Skip to main content

Full text of "Non-BPS Instability in Heterotic M-theory"

See other formats


Non-BPS Instability in Heterotic M-theory 

Ph. Braxf] 

Theoretical Physics Division, CERN 
CH-1211 Geneva 230 


We study the warped geometry of heterotic M-Theory in five dimensions where 
five-branes are included in the bulk. Five-branes wrapping holomorphic curves 
lead to BPS configurations where the junction conditions are automatically sat- 
isfied. We consider five-branes wrapped around non-supersymmetric cycles and 
show that the configuration is unstable. We describe explicitly the resulting time- 
dependent geometry where the bulk five-branes move towards the Horova-Witten 
boundary walls. The five-branes collide with the boundary walls in a finite time 
resulting in the restoration of supersymmetry. 


^ On leave of absence from Service do Physique Thcoriquc, CEA-Saclay F-91191 Gif/Yvette 
Cedex, France 

1 Introduction 

Five dimensional models with warped geometries have played a significant role in 
high energy physics and cosmology during the past few years. Many puzzles in 
four dimensions can been tackled by extending space-time to five dimensions fll]. 
In most settings the fifth dimension is either an interval in models inspired by the 
Horava-Witten theory]^ or a half-line with an AdS geometry for the Randall- 
Sundrum proposal [Q. The phenomeno logical applications are numerous ranging 
from the hierarchy problem]^ to the cosmological constant problem]^. 

Another guise of five dimensional models has been motivated by the AdS/CFT 
correspondence ( for a review see 0). The search for a supersymmetric version 
of the RS scenario has led to the concept of supergravity in singular spaces]^, |^. 
A particularly interesting class of supergravity models coupled to boundaries 
emerges from the compactification of M-theory on Calabi-Yau three-folds [^]. In 
five dimensions this leads to gauged supergravity theories with background fluxes. 
The origin of the background fluxes springs from the modification of the Bianchi 
identities due to the Horava-Witten boundaries and the inclusion of five-branes 
in the bulkjl^. The fluxes lead to the existence of potential terms for the vector 

The five dimensional solutions of the supergravity equations of motion have 
been widely studied (for a review see In particular one finds BPS configu- 

rations preserving = 1 supersymmetry in four dimensions. It also conspicuous 
to find cosmological solutions with a time dependent background |T2|. These 

solutions should have some relevance to the physics of the early universe. 

Recently non-BPS configurations have been extensively studied both from a 

theoretical and phenomenological point of view[|l^, |Tj] and might eventually lead 
to a better understanding of the origin of supersymmetry breaking. One of the 
purpose of the present letter is to consider non-BPS configurations in the context 
of the strongly coupled heterotic string theory |15|. In particular we shall be 
concerned with unstable configurations resulting from the presence of five-branes 
wrapping non-supersymmetric cycles in the bulk. 

In a first section we recall the necessary ingredients of five dimensional su- 
pergravity and its link to heterotic M-theory. We describe the BPS situation 
with five-branes wrapping supersymmetric cycles. We pay particular attention 
to the boundary conditions and show that the BPS property guarantees that the 
junction conditions are automatically satisfied. We then break supersymmetry 
by wrapping five-branes around non-supersymmetric cycles. After recalling the 
topological features of such configurations, we show that the modified boundary 
action on the five-branes leads to an instability. We find explicit solutions of the 
equations of motion where the five-branes move towards the boundary walls. The 
collision occurs within a time proportional to the fifth-dimension radius. 


2 Bulk Five-Branes and BPS Configurations 

We compactify M-theory0 on a Calabi-Yau three- fold with background fluxes 
switched on|]^. The compactification of eleven dimensional supergravity on a 
Calabi-Yau threefold with Hodge numbers {h^^'^\ h^'^'^^) leads to an N=2 D=5 
supergravity theory with h^^'^^ — 1 vector multiplets and /i*-^'^^ + 1 hypermulti- 
plets. In particular there is always one universal hypermultiplet containing the 
volume of the Calabi-Yau manifold Y. The other hypermultiplets belonging to 
a quaternionic moduli space will not play a role here. Switching on background 
fluxes leads to a potential for the vector multiplets. The resulting supergravity is 
gauged with the axion field charged under a f/(l)_R symmetry. One can introduce 
five-branes spread along four of the five non-compact directions and two of the 
internal dimensions. For five-branes wrapping holomorphic curves the resulting 
configuration is BPS and breaks half of the supersymmetries. 

Let us now be a bit more specific. The compactifying manifold Y lives along 
the xa, ^ = 5 ... 10, coordinates while space time is along Xj, i = . . .3, and x^. 
The Xs-axis is a Z2 orbifold under x^ — > —x^ that we identify with the interval 
[0, +7r/9]. We also include five-branes Mg extended along the four non-compact 
dimensions Xi and wrapped around holomorphic curves in Y. The Bianchi 
identity for the four form G4 of eleven dimensional supergravity is modified due 
to the presence of the five-brane 

dGi = AV2{^f/^[6M, - Sodx5 A J(^) - 6^pdx5 A J^')] (1) 


J® = ^(Tr(F(*) A F(^)) - -Tr(i? A R)). (2) 
IGtt^ 2 

Due to supersymmetry preservation each of the Horava-Witten planes carries a 

holomorphic vector bundle characterized by the two forms F^*-*, i = 1,2. We will 

choose F^"^^ = and consider the first plane at X5 = as our brane-world. The 

fundamental class is defined by 

/ /= / /A5m5 (3) 

and can be written as 


Sm^ = J2^xidx5 ASj^i (4) 


where Xq are the coordinates of the five-branes. In appropriate units Sj^i has 
dimension three in eleven dimensional Planck units. 

Due to the compactness of the X5 direction there is a topological condition to 
be satisfied 

5s = -^(Tr(F« A F«) - Tr(i? A R)) (5) 


as cohomology classes where 5^ — J^fLi ^e* ■ This exphcitly determines the ho- 
mology class of the two dimensional surface E. 

An explicit solution to the Bianchi identity is then 


where e^i^ jumps from -1 to 1 at Xq and we have used the notation 

Sj:o = -^(Tr(F(i) A F^^)) - ^Tr(i? A R)). (7) 

In each interval separating the i-th and the {i + l)-th five-branes there are back- 
ground magnetic charges defined by 

/ Efe, (8) 

P JCi 

where the four-manifolds C/ are Poincare duals to the the cj/'s forming a basis of 
the /i*^^'^) holomorphic two-forms. We have introduced the expansion parameter 

= ij^Y^^^^ s-iid ^ is the volume of Y. The effective action obtained by 
substituting in the eleven dimensional supergravity action depends crucially on 
these magnetic charges. 

The vector multiplets follow from the expansion of the Kahler form cu 

UJ = t^LOj. (9) 

The volume modulus of the Calabi-Yau manifold is given by 

V=^y a;Aa;Aa;. (10) 


= V^/^X^ (11) 
the scalars in the vector multiplets parameterize the solutions of 

CijkX^X^X^ = 6 (12) 

where Cjjk are the intersection numbers /y a;/ A cuj A ujk- The volume modulus 
belongs to the universal hypermultiplet. The low energy bosonic action takes the 
form of a non-linear sigma model with the metric defined by 

Gij = -\CjjkX'' + ^-{CilmX'^X^){CjpqX''X'^). (13) 


In the Einstein frame ds"^ = V^^^ds^j^ the action for the i-th interval reads] 


The last term is the potential for the scalars in the vector multiplets. 

Let us now consider the boundary actions. The boundary wall action reads 


Sl^4f "'-^^ (15) 

in the Einstein frame. The action on the three branes resulting from the bulk 
five-branes depends on the nature of the surface S. For BPS configurations the 
BPS bound for five-branes is saturated implying the equality between the central 
charge and the five-brane tension. This leads to the action for each five-brane 

S'b = T,J ^J-g^lVoliE^) (16) 
in the string frame. Now using p!6[| 

^5 = (17) 



Vol(S') = v^/"^ f u (18) 
one obtains the boundary action 

with [a}] = a} — Oi . Notice that this boundary action has the same functional 
form as the boundary wall action up to a factor of two. In the following section 
we will concentrate on the solutions of the equations of motions with a particular 
emphasis on the junction conditions. 

3 Non-BPS Configurations 

Before describing the non-BPS configurations we analyse the solutions of the 
equations of motions in the BPS case. Let us concentrate on the following warped 

ds" = e^^^'^^dxj/ + dxl (20) 


and consider xs-dependent fields only. From the action one can read off the 
junction conditions at the origin 

||^|„ = 2V2(a«..Y)|, 

Jo — — lo 








where in the last equation we have used a Lagrange multiplier to impose the 

constraint ([T^ . Similarly the junction conditions at the one of the bulk five- 
branes read 





" 72V 





where the latter differ from the former by a factor of two. Due to the Z2 action 
one has [/]o = 2/|o relating the jump at the origin to twice the value at the 

One of the features of BPS configurations is that the junctions conditions are 
automatically satisfied. This can be seen from the BPS equations deduced from 
the fermionic supersymmetry variations 







1 {a\X) 


in each interval. Combining these equations one getsj 







from which we deduce that in each interval 

CijKth^ = 2V2V^/^a]y + Ci (25) 
where we have introduced dy = V^'^^^dx^. Inverting (^) for gives 

V = ^CijKt't't'' (26) 

and the metric 

ds^ = V'/'dxJ/ + V'/'dy'. (27) 

The position of the five-branes is not constrained reflecting the no-force condition. 

The non-BPS configurations appear when the cohomology class 5s given by 
(H) is not effective, i.e. when the expansion 


S^ = Y.(^i^c^^ (28) 


in terms of the classes of holomorphic curves C*, contains both positive and 
negative integers. This implies that there is no holomorphic curve whose class 
coincides with 6j]. This topological characterization of non-supersymmetric cy- 
cle has several physical consequences. On the one hand the no-force condition 
between BPS five-branes is no longer valid. Writing 

5e = [A] - [B] (29) 

where [A] and [B] are effective cycles, i.e. there exist holomorphic curves A (resp. 
B ) whose classes are [A] (resp. [B]), one expects that separating the five-branes 
wrapped around A from the anti-five-branes wrapped around B is energetically 
disfavoured. Therefore we will consider that the five-branes coincide and wrap a 
single surface in the class 6-e. Within the homology class dual to 6j] we consider 
the surface 5* whose volume is minimum. As the brane tension is minimal this 
configuration is stable for a given Calabi-Yau manifold Y, i.e. the five brane 
wrapped around 5" gives rise to a stable non-BPS brane. The BPS bound states 
that the tension of the five brane wrapped around S is bounded from below by 
the central charge 

\Q\ = T,v''^ j d'x^^r I /^^|. (30) 

Equality would imply that is a calibrated surface]!^, pU |, i.e. a holomorphic 
curve, realizing a BPS configuration. Such stable non-BPS branes are sensitive 
to deformations of the Calabi-Yau manifold ^|21]. 

Let us denote by T > 1 the ratio beween the tension and the central charge. 
This leads to the boundary action 



a. = ^ / 6.. (32) 
p Jci 

The effect of supersymmetry breaking is to modify the boundary action. In 
particular the bulk equations of motion are still the same as before supersym- 
metry breaking. Therefore the solutions of the bulk equations of motion are not 
modified by the supersymmetry breaking mechanism. We first assume that T is 
independent of V and . The only effect of supersymmetry breaking is to alter 
the boundary conditions 

[dnVU = V2T{\a].X)l, 
T 2 


[dnXiU = ^(N - 7t(H.^)X,)U„ 

where 9„ is the normal derivative. The boundary conditions deduced from the 
bulk solutions do not match with the boundary conditions arising from the non- 
BPS brane action. Such a discrepancy has already been analysed in the context 
of supergravity in singular spaces fl^ . In particular we expect that the presence 
of a non-BPS brane destabilizes the vacuum. The perfect balance between the 
gravitational and scalar forces disappears and the non-BPS brane moves towards 
the boundary walls. 

We can generate time- dependent conformally flat solutions from the static 

solutions[0, |T8|. This is most easily achieved by using a boost along the 
direction. To do so we first introduce conformal coordinates so that the metric 

dsl = a^{u){dx^ + du^). (34) 


a' = V^/^ du = V^'^dy. (35) 

Under a boost and a rescaling the new solutions of the bulk equations of motions 

A{u,ri) = A{u + hr], 

V{u,ri) = V{u + hrj 


Xj{u,r]) = Xi{u + hr], 

vi — 




where rj is the conformal time. We have displayed the exphcit dependence on the 
magnetic charges a}. One can now use the BPS equations satisfied by {A, V, Xj) 
to deduce that 


in each of the two intervals. Evaluating the jumps at Uq, the fixed coordinate of 
the non-BPS brane, and using (|37D one finds that the boundary conditions are 
automatically satisfied provided that 

h = ±^^. (38) 

Notice that this requires T > 1. This is exactly the BPS bound with a static 
solution only in the BPS case. 

After applying the boost the two boundary walls are moving and the non-BPS 
brane is static. By reverting to the original coordinates one finds that the solution 
describes a moving non-BPS brane surrounded by two static boundary walls. 
As the bulk equations of motions are not modified by the presence of the non- 
BPS brane the boundary conditions at the two boundary walls are automatically 
satisfied. The moving non-BPS brane eventually hits the boundary walls in a 
finite time determined by the speed h. For a generic supersymmetry breaking 
parameter the life-time of the non-BPS brane is of the order of the size of the 
fifth dimension. 

When the supersymmetry breaking T depends on V and , the bulk equa- 
tions are still satisfied but the boundary conditions cannot be simply fulfilled by 
applying a boost in the fifth direction. In [jl5| the case where supersymmetry is 

broken in this fashion by one of the boundary walls was considered. It has been 
shown that static solutions would require a fine-tuning of the radius of the extra 
dimension and of the magnetic charges. The latter being unlikely because this 
requires tuning continuous and discrete variables. From our point of view the 
reason for the non-existence of static solution follows from the absence of balance 
between the forces on the non-BPS brane. It seems likely that an appropriate 
change of variables performed on the bulk solutions will imply the matching of 
the boundary conditions in this more general setting. The time dependence of 
the resulting solution would describe the motion of the non-BPS brane towards 
the boundary walls. 


Let us now briefly discuss the fate of the non-BPS brane after hitting one of 
the boundary walls. First of all the case of BPS five branes merging with the 
boundary walls has been extensively studied[^. In particular one finds small 
instanton transitions where the gauge bundle is modified. In the non-BPS case the 
flux conservation condition indicates that supersymmetry configurations such as 
the standard embedding case can spontaneously appear after the collision. This 
leads to a restoration of supersymmetry. 

4 Conclusion 

We have described the sharp difference between BPS and non-BPS configurations 
in heterotic M-Theory. In particular we have explicitly shown that the absence 
of balance between the gravitational and scalar forces leads to the motion of the 
non-BPS five-branes towards the boundary walls. Due to the finite size of the 
fifth dimension the life-time of the non-BPS configuration is measured in units 
of the eleven dimensional Planck length. Nevertheless one may use the resulting 
configuration in a phenomenological way by considering that the size of the extra 
dimension is large. Indeed the BPS condition on the boundary walls guarantees 
the absence of a radion potential and therefore allows to consider an arbitrarily 
large extra dimension. Moreover by tuning the supersymmetry breaking scale 
one may consider the speed of the extra dimension to be sufficiently small to 
allow for an adiabatic treatment. The resulting scenario might be useful in order 
to study the supersymmetry breaking induced by non-BPS branes in brane-world 

5 Acknowledgements 

I would like to thank C. Grojean and D. Waldram for many suggestions and 
useful comments. 



[1] S. Kachru " Lectures on Warped Compactifications and Stringy Brane Con- 
structions", |hep-th/UUU9'2I7| . 

[2] P. Horava and E. Witten, Nud. Phys B460 (1996) 506, P. Horava and E. 
Witten, Nud. Phys B475 (1996) 94. 

[3] L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690. 

[4] L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370. 

[5] N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Dimopoulos, N. Kaloper and R. Sundrum, it Phys. 
Lett. B 480 (2000) 193; S. Kachru, M. Schulz and E. Silverstein, Phys. 
Rev. D62 (2000) 08 5003; S. Forste, Z. lalak, S. Lavignac and H. P. Nilles, 
Phys. Lett. B 481 (2000) 360. 

[6] O. Aharony, S. S. Gubser, J. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz, Phys. Rept. 
323 (2000) 183. 

[7] R. Altendorfer, J. Bagger and D. Nemeschansky, "Supersymmetric Randall- 
Sundrum Scenario", |hep-th/ 0003 1171 T. Gherghetta and A. Pomarol, Nud. 
Phys. B 586 (2000) 141; A. Falkowski, Z. Lalak and S. Pokorski, Phys. 
M.B491 (2000) 172. 

[8] E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh and A. Van Proyen, JHEP 0010 (2000) 033; 
A. Falkowski, Z. Lalak and S. Pokorski," Five-Dimensional Gauged Super- 
gravities with Universal Hypermultiplet and Warped Brane Worlds, [hep- 

th/0009167 . 

[9] A. Lukas, B. A. Ovrut, K. S. Stelle, D. Waldram, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 
086001; A. Lukas, B. A. Ovrut, K. S. Stelle, D. Waldram, Nud. Phys. B552 
(1999) 246; K. Behrndt and S. Gukov, Nud. Phys. B 580 (2000) 225. 

[10] A. Lukas, B. A. Ovrut and D. Waldram, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 106005. 

[11] A. Lukas, B. A. Ovrut and D. Waldram, "Cosmology and Heterotic M- 
Theory in Five Dimensions" , Lectures at the advanced school on Cosmology 
and Particle Physics, Peniscola, Spain, June 1998. 

[12] A. Lukas, B. A. Ovrut and D. Waldram, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 086001; M. 
Braendle, A. Lukas and B. A. Ovrut, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 026003; H. 
A. Chamblin and H. S. Reall, Nud. Phys. B562 (1999) 133; J. E. Lidsey, 
Class. Quant. Grav. 17 (2000) L39. 


[13] A. Sen, "Non-BPS states and Branes in String Theory", APCTP winter 
school lectures, |hep-th/990i207| . 

[14] A. Sen, Int.J.Mod.Phys. A14 (1999) 4061. 

[15] S.P. de Alwis and N. Irges, Phys. Lett. B492 (2000) 171. 

[16] B. R. Greene, K. Schalm and G. Shiu, "Dynamical Topology Change in M 
Theory", |hep-th/0010207| . 

[17] Ph. Brax and A. C. Davis, Phys. Lett. B497 (2001) 289. 

[18] P. Binetruy, J. Cline and C. Grojean, Phys. Lett. B 489 (2000) 403. 

[19] K. Becker, M. Becker , D. R. Morrison, H. Ooguri, Y. Oz and Z. Yin, Nucl. 
Phys. B480 (1996) 225. 

[20] G. W. Gibbons and G. Papadopoulos, Comm. Math. Phys. 202 (1999) 593. 

[21] J. Majumder and A. Sen, JHEP 0009 (2000) 047. 

[22] E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 460 (1996) 541; B. Ovrut, T. Pantev and J. Park, 
JHEP 0005 (2000) 045.