P. (1994) Synthesis and characterization of layered silicate-expoxy 
nanocomposites, Chem. Mater., 6, 1719. 

8. Messersmith, P. B. and Giannelis, E. P. (1995) Synthesis and barrier properties of poly(e-caprolactone)-layered 
silicate nanocomposites, J! Pol. Sci. A. Pot. Chem., 33, 1047. 

9. S.D. Burnside and E.P. Giannelis, (1995) Synthesis and properties of new poly(dimethylsiloxane) 
nanocomposite, Chem. Mater., 7, 1597. 

10. Gilman, J.W., Kashiwagi, K., Nyden, M., Brown, J. E. T., Lomakin, S., Giannelis, E. P. and Manias, E. 
(1998) Flammability studies of polymer layered silicate nanocomposites, Proceedings Additives '98. 

11. Lee, D., Takehoshi, T. and Giannelis, E. P. (1997) Fire Resistant Nanocomposites, In Nanophase and 
Nanocomposite Materials II, Komameni, S., Parker, J.C. and Wollenberger, H.J. (eds.) MRS Symposium 
Proceedings, 457, 513. 

12. Vaia, R. A., Ishii, H. and Giannelis, E. P. (1993) Synthesis and properties of 2-dimensional nanostructures 
by direct intercalation of polymer melts in layered silicates, Chem. Mater. 5, 1694. 

13. (a) Vaia, R. A. and Giannelis, E. P. (1997) Lattice model of polymer melt intercalation in organically-modified 
layered silicates, Macromolecules, 30, 7990; (b) Vaia, R. A. and Giannelis, E. P. (1997) Polymer melt 
intercalation in organically-modified layered silicates: model predictions and experiment. Macromolecules, 
30, 8000. 

14. Krishamoorti, R., Vaia, R. A. and Giannelis, E. P. (1996) Structure and Dynamics of Polymer-Layered Silicate 
Nanocomposites, Chem. Mater. 8, 1728. 

15. (a) Vaia, R. A., Jandt, K. D., Kramer, E. J. and Giannelis, E. P. (1995) Kinetics of polymer melt intercalation 
Macromolecules 28, 8080. (b) Manias, E., Chen, H., Krishnamoorti, R., Genzer, J., Kramer, E. J.and 
Giannelis, E. P. submitted. 

16. Zax, D. B., Yang, D.-K., Santos, R. A., Hegemann, H., Giannelis, E. P. and Manias, E. submitted for 
publication.