Skip to main content

Full text of "Iowa journal of history"

See other formats


Google 


This  is  a  digital  copy  of  a  book  that  was  preserved  for  generations  on  Hbrary  shelves  before  it  was  carefully  scanned  by  Google  as  part  of  a  project 

to  make  the  world's  books  discoverable  online. 

It  has  survived  long  enough  for  the  copyright  to  expire  and  the  book  to  enter  the  public  domain.  A  public  domain  book  is  one  that  was  never  subject 

to  copyright  or  whose  legal  copyright  term  has  expired.  Whether  a  book  is  in  the  public  domain  may  vary  country  to  country.  Public  domain  books 

are  our  gateways  to  the  past,  representing  a  wealth  of  history,  culture  and  knowledge  that's  often  difficult  to  discover. 

Marks,  notations  and  other  maiginalia  present  in  the  original  volume  will  appear  in  this  file  -  a  reminder  of  this  book's  long  journey  from  the 

publisher  to  a  library  and  finally  to  you. 

Usage  guidelines 

Google  is  proud  to  partner  with  libraries  to  digitize  public  domain  materials  and  make  them  widely  accessible.  Public  domain  books  belong  to  the 
public  and  we  are  merely  their  custodians.  Nevertheless,  this  work  is  expensive,  so  in  order  to  keep  providing  this  resource,  we  liave  taken  steps  to 
prevent  abuse  by  commercial  parties,  including  placing  technical  restrictions  on  automated  querying. 
We  also  ask  that  you: 

+  Make  non-commercial  use  of  the  files  We  designed  Google  Book  Search  for  use  by  individuals,  and  we  request  that  you  use  these  files  for 
personal,  non-commercial  purposes. 

+  Refrain  fivm  automated  querying  Do  not  send  automated  queries  of  any  sort  to  Google's  system:  If  you  are  conducting  research  on  machine 
translation,  optical  character  recognition  or  other  areas  where  access  to  a  large  amount  of  text  is  helpful,  please  contact  us.  We  encourage  the 
use  of  public  domain  materials  for  these  purposes  and  may  be  able  to  help. 

+  Maintain  attributionTht  GoogXt  "watermark"  you  see  on  each  file  is  essential  for  informing  people  about  this  project  and  helping  them  find 
additional  materials  through  Google  Book  Search.  Please  do  not  remove  it. 

+  Keep  it  legal  Whatever  your  use,  remember  that  you  are  responsible  for  ensuring  that  what  you  are  doing  is  legal.  Do  not  assume  that  just 
because  we  believe  a  book  is  in  the  public  domain  for  users  in  the  United  States,  that  the  work  is  also  in  the  public  domain  for  users  in  other 
countries.  Whether  a  book  is  still  in  copyright  varies  from  country  to  country,  and  we  can't  offer  guidance  on  whether  any  specific  use  of 
any  specific  book  is  allowed.  Please  do  not  assume  that  a  book's  appearance  in  Google  Book  Search  means  it  can  be  used  in  any  manner 
anywhere  in  the  world.  Copyright  infringement  liabili^  can  be  quite  severe. 

About  Google  Book  Search 

Google's  mission  is  to  organize  the  world's  information  and  to  make  it  universally  accessible  and  useful.   Google  Book  Search  helps  readers 
discover  the  world's  books  while  helping  authors  and  publishers  reach  new  audiences.  You  can  search  through  the  full  text  of  this  book  on  the  web 

at|http  :  //books  .  google  .  com/| 


THE  IOWA  JOUENAL  OF  HISTOEY 

AND  POLITICS 


THE 


IOWA  JOURNAL 


•  *  • 

-     • •••• 

•  •  •  •  * 
•    •  •  • 


OF 


HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 


SDITOB 
BENJAMIN    F.    SHAHBAU6H 

PBOVBStOm    OF    POLITIOAL    •OIBHOB 
III    TBM    UKirsmSITT    OF    IOWA 


VOLUME  IX 
1911 


PUBLISH£D  QUABTBELT  BT 

THE  STATE  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY  OF  IOWA 

IOWA  CITY  IOWA 
1911 


•      « 


•  •  •   • 

•  •  - 


COPTSIOHT  1911  BT 
THl  STATE  HI8T0BICAL  80CIBTT  OF  IOWA 


I 

1 

I 

\ 


T 


i 


r 


CONTENTS 
Number  1  —  January  1911 

Ccn&tribntioiifi  of  Albert  Miller  Lea  to  the  History  of 
Iowa  CuFFOBD  Powell 

AndfiTBonville  and  the  Trial  of  Henry  Wirz 

John  Howard  Stibbs 

Baeonian  Club  of  Iowa  City 

Pablioations 

Americana  —  Oeneral  and  Miscellaneous 

Western 

lowana 


%  Bkrtorical  Societies 
Motes  and  Comment 
%  CSomtiibaton 


•2i 


Number  2  —  April  1911 

nbe  Establiflhment  and  Organization  of  Townships  in  John- 
son County  Clarence  Ray  Aurner 

The  Attitude  of  Congress  Toward  the  Pioneers  of  the  West 
1820^1850  Kenneth  W.  Colorove 

Pablications 

Americana  —  General  and  Miscellaneous 

Western 

lowana 

»rieal  Societies 

and  Comment 

ODiitzilratozB 


33 
57 
114 
114 
121 
123 
131 
144 
149 


155 

196 
303 
303 
311 
312 
319 
330 
332 


? 


■t 


••  • 


vi                                        CONTENTS 

Nu  ^f  BER  3  —  July  1911 

The  Expedition  of  Zebnlon  Montgomery  Pike  to  the  Sources 
of  the  Mississippi                       Ethyl  Edna  Martin 

335 

The  Settlement  of  Woodbury  County 

Frank  Harmon  Garver 

359 

The  Territorial  Convention  of  1837 

385 

Proceedings  of  a  Council  with  the  Chippewa  Indians 

408 

Some  Publications 

438 

Americana  —  General  and  Miscellaneous 

438 

Western 

445 

lowana 

446 

Historical  Societies 

453 

Notes  and  Comment 

468 

Contributors 

472 

Number  4  —  October  1911 

The  Work  of  the  Thirty-Fourth  General  Assembly  of  Iowa 

Frank  Edward  Horack 

475 

The  History  of  the  Codes  of  Iowa  Law 

Clifford  Powell 

493 

The  Coming  of  the  Hollanders  to  Iowa 

Jacob  Van  der  Zee 

528 

Some  Publications 

575 

Americana  —  General  and  Miscellaneous 

575 

Western 

581 

lowana 

585 

Historical  Societies 

592 

Notes  and  Comment 

605 

Contributors 

607 

Index 

609 

-1 

I  ^ 

X 

%•  . 

r 

U4  L 

0 

■ 

1 
1 

f 


( 

f 


THE  IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

JANUARY    NINETEEN    HUNDRED    ELEVEN 
VOLUME    MINE    NUMBEB    ONE 


\ 


voLk  rx — 1 


THE  CONTBIBUTIONS  OF  ALBERT  MILLEB  LEA 
TO  THE  LITEBATUBE  OF  IOWA  mSTOBY^ 

[This  essay  was  awarded  the  seventj-flve  dollar  prize  offered  in  1909  by  the 
Iowa  Boeietj  of  the  Colonial  Dames  of  America  for  the  best  essay  in  Iowa 
history.    The  essay  has  been  revised  for  publication. —  Editok.] 

The  contribntions  of  Albert  Miller  Lea  to  the  literature 
of  Iowa  history  are  neither  voluminons  nor  critical.  They 
consist  chiefly  of  a  small  book  of  forty-five  pages,  two  maps, 
and  two  reports ;  bnt,  having  been  written  during  the  forma- 
tive period  of  beginnings,  they  have  an  historical  impor- 
tance which  is  out  of  proportion  to  their  critical  character. 
The  little  book  gave  the  State  its  name ;  the  reports  were 
the  baseSi^of  legislation  and  large  appropriations  by  Con- 
gress ;  and  the  maps  served  as  guides  to  settlers  for  a  long 
period  of  years. 

Albert  Miller  Lea  was  a  Lieutenant  in  the  United  States 
Army  and  an  accomplished  dvil  engineer  —  a  man  of  varied 
attainments  and  remarkable  foresight.  He  was  bom  in 
1807  at  Lea  Springs  —  a  place  not  far  distant  from  Enox- 
ville,  Tennessee.  His  father  was  a  merchant  who  at  one 
time  held  the  position  of  Register  of  the  Land  Office  in  the 
State  of  Franklin  f  and  his  mother  was  one  Clara  Wisdom, 
who  is  described  by  her  son  Albert  as  a  **wise  and  prudent'' 
woman. 

1  The  writer  desires  to  express  his  thanks  to  Professor  Benj.  F.  Shambangh 
for  the  assistance  and  helpful  suggestions  given  in  the  preparation  of  this 
essay,  to  Mr.  A.  K.  Harbert  of  Cedar  Bapids  for  the  use  of  his  materials  relat- 
ing to  Albert  M.  Lea,  and  to  Dr.  Louis  Pelzer  and  Mr.  Kenneth  Colgrore  for 
kindly  reading  and  criticising  the  essay. 

s  Iowa  Hiitariedl  Beeard,  Vol.  Vni,  No.  1,  January,  1892,  p.  201. 
Lea  also  describes  his  father  as  "positive,  dictatorial,  domineering,  and 
lagadous.'' 


4       IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTOBT  AND  POLITICS 

The  early  education  of  Lieutenant  Lea  was  received  in 
the  common  schools  of  Ejioxville.  Later  he  entered  college,, 
and  was  within  one  session  of  graduation  when  he  was  com- 
pelled to  give  up  his  studies  on  account  of  poor  health. 
Within  a  year,  however,  he  had  regained  his  health  and  in 
1827  received  an  appointment  to  the  Military  Academy  at 
West  Point.*  Four  years  later,  on  July  1, 1831,  Lieutenant 
Lea  graduated  from  this  institution  (ranking  fifth  in  a  class 
of  thirty-seven)  and  was  assigned,  after  a  short  furlough,, 
to  the  United  States  Army.* 

The  commission  to  the  Military  Academy  proved  to  be- 
the  turning  point  in  Lea's  career;  for  instead  of  becomings 
a  planter  and  land  owner,  as  did  many  of  his  associates,^ 
he  entered  the  army,  came  west,  and  directed  several  large 
engineering  undertakings,'^  giving  the  best  part  of  his  life 
in  the  service  of  the  (Government.  The  three  years  follow- 
ing his  graduation  were  spent  in  going  from  one  part  of  the 
country  to  another  on  various  topographical  and  scientific- 

9  Iowa  Hittoriedl  Becord,  Vol.  VIII,  No.  1,  January,  1892,  pp.  201,  202. 
Lea  received  this  appointment  from  Senator  H.  L.  White,  who  was  a  com- 
petitor of  Martin  Van  Boren  in  1836. 

« Letter  to  Senator  Wm.  B.  Allison  from  the  Becord  and  Pension  Office,. 
January  15,  1904. 

''Albert  lifiller  Lea  was  a  cadet  at  the  United  States  Military  Academy 
from  Jnly  1,  1827,  to  Jnly  1,  1831,  when  he  was  graduated  and  appointed 
brevet  2nd  Lieutenant  of  Artillery.  He  was  transferred  to  the  7th  Infantry 
August  11,  1831,  and  was  promoted  2nd  Lieutenant  March  4,  1833;  was 
appointed  2nd  Lieutenant,  1st  Dragoons,  July  1,  1834,  to  rank  from  March 
4,  1833,  and  his  resignation  was  accepted  to  take  effect  May  31,  1836." 

Lea  was  on  leave  of  absence  from  February  1,  1836,  to  the  date  of  h'S 
resignation.  This  letter  is  in  the  collection  of  Mr.  A.  N.  Harbert  of  Cedar 
Bapids,  Iowa. 

B  Among  the  engineering  services  performed  were  the  following : 

A.  Drew  plans  for  first  locomotive  ever  constructed  by  the  Baldwins. 

B.  Famous  survey  of  the  B.  &  O.  B.  B.  where  a  cut  was  constructed  by  the 
use  of  geologic  bedding. 

C.  Survey  of  the  Tennessee  Biver. 

See  Iowa  Historical  Becord,  Vol.  Vm,  No.  1,  January,  1892,  for  a  complete- 
list. 


LEA'S  CONTRIBUTIONS  TO  IOWA  HISTORY  5 

duties.*  This  kind  of  work,  which  carried  him  from  the 
Great  Lakes  to  the  Gulf  and  from  Oklahoma  to  the  moun- 
tains of  Tennessee,  gave  him  a  vast  amount  of  valuable 
information  concerning  the  pioneers  and  the  West.  FinaUy, 
however,  he  was  ordered  for  a  second  time  to  Fort  Gibson,^ 
there  to  attach  himself  to  the  First  United  States  Dragoons 
—  a  regiment  formed  at  the  close  of  the  Black  Hawk  War. 

Upon  his  arrival  at  Fort  Gibson  in  the  autumn  of  1834, 
Lea  was  ordered  by  Colonel  Henry  Dodge  to  a  point  near 
the  present  site  of  BeUevue,  Nebraska,  to  pay  the  Lidians 
a  certain  amount  of  merchandise  which  was  due  them.^ 

When  he  had  completed  this  task  he  returned  to  Fort  Gib- 
son only  to  find  that  his  company,  with  two  others,  was  lo- 
cated at  a  new  post^  on  the  Upper  Mississippi,  hundreds  of 
miles  away.  He  immediately  set  out  to  join  his  command, 
taking  the  last  boat  of  the  season  going  north  from  St. 
Louis,  and  in  a  few  days  reached  the  town  of  Keokuk.  The 
present  prosperous  city  was  then  only  ^  ^  a  substantial  stone 
building,  used  as  a  trading  station,  the  only  house  on  the 
west  bank  for  many  miles  below  and  three  hundred  miles 
above. '^®  This  was  Lea's  first  view  of  the  country  to 
which,  within  two  years,  he  was  to  give  the  name  ^^lowa''. 
A  few  days  later  he  reported  at  Fort  Des  Moines,  near  the 
present  town  of  Montrose,  where  he  took  charge  of  his 
company. 

On  the  9th  of  March,  1835,  orders"  were  received  by 

•  Iowa  Hiiiorieal  Beeord,  Vol.  VIII,  No.  1,  January,  1892,  p.  202. 

T  Lieutenant  Lea  first  reported  at  Fort  Gibson  in  1832. —  See  Iowa  HUicrieal 
Becard,  VoL  Vm,  No.  1,  January,  1892,  pp.  200-205. 

•  For  a  full  account,  see  an  article  entitled  Early  ExplaraHam  in  Iowa  in  the 
Iowa  Hittorieai  Beoord^  Vol.  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  538. 

•  This  new  post  was  Fort  Des  Moines  No.  1. —  See  Annals  of  Iowa,  Third 
Series,  VoL  III,  Nos.  5-6,  April-July,  1898,  p.  351. 

10  Iowa  Historieal  Beeord^  VoL  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  541. 

11  AnnaU  of  Iowa,  Third  Series,  Vol.  Ill,  Nos.  5-6,  April-July,  1898,  p.  355. 


6       IOWA  JOUENAL  OF  HISTOBT  AND  POLITICS 

Identenant  Colonel  Kearney  to  proceed  with  his  command 
np  the  Des  Moines  Biver  to  a  certain  point  near  the  Bac- 
coon  Forks  and  from  there  in  a  northeasterly  direction  to 
the  Mississippi.  From  the  latter  place  the  command  was 
to  march  westward  until  the  Des  Moines  Biver  was  again 
reached^  when  a  return  should  be  made  to  Fort  Des  Moines. 
Accordingly,  on  June  7, 1835,  the  troop,  consisting  of  about 
150  mounted  men,  started  on  the  march  for  the  purposes 
of  exploration  and  of  impressing  the  Indians  with  the  power 
of  the  United  States  government.^  ^  It  was  on  this  expedi- 
tion that  Lieutenant  Lea  ^^voluntarily  assumed  the  duties 
of  topographer  and  chronicler' ';"  and  to  this  fact  we  owe 
many  fine  descriptions  of  the  original  condition  of  the  Iowa 
prairies  as  well  as  the  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory. 

The  line  of  march  followed  as  nearly  as  possible  the 
divide  between  the  Des  Moines  and  Skunk  rivers.  Being  in 
the  springtime,  the  ground  was  still  very  wet  and  soft,  ow- 
ing to  the  excessive  rainfall.  The  troop  proceeded  slowly, 
covering  only  from  fifteen  to  twenty  miles  a  day."  But 
with  the  single  discomfort  of  excessive  rainfall,  it  was  an 
ideal  time  of  the  year  to  make  the  trip,  as  the  weather  in 
other  respects  was  favorable  to  both  men  and  horses.  The 
scenery,  too,  was  magnificent;  and  Lieutenant  Lea  wrote 
that  ^^the  grass  and  streams  were  beautiful  and  strawber- 
ries so  abundant  as  to  make  the  whole  tract  red  for  miles''.^' 
Game  was  also  plentiful,  and  wild  fowl  was  a  part  of  nearly 
every  meal.  At  a  place  near  the  present  site  of  the  city  of 
Oskaloosa  **a  small  herd  of  buffalo*'^®  was  encountered. 

12  Annals  of  Iowa,  Third  Series,  Vol.  HI,  Noe.  5-6,  April- July,  1898,  p.  355. 
18  Iowa  Hiitorieal  Becord^  Vol.  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  546 
1*  Iowa  Hiatorieal  Becord,  Vol.  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  547. 
18  Iowa  Historical  Becord,  Vol.  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  547. 
16  Iowa  Historical  Becord,  Vol.  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  548. 


LEA*S  CONTBIBUTIONS  TO  IOWA  HISTORY  7 

Concerning  this  incident  Lieutenant  Lea  wrote :  ' '  It  was  the 
first  and  only  time  I  have  seen  vthe  lordly  beast  in  his  homOi 
and  probably  the  last  time  he  appeared  in  that  region.  "^^ 
The  various  pests  were  in  evidence  then  as  now,  for  at  one 
place  Lea  declares  that  ^^  after  my  tent  was  pitched  we 
killed  four  rattlesnakes  within  it,  and  the  next  day  I  had 
a  bath  in  a  pool,  occupied  by  mosquitos  so  large  that  I 
pressed  one  in  my  journal,  and  carried  for  years  as  a 
specimen  of  the  luxuriant  growth  of  the  plains.''  ^^ 

When  the  expedition  had  proceeded  as  far  as  the  place 
where  Boone  is  now  located,  the  order  was  given  to  march 
in  a  northeasterly  direction  to  the  Mississippi,^^  where  a 
steamboat  with  fresh  supplies  awaited  their  arrlvaL  After 
a  rest  of  a  few  days  on  the  banks  of  the  Mississippi  near 
Lake  Pepin  in  Minnesota,  the  march  was  again  taken  up, 
this  time  directly  westward  to  the  district  of  the  lakes  of 
Minnesota.  One  of  these.  Lake  Albert  Lea,^  perpetuates 
the  name  of  the  Lieutenant.  This  region  was  one  ^^of 
lakes  and  open  groves  of  oak,  beautiful  as  English  parks** ; 
and  when  writing  of  it  in  later  years  Lieutenant  Lea  de- 

17  i%i8  tame  ineident  is  mentioned  in  a  journal  of  this  march  in  the  follow- 
ing words: 

''[Wednesday,  June  the  Twenty-Fourth] 

24  Marched  25  miles  &  encamped  on  the  banks  of  the  Iwaj  a  small 
stream  30  yards  broad.  This  day  for  the  first  this  season  we  saw  Buffalo. 
Killed  5  or  6  —  many  of  onr  men  are  recruits  from  the  North  &  never  saw 
a  Buffalo  before  &  therefore  to  them  a  Buffalo  chase  was  something  remark- 
able. This  day  was  spent  in  eating  Buffalo  beef  &  sleep." — Thx  Iowa  Joui^ 
NAL  OF  HisTOBY  AND  PoLiTios,  VoL  VII,  No.  3,  July,  1909,  p.  368. 

IS  Iowa  Histariedl  Becord,  VoL  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  548. 

^9  Iowa  Historical  Becord,  Vol.  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  548. 

Near  the  present  site  of  Boone  the  troop  camped  ''oue  night  near  a  flint 
and  gravel  covered  conical  peak,  sixty  feet  above  the  plain".  This  is  easily 
found  to-day,  a  short  way  south  of  Boone. 

20  This  lake  was  named  by  Mr.  J.  N.  Nicollet,  a  surveyor,  and  also  a  friend 
of  Lea. —  See  Executive  Documents,  Document  No.  52,  2nd  Bession,  28th  Con- 
gress, Vol.  n,  p.  73.  Also  Iowa  Historicai  Becord^  Vol.  VI,  No.  4,  October, 
1890,  p.  549. 


8        IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTOBT  AND  POLITICS 

dared,  that  '^Possibly,  some  day,  I  may  again  ride  over  that 
trail ;  and  I  might  well  wish  that  my  freed  spirit  could  leave 
this  green  earth  with  the  impression  made  just  fifty-five 
years  ago,  as  I  gazed  and  sketched,  when  halted  for  our 
noon  rest  on  the  shaded  and  grassy  shore  of  Lake  Albert 
Lea. '  '**  Finally,  the  Des  Moines  headwaters  were  reached 
and  the  march  turned  southward,  entering  the  present  State 
in  the  neighborhood  of  Swea  City.** 

By  slow  degrees  the  troop  made  its  way  to  the  Raccoon 
Forks,**  near  a  place  where  the  capital  of  Iowa  is  now  lo- 
cated, but  which  at  that  time  was  simply  ^^a  grassy  and 
spongy  meadow  with  a  bubbling  spring  in  the  midst. '  ***  At 
this  place,  too.  Lieutenant  Lea  was  ordered  to  descend  the 
Des  Moines  Biver  in  a  canoe,*^  to  take  soundings,  and  to 
report  upon  the  practicability  of  navigating  keel  boats  over 
its  course.  This  proved  to  be  a  very  arduous  task;  but 
Lieutenant  Lea  reached  the  Fort  several  days  before  the 
main  body  of  troops,  who  returned  leisurely  by  land  in  the 
latter  part  of  August.** 

After  writing  his  report  upon  the  Des  Moines  River, 
Lieutenant  Lea  resigned  from  the  army  and  hastened  to 
Baltimore  where  he  published  the  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Ter- 
ritory.  Two  years  later,  in  1838,  he  again  came  to  the  Iowa 

SI  Iowa  Hiitariedl  Eeoord,  Vol.  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  549. 

ssThe  ezaet  loeation  can  not  be  deifinitelj  stated.  The  roate  was  on  the 
west  side  of  the  river  is  this  locality. 

ss  A  journal,  kept  daring  this  campaign,  may  be  found  in  The  Iowa  Joubnal 
OF  HiSTOBY  AND  POLITICS,  VoL  VII,  No.  3,  July,  1909,  p.  331. 

t«  Iowa  Hittorieal  Eeoord,  Vol  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  549. 

M  Iowa  HUtorioal  Seoard,  Veil  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  550 ;  AnnaU  of 
Iowa,  Third  Series,  VoL  m,  p.  356,  also  an  article  by  General  Parrott  on  p.  374. 

In  a  letter  to  Hon.  T.  S.  Parrin,  written  April  4,  1890,  Lieutenant  Lea  says : 
''I  made  a  sunrey,  in  a  canoe,  of  Des  Moines  river,  from  Rac[c]oon  down,  in 
1835." 

MSee  map  in  Lea's  Nates  on  WiaeonHn  Territory. 


LEA'S  CONTRIBUTIONS  TO  IOWA  HISTOBT         9 

cojmtry  as  the  United  States  Commissioner  to  deteimine 
ihe  boundary  between  the  State  of  Missouri  and  the  Terri- 
tory of  lowa.^^  When  this  task  was  completed  Lieutenant 
Lea  entered  the  employ  of  large  corporations  in  the  capacity 
of  chief  engineer.^  At  the  outbreak  of  the  Civil  War  he 
followed  his  old  friend  Robert  E.  Lee  into  the  Confederacy, 
vhere  he  completed  four  years  of  active  service.^  When 
peace  was  eventually  declared,  he  was  practically  ruined 
financially ;  and  in  this  condition  he  sought  a  new  country, 
moving  to  Corsicana,  Texas,  where  he  lived  until  his  death 
in  1890. 

The  contributions  of  Albert  M.  Lea  to  the  literature  of 
Iowa  history  are  based  upon  his  two  trips  to  the  Iowa 
country:  (1)  the  march  of  the  Dragoons  in  1835;  and  (2) 
his  work  as  a  member  of  the  boundary  commission  of  1838. 
Upon  both  occasions  Lieutenant  Lea  left  a  report  and  a 
map ;  and  these  occupy  a  prominent  place  in  the  earliest  lit- 
erature of  the  Commonwealth. 

THE  BEPOBT  ON  THB  DE8  MOINBS  BIVEB 

The  first  of  Lea's  contributions  in  point  of  time  is  the 
Report  on  the  Des  Moines  River  which  was  made  in  1835. 
Upon  arriving  at  Fort  Des  Moines  after  the  campaign  with 
the  Dragoons,  Lieutenant  Lea  made  a  comprehensive  re- 
port which  included,  besides  the  general  conclusions,  all  the 
soundings,  measurements,  and  notes  of  important  features 

if  Exeouiive  Documents,  House  Document  No.  38,  3rd  Session,  27th  Con- 
gress. This  doeoment  is  also  found  in  the  Iowa  Hiiiariedl  Beeardp  VoL  II,  No. 
1,  January,  1886,  p.  193. 

'•Lieutenant  Lea  was  for  a  number  of  years  City  Engineer  of  Enoxville, 
Tennessee,  and  later  of  Oalyeston,  Texas. —  Bee  Lea's  Autobiography  in  Iowa 
Historieal  Seoord,  VoL  VIII,  No.  1,  January,  1892,  p.  200. 

'•The  best  aceount  of  this  period  of  Lieutenant  Lea's  life  is  found  under 
the  title  of  Cdonel  Lea's  Beminisoenees,  a  series  of  articles  published  in  The 
Freeborn  County  Standard,  of  Albert  Lea,  Minnesota,  from  January  to  May, 
1890. 


10     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTOBT  AND  POLITICS 

from  the  Bacooon  to  the  Mississippi.  Unfortnnately  this 
report,  which  was  written  in  1835  (and  which  was  the  first 
contribution  relating  to  Iowa  penned  by  Lea)  can  not  be 
found.  It  seems  to  have  been  used  as  a  basis  for  legisla- 
tion; for  in  speaking  of  the  report  its  author  says:  '^The 
manuscript  was  published  by  Congress  in  1835-6  without 
the  map,  and  the  original  is  in  Adjutant-General's  office. 
It  was  the  foundation  of  aU  the  appropriations  for  Des. 
Moines  under  the  care  of  my  classmate,  Sam  B.  Curtis. '  '^^ 
The  evidence  of  the  commanding  officer  also  states  that  the 
report  was  actually  transmitted;  for  in  the  order  book  of 
lieutenant-Colonel  Kearney  we  find  this  statement:  '^I 
send  you  his  [Lea's]  report.'*" 

Despite  this  seemingly  conclusive  evidence  of  its  existence, 
the  document,  which  related  to  the  Des  Moines  Biver,  its 
characteristics,  its  commercial  and  economic  value,  has  not 
been  located  either  in  the  records  of  the  War  Department'^ 
or  among  the  papers  of  the  office  of  the  Adjutant-General 
of  the  State  of  Iowa.**  Its  historical  importance  can  not,^ 
therefore,  be  estimated. 

It  was  in  connection  with  this  report  that  Lieutenant  Lea 
drew  a  map  which  was  used,  with  some  changes,  in  his  Notes 
on  Wisconsin  Territory.   In  speaking  of  the  making  of  this 

>o  Letter  written  on  April  4,  1890,  hy  Albert  M.  Lea  to  Honorable  T.  8. 
Parrin. 

SI  Order  of  Lieotenant-Oolonel  Kearney. —  Found  in  an  article  prepared  by 
the  War  Department  for  Annals  of  Iowa,  Third  Seriee,  VoL  m,  p.  356. 

as  Letter  from  War  Department,  December  3,  1908. 

''The  report  made  by  Lieutenant  Albert  M.  Lea,  of  the  Ist  U.  8.  Dragoons, 
in  1835,  relative  to  the  Dee  Moines  river  is  not  found  in  the  Department."' 
Also  a  letter  from  the  War  Department  to  W.  B.  Allison  on  August  23,  1904 : 
''An  exhaustive  examination  of  the  records  on  file  in  this  office  has  resulted 
in  failure  to  find  any  report  made  by  Albert  M.  Lea. ' ' 

ss  Letter  written  to  A.  N.  Harbert  by  Adjutant-General  M.  H.  Byers  on 
July  20,  1901:  "There  are  no  reports  from  him  [A.  M.  Lea]  on  file  and  in- 
deed hit  name  is  not  found  on  any  papers  on  file. " 


LBA*S  CONTRIBUTIONS  TO  IOWA  HISTORY        11 

map  Lieutenant  Lea  says:  '^Without  delay,  I  mapped  the 
river  and  wrote  a  report  on  its  character  and  capabilitieSi 
which  was  forwarded  to  the  Adjutant-General ;  and  then  it 
occurred  to  me  that  I  could  get  an  outline  of  the  region  be- 
tween the  Mississippi  and  Missouri,  and  by  filling  it  in 
with  my  sketches,  the  whole  route  having  been  carefully 
meandered,  as  I  did  the  river,  I  could  make  a  map  that 
would  interest  the  public,  gain  me  some  reputation  and  per- 
haps a  little  money. ' '  When  the  map  was  finished,  however, 
the  post  commander.  Lieutenant  Colonel  Kearney,  sent  for 
it  and  even  refused  its  maker  a  copy.  The  next  year,  after 
much  difficulty.  Lieutenant  Lea  obtained  a  copy  of  his  map 
from  the  proper  officials  in  Washington  and  had  it  litho- 
graphed for  the  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory.^ 

NOTES  ON  WISCONSIN  TEBBITOBY 

The  second  and  perhaps  the  most  important  of  Lea's 
contributions  to  the  literature  of  Iowa  history  is  the  Notes 
on  Wisconsin  Territory  —  a  small  book  of  forty-five  pages. 
When  in  1836  Lieutenant  Lea  returned  to  Baltimore  from 
his  campaign  with  the  Dragoons  so  many  inquiries  for  in- 
formation concerning  the  western  country  were  addressed 
to  him^  that  he  decided  to  write  a  concise  and  accurate 
account  of  the  land  to  which  so  many  immigrants  were 
bound  and  over  which  the  Dragoons  had  made  their  march. 

Such  a  task  was  an  easy  undertaking  for  Lieutenant  Lea, 
since  he  had  secured  much  information  of  the  West  during 
his  travels  and  his  services  with  the  army.  The  demand, 
too,  for  a  book  of  this  kind  promised  to  be  large,  as  hun- 
dreds of  settlers  were  flocking  to  the  western  country.  Ac- 
cordingly, Lea  wrote  an  account  of  the  region  which  was 

9^  Early  Explorations  in  Iowa  in  the  Iowa  Historical  Becord^  Vol.  V,  No. 
4,  October,  1890,  p.  550. 

35  Lea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory^  the  prefaee. 


12    IOWA  JOXJRNAL  OP  HISTOBT  AND  POLITICS 

then  a  part  of  the  original  Territory  of  Wisconsin  and  lying 
west  of  the  Mississippi  Biver. 

When  this  was  finished  the  author  went  to  Washington, 
D.  C.J  where,  after  much  persuasion  he  managed  to  secure 
a  copy  of  the  map  which  has  been  described  above  and 
which  had  been  made  at  the  close  of  the  march  in  the  year 
1835.  The  map  and  manuscript  were  then  taken  to  Phila- 
delphia where  the  book  was  published.  Lea  later  described 
the  publication  of  this  valuable  book  in  this  manner : — '  ^  One 
thousand  copies  with  the  map  were  put  up  by  my  friend, 
H.  S.  Tanner,  to  whom  I  paid  thirty-seven  and  a  half  cents 
per  copy,  and  put  them  on  sale  at  a  dollar.  Being  quite 
ignorant  of  the  book  trade  I  assumed  the  sales  myself,  sent 
a  few  copies  by  mail,  and  five  hundred  in  a  trunk  as  freight 
to  Arthur  Bridgman  of  Burlington,  an  accomplished  mer- 
chant. The  last  I  heard  of  them  was  on  a  little  steamboat 
stranded  on  a  sandbank  in  the  Ohio."'®  The  book  indeed 
is  quite  rare,  and  less  than  a  score  of  copies  are  known  to  be 
in  existence.*^ 

The  book  is  small,  three  and  a  half  by  six  inches,  bound 
in  pale  blue  board  cover,  and  contains,  besides  a  map  of  the 
country  described,  forty-five  finely  printed  pages.  The  full 
title  of  this  interesting  little  contribution  is  Notes  On  The 
Wisconsin  Territory;  particularly  tvith  reference  to  the 
Iowa  District  or  Black  Hawk  Purchase.  It  was  written,  as 
the  author  declares  in  the  preface,  ^^to  place  within  the 
reach  of  the  public,  correct  information  in  regard  to  a  very 

86  Iowa  Historical  Becord,  Vol.  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  552. 

*T  A  partial  liat  of  the  owners  of  these  books  is  the  following:  L.  A.  Brewer, 
Cedar  Bapids;  T.  J.  I^tzpatriek,  Iowa  Citj;  Mr.  Blair,  Kossuth;  The  Masonic 
Library,  Cedar  Bapids;  The  Davenport  Academy  of  Science,  Davenport;  His- 
torical Department  of  Iowa,  Des  Moines;  State  Historical  Society,  Iowa  City; 
and  A.  N.  Harbert,  Cedar  Bapids. 

Mr.  Earl  Swem,  Assistant  State  Librarian  of  Bichmond,  Virginia,  can  fur- 
nish a  complete  list  of  the  owners  of  copies  of  this  book. 


LEA'S  CONTBIBUTIONS  TO  IOWA  HISTOBT        13 

interesting  portion  of  tiie  Western  Country '\*®  The  con- 
tentSy  too,  are  confined  to  subjects  which  would  interest  ''the 
emigrant,  the  speculator,  and  the  legislator."^  A  more 
complete  work  was  planned,  but  the  author  never  had  the 
inclination  nor  the  desire  to  finish  it.^ 

The  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory  consists  of  three 
general  chapters  or  divisions.  The  first  division  gives  a 
general  description  of  the  country ;  the  second  part  explains 
the  water  courses,  the  local  divisions,  and  the  form  of  gov- 
ernment ;  while  in  the  last  chaptelr  the  reader  finds  a  descrip- 
tion of  the  various  towns,  landings,  and  roads. 

The  country  to  which  the  author  limited  himself  was  a 
part  of  the  original  Territory  of  Wisconsin  which  he  chose 
to  call  the  **Iowa  District*' — a  strip  of  land  ** about  190 
miles  in  length,  50  miles  wide  near  each  end,  and  40  miles 
wide  near  the  middle  opposite  to  Bock  Island ;  and  would 
make  a  parallelogram  of  180  by  50  miles  equivalent  to  9000 
square  miles.  ''**  This  strip  of  country  had  been  practically 
unsettled  before  the  year  1832,  being  alternately  in  the  pos- 
session of  various  tribes  of  Indians,  but  chiefly  of  the  Sacs 
and  Foxes.  At  the  dose  of  the  Black  Hawk  War  in  1832  this 
country  was  obtained  from  the  Indians  and  the  date  of  the 
latter 's  removal  placed  at  June  1,  1833.  The  treaty  of 
cession  was  made  at  Davenport,  Oeneral  Scott  being  the 
chief  negotiator  on  the  part  of  the  United  States.^^  As  a 
result  the  ceded  area  was  popularly  known  as  ^^ Scott's  Pur- 
chase'' or,  later,  as  the  ** Black  Hawk  Purchase". 

The  treaty  was  barely  signed  when  several  families  and 
miners,  who  had  been  hovering  on  the  east  bank  of  the 

88  Lea 'b  Notes  on  Wiacomin  Territory,  the  preface. 

»»  Lea 's  N,otes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  the  preface. 

40 Lea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  the  preface. 

41  Lea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  Chap.  I,  p.  8. 

^3  Salter 'a  loiva:  The  First  Free  State  in  the  Louisiana  Purchase,  p.  155. 


14     IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Mississippi^  crossed  over  and  established  themselves  on  the 
choicest  parts  of  the  District;  but  these  people  ^^were  dis- 
possessed by  order  of  government '\**  Nevertheless  many 
white  families  remained  and  some  even  went  so  far  as  to 
put  in  crops.** 

The  climate  of  the  Iowa  District  is  first  described,  the  dif- 
ferent seasons  and  their  varying  aspects  beautifully  pic- 
tured. The  winds  were  of  especial  importance  in  the  opinion 
of  the  author,  being  as  fresh  and  bracing  as  the  sea-breezes 
and  very  much  less  chilling.  **The  prevailing  winds '^  he 
writes,  **are  from  the  southwest.  I  have  known  the  wind 
at  Bock  Island,  to  remain  constant  in  that  quarter  for  three 
weeks  successively '\**  The  salubriousness  of  the  climate 
was  variable  according  to  the  locality.  Lea  thought  that 
from  the  mouth  of  the  Des  Moines  until  the  great  bend  of 
the  Mississippi  was  reached  there  was  liable  to  be  much 
fever;  but  from  Bock  Island  northward  he  knew  of  no 
healthier  place  in  the  world. 

The  descriptions  of  the  various  seasons  furnish  one  of 
the  most  interesting  parts  of  the  book,  and  also  an  oppor- 
tunity for  comparison  with  the  seasons  of  the  present  day. 
As  a  proof  that  winter  is  not  changing  to  any  appreciable 
extent,  the  description  by  Lieutenant  Lea,  written  seventy- 
three  years  ago,  may  be  cited.  "Tfee  Winter' ',  he  declares, 
**is  generally  dry,  cold,  and  bracing;  the  waters  are  all 
bridged  with  ice;  the  snow  is  frequently  deep  enough  to 
afford  good  sleighing. '  '*® 

Spring  was  the  least  desirable  of  any  of  the  seasons,  being 
**a  succession  of  rains,  blows,  and  chills.'*  The  same  char- 
acteristics were  in  evidence  then  as  now,  for  Lea  writes 

4s  Lea's  Notes  on  Wiscoruin  Territory,  p.  8. 
^^Shambaogh'B  History  of  the  Constitutions  of  Iowa,  p.  38. 
MLea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  8. 
M Lea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  9. 


LEA'S  CONTRIBUTIONS  TO  IOWA  HISTORY        15 

that  ''We  have  no  gradual  gliding  from  cold  to  warm;  it  is 
snowy  —  then  stormy  —  then  balmy  and  delightful/'*^ 

Summer  was  a  season  in  which  all  the  conditions  were 
favorable  to  a  rapid  growth  of  vegetation.  The  appear- 
ance of  the  country  during  this  season  was  very  beautiful, 
as  all  the  grasses  and  flowers  grew  luxuriantly. 

Autumn,  however,  was  described  by  Lieutenant  Lea  as 
being  ''the  most  delightful  of  all  the  seasons  of  the  year." 
His  description  of  this  season,  written  in  1836,  would  apply 
to-day  with  equal  truthfulness.  "The  heat  of  the  summer 
is  over  by  the  middle  of  August ;  and  from  that  time  till  De- 
cember, we  have  almost  one  continuous  succession  of  bright 
clear  delightful  sunny  days.  Nothing  can  exceed  the  beauty 
of  Summer  and  Autumn  in  this  country,  where,  on  one  hand, 
we  have  the  expansive  prairie  strewed  with  flowers  still 
growing ;  and  on  the  other,  the  forests  which  skirt  it,  pre- 
senting all  the  varieties  of  colour  incident  to  the  fading 
foliage  of  a  thousand  different  trees.'**® 

The  soil  and  the  character  of  the  country  are  presented 
in  detail,  and  the  writer  gives  his  opinions  as  to  the  best 
crops  for  the  various  soils.  Indian  com,  he  believes,  was 
"peculiarly  adapted*'  to  the  low  lands  of  this  district. 

"The  general  appearance  of  the  country**,  declares  Lea, 
"is  one  of  great  beauty.  It  may  be  represented  as  one 
grand  rolling  prairie,  along  one  side  of  which  flows  the 
mightiest  river  in  the  world  and  through  which  numerous 
navigable  streams  pursue  their  devious  way  to  the  ocean*  *.*• 
Li  another  place  this  same  area  is  claimed  by  the  author  to 
be  superior,  all  things  considered,  to  any  other  part  of  the 
United  States.^^ 

47  Lea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  9. 
4sLea'8  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  10. 
^•Lea's  Notes  on  Wisamsin  Territory,  p.  11. 
BO  Lea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  12. 


16     IOWA  JOUENAL  OF  HISTOBY  AND  POLITICS 

The  distribution  of  timber,  water,  and  prairie  was  one  of 
the  unique  features  of  this  District.  The  beauty  of  the 
country  seemed  to  have  charmed  Lieutenant  Lea,  for  at  the 
dose  of  his  description  of  its  general  appearance  he  writes : 

Gould  I  present  to  the  mind  of  the  reader  that  view  of  this 
country  that  is  now  before  my  eyes,  he  would  not  deem  my  assertion 
unfounded.  He  would  see  the  broad  Mississippi  with  its  ten  thou* 
sand  islands,  flowing  gently  and  lingeringly  along  one  entire  side 
of  this  District,  as  if  in  regret  at  leaving  so  delightful  a  region ;  he 
would  see  half  a  dozen  navigable  rivers  taking  their  sources  in 
distant  regions,  and  gradually  accumulating  their  waters  as  they 
glide  steadily  along  through  this  favoured  region  to  pay  their 
tribute  to  the  great  "Father  of  Waters";  he  would  see  innumer- 
able creeks  and  rivulets  meandering  through  rich  pasturages,  where 
now  the  domestic  ox  has  taken  the  place  of  the  untamed  bison ;  he 
would  see  here  and  there  neat  groves  of  oak,  and  elm,  and  walnut, 
half  shading  half  concealing  beautiful  little  lakes  that  mirror  back 
their  waiving  branches ;  he  would  see  neat  looking  prairies  of  two 
or  three  miles  in  extent,  and  apparently  enclosed  by  woods  on  all 
sides,  and  along  the  borders  of  which  are  ranged  the  neat  hewed 
log  cabins  of  the  emigrants  with  their  fields  stretching  far  into  the 
prairies,  where  their  herds  are  luxuriating  on  the  native  grass; 
he  would  see  villages  springing  up,  as  by  magic,  along  the  banks 
of  the  rivers,  and  even  far  into  the  interior;  and  he  would  see  the 
swift  moving  steam-boats,  as  they  ply  up  and  down  the  Mississippi, 
to  supply  the  wants  of  the  settlers,  to  take  away  their  surplus  pro- 
duce, or  to  bring  an  accesion  to  this  growing  population,  anxious 
to  participate  in  the  enjoyment  of  nature's  bounties,  here  so  liber- 
ally dispensed.'^^ 

The  mineral  resources  were  described  as  abundant,  com- 
prising coal,  lead,  limestone,  zinc,  and  clay.  Lea  believed 
these  were  the  greatest  assets  of  the  country.  The  chief 
mineral  wealth  at  that  time,  however,  was  in  the  lead  indus- 
try which  was  in  a  thriving  condition  in  and  near  Dubuque. 
**Here'^  writes  Lea,  **are  capital,  western  enterprise,  for- 

BiLea's  Notes  on  WiicOMin  Territory,  p.  12. 


LEA'S  CONTRIBUTIONS  TO  IOWA  HISTORY        17 

eign  experiencOi  and  Yankee  ingenuity  combined ;  and  they 
have  brought  to  their  assistance  the  powers  of  both  water 
and  steam.  The  smelting  establishments  have  recently 
been  much  improved  and  are  now  conducted  with  scientific 
acoaracy,  yielding  seventy  or  eighty  per  cent  of  lead  from 
the  native  snlphuref^* 

The  larger  game  was  rapidly  beginning  to  disappear 
when  this  book  was  written,  but  the  writer  mentions  deer, 
< < some  bear' '9  and  buffalo.  The  wild  turkey,  grouse  and  the 
wild  duck  were  the  most  numerous  of  the  wild  fowls ;  and 
fish  of  all  varieties  were  found  in  the  numerous  rivers. 
Spearing  the  fish  in  the  rapids  was  a  favorite  sport  and 
large  strings  of  pike,  pickerel,  catfish,  and  trout  were  to  be 
had. 

Agricultural  products,  being  least  in  importance  at  this 
time,  are  only  briefly  mentioned.  The  chief  product  then, 
as  now,  was  com  or  maize,  of  which  the  yellow  varieties 
were  considered  the  most  certain  and  produced  from  forty 
to  seventy-five  bushels  per  acre.  Wheat  and  oats  were  very 
easily  grown,  the  latter  usually  yielding  from  '^  sixty  to 
seventy-five  bushels  per  acre.'*^'  Potatoes,  too,  were  one 
of  the  most  important  crops  of  the  period.  The  stock-rais- 
ing industry  was  still  unknown,  and  Lea  predicted  that 
'^The  growing  of  stock  of  various  kinds  will  doubtless  be 
extensively  pursued,  as  few  countries  afford  more  facilities 
for  such  purposes'"^* —  a  prophecy  which  has  been  abun- 
dantly fulfilled. 

Lea  estimated  that  the  population  in  1835  was  sixteen 
thousand,  representing  every  State  in  the  Union.  No 
higher  compliment  could  have  been  paid  them  than  the  one 
given  in  the  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory.    **The  char- 

sa  Lea's  Note*  on  Wiaoontin  Territory,  p.  41. 
58  Lea's  Notee  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  13. 
64  Lea '8  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  13. 

YOL.  IX— 2 


18     IOWA  JOUENAL  OP  HISTOBT  AND  POLITICS 

acter  of  this  population  is  such",  says  the  author,  ^^as  is 
rarely  found  in  our  newly  acquired  Territories.  With  very 
few  exceptions  there  is  not  a  more  orderly,  industrious,  ac- 
tive, painstaking  population  west  of  the  Alleghanies,  than  is 
this  in  the  Iowa  District.  .  .  .  For  intelligence,  I  boldly 
assert  that  they  are  not  surpassed,  as  a  body,  by  an  equal 
number  of  citizens  of  any  country  in  the  world* \'*^  Even 
in  the  mining  camps  very  little  disorder  was  found,  and 
**the  District  is  forever  free  from  slavery''*^ — a  condition 
which  was  a  blessing  in  the  judgment  of  the  author. 

**The  trade  of  the  District '^  writes  Lea,  **is  confined  al- 
most entirely  to  the  grand  thorough-fare  of  theMississippi'^ 
There  were  ten  or  twelve  steamboats  which  carried  the  lead 
and  farm  products  to  St.  Louis,  which  was  the  only  market 
of  any  importance.  It  took  three  or  four  days  for  one  of 
these  boats  to  run  from  St.  Louis  to  the  Lead  Mines  and  as 
a  consequence  there  was  a  boat  each  way  daily.  The  rail- 
road was  several  hundred  miles  from  Iowa  at  this  time  but 
we  are  told  that  a  railroad  was  being  pushed  westward  from 
New  York  along  ^^the  southern  shore  of  Lake  Erie''  to  Chi- 
cago and  thence  to  the  Mississippi.  ^'This  work'',  writes 
Lea,  ^^  would  place  the  center  of  the  Iowa  District  within 
sixty  hours  of  the  city  of  New  York ;  and  if  any  of  the  *  down- 
easters'  think  this  project  chimerical,  let  them  take  a  tour 
of  a  few  weeks  to  the  Upper  Mississippi,  and  they  will 
agree  with  me,  that  it  is  already  demanded  by  the  interests 
of  the  country. '"^^ 

To  the  student  of  Iowa  history  the  Notes  on  Wisconsin 
Territory  is  also  interesting  since  it  gives  the  first  unofficial 
account  of  the  organization  of  the  District,  which  in  1835 
was  composed  of  the  two  counties  of  Dubuque  and  Demoine. 

SB  Lea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  14. 
66  Lea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  14. 
BT  Lea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  17. 


LEA'S  CONTRIBUTIONS  TO  IOWA  HISTOBY        19 

At  the  time  of  the  writing  of  the  book  the  government  of 
the  District  was  in  disorder.  The  Territory  of  Michigan 
had  assumed  the  form  of  a  State  government ;  and  the  Ter- 
ritory of  Wisconsin,  to  which  the  Iowa  District  was  later 
attached,  was  not  yet  formed.  The  Claim  Association, 
too,^  which  was  an  extra-legal  institution,  is  described  by 
the  author  as  an  organization  made  by  the  people  of  the 
District  who  ''have  entered  into  an  agreement  to  support 
each  other  in  their  claims  against  any  unjust  action  of  the 
government  or  against  any  attempt  at  improper  speculation 
by  capitalists  at  a  distance.  And  those  who  know  the  po- 
tency of  such  leagues  will  feel  perfectly  assured,  that  what- 
ever is  protected  by  this  one,  will  be  safe  from  molesta- 
tion.''~ 

Decidedly  the  most  interesting  part  of  the  first  chapter, 
as  well  as  of  the  whole  book,  is  the  references  made  to  the 
name  ''Iowa".  It  is  now  agreed  that  it  was  the  publica- 
tion of  this  book  which  brought  the  name  "Iowa"  into  gen- 
eral use.  One  prominent  writer  precisely  summarizes  this 
opinion  in  the  statement:  "It  cannot  of  course  be  said  with 
absolute  certainty  that  the  name  'Iowa  District'  was  used 
for  the  first  time  in  this  book.  On  the  contrary  it  is  alto- 
gether probable  that  this  was  not  the  case.  But  since  the 
name  was  fixed  and  made  generally  prevalent  through  the 
publication  of  Lieutenant  Lea 's  book  and  map,  it  is  proper 
and  accurate  to  say  that  Lieutenant  Lea  is  the  father  of  the 
expression  'Iowa  District'  ".•^ 

The  manner  in  which  Lea  came  by  the  name  "Iowa"  is^ 
given  in  the  book  itself.    The  name  was  not  taken,  as  some 

B8  For  a  full  account  of  the  daim  Aisociation  see  Shambaugh  *b  Claim  Assih 
eiaiion  of  Johnson  County;  and  also  Shambaugh 'a  History  of  the  Constitutions 
of  Iowa. 

89  Lea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  18. 

^See  article  by  Benjamin  F.  Shambaugh  in  Annais  of  Iowa,  Third  Series^ 
VoL  m,  p.  641. 


20     IOWA  JOTJBNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

have  claimedy  from  Iowa  County  in  Wisconsin.  On  this 
point  Lieiitenant  Lea  tells  us  that  ^'the  District  under  re- 
view has  been  often  called  'Scott's  Purchase',  and  it  is 
sometimes  called  the  'Black  Hawk  Purchase',  but  from  the 
extent  and  beauty  of  the  Iowa  Biver  which  runs  centrally 
through  the  District,  and  gives  character  to  most  of  it,  the 
name  of  that  stream  being  both  euphonious  and  appropriate 
has  been  given  to  the  District  itself  ".^^ 

The  name  as  applied  to  the  river  was  spelled  ''loway"** 
and  extends  back  a  hundred  years  or  more  when  the  French 
spelled  it  ''Aouway".  In  later  years,  after  the  State  was 
formed.  Lieutenant  Lea  tried  to  have  the  spelling  changed 
to  **Ioway",  which  as  he  declares  '*it  ought  to  have  been",** 

His  descriptions  of  the  waterways  furnish  the  student 
with  much  valuable  information,  as  most  of  the  streams  have 
the  same  names  as  in  1835,  very  few  having  been  changed 
since  fhen.  The  Skunk  Biver,  however,  bore  at  that  time 
the  more  dignified  name  of  Chicaqua,*^  and  the  Iowa  was 
oftentimes  known  as  the  Bison  or  Buffalo.^ 

The  Mississippi  is  given  the  most  attention  as  that  river 
was  the  great  thoroughfare  of  the  period.  Next  in  impor- 
tance is  the  Des  Moines  Biver  and  its  tributaries,  which  are 
also  described  in  detail.  The  various  bends,  rapids,  and 
fording  places  are  outlined,  and  any  deposits  of  minerals 
or  stone  are  also  mentioned.  The  contiguous  lands  and 
their  value  for  future  settlement  are  described  and  esti- 
mated. 

The  Iowa  Biver  was  the  favorite  of  Lieutenant  Lea  and  he 

61  Lea 'e  Notes  en  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  8. 

u  Annals  of  Iowa,  Third  Series,  Vol.  Ill,  p.  641. 

M  Letter  of  A.  M.  Lea  to  Editor  H.  G.  Day  of  Albert  Lea,  Minnesota,  dated 
January  1,  1890. —  In  collection  of  Mr.  A.  N.  Harbert  of  Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa. 

<*See  the  map  in  Lea's  Notes  ot^  Wisconsin  Territory, 

•sSee  the  map  in  Lea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory, 


LEA'S  CONTEroUTIONS  TO  IOWA  HISTOBY        21 

• 

never  mentions  it  without  becoming  enthusiastic.  He  de- 
darei?  ''it  presents  to  the  imagination  the  finest  picture  on 
earth."  Other  rivers  which  the  writer  describes  are  the 
*'Pine",  the  **Wabesapinica",  the  *' Great  Mequoquetoia", 
the  **Tetes  des  Morts",  and  the  **Penaca  or  Turkey  river". 
Other  small  creeks  and  sloughs  are  also  mentionedi  which 
had  no  importance  except  as  landmarks. 

Two  tracts  of  land  which  were  the  subjects  of  much  spec- 
ulation are  discussed  by  Lea.  The  first  of  these  is  the 
''Half -Breed  Tract ",  a  portion  of  land  lying  in  the  angle 
between  the  Des  Moines  and  the  Mississippi  rivers.    The 

» 

history  of  this  tract  is  related  from  the  time  of  the  treaty 
of  1824  with  the  Sauk  and  Fox  Indians.  Not  only  is  the  soil 
of  this  tract  described,  but  the  various  small  streams  are 
mentioned,  the  conditions  of  its  inhabitants  explained,  and 
the  validity  of  the  land  titles  discussed. 

The  second  tract  is  that  strip  of  land  known  as  ''The 
IndianEeserve'Nor-Keokak'sEeserve".  This  comprised 
a  strip  of  land  along  the  Iowa  Biver  containing  four  him- 
dred  square  miles.  At  this  time  the  Indians  had  removed 
in  large  numbers  and  the  whites  were  eagerly  awaiting  a 
chance  to  seize  upon  some  of  the  choicest  parts  of  the  Dis- 
trict. 

The  descriptions  of  the  towns  are  of  exceeding  interest, 
since  the  struggling  little  villages  of  that  day  are  now  in 
'  many  instances  thriving  cities ;  while  in  other  cases  no  rem- 
nant remains  of  what  promised  to  be  prosperous  and  weal- 
thy  communities.  Keokuk  was  a  town  which  derived  its 
chief  importance  from  the  rapids  in  the  Mississippi,  for  all 
boats  were  forced  to  stop  and  change  their  f reight.^^  The 
town  lots  were  held  in  common  by  the  owners  of  the  "Half- 
Breed  Tract". 

MLea's  Notes  on  Wiseontin  Territory p  p.  35. 


22     IOWA  JOUBNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Fort  Des  Moines,  now  no  longer  in  existence,  was  then  an 
important  place/^  A  good  landing  was  located  here,  and 
much  fine  farming  country  was  close  hj.  A  legend  claimed 
that  this  was  the  location  of  an  old  French  settlement ;  and 
some  remains  of  such  a  settlement  were  to  be  found. 

Madison  (Fort  Madison)  was  located  upon  the  site  of  old 
Fort  Madison,  which  had  been  burned  during  the  War  of 
1812.  This  town  had  been  laid  out  in  1835  and  gave  great 
promise  of  growth.** 

Burlington  was  a  town  of  four  hundred  inhabitants  and 
was  beginning  to  boom.  Lots  were  being  bought  and  sold 
with  remarkable  briskness,  and  the  town  impressed  one  as 
a  rich  business  center.** 

lowa,^*  **a  town  to  be  laid  out*^  and  located  at  the  great 
bend  of  the  Mississippi,  between  Davenport  and  Muscatine, 
is  mentioned  as  the  future  metropolis  of  the  District.*^^ 
'' Should  the  seat  of  Government  of  the  future  State  of  Iowa 
be  located  on  the  Mississippi,  it  would  probably  be  fixed  at 
Iowa.  •  .  •  And  if  it  be  located  in  the  interior,  it  must  be 
near  the  Iowa  river".  This  proved  to  be  the  case,  as  the 
seat  of  government  was  located  at  Iowa  City.*^* 

Considerable  attention  is  given  to  Davenport,  ^^a  town 

•T  Lea's  Noiei  on  Wiseantin  Territory,  p.  35. 
M Lea's  Notei  on  Wiieantin  Territory,  p.  85. 
••Lea's  Notee  on  Wiseonein  Territory,  p.  36. 

TO  Lea's  Notee  on  Wieeonein  Territory,  p.  37. 

Lieatenant  Lea  had  booght  a  large  strip  of  land  at  the  mouth  of  the  Pine 
Biyer  and  had  platted  the  District.  Later  he  organised  a  ferry  and  immigra- 
tion companj,  but  laeked  the  necessary  capital  to  carry  his  project  through. 
A  letter  written  by  Lieatenant  Lea's  daughter,  Lida  L.  Lea,  on  January  5, 
1904,  says:  ''He  [A.  M.  Lea]  had  some  'frild  lands'  for  which  he  refused 
$30,000  and  afterwards  forgot  —  in  other  business  enterprises, —  and  allowed 
to  be  sold  for  the  taxes". — See  Aete  of  the  Territorial  Assembly  of  Iowa 
for  1840-1841  for  the  Articles  of  Incorporation,  Chapter  63. 

Ti  Lea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  pp.  37,  38. 

TSThis  forecast  is  typical  of  those  made  by  Lea  and  shows  the  aeeuraey 
and  eaxe  usually  e]diibited  in  his  writings. 


LEA'S  CONTRIBUTIONS  TO  IOWA  HISTOBY        23 

just  laid  out  on  a  reserve  belonging  to  Antoine  Ledaire^'J* 
The  most  interesting  part  of  the  description  of  this  town 
has  historical  significance  in  regard  to  the  location  of  the 
capital  city.  "The  town'^  says  Lea,  *'is  laid  out  on  a  lib- 
eral scale,  with  a  view  to  its  becoming  a  large  city.  Three 
public  squares  have  been  reserved  from  sale,  one  of  which, 
it  is  supposed  by  the  proprietors,  will  be  occupied  by  the 
public  buildings  of  the  future  State  of  Iowa ;  for  they  con- 
fidently predict  that  the  seat  of  Government  of  this  forth- 
coming commonwealth  will  be  no  other  than  the  dty  of 
Davenport  itself.   Noim  verrons*^'^^ 

Dubuque  (or  Du  Buque  as  it  was  then  spelled)  was  the 
most  prosperous  of  any  of  these  towns  ;''^  for  besides  a 
population  of  over  1200  it  had  twenty-five  dry  goods  stores, 
numerous  groceries,  four  taverns,  a  court  house,  a  jail,  and 
three  churches.  It  was  claimed  that  the  art  of  mining  was 
''more  skilfully  practised  at  these  mines  than  in  any  other 
part  of  the  world 'V* 

Many  other  towns  are  mentioned  which  have  long  since 
ceased  to  exist.  Among  this  class  of  towns  was  Catfish,  a 
small  town  laid  out  in  1832  in  the  region  of  the  mines  south 
of  Dubuque. 

Biprow  was  another  small  town  of  which  Lieutenant  Lea 
declared  ''here  are  some  of  the  finest  smelting  establish- 
ments in  the  world." 

Easey's,  a  town  to  be  laid  out  by  a  gentleman  bearing 
that  name,  was  on  the  present  site  of  the  city  of  Muscatine. 
As  this  was  close  to  the  town  of  Iowa,  in  which  Lea  was  in- 
terested, the  town  of  Easey^s  was  not  given  a  very  allur- 
ing write-up. 

Ts Lea's  Notei  on  Wi$oanain  Territory,  p.  39. 

T4Lea'8  Notes  on  Wisconein  Territory,  p.  39. 

TsLea'8  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  41. 

Tt  Lea's  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory,  p.  41. 


24     IOWA  JOUBNAL  OP  mSTOBY  AND  POLITICS 

THE  MAP  OF  THE  IOWA  DI8TBICT 

In  connection  with  the  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory  is  a 
map  of  the  District  of  which  mention  has  already  been 
made ;  and  this  was  one  of  the  two  maps  of  the  Iowa  conn- 
try  drawn  by  lieutenant  Lea.  It  is  '^a  Map  of  Wisconsin 
Territory,  compiled  from  Tanner's  map  of  United  States, 
from  snrveys  of  pnblic  lands  and  Indian  boundaries,  from 
personal  reconnoissance  and  from  original  information  de- 
rived from  explorers  and  traders ''J^  Among  the  latter  was 
Captain  Nathan  Boone,  a  son  of  the  famous  Daniel  Boone 
and  an  intimate  friend  of  Lieutenant  Lea J^  It  was  largely 
through  Boone's  aid  that  Lea  secured  the  information  con- 
cerning the  river  courses  and  the  Indian  lands  which  made 
the  map  one  of  the  most  accurate  of  the  period  J^ 

The  map  is  interesting,  in  the  first  place,  from  a  mechan- 
ical standpoint.  It  is  small,  about  16  by  22  inches,  and 
very  finely  drawn.  The  coloring  is  excellently  done  in 
bright  shades^  and  the  engraving  is  perfect  Upon  it  we  see 
some  of  the  roads  then  in  existence,  all  the  towns,  and  a 
few  of  the  winding  Indian  trails.  We  can  also  see  the 
streams  with  their  old-time  spelling  —  although  most  of  the 
rivers  bear  the  same  names  as  at  present. 

TTLea  had  not  traveled  over  wertem  Iowa,  which  at  that  time  had  never 
been  explored,  and  it  waa  necessary  to  use  the  information  of  trappers  and 
traders. 

TB  Nathan  Boone  was  Captain  of  Company  H  of  the  First  United  Btates 
Dragoons.  In  1832  he  had  surveyed  the  Neutral  Strip,  a  tract  of  land  forty 
miles  wide  which  divided  the  Sioux  and  the  Sac  and  Fox  tribes  of  Indians. — 
AnnaU  of  lava.  Third  Series,  Vol.  VII,  p.  436. 

70  Other  maps  of  this  District  during  this  period  are  John  Plumbe's  and 
J.  H.  Colton's  maps  of  1839;  J.  H.  Colton's  and  Jesse  Williams'  maps  of 
1840;  Newhall'e  map  of  1841;  Willard  Barrow's  map  of  1845.— See  The 
Iowa  Joubnal  of  Bibtoby  and  Poutics,  Vol.  I,  p.  82. 

so  The  coloring  of  the  early  maps  was  in  very  bright  shades  and  their  lasting 
qualities  were  very  great. 


LEA'S  CONTRIBUTIONS  TO  IOWA  HISTOBY       25 

One  of  the  most  interesting  features  of  the  map  is  the 
route  taken  by  the  Dragoons  in  1835.^^  This  is  very  clearly 
shown,  with  the  camping  places,  the  distances  covered  daily, 
and  any  peculiar  geographical  formations  plainly  marked. 
Among  the  latter  is  a  high  mound  located  a  short  distance 
below  the  present  city  of  Boone.^'  A  large  part  of  the  pres- 
ent States  of  Missouri,  Illinois,  Wisconsin,  and  Minnesota 
is  also  outlined.  The  completeness,  the  accuracy,  and  the 
simplicity  of  the  map  caused  it  to  be  generally  used  both 
by  the  government^*  and  by  individuals. 

THB  BEPOBT  ON  THB  lOWA-MISSOUBI  BOUNDABY 

Next  in  importance  to  the  Notes  on  Wisconsin  Territory 
as  a  contribution  to  the  literature  of  Iowa  history  is  the 
report  made  by  Lieutenant  Lea  as  United  States  Commis- 
sioner to  locate  the  Iowa-Missouri  boundary.  When  the 
Territory  of  Iowa  was  created  by  an  act  of  Congress  on 
June  12,  1838,^  a  controversy  with  the  State  of  Missouri 
had  already  arisen  concerning  the  boundaries  of  the  two 
jurisdictions.  Accordingly,  on  the  18th  of  June  Congress 
passed  an  act  which  empowered  the  President  of  the  United 
States  to  cause  the  southern  boundary  of  Iowa  to  be  ascer- 
tained and  marked.^^  This  act  provided  for  the  appointment 
of  a  commissioner  who  should  work  with  a  commissioner 
from  the  Territory  of  Iowa  and  one  from  the  State  of 
Missouri.  Following  the  provisions  of  this  law.  President 
Van  Buren  appointed  Lieutenant  Lea  as  Commissioner  for 

SI  Thii  route  eovered  over  1100  miles. — See  Iowa  Historiedl  Beeord,  VoL  VI, 
No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  535. 

S'See  note  18  above. 

M  Iowa  Historiedl  Beeord^  VoL  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  550.    cf .  note  92. 

M  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  VoL  V,  p.  235. 

M  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  VoL  V.  p.  248. 


26     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTOBY  AND  POLITICS 

the  United  States  ;*•  and  Governor  Lucas  appointed  Dr, 
James  Davis.®^  But  Governor  Boggs  of  Missouri  failed 
to  appoint  a  man  to  represent  Ms  State. 

Aft  soon  as  Lieutenant  Lea  received  his  appointment  lie 
hastened  to  St.  Louis,  arriving  there  on  September  1, 1838.** 
After  securing  the  necessary  amoimt  of  help  and  instru- 
ments he  came  north  to  Keokuk,  and  there  he  met  the  Iowa 
commissioner.  These  two  spent  most  of  the  winter  in  ex- 
amining and  surveying  the  country,  and  in  going  over  the 
various  documents  connected  with  the  history  of  the  con- 
troversy.** Finally,  on  the  19th  of  January,  1839,  Lieuten- 
ant Lea  submitted  his  report  to  the  General  Land  Office. 
It  was  printed  as  an  Executive  Document  and  used  exten- 
sively in  the  debates  in  Congress.*^ 

This  report  is  remarkable  in  many  respects,  and  for  some 
years  was  the  most  important  and  most  widely  known  work 
of  Lieutenant  Lea.  It  is  concise,  gives  a  full  and  accurate 
history  of  the  land  in  dispute,  and  states  clearly  the  issues 
which  Congress  must  decide. 

After  an  introduction  outlining  the  work  done  by  the  com- 
missioners, a  history  of  the  tract  in  dispute  is  given.*^    It 

—  SxeouHve  Doewmenti,  House  Doeament  No.  88,  Third  Seiiion,  27tli  Con- 
gntt,  p.  6;  alto  One's  HiMtory  of  lawa,  Vol.  I,  p.  176. 

■T  One's  BUiwrff  of  Iowa,  VoL  I,  p.  176. 

-  Iowa  Eiftoriedl  Beeord,  VoL  VIH,  No.  1,  January,  1892,  p.  204. 

M  Among  these  doenments  maj  be  noted  the  following:  Act  creating  State 
of  Missouri;  Act  creating  Territory  of  Missouri;  several  important  letters; 
eopies  of  a  Spanish  Land  Grant.  The  latter  is  a  eopj  of  one  of  the  four  land 
grants  made  bj  the  Spanish  Government  from  territory  now  witiiin  the  limita 
of  the  State  of  Iowa.    It  is  signed  by  the  G<yvemor,  Zenon  Trudeau,  and  reads: 

'<St.  Louis^  le  30  Mars,  1799. 

'^n  est  permis  k  Mr.  Louis  Honor6  d  s'^tablir  an  haut  du  rapide  de  la  rividre 
Des  Moines." 

•0  See  files  of  the  C<mgre99i<mdl  Olobe  for  thia  period,  1838-1848. 

•1  Bepart  <m  the  lowa-Miisowri  Boundary  in  the  Iowa  Eistoriodl  Beoord^  VoL 
n,  No.  1,  January,  1886,  p.  193. 


LEA'S  CONTRIBUTIONS  TO  IOWA  mSTOBY        27 

relates  how  in  1808  the  Osage  Indians  ceded  this  land,  com- 
prising the  northern  part  of  Missouri,  to  the  United  States 
government.  A  few  years  later,  in  1816,  Colonel  John  C. 
Snllivan  surveyed  these  lands  and  ran  a  line  which  was 
commonly  considered  the  northern  boundary  of  Missouri. 
This  line  started  at  the  "Old  Northwest  Comer",  a  point 
one  hundred  miles  due  north  of  the  mouth  of  the  Kansas 
Biver,  and  was  supposed  to  run  due  east  to  the  ''Des 
Moines  Bapids''.  But  owing  to  carelessness  in  correcting 
the  needle,  the  line  run  by  Colonel  Sullivan  was  two  and 
one-half  degrees  north  of  east  when  the  Des  Moines  Biver 
was  reached.®' 

Four  years  later,  in  1820  when  the  people  of  Missouri 
formed  a  State,  they  used  the  words  "to  correspond  with 
the  Indian  boundary  line''**  in  their  petition  to  Congress; 
and  thus  the  dispute  arose.  Missouri  claimed  that  the  ''Des 
Moines  Bapids ' '  were  in  the  Biver  Des  Moines,  while  Iowa 
claimed  that  the  phrase  referred  to  those  rapids  above  Keo- 
kuk in  the  Mississippi  or  ''Les  rapids  de  la  riviere  Des 
Moines''  of  the  French  period. 

Four  lines  at  once  presented  themselves  for  the  considera- 
tion of  the  commissioners;  and  these  were  carefully  ex- 
amined. First,  there  was  the  old  Indian  boundary  or  Sulli- 
van's line  which  extended  west  to  the  Missouri  Biver.  Sec- 
ond, there  was  the  parallel  of  latitude  passing  through  the 
Old  Northwest  Comer  of  the  Indian  boundary.  Third,  there 
was  the  parallel  of  latitude  passing  through  the  Des  Moines 
rapids  in  the  Mississippi.  And  fourth,  there  was  the  paral- 
lel of  latitude  passing  through  the  rapids  in  the  Des  Moines 
Biver  at  the  Great  Bend,  near  the  present  site  of  Keosauqua. 

•s  Bepofi  on  the  lowa-Miisouri  Boundary  in  the  Iowa  Historiedl  Beoard^  VoL 
H,  No.  1,  January,  1886,  p.  194. 
•a  United  Statet  Statutes  at  Large,  VoL  m,  p.  546. 


28     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTOBY  AND  POLITICS 

The  first  line  appeared  to  be  the  just  one  and  the  line 
commonly  nsed;  bnt  it  did  not  conform  to  the  law,  which 
called  for  a  ''parallel  of  latitude''.**  And  thongh  the  other 
three  lines  were  parallels  of  latitude,  yet  they  failed  to  pass 
through  the  required  rapids  or  the  Old  Northwest  Comer. 
Lieutenant  Lea  concluded  that  the  old  Lidian  boundary,  or 
Sullivan's  line,  *4s  the  equitable  and  proper  northern 
boundary  of  the  State  of  Missouri;  but  that  the  terms  of 
the  law  do  not  allow  the  Commissioner  to  adopt  that  line."*^ 

This  report  on  the  Missouri-Iowa  boundary  caused  much 
discussion  in  Congress.  The  committee  to  which  it  was  re- 
ferred was  unable  to  settle  the  question,  and  for  a  period 
lasting  over  ten  years  it  was  a  subject  of  much  debate  in 
both  houses.  Congress  at  last  found  itself  unable  to  settle 
the  question  and  the  case  was  taken  to  the  United  States 
Supreme  Court,  where  the  opinions  and  sound  judgment  of 
Lea,  as  exhibited  in  the  report,  were  affirmed  by  the  deci- 
sion*^ handed  down  by  Mr.  Justice  Catron,  who  said  in  part : 
**This  court  doth  therefore  see  proper  to  decree,  and  accord- 
ingly order,  adjudge,  and  decree,  that  the  true  and  northern 
boundary  line  of  the  State  of  Missouri  and  the  true  southern 
line  of  the  State  of  Iowa,  is  the  line  run  and  marked  in 
1816  by  John  C.  SuUivan^.^^ 

A  map  of  the  Iowa  country  accompanies  the  report  and 
is  the  second  drawn  of  this  section  by  Lieutenant  Lea.*^  It 
is  large,  about  24  by  36  inches  in  size,  and  shows  northern 
Missouri  and  the  lower  one-third  of  Iowa.  The  most  in- 
teresting features  of  the  map  are  the  different  lines  which 

94  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  VoL  III,  p.  545. 

9^  Executive  DooumentSt  House  Document  No.  38,  3rd  Session,  27th  Con- 
gress.   Also  Iowa  Bistoricat  Becord,  Vol.  II,  No.  1,  January,  1886,  p.  193. 
—  Found  in  7  Howard  660. 
97  7  Howard  679. 
9t  Executive  Documents,  House  Document  No.  38,  3rd  Session,  27th  Con- 


LBA'S  CONTRIBUTIONS  TO  IOWA  HISTORY        29 

were  in  dispute.  These  lines  are  so  drawn  that  the  issues 
present  themselves  without  a  word  of  explanation.  The  map 
is  decidedly  superior  to  the  one  which  is  found  in  the  Notes 
m  Wisconsin  Territory  in  that  it  is  more  accurately  drawn, 
the  rivers,  too,  having  their  permanent  names  by  this  time. 

OTHEB   GOKTBIBXTTIONS 

Those  already  mentioned  comprise  the  most  important 
contributions  of  Albert  Miller  Lea  to  the  literature  of  Iowa 
history ;  but  there  are  some  other  writings  of  lesser  impor- 
tance which  should  be  noticed.  Among  these  lesser  contribu- 
tions the  most  important  is  the  autobiography  of  Lieutenant 
Lea*^  which  was  published  in  the  Iowa  Historical  Record. 
This  contribution  explains  some  of  the  conditions  which  ex- 
isted at  the  time  of  Lea's  work  in  Iowa  and  gives  a  graphic 
account  of  Iowa  pioneer  life.^^  An  article  of  nearly  the 
same  importance  is  also  found  in  the  same  publication  and 
is  entitled  Early  Explorations  in  lowa}^^  This  gives  in  a 
conversational  manner  the  story  of  the  march  of  the  Dra- 
goons in  1835y  and  is  considered  by  most  students  as  the 
best  account  of  the  march  ever  written.*®' 

MA  longer  antobiographj  was  prepared  bj  Lientenmnt  Lea  for  the  Minne- 
lota  Historical  Societj  and  published  by  the  Albert  Lea,  Minnesota,  Freehofn 
CMAty  Standard,  on  Mareh  13,  1879. 

100  loMKL  Histaricdl  Beeord,  VoL  VIII,  No.  1,  January,  1892,  p.  200. 

101  Iowa  Higtariedl  Beoard,  VoL  VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  535. 

in  A  Journal.  An  important  and  very  valuable  document  came  to  light  in 
the  aatumn  of  1908  at  Madrid,  Iowa,  where  it  was  claimed  that  Albert  M.  Lea 
WM  the  author.  The  title  of  the  document  was  the  '' Journal  of  different 
Harehes  Made  by  the  Dragoons  in  the  years  1834  and  6  with  some  remarks''. 
Itwu  in  a  faded  handwriting,  signed  "L — '',  and  agreed  so  perfectly  with 
tbe  known  facts  that  very  few  questioned  its  authorship  by  Lieutenant  Lea. 
Bat  upon  close  examination  of  the  manuscript  many  features  came  to  light 
vliieh  proved  beyond  a  doubt  that  it  was  not  written  by  the  gifted  Lieutenant. 
In  the  first  place,  the  journal  of  1834,  which  describes  day  by  day  the  mareh 
of  the  Dragoons  into  the  Pawnee  country,  could  not  possibly  have  been  written 


30     IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTOBY  AND  POLITICS 

In  1890  Lieutenant  Lea  wrote  a  series  of  articles  for  a 
paper^^'  published  in  Albert  Lea,  Minnesota,  which  deal  not 
only  with  the  early  history  of  Iowa,  but  also  relate  to  the 
Civil  War  and  to  incidents  in  the  life  of  the  author.^^^  Some 

l^  Lea  for  he  did  not  join  that  regiment  until  its  return  to  Fort  Gibson  in 
the  autumn  of  1834. 

The  Journal  of  1835,  moreover,  was  not  written  l^  Lieutenant  Lea,  for  it 
gives  a  daily  account  of  the  marches  from  the  Baccoon  Forks  to  Fort  Des 
Moines  No.  1.  Since  Lieutenant  Lea  covered  this  distance  in  a  canoe  upon 
the  Bes  Moines  Blver,  and  was  not  with  the  troops  over  that  portion  of  the 
march,  it  was  an  impossibility  for  him  to  keep  such  a  record. 

There  are  also  other  evidences  in  the  body  of  the  text  to  prove  that  it  did 
not  owe  its  authorship  to  Lieutenant  Lea.  Nor  is  external  evidence  lacking  to 
prove  this  statement;  for  the  handwriting,  the  rhetoric,  the  orders  of  the  com- 
manding officers,  all  go  to  show  that  Albert  M  Lea  did  not  write  these  journals. 

However,  the  fact  that  they  were  written  by  an  unknown  man,  who  signed 
himself  **h — "  does  not  in  the  least  lessen  their  value.  They  compare  accu- 
rately with  the  known  and  reliable  sources  concerning  the  march,  such  as  the 
map  in  the  Notes  an  Wiscomin  Territory  and  the  account  given  by  Lea  in  a 
magaaine  article.  In  fact  they  touch  upon  phases  overlooked  by  Lieutenant  Lea 
himself  and  must  bo  considered  as  a  valuable  addition  to  the  literature  of  the 
early  history  of  Iowa. 

The  Jowmai  has  been  edited  by  Louis  Pehser  and  published  in  fuU  in  the 
July,  1909,  number  of  Thi  Iowa  Joubnal  of  Hi8T<»y  and  Politics. 

Lieutenant  Lea  has  described  hia  trip  from  the  present  site  of  Bes  Moines 
to  Fort  Bes  Moines  No.  1,  in  the  Iowa  Hittorieal  Record,  VoL  VI,  No.  4, 
October,  1890,  p.  550,  in  these  words:  "The  next  morning,  a  bright  Sunday, 
I  got  orders  to  reconnoitre  the  Des  Moines  river,  by  descending  it  in  a  canoe, 
to  ascertain  the  practicability  of  navigation  with  keel  boats,  with  a  view  to 
the  establishment  of  a  military  port.  A  goodly  cottonwood  was  selected,  my 
men  set  to  work  with  a  will,  and  at  sunrise  Tuesday  I  bade  adieu  to  the  camp, 
and  aided  by  a  soldier  and  an  Indian,  started  on  my  toilsome  task,  sounding 
all  shoals,  taking  courses  with  a  i>ocket  compass,  estimating  distances  from 
bend  to  bend  by  the  time  and  rate  of  motion,  sketching  every  notable  thing, 
occasionally  landing  to  examine  the  geology  of  the  rocks,  and  sleeping  in  the 
sand  despite  the  gnats  and  mosquitoes.  We  made  the  trip  without  an  accident, 
and  leaving  our  canoe  with  Capt.  White  at  the  trading  house,  we  footed  it 
to  the  fort,  where  we  arrived  many  days  before  the  main  body,  who  returned 
leisurely  by  land,  and  arrived  in  fine  order,  without  the  loss  of  a  man,  a 
horse,  a  tool,  or  a  beef,  which  were  fatter  than  at  the  starting,  after  a  march 
of  eleven  hundred  miles.'' 

108  Freeborn  County  Standard,  Albert  Lea,  Minnesota,  edited  by  H.  G.  Day. 

104 Lea  was  an  intimate  friend  of  President  Jefferson  Davis;  and  he  claimed 
relationship  to  General  Bobert  E.  Lee.    In  the  early  part  of  the  war,  however, 


LEA'S  CONTRIBUTIONS  TO  IOWA  mSTOBY        31 

of  these  articles  are  especially  valnable  as  they  give  the 
Indian's  side  of  the  Black  Hawk  War,^^^  just  as  Lieutenant 
Lea  heard  it  from  the  lips  of  Black  Hawk  himself.  Li  an- 
other of  these  same  articles  we  are  told  of  the  formation 
of  the  United  States  Dragoons.^^^  A  cavalry  regiment  of 
five  companies  was  formed  at  the  dose  of  the  Black  Hawk 
War,  and  this,  declares  Lea,  ''was  the  cause  and  neudeus  of 
the  First  United  States  Dragoons". 

The  last  of  these  lesser  contributions^^''  is  a  letter  by 
Lieutenant  Lea,  which  deserves  spedal  mention  as  it  throws 
some  light  on  the  name  ''Iowa'\  It  appears  that  the  name 
was  spelled  **Ioway"  by  the  earliest  settlers;  but  in  order 
to  satisfy  their  desires  for  Latin  endings,  George  W.  Jones, 
the  Territorial  Delegate  to  Congress,^®*  and  Lieutenant  Lea 
agreed  to  spell  it  '*Iowa".  Several  years  later,  after  the 
State  had  been  formed,  the  original  spelling  seemed  pref- 
erable ;  and  in  this  letter  the  writer  asks  his  friends  to  re- 
vert to  the  old  spelling  of  **Ioway". 

The  contributions  of  Albert  M.  Lea*^*  are  not  numerous, 

Identenant  Lea  inenrred  tlie  disfavor  of  Jefferaon  Dayis  and  never  rose  higher 
than  the  rank  of  Major. 

At  the  battle  of  Galveston,  Albert  M.  Lea  fought  against  his  son,  who  was 
a  Lieutenant  on  a  Federal  gunboat.  The  younger  Lea  was  slain  and  the  article 
telling  of  this  battle  is  the  most  pathetic  story  ever  written  by  Albert  M.  Lea. 

106  Lea,  accompanied  by  General  Parrott,  visited  the  lodge  of  Black  Hawk. 
io«  Article  published  in  the  Freeborn  County  Standard  on  January  30,  1890. 

107  Letter  written  to  H.  G.  Day  of  Albert  Lea,  Minnesota,  on  January  1, 1890, 
preserved  in  collection  of  Mr.  A.  N.  Harbert. 

los  For  a  complete  history  of  the  Territorial  Delegate  see  an  article  by  Ken- 
neth W.  Colgrove  entitled  The  Iowa  Territoriai  Delegates  in  Thi  Iowa  Journal 
OF  History  and  Politigs,  Vol.  Vn,  No.  2,  April,  1909,  p.  230. 

109  Lieutenant  Lea  was  a  very  careful  writer  and  most  of  his  writings  agree 
perfectly  with  official  records  and  documents.  The  map  in  the  Notes  on 
Wisconsin  Territory,  however,  was  based  to  a  considerable  extent  ui>on  data 
furnished  by  Capt.  Nathan  Boone;  and  a  comparison  of  this  map  with  the 
present  map  of  the  State  shows  its  defects.— See  Iowa  Eistoricdl  Record,  VoL 
VI,  No.  4,  October,  1890,  p.  560. 


32     IOWA  JOUENAL  OF  HISTOBY  AND  POLITICS 

neither  are  they  in  the  best  sense  critical.    The  author 

did  not  realize  the  part  they  would  play  nor  the  influence 

they  would  exert.   They  are,  however,  remarkable  in  many 

respects.    They  give  us  real  pictures  of  the  virgin  Iowa 

prairies,  of  the  streams,  and  the  homes  of  the  pioneers. 

They  were  in  most  respects  accurate  and  reliable,  concise 

and  clear.    These  contributions  though  few  in  number  are 

prized  by  all  students  of  Iowa  history.    They  are,  indeed, 

the  most  enduring  monuments  to  the  life  and  memory  of 

Albert  Miller  Lea. 

.        ^       ,  CuFFOBD  Powell 

Iowa  City,  Iowa 


J 


ANDEBSONVILLE  AND  THE  TRTAL  OF 

HENEY  WIEZ^ 

[In  1884  Ex-Iiieiitenaitt  Governor  Benj.  F.  One  of  Iowa  yiiited  the  lita 
of  AndenonTiUe  PriBon  and  eompiled  from  the  eemetezy  register  the  number 
of  burials  of  Iowa  soldien  in  the  cemetery.  He  found  the  names  of  two 
hundred  Iowa  men,  representing  twenty-eight  regiments.  The  names  of  these 
men,  with  company  and  regiment,  were  published  in  the  Iowa  State  JHegitier 
of  April  16, 1884.  The  list  was  republished,  together  with  a  description  of  the 
prison  stockade,  in  the  Annals  of  Iowa,  Third  Series,  Vol.  I,  pp.  65-87.-^ 
EnnoE.] 

I  have  been  introdnoed  to  yon  as  the  sole  snrvivor*  of 
the  Conrt  that  tried  Captain  Henry  Wirz,  the  keeper  of 
the  Andersonville  Prison,  and  I  have  been  asked  to  tell  yon 
something  of  the  prison  and  its  management.  Were  it  not 
for  reasons  herein  given  my  preference  wonld  be  to  say 
nothing  on  the  snbject,  not  because  I  wonld  shirk  the  re- 
sponsibility of  having  participated  in  the  trial  of  Wirz^ 
but  because  for  more  than  fifty  days  during  his  trial  I  sat 
and  listened  to  the  terrible  story  of  the  sn£ferings  and  death 
of  our  brave  boys  at  Andersonville,  and  when  the  end  was 

1  This  paper  was  read  hy  General  John  Howard  Btibbs  at  Iowa  City,  Iowa,, 
on  May  30,  1910.  The  military  record  of  General  Stibbs  as  shown  in  VoL  I 
of  the  HMoriedl  Begister  and  Dictionary  of  the  VnUed  Statee  Army  is  as 
follows:  Mustered  into  the  United  States  Service  as  Captain  of  Twelfth  Iowa 
Infantry  Volunteers,  November  25, 1861;  as  Major,  May  2,  1868;  as  Lieutenant 
Colonel,  September  25, 1863;  as  Colonel,  September  18, 1866;  as  Brevet  Colonel 
United  States  Volunteers,  March  18,  1866,  for  distinguished  gallantry  in  the 
battles  before  Nashville,  Tennessee;  Brevet  Brigadier  General,  United  States 
Volunteers,  March  13,  1866,  for  meritorious  services  during  the  war;  and  was 
honorably  discharged,  April  30,  1866.  For  a  more  detailed  sketch  of  General 
Stibbs,  see  below  under  "  Contributors '^ 

s  Since  the  preparation  of  this  paper  it  has  been  learned  that  the  Judge  Ad> 
vocate.  Genera]  N.  P.  Chipman,  who  prosecuted  the  case  against  Oaptain  Win, 
is  still  living  as  a  resident  of  Sacramento,  CaUf  omia. 

VOL  IX — 3  W 


34     IOWA  JOUENAL  OP  HISTOET  AND  POLITICS 

reached  I  felt  that  I  would  like  to  banish  the  subject  from 
my  mind  and  forget,  if  I  could,  the  details  of  the  terrible 
crime  committed  there. 

On  innumerable  occasions  since  the  Civil  War  I  have 
been  urged,  and  at  times  tempted,  to  say  or  write  some- 
thing in  relation  to  the  trial  of  Wirz,  but  it  has  always 
seemed  to  me  a  matter  of  questionable  propriety.  The 
record  of  the  trial  had  been  published  to  the  world;  and 
on  occasions  when  the  action  of  the  Court  has  been  criti- 
cised, or  condemned,  I  have  felt  that  it  was  the  duty  of 
our  friends  to  defend  those  who  had  served  as  members 
of  the  Court  rather  than  that  we  should  speak  for  ourselves. 
Then,  too,  I  have  been  in  doubt  as  to  the  extent  of  my 
obligation,  taken  when  I  was  sworn  as  a  member  of  the 
Court,  and  as  a  result  I  have  remained  silent  on  the  subject 
for  nearly  forty-five  years;  but  as  time  passed  and  one 
after  another  of  those  who  served  with  me  passed  off  the 
stage,  leaving  me  the  sole  survivor  of  the  Court,  and  after 
a  monument  was  erected  to  perpetuate  the  memory  of  Wirz 
and  he  was  proclaimed  a  martyr  who  had  been  unfairly 
tried  and  condemned,  I  concluded  to  lay  aside  all  question 
of  propriety  and  obligation  and  accede  to  the  request  of 
some  of  my  Iowa  friends  who  were  urging  me  to  prepare 
a  paper.  I  will  add  that  one  of  my  chief  reasons  for  yield- 
ing in  this  matter  was  that  I  wanted  to  describe  the  per- 
sonnel of  the  Court ;  to  tell  who  and  what  the  men  were  who 
composed  it ;  and  to  tell,  as  I  alone  could  tell,  of  the  unani- 
mous action  of  the  Court  in  its  findings. 

I  will  not  attempt  to  describe  fully  the  horrors  of  Ander- 
sonville,  but  will  simply  give  you  an  outline  description 
of  the  place  and  the  conditions  existing  there.  With  that 
picture  before  you,  your  own  imagination  will  supply  the 
details. 


ANDEBSONVILLE  AND  THE  TBIAL  OF  WIBZ       35 

In  the  fall  of  1863  the  rebel  prisons  in  the  vicinity  of 
Richmond  had  become  overcrowded^  and  a  new  prison  was 
located  with  a  view,  as  was  claimed  at  the  time,  of  making 
more  room  for  onr  men  and  of  placing  them  as  far  as  pos- 
sible from  onr  lines,  where  they  conld  be  cared  for  by  a 
comparatively  small  gnard  and  where  provisions  were  most 
accessible.  Bnt  the  evidence  presented  before  the  Wirz 
Commission  satisfied  the  Conrt  beyond  a  doubt  that  while 
this  prison  was  being  made  ready,  if  not  before,  a  conspir- 
acy was  entered  into  by  certain  persons,  high  in  authority 
in  the  Confederate  service,  to  destroy  the  lives  of  our  men, 
or  at  least  subject  them  to  such  hardships  as  would  render 
them  unfit  for  further  military  service. 

Andersonville  is  situated  on  the  Southwestern  Bailroad 
about  sixty  miles  south  from  Macon,  (Georgia.  In  1864  the 
place  contained  not  more  than  a  dozen  houses.  The  country 
round  about  was  covered  with  a  heavy  growth  of  pine  tim- 
ber, and  in  the  midst  of  this  timber,  a  short  distance  from 
the  station,  the  prison  was  laid  out.  Planters  in  the  neigh- 
borhood were  called  upon  to  send  in  their  negro  men ;  and 
with  this  force  trenches  were  dug  inclosing  an  area  of 
eighteen  acres,  which  subsequently  was  enlarged  to  about 
twenty-seven  acres.  The  timber  was  cut  down  and  the 
trees  trimmed  and  set  into  the  trenches,  forming  a  stockade 
about  eighteen  feet  high.  Inside  the  stockade,  about  twenty 
feet  from  the  wall,  was  established  a  dead-line,  formed  by 
driving  small  stakes  in  the  ground  and  nailing  on  top  of 
them  a  strip  of  board ;  and  the  orders  were  to  shoot  down 
without  warning  any  prisoner  whp  crossed  this  line.  Every 
tree  and  shrub  within  the  indosure  was  cut  down,  and  it 
contained  no  shelter  of  any  kind.  Colonel  W.  H.  Persons, 
who  was  the  first  commandant,  ordered  a  lot  of  lumber  with 
which  to  build  barracks  for  the  men ;  but  before  any  work 


36     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTOET  AND  POLITICS 

was  done  he  was  snooeeded  by  Brigadier  (}eneral  John  H. 
Winder,  and  the  lumber  was  used  for  other  purposes.  Al- 
though there  was  a  steam  saw-mill  within  a  quarter  of  a 
mile  and  four  mills  within  a  radius  of  twenty  miles,  no 
buildings  or  shelters  of  any  kind  were  erected  within  the 
inclosure  while  our  men  remained  there,  save  two  barren 
sheds  at  the  extreme  north  end  of  the  stockade  which  were 
used  for  hospital  purposes.  On  the  outside  of  the  stock- 
ade, and  near  its  top,  there  were  built  a  series  of  platforms 
and  sentry  boxes  at  intervals  of  about  one  hundred  feet 
in  which  guards  were  continually  posted.  They  were  so 
close  together  that  the  guards  could  readily  commimicate 
with  each  other ;  and  from  where  they  were  posted  they  had 
an  unobstructed  view  of  the  interior  of  the  prison.  At  a 
distance  of  sixty  paces  outside  the  main  stockade,  a  second 
stockade,  about  twelve  feet  high,  was  built,  and  the  inter- 
vening space  was  left  unoccupied.  This  was  designed  as 
an  additional  safeguard  against  any  attempt  of  the  pris- 
oners to  escape.  Surrounding  the  whole  was  a  cordon 
of  earthworks  in  which  seventeen  guns  were  placed  and  kept 
continually  manned.  The  guard  consisted  of  a  force  of 
from  three  to  five  thousand  men,  chiefly  home  guards,  and 
they  were  encamped  west  of  and  near  to  the  stockade.  A 
creek  having  its  source  in  a  swamp  or  morass,  less  than 
half  a  mile  from  the  stockade,  ran  from  west  to  east 
through  the  place  at  about  the  center.  The  water  in  this 
creek  was  not  wholesome  at  its  source,  and  before  it  reached 
the  stockade  there  was  poured  into  it  all  the  filth  from  the 
camp  of  the  Confederate  guard,  the  hospitals,  and  cook 
houses;  and  to  this  was  added  all  the  filth  and  excrement 
originating  within  the  prison  pen.  For  a  time  this  creek 
was  the  only  source  from  which  our  men  obtained  water; 
but  in  time  the  creek  bed  and  fully  an  acre  or  more  of  land 


ANDEBSONVILLE  AND  THE  TRIAL  OF  WIBZ      37 

bordering  it  became  a  putrid  mass  of  oormption,  into  which 
the  men  waded  knee-deep  to  secure  water  from  the  running 
stream.  In  this  extremity  many  of  the  men  set  to  work 
and  with  their  knives  and  pieces  of  broken  canteens  they 
dug  wells,  some  of  them  seventy  feet  deep,  and  thereafter 
such  as  were  fortunate  enough  to  have  an  interest  in  a  well 
were  supplied  with  wholesome  water. 

When  the  place  was  first  occupied  the  ground  was  cov- 
ered with  the  stumps  of  the  trees  that  had  been  cut  down ; 
but  there  was  such  a  scarcity  of  wood  with  which  to  cook 
their  food  and  warm  their  numb  fingers  that  our  men  went 
to  work  with  their  knives  and  the  rude  implements  at  hand 
and  cut  out  the  stumps,  digging  far  into  the  ground  to  secure 
the  roots,  until  not  a  vestige  of  a  stump  remained. 

On  February  15,  1864,  the  first  lot  of  prisoners,  860  of 
them,  were  turned  into  the  stockade.  In  April  following, 
the  number  had  increased  to  9577;  which  number  was 
doubled  a  month  later;  and  in  August,  1864,  there  were 
more  than  33,000  men  within  the  indosure. 

Think  of  it!  Picture  it  if  you  can!  A  great  barren 
field  so  filled  with  men  that  there  was  scarcely  room  enough 
for  all  of  them  to  lie  down  at  the  same  time  —  without  a 
shelter  of  any  kind  to  shield  them  from  a  southern  sun  or 
frequent  rain ;  without  a  seat  on  which  to  rest  their  weary 
bodies  when  too  tired  to  stand;  without  blankets,  and  in 
many  instances  without  sufficient  clothing  to  cover  their 
nakedness;  with  scant  rations  of  the  coarsest  food,  many 
times  uncooked ;  and  with  nothing  to  do  but  to  stand  around 
waiting  for  death,  or  a  i)ossible  exchange.  Is  it  a  wonder 
that  men  became  sick  under  such  conditions  f  The  wonder 
to  me  is  that  any  one  of  them  lived  through  it.  Here  the 
question  is  suggested.  What  means  were  provided  for  the 
care  and  treatment  of  our  men  when  they  became  sickf 


38     IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  mSTOBT  AND  POLITICS 

As  a  prelnde  to  my  answer  I  will  state  that  during  the 
trial  of  Wirz  one  hundred  and  forty-six  witnesses  were 
sworn,  and  of  this  number  nearly  one  hundred  had  been 
confined  as  prisoners  in  the  stockade.  One  after  another 
they  told  their  experiences  as  prisoners  and  of  the  condi- 
tions existing  in  and  about  the  stockade,  until  we  had  the 
picture  complete  from  their  standpoint ;  and  had  there  been 
no  other  evidence  in  the  case,  the  story  told  by  their  com- 
bined testimony  might  with  some  show  of  fairness  have 
been  discredited  because  of  the  fact  that  all  had  been  suf- 
ferers and  supposedly  were  prejudiced  and  biased.  But 
we  had  other  witnesses^  two  score  or  more  of  them,  who 
had  been  in  the  Confederate  service  and  were  at  the  prison 
as  guards,  officers,  surgeons,  etc.,  and  some  of  them  had 
made  official  reports,  telling  of  the  horrible  condition  of  the 
prison  and  its  inmates.  A  number  of  these  reports  were 
found  and  introduced  as  evidence  before  the  Court,  and 
the  parties  who  made  them  were  called  in  to  testify  con- 
cerning what  they  had  written.  This  evidence  served  to 
corroborate  in  the  fullest  particular  all  that  had  been  tes- 
tified to  by  those  who  had  been  prisoners  concerning  the 
general  conditions  in  the  prison.  I  feel  that  it  will  answer 
my  purpose  if  I  quote  from  their  testimony  alone  in  my  ef- 
forts to  place  before  you  a  comprehensive  picture  of  Ander- 
sonville  as  it  existed  in  the  summer  of  1864. 

In  August,  1864,  Dr.  Joseph  Jones,  an  ex-surgeon  of  the 
Confederate  army  whom  Jefferson  Davis,  in  an  article  pub- 
lished in  B  elf  or  d*  8  Magazine  in  January,  1890,  referred  to 
as  being  ^  ^  eminent  in  his  profession,  and  of  great  learning 
and  probity",  was  sent  to  Andersonville  to  investigate  and 
report  his  observations ;  and  his  official  report  made  to  Sur- 
geon General  Moore  was  very  full  and  complete.  In  it  he 
gave  a  minute  description  of  the  stockade,  and  the  hospital 


ANDEBS0N7ILLE  AND  THE  TRIAL  OF  WIBZ      39 

adjacent;  of  the  number  of  prisoners  and  their  crowded 
condition ;  of  the  lack  of  food,  fuel,  shelter,  medical  attend- 
ance, etc ;  of  the  condition  of  the  men  in  the  stockade  and 
in  the  hospital;  of  the  deaths  and  death  rate;  and  in  fact, 
as  I  remember,  he  went  over  the  entire  ground.  His  report 
was  introduced  in  evidence,  and  identified  by  him  when 
called  as  a  witness.  He  frankly  admitted  that  he  did  not 
go  to  Andersonville  with  a  view  of  ameliorating  the  suffer- 
ings of  the  prisoners,  but  purely  in  the  interest  of  science 
for  the  ''benefit  of  the  medical  department  of  the  Confeder- 
ate armies",  and  that  his  report  was  intended  for  the  sole 
use  of  the  Surgeon  General.  I  will  quote  briefly  from  his 
report   On  pages  4340  and  4341  of  the  Record,  be  says: 

I  visited  two  thousand  sick  within  the  stockade,  lying  under  some 
long  sheds  which  had  been  built  at  the  northern  portion  for  them- 
selves. At  this  time  only  one  medical  officer  was  in  attendance, 
whereas  at  least  20  medical  officers  should  have  been  employed.* 

Further  on,  after  referring  to  the  sheds  in  the  stockade 
which  were  open  on  all  sides,  he  says  on  page  4348  of  the 
Record : 

The  sick  lay  upon  the  bare  boards,  or  upon  such  ragged  blankets  as 
they  possessed,  without,  as  far  as  I  observed,  any  bedding  or  even 
straw.  Pits  for  the  reception  of  feces  were  dug  within  a  few  feet  of 
the  lower  floor,  and  they  were  almost  never  unoccupied  by  those  suf- 
fering from  diarrhoea.  The  haggard,  distressed  countenanees  of  these 
miserable,  complaining,  dejected,  living  skeletons,  crying  for  medi- 
cal aid  and  food,  ....  and  the  ghastly  corpses,  with  their  glazed 
eye  balls  staring  np  into  vacant  space,  with  the  flies  swarming  down 
their  open  and  grinning  months,  and  over  their  ragged  clothes,  in- 
fested with  numerous  lice,  as  they  lay  amongst  the  sick  and  dying, 
formed  a  picture  of  helpless,  hopeless  misery  which  it  would  be  im- 
possible to  portray  by  words  or  by  the  brush.* 

*  Copied  from  the  Tritd  of  Henry  WirM,  Sxeevtive  Documents,  2nd  SeMion, 
40th  Congress,  No.  23,  pp.  623,  624. 

«  Copied  from  the  Trial  of  Henry  Win,  Bxeouiive  DocmnenU,  2nd  Sessioni 
40th  Congress,  No.  23,  p.  626. 


40     IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Again,  referring  to  the  hospital  inclosure  of  less  than  five 
acres  he  says  on  pages  4350,  4351,  and  4354  of  the  Record : 

The  patients  and  attendants,  near  two  thousand  in  number  are 
crowded  into  this  confined  space  and  are  but  poorly  supplied  with 
old  and  ragged  tents.  Large  numbers  of  them  were  without  any 
bunks  in  the  tents,  and  lay  upon  the  ground,  of ttimes  without  even 
a  blanket.  No  beds  or  straw  appeared  to  have  been  furnished.  The 
tents  extend  to  within  a  few  yards  of  the  small  stream,  the  eastern 
portion  of  which  ....  is  used  as  a  privy  and  is  loaded  with  excre- 
ments; and  I  observed  a  large  pile  of  com  bread,  bones,  and  filth 
of  all  kinds,  thirty  feet  in  diameter  and  several  feet  in  height, 
swarming  with  myriads  of  flies,  in  a  vacant  space  near  the  pots 
used  for  cooking.  Millions  of  flies  swarmed  over  everything  and 
covered  the  faces  of  the  sleeping  patients,  and  crawled  dovm  their 
open  mouths,  and  deposited  their  maggots  in  the  gangrenous  wounds 
of  the  living,  and  the  mouths  of  the  dead.  Mosquitoes  in  great 
numbers  also  infested  the  tents,  and  many  of  the  patients  were  so 
stung  by  these  pestiferous  insects,  that  they  resembled  those  suffer- 
ing with  a  slight  attack  of  the  measles. 

The  police  and  hygiene  of  the  hospital  was  defective  in  the  ex- 
treme  Many  of  the  sick  were  literally  encrusted  with  dirt 

and  filth  and  covered  with  vermin.  When  a  gangrenous  wound 
needed  washing,  the  limb  was  thrust  out  a  little  from  the  blanket, 
or  board,  or  rags  upon  which  the  patient  was  lying,  and  water 
poured  over  it,  and  all  the  putrescent  matter  allowed  to  soak  into 
the  ground  fioor  of  the  tent.  ...  I  saw  the  most  filthy  rags  which 
had  been  applied  several  times,  and  imperfectly  washed,  used  in 
dressing  recent  wounds.  Where  hospital  gangrene  was  prevailing, 
it  was  impossible  for  any  wound  to  escape  contagion  under  these 
circumstances.* 

These  statements  of  Dr.  Jones  were  fully  corroborated 
by  Doctors  B.  G.  Head,  W.  A,  Barnes,  G.  G.  Roy,  John  C- 
Bates,  Amos  Thombnrg,  and  other  surgeons  who  were  on 
duty  at  Andersonville.  Dr,  G.  G.  Boy  when  called  on  to 
describe  the  appearance  and  condition  of  the  men  sent  from 

>  Copied  from  the  Trial  of  Henry  Wirs,  Exeouiive  Documents,  Snd  Session, 
40th  Oongreis,  No.  23,  pp.  626,  627. 


ANDEBSONYILIiE  AND  THE  TBIAL  OF  WIBZ      41 

the  stockade  to  the  hospital  said  on  pages  485  and  486  of 
the  Record : 

They  presented  the  most  horrible  spectacle  of  humanity  that  I 
e?er  saw  in  my  life.  A  good  many  were  suffering  from  scurvy  and 
other  diseases;  a  good  many  were  naked  •  •  .  .  their  condition  gen- 
erally was  almost  indescribable.  I  attributed  that  condition  to  long 
confinement  and  the  want  of  the  necessaries  and  comforts  of  life, 
and  all  those  causes  that  are  calculated  to  produce  that  condition 
of  the  system  where  there  is  just  vitality  enough  to  i>ermit  one  to 
live.  .  .  .  The  prisoners  were  too  densely  crowded.  .  .  .  There 
iras  no  shelter,  except  such  as  they  constructed  themselves,  which 
was  very  insufficient.  A  good  many  were  in  holes  in  the  earth 
with  their  blankets  thrown  over  them ;  a  good  many  had  a  blanket 
or  oil-doth  thrown  over  poles;  some  were  in  tents  constructed  by 
their  own  ingenuity,  and  with  just  such  accommodations  as  their 
own  ingenuity  permitted  them  to  contrive.  There  were,  you  may 
sajr,  no  acconmiodations  made  for  them  in  the  stockade.* 

The  death  register  kept  at  the  prison  during  its  occn- 
pancy,  and  still  in  existence  at  the  Andersonville  cemetery, 
gives,  supposedly,  the  cause  of  death  in  the  case  of  each  man 
who  died  at  the  prison.  I  have  found  upon  examination 
of  six  hundred  names,  taken  haphazard,  the  cause  of  death 
was  given  as  follows :  Diarrhoea  and  Dysentery,  310,  Scro- 
bntus,  205 ;  Anasarca,  20 ;  and  all  other  causes  65— total,  600. 

I  think  it  proper  to  say,  however,  that  the  Court,  in  de- 
liberating on  the  evidence  heard  during  the  trial,  were 
imanimoTis  in  the  conclusion  that  the  death  register  would 
better  have  represented  the  facts  if  in  a  very  large  per- 
centage of  cases  the  death  cause  had  been  shown  by  the  one 
word  Stabvation  —  the  causes  named  being  simply  compli- 
cations. 

The  evidence  presented  to  the  Court  showed  conclusively 
fhat  the  food  furnished  our  men  in  the  stockade,  in  quality 

•Copied  from  the  Trial  cf  Henry  Wirt,  BseeuHve  DoewmeniM^  2iid  Seifioii, 
tttk  CoBgreM,  No.  23,  p.  S2. 


42     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTOEY  AND  POLITICS 

and  qnantitj,  was  not  sufficient  to  sustain  life  for  an  in- 
definite time.  I  will  not  attempt  to  show  specifically  the 
rations  furnished  the  men  in  the  stockade;  but  will  give  a 
couple  of  extracts  from  the  testimony  of  Confederate  sur- 
geons, showing  the  kind  and  amount  of  food  provided  for 
the  men  in  the  hospital,  and  will  leave  you  to  draw  your 
own  conclusions. 
Doctor  John  C.  Bates,  on  page  125  of  the  Record,  said : 

The  meat  ration  was  cooked  at  a  different  part  of  the  hospital ; 
and  when  I  would  go  up  there,  especially  when  I  was  medical 
officer  of  the  day,  the  men  would  gather  around  me  and  ask  me 
for  a  bone.  ...  I  would  give  them  whatever  I  could  find  at  my 
disposition  without  robbing  others.  I  well  knew  that  an  appropria- 
tion of  one  ration  took  it  from  the  general  issue;  that  when  I 
appropriated  an  extra  ration  to  one  man,  some  one  else  would  fall 
minus.  ...  I  then  fell  back  upon  the  distribution  of  bones.  They 
did  not  presiune  to  ask  me  for  meat  at  all.  .  .  .  they  could  not  be 
furnished  with  any  clothing,  except  that  the  clothing  of  the  dead 
was  generally  appropriated  to  the  living.  ,  .  .  there  was  a  partial 
supply  of  fuel,  but  not  sufficient  to  keep  the  men  warm  and  pro- 
long their  existence.  Shortly  after  I  arrived  there  I  was  api>ointed 
officer  of  the  day  ...  it  was  my  duty  as  such  to  go  into  the  various 
wards  and  divisions  of  the  hospital  and  rectify  anything  that  needed 
to  be  cared  for.  ...  As  a  general  thing,  the  patients  were  desti- 
tute; they  were  filthy  and  partly  naked.  .  .  .  The  clamor  all  the 
while  was  for  something  to  eat.^ 

Doctor  J.  C.  Pelot  in  an  official  report  directed  to  the 
Chief  of  his  Division,  dated  September  5,  1864,  and  filed 
as  Exhibit  No.  9  of  the  Record,  said : 

The  tents  are  entirely  destitute  of  either  bunks,  bedding  or  straw, 
the  patients  being  compelled  to  lie  on  the  bare  ground.  I  would 
earnestly  call  attention  to  the  article  of  diet.  The  com  bread  re- 
ceived from  the  bakery  being  made  up  without  sifting,  is  wholly 

▼  Copied  from  the  Trial  of  Henry  Wirz^  Executive  Documents,  2nd  Sessioxi, 
40th  Congress,  No.  23,  p.  28. 


i 


ANDEBSONYILLE  AND  THE  TRIAL  OF  WIBZ      43 

unfit  for  the  use  of  the  sick;  and  often  (in  the  last  twenty-foor 
honn)  npon  examination,  the  inner  portion  is  found  to  be  per- 
fectly raw.  The  meat  (beef)  received  for  the  patients  does  not 
amount  to  over  two  ounces  a  day,  and  for  the  past  three  or  four 
days  no  flour  has  been  issued.  The  com  bread  cannot  be  eaten 
hy  many,  for  to  do  so  would  be  to  increase  the  diseases  of  the 
bowels,  from  which  a  large  majority  are  suffering,  and  it  is  there- 
fore thrown  away.  All  their  rations  received  by  way  of  sustenance 
is  two  ounces  of  boiled  beef  and  half  pint  of  rice  soup  per  day. 
Under  these  circumstances,  all  the  skill  that  can  be  brought  to  bear 
upon  their  cases  by  the  medical  officer  will  avail  nothing.* 

The  foregoing  I  think  is  quite  enough  to  convince  yon 
that  our  men  were  left  to  suffer  all  the  horrors  of  the 
stockade,  with  practically  no  medical  treatment  or  atten- 
tion, until  their  condition  became  such  that  their  removal 
to  the  hospital  was  only  a  stepping  stone  from  the  stockade 
to  the  cemetery. 

Immediately  after  the  place  was  occupied  our  men  be- 
gan to  die.  In  April,  1864,  as  shown  by  the  Confederate 
records,  there  were  592  deaths;  and  in  August  following 
2992  of  our  brave  boys  passed  to  their  final  resting  place. 
In  one  day,  August  23rd,  127  of  them  answered  the  final  call. 
Some  of  them  in  desperation  deliberately  crossed  the  dead- 
line, and  were  shot  down;  while  others  who  had  become 
crazed  and  demented  by  their  sufferings,  blindly  blundered 
across  the  fatal  line,  and  they  too  were  killed  without  a 
challenge.  The  records  show  that  149  died  from  gunshot 
wounds.  We  can  only  guess  at  the  number  of  these  who 
were  killed  on  the  deadline,  but  the  evidence  showed  that 
deaths  from  that  cause  were  of  frequent  occurrence.  Only 
a  part  of  these  men  were  taken  to  the  hospital  for  treat- 
ment; fully  one-half  died  in  the  stockade  without  having 

I  Copied  from  the  Trial  of  Henry  Wirz,  Executive  DoeumenU,  2iid  Sesrion, 
iOth  Congress,  No.  23,  pp.  37,  38. 


44     IOWA  JOUBNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

received  medical  aid,  and  their  comrades  carried  them  to 
the  gate  where  they  were  thrown,  one  on  top  of  another,  on 
a  wood  rack,  hauled  out  to  the  borying  ground,  and  placed 
in  trenches  where,  during  the  occupancy  of  the  prison,  more 
than  13,000  of  our  men  were  buried  —  more  than  twenty- 
eight  per  cent  of  the  entire  number  of  those  confined  in  the 
stockade.  This  statement,  appalling  as  it  may  appear, 
does  not  represent  by  any  means  the  aggregate  loss  of  life 
sustained  by  our  men  as  a  result  of  the  cruel  treatment  im- 
posed on  them  at  Andersonville.  Evidence  presented  be- 
fore the  Court  showed  conclusively  that  fully  2,000  of  our 
men  died  after  leaving  the  prison,  and  while  on  their  way 
home;  and  we  know  as  a  natural  result  that  hundreds, 
possessed  of  barely  enough  life  and  strength  to  enable  them 
to  endure  the  journey  home,  must  have  died  within  a  few 
days,  weeks,  or  months  after  reaching  home. 

This  is  only  part  of  the  horrible  story,  but  it  is  enough. 
And  now  some  one  asks,  could  these  horrors  have  been  pre- 
vented or  averted?  I  reply,  yes  —  scarcely  having  patience 
to  answer  the  question.  This  prison  was  located  in  one  of 
the  richest  sections  of  the  State  of  Georgia.  Supplies  were 
abundant,  the  prison  was  surrounded  with  a  forest,  and 
yet  some  of  our  men  froze  to  death  for  lack  of  fuel,  which 
they  would  gladly  have  gathered  had  they  been  permitted 
to  do  so.  Among  those  confined  in  that  stockade  were  men 
possessed  of  all  the  training  and  ability  necessary  to  con- 
struct anything  from  a  log  cabin  to  a  war-ship;  and  they 
would  have  considered  it  a  privilege  to  have  done  all  the 
work  necessary  to  enlarge  the  stockade,  build  barracks,  and 
provide  a  supply  of  pure  water  had  they  been  provided 
with  tools  and  materials  and  given  the  opportunity.  I  am 
convinced  beyond  a  doubt,  that  the  lives  of  more  than  three- 
fourths  of  those  who  died  at  Andersonville  might  have  been 


ANDEBSONVILLE  AND  THE  TRIAL  OF  WIBZ      45 

saved  with  proper  care  and  treatment ;  and  to  this  opinion 
I  will  add  that  of  Acting  Assistant  Snrgeon  J.  C.  Bates,  an 
educated  gentleman  who  had  been  a  medical  practitioner 
since  1850  and  who  was  on  duty  at  Andersonville  for  a 
number  of  months.  He  was  asked  by  the  Judge  Advocate 
to  state  from  his  observation  of  the  condition  and  surround- 
ings of  our  prisoners  —  their  food,  their  drink,  their  ex- 
posure by  day  and  by  night,  and  all  the  circumstances  which 
he  had  described  —  his  professional  opinion  as  to  what  pro- 
portion of  deaths  occurring  there  were  the  result  of  the  cir- 
cumstances and  surroundings  which  he  had  narrated.  And 
his  reply  was  as  follows : 

I  feel  myself  safe  in  saying,  that  75  per  cent  of  those  who  died, 
might  have  been  saved,  had  those  unfortunate  men  been  properly 
cared  for  as  to  food,  clothing,  bedding,  etc.* 

In  order  to  make  the  situation  at  Andersonville  plain  to 
you  I  will  say  that  John  H.  Winder  was  a  General  who  never 
was  given  command  of  troops  in  the  field.  He  was  the  spe- 
cial and  particular  friend  and  proteg6  of  Jefferson  Davis^ 
who  early  in  the  war  made  him  a  Brigadier  (General  and 
assigned  him  to  duty  in  Bichmond,  Virginia,  as  Provost 
Marshal  and  Superintendent  of  Military  Prisons,  in  which 
capacity  he  made  himself  notorious  by  his  harsh  and  brutal 
treatment  of  prisoners  committed  to  his  care.  No  words 
of  mine  would  more  fittingly  describe  this  man's  character 
than  his  own  language  used  in  his  celebrated  order,  No.  13, 
about  which  much  has  been  said  and  written.  When  Gen- 
eral Kilpatrick's  command  moved  in  the  direction  of  Ander- 
sonville, in  July,  1864,  and  it  was  expected  that  in  his  raid 
he  would  reach  the  prison,  the  following  order  was  issued : 

•  Copied  f x«m  the  Trial  of  Henry  Wir§,  Bxeeutive  DoewnenU,  2nd  SeMiott^ 
40th  Congreit,  No.  23,  p.  38. 


46     IOWA  JOUENAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

OBDEB  NO.  13 
Hbadquabtebs,  Confederate  States,  Miutaby  Prison 

ANDERSONVHiLE,  JuLY  27,  1864 

The  Officer  on  duty  and  in  charge  of  the  Battery  of  Florida 
Artillery,  at  the  time,  will  upon  receiving  notice  that  the  enemy 
has  approached  within  seven  miles  of  this  Post,  open  fire  upon 
the  stockade  with  grape  shot,  without  reference  to  the  situation 
beyond  these  lines  of  defense.  It  is  better  that  the  last  Federal  be 
exterminated  than  be  permitted  to  burn  and  pillage  the  property 
of  loyal  citizens,  as  they  will  do  if  allowed  to  make  their  escape 
from  the  prison. 

Bt  Order  of  John  H.  Winder, 

W.  S.  Winder,  Brigadier  General. 

Assistant  Adjutant  General. 

General  Winder  had  much  to  do  with  the  location  of  the 
prison  at  Andersonville.  First,  his  son,  Captain  W.  S. 
Winder,  was  sent  out  to  locate  and  construct  the  prison; 
and  while  so  employed,  as  was  shown  by  competent  evi- 
dence, when  it  was  suggested  to  him  that  he  leave  standing 
some  of  the  trees  in  the  stockade,  he  replied:  '^That  is 
just  what  I  am  not  going  to  do ;  I  will  make  a  pen  here  for 
the  damned  Yankees,  where  they  will  rot  faster  than  they 
can  be  sent."  He  served  as  Assistant  Adjutant  General  on 
his  father's  staff. 

On  March  27, 1864,  Captain  Henry  Wirz,  who  was  a  mem- 
ber of  General  Winder's  staff,  was  sent  from  Richmond 
with  orders  to  assume  command  of  the  prison  proper ;  and 
one  of  his  first  acts  was  to  establish  and  construct  the  dead- 
line, which  prior  to  that  time  had  not  existed.  On  April  10, 
1864,  General  Winder  made  his  first  appearance  at  Ander- 
sonville and  assumed  command  of  the  post  and  the  county 
in  which  it  was  situated ;  and  among  his  first  formal  pub- 
lished orders  was  one  assigning  Captain  Henry  Wirz  to 
the  superintendence,  management,  and  custody  of  the  pris- 
oners at  Andersonville. 


/ 


ANDBBSONVILLE  AND  THE  TEIAL  OP  WIEZ       47 

When  General  Winder  left  Bichmond  to  assume  com- 
mand at  Andersonville  the  Richmond  Examiner  had  this  to 
say  of  him :  '^  Thank  Ood  that  Bichmond  is  at  last  rid  of  old 
Winder ;  Ood  have  mercy  upon  those  to  whom  he  has  been 
sent.''  This,  I  think,  is  enough  to  convince  yon  that  from 
the  outset  our  men  at  Andersonville  were  at  the  mercy  of 
one  who  by  his  cruelty  and  barbarism  had  already  made 
himself  obnoxious  to  the  better  element. 

Now,  in  answer  to  the  question  whether  it  was  clearly 
shown  that  the  horrible  conditions  existing  at  Anderson- 
ville were  made  known  to  those  high  in  authority  in  the 
Confederate  government,  I  will  say  that  the  Court  listened 
to  a  mass  of  evidence  upon  this  point.  The  report  of  Doc- 
tor Jones  was  sent  to  the  Surgeon  General ;  and  other  re- 
ports, from  time  to  time,  had  been  made  to  those  in  author- 
ity, in  which  the  horrors  and  needs  of  the  prison  were  set 
forth.  I  will  refer  to  only  one  other  witness.  After  the 
capture  of  Bichmond  there  was  discovered  a  report  made 
by  Colonel  D.  T.  Chandler,  Assistant  Adjutant  General  and 
Inspector  General  of  the  Confederate  army,  dated  at  Ander- 
sonville, August  5,  1864,  in  which  he  gave  a  very  graphic 
description  of  the  conditions  existing  at  Andersonville  and 
of  the  sufferings  of  our  men ;  and  he  recommended  immedi- 
ate action  to  relieve  the  suffering  of  the  prisoners,  offer- 
ing many  practical  suggestions.  In  closing  his  report  he 
said: 

My  duty  requires  me  respectfully  to  recommend  a  change  in  the 
officer  in  command  of  the  Post,  Brig.  Qeneral  STohn  H.  Winder, 
and  the  substitution  in  his  place  of  some  one  who  unites  both  energy 
and  good  judgment  with  some  feeling  of  humanity  and  considera- 
tion for  the  welfare  and  comfort  (so  far  as  is  consistent  with  their 
safe  keeping)  of  the  vast  number  of  unfortunates  placed  under  his 
control;  some  one  who  at  least  will  not  advocate  deliberately  and 
in  cold  blood  the  propriety  of  leaving  them  in  their  present  oon- 


48     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTOEY  AND  POLITICS 

dition  until  their  number  has  been  sufficiently  reduced  by  death 
to  make  the  present  arrangements  suffice  for  their  accommodation ; 
who  will  not  consider  it  a  matter  of  self -laudation  and  boasting 
that  he  has  never  been  inside  of  the  stockade,  a  place  the  horrors 
of  which  it  is  difficult  to  describe,  and  which  is  a  disgrace  to  civi- 
lization ;  the  condition  of  which  he  might,  by  the  exercise  of  a  little 
energy  and  judgement,  even  with  the  limited  means  at  his  com- 
mand, have  considerably  improved.^^ 

On  the  back  of  this  report  was  endorsed  the  following : 
Adjutant  and  Inspector  General's  Office,  August  18,  1864.  Re- 
spectfully submitted  to  the  Secretary  of  War.  The  condition  of 
the  prison  at  Andersonville  is  a  reproach  to  us  as  a  nation.  The 
Engineer  and  Ordinance  Departments  were  applied  to,  and  author- 
ized their  issue,  and  I  so  telegraphed  Qeneral  Winder.  Col.  Chand- 
ler's recommendations  are  coincided  in.  By  Order  of  Oeneral 
Cooper. 

(Signed)   R.  H.  Chh/ton,  A.  A.  &  I.  O. 

Following  this  was  another  endorsement : 

These  reports  show  a  condition  of  things  at  Andersonville,  which 
call  very  loudly  for  the  interposition  of  the  Department,  in  order 
that  a  change  be  made. 

(Signed)    J.  A.  Cakpbell^ 
Assistant  Secretary  of  War. 

And  finally  there  was  endorsed:  ** Noted  —  File.  J.  A. 
S."  The  initials  are  those  of  James  A.  Seddon,  Secretary 
of  War. 

This  original  report  was  introduced  before  our  Court, 
and  Colonel  Chandler  was  brought  there  to  testify  concern- 
ing it.  He  was  an  officer  who  had  been  educated  at  West 
Pointy  a  polished  gentleman  in  manner  and  speech ;  and  his 
testimony,  given  in  a  f rank,  straightforward  way,  made  a 
deep  impression  on  the  Court.  He  swore  that  he  vnrote 
the  report  and  that  the  statements  embodied  in  it  were  true. 

10  Copied  from  the  Trial  of  Henry  Win,  Bseeutive  DocumenU,  2nd  Seenon, 
iOth  Congreet,  No.  28,  p.  227. 


ANDEBSONVILLE  AND  THE  TBIAL  OF  WIBZ      49 

He  told  of  his  very  minnte  inspection  of  the  stockade,  of 
his  measurements  and  compntationsy  showing  the  amount 
of  space  allowed  each  inmate,  and  of  the  horrors  he  en- 
countered on  every  hand.  The  picture  he  drew  of  the 
place  served  to  confirm  the  stories  of  the  men  who  had  been 
held  there  as  prisoners.  He  told  of  calling  on  Winder  and 
remonstrating  with  him  regarding  the  care  of  the  prison, 
and  of  Winder's  infamous  language  in  connection  there- 
with. He  said  that  when  he  mailed  his  report  to  the  Secre- 
tary of  War  he  confidently  expected  that  General  Winder 
would  be  removed  from  the  command  of  the  prisoners,  and 
that  he  felt  disgusted  and  outraged  when  he  learned  that 
instead  of  being  removed  Winder  had  been  promoted  to  be 
Commissary  (General  and  Commander  of  all  Military  Pris- 
ons and  prisoners  throughout  the  Confederate  States. 

When  Colonel  Chandler  was  at  Andersonville  he  was 
onder  orders  to  inspect  all  the  prisons  in  the  South  and 
West,  and  considerable  time  elapsed  before  he  got  back  to 
Richmond.  He  then  made  an  investigation  and  found  that 
his  report,  relating  to  Winder,  had  been  received  and  con- 
sidered by  Seddon,  the  Secretary  of  War.  He  threatened 
to  resign  unless  his  report  was  taken  up  and  acted  upon; 
but  at  about  that  time  Seddon  was  succeeded  by  Mr.  Breck- 
enridge  as  Secretary  of  War,  and  soon  thereafter  General 
T^der  died.  Then  followed  the  closing  days  of  the  War 
and  collapse  of  the  Bebellion. 

Now  a  word  as  to  the  personnel  of  the  Court.  I  have 
examined  a  number  of  books  purporting  to  give  the  truth 
concerning  Andersonville  and  the  trial  of  Captain  Henry 
Wirz;  and  in  all  of  them,  as  I  remember,  occurs  the  same 
error  that  General  E.  S.  Bragg  of  li^sconsin  is  named  as  a 
member  of  the  Court  that  tried  and  condemned  Wirz.  The 
truth  is  that  while  General  Bragg  was  named  in  the  orig- 

VOL. 


50     IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTOBY  AND  POLITICS 


detail  for  the  Court,  he  was  relieved  from  farther  ser- 
vice at  an  early  stage  of  the  trial  and  took  no  part  in  the 
deliberations  and  findings  of  the  C!onrt^^ 

The  Court  met  first  on  August  21, 1865,  pursuant  to  in- 
structions in  Special  Order  No.  449,  and  Wirz  was  arraigned 
and  entered  a  plea  of  not  guilty.  Without  further  action 
the  Court  adjourned  until  the  following  day.  On  reassem- 
bling an  order  was  received  from  the  Secretary  of  War 
dissolving  the  Court,  and  a  day  later  it  was  called  to  meet 
again  under  Special  Order  No.  453,  dated  August  23,  1865. 
In  the  meantime  the  charges  and  specifications  had  been 
materially  changed  and  amended  by  striking  from  the  list 
the  names  of  several  persons  who  had  been  charged  with 
having  conspired  with  Wirz  to  destroy  the  lives  of  our 
soldiers.  Wirz  was  again  arraigned  and  his  plea  of  not 
guilty  was  entered;  but  at  this  juncture  his  counsel  made 
a  determined  effort  to  secure  his  discharge  on  the  ground 
that  he  had  been  placed  in  jeopardy  during  his  first  arraign- 
ment, and  that  under  the  Constitution  he  could  not  legally 
be  placed  on  trial  a  second  time.  After  a  full  hearing  the 
Court  decided  that  the  action  taken  by  the  War  Department 
was  in  conformity  to  the  law  and  precedents,  and  so  the 
trial  proceeded. 

In  this  connection  I  think  it  proper  to  state  that  the 
charges  under  which  Wirz  was  first  arraigned  embraced 
the  names,  as  co-conspirators,  of  Jefferson  Davis,  James  A. 
Seddon,  Howell  Cobb,  and  Bobert  E.  Lee.  These  names 
were  stricken  from  the  charges  as  amended;  but  when  the 
Court  made  up  its  findings,  being  satisfied  beyond  question 
that  a  conspiracy  had  existed  as  charged,  and  believing  it 
to  be  our  duty  to  include  in  our  verdict  the  names  of  any 

11  Copied  from  the  Trial  of  Henry  Wirt,  Bxeeutive  DoemmenU,  2nd  Seadon, 
40th  Congrew,  No.  23,  p.  511. 


ANDEBSONVILLE  AND  THE  TRIAL  OF  WIBZ       51 

of  those  prominent  in  the  Confederate  government  who 
were  shown  to  have  been  directly  or  indirectly  connected 
with  this  conspiracy,  we  amended  the  specification  to 
Charge  No.  1,  by  adding  the  names  of  Davis,  Seddon,  and 
Cobb.  We  took  it  for  granted  that  if  onr  verdict  was  ap- 
proved by  the  President  the  government  wonld  accept  onr 
finding  as  an  indictment  of  the  persons  named,  and  that 
they  would  be  brought  to  trial.  I  am  pleased  to  say,  how- 
ever, that  the  Court  found  no  evidence  showing  that  Gen- 
eral Lee  was  cognizant  of,  or  was  in  any  measure  a  party 
to,  this  conspiracy,  and  his  name  was  not  included  in  the 
verdict 

The  Military  Commission  that  met  and  tried  Wirz  held 
their  sessions  in  the  rooms  of  the  Court  of  Claims  in  the 
Capitol  Building  at  Washington,  D.  C.  It  was  made  up  as 
follows  (omitting  the  name  of  General  Bragg  for  the  rea- 
son stated) :  —  At  the  head  of  the  table  sat  Major  General 
Lew  Wallace,  the  President  of  the  Court.  He  was  at  that 
time  a  man  of  mature  years,  a  lawyer  by  profession,  and 
of  recognised  ability.  On  his  right  at  the  table  sat  Major 
General  G.  Mott,  who  subsequently  became  Governor  of 
New  Jersey.  He  was  a  man  then  of  forty-five  or  fifty  years,^ 
a  lawyer,  and  a  man  of  excellent  judgment  and  discretion 
Opposite  him  sat  Major  General  Lorenzo  Thomas,  the  Ad- 
jutant (General  of  the  United  States  Army.  He  was  then 
fully  sixty-five  years  of  age,  had  been  for  many  years 
connected  with  the  regular  service,  and  was  an  acknowl- 
edged authority  on  military  law  and  the  rules  and  usages 
of  war.  On  General  Mott's  right  sat  Major  General  J.  W. 
Geary,  who  after  his  discharge  from  the  military  service 
was  made  €k>vemor  of  the  great  State  of  Pennsylvania — 
a  man  aged  fifty  or  more,  and  possessed  of  more  than 
ordinary  ability.     Opposite  him  sat  Brigadier  General 


52     IOWA  JOUENAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Francis  Fessenden  of  Maine,  son  of  old  Senator  Fessenden, 
a  man  aged  about  thirty-five,  a  lawyer,  and  one  who  in 
every  sense  might  have  been  called  an  educated  gentleman. 
On  Oeneral  Geary's  right  sat  Brevet  Brigadier  (General 
John  F.  Ballier  of  Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania,  an  educated 
German,  aged  fifty  or  more,  who  had  commanded  the 
Ninety-eighth  Pennsylvania  Infantry.  On  his  right  sat 
Brevet  Colonel  T.  Allcock  of  New  York,  a  man  of  forty  or 
more,  and  a  distinguished  artillery  officer,  and  finally  on 
the  opposite  side  of  the  table,  was  placed  the  boy  member 
—  your  humble  servant.  Possibly  it  might  have  been 
truthfully  said  of  me  that  I  was  too  young  and  inexperi- 
enced to  fill  so  important  a  position,  since  I  was  then  only 
in  my  twenty-sixth  year;  but  I  had  seen  four  years  of 
actual  warfare,  had  successfully  commanded  a  regiment  of 
Iowa  men,  and  I  thought  then,  as  I  think  now,  that  I  was 
a  competent  juror.  The  Judge  Advocate  of  the  Commis- 
sion was  Colonel  N.  P.  Chipman,  who  early  in  the  war 
served  as  Major  of  the  Second  Iowa  Infantry.  He  was 
severely  wounded  at  Fort  Donnelson  in  February,  1862. 
When  sufficiently  recovered  to  return  to  duty  he  was  pro- 
moted and  became  Chief  of  Staff  for  General  S.  B.  Curtis, 
and  later  was  placed  on  duty  in  Washington.  He  was  a  law- 
yer by  profession,  a  man  of  superior  education  and  refine- 
ment, and  withal  one  of  the  most  genial,  kind-hearted,  com- 
panionable men  I  have  ever  had  the  good  fortune  to  meet. 
The  average  level-headed  citizen  while  considering  the 
verdicts  rendered  in  an  ordinary  criminal  case  is  generally 
ready  to  say:  **The  jury  are  the  best  judges  of  the  evi- 
dence, they  heard  it  all  as  it  was  given,  had  an  opportunity 
to  judge  of  its  value  and  estimate  the  credibility  of  the  wit- 
nesses, and  their  judgment  should  be  accepted  as  correct 
and  final."   It  seems  to  me  that  the  American  people,  and 


ANDEBSONVILLE  AND  THE  TBIAL  OF  WIBZ       53 

especially  the  future  historian,  should  be  equally  fair  in 
dealing  with  the  Wirz  Commission.  Indeed,  I  do  not  see 
how  it  would  be  possible  for  an  intelligent,  unprejudiced^ 
fair-minded  reviewer  to  conclude  that  such  a  Court  could 
or  would  have  rendered  a  verdict  that  was  not  in  full 
accord  with  the  evidence  presented.  I  assure  you  that 
no  attempt  was  made  to  dictate  or  influence  our  verdict; 
and  furthermore,  there  was  no  power  on  earth  that  could 
have  swerved  us  from  the  discharge  of  our  sworn  duty 
as  we  saw  it.  Our  verdict  was  unanimous.  There  were  no 
dissenting  opinions.  And  for  myself  I  can  say  that  there 
has  been  no  time  during  the  forty-five  years  that  have  in- 
tervened since  this  trial  was  held  when  I  have  felt  that  I 
owed  an  apology  to  anyone,  not  even  to  the  Almighty,  for 
having  voted  to  hang  Henry  Wirz  by  the  neck  until  he  was 
dead. 

Wirz  was  tried  on  two  charges.  The  first  charge  was 
that  he  had  conspired  with  John  H.  Winder  and  others  to 
injure  the  health  and  destroy  the  lives  of  our  soldiers  who 
were  held  as  prisoners  of  war.  And  the  second  charge  was 
'^ Murder  in  violation  of  the  laws  and  customs  of  war". 
The  Court  found  him  guilty  of  both  of  the  charges  and  of 
ten  of  the  thirteen  specifications.  Throughout  the  trial  the 
prisoner  was  treated  with  the  utmost  fairness,  kindness, 
and  consideration  by  the  Court  and  the  Judge  Advocate. 
When  our  verdict  was  rendered  and  the  record  made  com- 
plete it  was  submitted  for  review  to  General  Joseph  Holt, 
Judge  Advocate  General,  a  man  noted  for  his  high  char- 
acter, patriotism,  and  ability  as  a  lawyer  and  a  judge.  I 
quote  but  a  paragraph  or  two  from  his  review.   He  said : 

Language  fails  in  an  attempt  to  denounce,  even  in  faint  terms, 
the  diabolical  combination  for  the  destmction  and  death,  by  cruel 
and  fiendishly  ingenious  processeSy  of  helpless  prisoners  of  war  who 


54     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTOBT  AND  POLITICS 

might  fall  into  their  hands,  which  this  record  shows  was  plotted 
and  deliberately  entered  upon,  and,  as  far  as  time  permitted, 
accomplished  by  the  rebel  authorities  and  their  brutal  underlings 
at  Andersonville  Prison.^' 

And  in  closing  his  review,  after  reference  to  the  high 
character  of  the  men  composing  the  Court  and  of  the  fair- 
ness of  the  trial,  he  said : 

The  conclusion  reached  is  one  from  which  the  overwhelming 
volume  of  testimony  left  no  escape. 

This  paper  does  not  demand  nor  will  it  admit  of  farther 
reference  to  the  vast  mass  of  testimony  listened  to  by  the 
C!ourt.  In  conclusion  I  will  refer  to  a  single  incident  of 
the  trial.  For  weeks  after  the  trial  began  the  Judge  Ad- 
vocate presented  only  such  testimony  as  went  to  show  the 
general  conditions  existing  at  the  prison  and  which  tended 
to  establish  the  charge  of  conspiracy,  and  he  held  back 
until  near  the  dose  of  the  trial  the  evidence  on  which  he 
depended  to  establish  the  fact  that  Wirz  had  by  his  own 
acts  been  guilty  of  willful  murder.  As  a  result  Wirz  evi- 
dently concluded  that  no  such  evidence  had  been  found, 
and  on  repeated  occasions  he  addressed  the  Court  through 
his  counsel,  saying  that  he  was  ready  to  admit  the  truth  of 
all  evidence  that  had  been  presented,  but  that  he  was  not 
personally  responsible  for  the  conditions  shown  to  have  ex- 
isted in  the  prison ;  that  he  had  simply  acted  in  conformity 
to  the  orders  of  his  superior  officers,  and  should  not  be  held 
responsible  for  them ;  and  he  therefore  asked  for  an  acquit- 
tal and  discharge.  These  requests,  one  after  another,  were 
denied  by  the  Court. 

Early  in  the  trial  Wirz  became  sick,  and  a  lounge  was 
brought  into  the  room  on  which  he  was  permitted  to  re- 

it  Copied  from  the  Trial  of  Henry  Win,  Exeoviive  Doimmenta,  2iid  SeBsion, 
40th  GongreBSy  No.  23,  pp.  809, 814. 


ANDEBSONVILLE  AND  THE  TRIAL  OF  WIBZ      55 

dine;  and  during  many  days  of  the  trial  lie  lay  on  the 
lonnge  with  his  handkerchief  over  his  face,  apparently  ob- 
livions to  all  that  was  taking  place.  Finally  a  witness  was 
placed  on  the  stand  who  told  of  his  escape  from  the  stock- 
ade in  company  with  a  comrade  whose  name  he  did  not 
know,  of  their  pnrsnit  by  the  blood  hounds,  and  of  their 
recapture  and  return  to  the  Confederate  camp.  He  said 
that  when  brought  to  Wirz's  tent  and  their  escape  and  re- 
capture was  reported,  Wirz  became  furious,  and  rushing 
from  his  tent  he  began  cursing  and  damning  them  for  hav- 
ing attempted  to  escape.  The  comrade,  who  was  nearly 
dead  from  exposure  and  suffering,  had  staked  his  last 
effort  on  this  attempt  to  regain  his  freedom,  and  the  recap- 
ture had  discouraged  him  completely  and  caused  him  to 
feel  that  death  itself,  was  preferable  to  a  return  to  the 
stockade.  like  a  caged  animal  he  turned  on  Wirz  and 
gave  him  curse  for  curse,  challenged  him  to  do  his  worst, 
and  told  him  he  would  rather  die  than  return  to  the  hell 
hole  from  which  he  had  escaped.  This  so  enraged  Wirz 
that  he  sprang  at  the  man,  knocked  him  down  with  his 
revolver,  and  then  kicked  and  trampled  him  with  his  boot 
heels  until  he  was  dead.  When  the  witness  began  this 
story  Wirz  became  interested.  First  he  removed  the  hand- 
kerchief from  his  face ;  then  propped  himself  on  one  elbow ; 
and  as  the  story  progressed  he  gradually  rose  up  until  he 
stood  erect.  His  fists  were  clenched,  his  eyes  were  fairly 
bursting  from  their  sockets,  and  his  face  presented  a  horri- 
ble appearance.  As  the  witness  finished  his  story  Wirz 
fairly  screamed  at  him:  **You  say  I  killed  that  man.** 
**Tes  sir**,  replied  the  witness.  **You  tramped  him  to 
death  in  my  presence**.  At  this  Wirz  threw  up  his  hands 
and  exclaimed,  '^Oh  my  Gott'*,  and  fell  back  in  a  faint  on 
the  lounge. 


56     IOWA  JOUENAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 


was  one  of  a  number  of  stories  that  told  of  Wirz's 
personal  acts  of  cruelty.  In  addition  he  was  directly 
chargeable  with  the  unwarranted  punishments  which  he 
caused  to  be  inflicted  on  men  who  attempted  to  escape  or  in 
other  ways  violated  the  rules  of  discipline  which  he  had 
established.  These  punishments  consisted  of  stopping  of 
rations,  establishment  of  a  dead-line,  use  of  the  stocks,  the 
chain-gang,  use  of  hounds,  bucking  and  gagging,  tying  up 
by  the  thumbs,  floggiag  on  the  bare  back,  and  chaining  to 
posts,  from  all  of  which  causes  deaths  were  shown  to  have 
resulted. 

'^  Mister  Johnny  Beb'',  as  we  called  him  in  war  time,  the 
man  who  bared  his  bosom  to  our  bullets  and  challenged  us 
to  come  on,  was  a  big-hearted,  generous  fellow  whom  I  have 
always  believed  fought  for  the  right  as  he  saw  it.  I  know 
by  my  experience  that  he  was  as  brave  a  soldier  as  ever 
carried  a  gun ;  and  prisoners  who  fell  into  his  hands  on  the 
battle  field  were  invariably  treated  with  kindness  and  con- 
sideration. It  was  only  men  of  the  Wirz-Winder  type, 
bushwhackers,  and  home  guards,  that  presumed  to  offer 
insult  and  abuse  to  our  men  in  captivity.  I  make  this  dos- 
ing remark  because  of  the  fact  that  with  the  passing  of 
years  the  bitter  feeling  that  had  existed  between  the  North 
and  the  South  has  been  practically  wiped  out  and  the  rem- 
nants of  the  old  fighting  forces  on  both  sides  have  been  com- 
ing together  and  shaking  hands  as  friends,  and  I  would  be 
sorry  to  know  that  in  this  address  I  have  uttered  a  word 
that  will  serve  to  mar  in  the  least  the  spirit  of  harmony 
existing  between  these  old  veterans. 

John  Howabd  Stibbs 

CmCAGO,  IliLINOIS 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  OP  IOWA  CITY 
HISTOEICAL  INTRODUCTION 

At  seven-thirty  on  the  evening  of  November  20,  1885,  a 
small  gronp  of  men  who  were  interested  in  Science  met  in 
the  Chemical  Laboratory  of  the  State  University  of  Iowa. 
They  had  assembled  at  the  call  of  Dr.  L.  W.  Andrews,  at 
that  time  and  for  many  years  afterward  Professor  of  Chem- 
istry in  the  University.  Dr.  Andrews  stated  that  the  object 
which  he  had  in  mind  in  calling  the  meeting  was  the  forma- 
tion of  a  '^ Science  Circle";  and  with  this  announcement 
^'the  meeting  proceeded  to  temporary  organization  by  the 
election  of  Prof.  Leonard  as  Chairman  and  E.  L.  Boemer 
as  Sec'y."^  Then  a  committee  was  appointed  to  draft  a 
constitution  and  by-laws  for  a  permanent  organization. 
^' After  listening  to  an  interesting  informal  lecture  by  Prof. 
Leonard  on  the  probable  course  of  the  meteor,  the  meeting 
adjourned  to  7  o'clock  Saturday  evening,  Nov.  28th."' 

The  report  by  the  committee  on  constitution  and  by-laws, 
which  was  made  at  the  meeting  on  November  28th  was  re- 
ferred back  to  the  committee  with  instructions  to  make 
certain  changes.  At  a  meeting  on  the  evening  of  December 
11th,  however,  the  constitution  was  unanimously  adopted.' 

Such,  in  brief,  is  the  story  of  the  organization  of  the 
Baconian  Club  of  Iowa  City.  Professor  N.  E.  Leonard  was 
the  first  President  of  the  Club,  and  Professor  L.  W.  An- 
drews, to  whom  is  due  the  credit  for  inaugurating  the  Club, 

1  Ba4Mnian  Club  Seeord-Booh^  Vol  I,  p.  3. 
3 Baconian  Club  SecardBooh,  Vol.  I,  pp.  3,  4. 
>  Baconian  Club  Seeord-BooJc,  Vol.  I,  p.  7. 

57 


58     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

was  the  first  Secretary.  The  charter  members  were :  N.  B. 
Leonard,  P.  H.  Philbrick,  Samuel  Calvin,  T.  H.  Macbride, 
J.  G.  Gilchrist,  L.  W.  Andrews,  and  Andrew  A,  Veblen* — all 
of  whom  were  at  the  time  professors  in  the  State  University 
of  Iowa.  Two  of  these  charter  members.  Professor  Mac- 
bride  and  Professor  Calvin,  have  remained  in  the  service  of 
the  University;  and  all  but  two,  Professor  Philbrick  and 
Professor  Gilchrist,  are  living  at  the  present  time.  The 
Club  thus  organized  has  had  a  continuous  and  prosperous 
existence. 

The  passage  of  the  years,  however,  has  witnessed  many 
changes  in  the  character  and  membership  of  the  Club.  The 
largely  attended  meetings  which  are  now  held  in  an  electric- 
lighted,  steam-heated  room,  are  in  striking  contrast  to  the 
meetings  held  twenty-five  years  ago,  when  the  Club  was  in 
its  infancy.  Then  a  few  men,  seldom  more  than  twenty  and 
often  less  than  half  that  number,  gathered  in  the  Chemical 
Laboratory  in  old  North  Hall  and  sat  in  a  circle  around  the 
stove,  the  members  taking  turn  in  replenishing  the  fire. 
The  reader  of  the  evening  sat  in  the  circle  with  the  other 
members,  and  there  was  an  almost  total  lack  of  formality, 
the  meeting  assuming  the  nature  of  a  friendly  conference 
rather  than  having  a  set  form  of  procedure.  Indeed  the 
meeting  was  often  without  a  formal  paper. 

At  each  meeting  a  subject  for  discussion  the  following 
week  was  chosen  by  mutual  consent  and  assigned  to  some 
member  by  the  President.  Frequently  no  paper  was  pre- 
pared, the  member  to  whom  the  subject  was  assigned  simply 
opening  the  discussion  by  speaking  in  an  informal  manner 
with  or  without  notes.  The  discussion  of  topics  was  free 
and  often  animated,  since  the  object  of  the  Club  was  to 
give  the  members  the  benefit  of  each  other's  ideas.    The 

^CanHituUon  of  the  Baconian  Chib  (Edition  of  1891),  p.  8. 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  59 

meetings  were  in  no  sense  open  to  the  public,  and  no  record 
of  the  discussions  was  kept.  Consequently  the  members 
were  under  no  restraint  in  the  expression  of  their  viewSi 
but  stated  their  beliefs  freely  and  fully  whether  they  met 
with  the  approval  of  other  members  or  not.  Besides  the 
discussion  of  regularly  assigned  subjects,  the  policy  was 
early  established  of  permitting  voluntary  reports  on  any 
topic  of  interest  to  the  Club  —  a  custom  which  has  been  ad- 
hered to  down  to  the  present  time. 

The  Constitution  provides  for  three  classes  of  members : 
ex  officio  members;  full  members,  or  'Hhose  engaged  in 
active  scientific  work'';  and  associate  members,  or  ''those 
interested  in  scientific  work".  The  President  of  the  Uni- 
versity is  a  member  ex  officio.^  The  actual  working  of  this 
provision  has  had  these  results:  full  members  have  been 
persons  on  the  faculty  of  the  State  University  of  Iowa ;  while 
the  associates  have  been  instructors  in  the  University, 
fellows,  scholars,  or  graduate  students  pursuing  researches 
in  scientific  subjects. 

In  the  beginning,  as  has  been  suggested,  no  publicity 
was  given  to  the  meetings  of  the  Club.  Occasionally  a  few 
guests  were  invited  to  be  present,  and  later  guests  were 
permitted  to  participate  in  the  discussions,  but  the  tendency 
was  to  restrict  the  attendance  to  members  and  those  vitally 
interested.  In  February,  1889,  a  standing  resolution  was 
adopted  providing  that  ''only  full  and  associate  members 
and  those  personally  invited  by  members"  should  be  ad- 
mitted to  the  meetings  of  the  Club,  and  that  invitations 
might  be  issued  "for  any  specified  evening  or  for  the  whole 
or  any  portion  of  the  club  year".^    This  resolution,  how- 

8  Canstiiutian  of  the  Baconian  Club  (Edition  of  1900),  p.  3. 
In  the  Constitution  aa  originally  adopted  there  was  no  provision  for  ex 
officio  members. 

«  Baamian  Club  Beoord-Booh,  Vol.  I,  p.  199. 


60     IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

ever,  has  not  always  been  f ollowed,  and  in  fact  at  present  a 
general  invitation  is  given  to  the  public  to  attend  the  meet- 
ings of  the  Clnb,  and  acconnts  of  the  papers  and  discussions 
often  appear  in  the  University  publications  or  in  the  city 
newspapers. 

The  papers  read  before  the  Club  have  covered  a  broad 
range  of  subjects,  as  will  be  revealed  by  a  reading  of  the 
list  which  is  published  herewith.  The  papers  as  a  rule  have 
been  prepared  with  care  and  with  only  a  few  exceptions 
have  been  presented  by  the  members  themselves,  little  effort 
having  been  made  to  secure  addresses  by  scientists  of  rep- 
utation from  outside  the  University.  Thus  individual  effort 
on  the  part  of  members  of  the  Club  has  been  encouraged 
and  a  spirit  of  mutual  helpfulness  has  prevailed. 

From  the  time  the  Constitution  of  the  Club  was  adopted 
and  signed  in  1885  the  number  of  members  has  increased 
until  at  present  there  are  nearly  fifty  full  members.  In  the 
meantime  many  have  come  and  gone,  and  hence  the  mem- 
bership has  varied  from  year  to  year  both  in  numbers  and 
in  personnel.  Besides  those  already  mentioned  as  charter 
members  the  following  professors,  still  serving  on  the  fac- 
ulty of  the  State  University  of  Iowa,  were  elected  to  full 
membership  in  the  Club  during  the  first  five  years  of  its 
existence:  Laenas  Q.  Weld,  Charles  C.  Nutting,  Elbert  W. 
Bockwood,  (George  T.  W.  Patrick,  and  Bohumil  Shimek. 

The  records  of  the  Baconian  Club  are  unusually  complete. 
The  Secretary's  Record-Books  from  the  very  beginning 
are  still  in  existence,  and  in  these  books  may  be  found  the 
minutes  of  all  the  meetings,  together  with  lists  of  officers 
and  members.  The  purpose  of  the  founders,  the  character 
of  the  meetings,  the  persons  in  attendance,  and  the  topics 
which  from  year  to  year  were  of  interest  in  the  world  of 
science  are  revealed  in  the  pages  of  these  Record-Books, 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  61 

and  henoe  in  them  may  be  fomid  the  best  histoiy  of  the 
Baconian  Club. 

The  Baconian  Club  was  the  first  organization  of  its  kind 
in  the  University.  During  the  early  years,  although  the 
chief  object  of  the  Club  was  to  discuss  subjects  in  the  natu- 
ral and  physical  sciences^  the  membership  included  men  from 
the  faculties  of  all  the  colleges  and  departments  in  the 
University,  But  as  the  University  grew  the  need  of  similar 
dubs  in  the  various  departments  began  to  be  felt.  And  so, 
as  time  went  on  members  of  the  Baconian  Club  who  were 
not  primarily  interested  in  the  natural  and  physical  sci- 
ences withdrew  and  formed  the  Political  Science  Club,  the 
Philosophical  Club,  the  Humanist  Society,  and  other  similar 
organizations,  modelled  after  the  Baconian  Club  which  was 
the  i)arent  society.  The  result  is  that  at  the  present  time 
the  membership  of  the  Baconian  Club  is  confined  almost  en- 
tirely to  persons  actively  engaged  in  teaching  or  research 
work  in  the  natural  and  physical  sciences. 

CONSTITUTION 
Abticlb  I — Name  and  Object 

Section  1.  This  organization  shall  be  known  as  the 
Baconian  Club  of  Iowa  City. 

Section  2.  Its  object  shall  be,  the  mutual  interchange  of 
thought,  and  the  discussion  of  such  scientific  topics  as  pos- 
sess a  general  interest 

Abticle  n — ^Membership 

Section  1.  Membership  shall  be  of  three  classes,  viz., 
ei-officio,  full,  and  associate.  The  President  of  the  Uni- 
versity shall  be  a  member,  ex-offido. 

[BeriBed  April  15,  1898.] 

Section  2.  Members  shall  be  those  engaged  in  active 
scientific  work. 


62     IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Section  3.  Associates  shall  be  those  interested  in  sci- 
entific work. 

Section  4.  Members  and  associates  shall  be  elected  by 
ballot  of  the  members  of  the  dnb,  the  names  having  been 
proposed  at  least  one  week  previously.  Three  black  balls 
shall  cause  the  rejection  of  the  candidate.  In  case  of  re- 
jection a  second  ballot  may  be  had,  at  a  subsequent  stated 
meeting.  A  second  rejection  shall  render  the  candidate 
ineligible  for  the  remainder  of  the  club  year. 

[Amended  October  25,  1889,  hj  adding:] 

Section  5,  No  person  not  a  resident  of  Iowa  City  shall 
be  a  member  of  the  club.  Members  who  remove  their  resi- 
dence permanently^  or  members  who  though  residents  of 
the  city  have  not  been  in  attendance  on  the  meetings  of  the 
dub  for  one  year,  shall  thereby  cease  to  be  members,  but 
may,  by  vote  of  the  dub,  be  carried  on  the  rolls  as  assodate 
members. 

Section  6.  A  member  who  refuses  to  give  a  paper  during 
any  one  year,  or  who  fails  to  read  a  paper  during  any  two 
consecutive  years,  unless  such  failure  is  due  to  illness  or  un- 
avoidable absence  from  the  dty,  shall  have  his  name  dropped 
from  the  roll  of  the  dub.  In  case  the  membership  is  too 
large  to  allow  an  assignment  of  topic  during  the  year,  one 
or  more  voluntary  reports  may  be  accepted  as  a  substitute. 

[Adopted  April  15,  1898.] 

Section  7.  An  associate  who  removes  his  residence  per- 
manently from  the  dty  shall  thereby  cease  his  membership 
in  the  club,  provided,  always,  that  any  associate  may  con- 
tinue his  relations  with  the  club  by  presenting,  either  per- 
sonally or  by  written  communication,  at  least  one  voluntary 
report  each  year.  By  a  two-thirds  vote  of  the  dub,  any 
name  may  be  retained  permanently  on  the  roll  of  assodates. 

[Adopted  April  15,  1898.] 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  63 

Abtiolb  m — Offiosbs 

Sbotion  1.  The  officers  of  the  dub  shall  be  a  President 
and  a  Secretary. 

Section  2.  The  President  shall  be  elected  at  the  first 
meeting  in  September,  of  each  year,  from  among  the  mem- 
bers, by  a  majority  vote  of  all  members  present.  He  shall 
hold  office  until  the  next  annual  meeting,  or  until  his  succes- 
sor is  elected.  He  shall  perform  the  duties  usually  apper- 
taining to  the  office  of  President.  In  his  absence  his  place 
shall  be  taken  by  a  Chairman  elected  by  the  members  pres- 
ent. 

Section  3.  The  Secretary  shall  be  elected  at  the  same 
time,  and  in  the  same  manner  as  is  prescribed  for  the  elec- 
tion of  the  President,  and  his  term  of  office  shall  be  the  same. 
He  shall  perform  the  duties  usually  devolving  upon  a  Secre- 
tary. Should  he  be  absent  from  any  meeting,  a  Secretary 
pro  tern,  shall  be  elected. 

AbTICLB  IV — ^DXTBS  AND  FeES 

There  shall  be  no  dues  nor  fees.  Any  expenses  incurred 
by  vote  of  the  dub,  shall  be  met  by  a  pro  rata  assessment, 
previously  made,  on  all  the  members. 

Article  V — Meetings 

Section  1.  The  meetings  shall  be  Annual,  Begular,  and 
Spedal. 

Section  2.  The  Annual  Meeting  shall  be  in  the  last  week 
in  September.  At  this  meeting  the  Order  of  Business  shall 
be: 

1.  Beport  of  President. 

2.  Beport  of  Secretary. 

3.  Beport  of  Committees. 

4.  Election  of  Officers. 

Section  3.    The  Begular  Meetings  shall  be  held  once  a 


64     IOWA  JOUENAL  OF  HISTOET  AND  POLITICS 

week,  from  the  last  week  in  September  to  the  last  week  in 
Aprily  on  such  day,  at  such  hour,  and  in  such  place  as  the 
dub  may  from  time  to  time  direct  The  Order  of  Business 
at  these  meetings  shall  be  as  hereinafter  provided. 

Section  4.  Special  Meetings  may  be  held  at  any  time, 
by  vote  of  the  club,  on  call  of  the  President,  or  at  the  request 
of  three  members.  At  such  meetings  no  other  business  than 
that  for  which  the  meeting  has  been  called  shall  be  trans- 
acted. 

Abtiolb  VI — Order  of  Business 

The  Order  of  Business  at  all  regular  meetings  shall  be  as 
follows : 

1.  Beading  of  Minutes. 

2.  Beading  of  Essay. 

3.  Colloquium. 

4.  Discussion. 

5.  Voluntary  Beports. 

6.  Assignment  of  Topic. 

7.  Miscellaneous  Business. 

8.  Adjournment. 

Abtiole  Vn — ^Essays  and  Essayists 

Section  1.  The  appointed  essayist,  at  each  regular  meet- 
ing, shall  furnish  the  Secretary  with  an  abstract  of  the 
paper,  to  be  entered  in  the  minutes. 

Section  2.  The  essay  shall  remain  the  property  of  the 
writer,  unless  it  shall  be  published  in  full  by  the  club,  with 
the  consent  of  the  author,  in  which  case  the  copyright 
shall  remain  with  the  dub. 

Article  Vlll — ^By-Laws 

The  club  may  adopt  Standing  Besolutions,  at  any  meeting, 
as  circumstances  may  require,  by  a  majority  vote  of  all  the 
members  present.    Such  Standing  Besolutions  shall  be  re- 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  65 

corded,  and  have  all  the  anthoritj  of  By-Laws  iintil  re- 
I>ealed. 

Abtiolb  IX — ^Ahbkdmbnts 

The  Constitution  may  be  altered  or  amended  at  any  regu- 
lar meeting,  by  a  two-thirds  vote  of  all  the  members,  writ- 
ten notice  of  the  proposed  amendment  having  been  given 
at  least  one  week  previously.  Absent  members  may  vote 
by  proxy  on  questions  of  amendment. 

OFFICERS  OF  THE  CLUB  1886-1910 

For  the  Year  J885-Jfifitf— President,  N.  E.  Leonard ;  Secre- 
tary, L.  W.  Andrews  and  A.  A.  Veblen. 

For  the  Year  J88tf-ifiS7— President,  Samuel  Calvin ;  Secre- 
tary, A.  A.  Veblen. 

For  the  Year  i887-ifi88— President,  Samuel  Calvin ;  Secre- 
tary, A.  A.  Veblen. 

For  the  Year  Jfififi-ififiS— President,  L.  W.  Andrews ;  Secre- 
tary, A.  A.  Veblen. 

For  the  Year  1889-1890— Presidenty  A.  A.  Veblen;  Secre- 
tary, C.  C.  Nutting. 

For  the  Year  1890-1891— Presidentj  T.  H.  Macbride;  Sec- 
retary, C.  C.  Nutting. 

For  the  Year  1891-1892— Presidentj  J.  G.  Gilchrist ;  Secre-^ 
tary,  L.  G.  Weld. 

For  the  Year  ifiP^-ifiP5— President,  C.  C.  Nutting ;  Secre- 
tary, A.  L.  Amer. 

For  the  Year  ifiP5-ISP4— President,  L.  G.  Weld ;  Secretary,. 
W.  K  Barlow. 

For  the  Year  ifiP4-iSP5— President,  G.  T.  W.  Patrick;  Sec- 
retary, A.  G.  Smith  and  Frank  Bussell. 

For  the  Year  1895-1896 — ^President,  A.  L.  Amer ;  Secretary^ 
A.  G.  Smith. 

VOL.  EE— 5 


66     IOWA  JOUENAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

For  the  Year  ifiPtf-IfiP7— President,  E.  W.  Bockwood ;  Sec- 
retary, A.  G.  Smith. 

For  the  Year  1897-1898 — ^President,  A.  G.  Smith ;  Secretary, 
G.  L.  Houser. 

For  the  Year  1898-1899 — ^President,  W.  L.  Bierring ;  Secre- 
tary, G.  L.  Houser. 

For  the  Year  1899-1900 — ^President,  B.  Shimek;  Secretary, 
W.  E.  Barlow. 

For  the  Year  1900-1901 — ^President,  Samuel  Calvin ;  Secre- 
tary, C.  E.  Seashore. 

For  the  Year  1901-1902 — ^President,  A.  V.  Sims ;  Secretary, 
C.  E.  Seashore. 

For  the  Year  1902-1903 — ^President,  C.  E.  Seashore;  Sec- 
retary, C.  L.  Von  Ende. 

For  the  Year  1903-1904 — ^President,  W.  J.  Teeters ;  Secre- 
tary, C.  L.  Von  Ende. 

For  the  Year  1904-1905 — ^President,  A.  A.  Veblen;  Secre- 
tary, J.  J.  Lambert. 

For  the  Year  1905-1906 — ^President,  G.  L.  Houser;  Secre- 
tary, C.  L.  Bryden. 

For  the  Year  iP(?tf-iP(?7— President,  Karl  E.  Guthe ;  Secre- 
tary, F.  A.  Stromsten. 

For  the  Year  1907-1908— President,  W.  G.  Baymond ;  Sec- 
retary, A.  G.  Worthing. 

For  the  Year  1908-1909 — ^President,  B.  B.  Wylie ;  Secretary, 
P.  S.  Biegler. 

For  the  Year  1909-1910— Presidentj  G,  F.  Kay;  Secretary, 
S.  M.  Woodward. 

PAPERS  AND  REPORTS  1885-1910 

Frank  Stanton  Aby,  1888. —  Papers :  The  Development 
of  the  Cerebro-Spinal  Axis,  1889;  Trichinae,  1891;  The 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  67 

Ultimate  Distribntioii  of  the  Blood,  1892 ;  Recent  Researches 
on  the  Physical  Basis  of  Life  and  Heredity,  1893.  Reports : 
Cultivation  of  Mushrooms,  1889;  The  Sweat  Ducts  and 
Blood  Supply  of  the  Stdn,  Discovery  of  the  Hog-Cholera 
Microbe,  1891 ;  Coloring  Matter  in  Human  Epidermis,  1892 ; 
The  Estimation  of  the  Weight  of  Haemoglobin  in  a  Dried 
Human  Blood  Cell,  A  New  Science  **Cy8tology'',  Demon- 
stration of  Giant  Cell  of  Sarconea,  A  Theory  of  Heat- 
producing  Centers  in  the  Brain,  Partheno-genesis  as  Shown 
by  the  Worker  Bee,  1893;  Review  of  Article  by  W.  D. 
Howells  on  ^^ Nerve  Degeneration  and  Regeneration"  (given 
by  Gilchrist  and  Aby),  1894. 

Hbnby  Albert,  1904. —  Papers:  Insects,  the  Role  They 
Play  in  the  Transmission  of  Diseases,  1905 ;  Bacteria  and 
the  Public  Health,  1906;  Animal  Diseases  Transmissible 
to  the  Human  Being,  1907 ;  Arterio-sclerosis  —  its  Relation 
to  the  Pathology  of  Senility,  1908 ;  The  Pasteur  Treatment 
of  Rabies  and  Other  Forms  of  Vaccine  Therapy,  1909. 
Reports:  The  Preparation  of  Permanent  Museum  Speci- 
mens, 1903 ;  Construction  and  Working  of  the  Epidiascoi)e, 
1905;  Filaria,  Sulphur  and  Formaldehyde  Bhunigation, 
Light  Producing  Bacteria,  1906;  Inhalation  of  Coal  Dust, 
Api)endicitis,  1907;  Spirochaete  Bacteria,  Method  of  Iso- 
lating the  Typhoid  Bacillus  from  Others  Found  in  Water, 
1908 ;  Making  of  Colored  Slides  by  a  New  Process  of  Color 
Photography,  Hook-worm  and  the  Hook-worm  Diseases, 
1909 ;  The  Work  of  Cultivating  Tissues  and  Organs  of  the 
Body  outside  of  the  Body,  1910. 

Edwabd  X.  Anderson,  1909. —  Report :  The  Nudeation  of 
Pure  and  Mixed  Vapors  in  Dust  Free  Air,  1910. 

Laungelot  Winghssteb  Andbbws,  Charter. —  Papers: 
Dead  Matter,  1886;  Historical  Review  of  the  Methods  Em- 


68     IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

ployed  for  the  Production  of  Extreme  Cold  and  the  lique- 
faction of  the  Permanent  Oases,  1886;  Evolution  of  the 
State,  1886;  The  Flowing  Wells  at  Belle  Plaine  (with 
Calvin),  1886;  The  Asymmetric  Carbon  Atom  in  Organic 
Compounds,  1886;  The  Evolution  of  the  Telephone,  1887; 
Atomic  Theories  in  the  Light  of  Atomic  Facts,  1887 ;  What 
We  E:now  about  the  Weight  of  Atoms,  1888 ;  Electrical  Stor- 
age  Batteries,  1888;  A  Chapter  from  the  History  of  Sd- 
ence,  1889 ;  What  Have  the  Material  Sciences  to  Do  with 
Education,  1889;  The  Absolute  Size  of  Molecules,  1889; 
Osmosis  and  Allied  Manifestations  of  Molecular  Motion  in 
Solutions,  1890 ;  Aluminum  —  its  Manufacture  and  Possible 
Industrial  Value,  1890 ;  A  Symposium  on  the  Nature  of  the 
Centre  of  the  Earth  (with  Weld  and  Calvin),  1891;  The 
Spectrum,  1891;  Progress  toward  Aerodynamical  Naviga- 
tion, 1891 ;  Modem  Explosives,  1892 ;  Paracelsus  Bombastus 
and  the  Science  of  his  Day,  1892 ;  Some  Principles  of  Evo- 
lution Illustrated  in  Chemical  Processes,  1892 ;  The  Develop- 
ment of  Chemistry  from  Alchemy,  1893 ;  Becent  Useful  Ap- 
plications of  Electricity  Other  than  Mechanical,  1893 ;  Some 
Applications  of  Science  to  the  Detection  of  Crime,  1894; 
Porcelain,  1896;  Next  to  Nothing,  1896;  An  X  Bay  Soiree, 
1896;  Discovery  Scientific  and  Otherwise,  1898;  The  Non- 
Chemical  Elements,  1898;  The  Air  We  Breathe,  1899;  Con- 
cerning the  Scope  of  University  Training,  1900;  How  the 
Weight  of  an  Atom  is  Ascertained,  1901 ;  The  Water  Supply 
and  Purification  System  of  Budapest,  1902 ;  Some  Belations 
of  Mass  to  Chemical  Action,  1903.  Reports :  Silicon  in  Iron 
and  Steel,  Fallacies  Concerning  Freezing  of  Water,  Poison  in 
Wall  Paper,  Determination  of  the  Velocity  of  Meteors,  The 
Linking  Carbon  Atom  in  Organic  Compounds,  Intelligence 
Displayed  by  Mice,  Some  Phenomena  in  Connection  with 
Fracture  of  Glass,  Edelmann's  Calorimeter  and  von  Beets 'b 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  69 

Lecture  Galvanometer,  Another  Series  of  Experiments  on 
Nitrification,  A  New  Astatic  Galvanometer  with  Spiral 
Needle,  Survival  of  the  Fittest  in  the  Conflict  of  Molecules, 
1886 ;  Antisepsis  and  Sterilization  by  Electricity,  The  Func- 
tion of  Bain  in  Supplying  Substances  Important  to  Plant 
Life,  Methods  of  Photometry,  A  Hydrostatic  Balance  and 
Testing  Machine,  Secretions  of  Insectivorous  Plants,  Free 
Fluorine,  Comparison  of  the  Sense  of  Smell  with  the  Other 
Senses  as  Begards  Delicacy,  Electrification  of  Air,  Viscos- 
ity of  Liquids  and  a  New  Form  of  Viscosimeter,  The  Pre- 
diction and  Discovery  of  the  Element  (Germanium,  The 
Symptoms  of  Hemlock  Poisoning,  1887;  Aluniinum  in 
Plants ,  Molecular  (Geometry,  Influence  of  light  on  Electric 
Leakage  and  Disruptive  Discharge,  Microscopic  Perspec- 
tive, The  Kruess  Vierordt  Spectroscope,  Singing  Flames, 
The  Formation  of  Waterspouts,  The  Cimento  Academy  of 
Florence,  1889;  Becent  Besearches  Concerning  Solutions, 
The  Element  **X",  The  Action  of  Light  in  Producing  Elec- 
trical  Disturbances,  A  Pipette  for  Volumetric  Work,  Modi- 
fications in  the  Theory  of  Electrolysis,  The  Manufacture 
of  Photographic  Dry  Plates  and  the  Theory  of  Developing 
the  Image,  Discovery  of  Criteria  for  the  Actuality  of  Truth, 
1889;  Photography  of  the  Electric  Spark,  Herbert  Spen- 
cer's Principles  of  Psychology,  Vol.  I,  Ch.  V,  Last  Line, 
The  Sandwich  Islands,  Plasmodium  Malariae  (for  Hage- 
beck).  Christening  of  the  '*Myopyknometer'',  The  Pasteur 
Filter,  Hydrazic  Acid,  1890;  The  Application  of  Electrol- 
ysis to  Toxicology,  The  Electric  Coal  Cutter,  A  Bronze 
Microbe,  Individuality  of  the  Chemical  Unit,  Siemens 's  Be- 
generative  Evaporator,  1891;  Stas  and  his  Work  on  the 
Determination  of  Atomic  Weights,  The  Nature  of  the  Inter- 
atomic Force  Acting  within  the  Molecule,  Becent  Experi- 
ments in  the  Sub-Divisions  of  Matter,  The  Asymmetric 


70     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTOET  AND  POLITICS 

Arrangement  of  Atoms,  An  Analysis  of  the  Illnminating  Gas 
of  the  Iowa  City  Gas  Company,  Prof.  H.  A.  Rowland's  New 
Map  of  the  Solar  Spectnim,  A  Chemical  Paradox,  Non- 
Existence  of  Chemical  Action  at  Low  Temperatures,  1892; 
A  Supposed  Meteorite  by  Analysis  Shown  to  be  only 
Hematite;  Besults  of  a  Chemical  Examination  Bearing  on 
the  Oxygenation  of  the  Water,  An  Experiment  in  Capillarity 
Showing  Belative  Bate  of  Movement  of  Water  and  the 
Substance  Dissolved  in  it.  The  Longitudinal  Conductivity 
of  Quartz  Crystals,  The  Use  of  Tools  by  Animals,  Illustra- 
tions of  the  Structure  of  Molecules  by  Means  of  Models, 
Wolf's  Electrolytic  Apparatus  for  the  Detection  and  Esti- 
mation of  Small  Quantities  of  Arsenic,  1893 ;  The  Optics  of 
Photography,  Photographic  Inaccuracies,  Use  of  EHectric- 
ity  in  Bleaching  Operations,  Use  of  Electricity  for  the  Dis- 
infection of  Sewage,  Perception  of  Time,  Viscocity  and 
Diffusion,  Lack  of  a  Bythmic  Sense,  Dangers  from  Kero- 
sene Stoves,  1894 ;  The  Effect  of  Ammonia  upon  India  Bub- 
ber.  The  Survival  of  the  Fittest  as  Shown  in  the  Overthrow 
of  Past  Civilizations,  Myrotype,  a  New  Photographic  Print- 
ing Paper,  Argon,  Some  Physiological  Effects  of  Extreme 
Cold,  The  Phenomena  of  Electro-Thermometry,  A  Hot  Air 
Motor,  The  Incombustibility  of  Sulphur  in  Dry  Oxygen, 
Cycles  of  Lengthening  and  Shortening  of  the  Swiss  Gla- 
ciers (with  Littig),  Aluminum  Bronze,  Translation  of  a 
Paper  by  Ostwald  on  the  Overthrow  of  Scientific  Material- 
ism, The  Absence  of  Hydrogen  from  the  Atmosphere,  1895 ; 
Calculating  Machines,  Experiments  in  Cathode  Bay  Photo- 
graphy, The  Apparatus  Used  in  the  Discovery  and  Study 
of  the  Lenard  Bays,  Attempts  to  Obtain  the  X  Bay  without 
a  Vacuum,  Negatives  Dlustrating  the  Location  of  a  Foreign 
Body  by  Means  of  the  X  Bays,  1896 ;  Sciograph  of  a  Femur 
Showing  a  Bifle  Bullet  Lodged  in  the  Flesh,  Curious  Mark- 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  71 

ings  in  the  Interior  of  a  Compound  Lens  Due  to  the  Slow 
Contraction  of  the  Canada  Balsam  Used  as  a  Cement,  The 
Sea  Mills  in  Cephalonia,  The  Energy  of  Chemical  Chaiige, 
The  Wetherell  Electromagnetic  Method  of  Ore  Concentrat- 
ingy  Recent  Bevivals  of  Alchemistic  Notions,  The  Melting 
of  Impure  Ice,  1897 ;  The  Selective  Radiation  of  light  by 
Certain  Substances,  Modem  Methods  of  Liquefying  Air, 
1898;  The  Keeley  Motor  Fraud,  The  Degree  of  Accuracy 
Attained  in  Atomic  Weight  Determination,  Comparison  in 
Size  of  the  Smallest  Bacteria  and  the  Molecules  of  Starch 
(with  Bierring),  1899;  The  Transmission  of  Coloring  Mat- 
ter to  the  Plumage  of  Birds  through  Food,  1900 ;  The  Death 
Rate  Greater  in  the  Cities  than  in  the  Country,  A  Model 
to  niustrate  the  Process  of  Electrolysis,  A  Phase  of  Vital 
Statistics,  The  Acoustics  of  an  Auditorium,  Investigation 
Made  by  Piquard  on  the  Self  Healing  Power  of  Glass,  1901 ; 
Poisoning  of  Chemical  Reactions,  Mercerized  Wool,  1902; 
Radium,  Small  Amount  of  Catalyzers  Required  to  Cause  a 
Marked  Hastening  of  Action,  1903;  Discovery  of  Radium, 
1904. 

OscAB  William  Anthony,  1889. — Papers :  Thermo-Elec- 
tricity,  1890 ;  Vortex  Rings  with  Special  Reference  to  their 
Properties  in  a  Non-viscous  Medium,  1891 ;  Some  Achieve- 
ments and  Possibilities  of  Mathematics,  1892. 

Albert  Levi  Abneb^  1890. —  Papers :  Electro-Magnetism 
and  the  Methods  of  its  Measurements,  1891 ;  The  Tendency 
of  Modem  Electrical  Theory,  1891 ;  Temperature  and  Pre- 
cipitation, 1892;  The  Removal  of  Faults  in  Submarine 
Cables,  1894 ;  Cloud  Formation,  1894 ;  The  Principle  of  Inter- 
ference and  its  Application  to  the  Refraction  of  light,  1896 ; 
Some  Characteristics  of  Modem  Physics,  1897.  Reports: 
A  Recent  Electrical  Installation  in  London,  A  Thompson 
Houston  Watt-metre,  Nature  of  the  Charge  and  Discharge 


72     IOWA  JOUBNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITIOS 

of  the  Leyden  Jar,  1891;  Electrolytic  Method  of  Befining 
Copper,  High  Electrical  Resistance,  Continiiity  of  the  Speo- 
tmniy  Magnetic  Hysteresis  and  its  Manifestation  in  the 
Armature  of  the  Dynamo,  Certain  Analogies  between  the 
Electric  Current  (so-called)  and  Flowing  Water,  A  Con- 
tribution to  the  Theory  of  the  Electrophorous,  Eixperiment 
Confirming  the  ** Kinetic  Theory  of  Gases",  1892 ;  The  The- 
ory of  Induction,  Comparative  Economy  of  Heating  by  Coal 
and  Electricity,  1893;  A  Frauenhofer  Micrometer,  Queen 
and  Company's  New  Pyrometer,  Meteoric  Dust  Shower  of 
March  17,  Isothermal  Lines  of  Iowa,  1894 ;  The  Cold  Pole  in 
Northeast  Siberia,  Municipal  Control  of  Electric  Lighting 
Plants,  1895 ;  Cathode  Bay  Photography,  The  Measurement 
of  Magnetic  Fields,  The  Distribution  of  Temperature  in 
Iowa  on  April  16th,  1896, 1896. 

Fred  Geobgb  Baendeb^  1906. —  Papers :  The  Belation  of 
the  Mechanical  Trades  to  Each  Other,  1906 ;  The  Develop- 
ment of  a  Phonographic  Becord,  1908.  Reports :  Applica- 
tion of  the  Gyroscope  in  Automobile  Practice,  1908 ;  Installa- 
tion of  the  White  Steam  Car,  1909. 

BiGHABD  Philip  Bae:eb,  1906. —  Papers:  Mathematical 
Concepts,  1907;  Printer's  Ink,  1908. 

William  Edwabd  Bablow,  1892. —  Papers:  The  Phos- 
phatic  Nodules  of  the  Mesozoic  Deposits  of  Cambridgeshire, 
England,  1893;  Impure  Air,  1894;  Coffee  and  its  Adulter- 
ants, 1897;  The  Beducing  Properties  of  Aluminum,  1899; 
Corundum,  Especially  Bubies  and  Sapphires,  1900.  Re- 
port :  Becent  Improved  Methods  of  Gold  Extraction,  1895. 

Edwabd  Newton  Babbett,  1888. —  Reports :  Some  Psycho- 
logical Phenomena,  Cosmogony  of  the  Pre-historic  Bace 
of  Central  America,  1891;  Becent  Archaeological  Discov- 
eries in  the  Orient,  1893 ;  The  Last  of  the  Samaritans,  1894 ; 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  73 

A  Table  Giving  a  Babylonian  Acoonnt  of  the  Deluge,  The 
Principles  of  the  Polychrome  Bible,  1898 ;  The  Becent  Dis- 
covery of  a  Boyal  Mnmmy  Supposed  to  be  that  of  the 
Pharaoh  of  Exodus,  1900. 

Geobge  Neandeb  Bauer,  1895. —  Papers :  The  \Nine-point 
Circle,  1897 ;  The  Principle  of  Duality,  1897. 

H.  Heath  Bawdbn,  1900. —  Papers:  The  Psychological 
Theory  of  Organic  Evolution,  1901.  Report :  A  Beview  of 
Loeb's  Physiology  of  the  Brain,  1901. 

Abthub  Beavis,  1887. —  Papers:  The  Passion  Play  and 
Some  Deductions  Therefrom,  1887;  The  Evolution  of  the 
Bicycle,  1888. 

William  EDMxnn>  Beok,  1902. —  Paper:  The  Northern 
Constellations,  1904. 

Fbedebiok  Jacob  Begkeb,  1902. —  Paper:  The  Infusion  of 
a  Salt  Solution,  1903. 

BussELL  Burns  Haldane  Bego,  1899. —  Paper :  The  Fa* 
tigue  of  Metals,  1900. 

William  Bonab  Bell,  1902. —  Report:  Besults  of  Ex- 
X)eriment8  at  Woods  HoU,  1903. 

Philip  SHEsmAN  Biegleb,  1906. — Paper:  Electrification 
of  Steam  Bailways,  1907. 

Walteb  Lawbenoe  Biebbiko,  1893. —  Papers:  Modem 
Methods  of  Bacteriological  Besearch,  1894 ;  The  Sewers  of 
Paris,  1895 ;  Louis  Pasteur  the  Scientist  and  the  Fruits  of 
his  Labors,  1895;  Animal  Parasites  in  Disease,  1896;  For- 
maldehyde the  New  Disinfectant,  1897 ;  Some  of  the  Bene- 
fits of  Bacteria,  1899 ;  Becent  Developments  in  the  Study  of 
Pathological  Processes,  1899;  The  Bole  of  Lisects  in  the 
Spreading  of  Disease,  1900 ;  The  Belation  of  Tuberculosis 
in  Man  to  that  in  the  Lower  Animals,  1890;  Smallpox  Vac- 


74     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

cine,  its  Preparation  and  Use,  1903 ;  Why  are  We  Becoming 
a  Race  of  Dyspeptics,  1905.  Reports :  Bacilli  of  Tubercu- 
losis of  Leprosy  and  of  Actinomycosis  or  Ray  Fnngns,  1893 ; 
Diphtheria,  1895;  Loeffler's  Blood  Sennn  in  Diphtheria 
Diagnosis,  The  Cause  of  Cancer,  Odontoma,  1896;  The 
Plague  in  India,  A  New  Method  of  Cultivating  Anaerobic 
Bacteria,  The  Discovery  of  Bacillus  Icteroidis,  the  Microbe 
of  Yellow  Fever,  1897 ;  A  Method  of  Preparing  the  Eye  for 
Demonstration,  Leprosy,  Demonstration  of  the  Microbe  of 
Yellow  Fever,  A  Hair  Ball  from  a  Human  Stomach,  A  Cul- 
ture Medium  of  Human  Blood  Serum,  1898 ;  Phototherapy^ 
Comparison  in  Size  of  the  Smallest  Bacteria  and  the  Mole- 
cules of  Starch,  1899;  A  Case  of  Agoraphobia,  Mosquito 
Inoculation  for  the  Spreading  of  Malaria,  1901;  Tetanus 
Besulting  from  the  Use  of  Antitoxin,  1902. 

Walter  Mabtinus  Boehm^  1903. —  Paper:  The  Musical 
Scale,  1904.  Reports :  Making  Zone  Plates,  1901 ;  Ether  of 
Space,  1904;  Electrical  Conductivity  of  Various  liquids^ 
1906;  Advance  in  Science  in  the  Year  1907,  1907. 

Charles  Henbt  Bowman,  1894. —  Papers:  Alternating 
Currents,  1896;  The  Wave  Theory  of  light,  1897;  Thermo- 
dynamics, 1898;  The  Electromagnetic  Theory,  1900.  Re- 
ports :  Modulus  of  Elasticity  of  Steel,  1894 ;  A  Demonstra- 
tion of  the  Vibration  of  a  Soap  Film  Due  to  Sound  Waves^ 
Experiments  on  the  Interference  of  light,  1897 ;  The  Phe- 
nomena of  Interference  in  Light  Waves,  1898 ;  The  Wehnelt 
Interrupter,  Interference  Phenomena  in  Circular  Shadows, 
Some  Experiments  in  Hydrodynamics,  1899;  Surface  Ten- 
sion of  Liquids,  1900. 

William  J.  Bbadt,  1902. —  Papers :  Are  the  Teeth  of  Man 
Degenera^gt,  1902;  The  Influence  of  Civilization  on  the 
Teeth,  1902 ;  Why  Teeth  Decay,  1905. 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  75 

Fay  Cltjff  Bbown,  1909, —  Paper :  light  Electric  Prop- 
erties of  light-Positive  and  light-Negative  Selenium, 
1910.  Reports :  A  New  Form  of  Selenium  Cell,  1909 ;  Some 
Recent  Facts  Concerning  Radio- Activity,  1910. 

Maud  Bbown,  1903. —  Report :  Technique  of  Experiments 
in  Psychological  Laboratory,  1904. 

Chables  Lazabtjs  Bbydbn^  1904. —  Papers:  The  History 
of  a  Piece  of  Coal,  1906 ;  Extingnishing  an  Anthracite  Mine 
I^e,  1906.  Reports:  Mineral  Carbomndmn,  Method  of 
Eliminating  Moisture  from  Air  Used  in  Blast  Furnaces, 
1905;  Mining  of  Anthracite  and  Bituminous  Coal,  1906. 

MoTiEB  A.  BxTLLocK,  1889,  Associate. —  Reports :  Ancient 
Bread  Found  in  Qiff  Dwelling,  1890;  The  Utilization  of 
Electricity  in  Horticulture  and  Floriculture,  Employment 
of  Monkeys  in  Siam  for  Detection  of  Spurious  Coin,  Bodily 
Levitation,  1891;  Waterworks  System  of  South  Haven, 
Michigan,  Use  of  Electric  light  in  Forcing  Certain  Plants, 
Hay  Fever  and  Asthma,  1893;  The  Discovery  of  an  Ex- 
tinct Bace  in  Egypt,  1895;  A  Case  of  Double  Conscious- 
ness, 1897;  The  George  Junior  Bepublic,  1898;  The  Scien- 
tific View  of  the  Doctrine  of  Immortality,  1899. 

AiiBBBTUs  Joseph  Bubgb^  1901. —  Papers:  Blood  in 
Health  and  in  Disease,  1902 ;  Physics  Applied  in  Medicine, 
1904;  Facts  and  Fancies  about  Appendicitis,  1907;  The 
Doctor  as  an  Economic  Factor,  1908.  Report:  Foreign 
Substances  Taken  from  the  Body,  1907. 

JossPH  M.  Camff,  1886. — Papers:  The  Contest  between 
Heavy  Guns  and  Heavy  Armor  Plating,  1886;  The  Dyna- 
mite Gun,  1887;  Submarine  Mines,  1888;  The  Develop- 
ment of  the  Modem  Bifle,  1888;  The  Development  of  the 
Modem  High  Power  Rifle,  1889.  Reports :  The  Latest  Re- 
sults in  Experiments  on  Slow  Burning  Powder,  The  New 


76     IOWA  JOUENAL  OF  HISTOET  AND  POLITICS 


Explosive  Melanite  and  Other  High  Explosives,  Experi- 
ments in  the  Use  of  Torpedo  Netting  in  the  Defense  of 
Vessels,  1887;  The  Accuracy  of  Modem  Bifled  Cannon, 
1888;  Results  of  the  Tests  of  the  New  Steel  Guns,  1889; 
The  Composition  of  Nickel-Steel  Armor  Plate,  1892. 

Samxtel  Calvin,  Charter. —  Papers :  Living  Matter,  1885 ; 
The  Sources  of  Vital  Energy  (with  Macbride),  1886;  Geol- 
ogy in  Iowa,  1886;  Formation  of  Strata,  1886;  The  Flow- 
ing Wells  at  Belle  Plaine,  (with  Andrews),  1886;  CroU's 
Theory  of  Secular  Changes  in  Climate,  1886 ;  Spontaneous 
Generation,  1887 ;  The  Vorticellidae,  1887 ;  The  Deep  Well 
at  Washington,  Iowa,  1887 ;  Some  Special  Geological  Prob- 
lems in  the  Sierras,  1888 ;  Some  Points  in  the  Physiology  of 
the  Nervous  System,  1889;  The  Duration  of  Geological 
Time,  1889;  Mountain  Making,  1890;  The  Eccentricities  of 
Bivers,  1890 ;  A  Symposium  on  the  Nature  of  the  Center  of 
the  Earth  (with  Weld  and  Andrews),  1891;  The  Elephant 
in  Iowa  and  Elephant  Dentition  in  General,  1891;  The 
Niagara  Limestone  of  Iowa,  1892 ;  Some  Mesozoic  Beptiles 
and  Birds,  1893 ;  The  Drif  tless  Area  in  Northeastern  Iowa, 
1893;  Conditions  Attending  the  Deposition  of  the  Cam- 
brian and  Silurian  Strata  of  Iowa,  1894 ;  The  History  and 
Genesis  of  the  Soils  of  Northeastern  Iowa,  1896 ;  Pre-Paleo- 
zoic  and  Paleozoic  Faunas,  1896;  Pleistocene  Iowa,  1897; 
The  Mesozoic  Faunas,  1897 ;  Geological  Walks  about  Iowa 
City,  1899 ;  Land  Forms  in  Iowa,  1899 ;  The  Geology  and 
Scenery  of  the  Pipestone  Begion,  1900 ;  A  Geological  Trip 
through  Colorado,  1901;  A  Trip  to  British  Columbia,  1902; 
The  Intergladal  Deposits  of  Iowa,  1904;  Vulcanism  and 
Associated  Phenomena,  1905 ;  Some  Points  in  the  Geologi- 
cal History  of  the  Mississippi  Biver,  1907 ;  Some  Mammals 
now  Extinct,  that  once  Inhabited  Iowa,  1907;  Large  Ani- 
mals now  Extinct  which  lived  in  Iowa  during  the  First 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  77 

Inter-Olacial  Interval,  1909.  Reports:  On  Certain  Inseo- 
tivorons  Plants,  (Geological  Formations  Penetrated  in  the 
Boring  of  the  Belle  Plaine  Wells,  1886;  Development  of 
Certain  Cells  of  the  Cerebellmn  of  Birds,  Certain  Phe- 
nomena in  Connection  with  the  Presence  of  Trichina,  The 
Evening  Grosbeak,  The  Influence  which  Training  of  Any 
Organ  May  Have  upon  Other  Organs,  Booetherimn  Cavi- 
frons.  Some  Laws  (Governing  the  Introduction  of  Species, 
The  Walled  Lakes  of  Iowa  and  Minnesota,  On  the  Paleon- 
tology of  Widder,  Ontario,  1887 ;  Conditions  for  the  Pres- 
ence of  Natural  Gas  and  Oil,  Chlorophyl  Bodies  in  the  Cells 
of  the  Green  Hydra,  Evolution  as  Shown  by  Some  Geologi- 
cal Forms,  1888;  Phenomena  Connected  with  the  Transec- 
tion of  the  Spinal  Cord  of  Frogs,  The  Bad  Lands  near  Glen- 
dive,  Montana,  1889;  Some  Peculiarities  in  the  Distribu- 
tion of  the  Blood  in  the  Brain,  The  Manner  in  which  the 
Highly  Organized  Tissues  are  Nourished,  Trichinae  in  a 
Bat,  An  Listrument  for  Demonstrating  the  Seduction  in 
Bulk  of  Muscles  during  Contraction,  The  So-called  Immor- 
tality of  Microorganisms,  Why  are  We  Bight  Handed  t, 
1890 ;  Presence  of  the  Bobin  at  Iowa  City  on  January  16th, 
The  Presence  of  Copper  in  the  Blood  of  Invertebrates,  Nor- 
mal Faults  as  an  Explanation  of  the  Parallel  Banges  of 
Mountains  in  the  Basin  Begion,  Some  Additional  Evidence 
of  the  Existence  of  Man  in  California  before  the  Lava 
Flows,  What  Constitutes  an  Individual  t,  1891;  Certain 
Proposed  Changes  in  Geological  Nomenclature,  The  Geo- 
logical Aspect  of  CroU's  Theory  of  Climate  and  Time,  The 
Action  of  the  Pancreatic  Fluid  in  the  Digestion  of  Fats, 
Oypsum  Beds  at  Fort  Dodge  and  Methods  Employed  in 
Making  Stucco  There,  1892 ;  The  Geological  Formations  in 
the  Vicinity  of  Sioux  City,  Becent  Views  Concerning  the 
Antiquity  of  the  Globe,  1893 ;  The  Secondary  Formation  of 


78     IOWA  JOUENAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Qnartzite,  Gladers,  Forminiferal  Origin  of  the  Chalk  of 
Iowa  and  Neighboring  States,  The  Oscillatory  Movement 
in  Iowa  during  the  Lower  Carboniferous  Period,  The  Ef- 
fect of  Geological  Structure  upon  Topographical  Form 
within  the  Driftless  Areas  of  Northeastern  Iowa,  Some 
Probable  Habits  of  Belemnites,  1894;  Some  Evidences  of 
Movements  in  the  Earth's  Crust,  Stumella  Magna  Neglecta, 
Sialia  Sialis,  The  Relation  between  Base  Leveling  and  Or- 
ganic Evolution,  1895 ;  The  Saint  Peter  Sandstone  at  Post- 
viUe,  The  Pleistocene  Deposits  in  Iowa,  1896 ;  The  Sea  Mills 
in  Cephalonia,  Becent  Improvements  in  Qold  Mining,  A 
Blowing  Well,  1897;  Topographic  Features  of  Delaware 
County,  1898 ;  The  Crowding  up  of  the  Ice  on  Certain  Shores 
of  Lakes,  1899 ;  A  Specimen  of  Chalk  from  the  Holy  Land, 
1900;  The  Geology  of  the  Begion  about  Brinkemoitt,  Ore- 
gon, The  Finding  of  Qold  in  Iowa,  Overlap  in  Winneshiek 
and  Adjacent  Counties,  1901;  A  Human  Skeleton  Found 
near  Lansing,  Kansas,  Lithographic  Stone  from  Mitchell 
County,  1902 ;  Peculiar  Geologic  Condition  in  Iowa  North- 
east of  the  Cedar  Biver,  Great  Lava  Fields  about  Shoshone, 
Idaho,  1903;  Experience  in  Electrical  Matters,  Jackson 
County  Carboniferous  Outcrop,  1904 ;  Ice  Push,  How  Lam- 
ination is  Produced  in  Bocks  by  Force  and  Pressure,  Flow- 
ers Growing  under  Snow,  The  Comparison  of  the  Produc- 
tion of  Iowa  Soil  and  Production  of  Gold  of  the  World, 
1905;  Variations  of  Heat  on  the  Earth's  Surface  without 
Begard  to  the  Heat  of  the  Snow,  Earthquakes,  Displacement 
Caused  by  Becent  Earthquakes  at  San  Francisco,  1906 ;  The 
Mining  of  Lead  and  Zinc  in  the  Neighborhood  of  Dubuque, 
1907;  Petrified  Forests  of  Arizona,  Bones  of  the  Original 
American  Horse,  Experiments  to  Determine  the  Causes  of 
Mine  Explosions,  1908;  The  Discovery  of  Fossils  in  the 
Af tonian  Gravels  of  Iowa,  1909. 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  79 

William  B.  Coohbaks,  1892. — Papers :  Mineral  and  Ther- 
mal Springs,  1894 ;  Modem  Surgery  of  the  Digestive  Tract, 
1895 ;  Some  Defects  in  Eye  Refraction,  1895. 

Samuel  W.  Collbtt,  1905. — Paper:  Plant  Breeding, 
1906. 

Jacob  Elon  Cokneb,  1901. —  Report:  Some  Features  of 
the  Tariff  Schedule,  1903. 

Amos  Noyes  Cubbieb,  1889.  Associate. —  Reports:  De- 
cline of  Sural  New  England,  1890 ;  Lately  Found  Constitu- 
tion of  Athens  by  Aristotle,  What  Should  Precede  the  Amer- 
ican University,  1891 ;  The  Cleanliness  of  the  Ancient  Bo- 
mans,  1895. 

BoBEBT  BuBDETTE  Dale,  1909. —  Report:  The  Teredo 
Navalis,  1910. 

Lee  Wallace  Dean,  1894. —  Papers:  The  Plastic  Com- 
pounds of  Cellulose,  1895;  Some  Practical  Points  in  Die- 
tetics, 1898 ;  The  Hygiene  of  the  Eye  in  the  Public  Schools, 
1899;  The  Anomalies  of  Refraction,  1900;  The  Causes  of 
Blindness  in  Children  in  Iowa,  1901;  The  Beating  of  the 
Heart,  1902;  Taking  Cold,  1903. 

Mbs.  J.  J.  DiETz,  1889.  Associate. — Report:  Some 
Thoughts  from  Emerson,  1904. 

Edwabd  Lewis  Dodd,  1904. —  Paper:  The  Literest  on 
One  Cent  and  Some  Mathematical  Curiosities,  1905. 

Ebio  Doolittle,  1893. — Papers:  The  Determination  of 
the  Figure  of  the  Earth  by  Pendulum  Experiments,  1894 ; 
Some  Unanswered  Questions  in  Astronomy,  1894.  Reports : 
The  Mf  th  Satellite  of  Jupiter,  Three  Visual  Illusions,  1895. 

Oilman  Abthub  Dbew,  1888.  Associate. —  Report :  The 
Sting  of  the  Honey  Bee,  1890. 


80     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  mSTOET  AND  POLITICS 

Fbank  Mosbb  Dbyzeb,  1908.  Associate. —  Report :  Prin- 
ciple of  Least  Work,  1909. 

Clabbnce  Willis  Eastman,  1898. —  Report:  Defects  of 
the  Verb  *'Must",  1901. 

BuBTON  SooTT  Easton,  1898. — Paper:  Star  Color  under 
the  Meteoric  Hypothesis,  1899.  Reports :  The  Discovery  of 
the  Ninth  Satellite  of  Satnm,  Dr.  Morrison's  Paper  on 
Hebrew  Sundials,  1899. 

Anmn  Eodahl,  1905.  —  Paper:  Becent  Work  in  Iminu- 
nity,  1906.  Reports :  Malaria  with  Reference  to  the  Tertian 
and  Qnarten  Types,  Case  of  Blastomydtes  Dermitites,  1906 ; 
Becent  Work  Done  on  Animal  Parasites,  1907. 

Hanson  Edwabd  Ely,  1897. —  Report:  The  Defense  of 
Sea  Coasts  and  Harbors,  1898. 

Clabbnob  Estbs,  1909. —  Report :  Badinm  Content  of  Hot 
Springs  in  the  Yellowstone  National  Park,  1910. 

J.  M.  Faucbtt,  1886. —  Report:  Belative  Durability  of 
Limestone  and  Sandstone  in  Engineering  Structures,  1886. 

BxTBTON  Pbboival  Flbming,  1909. —  Paper :  Some  Phases 
of  Irrigation  Engineering,  1910. 

Abthttb  Hillybb  Fobd,  1905. —  Papers:  Electric  Power 
Transmission,  1905 ;  Illumination,  1906 ;  Design  of  an  Elec- 
tric Power  Station,  1907;  Street  Lighting,  1908;  Becent 
Advances  in  Electric  Lamps,  1909. 

J.  Allbn  Oilbbbt,  1895. —  Papers:  Some  Effects  of  the 
Loss  of  Sleep,  1896;  Besearches  upon  the  School  Children 
of  Iowa  City,  1897.  Reports :  A  Measurement  of  an  Error 
of  Judgment,  1895;  An  Instrument  for  Testing  Hearing, 
The  Spark  Method  of  Measuring  Time,  1897. 

Jambs  Gbant  Gilohbist,  Charter. — Papers:  Migration 
of  Leucocytes,  1885;  Abnormal  Changes  in  Cell  Structure 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  81 

and  Development,  1886;  light  Houses  and  Buoys,  1886; 
Cognition  Physiologically  Considered,  1886;  Mechanism 
and  the  Effects  of  Snake-Bite,  1887;  The  Anatomical  and 
Physiological  Seasons  for  Bight-Handedness  and  Left^ 
Handedness,  1887 ;  Difference  in  Cellular  Structure  in  Orig- 
inal and  Separative  Organizations,  1887 ;  Auxiliary  Motive 
Power  in  Ships  of  War,  1888;  The  Genesis  of  Morbid  Ac- 
tion, 1888;  Development  of  the  Pipe  Organ,  1888;  The 
Origin  of  the  Blood,  its  IHmctions  and  the  Mechanism  of 
its  Circulation,  1889;  The  Military  Lessons  of  the  Civil 
War,  1889;  Modem  Surgery,  1889;  A  National  Seserve, 
1890;  Fractures  and  Methods  of  Sepair,  1890;  The  Natural 
History  of  Disease,  1891;  Surgical  Anaesthesia,  1891; 
The  Anatomy  and  Physiology  of  a  Man  of  War,  1892 ;  The 
Phenomena  of  Inflammation,  1892;  Medical  Education  as 
a  Function  of  the  State,  1892 ;  Vascular  Traumatism,  1893 ; 
Beminiscences  of  Travel  in  Venezuela,  1893 ;  Inflammation, 
1894;  Dislocations  With  Particular  Beference  to  their  Be- 
duction,  1895;  Gunshot  Wounds,  1895;  The  Genesis  and 
Classification  of  Tumors,  1896;  Vis  Medicatrix  Naturae, 
1896 ;  Medical  Jurisprudence,  1897 ;  Physiological  Compen- 
sations, 1898;  Our  Naval  Successes  and  the  Seasons  for 
Them,  1898;  Some  Becent  Considerations  of  the  Surgery 
of  the  Great  Cavities  of  the  Body,  1899;  Westminster 
Abbey,  1900 ;  Gun  Shot  Wounds  in  the  Great  Cavities,  1901 ; 
How  to  Meet  Modem  Bequirements  for  a  Medical  Educa- 
tion, 1902 ;  College  Amateur  Athletics,  1903 ;  The  Problem 
in  Medical  Art,  1903;  Aneurisms,  1904;  The  Evolution  of 
the  Gothic  in  English  Architecture,  1905;  The  Genesis  of 
Malignant  Tumors  and  Factors  Favoring  their  Becur- 
rence,  1905.  Reports:  On  the  Migratory  Cell,  A  Method 
of  Emptying  Bilge-water  from  Vessels,  Visceral  Evolution, 
Symptoms  of  Poisoning  as  Segards  Judicial  Toxicology, 

VOL. 


82     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

1887;  The  Embrjonic  Origin  of  Tumors,  On  the  Effects 
of  Certain  Operations  for  Cataract,  Decoloration  of  Hn- 
man  Hair,  Some  Cases  of  Arrested  Development  of  Or- 
gans, 1888;  The  Structure  of  Dentine,  Cerebral  Localiza- 
tion, Modem  Surgery,  A  Postscript  to  a  Paper  on  Modem 
Surgery,  A  Poisonous  Spider  in  the  West  Lidies,  1889; 
Fallacies  of  the  Microscope,  The  Science  of  Heraldry, 
Heraldry,  The  Establishment  of  Collateral  Circulation, 
The  Ultimate  Circulation  of  the  Blood,  The  Behavior  of 
Scars,  Exclusion  of  Germicides  in  Operations,  Ruptures  of 
Blood  Vessels,  The  Epitaph  of  Plasmodium,  1890;  The 
Origin  of  Reports  of  Lizards  Being  Swallowed  and  Living 
in  the  Human  Stomach,  Peculiar  Course  of  a  Bullet  in  the 
Brain,  The  Decussation  of  Nerve  Fibres  in  the  Cord,  The 
Musical  Sense,  Microcephalous,  Results  of  Certain  Experi- 
ments Relating  to  the  Restoration  of  IHmctions  in  Divided 
Nerve  Fibres,  Some  Recent  Experiments  Made  with 
Nickel-Steel  Armor  Plates  (on  behalf  of  Califf),  Whether 
there  is  Any  Such  Thing  as  Hydrophobia,  1891;  Treat- 
ment of  Necrosis,  Gun  Shot  Lijuries  of  Modem  Fire- Arms, 
Hysteria,  Voltage  of  Currents  Used  in  Electrocution,  Re- 
cent Experiments  with  the  Sphygmograph  on  Anaesthesia 
Produced  by  Ether  and  Chloroform,  Practical  Application 
of  Localization  of  Brain  Function  to  Surgical  Cases,  Spe- 
cific Character  of  Arsenical  Poisons,  1892 ;  Comma  Bacillus, 
Intestinal  Surgery,  Is  the  Cancer  Contagious  f.  Anaesthe- 
sia, 1893 ;  Review  of  Article  by  W.  D.  Howells  on  *  *  Nerve 
Degeneration  and  Regeneration**  (jointly  given  by  Gil- 
christ and  Aby),  Nerve  Regeneration,  Reunion  of  Divided 
Structures  in  the  Animal  Body,  Some  Anomalous  Results 
in  Cerebro-Localization,  Modem  Army  Rifle  Wounds,  More 
Recent  Experiments  on  Modem  Army  Rifle  Wounds,  The 
Functions   of  the  Lupuscite,   The   Iodoform  and   Other 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  83 

Methods  of  Treatment  of  WotmdSy  1894 ;  Intercranial  Neu- 
rectomy, The  Besnlts  of  the  Division  of  Nerves,  The  Diffi- 
culty of  Determining  the  Nature  of  an  Injury  to  the 
Spinal  Column,  Further  Report  on  a  Case  of  Neuropa- 
thology, 1895;  Pterodactylism,  Peculiarities  Found  in  the 
Dissection  of  a  Museum  Specimen  of  United  Twins,  A 
Specimen  of  Dermoid  Cyst,  Dr.  Tiffany's  Report  on  the 
Restoration  of  Sensation  after  the  Removal  of  Certain 
Sense  Ganglia,  1897;  Ohstruction  of  the  Oesophagus  Due 
to  Scalding,  Materials  Entering  into  a  Chinese  Medical 
Prescription,  The  Problems  of  Anaesthesia,  Some  Cases  of 
Spontaneous  Repair  in  Arrested  Development,  The  Pointed 
Arch  in  English  Cathedrals,  A  Peculiar  Tumor,  1898; 
Suturing  of  Cut  Blood  Vessels,  On  the  Change  from  Round 
to  Pointed  Arches  in  Mediaeval  Structures,  1899 ;  The  Dif- 
ference between  Strategy  and  Tactics,  Tubular  Pneumatic 
Action  in  Modem  Organs,  The  Use  of  a  Vegetable  Button 
in  Intersecting,  The  Use  of  Local  Anaesthetics,  Which  is 
the  Last  Musical  Instrument  f,  1900;  Three  Cases  of  Surgi- 
cal Treatment  in  Epilepsy,  Physiological  Compensation  in 
Certain  Sensory  Ganglia,  Recent  Study  of  Church  Archi- 
tecture, Cause  of  Anaesthesia,  1901;  A  Recent  Case  of 
Undue  Activity  on  the  Part  of  a  Petty  Official,  Anomalous 
Distribution  of  the  Nerve  Foramina  at  the  Base  of  the 
Human  Skull,  1902 ;  Prevailing  Fads  even  in  Surgical  Sci- 
ence, New  Teachings  of  Medical  Authorities,  1903;  Can 
Any  Real  Mark  of  Degeneracy  be  Pointed  Outf,  Medico- 
Legal  Aspects  of  Surgery,  Bridging  of  Several  Nerve 
Trunks  with  a  View  of  Restoring  Lost  Innervation^ 
Relative  Merits  of  Several  Kinds  of  Motors  Used  in  Pump- 
ing the  Bellows  of  Pipe  Organs,  1904;  President  Harper's. 
Surgical  Case,  Surgical  Shock,  Heart  Suturing,  Modem: 
Pedagogic  Methods,  Lamination  of  Tissues  by  Pressure  in^ 


84     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Formation  of  CapstQes,  IHinction  of  Suppuration  in  the 
Healing  of  a  Wound,  1905. 

BuBSELL  D.  Oeobge,  1900. —  Papers:  A  Sketch  of  the 
Geology  of  Canada,  1900;  A  Sketch  of  Qold  Mining  and 
Milling  in  the  United  States,  1902 ;  The  Development  of  the 
Iron  Industry  in  the  United  States,  1902.  Reports :  Becent 
Criticism  of  the  Nehular  Hypothesis,  1900;  Marble  Flows, 
1901 ;  Report  of  Mineral  Output  for  1901,  The  Possibility 
of  Aluminum  Replacing  Copper,  Solubility  of  Glass  in 
Water  at  a  High  Pressure,  1902 ;  Growing  of  Crystals,  1903. 

Hbkby  Max  Goettsoh,  1899. —  Papers :  Drinking  Water 
and  Typhoid  Fever,  1900;  The  Pecuniary  Economy  of 
Food,  1901. 

Ethel  Golden,  1897. —  Report :  The  Education  of  Linnie 
Haguewood,  a  Blind  and  Deaf  Girl,  1898. 

Charles  Edward  (Gordon,  1907.  Associate. — Papers :  Un- 
derground Waters,  1908 ;  Railroad  Construction,  1909.  Re- 
port :  Work  of  the  Reclamation  Service,  1909. 

Selskar  Michael  Gtjnn,  1906. — Report:  The  Problem 
of  Clean  Milk,  1907. 

Karl  Eugen  Guthe,  1905. — Papers:  The  Whistling 
and  the  Speaking  Arc  light,  1906 ;  What  is  Matter,  1906 ; 
Electrical  Units,  1907.  Reports :  A  New  Tantalum  Elec- 
tric Incandescent  Lamp,  1905;  Two  Kinds  of  Burners  in 
Iowa  City,  Magnetic  Properties  of  Different  Materials 
Especially  Manganese,  Theory  of  Isostasy,  1906;  Average 
Temperatures  of  the  Winter  Months  during  the  Past  Few 
Years,  1907;  Application  of  the  Gyroscope  to  the  Steam- 
ship, 1908;  Difference  in  Pressure  in  the  Atmosphere  by 
Small  Changes  in  Height,  Vibrations  of  Spring  and  Wires, 
Weather  Conditions  of  the  Past  Fifty  Years,  1909. 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  85 

Fbidbbick  Goodbok  Higbbb,  1905. —  Papers  i  Mechanical 
Drawing,  1906 ;  Lumber  Lidnstry  in  the  Pacific  Northwest, 
1909 ;  Our  Liland  Seas,  1910. 

Jaok  Bbtjkt  Hill,  1909. —  Report:  The  Heating  Ele- 
ment of  an  Electric  Flat  Lron,  1909. 

Albbbt  S.  Hitohoook,  1886. —  Papers :  Chlorophyl,  1886 ; 
The  Fntnre  of  Chemical  Science  Economically  Considered, 
1887 ;  The  Metallnrgy  of  Silver,  1887 ;  The  Chemistry  of  the 
Plant  Cell,  1888.  Reports :  Variations  of  Sucrose  in  Sor- 
ghum, On  Manufacture  of  Oun-Cotton,  Changes  in  the 
Spectrum  of  Chlorophyl  on  Standing  in  the  Dark,  Heating 
of  Platinum  by  Condensation  of  Gktses  on  its  Surface,  1887 ; 
The  Delicacy  of  Chemical  Reactions,  Certain  Cases  of  Ab- 
normal Flowers,  On  Two  Species  of  Peronospora,  Lines 
of  Magnetic  Force,  Bemarks  on  the  Iowa  Flora,  Absorp- 
tion Bands  of  the  Chlorophyl  Spectrum,  1888 ;  Chlorophyl 
in  Alcoholic  Specimens  of  Silk-Worm,  Two  Specimens  of 
SiUdfied  Wood,  1889. 

Abthttb  Wabbbn  Hixok,  1908. —  Paper :  Lron  Mining  in 
the  Lake  Superior  Begion,  1909. 

F.  A.  HoLTOK,  1887. —  Paper :  Methods  of  Distinguishing 
between  Butter  and  Butter  Substitutes,  1887. 

OiLBBBT  Logan  Hotjsbb,  1892. —  Papers:  Some  Features 
of  Paleozoic  Corals,  1893 ;  The  Structural  Elements  of  Con- 
nective Tissue,  1894;  The  aeavage  of  the  Egg,  1895;  Seg- 
mentation of  the  Vertebrate  Head,  1895;  The  Ear,  1896; 
The  Degeneration  of  the  Tunicate,  1898 ;  The  Data  of  Mod- 
em Neurology,  1899 ;  The  Physical  Basis  of  Heredity,  1900 ; 
Becent  Progress  in  Cellular  Biology,  1901 ;  The  Results  of 
Experimental  Embryology,  1902 ;  Vitalism  and  Mechanism 
as   Explanations  of  Life,  1903;  Phosphorescence,  1905; 


86     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Primary  Causes  of  Animal  Behavior,  1903;  The  Brain 
of  the  Vertebrate,  1906;  Becent  Progress  in  the  Study 
of  the  Living  Substance,  1908;  Present  Status  of  Dar- 
winism in  the  B^eld  of  Zoology,  1909 ;  Some  Modem  View- 
points of  Animal  Life,  1909 ;  Form  Changes  in  the  Animal 
Cell,  1910.  Reports :  The  Nematocysts  of  the  Fresh  Water 
Hydra,  1893 ;  Formaline,  1893 ;  The  Formation,  Growth  and 
Disappearance  of  a  Water  Spout,  1896;  The  Origin  and 
Purpose  of  the  Thyroid  Gland,  1897 ;  The  Eelation  between 
the  Auditory  Nerve  and  the  Hair  Cells  of  the  Ear,  Changes 
in  Nerve  Cells  due  to  Activity,  1898 ;  Effect  of  Badiation  of 
Badium  on  Animal  Life,  Achievements  of  Carl  Gegenhaur, 
Experiments  of  the  Japanese  Hatai  with  Lecithin,  1903; 
Phosphorescence  in  Animals,  The  Stimulation  of  Proto- 
plasm and  the  Deferring  of  Somatic  Death,  1905 ;  Cilia,  The 
Distribution  of  the  Physiological  Metals  in  the  Animal  Cell, 
Oxidation  in  the  Living  Cell,  1906;  Changes  in  Cellular 
Structure  of  Animals  with  Age,  1908. 

MiKHiB  HowB,  1888.  Associate. —  Report :  The  Flora  of 
a  Metamorphic  Ledge  in  Luveme  County,  Minn.,  1891. 

AiiFBED  Onias  Hunt,  1888. —  Papers:  Toothache,  1888; 
Methods  of  Tooth-Saving,  1889. 

James  Eldeb  Hutchinson,  1909. — Report:  Liquid  Illu- 
minating Gas  in  Switzerland,  1910. 

Woods  Hutchinson,  1895. —  Paper :  Uses  of  Pain,  1895. 

Z.  H.  Hutchinson,  1894. — Reports:  An  Apparent  Im- 
munity from  Rattlesnake  Poison  Acquired  by  Dogs,  Two 
Present  Day  Instances  of  Old  Sick-Boom  Superstitions, 
1894. 

W.  T.  Jackson,  1891.—  Report :  The  Writings  of  Com- 
menius,  1892. 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  87 

Chablbs  Davis  Jambsok,  1887. —  Papers:  The  Panama 
Canal,  1887;  Photography  Applied  to  Surveying,  1888; 
Engineering  Features  of  the  Proposed  Nicaragua  Canal, 
1888;  Evolution  of  the  Bridge  Truss,  1889;  Sewerage  and 
Sewers,  1889;  Bailroad  Signals  and  Safety  Appliances, 
1890;  The  Virtual  Length  of  BaUways,  1890;  Field  Meth- 
ods of  Bailroad  Location,  1891 ;  The  Evolution  of  the  Mod- 
em House,  1892 ;  A  Comparison  of  English  and  American 
Bailways,  1892 ;  The  Evolution  of  Bapid  Transit  in  Cities, 
1893;  The  Lidicator  and  its  Use,  1894;  An  Engineering 
Education,  1894.  Reports :  An  Astonishing  History  Show- 
ing the  Great  Justice  in  the  Working  of  the  Bailroad  Law 
in  Iowa,  The  Belative  Efficiency  of  Electric  and  Steam 
Locomotives,  Color  Photography,  1890;  The  Fall  of  Two 
Spans  of  the  Louisville  and  Jeffersonville  Bridge,  Glaciers 
of  Alaska,  1894. 

Leoba  Johkson,  1890.  Associate. —  Report:  The  Pre- 
vention of  Diphtheria  by  Lioculation,  1894. 

Chables  Kahlke,  1890.  Associate. — Report  z  Inoculation 
of  a  Babbit  with  Anthrax  Badllus,  1891. 

William  Jay  Kabslake,  1909. —  Paper :  The  Doctrine  of 
Valence,  1909. 

Obobgb  Fbbdbbiok  Kay,  1907. —  Papers :  Theories  of  the 
Earth's  Origin,  1908 ;  The  Coal  Supply  of  the  United  States, 
1910.  Reports :  Discovery  of  Diamonds  in  Arkansas,  1906 ; 
Nickel  Ore  Deposits  in  Northern  California,  1908;  Supply 
and  Conservation  of  Coal,  1909;  Evidences  of  Glaciation, 
1909. 

Habby  Eugsnb  Kelly,  1897. —  Report:  The  Harvard 
English  Beports,  1898. 

Theodobb  Wilbebt  Kemmbbeb,  1899. —  Report :  Two  Bab- 
bits Inoculated  with  the  Hydrophobia  Virus,  1900. 


88     IOWA  JOUBNAL  OF  HISTOBT  AND  POLITICS 

Obacb  Eeht,  1893.  Associate. — Report:  Effects  of  Fa- 
tigue upon  the  Senses,  1904. 

Edwabd  C.  Ehowsb,  1885. —  Paper:  Changes  in  Taetics 
since  Waterloo  and  the  Breech-Loaderi  1886. 

Albbbt  Kxjntz,  1908. —  Report:  Development  of  the 
Sympathetic  Nervous  System,  1910. 

Btbok  James  Lambsbt,  1903. —  Papers :  The  Automobile, 
1904;  The  Tunnels  and  Subways  of  New  York  City,  1907; 
Illustrated  Description  of  the  Big  Bridges  of  New  York 
City,  1909;  Aeronautics,  1910.  Reports:  Tel^nraphone, 
1905;  Transportation  Facilities  of  the  Brooklyn  Bridge, 
1905;  Report  on  Bridge  near  Quebec  which  Collapsed, 
1907;  Michigan  Central  Tunnel  under  the  Detroit  Biver, 
1908. 

John  Joseph  Lambebt,  1900. — Papers:  Regeneration  in 
Anhnals,  1902 ;  Animal  Grafting,  1903 ;  The  Physiology  of 
Sleep,  1904;  The  Marine  Biological  Laboratory  at  Woods 
HoU,  1905.  Reports:  Dr.  Kim's  Phototherapeutics  by  In- 
jection into  the  Spinal  Cord,  1901;  Beating  of  a  Cat's 
Heart,  Cause  of  Muscle  Contraction,  1902 ;  Distribution  of 
Animals,  1904. 

James  Henby  Lees,  1902. —  Reports:  The  Study  of  the 
Drift  in  Madison  County,  Continued  Motion  of  Occluded 
Bubbles,  1903. 

Nathak  R.  Leonard,  Charter. —  Papers:  Meteorites, 
1886;  Physical  Cause  of  Earthquake,  1886;  Color  Envel- 
opes, 1886;  CrolPs  Theory  of  Glacial  Qimate,  1887;  Meth- 
ods of  Measuring  the  Velocity  of  Light,  1887.  Reports: 
Becent  Meteoric  Showers,  On  Meteorites,  Method  of  Dis- 
tinguishing between  Atmospheric  and  Solar  Lines  of  the 
Spectrum,  Displacement  of  the  First  Band  of  the  Spectrum 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  89 

of  Encke's  Comety  Temperature  of  Different  Parts  of  Sun 
Spots,  1886;  Velocities  Observed  in  Solar  Prominences, 
Progress  in  Celestial  Photography,  1887. 

LiLWBBKOB  William  Littig,  1890. —  Papers:  Cleanliness 
in  Surgery  —  What  it  Implies  To-day,  1891;  Cause  and 
Prevention  of  Typhoid  Fever,  1893;  Brief  Beferences  to 
Pasteur  and  Some  of  his  Works,  1893;  The  Spinal  Cord 
and  its  Functions,  1894 ;  The  Athletic  and  the  Senile  Heart, 
1895 ;  La  Orippe,  1897.  Reports :  Some  Bemarkable  Cases 
of  Hysteria,  Two  Cases  of  Hysteria  Cured  by  Suggestion, 
1893 ;  A  Copy  of  Father  Kneippe's  Book  on  Water  Cure  and 
Some  of  his  Methods,  1894;  Cycles  of  Lengthening  and 
Shortening  of  the  Swiss  Oladers,  1895 ;  A  Hair  Tumor  in 
a  Human  Stomach,  1896;  A  Case  of  Cure  by  Suggestion, 
1897. 

Fred  James  Lokgwobth,  1907. —  Paper:  'Mimng  and 
Smelting  Conditions  in  British  Columbia,  1908.  Report: 
Effect  of  Becent  Financial  Flurry  on  Mining,  1907. 

Isaac  Ajlthaxtb  Loos,  1890.  Associate. — Paper:  Logical 
Methods  in  Political  Economy,  1895.  Report:  Professor 
Nutting's  Theory  of  the  Coloration  of  Deep  Sea  Animals, 
1900. 

Chabi;e8  F.  Lobbkz,  1900. —  Papers:  Measurement  by 
Light  Waves,  1901;  A  Few  Electrodynamic  Experiments, 
1903;  Stereoscopic  Projection,  1904.  Reports:  The  Phe- 
nomena of  a  Botary  Magnetic  Field,  1898;  Principle  of 
Orthochromatic  Photography,  A  New  Nemst  Lamp,  1903 ; 
Cooper  Hewitt  Mercury  Vapor  Lamp,  1906. 

Thomas  Huston  Maobbide,  Charter. —  Papers:  The 
Sources  of  Vital  Energy  (with  Calvin),  1886;  Devices  for 
Securing  Cross-Fertilization  among  Plants,  1886 ;  Intercel- 


90     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

ItQar  Secretions  and  Excretions  of  Mineral  Matter  in  the 
Cells  of  Plants,  1886 ;  Variations  of  Plants  under  Varying 
Circumstances,  1887 ;  The  Difference  between  a  Mushroom 
and  a  Toadstool,  1887 ;  Peculiarities  of  Plant  Distribution, 
1888;  The  Slime-Molds,  1888;  Smuts  and  Busts,  1889;  The 
Great  American  Desert  and  What  is  to  Come  of  it,  1889 ;  The 
Life  and  Death  of  a  Tree,  1890;  Microbes,  1890;  What 
Constitutes  a  Type,  1891 ;  Nuclear  Division,  1893 ;  Pitcher 
Plants,  1894;  Some  Phases  of  California  Flora,  1895;  The 
Forests  of  Iowa  and  their  Distribution,  1895;  Parasitism 
and  Symbiosus,  1896;  The  Botany  of  Shakespeare,  1897; 
What  is  an  Animal  f,  1898;  Figs,  1900;  Twentieth  Century 
Protoplasm,  1901;  Point  Lobos,  1902;  The  Plant  Bespon- 
sive,  1903;  The  Response  of  Plants  to  Human  Preference, 
1904;  Luther  Burbank  and  his  Garden,  1905;  A  Study  in 
Parasitism,  1907 ;  On  the  Present  Trend  of  Natural  History 
Study,  1908.  Reports :  Organic  Connection  Between  Cells, 
Abnormalities  in  Vegetable  Cells,  1886 ;  Pines  and  Spruces 
of  the  Sierras,  Puff  Balls,  Some  Species  of  Club-Mosses 
Lately  Found  near  Iowa  City,  Solanum  Bostratum,  1887; 
Peculiar  Outcome  of  Cross-Fertilization  as  Shown  in  a 
Specimen  of  Squash,  Life  and  Services  of  the  Late  Dr.  Asa 
Gray,  Calcium  Oxalate  in  Plants,  On  the  Discovery  of  Teeth 
in  the  Embryo  of  the  Duck-bill  Mole,  On  the  Appearance  of 
Horns  on  Polled  Cattle,  The  Flora  of  Krakatoa  after  the 
Eruption  in  1883,  Some  Bare  Forms  of  Saprophytic  Fungi, 
A  Piece  of  Sugar  Pine  from  the  Comstock  Mine,  1888 ;  Be- 
cent  Discovery  of  Shortia  by  Professor  Sargent,  The 
Metallurgy  of  Qold  by  the  Arastra,  Folk  Lore  in  Begard 
to  Planets,  Some  Native  Stinkhoms,  Character  and  Scien- 
tific Work  of  Professor  Lesquereuz,  The  Cedars  of  Leb- 
anon, 1889 ;  Thuja  Gigantea ;  Liriodendrom  Tulipif era,  The 
Dodder,  The  Time  Bequired  to  Beplace  Forest  Trees,  An 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  91 

Ear  of  Com,  1890;  A  Number  Form,  Slime-Molds  Be- 
garded  as  Animals,  The  Ocoorrence  of  the  White  Pine  in 
Japan,  Aricaria  SImbricata,  Results  of  Experiments  for 
Determining  the  Active  Principle  in  Yeast,  Plasmodina 
Malariae,  1891;  Primitive  Cantilever  Bridges  over  Alpine 
Streams,  Observations  on  Forestry  in  Iowa,  An  Experi- 
ment on  Babies  Witnessed  in  Pasteur's  Laboratory,  1892; 
A  Bacteriological  Investigation  of  the  City  Water,  The 
Slime-Molds  of  Nicaragua,  The  Inefficiency  of  Inoculation 
by  Bacilli  in  a  Healthy  Body,  A  Becent  Discovery  of  Cy- 
<cads.  Distribution  and  Character  of  the  Trees  in  the  Black 
Hills  Begion,  1893;  Certain  Aquatic  Plants  at  the  Hot 
Springs  in  South  Dakota,  The  Effects  of  Pasturing  Sheep 
upon  Wild  Barley,  A  Small  Photographic  Camera,  1895; 
The  Hickory  Nut  Trees  of  Iowa,  1896;  Caffir  Com,  1898; 
Impregnation  in  Flowering  Plants,  1900 ;  Origin  of  Words 
as  Sarsaparilla,  Briarwood,  and  Oin.    1903. 

Chables  Scott  Magowan,  1886. — Papers:  Eailway  Car 
Brakes,  1888;  Irrigation  in  the  United  States,  1889;  Ice 
Making  and  Befrigerating  Machines  and  their  Processes, 
1891;  The  Development  of  the  Water  Power  of  Niagara, 
1894;  The  Chicago  Drainage  Canal,  1897;  Title  by  Posses- 
sion, 1898;  Methods  of  Measuring  Water,  1899;  The  Fil- 
tration of  Public  Water  Supplies,  1901;  Sanitary  En- 
gineering, 1904;  Some  Examples  of  Concrete  Steel  Struc- 
tures, 1905;  Stand-pipes  and  Elevated  Tanks,  1906.  Re- 
ports: A  Bogus  Meteorite,  Skimmed  Milk  as  a  Spreader 
of  Contagious  Diseases,  1897 ;  The  Causes  of  the  Crystalline 
Appearance  of  Fracture  in  Iron  Subjected  to  Frequent  and 
Varied  Stresses,  1900;  Lighting,  1902. 

EicuN  MoClain,  1889.  Associate. — Reports:  Individual- 
ism as  a  Factor  in  the  Social  Sciences,  1890 ;  Becent  Court 


92     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Decisions  Touching  the  Bight  of  Ownership  of  Meteorites^ 
1892 ;  Behring  Sea  Controversy,  1893 ;  The  Eight  of  Crimin- 
als to  Befnse  the  Taking  of  Fingerprints  for  Purposes  of 
Identification,  1899. 

JoHK  Thomas  MoClintook,  1903. —  Papers:  The  Eleo- 
trical  Phenomena  of  Cell  Activity,  1903 ;  Therapeutics  of  Al- 
cohol, 1906;  Chemical  Agents  in  Coordination  with  Physi- 
ological Action,  1907;  Our  Natural  Defenses  against  In- 
fection, 1910.  Reports:  Fiocca's  Method  for  the  Staining 
of  Spores  of  Bacteria,  1899 ;  Neurone  Theory,  1905. 

Frbd  D.  Mebbitt,  1897. — Paper:  The  Application  of 
Mathematics  to  Political  Economy,  1899. 

James  Bxtbt  Minbb,  1904. —  Paper:  An  Iowa  Case  of 
"^^ision  Acquired  in  Adult  life,  1905. 

Pbboy  C.  Myxbs,  1896. —  Reports:  A  Megarmicroscope, 
The  Diatomaceous  Deposit  of  Clear  Lake,  The  Diatomace- 
ous  Deposits  of  Lake  Okoboji,  1898. 

Frank  John  Newbbbby,  1895. —  Papers :  The  Belation  of 
Electricity  to  Medicine,  1896;  The  Ophthalmoscope  and 
What  it  Beveals,  1897 ;  The  Human  Ear,  1897 ;  Color  Blind- 
ness, 1898;  Some  Observations  Concerning  the  Upper 
Bespiratory  Tracts,  1900;  The  Sympathetic  Belations  Be- 
tween the  Two  Eyes,  1901. 

Ebnbst  B.  Nichols,  1SS6.— Papers :  Series,  1888;  Tro- 
choids, 1889;  The  Growth  of  Mathematics,  1890. 

Chables  Cleveland  Nutting,  1886. —  Papers:  The  Bel- 
ative  Merits  of  the  Panama  and  Nicaragua  Canal  Boutes, 
1886 ;  Observation  on  Central  American  Birds  with  Bef er- 
ence  to  Theories  Advanced  by  Darwin  and  Wallace,  1887; 
The  First  Three  Days  of  the  Embryology  of  the  Chick, 
1887 ;  Animal  Intelligence,  1888 ;  Observations  and  Ezperi- 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  93 

ments  on  Living  Sea-UrchinSy  1888;  Skeletons  of  Inverte- 
brate Animals,  1889 ;  The  Significance  of  the  Geographical 
Distribution  of  Certain  American  Mammals  and  Birds, 
1890;  Are  Mammals  the  Highest  of  the  Vertebrates  f,  1890; 
Can  Acquired  Characters  be  Inherited  f,  1891 ;  Jelly  Fishes, 
1892 ;  Deep  Sea  Investigation,  1893 ;  Informal  Report  upon 
the  Bahama  Expedition,  1893 ;  The  Epiblastic  Structure  of 
the  Mammalia,  Weapons  of  Animals,  1894 ;  The  Origin  and 
Significance  of  Sex,  1895;  The  Naples  Zoological  Station, 
1896;  The  Fur  Seal  and  the  Seal  Islands,  1897;  Do  the 
Lower  Animals  Season  f,  1897;  Observations  on  Young 
Chicks,  1898;  The  Phosphorescent  Light  of  Marine  Ani- 
mals, 1899 ;  The  Eyes  of  the  Blind  Cave  Animals  of  North 
America   and   their  Bearing  on   Evolutionary  Doctrine, 
1900 ;  Jelly  Fishes  and  their  Belation  to  the  Hydroid  Col- 
ony, 1900;  A  Visit  to  the  Home  of  the  CliflF  Dwellers,  1901; 
Life  on  Board  the  United  States  Steamer  Albatross,  1902 ; 
Some  Principles  of  Protective  Coloration  among  Animals, 
1903;  The  Salmon  and  Salmon  Fisheries  of  Alaska,  1904; 
The  First  Fauna  of  the  World,  1906;  Scientific  Results  of 
the  Hawaiian  Cruise,  1907;  A  Zoological  Puzzle  and  At- 
tempts at  its  Solution,  1908;  Some  More  about  ^'La  Jolla'' 
and  its  Biological  Station,  1910.  Reports :  The  Geographical 
Distribution  of  the  Evening  Grosbeak  during  this  Season, 
Calabashes  and  Their  Uses,  Some  Notes  of  Local  Ornitho- 
logical Facts  and  Observations,  A  New  Unicellular  Animal, 
Podophrya  Compressa,  Urn-Burial  as  Practiced  by  the  An- 
cient  Nicaraguans,    1887;    Some    Specimens    of    British 
Game  Birds,  Life  Character  and  Services  of  the  Late 
Professor  Spencer  F.  Baird;  Dichromatism  among  Birds, 
Appearances  of  the  San  Domingo  Duck  in  Iowa,  Some  Iso- 
lated Communities  on  the  Bahama  Islands,  AnimRl  Intelli- 
gence,  The   Portuguese   Man-of-War,   1888;   The   Great 


94     IOWA  JOUBNAL  OP  HISTOBT  AND  POLITICS 

Homed  Owl  and  its  Varieties,  Growth  and  Wearing  away 
of  Coral  Islands,  Absence  of  Lasso  Cells  among  Certain 
Alcyonoid  Corals,  A  Case  of  Suspended  Animation,  Corre- 
lations of  Organs,  Means  by  which  the  Polyps  of  (Jorgonias 
are  Protected,  1889;  Spontaneous  Combustion,  The  Meth- 
ods of  Sampling  Ore,  The  Vascular  Supply  in  Bone  and 
Teeth,  The  Gila  Monster,  Badial  Symmetry,  A  Case  of 
Involved  Identity,  A  Method  of  Exhibiting  Anatomical  Dis- 
sections, 1890;  Mother  Carey's  Chicken,  The  Vascular  Sup- 
ply of  the  Teeth,  A  Plant  Found  in  a  Colorado  Mine,  A 
Peculiarity  of  the  Flagellate  Cells  Lining  the  Ampullae  of 
the  Sponges  Grantia  Ciliata,  Cosmogony  of  the  Swampy- 
Cree  Indians,  Peculiarities  of  the  Star  f^sh,  Pterastes  Mili- 
taris,  Cause  of  the  Sudden  Blanching  of  the  Hair  of  Man 
and  Other  Animals,  1891 ;  The  Sloth,  Belation  of  the  Cana- 
dian Government  and  of  the  Hudson's  Bay  Company  to  the 
British  American  Indians,  A  New  Discovery  in  Embryol- 
ogy, Photograph  of  an  Infant's  Foot  with  Significance  of 
Certain  Marks,  First  Finding  of  the  Duck,  Glaudonette 
Islandica  in  Iowa,  The  Poisonous  Fangs  of  the  Heloderma 
and  the  Homology  of  Teeth  and  Scales,  1892 ;  A  Case  Show- 
ing that  Acquired  Characters  May  be  Inherited,  Plastic 
Models  for  Aid  in  Teaching  the  Anatomy  of  Animal  Forms, 
The  Hydroids  Found  upon  the  Bahama  Expedition,  Two  Li- 
teresting  Species  of  Deep  Water  Corals,  Suspended  Animar 
tion  or  Hibernation  of  Animals,  1893 ;  The  Greatest  Thermal 
Biver  in  the  World,  Besemblances  between  Graptolites  and 
a  Group  of  Modem  Hydroids,  Albinism,  The  Significance 
of  Sex  in  the  Animal  Kingdom,  A  Specimen  of  the  Bassari- 
dae,  The  Migration  of  Certain  Forms  of  life.  Optical  Bla- 
sions  in  Estimating  the  Number  of  Individuals  in  a  Com- 
pany, The  Killing  of  a  Saw-Whet  Owl  in  this  Vicinity,  The 
Occurrence  of  Clark's  Crow  in  this  State,  Fungus  on  a 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  95 

Mnsenm  Si>ecimen  in  Aloohol,  1894;  The  Belative  Exact- 
ness of  the  Natural  and  the  Mathematical  Sciences,  Lord 
Kelvin's  Deep  Sea  Sonnding  Apparatus,  The  Force  that 
Extends  the  Thread  of  the  Nematocyst  Cells  in  Hydroids, 
The  Connection  between  Volcanic  Emptions  and  Tidal 
Phenomena,  1895;  Some  Becent  Experiments  upon  Tad- 
poles, A  New  Species  of  Hydroid,  The  Slowness  of  the  Dis- 
appearance of  Vestigial  Organs  by  Evolution,  The  Distri- 
bution of  Life  in  the  Ocean  Depths,  The  Fundamental  Dif- 
ferences between  the  Neo-Darwinian  and  the  Neo-La- 
marddan  Schools,  The  Malicious  Damaging  of  the  Newport 
Biological  Laboratory  by  the  Addition  of  Sewage  to  the 
Collecting  Waters,  The  Characteristics  of  a  South  Ameri- 
can Opisthocomus,  1896;  Protective  Coloration  and  Lnita- 
tion  in  the  Bull  Snake,  The  Teeth  and  Spines  of  Sharks, 
The  Salamanders  of  Lake  Cayuga,  The  Work  of  the  Late 
Professor  E.  D.  Cope,  The  Appreciation  of  Number  in 
Ants,  The  Function  of  Certain  Spots  in  Deep-Sea  Cephalo- 
poda, The  Close  Observation  Characteristic  of  the  English 
People,  Problematic  Structures  between  the  Plates  of  Cer- 
tain Starfish,  The  Mechanism  of  the  Stinging  Spines  of  the 
Sea  Urchin,  Organs  of  Orientation  in  Certain  of  the  Echino- 
dermata,  1897 ;  A  Comparison  of  the  Dentition  of  Bodents 
and  Other  Mammals,  The  City  of  Havana  and  Its  Harbor, 
Possible  Use  of  the  Carrier  Pigeon  in  Naval  Warfare, 
Some  Cases  of  Protective  Mimicry  in  Butterflies,  Does  the 
Begenerated  Part  of  an  Animal  Tend  to  Revert  to  a 
Lower  Type,  Becent  Experiments  on  the  Begeneration  of 
Limbs  in  Tadpoles,  The  Structure  of  the  Feather,  A  New 
Specimen  of  the  Anthropoid  Ape  from  Borneo,  The  Educa- 
tion of  a  Fish,  1899;  Investigation  of  Skeletal  Variations 
by  the  X  Bay  Method,  The  Becent  Beappearance  of  the 
Tile  Fish,  Expedition  to  Alaska,  The  Discovery  of  a  New 


96     IOWA  JOUBNAL  OP  HISTOBT  AND  POLITICS 

Method  of  Beprodnction  among  the  Hydro-Medusae,  1900; 
Professor  Loeb's  So-called  Discovery  of  Partheno-Gtenesis, 
Monograph  on  Hydroids,  Discovery  of  a  Giant  Hydroid, 
Discovery  of  a  Six-Bayed  Serpent  Star,  1901;  A  Summer's 
Cruise  of  the  Albatross,  1902 ;  Observations  by  Calkins  of 
Columbia  University,  Three  Bemarkable  Specimens  of  Sea 
Urchins,  A  Scare  Crow,  Controversy  Concerning  the  Origin 
of  Coral  Islands,  Beport  on  an  Article  which  Gives  Results 
of  Subjecting  Organisms  to  Intense  Cold  for  Weeks,  1903 ; 
Best  Method  of  Lighting  an  Exhibition  Space,  Slides  on 
Protective  Coloration,  1904 ;  Zoophytes,  Life  Existing  Luxu- 
riantly at  a  very  Low  Temperature,  1905;  Baconian  Club 
as  it  Existed  Twenty  Years  Ago,  The  Besults  of  Last  Ex- 
pedition of  the  Albatross,  Changes  in  the  Sea  Bottom  in 
Mid-Pacific,  Organism  Producing  Cancer,  1906;  Some  Cu- 
rious Cases  of  Parasitism,  Fossil  Tooth  of  a  Hippopotamus, 
Opinion  of  Leading  Zoologists  Concerning  Work  of  Dar- 
win, The  Beasons  for  Desertions  from  the  United  States 
Army,  Pedicellariae  of  Sea-Urchins  and  Star  Fish,  1907; 
Beprodnction  by  Conjugation  in  the  Amoeba,  Natural  Se- 
lection, Memory  in  the  Lower  Animals,  A  Plan  for  a  (Gov- 
ernment Biological  Station  in  Iowa,  1908 ;  Social  and  Bio- 
logical Work  in  Holland,  Hydroid  Painted  by  the  Japanese, 
Becent  Investigations  of  Sleeping  Sickness  in  Africa, 
Power  of  Organisms  to  Live  under  Adverse  Physical  Con- 
ditions, Life  of  Alexander  Agassiz,  Exploring  Expedition 
of  Anderson  and  Stef  ansson,  1910. 

Ernest  Linwood  Ohle,  1905. —  Paper:    Smoke  and  its 
Abatement,  1907. 

BoBEBT  OoLDSBOBOuoH  OwEN,  1909. —  Repofti  Pellagra, 
1910. 

Louis  Alexakdeb  Pabsoks,  1894. —  Beport:    A  Photo- 
graphic Printing  Paper,  1895. 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  97 

Geobge  Thomas  Whitb  Patbiok,  1888. —  Papers:  Hyp- 
notism,  1889 ;  Memory  and  Mnemonics,  1890 ;  Time  of  Men- 
tal Operations,  1890;  Hnman  Automatism  in  its  Belation 
to  Spiritnalism,  1891 ;  The  Localization  of  Brain  Function, 
1891 ;  Expression  of  the  Emotions,  1893 ;  Criminal  Anthro- 
pology, 1893 ;  The  Psychology  of  Women,  1895 ;  Some  Meth- 
ods and  Besults  of  Child  Study,  1895;  Scientific  Materi- 
alism, 1896 ;  Sleep,  1898 ;  Some  Disturbances  of  the  Person- 
ality, 1898 ;  The  Psychology  of  Crazes,  1899 ;  The  Psychol- 
ogy of  Profanity,  1901 ;  The  Psychology  of  Play,  1901.  Re- 
ports :  Becent  Experiments  in  Thought-transference,  Some 
Experiments  by  Sir  John  Lubbock  on  the  Limits  of  Vision 
in  Lisects;  On  the  Homing  Power  of  Animals,  1888;  The 
Psychophysic  Law,  The  Gum-Chewing  Wave,  1889;  The 
Phenomenon  of  Multiple  Personality,  The  Brain  of  Laura 
Bridgeman,  1890 ;  Arithmetical  Prodigies,  Emotional  Effect 
of  Colors,  1891;  Methods  and  Means  Employed  by  Mind 
Beaders  in  the  Practice  of  their  Profession,  Automatic 
Writing,  Aphasia,  A  Becent  Experimental  Concert  to  De- 
termine Whether  or  not  Music  Conveys  to  the  Hearer  a 
Definite  Thought,  The  Zemonian  Antinomies,  1892 ;  Descrip- 
tion of  a  Modem  Jail,  The  Theory  of  the  Correlation  of 
Mental  and  Physical  Powers,  1893;  Hypnotism,  Some  At- 
tempts Made  toward  the  Classification  of  the  Sciences,  Dar-v 
winism  and  Swimming,  Wundt's  Sphygmomanometer,  The 
Detection  of  Near  Objects  by  Blind  Persons,  1894;  Mac- 
donald's  Experiments  on  Sensibility  to  Pain,  Contrast  in 
Color  Sensation,  Some  Photographs  to  Illustrate  the  Illu- 
sion of  Contrast,  Hearing  and  Sight  of  School  Children, 
1895 ;  Fatigue  in  School  Children,  The  Conditions  of  Fa- 
tigue in  Beading,  1896;  The  Psychophysical  Phenomena 
of  Vorticella,  1897;  Possible  Improvements  in  the  Banet- 
oscope.  The  Persistence  of  the  Memory  of  Olfactory  Sensa- 

VOL.  EL — 7 


98     IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

tions,   1898;   An  Interesting   Case  of   Glossolalia,   1900, 
Plattians  in  the  Training  of  Telegraphy,  1901. 

jABfEs  Newton  Peabce,  1907. —  Paper:  Some  Becent 
Work  on  the  Hydrate  Theory,  1908;  Colloidal  Chemistry 
and  its  Applications,  1910. 

Alfred  Chables  Petebs,  1891. —  Paper :  The  Phenomenon 
of  Taking  Cold,  1892. 

Philetus  H.  Philbrick,  Charter. —  Papers:  The  Canti- 
lever Bridge,  1886;  Eads's  Ship  Railway  Plan,  1887. 

Chables  Delos  Poobe,  1905 : —  Papers :  Chemistry  Boiled 
Down,  1905 ;  Does  the  Ion  Simplify  the  Study  of  Chemistry, 
1906.  Reports :  Carbonic  Acid  Gas,  Colored  and  Colorless 
Ions  as  an  Argmnent  in  Favor  of  the  Dissociation  Theory, 
1906 ;  Thermometric  Scales,  1908. 

William  Galt  Eaymond,  1904. —  Papers :  A  Trip  to  the 
Lick  Observatory,  1904;  The  Development  of  Locomotive 
Tractive  Power  in  America,  1906;  How  Many  Miles  Can 
We  Travel  withont  Being  Killed?,  1907;  Eailroad  Bates, 
1908 ;  The  Grade  Element  in  Bailroad  Operation,  1909.  Re- 
ports: Eelative  Attendance  of  Students  in  Arts  and  Sci- 
ences as  Compared  with  Engineering,  Visit  Made  by  Board 
of  Regents  Committee  at  Various  Engineering  Schools. 
1905;  Recent  Improvements  in  Locomotives,  1907. 

George  Windle  Read,  1889. —  Papers :  The  Military  Pol- 
icy of  the  United  States,  1890;  Signalling,  1890;  Modern 
War,  1892. 

John  Franklin  Reilly,  1909. —  Paper:  The  Orbit  of  a 
Heavenly  Body  with  Special  Reference  to  Halley's  Comet, 
1910. 

Roe  Remington,  1906. —  Paper:  The  Fixation  of  Nitro- 
gen, 1907. 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  99 

Elbebt  William  Bocewood,  1888. —  Papers:  Some  As- 
pects of  Photography,  1889;  Foods,  1889;  Salt,  1891;  The 
Formation  of  Fat  in  the  Animal  Body,  1891;  Drinking 
Water,  1892 ;  The  Sources  of  Muscular  Energy,  1893 ;  Fer- 
mentation, 1894;  The  Chemical  Products  of  Bacterial  Ac- 
tion, 1895 ;  Milk,  1896 ;  The  Chemistry  and  Bacteriology  of 
Water  Filtration,  1897 ;  Becent  Eesearches  in  Physiological 
Chemistry,  1897 ;  The  Experimental  Determination  of  Ani- 
mal Metabolism  with  Some  Practical  Applications,  1898 
Food  Adulterations,  their  Extent  and  Significance,  1900 
Digestive  Ferment  in  the  Vegetable  Kingdom,  1902 
Physical  Chemistry  in  the  Biological  Science,  1902;  Food 
Preservatives,  1903;  Do  We  Eat  too  Much?,  1905;  Do 
the  Chemical  Elements  Exist  f,  1906;  Something  about 
Albumen,  1907;  Bleached  Flour,  a  Chemico-Physiolog- 
ical  Legal  Problem,  1908;  Food  Preservatives  with  Spe- 
cial Reference  to  Sodium  Benzoate,  1910.  Reports :  Iowa 
limestone  and  Clays  and  their  Fitness  for  the  Manu- 
facture of  Portland  Cement,  1889;  Photography  with- 
out the  Use  of  a  Lens,  1890;  Bromelin  —  a  Digestive 
Fluid  Found  in  the  Juice  of  the  Pineapple,  The  Effect  of 
Extreme  Low  Temperatures  on  Chemical  Action,  1894 ;  The 
Cultivation  of  Useful  Bacteria,  1895 ;  The  Effect  of  Loss  of 
Sleep  on  the  Excretion  of  Phosphoric  Acid  and  Nitrogen, 
An  Epidemic  of  Typhoid  Fever  at  Tipton,  Iowa,  Attribut- 
able to  the  Use  of  Well  Water,  An  Apparatus  for  Determin- 
ing Approximately  the  Amount  of  Carbon  Dioxide  in  the 
Air,  1896 ;  Food  Investigations  by  the  United  States  Depart- 
ment of  Agriculture,  A  Nitro-Cellulose  Substitute  for  Silk, 
Precautions  against  Contagion  from  Milk,  Comparative 
Values  of  Plant  and  Animal  Foods,  A  Meteorological  Phe- 
nomenon, 1897;  Nutritive  Values  of  Foods  Used  in  the 
Slnms  of  New  York,  An  Original  Translation  of  Caput 


100  IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Mortnmn,  1898;  Antiseptic  Duellixig,  1899;  The  Food  Value 
of  Alcohol,  1900;  Vessel  Used  in  Preparing  Infant's  Milk, 
1900;  The  Stamping  Out  of  the  Bubonic  Plague  in  Some 
Japanese  Cities,  1903;  Use  of  Copper  Salts  in  Drinking 
Water,  Use  of  Methyl  Alcohol,  1904;  An  Insoluble  Sub- 
stance in  Soft  Water,  Arsenic  Poisoning,  The  Formation  of 
the  Diamond,  1905 ;  Systematic  Zoology  and  Chromosomes, 
Food  Adulterants,  Nature  of  Waste  Products  in  the  Body, 
Alcohol,  Recent  Jubilee  of  the  Coal  Tar  Industry,  Oxida- 
tion as  it  Occurs  in  the  Organic  World,  1906 ;  Manufacture 
and  Use  of  Denatured  Alcohol,  Comparative  Digestibility 
of  Cooked  and  Uncooked  Food,  Statistics  on  the  Production 
of  Sulphur  in  the  United  States,  Becent  Improvements  in 
Getting  and  Keeping  Pure  Milk,  Beport  of  two  Great  Chem- 
ists Moissan  and  Mendeljeff,  Belation  of  Diet  to  Endur- 
ance, Modification  of  Some  Vital  Processes  Due  to  the  Use 
of  the  Automobile,  Autochrome  Process  of  Color  Photog- 
raphy, 1907;  Cereal  Foods,  Crenothrix  the  Micro  Organ- 
ism at  the  Present  Time  Contaminating  the  Water  Supply 
of  Iowa  City,  Possibility  of  Changing  Copper  to  Lithium, 
Analysis  of  the  City  Water,  1908;  Some  Diseases  of  Tin, 
Color  Photography,  Commercial  Price  of  Badium,  1909; 
Becent  Method  of  the  Preparation  of  Peat  for  Commercial 
Use,  Fake  Patent  Medicines,  The  Use  of  Aluminum  in 
Cooking  Utensils,  The  Effect  of  Hard  Water  upon  the 
Teeth,  1910. 

Balph  Eugene  Boot,  1909. — Reports:  Professor  Moore's 
General  Analysis,  The  Examination  and  Marking  System, 
1910. 

Frank  Bussell,  1894.— Paper:  The  Yellow  Knife  In- 
dians, 1895.  Reports:  Esquunaux'  Waterproof  Boots,  An 
Albino  Specimen  of  Geomys  Bursarius,  1895. 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  101 

Mabtik  Wbioht  Samfsok,  1889. —  Reports :  Literary  and 
Artistic  Work  of  Women  as  Contrasted  with  that  of  Men, 
Query  in  Begard  to  the  Picturesque  Quality  of  Photog- 
raphy, 1890. 

Thomas  Edmuot)  Savagb,  1896. —  Reports :  The  Flora  of 
the  **Wad  Den''  Eegion,  1897;  Some  Features  in  the  Nat- 
ural History  of  the  Begion  of  Ironton,  Missouri,  1898. 

Chablbs  Ashmbad  Sohabffbb,  1887. — Papers:  Steel, 
1888;  The  Mining  and  Metallurgy  of  Gold,  1888;  Natural 
and  Artificial  Cements,  1889;  The  Systematic  Method  of 
Organic  Chemistry,  1890. 

F.  L.  Sohaub,  1902. —  Report:  Beport  on  a  Paper  by 
Professor  Stratton  ^^Eye  Movements  in  the  Esthetics  of 
Vision'',  1903. 

Cabl  Emil  Sbashobb,  1897. —  Papers:  A  Study  in  Psy- 
chological Measurement,  1898 ;  Visual  Perception  of  Inter- 
rupted Linear  Distances,  1899 ;  The  Principal  Types  of  Nor- 
mal Illusions  in  the  Perception  of  Oeometrical  Forms,  1900 ; 
Automatism  in  the  Use  of  the  Divining  Bod  in  Tracking  for 
Underground  Water,  1901 ;  Some  Experiments  in  Auditory 
Perception  of  Direction,  1902 ;  Dreams,  1903 ;  Color  Vision 
in  the  Indirect  B^eld,  1905 ;  The  Tonoscope  and  its  Use  in 
Singing,  1906;  The  Psychology  of  Play,  1908;  Darwin  from 
the  View-point  of  the  Psychologist,  1909.  Reports:  The 
Beign  of  Men,  1898 ;  Some  Cases  of  Budimentary  Movements 
of  the  Human  Ear,  The  Discriminative  Sensibility  for  Pitch, 
1899 ;  The  Psychergometer,  A  New  Erggraph,  1900 ;  A  New 
Method  of  Measuring  the  Pitch  of  the  Voice  in  Singing  and 
Speaking,  1901;  The  Belative  Frequency  of  Ideas,  Scrip- 
ture's Color  Sense  Tester,  1902;  To  Obtain  a  Cheap  and 
Convenient  Battery  for  Short  Circuits  in  the  Laboratory, 
1904 ;  The  Photography  of  Eye  Movements,  1905 ;  Forma- 


102  IOWA  JODENAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

tion  of  Habits  in  the  Starfish,  Some  Experiments  on  Bats, 
1907;  Possibility  of  Localizing  the  Sense  of  Taste,  1908;  A 
New  Paper  File,  1909. 

Benjamin  Franeun  Shambauoh,  1897,  Associate. — 
Reports:  The  Latest  Original  Package  Case,  The  Nature 
of  the  Problem  of  Justification  in  the  Interference  of  the 
United  States  in  the  Cuban  Situation,  The  Possession  and 
Occupancy  of  Iowa  in  its  Legal  Aspects,  The  Naming  of  the 
Commonwealth  of  Iowa,  1898 ;  History  of  the  Establishment 
of  the  Boundaries  of  the  Commonwealth  of  Iowa,  1899. 

BoHUMiL  Shimee,  1890. — Papers:  The  Badula  of  the 
MoUusca,  1891;  The  Loess  in  the  Northwest,  1892;  The 
Geographical  Distribution  of  Mollusca  with  Belation  to 
Current  Glacial  and  Loess  Theories,  1892;  The  Nicaragua 
Canal,  1893 ;  Types  of  Nicaraguan  Ferns,  1894 ;  Plant  Hairs, 
1895;  Plant  Distribution  in  Iowa,  1896;  Water  Nymphs, 
1897;  Textile  Vegetable  Fibres,  1898;  Eomance  in  Natural 
History,  1898;  Forestry  in  Iowa,  1900;  The  Okoboji  School 
of  Botany,  1902;  An  lowan  Desert,  1903;  The  White  Lands 
of  New  Mexico,  1904 ;  Ferns  in  the  Desert,  1905 ;  Forests  of 
the  United  States,  1906 ;  A  Bit  of  Geology  and  Geography 
Revised,  1907;  Why  Are  the  Prairies  Treeless?,  1908;  Dar- 
win from  the  Standpoint  of  the  Botanist,  1909 ;  The  Prairie 
and  Forest  Problem  as  Illustrated  in  the  Lake  Okoboji  Ee- 
gion,  1910.  Reports :  The  Canadian  Thistle  in  Iowa  City,  Re- 
marks on  Pyrgula  and  Planorbis,  1890 ;  the  Fania  Integraf o- 
lia,  A  Remarkable  Snake 's  Nest,  1892 ;  Some  Peculiar  Hab- 
its of  Ferns,  The  Russian  Thistle,  The  Blooming  of  Plants 
during  the  Present  Autumn,  Cases  of  Certain  Diaecious 
Plants  Producing  Perfect  Flowers,  1894 ;  Conditions  Favor- 
ing the  Growth  of  the  Hard  Maple,  1896 ;  The  Repair  of  In- 
juries to  the  Cambium  Layer  in  Trees,  the  Physiological 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  103 

Effects  of  Poison  Ivy,  1898 ;  A  Specimen  of  the  Plasmodium 
of  a  Slime-Mold,  A  Dwarf  Form  of  Burr  Oak,  1899;  Bitter- 
Sweet,  1900 ;  The  Causes  of  the  Flow  of  Sap  in  the  Spring, 
1900;  Sknnk  Cabbage,  1903. 

Lbb  Paul  Sibg,  1906.— Papers :  The  Nature  of  White 
Light,  1908;  Limits  of  Vision,  1909;  The  Microscope  and 
the  Ultra  Microscope,  1910.  Reports:  Abbe's  Theory  of 
Microscopic  Vision  as  Applied  to  Ordinary  Vision,  1906; 
Determining  the  Optical  Focus  of  a  Lens,  The  Theory  of 
the  Diffraction  Grating,  1907. 

Chables  Gamblb  Simpson,  1909. — Report:  A  Discontin- 
uous Function,  1910. 

Alfred  Vablby  Sims,  1895. —  Papers:  Self -Purification 
and  Filtration  of  Water  in  Belation  to  the  Health  of  Cities, 
1897;  The  Simplicity  and  Practicability  of  the  Graphical 
Determination  of  Stresses,  1898 ;  The  Determination  of  the 
Strength  of  Cement,  1900;  Some  Features  of  the  Boad 
Problem,  1901;  Some  Glimpses  of  the  life  of  a  Southern 
Tobacco  Farm,  1902.  Reports:  Methods  of  Sterilizing 
Water,  The  Bate  of  Corrosion  of  Iron  Buried  in  Different 
Kinds  of  Soil,  1899. 

Abthtjb  Geobge  Smith,  1893. —  Papers :  Variable  Stars, 
1894;  The  Laws  of  Chance,  1896;  The  Quadrature  of  the 
Circle,  1896 ;  The  Number  Concept,  1897 ;  A  Study  in  Mathe- 
matical Interpretation,  1898;  The  Tides,  1899;  The  In- 
scribed Polygon  of  Seventeen  Sides,  1901 ;  Mathematics  in 
Biology,  1902;  Some  Elementary  Methods  and  Besults  in 
Statistical  Anthropology,  1903 ;  The  Hydrographical  Work 
of  the  United  States  Government,  1904 ;  Sound  and  Music, 
1906 ;  The  Shape  of  the  Earth  and  its  Determination,  1906 ; 
Some  Aeronautical  Mechanics,  1908 ;  The  Gyroscope,  1910 ; 
A  Bational  Marking  System,  1910.    Reports:  A  Function 


104  IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 


in  which  the  Second  Partial  Differential  Coefficient  Depends 
npon  the  Order  of  Differentiation,  1895 ;  The  Mathematical 
Theory  of  the  Honey  Bee  Cell,  1896 ;  The  Measurement  of 
the  Velocity  of  the  Bifle  Ball,  Variation  in  Longitude,  1897 ; 
Determination  of  ^  by  the  Gaussian  Law  of  Error,  The  Me- 
chanics of  the  Nebular  Hypothesis,  1898;  See's  Law  of  the 
Temperature  of  Oaseous  Bodies,  The  Economy  of  Material 
in  Nature,  The  lines  of  Flow  in  a  Liquid,  The  Penetrating 
Power  of  the  Modem  Bullet,  The  Steel  Jackets  of  Modem 
Bullets,  1899 ;  The  Expectation  of  Living,  Scientific  Study 
of  the  Awarding  of  First  and  Second  Prizes  by  Competitive 
Examination  by  Sir  Francis  Galton  and  Carl  Pierson,  1902 ; 
The  Precipitation  of  Moisture  in  Iowa  and  Iowa  City,  Some 
Facts  Regarding  Earthquakes,  1906;  The  Formation  of 
Frazil  and  of  Anchor  Ice,  1907 ;  Galton 's  Individual  Differ- 
ence Problem  in  Statistics,  1910. 

Chables  Leonabd  Smith,  1893.  Associate. — Reports: 
Vegetation  of  Nicaragua,  1893 ;  A  Collecting  Trip  through 
Mexico  and  Nicaragua,  1896. 

Fbanklin  Obion  Smith,  1907. —  Reports:  A  Few  Diffi- 
culties Encountered  in  the  Study  of  Color  Perception,  1907 ; 
The  Rationale  of  Promotion  and  the  Elimination  of  Waste 
in  Elementary  and  Secondary  Schools,  1910. 

Frederick  William  Spanutius,  1889. —  Papers:  Quick- 
silver, 1890 ;  Dissociation,  1891 ;  Glass  and  its  Solubility  in 
Water,  1892.  Reports:  Siliceous  Oolite,  Smoky  Quartz 
from  Branchville,  Connecticut,  1890;  Free  Fluorine,  1891; 
Chemistry  and  Mineralogy  of  Garnet,  1892. 

John  Springer,  1896.  Associate. — Papers :  Type-Setting 
Machines,  1900;  The  Lost  Art  of  Wood  Engraving,  1901. 
Reports :  Modem  Processes  of  Color  Printing,  1898 ;  A  Let- 
ter from  Hon.  John  P.  Irish  on  the  Growing  of  E^s  in  Cal- 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  105 

ifomia,  Famous  Printers'  Errors,  1900;  A  Mammoth 
Camera,  1901;  Oil  Begions  of  Iowa,  1902;  Experience  in 
Producing  Silhouette  Photographs,  1904. 

Edwin  Dilleb  Stabbuok,  1906. —  Papers:  The  Idealist's 
Interpretation  of  Matter,  1907 ;  A  Comparison  of  the  Mental 
Capacities  of  the  Sexes,  1908;  Pragmatism,  1909;  Some 
Somological  Phases  of  Adolescence,  1910.  Reports:  The 
Mental  and  Physical  Differences  in  the  Sexes,  1906 ;  Orienta- 
tion and  Localization  of  Certain  Birds,  1908. 

Daniel  Staboh,  1906. —  Paper :  The  Influence  of  Weather 
on  Human  Conduct,  1907.  Reports:  Results  of  Experi- 
ments Carried  out  in  the  Psychological  Laboratory  on  Aud- 
itory Localization  of  Sound,  1904;  Localization  of  Sound, 
Sound  in  Psychological  Laboratory,  1905. 

Geobge  Waltbe  Stbwabt,  1909. —  Report:  Beport  of 
President  Pritchett  Regarding  Cost  of  College  Instruction 
in  Physics,  1910. 

Fbank  Albebt  Stbomsten,  1900. —  Paper:  The  Marine 
Biological  Laboratory  at  Tortugas,  1908.  Reports :  Obser- 
vations of  Dr.  Mathews  on  the  Changes  in  the  Oland  Cells 
of  the  Pancreas  of  the  Mud  Puppy,  1903 ;  Order  of  the  De- 
velopment of  the  Venous  System,  1906 ;  Palola  Worm,  1907 ; 
The  Lymphatic  Development  in  Turtles,  1910. 

Henbt  Waldgbavb  Sttjabt,  1901. —  Papers:  Choice  and 
Knowledge,  1902;  Ethics,  its  Nature  and  its  Place  among 
the  Sciences,  1904. 

WiLBEB  John  Teetebs,  1897. —  Papers:  The  Manufac- 
ture and  Chemistry  of  Soap,  1899 ;  Some  Facts  about  Patent 
Medicines,  1899;  The  Prescription,  1902;  The  Synonyms 
of  the  Pharmacopoeia,  1903 ;  Coal  Tar,  1904 ;  Cinchona  and 
its  Alkaloids,  1907:  Some  Besults  of  the  Pure  Food  and 


106  IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Drag  Law,  1909.  Reports :  Armonr  ft  Co.,  Dessicated  Ani- 
mal Substances,  Sarsaparilla  Ciontainer,  An  Original  Pack- 
ing Case  for  Ciort  from  Ochissima,  1901 ;  Vanilla  Bean  as 
Cnred  and  as  it  Comes  on  the  Market,  1906 ;  Importation  of 
Aloes,  1907;  Patent  Medicines,  IJnsnccessfnl  Attempts  to 
Brand  Cattle  by  Chemical  Methods,  1908;  Specimen  from 
a  Wine  Cask,  1909. 

Fbedebige  Chables  L.  Van  Stebkdeben,  1894.  Associate. 
— Reports :  A  Device  for  the  Trisection  of  an  Angle,  1894 ; 
The  Inflnence  of  the  Tentonic  npon  the  Bomance  Languages, 
The  Origin  of  Langoages,  1895;  A  Sentence  Containing  a 
Key  to  the  Quantity  ^  ,  1897 ;  The  Engineering  Situation 
in  Holland,  1898;  The  Place  of  French  Literature  in  Lit- 
erature, 1899 ;  A  Note  on  the  General  Laws  Governing  the 
Changes  in  the  Meaning  of  Words,  1903. 

Andrew  Andebson  Vbblen,  Charter. —  Papers:  Modem 
Geometry,  1886;  Electric  Units  and  Measurements,  1886; 
Determination  of  the  Length  of  light  Waves,  1887;  The 
Theory  of  Dynamo-Electric  Machines,  1888;  Polarization 
of  Light,  1889;  Transmission  of  Electrical  Oscillations, 
1889;  Some  Points  on  Electric  Lighting,  1890;  The  light 
of  Fire-Flies,  1890;  Electro  Motors,  1891;  Electric  Bail- 
ways,  1891;  The  Finding  of  America  by  the  Norsemen, 
1892;  The  Practical  Electrical  Units  and  the  Commercial 
Measurement  of  Electricity,  1893;  Notes  on  Electricity  at 
the  World's  Fair,  1894;  lighting,  1895;  Some  Elementary 
Facts  in  Acoustics  and  the  Physical  Theory  of  Music,  1896 ; 
The  Characteristics,  Classification  and  Uses  of  Finger- 
prints, 1897;  Wireless  Telegraphy,  1898;  Ancient  Scandi- 
navian Ships,  1900;  Photographic  Optics,  1901;  Finger- 
prints, 1902;  Electrons,  1903;  The  University  of  Upsala, 
1903.  Reports:  Rosenthal's  Micro-Galvanometer,  1886;  On 


..  ^ 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  107 

a  Suggestion  of  a  System  of  Local  Survey,  1887;  Snow 
Shoes,  On  the  Grammar  of  Volapiik,  The  Theory  of  Electric 
Potential,  The  Uses  of  the  Battle  Axe,  A  Torsion  Balance, 
1888 ;  Electrical  Measuring  Instruments,  Effect  of  Elevation 
upon  Weight,  1889 ;  A  New  Kind  of  Telephone,  Welding  by 
Electricity,  Magneto-optic  Production  of  Electricity,  The 
Motion  of  Atoms  in  Electrical  Discharge,  1890;  Are  We 
Approaching  Another  Ice  Agef,  1891;  The  Spade  Bayonet 
in  the  United  States  Army,  A  New  Method  of  Detecting  Os- 
cillations of  the  Earth's  Crust,  Some  Applications  of  the 
Hertz  Experiments  to  Marine  Signaling,  The  Corruption  of 
Scandinavian  Names  in  America,  Late  Advances  in  Elec- 
trical Science,  Description  and  Model  of  Cable  Switch  Board 
Made  by  himself  for  Use  in  the  Physical  Laboratory,  An 
Electrical  Fire  Damp  Indicator,  1892;  Breaking  of  the 
World's  Skee- Jumping  Records  at  Bed  Wing,  Minnesota, 
The  Long  Distance  Telephone,  Gravitational  Phenomena 
"N^ewed  as  Waves  of  Ether,  Peculiarities  of  Trees  Growing 
upon  Hillsides,  Botary  Steam  Engines,  Besistance  Boxes, 
1893;  A  New  Style  of  Bedprocating  Engine,  Double  Sur- 
faces, The  Instructive  or  Natural  Use  of  Correct  Gender  in 
Danish  Dialects,  A  New  Form  of  Planimeter,  limit  of  Vi- 
sion with  Bespect  to  the  Eyes  of  Insects,  The  Effect  of  Elec- 
tric Shocks,  Experiments  upon  the  Falling  of  Cats,  1894; 
Hearst's  Spectrum  Disks,  Wireless  Telegraphy,  Measure- 
ments upon  the  Growth  of  Trees,  A  Machine  for  Compound- 
ing Harmonic  Motion,  Model  of  Circular  and  Transverse 
Wave  Motion,  1895 ;  Photographic  Effects  by  Means  of  Elec- 
trical Badiation,  The  X  or  Boentgen-Bay,  The  Becent  Nan- 
sen  Expedition,  1896 ;  The  Use  of  Alternating  Currents  for 
Gaining  Speed  in  Telegraphy,  The  Amount  of  Energy  Im- 
parted to  the  Beceiver  of  the  Telephone  in  Speaking,  1897 ; 
Tesla's  Wireless  Transmission  of  Energy,  Immunity  of  the 


108  IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTOEY  AND  POLITICS 

Baoe  from  the  Effects  of  Alcohol,  A  Comparison  of  the 
Welsbach  Burner  with  the  Ordinary  Naked  Burner,  1898; 
A  New  Camera  Table  for  Photography  for  Scientific  Pur- 
poses, The  Polak-Virag  Method  of  Bapid  Telegraphy,  1899; 
The  Curving  Flight  of  a  Botating  Ball,  Loosely  Piled  Bridks 
as  a  Vibration-free  Support  for  Delicate  Instruments, 
Borchgrevinck's  Antarctic  Explorations,  Becent  Progress 
in  Wireless  Telegraphy,  Existence  of  Nodes  and  Vibrations 
of  the  String,  A  New  Copying  Camera  Table,  1900 ;  Beason 
for  Professor  Bowland's  Fame,  Optical  Illusion  Visible  in 
Mr.  Boehm's  Zone  Plate,  A  Method  of  Changing  the  Density 
of  Skyograph  Negatives,  1901 ;  Nature  of  Electric  Discharge 
in  Thunderstorms,  1902;  Birksland  Electromagnetic  Gun 
for  Throwing  Dynamite,  Becently  Discovered  Bemains  in 
Norway  of  Ancient  Boats,  1903 ;  A  New  Compact  Projecting 
Lantern,  Dr.  Niels  Finsen,  1904;  Land  Slide  in  Norway, 
Earthquake  in  the  Scandinavian  Peninsula,  Sixty-four  Sci- 
ence Charts  Suitable  for  Elementary  Nature  Study,  Experi- 
ments to  Prove  that  a  Body  can  not  Sink  in  Quic^  Sand, 
1905. 

Chables  B.  Vogdes,  1893. —  Papers:  Historical  Sketch 
of  Infantry  Tactics,  1895 ;  The  First  Campaign  of  Napoleon, 
1896. 

Cabl  Leopold  von  Endb,  1893. —  Papers :  Some  Physical 
Methods  in  Chemistry,  1895 ;  The  Modem  Theory  of  Solu- 
tion, 1901;  The  Osmotic  Theory  of  the  Galvanic  Cell,  1903; 
Catalysis,  1906.  Reports:  Vitreous  Silicon  or  Quartz  Glass, 
Purification  of  Water  by  Means  of  Copper  Sulphate  and 
also  by  Copper,  1905. 

Pbboy  H.  Walkeb,  1S92.— Papers :  Iron,  1893;  Alloys, 
1895 ;  Explosives,  1899.  Reports :  Utilization  of  Iron  Ores 
Containing  Titanium,  A  Peculiar  Form  of  Calcite  Found 
in  the  Neighborhood,  1893. 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  109 

DiTBBN  Jakbs  Hudson  Wabd,  1906.— •  Poper :  The  Legi- 
timate Field  of  Anthropology  and  Ethnology,  1906.  Re- 
port :  Prehistoric  People  of  Iowa,  1906. 

Samuel  N.  Watson,  1886.— Papers:  The  Next  Step  in 
the  Evolution  Process,  1887 ;  Biology  and  Ethics,  1887 ;  An 
Inquiry  into  the  Permanence  of  the  Human  Species,  and 
Some  Deductions  Therefrom,  1888;  Social  Development, 
1891;  The  Embryology  of  Personality,  1893;  Sensation, 
1894;  Thermics,  1896.  Reports:  Evidence  of  Intelligence 
in  the  Lower  Animals,  On  Some  Statements  in  Professor 
Huxley's  Book  "Advance  of  Science  in  the  Last  Half  Cen- 
tury'',  Electric  Heating,  1888;  The  Bermuda  Islands,  1890; 
Oligocythaemia,  1893. 

Gailobd  D.  Weeks,  1900. —  Paper :  Bailway  Construction, 
1901. 

Laenab  Giffobd  Weld,  1886. — Papers:  Wave  Motion, 
1887;  Vortex  Motion,  1887;  Determinants,  1888;  The  Tran- 
sit of  Venus  in  1874, 1888 ;  Double  Stars,  1889 ;  The  Nebular 
Hypothesis  of  La  Place,  1889;  Some  Instances  of  Becent 
Progress  in  Stellar  Astronomy,  1890 ;  The  Tenets  of  Astrol- 
ogy, 1890;  A  Symposium  on  the  Nature  of  the  Center  of 
the  Earth  (with  Calvin  and  Andrews),  1891;  The  Stars  as 
Timekeepers,  1891;  Comets,  1892;  The  Sun,  1892;  The  Phy- 
siography of  the  Moon,  1893;  Exhibition  of  Astronomical 
Iiantem  Slides,  1894;  The  Foundations  of  Geometry,  1894; 
Some  Mathematical  Illustrations  of  the  Doctrine  of  Con- 
tinuity, 1895;  Numbers  1896;  Tories,  1896;  Pendulum  Ob- 
servations, 1897;  Variable  Stars,  1898;  The  Phenomenon 
of  Periodicity,  1899;  The  life  History  of  a  Star,  1900 ;  The 
Mechanics  of  a  Harp  String,  1900;  Are  Other  Worlds  In- 
habited, 1901 ;  Some  Applications  of  the  Statistical  Method 
to  Stellar  Astronomy,  1902;  The  Planet  Jupiter,  1903;  Star 


no  IOWA  JOUBNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Dust,  1905;  How  Did  the  Sun  Become  Hot  and  What  Keeps 
it  Hot,  1906;  The  Spiral  Nebulae  and  their  Significance, 
1906 ;  The  Legends  of  the  Stars,  1907 ;  The  Great  Pyramids, 
1910.  Reports :  Certain  Experiments  on  Nitrification,  1886; 
Imaginary  Cube  Boots  of  Unity,  1887 ;  The  Hypergeometric 
Series,  The  Mathematical  Laws  Governing  the  Carrying 
Power  of  Streams,  The  Variable  Star  Algol,  The  Solar 
Eclipse  of  January  1, 1889, 1888;  Arago's  Helioscope,  1889; 
The  Personal  Equation,  1890 ;  The  Time  of  Botation  of  the 
Planet  Mercury,  The  Bedprocal  Belations  between  the  Pas- 
calion  and  Brianchonian  Hexagons,  Becent  Discovery  of 
the  Nature  and  Extent  of  the  Variation  of  Latitude  of 
Points  on  the  Earth's  Surface,  1891;  The  Magnitude  of  the 
Forces  Interacting  among  the  Celestial  Bodies,  Periodic 
and  Secular  Changes  of  Latitude,  Becent  Discovery  of  the 
Fifth  Moon  of  Jupiter,  The  Zenith  Telescope  and  its  Use 
in  Latitude  Determinations,  Infinity  as  a  Mathematical  Con- 
cept, 1892;  Construction  of  a  Conic  Passing  through  Five 
Points,  1893 ;  The  Gtegenschein,  Advantages  of  the  Trilinear 
System  of  Co-ordinates,  The  Present  Opposition  of  the 
Planet  Mars,  1894 ;  The  Becent  Discovery  of  a  Second  Satel- 
lite of  Neptune,  1895;  The  Planet  Saturn  and  its  System, 
A  Mechanical  Method  of  Trisecting  an  Angle,  An  Original 
Linkage  Machine  for  Determining  the  Boots  of  Cubic  Equa- 
tions, Parheliac  Circles,  A  Graphic  Method  for  the  Solution 
of  the  Equation  x* — px—q^  =  0,  A  Graphic  Method  of  Solv- 
ing Cubic  Equations,  On  Ascertaining  Properties  of  a  Func- 
tion Bepresented  by  Some  Integral  that  can  not  be  In- 
tegrated, 1897 ;  Conditions  Affecting  the  limit  of  Capacity 
of  Large  Guns,  1898 ;  The  Becently  Discovered  Planet  D.  Q., 
1899;  A  New  Comet,  1902;  Difference  between  Volcanic 
Activity  on  the  Moon  and  on  the  Earth,  1903 ;  A  Particular 
Partial  Differential  Equation,  livasey  Depression  Bange 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  HI 

Finder,  Latest  Discovery  at  lick  Observatory,  1904;  De- 
scription of  a  Piece  of  Photometric  Apparatus  Seen  in 
Standard  Bureau  at  Washington,  Astronomical  Instrument 
for  Eliminating  the  Personal  Equation  in  Obtaining  the 
Transit  of  a  Star,  1905 ;  Some  Factors  to  be  Considered  in 
the  Determination  of  Loss  of  Matter,  1906 ;  Certain  Methods 
of  Sinking  Wells  Through  Sandy  Soils,  1907. 

Boy  Titus  Wells,  1903. —  Papers:  Some  Developments 
in  Electric  Railroading,  1904 ;  The  Reaction  of  a  Conducting 
Core  on  a  Solenoid,  1904.  Reports :  An  Electrically  Driven 
Pendulum,  1903;  Regulating  the  Strength  of  a  Field,  1904; 
Electric  Traction,  A  New  Electric  Light  Bulb,  Methods  of 
Measuring  very  Minute  Alternating  Currents,  1905. 

John  Van  Etten  Westpal,  1899. —  Papers:  A  Famous 
Old  Problem  in  Geometry,  1900 ;  The  Game  of  Minor  Fan 
Tan,  1902;  The  Fundamental  Principles  of  Life  Insurance 
and  Annuities,  1902 ;  A  Proof  of  the  Transcendency  of  e  and 
^,  1903;  Transcendental  Numbers,  1904. 

William  Bobebt  Whiteis,  1893. —  Papers:  Immunity, 
1895 ;  The  Histology  of  the  Tooth,  1897.  Reports :  A  Solu- 
tion for  Staining  Nerve  Centers,  A  Large  Microtome  for 
Sectioning  the  Entire  Brain,  1897. 

Henby  Fbedebiok  Wiokham,  1903. —  Papers :  Ants,  1903 ; 
Some  Remarkable  Habits  of  Spiders,  1904;  Insect  Life  in 
the  Great  Basin,  1905 ;  Arctic  Colonies  in  the  Rocky  Moun- 
tains, 1905 ;  Notes  on  a  Trip  to  Mexico,  1908 ;  Notes  on  the 
Mexican  Trip  of  1908,  1909 ;  Variation  of  Color  Pattern  in 
the  Genus  Cecindela,  1910.  Reports:  The  Simplest  Form 
of  Insects  —  Compodes  Staphylinus,  1907 ;  A  Peculiar  Bug 
Emesa  Longipes,  1910. 

William  Cbaig  Wilcox,  1894. —  Report :  Trend  of  Modem 
Historic  Research  in  this  Country,  1904.  , 


112  IOWA  30UBNAL  OF  HI8T0BY  AND  POLITICS 

Frank  Alonzo  Wildeb,  1903. —  Papers :  Yellowstone  Na- 
tional Park,  1904;  The  Geological  History  of  the  Bhine  Val- 
ley and  its  Belations  to  History  and  Science,  1905;  The 
Oeology  of  the  Appalachian  Mountains  and  its  Bearings 
on  American  History,  1906.  Reports :  Becent  Criticism  of 
the  Nebular  Hypothesis,  Coal-Testing  Plant  at  St.  Lonis, 
1904 ;  Gas  and  Oil  Fields  of  Kansas,  1904 ;  Government  Coal 
Testing  at  St  Louis  Fair,  Mining  and  Shipping  of  Iron  Ore, 
Producer  Gas,  1905. 

Mabel  Clabe  Williams,  1903. — Papers:  The  Subcon- 
scious, 1903 ;  How  Many  Senses  Has  Man,  1903 ;  Memory  in 
Animals,  1903 ;  Bhythm,  1910.  Reports :  Besult  of  Experi- 
ments in  Area- Volume  Illusion,  1901;  Investigation  by 
Motora,  1904. 

Henbt  Smith  Williams,  1886. — Paper:  Brains,  1886. 

Edwabd  Wolesensky,  1909. —  Report :  A  New  Method  of 
Preparing  Diamonds,  1910. 

Shebmak  Melville  Woodwabd,  1904. —  Papers :  A  Mathe- 
matical Attempt  to  Mitigate  the  Severity  of  a  Torrid  Cli- 
mate, 1905;  The  Principle  of  Least  Work  as  Applied  to 
Beams,  1909 ;  English  Gothic  Cathedral  Construction,  1909. 
Reports :  A  Freak  Standpipe,  1905 ;  Conditions  Causing  the 
Explosion  of  an  Evaporator  in  a  Factory,  1908 ;  A  Problem 
in  Hydraulics,  The  Humphrey  Gas  Pump,  1909. 

Abohie  Gabheld  Wobthing,  1906. —  Papers :  The  Appli- 
cation of  the  Electron  Theory  to  Certain  Physical  Phenom- 
ena, 1908 ;  Water  Splashes,  1909.  Reports:  Atomic  Weight 
of  Nickel,  Some  Experiments  of  Sir  Wm.  Bamsey,  1907. 

Bobebt  Bbadfobd  Wtlie,  1906. — Papers:  A  Primary 
Factor  in  the  Evolution  of  Plants,  1908;  The  Okoboji  Lake- 
side Laboratory,  1909.    Reports:  Peculiar  Characteristics 


THE  BACONIAN  CLUB  113 

of  the  Bed  Algae,  1907 ;  Method  of  Isolating  Some  Forms 
of  Fangi,190& 

The  following  papers  were  read  by  invitation  of  the 
members  of  the  Clnb : 

Capt.  BBinarBTT  —  Some  Pecnliarities  of  Whales,  1889. 

Pbof.  W  J  MoGbb  —  A  Visit  to  a  Savage  Tribe,  1899. 

Pbof.  W.  H.  Nobton  —  Shore  Forms,  1901;  Artesian 
Wells  in  this  Locality,  1908;  Illnstrated  Account  of  the  San 
Francisco  Earthquake  Disaster,  1908. 

Beobkt  AiiBEBT  W.  SwALH  —  The  Growth  and  Prosperity 
of  the  University,  1894. 

Db.  E.  S.  Talbot  —  D^eneracy,  its  Causes,  Signs  and 
Besults,  1904. 

Pbof.  S.  N.  Williams  —  The  Obligation  of  Science  to 
Suffering  Humanity,  1910. 

Mb.  WmxB  —  The  Great  Storm  at  Samoa,  1890. 

Malcolm  Glbnn  Wybb  —  Book  Binding,  1909. 

Mb.  Geoboe  p.  Diegkmann  —  The  Modem  Manufacture  of 
Portland  Cement  from  the  Mechanical  and  Chemical  Stand- 
points, 1910. 


vol.  iz— 8 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS 

AMEBIGANA 
GBNEEAL  AND  MIBOELLANBOUS 

Percy  L.  Kaye  is  the  compiler  of  a  volume  of  Readings  in  Ciwl 
Oavemment,  which  has  been  issued  by  the  Century  Company. 

Laws  as  Contracts  and  Legal  Ethics  is  the  title  of  an  address  by 
Phiny  F.  Sexton,  which  has  been  published  in  pamphlet  form. 

Volume  four,  part  two,  of  the  Anthropdlogical  Papers  of  the 
American  Museum  of  Natural  History  contains  some  Notes  Con- 
cerning New  Collections,  edited  by  Robert  H.  Lowie. 

In  the  August-September  number  of  the  Proceedings  of  the 
American  Philosophical  Society  there  is  a  paper  by  B.  H.  Matthews, 
entitled  Further  Notes  on  Burial  Customs,  Australia. 

The  September  number  of  The  National  Civic  Federation  Re- 
view  is  devoted  to  discussions  of  the  various  phases  of  the  move- 
ment for  uniformity  in  Federal  and  State  legislation. 

A  new  edition  of  Alexander  Johnston's  valuable  History  of 
American  Politics,  revised  and  enlarged  by  W.  M.  Sloane  and  con- 
tinued down  to  date  by  W.  M.  Daniels,  has  recently  appeared. 

Ernest  R.  Spedden  is  the  author  of  a  monograph  on  the  smbject 
of  The  Trade  Union  Label,  which  appears  as  a  recent  number  of 
the  Johns  Hopkins  University  Studies  in  Historical  and  PoUtiod 
Science. 

The  American  Catholic  Historical  Researches  for  October  opens 
with  some  Catholic  Revolutionary  Notes.  J.  E.  Dow  contributes 
Some  Passages  in  the  Life  of  Commodore  John  Barry.  An  article 
of  western  interest  is  one  by  J.  J.  Holzknecht  on  Bishop  Henni's 
Visitation  of  Wisconsin 

114 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS  115 

The  Report  of  the  Sixteenth  Afmudl  Meeting  of  the  Lake  Mohonk 
Conference  on  International  Arbitration  contains  a  good  variety  of 
addresses  and  reports  dealing  with  different  phases  of  the  problem 
involved. 

A  complete  edition  of  the  TreiUies,  Conventions,  International 
Acts,  Protocols  and  Agreements  Between  the  United  States  and 
Other  Powers,  1776-1909,  has  recently  been  issued  from  the  Govern- 
ment Printing  Office. 

E.  Clyde  Bobbins  is  the  compiler  of  a  volume  containing  Selected 
Articles  on  a  Central  Bank  of  the  United  States  which  appears  in 
the  Debater's  Handbook  Series  published  by  the  H.  W.  Wilson 
Company  of  Minneapolis. 

The  New  Netherland  Register  is  the  title  of  a  new  periodical,  the 
first  number  of  which  appeared  in  January,  1911.  The  most  ex- 
tended contribution  in  this  number  bears  the  heading.  Pioneers  and 
Founders  of  New  Netherlands 

Kari  Singewald  is  the  writer  of  a  monograph  on  The  Doctrine  of 
Non-SudbUity  of  the  State  in  the  United  States,  which  has  been 
published  as  a  number  of  the  Johns  Hopkins  University  Studies  in 
Historical  and  Political  Science. 

The  Railway  Library  1909,  compiled  and  edited  by  Slason  Thomp- 
son, contains  a  number  of  papers  and  addresses  dealing  with  the 
operation  and  progress  of  railroads,  and  their  regulation  by  the 
State  and  National  governments. 

A  valuable  monograph  from  the  standpoint  of  western  history 
is  that  prepared  by  Bobert  T.  Hill  on  The  Public  Domain  and 
Democracy,  and  published  in  the  Columbia  University  Studies  in 
History,  Economics,  and  Public  Law. 

The  fourteenth  volume  of  the  Review  of  Historical  Pvhlications 
Relating  to  Canada,  edited  by  Qeorge  M.  Wrong  and  H.  H.  Langton, 
has  appeared  as  a  number  of  the  University  of  Toronto  Studies. 
This  volume  contains  over  two  hundred  pages  devoted  to  publica- 
tions which  came  out  during  the  year  1909. 


116  IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

World  Corporation  is  the  title  of  a  yolume  by  King  Camp  Qil- 
lette,  which  outlineB  a  program  of  socialiatio  reform.  The  corpora- 
tion, the  purpose  of  which  this  volvme  explains,  is  organized  under 
the  laws  of  the  Territory  of  Arizona. 

The  seventeenth  and  eighteenth  volumes  of  the  Library  of  Con- 
gress edition  of  the  Journals  of  the  CofUinental  Congress,  1774-1789, 
edited  by  Qaillard  Hunt,  have  appeared.  These  two  volumes  bring 
the  proceedings  of  the  Congress  down  to  the  close  of  the  year  1780. 

W.  Max  Beid  is  the  author  of  a  volume  entitled  Lake  George  and 
Lake  Champlain:  the  War  Trail  of  the  Mohawk  and  the  Battle- 
ground of  France  and  England  in  their  Contest  for  the  Control  of 
North  America,  which  has  come  from  the  press  of  Q.  P.  Putnam's 
Sons. 

The  October  number  of  the  Bulletin  of  the  Pan  American  Union 
contains,  among  other  things,  an  account  of  Mexico's  Centennial 
Celebrations.  It  is  to  be  noted  that  the  name  ''The  Pan  American 
Union"  has  been  substituted  for  ''The  International  Bureau  of  the 
American  Republics." 

Max  Schrabisch  is  the  writer  of  an  article  on  The  Indians  of  New 
Jersey  which  appears  in  the  September-October  number  of  Ameri- 
cana.  Others  articles  are:  Thomas  Paine' s  L<ist  Days  in  New  York, 
by  William  M.  Van  der  Weyde;  and  a  continuation  of  the  History 
of  the  Mormon  Church,  by  Brigham  H.  Roberts. 

The  Religiotis  Question  in  Spain  is  discussed  by  Louis  Garcia 
Guijarro  in  an  article  which  appears  in  The  Yale  Review  for  No- 
vember. Economic  Phases  of  the  Railroad  Rate  Controversy  is  the 
subject  treated  by  A.  M.  Sokolski.  Among  the  remaining  contri- 
butions is  one  by  Julius  H.  Parmalee  on  The  Statistical  Work  of 
the  Federal  Oovemment. 

The  January,  April,  and  July  numbers  of  the  BuUetin  of  the 
Virginia  State  Library  are  combined  into  one  volume  which  is  de- 
voted to  a  Finding  List  of  the  Social  Sciences,  Political  Science, 
Law,  and  Education.    This  volume  is  in  reality  a  condensed  cata- 


SOME  PUBUCATIONS  117 

logae  of  the  books  coming  under  the  headings  indicated  which  are 
to  be  found  in  the  Virginia  State  Library.  It  will  serve  as  a  useful 
guide,  however,  for  research  students. 

Among  the  articles  in  the  Political  Science  Quarterly  for  Sep- 
tember are:  Judiciai  Views  of  the  Bestriction  of  Women's  Hours 
of  Labor,  by  Qeorge  Gorham  Oroat;  Reciprocal  Legidation,  by 
Samuel  McGune  Lindsay ;  Effect  on  Real  Estate  Values  of  the  San 
Francisco  Fire,  by  Thomas  Magee ;  and  The  Opening  of  Korea  by 
Commodore  Schufeldt,  by  Charles  Oscar  Paullin. 

The  November  number  of  The  Quarterly  Journal  of  Economics 
opens  with  a  discussion  of  BaHway  Bate  Theories  of  the  Interstate 
Commerce  Commission,  by  M.  B.  Hammond.  There  is  a  third  in- 
stallment of  0.  M.  W.  Sprague's  study  of  Proposals  for  Strengthen^ 
ing  the  National  Banking  System.  Another  article  is  one  by  Wil- 
liam J.  Cunningham  on  Standardizing  the  Wages  of  BaUroad  Train- 
men. 

Charles  A.  EUwood  is  the  writer  of  an  article  on  The  dassificO' 
tion  of  Criminals  which  appears  in  the  November  number  of  the 
Journal  of  the  American  Institute  of  Criminal  Law  and  Criminol- 
ogy. Other  articles  are:  Nature  and  Limits  of  the  Pardoning 
Power,  by  William  W.  Smithers ;  and  The  Bdation  of  the  Alien  to 
the  Administration  of  the  CivU  and  Criminal  Law,  by  Qino  C. 
Speranza. 

William  Oarrott  Brown  discusses  The  New  Politics  in  an  article 
in  The  North  American  Beview  for  October.  He  deals  especially 
with  the  evidences  of  change  which  are  to  be  seen  in  our  political 
life  of  to-day.  Other  articles  are :  The  German  Social  Democracy, 
by  John  W.  Perrin ;  The  Changing  Position  of  American  Trade,  by 
Thomas  A.  Thacher;  and  The  Public  and  the  Conservation  Policy, 
by  James  R.  McEee. 

Senator  Beveridge  of  Indiana,  by  Lucius  B  Swift;  Milwaukee's 
Socialist  Oovemmsnt,  by  Gtoorge  Allan  England;  William  James: 
Builder  of  American  Ideals,  by  Edwin  Bjorkman ;  and  The  Indian 
Land  Troubles  and  How  to  Solve  Them,  by  Francis  E.  Leupp,  are 


118  IOWA  JOUENAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

artides  in  the  October  number  of  The  American  Review  of  Beviewi. 
Woodrow  WiUan  and  the  New  Jersey  Oavemarship  is  an  article  in 
the  November  number. 

The  First  Historian  of  Cumberland,  by  James  Wilson,  is  an 
article  which  appears  in  the  October  number  of  The  Scottish  His- 
torical Review.  Charles  J.  Guthrie  wri/tes  on  The  History  of  Di- 
vorce in  Scotland.  There  are  some  Letters  from  Francis  Kennedy, 
Abbeyhm,  to  Baron  Kennedy  at  Dalquharran,  Mayboll,  Relative  to 
the  Siege  of  Edinburg,  1745.  Gtoorge  Neilson  teUs  of  Roderick 
Dhu :  His  Poetical  Pedigree. 

The  Transition  to  an  Objective  Standard  of  Social  Contrdl,  by 
Luther  Lee  Bernard ;  and  A  Contribution  to  the  Sociology  of  Sects, 
by  John  L.  Qillin,  are  articles  in  the  September  number  of  The 
American  Journal  of  Sociology.  The  first  named  article  is  con- 
tinued in  the  November  number,  where  may  also  be  found  a  dis- 
cussion of  The  Influence  of  Newspaper  Presentations  upon  tha 
Orowth  of  Crime,  by  Prances  Penton. 

Location  of  the  Towns  and  Cities  of  Central  New  York,  by  Ralph 
S,  Tarr;  and  Oeography  and  Some  of  its  Present  Needs,  by  A.  J. 
Herbertson,  are  articles  of  interest  in  the  October  number  of  the 
Bulletin  of  the  American  Oeographical  Society.  In  the  November 
number  Walter  S.  Tower  writes  on  Scientific  Oeography :  the  Re- 
lation of  Its  Content  to  Its  Subdivisions;  and  S.  P.  Vemer  discusses 
the  Effective  Occupation  of  Undeveloped  Lands. 

In  the  September  number  of  the  Journal  of  the  United  States 
Cavalry  Association  the  principal  article  of  historical  interest  is  one 
on  The  Oeronimo  Campaign  of  1885-6,  by  Charles  P.  Elliott.  In  the 
November  number  there  is  a  discussion  of  The  ChanceUorsviUe 
Campaign,  by  John  Bigelow.  Long  Distance  Rides  and  Raids,  by 
Ezra  B.  Puller;  and  Cavalry  in  the  War  of  Independence,  by 
Charles  Prancis  Adams,  are  articles  in  the  January  number. 

The  following  are  pamphlets  published  by  the  American  Associ- 
ation for  International  Conciliation  during  September,  October,  and 
November,  respectively:  Conciliation  Through  Commerce  and  In- 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS  119 

duitry  in  South  America,  by  Charles  M.  Pepper ;  International  Con- 
ciUatian  in  the  Far  East,  which  consists  of  a  collection  of  papers  on 
various  topics  by  different  writers ;  and  The  Capture  and  Deetruc* 
turn  of  Commerce  at  Sea  and  Taxation  and  Armaments,  by  F.  W. 
Hirst. 

Among  the  recent  articles  in  The  Survey  are  the  following:  an 
address  on  Civic  Responsibility,  by  Theodore  Roosevelt  (Septem- 
ber 17) ;  an  editorial  on  JudicuA  Disregard  of  Law  (October  1) ; 
Who  Pays  the  Taxes  in  Orounng  Cities,  by  John  Martin  (October 
15) ;  The  International  Prison  Congress  at  Washington,  by  Paul  U. 
Kellogg  (November  5) ;  and  From  Cave  Life  to  City  Life,  by  Lewis 
B.  Palmer,  and  Tolstoi*s  *' Resurrection**,  by  A.  S.  Goldenweiser 
(December  3). 

*  The  South  Atlantic  Quarterly  for  October  opens  with  an  article 
on  The  English  Constitutional  Crisis,  by  William  Thomas  Laprade. 
Judge  Martinis  Version  of  the  Mecklenburg  Declaration  is  the  title 
of  an  interesting  discussion  by  Samuel  A.  Ashe.  Other  contribu- 
tions are:  Three  Studies  of  Southern  Problems,  by  William  E. 
Boyd;  The  Influence  of  Industrial  and  Educational  Leaders  on 
the  Secession  of  Virginia,  by  Henry  Q.  Ellis ;  and  The  Legislatures 
of  the  States,  by  Bernard  G.  Steiner. 

The  November  number  of  The  Annals  of  the  American  Academy 
of  Political  and  Social  Science  is  devoted  to  Banking  Problems. 
Among  the  articles  dealing  with  the  various  problems  are:  The 
Problem  Before  the  National  Monetary  Commission,  by  A.  Piatt 
Andrew;  The  Extension  of  American  Banking  in  Foreign  Coun- 
tries, by  Samuel  McBoberts;  The  Canadian  Banking  System  and 
its  Operation  Under  Stress,  by  Joseph  French  Johnson ;  and  State 
and  Federal  Control  of  Banks,  by  Andrew  J.  Frame. 

The  opening  contribution  in  the  Columbian  Law  Review  for 
November  is  a  very  interesting  discussion  of  the  Violation  by  a 
State  of  the  Conditions  of  Its  Enabling  Act,  by  Julian  C.  Monnet. 
Judicial  Control  over  the  Amendment  of  State  Constitutions  is  the 
subject  of  a  pertinent  article  by  W.  F.  Dodd.    Contributions  in  the 


120  IOWA  JOUBNAL  OF  HI8T0BY  AND  POLITICS 

December  number  are:  The  Supreme  Court  and  the  Anti^Trutt 
Act,  by  Victor  Morawetz ;  and  The  Place  of  EngUsh  Legal  History 
in  the  Education  of  English  Lawyers,  by  W.  S.  Holdsworth. 

An  Educational  Department  BuUetin  pabliahed  by  the  New  York 
State  Library  in  September  contains  a  Review  of  Legislation  1907- 
1908.  Clarence  B.  Lester  is  the  editor  of  the  ydame ;  while  various 
men  have  prepared  the  reviews  of  the  different  phases  of  legislation. 
The  work  covers  the  legislation  enacted  in  all  the  States  of  the 
Union  during  the  year  indicated,  and  will  prove  very  useful  for 
reference  purposes;  although  its  helpfulness  would  have  been  en- 
hanced had  it  appeared  earlier. 

Under  the  title,  Constitutional  Law  in  1909-1910,  Eugene  Warn- 
baugh  presents  an  outline  of  Supreme  Court  decisions,  in  the 
November  {number  of  The  American  Political  Science  Review. 
Stephen  Leacock  discusses  The  Union  of  South  Africa;  while 
Hiram  Bingham  is  the  writer  of  an  article  on  the  Causes  of  the  Lack 
of  Political  Cohesion  in  Spanish  America.  Two  other  contributions 
are :  The  Extraordinary  Session  of  the  Philippine  Legislature,  and 
the  Work  of  the  PhS,ippine  Assembly,  by  James  Alexander  Bobert- 
son ;  and  The  Railroad  BiU  and  the  Court  of  Commerce,  by  James 
Wallace  Bryan. 

The  Journal  of  American  History,  volume  four,  number  four, 
contains  an  article  by  Charles  W.  Eliot,  entitled  America's  Heritage 
— Pilgrim  Foundation  of  American  Civilization,  in  which  is  traced 
the  assimilation  and  development  of  the  principles  and  doctrines  of 
the  Pilgrims  into  American  character  and  American  political  in- 
stitutions. Henry  Cabot  Lodge  writes  on  The  Mayflower's  Message 
to  America.  Under  the  heading  Builders  of  the  Great  American 
West,  D.  C.  Allen  writes  a  biographical  sketch  of  Colonel  Alexander 
W.  Doniphan.  An  account  of  Henderson's  Transylvania  Colony  is 
given  by  Mrs.  James  Halliday  McCue  in  an  article  entitled  First 
Community  of  American-Bom  Freemcm  and  Its  Dominion.  Theo- 
dore G.  Carter  tells  of  Early  Migrations  to  the  Middle  West  and 
Massacres  on  the  Frontier.  Under  the  title,  Anniversary  in  the 
American  West,  H.  Gardner  Cutler  makes  an  appeal  for  the  cele- 
bration of  April  thirtieth  in  memory  of  the  Louisiana  Purchase. 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS  121 

WESTERN 

A  neat  biographical  pamphlet  of  western  interest  bears  the  titles 
Quarter  Centennial  of  Judson  Titswarth  as  Minister  in  Plymouth 
Church,  MUwa/ukee. 

W.  A.  Schaper  is  the  editor  of  the  volume  of  the  Papers  and 
Proceedings  of  the  third  annual  meeting  of  the  Minnesota  Academy 
of  Social  Sciences,  which  has  recently  appeared. 

The  number  of  the  Ohio  University  Bulletin  published  in  October 
is  devoted  to  an  historical  account  of  Ohio  University,  the  Historic 
College  of  the  Old  Northwest,  by  Clement  L.  MartzolfF. 

Two  Bulletins  recently  issued  by  the  Bureau  of  American  Eth- 
nology  are:  Antiquities  of  Central  and  Southeastern  Missouri,  by 
Oerard  Fowke ;  and  Chippewa  Music,  by  Frances  Densmore. 

The  Ohio  Country  Between  the  Years  1783  and  1815,  by  Charles 
Elihu  Slocum,  is  a  volume  published  by  O.  P.  Putnam's  Sons.  It 
deals  chiefly  with  the  Indian  Wars  of  the  period  and  with  the  War 
of  1812. 

The  Chumash  and  Costanoan  Languages  is  the  title  of  a  brief 
monograph  by  A.  L.  Eroeber)  published  in  November  as  a  number 
of  the  University  of  Calif omia  Pul)Ucations  in  American  Archae- 
ology and  Ethnology. 

Robert  W.  Neal  is  the  writer  of  Some  Personal  ConduMons  About 
Things  Educational,  which  appear  in  The  Graduate  Magazine  of  the 
University  of  Kansas  for  November.  The  writer  finds  much  to  criti- 
cise in  the  modem  educational  system. 

The  number  of  the  Ohio  University  Bulletin  published  in  July  is 
devoted  to  the  Legal  History  of  Ohio  University,  compiled  by  Wil- 
liam E.  Peters,  from  legislative  enactments,  judicial  decisions,  pro- 
ceedings of  the  trustees,  and  other  sources. 

From  the  pen  of  William  Bomaine  Hodges  there  appears  an  at- 
tractive little  biography  of  Carl  Weimar,  the  well  known  painter  of 
Indians  and  buffaloes,  who  did  so  much  to  preserve  for  posterity  an 
accurate  record  of  the  wild  life  of  the  plains  of  the  Middle  West. 


122  IOWA  JOUBNAL  OP  HISTOBT  AND  POLITICS 

David  French  Boyd  is  the  writer  of  a  brief  sketch  of  General  W. 
T.  Sherman  as  a  CoUege  President,  which  has  been  reprinted  from 
The  American  CoUege.  The  institution,  which  soon  after  its  es- 
tablishment became  known  as  The  Louisiana  State  University,  was 
organized  by  (General  Sherman,  who  was  its  first  executive. 

The  October  number  of  the  University  of  Calif omia  Chronicle 
opens  with  an  address  on  Blackstone — The  Lawyer  and  the  Man, 
by  Charles  S.  Wheeler.  The  Historical  Spirit  is  the  subject  of  an 
address  by  Eendric  C.  Babcock.  Other  contributions  are :  The  Re- 
lations of  Organized  Labor  and  Technical  Education,  by  Alfred 
Boncovieri ;  and  Self-Directed  High  School  Development,  by  Alexis 
F.  Lange. 

Two  volumes  on  the  Indians  which  have  recently  appeared  are: 
The  Indian  and  his  Problem,  by  Francis  E.  Leupp  (Charles  Scrib- 
ner's  Sons) ;  and  My  Friend  the  Indian,  by  James  McLaughlin 
(Houghton,  Mifflin  &  Company).  Both  Mr.  Leupp  and  Mr.  Mc- 
Laughlin have  been  intimately  connected  with  the  administration  of 
Indian  affairs  and  hence  are  well  qualified  to  write  upon  the  subjects 
they  have  chosen. 

The  country  stretching  westward  from  the  western  border  of  the 
Mississippi  Valley  to  the  Coast  Bange  is  the  field  covered  by  Harlan 
I.  Smith  in  an  article  entitled  An  Unknown  Field  in  American 
Archaeology,  which  appears  in  the  July-September  number  of  The 
American  Antiquarian.  Charles  Hallock  writes  on  The  Caves  and 
Ruins  of  Arizona  and  Colorado,  setting  forth  their  cause  and  origin 
and  the  people  who  occupied  them.  There  is  another  installment  of 
Chippewa  Legends,  by  J.  0.  Einnaman. 

A  new  periodical,  which  gives  promise  of  good  things,  has  ap- 
peai'ed  in  the  Middle  West.  The  Quarterly  Journal  of  the  Uni- 
versity of  North  Dakota  is  the  name  of  this  new  publication,  and  the 
initial  number  appeared  in  October.  The  opening  contribution  is 
an  article  on  The  Office  of  the  Appellate  Judge,  by  Andrew  Alex- 
ander Bruce.  Then  follows  an  address  entitled  Past  and  Present 
Sticking  Points  in  Taxation,  by  Frank  L.  McVey.   James  E.  Boyle 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS  123 

contributes  a  chapter  in  a  discnasion  of  Co-operation  in  North 
Dakota;  and  John  Morris  Gillette  writes  on  City  Trend  of  Popu- 
lotion  and  Leadership. 

lOWANA 

In  the  October  and  November  numbers  of  Autumn  Leaves  there 
■are  continuations  of  L.  J.  Hartman's  Memories  of  Childhood. 

The  State  Banking  Board  is  the  subject  of  an  address  hy  Silas 
B.  Barton  which  is  published  in  The  Northwestern  Banker  for 
October. 

The  Relations  of  the  State  Board  of  Education  to  the  Puhlic 
School  System  are  discussed  by  James  H.  Trewin  in  the  Midland 
Schools  for  December. 

In  the  July-September  number  of  the  Iowa  Library  Quarterly 
there  is  a  discussion  of  Library  Orowth  and  Library  Laws;  and  a 
biographical  sketch  of  Honorable  C.  J.  A.  Ericson. 

In  the  November  number  of  The  Alumnus  published  at  Iowa 
State  College  there  is  to  be  found  an  article  entitled  Impressions  at 
I.  S.  C.  1880-1910,  by  Malinda  Cleaver  Faville. 

A  welcome  addition  to  the  history  of  Iowa  churches  is  to  be 
found  in  a  History  of  the  First  Congregational  Church  of  Council 
Bluffs,  Iowa,  which  was  prepared  by  N.  P.  Dodge  and  Q.  Q.  Bice. 

The  Fairfield  Ledger  of  October  12, 1910,  contains  an  account  of 
the  thirtyHBecond  annual  reunion  of  the  Jefferson  County  Old  Set- 
tler's  Association,  which  was  held  at  Fairfield  on  October  5, 1910. 

The  Last  of  the  Founders,  by  James  L.  Hill,  is  an  article  in  The 
ijhrinneU  Review  for  October.  In  the  November  number  there  is  a 
letter  from  M.  M.  Blackburn  relating  to  Opportunities  in  the  Oov- 
smment  Service. 

In  the  Madrid  Register-News  of  December  8,  1910,  there  is  an 
interesting  article  by  C.  L.  Lucas  on  the  Days  of  the  Riverland 
Troubles,  One  week  later  in  the  same  paper  Mr.  Lucas  relates  the 
History  of  the  Riverland  Orant. 


124  IOWA  70UBNAL  OF  HISTOBY  AND  POLITICS 

A  Biography  of  Elder  Joieph  E.  Burton,  hy  Emma  B.  Burton^ 
opens  the  October  number  of  the  Journal  of  History  published  at 
Lamoni  by  the  Reorganized  Church  of  Jesus  Christ  of  Latter  Dsy 
Saints.  There  is  a  ccmtinuation  of  the  Biography  of  Sidney  Bigdon, 
hy  Heman  C.  Smith,  as  well  as  of  a  number  of  other  biographical 
and  autobiographical  sketches.  There  is  also  an  article  (m  Mormon 
Troubles  in  Missouri. 

The  Battle  of  Atlanta  and  Other  Campaigns,  Addresses,  etc.,  is 
the  title  of  an  interesting  volume  from  the  pen  of  GrenviUe  M. 
Dodge,  who  was  Commander  of  the  Department  of  Missouri  in  1865. 
Among  the  contents  are  chapters  on  the  southwestern  campaign,  the 
battle  of  Atlanta,  the  Indian  campaigns  in  the  last  years  of  the 
war,  the  Army  of  the  Tennessee,  the  western  campaign,  and  General 
Grant.   Numerous  illustrations  add  interest  to  the  volume. 

The  Story  of  Greater  Oskaioosa  is  told  by  J.  W.  Johnson  in  the 
August-September  double  number  of  The  Midwestern,  and  there  is 
a  foreword  by  the  editor,  Carolyn  M.  Ogilvie.  The  Story  of  Des 
Moines  is  also  related  in  this  number;  Henry  E.  Sampson  describes 
the  Working  of  the  Des  Moines  Plan;  and  E.  G.  Wylie  discusses 
BaUroad  Bate  Legislation.  In  the  October  number  there  is  an 
article  by  Tacitus  Hussey  on  Early  Settlers — Fathers  and  Sons. 
The  same  writer  has  A  History  of  the  Banks  of  Des  Moines  in  the 
January  number. 

Municipal  Ownership  Under  Commission  Chvemment,  by  W.  A. 
Miller ;  Municipal  Accounting,  by  Charles  M.  Wallace ;  Home  Bule 
for  Cities,  by  Thomas  Maloney;  and  a  discussion  of  the  Unit  Tax 
System,  are  to  be  found  in  the  October  number  of  Midland  Munici- 
palities. Frank  G.  Pierce  is  the  writer  of  an  address  on  Uniform 
Municipal  Accounting  which  appears  in  the  December  number. 
The  President's  Annual  Address,  League  of  Nebraska  MunicipaU- 
ties,  by  Don  L.  Love,  is  the  principal  contribution  in  the  January 
number. 

SOME  RECENT  FUBU0ATI0K8  BT  IOWA   AUTHOBS 

Anderson,  Melville  Best, 

The  Happy  Teacher.   New  Tork :  Benjamin  W.  Huebsch.  1910. 


SOMB  PUBLICATIONS  125 

Bain,  Harry  Foster, 

More  Recent  Cyanide  Practice.    San  Franciaeo:  Mining  and 
Scientific  Preia.    1910. 
Ball,  Jame9  Moorea, 

Andreas  Veealius,  the  Reformer  of  Anatomy.    St.  Lonia:  Med* 
ical  Science  PreaB.    1910. 
Bolton,  Frederick  Elmer, 

Principles  of  Education.    New  York:  Charlea  Scribner'a  Sons. 
1910. 
Brigham,  Johnaon, 

The  Banker  in  Literature.    New  York :  The  Banking  Pnbliah- 
ingCo.    1910. 
Brown,  Charles  Beynolds, 

The  Cap  and  Oown.    Boston:  Pilgrim  Press.    1910. 
Bush,  Bertha  E., 

A  Prairie  Rose.    Boston :  Little,  Brown  &  Co.    1910. 
Dodge,  Orenville  M., 

The  Battle  of  Atlanta  and  Other  Campaigns,  Addresses,  etc. 
Council  Bluffs:  Monarch  Printing  Company.    1910. 
Ficke,  Arthur  Davison, 

The  Breaking  of  Bonds:  A  Drama  of  the  Social  Unrest. 
Boston :  Sherman,  French  &  Company.    1910. 
Oarland,  Hamlin, 

Other  Main-Traveled  Roads.     New  York:  Harper  Brothers. 
1910. 
Oibson,  Clarence  B., 

Reflections  of  Nature  with  Affection  Taught.    Panora:  Pub- 
lished by  the  author.    1910. 
Hoist,  Bemhart  Paul,  (Joint  editor). 

Practical  Home  and  School  Methods  of  Study  and  Instruction 
in  the  Fundamental  Elements  of  Education.   Chicago :  Hoist 
Publishing  Co.    1910. 
Hough,  Emerson, 

The  Purchase  Price.    Indianapolis:   The  Bobbs-Merrill  Com- 
pany.   1910. 


126  IOWA  JOUBNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 


The  Singing  Mouse  Stories.    Indianapolis :  The  Bobbs-Merrill 

Company.   1910. 
The  Sowing:  A  ''Yankee's''  View  of  England's  DtUy  to  Her- 
self and  to  Canada.    Chicago :  Vanderhoof-Onnn  Co.    1910. 
Huebinger,  Melchoir, 

Map  and  Ouide  for  Biver  to  £fuer  Boad.    Dea  Moines:  Iowa 
Publishing  Co.    1910. 
Hughes,  Bnpert, 

The  Gift  Wife.    New  York:  Moffat,  Yard  &  Co.    1910. 
The  Lakerim  Cruise.    New  York:  Century  Co.    1910. 
Eaye,  Percy  Lewis, 

Beadings  in  Civil  Oovemment.  *  New  York :  Century  Co.    1910. 
La  Tourette,  Clara,  and  Charles  Foster  McDaniel, 

Commercial  Art  Typewriting.    Cedar  Bapids :  C.  F.  McDanieL 
1910. 
Lazell,  Frederick  J., 

Isaiah  as  a  Nature-Lover.    Cedar  Bapids:    The  Torch  Press. 
1910. 
Lillibridge,  William  Otis, 

Quercus  Alha,  the  Veteran  of  the  Ozarks.    Chicago:  A.  C.  Mo- 
Clurg&Co.    1910. 
MacMurray,  Arthur, 

Practical  Lessons  in  Public  Speaking.    Ames:    Published  by 
the  author.    1910. 
Newton,  Joseph  Fort, 

Lincoln  and  Hemdon.   Cedar  Bapids :  The  Torch  Press.    1910. 
Pammel,  Louis  Hermann, 

A  Manual  of  Poisonous  Plants.    Cedar  Bapids:  The  Torch 
Press.    1910. 
Parrish,  Bandall, 

Don  MacOrath:  A  Tale  of  the  Biver.   Chicago :  A.  C.  McChirg 
ft  Co.    1910. 
Baymond,  William  Oalt, 

BaUroad  Field  Oeomstry.    New  York:  7ohn  Wiley  and  Sons. 
1910. 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS  127 

Bobbins,  E.  Clyde, 

Selected  Articles  an  a  Central  Bank  of  the  United  States. 
Minneapolis:   The  H.  W.  Wilson  Company.  1910. 
Bogers,  Jnlia  E., 

Earth  and  Sky  Every  ChUd  Should  Know.     New  York: 
Donbleday,  Page  &  Co.    1910. 
Sedlasky,  Ferdinand  J., 

Defense  of  the  Truth.    Fort  Dodge :  Published  by  the  author. 
1910. 
Sharpe,  Gazelle  Stems, 

A  Little  Patch  of  Blue.    Boston :  Gtorham  Press.    1910. 
Steiner,  Edward  A., 

Against  the  Current.    New  York  and  Chicago:  Fleming  H. 
BevellCo.    1910. 
Walker,  Margaret  Coulson, 

Tales  Come  True.    New  York:  Baker  &  Taylor  Co.    1910. 
Weld,  Laenas  O., 

On  the  Way  to  Iowa.   Iowa  City :  The  State  Historical  Society 
of  Iowa.    1910. 
White,  Hamilton, 

The  New  Theology.  New  York :  Broadway  Publishing  Co.  1910. 
Zollinger,  Oulielma, 

The  Rout  of  the  Foreigners.    Chicago:  A.  C.  McQurg  &  Co. 
1910. 

SOMB  BBCENT  HISTORICAL  ITEMS  IN  IOWA  NEWSPAPBBS 

The  Register  and  Leader 

General  Baker  Might  Have  Been  President,  but  he  Came  to  Iowa, 
by  G.  W.  Crosley,  September  25,  1910. 

Story  of  the  Earliest  Hanging  in  Iowa,  by  0.  H.  Mills,  September 
25,  1910. 

When  Josiah  T.  Young  was  Secretary  of  State,  by  L.  F.  Andrews, 
September  25, 1910. 

Sketch  of  Life  of  Sidney  Anderson,  October  2, 1910. 

Life  Story  of  Henry  Wallace,  the  New  Head  of  Conservation,  Oc- 
tober 2, 1910. 


128  IOWA  ffOUBNAL  OF  HISTOBY  AND  POLITICS 

Marvelous  Stoiy  of  a  Treasure  Mystery  in  Jefferson  County,  Octo- 
ber 2, 1910. 

Indian  Payments  are  Changed  Again,  October  2, 1910. 

John  S.  Bunnells,  One  of  Prominent  Early  Lawyers  of  Iowa,  by 
L.  F.  Andrews,  October  2,  1910. 

Sketch  of  Life  of  Thomas  Updegraff,  October  9,  1910. 

Sketch  of  Life  of  S.  H.  M.  Byers,  by  L.  F.  Andrews,  October  9, 1910. 

Sketch  of  Life  of  W.  H.  Ingersoll,  who  Came  to  Iowa  in  1835, 
October  9,  1910. 

G.  W.  Eatterman,  Oldest  Native  Son  of  Wapello  County,  October 
9,  1910. 

Two  Early  Settlers  in  Van  Buren  County,  October  9, 1910. 

Sketches  of  Life  of  Johnathan  P.  DoUiver,  October  16,  1910. 

Bobert  C.  Webb,  an  Early  Settler  of  Polk  County,  October  16, 1910. 

Coincidence  in  Dolliver's  Life,  October  21, 1910. 

Sketch  of  Major  Charles  Mackenzie's  Notable  Military  Service,  by 
L.  F.  Andrews,  October  23,  1910. 

Mr.  Clarkson's  Farewell  Tribute  to  Dolliver,  October  23, 1910. 

How  an  Indian  Fled  from  Death  in  Early  Iowa,  by  O.  H.  MUls, 
November  6,  1910. 

Sketch  of  Life  of  Lowell  Chamberlain,  by  L.  F.  Andrews,  November 
6,  1910. 

Memory  of  Charlotte  Bronte  in  Des  Moines,  by  Mrs.  Addie  B.  Bil- 
lington,  November  6,  1910. 

H.  W.  Macomber  —  A  Boyhood  Friend  of  Hiram  Maxim,  the  Sci- 
entist, November  6,  1910. 

Lives  Spent  in  Loyal  Service  for  the  Burlington  Bailroad  Company, 
November  13, 1910. 

John  Cooper,  a  Belative  of  Peter  Cooper,  November  13,  1910. 

Story  of  the  Genesis  of  the  First  Bailroad  into  Des  Moines,  Novem- 
ber 13,  1910. 

Ackworth  and  Whittier,  Topical  Quaker  Communities  in  Iowa,  by 
Florence  Armstrong,  November  20,  1910. 

Origin  of  the  Chautauqua  Movement  in  Iowa,  by  Mrs.  Addie  B. 
Billington,  November  20,  1910. 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS  129 

Origin  of  the  Des  Moines  Ciollege,  by  L.  F.  Andrews,  November 
20,  1910. 

Sketch  of  Life  of  C.  T.  Brookins,  December  4,  1910. 

Sketch  of  life  of  Professor  Leona  Gall,  by  Mrs.  Addle  B.  Billington^ 
December  4,  1910. 

Winslow  Casady  Tompkins  —  Sole  Survivor  of  Famous  War  Squad,. 
December  4,  1910. 

Sketch  of  Life  of  Alfred  M.  Lyon,  One  of  Iowa's  Bravest  Soldiers^ 
by  L.  F.  Andrews,  December  4,  1910. 

Old  Proclamation  Found  —  Document  Declaring  Des  Moines  to  be 
Capital  of  State,  December  11,  1910. 

Lester  Perkins  —  Noted  Pioneer  of  Des  Moines,  by  L.  F.  Andrews, 
December  11,  1910. 

Forty-four  Years  of  Street  Bailwi^  Business  in  Des  Moines,  Decem- 
ber 11, 1910. 

Story  of  Mystery  Which  Puzzled  Early  Settlers,  by  0.  H.  MiDs, 
December  18,  1910. 

Isaac  Nash  of  Springville,  a  Veteran  of  two  Wars,  December  18, 
1910. 

Sketch  of  Life  of  Augustus  Washburn,  by  L.  F.  Andrews,  Decem- 
ber 18,  1910. 

The  Pilgrims  of  Iowa,  December  25,  1910. 

Sketch  of  Life  of  Soma  Wheeler  Woods,  by  Mrs.  Addie  B.  Billing- 
ton,  December  25, 1910. 

History  of  the  Famous  Second  Regiment  and  Colonel  N^  W.  Mills, 
by  L.  F.  Andrews,  December  25, 1910. 

The  Burlinfftan  Hawk-Eye 

Twenty  Years  Ago.     (In  each  Sunday  Issue). 

Description  of  a  Pioneer  Cabin,  October  2,  1910. 

Veterans  of  the  25th  Iowa  to  Review  War  Experiences,  October  2,. 

1910. 
An  Iowa  Soldier  on  the  Skirmish  Line,  by  H.  Heaton,  October  2,. 

1910. 
Sketch  of  Life  of  Jonathan  P.  DoUiver,  October  16, 1910. 
Thrilling  Story  of  Indian  Fighting  in  the  West,  by  7.  H.  Dodds^ 

October  16,  1910. 

voii.  IX— 9 


130  IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Campaigning  Around  Atlanta  with  Sherman  in  1864,  I,  by  J.  W. 

Cheney,  October  23,  1910. 
Sacajawea:  The  Romance  of  an  Indian  Oirl  Who  Helped  to  Qive 

Our  Nation  the  Great  Northwest  Territory,  October  23,  1910. 
Campaigning  Around  Atlanta  with  Sherman  in  1864,  II,  by  J.  W. 

Cheney,  October  30,  1910. 
Our  Same  Old  Tent  —  A  Reminiscence  of  War  Times,  by  W.  P. 

Elliot,  November  6,  1910. 
Exercises  at  the  Marking  of  the  Site  of  Old  Zion  Church,  November 

13,  1910. 
The  Memorial  of  a  Forceful  Man's  Life  —  Charles  Elliott  Perkins, 

November  13,  1910. 
W.  H.  Ingersoll,  an  Old  Pioneer  of  Des  Moines  County,  November 

13,  1910. 
The  Story  of  How  Burlington  was  Named,  by  E.  H.  Waring,  Nov- 
ember 27,  1910. 
Experiences  During  the  Winter  of  1880,  by  S.  Hutchins,  December 

11,  1910. 
Memories  of  the  Civil  War,  by  W.  P.  Elliott,  December  18,  1910. 

Cedar  Rapids  Bepuhlican 

How  Iowa  Received  its  Name,  October  2,  1910. 

Story  of  Indian  Fights,  October  9,  1910. 

Sketch  of  Life  of  Senator  Jonathan  P.  Dolliver,  October  16,  1910. 

Ste.  Genevieve  —  Old  Missouri  Town,  October  16,  1910. 

Lincoln  and  Hemdon,  November  6,  1910. 

Mr.  Clarkson's  PArewell  Tribute  to  Senator  Dolliver,  November 

6,  1910. 
An  Indian's  Race  for  Life,  by  0.  H.  Mills,  November  13, 1910. 
The  First  Directory  Published  in  Cedar  Rapids,  November  27, 1910. 

The  Dubuque  Telegraph-Herald 

Sketch  of  Life  of  Senator  Jonathan  P.  Dolliver,  October  16,  1910. 
Story  of  Earliest  Hanging  in  Iowa,  by  H.  0.  Mills,  October  16, 1910. 
Careers  of  Old  Time  Printers,  October  23,  1910. 
Jonathan  P.  Dolliver:  A  Statesman  of  the  New  School,  by  N.  W. 
Waters,  October  30, 1910. 


HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES 

PUBLICATIONS 

The  Buffalo  Historical  Society  has  published  a  reprint  containing 
a  Rough  List  of  Manuscripts  in  the  Library  of  the  Buffalo  Historical 
Society. 

A  paper  on  Stage-Coach  Days  in  Medford,  by  Eliza  M.  Oill,  is  the 
principal  contribution  to  The  Medford  Historical  Register  for 
October.    An  Old-Time  Muster  is  another  item  of  interest. 

A  recent  reprint  from  the  Annual  Report  of  the  American  His- 
torical Association,  for  1908,  contains  the  Proceedings  of  the  Fifth 
Annual  Conference  of  Historical  Societies^  reported  by  St.  Gteorge 
L.  Sioussat. 

The  May- August  number  of  the  German  American  Annals  is  de- 
voted entirely  to  the  Elfte  Staats-Konvention  des  Deutsch-Ameri- 
kanischen  Zentral-Bundes  von  Pennsylvanien,  the  proceedings  of 
which  are  printed  in  Oerman. 

In  the  September-October  number  of  the  Records  of  the  Past 
Hjalmar  Rued  Holand  discusses  the  question,  Are  there  English 
Words  on  the  Kensington  Runestonef  Leon  Dominian  tells  of  The 
Pyramids  of  San  Juan  Teotihuacan. 

John  Heman  Converse  is  the  subject  of  a  biographical  sketch 
which  appears  in  the  September  number  of  the  Journal  of  the 
Presbyterian  Historical  Society.  Among  the  editorials  are  discus- 
sions of  Sycamore  Shoals  and  its  Monument,  and  of  Endowing 
Church  History. 

Der  deutsche  SchuUmeister  in  der  Amerikanischen  Oeschichte, 
by  A.  B.  Faust,  is  the  opening  article  in  the  October  number  of  the 
Deutsch-Americkanische  Oeschichtsbldtter.  Other  articles  are:  Die 
Deutschen  in  Illinois,  by  Emil  Mannhardt;  and  Die  Deutschen  in 
Davenport  und  Scott  County  in  Iowa. 

181 


132  IOWA  JOUBNAL  OF  mSTOEY  AND  POLITICS 

The  portions  of  The  Randolph  Manuscript  published  in  the 
October  number  of  The  Virginia  Magatine  of  History  and  Biog- 
raphy cover  the  period  from  the  latter  part  of  the  year  1682  to  the 
middle  of  the  year  1684.  Continuations  of  documentary  material 
take  up  practically  the  entire  number. 

Volume  nine,  number  two  of  The  James  Sprunt  Historical  Pub- 
lications, published  under  the  direction  of  The  North  Carolina  His- 
torical Society,  contains  a  study  of  Federalism  in  North  Carolina, 
by  Henry  McQilbert  Wagstaff ;  and  a  number  of  Letters  of  Wiliiam 
Barry  Orove,  also  edited  by  Mr.  Wagstaff. 

The  proceedings  attendant  upon  The  Formal  Opening  of  the  New 
Fireproof  Building  of  the  Historical  Society  of  Pennsylvania,  April 
6-7,  1910,  are  set  forth  in  a  pamphlet  recently  published  by  the 
Society.  Several  cuts  showing  the  various  homes  of  the  Society 
and  photographs  of  its  Presidents,  add  interest  to  the  pamphlet. 

Henry  A.  M.  Smith  contributes  a  second  chapter  of  his  study  of 
The  Baronies  of  South  Carolina  to  the  October  number  of  The  South 
Carolina  Historical  and  Genealogical  Magazine.  This  time  the  Fair- 
lawn  Barony  is  discussed.  The  greater  part  of  the  Magazine  is  taken 
up  with  a  genealogical  account  of  the  Cantey  Family,  by  Joseph  S. 
Ames. 

Among  the  contents  of  volume  fifteen  of  the  Collections  of  the 
Nova  Scotia  Historical  Society  are  the  following  papers :  The  Fish- 
eries  of  British  North  America  and  the  United  States  Fishermen,  by 
Wallace  Qraham;  MemMr  of  Governor  John  Parr,  by  James  S. 
MacDonald;  Halifax  and  the  Capture  of  St.  Pierre  in  1793,  by  T. 
Watson  Smith ;  and  Dements  Tercentenary  at  Annapolis,  1604-1904, 
by  Justice  Longley. 

The  October  number  of  the  Historical  Collections  of  the  Essex 
Institute  contains  a  continuation  of  the  history  of  The  Houses  and 
Buildings  of  Grovdand,  Massachusetts,  by  Alfred  Poore;  a  fourth 
chapter  in  Sidney  Perley's  discussion  of  Marblehead  in  the  Year 
1700;  and  other  continuations.  Another  contribution  is  the  Revo- 
lutionary Orderly  Book  of  Capt.  Jeremiah  Putnam  of  Danvers,, 
Mass.,  in  the  Rhode  Island  Campaign. 


HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  133 

John  F.  Philips  is  the  author  of  an  article  entitled  Hamilton 
Bowan  Gamble  and  the  Proviaional  Oovemment  of  Missouri,  which 
is  the  opening  contribution  in  the  October  number  of  the  Missouri 
Historical  Review.  F.  A.  Sampson  has  compiled  some  interesting 
notes  on  Washington  Irving:  Travels  in  Missouri  and  the  South. 
A  list  of  Old  Newspaper  FUes  in  the  library  of  the  State  Historical 
Society  of  Missouri  will  be  of  service  to  investigators. 

The  Proceedings  of  the  American  Antiqv^^rian  Society  at  the  semi- 
annual meeting  held  on  April  20,  1910,  contains  the  customary 
reports  and  three  rather  extended  papers.  The  first  is  by  Benjamin 
Thomas  Hill,  and  describes  Life  at  Harvard  a  Century  Ago,  as 
illustrated  by  the  letters  and  papers  of  Stephen  Salisbury  of  the 
class  of  1817.  The  Jumano  Indians  is  the  subject  discussed  by 
Frederick  Webb  Hodge;  and  an  article  on  The  Libraries  of  the 
Mathers  is  written  by  Julius  Herbert  Tuttle. 

The  July  number  of  The  Pennsylvania  Magazine  of  History  and 
Biography  is  largely  taken  up  with  an  account  of  The  Formal  Open- 
ing of  the  New  Fireproof  Building  of  the  Historical  Society  of  Penn- 
sylvania. In  the  October  number  there  is  to  be  found  some  cor- 
respondence between  Thomas  Jefferson  and  William  Wirt  under  the 
heading,  Jefferson^s  Recollections  of  Patrick  Henry,  contributed  by 
Stan.  y.  Henkels.  An  Autobiographical  Sketch  of  the  Life  of  Gen. 
John  Burrows,  of  Lycoming  Co.,  Penna.,  written  in  1837,  is  another 
contribution. 

The  forty-third  volume  of  the  Proceedings  of  the  Massachusetts 
Historical  Society  covers  the  period  from  October,  1909,  to  June, 
1910.  Among  the  many  papers  contained  in  this  volume  the  fol- 
lowing may  be  mentioned:  The  Oregon  Trail,  by  Horace  Davis; 
Bancroft  Papers  on  the  Mecklenburg  Declaration  of  Independence, 
contributed  by  Mark  Antony  De  Wolfe  Howe ;  HamUton^s  Report 
upon  the  Constitutumality  of  a  National  Bank,  contributed  by 
Worthington  C.  Ford;  War  Letters  of  Dr.  Seth  Rogers,  1862-63, 
communicated  by  T.  W.  Higginson ;  Letters,  1694-95,  on  the  Defense 
of  the  Frontier,  communicated  by  Charles  Pelham  Qreenough ;  and 
Cheat  Secession  Winter  of  1860-61,  by  Henry  Adams. 


134  IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Athens  and  HeUenum  is  the  topic  discnflBed  by  William  S.  Fer- 
guson in  the  October  number  of  The  American  Historical  Review. 
G.  Raymond  Beazley  writes  on  Prince  Henry  of  Portugal  and  the 
African  Crusade  of  the  Fifteenth  Century;  and  Ralph  C.  N.  Gat- 
terall  is  the  author  of  a  paper  on  The  Credibility  of  Marat.  Two 
articles  on  subjects  in  American  history  are:  The  Mexican  Recogni- 
tion of  Texas,  by  Justin  H.  Smith;  and  The  Second  Birth  of  the 
Republican  Party,  by  William  A.  Dimning.  In  the  last  named 
paper  it  is  the  object  of  the  writer  to  show  that  the  Republican 
party,  as  organized  in  1854,  did  not  have  an  unbroken  existence. 
Under  the  heading  of  Documents  there  are  presented  some  interest^ 
ing  Letters  of  Toussaint  Louverture  and  of  Edward  Stevens,  1798- 
1600. 

Charles  Dickens  in  Illinois  is  the  title  of  an  interesting  article  by 
J.  F.  Snyder,  which  appears  in  the  October  Journal  of  the  Illinois 
State  Historical  Society.  Clarence  Walworth  Alvord  is  the  editor  of 
some  letters  and  documents  from  the  papers  of  Edward  Cole,  Indian 
Commissioner  in  the  Illinois  Country,  which  illustrate  the  conduct  of 
Indian  affairs  in  the  West  during  the  British  period.  In  a  letter  en- 
titled Governor  Coles*  Autobiography  there  are  related  some  inci- 
dents in  the  early  settlement  of  Illinois.  Oliver  R.  Williamson  dis- 
cusses the  very  pertinent  subject  of  American  History  and  the  Imr 
migrant.  Among  other  contributions  are :  Honorable  Lewis  Steward, 
by  Avery  N.  Beebe;  The  ''Comer  Stone''  Resolution,  by  Duane 
Mowry;  and  A  Letter  from  Illinois  Written  in  1836,  by  Richard 
H.  Beach. 

Charles  E.  Brown  is  the  writer  of  an  account  of  The  Wisconsin 
Archaeological  Society,  State  Field  Assembly,  which  appears  in  the 
Ohio  Archaeological  and  Historical  Quarterly  for  October.  E.  L. 
Taylor's  article  on  La  Salle's  Route  Down  the  Ohio  is  a  contribution 
to  the  discussion  of  a  puzzling  period  in  the  explorer's  career.  The 
Ohio  Declaration  of  Independence  is  the  subject  of  a  sketch  by 
Clement  L.  Martzolff,  who  also  writes  on  Ohio  University  —  the 
Historic  College  of  the  Old  Northwest,  It  is  to  be  noted  that 
Oliver  Perry  Shiras,  who  for  so  many  years  was  a  Federal  Judge 


HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  135 

in  Iowa,  received  his  early  education  at  Ohio  University.  An  ac- 
count  of  Bofvman^s  Expedition  Against  ChUUcothe  is  taken  from 
the  Draper  manuscripts.  The  concluding  article  is  one  by  Isaac 
J.  Cox  on  the  Significance  of  Perry^s  Victory. 

The  State  Finances  of  Texas  During  the  Reconstruction  is  the 
subject  of  an  interesting  article  written  by  E.  T.  Miller,  which  is 
the  opening  contribution  in  The  Quarterly  of  the  Texas  State  His- 
torical Association  for  October.  In  The  City  of  Austin  from  1839 
to  1865  Alex.  W.  Terrell  tells  how  Austin  came  to  be  chosen  as  the 
seat  of  government  six  years  before  annexation,  and  traces  the 
history  of  the  capital  city  through  the  Civil  War.  The  Last  Hope 
of  the  Confederacy  is  the  heading  given  to  a  memorial  from  John 
Tyler  to  the  Governor  and  authorities  of  Texas,  for  which  Charles 
W.  Ramsdell  has  written  an  introduction.  Two  biographical  sketches 
are:  General  Volney  Erskine  Howard,  by  Z.  T.  Pulmore;  and  Albert 
Triplett  Burnley,  by  Martha  A.  Burnley.  The  concluding  contri- 
bution is  a  letter  from  Peter  W.  Qrayson  to  Mirabeau  B.  Lamar 
dealing  with  The  Release  of  Stephen  F.  Austin  from  Prison. 

The  July  and  October  numbers  of  the  Annals  of  Iowa  are  com- 
bined in  a  double  number  which  is  filled  with  interesting  and  valu- 
able material.  The  opening  contribution  is  on  The  Republican  State 
Convention,  Des  Moines,  January  18,  1860,  and  is  written  by  F.  I. 
Herriott.  The  convention  is  described  largely  from  the  standpoint 
of  the  choice  of  delegates  to  the  National  Republican  Convention  at 
Chicago.  Under  the  title,  Across  the  Plains  in  1850,  there  are  pub- 
lished a  journal  and  some  letters  written  by  Jerome  Dutton  while 
on  an  overland  journey  from  Scott  County,  Iowa,  to  Sacramento 
County,  California.  William  Fletcher  King,  who  for  a  period  of 
forty-four  years  was  the  president  of  Cornell  College,  is  the  subject 
of  an  appreciation  by  Eollo  P.  Hurlburt.  A  Brief  History  of  the 
French  Family  is  written  by  Mary  Queal  Beyer.  Other  articles  are : 
Judge  Alexander  Brown,  by  Robert  Sloan;  The  Sword  of  Black 
Hawk,  by  D.  C.  Beaman ;  and  Old  Zion  Church,  Burlington,  Iowa, 
by  Edmund  H.  Waring.  Among  the  editorials  may  be  found  a 
brief  sketch  of  Justice  Samuel  F.  Miller  and  his  First  Circuit  Court. 


136  IOWA  JOUBNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

A  third  installment  of  F.  G.  Young's  monograph  on  the  Finan- 
cial History  of  the  State  of  Oregon  may  be  found  in  the  June  num- 
ber  of  The  Quarterly  of  the  Oregon  Historical  Society,  This  in- 
stallment deals  with  the  sale  of  public  lands  in  Oregon.  In  the 
Recollections  of  a  Pioneer  of  1859:  Lawson  Stockman,  B.  F.  Manring 
tells  some  interesting  experiences  of  an  early  western  settler.  Law- 
son  Stockman  started  from  Iowa  City,  Iowa,  in  March,  1859,  on  the 
long  journey  westward  to  Oregon.  What  I  Know  of  Dr,  McLaughlin 
and  How  I  Know  It  is  the  title  given  to  some  fascinating  recollec- 
tions by  John  Minto  who  made  the  journey  from  Missouri  to  Oregon 
in  the  year  1844.  A  continuation  of  The  Peter  Skene  Ogden  Jour- 
nals, edited  by  T.  C.  Elliott ;  and  An  Estimate  of  the  Character  and 
Services  of  Judge  George  H,  Williams,  by  Harvey  W.  Scott,  may 
also  be  found.  Judge  Williams  was  a  prominent  character  in  Iowa 
during  the  early  years  of  Statehood.  It  was  in  1853  that  he  was 
appointed  Chief  Justice  of  the  Territory  of  Oregon. 

ACTIVITIES 

The  Arkansas  Historical  Association  expects  to  distribute  the 
third  volume  of  its  Puhlicaticns  some  time  in  January. 

The  new  librarian  of  the  Bhode  Island  Historical  Society  is 
Professor  Frank  O.  Bates,  formerly  of  the  University  of  Kansas. 

The  Pacific  Coast  Branch  of  the  American  Historical  Association 
held  its  annual  meeting  at  the  University  of  California  on  November 
18  and  19,  1910. 

The  Ohio  Archaeological  and  Historical  Society,  under  the  di- 
rection of  Mr.  E.  0.  Randall,  is  editing  the  Moravian  Records  and 
preparing  them  for  publication. 

The  Michigan  Pioneer  and  Historical  Society  is  performing  a 
valuable  service  in  the  translation  of  Margry's  Documents.  Three 
volumes  are  now  ready  for  the  press. 

Dr.  A.  C.  Tilton,  who  for  seven  years  has  been  chief  of  the  manu- 
script department  of  the  State  Historical  Society  of  Wisconsin,  has 
accepted  a  similar  i>osition  in  the  Connecticut  State  Library. 


HISTORICAL  SOCIETIBS  137 

Mr.  Purd  B.  Wright,  for  several  years  a  Trustee  of  the  State 
Historical  Society  of  Missouri,  has  been  elected  Librarian  of  the 
Los  Angeles  Public  Library,  and  hence  has  severed  his  connection 
with  the  Society. 

On  April  6  and  7,  1910,  occurred  the  formal  opening  of  the  new 
building  of  the  Historical  Society  of  Penn^lvania.  The  building 
was  erected  at  a  cost  of  nearly  three  hundred  and  forty  thousand 
dollars,  half  of  which  was  appropriated  by  the  State  legislature. 

The  Illinois  State  Historical  Library  has  in  press  a  volume  con- 
taining a  list  of  Illinois  newspapers  down  to  1840,  and  the  second 
volume  of  the  Governors'  Letter-Books.  The  papers  of  Oeorge 
Bogers  Clark  are  being  prepared  for  publication  by  Professor 
James  A.  James. 

The  fifty-eighth  annual  meeting  of  the  State  Historical  Society 
of  Wisconsin  was  held  at  Madison  on  October  20,  1910.  The  crowd- 
ed condition  of  the  library  was  commented  upon  by  the  Secretary, 
Dr.  Reuben  Qold  Thwaites  in  his  report,  and  the  urgent  need  for 
a  new  book-stack  wing  was  pointed  out.  The  library  now  numbers 
331,567  titles.  The  most  conspicuous  addition  to  the  manuscript 
collections  of  the  Society  during  the  past  year  are  the  papers  of  the 
late  Gteorge  H.  Paul  of  Milwaukee.  The  principal  address  at  the 
annual  meeting  was  delivered  by  Professor  Benjamin  F.  Sham- 
baugh  of  the  State  University  of  Iowa  on  The  History  of  the  West 
end  the  Pioneers. 

The  report  of  the  Secretary  of  the  Kansas  State  Historical  So- 
ciety for  the  year  ending  December  6,  1910,  reveals  a  substantial 
growth  in  the  collections  of  the  Society.  Nearly  eleven  thousand 
books,  pamphlets,  and  bound  volumes  of  newspapers  were  added 
to  the  library.  The  most  notable  accessions  are  in  the  department 
of  archives,  where  nearly  twenty  thousand  documents  were  added 
during  the  year.  The  total  collections  of  the  Society  now  number 
in  the  vicinity  of  four  hundred  thousand  items.  Along  the  line  of 
publication  the  Society  has  issued  volume  eleven  of  its  CoUectuyfis. 
It  has  been  decided  to  suspend  work  on  the  Memorial  and  Historical 


138  IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Building,  of  which  the  foundation  has  been  completed,  until  after 
the  session  of  the  legislature  in  1911.  It  is  sincerely  to  be  hoped 
that  the  legislature  will  remedy  the  unfortunate  situation  which 
now  exists,  and  the  building  will  receive  the  generous  appropriation 
which  it  deserves. 

OHIO  VALLEY  HISTORICAL  A8S0GUTI0N 

The  fourth  annual  meeting  of  the  Ohio  Valley  Historical  Associ- 
ation was  held  at  Indianapolis,  Indiana,  on  December  27,  1910.  At 
12 :30  p.  m.  there  was  a  luncheon  at  the  University  Club,  followed  by 
a  program  at  which  the  proposed  Pittsburg  Centennial  of  steamboat 
navigation  on  western  waters  was  the  first  topic  of  discussion.  Pre- 
liminary bibliographic  reports  on  steamboating  on  the  Ohio  River 
were  presented,  and  the  session  closed  with  a  discussion  of  the  pro- 
posed consolidation  of  the  Ohio  Valley  and  the  Mississippi  Valley 
Historical  Associations.  It  was  decided,  however,  that  final  decision 
upon  the  matter  of  consolidation  should  be  left  to  the  Executive 
Committees  of  the  two  Associations,  with  power  to  act.  At  four 
o'clock  there  was  a  Conference  on  Historical  Publication  work  in 
the  Ohio  Valley,  at  which  time  an  address  was  delivered  by  J. 
Franklin  Jameson,  and  brief  reports  were  presented  by  representa- 
tives of  historical  societies  in  the  Ohio  Valley.  In  the  evening  a 
joint  session  was  held  with  the  other  associations  meeting  at  In- 
dianapolis. 

THE  MISSISSIPPI  VALLEY  HISTORICAL  ASSOCUTION 

The  mid-year  meeting  of  the  Mississippi  Valley  Historical  Asso- 
ciation was  held  at  Indianapolis  on  Tuesday,  December  27,  1910. 
The  afternoon  was  taken  up  with  meetings  of  the  Executive  Com- 
mittee and  the  various  standing  committees  of  the  Association. 
In  the  evening  at  eight  o'clock  there  was  a  joint  session  with  the 
Ohio  Valley  Historical  Association  and  the  American  EUstorical 
Association  at  which  Professor  Benjamin  F.  Shambaugh  presided. 
The  following  program  was  presented  at  this  time : 
Paper — New  Light  on  the  Explorations  of  the  Verendrye — Orin 
6.  Libby,  Professor  in  the  University  of  North  Dakota.    Dis- 
cussion by  Clarence  W.  Alvord,  Associate  Professor  in  the 
University  of  Illinois. 


HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  139 

Paper — The  American  Intervention  in  West  Florida — Isaac  Joslin 
Cox,  Professor  in  the  UniTendly  of  Cincinnati.    Discussion  by 
Frederick  A.  Ogg,  Professor  in  Sinunons  College ;  and  Dunbar 
Rowland,  Director  of  the  Department  of  Archives  and  History 
of  the  State  of  Mississippi. 
Paper — A  Century  of  Steamboat  Navigation  on  the  Ohio — ^Archer 
B.  Hulburt,  Professor  in  Marietta  College.    Discussion  by  R. 
B.  Way,  Professor  in  Indiana  Universily;  and  John  Wlison 
Townsend,  Business  Manager  of  the  Kentucky  State  Historical 
Society. 
Paper — The  Beffinnings  of  the  Free-Trade  Movement  in  the  Cana- 
dian  Northwest — ^P.  E.  Gunn,  of  Winnipeg,  Canada.     (Mr. 
Gunn  was  not  present.) 
Paper — Early  Forts  on  the  Upper  Mississippi — ^Dan  E.  Clark,  As- 
sistant Editor  in  The  State  Historical  Society  of  Iowa. 
The  proceedings  and  papers  at  the  mid-year  meeting  will  be 
included  in  the  volume  containing  the  proceedings  of  the  next  an- 
nual meeting,  which  will  be  held  at  Evanston,  Illinois,  in  May  or 
June. 

THE   AMERICAN   HISTORICAL   AJBSOCUTION 

The  twenty-sixth  annual  meeting  of  the  American  Historical 
Association  was  held  at  Indianapolis,  Indiana,  on  December  27-30, 
1910.  The  sessions,  which  for  the  most  part  were  held  in  the  Clay- 
pool  Hotel,  were  quite  largely  attended. 

The  session  on  Tuesday  evening  was  devoted  to  topics  in  western 
history,  and  was  a  joint  session  with  the  other  associations  meeting 
at  the  same  place.  On  Wednesday  morning  there  was  a  program 
under  the  auspices  of  the  North  Central  History  Teachers'  Associa- 
tion at  which  there  was  a  free  and  helpful  discussion  of  the  prob- 
lems connected  with  the  teaching  of  History  and  Civics.  The  after- 
noon on  Wednesday  was  given  over  to  conferences  on  Ancient  His- 
tory, Modem  European  History,  American  Diplomatic  History 
with  Special  Reference  to  Latin  America,  and  a  Conference  of  State 
and  Local  Historical  Societies.  At  the  last  named  conference  the 
reports  of  the  widest  interest  were  Mr.  Dunbar  Rowland's  account 


140  IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTOEY  AND  POLITICS 

of  the  progress  of  the  work  of  calendaring  the  manuscripts  in  French 
archives  relating  to  the  Mississippi  Valley,  and  Professor  Clarence 
W.  Alvord's  very  practical  discussion  of  the  methods  of  restoring 
and  preserving  manuscripts. 

The  presidential  address  by  Professor  Frederick  J.  Turner  on 
Wednesday  evening  dealt  in  a  profound  and  interesting  manner 
with  the  social  aspects  of  American  history.  The  address  was  fol- 
lowed by  a  reception  at  the  John  Herron  Art  Institute. 

Thursday  and  Friday  mornings  were  devoted  to  sessions  com- 
memorating the  fiftieth  anniversary  of  secession.  The  papers  on 
Thursday  morning  clustered  about  the  conditions  and  events  in  the 
North  in  1860;  while  the  general  subject  of  discussion  on  Friday 
morning  was  the  South  in  1860.  Especial  interest  was  manifested  in 
these  two  sessions. 

A  Conference  on  Medieval  History,  a  Conference  of  Archivists, 
and  a  Conference  of  Teachers  of  History  in  Teachers'  Colleges  and 
Normal  Schools,  were  held  on  Thursday  afternoon.  An  interesting 
feature  of  the  Conference  of  Archivists  was  the  report  by  Mr.  A 
J.  F.  Van  Laer  on  the  work  of  the  International  Conference  of 
Archivists  and  Librarians  held  at  Brussels,  August  28-31,  1910. 
The  session  on  Thursday  evening  was  a  session  on  European  His- 
tory, the  paper  which  excited  the  greatest  comment  being  one  by 
H.  Morse  Stevens,  of  the  University  of  California.  After  this  pro- 
gram there  was  a  smoker  at  the  University  Club. 

A  luncheon,  followed  by  informal  speaking,  was  given  at  the 
Claypool  Hotel  Friday  noon.  The  subject  of  discussion  at  the  final 
session  on  Friday  evening  was  The  Relation  of  History  to  the  Newer 
Sciences  of  Mankind, 

THE  STATE  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY  OP  IOWA 

The  two-volume  History  of  Taxation  in  Iowa,  by  Professor  John 
E.  Brindley,  will  be  distributed  in  February. 

The  Secretary,  Dr.  Frank  E.  Horack,  read  a  paper  on  The  Iowa 
Primary  and  Its  Workings  at  the  meeting  of  the  American  Political 
Science  Association  at  St.  Louis  during  the  holidays. 


HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  141 

Professor  Laenas  O.  Weld's  address  entitled  On  the  Way  to  Iowa, 
has  been  published  and  distributed  to  members. 

The  manuscript  of  Dr.  Louis  Pelzer's  biography  of  Henry  Dodge 
has  been  accepted  by  the  Board  of  Curators  and  will  be  put  to 
press  in  the  near  future. 

The  Society  has  just  issued  a  new  and  revised  edition  of  the 
booklet  entitled  Some  Information,  which  describes  the  work  of  the 
Society,  and  contains  a  list  of  members. 

The  Superintendent  delivered  the  principal  address  at  the  annual 
meeting  of  the  State  Historical  Society  of  Wisconsin  on  October  20, 
1910.  He  also  addressed  fhe  State  Historical  Society  of  Nebraska 
at  Lincoln  on  January  10,  1911. 

Mr.  Joseph  W.  Rich,  a  Curator  of  the  Society,  has  been  elected 
President  of  the  Political  Science  Club  of  the  State  University  of 
Iowa  for  the  ensuing  year.  Dr.  Dan  E.  Clark,  the  Assistant  Editor, 
was  chosen  Secretary  of  the  same  club. 

Owing  to  the  great  demand  for  copies  of  Mr.  Joseph  W.  Rich's 
monograph  on  The  BMle  of  ShUoh,  which  was  first  published  in 
The  Iowa  Joubnal  op  History  and  Politics  in  October,  1909,  it 
will  be  reprinted  in  book  form  in  the  near  future. 

The  Twenty-Eighth  Biennial  Report  of  the  Board  of  Curators  of 
the  State  Historical  Society  of  Iowa  has  been  printed.  It  contains 
a  detailed  account  of  the  activities  of  the  Society  during  the  two 
years  ending  July  1,  1910,  a  list  of  members,  and  recommendations 
for  increased  support. 

Dr.  Benjamin  F.  Shambaugh  and  Dr.  Dan  E.  Clark  represented 
the  Society  at  the  meetings  of  the  Mississippi  Valley  Historical  As- 
sociation and  the  American  Historical  Association  at  Indianapolis, 
December  27-30.  Dr.  Shambaugh  is  President  of  the  Mississippi 
Valley  Historical  Association.  Dr.  Clark  read  a  paper  on  Early 
Forts  on  the  Upper  Mississippi,  and  made  a  report  on  the  Public 
Archives  of  Iowa. 

The  following  persons  have  recently  been  elected  to  membership 


142  IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTOET  AND  POLITICS 

in  the  Society;  Mr.  C.  Bay  Aomer,  Iowa  City,  Iowa;  Lieutenant 
Morton  C.  Momma,  Iowa  Cily,  Iowa ;  Mrs.  F.  S.  McGee,  Riverside, 
Iowa;  Miss  Helen  E.  Ruser,  Davenport,  Iowa;  Mr.  D.  E.  Voris, 
Marion,  Iowa;  Mr.  John  L.  Etzel,  Clear  Lake,  Iowa;  Mr.  R.  W. 
Birdsall,  Dows,  Iowa;  Mr.  P.  0.  Bjorenson,  Milford,  Iowa;  Mr.  W. 
E.  Crum,  Bedford,  Iowa;  Mr.  Brode  B.  Davis,  Chicago,  Illinois; 
Mr.  Nathan  P.  Dodge,  Jr.,  Omaha,  Nebraska ;  Mr.  D.  Q.  Edmund- 
son,  Des  Moines,  Iowa;  Mr.  John  M.  Galvin,  Council  Blufb,  Iowa; 
Dr.  J.  W.  Hanna,  Winfield,  Iowa;  Mr.  Chas.  L.  Hays,  Eldora,  Iowa; 
Mr.  J.  W.  Hill,  Des  Moines,  Iowa ;  Mr.  H.  R.  Howell,  Des  Moines , 
Iowa;  Mr.  Finis  Idleman,  Des  Moines,  Iowa;  Mr.  Jesse  W.  Lee, 
Webster  City,  Iowa ;  Mr.  E.  E.  Manhard,  Waterloo,  Iowa ;  Mr.  R.  S. 
Sinclair,  Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa;  Mr.  Jacob  Springer,  Marengo,  Iowa; 
Mr.  B.  Van  Stienberg,  Preston,  Iowa;  Mr.  L.  0.  Worley,  Blairstown, 
Iowa;  Mr.  Geo.  Wright,  Eagle  Grove,  Iowa;  Mr.  John  A.  Young, 
Washington,  Iowa ;  Mr.  Samuel  Hayes,  Iowa  City,  Iowa ;  Mr.  W.  W. 
Baldwin,  Burlington,  Iowa;  Mrs.  Mary  Queal  Beyer,  Des  Moines, 
Iowa;  Mr.  James  B.  BrufF,  Atlantic,  Iowa;  Mr.  T.  J.  Bryant,  Gris- 
wold,  Iowa;  Mr.  Henry  S.  Ely,  Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa;  Mr.  C.  O.  Har- 
rington, Vinton,  Iowa;  Mr.  L.  S.  Hill,  Des  Moines,  Iowa;  Mr. 
Charles  N.  Kinney,  Des  Moines,  Iowa;  Mr.  V.  R.  McGinnis,  Leon, 
Iowa;  Mr.  C.  F.  Mauss,  Milford,  Iowa;  Mr.  F.  S.  Merriau,  Waterloo, 
Iowa;  Mr.  Arthur  Poe,  Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa;  Mr.  J.  B.  Rockafellow, 
Atlantic,  Iowa;  Mrs.  Agnes  W.  Smith,  Waterloo,  Iowa;  Mr.  Thos. 
H.  Smith,  Harlan,  Iowa ;  and  Mr.  Edward  S.  White,  Harlan,  Iowa. 

THE  RESIGNATION  OF  MR.  PETER  A.  DET 

Because  of  advancing  years  Mr.  Peter  A.  Dey,  who  for  many 
years  has  been  President  of  the  Society  and  a  member  of  the  Board 
of  Curators,  has  retired  from  the  Board.  The  following  resolution 
appreciative  of  his  services  was  passed  by  the  Board  of  Curators 
on  October  5,  1910: 

**Be  it  resolved  by  the  Board  of  Curators  of  The  State  Historical 
Society  of  Iowa  that  it  is  with  deep  regret  that  we  accept  the  resigna- 
tion of  Mr.  Peter  A.  Dey  as  a  member  of  this  Board,  since  we  feel 
that  the  Board  of  Curators  suffers  a  great  loss  in  being  deprived  of 


HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  143 

his  wise  oounsel  and  advice.  Mr.  Dey  has  served  as  a  member  of  the 
Board  of  Curators  for  twenty-four  years,  from  1886  to  1910.  From 
September  8, 1900,  to  July  7, 1909,  he  held  the  office  of  President  of 
the  Board  and  of  the  Society.  For  the  marked  growth  and  develop- 
ment of  the  Society  during  these  years  Mr.  Dey  deserves  a  large 
measure  of  credit.  He  was  wise  in  his  judgment  and  always  faithful 
and  punctual  in  the  performance  of  his  duties." 


k .' 


NOTES  AND  COMMENT 

The  North  Central  History  Teachers'  Association  held  a  meeting 
at  Indianapolis  on  December  28,  1910. 

The  twenty-first  annual  meeting  of  the  Iowa  Library  Association 
was  held  at  Davenport,  October  11-13,  1910. 

Dr.  W.  P.  Dodd,  formerly  of  Johns  Hopkins  University,  is  now 
a  member  of  the  faculty  of  the  University  of  SUnois. 

The  second  annual  meeting  of  the  American  Institute  of  Criminal 
Law  and  Criminology  was  held  at  Washington,  D.  C,  on  September 
30  and  October  1,  1910. 

The  newly  appointed  General  Secretary  of  the  Archaeological 
Institute  of  America  is  Professor  Mitchell  CarroU,  who  has  been 
connected  with  the  Institute  for  several  years. 

July  26  to  29, 1911,  are  the  dates  set  for  an  International  Congress 
dealing  with  the  problems  arising  in  the  relations  between  the  West 
and  the  East.    London  will  be  the  place  of  meeting. 

Professor  Herbert  E.  Bolton,  formerly  of  the  University  of  Texas 
and  now  of  Stanford  University,  has  accepted  the  professorship  of 
American  History  in  the  University  of  California,  to  take  efFect 
July  1,  1911. 

The  sum  of  twenty  thousand  dollars  has  been  presented  to  Har- 
vard University,  with  the  stipulation  that  the  income  shall  be  ap- 
plied to  research  work  in  historical  archives.  It  is  preferred  that 
these  researches  shall  be  along  the  line  of  American  history,  and 
especially  that  the  work  shall  be  carried  on  in  the  Spanish  archives. 

The  seventh  annual  meeting  of  the  American  Political  Science 
Association  was  held  at  St  Louis,  Missouri,  from  December  27,  to 
30, 1910.  Besides  the  general  sessions  on  national  and  international 
problems,  there  were  programs  and  conferences  devoted  to  such  sub- 
jects as  judicial  organization  and  procedure,  primary  elections, 

144 


NOTES  AND  COMMENT  145 

mnnieipal  government,  taxation,  and  political  theory.  The  Ameri- 
can Association  for  Labor  Legislation,  and  the  American  Statistical 
Society  held  their  meetings  at  the  same  time  and  place  and  there 
were  a  number  of  joint  sessions. 

It  has  been  announced  by  Mr.  Dnnbar  Rowland,  Director  of  the 
Department  of  History  and  Archives  of  the  State  of  Mississippi^ 
that  the  calendar  of  manuscripts  in  the  French  archives  rdating* 
to  the  Mississippi  Valley  is  nearly  ready  for  publication.  The  work 
of  preparing  the  calendar  has  been  done  by  Mr.  Waldo  G.  Leland. 
The  various  historical  agencies  in  the  Mississippi  Vallqr  are  acting 
in  cooperation  in  supporting  this  work. 

The  Manuscripts  Division  of  the  Library  of  Congress  has  recently 
acquired  the  Madison  papers  and  the  Polk  papers,  including  the 
Polk  diary,  which  have  heretofore  been  in  the  possession  of  the 
Chicago  Historical  Society.  La  Harpe's  valuable  journal  dealing 
with  the  establishment  of  the  French  in  Louisiana  has  also  been  se- 
cured ;  and  the  Pickett  papers  containing  the  official  correspondence 
and  records  of  the  Confederate  government  have  been  transferred 
from  the  Treasury  Department. 

NATHAN  PHILLIPS  DODGB 

Mr.  Nathan  P.  Dodge,  a  member  of  The  State  Historical  Society 
of  Iowa,  died  at  his  home  at  Council  Blufb  on  January  12,  19]  1. 
Mr.  Dodge  was  bom  at  South  Danvers  (now  Peabody),  Massa- 
chusetts, on  August  20, 1837.  In  1854  he  came  to  Iowa  City,  where 
he  joined  his  brother,  Grenville  M.  Dodge,  who  was  at  that  time  di^ 
recting  the  survey  for  the  Rock  Island  Railroad  across  Iowa.  Dur* 
ing  the  following  spring  he  took  up  land  on  the  Elkhom  River  im 
Nebraska,  but  on  account  of  Indian  troubles  he  soon  moved  to> 
Omaha  and  later  to  Council  Bluffii,  where  he  spent  the  remainder 
of  his  life,  devoting  himself  to  banking  and  real  estate  business. 

Mr.  Dodge  took  a  keen  interest  in  western  history,  and  was- 
especiaUy  well  informed  on  the  local  history  of  Council  BIu£b. 
He  wrote  numerous  valuable  historical  articles  which  were  pub- 
lished in  the  local  newspapers,  the  last  one  being  on  the  subject 

VOL.  iz — ^10 


146  IOWA  JOUENAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Woman's  Aid  and  Saniiafy  Commissions  During  ihs  CivU  War, 
He  was  beloved  by  all  who  knew  him,  and  his  death  will  long  be 
deeply  mourned. 

JONATHAN  p.  DOLLIVEB 

Johnathan  Prentiss  Dolliver  was  bom  near  Kingwood,  Preston 
County,  Virginia  (now  West  Virginia),  on  February  6,  1858.  He 
graduated  from  the  University  of  West  Virginia  in  1875,  and 
taught  school  for  two  years  at  Sandwich,  Illinois,  at  the  same  time 
studying  law.  In  1878,  in  company  with  his  brother,  he  removed 
to  Fort  Dodge,  Iowa,  and  opened  a  law  office.  His  political  career 
may  be  said  to  have  begun  with  his  speech  as  temporary  chairman 
of  the  Bepublic€Ln  State  Convention  in  1884.  From  that  time  until 
the  date  of  his  death  his  abilities  as  a  public  speaker  made  him  a 
powerful  factor  in  political  campaigns,  National  as  well  as  State. 

In  1888  Mr.  Dolliver  was  elected  Congressman  from  the  Tenth 
District,  which  position  he  held  by  successive  terms  until  1900.  In 
July  of  that  year  the  death  of  Senator  John  H.  Gear  left  a  vacancy 
in  the  United  States  Senate,  and  Governor  Shaw  appointed  Jonathan 
P.  Dolliver.  In  this  capacity  he  was  retained,  through  elections 
by  the  legislature,  until  the  date  of  his  death,  which  occurred  at  Fort 
Dodge  on  October  15,  1910. 

Senator  Dolliver  was  recognized  as  a  leader  in  the  Senate.  His 
long  experience  in  Congress,  his  habit  of  making  a  careful  study  of 
all  legislative  problems,  and  his  eloquent  and  convincing  powers 
of  debate,  gave  him  an  influence  which  was  felt  throughout  the 
Nation. 

JOHN  A.  KASSON 

John  A.  Easson  was  bom  at  Charlotte,  Vermont,  on  January  11, 
1822,  and  died  in  Washington,  D.  C,  May  19,  1910.  After  gradu- 
ating from  the  University  of  Vermont  in  1842  he  studied  law  and 
in  1845  was  admitted  to  the  bar  in  Massachusetts.  Soon  afterward 
he  removed  to  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  where  he  practiced  his  profession 
until  1857  when  he  came  to  Iowa  and  located  at  Des  Moines.  From 
the  beginning  he  took  a  prominent  part  in  politics  as  a  Republican. 


NOTES  AND  COMMENT  147 

During  his  long  public  career  he  served  as  a  member  of  the  General 
Assembly  of  Iowa,  as  a  Bepresentative  from  Iowa  in  several  ses- 
sions of  Congress,  and  as  Minister  to  Austria  and  Minister  to  Ger- 
many. He  represented  the  United  States  in  a  number  of  inter- 
national conferences,  and  performed  various  other  diplomatic  ser- 
vices for  his  country.  He  was  a  member  of  several  learned  and 
scientific  societies  and  was  prominent  as  a  writer  on  political  sub- 
jects. 

HABVEfT  BEn> 

At  a  regular  meeting  of  the  Iowa  Soldiers'  Boster  Board,  held  in 
Des  Moines,  on  the  20th  day  of  December,  1910,  the  following  pre- 
amble and  resolutions  were  unanimously  adopted: 

Whereas:  Soon  after  the  organization  of  this  Board,  and  its 
adoption  of  the  plans  submitted  for  the  prosecution  of  the  work, 
upon  the  recommendation  of  Honorable  Charles  Aldrich,  Curator  of 
the  Historical  Department  of  Iowa,  Harvey  Beid  of  Maquoketa, 
Iowa,  was  authorized  by  the  Board  to  prepare  that  portion  of  the 
work  pertaining  to  the  early  military  history  of  the  State,  and, 

Whereas:  The  work  thus  committed  to  the  hands  of  Mr.  Beid 
involves  much  careful  and  painstaking  research,  and  has  been 
prosecuted  to  successful  completion  by  him,  notwithstanding  he  was 
in  such  feeble  health  during  a  considerable  portion  of  the  time  he 
was  engaged  upon  it,  as  might  well  have  discouraged  one  possessed 
of  less  fortitude  and  courage,  and. 

Whereas  :  Only  a  few  weeks  after  completing  and  delivering  his 
manuscript  into  the  hands  of  Adjutant  General  Logan,  Mr.  Beid  was 
stricken  by  the  hand  of  death,  therefore,  be  it 

Besolved:  That  in  the  death  of  Harvey  Beid,  we  recognize  the 
passing  from  earth  of  another  of  the  brave  defenders  of  the  Bepub- 
lic,  who  went  forth  in  the  vigor  of  his  young  manhood,  to  serve  his 
country  in  her  hour  of  greatest  need. 

Besolved  :  That  we  hereby  express  our  high  appreciation  of  the 
faithful  and  capable  manner  in  which  he  performed  his  part  of  the 
great  work  of  preserving  the  history  and  records  of  Iowa  Soldiers. 
In  his  death  the  State  has  lost  one  of  its  most  intelligent  and  useful 


148  IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTOET  AND  POLITICS 

oitifens.    To  his  bereaved  widow  and  f amily,  we  extend  our  sincere 
oondolence. 

Tlie  Secretary  is  hereby  instmeted  to  spread  the  foregoing  reao- 
Intions  npon  the  minutes  of  this  meeting,  and  to  transmit  a  copy 
of  the  same  to  Mrs.  Harvey  Beid,  to  the  Superintendent  of  the 
State  Historical  Society,  and  to  the  Curator  of  the  Historical  De- 
partment of  Iowa. 


f 

j 


CONTRIBUTORS 

Clifford  Powell,  Member  of  The  State  Historical  Society 
of  Iowa.  Won  the  Colonial  Dames  Prize  for  the  best  essay  on  a 
subject  in  Iowa  History  in  1909.  Bom  at  Elliott,  Iowa,  on  Decem- 
ber 14,  1887.  Graduated  from  the  Bed  Oak  High  School  in  1906. 
Graduated  from  the  State  University  of  Iowa  in  1910. 

John  Howabd   Stibbs  was  bom  at  Wooster,  Wayne 

County,  Ohio,  March  1,  1840.  In  1861  he  was  in  business  for  him- 
self at  Cedar  Bapids,  Linn  County,  Iowa.  The  news  of  the  firing 
on  Sumter  was  received  there  on  Sunday  morning  following  the 
bombardment,  and  within  thirty  minutes  after  the  receipt  of  this 
newB,  Mr.  Stibbs  was  parading  the  street,  carrying  a  banner,  and 
calling  for  recruits  to  save  the  Union.  During  the  week  following 
he  organized  a  company,  which  became  Company  K,  First  Iowa 
Infantry  Volunteers.  He  'declined  a  commission  in  the  Company, 
and  was  made  Orderly  Sergeant.  On  May  9, 1861,  he  was  mustered 
into  the  United  States  Service,  and  was  honorably  discharged  by 
reason  of  the  expiration  of  his  term  of  service  on  August  20,  1861. 
His  service  was  with  General  Lyon  in  Missouri,  and  he  participated 
with  him  in  the  Battle  of  Wilson  Creek,  Missouri,  on  August  10, 
1861.  For  his  service  on  that  day  he  received  honorable  mention. 
On  his  return  to  his  home,  Mr.  Stibbs  was  authorized  to  recruit 
a  company  for  the  three  years  service.  He  organized  Company  D, 
Twelfth  Iowa  Infantry  Volunteers,  and  was  mustered  into  the 
United  States  Service  as  its  Captain  on  October  26, 1861.  The  regi- 
ment was  sent  to  St.  Louis,  Missouri ;  thence  to  join  General  Grant's 
forces  at  Paducah,  Kentucky;  participated  in  the  capture  of  Forts 
Henry  and  Donelson ;  and  at  Pittsburg  Landing  he  fought  in  the 
^* Hornets'  Nest"  as  a  member  of  Tuttle's  Brigade  of  (General  Wm. 
H.  L.  Wallace's  Division.  At  5:30  P.  M.  on  Sunday,  April  6th,  the 
remnant  of  the  regiment  remaining  on  the  field  was  captured,  and 

149 


150  IOWA  JOUBNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Mr.  Stibbs  was  held  a  prisoner  for  more  than  six  months.  He  was 
paroled  at  Richmond,  Virginia,  on  October  13, 1862,  and  exchanged 
five  weeks  later.  When  the  regiment  was  reorganized  in  the  win- 
ter of  1862-1863,  a  very  large  majority  of  the  line  officers  joined  in 
a  petition  for  his  promotion  to  Major,  and  he  was  commissioned  as 
such  on  March  23,  1863,  and  was  mustered  July  30,  1863.  In 
April,  1863,  his  regiment  joined  General  Grant's  army  at  Duckport, 
Louisiana,  and  participated  in  the  Vicksburg  Campaign  and  subse- 
quent movements  of  the  Army  in  that  vicinity. 

On  August  5,  1863,  Mr.  Stibbs  was  commissioned  Lieutenant 
Colonel,  and  mustered  as  such  on  September  5,  1863;  and  from 
that  time  until  January,  1865,  he  was  almost  continually  in  com- 
mand of  the  regiment. 

In  November,  1863,  Colonel  Stibbs 's  regiment  was  sent  up  the 
river  to  Memphis,  and  thence  to  Chewalla,  Tennessee,  where  it  re- 
mained until  the  last  of  January,  1864.  While  there  a  very  large 
majority  of  the  regiment  reenlisted  as  veterans. 

In  February,  1864,  he  went  with  General  Sherman  back  to  Vicks- 
burg, and  in  March  following  was  sent  home  on  veteran  furlough. 
He  returned  to  duty  at  Memphis,  Tennessee,  on  May  2,  1864,  and 
two  weeks  later  was  sent  with  six  companies  to  establish  a  post  at 
the  mouth  of  the  White  River,  Arkansas,  where  he  remained  four 
weeks.  When  (Jeneral  A.  J.  Smith  returned  from  the  Red  River 
Expedition  on  June  10,  1864,  Colonel  Stibbs 's  regiment  was  as- 
signed to  its  old  place  in  the  Third  Brigade,  First  Division,  16th  A. 
C,  and  was  with  him  in  all  the  subsequent  movements  of  his  com- 
mand. At  Tupelo,  Mississippi,  on  July  14,  1864,  Colonel  Stibbs's 
regiment  bore  the  brunt  of  the  fight.  On  December  1,  1864,  at 
Nashville,  Tennessee,  all  commissioned  officers  of  his  regiment, 
except  five,  were  mustered  out,  and  when  he  went  into  the  battle 
there  two  weeks  later,  his  companies  were  all  commanded  by 
non-commissioned  officers.  However,  the  work  of  his  men  proved  so 
satisfactory  that  he  was  brevetted  Colonel  United  States  Volunteers, 
to  rank  from  March  13,  1865.  His  commission  dated  April  5,  1865, 
and  reads  ''for  distinguished  gallantry  in  the  battles  before  Nash- 
ville, Tenn." 


CONTRIBUTORS  151 

On  February  11,  1865,  he  was  commissioned  Colonel  of  his  regi- 
ment, but  as  it  had  fallen  below  the  minimum,  he  could  not  be 
mustered  until  November  11,  1865.  The  War  Department,  in  re- 
sponse to  a  special  request  of  the  Qovemor  of  Iowa,  issued  special 
order  No.  594,  ordering  his  muster  as  Colonel  to  date  September 
11,  1865. 

While  at  Eastport,  Mississippi,  early  in  January,  1865,  General 
Stibbs  was  ordered  to  Iowa  and  thence  to  Washington,  D.  C,  on 
official  business,  and  while  in  Washington  was  assigned  to  special 
duty  and  retained  there  until  his  final  muster  out,  April  30,  1866, 
on  which  day  his  commission  as  Brevet  Brigadier  General  was  issued, 
to  take  effect  from  March  13, 1865,  for  "meritorious  services  during 
the  war". 

From  the  middle  of  April,  1861,  to  the  first  of  May,  1866,  his  en- 
tire time  was  devoted  to  the  service,  either  in  service  or  in  raising 
and  organizing  companies.  He  was  actually  in  the  service  for  a 
period  of  four  years,  nine  months,  and  fifteen  days. 


1 


19 

t 


m'' 

■1^ 


I' 


I 


K 


ni 


'!? 


-■.J 


I     I 


THE  IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

APRIL  NINETEEN   HUNDRED  ELEVEN 
VOLUME  NINE  NUMBER  TWO 


VOL.  IX — ^11 


THE   ESTABLISHMENT  AND  ORGANIZATION  OF 
TOWNSHIPS  IN  JOHNSON  COUNTY 

By  an  act  of  the  Legislative  Assembly  of  the  original 
Territory  of  Wisconsin,  approved  December  21, 1837,  John- 
son County  was  established;^  but  provision  for  the  organ- 
ization of  the  government  of  this  county  was  not  made  until 
1838.  In  the  meantime  it  was  temporarily  **  attached  to 
and  considered  in  all  respects  a  part  of  Cedar  County. ''^ 
By  the  act  of  the  Legislative  Assembly  of  the  Territory  of 
Iowa,  approved  June  22,  1838,  provision  was  made  for  the 
organization  of  the  county  *  *  from  and  after  the  fourth  day 
of  July".  This  act  also  provided  for  the  holding  of  two 
terms  of  the  district  court  annually;  and  the  town  of  Na- 
poleon was  designated  as  the  first  seat  of  justice.* 

According  to  the  provisions  of  the  act  of  December  21, 
1837,  Johnson  County  included  twenty  congressional  town- 
ships. This,  however,  was  but  a  temporary  arrangement, 
since  by  the  act  (of  January  ^5,  1839)  of  the  Legislative 
Assembly  of  the  Territory  of  Iowa,  locating  the  boundaries 
of  the  County  of  Washington,  three  townships  were  taken 
from  the  southern  tier  of  Johnson  County  and  added  to 
Washington  County.  (See  Map  I.)*  Again,  in  1845  the 
Legislative  Assembly  of  the  Territory  of  Iowa  detached 
that  portion  of  township  seventy-seven,  north,  range  six 
west,  which  lies  east  of  the  Iowa  River,  from  Washington 

1  Laws  of  tlie  Territory  of  Wisconsin,  1837,  p.  135. 

2  Laws  of  the  Territory  of  Wisconsin,  1837,  p.  136. 

«  Laws  of  the  Territory  of  Wisconsin,  1838,  p.  543.    The  town  of  Napoleon 
has  long  been  extinct. 

4  Laws  of  the  Territory  of  Iowa,  1838,  p.  100. 

155 


156  IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

County  and  added  it  to  Johnson  County,  thus  making  the 
Iowa  River  the  western  boundary  of  that  portion  of  the 
county.     (See  Map  11.)* 

Previous  to  the  formation  of  civil  townships  the  county 
was  divided  into  precincts  for  election  purposes.  Al- 
though  few  in  number  these  precincts  may  be  regarded  as 
the  historical  precursors  of  the  civil  townships.  At  first 
it  appears  that  the  entire  county  was  divided  into  two 
electoral  precincts  —  a  division  that  was  authorized  by  the 
County  Commissioners  on  March  6,  1840.  The  southern 
part  of  the  county  was  designated  as  precinct  number  one 
and  the  northern  part  as  precinct  number  two.  The  line 
separating  these  two  precincts  was  not  defined  at  this 
meeting  of  the  Board,  although  the  places  of  election  are 
named  as  Iowa  City  and  the  house  of  Warren  Stiles  re- 
spectively.® That  no  division  line  was  named  at  the  March 
session  appears  to  have  been  an  oversight  on  the  part  of 
the  Commissioners,  for  it  appears  that  they  established  the 
line  at  the  regular  session  in  the  following  July.  As  de- 
fined on  July  8, 1840,  the  line  of  division  commenced  at  the 
northeast  comer  of  section  twenty-four,  township  eighty 
north,  range  five  west,  and  followed  the  line  between  sec- 
tions thirteen  and  twenty-four  westward  to  the  Iowa  River, 
and  from  this  point  up  the  river  to  the  county  line.^  (See 
Map  IIL) 

On  April  8,  1841,  that  part  of  the  county  lying  west  of 
the  Iowa  River  was  declared  to  constitute  **an  electoral 
precinct  and  to  be  known  as  precinct  number  three'*;  and 
the  elections  in  this  precinct  were  to  be  held  at  the  house 
of  John  Hawkins.®     (See  Map  IV.)     At  this  same  session, 

BLati;^  of  the  Territory  of  Iowa,  1845,  p.  66. 
^Becords  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  I,  p.  15. 
T  Becords  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  I,  pp.  24,  25. 
^Becords  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  I,  p.  77. 


i 


TOWNSHIPS   IN  JOHNSON   COUNTY  157 

the  place  of  elections  in  the  second  precinct  was  changed 
from  the  house  of  Warren  Stiles  to  that  of  Abner  Arro- 
smith. 

A  further  division  of  the  county  was  made  in  1842,  at 
the  January  session  of  the  Commissioners,  by  dividing  the 
third  precinct  by  a  line  beginning  on  the  Iowa  River  and 
running  due  west  between  sections  twenty-two  and  twenty- 
seven,  township  seventy-nine  north.  All  the  territory 
south  of  this  line  was  designated  precinct  number  four, 
and  the  place  of  holding  elections  was  located  at  the  house 
of  Jacob  Fry.  At  the  same  session  of  the  Board  precinct 
number  five  was  created  by  dividing  the  second  precinct 
by  a  line  running  north  and  south  one  mile  east  of  the 
township  line  dividing  ranges  six  and  seven.  The  house  of 
M.  P.  McAllister  was  named  by  the  Commissioners  as  the 
polling  place.®  (See  Map  V.)  One  finds  on  the  records 
for  this  session  a  change  in  the  place  of  election  in  the 
second  precinct  from  the  house  of  Hamilton  H.  Kerr  to  the 
town  of  Solon;  but  no  mention  is  made  of  the  time  when 
the  house  of  Abner  Arrosmith  was  abandoned,  as  the  place 
for  elections,  for  the  house  of  Kerr. 

Proper  names  were  assigned  to  some  of  these  precincts 
in  1843,  since  election  judges  are  named  by  the  Commis- 
sioners for  Iowa  City  precinct,  for  Big  Grove  precinct,  and 
for  Monroe  precinct.  The  other  two  were  known  by  num- 
bers until  July  3,  1844,  when  according  to  the  records  all 
of  the  five  are  referred  to  by  names  instead  of  numbers. 
Thus  precinct  number  one  was  called  Iowa  City;  precinct 
number  two.  Big  Grove;  precinct  number  three.  Clear 
Creek;  precinct  number  four.  Old  Man's  Creek;  and  pre- 
cinct number  five,  Monroe.^  ^ 

No  provision  was  made  for  the  estabUshment  of  civil 

^Eecords  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  I,  p.  153. 

10  Becords  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  II,  pp.  24,  25,  85,  111. 


158  IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

townships  in  Johnson  County  until  petitions  came  before 
the  Board  of  County  Commissioners  at  the  January  session 
in  the  year  1844.  Qn  this  occasion  three  separate  petitions 
for  the  establishment  of  townships  west  of  the  Iowa  River 
were  presented  for  their  consideration.  Owing  to  the  eon- 
fusion  of  overlapping  boundaries,  as  requested  in  the  pe- 
titions, no  action  was  taken  on  the  subject  by  the  Conmiis- 
sioners  at  this  session.^*  In  April  of  the  same  year  (1844) 
another  petition  came  up  **from  sundry  citizens '*  of  Clear 
Creek  voting  precinct,  requesting  the  estabUshment  of  a 
civil  township  in  that  vicinity.  The  record  breaks  off  sud- 
denly, which  seems  to  indicate  a  want  of  information  or  a 
postponement  of  consideration  for  the  session.  The  words 
** commencing  at  the  southeast  comer  of  township  eighty*', 
being  all  that  is  found  in  this  connection,  suggests  that  the 
civil  township  under  consideration  was  number  eighty 
north,  range  seven  west.^ 

It  was  not  until  April,  1845,  that  any  civil  township  was 
established  in  Johnson  County.  Then  the  Commissioners 
took  the  initiative,  so  far  as  can  be  learned,  and  decided 
upon  the  name  of  **Big  Grove"  for  township  eighty-one 
north,  range  six  west.  The  first  election  for  the  local  of- 
ficers of  the  township  was  held  at  the  Big  Grove  school 
house  on  the  first  Monday  in  April,  1846  -^  which  was  the 
regular  election  day  for  township  oflScers  throughout  the 

11  Becords  of  the  County  Commissumers,  Book  II,  p.  70. 

"On  the  Ist  and  2nd  days  of  this  session  three  Petitions  were  presented 
to  this  Board  for  the  Organization  of  Townships  of  a  portion  of  this  Countj 
west  of  the  Iowa  Biver,  and  the  Board  having  duly  considered  sd  Petitions, 
find  that  the  bounds  as  proposed,  interfere  with  each  other,  and  therefore  —  It 
is  considered  that  no  action  shall  be  had  on  either  of  said  petitions  at  this 
Term". 

^2  Becords  of  the  County  Commissioners ,  Book  H,  p.  81. 

On  the  petition  of  sundry  citizens  of  Clear  Creek  Precinct  for  the  organiza- 
tion of  a  township  with  the  following  bounds:  "Commencing  at  the  South- 
East  Comer  of  Township  80".  • 


TOWNSHIPS   IN  JOHNSON   COUNTY  159 

Territory.^ ^  (See  Map  VI.)  Moreover,  early  in  the  year 
1846  there  appears  to  have  been  a  general  demand  for  the 
establishment  of  civil  townships  throughout  the  county, 
which,  with  but  a  single  exception,  resulted  in  the  prelimi- 
nary definition  of  boundaries  for  all  the  territory  of  the 
county  in  the  form  of  civil  townships. 

The  first  petition  in  1846  came  from  the  settlers  in  town- 
ship eighty-one  north,  range  five  west;  and  it  will  be  no- 
ticed that  this  territory  lies  just  east  of  Big  Grove  town- 
ship which  was  established  in  the  fall  of  1845.  The  petition 
was  heard  and  favorably  considered  by  the  Commissioners. 
The  name  ** Cedar**  was  given  to  the  new  township;  and 
the  first  election  was  called  at  the  house  of  Philo  Haynes. 
(See  Map  VII.)  No  date  being  mentioned,  one  must  con- 
clude that  the  election  was  held  on  the  same  day  as  that  of 
the  other  townships,  namely,  the  first  Monday  in  April, 
1846.^* 

Moreover,  it  appears  that  the  first  townships  established 
coincided  with  the  congressional  lines  according  to  the  pe- 
titions of  the  citizens  who  occupied  the  territory.  This  was 
also  true  of  Iowa  City  township,  for  the  estabUshment  of 
which  no  petition  was  presented  from  the  inhabitants.  In 
this  instance  the  record  of  the  Commissioners  reads  that 
*  township  seventy-nine  north,  range  six  west,  shall  be 
known  as  Iowa  City  township,  and  the  first  election  shall 
be  held  at  the  court  house  in  Iowa  City".**     (See  Map 

vn.) 

At  an  extra  session  of  the  Board  of  Commissioners  which 
was  held  in  February,  1846,  the  chief  business  was  that  of 

i^Becords  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  11,  p.   159;    Laws  of  the 
Territory  of  Iowa,  1845,  p.  27. 

14  Records  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  II,  p.  207. 

IB  Records  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  II,  pp.  207,  217. 
The  court  house  in  which  this  election  was  held  stood  on  the  southeast 
eomer  at  the  intersection  of  Clinton  and  Harrison  streets. 


160  IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

establishing  and  naming  civil  townships.  At  this  time  it 
was  cnstomary  for  the  people  of  a  certain  neighborhood  to 
fix  upon  the  boundaries,  which  were  then  usually  specified 
in  the  petition  asking  for  the  establishment  of  the  town- 
ship. The  Commissioners  as  a  rule  followed  the  lines  as 
described  in  the  petition.  This  method  as  a  matter  of  fact 
frequently  resulted  in  the  division  of  congressional  town- 
ships in  the  formation  of  civil  townships,  which  led  to 
many  readjustments  in  township  boundaries  in  the  subse- 
quent history  of  the  county.  Ll  of  the  first  elections  in 
the  townships  established  at  this  extra  session  of  the  Board 
took  place  on  the  first  Monday  in  April,  1846. 

According  to  the  records  Scott  township  was  to  include 
aU  the  territory  of  congressional  township  seventy-nine 
north,  range  five  west.  This  is  definite  and  simple,  the 
thirty-six  square  miles  needing  no  other  description.  (See 
Map  Vn.)  The  first  election  was  to  be  held  at  the  school 
house  near  the  home  of  Matthew  Tenicke, 

Pleasant  Valley  township  was  to  be  composed  of  all  that 
part  of  Johnson  County  south  of  township  seventy-nine 
north,  ranges  five  and  six  west,  lying  east  of  the  Iowa 
River.  It  included  congressional  townships  seventy-seven 
and  seventy-eight  north,  range  five  west,  and  the  fractions 
of  the  same  townships  in  range  six,  lying  east  of  the  Iowa 
River.  (See  Map.  VIE.)  The  first  election  was  to  be  held 
at  the  house  of  Robert  Walker.^  • 

Monroe  township  is  described  as  formed  from  the  part  of 
Johnson  County  which  lies  in  congressional  townships 
numbered  eighty-one  north  in  ranges  seven  and  eight  west, 
and  north  of  the  Iowa  River.  (See  Map  VII.)  Here  the 
first  election  was  to  be  held  at  the  home  of  William  Du- 
pont.^^ 

i^Beoards  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  IT,  p.  217. 
ir  Becords  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  II,  p.  218. 


TOWNSHIPS   IN  JOHNSON   COUNTY  161 

Perm  township  requires  a  more  detailed  description 
which,  as  found  in  the  records,  reads :  ^  ^  Commencing  at  the 
middle  of  the  main  Channel  of  the  Iowa  River,  where  the 
north  line  of  township  number  seventy-nine  range  six 
crosses  the  same,  then  west  along  this  township  line  to  the 
northwest  comer  of  the  same  township,  then  north  on  the 
range  line  two  miles,  then  west  one  mile,  then  north  one 
mile,  then  west  to  the  west  line  of  township  eighty  north, 
range  seven  west,  then  on  the  range  line  to  the  Iowa  River, 
and  then  with  the  river  to  the  place  of  beginning/*  (See 
Map  Vn.)  The  first  election  in  this  township  was  to  be 
held  at  the  school  house  near  Chapman's.^® 

In  the  description  of  Penn  township  no  mention  is  made 
•of  the  change  in  the  boundaries  of  Big  Grove  township  as 
established  in  1845.  As  a  matter  of  fact  the  portion  of 
township  eighty-one  north,  range  six  west,  lying  south  of 
ihe  Iowa  River  now  became  a  part  of  Penn  township. 
(Compare  Maps  VI  and  VIE.)  This  change  made  little 
.<iifference,  however,  in  the  affairs  of  the  township  of  Big 
Grove,  since  elections  had  not  yet  been  held  in  any  of  the 
townships. 

One  of  the  larger  divisions  of  the  county  made  at  this 
time  for  civil  purposes  was  the  township  of  Clear  Creek, 
which  was  composed  of  fractions  of  several  congressional 
townships.  Commencing  at  the  northwest  comer  of  con- 
gressional township  seventy-nine  north,  range  six  west,  the 
boundary  line  of  this  civil  township  follows  the  southern 
and  western  boundary  of  Penn  township  until  it  reaches  the 
north-west  comer  of  township  eighty  north,  range  seven 
west ;  then  it  runs  west  on  the  township  line  until  the  west 
line  of  the  county  is  reached;  then  down  the  county  line 
until  it  reaches  the  middle  of  township  seventy-nine,  range 
eight  west;  then  east  along  this  line  to  the  west  line  of 

^9  Becorda  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  11,  p.  218. 


162   IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

township  seventy-nine,  range  six  west;  then  north  to  the 
place  of  beginning.  (See  Map  VII.)  The  first  election 
was  called  at  the  honse  of  Bryan  Dennis,  who  was  a  citizen 
of  the  district  described. 

It  is  noticeable  that  the  boundaries  of  Clear  Creek  town- 
ship leave  the  fractional  part  of  township  eighty-one,  range 
eight  west,  lying  south  of  the  Iowa  River,  without  any  or- 
ganization, since  it  was  left  out  of  Monroe  at  the  time  of 
its  organization  and  is  not  now  included  in  Clear  Creek.  ^^ 
(See  Map  VIL) 

Newport  township  in  its  original  form  included  all  of 
congressional  township  eighty  north,  range  five  west,  and 
all  of  the  same  township  in  range  six,  lying  east  of  the 
Iowa  River.  (See  Map  VEL)  It  will  be  remembered  that 
Penn  township  was,  in  part,  composed  of  the  remainder  of 
congressional  township  eighty  north,  range  six  west,  which 
lay  west  of  the  river.  The  first  election  was  called  at  the 
house  of  Cornelius  Lancaster. 

Liberty  township  was  at  first  composed  of  a  part  of  that 
portion  of  the  county  which  Ues  along  the  southern  bound- 
ary of  the  county  and  may  be  best  described  in  the  lan- 
guage of  the  order  by  which  it  was  established.  It  in- 
cludes all  that  part  of  Johnson  County  **  Commencing  at 
the  south  line  of  the  County  on  the  west  bank  of  the  Iowa 
River,  then  up  the  river  to  the  south  line  of  township  sev- 
enty-nine, range  six  west,  then  west  to  the  south  west  comer 
of  said  township,  then  north  on  the  range  line  to  the  center 
of  the  west  line  of  the  same  township,  then  west  to  the  cen- 
ter of  township  seventy-nine,  range  seven  west,  then  south 
to  the  county  line;  then  east  to  the  place  of  beginning''. 
(See  Map  VII.)  In  this  township  the  first  election  was 
ordered  to  be  held  at  the  house  of  John  Smith.^^ 

^^Becords  of  the  County  Commissioners^  Book  II,  p.  219. 
ioBecords  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  II,  p.  219. 


TOWNSHIPS   IN  JOHNSON   COUNTY  163 

The  last  of  the  orders  of  the  Commissioners  in  fixing  the 
preliminary  boundary  lines  for  civil  townships  in  the  year 
of  1846  relates  to  the  township  of  Washington,  which  lies 
in  the  southwest  comer  of  the  county.  In  the  beginning 
this  township  included  more  than  twice  its  present  area. 
The  lines  limiting  it  were  the  western  boundary  of  the 
township  of  Liberty,  commencing  in  the  middle  of  the  south 
line  of  township  seventy-eight,  range  seven  west,  then  run- 
ning north  to  the  middle  of  township  seventy-nine,  range 
seven  west,  then  west  to  the  county  line,  then  south  to  the 
comer  of  the  county,  and  finally  east  to  the  place  of  begin- 
ning. (See  Map  VII.)  The  first  election  was  to  occur  at 
the  home  of  William  Fry.^^ 

This  completes  the  original  division  of  the  territory  of 
Johnson  County  into  civil  townships  —  with  the  exception 
of  the  small  fraction  of  township  eighty-one  north,  range 
eight  west,  lying  south  of  the  Iowa  Eiver.  This  first  dis- 
tricting of  the  county  into  civil  districts  was  accomplished 
by  the  Board  in  1845  and  1846  and  is  fully  illustrated  by 
Maps  VI  and  VH. 

In  April,  1847,  a  petition  was  presented  from  seventeen 
citizens  of  Scott  township  asking  to  have  that  township 
attached  to  Iowa  City  township  for  civil  purposes.  The 
Commissioners  took  the  petition  under  consideration  and 
finally  agreed  to  place  it  on  file  until  their  next  session, 
which  would  occur  in  July.^^  Careful  examination  of  the 
records  of  the  July  meeting  reveals  no  record  of  any  fur- 
ther action  on  the  subject.  Not,  indeed,  until  the  October 
session  of  the  Board  was  any  change  made  in  the  bound- 
aries of  this  township,  Then  the  boundaries  were  altered 
so  that  sections  thirty-four,  thirty-five,  and  thirty-six  and 
the  south  half  of  sections  twenty-seven,  twenty-six,  and 

21  Becorda  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  II,  p.  220. 
22Becords  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  11,  p.  280. 


164  IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

twenty-five  of  township  eighty  north,  range  five  west,  were 
attached  to  Scott  township  **for  all  civil  and  judicial  pur- 
poses'\  It  will  be  observed  that  these  sections  and  frac- 
tions of  sections  were  taken  from  Newport  township,  thus 
altering  the  boundaries  of  that  township  as  described  in 
1846.     (See  Map  VHL) 

During  this  same  October,  1847,  session  of  the  Conmiis- 
sioners,  and  without  petition  or  suggestion  so  far  as  the 
records  show,  the  lines  of  other  civil  townships  were 
changed,  indicating  the  uncertainty  of  what  was  thought 
best  to  be  done  with  the  scattered  settlements  of  the  time. 
Washington  township  was  enlarged  by  taking  the  north 
half  of  congressional  township  seventy-nine,  range  eight 
west,  from  Clear  Creek  and  giving  it  to  Washington.  This 
left  Clear  Creek  in  a  very  unsatisfactory  shape  for  a  civil 
township,  as  will  be  observed  by  a  study  of  Map  VlU.^ 
Moreover,  it  is  interesting  to  notice  the  next  move  of  the 
citizens  of  township  seventy-nine  north,  range  seven  west, 
which,  however,  did  not  occur  until  five  years  had  passed, 
or  until  1852. 

At  the  August,  1852,  session  the  County  Court  was  pe- 
titioned to  make  a  new  township  out  of  congressional  town- 
ship seventy-nine  north,  range  seven  west.  County  Com- 
missioners were  no  longer  sitting  in  judgment  on  these  pe- 
titions, since  by  this  time  they  had  been  succeeded  in  au- 
thority by  the  County  Judge.  The  petition  in  question 
came  from  citizens  of  three  civil  townships  as  then  estab- 
lished, namely.  Clear  Creek,  Washington,  and  Liberty. 
They  declared  in  their  petition  that  they  were  put  to  great 
inconvenience  in  attending  elections  and  public  meetings 
in  the  townships  as  then  established,  pointing  out  that  the 
new  arrangement  would  be  much  better  for  all  concerned. 
Judge  Lee  heard  the  request,  which  was  signed  by  John 

^^Becords  of  the  County  Commissioners,  Book  II,  p.  297. 


TOWNSHIPS   IN  JOHNSON   COUNTY  165 

D.  Abel,  Edward  Tudor,  and  thirty-three  other  citizens. 
After  due  consideration  it  was  ordered  by  the  Judge  that 
the  boundaries  of  the  new  township,  called  Union,  be  fixed 
as  *  Sprayed  for*',  which  meant  that  it  would  include  the 
whole  of  congressional  township  seventy-nine  north,  range 
seven  west.  Thus  Union  township  was  made  up  of  terri- 
tory taken  from  three  civil  townships  previously  organized* 
(See  Map  IX.)  The  first  election  was  to  be  held  at  the 
house  of  James  Seahom  on  the  first  Monday  in  April, 
1853.2* 

In  March,  1854,  Ebenezer  Bivins,  P.  P.  Cardwell,  William 
A.  Howard,  and  thirty-seven  others  petitioned  the  County 
Judge  to  divide  Monroe  township  on  the  range  line  between 
ranges  seven  and  eight  so  that  it  would  retain  all  of  town- 
ship  eighty-one  north,  range  eight  west,  lying  north  of  the 
Iowa  River;  while  a  new  township,  to  be  called  Jefferson^ 
was  to  be  established  including  the  remainder  of  Monroe 
as  first  established  and  organized,  or  all  of  township  eighty- 
one  north,  range  seven  west,  lying  north  of  the  Iowa  Biver^ 
(See  Map  X.)  The  request  was  granted;  and  the  first 
election  was  ordered  to  be  held  as  usual  on  the  regular  day 
for  the  election  of  officers  of  civil  townships,  at  the  house 
of  Walter  F.  Lloyd." 

Union  township  was  also  modified  at  this  time,  although 
one  might  suppose  its  boundaries  were  as  near  perfect  as. 
they  could  be  made.  A  German  citizen,  Gotleb  Bossier 
(probably  Gottlieb  Bossier),  presented  his  individual  peti- 
tion for  a  change  that  is  rather  peculiar.  He  wished  to 
have  sections  1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  7,  8,  9,  10,  11,  and  12  of  town- 
ship seventy-eight  north,  range  seven  west,  except  the 
south-west  one-fourth  of  section  seven,  added  to  Union 
township.    The  Judge  appears  to  have  taken  a  favorable 

2*  Eecords  of  the  County  Judge,  Book  III,  p.  163. 
2^Becord8  of  the  County  Judge,  Book  III,  p.  349. 


166   IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

view  of  this  request  —  although  one  can  not  see  why  the 
exception  should  be  made  in  the  case  of  section  seven.  Ac- 
cordingly, the  changes  were  ordered  as  requested  and  the 
boundaries  re-formed  by  giving  detailed  outlines.  No  sys- 
tematic order  of  beginning  is  observed  in  the  description, 
but*  the  aim  seems  to  have  been  to  find  a  point  that  could 
be  located  without  error.  In  this  case  the  description  of 
the  boundary  line  begins  at  the  northeast  comer  of  town- 
ship seventy-nine  north,  range  seven  west,  runs  south  on 
the  range  line  to  the  southeast  comer  of  section  twelve, 
township  seventy-eight  north,  range  seven  west,  then  west 
on  the  section  line  to  the  southwest  comer  of  the  southeast 
quarter  of  section  seven  of  the  last-mentioned  township, 
then  north  to  the  center  of  section  seven,  then  west  to  the 
west  line  of  the  congressional  township,  then  north  on  the 
range  line  to  the  northwest  comer  of  township  seventy- 
nine  north,  range  seven  west,  and  then  east  to  the  place  of 
beginning.^®     (See  Map  X.) 

The  large  territory  included  in  Clear  Creek  township  as 
originally  estabUshed  was  gradually  reduced  by  the  forma- 
tion of  other  townships.  Union  had  been  taken  largely 
from  it;  and  now  in  1856  a  petition  comes  for  a  second 
township  to  be  formed  from  congressional  township  eighty 
north,  range  eight  west,  and  the  fractional  part  of  township 
eighty-one,  range  eight,  lying  south  of  the  Iowa  River. 
(See  Map  XI.)  The  petition  was  signed  by  W.  H.  Cotter, 
Luther  Doty,  Hiram  B.  McMicken,  and  forty-one  others. 
The  township  name  selected  by  the  petitioners  was  **  Ox- 
ford ".^^  This  was  ten  years  after  the  establishment  of 
Monroe  township,  the  fractional  part  of  the  congressional 
township  of  which  Monroe  was  a  part  not  having  been  pro- 
vided for  until  this  time.     (See  Map  VII.)     The  first  elec- 

^pBecords  of  the  County  Judge,  Book  III,  p.  350. 
27Becord8  of  the  County  Judge,  Book  HI,  pp.  589,  590. 


TOWNSHIPS   IN  JOHNSON   COUNTY  167 

tion  for  Oxford  township  was  ordered  to  be  held  at  the 
house  of  John  L.  Hartwell. 

Graham  township  dates  its  establishment  from  1857  when 
Judge  Lee  described  the  boundaries  in  these  words :  *  *  Com- 
mencing at  the  southeast  comer  of  township  eighty  north, 
range  five  west,  north  on  the  county  line  to  the  northfeast 
comer  of  the  same  township,  west  to  the  northwest  comer 
of  section  five,  south  on  the  section  line  to  the  southwest 
comer  of  section  thirty-two,  then  east  to  the  place  of  be- 
ginning/^ (See  Map  XII.)  This  was  in  fact  a  division  of 
Newport  township  as  established  in  1846.  The  first  election 
was  ordered  to  be  held  at  the  house  of  Miles  K.  Lewis.^® 

The  first  official  mention  of  Fremont  township  is  in  the 
returns  of  an  election  on  the  question  of  issuing  bonds  for 
the  construction  of  a  railroad.  This  occurred  in  April, 
1857.  For  services  at  this  election  in  Fremont  township 
Daniel  S.  Ball  was  allowed  one  dollar  and  fifty  cents.^® 
As  organized  in  1846  Pleasant  Valley  included  the  territory 
now  in  Fremont.  In  1870,  the  township  of  Lincoln  did  not 
embrace  that  portion  of  the  county  which  is  today  included 
in  Fremont  township.  The  conclusion  follows  then,  from 
other  data  mentioned  above,  that  the  township  was  organ- 
ized in  the  eariy  part  of  1857.  (See  Map  XII.)  The  coun- 
ty records,  however,  throw  no  light  on  this  subject  beyond 
the  item  mentioned,  and  inquiry  fails  to  produce  any  fur- 
ther information. 

The  establishment  of  Oxford  township  left  Clear  Creek 
township  with  a  small  territory.  This  seems  to  have  led 
several  citizens  to  petition  for  a  change  in  boundaries  by 
which  some  of  the  territory  of  Union  would  be  added  to 
Clear  Creek.  According  to  the  changes  ordered  by  Judge 
Lee  in  July,  1857,  the  boundaries  of  Clear  Creek  were 

2^  Records  of  the  County  Judge,  Book  IV,  p.  71. 
^9  Records  of  the  County  Judge,  Book  IV,  p.  117. 


168  IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

brought  to  their  present  description  on  the  sonth.  The 
northern  line  was  not  changed.  The  sonth  boundary  be- 
gan at  the  southeast  comer  of  section  one,  township  sev- 
enty-nine north,  range  seven  west,  and  f  oUowed  the  section 
line  west  to  the  range  line.  This  change  took  six  sections, 
from  Union  township.'^     (See  Map  XII.) 

Hardin  township  was  very  simple  in  its  estabUshment 
and  organization.  It  appears  that  William  Hardin  and 
others  presented  a  petition  to  Judge  McCleary  early  in 
1858  for  a  change  in  the  boundaries  of  the  township  called 
Washington  by  giving  a  separate  organization  to  congres- 
sional township  seventy-nine  north,  range  eight  west,  which 
was  to  be  called  ** Hardin '\«i  (See  Map  XIH.)  But  the 
civil  township  thus  erected  on  the  basis  of  congressional 
township  seventy-nine  did  not  remain  long  with  these 
boundaries  as  wUl  be  seen  in  another  petition.  The  first 
election  in  Hardin  township  was  held  at  the  school  house 
in  the  village  of  Windham,  which  was  located  on  section 
thirty-four. 

On  the  petition  of  George  T.  Davis  and  others  Judge 
McCleary  ordered  another  civil  township  to  be  formed  out 
of  congressional  township  seventy-eight  north,  range  seven 
west.  This  was  done  in  the  year  1858.  Before  this  time 
congressional  township  seventy-eight  was  included  in  the 
civil  townships  of  Liberty  and  Washington  —  the  west 
half  being  in  Washington  and  the  east  half  in  Liberty. 
This,  indeed,  had  been  its  situation  from  1846  to  1858. 
(See  Map  VH.) 

The  change  made  in  the  lines  of  Union  township  in  1852, 
by  which  the  two  tiers  of  sections  on  the  northern  boundary 
of  township  seventy-eight  north,  range  seven  west,  except- 
ing one  quarter  section,  were  added  to  Union  (See  Map  X.), 

so  Becords  of  the  County  Judge,  Book  IV,  p.  147. 
ziBecords  of  the  County  Judge,  Book  IV,  p.  244. 


TOWNSHIPS   IN  JOHNSON   COUNTY  169 

was  now  (in  1858)  restored,  making  the  new  township  of 
Sharon  a  fnll  congressional  township  as  it  remains  at  the 
present  time.'*    (See  Map  X 1 1 L) 

A  slight  modification  of  the  boundaries  of  three  town- 
ships was  made  by  Judge  McCleary  in  1858  on  petition  of 
citizens  of  the  different  communities.  A.  H.  Humphreys 
presented  the  request  as  one  of  the  number.  The  change 
asked  for  as  given  in  the  records  reads :  *  *  Commencing  at 
the  south-east  comer  of  township  seventy-nine,  range  eight, 
then  west  three-fourths  of  one  mile,  then  north  three  miles, 
east  three-fourths  of  one  mile,  then  south  to  the  place  of 
beginning*'.  The  territory  thus  described  was  to  be  added 
to  Union  township.  Again,  the  north  half  of  the  north  half 
of  section  one,  township  seventy-eight  north,  range  eight 
west,  was  also  to  be  added  to  Union.  This  petition,  more- 
over, came  from  citizens  of  three  different  civil  townships. 
Against  this  proposed  change  A.  D.  Packard  and  others 
filed  a  remonstrance  protesting  against  the  inclusion  of  the 
territory  taken  from  Hardin  township.  The  matter  was 
continued  from  the  session  of  the  County  Court  in  which 
it  was  presented  until  the  January  session  in  1859  by  agree- 
ment of  the  parties  in  the  case.'*  At  the  meeting  of  the 
Court  in  January  no  mention  is  made  of  the  matter,  and  it 
is  probable  that  the  remonstrance  was  withdrawn.  At  any 
rate  the  petition  was  granted  and  the  additional  territory 
given  to  Union  township,  It  will  be  noticed  that  this  took 
a  fourth  of  one  section  from  Washington  township,  a  con- 
dition which,  if  records  are  complete,  is  found  to  exist  at 
the  present  day.     (See  Map  Xm.) 

In  the  meantime,  that  is  between  the  offering  of  the  pe- 
tition last  above  mentioned  and  its  determination,  a  change 

i^Becords  of  the  County  Judge,  Book  IV,  p.  256. 

33  Records  of  the  County  Judge,  Book  IV,  pp.  403,  420.    See  Plat  Book  and 
Tax  Liist  of  Union  Township  for  1910,  Tax  List,  pp.  16,  3,  12,  22. 

VOL.  IX — ^12 


170  IOWA  JOUBNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

was  made  in  the  boundaries  of  Iowa  City  and  Newport 
townships  by  the  taking  that  part  of  sections  thirty-three 
and  thirty-four  in  township  eighty  north,  range  six  west, 
which  lies  east  of  the  Iowa  River  from  Newport  and  placing 
it  under  the  jurisdiction  of  Iowa  City  township.  This  came 
about  through  the  petition  of  Sylvanus  Johnson  and  other 
citizens  of  these  sections.**    (See  Map  XITE.) 

The  official  act  of  the  County  Judge  in  reference  to  the 
establishment  of  Madison  township  can  not  be  found,  since 
the  county  records  for  1860  are  wanting.  There  is  a  record 
furnished  by  the  clerk  of  that  township,  William  Shrimp, 
who  filled  that  office  some  years  ago,  probably  about  1880. 
He  gives  the  date  of  establishment  as  1860.  George  Mc- 
Cleary  was  judge  at  that  time  and  it  is  for  the  last  year  of 
his  term  that  the  record  is  not  available.  But  it  is  not 
difficult,  however,  to  surmise  the  description  of  the  portion 
of  Penn  township  (See  Map  VII.)  which  was  to  be  included 
in  the  new  township.  It  will  be  remembered  that  in  1846 
the  Iowa  River  formed  the  boundary  of  Penn  township  for 
many  miles  on  its  northern  border.  The  new  plan  reduced 
the  size  of  the  latter  materially,  as  will  be  seen  by  compar- 
ing the  two  Maps  VII  and  XIV.  Details  of  the  lines  which 
describe  Madison  are  as  follows:  Commencing  at  the 
southeast  comer  of  section  fourteen,  township  eighty  north, 
range  seven  west,  the  boundary  line  follows  the  section  line 
north  until  it  intersects  the  Iowa  River.  From  this  point 
it  follows  the  river  until  the  range  line  between  ranges 
seven  and  eight  west  is  crossed ;  then  it  follows  this  range 
line  until  the  southwest  corner  of  section  eighteen,  town- 
ship eighty  north,  range  seven  west,  is  reached;  and  from 
this  point  it  proceeds  eastward  to  the  place  of  beginning. 
Thus,  Madison  township  includes  the  fractional  parts  of 
two  congressional  townships.    If  a  petition  was  presented 

9*Becord8  of  the  County  Judge,  Book  IV,  p.  419. 


TOWNSHIPS   IN  JOHNSON   COUNTY  171 

at  the  time,  which  can  not  now  be  determined,  it  contained 
probably  the  suggestion  of  the  boundaries  described  if  not 
the  exact  wording  thereof.  Furthermore,  the  township 
may  have  been  named  by  the  citizens  in  their  petition.'*^ 
(See  Map  XIV.)  The  first  election  of  officers  was  to  be 
held  at  the  log  school  house  near  Swan  Lake. 

After  1860  the  changes  in  township  boundaries  become 
less  frequent  and  are  of  a  minor  nature.  The  large  di- 
visions had  been  practically  agreed  upon.  Moreover,  it  is 
noticeable  that  in  all  the  modifications  that  have  thus  far 
occurred  no  objection  was  raised  on  the  part  of  the  county 
authorities  to  the  arrangements  proposed  by  the  petition- 
ers. At  least  the  records  indicate  no  such  opposition. 
Only  one  remonstrance  is  recorded  in  any  case  and  that 
came  from  a  body  of  citizens. 

The  Board  of  Supervisors  came  into  office  and  began 
their  duties  in  January,  1861.  Their  first  official  act  with 
reference  to  township  organization  was  to  divide  Pleasant 
Valley  township  by  a  line  commencing  at  the  northern 
boundary  of  township  seventy-eight  north,  range  five  west, 
on  the  half  section  line  of  section  five  and  following  this 
half  section  line  to  the  south  line  of  the  township  named, 
dividing  sections  five,  eight,  seventeen,  twenty,  twenty- 
nine,  and  thirty-two.  The  territory  west  of  this  line  re- 
tained the  name  of  Pleasant  Valley  while  that  east  of  the 
line  was  called  Lincoln  township.  The  question  of  election 
this  time  was  referred  to  the  committee  of  the  Board  on 
township  organization.  It  appears  from  the  minutes  that 
the  movement  resulting  in  this  division  was  begun  by 
Supervisor  Dilatush,  and  the  date  of  the  order  was  June 
8, 1870. 

Later  in  the  same  month  it  was  ordered  by  the  Board  that 
the  officers  of  Pleasant  Valley  should  exercise  the  same 

ss  Johnson  County  History,  1883,  p.  732. 


172   IOWA  JOUENAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

authority  over  Lincoln  township  that  they  did  over  their 
own  township  until  an  election  should  be  held,  the  same  as 
if  no  division  had  occurred.'*  The  cause  of  the  delay  in 
holding  the  election  in  Lincoln  township  was  the  opposition 
of  certain  citizens  to  the  change.  They  presented  petitions 
of  protest,  and  the  question  was  not  finally  determined 
until  April,  1871,  when  the  parties  appeared  before  the 
Board  of  Supervisors  to  argue  the  case.  After  the  argu- 
ments were  heard  the  Supervisors  took  some  time  for  con- 
sideration.'^ Later  at  the  same  session  it  was  decided,  by 
a  vote  of  two  to  one  in  committee,  to  change  the  line  of  di- 
vision as  described  on  the  half  section  line  to  the  section 
line  between  sections  four  and  five  and  then  to  the  south 
boundary.  This,  it  will  be  seen,  moved  the  line  of  division 
one  half  mile  to  the  east.  (See  Map  XV.)  The  first  com- 
mittee on  this  matter  were  S.  H.  Hemsted,  Christopher 
Fuhrmeister,  and  Wm.  T.  Buck.  The  second  committee  in- 
cluded Supervisors  Samuel  Spurrier,  M.  J.  Morsman,  and 
L.  R.  Wolf. 

In  1873  citizens  of  Iowa  City  township  asked  to  have  an 
organization  separate  from  that  of  the  city  so  far  as  town- 
ship government  was  concerned,  and  they  offered  a  petition 
in  support  of  this  request.  After  investigation  a  special 
committee  of  the  Board  of  Supervisors  reported  on  the 
matter  in  January,  1873.  According  to  their  report  the 
census  of  1869  gave  the  population  of  Iowa  City  as  ex- 
ceeding four  thousand,  or  6,548.  The  signers  of  the  peti- 
tion living  outside  of  the  city,  according  to  the  poll  books 
which  were  examined,  constituted  the  required  number,  of 
a  majority.  The  committee  reported  that  all  the  conditions 
of  the  law  had  been  complied  with.  The  official  act  estab- 
lishing the  township  of  Lucas  followed  this  report.    AJl  the 

9^  Minutes  of  the  County  Supervisors,  Book  II,  pp.  485,  501,  523,  524. 
s7  Minutes  of  the  County  Supervisors,  Book  III,  p.  35. 


TOWNSHIPS   IN  JOHNSON   COUNTY  173 

territory  outside  of  the  corporate  limits  of  Iowa  City  was 
to  form  one  township  to  be  called  Lucas,  while  the  city  area 
was  to  retain  the  name  of  Iowa  City  township.  (See  Map 
XV.)  Polling  places  for  the  coming  general  election  were 
fixed  at  the  court  house  for  the  people  of  Iowa  City  town- 
ship and  the  fair  grounds  for  the  people  of  Lucas  town- 
ship.88     (See  Map  XV.) 

The  first  change  in  the  boundaries  of  Iowa  City  town- 
ship, after  the  formation  of  Lucas  from  the  territory  out- 
side of  the  corporation,  was  due  to  the  changes  in  school 
districts.  Some  discussion  arose  between  the  independent 
district  of  Iowa  City  and  the  school  township  of  Lucas,  and 
as  a  result  it  became  desirable  to  rearrange  the  lines  of 
Iowa  City  township.  The  changes  then  (April  7,  1879) 
included  the  smaU  portion  of  territory  added  to  the  inde- 
pendent  district.  It  began  on  the  left  bank  of  the  Iowa 
River  at  the  southwest  comer  of  lot  three  as  surveyed  by 
ihe  United  States  government,  in  section  fifteen.  From 
this  point  the  boundary  extended  eastward  to  the  southeast 
•comer  of  the  northwest  quarter  of  the  southwest  quarter  of 
section  fourteen ;  then  north  to  the  northeast  comer  of  the 
west  one-half  of  the  southwest  quarter  of  section  two ;  then 
west  to  the  northwest  comer  of  the  east  half  of  the  south- 
east quarter  of  section  three;  and  then  south  to  the  north 
line  of  section  ten.  This,  together  with  the  original  terri- 
tory of  Iowa  City  township,  became  the  new  township  of 
Iowa  City.3«     (See  Map  XV.) 

^9  Minutes  of  the  County  Supervisors,  Book  III,  pp.  158,  159.  Also  Sec- 
tion three.  Chapter  Fifty-two,  Acts  of  the  Fourteenth  General  Assembly,  1872, 
j>.  60. 

Returns  of  assessor  for  the  year  1872  showed  that  there  were  472  legal 
voters  outside  the  city  corporation.  Of  these  284  signed  the  petition,  that  is, 
a  majority  as  required  by  the  law.  Samuel  Spurrier  was  the  special  committee 
appointed  by  the  Board  of  Supervisors  to  investigate  and  report. 

99  Minutes  of  the  County  Supervisors,  Book  IV,  p.  31.  See  Lucas  township 
School  Board  Minutes,  August  26,  1876,  and  April  13,  1878.  See  township 
plats  as  compared  with  original  surveys  by  F.  H.  Lee. 


174  IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND   POLITICS 

Originally  the  boundaries  of  Lucas  township  correspond- 
ed to  the  congressional  township  of  Iowa  City  as  estab- 
lished in  1846  —  if  the  change  in  the  line  of  West  Lucas  can 
be  accounted  for.  Somewhere  between  the  years  1858  and 
1870  the  west  three-fourths  of  sections  nineteen,  thirty,  and 
thirty-one  of  what  was  Iowa  City  township,  or  congression- 
al township  seventy-nine  north,  range  six  west,  was  added 
to  Union  township;  but  no  record  can  be  found  to  show 
when  or  how  this  change  was  made.  It  happens  that  the 
portion  of  the  township  mentioned  is  the  exact  counterpart 
of  that  on  the  west  line  of  Union  which  was  added  by  peti- 
tion in  1858.  It  may  have  been  added  then  as  a  matter  of 
accommodation ;  but  this  is  merely  an  inference,  there  bein^ 
no  specific  authority  in  the  records  for  such  a  conclusion. 
The  natural  division  of  Lucas  township  into  two  parts  by 
the  river  led  to  the  establishment  of  two  election  precincts 
on  June  2, 1874 ;  and  in  the  returns  of  elections  the  divisions 
came  to  be  called  West  Lucas  and  East  Lucas  without  the 
term  **precincf  thereto  attached.  Hence  it  was  quite 
natural  to  speak  or  write  of  West  Lucas  township ;  and  as 
a  matter  of  fact  in  the  minutes  of  the  County  Board  of 
Supervisors  this  term  does  appear  before  its  use  is  war- 
ranted by  any  authority  other  than  custom.*^  The  same 
term  is  again  used  in  the  minutes  for  1891  —  probably  after 
a  petition  was  offered  but  before  any  authority  was  given 
for  such  use.^^  The  actual  division  into  East  Lucas  and 
West  Lucas  was  ordered  on  April  8, 1891.  Since  a  change 
in  the  boundaries  of  these  townships  is  given  below  in  full 
it  is  not  necessary  to  repeat  here  the  outside  boundaries  of 
the  townships.  The  only  change  that  took  place  since  the 
establishment  of  the  first  boundaries  of  Iowa  City  town- 

*o  Minutes  of  the  County  Supervisors,  Book  IV,  p.  323. 
«i  Minutes  of  the  County  Supervisors,  Book  V,  pp.  476,  481. 


TOWNSHIPS   IN  JOHNSON   COUNTY  175 

ship  has  been  mentioned  above  in  connection  with  the  Union 
township  boundary. 

The  last  change  in  boundaries,  the  description  of  which 
contains  the  outlines  of  East  Lucas  and  West  Lucas  and 
the  boundaries  of  Iowa  City  townships,  was  as  recent  as 
September,  1910.  The  minutes  of  the  Board  of  Supervis- 
ors relative  to  these  boundaries  are  exact  and,  indeed,  were 
drafted  to  correspond  with  the  drawing  prepared  by  the 
city  officers.  To  describe  West  Lucas  it  is  necessary  to  fol- 
low the  lines  very  closely  to  make  the  change  clear  either 
in  language  or  on  the  map.  Commencing  at  the  township 
line  between  congressional  townships  seventy-eight  and 
aeventy-nine  north,  range  six  west,  on  the  west  bank  of  the 
Iowa  River,  the  boundary  follows  this  side  of  the  river 
to  the  limits  of  Iowa  City;  then  it  runs  west  to  the  south- 
west comer  of  the  northwest  quarter  of  the  southeast  quar- 
ter of  section  sixteen,  township  seventy-nine;  then  it  pro- 
ceeds north  along  the  east  line  of  the  west  half  of  sections 
sixteen  and  nine  to  the  north  side  of  the  State  Boad  to  New- 
ton and  follows  the  north  side  of  this  road  to  the  west  line 
of  section  nine ;  thence  it  runs  north  to  the  west  bank  of  the 
river ;  then  follows  the  river  to  the  northeast  until  the  north 
line  of  section  nine  is  reached ;  then  runs  east  to  the  north- 
west comer  of  section  ten;  and  thence  north  to  the  west 
bank  of  the  river.  At  this  point  there  is  a  confusing  prob- 
lem that  compels  one  to  retrace  his  steps,  following  the 
west  bank  of  the  river  in  a  southwesterly  and  finally  north- 
erly direction  around  the  bend  until  the  north  line  of  sec- 
tion four,  township  seventy-nine  north,  range  six  west,  is 
reached.  The  description  from  this  point  is  the  same  as 
for  West  Lucas  township  in  1891,  namely;  west  from  the 
river  on  the  township  line  between  townships  seventy-nine 
and  eighty  to  the  range  line  between  ranges  six  and  seven ; 
then  south  to  the  southwest  comer  of  section  eighteen ;  then 


176  IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

east  to  the  northeast  comer  of  the  northwest  quarter  of  the 
northeast  quarter  of  section  nineteen;  then  south  on  the 
east  line  of  the  west  half  of  the  east  half  of  sections  nine- 
teen,  thirty,  and  thirty-one  to  the  township  line;  and  then 
east  to  the  starting  point  on  the  river.     (See  Map  XVL) 

The  East  Lucas  boundary  conunences  at  the  southeast 
comer  of  section  thirty-six  and  follows  the  township  line 
between  townships  seventy-eight  and  seventy-nine  to  the 
river.  Then  it  runs  north  to  the  city  limits  and  east  to  the 
right  of  way  of  the  main  line  of  the  Bock  Island  Railroad. 
It  follows  this  right  of  way  in  a  southeasterly  direction 
until  the  east  line  of  section  fourteen  is  reached^  then  it  mns 
north  along  the  east  line  of  this  section  to  the  northeast 
comer  of  the  same,  then  west  along  the  north  line  of  section 
fourteen,  to  the  northwest  comer  of  the  northeast  quarter 
of  section  fourteen,  then  north  along  the  east  line  of  the 
west  half  of  sections  eleven  and  two  of  township  seventy- 
nine  north,  range  six  west,  to  the  south  side  of  the  Dubuque 
road  in  section  two,  then  in  a  westerly  direction  along  the 
Dubuque  road,  on  the  south  side  to  the  southeast  comer  of 
the  northwest  quarter  of  the  northwest  quarter  of  section 
two,  then  west  to  the  southwest  comer  of  the  northwest 
quarter  of  the  northwest  quarter  of  section  three^  then 
south  on  the  west  line  of  section  three  to  the  east  bank  of 
the  river.  It  follows  the  east  bank  of  the  river  until  the 
north  line  of  section  thirty-four,  township  eighty  north, 
range  six  west,  is  reached,  then  runs  east  to  the  northeast 
comer  of  the  same  section  thirty-four,  then  south  to  the 
southeast  comer  of  the  same  section,  then  east  to  the  north- 
east comer  of  section  one  in  township  seventy-nine  north, 
range  six  west  (the  original  Iowa  City  township),  and 
finally  runs  south  on  the  range  line  between  ranges  five  and 
six  to  the  place  of  beginning.^^     (See  Map  XVI.) 

43  Minutes  of  the  County  Supervisors,  Book  VIII,  p.  38. 


TOWNSHIPS    IN   JOHNSON    COUNTY  177 


. 

. 

• 

. 

■ 

, 

. 

■ 

, 

\ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

■• 

• 

- 

f 

- 

- 

- 

'• 

- 

- 

" 

" 

■- 

" 

' 

' 

' 

- 

- 

■• 

' 

" 

(• 

rf" 

- 

- 

. 

- 

- 

■• 

:y 

r 

> 

•\ 

" 

- 

" 

- 

-- 

• 

- 

>j 

f< 

J 

sf 

' 

0 

A 

i. 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

■■ 

. 

■ 

- 

A 

I . 

■=V 

^1 

- 

•■ 

V 

c 

" 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

.- 

.. 

- 

- 

' 

/ 

?>, 

. 

" 

■ 

' 

- 

- 

■^ 

t' 

- 

" 

- 

- 

" 

• 

" 

- 

• 

• 

' 

" 

'■ 

■■ 

" 

1 

A 

- 

- 

■ 

'■ 

- 

- 

" 

- 

" 

- 

" 

y 

■-- 

^ 

" 

- 

T 

*• 

- 

. 

.. 

- 

. 

T^ 

"-iT 

"^' 

'^ 

< 

'- 

- 

• 

■• 

- 

- 

" 

i 

- 

- 

- 

- 

• 

. 

• 

- 

- 

\ 

" 

^ 

- 

- 

r 

1. 

* 

- 

- 

~ 

- 

- 

i 

• 

~ 

X 

-j_ 

J-- 

1^ 

^ 

> 

7 

• 

■ 

■ 

^ 

. 

-^ 

• 

• 

■ 

?. 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

• 

S, 

- 

- 

I 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

" 

- 

- 

- 

.. 

- 

- 

• 

- 

" 

■«. 

- 

t 

- 

- 

- 

^ 

• 

- 

- 

- 

■• 

y 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

i- 

-^ 

V 

T 

- 

\- 

- 

- 

-\ 

- 

- 

I 

- 

~ 

- 

• 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

;' 

"l 

-^ 

^ 

V 

■ 

l" 

• 

■J 

- 

- 

" 

- 

- 

- 

1^ 

^ 

• 

■/ 

• 

y 

- 

• 

■i~ 

\ 

■■ 

■■ 

■ 

- 

■ 

' 

- 

- 

■ 

^ 

'm 

L 

-^ 

;'^ 

>■ 

-J 

- 

' 

•■ 

- 

- 

- 

• 

- 

- 

■• 

-^ 

^ 

-^ 

ji 

jy 

v< 

- 

r,\ 

" 

r 

- 

•■ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

i. 

.- 

Jt- 

y 

- 

- 

■ 

- 

- 

- 

" 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

•■ 

- 

■■ 

■ 

- 

" 

■■ 

- 

■■ 

- 

• 

- 

- 

"V" 

- 

" 

- 

■- 

- 

■ 

mti 

- 

■■ 

'- 

• 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

" 

■• 

- 

- 

- 

\f 

J^ 

l1 

A 

ji 

_i 

178   IOWA   JOURNAL  OF   HISTORY   AND   POLITICS 


TOWNSHIPS   IN  JOHNSON   COUNTY  179 


• 

. 

- 

. 

.. 

• 

■ 

■ 

- 

> 

- 

• 

- 

- 

■■ 

' 

■ 

" 

■■ 

■' 

" 

■ 

• 

■• 

- 

» 

- 

- 

t 

O 

. 

. 

~ 

• 

- 

" 

■■ 

jy 

1^ 

■V 

T 

- 

- 

>■ 

- 

.- 

- 

- 

S> 

it\ 

^ 

- 

(^ 

J 

V 

" 

i. 

hS 

1 

• 

- 

- 

- 

1 

.. 

- 

- 

w 

=B« 

f' 

'jt 

- 

« 

- 

- 

'■„ 

»j 

' 

• 

V 

\>, 

■ 

" 

• 

' 

- 

•^ 

- 

■ 

- 

- 

- 

" 

- 

• 

• 

" 

• 

• 

■■ 

" 

1 

■^ 

•• 

. 

- 

- 

~ 

- 

"•■, 

" 

- 

" 

y 

" 

■\ 

- 

- 

' 

? 

- 

- 

« 

" 

- 

-^ 

■^ 

-^ 

'- 

■ 

■^v 

< 

'- 

- 

- 

V 

•■ 

- 

" 

/ 

- 

- 

" 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

X 

'• 

" 

^ 

- 

" 

>. 

1. 

■• 

- 

- 

- 

;, 

~ 

■N^ 

_!_ 

V 

/T 

1 

V, 

. 

• 

-^ 

'■ 

• 

- 

~^ 

- 

• 

- 

- 

Ss 

c 

• 

t 

- 

"f 

- 

• 

■ 

- 

"/ 

'"« 

r 

■T 

- 

-> 

- 

\ 

- 

- 

- 

^ 

- 

• 

•• 

" 

- 

i- 

'^ 

V 

T 

^• 

\- 

■' 

-1 

■ 

■ 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

" 

' 

- 

■ 

) 

^ 

-^ 

jr 

V 

- 

' 

» 

1 

~ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

r- 

■ 

' 

■ 

y 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

• 

- 

-^ 

^-"~ 

-^ 

J, 

y^— 

\- 

- 

• 

- 

• 

- 

- 

■ 

- 

■ 

- 

- 

•• 

-^ 

-— 

■^ 

^ 

-jv 

<■ 

• 

A 

" 

r 

- 

~ 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

• 

• 

- 

i_ 

_- 

JL. 

y 

- 

" 

- 

• 

- 

"f 

- 

•■ 

- 

•• 

- 

- 

■■ 

• 

■■ 

* 

- 

•■ 

■ 

" 

- 

- 

•• 

■■ 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

■• 

■ 

■ 

- 

Election  Precincts  in  1840 

V 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

'• 

" 

- 

- 

w 

^ 

-J 

Jll 

- 

180    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 


. 

T" 

T 

. 

T 

. 

T" 

■ 

. 

. 

. 

. 

. 

. 

T 

. 

, 

. 

"^ 

■^ 

"* 

. 

. 

. 

■ 

- 

- 

• 

' 

- 

- 

- 

- 

•• 

" 

- 

'• 

•• 

■■ 

■• 

■ 

- 

• 

- 

' 

- 

- 

r 

- 

- 

. 

~ 

■• 

J^ 

w 

> 

i" 

'• 

■•■i 

,"^ 

- 

. 

"(f 

S 

J 

NT" 

- 

h. 

s 

'y. 

• 

- 

■ 

> 

K 

■^ 

A 

3 

■■ 

■• 

'^ 

• 

- 

.• 

" 

• 

■ 

• 

■ 

• 

i 

?! 

. 

. 

- 

■ 

• 

• 

• 

•^ 

- 

- 

. 

- 

'• 

- 

" 

• 

" 

■• 

■■ 

" 

1 

^ 

. 

- 

■■ 

- 

•■ 

- 

- 

■» 

/ 

■-■ 

■<, 

- 

■• 

" 

- 

- 

- 

« 

o 

- 

. 

-jr- 

-<r 

'-■ 

^ 

< 

'- 

• 

■■ 

- 

. 

B 

. 

- 

- 

. 

- 

- 

' 

X 

"- 

-^. 

- 

f 

S- 

- 

- 

- 

. 

- 

^ 

• 

~ 

X 

JL 

->- 

V 

> 

. 

■ 

• 

V, 

• 

- 

-'s 

'• 

• 

- 

• 

- 

:>, 

• 

r% 

,\. 

'P 

'n 

^ 

■■ 

- 

' 

- 

■V 

- 

1 

- 

\ 

' 

- 

■  ~^ 

,«, 

- 

- 

.^ 

<r 

V 

T 

•■ 

\" 

- 

• 

- 

■• 

"^ 

,- 

" 

- 

• 

.. 

- 

.■ 

- 

/ 

Y 

-^ 

^ 

-45 

y 

" 

" 

- 

■■ 

,' 

- 

. 

*,"" 

- 

: 

- 

■ 

,^ 

■' 

■ 

r 

7"- 

• 

■ 

■ 

• 

- 

- 

~^ 

,>' 

-^ 

^Z^ 

\\ 

• 

" 

» 

• 

- 

- 

- 

- 

~ 

■ 

-'• 

— 

■'■, 

Li 

i^ 

-* 

• 

\ 

- 

if 

- 

- 

■' 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

" 

z^ 

-^ 

^ 

y 

■ 

■■ 

- 

- 

■ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

" 

■■ 

• 

' 

r- 

-■ 

- 

" 

- 

■■ 

1" 

- 

' 

- 

- 

■■ 

MAP  IV 

- 

' 

- 

- 

■ 

Election  Precincts  in  1841 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

" 

~ 

■- 

- 

C< 

^ 

j_ 

TOWNSHIPS  IN  JOHNSON  COUNTY  181 


. 

. 

. 

. 

• 

. 

■ 

. 

■ 

. 

. 

~ 

~ 

~ 

"7" 

":* 

f\ 

"7" 

■f 

fF 

r 

/ 

C-5 

y 

-v 

- 

. 

- 

• 

- 

f 

. 

- 

- 

- 

" 

» 

- 

- 

" 

» 

" 

• 

- 

» 

- 

• 

- 

L- 

t 

- 

- 

- 

- 

" 

" 

" 

^ 

s< 

■^ 

^ 

- 

■^ 

» 

" 

" 

M 

1^ 

s 

7^ 

k 

- 

i\ 

J 

Sif 

" 

i. 

s 

■\% 

- 

. 

■<r 

. 

r^^ 

t 

., 

. 

. 

,. 

^ 

V 

■!^ 

'A 

^ 

- 

•• 

y 

< 

•^ 

» 

- 

7 

. 

. 

• 

- 

' 

i 

?l 

■ 

■ 

" 

» 

- 

• 

■{i 

- 

■ 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

■ 

- 

- 

» 

'■ 

• 

'^^ 

J 

" 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

T 

4 

f" 

,% 

^', 

.% 

" 

- 

- 

" 

" 

M 

■— 

^ 

' 

'^ 

< 

" 

■■ 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

" 

- 

X 

- 

^ 

■ 

' 

ps 

S- 

- 

" 

- 

^ 

• 

^, 

\ 

_^ 

f 

. 

V 

■ 

^ 

■ 

■" 

'• 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

M 

s" 

- 

• 

t 

- 

- 

- 

- 

■■ 

■ 

- 

' 

- 

- 

•^ 

,- 

- 

\ 

- 

\ 

" 

- 

- 

- 

. 

^ 

■■ 

- 

■■ 

i- 

s: 

t 

\- 

rr 

-\ 

- 

■■ 

'"■7 

f 

- 

- 

- 

- 

>' 

L 

"^ 

■^ 

T 

- 

t" 

- 

,•- 

~-^ 

. 

- 

;"r 

,- 

y 

- 

^ 

■ 

- 

• 

- 

• 

- 

- 

- 

x_ 

^ 

-^ 

^ 

'^ 

--. 

-Jk 

A- 

1- 

" 

- 

- 

■ 

- 

■■ 

■ 

. 

- 

■ 

- 

■■ 

■■" 

— 

^ 

_j^ 

-< 

" 

A 

^ 

- 

~ 

■■ 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

-ij 

L" 

-^ 

j^ 

■ 

- 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

" 

• 

■■ 

■■ 

- 

" 

■ 

> 

- 

•■ 

' 

•■ 

- 

- 

■• 

- 

-< 

r 

- 

- 

- 

■■ 

" 

■ 

• 

• 

Election  Precincts  in  1843 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

•■ 

- 

' 

- 

- 

\^ 

^ 

jj 

" 

- 

• 

182    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 


. 

. 

. 

T 

■ 

- 

. 

. 

■ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

. 

"> 

p 

• 

- 

<• 

■ 

■ 

• 

- 

■■ 

- 

" 

" 

■ 

■• 

• 

" 

" 

- 

» 

■• 

7 

r 

^ 

J' 

- 

b 

- 

~ 

- 

- 

" 

- 

" 

:y 

'■ 

> 

1 

- 

- 

s 

'■/■ 

s. 

n 

J 

»;< 

y 

" 

5 

-! 

h 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

-^ 

u 

' 

■B* 

/; 

- 

y 

<, 

/^ 

" 

- 

- 

. 

•. 

• 

' 

? 

!> 

. 

• 

" 

- 

f 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

' 

- 

- 

• 

1 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

■ 

- 

X 

" 

^ 

- 

•> 

3 

" 

« 

- 

■^ 

■^ 

-<■ 

Sv 

< 

'- 

■ 

- 

- 

■ 

" 

4 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

. 

■^ 

"- 

- 

-^ 

■ttt^ 

- 

- 

P- 

i_ 

.. 

- 

,, 

• 

X 

■"■ 

V 

jj 

\r 

^ 

^ 

^ 

'• 

K 

- 

- 

- 

^ 

s" 

■ 

- 

t 

r 

- 

- 

- 

• 

■^ 

1 

- 

- 

\ 

- 

- 

- 

y 

- 

" 

- 

- 

i- 

V 

T 

\- 

1- 

- 

-\ 

t 

- 

- 

- 

" 

■• 

■■ 

- 

i 

t- 

-^ 

^ 

^ 

" 

I" 

") 

• 

- 

- 

• 

,•- 

/ 

• 

'K 

■= 

- 

- 

\ 

• 

- 

■ 

- 

- 

X, 

'.r 

-i. 

\- 

\ 

' 

- 

- 

- 

* 

- 

- 

- 

• 

-■^ 

■^ 

_5' 

-<• 

\ 

r 

- 

- 

- 

" 

- 

- 

- 

i. 

.'• 

^ 

y 

- 

• 

^ 

■ 

" 

' 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

•■ 

■ 

- 

- 

- 

• 

'■ 

- 

' 

■• 

-<- 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

. 

MAP  VI 

■ 

- 

Bio  Qhove,  the  First  Civii.  Township,  Established 

- 

- 

• 

IN  1845 

- 

• 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

<^ 

j_ 

Jl. 

_;;_ 

- 

TOWNSHIPS  IN  JOHNSON  COUNTY  183 


~ 

. 

. 

. 

. 

. 

. 

, 

■*> 

. 

.. 

., 

. 

■' 

■ 

/ 

> 

iS 

-s 

.^ 

> 

-(- 

s 

F 

'< 

*> 

. 

.. 

- 

-»J 

T 

J> 

n" 

- 

If 

s 

■■ 

. 

iri' 

^ 

^ 

■ 

^ 

\ 

P"' 

- 

- 

- 

• 

. 

• 

- 

u 

* 

•^ 

«'-. 

- 

■ 

■^ 

- 

■■ 

- 

» 

.' 

. 

' 

■ 

c 

t> 

. 

- 

'f- 

,p 

," 

> 

^5 

- 

■ 

. 

. 

- 

. 

■■ 

" 

% 

'V 

. 

^ 

■4. 

- 

. 

. 

., 

- 

■■ 

. 

,. 

- 

X 

■\ 

- 

- 

■1 

3 

. 

^ 

^ 

iT 

■^ 

'f 

•". 

- 

- 

) 

■ 

"( 

I 

- 

» 

- 

■■ 

- 

"( 

. 

A 

\- 

^■^ 

. 

^ 

" 

r 

1. 

- 

- 

„ 

.. 

'^ 

> 

_J_ 

-^ 

V 

•' 

V 

1 

■ 

• 

^ 

. 

. 

"^. 

- 

' 

- 

- 

. 

^ 

- 

V 

- 

- 

• 

'o 

Im 

fl 

"C 

r 

vr 

f 

"~ 

- 

- 

\ 

- 

- 

- 

^ 

' 

■• 

" 

' 

r 

Vr 

Y 

- 

■■ 

- 

.■ 

-^ 

V 

T 

" 

\- 

■ 

■- 

■\ 

- 

V 

■■ 

- 

- 

• 

- 

. 

.. 

- 

■■ 

- 

/ 

'l. 

^ 

"f 

,- 

" 

.A 

• 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

- 

. 

f^ 

-^ 

1 

I'f 

. 

- 

^ 

y 

■ 

- 

. 

^ 

-^ 

^ 

^-r- 

'^ 

T> 

j^ 

'-"^ 

\- 

j 

- 

- 

- 

. 

. 

~ 

~ 

■• 

-■■ 

— 

JL 

J' 

- 

\ 

^ 

r 

- 

■• 

- 

•■ 

" 

- 

- 

- 

- 

■■ 

^ 

- 

4L 

y 

- 

- 

- 

- 

' 

' 

■ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

. 

■■ 

- 

- 

'• 

' 

" 

- 

" 

■■ 

•1 

~ 

- 

'f 

'■n 

>, 

^> 

r" 

w\ 

^^ 

MAP  VII 

- 

- 

- 

• 

~ 

- 

AND  1846 

r 

■ 

- 

- 

^: 

- 

- 

• 

s 

V" 

^ 

L 

:i 

1_ 

184    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 


— 

-^ 

■y 

~ 

. 

. 

• 

. 

■ 

. 

. 

. 

• 

, 

■ 

■ 

■■ 

» 

~ 

. 

. 

r 

n 

■• 

'• 

' , 

'■^ir 

"f 

iV 

^' 

-, 

-^ 

^l,- 

/" 

. 

. 

- 

. 

jr 

t 

? 

*\ 

-• 

'^ 

<s 

■■ 

^ 

•i 

.( 

5 

-j 

,^ 

' 

- 

' 

- 

- 

- 

- 

y 

U 

^ 

i' 

.t 

^ 

^ 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

, 

> 

I 

•?I 

• 

- 

.. 

V 

\ 

^' 

- 

- 

T 

■ 

- 

■• 

- 

- 

" 

" 

1 

/'h 

," 

" 

. 

- 

- 

- 

- 

• 

/ 

- 

■\ 

- 

- 

- 

-■ 

1 

■■ 

- 

-!•- 

-r 

3^ 

'S 

,' 

y 

- 

• 

*( 

f. 

- 

- 

- 

"^ 

r 

).. 

- 

- 

- 

; 

X 

^ 

V 

J 

'1 

■ 

■ 

^ 

. 

. 

. 

^, 

- 

- 

■ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

S- 

s" 

t 

- 

- 

'in 

1- 

" 

"  i 

- 

^ 

• 

■^ 

- 

- 

t 

~ 

- 

- 

\ 

• 

- 

- 

- 

" 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

N. 

-^ 

V 

->" 

^" 

V 

■ 

■' 

■ 

- 

" 

" 

- 

- 

- 

. 

. 

« 

. 

- 

. 

f 

i- 

-^ 

.^ 

f 

■ 

t" 

» 

- 

■ 

- 

- 

-^ 

• 

- 

r 

•"~ 

■• 

" 

* 

. 

. 

. 

« 

- 

X, 

7 

yu 

r> 

V 

- 

■' 

■■ 

- 

- 

" 

. 

• 

. 

- 

. 

- 

■• 

-" 

— 

A 

A 

r 

- 

•■ 

. 

- 

- 

- 

• 

■■ 

iL 

_- 

--- 

y 

• 

- 

- 

" 

- 

■ 

- 

' 

- 

" 

A 

- 

- 

" 

- 

" 

* 

- 

" 

" 

-^ 

5^ 

-"^ 

s'l* 

^ 

^■ 

^ 

• 

■ 

,; 

• 

MAP  vm 

- 

• 

- 

• 

( 

- 

' 

- 

» 

y 

- 

- 

- 

- 

k 

- 

- 

- 

- 

s 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

• 

TOWNSHIPS   IN   JOHNSON   COUNTY  185 


~ 

~ 

~ 

7~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

. 

~ 

~ 

"^ 

~ 

"7" 

"^ 

V] 

~ 

. 

. 

~ 

■ 

• 

• 

" 

■ 

■• 

- 

/ 

• 

" 

" 

- 

- 

Al 

n 

J*^ 

r) 

=■'■ 

"f1/r 

"n 

'r 

^■' 

^ 

fj" 

~ 

. 

- 

. 

:-J' 

;^ 

T 

iJ? 

- 

» 

^ 

^ 

■5. 

" 

'^ 

a^ 

*t 

a 

-4 

« 

• 

s 

i. 

- 

• 

" 

- 

- 

- 

- 

•• 

" 

- 

■• 

'■ 

» 

•• 

- 

■ 

' 

i 

>, 

. 

> 

■ 

' 

is 

€^ 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

• 

• 

■ 

" 

- 

\ 

'■^ 

xA' 

"r 

- 

- 

r 

- 

" 

" 

/ 

■s 

" 

« 

" 

' 

J 

« 

- 

r 

rf^ 

Jv 

<- 

'■■ 

,' 

■■ 

• 

"J 

# 

. 

- 

» 

- 

j; 

~- 

""-y 

- 

1 

),. 

- 

' 

- 

•■ 

- 

^ 

• 

X 

_:_ 

>- 

V 

'< 

y 

1 

• 

. 

. 

■ 

V 

,• 

. 

^ 

- 

■" 

■ 

■■ 

- 

■ 

- 

S- 

• 

l\ 

,-■ 

■ 

- 

'r 

- 

^- 

■■ 

"e 

^• 

" 

■^ 

■ 

- 

\ 

- 

- 

^ 

- 

- 

,5 

- 

■ 

■• 

■■ 

- 

' 

" 

> 

■^ 

V 

T 

- 

\- 

■ 

•\ 

- 

- 

- 

■• 

- 

- 

' 

- 

■■ 

- 

•• 

" 

i 

-!L 

-^ 

j^ 

y 

.'■ 

' 

1 

- 

- 

. 

- 

" 

- 

,hVr. 

^ 

' 

• 

- 

■ 

- 

^ 

• 

■ 

• 

■ 

• 

. 

- 

-^ 

>- 

^ 

^ 

'-'' 

- 

^ 

A 

< 

*•• 

- 

- 

- 

- 

. 

.. 

- 

■■ 

" 

,^ 

— 

'. 

'^ 

■^ 

-s- 

\ 

Jj 

pf 

" 

- 

•■ 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

- 

■ 

- 

=-_ 

.• 

JL 

y 

' 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

■• 

- 

" 

- 

■■ 

' 

■■ 

'• 

• 

•• 

A. 

- 

'fi 

j" 

^- 

MAr  IX 

Civil  Townsiiii^  after  the  C'reation  of  Union  in 
1853 

^ 

' 

^'rt 

- 

- 

( 

■ 

" 

- 

■ 

T 

- 

- 

- 

- 

^; 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

N 

u 

:;, 

Ld 

j^ 

_1 

J^ 

186    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTOET  AND  POLITICS 


— 

— 

7- 

— 

~ 

> 

"^ 

"7 

■7 

■ 

^ 

rr 

~ 

r^ 

V 

. 

. 

. 

,. 

, 

■ 

' 

- 

• 

- 

- 

P 

■r- 

r,, 

/■a 

r'.l' 

■. 

- 

,-^ 

/'r 

^ 

ho 

'^' 

"-^ 

'r. 

■d 

4'f- 

.^, 

■• 

"fj 

ifi 

^ 

ff 

u 

f^ 

, 

. 

- 

i£^ 

1" 

<P 

If 

" 

- 

» 

- 

- 

- 

- 

>i 

s 

'f 

■s 

■■ 

ifS 

4 

^ 

■ 

Lh 

s 

•l 

h 

• 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

U 

^ 

■^1 

'i 

- 

" 

*? 

t 

'^ 

" 

- 

- 

- 

• 

•• 

■ 

■■ 

? 

^ 

1 

. 

■■ 

- 

• 

■/= 

r'A 

^% 

• 

V 

^5 

- 

- 

- 

- 

'r 

-"a 

<? 

- 

'• 

■ 

• 

- 

■■ 

.■ 

J 

"/ 

/t- 

T' 

=0 

R- 

- 

- 

T 

fi 

-7- 

JS, 

- 

. 

- 

X 

- 

1^ 

- 

» 

• 

3 

.. 

. 

^ 

■~ir 

■^ 

-^ 

'- 

- 

- 

y 

" 

- 

'i 

/ 

- 

- 

- 

» 

- 

- 

\ 

"-" 

- 

^ 

■ 

- 

r 

- 

- 

- 

- 

• 

■^ 

"<- 

_:_ 

V 

'' 

Ir 

7 

V, 

. 

^ 

■ 

'. 

■• 

- 

■ 

:>- 

- 

• 

t 

- 

& 

•f 

■■ 

f 

•s 

- 

t 

- 

- 

n, 

'^ 

"'"^ 

r 

• 

- 

^ 

■• 

- 

J- 

<r 

V 

T 

V 

- 

■' 

- 

- 

• 

- 

■ 

» 

. 

. 

f 

\. 

-^ 

^ 

■f 

1" 

- 

'  1 

- 

- 

- 

- 

. 

•k 

~^ 

■ 

!i 

►ff 

* 

„- 

T 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

. 

-^ 

-«. 

Jk 

^"-^ 

r 

- 

• 

- 

- 

. 

. 

- 

- 

■• 

„v 

— 

■«., 

ji. 

j:/ 

^■\ 

•n! 

r 

- 

■• 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

i. 

■ 

^ 

y 

■ 

''"f 

Rl 

• 

- 

- 

- 

- 

^ 

.. 

- 

•■ 

- 

> 

- 

• 

■■ 

- 

"f 

'Li 

A 

,A 

v 

v\ 

■ 

MAPX 

- 

( 

- 

• 

■■ 

- 

T 

■ 

- 

- 

- 

^: 

■ 

• 

- 

s 

'to' 

■^ 

J^ 

^ 

- 

TOWNSHIPS  IN  JOHNSON  COUNTY  187 


~ 

~ 

. 

T 

~ 

• 

: 

. 

• 

■ 

■ 

• 

„ 

? 

- 

. 

„ 

. 

■ 

- 

- 

• 

" 

. 

^ 

fil 

» 

"/( 

V 

=^> 

^ 

■^h 

"f^ 

» 

"r 

c 

. 

> 

T 

'^ 

» 

■■ 

(^ 

s 

■■ 

ti 

Ji 

■4 

s 

J(i 

I"* 

- 

' 

■ 

- 

- 

■• 

- 

- 

- 

«r 

" 

>^ 

h 

^ 

■• 

•■ 

» 

?: 

'■ 

' 

- 

- 

'■ 

■■ 

■• 

- 

• 

•?>, 

• 

■ 

- 

^ 

• 

- 

• 

r 

^ 

- 

. 

^- 

• 

■ 

" 

- 

ifft 

-„ 

- 

'f 

f^ 

_\ 

- 

" 

.. 

■ 

", 

- 

■ 

.. 

/ 

■A 

- 

- 

- 

1 

" 

- 

~ 

- 

■■ 

-^ 

-c- 

"„' 

-^ 

'^ 

"- 

^ 

•^ 

•■ 

"( 

i 

■■ 

- 

■ 

> 

» 

- 

■. 

V; 

■^ 

- 

"^ 

r 

).. 

" 

- 

» 

" 

- 

; 

. 

X 

_^ 

V 

jj 

V 

•r 

. 

's 

'. 

• 

■~ 

•■ 

■ 

s. 

• 

,\ 

- 

' 

- 

- 

„- 

■■ 

•c 

- 

.' 

• 

■^ 

. 

- 

\ 

- 

- 

\ 

~ 

- 

"r 

^; 

" 

" 

• 

- 

i^ 

<r 

V 

T 

■■ 

\ 

• 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

■■ 

" 

• 

' 

.. 

. 

~ 

- 

} 

t 

-^ 

jr 

"J- 

■ 

V- 

• 

1 

- 

- 

■• 

- 

' 

1^ 

f. 

-. 

. 

■^ 

\ 

- 

- 

~ 

- 

- 

■ 

• 

• 

. 

- 

^ 

■^ 

- 

-» 

-i. 

^ 

r, 

" 

■• 

' 

- 

■ 

. 

- 

~ 

- 

■■ 

-^ 

— 

*, 

fff 

-< 

■{ 

r 

- 

" 

•■ 

- 

. 

- 

. 

. 

- 

^ 

- 

X. 

y 

■ 

- 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

. 

•■ 

~ 

•■ 

- 

• 

» 

•■ 

' 

■■ 

■■ 

- 

" 

- 

V 

;; 

\"i 

V( 

' 

■ 

MAP  XI 

" 

" 

( 

- 

• 

• 

' 

- 

IN  1856 

T 

- 

- 

- 

- 

k 

- 

- 

■ 

- 

- 

- 

s 

~ 

■ 

' 

- 

- 

188    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 


Civil  Townshii' 


MAP  XII  .1. 

I'S  AfTER  TIIK  CREATII.IN   K\V   ORAKAJI         V  HT 

ND  Fremont  in  1857  ^JL 

N 


TOWNSHIPS   IN   JOHNSON   COUNTY  189 


. 

' 

. 

. 

. 

« 

• 

- 

- 

• 

- 

■ 

- 

- 

- 

^• 

n, 

fP 

i'f^ 

7 

-W 

-p^ 

■•^ 

r7 

V 

[- 

f^ 

~ 

Ji' 

¥ 

"Vr" 

- 

>■ 

JT 

s 

^ 

^ 

in 

J 

■4 

- 

L 

s 

■fL^ 

- 

' 

- 

- 

. 

- 

- 

■ 

• 

U 

k 

'3i 

" 

^^^ 

" 

- 

- 

' 

« 

" 

■■ 

- 

'• 

' 

I 

5> 

• 

■ 

■ 

• 

• 

■■ 

- 

V 

'F 

,- 

\ 

sft 

•"f 

- 

- 

r 

'^'r 

- 

■■ 

' 

f 

V 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

y 

" 

\ 

" 

- 

- 

• 

1 

■■ 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

-J^ 

~-ir 

"- 

■^ 

■=? 

•i 

- 

"( 

^ 

■• 

- 

- 

-• 

- 

- 

. 

- 

>. 

• 

•• 

- 

■■ 

~^ 

..-• 

- 

■■ 

r 

1,. 

" 

- 

« 

- 

" 

. 

- 

^ 

~ 

^ 

^ 

V 

V 

^ 

' 

■  ' 

s. 

- 

-v 

• 

• 

- 

'f 

"'r 

^ 

,- 

■ 

V, 

- 

•■ 

■■ 

- 

■ 

M- 

■■ 

- 

• 

• 

*»s 

• 

- 

t 

'~ 

- 

Cn 

V 

- 

- 

- 

'r 

Vt 

- 

• 

.» 

- 

- 

- 

- 

>- 

<r 

^ 

T 

\- 

- 

- 

- 

V, 

- 

•■ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

J* 

» 

" 

' 

" 

■■ 

f 

-^ 

Jr 

V, 

- 

... 

» 

.1 

" 

- 

- 

- 

■• 

- 

- 

- 

• 

r 

- 

• 

1 

. 

?^ 

^ 

4 

- 

• 

■ 

Fi 

■  "i 

.;^ 

^ 

j- 

-». 

A 

jf 

" 

> 

>/> 

•■ 

"h 

- 

■■ 

^ 

.'^ 

ri 

^ 

- 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

■ 

■■ 

--_ 

_• 

J^ 

cy 

• 

■• 

T 

■ 

- 

- 

■' 

•• 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

■■ 

■ 

» 

" 

' 

- 

■• 

- 

'• 

^ 

» 

" 

~ 

■■ 

- 

»^ 

• 

MAP  XIII 

Civil  Townships  after  the  Cre.\tion  op  Hardin  and 
Sharon  in  1858 

■■ 

- 

- 

1 

r,% 

M 

n~ 

- 

„ 

>'■ 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

•^l 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

■^ 

V^ 

=^ 

Ld 

Li 

j_ 

j_ 

190    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 


. 

. 

■ 

. 

^ 

. 

. 

. 

.. 

- 

- 

• 

- 

. 

" 

• 

• 

- 

A- 

h 

^f 

ft 

<^' 

- 

7 

'"V 

'^"H 

*.fri~ 

"f 

"ir 

77 

w 

iV 

f 

■;t 

-i. 

t> 

u 

^ 

J»^ 

^ 

> 

^ 

» 

^ 

%. 

T 

■^ 

h 

i) 

^ 

•^ 

s 

1 

% 

- 

~ 

. 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

" 

■• 

V 

^^ 

-1%, 

■ih 

aJ 

V 

i 

!> 

* 

. 

■ 

- 

■ 

- 

• 

" 

- 

\ 

4i 

■Hi- 

ij^ 

'c 

RT 

- 

. 

r 

i 

r'c 

fi> 

n 

• 

- 

- 

- 

- 

,a, 

r^ 

h 

- 

7 

^ 

Af- 

-f 

~ 

. 

r 

^ 

^■v 

" 

' 

■ 

3 

" 

■»■ 

^ 

-<■ 

"'„~ 

-T 

^^ 

■■ 

■ 

"d 

i# 

- 

" 

- 

- 

- 

- 

~ 

" 

- 

M- 

"^ 

- 

r 

1. 

■• 

- 

- 

. 

^ 

' 

'' 

^, 

j_ 

-M 

V 

■J 

Ir 

J 

V, 

- 

. 

^ 

- 

■ 

<. 

- 

. 

:>, 

■ 

t 

- 

V 

1^ 

- 

■ 

- 

- 

/", 

X 

n\ 

■■ 

■• 

- 

- 

r 

~ 

- 

- 

-=- 

■■ 

- 

"T 

■ 

- 

-\ 

- 

- 

~ 

• 

- 

J. 

. 

.. 

V 

- 

i 

"l 

-^ 

:^ 

-* 

"?■ 

- 

t" 

• 

'  1 

- 

- 

- 

" 

7" 

-^ 

- 

- 

■f 

- 

- 

- 

^ 

• 

,^- 

Sv 

>■ 

^ 

Tr 

-*- 

-h 

fcV 

- 

7 

W 

A 

rZ 

• 

■• 

J!/ 

■n 

■V 

r 

' 

~A 

.- 

■ 

■ 

^ 

- 

' 

- 

-^ 

_'■ 

JIL 

y 

• 

• 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

A 

- 

" 

- 

»■ 

- 

» 

- 

'■ 

- 

" 

- 

- 

■ 

" 

- 

- 

" 

w\ 

■ 

• 

• 

MAP  XIV 

CmL  Townships  after  the  Creation  op  Madison  in 
1860 

" 

- 

( 

- 

'Ft 

r  ( 

w 

r" 

7 

\ 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

N 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

TOWNSHIPS  IN  JOHNSON  COUNTY  191 


— 

r 

~ 

— 

"^ 

~^ 

. 

' 

. 

. 

^ 

. 

• 

. 

.. 

„ 

• 

- 

■ 

- 

• 

" 

•■ 

/ 

- 

TV 

A 

J'0 

<^( 

» 

7, 

-y 

=■> 

w.' 

o 

;' 

'fl 

"r. 

R-V 

y 

r. 

it 

f^ 

. 

- 

■• 

■*T 

- 

H 

1? 

s. 

«^ 

ir, 

^ 

0 

<<r 

-4, 

i 

- 

• 

- 

- 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

■• 

• 

•■ 

- 

•• 

- 

- 

- 

" 

- 

■• 

- 

'a 

7^ 

>, 

• 

n| 

^( 

^■ 

W' 

\vr 

?n 

P7- 

- 

" 

- 

• 

'■ 

" 

- 

» 

^ 

^ 

■■ 

y. 

■^ 

n"i 

n"n 

J" 

. 

. 

~ 

- 

~i 

- 

V, 

,■ 

^ 

- 

■n 

1 

" 

- 

• 

' 

- 

--- 

'.' 

^ 

ri 

- 

- 

"C 

« 

- 

- 

- 

- 

■• 

- 

- 

- 

. 

- 

•' 

» 

■■ 

"■^ 

- 

"1 

P^ 

1.. 

" 

- 

" 

- 

•• 

- 

"^ 

^ 

-L. 

->• 

\ 

-V 

Hr 

.■ 

^ 

^. 

• 

^v 

- 

- 

- 

■• 

- 

■h 

M 

. 

t 

■ 

•■ 

- 

- 

■ 

■It; 

|- 

■>; 

• 

' 

■^ 

\ 

- 

- 

l7r 

h, 

■■ 

- 

y 

- 

- 

•■ 

- 

- 

- 

> 

T 

- 

- 

- 

\ 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

- 

- 

, 

- 

.. 

- 

,' 

^ 

-^ 

■^ 

y 

.- 

" 

» 

- 

- 

- 

■■ 

■ 

- 

- 

Ti 

■ 

! 

. 

y 

. 

■ 

■ 

r- 

1 

■ 

• 

- 

. 

iT 

> 

■W 

W 

t" 

JL. 

5- 

=? 

1. 

? 

- 

. 

L- 

/ 

nV 

. 

. 

- 

- 

. 

- 

^ 

- 

JL 

y 

- 

- 

i\i" 

H 

- 

" 

- 

. 

. 

- 

- 

■■ 

- 

■ 

- 

" 

" 

• 

- 

■• 

M" 

- 

• 

}' 

" 

- 

- 

V 

MAP  XV 

- 

■ 

- 

- 

< 

•■ 

■P 

" 

T 

- 

k 

- 

" 

- 

- 

- 

- 

s 

W" 

^ 

Li 

J^ 

j;_ 

j:_ 

192     IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  BISTORT  AXD  POLITICS 


■  -I- 

.  1,  j.  1.  '.  [. 

.  ,  . 

,  .  1, 

7" 

.    . 

•h-l 

.  .  . 

•     • 

"  'y 

- 

■A 

7> 

J/ 

••o^    " 

04^^/-<r5i'tfO~ 

-iiijt 

f,l-\.€ 

'< 

i  -"^ 

4  ^ 

> 

. 

. 

. 

- 

<M> 

^* 

•ir 

\ 

-T. 

1- 

• 

- 

5^ 

- 

r 

^ 

'  "-I 

A 

9 

V 

4, 

0 

-I 

^- 

'l-f- 

- 

- 

- 

s/^ 

■J 

.  ,  .  1  . 

y 

< 

ys,' 

- 1  - 

- 

- 

" 

- 

■> 

■'• 

7 

r-a 

D/i^'oj/V 

•  ■ 

- 

- 

■ 

- 

■Nfi 

^t  i^ 

'c 

fir 

- 

• 

Y 

y 

l'< 

i5a 

• 

-       ■ 

- 

"^ 

3?' 

V/N 

rt 

■  - 

V 

. 

^5,J 

. 

"^ 

-- 

?il4"   '   "^ 

- 

u 

- 

*<- 

- 

cH 

■.\^h'A%: 

- 

- 

"1 

- 

- 

■ 

- 

. 

- 

* 

. 

■ 

r 

— 

i1%| 

- 

iJ 

. 

. 

>    . 

N 

• 

.>-^ 

V 

■\ 

/ 

S> 

.    . 

^^,  * 

- 

■ 

1 

- 

'^ 

V-  , 

r. 

- 

■ 

- 

- 

• 

l 

- 

Tr 

r> 

•r 

• 

■V 

t 

- 

n 

X 

rf/- 

- 

• 

tt'e 

,?^ 

»,  ■» 

■r 

"1" 

- 

- 

^ 

-^ 

- 

-f 

-  ■' 

r<, 

■>i 

'  i'" 

S' 

- 

■ 

- 

. 

» 

- 

- 

. 

> 

'L 

-^ 

J? 

^<. 

- 

- 

- 

-    - 

. 

. 

^ 

• 

> 

-, 

• 

'  1  ■ 

X 

- 

• 

■ !  • 

11' 

. 

,, 

1^ 

^ 

■f 

^ 

^ 

"'"'1 

^ 

T 

\' 

\p 

1  r/ 

•!/ 

N7 

7 

w 

'b 

LtA 

. 

. 

- 

J!/ 

■s 

A 

^>^ 

A/. 

i"i 

- 

• 

- 

- 

- 

■ 

- 

i 

x. 

y 

- 

T  - 

- 

*■ 

- 

- 

« 

- 

- 

" 

■■ 

- 

■ 

" 

" 

■• 

- 

• 

- 

•■ 

-*- 

- 

- 

- 

^ 

; 

V/\ 

■ 

• 

• 

MAP  XVI 

■ 

• 

- 

• 

- 

■/ 

~h 

r' 

■#V 

»A/ 

f 

AND  Weht  Lrcts  IN  1891  and  the  Definition 
OF  ALL  Boundaries  in  1911 

- 

- 

V 

• 

' 

- 

^ 

^ 

jl 

_^ 

■ 

TOWNSHIPS  IN  JOHNSON  COUNTY  193 

SUMMARY 

Big  Grove :  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of  Com- 
missioners mider  date  of  April  9,  1845;  first  election  held 
on  first  Monday  in  April,  1846;  subsequent  changes  in 
boundaries  occur  in  1846. 

Cedar:  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board'of  Commis- 
sioners under  date  of  January  7, 1846 ;  first  election  held  on 
the  first  Monday  in  April,  1846 ;  no  subsequent  changes  oc- 
cur in  boundaries. 

Clear  Creek:  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of 
Commissioners  under  date  of  February  10,  1846 ;  first  elec- 
tion held  on  the  first  Monday  in  April,  1846;  subsequent 
changes  in  boundaries  occur  in  October,  1847,  August,  1852,. 
March,  1856,  and  July,  1857. 

Fremont:  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Judge  of  the 
County  Court  in  the  early  part  of  1857;  mention  of  the 
township  made  in  connection  with  special  election  for  rail- 
road tax  held  on  April  6, 1857 ;  no  subsequent  changes  occur 
in  boundaries. 

Graham:  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Judge  of  the 
County  Court  under  date  of  January  5,  1857 ;  first  election 
held  on  April  6,  1857;  no  subsequent  changes  occur  in 
boundaries. 

Hardin:  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Judge  of  the 
County  Court  under  date  of  January  4,  1858 ;  first  election 
held  on  April  5,  1858;  subsequent  changes  in  boundaries- 
occur  in  February,  1858. 

Iowa  City :  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of  Com-^ 
missioners  under  date  of  February  10,  1846;  first  election 
held  on  the  first  Monday  in  April,  1846 ;  subsequent  changes 
in  boundaries  occur  in  January,  1859,  January,  1873,  and 
September,  1910. 

Jefferson:  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Judge  of  the 

VOL.  IX — 14 


194    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

County  Court  under  date  of  March  6,  1854;  first  election 
held  on  April  3,  1854;  no  subsequent  changes  occur  in 
boundaries. 

Liberty: — Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of  Com- 
missioners under  date  of  February  10,  1846;  first  election 
held  on  the  first  Monday  in  April,  1846 ;  subsequent  changes 
in  boundaries  occur  in  March,  1854,  and  February,  1858. 

Lincoln :  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of  Super- 
visors under  date  of  June  8,  1870;  first  election  held  on 
second  Tuesday  in  October,  1870;  subsequent  changes  in 
boundaries  occur  in  April,  1871. 

Lucas:  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of  Super- 
visors under  date  of  January  15,  1873;  first  election  held 
on  second  Tuesday  in  October,  1873 ;  subsequent  changes  in 
boundaries  occur  in  April,  1891. 

Lucas,  East:  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of 
Supervisors  under  date  of  April  8,  1891;  mention  of  the 
township  made  in  connection  with  the  general  election  of 
1891;  subsequent  changes  in  boundaries  occur  in  Septem- 
ber, 1910. 

Lucas,  West:  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of 
Supervisors  under  date  of  April  8,  1891;  mention  of  the 
township  in  connection  with  the  general  election  of  1891; 
subsequent  changes  in  boundaries  occur  in  September,  1910. 

Madison :  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of  Super- 
visors in  1860;  first  election  probably  held  on  the  second 
Tuesday  in  October,  1860 ;  no  subsequent  changes  occur  in 
boundaries. 

Monroe :  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of  Com- 
missioners under  date  of  February  10,  1846;  first  election 
held  on  the  first  Monday  in  April,  1846 ;  subsequent  changes 
in  boundaries  occur  in  March,  1854. 

Newport :  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of  Com- 
missioners under  date  of  February  10,  1846;  first  election 


TOWNSHIPS  IN  JOHNSON  COUNTY  195 

held  on  the  first  Monday  in  April,  1846 ;  subsequent  changes 
in  boundaries  occur  in  October,  1847,  January,  1857,  and 
January,  1859. 

Oxford:  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Judge  of  the 
County  Court  under  date  of  March  3,  1856;  first  election 
held  on  April  7,  1856;  no  subsequent  changes  occur  in 
boundaries. 

Penn :  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of  Commis- 
sioners under  date  of  February  10, 1846 ;  first  election  held 
on  the  first  Monday  in  April,  1846 ;  subsequent  changes  in 
boundaries  occur  in  October,  1860. 

Pleasant  Valley :  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of 
Commissioners  under  date  of  February  10, 1846 ;  first  elec- 
tion held  on  the  first  Monday  in  April,  1846;  subsequent 
changes  in  boundaries  occur  in  June,  1870. 

Scott :  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of  Commis- 
sioners under  date  of  February  10, 1846 ;  first  election  held 
on  the  first  Monday  in  April,  1846 ;  subsequent  changes  in 
boundaries  occur  in  October,  1847. 

Sharon-.  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Judge  of  the 
County  Court  under  date  of  February  1, 1858 ;  first  election 
held  on  the  first  Monday  in  April,  1858;  no  subsequent 
changes  occur  in  boundaries. 

Union :  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Judge  of  the  Coun- 
ty Court  under  date  of  August  30,  1852 ;  first  election  held 
on  April  4,  1853;  subsequent  changes  in  boundaries  occur 
in  March,  1854,  July,  1857,  February,  1858,  and  some  time 
between  1858  and  1870. 

Washington-.  —  Established  by  order  of  the  Board  of 
Commissioners  under  date  of  February  10,  1846 ;  first  elec- 
tion held  on  the  first  Monday  in  April,  1846;  subsequent 
changes  in  boundaries  occur  in  October,  1847,  August,  1852, 
March,  1854,  January,  1858,  and  February,  1858. 

CiiABENCE  Bay  Aubneb 
Iowa  City,  Iowa 


^■. 


THE  ATTITUDE  OF  CONGEESS  TOWAED  THE 

PIONEEES  OF  THE  WEST 
1820-1850 


RELATIONS  BETWEEN  THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS 

THE  FBONTIE»  IN  1820 

In  the  year  1820  a  line  of  outposts  extending  from  the 
Lakes  to  the  mouth  of  the  Mississippi  marked  the  military 
frontier  in  the  West.  At  the  northern  end  of  this  line  stood 
the  island  town  and  fort  of  Michilimackinack  in  the  straits 
of  Lakes  Michigan  and  Huron.  Thence  southward  lay  Fort 
Howard  on  Green  Bay  and  Prairie  du  Chien  at  the  mouth 
of  the  Wisconsin  Eiver.  Two  regiments  of  infantry  were 
encamped  along  the  Missouri  Eiver ;  while  in  the  South,  the 
Sabine  Eiver  was  guarded  by  a  small  detachment.  Thence 
eastward  several  small  posts  completed  the  border  defenses 
through  Louisiana  to  New  Orleans.^ 

A  glance  at  the  census  map  of  1820  will  show  that  there 
existed  a  gap  between  this  f ar-spreading  miUtary  line  and 
the  established  settlements.^  In  the  South  the  pioneers  had 
advanced  beyond  the  Mississippi  into  Missouri  and  Arkan- 
sas ;  and  parts  of  western  Louisiana  had  long  been  occupied. 
But  north  and  west  of  the  Missouri  settlements  the  Missis- 

^Niles'  Weekly  Begiater,  Vol.  XIX,  p.  251;  American  State  Papers,  Military 
Affairs,  Vol.  II,  p.  37.  For  a  picture  of  army  life  on  this  frontier,  see  Colonel 
Cooke's  Adventures  in  the  Army  (Philadelphia,  1859). 

2  Map  facing  page  zxii,  Eleventh  Census,  Population,  Vol.  I,  Part  1.  See 
also  Turner 's  Colonisation  of  the  West  in  the  American  Historicai  Review,  VoL 
XI,  p.  307.  For  a  comparison  of  the  "farmer's  frontier"  and  the  military 
frontier,  see  Turner's  Significance  of  the  Frontier  in  American  History  in  the 
Annual  Beport  of  the  American  Historical  Association,  1893,  p.  211. 

IM 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  197 

sippi  Valley  was  unbroken  Indian  country.  On  the  eastern 
side  of  the  river,  the  body  of  settlements  had  hardly  ad- 
vanced further  northward  than  a  line  drawn  from  the  mouth 
of  the  Missouri  Eiver  to  Detroit  in  Michigan. 

Eastward,  also,  within  the  interior  lay  large  districts 
barren  of  legal  habitation,  because  the  Indian  title  had  not 
been  extinguished.  Along  the  old  Spanish  border  of  Flor- 
ida, the  army  had  but  recently  been  employed  in  subduing 
the  Seminoles  and  their  allies.  Again,  in  the  States  of  Indi- 
ana and  Illinois  and  in  the  Territory  of  Michigan  there  were 
extensive  wildernesses  where  the  Chippewas,  Ottawas,  Pot- 
tawatomies,  Winnebagos,  Menomonees,  Miamis,  and  Sac 
and  Fox  Indians  still  retained  their  possessory  rights  to  the 
soil  and  sullenly  resisted  the  encroachment  of  settlers. 
Even  as  far  east  as  the  State  of  Georgia  the  Cherokees  and 
the  Creeks  stubbornly  clung  to  their  native  land,  as  did  the 
Choctaws  and  Chickasaws  in  Mississippi  and  Alabama. 
White  settlements  encroached  upon  these  Indian  lands  from 
all  directions,  so  that  some  tribes  like  the  Cherokees  and 
the  Creeks  were  almost  surrounded  by  citizen  pioneers. 
Thus  conflicts  between  the  two  races  were  inevitable. 
Frontiersmen,  impatient  at  the  Government's  delay  in  ac- 
quiring the  Indian  title  to  these  rich  valleys,  frequently 
staked  out  their  little  claims  within  the  Indian  territory  and 
thereby  brought  down  upon  themselves  the  resentment  of 
the  original  claimants  who  retaliated  by  pilfering  com  and 
stealing  cattle.  The  Indians  on  their  part,  after  ceding 
their  lands  to  the  United  States  and  agreeing  to  retire  to 
other  possessions,  were  often  loath  to  leave  and  hung  about 
the  new  settlements  much  to  the  annoyance  of  the  settlers.' 

The  relations  between  the  pioneers  and  the  aborigines  were 
theoretically  prescribed  by  Federal  laws.     These  **  trade 

8  The  American  State  Papers^  Indian  A  fairs,  contain  a  mass  of  evidence 
conceming  the  relations  of  the  backwoodsmen  and  the  Indians. 


198    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

and  intercourse  acts,  * '  as  they  were  called  —  the  first  one 
being  passed  as  early  as  1796  —  provided  severe  penal- 
ties not  only  for  attempting  to  settle  npon  any  lands,  the 
Indian  title  to  which  had  not  yet  been  extingnished,  but 
.they  even  imposed  a  penalty  for  going  into  the  Indian  coun- 
try without  a  passport.  The  military  force  of  the  United 
States  might  be  used  to  expel  such  intruders.*  But  in  spite 
of  these  Federal  enactments,  there  always  existed  on  the 
frontier  more  or  less  irritation  and  tension.  Pioneers  im- 
patient for  land  eluded  the  scattered  dragoons  of  the  small 
western  army  and  encroached  upon  the  Indian  country. 
The  Iowa  country  was  thus  invaded  by  a  few  bold  settlers 
who  crossed  the  Mississippi  at  Dubuque  in  1830.*^  The  ma- 
jority of  the  frontier  pioneers  were  content  to  wait  until 
the  Government  had  bought  the  Indian  title  to  the  western 
lands.  But  even  after  this  title  had  been  secured  troubles 
sometimes  arose  —  due  to  the  failure  of  some  Indians  to 
comprehend  the  papers  which  they  had  signed  or  on  ac- 
count of  their  simple  and  savage  unwillingness  to  perform 
their  obligations.® 

To  this  state  of  things  the  plan  to  remove  all  tribes  from 
the  east  to  the  west  of  the  Mississippi  owes  its  origin  in  the 
early  years  of  the  nineteenth  century.  Jefferson  was  the 
first  to  elaborate  the  idea.  Colonization  in  Upper  Louisiana 
was  the  plan  that  occurred  to  him  in  the  year  1803.''    Al- 

4  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  I,  pp.  470,  745;  Vol.  II,  p.  139;  Vol. 
m,  p.  332. 

B  Parish '8  The  Langworthys  of  Early  Dubuque  ar^  Their  Contributions  to 
Local  History  in  The  Iowa  Joubnal  op  History  and  Politics,  Vol.  Vni,  No. 
3,  p.  317. 

9  The  Indians'  side  of  the  story  is  well  told  in  the  Life  of  Black  Hawk 
(Boston,  1834).  Mrs,  Gratiot's  Narrative  in  the  Wisconsin  Historical  Col- 
lections, Vol.  X,  p.  261,  is  a  good  type  of  the  pioneer  accounts. 

T Ford's  The  Writings  of  Thomas  Jefferson,  Vol.  VIII,  pp.  241-243.  Jef- 
f erson  's  first  proposal  of  such  a  plan  to  any  tribe  was  his  address  to  the  Chiek- 
asaws  in  1805. — ^Washington's  Writings  of  Thomas  Jefferson,  Vol.  VIII,  p.  199. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  199 

though  he  made  no  definite  reconunendations  thereon  to 
Congress  his  views  were  widely  known  by  correspondence 
and  personal  conversations ;  and  through  such  means  it  was 
that  the  sixteenth  section  of  the  Louisiana  Territorial  Act 
of  1804  was  written,  empowering  the  President  to  exchange 
Indian  lands  east  of  the  Mississippi  for  lands  on  the 
west  side.  Attempts  to  secure  removal  during  Jefferson's 
administration  were  neither  energetic  nor  successful,  al- 
though the  application  of  this  remedy  to  the  Indian  problem 
was  urged  by  the  Governor  of  the  Territory  of  Indiana, 
William  Henry  Harrison,  and  was  occasionally  advocated 
in  Congress.® 

The  idea  of  westward  removal  appealed  most  strikingly 
to  Southerners.  Four  great  tribes  —  the  Cherokees  and 
Creeks  and  the  Chickasaws  and  Choctaws  —  were  coming  to 
be  a  most  serious  menace  to  the  progress  of  the  southwest- 
em  frontier.  These  tribes  still  retained  their  possessive 
rights  to  large  tracts  of  most  fertile  land  in  Tennessee, 
Georgia,  and  the  Territory  of  Mississippi,  and  thus  their 
presence  threatened  seriously  to  retard  industrial  develop- 
ment. In  the  Northwest  the  need  of  removal  beyond  the 
Mississippi  was  not  so  ardently  demanded  until  after  the 
War  of  1812  because  the  over-strenuous  administrations  of 
General  Anthony  Wayne  and  Governor  Harrison  acquired 
from  the  Indians  vast  sections  of  land  years  in  advance  of 

The  origin  of  the  removal  policy  is  exhaustively  discussed  by  Dr.  Abel  in 
Indian  Consolidation  West  of  the  Mississippi  in  the  Annual  Beport  of  the 
American  Historicai  Associ€Uion,  1906,  Vol.  I,  p.  235  et  seq.  Dr.  Abel  de- 
scribes the  Indian  removal  chief 7  from  the  aide  of  the  Executive  Department, 
Tvhile  Phillips  in  Georgia  and  State  Bights  describes  the  episode  of  the  Greek 
and  Cherokee  removals  from  the  viewpoint  of  the  States  concerned. — Annual 
Report  of  the  American  Historicai  Association,  1901,  Vol.  IL  On  the  other 
hand,  the  removal  of  Indians  across  the  Mississippi  is  portrayed  from  the  In- 
dians'  side  in  the  monograph  by  Royce  entitled  The  CheroJcee  Nation  of  In- 
dians in  the  Fifth  Annuctl  Beport  of  the  Bureau  of  Ethnology,  p.  129. 

8  Annals  of  Congress,  1st  Session,  8th  Congress,  pp.  41,  440.  Senator  James 
Jackson  of  Qeorgia  and  John  Randolph  of  Virginia  casually  mention  the  plan. 


200    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

the  actual  economic  need  of  that  section  of  the  country ;  and, 
moreover,  the  Indians  themselves  retreated  westward  more 
rapidly  than  did  their  southern  brothers  before  the  stream 
of  eastern  emigration.  Perhaps  the  first  serious  proposal 
to  exchange  the  lands  of  the  northern  Indians  for  lands  be- 
yond the  Mississippi  occurred  in  1817,  when  Lewis  Cass, 
Governor  of  Michigan  Territory,  was  instructed  by  Mon- 
roe's Secretary  of  War  to  propose  to  the  Indians  of  the 
Ohio  that  they  exchange  their  lands  for  equal  tracts  beyond 
the  Mississippi  —  reserving,  however,  a  certain  number  of 
acres  in  the  ceded  territory  to  each  head  of  a  family  who 
wished  to  remain.*  A  year  later  the  first  treaty  whereby  a 
northern  tribe  —  in  this  case  the  Delawares  —  ceded  their 
lands  in  Indiana  for  a  tract  beyond  the  Mississippi  was  ne- 
gotiated by  Lewis  Cass  and  two  other  commissioners.^^  In 
1819  a  similar  treaty  was  negotiated  with  the  Kickapoos  of 
Ulinois.^^  Then  the  score  of  years  following  was  marked 
with  similar  zealous  and  successful  efforts  to  evict  the  In- 
dians from  the  Old  Northwest  under  the  guise  of  solemnly 
negotiated  treaties. 

In  July  of  the  year  when  removal  was  inaugurated  in  the 
Indian  affairs  of  the  North,  Andrew  Jackson  secured  with 
much  effort  a  treaty  with  a  southern  tribe,  the  Cherokees, 
providing  for  the  removal  of  such  individuals  of  that  tribe 
as  were  willing  to  make  the  change.^  The  question  of  the 
removal  of  these  Indians  and  the  Creeks  soon  became  in- 
volved in  the  fierce  controversy  between  these  nations  and 
the  State  of  Georgia.  Thereupon  the  whole  affair  was  sev- 
eral times  reviewed  in  Congress  as  will  be  further  noted. 

These  then  were  the  beginnings  of  the  removal  policy. 

»  American  State  Papers,  Indian  Affairs,  Vol.  II,  p.  136. 
lOKappler'g  Indian  Affairs,  Laws  and  Treaties,  Vol.  II,  p.  170. 
11  Kappler  'a  Indian  Affairs,  Laws  and  Treaties,  Vol.  II,  p.  182. 
i2Kappler'8  Indian  Affairs,  Laws  and  Treaties,  Vol.  II,  p.  140. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  201 

Its  ori^  was  executive,  not  congressional.  Indeed,  we 
shall  see  that  the  stimulus  for  a  national  plan  of  removal 
came  almost  entirely  from  the  Executive  Department,  al- 
though local  interests  never  ceased  to  memorialize  Con- 
gress for  the  removal  of  individual  tribes  whose  presence 
annoyed  particular  States.  Before  the  third  decade  of  the 
century  the  plan  was  little  dreamed  of;  but  what  the  atti- 
tude of  Congress  would  be  when  it  should  seriously  con- 
sider the  subject  was  already  forecasted.  Commiseration 
for  the  retreating  Indians,  whether  maudlin  or  philanthrop- 
ic, was  to  be  put  aside.  The  story  of  Clay's  futile  elo- 
quence on  behalf  of  the  Seminoles  has  already  been  told.^* 
On  all  points  was  Jackson's  decisive  conduct  with  the  Flor- 
ida Indians  sustained,  not  only  in  the  Fifteenth  Congress 
but  as  well  in  the  first  session  of  the  Sixteenth  Congress.^* 

BBGINNINGS   OF  THE  GEOBGIA  INDIAN   CONTBOVEBST 

Of  the  thirteen  original  States,  Georgia  was  the  only  one 
possessing  in  1820  a  considerable  frontier.^*^  In  the  North,  . 
the  Indian  frontier  had  passed  westward  beyond  Ohio,  al- 
though a  few  isolated  tribes  and  individuals  still  remained 
in  New  York  and  in  New  England.  From  Virginia  the  bor- 
der difficulties  in  the  back  country  which  filled  the  corre- 
spondence of  Governor  Patrick  Henry  were  now  long  van- 
ished. Even  Kentucky  —  the  first  of  the  admitted  States  in 
the  West  —  was  quite  free  from  aboriginal  inhabitants. 
Prosperous  plantations  covered  these  once  famous  hunting 
grounds. 

18  The  Iowa  Joubnal  of  Histoby  and  Politics^  VoL  vm,  No.  1,  pp. 
109-114. 

^*  Annals  of  Congress,  Ist  Session,  16th  Congress,  p.  1542. 

16  No  less  a  historian  than  Frederick  J.  Turner  has  included  the  back  coun- 
try of  Georgia,  daring  the  years  following  1820,  as  a  part  of  the  western 
frontier. —  Bise  of  the  New  West,  p.  57.  The  settlers  who  were  encroaching 
upon  the  Cherokee  and  Creek  lands  west  of  the  Ocmulgee  Biver  had  much  in 
common  with  the  settlers  who  were  crossing  the  Mississippi  at  the  same  time. 

VOL.  IX — 15 


x 

t 

\ 


202    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

But  Georgia  presents  another  story.  One-third  of  the 
State,  in  fact  all  of  the  lands  north  and  west  of  the  Ocmul- 
gee  Eiver,  was  still  held  by  the  Creeks  and  Cherokees.^* 
The  Cherokees  were  semi-civilized  but  annoying.  The 
Creeks  were  more  war-like.  Divided  in  their  councils,  a 
part  had  struck  the  Government  in  the  War  of  1812,  while 
the  other  part  had  been  actively  loyal.  The  danger  of  their 
presence  was  ever  a  source  of  worry ;  and  this  the  Georgia 
delegation  often  told  Congress.^''  **The  unprotected  situa- 
tion of  the  frontiers  invited  aggression  and  the  predatory 
and  sanguinary  depredations  of  a  dark  and  insidious  ene- 
my, whose  track  was  to  be  traced  by  blood  and  desolation, 
cried  aloud  for  vengeance  *  \  declared  one  Georgian  Eepre- 
sentative.^8  This  utterance  was  made  when  Georgia  was  ad- 
vocating  her  Militia  Claims.  The  debates  upon  these 
claims,  although  referring  to  conditions  at  the  close  of  the 
eighteenth  century,  reflect  much  of  the  contemporary  atti- 
tude of  the  Georgia  delegation.  As  an  example  of  the  hun- 
dreds of  similar  claims  presented  to  Congress  by  western 
members  almost  every  year  they  may  beg  the  attention  of 
the  reader  for  a  moment.  The  Georgia  Militia  Claims  orig- 
inated in  the  border  outbreaks  of  1792,  when  the  State  had 
employed  her  militia  in  suppressing  the  Indians.  Some 
years  later  Georgia  demanded  recompense  therefor,  al- 
though these  claims  were  said  to  have  been  liquidated  in  the 
transactions  of  1802  when  Georgia  ceded  her  lands  to  the 
United  States.^®  For  a  score  of  years  thereafter  the  im- 
passioned speeches  of  the  Georgians  presented  Congress 

16  Annals  of  Congress,  Ist  Session,  18th  Congress,  p.  465. 

17  oamer  '•  SJceiches  of  the  Settlers  of  Upper  Georgia,  p.  504  et  seq. 

18  Annals  of  Congress,  2nd  Session,  17th  Congress,  p.  163. 

19  The  argument  for  these  claims  is  given  at  length  in  Senator  Elliott 's  re- 
port of  1822. —  Annals  of  Congress,  1st  Session,  17th  Congress,  p.  383.  Annals 
of  Congress,  2nd  Session,  7th  Congress,  p.  461.  For  the  argument  against  the 
claims,  see  pp.  523,  535. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  203 

with  a  vivid  picture  of  the  State's  border  position.  That 
eastern  members  could  never  appreciate  the  horrors  of 
Georgia's  exposed  condition  nor  comprehend  the  service 
that  she  was  rendering  to  the  nation  by  standing  as  a  bul- 
wark against  the  Indians  was  the  burden  of  these  har- 
angues* Heart- thrilling  accounts  of  the  **  midnight  char- 
acter of  Indian  hostility'*  depicted  in  rather  lively  col- 
ors this  frontier  and  idealized  the  settlers  who  ventured 
with  their  families  so  close  to  the  aborigines.^  Persistence 
in  these  addresses  finally  won  an  appropriation  from  Con- 
gress in  the  year  1827,  in  spite  of  the  bar  to  the  claims.*^ 
Meanwhile  Georgia  had  carried  to  Congress  the  most  ob- 
stinate of  all  frontier  problems.  Should  the  Creeks  and 
Cherokees  continue  to  hold  wildernesses  in  a  civilized  State 
and  bar  the  progress  of  American  settlement?  True,  the 
Cherokees  were  of  all  American  tribes  the  most  civilized; 
both  they  and  the  Creeks  had  made  progress  in  agriculture 
and  were  becoming  attached  to  the  land  they  occupied  by 
stronger  bonds  than  those  which  bound  the  roving  Indians 
of  the  Northwest  to  their  hunting  grounds.^^  But  the  eco- 
nomic interests  of  Georgia  were  ready  for  expansion  upon 

20  Mr.  WDej  Thompson  of  Georgia  exclaimed  that  Georgia  had  been  "del- 
uged by  the  blood  of  her  citizens,  slaughtered  in  defending  the  United  States; 
and  still  justice  ....  is  withheld  from  them." — Begister  of  Debates, 
2nd  Session,  18th  Congress,  p.  81. 

Indian  troubles  were  unavoidable,  Thompson  contended.  Eastern  States 
seemed  not  to  appreciate  Georgia's  position  —  how  she  stood  as  "a  bulwark 
between  the  Indians  and  the  interior  States,  while  she  received  the  death  stroke 
of  the  Indian  tomahawk  in  her  own  bosom". —  "Register  of  Debates,  2nd  Ses- 
sion, 19th  Congress,  p.  1245. 

John  Forsyth  charged  that  the  claims  had  been  rejected  simply  because  the 
State  operations  against  the  Creeks  and  Cherokees  had  taken  a  direction  of- 
fensive to  the  Administration. —  Register  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  18th  Con- 
gress, p.  581. 

21  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,   19th   Congress,  pp.   1266,  488. 

22  Royce  's  The  Cherokee  Nation  of  Indians  in  the  Fifth  Annual  Beport  of 
the  Bureau  of  Ethnology,  p.  23L 


204    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

the  Indian  lands ;  the  aggressive  settlers  demanded  portions 
of  the  unused  districts  still  held  by  the  Creeks  and  Chero- 
kees;  but  demand  as  they  might,  these  tribes  began  stub- 
bornly to  refuse  any  further  cessions  of  their  remaining 
domain.^' 

Such  a  condition  boded  trouble  indeed.  One  third  of  a 
Commonwealth  in  the  hands  of  some  thirty  thousand  per- 
sistent aborigines  was  a  fact  which  naturally  provoked  the 
citizens,  who  were  nearly  two  hundred  thousand  in  number 
and  rapidly  increasing.^* 

The  problem  would  have  been  quickly  solved  had  the 
State  controlled  the  lands  in  question.  But  in  1802  Georgia 
had  ceded  her  public  lands  to  the  United  States.  In  the 
compact,  however,  the  Federal  Government  stipulated  that 
the  title  to  Indian  lands  lying  within  the  State  should  be 
extinguished  as  early  as  could  be  peaceably  done  upon  rea- 
sonable terms.^*^  This  the  Federal  Government  proceeded 
to  accomplish,  and  by  treaties  with  the  Creeks  and  Cher- 
okees  secured  for  both  Georgia  and  Alabama  prior  to  the 
year  1824  some  fifteen  million  acres  of  land.^*  Ten  million 
still  remained  in  the  possession  of  the  two  tribes  when  they 
manifested  their  determination  to  cede  no  more. 

Since  1802  the  Executive  Department  had  been  sincerely 
willing  to  fulfil  its  promises,  although  ever  insisting  upon 
treating  the  Indians  with  diplomatic  courtesy.  And  Con- 
gress as  well  had  voted  generous  appropriations  to  conduct 
treaties  of  cession.  Now,  however,  it  was  apparent  that  if 
the  diplomatic  attitude  of  the  Executive  continued  no  more 

2s  For  a  comparative  map  of  Indian  land  cessions  in  Georgia,  fee  the  Eight- 
eenth AnnwU  Bepori  of  the  Bureau  of  Ethnology,  Part  2,  Plate  XV. 

24  For  population  of  Creeks  and  Cherokees,  see  American  State  Papers,  In- 
dian Affairs,  Vol.  II,  p.  546. 

25  American  State  Papers,  Public  Lands,  Vol.  I,  p.  125. 

2«  Beport  of  Secretary  of  War. —  Annals  of  Congress,  Ist  Session,  ISth  Con- 
gress, p.  465. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  205 

cessions  could  be  obtained.  A  commanding  attitude  was 
necessary  to  make  these  Indians  retreat ;  and  the  Georgians 
were  disappointed  and  provoked  because  such  a  course  of 
action  was  not  vigorously  followed  by  Monroe  and  Madi- 
son.^ ^  The  Governor  and  legislature  frankly  told  the  Gov- 
ernment so  at  different  times  with  increasing  irritation.^® 
That  the  Federal  Executive  was  disinclined  to  coerce  the 
Cherokees  and  Creeks  was  evident  in  Monroe 's  message  of 
March  30,  1824.  **I  have  no  hesitation *^  wrote  the  Presi- 
dent, *  *  to  declare  it  as  my  opinion,  that  the  Indian  title  was 
not  affected  in  the  slightest  circumstance  by  the  compact 
with  Georgia,  and  that  there  is  no  obligation  on  the  United 
States  to  remove  the  Indians  by  force. '^  But  he  added: 
*  *  My  impression  is  equally  strong  that  it  would  promote  es- 
sentially the  security  and  happiness  of  the  tribes  within 
our  limits,  if  they  could  be  prevailed  on  to  retire  west  and 
north  of  our  States  and  Territories,  on  lands  to  be  procured 
for  them  by  the  United  States,  in  exchange  for  those  on 
which  they  now  reside. '  '^® 

27  Calhoun  when  Secretary  of  War  under  Monroe  disapproved  the  policy  of 
treating  with  the  Indian  tribes  as  with  States  or  nations. —  American  State 
Papers,  Indian  Affairs,  Vol.  II,  p.  276. 

The  attitude  of  Monroe  and  Adams  in  this  respect  is  open  to  just  criticism. 
The  Georgia  delegation  pronounced  formal  treaty-making  to  be  a  farce.  Why 
should  the  Government  act  as  if  the  Indians  were  foreign  powers f  asked  For- 
syth. The  question  seems  never  to  have  been  satisfactorily  answered. —  Begister 
of  Dehates,  1st  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  2614. 

For  an  army  officer's  opinion  in  later  days,  see  Centenniai  of  the  United 
States  Military  Academy  at  West  Foint  (Washington,  1904),  p.  527. 

28  Phillips 's  Georgia  and  State  Bights  in  the  Annual  Beport  of  the  American 
Historical  Association,  1901,  Vol.  II,  p.  52  et  seq.  The  attitude  of  Georgia  was 
nicely  expressed  in  the  memorial  addressed  by  the  legislature  to  the  President 
of  the  United  States  in  1819.  "The  State  of  Georgia'',  read  this  protest, 
''claims  a  right  to  the  jurisdiction  and  soil  of  the  territory  within  her  limits. 
.  .  .  .  She  admits  however,  that  the  right  is  inchoate  —  remaining  to  be 
perfected  by  the  United  States,  in  the  extinction  of  the  Indian  title;  the  United 
States  pro  hac  vice  as  their  agents." — See  Worcester  vs.  State  of  Georgia,  6 
Peters  585. 

29  Annals  of  Congress,  1st  Session,  18th  Congress,  p.  463.    The  Message  and 


206    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Monroe  admitted  that  the  question  had  developed  beyond 
executive  control ;  and  he  therefore  submitted  to  the  consid- 
eration of  Congress,  trusting  that  the  Indians  as  well  as  the 
people  of  Georgia  would  receive  equal  justice.  If  Monroe 
hoped  by  this  message  to  throw  the  responsibility  for  action 
upon  Congress  he  was  doomed  to  disappointment.  The  so- 
lution which  he  tentatively  proposed  was  to  peaceably  in- 
dine  the  Cherokees  toward  accepting  the  removal  plan. 
But  Congress  was  not  ready  to  assume  the  responsibility. 
The  President  possessed  the  treaty  powers  under  the  Con- 
stitution. Why  should  he  not  continue  to  treat  and  the 
Senate  to  ratify? 

While  Congress  hesitated  to  touch  the  affair,  the  Georgia 
delegation  were  loud  in  their  attempts  to  secure  decision. 
**If  the  Cherokees  are  unwilling  to  remove,'^  they  said, 
**the  causes  of  that  unwillingness  are  to  be  traced  to  the 
United  States.  If  a  peaceable  purchase  cannot  be  made  in 
the  ordinary  mode,  nothing  remains  to  be  done  but  to  order 
their  removal  to  a  designated  territory  beyond  the  limits  of 
Georgia '^^®  It  is  needless  to  say  that  their  efforts* were  in 
vain.  The  Senate  Committee  on  Indian  Affairs  passed  over 
the  matter  without  reporting.^^  The  House  Conmaittee,  be- 
ing headed  by  John  Forsyth,  naturally  reported  that  im- 
mediate removal  was  wise,  but  the  measure  was  lost  in  the 
House.^^  The  times  were  premature  for  drastic  solution, 
although  the  issue  had  become  well  defined.  If  the  Georgia 
Indians  refused  to  emigrate  should  their  possessive  rights 

accompanying  documents  were  printed  in  Senate  Documents,  Ist  Session,  18th 
Congress,  No.  63. 

80  Anndls  of  Congress,  1st  Session,  18th  Congress,  p.  471. 

81  The  Senate  referred  the  Georgia  Indian  controversy  to  its  Committee  on 
Indian  Affairs,  of  which  Benton  was  chairman. —  Annals  of  Congress,  1st  Ses- 
sion, 18th  Congress,  p.  474.  The  Journal  of  the  Senate  does  not  indicate  that 
the  Committee  reported  during  the  session. —  Journal  of  the  Senate,  Ist  Session, 
18th  Congresty  p.  28. 

82  Annais  of  Congress,  Ist  Session,  18th  Congress,  p.  2348. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  207 

to  soil  in  Georgia's  jurisdiction  be  maintained  by  Federal 
authority  T  Or,  should  the  stubborn  Indians  be  forced  to 
emigrate  f  The  first  horn  of  this  dilemma  was  intolerable 
to  the  State  of  Georgia  and  to  her  sympathizers ;  while  nei- 
ther eastern  Congressmen  nor  the  President  would  seize 
the  latter* 

MONBOB  AND  THE  REMOVAL  POLIOT 

The  Georgia  delegation  little  realized  that  their  persist- 
ent demands  in  Georgia's  behalf  would  gradually  force 
Congress  and  the  Executive  to  the  adoption  of  some  general 
plan  for  disposing  of  the  Indians.  But  that  event  was  to 
be  in  the  future  and  at  present  was  little  contemplated  by 
members  of  Congress,  although  signs  of  the  disastrous  pol- 
icy, then  being  pursued,  were  not  lacking  even  in  the  halls 
of  Congress.  In  December,  1823,  a  most  egregious  blunder 
had  been  exposed,  concerning  the  assignment  of  lands  to  the 
Choctaws  ^nd  Cherokees  west  of  the  Mississippi.  It  ap- 
pears that  the  most  fertile  of  the  lands  ceded  to  these  tribes 
during  the  years  1817  to  1820,  in  exchange  for  their  eastern 
possessions,  lay  within  the  Territory  of  Arkansas  and  were 
already  occupied  in  part  by  white  **  squatters '*.  In  the  case 
of  the  Cherokee  tribe  the  United  States  agreed  by  treaty  to 
remove  all  intruders  upon  the  ceded  lands ;  while  the  Choc- 
taws relied  upon  the  promise  of  General  Jackson,  who  was 
acting  as  commissioner  on  the  part  of  the  United  States, 
that '  *  the  arm  of  the  Government  was  strong,  and  that  the 
settlers  should  be  removed.  *  '^ 

Their  reliance  upon  the  Government  was  disastrous  to 
themselves,  for  within  a  few  years  local  interests  caused 
even  the  national  legislature  to  undermine  their  rights. 

saKappler's  Indian  Affairs,  Laws  and  Treaties,  Vol.  II,  p.  142;  American 
State  Papers,  Indian  Affairs,  Vol.  II,  p.  549.  For  a  map  of  the  cesaions,  aee 
Royce  's  Indian  Land  Cessions  in  the  Eighteenth  Annual  Beport  of  the  Bureau 
of  Ethnology,  Plate  VI. 


208    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

The  occasion  was  an  angry  remonstrance  from  the  Terri- 
torial legislature  of  Arkansas  against  the  action  of  Con- 
gress in  establishing  the  western  boundary  of  the  Terri- 
tory.'* This  line,  the  citizens  complained,  cut  off  from  the 
Territory  large  numbers  of  **most  respectable  inhabitants" 
who  had  intruded  upon  the  public  domain.  Henry  Conway, 
the  Delegate  from  ALrkansas,  loudly  maintained  the  alleged 
rights  of  the  intruders.  **I  can  never  consent*',  he  wrote 
to  the  Secretary  of  War,  **to  any  measure  which  is  calcu- 
lated to  check  the  prosperity  of  my  Territory,  or  to  destroy 
the  interests  of  any  portion  of  its  inhabitants.  *  ^' 

In  the  Senate  the  memorial  from  Arkansas  was  presented 
by  Benton  and  it  was  referred  to  a  select  committee  con- 
sisting of  Benton,  King  of  Alabama,  and  Lowrie  of  Penn- 
sylvania.** This  occurred  in  December,  1823.  In  March 
the  committee  reported  a  document  of  surprising  ingenu- 
ity.*'' There  were  three  questions  comprising  the  solution 
of  the  case,  the  committee  began  to  explain.  Should  the  in- 
habitants cut  off  by  the  line  of  1823  be  left  as  they  were 
without  law  to  govern  them  t  Or,  should  they  be  compelled 
to  come  within  the  present  limits  of  the  Territory?  Or, 
should  the  western  boundary  be  extended  to  include  themt 

The  first  method  the  committee  rejected,  for  reasons  **too 
obvious  to  require  specification. '  *  The  second  was  also  re- 
jected with  a  confusing  number  of  objections.  And  so,  by 
elimination,  what  was  left  but  the  third  plant  Accordingly, 
the  conmaittee  reported  a  bill  for  the  extension  of  the  west- 
em  boundary.  How  the  adjustment  of  the  Choctaw  and 
Cherokee  boundary  lines  with  this  new  Territorial  line 

^*  American  State  Papers,  Indian  Affaire,  Vol.  11,  p.  556;    United  States 
Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  HI,  p.  750. 

«»  American  State  Papers,  Indian  Affairs,  Vol.  II,  p.  556. 

s«  Annals  of  Congress,  lit  Session,  18th  Congress,  p.  47. 

87  Annais  of  Congress,  Ist  Session,  18th  Congress,  p.  420. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  209 

might  be  accomplished  the  committee  did  not  venture  to 
prophesy,  save  merely  to  express  a  hint  that  the  Executive 
would  find  such  conflicts  occasions  for  further  treaties  with 
the  Indians. 

The  bill  as  later  amended  in  the  Senate  directed  the  Presi- 
dent to  treat  with  the  Choctaws  for  a  modification  of  the 
Treaty  of  1820.'®  In  this  form  it  passed  both  houses  and 
became  law  in  May,  1824.  Thus  the  Executive  Department 
was  forced  into  the  position  of  breaking  public  faith  with 
the  western  Choctaws.  The  consequence  was  what  might 
have  been  expected :  the  Choctaws  were  compelled,  in  1825, 
to  retire  west  of  the  Arkansas  line,  leaving  their  promised 
lands  in  the  hands  of  the  irrepressible  pioneers.*®  The 
Oherokees  on  the  lands  to  the  north  of  them  soon  met  the 
same  fate.*® 

That  such  miserable  procedures  were  the  inevitable  out- 
come of  the  haphazard  and  sporadic  attempts  in  solving  the 
Indian  problem,  Monroe  was  more  than  ever  convinced. 
The  last  years  of  his  administration  were  enough  to  show 
him  that  sectional  bickerings  and  extravagant  expense 
would  ever  be  attendant  upon  a  continuation  of  the  present 
imsystematic  Indian  policy.  With  the  opening  of  the  sec- 
ond session  of  the  Eighteenth  Congress  barely  three  months 
of  legislative  sittings  were  left  to  his  administration ;  yet  he 
did  not  evade  the  bold  presentation  of  the  problem  in  its 
larger  scope.  He  recommended  to  Congress  the  advisabil- 
ity of  adopting  *'some  well  digested  plan'*  of  establishing 

S8  Annals  of  Congress,  1st  Besiion,  18th  Congress,  p.  778 ;  United  States  Stat- 
utes at  Large,  Vol.  IV,  p.  40. 

The  Executive  Department  apparently  disregarded  that  part  of  the  act  which 
extended  the  boundaries  of  the  Territory  of  Arkansas  west  of  the  southwest 
corner  of  Missouri. —  Note  the  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  VTI,  p. 
311;  Vol.  V,  p.  50;  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  26th  Congress,  p.  54. 

89  Kappler's  Indian  Affairs,  Laws  and  Treaties,  Vol.  II,  p.  211. 

*o  Kappler's  Indian  Affairs,  Laws  and  Treaties,  Vol  II,  p.  288. 


210    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

an  Indian  district  '*  between  the  limits  of  our  present  States 
and  territories,  and  the  Eocky  Mountain [s]^^  where  the 
Government  should  carefully  supervise  their  progress  in 
civilization.*^ 

Having  announced  his  attitude,  the  President  left  the 
elaboration  of  his  ideas  to  his  Secretary  of  "War,  John  C. 
Calhoun.  Calhoun  developed  a  plan  —  one  unusual  com- 
pared with  those  hitherto  proposed.  It  was  communicated 
to  Congress  on  the  27th  of  January,  1825.**  It  contemplated 
the  establishment  of  a  permanent  Indian  Territory  west  of 
the  settlements  with  a  government  uniting  all  tribes  in  one 
organization.  To  this  end  the  Secretary  recommended  that 
Congress  provide  for  a  convention  of  the  leaders  of  aU  east- 
em  tribes  in  order  to  explain  to  them  the  views  and  prom- 
ises of  the  government. 

Already  the  committees  on  Indian  affairs  in  both  houses 
were  considering  the  first  suggestions  of  Monroe  in  his  mes- 
sage at  the  opening  of  Congress.  Benton,  the  chairman  of 
the  Senate  committee,  approved  a  definite  national  plan  of 
reUeving  the  western  States  from  their  undesirable  Indian 
population.  The  bill  which  this  committee  reported  came 
from  the  pen  of  Calhoun  and  gave  legal  form  to  the  **weU 
digested'*  plan  which  Monroe  had  suggested.  Its  title  an- 
nounced it  as  an  act  for  the  preservation  and  civilization  of 
the  Indians.    On  February  23rd  it  passed  the  Senate.*' 

In  the  lower  chamber  the  bill  was  referred  to  the  standing 
committee  of  which  John  Cocke  of  Tennessee  was  chairman* 
The  records  do  not  indicate  that  it  was  ever  considered  in 
the  Committee  of  the  Whole  House  —  perhaps  because  of 
the  press  of  other  matters.    A  bill  of  similar  nature,  con- 

*i  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  18th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  7. 

*2  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  18th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  57 ;  Senate 
Documents,  No.  21;  Niles'  Weekly  Begister,  Vol.  XXVII,  p.  404. 

48  Journal  of  the  Senate  of  the  United  States,  2nd  Session,  18th  Congress, 
p.  187. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  211 

cocted  by  the  House  committee  itself,  met  the  same  fate.  To 
the  proposals  of  the  President  little  further  attention  was 
given,  save  by  the  easily  frightened  Delegate  from  the  Ter- 
ritory of  Arkansas,  who  demanded  that  no  lands  of  his  con- 
stituency be  granted  to  the  emigrating  Indians.** 

Such  apathy  on  the  part  of  western  Congressmen,  when 
Illinois,  Indiana,  Michigan  Territory,  Missouri,  Mississippi, 
Alabama,  and  Georgia  were  looking  with  restless  glances  at 
the  Indians  within  their  borders,  can  only  be  explained  by 
the  supposition  that  sectional  interests  had  not  yet  been 
combined  into  one  great  national  plan.  While  Elliott  of 
Georgia  supported  Calhoun  *s  bill  in  the  Senate,**^  the  re- 
mainder of  the  Georgia  delegation  appeared  strangely  si- 
lent in  the  House,  except  in  respect  to  their  own  grievances 
with  the  Creeks  and  the  Cherokees.  Headed  by  Forsyth 
they  called  for  the  vengeance  of  Congress  to  descend  upon 
these  stiff-necked  Indians.  Their  vexation  —  fanned  into  a 
passionate  rage  by  the  inertia  of  Congress  — adopted  the 
method  of  blocking  all  proposals  to  extend  any  act  of  cour- 
tesy or  justice  to  these  Indians,  even  when  such  acts  would 
not  interfere  with  the  rights  of  Georgia.** 

^^Niles'  Weekly  Begister,  Vol.  XXVII,  p.  271. 

«s  Begister  of  Debates,  2iid  Session,  18th  Congress,  p.  639. 

^  The  Cherokee  claim  in  regard  to  the  Wafford  Settlement  gave  one  occasion 
for  this  ungenerous  display  on  Georgia's  part.  Among  the  items  of  the  mili- 
tary bill,  the  Committee  on  Ways  and  Means  had  included  an  appropriation  to 
cancel  the  obligation  of  the  long  neglected  treaty  ceding  the  lands  in  question. 
—  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  18th  Congress,  p.  536. 

The  gist  of  the  matter  was  that  the  Government  had  undertaken  in  the  year 
1804  to  protect  certain  settlers  who  had  invaded  the  Indian  lands  in  violation 
of  the  Federal  laws  and  treaties,  but  had  failed  to  recompense  the  Cherokees 
for  the  land  thus  illegally  seized. —  Royce  's  The  Cherokee  Nation  of  Indians  in 
the  Fifth  Annual  Beport  of  the  Bureau  of  Ethnology,  p.  186. 

John  Forsyth  and  his  colleagues  protested  against  this  appropriation.  They 
were  outvoted. —  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  18th  Congress,  p.  546. 

The  episode  is  an  illustration  of  Congress  condoning  illegal  settlements. 
*  *  The  Cherokees ' ',  said  McLane  of  Delaware  during  the  debate,  ' '  were  in  pos- 
session of  this  land  within  the  limits  of  Georgia,  in  1804.    Their  lands  were  in- 


212    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

THE  END  OF  THE  CBEEK  CONTBOVEBSY 

Before  the  last  session  of  his  administration  had  closed 
Monroe  was  able  to  submit  to  the  Senate  tangible  results  of 
his  efforts  to  continue  the  policy  of  treaty-making  with  the 
Creeks  in  Georgia.  At  Indian  Springs  on  the  12th  of  Feb- 
ruary the  commissioners  of  the  Government  had  succeeded 
in  persuading  certain  chiefs  of  the  Creek  nation  to  sign  a 
treaty  ceding  all  their  lands  lying  within  the  State  of 
Georgia.*^  Without  inquiring  too  closely  into  the  history 
of  the  negotiations  Monroe  transmitted  it,  late  in  February 
and  only  a  few  days  before  the  end  of  his  administration,  to 
the  Senate.  This  body,  on  the  third  of  March,  hastily  ad- 
vised and  consented  to  ratification,*®  although  the  fact  had 
become  officially  known  that  the  Alabama  chiefs  of  the 
Creek  nation  had  never  agreed  to  the  cession.**    On  March 

truded  on  by  citizens  either  of  that  state  or  some  other;  and  an  application 
was,  in  consequence,  made  by  the  Cherokees  to  the  United  States  to  dispossess 
the  intruders.  The  Government  of  the  United  States  felt  that  it  was  their  duty 
to  do  so.  Orders  were  issued  accordingly,  and,  military  force  sent  to  put  them 
into  execution.  When  the  troops  arrived  on  the  spot,  they  found  that  the  set- 
tlers, for  the  most  part,  had  crops  then  growing,  and  not  gathered;  and  the  of- 
ficers interceded  with  the  Cherokees  to  delay  the  removal  of  the  intruders  until 
their  crops  could  be  gathered  in,  and  finally  succeeded  in  persuading  them  to 
sell  the  land  to  the  United  States.  The  Government  accordingly  issued  a  com- 
mission to  Messrs.  Meigs  and  Smith,  to  negotiate  for  the  purchase.  A  treaty 
was  held,  in  which  the  Indians  agreed  to  sell,  and  the  commissioners  to  buy  their 
land.  ...  As  soon  as  this  treaty  was  made,  the  Indians  abandoned  their 
land,  and  the  settlers  were  suffered  to  remain,  and  others  to  enter.  The  Indians 
executed  the  treaty  in  good  faith,  and  the  only  question  that  we  ought  to  have 
any  difficulty  in  deciding,  would  be,  not  whether  they  are  entitled  to  receive  the 
arrearages  of  the  annuity,  but  whether  we  ought  not  to  allow  them  interest  for 
the  whole  time  it  has  not  been  paid. —  Register  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  18th 
Congress,  p.  539. 

*T  Kappler's  Indian  A  fairs.  Laws  and  Treaties,  Vol.  II,  p.  214. 

^9  Executive  Journal  of  the  Senate  (1828),  Vol.  Ill,  p.  424. 

*9  Memoirs  of  John  Quincy  Adams,  Vol.  VII,  p.  12.  The  correspondence 
transmitted  to  the  Senate  along  with  the  treaty,  must  have  appeared  to  a  care- 
ful peruser  strangely  suspicious. —  American  State  Papers,  Indian  Affairs,  Vol. 
II,  p.  579. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  213 

7th  John  Quincy  Adams,  respecting  the  acts  of  his  prede- 
cessor, proclaimed  the  treaty  without  ado.*® 

To  the  Georgians,  who  coveted  the  Creek  lands  like  the 
vineyard  of  Naboth,  the  treaty  was  most  gratifying.  It 
promised  to  end  their  long  contention  with  the  Creeks  and 
undoubtedly  would  have  ended  the  affair  had  the  treaty 
been  genuine.  But  the  scandalous  conduct  of  the  commis- 
sioners, although  legalized  by  the  Senate,  was  not  to  stand 
unrepudiated  by  either  the  President  or  the  Senate  itself* 
Before  the  next  session  of  Congress  the  ugly  rumors  and 
hints  of  the  early  part  of  the  year  were  fully  confirmed  in 
Washington.  It  became  well  known  that  an  impotent  and 
discredited  faction  of  the  Creeks  had  signed  the  treaty  in 
direct  opposition  to  the  will  of  the  whole  nation.  Acting  up- 
on this  light  Adams  directed  the  Secretary  of  War  to  nego- 
tiate a  new  treaty  with  the  accredited  chiefs  of  the  Creeks 
who  had  journeyed  to  the  capital  protesting  the  affair  of 
Indian  Springs.*^^ 

By  his  action  the  President  found  himself  immediately  at- 
tacked by  Governor  Troup  and  the  Georgia  delegation  in 
Congress.^^  While  Governor  Troup  directed  the  quarrel 
with  so  much  vehemence  that  his  name  was  ever  after  known 
for  angry  defiance  to  the  Federal  Executive,  the  Georgia 
delegation  in  Congress  were  none  the  less  extreme.*^*  On 
January  7, 1826,  they  declared  to  the  Secretary  of  War  that 
Georgia  would  never  admit  the  invalidity  of  the  treaty  of 
Indian  Springs.  Their  method  of  proving  its  genuineness 
was   an  argumentum  ad  ignorantiam.     The  citizens   of 

60  Memoirs  of  John  Quincy  Adams,  Vol.  VII,  p.  12.  Compare  with  the  mes- 
sage to  the  Senate,  January  31,  1826. —  Bichardson's  Messages  and  Papers  of 
the  Presidents,  Vol.  II,  p.  324. 

61  Memoirs  of  John  Quincy  Adams,  Vol.  VII,  pp.  74,  108. 

62  Phillips 's  Georgia  and  State  Bights  in  the  Annual  Beport  of  the  Americaf^ 
Historical  Association,  1901,  Vol.  II,  p.  59. 

68  American  State  Papers,  Indian  Affairs,  Vol.  II,  p.  747. 


214    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Georgia,  they  maintained,  being  *  *  resident  near  the  scene  of 
this  controversy,  and  deeply  interested  in  its  result  .... 
have  been  attentive  observers  of  the  process  by  which  it  has 
been  conducted" — evidently  meaning  to  imply  that  the 
Georgians  were  better  judges  than  the  Federal  Government. 

The  President  did  not  surrender  to  the  demands  of 
Georgia,  although  his  position  was  rendered  the  more  per- 
plexing by  the  Creeks  who,  while  willing  to  legally  cede  part 
of  their  lands,  refused  to  cede  any  west  of  the  Chatta- 
hoochee.*^* 

In  his  annual  message  on  December  6th,  Adams  had  prom- 
ised to  submit  the  whole  tangled  affair  to  the  consideration 
of  Congress.**'  If  the  President  hoped  thereby  to  secure 
congressional  cooperation  in  solving  the  problem  as  Monroe 
had  hoped  in  the  preceding  year  he  evidently  changed  his 
mind,  for  the  special  message  was  never  transmitted.  Web- 
ster undoubtedly  helped  him  to  this  decision  by  his  sound 
advice  that  nothing  would  be  gained,  since  Congress  would 
do  nothing.  He  even  explained  to  the  President  the  various 
motives  by  which  different  members  would  be  actuated 
to  do  nothing,  leaving  the  Administration  to  pursue  its  way 
alone.**®  Adams  was  so  impressed  with  the  fear  of  provok- 
ing a  damaging  controversy  in  Congress  that  he  submitted 
none  of  the  papers  concerning  the  Georgia  question  when  at 
last  he  sent  to  the  Senate  the  new  treaty  which  Barbour  had 
negotiated  with  the  Creek  delegation  in  Washington  as  a 
substitute  for  the  Treaty  of  Indian  Springs.**^ 

Barbour's  treaty  did  not  provide  for  the  cession  of  the 
entire  Creek  country  in  Georgia.**®    So  its  reception  by  the 

8*  Memoirs  of  John  Quincy  Adams,  Vol.  VTI,  p.  66. 

ss  Begister  of  DeJxites,  Ist  Session,  19th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  4. 

8«  Memoirs  of  John  Quincy  Adams,  Vol.  VII,  p.  73. 

«T  Memoirs  of  John  Quincy  Adams,  Vol.  VII,  p.  110. 

s9  Kappler  's  Indian  A  fairs.  Laws  and  Treaties,  VoL  II,  p.  264. 


j^ 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  215 

Senate  Committee  on  Indian  Affairs  might  easily  be  fore- 
known, since  Benton  was  chairman  and  Cobb  of  Georgia  a 
leading  member.  The  conunittee  reported  on  March  17, 
1826,  that  the  Senate  should  not  advise  and  consent  to  the 
ratification.**®  Two  weeks  later  Adams  was  able  to  submit  a 
supplementary  article  by  which  the  Creeks  conceded  the 
Senate 's  point  and  ceded  what  was  then  supposed  to  be  all 
their  remaining  lands  in  Georgia.®^  Benton  *s  conunittee  of 
course  accepted  this  concession,  and  reported  back  to  the 
House  the  article  without  amendment.®^  In  the  Conunittee 
of  the  Whole  a  stubborn  but  unsuccessful  effort  was  made 
by  Berrien  of  Georgia  to  alter  the  first  article  so  as  to  annul 
the  treaty  of  Indian  Springs  without  reflecting  upon  the  na- 
ture of  its  negotiation.®^  Upon  the  final  question  of  advis- 
ing and  consenting  the  vote  stood  thirty  yeas  and  seven 
nays.®^  The  negative  vote  was  headed  by  the  two  Georgia 
Senators.  The  five  Senators  who  voted  with  them  probably 
based  their  objection  to  the  treaty  on  constitutional  consid- 
erations.®* 

Bealizing  that  the  Indians  would  be  loath  to  emigrate 
even  from  the  ceded  lands,  Berrien  immediately  introduced 
resolutions  looking  toward  the  Government 's  assisting  and 
encouraging  such  emigration.®*  With  that  purpose  in  view 
a  bill  appropriating  sixty  thousand  dollars  passed  both 
houses.®® 

59  Executive  Journal  of  the  Senate  (1828),  Vol.  Ill,  p.  521. 

«o  Kappler  's  Indian  Affairs,  Laws  and  Treatiest  Vol.  II,  p.  267. 

^i  Executive  Journal  of  the  Senate  (1828),  Vol.  Ill,  p.  526. 

•2  Executive  Journal  of  the  Senate  (1828),  Vol.  Ill,  p.  531. 

«8  Executive  Journal  of  the  Senate  (1828),  Vol.  Ill,  p.  533. 

«*  This  at  least  was  the  supposition  of  contemporaries. —  See  Niles '  Weekly 
Begister,  Vol.  XXX,  p.  297. 

^ti  Executive  Journal  of  the  Senate  (1828),  Vol.  Ill,  pp.  527,  532;  Begister 
of  Debates,  1st  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  620. 

^^  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Sesiion,  19th  Congress,  p.  2623;   United  States 
Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  FV,  p.  187. 


216    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Within  a  week  of  the  ratification  of  the  Washington 
Treaty  the  Committee  on  Appropriations  in  the  House  in- 
troduced a  bill  to  carry  into  effect  its  provisions.  The  dis- 
cussion thereon  was  almost  entirely  by  the  Georgia  delega- 
tion, who  protested  against  the  late  action  of  the  Senate  and 
criticised  the  whole  policy  of  Federal  control  of  Indian  Af- 
fairs as  an  abridgment  of  State  sovereignty.*^  Their 
speeches  did  not,  however,  long  delay  the  roll  call  on  the  bill 
which  passed  with  167  affirmative  votes.  All  but  one  of  the 
Georgia  delegation  voted  in  the  negative.*®  Again  return- 
ing to  the  Senate  we  find  Senator  Benton  self-righteously 
assuming  the  task  of  amending  the  bill  so  as  to  prevent  the 
"corrupt  distribution**  of  the  purchase  money  ** among  a 
few  chiefs  *  *  instead  of  to  the  whole  nation.** 

The  ratification  of  Barbour's  Treaty  would  have  prac- 
tically ended  the  Creek  Indian  contention  with  Georgia  had 
not  Governor  Troup  insisted  upon  surveying  the  boundary 
between  Georgia  and  Alabama  before  the  date  set  for  the  re- 
linquishment of  the  Indian  lands  —  and,  moreover,  the  line 
which  he  sought  to  establish  passed  through  lands  not  ceded 
by  the  treaty.*'^  This  action  of  surveying  territory  where 
the  Indian  title  had  not  been  extinguished  was  a  palpable 
violation  of  the  treaty  and  of  the  Federal  trade  and  inter- 
course law  of  1802.*^^  Adams  ordered  Governor  Troup  to 
desist  ;^^  but  the  Governor  supported  by  his  legislature 

*f  Begigter  of  Debates,  Ist  Sessioxi,  19th  Congress,  pp.  2606  et  seq,  Adams 
was  also  criticised  by  the  opposition  for  not  fulfilling  his  promises  concerning 
submitting  the  whole  Georgia  transactions  to  Congress. —  Begister  of  Dehates, 
1st  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  2607. 

88  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  2626. 

••Benton's  Twenty  Years'  View,  Vol.  I,  p.  60. 

70  Phillips's  Georgia  and  State  Bights  in  the  Annual  Bepori  of  the  American 
Historical  Association,  1901,  Vol.  II,  p.  60  et  seq, 

71  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  II,  p.  141. —  See  Section  5. 

72  American  State  Papers,  Indian  Affairs,  Vol.  II,  p.  744. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  217 

again  violently  defied  the  Federal  authority.^*  The  United 
States  Attorney  for  the  District  of  Georgia  refused  to  obey 
the  President's  order  to  prosecute  the  surveyors  J* 

On  February  5,  1827,  Adams  appealed  to  Congress.  He 
sent  **the  most  momentous  message  he  had  yet  written  *'J*^ 
In  both  houses  it  was  referred  to  select  committees ;  of  the 
one  Senator  Benton  was  chairman,  and  over  the  other  Eep- 
resentative  Edward  Everett  of  Massachusetts  presided. 
The  report  of  Benton 's  committee  on  March  1st  upheld  the 
claims  of  Georgia ;  while  the  House  report  maintained  that 
the  Treaty  of  Washington  should  be  executed  by  **all  neces- 
sary constitutional  and  legal  means '^''®  Both  advised  the 
Executive  to  continue  his  exertions  to  obtain  a  cession  of  the 
remaining  Creek  lands  in  Georgia  as  the  only  possible  al- 
leviation of  the  embarrassment.  This,  indeed,  was  what 
Adams  had  already  undertaken.''''  Late  in  the  year  the  hun- 
dred and  ninety  thousand  acres  of  pine  barrens  still  held  by 
the  Creeks  in  Georgia  were  relinquished  by  treaty.^®  Thus 
Georgia 's  contention  with  these  Indians  was  brought  to  an 
end.  But  this  was  not  the  end  of  all  Indian  quarrels.  Ten 
thousand  Cherokees  still  remained  on  Georgian  soil,  prom- 
ising troubles  of  their  own ;  while  the  attitude  of  the  State  of 
Alabama  toward  the  Creeks  still  within  her  borders  prom- 
ised a  repetition  of  the  strife  so  lately  consummated  in  the 
sister  State.*^® 

f^  American  State  Papers,  Indian  Affairs,  VoL  II,  p.  149  et  aeq.;  NUes* 
Weekly  Begister,  Vol.  XXXII,  p.  16. 

74  Phillips '8  Georgia  and  State  Bights  in  the  Annual  Beport  of  the  Ameriean 
Historiccd  Assodation^  1901,  Vol.  II,  p.  62. 

75  Memoirs  of  John  Quincy  Adams,  Vol.  VII,  p.  221. 

76  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  19th  Congress,  pp.  498,  1534.    The  Sen- 
ate report  is  in  Senate  Documents,  2nd  Session,  19th  CongreiB,  No.  69. 

fT  House  Documents,  1st  Session,  20th  Congress,  No.  238,  p.  7.     Secretary 
Barbour  to  Colonel  Crowell,  January  31,  1827. 

78  Kappler  's  Indian  A  fairs.  Laws  and  Treaties,  Vol.  II,  p.  284. 

T»  American  State  Papers,  Indian  A  fairs.  Vol.  II,  p.  644. 

VOL.  IX — 16 


218    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

AGITATIONS  FOB  A  GENERAL  BEMOVAL  POLICY 

Meanwhile  the  movement  for  westward  colonization  of  the 
Indians  was  gaining  ground.  The  story  of  the  Senate  bill 
of  1825  for  **the  preservation  and  civilization"  of  the  In- 
dians —  how  it  failed  in  the  House  —  has  already  been  told. 
The  next  congressional  attempt  at  a  general  plan  originated 
in  the  House,  and  likewise  received  inspiration  and  direction 
from  the  Executive  Department,  particularly  from  the  new 
Secretary  of  War,  James  Barbour.  In  the  early  months  of 
his  administration  Barbour  tentatively  nursed  a  plan  for  in- 
corporating the  Indians  in  the  body  politic  of  the  several 
States.®^  By  the  time,  however,  that  the  House  Committee 
on  Indian  Affairs  applied  to  him  for  advice  in  January  of 
the  year  1826  he  had  completely  revised  his  first  opinions.®^ 

The  project  of  a  bill  which  the  Secretary  prepared  for  the 
House  committee  aimed  to  establish  an  Indian  Territory  to 
be  maintained  by  the  United  States  and  quite  similar  in  de- 
tails to  the  first  grade  of  territorial  government.®^  This  In- 
dian government  he  proposed  to  locate  west  of  the  existing 
States  and  Territories  and  entirely  west  of  the  Mississippi^ 
save  that  it  was  to  include  a  part  of  the  Michigan  and  Wis- 
consin country.  That  the  bill  proposed  an  Indian  reserva- 
tion so  close  to  the  settlements  in  the  Northwest  would  have 
been  an  object  of  protest  had  it  received  much  attention  in 
Congress.  Despite  this  mistake  Barbour's  intentions  were 
evidently,  as  he  himself  said,  the  result  of  a  *  *  desire  to  com- 
ply with  the  requests  of  the  People  of  the  United  States  re- 
siding in  the  neighborhood  of  Indian  settlements.''    As  it 

80  Memoirs  of  John  Quincy  Adams,  Vol.  VII,  p.  89. 

«i  Memoirs  of  John  Quincy  Adams,  Vol.  VII,  p.  113.  The  Committee  on  In- 
dian Affairs  had  considered  reporting  to  the  House  Calhoun's  bill  of  the  pre- 
ceding session. —  Register  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  24th  Congress,  Appendix,, 
p.  55. 

82  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  19th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  40. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  219 

was  Chairman  Cocke  of  the  House  committee  reported  a  bill 
comprising  the  essential  features  of  Barbour's  plans  on 
February  21st  f^  but  the  records  indicate  that  the  Commit- 
tee of  the  Whole  House  never  reported  progress  thereon. 
There  can  be  no  doubt  of  Cocke 's  earnestness  in  the  matter 
of  removal  and  that  he  really  did  view  with  regret,  as  he 
said  he  did,  the  condition  of  the  aborigines.^  ^ 

In  the  next  session  the  opinion  of  the  Secretary  of  War 
was  again  sought,  this  time  by  a  resolution  of  the  House  re- 
questing information  upon  the  obstacles  in  the  way  of  re- 
moval beyond  the  Mississippi.®*  The  mover  of  the  resolu- 
tion was  John  McLean  of  Ohio.  Another  Representative, 
Haile  of  Mississippi,  presented  a  resolution  exhibiting  a 
different  side  of  the  removal  question.®*  It  has  already 
been  noted  that  settlers  were  intruding  upon  lands  in 
Arkansas  granted  to  the  Choctaws  who  had  migrated  from 
Mississippi  and  Alabama.®''  Haile  now  demanded  an  in- 
vestigation. Such  breaches  of  the  public  faith,  he  explained, 
were  causing  suspicions  among  the  remaining  Indians  in 
the  State  of  Mississippi  and  increasing  their  opposition  to 
emigrate.  **If  these  encroachments  are  permitted,''  he 
said,  *  *  the  Indians  will  be  fastened  upon  us  without  the  hope 
of  removal. ' ' 

The  Delegate  from  Arkansas,  who  two  years  before  had 
so  energetically  defended  these  pioneer  intruders  in  the 
western  boundary  episode,  moved  an  amendment  to  the  res- 
olution, the  real  purport  of  which  was  to  exonerate  the  citi- 
zens upon  the  lands  in  question.    The  House  readily  agreed 

88  Journal  of  the  House,  let  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  276.  The  title  of  this, 
bill  copied  that  of  the  year  1824,  namely :  ' '  A  biU  for  the  preservation  and  civ- 
ilization of  the  Indian  tribes  within  the  United  States. ' ' 

84  American  State  Papers ,  Indian  A  fairs,  Vol.  II,  p.  667. 

88  Register  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  538. 

86  Register  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  544. 

8T  See  above  p.  207. 


220    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

to  the  amendment.®®  The  question  was  too  trifling  for  de- 
bate, but  a  world  of  prophecy  lay  hidden  therein  and  por- 
tended the  fate  of  the  wanderers.  Was  the  tragedy  of  the 
eastern  portion  of  the  Mississippi  Valley  to  be  repeated  on 
the  western  side  ?  Were  local  interests  to  hamper  and  clog 
the  already  weak  policy  of  Indian  preservation?  Were 
these  tribes  to  be  cast  from  territory  to  territory  as  soon  as 
their  lands  were  desired  by  settlers,  all  for  the  lack  of  a  def- 
inite national  system  of  removal  and  colonization? 

Congress  had  been  advised  for  years  that  some  system 
should  be  adopted.  Jefferson,  the  Eeverend  Jedidiah 
Morse,  the  Eeverend  Isaac  McCoy,  Monroe,  Calhoun,  and 
Barbour  had  outlined  plans  and  formulated  projects  for 
bills,  but  to  no  purpose.  Local  communities  easily  pre- 
vailed upon  Congress  to  effect  local  removals ;  but  a  nation- 
al plan  to  colonize  the  removed  went  begging. 

While  Haile  in  the  House  was  attempting  to  interest  the 
Government  in  the  removal  of  the  Mississippi  Indians,  Sen- 
ator Eeed  of  the  same  State  was  calling  upon  the  Adminis- 
tration for  the  causes  of  the  failure  of  the  late  negotiations 
with  the  Choctaw  and  Chickasaw  Indians.®*  PersonfiUy  he 
attributed  the  failure  to  the  interference  of  certain  whites 
living  among  these  Indians,  and  hinted  that  missionaries  to 
these  tribes  were  also  not  above  suspicion.  The  wretched- 
ness and  misery  of  the  Indians  is  so  great,  he  said,  that  they 
*  *  are  desirous  of  seeking  a  new  abode  on  our  Western  bor- 
ders", but  are  prevailed  upon  to  remain  by  the  intrigues 
of  **a  few  interested  individuals,  white  men,  and  mixed- 
blooded  Indians '^    Continuing  Eeed  said: 

It  is  well  understood,  that  a  great  many  white  men,  fleeing  from 
their  crimes,  and  from  debt,  have  sought  refuge  from  the  conse- 
quences of  both,  upon  the  Territories  occupied  by  the  Indian  tribes 

88  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  546. 
99  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  71. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  221 

within  the  State  of  Mississippi.  They  are  there  contrary  to  the 
laws  of  the  United  States  to  the  great  detriment  of  the  Southern 
country;  and  provision  ought,  long  since,  to  have  been  made  for 
their  removal.  Those  are  the  People,  many  of  them  more  savage 
than  the  Indians  themselves,  who  instigate  the  tribes,  for  their  own 
purposes,  to  decline  every  overture  made  for  their  removal,  and  for 
a  cession  of  their  Territory.*^ 

In  the  House  it  appears  that  John  Cocke  of  Tennessee^ 
chairman  of  the  Committee  on  Indian  Affairs,  also  held 
that  removal  was  retarded  by  the  *  *  influence  of  a  number  of 
profligate  vrhite  men,  who  had  fled  from  their  debts  or  from 
justice,  and  had  a  personal  interest  in  preventing  the  re- 
moval of  the  Indians/*®^  And  when  John  Woods  of  Ohio 
expostulated  at  the  coercive  language  used  by  the  late  com- 
missioners who  had  attempted  to  negotiate  a  treaty  with 
the  Choctaws  and  Chickasaws,  Haile  in  reply  thanked  **the 
gentleman  from  Ohio  for  the  sympathy  he  had  manifested 
towards  the  Indians  of  Mississippi.  The  Indians  are  re- 
moved beyond  the  limits  of  the  State  of  Ohio,  and  they  no 
longer  annoy  the  gentleman.  His  sympathy  manifests  it- 
self at  a  late  period. '  '^^  James  K.  Polk  of  Tennessee  also 
defended  the  commissioners  against  the  charge  of  using  co- 
ercive language,®®  as  did  John  Forsyth  of  Georgia,  who 
could  not  well  refuse  aid  to  a  sister  State  in  the  same  pre- 
dicament that  Georgia  had  faced  from  the  beginning  of  the 
national  epoch.®* 

The  session  passed  with  no  more  serious  accomplishment 
than  calling  upon  the  Executive  Department  for  informa- 
tion concerning  the  obstacles  to  removal.  The  reports 
which  Barbour  and  his  Commissioner  of  Indian  Affairs, 

•0  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  73. 

»i  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  838. 

92  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  839. 

»s  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  19th  Congress,  pp.  842,  843.  ? 

»*  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  847.  i  ^ 


222    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Thomas  McKenney,  prepared  gave  encouraging  signs  that 
a  well  directed  continental  plan  of  colonization  would  meet 
the  disposition  of  the  Lidian  tribes  and  succeed  in  prac- 
tice.*'    But  Congress  responded  with  no  law. 

When  Congress  again  convened  on  December  3,  1827, 
there  was  a  brighter  prospect  for  the  adoption  of  some 
scheme  of  removal.  Li  the  summer  of  1827  Thomas  McKen- 
ney had  made  a  tour  of  the  southern  States  in  the  interests 
of  removal  and  had  returned  confident  that  at  least  three  of 
the  principal  nations  in  the  South  were  disposed  to  emi- 
grate.*®  The  results  of  his  investigation  were  summed  up 
by  the  Secretary  of  War  and  transmitted  to  Congress  in  the 
President's  annual  message.®^  Another  stimulus  to  action 
was  found  in  the  person  of  Isaac  McCoy,  a  Baptist  mission- 
ary to  the  Pottawatomies  who  had  become  convinced  that 
removal  and  colonization  was  the  only  hopeful  solution 
of  the  Indian  problem  and  who  arrived  in  Washington  to 
lobby  for  that  purpose.*® 

Early  in  the  session  the  House  Committee  on  Indian  Af- 
fairs took  into  consideration  a  plan  for  the  gradual  removal 
and  establishment  of  a  Territorial  government  for  all  the 
Indians.*®  But  distracting  sectional  jealousy  robbed  the 
plan  of  its  national  scope  and  allowed  it  to  develop  into  an 
undignified  scramble  of  the  several  States  to  insure  their 
individual  accommodations.  The  Georgia  delegation  know- 
ing that  Georgia's  legislature  contemplated  extending  the 
State  jurisdiction  over  the  remaining  Cherokee  lands  in 
that  State  refused  to  consider  any  plan  which  did  not  have 

OB  House  Documents,  2nd  Session,  19th  Congress,  No.  28. 

99Naes'  Weekly  Begister,  Vol.  XXXIH,  p.  274. 

07  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  20th  Congress,  p.  2789. 

M  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  20th  Congress,  p.  661 ;  Memoirs  of  John 
Quiney  Adams,  Vol.  VII,  p.  410;  McCoy's  History  of  Indian  A  fairs,  p.  321; 
Bemarlcs  on  the  Practicability  of  Indian  Beform  (Boston,  1827),  p.  25. 

99  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  20th  Congress,  pp.  819,  823. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  223 

peculiar  reference  to  Georgia.  The  Mississippi  delegation 
blocked  all  proposed  legislation  which  did  not  conform  to 
their  peculiar  needs.^^^  And  two  Eepresentatives  of  Ohio 
in  the  House,  Woods  and  Vinton,  intentionally  embarrassed 
the  proposition  —  the  former  because  he  opposed  any  plan 
of  inducing  the  Cherokees  to  emigrate  from  Georgia,  and 
the  latter  because  he  was  seized  by  a  fear  that  the  proposed 
Indian  Territory  might  be  so  placed  as  to  impede  the  ex- 
pansion of  Free-soil  territory. ^^^  The  Delegate  from  Ar- 
kansas did  not  fail  to  denounce  all  proposals  for  removing 
the  Indians  in  the  direction  of  his  Territory. ^^^  And  an  un- 
expected opposition  was  found  in  a  New  York  Eepresenta- 
tive  —  Henry  E.  Storrs  —  who  opposed  removal  to  the  West 
as  placing  **an  insuperable  bar  to  the  progress  of  emigra- 
tion, in  that  direction,  by  the  Whites '  \  A  sparse  and  un- 
civiUzed  Indian  population,  he  contended,  should  never  hold 
these  lands  in  the  face  of  industrious  white  citizens  who 
would  turn  the  wilderness  into  fruitful  fields.^«» 

There  were  not  lacking,  however,  signs  that  the  day  for 
the  adoption  of  a  concerted  policy  was  about  to  come.  In 
June,  1828,  Barbour  was  sent  on  the  mission  to  England. 
He  was  succeeded  in  the  portfolio  of  War  by  Peter  B.  Por- 
ter of  western  New  York.  The  Indian  policy  of  the  new 
Secretary  forecasted  what  might  be  expected  when  would 
begin  the  inevitable  administration  of  the  Teniiesseean 
whose  four  years  of  waiting  were  now  nearly  at  an  end. 
Porter  believed  that  the  missionaries  and  teachers  among 
the  Indian  tribes  were  defeating  the  efforts  of  the  Govern- 
ment agents  to  further  the  project  of  emigration.    He  rec- 

100  Note  the  wrangle  over  the  Indian  Appropriation  BiU. —  Begister  of  De- 
bates, 1st  Session,  20th  Congress,  p.  1533  et  aeq. 

101  Begister  of  Debates^  Ist  Session,  20th  Congress,  pp.  1539,  1566,  1568-1584. 

102  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  20th  Congress,  p.  2494. 
los  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  20th  Congress,  p.  2482. 


224    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

ommended  that  Federal  aid  to  the  cause  of  civilizing  the 
Indians  be  withdrawn  from  all  tribes  east  of  the  Mississippi 
and  be  expended  solely  upon  those  in  the  far  West.^®*  A 
similar  opinion  had  been  held  by  Cocke  who  was  chairman 
of  the  House  Committee  on  Indian  Affairs  in  the  eighteenth 
and  nineteenth  Congresses  and  who  once  reported  to  the 
House  that  the  failure  of  the  removal  policy  was  due  to  the 
obstinacy  of  the  Indians  arising  from  their  partial  civiliza- 
tion.i«» 

But  despite  these  manifestations  the  removal  policy  had 
not  gained  sufficient  momentum  to  call  for  a  definite  com- 
mittal on  the  part  of  Congress.  It  is  a  curious  commentary 
on  American  legislation  to  note  that  the  western  States  did 
not  attempt  to  conceal  their  true  motive  for  expelling  the 
Indians.  No  veil  was  thrown  over  the  thoughts  which  rose 
uppermost  in  the  minds  of  Congressmen  from  the  frontier. 
The  demands  of  western  communities  were  hid  under  no 
shabby  coats  of  hypocrisy.  It  was  seldom  if  ever  denied 
that  the  settlers  coveted  the  lands  of  **the  children  of  the 
forest '  \  White  of  Florida  referred  to  the  Seminoles  as  the 
Indians  ** which  are  the  annoyance  of  my  constituents", 
and  Lumpkin  of  Georgia  declared  that  the  Cherokees  should 
learn  the  destiny  of  their  race,  namely,  to  flee  before  the 
face  of  civilization.^^®  An  Alabama  Bepresentative  frankly 
pronounced  the  Indians  a  *' curse  upon  the  newer  States* ^^^^ 
Nor  were  there  lacking  Eastern  members  to  sympathize 

104  Begister  of  Debates,  2iid  Session,  20th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  10. 

106  It  is  interesting  to  note  that  Indian  Commissioner  McEennej  reported  to 
Barbour,  in  1827,  that  all  teachers  of  Indian  schools  were  believed  to  be,  with 
a  single  exception,  in  favor  of  emigration  westward.  Concerning  the  effects  of 
becoming  civilized  in  prejudicing  the  Indians  against  removal  Cocke  was  right. 
Witness  for  instance  the  tenacity  with  which  the  most  civilized  tribe,  the  Cher- 
okees, clung  to  their  Georgian  lands. 

io«  Register  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  20th  Congress,  pp.  1537,  1587.  See  also 
Ivt  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  1463. 

107  Begister  of  Debates^  2nd  Session,  19th  Congress,  p.  838. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  225 

with  the  West.  A  Maryland  Eepresentative  declared  that 
he  had  seen  the  Indian  half-breed,  whose  hand  he  declared 
was  against  every  man  and  every  man's  hand  against  him; 
and  for  his  own  part  he  would  rather  have  him  **a  little 
farther  off^.^^®  M'Duffie  of  South  Carolina  held  it  to  be 
**the  settled  opinion  of  a  large  majority  of  the  House,  that 
the  Indians  within  the  limits  of  our  settled  States  must  ei- 
ther be  induced  to  emigrate,  or  must  infallibly  sink  into  a 
state  of  indescribable  and  irretrievable  wretchedness/^  He 
considered  **the  idea  of  civilizing  and  educating  them  as 
wholly  delusive.  The  experiment  had  been  tried,  and  the 
result  had  proved,  that,  while  surrounded  by  the  whites,  the 
Indians  acquired  all  the  vices  of  a  civilized  People,  and  none 
of  their  virtues.  *^^® 

Strangely  enough  it  remained  for  a  western  Represen- 
tative to  suggest  at  this  time  that  the  pioneers  were  respon- 
sible for  the  sufferings  and  degradation  of  the  Indians.  In 
a  most  sarcastic  speech  Vinton  of  Ohio  declared  that  it 
would  ever  be  impossible  to  place  the  Indians  beyond  the 
pale  of  corruption. 

If  it  were  so  much  as  known  to  what  district  the  Indians  were  to 
remove,  no  matter  how  distant  the  country  ....  the  pio- 
neers would  be  there  in  advance  of  them;  men  of  the  most  aban- 
doned and  desperate  character,  who  hang  upon  the  Indians  to  de- 
fraud them.  You  cannot  run  away  from  these  men  nor  shut  them 
out  from  access  to  Indians,  scattered  over  the  wilderness ;  for,  with 
the  pioneers,  the  law  is  a  jest,  and  the  woods  their  element;  the 
farther  you  go  with  the  Indians,  with  just  so  much  more  impunity 
will  they  set  your  laws  at  defiance."*^ 

Harshly  stigmatizing  the  plan  of  colonization  as  *  *  a  high 
handed  outrage  upon  humanity",  he  maintained  that  the 
Indians  were  fully  capable  of  civilization,  and  proposed  as 

108  Register  of  Debates,  Ist  Sesmon,  20th  Congress,  p.  1566. 

109  Register  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  20th  Congress,  p.  1540. 

110  Register  of  Debates,  Iwt  Session,  20th  Congress,  p.  1579. 


226    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

an  absolute  solution  of  the  whole  matter  that  they  should 
be  granted  farms  in  fee  simple  like  the  settlers. 

Before  sectional  jealousies  and  diversity  of  opinion  the 
project  of  colonization  crumbled  again  with  the  adjourn- 
ment of  the  first  session  of  the  Twentieth  Congress.  Four 
sessions  had  now  opened  and  adjourned  since  Monroe  first 
asked  for  some  well-digested  plan  for  relieving  the  western 
States  of  their  Lidian  encumbrance  and  preserving  the  Vi- 
dians from  the  inevitable  and  destructive  pressure  of  west- 
em  settlements.  Many  plans  had  been  suggested  but  none 
crystallized  into  law.  It  was  indeed  with  a  melancholy  but 
an  altogether  true  reflection  that  Adams  referred  to  the 
subject  in  his  last  annual  message.  **We  have  been  far 
more  successful",  he  said,  *'in  the  acquisition  of  their  lands 
than  in  imparting  to  them  the  principles,  or  inspiring  them 
with  the  spirit,  of  civilization. ''^^^ 

JACKSON  AND  THE  REMOVAL  POLICY 

President  Adams,  although  deeply  interested  in  the  wel- 
fare of  the  Lidians,  lacked  the  confidence  of  Congress  to 
inspire  any  far-reaching  solution  of  the  problem;  nor  is  it 
certain  that  he  had  any  definite  solution  in  mind.  It  re- 
mained  to  the  President  of  the  eleventh  administration, 
filled  with  the  spirit  of  the  West,  to  grip  the  discordant 
clamors  of  sectional  interests  into  a  nation-wide  scheme: 
and  that  scheme  was  of  course  westward  removal. 

Jackson  understood  the  Lidian  problem.  He  was  a 
Tennessee  pioneer,  educated  in  the  life  of  the  woods,  the 
prairies,  and  miUtia  camps.  His  miUtary  prestige  rested 
as  well  upon  his  exploits  as  an  Indian  fighter  as  upon  his 
defense  of  New  Orleans  against  Pakenham.  In  three 
pitched  skirmishes  he  had  vanquished  the  Creeks,  and  the 
episodes  of  his  Seminole  campaign  were  household  stories. 

Ill  Begiater  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  20th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  5. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  227 

As  an  Indian  commissioner  he  had  been  the  guardian  of 
many  tribes.  Four  important  treaties  with  Creeks,  Cher- 
okees,  and  Chickasaws  he  had  negotiated  in  person.  There 
was  scarcely  an  Indian  community  in  the  South  but  had  en- 
dured his  chastisement  or  listened  to  his  talks.  Those  who 
had  accepted  his  advice  had  seldom  regretted  it ;  those  who 
had  repulsed  him  had  learned  to  rue  their  mistake.  But 
withal  Jackson  had  attained  a  reputation  for  justice.  In 
some  peculiar  way  he  impressed  the  minds  of  his  savage 
wards  with  respect,  trust,  and  confidence.  His  election  as 
President  was  actually  hailed  by  the  Cherokees  with  re- 
joicing. 

The  first  year  of  the  new  administration  sufficed  to  show 
how  utterly  useless  were  their  hopes.  The  Cherokees  had 
attempted  to  establish  a  national  government  upon  their 
lands  within  the  State  of  Georgia.  The  President's  atti- 
tude toward  this  anomalous  Indian  organization  was  in- 
stantly hostile,  and  the  first  annual  message  in  December, 
1829,  minced  no  words  in  declaring  that  all  attempts  on  the 
part  of  the  Indians  to  erect  independent  governments  with- 
in States  would  be  rigidly  suppressed.  *'It  is  too  late  to  in- 
quire**, read  the  message,  **  whether  it  was  just  in  the 
United  States  to  include  them  and  their  territory  within 
the  bounds  of  new  States.  .  .  .  That  step  cannot  be  re- 
traced. A  State  cannot  be  dismembered  by  Congress,  or 
restricted  in  the  exercise  of  her  constitutional  power.  **^^* 
But  in  order  to  render  a  tardy  justice  to  this  long  neglected 
race,  Jackson  resurrected  the  old  plan  of  an  Indian  district 
west  of  the  Mississippi. 

Despite  the  air  of  justice  which  pervaded  the  message 
there  was  one  sentence  which  to  Adams  men  wore  the  veil 
of  hypocrisy.  These  words  were:  ''This  emigration  should 
be  voluntary :  for  it  would  be  as  cruel  as  unjust  to  compel 

112  Begister  of  Debates,  let  Session,  21st  Congress,  Appendix,  pp.  15,  16. 


228    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

the  aborigines  to  abandon  the  graves  of  their  fathers,  and 
seek  a  home  in  a  distant  land/'  From  any  charge  of  in- 
consistency, however,  Jackson  saved  himself  at  this  point 
by  the  admission  that  if  the  Lidians  chose  to  remain  within 
the  limits  of  the  States  they  might  so  remain  providing 
they  be  subject  to  State  laws.  And  in  return  for  their  obedi- 
ence they  would  without  doubt,  thought  Jackson,  be  pro- 
tected in  the  enjoyment  of  those  ''possessions  which  they 
have  improved  by  their  industry. ' '  These  fair  words  could 
hardly  have  deceived  anyone  into  believing  that  Jackson's 
policy  was  any  other  than  a  force  policy.  Could  anyone 
doubt  the  true  meaning  of  the  closing  sentence  which  read: 
''It  seems  to  me  visionary  to  suppose  that  .  .  .  . 
claims  can  be  allowed  on  tracts  of  country  on  which  they 
[the  Lidians]  have  neither  dwelt  nor  made  improvements^ 
merely  because  they  have  seen  them  from  the  mountain,  or 
passed  them  in  the  chase ' '. 

A  month  later  the  President 's  attitude  was  tersely  inter- 
preted by  Governor  Cass  of  Michigan  Territory.  The  Pres- 
ident offers  them  a  country  beyond  the  Mississippi,  wrote 
the  frontier  governor  in  the  North  American  Review,  but 
those  who  refuse  to  migrate  must  submit  to  the  jurisdiction 
of  the  States.^^^  Congress  and  the  country  needed  no 
further  elucidation  of  the  Presidential  program. 

The  new  Congress  received  the  dictation  of  the  White 
House  with  a  willingness  that  boded  a  speedy  conclusion  to 
the  whole  matter.  The  Committee  on  Indian  Affairs  in 
both  houses  immediately  took  the  matter  into  consideration. 
Their  reports  might  easily  have  been  predicted  by  a  perusal 
of  their  membership.  Of  the  Senate  Committee,  Hugh  L. 
White  of  Tennessee  was  chairman,  and  his  four  colleagues 

118  North  American  Beview,  January,  1830,  Vol.  XXX,  p.  86.  This  article 
provoked  various  controversial  replies  among  whdch  may  be  noted  the  semi- 
religious  appeal  in  the  Americom  MoniMy  Magazine  (Boston:  1829-1831)  Vol. 
I,  p.  701. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  229 

were  Troup  of  Georgia,  Hendricks  of  Indiana,  Benton  of 
Missouri,  and  Dudley  of  New  York.^^*  The  House  Com- 
mittee was  also  headed  by  a  Tennessee  member,  John  Bell ; 
and  his  colleagues  were  Gaither  of  Kentucky,  Lewis  of  Ala- 
bama, Storrs  of  Connecticut,  and  Hubbard  of  New  Hamp- 
shire.^^** 

On  February  22, 1830,  the  Senate  Committee  reported  an 
elaborate  argument  in  favor  of  removal,  and  a  bill ' '  to  pro- 
vide for  an  exchange  of  lands  **.^^®  Two  days  later  the 
House  Committee  made  its  report  accompanied  by  a  bill 
*' to, provide  for  the  removal  of  the  Indian  tribes *\^^''  The 
two  bills  were  practically  the  same;  and  since  the  Senate 
bill  was  passed  first  the  Committee  of  the  Whole  in  the 
lower  house  substituted  it  for  the  original  House  bill.^^® 
The  fact  could  not  long  be  concealed  from  the  Whigs  that 
the  leaders  of  the  Democrats  were  making  the  bill  a  party 
measure  and  that  the  friends  of  the  Administration  were 
pledged  to  support  it.^^®  Jackson  had  issued  his  pronuncia- 
mento :  the  Indians  must  be  removed.  That  fact  was  reason 
enough  for  the  Jacksonian  Democrats  to  vote  aye.  And  the 
votes  of  most  States  Eights  Democrats  might  certainly  be 
relied  upon  in  this  affair. 

The  crux  of  the  subject  was  contained  in  the  second  sec- 
tion of  the  bill.  It  empowered  the  President  to  exchange 
any  lands  occupied  by  Indian  nations  within  the  boundaries 
of  a  State  or  Territory  for  lands  beyond  the  Mississippi.^^^ 

11* /ottmol  of  Senate,  Ist  Sessioiiy  21et  CongresB,  p.  23. 

116  Journal  of  the  House  of  Bepresentatives,  Ist  Session,  2l8t  Congress,  p.  30. 

lis  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  2l8t  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  91.  Senate 
Documents,  No.  61. 

117  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  2l8t  Congress,  p.  581. 

118  Journal  of  the  House,  1st  Session,  21st  Congress,  pp.  570,  648.  The  House 
asked  the  President  for  estimates  of  the  expense  of  removing  and  supporting 
the  Indians  west  of  the  Mississippi. —  House  Documents,  No.  91. 

ii9Niles'  Weekly  Begister,  Vol  XXXVni,  p.  402. 

120  Niles'  Weekly  Begister,  VoL  XXXVILI,  p.  234. 


230    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Not  one  word  of  coercion  was  employed.  To  all  outward 
appearances  the  act  called  for  voluntary  removal.  But  the 
friends  of  the  Lidian  read  between  the  lines  and  found  there 
extortion,  force,  and  heartlessness.^^^  For  if  the  bill  be- 
came law,  would  not  its  executor  be  the  hero  of  the  Seminole 
Indian  Wart 

The  philanthropists  of  the  East  were  now  fully  aware 
that  the  crisis  in  Lidians  affairs  was  reached  and  about  to 
be  passed.  The  rise  or  fall  of  the  Administration 's  Indian 
policy  was  to  be  determined  by  the  vote  on  Senator  White  *8 
bill.  And  if  at  first  there  was  any  doubt  as  to  what  this 
policy  was,  that  doubt  had  entirely  vanished  on  the  appear- 
ance of  the  bill.  Churches  and  benevolent  societies,  colleges 
and  villages  began  to  frame  protesting  petitions  by  the 
score.^^  The  ''friends  of  the  Indians''  had  studied  the 
able  articles  of  Jeremiah  Evarts  appearing  in  the  National 
Intelligencer  under  the  name  of  WiUiam  Penn.  ''Cursed 
be  he,  that  removeth  his  neighbor's  landmark.  .  .  . 
Cursed  be  he  that  maketh  the  blind  to  wander  out  of  the 
way ' ',  exclaimed  this  devoted  idealist ;  and  the  New  England 
people  said  "Amen".^^^ 

As  the  Opposition  were  convinced  that  the  inherent  evil 
of  the  bill  lay  more  in  the  drastic  manner  with  which  the 
pioneer  President  would  certainly  enforce  it  than  in  its  con- 
tents, so  the  delegations  from  Georgia,  Alabama,  and 
Mississippi  and  from  the  northwestern  States  saw  the  In- 
dians within  their  borders  disappear  before  the  iron  hand 
of  the  President  when  he  should  come  to  apply  the  second 
section.  Especially  did  the  Georgia  delegation  rejoice  that 
at  last  legal  means  for  disgorging  the  Cherokees  were  in 

121  Compare  Niles'  Weekly  Begisier,  Vol.  XXXVIII,  p.  67. 

122  Senate  Documents,  Ist  Session,  2l8t  Congress,  Nos.  56,  66,  73,  74,  76,  77, 
et  cetera;  House  Documents,  Nos.  253,  254,  et  cetera. 

^i^  Essays  on  the  Present  Crisis  in  the  Condition  of  the  American  Indians 
(Boston:  1829),  p.  100. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  231 

sight  and  they  thereupon  lost  no  opportunity  to  maintain 
the  proposition  of  States  Bights  in  the  debate.^  ^*  The  case 
for  Georgia  was  strong.  Who  was  there  but  would  admit 
that  such  a  condition  as  the  erection  of  an  independent  In* 
dian  government  within  the  borders  of  a  State  and  not  un- 
der the  jurisdiction  of  the  State  was  not  only  intolerable  but 
unconstitutional?  Constitutionally  there  could  not  be  an 
imperium  in  imperio.  But  what  if  the  Indians  resisted  the 
jurisdiction  of  civilization?  Could  there  then  be  a  better 
solution  to  the  whole  problem  than  to  remove  them  to  the 
far  West  —  gently  if  possible,  harshly  if  necessary?  In  the 
Senate  the  case  for  removal  was  tersely  stated  by  Forsyth 
of  Georgia,  White  of  Tennessee,  and  McKinley  of  Ala- 
bama.^2* 

Not  only  did  these  advocates  base  their  argument  upon 
State  Sovereignty,  but  they  also  flung  wide  the  doctrine  that 
removal  was  in  the  best  interests  of  the  ''ill-fated  Indians.'^ 
Their  position  had  been  well  canvassed  in  the  conunittee  re- 
port itself.  How  can  Georgia  have  a  republican  form  of 
government,  read  this  document,  unless  a  majority  of  the 
citizens  subscribe  to  the  rules  to  which  all  must  conform? 
The  Indians  must  either  submit  to  State  law  or  they  must 
remove.  The  committee  apprehended  no  reason  that  any  of 
the  States  contemplated  forcing  them  to  abandon  the  coun- 
try in  which  they  dwelt,  should  they  subject  themselves  to 
the  laws  of  these  States.  But  obstinacy  on  the  part  of  the 
Indians  would,  the  conunittee  admitted,  result  only  in 
further  distress.  ^^® 

Frelinghuysen  of  New  Jersey  replied  for  the  Opposition^ 
and  he  was  ably  supported  by  Sprague  of  Maine  and  Bob- 

i2«  Begister  of  Debates,  let  Sesdon,  2l8t  Congress,  p.  325  et  aeq, 

iss  Begister  of  Debates,  let  Session,  2l8t  Congress,  pp.  305,  324,  325,  377^ 
381. 

120  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  21st  Congress,  Appendix,  pp.  91-98. 


232    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

bins  of  Bhode  Island. ^^^  Their  speeches,  while  maintaining 
a  dignified  reserve,  were  nevertheless  scathing  criticisms  of 
both  the  doctrine  of  State  Sovereignty  and  of  (Georgia  *8  at- 
tempt to  oust  the  Indians  from  their  lands.  That  the  claim 
of  the  Cherokees  outdated  the  Constitution  was  their  prin- 
cipal contention. 

In  the  end  the  bill  passed  the  Senate.^^®  Webster  and 
Clayton  were  among  the  nineteen  who  voted  in  the  nega- 
tive, although  neither  spoke  at  length  against  the  bill. 
From  the  beginning  of  the  session  the  result  had  been  evi- 
dent although  the  Opposition,  small  as  it  was,  had  been  so 
persistent  as  to  cause  much  anxiety  to  Judge  White.  On 
April  28th,  the  Chairman  expressed  his  relief  in  writing  to 
a  friend  in  these  words : 

The  Bill  to  provide  for  a  removal  of  the  Indians  west  of  the 
Mississippi  has  finally  passed  the  Senate  by  a  vote  of  28  to  19.  This 
has  taken  off  my  mind  a  burthen  which  has  been  oppressive  from 
the  commencement  of  the  session.  I  hope  it  may  pass  the  other 
House. 

Cold  as  the  notice  taken  of  our  exertions  in  the  Telegraph  is,  no 
G^rgian  nor  Tennessean  will  ever  be  mortified  by  hearing  the  de- 
bate spoken  of,  if  truth  be  told.  We  had,  I  think,  in  the  estimation 
of  all  intelligent  men,  at  least  as  much  ascendancy  in  the  argument 
as  we  had  in  the  vote.  As  good  fortune  would  have  it,  Judge  Over- 
ton, Collingsworth,  district  attorney  of  West  Tennessee,  Major 
Armstrong,  and  many  others  from  different  quarters,  were  present, 
and  know  that  our  side  was  sustained  in  a  style  which  gratified  our 
friends,  and  mortified  our  enemies.^'* 

While  congratulating  himself  upon  the  ascendancy  of  the 
Administration's  argument.  Judge  White  rejoiced  that  his 
bill  had  escaped  the  lime-light  of  the  Webster-Hayne  de- 

127  Begisier  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  2l8t  Congress,  pp.  305,  343,  374. 

128  Journal  of  the  Senate,  Ist  Session,  21st  Congress,  p.  268. 

i2»  Scott 's  Memoir  of  Hugh  Lawson  White,  p.  270.  The  newspaper  referred 
to,  the  Telegraph,  was  the  organ  published  by  Duff  Qreen  in  the  interests  of 
Calhoun. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  233 

bate.  In  the  lower  house,  on  the  other  hand,  he  had  more 
to  fear.  Here  the  opposition  was  to  be  more  intense.  The 
sharp  discussion  was  such  as  might  be  expected  from  a 
party  measure.  On  May  13th  the  debate  began  in  the  Com- 
mittee of  the  Whole.^^®  Bell  of  Tennessee,  Lumpkin, 
Wayne,  and  Wilde  of  Georgia  contended  with  Bates  of 
Massachusetts,  Edward  Everett  of  Massachusetts,  Storrs 
and  Judge  Spencer  of  New  York,  and  Evans  of  Maine. 
Storrs  in  a  logical  speech  pointed  out  the  usurpation 
of  the  President  when  he  refused  protection  to  the  Cher- 
okee nation  from  the  Georgia  laws  of  1828.*^^  By  this 
action,  Storrs  maintained,  the  President  had  (without 
consulting  Congress)  not  only  admitted  the  sovereignty 
of  the  State  of  Georgia,  but  also  virtually  nullified  the  Fed- 
eral intercourse  laws  and  denied  the  validity  of  Indian 
treaties  solemnly  ratified  by  the  Senate.  The  Executive  has 
no  power,  declared  Storrs,  to  abrogate  treaties  *'by  an  or- 
der in  council '^  or  to  *'give  the  force  of  law  to  an  executive 
proclamation.'^ 

Everett  adroitly  confronted  the  argument  that  removal 
would  improve  the  condition  of  Georgia  Indians  by  an  em- 
barrassing question.  What  benefit  would  accrue  to  the  al- 
ready civilized  Cherokees  to  be  driven  from  '*  their  houses^ 
their  farms,  their  schools  and  churches  *  *  to  lead  a  wander- 
ing and  savage  life  in  the  wilderness  t^*^  He  produced  evi- 
dence to  show  the  advanced  stage  of  civilization  attained  by 
the  Cherokees,  and  attempted  to  prove  that  the  Choctaws 
and  Chickasaws  were  not  far  behind  them.  Wilde  of 
Georgia  answered  Everett  with  an  argument  similar  to  that 
displayed  in  the  report  of  the  Senate  committee.  He  main- 
tained that  Georgia  would  not  object  to  permitting  the 

180  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Seedon,  21st  Congross,  p.  988. 
jsi  Begister  of  Debates,  lit  Session,  2l8t  Congress,  p.  1000. 
182  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  21st  Congress,  p.  1060. 

VOL.  IX — 17 


234    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Cherokees  to  remain  and  occupy  such  land  as  they  could 
cultivate,  provided  they  submitted  '*in  obedience  to  our 
laws,  like  other  citizens/ *^^*  But  what  right  had  the  Cher- 
okees under  the  present  conditions  to  impede  progress  by 
refusing  their  lands  for  settlement?  K  five-sixths  of  the 
Cherokee  lands  in  Georgia  were  ceded  there  would  yet  re- 
main one  thousand  acres  to  every  Lidian  family.  Foster  of 
Georgia  further  expanded  the  idea  of  the  Indian  obstruction 
to  the  progress  of  civilization.^  **  They  possessed,  he  main- 
tained, no  national  sovereignty:  their  title  to  lands  was 
based  strictly  on  occupancy.  So  far  he  did  not  exceed  the 
opinion  of  the  Supreme  Court  delivered  by  Justice  Marshall 
in  the  case  of  Johnson  vs.  McLitosh.^^*^  But  since  that  court 
declined  to  '  *  enter  into  the  controversy,  whether  agricultur- 
ists, merchants,  and  manufacturers,  have  a  right,  on  ab- 
stract principles,  to  expel  hunters  from  the  territory  they 
possessed,  or  to  contract  their  limits*'  it  was  necessary  for 
the  Georgia  Representative  to  outdistance  the  Federal  Ju- 
diciary when  he  proceeded  to  the  last  conclusions  of  his  ar- 
gument, namely :  the  Lidians  had  no  rightful  claim  upon  the 
vacant  lands  surrounding  them.  And  to  the  support  of  this 
conclusion  Foster  called  no  less  an  authority  than  the  late 
President  himself.  Three  decades  before  Adams,  in  an  ora- 
tion delivered  at  the  Anniversary  of  the  Landing  of  the  Pil- 
grims, had  given  the  clearest  expressions  on  this  moral 
question,  when  he  said : 

The  Indian  right  of  possession  itself  stands  with  regard  to  the 
greatest  part  of  the  country,  upon  a  questionable  foundation.  Their 
cultivated  fields;  their  constructed  habitations;  a  space  of  ample 
sufficiency  for  their  subsistence,  and  whatever  they  had  amiexed 
to  themselves  by  personal  labor,  was  undoubtedly  by  the  laws  of 

li^Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  21st  Congress,  p.  1095. 
is^Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  2l8t  Congress,  p.  1030  et  seq, 
185  8  Wheaton  543. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  235 

nature  theirs.  But  what  is  the  right  of  a  huntsman  to  the  forest  of 
a  thousand  miles  over  which  he  has  accidentally  ranged  in  quest  of 
prey  t  Shall  the  liberal  bounties  of  Providence  to  the  race  of  man 
be  monopolized  by  one  of  ten  thousand  for  whom  they  were  cre- 
ated? Shall  the  exuberant  bosom  of  the  common  mother,  amply 
adequate  to  the  nourishment  of  millions,  be  claimed  exclusively  by 
a  few  hundreds  of  her  offspring!  Shall  the  lordly  savage  not  only 
disdain  the  virtues  and  enjoyments  of  civilization  himself,  but  shall 
he  controul  the  civilization  of  a  world  t  Shall  he  forbid  the  wilder- 
ness to  blossom  like  the  roset  .  .  .  No,  generous  philanthro- 
pists! Heaven  has  not  been  thus  inconsistent  in  the  works  of  its 
hands !  Heaven  has  not  thus  placed  at  irreconcileable  strife,  its  mor- 
al laws  with  its  physical  creation.^** 

All  the  debates  for  the  last  score  of  years  had  never  ex- 
hibited a  more  beautiful  argument  for  Indian  expulsion. 
Was  the  contempt  of  Georgia  for  the  Cherokees  better  ex- 
pressed than  by  the  words,  *' lordly  savages*'?  Should  the 
'^Uberal  bounties  of  Providence ''— one-third  of  the  fair 
Georgia  —  be  conferred  upon  a  meagre  Indian  population, 
while  civilization  chafed  in  constrained  limits  t  And  should 
philanthropists  forbid  the  wilderness  to  blossom  Uke  the 
rose  t    No,  generous  philanthropists ! 

Throwing  sarcasm  to  the  winds  Foster's  speech  discussed 
the  question  from  the  broadest  view-point.  No  matter  how 
much  his  opponents  might  yearn  to  prove  that ' '  the  superior 
title  of  civilization"  could  never  override  the  original 
claims  of  the  natives,  few  were  so  bold  as  to  attempt  this 
impossible  argument.  Evans,  however,  did  declare  that  civ- 
ilization should  never  demand  that  savages  give  space  until 
its  borders  were  full  to  over-flowing  —  which  certainly  was 
not  the  case  in  Georgia  nor  in  the  Middle  West.^^^ 

But  the  fate  of  the  bill  was  to  be  decided  by  party  votes 
and  not  by  argument.    On  the  18th  of  May  the  Conmiittee  of 

199  An  Oration  Delivered  at  Plymouth,  December  gg,  180(8  (Boston:  1802), 
p.  23 ;  Register  of  Debates,  Iflt  Session,  21st  Congress,  p.  1031. 

187  Register  of  Debates^  Ist  Session,  21st  Congress,  p.  1043. 


236    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

the  Whole  House  reported  the  Senate  bill  with  amendments. 
These  were  accepted,  and  on  the  26th  the  bill  passed  by  a 
vote  of  103  to  97  and  returned  to  the  Senate.^  ^  For  the 
minority,  defeated  by  six  votes,  there  was  nothing  left  but 
to  ''record  the  exposure  of  perfidy  and  tyranny  of  which 
the  Indians  are  to  be  made  the  victims,  and  to  leave  the  pun> 
ishment  of  it  to  Heaven '^  Adams  furiously  wrote  in  his 
diary.*  ^® 

On  the  same  day  the  amendments  from  the  House  were 
considered  in  the  Senate.  In  the  upper  chamber  the  attitude 
was  plainly  intolerant  of  further  discussion.  Prompt  con- 
currence in  the  relatively  unimportant  amendments  was  the 
ruling  sentiment.  But  Frelinghuysen  seized  this  last  oppor- 
tunity to  move  an  amendment  providing  that  all  tribes 
should  be  protected  from  State  encroachment  until  they 
chose  to  remove.**®  It  was  voted  down.  Another  amend- 
ment by  Sprague  to  the  effect  that  all  existing  treaties 
should  be  executed  according  to  the  original  intent  was 
promptly  rejected.  Likewise  was  Clayton  *s  proposal  that 
the  act  extend  only  to  the  Georgia  Indians.***  The  Senate 
thereupon  concurred  in  the  House  amendments.  The  Presi- 
dent attached  his  signature  on  the  28th  of  May,  and  the  bill 
facilitating  Executive  expulsion  of  Indians  from  the  South 
and  Middle  West  became  a  law.**^ 

Such  was  the  victory  of  the  removal  scheme  under  the 
leadership  of  Jackson.  The  project  long  entertained  by  Jef- 
ferson, Monroe,  Calhoun,  and  Barbour  was  at  last  consum- 
mated by  a  short  act  of  eight  briefly  worded  sections.  As  a 
measure  to  relieve  the  frontier  of  its  encumbering  Lidian 

188  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Seesion,  2l8t  Congreas,  p.  1135. 

i8»  Memoirs  of  John  Quincy  Adams,  Vol.  VIII,  p.  206.    The  speeches  m  this 
debate  were  collected  into  book  form  and  published  at  Boston  in  1830. 
1*0  Journal  of  the  Senate,  Ist  Session,  21st  Congress,  p.  328. 
141  Journal  of  the  Senate,  Ist  Session,  21st  Congress,  p.  329. 
1*2  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  IV,  p.  411. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  237 

population  it  was  all  that  might  be  asked;  for  it  granted 
carte  hlanche  to  an  energetic  President  —  himself  a  man  of 
the  frontier.  And  no  one  doubted  how  he  would  use  his 
newly  granted  power.^**  But  as  a  measure  to  promote  the 
civilization  of  the  removed  aborigines  it  was  an  engine  of 
destruction.  The  Indian  Territory  of  Monroe,  Calhoun,  and 
Barbour  had  crumbled  into  dust. 

In  despair  the  Cherokee  delegation  at  Washington  came 
to  Webster  and  Freylinghuysen  for  personal  advice:  they 
were  counselled  to  expect  no  relief  from  the  legislature. 
Their  last  resource,  said  their  counsellors  and  friends,  lay 
in  petitioning  the  Supreme  Court.  And  this  advice  they  ac- 
cepted.^** 

With  the  appeal  of  the  Cherokees  to  the  judicial  depart- 
ment the  problem  concerning  the  removal  of  this  nation 
passed  for  a  time  from  legislative  consideration.  The 
Cherokee  question,  indeed  the  question  of  removal  of  all 
tribes,  as  far  as  Congress  was  concerned,  was  settled  by  the 
act  of  May  28,  1830.  Whether  the  Judicial  Department 
would  decide  against  the  removal  of  the  Cherokees  and 
whether  the  Executive  would  enforce  any  such  decision  if  it 
were  rendered  were  questions  outside  of  legislative  com- 
petence. 

AN  INDIAN  TEBBITOBY  IN  THE  WEST 

The  inadequacy  of  the  Act  of  1830  in  disposing  of  the  In- 
dians after  they  had  emigrated  beyond  the  Mississippi  was 

148  In  1836  John  Bosi,  the  principal  chief  of  the  Cherokees,  in  a  memorial  to 
Congress,  said  concerning  the  act  of  May,  1830:  "That  law,  though  not  so  de- 
signed by  Congress,  has  been  the  source  from  which  much  of  the  Cherokee  suf- 
ferings have  come." — Executive  Documents,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  No. 
266,  p.  9. 

For  an  account  of  how  Jackson  used  his  power,  see  Abel's  Indian  Consolida- 
tion in  the  Annual  Beport  of  the  American  HistoriccU  Association,  1906,  Vol.  I, 
p.  381  et  seq, 

1**  Kennedy's  Memoirs  of  the  Life  of  WiOiam  Wirt,  Vol.  U,  p.  254. 


238    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

apparent  to  even  the  uninterested.  The  friends  of  the  Li- 
dians  confidently  expected  more  congressional  action,  and 
the  several  years  following  were  full  of  proposals  of  all 
sorts.^***  Even  before  the  birth  of  the  act  of  1830  Secretary 
Eaton  had  recommended  the  establishment  of  an  Lidian 
Territory  in  his  first  report  of  December,  1829.^*®  But  the 
emphasis  of  the  Executive  had  been  so  emphatically  upon 
removal  that  the  complete  program  of  the  Government  had 
been  overlooked. 

By  1832  the  confusion  of  Lidian  affairs  in  the  West  could 
scarcely  be  further  overlooked.  Congress  resorted  to  the 
expedient  of  providing  a  commission  to  examine  the  appor- 
tioning of  tribes  to  lands  in  the  West  and  to  arrange  the 
quarrels  among  the  various  tribes.  To  these  duties  was  also 
added  that  of  preparing  a  plan  for  Lidian  improvement  and 
government.^*''  Li  short  the  conunission  was  to  devise  a  so- 
lution of  the  whole  matter. 

By  this  time  had  occurred  the  resignation  of  Jackson's 
first  cabinet.  Lewis  Cass  who  had  interpreted  the  Presi- 
dent's Lidian  policy  in  1830  now  succeeded  Eaton  as  Secre- 
tary of  War.  Cass  already  had  his  solution  in  mind.  Eight- 
een years  of  governing  both  the  settlers  and  Lidians  of 
Michigan  Territory  had  convinced  him  that  the  visions  of 
Calhoun  and  Barbour  of  an  Lidian  State  were  as  vain  as  the 
tower  of  Babel.^*®     Li  his  first  report  as  Secretary  he 

145  The  Reverend  Isaac  McCoy,  a  Baptist  missionary  to  the  western  Indians, 
commenced  in  1835  the  publication  of  an  Annual  Begister  of  Indian  A  fairs  as 
an  organ  for  advocating  reform.  McCoy's  plan  embraced  the  establishment  of 
an  Indian  Territory. 

Among  other  plans  from  different  sources,  should  be  noticed  that  proposing 
the  assignment  in  severalty  of  lands  belonging  to  the  emigrating  tribes. — 
Senate  Documents,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  No.  425. 

i4«  Register  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  2l8t  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  28. 

i*T  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  IV,  p.  595. 

i«  For  eighteen  years,  1813-1831,  Cass  was  Governor  of  Michigan  Territory. 
The  Qovemor  was  also  Superintendent  of  Indian  Affairs  for  the  Territory.    In 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  239 

summed  up  his  conclusions  in  regard  to  the  proper  regula- 
tion of  the  Indians  who  had  emigrated.^^^  Laying  down  as 
his  first  proposals  the  platitudes  that  the  reservations  in  the 
West  should  be  permanent,  that  whiskey  should  never  be 
sold  within  the  reservations,  and  that  military  forces  should 
preserve  peace  on  the  borders,  he  proceeded  to  establish  the 
proposition  that  the  ownership  in  severalty  of  property  and 
the  pursuit  of  agriculture  should  be  encouraged,  although 
the  pecuUar  tribal  relations  and  institutions  of  the  Indians 
should  not  be  disturbed.  These  practical  considerations  of 
Indian  conditions  quite  discredited  any  idea  of  an  Indian 
State  as  idealistic  and  visionary.  Coming  as  they  did  from 
one  so  well  versed  in  frontier  affairs  as  was  Secretary  Cass 
they  carried  more  than  ordinary  conviction.  In  spite  of 
many  plans  of  the  next  few  years  they  remained  substan- 
tially the  policy  of  the  Government  for  almost  half  a  cen- 
tury. 

The  proposals  made  by  the  Commissioners-  of  1832  de- 
serve, on  the  other  hand,  some  attention.  Their  long  await- 
ed report  was  ready  in  the  first  session  of  the  Twenty-third 
Congress.  The  remedy  proposed  therein  was  a  Territorial 
government  for  the  Indians.^^  On  May  20, 1834,  these  pro- 
posals took  concrete  form  when  Horace  Everett  of  Vermont, 
from  the  House  Committee  on  Indian  Affairs,  reported 
three  bills  —  the  work  of  the  Comomission.  One  bill  assayed 
to  reorganize  the  whole  Department  of  Indian  Affairs; 
one  to  regulate  trade  and  intercourse  with  the  Indians; 

this  office  the  sucoeeB  of  Cass  as  guardian  of  the  Indians  is  highly  praised. — 
McLaughlin's  Lewis  Cass,  p.  131. 

^*9  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  22nd  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  14.  In 
1838,  Hugh  L.  White,  who  from  the  year  1828  to  1840  was  chairman  of  the 
Senate  Committee  on  Indian  Affairs  reported  to  the  Senate  that  the  assign- 
ment of  Indian  lands  in  severalty  was  unwise. —  Senate  Documents,  2nd  Session^ 
25th  Congress,  No.  425. 

^^0  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  23rd  Congress,  Appendix,  p.   10. 


240    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

and  the  third  to  establish  a  Western  Territory  for  the 
Indians.^  **^ 

The  Trade  and  Literconrse  Bill  defined  the  * '  Indian  conn- 
try  *'  as  that  part  of  the  United  States  west  of  the  Mississip- 
pi and  not  within  the  States  of  Missouri  and  Louisiana, 
or  the  Territory  of  Arkansas,  and  also  all  lands  east  of  the 
Mississippi  to  which  the  Indian  title  had  not  been  extin- 
guished. Over  this  country  it  extended  regulations  similar 
to  the  Trade  and  Intercourse  Law  of  1802  providing  that 
traders  should  be  licensed,  that  intruders  and  settlers  should 
be  removed  by  miUtary  force,  and  that  the  country  west  of 
the  Mississippi  for  legal  purposes  should  be  attached,  part 
to  the  Territory  of  Arkansas  and  part  to  the  judicial  district 
of  Missouri.  The  first  two  bills  passed  both  houses,  al- 
though late  in  the  session,  and  were  presented  to  the  Presi- 
dent upon  the  last  day.^*** 

The  third  bill  —  the  only  really  new  feature  of  the  Com- 
missioners '  work  —  met  instant  opposition  in  the  House  and 
was  tabled.^*^^  It  proposed  to  establish  a  Western  Territory 
for  the  Indians  (who  should  be  organized  into  a  confedera- 
tion of  tribes)  which  should  enjoy  the  right  of  a  Delegate  to 
Congress.  Ultimate  admission  as  a  State  might  be  the  log- 
ical outcome  of  this  arrangement.  Congress  was  not  ready 
for  any  such  solution  nor  were  the  western  members  willing 
to  block  the  expansion  of  the  West  by  a  permanent  Indian 
Territory  such  as  the  bill  proposed.  The  excuse  for  tabling, 
and  undoubtedly  the  chief  reason  for  the  moment,  was  lack 
of  time  for  discussion.^" 

iBi  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  23rd  Congress,  p.  4200.  Everett  ac- 
companied the  bills  hj  a  scholarly  report  of  his  own  composition. —  See  Beports 
of  Committees,  Vol.  IV,  No.  474. 

162  Journal  of  the  House,  let  Session,  23rd  Congress,  pp.  852,  911,  912,  915, 
916;  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  VoL  IV,  pp.  729,  735. 

lis  Journal  of  the  House  of  Bepresentatives,  Ist  Session,  23rd  Congress,  p. 
834;  Begister  of  Debates,  p.  4779. 

iB^Note  Archer's  speech. —  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  23rd  Congress, 
p.  4775.    NUes'  Weekly  Begister,  Vol.  XLVI,  p.  317. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  241 

For  several  sessions  following  this  first  attempt  Everett 
and  Senator  John  Tipton  of  Indiana  introduced  bills  for  an 
Indian  Territory.  All  failed  to  become  law,  although  Tip- 
ton 's  bill  actually  passed  the  Senate  in  two  succeeding  ses- 
sions.^^ 

The  Executive  stimulus  to  removal  having  been  so  ef- 
fective, what  now  were  the  Executive  plans  in  regard  to  civ- 
ilization of  the  Indians  in  their  new  homes  f  Naturally  one 
turns  to  Jackson.  In  the  annual  message  of  1829  which  pre- 
ceded the  train  of  debates  leading  up  to  the  act  of  May, 
1830,  Jackson  distinctly  suggested  the  plan  of  separate 
tribal  governments  on  allotted  lands  in  the  West,  with 
enough  supervision  on  the  part  of  the  United  States  to  pre- 
serve peace  and  to  protect  the  Indians  from  intruders.^*^^ 
Jackson  evidently  gave  no  favor  to  the  Utopian  proposals 
for  a  united  Indian  State,  although  his  message  of  De- 
cember 3, 1833,  indicates  a  disposition  open  to  conviction  on 
this  subject  since  he  tells  Congress  that  he  awaits  the  report 

155  In  February,  1835,  Everett's  bill  was  taken  from  the  table,  half-heartedly 
debated,  and  then  dropped. —  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  23rd  Congress, 
pp.  1445,  1462.  On  February  19,  1836,  Everett  reported  for  the  second  time  a 
bill. —  Journal  of  the  House  of  Bepresentativee,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p. 
369.  Again  in  1837  he  reported  a  third  bill. —  Journal  of  the  House  of  Bepre- 
sentatives,  2nd  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  325.  His  fourth  bill  was  introduced 
in  the  year  1838. —  Journal  of  the  House  of  Bepresentatives,  2nd  Session,  25th 
Congress,  p.  330. 

In  the  session  of  1835-1836,  Tipton  introduced  a  bill  supplementary  to  the 
removal  act  of  May,  1830.  This  bill  omitted  many  details  contained  in  the 
House  bill,  outlining  a  more  general  plan.  An  amiable  report  accompanied  it. 
—  Senate  Documents,  No.  246 ;  Annual  Begister  of  Indian  A  fairs,  1837,  p.  71. 
The  bill  failed. —  Joumai  of  the  Senate,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  220.  In 
the  next  session  Tipton's  bill  was  again  introduced. —  Joumai  of  the  Senate, 
2nd  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  31. 

Again  in  1838  Tipton  introduced  another  bill. —  Joumai  of  the  Senate,  2nd 
Session,  25th  Congress,  pp.  367,  385.  This  bill  passed  the  Senate,  but  failed  in 
the  House.  Again,  being  introduced  in  the  next  session,  the  Senate  passed  the 
bill,  but  it  never  came  to  a  vote  in  the  House. —  Journal  of  the  Senate,  3rd 
Session,  25th  Congress,  pp.  35,  272. 

^^^  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  21st  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  16. 


•  • 


242    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

and  recommendations  of  the  Commissioners  then  examining 
western  affairs.^*^^  It  is  difficult  to  see  how  this  Commission 
could  mnch  enlighten  the  President.  His  detailed  knowl- 
edge of  Indian  affairs  and  Indian  nature  has  ever  been  a 
matter  of  fame.  Be  that  as  it  may,  the  President  desired 
some  definite  system  of  government.  As  to  what  this  should 
be  the  awkward  phrases  of  his  message  of  December  7, 1835, 
indicate  some  vagueness  on  his  part.^^  To  regulate  the  In- 
dian affairs  of  the  far  West  from  Washington  was  a  difficult 
matter.  But  the  real  need  of  the  emigrant  Indians  was  un- 
doubtedly protection  and  competent  supervision  by  honest 
government  agents  resident  among  the  tribes  rather  than 
any  scheme  of  united  Territorial  government.  If  all  Indian 
Agents  in  the  West  had  been  men  of  Jackson's  type  order 
would  have  been  created  out  of  chaos  and  the  bitter  criti- 
cisms of  Calhoun  would  have  been  unfounded.^** 

While  the  Government  was  faltering  in  the  choice  of  an 
Indian  policy,  projects  from  all  sides  were  never  lacking. 
Horace  Everett  in  the  House  desired  a  western  Territory 
and  perhaps  its  future  admission  as  a  State.  Similar  but 
less  definite  views  were  championed  in  the  Senate  by  Tipton 
of  Indiana.  The  Reverend  Mr.  McCoy  was  ever  urging  a 
definite  system  of  colonization  and  intertribal  government; 
while  Forsyth  of  Georgia  presented  a  plan  by  which  all  In- 
dians should  become  citizens  in  the  year  1900.^®^  But  the 
problem  was  so  baffling,  the  previous  efforts  at  civilization 
so  often  discouraging,  that  Senator  Bobbins  might  well  ex- 
claim :  *  *  HI  fated  Indians  I  barbarism  and  attempts  at  civi- 

i«T  Begister  of  Debates,  let  Session,  23rd  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  6. 

168  Begister  of  Dehates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  10. 

ISO  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  1459. 

i«o  Annual  Begister  of  Indian  A  fairs,  1838 ;  Executive  Documents,  2nd  Ses- 
sion, 25th  Congress,  pp.  566,  579;  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  21st  Con- 
gress, p.  327. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  243 

lization  are  alike  fatal  to  your  rights ;  but  attempts  at  civi- 
lization the  more  fatal  of  the  two/*^®^ 

The  administration  of  Van  Bnren  was  a  wet  blanket  to  all 
proposals  for  an  Indian  government.  Not  that  the  Presi- 
dent was  hostile  to  an  Indian  Territory,  for  he  continually 
reminded  Congress  of  the  need  therefor.^®^  But  neither 
Van  Buren  nor  his  immediate  advisers  were  interested  to 
the  extent  of  making  definite  recommendations.  Tacitly  the 
bills  of  Everett  and  Tipton  had  the  Administration  support ; 
but  curiously  enough  they  were  opposed  by  Benton  as  well 
as  by  Calhoun,  while  Clay  never  loaned  his  eloquence  to 
their  cause.  Why  should  the  most  talented  champions  of 
Indian  rights  hold  themselves  aloof  f  The  probable  con- 
jecture is  that  both  Clay  and  Calhoun  considered  the  project 
futile. 

The  year  1839  was  not  the  end  of  proposals  for  an  Indian 
government.  Individual  schemes  were  often  projected,  but 
never  again  did  any  bill  similar  to  Tipton  *s  or  to  Everett 's 
pass  either  branch  of  Congress.^^ 

INDIAN  WABS  OF  THB  DBOADB  1830-1840 

It  was  soon  after  the  termination  of  the  Seminole  Indian 
War  that  Congress  reduced  the  army  of  the  United  States 
to  six  thousand  men.  This  was  during  the  session  of  1820- 
1821.  Clay,  who  was  ever  an  advocate  of  the  employment 
of  militia  in  preference  to  a  standing  army,  led  the  senti- 
ment in  favor  of  reduction.^®*  A  desire  on  the  part  of  Dem- 
ocratic members  to  retrench  public  expenditures  induced 

i«i  Begisier  of  Debates,  let  Session,  21flt  Congress,  p.  377. 

^^^  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  7;  also  3rd  Session, 
25th  Congress,  p.  7. 

163 For  the  later  history  of  these  efforts,  see  Abel's  Proposals  for  ar^  Indian 
State  in  the  Annual  Beport  of  the  American  Historical  Association,  1907,  Vol. 
I,  p.  99  et  seq. 

19*  Annals  of  Congress,  1st  Session,  16th  Congress,  p.  2233. 


244    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Hiem  to  follow  Clay.  The  proposal  was  quite  ruiopposed. 
Floyd  of  Virginia,  who  for  two  sessions  had  been  advo- 
<5ating  the  military  occupation  of  Oregon,  spoke  for  the  re- 
duction bill.^®*  Even  western  members  declared  that  a 
small  army  was  sufficient  for  the  protection  of  the  frontier 
if  supported  by  the  local  militia. 

Trimble  of  Kentucky  went  into  an  elaborate  discussion 
to  show  that  the  line  of  forts  from  Michilimackinack  to  New 
Orleans  formed  a  ** cordon*'  of  sufficient  strength  for  the  pi- 
oneers and  was  far  superior  to  the  protection  of  the  frontier 
in  the  year  1802.  He  claimed  that  the  pioneer  settlements 
now  were  stronger  than  those  in  the  early  days  of  the  cen- 
tury, and  that  the  Indians  of  the  West  had  become  less 
numerous  and  less  warlike.^*®  Cannon  of  Tennessee  could 
not  refrain  from  delivering  a  eulogium  upon  the  superiority 
of  militia  organized  from  the  **  hardy  sons  of  the  West".^®^ 
Such  argument  cannot  but  raise  the  suspicion  that  west- 
erners were  better  pleased  to  execute  the  Indian  trade  and 
intercourse  laws  with  their  own  hands  than  to  submit  to  the 
more  impartial  supervision  of  regular  army  officers.  As  it 
was  the  bill  passed  both  houses  with  large  majorities.^®® 

As  if  to  further  relax  the  Government's  control  on  the 
frontier,  the  factory  system  was  abolished  the  next  year. 
This  department  had  been  established  in  1796  upon  the 
recommendation  of  Washington.  Its  object  was  to  counter- 
act the  influence  of  Canadian  fur  traders  and  to  control  and 
protect  the  Indians  by  maintaining  trading  posts  where  the 
Indians  might  exchange  their  furs  for  goods  at  cost.^®* 

i^^  Annals  of  Congress,  2nd  Session,  16th  Congress,  p.  891. 

iMAnnaU  of  Congress,  2nd  Session,  16th  Congress,  p.  879. 

167  Annals  of  Congress,  2nd  Session,  16th  Congress,  p.  136. 

^99  Annals  of  Congress,  2nd  Session,  16th  Congress,  pp.  936,  379;   Niles' 
Weekly  Begister,  Vol.  XXII,  p.  75. 

160  Bichardson 's  Messages  and  Papers  of  the  Presidents,  Vol.  I,  p.   185. 
Benton's  Thirty  Years'  View,  Vol.  I,  p.  21. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  245 

The  move  against  the  department  was  by  Benton.  He  ac-^ 
cused  the  factors  of  *  *  scandalous  abuse ' ',  and  characterized 
the  system  as  a  means  **to  make  the  West  purchase  from 
the  East ' '.  Benton  proposed  that  the  trade  be  left  entirely 
in  private  hands.^^®  His  bill  passed  both  houses,  provok- 
ing debate  in  neither,  save  a  most  violent  speech  by  a  Ken^ 
tucky  representative  who  proposed  to  repeal  all  acts  at- 
tempting to  civilize  the  Indians.^^^ 

In  Congress  little  attention  was  thereafter  given^  to  de- 
fenses of  the  northwestern  frontier.  Nor  was  there  any 
great  need  of  such  defenses  since  peaceful  conditions  on 
the  whole  prevailed  until  the  breaking  out  of  the  episode- 
known  as  the  Black  Hawk  War.^^^  Hostilities  began  in 
the  summer  of  1831.  In  the  following  session  of  Congress, 
the  condition  of  the  Northwest  received  consideration  and 
was  the  occasion  of  several  eulogiums  on  behalf  of  the  west- 
em  people  by  western  Congressmen.  Senator  Tipton  of 
Indiana  declared  that  the  pioneers  could  not  be  blamed  if 
they  exterminated  all  the  Indians  from  Tippecanoe  to  the 
Mississippi,  unless  the  Government  more  energetically 
undertook  the  defense  of  the  frontier.    He  said : 

It  is  our  duty,  in  self-defence,  to  do  this  [i.  e.  exterminate  the 
Indians] ;  and,  after  it  is  done,  let  me  not  be  told,  you  Western  peo- 
ple are  savag/es;  you  murdered  the  poor  Indians.  Do  gentlemen 
expect  us  to  beg  the  lives  of  our  families  upon  our  knees  ?  .  .  . 
Congress  will  adjourn  in  a  few  days;  and  when  we  return  to  our 
people,  and  tell  them  that  we  have  done  all  in  our  power  to  procure 
men  for  their  defence,  and  have  failed,  then,  sir,  our  constituents 
know  what  to  do,  and  upon  you,  not  upon  us,  be  the  charge  of  what 
follows;  for  these  wars  will  be  brought  to  a  close  in  the  shortest 
possible  way."* 

170  Annals  of  Congress,  Ist  Session,  17th  Congress,  p.  317  et  seq, 

^"^^  Annals  of  Congress,  1st  Session,  17th  Congress,  p.  1801. 

172  Por  an  account  of  the  war,  see  Stevens's  The  Black  Hawk  War, 

if^  Register  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  22nd  Congress,  p.  1075.     This  was  the 
same  Senator  Tipton  who  later  advocated  a  Western  Territory  for  the  Indians^ 


246    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Again  Senator  Tipton  declared : 

We  must  sweep  these  people  [the  Indians]  from  existence,  or 
keep  them  peaceable.  ...  No  one  can  imagine  the  distress  that 
an  alarm  on  the  frontier  produces,  without  witnessing  it.  Those 
who  are  at  the  point  of  attack,  flee  with  their  families ;  those  next  in 
the  rear,  though  more  secure,  are  not  safe.  No  man  can  leave  his 
own  family  to  help  his  neighbor ;  and  the  consequence  is,  that  they 
break  up  and  desert  their  homes,  taking  little  with  them,  and  leave 
their  property  to  be  pillaged  by  the  dishonest  whites,  as  well  as  the 
Indians.^^* 

Senator  Alexander  Buckner  of  Missouri  expressed  **a 
deep  feeling  for  the  people  of  Illinois^',  which  was  natural, 
for  like  Benton  and  Tipton  he  himself  had  fought  in  Indian 
wars.^^* 

On  June  15, 1832,  the  bill  to  raise  six  hundred  volunteers 
was  passed  —  too  late,  however,  to  aid  even  in  the  closing 
campaign  of  the  Black  Hawk  War.^^®  The  whole  affair 
was  reviewed  by  Jackson  in  his  annual  message  to  Con- 
gress in  the  following  December,  wherein  he  urged  a  more 
perfect  organization  of  the  militia  for  the  protection  of 
the  western  country.^''''  After  praising  the  militia  of  Illi- 
nois and  the  government  troops  under  Generals  Scott  and 
Atkinson,  Jackson  did  not  let  pass  the  opportunity  of  point- 
ing out  the  moral  to  be  learned  by  the  savages  from  the  de- 
feat of  Black  Hawk.  "Severe  as  is  the  lesson  to  the  In- 
dians," he  said,  **it  was  rendered  necessary  by  their  un- 
provoked aggressions,  and  it  is  to  be  hoped  that  its  impres- 
sion will  be  permanent  and  salutary."  That  the  Indians 
in  fact  were  learning  this  lesson  of  civilization  might  be  in- 
ferred from  another  part  of  the  message,  where  Jackson 
was  happy  to  inform  Congress  *  *  that  the  wise  and  humane 

^"r^Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  22nd  Congress,  p.  1083. 

"^f^Begisier  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  22nd  Congress,  p.  1087. 

i7«  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  IV,  p.  533. 

177  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  22nd  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  6. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  247 

policy  of  transferring  from  the  eastern  to  the  western  side 
of  the  Mississippi  the  Remnants  of  our  aboriginal  tribes, 
with  their  own  consent  and  upon  just  terms,  has  been 
steadily  pursued,  and  is  approaching,  I  trust,  its  con- 
summation. ' ' 

The  Black  Hawk  War  was  suppressed  without  any  aug- 
mentation of  the  standing  army.  But  the  harrowing  scenes 
of  this  episode  were  frequently  pictured  during  the  debates 
when  Benton  in  the  year  1836  proposed  an  increase  of  the 
army,  avowedly  for  western  defense. 

In  the  meantime  attention  was  directed  to  the  South. 
Hardly  had  three  years  passed  after  peace  in  the  North- 
west, when  there  broke  out  one  of  the  most  perplexing  of 
Indian  hostilities  —  the  Florida  Indian  War.  For  seven 
years  this  conflict  continued.  The  tangled  everglades  and 
swampy  wastes  of  Florida  and  the  persistence  of  the  In- 
dians long  baffled  and  delayed  the  generals  and  troops  of 
the  United  States;  and  withal  some  thirty  millions  of 
dollars  were  expended  before  the  Seminoles  were  subdued. 
To  an  observer  from  afar  the  conduct  of  the  war  appeared 
bunglesome,  its  cause  unjust,  and  its  ultimate  purpose 
simply  the  oppression  and  the  extermination  of  a  gallant 
band  of  exiled  Indians.  So  the  opposition  to  the  Adminis- 
tration became  loud  in  condemning  the  war  and  its  manage- 
ment.^*^® 

Besides  the  early  discussions  upon  the  Florida  War  in 
the  session  of  1835-1836  other  questions  of  similar  nature 
were  brought  before  Congress,  which  gave  occasion  for  a 
review  of  all  phases  and  problems  of  the  question  of  south- 
ern frontier  protection.  Among  these  were  the  demand  of 
Alabama  for  the  removal  of  the   Creek  Indians,^*^®   the 

178  Benton '8  ThiHy  Years'  View,  Vol.  II,  p.  70. 

nsJourruU  of  the  Senate,  1st  SeMion,  24th  CongreMy  p.  146;  Senate  Docu- 
ments, No.  132. 


248    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

threatened  hostilities  of  the  Creeks,^®®  the  memorials  pray- 
ing the  recognition  of  the  independency  of  Texas,^®^  as  well 
as  the  demand  from  the  West  for  an  increase  in  army  pro- 
tection.^®* 

In  regard  to  the  Seminole  Indian  War  it  appears  that 
Congress  took  prompt  action.  No  matter  whether  the 
cause  was  jnst  or  nnjnst,  no  delay  occurred  in  providing 
for  the  immediate  protection  of  the  pioneers  from  the  fury 
of  the  Indians.  The  first  act  of  the  session  was  an  appro- 
priation for  suppressing  the  hostiUties  of  the  Seminoles 
and  was  hurriedly  passed  on  January  14,  1836.^®*  Two 
weeks  later  the  second  act  of  the  session  was  passed,  mak- 
ing a  still  larger  appropriation.^®*  Three  days  later  a  reso- 
lution was  passed  authorizing  the  President  to  furnish 
rations  from  the  public  stores  to  the  frontiersmen  in  Flor- 
ida who  had  been  driven  from  their  homes  by  the  depreda- 
tions of  the  Indians.^®*^  All  of  these  measures  were  adopted 
without  extended  debate  —  only  when  the  second  appropria- 
tion was  proposed  Clay  asked  the  cause  of  this  war  which 
was  raging  with  such  **  rancorous  violence  within  our  hoT- 
ders".^®®  No  one  could  adequately  reply.  Webster,  the 
chairman  of  the  finance  committee  who  reported  the  bill, 
avowed  that  he  could  not  give  any  answer  to  the  Senator 
from  Kentucky;  but  he  added  impressively:  **The  war 
rages,  the  enemy  is  in  force,  and  the  accounts  of  their 
ravages  are  disastrous.    The  Executive  Government  has 

ISO  Begiater  of  Debates,  Ist  Sessioiiy  24th  CongreaSy  p.  2556;  NQes'  Weekly 
Begister,  Vol.  L,  pp.  205,  219,  267,  321. 

181  Eegister  of  Debates,  Ist  Seesion,  24th  CongraeB,  pp.    1286,    1414,    1759, 
1762,  1877. 

1S2  Register  of  Debates,  iBt  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  3493. 

i«8  jjnited  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  V,  p.  1. 

i«*  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  V,  p.  1. 

i«»  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  V,  p.  131. 

186  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  290. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  249 

asked  for  the  means  of  suppressing  these  hostilities ''i 
and  he  conceived  it  necessary  to  provide  for  the  imme- 
diate protection  of  Florida.  Even  the  loquacious  Ben- 
toUy  despite  the  fact  that  he  was  in  the  confidence  of  the 
Administration,  confessed  his  entire  ignorance  concern- 
ing the  causes  of  the  war.^®^ 

Nevertheless,  after  continued  appropriations  were  de- 
manded by  the  Executive,  and  a  bill  to  increase  the  army 
was  vigorously  advocated  by  its  friends,  the  Opposition 
began  to  inquire  earnestly  into  the  cause  of  this  commo- 
tion. '*One  would  have  supposed  ^^  remarked  Clay, 
'^that  all  at  once  a  gallant  nation  of  some  millions  had 
been  suddenly  precipitated  on  our  frontier,  instead  of  a 
few  miserable  Indians."^®®  Yet  all  the  bills  providing 
for  the  suppression  of  the  Seminole  hostilities  which 
Jackson  *s  government  asked  for  were  promptly  passed.^®* 
So  also  was  the  bill  to  provide  for  ten  thousand  volun- 
teers, Calhoun  himself  being  the  manager  of  the  bill  on 
the  part  of  the  Senate  in  the  conferences  between  the  two 
houses.^®®  But  Benton  *s  proposal  to  increase  the  stand- 
ing army  met  disagreement  as  shall  be  related  below. 

To  the  opponents  of  the  Government's  Indian  policy 
the  cause  of  the  Seminole  hostilities  was  clear  enough. 
Some  blamed  the  pioneers,  some  the  speculators,  but  all 
blamed  the  Government.  Calhoun,  for  instance,  exoner- 
ated the  pioneers  but  denounced  the  frauds  of  the  Indian 
Bureau.  ^®^  He  regretted  that  the  speculators  in  Indian 
lands  were  not  the  persons  to  suffer,  instead  of  the 
frontier  inhabitants.    Indeed,  he  said,  it  made  his  **  heart 

i^'r  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  291. 

^»»Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  1756. 

180  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  V,  pp.  1,  8,  17,  33,  65, 131, 135, 152. 

100  Journal  of  the  Senate,  Ist  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  366. 

101  Begister  of  Debates^  Itt  Session,  24th  Congress,  pp.  1459,  1460. 

VOL.  IX — 18 


250    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

bleed  to  think  of  the  sufferings  of  the  innocent  frontier 
settlers.'*  All  these  evils  were  the  result  of  mismanage- 
ment. The  Indian  agents  had  generally  been  incapable 
or  unfaithful.     Calhoun  continued: 

The  Qovemment  ought  to  have  appointed  men  of  intelligence,  of 
firmness,  and  of  honor,  who  would  have  faithfully  fulfilled  their 
obligations  to  the  United  States  and  to  the  Indians.  Instead  of 
that,  men  were  sent  out  to  make  fortunes  for  themselves,  and  to  op- 
press the  Indians.  ...  If  they  would  appoint  honest,  faithful^ 
intelligent  men,  to  transact  their  business  with  the  Indians,  instead 
of  broken  down  politicians,  men  sent  out  to  be  rewarded  for  party 
services,  these  Indian  disturbances  would  soon  cease;  but  unless 
that  was  done,  it  was  apparent  that  there  would  be  continual  dis- 
turbances, creating  causes  for  wars,  to  be  followed  by  a  large  in- 
crease of  the  standing  army. 

In  the  House  Mr.  Vinton  of  Ohio  expostulated  in  these 
words : 

When  the  cry  is  sent  up  here  that  the  people  of  the  frontier  are 
assailed  by  Indian  hostility,  we  raise  the  means  of  making  war  upon 
them  without  a  moment's  delay;  we  crush  them  by  our  superior 
power.  But  we  never  inquire,  while  the  war  is  going  on,  or  after  it 
is  ended,  into  its  causes;  we  make  no  investigation  to  learn  who 

were  the  instigators  of  the  war,  or  who  was  to  blame I 

told  the  House  there  were  those  on  the  frontier  who  had  an  interest 
in  exciting  Indian  wars ;  that  there  were  those  who  disregarded  the 
rights  of  the  Indians,  and  were  disposed  to  encroach  upon  them; 
that  if  we  omitted  to  investigate  the  causes  of  these  disturbances, 
and  thus  induce  those  who  have  an  interest  in  exciting  them  to 
think  they  can  involve  us  without  scrutiny  and  without  exposure,  we 
should  have  other  Indian  wars,  in  all  probability,  before  the  end  of 
the  session.  ...  If  we  suffer  ourselves  to  go  on  in  this  way,  in 
three  years'  time  every  Indian  will  be  driven  by  force  from  every 
State  and  Territory  of  the  Union.  In  the  States  and  Territories, 
wherever  they  are,  they  are  regarded  as  an  incumbrance,  and  there 
is  a  strong  desire  to  get  them  out  of  the  way ;  and  if  we  will  furnish 
the  means  without  inquiry,  they  will  be  disposed  of.  Sir,  our 
frontier  inhabitants  know  our  strength  and  their  weakness ;  and  if 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  251 

we  are  to  stand  armed  behind  them,  and  let  them  have  their  way, 
we  must  expect  they  will  overbear,  and  encroach  upon  them.  The 
Indians  with  whom  we  are  in  contact  know  full  well  their  weakness 
and  our  power ;  and  it  is  hardly  credible  that  they  will  open  a  war 
upon  us  except  from  a  strong  sense  of  injury.  .  .  .  We  ought 
to  send  the  immediate  means  of  defending  our  frontier  inhabitants 
from  massacre  and  pillage;  and  it  is,  in  my  opinion,  our  further 
duty  to  set  on  foot  immediately  an  investigation  into  the  cause  of 
these  disturbances ;  and  if  we  are  in  the  wrong,  we  ought  instantly 
to  send  commissioners  to  offer  them  reparation  and  do  them  justice. 
When  we  look  at  the  contrast,  and  see  how  weak  and  defenceless 
they  are,  and  how  strong  and  mighty  we  are,  the  character  of  the 
House,  the  honor  of  the  country,  and  the  feelings  of  the  world,  call 
upon  us  to  pursue  this  course  toward  them.^" 

Edward  Everett  summed  up  the  causes  of  the  Florida 
War  to  be  the  efforts  of  the  whites  to  capture  negro  slaves 
among  the  Seminoles  and  to  vnrest  from  these  Indians 
their  lands  per  fas  aut  nefas.^^^  But  of  all  the  speeches 
the  most  widely  noted  denunciation  of  the  war  was  made 
by  Everett's  colleague,  Adams  the  ex-President.^**  The 
inoLmediate  occasion  for  Adams's  speech  was  a  joint  reso- 
lution from  the  Senate  authorizing  the  President  to  dis- 
tribute rations  to  the  suffering  frontiersmen  in  Alabama 
and  Georgia  as  had  been  done  to  the  sufferers  in  Florida.^**^ 
Although  stating  that  he  should  vote  for  the  resolution 
because  of  his  sympathy  for  the  sufferers,  Adams  main- 
tained that  **mere  conuniseration,  though  one  of  the  most 
amiable  impulses  of  our  nature,  gives  us  no  power  to 
drain  the  Treasury  of  the  people  for  the  relief  of  the  suf- 
fering".^®®    After  an  irrelevant  discourse  in  which  the 

182  Begtster  of  Debates,  let  SeBsion,  24th  Congress,  p.  3767. 

^93Begi8ter  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  4158. 

i9*Niles*  Weekly  Begister,  Vol.  L,  p.  276;  Memoirs  of  John  Quincy  Adams, 
Vol.  IX,  pp.  290,  298. 

195  Begtster  of  Debates,  1st   Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  4032. 

i^^Begister  of  Debates,  1st   Session,  24th  Congress^  p.  4037. 


252    IOWA  JOUKNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

venerable  statesman  detected  the  curse  of  slavery  in 
frontier  disturbanoeSi  he  concluded  his  discourse  by 
charging  the  cause  of  the  Seminole  War  to  the  injustice 
of  the  present  Administration.  All  preceding  Adminis- 
trationSy  he  claimed,  had  sought  to  civilize  the  Indians 
and  attach  them  to  the  soil  upon  which  they  lived.  But 
this  humane  poUcy  was  now  abandoned. 

Instead  of  it  you  have  adopted  that  of  expelling  by  force  or  by 
compact  all  the  Indian  tribes  from  their  own  territories  and  dwell- 
ings to  a  region  beyond  the  Mississippi^  beyond  the  Missouri,  be- 
yond the  Arkansas,  bordering  upon  Mexico ;  and  there  you  have  de- 
luded them  with  the  hope  that  they  will  find  a  permanent  abode  — 
a  final  resting-place  from  your  never-ending  rapacity  and  persecu- 
tion. ...  In  the  process  of  this  violent  and  heartless  operation 
you  have  met  with  all  the  resistance  which  men  in  so  helpless  a  con- 
dition as  that  of  the  Indian  tribes  could  make.  Of  the  immediate 
causes  of  the  war  we  are  not  yet  fully  informed ;  but  I  fear  you  will 
find  them,  like  the  remoter  causes,  all  attributable  to  yourselves.^*^ 

Toward  the  end  of  the  session  a  surprising  memorial 
was  presented  to  Congress  from  citizens  resident  at  the 
seat  of  the  Creek  and  Seminole  hostilities,  i.  e.  Eastern 
Alabama  and  Georgia.^®®  These  memorialists  represent- 
ed that  the  Indian  disturbances  were  **  caused  by  individ- 
uals jointly  associated  under  the  name  of  land  companies, 
whose  proceedings  and  contracts  were  of  the  most  ne- 
farious character."  The  memorialists  prayed  that  an  in- 
vestigation be  instituted,  and  intimated  that  it  would  be 
found  that  **the  press  of  that  country  is  entirely  under 
the  control  of  these  heartless  agitators,  and  that,  through 
bribery  and  corruption,  all  channels  of  information  to  the 
public  and  to  the  Government  on  this  subject  are  closed." 

Lewis  of  Alabama  moved  that  the  investigation  be 
placed  in  the  hands  of  the  President  with  power  to  prose- 

197  Begister  of  Debates,  1ft   Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  4049. 
i9BBegi8ter  of  Dehtxtes,  Ist  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  4578. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  253 

cute  the  guilty  persons  if  any  might  be  apprehended. 
Wise  of  Virginia,  Adams  of  Massachusetts,  and  Peyton 
of  Tennessee  sprang  to  the  opposition.  The  Virginian 
moved  to  amend  by  selecting  a  committee  of  the  House  to 
investigate.  Executive  officers,  he  claimed,  were  impli- 
cated in  the  charges  and  to  refer  the  matter  to  the  Presi- 
dent would  **have  the  effect  to  cover  up  these  frauds,  in- 
stead of  exposing  them."^®*  After  a  hot  debate,  in  which 
Peyton  likened  Andrew  Jackson  to  Warren  Hastings  and 
dubbed  all  Indian  agents  as  *' petty  tyrants*'  engaged  in 
plundering  the  savages  and  ''then  aiding  and  encourag- 
ing them  to  make  war  upon  your  defenseless  frontier'', 
the  amendment  proposed  by  Wise  was  rejected  and  the 
motion  of  Lewis  passed  by  so  many  ayes  that  the  noes 
were  not  even  counted.*^® 

The  last  annual  message  of  Jackson  in  December,  1836, 
called  for  further  appropriations  to  subdue  the  Seminoles 
and  Creeks  and  urged  an  increase  of  the  regular  army  as 
well  as  a  reorganization  of  the  militia.*®^  The  appropria- 
tions were  supplied  by  Congress,  but  not  the  increase  in 
the  standing  army.^®^  In  the  following  December  his 
successor,  perforce,  repeated  similar  recommendations  not 
only  for  the  increase  of  the  regular  army  but  also  to 
continue  suppressing  the  Seminole  hostilities.^^*  Al- 
ready the  members  of  Congress  who  had  voted  for  the 
early  appropriations  merely  in  the  hope  that  immediate 
aid  would  quiet  the  disturbances  on  the  frontier  were 
much  provoked  because  of  the  never-ending  campaigns. 
Webster   mildly   advised   more   deliberation   in   expendi- 

199  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  SesBion,  24th  Congress,  p.  4583. 

200  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist   Session,  24th  Congress,  pp.  4597,  4604. 

^oiBegister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  24th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  8. 

202  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  V,  pp.  135,  152. 

toi  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.   6.     Also  Appendix, 
p.  3. 


254    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

tnres.*®*  Twenty  million  dollars  had  been  expended,  he 
said,  and  little  accomplished.  Before  greater  appropria- 
tions were  voted  the  whole  matter  should  receive  a  thor- 
ough investigation.  Preston  of  South  Carolina  also  de- 
manded an  investigation.^*^  And  Senator  Southard  of 
New  Jersey  brought  serious  charges  to  the  door  of  the 
Administration  by  maintaining  that  **a  fraud  was  com- 
mitted upon  the  Florida  Indians  in  the  treaty  negotiated 
with  them  for  their  removal  to  the  West;  that  the  war 
which  has  ensued  was  the  consequence  of  this  fraud;  and 
that  our  Government  was  responsible  to  the  moral  sense  of 
the  community,  and  of  the  world,  for  all  the  blood  that  has 
been  shed,  and  for  all  the  money  that  has  been  expended, 
in  the  prosecution  of  this  war.*^°® 

These  pleas  for  investigation  called  down  a  torrent  of 
abuse  and  wrath.  Benton  replied  to  Southard  in  a 
trenchant  speech,  the  burden  of  which  was  a  condemna- 
tion of  ^Hhe  mawkish  sentimentaUty  of  the  day  ...  . 
a  sentimentaUty  which  goes  moping  and  sorrowing  about 
in  behalf  of  imaginary  wrongs  to  Lidians  and  negroes, 
while  the  whites  themselves  are  the  subject  of  murder, 
robbery  and  defamation.  ^^^^^  Clay  of  Alabama  replied  to 
Webster  and  Preston  in  a  harangue  quivering  with  in- 
vective heaped  upon  philanthropists  who  assayed  **to 
take  care  of  the  national  honor  I  "^^^  Other  arguments 
followed  depicting  the  depraved  condition  of  the  Indians, 
and  therefore  their  lack  of  rights.  Indeed,  almost  all  of 
the  arguments  in  the  entire  Seminole  War  debates  con- 
sisted largely  of  vivid  defenses  of  pioneer  character,  and 

204  Congressional  Olobe,  2nd  Sesgion,  25th  Congren,  Appendix,  p.  373. 

205  CongressioncH  Olohe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  373. 

206  Congressional  Olobe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  353. 

207  Congressional  Olohe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  354. 

208  Congressional  Olobe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  376. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  255 

philippics  against  the  American  aborigines,  enlivened 
with  bloody  descriptions  of  the  scalping  knife  and  toma- 
hawk. 

The  following  words  from  the  remarks  of  Towns  of 
Georgia  well  illustrate  the  tone  of  these  debates : 

Every  mail  from  Georgia  tells  me  the  story  of  death ;  butcheries 
the  most  revolting  are  perpetrated  every  day  in  the  borders  of  Ala- 
bama, and  on  the  frontiers  of  Georgia.  .  .  .  One  scene  of  wide- 
spread desolation  alone  is  to  be  seen  in  that  quarter,  where  but  a 
short  time  since  there  was  peace,  quiet,  and  prosperity.  And  such, 
sir,  has  been  the  imparalleled  devastation  of  property  and  life,  that 
there  is  scarcely  a  human  being  to  be  seen  in  all  that  country,  unless 
it  be  the  merciless  foe,  or  some  unfortunate  settler  flying  from  the 
tomahawk  and  scalping-knife.  So  sudden  has  been  this  war,  when 
the  Indian  was  ready  to  deal  out  death  in  all  its  horrors,  few,  if 
any,  were  prepared  to  give  the  slightest  resistance;  unprotected 
with  arms  or  ammunition,  the  honest  settler  of  the  country  felt  it  to 
be  his  first  duty  to  yield  to  the  entreaties  of  wife  and  children,  to  fly 
for  safety ;  and  the  melancholy  story  but  too  often  reaches  us,  when 
thus  flying,  that  many  of  them  have  fallen  victims  to  the  most  cruel 
of  all  deaths,  the  scalping-knife  and  tomahawk.'®^ 

Alf  ord  of  Georgia  declared  that  when  he  heard  appeals 
for  justice  to  the  Seminole  Indians  his  mind  **  reverted  to 
his  own  people,  who  deserved  the  sympathy  of  the  House 
more  than  the  savage  Indian. '^^^^  Richard  M.  Johnson  of 
Kentucky  pictured  southern  rivers  as  deluged  **with  the 
blood  of  innocence",  and  that  Florida  lay  bleeding  ** un- 
der the  hand  of  savage  barbarity. '^^^^  Mr.  Jonathan 
Cilley  of  Maine  declaimed  as  follows : 

My  blood  thrills  in  my  veins  to  hear  the  conduct  of  faithless  and 
murderous  Indians  lauded  to  the  skies,  and  our  sympathies  invoked 
in  their  behalf,  while  in  the  same  breath  our  own  government  and 
its  most  distinguished  citizens  are  traduced  and  villified  to  the  low- 

209  Begister  of  Debates,  let  Session,  24fth  Congress,  p.  4034. 

210  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  1559. 

211  Begister  of  Debates,  lot   Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  2725. 


256    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

est  degree.  ...  I  hope  gentlemen^  whose  sensibilities  are  now 
so  much  enlisted  in  the  conditions  of  the  Seminoles  and  Cherokees, 
now  in  Florida  and  Georgia,  will  not  forget  how  their  own  fore 
fathers  ....  when  they  were  a  frontier  people  .... 
dealt  with  similar  enemies.*^ 

In  a  fiery  harangue  Mr.  Bynum  of  North  Carolina 
asked : 

What  are  our  obligations  to  protect  the  exposed  inhabitants  of 
that  Territory  [Florida]  t  Surely  all  that  is  sacred  .... 
should  prompt  us  to  a  speedy  and  determined  resolution  not  only  to 
defend,  but  reserve  that  Territory  at  every  hazard  .... 
from  the  blood-stained  hands  of  these  unrelenting  savages.  Gentle- 
men surely  could  not  be  in  earnest  to  talk  of  peace,  until  these 
bloody,  perfidious,  treacherous  devils  were  whipped.*^* 

Peyton  of  Tennessee,  replying  to  Adams  of  Massachu- 
setts, said:  '^That  gentleman  does  not  know,  living,  as  he 
does,  far  from  such  scenes,  the  vivid  feeling  of  Southern 
and  Western  men,  when  they  see  hostile  savages  hovering 
around  their  villages,  and  lying  in  ambush,  to  murder  the 
old  and  the  young  ".^^^ 

Thus,  figuratively  speaking,  with  brandishing  of  toma- 
hawk and  scalping  knife  bill  after  bill  appropriating  mon- 
ey for  the  suppression  of  Seminole  hostilities  was  passed. 

The  reactions  of  Jackson's  Indian  policy  fell  upon  his 
successor.  Throughout  the  whole  of  Van  Buren's  term, 
the  Seminole  hostiUties  raged  in  Florida,  and  the  conduct 
of  the  warfare  was  constantly  used  by  the  Opposition  in 
Congress  as  a  weak  point  for  attacking  the  Administra- 
tion. At  last  Benton  in  1839,  after  consultation  with  his 
Administration  friends,  proposed  a  plan  for  the  ultimate 

2i«  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  Appendix,  pp.  78,    79. 
218  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  75. 

21*  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  3520. 

These  speeches  may  be  compared  with  such  current  pamphlets  as  the  Nar- 
raiive  of  the  Massacre,  by  the  Savages,  of  the  Wife  and  Children  of  Thomas 
Baldwin  (New  York:  1836). 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  257 

suppression  of  these  long-drawn-out  hostilities.^"  Fed- 
eral encouragement  to  the  pioneers  was  the  basis  of  Ben- 
ton's  scheme.  Settlers  were  to  be  emboldened  to  brave  the 
dangers  of  Florida  settlement  by  free  grants  of  land,  and 
ammunition,  and  provisions  for  one  year.  Into  the  de- 
fense of  this  measure  Benton  flung  himself  with  his  char- 
acteristic vigor,  calling  upon  the  North  not  to  begrudge 
generous  treatment  to  Southern  pioneers  since  it  was  by 
armed  occupation  only  that  the  treacherous  lands  of  Flor- 
ida might  ever  be  settled.^  ^® 

That  the  pioneers  should  possess  the  wilderness  was 
Benton's  pet  axiom.  ** Every  inch  of  territory  on  this 
continent,  now  occupied  by  white  people,**  he  exclaimed, 
^'was  taken  from  the  Indians  by  armed  settlers  and  pre- 
emptions and  donations  of  land  have  forever  rewarded 
the  bold  settlers  who  rendered  this  service  to  the  civiliza- 
tion of  the  world.  •  •  •  The  blockhouse,  the  stockade, 
the  rifle,  have  taken  the  country,  and  held  it,  from  the 
shores  of  the  Atlantic  to  the  far  West;  and  in  every  in- 
stance grants  of  land  have  rewarded  the  courage  and  en- 
terprise of  the  bold  pioneer. '^^^^  Armed  settlement  was 
ever  the  true  course  of  pioneer  progress  in  America. 
**  Cultivation  and  defense  then  goes  hand  in  hand.  The 
heart  of  the  Indian  sickens  when  he  hears  the  crowing  of 
the  cock,  the  barking  of  the  dog,  the  sound  of  the  axe,  and 
the  crack  of  the  rifle.  These  are  the  true  evidences  of  the 
dominion  of  the  white  man;  these  are  the  proof  that  the 
owner  has  come,  and  means  to  stay ;  and  then  they  feel  it 
to  be  time  for  them  to  go.*^^®    The  story  of  the  recession 

218  jViZc«'  Weekly  Begister,  Vol.  LV,  p.  314;  Benton's  Thirty  Years'  View, 
Vol.  II,  p.  167,  et  seq.;  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  25th  Oongreas,  p.  89. 

2^^  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  25th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  165. 

217  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Bession,  25th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  163. 

218  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  26th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  73. 


258    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

of  the  Lidians  before  the  pioneers  as  told  by  Benton 
(himself  a  pioneer)  thrills  with  a  shuddering  coldness; 
but  its  truth  can  not  be  gainsaid. 

Both  Clay  and  Webster,  as  might  be  expected,  opposed 
Benton 's  bill  for  armed  occupation  and  free  grants  —  but 
unsuccessfully  in  the  Senate.^  ^®  Li  the  lower  house  the 
bill  was  lost.220 

Among  those  who  voted  against  the  bill  in  the  House 
was  Joshua  R.  Giddings,  who  later  leaped  into  prominence 
by  his  vehement  speech  in  opposition  to  a  bill  proposed  by 
Thompson  of  South  Carolina.  Thompson's  bill  provided 
for  the  removal  of  the  Seminoles  to  the  West.^^^  Giddings 
chose  the  subject  of  the  Seminole  War  not  so  much  to  de- 
fend the  Lidians  as  to  attack  the  institution  of  slavery,  and 
in  his  speech  of  February  8, 1841,  he  assigned  as  the  causes 
of  the  Florida  War  the  attempts  of  slave-hunters  to  capture 
fugitive  negroes  who  had  taken  refuge  with  the  Seminoles 
and  intermarried  with  them.  All  the  public  treasure  spent 
to  suppress  the  hostilities,  all  the  blood  of  the  defenseless 
pioneers,  women  and  children  murdered  by  the  Indians,  and 
the  disgrace  to  the  American  army  he  attributed  to  the  at- 
tempts of  the  Georgia  slaveholders  seeking  to  recover  their 
runaway  slaves  and  to  the  **  unlawful  interference  by  the 
people  of  Florida  with  the  Lidian  negroes '  \^^^  The  replies 
which  Giddings  received  were  bitter  and  offensive,  and,  as 
might  be  expected,  concerned  slavery  more  than  they  did 
the  war. 

Li  the  chaos  of  the  Florida  discussion  Benton  alone  ap- 
peared with  a  clear-cut  and  consistent  remedy  for  the  exas- 

^^9  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  194. 

220  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  235. 

221  Congressional  Globe,  2nd    Session,    26th    Congress,    Appendix,    p.    346 ; 
Memoirs  of  John  Quinoy  Adams,  Vol.  X,  p.  416. 

MS  Congressionai  Globe,  2nd  Session,  26th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  349. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  259 

peratmg  condition  in  that  Territory.  His  bill  for  armed 
occupation  —  the  same  which  was  rejected  by  the  House  in 
1839  —  was  the  embodiment  of  his  program.  With  his 
usual  tenacity  Benton  introduced  this  bill  in  the  following 
sessions,  and  spoke  on  the  subject,  as  he  himself  said,  when- 
ever no  other  Senator  manifested  a  desire  to  speak.**^  The 
scheme  was  ably  supported  in  the  Senate  by  Benton's  col- 
league, Lewis  F.  Linn,22*  by  Clay  of  Alabama,^^**  and  by 
Tappan  of  Ohio;^^®  and  in  the  House  support  came  from 
Butler  of  Kentucky  —  the  latter  sighing  for  the  days  of 
primitive  simplicity  when  it  was  thought  no  disgrace  to  kill 
an  Indian  enemy.^*^  John  Robertson  of  Virginia,*^®  Crit- 
tenden of  Kentucky ,22»  and  Preston  of  South  Carolina^^ 
were  opposed. 

**The  inducements  which  you  hold  forth  for  settlers'', 
declared  Crittenden,  **are  such  as  will  address  themselves 
most  strongly  to  the  most  idle  and  worthless  classes  of  our 
citizens. ' '  And  again  he  said  that  *  *  these  garrison  citizens ' ' 
would  in  no  respect  resemble,  nor  could  they  accomplish  the 
achievements  of,  the  **  hardy  and  resolute  pioneers  of  the 
West. '  '2**  Senator  Preston  prophesied  that  the  settlers  un- 
der the  proposed  act  would  not  be  such  as  the  *  *  daring,  res- 
olute men ' '  who  settled  the  Northwest  frontier,  but  instead 
*  *  speculators,  men  expecting  a  bounty  rather  than  desiring 

^^^  Congressional   Globe,   Ist  Session,   26th   Congress,   p.   20;    2nd   Session, 
27th  Congress,  p.  503. 

224  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  25th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  165 ;  End 
Session,  27th  Congress,  p.  623. 

228  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  26th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  47. 

226  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  26th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  74. 

227  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  26th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  669. 

228  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  202. 

229  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  26th  Congrew,  Appendix,  p.  80. 

230  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  26th  Congress,  Appendix,  pp.    74,   84. 
281  Congressional  Globe^  Ist  Session,  26th  Congress,  Appendix,  pp.   80,   81. 


260    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

to  make  permanent  settlements '  \^^^  Tappan  of  Ohio  saw 
the  matter  in  the  same  light  when  he  said :  ^  ^  The  men  you 
will  probably  obtain  nnder  this  law,  will  be  the  idle  and 
worthless  population  of  our  large  cities  *^^" 

Benton's  persistence  in  the  end  won  the  day.  The  bill, 
despite  dire  predictions,  was  passed  by  both  houses  and 
signed  by  the  President  on  August  4, 1842.***  Benton,  as  he 
tells  the  story  in  his  Thirty  Years^  View  implies  that  the 
enacting  of  this  law  marked  the  close  of  the  Seminole  Indian 
War.^'^  There  continued,  however,  a  smouldering  resist- 
ance from  the  wretched  remnants  of  Florida  tribes,  who 
were  not  transplanted  West,  long  after  the  announcement 
by  the  commanding  officer  of  the  army  in  August,  1843,  to 
the  effect  that  hostilities  in  Florida  had  ceased.  Indeed,  as 
late  as  1858  Giddings,  writing  in  his  Exiles  of  Florida  main- 
tained that  the.  United  States  was  still  in  open  war  with 
these  forlorn  people.^^® 

As  far  as  general  interest  was  concerned,  this  session 
did  mark  the  end  of  the  discussion  of  the  Florida  War,  save 
for  the  intermittent  speeches  of  Abolitionists  who  used 
the  subject  as  a  handle  for  attacks  upon  slavery.**^ 

i*^  Congressional  Oiohe,  Ist  SessioiXy  26th  CongreeSf  Appendix,  p.  75. 

2M  Congressional  Glohe,  Ist  Seesion,  26th  Oongren,  Appendix,  p.  74. 

2s«  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  V,  p.  502. 

a«B  Benton's  Thirty  Tears'  View,  Vol.  EC,  p.  70. 

S8«  GiddingB'B  The  Exiles  of  Florida,  p.  316. 

SS7  The  efforts  of  this  Abolitionist  in  behalf  of  Seminole-Negro  people  are 
not  to  be  east  aside.  His  exertions  for  justice  to  them  oontinoed  after  the 
greater  part  of  them  had  been  transported  to  their  new  homes  in  the  Cherokee 
lands  of  the  West.  Here  he  sought  in  Congress  to  protect  the  Seminole-Negroes 
from  the  Creeks,  who  claimed  them  as  slaves,  and  from  slave-hunters  from  the 
States.  During  his  last  term  in  Congress,  1857-1859,  Giddings  puUished  a  re- 
markably inspiring  account  of  the  exiles  of  Florida.  The  object  of  this  book, 
he  frankly  stated,  was  to  disabuse  the  public  mind  of  the  opinion  that  the  Sem- 
inole Wars  were  caused  by  the  depredations  of  the  Indians  upon  the  white 
settlements,  but  rather  by  the  persecutions  of  the  Southerners  and  of  a  gov- 
ernment subservient  to  the  institution  of  slavery.    Qiddings  closed  his  tragic 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  261 

FLANS  FOB  THB  DEFENSE  OF  THE  WESTEBN  FBONTIEB 

The  war  panic  in  the  fall  of  1835  stdmnlated  an  interest 
in  national  defense  which  ultimately  accrued  to  the  advan- 
tage of  the  frontier.  The  President's  annual  message  of 
December,  1835,  had  vigorously  reviewed  the  diplomatic 
friction  over  the  Spoliation  payments  from  France,  and  his 
message  of  January,  1836,  definitely  called  for  naval  and 
coast  defenses.^^  Some  months  later  the  elaborate  report 
of  Secretary  Cass  upon  the  land  and  naval  defenses  was 
sent  to  the  Senate.^^®  But  the  war  sensation  was  soon  end- 
ed. For  scarcely  a  month  later  the  delayed  installments 
were  in  the  hands  of  the  United  States.^^  Meanwhile  had 
occurred  both  the  desultory  debate  upon  Benton's  resolu- 
tion to  appropriate  the  surplus  revenues  for  the  purposes 
of  national  defense  and  the  debate  upon  the  elaborate  pro- 
visions of  the  Fortification  Bill  reported  by  the  Senate  Mili- 
tary Committee.^*^ 

In  this  hubbub  Benton  and  Linn  contrived  to  bring  some 
actual  advantage  to  the  fortification  question.  Western 
men  were  coming  to  consider  the  lack  of  adequate  frontier 
defense  as  a  matter  of  acute  danger.  For  some  time  Benton 
and  Secretary  Cass  had  consulted  with  each  other.  Both 
were  impressed  with  the  danger  of  Indian  uprisings  in  the 
Northwest  (the  region  where  the  Black  Hawk  War  was  not 
soon  to  be  forgotten)  and  both  were  of  the  opinion  that  the 
Seminole  hostilities  might  stimulate  the  prairie  Indians  to 
like  bold  attacks.  Reports  from  western  army  officers  con- 
story  with  a  relation  of  the  fate  of  the  exiles  whom  the  United  States  had 
transported  to  the  West.  He  pictured  this  band  of  miserable  people,  still  har- 
assed by  slave-hunters,  finally  attempting  to  flee  toward  Mexico. 

288  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  167,  Appendix,  p.  3. 

230  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  81. 

2M  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  1426;  NUes'  Weekly 
Begister,  Vol.  L,  p.  185. 

2«i  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  pp.  130,  591. 


262    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

firmed  their  fears.^*^  These  military  advices  were  to  the 
effect  that  the  force  on  the  frontier  was  inadeqnate  both  to 
protect  the  settlements  and  to  command  respect  from  the 
warlike  tribes.  This  condition  was  exhibited  to  the  Senate 
in  a  letter  from  the  War  Department  early  in  March.^*^ 
Secretary  Cass  called  attention  to  the  necessity  of  advanc- 
ing the  troops  and  posts  westward,  simultaneously  with  the 
receding  Indian  country.  As  a  basis  for  the  development  of 
the  fortification  of  the  new  frontier  he  proposed  new  mili- 
tary roads  and  posts  west  of  Missouri  and  Arkansas,  as 
well  as  an  increase  of  the  army.  These  plans  were  substan- 
tially repeated  in  his  report  on  the  military  and  naval  de- 
fenses made  in  April.^**  Benton  had  already  reported  from 
the  Military  Committee  a  bill  for  the  construction  of  a  mili- 
tary road  in  the  West,  and  now  he  reported  a  bill  to  increase 
the  army  of  the  United  States  in  accordance  with  the  recom- 
mendation of  the  Secretary  of  War.^*^ 

Li  the  House,  Johnson  of  Kentucky  had  reported  from 
the  Military  Committee  a  bill  authorizing  the  President  to 
raise  ten  thousand  volunteers,  and  a  bill  for  a  military  road 
and  forts  in  the  western  country .^^^  The  bill  for  the  vol- 
unteers had  special  reference  to  the  Florida  War. 

In  support  of  these  measures  Benton  presented  the  Sen- 
ate with  a  mass  of  pertinent  and  detailed  information. 
Using  the  estimates  of  Cass,  Benton  claimed  the  number  of 
Indians  upon  the  western  and  northwestern  border  to  be 
253,000  souls,  of  whom  50,000  were  warriors.^ *^    To  protect 

2*2  American  State  Papers,  Military  Affairs,  Vol.  VI,  p.  153;  Register  of 
Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  100. 

2*^  Register  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  96. 

2**  Register  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  24th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  81. 

2*&  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  24th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  126;  Jour- 
nal of  the  Senate,  p.  244. 

246  Journal  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  pp. 
253,  454,  3593. 

2*7  Register  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  24tii  Congress,  p.  1746. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  263 

the  people  of  the  West  and  Northwest  from  the  incessant 
danger  of  such  a  vast  array  of  savages  only  a  small  part  of 
the  small  United  States  army  was  employed.  The  six  thou- 
sand soldiers  of  the  United  States  were  distributed  along 
the  lake,  maritime,  gulf,  and  western  frontiers  —  a  circuit 
of  some  twelve  thousand  miles.  The  fortifications  upon  the 
maritime  and  gulf  coast  required  a  great  part  of  the  force ; 
and  of  that  allotted  to  the  West  a  part  had  to  be  kept  not  on 
the  frontier  but  at  a  convenient  position  for  mobilization* 
The  greater  division  of  the  western  troops  were  now  on  the 
Eed  Eiver,  watching  the  progress  of  events  on  the  Texas 
frontier.  The  result  was  that  the  Middle  West  and  North- 
west, always  insufficiently  guarded,  were  nearly  stripped  of 
defense  —  and  this  at  a  time  when  the  Indian  wars  in  the 
South  were  exciting  the  Indians  in  all  quarters.  The  East- 
em  States,  moreover,  owed  a  moral  obligation  to  protect 
the  Western  States  from  the  hordes  of  Indians  which  had 
been  and  were  still  being  removed  westward  in  order  to 
relieve  the  old  States  from  a  dangerous  and  useless  popu- 
lation. 

In  his  dramatic  manner  Benton  appealed  to  the  Senators 
*4n  the  name  of  that  constitution  which  had  for  its  first  ob- 
ject the  common  defense  of  the  whole  Union'*  to  prevent  a 
repetition  in  the  Northwest  of  the  scenes  of  **fire  and  blood, 
of  burnt  houses,  devastated  fields,  slaughtered  inhabitants, 
unburied  dead,  food  for  beasts  and  vultures,  which  now  dis- 
figure the  soil  of  Alabama,  Florida,  and  Georgia*'.^*®  Ben- 
ton 's  fascinating  arguments  were  reinforced  by  the  earnest 
appeals  of  his  colleague,  Lewis  F.  Linn,  and  of  Alexander 
Porter  of  Louisiana.  The  former  maintained  that  the  pres- 
ent frontier  population  of  Missouri  was  ''very  different 
from  those  hardy  and  warlike  adventurers  who  conquered 
the  valley  of  the  Mississippi.     They  were  generally  per- 

248  Begister  of  Debates,  let  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  1750. 


264    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

sons  in  easy  circumstances^  who  had  emigrated  from  the 
East  for  the  purpose  of  acquiring  land  for  their  growing 
families,  and  were  more  fitted  for  the  pursuits  of  peace 
and  industry  than  the  hardships  and  dangers  of  Indian  war- 
fare." To  such  it  was  all-important  to  pursue  their  usual 
vocations  without  the  constant  dread  of  savage  depreda- 
tions. There  was  no  doubt  but  that  they  could  conquer  the 
Indians,  but  it  would  only  be  after  **many  fair  fields  had 
been  made  desolate,  and  many  a  widow  would  be  weeping 
over  her  fatherless  children.  "^^^  Linn  also  referred  to  the 
consequences  of  the  removal  policy.  The  Government  was, 
he  asserted,  peculiarly  responsible  for  the  protection  of  the 
frontier  States,  after  ^  ^  throwing  large  masses  of  Indians  on 
them,  contrary  to  the  wishes  of  the  frontier  States,  and  in 
defiance  of  the  solemn  protest  of  one  of  them."**^ 

The  unprotected  condition  of  the  Texan  frontier  was  an- 
other argument  for  military  augmentation.  Besides  linn, 
Preston  of  South  Carolina,  Porter  of  Louisiana,  Buchanan 
of  Pennsylvania,  and  Walker  of  Mississippi  in  the  Senate 
prophesied  much  trouble  from  this  direction  and  urged  a 
more  careful  patrol  of  the  southwestern  border  line.*®^ 

Of  the  various  army  bills  under  consideration,  the  Senate 
passed  Benton's  for  the  increase  of  the  standing  army,  but 
passed  it  too  late  in  the  session  to  get  action  in  the  House.*'* 
On  the  other  hand  the  House  passed  Johnson 's  bill  for  the 

240  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  1852. 

2^0  Be  gist  er  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  1386.  See  also  p. 
1304. 

251  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  pp.  1386,  1391,  1394, 
1417,  1755.  Linn,  however,  denied  that  he  urged  the  bill  with  a  view  toward 
the  state  of  affairs  in  Texas. —  See  p.  1395. 

In  the  issue  of  the  NattoncU  Intelligencer,  December  24,  1835,  Rice  Qarland, 
a  Representative  from  Louisiana  published  a  statement  declaring  that  the 
Government  had  acquired  too  much  land  by  extinguishing  Indian  titles  and 
locating  the  Indians  on  the  southwestern  border. 

262  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  1854. 


) 
(:■ 


\.- 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  265 

ten  thousand  volunteers  and  his  bill  for  a  military  road  and 
posts  in  the  West,  and  the  Senate  concurred  therein.**^ 

Benton  was  determined,  however,  to  increase  the  stand- 
ing army.  In  the  next  session  he  introduced  another  bill. 
The  Senate  was  willing  to  pass  it,  with  a  majority  of  thir- 
teen, but  the  House  deferred.***  The  next  regular  session 
(1837-1838),  however,  saw  the  triumph  of  the  bill.  The  irri- 
tating hostilities  in  Florida  as  well  as  the  universal  feeling 
of  insecurity  for  the  western  frontier  militated  against 
further  postponement.  Even  the  sensation  caused  by  the 
Caroline  affair  on  the  Canadian  border  contributed  to  the 
merits  of  the  discussion.***  But  the  basic  argument  was 
that  of  defense  for  the  West.   Benton  spoke  in  these  words : 

The  whole  Indian  population  of  the  United  States  are  now  ac- 
cumulated on  the  weakest  frontier  of  the  Union  —  the  Western, 
and  Southwestern,  and  Northwestern  frontier  —  and  they  are  not 
only  accumulated  there,  but  sent  there  smarting  with  the  lash  of 
recent  chastisement,  burning  with  revenge  for  recent  defeats,  com- 
pletely armed  by  the  United  States,  and  placed  in  communication 
with  the  wild  Indians  of  the  West,  the  numerous  and  fierce  tribes 
towards  Mexico,  the  Bocky  Mountains,  and  the  Northwest,  who 
have  never  felt  our  arms,  and  who  will  be  ready  to  join  in  any  in- 
road upon  our  frontiers.**' 

A  Senator  from  the  new  State  of  Arkansas  made  a  plea 
for  his  people.  The  Indians  with  whom  our  forefathers 
contended,  he  argued,  were  **  wholly  undisciplined,  and 
armed  only  with  war  clubs  and  bows  and  arrows*';  they 
were  remote  from  each  other  and  at  war  with  each  other. 
But  the  Indians  who  face  the  Arkansas  frontier  are  better 
armed  than  even  our  citizens.    These  western  Indians  were 

^tisBegister  of  Debates,  let  SeiBion,  24th  Congress,  pp.  3375,  3756,  1523, 
1930. 

2S4Begister  of  Dehaies,  2nd  Session,  24th  Congrets,  p.  840;  Jowmai  of  the 
Eouse  of  Bepresentatives,  p.  600. 

25&  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  484. 

256  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  813. 

VOL.  IX — ^19 


266    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

located  ^'thousands  of  miles  from  this  Capitol,  and  hnn- 
dreds  of  miles  distant  from  the  nearest  points  from  which 
relief  to  the  frontier  settlements  could  be  brought  in  the 
event  of  war.  They  have  been  taken  from  .... 
Georgia,  Alabama,  Indiana,  Illinois,  Ohio,  and  the  Caro- 
linas,  and  located  together  upon  the  borders  of  the  weakest 
and  most  remote  States  in  the  Union. ''^^^^ 

Linn  replied  to  the  charge  made  against  the  Missouri 
people  of  having  plundered  and  oppressed  the  Indians  on 
her  borders^ 

There  was  not  a  man  in  either  Missouri  or  Wisconsin  who  did  not 
possess  too  much  sense  to  attempt  to  plunder  Indians.  They 
all  knew  that  at  that  game  they  were  very  sure  to  come  off  losers: 
for  the  Indians  could  beat  all  the  white  men  on  the  face  of  the 
earth  at  stealing.  No ;  the  people  of  Missouri  had  never  robbed  or 
trampled  on  these  natives  of  the  forest.  All  the  injuries  in  the  case 
had  been  perpetrated  by  Indians  upon  the  peaceable  white  settlers 
and  their  families.  The  Indians  had  been  represented  as  a  x>oor, 
spiritless,  down-trodden  race,  ignorant  of  their  own  rights,  and  con- 
tinually imposed  upon  by  the  whites.  Nothing  could  be  more  op- 
posite to  the  truth.  A  deal  of  trash  of  this  kind  had  been  uttered  in 
the  course  of  this  debate,  by  those  who  ought  to  know  better.  No 
people  on  the  face  of  the  earth  were  keener  sighted,  or  more  fully 
awake  to  their  rights  and  interests,  than  the  North  American  In- 
dians. .  .  .  Never  had  they  been  more  fierce,  never  more  bent 
on  war.*"* 

Such  speeches  exhibited  much  solicitude  on  the  part  of 
western  members;  but  their  statements  were  so  sweeping 
and  so  generaUzing  that  the  suspicion  of  exaggeration 
might  well  arise.  Calhoun,  Clay,  and  Crittenden  of  Ken- 
tucky called  in  question  this  warlike  panic.  **What  had 
created  so  great  a  dread  of  those  70,000  Indians,'*  ex- 
claimed the  latter,  *  *  composed  of  the  fragments,  the  broken 

2^f  Begistcr  of  DebateSy  2nd  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  835. 
t^^  Register  of  Debates^  2nd  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  837. 


/ 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  267 

fragments,  of  a  poor,  disheartened,  dispirited,  down-trod- 
den people!  It  was  in  vain  to  effect  a  terror  of  this  now 
fallen  race,  trampled  in  the  dust,  and  broken  in  spirit,  as  an 
argument  for  the  increase  of  the  standing  army.**^^®  The 
pioneers  of  Kentucky  and  Tennessee,  Crittenden  told  the 
Senate,  had  conquered  their  wilderness  without  the  aid  of 
Federal  troops.  Why  should  not  the  pioneers  of  the  far 
West  do  the  same  in  their  region? 

Concerning  the  influence  that  annuities  might  have  in  pre- 
serving peace  with  the  Indians,  the  opinions  of  Calhoun  and 
Linn  directly  opposed  each  other.  Calhoun  believed  that 
the  Cherokees,  Creeks,  Choctaws,  and  Chickasaws,  all  of 
whom  were  friendly  to  the  United  States  and  received  large 
annuities  from  the  Government,  would  never  forfeit  these 
bounties  by  a  hostile  act.^®^    Linn  replied : 

The  great  tribes,  to  whom  large  annual  payments  in  money  had 
been  guaranteed,  would  not  go  to  open  war  with  this  Gtovemment, 
lest  their  annuities  should  be  forfeited ;  but  there  were  some  smaller 

^^^Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  24th  CongreaSy  p.  829. 

The  technical  objection  to  Benton 's  bill  which  pertained  to  a  point  of  military 
economy  Was  that  of  replenishing  the  file  of  the  regiments  or  of  increasing  the 
regiments.  In  other  words  that  of  increasing  or  not  the  proportion  of  priTates 
to  the  officers.  Galhoon,  who  it  will  be  recalled  was  Secretary  of  War  under 
President  Monroe,  held  that  the  staff  of  the  army  should  be  increased,  and 
not  the  file.  Clay  disfavored  a  considerable  standing  army  and  advocated  re- 
liance on  the  militia. —  Register  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  1852 ; 
Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25tii  Congress,  p.  133. 

It  is  interesting  to  note  some  of  the  other  objections  to  increasing  the  stand- 
ing army.  For  instance,  Everett  of  Vermont  objected  because  any  increase  in 
the  army  must  be  made  up  chiefly  from  an  enlistment  of  foreigners,  and  he 
hoped  never  to  ''see  that  day  when  Irishmen,  Englishmen,  and  other  aliens 
should  be  organized  and  armed  to  keep  the  citizens  of  his  State  in  order." — 
Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  484. 

260  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  808. 

Calhoun's  position  on  this  point  is  self-explanatory.  As  told  by  the  con- 
gressional reporter,  Calhoun  said  in  part: — ''The  bill  proposed  to  increase 
our  existing  military  establishment.  ...  by  the  addition  of  5,500  men, 
.  .  .  and  augmenting  the  expense  of  its  maintenance  by  a  million  and  a 
half  or  two  millions  of  dollars.    Was  this  necessary  f    He  contended  that  it  was 


268    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

tribes  not  so  restrained;  these  were  not  unlikely  to  commence  a 
hostile  movement;  and,  the  moment  they  should  do  so,  there  were 
multitudes  of  the  young  warriors  from  the  larger  tribes  ready  and 
eager  to  join  them.'*^ 

not.  .  .  .  Abroad  we  were  at  peace  with  all  the  world;  and  as  to  Mexico^ 
he  believed  no  gentleman  serioualy  contemplated  that  we  were  to  go  to  war 
with  her.  Never  had  there  been  a  time  when  so  little  force  was  necessary  to 
pot  our  Indian  relations  upon  the  safest  footing.  Our  Indian  frontier  had^ 
within  a  few  years,  been  contracted  to  one  half  its  former  dimensions.  It 
had  formerly  reached  from  Detroit  all  the  way  round  to  the  month  of  the 
St.  Mary's,  in  Georgia;  whereas,  at  present,  its  utmost  extent  was  from  St. 
Peter's  to  the  Bed  river.  To  guard  this  frontier,  the  (Government  had  nine 
regiments  of  artillery,  seven  of  infantry,  and  two  of  dragoons.  He  would 
submit  to  every  one  to  say  whether  such  a  line  could  not  be  amply  defended  by 
such  a  force.  Supposing  one  regiment  to  be  stationed  at  St.  Louis,  and  an- 
other at  Baton  Bouge,  there  still  remained  seven  regiments  to  be  extended 
from  St.  Peter's  to  Bed  river.  Supposing  one  of  them  to  be  stationed  at 
St.  Peter's,  one  upon  the  Missouri,  one  in  Arkansas,  and  one  upon  the  Bed 
river,  there  were  still  three  left  at  the  disposal  of  the  Government.  He  con- 
tended that  this  force  was  not  only  sufficient,  but  ample.  He  should  be  told 
that  there  was  a  very  large  Indian  force  upon  this  frontier.  That  was  very 
true.  But  the  larger  that  force  was,  the  more  secure  did  it  render  our  posi- 
tion; provided  the  Government  appointed  among  them  faithful  Indian  agents,, 
who  enjoyed  their  confidence,  and  who  would  be  sustained  by  the  Government 
in  measures  for  their  benefit.  Of  what  did  this  vast  Indian  force  consist  t 
In  the  first  place,  there  were  the  Choctaws,  who  had  removed  beyond  the 
Mississippi  with  their  own  consent;  a  people  always  friendly  to  this  Govern- 
ment, and  whose  boast  it  was  that  they  had  never  shed,  in  a  hostile  manner^ 
one  drop  of  the  white  man 's  blood.  Their  friendship  was  moreover  secured  by 
heavy  annuities,  which  must  at  once  be  forfeited  by  any  hostile  movement. 
Whenever  this  was  the  case,  the  Government  possessed  complete  control,  by 
the  strong  consideration  of  interest.  Next  came  the  friendly  Creeks,  who 
had  all  gone  voluntarily  to  the  west  bank  of  the  river.  Then  came  the  friendly 
Cherokees,  who  had  done  the  same  thing;  and  next  the  Chickasaws,  whom  we 
also  held  by  heavy  annuities.  All  this  vast  body  of  Indians  were  friendly 
toward  the  United  States,  save  a  little  branch  of  the  Creeks;  and  it  would 
be  easy  for  any  prudent  administration,  by  selecting  proper  agents,  and  sus- 
taining them  in  wise  measures,  to  keep  the  whole  of  these  people  peaceable  and 
in  friendship  with  this  Government,  and  they  would  prove  an  effectual  barrier 
against  the  incursions  of  the  wild  Indians  in  the  prairies  beyond.  But  to 
increase  largely  our  military  force  would  be  the  most  certain  means  of  pro- 
voking a  war,  especially  if  improper  agents  were  sent  among  them  —  political 
partisans  and  selfish  land  speculators.  Men  of  this  cast  would  be  the  more 
bold  in  their  measures,  the  more  troops  were  ready  to  sustain  them".  Note 
also  a  further  speech  on  p.  826.  Compare  Nilea'  Weekly  Register,  VoL  LII, 
p.  99. 
261  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  838. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  269 

Thronghont  the  debate  there  appeared  vagae  accusatioiis 
against  Clay  and  Calhonn.  Were  Clay  and  Calhoun  hostile 
to  adequate  frontier  defense?  No  one  can  read  the  speeches 
on  the  Army  Bill  without  perceiving  that  more  than  a  few 
individuals  considered  them  so  to  be.  But  such  sentiments 
were  without  foundation.  Clay's  attitude  had  been  ex- 
pressed on  this  very  question  time  and  time  again  for  a 
score  of  years.  It  was  always  the  same.  Clay  disliked  a 
standing  army;  he  would  have  the  western  country  rely 
upon  an  efficient  militia.^®^ 

As  to  Calhoun,  if  he  were  seeking  an  alliance  between 
South  Carolina  and  the  West,  as  his  correspondence  during 
this  period  might  lead  one  to  suppose,  then  there  existed  a 
powerful  political  motive  to  prohibit  his  taking  an  attitude 
in  any  way  unfriendly  to  Benton's  Army  Bill.^®^  But  as  a 
matter  of  fact,  Calhoun  was  ever  zealous  for  western  de- 
fense. His  administration  of  the  War  Department  under 
Monroe  exhibited  in  that  respect  a  record  which  he  could 
point  to  with  pride.^®*  Like  Clay  he  opposed  a  large  stand- 
ing army.  While  disapproving  Benton's  broad  plan  of  mili- 
tary establishment,  Calhoun  nevertheless  voted  for  the 
Army  Bill  in  1836  ;2®'^  and  during  the  same  session  he  was 
manager  of  the  Volunteer  Bill  in  the  conferences  between 
the  two  houses.^®^ 

262  Clay  '8  opposition  to  the  Army  Bill  may  haTO  contributed  to  his  unpopu- 
larity in  some  sections  of  the  West  in  the  same  way  that  his  Land  Bill  did. — 
Pelzer's  The  Early  Democratic  Party  of  Iowa  in  The  Iowa  Journal  of  His- 
tory AND  Politics,  Vol.  VT,  p.  30. 

2«3  Calhoun  Correspondence,  Annu{U  Beport  of  the  American  Historicdl  Asso- 
ciation, 1899,  Vol.  II,  pp.  349,  353,  366. 

^^*Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  826. 

2^'i  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  1853.  For  Calhoun's 
votes  against  the  bills  of  1837  and  1838,  see  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session, 
24th  Congress,  p.  840 ;  Journal  of  the  Senate,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  170. 

2M  Journal  of  the  Senate,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  366;  Begister  of 
Debates,  p.  1503. 


270    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

More  truth,  however,  lies  in  the  assertion  that  Benton 
pressed  his  Army  Bills  upon  Congress  with  an  eye  single 
to  his  elaborate  scheme  of  national  defense.  Benton  was 
almost  vindictively  opposed  to  the  Surplus  Revenue  Dis- 
tribution Bill.  So  the  more  surplus  of  the  treasury  diverted 
to  the  army,  the  less  there  would  be  for  distribution  to  the 
States.**^    The  frontier  scare  was  a  convenient  argument. 

As  a  matter  of  fact  the  Indian  outcry  of  the  day  was 
somewhat  exaggerated.^^^    Even  Benton  admitted  that  the 

267 Compare  with  Meigs'  Benton,  p.  171,  and  with  Linn  and  Sargent's  Life 
and  Public  Services  of  Br,  Ltnn,  p.  280.  Many  charges  were  made  that  the 
Fortification  Bill  of  1835,  as  well  as  the  bill  for  the  increase  of  the  army, 
was  a  political  maneuver.  For  instance,  see  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session, 
24th  Congress,  pp.  2390,  2436. 

s«*The  following  letters  from  the  southwestern  frontier  show  an  ulterior 
motive  in  spreading  rumors  of  Indian  hostilities.  One  letter  dated  August  28, 
1836,  at  Natchitoches,  Louisiana,  says:  "One  of  the  ostensible  causes  of  this 
permanent  military  occupation  of  Texas  is  the  reported  disaffected  state  of  a 
number  of  tribes  or  fragments  of  tribes,  of  Texian  Indians,  and  some  that  once 
lived  in  the  United  States.  The  Tezans  are  pleased  by  the  presence  of  our 
troops  as  giving  their  cause  countenance,  and  with  that  policy  they  raise  and 
spread  rumors  of  threatened  attacks. ' ' —  NUes '  Weekly  Begister,  Vol.  LI,  p.  87. 
Another  letter  from  Camp  Sabine  declares:  *'This  frontier  is  perfectly  quiet. 
No  Indian  disturbances,  and  none  likely  to  take  place.  The  Indians  are  few 
in  number,  quietly  pursuing  their  avocations,  and  in  my  opinion  dare  not  mo- 
lest the  frontier  settlements  of  Louisiana;  and  it  is  believed  that  they  have 
never  entertained  an  idea  of  the  kind.  A  thousand  stories  have  been  circulated 
to  the  prejudice  of  the  Indians,  which  have  proved  false.  On  this  frontier,  a 
man  would  be  considered  very  credulous,  who  should  regard  the  reports  that 
daily  come  from  Texas." — NUes'  Weekly  Begister,  Vol.  LI,  p.  162.  A  letter 
from  Camp  Nacogdoches,  dated  September  21st,  says:  "There  is  something 
singular  in  our  occupation  of  Nacogdoches.  There  never  has  been,  nor  is  there 
likely  to  be,  any  difficulties  with  the  Indians. —  They  are  as  peaceable  as  could 
be  expected,  urging  the  necessity  of  keeping  white  men  out  of  their  country. ' ' — 
NUes'  Weekly  Begister,  Vol.  LI,  p.  162. 

The  maneuvers  of  General  Gaines  upon  the  Texan  boundary  in  the  summer  of 
1836  raised  a  storm  of  protest  from  those  in  the  United  States  opposed  to 
annexation,  and  the  denials  of  possible  Indian  hostilities  were  quite  likely 
exaggerated.  However,  these  were  undoubtedly  false  rumors  about  Indian 
dangers.  Further  opinions  of  the  time  may  be  found  in  Benjamin  Lundy  's  The 
War  in  Texas  (Philadelphia:  1837),  pp.  44-51;  William  Kennedy's  Texas 
(London:  1841),  Vol.  II,  p.  291;  and  Mrs.  Mary  Austin  Holley's  Texas  (Lex- 
ington, Kentucky:  1836),  p.  161. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  271 

western  people  had  their  just  proportion  of  the  American 
army.^**  It  required  no  elaborate  fortifications  of  stone 
and  mounted  cannon  to  repulse  such  an  enemy  as  the  abor- 
igines. Crudely  constructed  posts  and  a  few  mounted 
dragoons  were  enough.*^^  Such  defenses  were  already  on 
the  frontier.  But  if  adventurers  advanced  beyond  the  out- 
posts and  into  the  Indian  country,  did  they  deserve  any 
further  protection  from  the  Government!  It  was  a  western 
Representative,  Bell  of  Tennessee,  who  turned  the  question 
by  suggesting  that  an  army  was  needed  on  the  border  as 
much  'Ho  coerce  our  own  settlers  to  an  obedience  of  the 
laws  *  *  as  to  awe  the  Indians.*^^ 

The  War  Department  was  interested  in  the  enlargement 
of  the  army,  and  recommendations  of  the  nature  of  Poin- 
sett's report  in  1837  carried  much  weight  ^^^ — so  also  did 
the  mass  of  reports  from  regular  army  officers.^^'  The  De- 
partment outlined  for  congressional  consideration  an  elab- 
orate system  of  fortifications  in  the  West ;  and  in  1838  Ben- 
ton introduced  a  bill  to  put  it  into  effect,  but  the  bill  wa^ 
lost  in  the  press  of  other  matters.^^*  Congressional  atten- 
tion, however,  had  been  definitely  called  to  the  need  of  the 
West,  and  the  appropriation  bills  for  fortifications  during 

260  Register  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  1746. 

270  This  is  the  opinion  of  Secretary  Cass. —  Register  of  Debates,  1st  Session, 
24th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  81. 

271  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  483. 

272  Senate  Documents,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  No.  1,  p.  171. 

2^9  Senate  Documents,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  No.  1,  p.  204;  Executive 
Documents,  No.  276. 

274  Congression<il  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  265. 

In  the  following  session  Senator  Linn 's  plan  of  fortifications  to  extend  from 
the  Sabine  Biver  to  Fort  Snelling  deserves  attention.  For  several  sessions  also, 
Senator  Fulton  of  Arkansas  introduced  a  bill  for  setting  apart  a  belt  of  land 
on  the  western  borders  of  Missouri  and  Arkansas  as  bonntj  lands,  to  be 
granted  to  settlers  for  a  term  of  years  in  defense  of  the  frontier.  His  argu- 
ment therefor  may  be  found  in  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress, 
Appendix,  p.  412. 


272    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

the  following  years  contained  items  for  carrying  out  the 
War  Department's  plan,  especially  for  establishing  posts 
along  the  Arkansas  and  Missonri.^*^^ 

THE  END  OF  THE  OHBBOKS^B  C0NTB0VEB8Y 

The  question  as  to  the  Cherokees  again  came  to  Congress. 
This  tribe  had  failed  to  obtain  relief  by  their  appeal  to  the 
Supreme  Court;  and  from  the  Executive  Department  they 
received  only  admonitions  to  sell  their  lands  and  depart 
westward.*'^'  Now  they  renewed  their  earnest  but  utterly 
vain  petition  to  Congress.  Clayton  of  Delaware  presented 
their  memorial  to  the  Senate  on  May  20,  1834.^'^  Forsyth 
immediately  objected  to  its  reception,  but  was  outvoted  — 
three  nays  to  thirty  yeas.^^®  The  Senate  would  not  ruth- 
lessly deny  these  Indians  a  courteous  hearing,  nor  refuse 
them  the  right  of  petition.  But  little  more  than  this  could 
the  Cherokees  expect  from  either  house.  Complete  ex- 
tinction of  the  Georgia  Indian  title  had  become  a  tenet  of 
the  Government's  policy.  All  further  stubbornness  on  the 
part  of  the  Indians  made  the  business  only  the  more  put- 
tering and  unpleasant.  The  Senate  had  learned  a  lesson, 
however,  from  the  unfortunate  episode  of  Indian  Springs. 
No  more  minority  treaties  would  be  consented  to.  So  when 
in  the  latter  part  of  the  session  the  President  transmitted 
a  treaty  (negotiated  by  John  H.  Eaton  as  commissioner  on 
the  part  of  the  United  States)  which  surrendered  the  Cher- 
okee  lands  in  Georgia,  the  Senate  investigated  the  negoti- 

27B  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  V,  pp.  582,  609,  660. 

2T«  Cherokee  Nation  vs.  State  of  Georgia,  5  Peters  1.  Worcester  vs.  State 
of  Georgia,  6  Peters  515.    NUes '  WeeTcly  Register,  Vol.  XXXVI,  p.  257. 

Note  also  Jackson's  supposed  remark  in  regard  to  leaving  Chief  Justice 
Marshall  to  enforce  his  decision  in  regard  to  the  Cherokees. —  Greeley's  The 
American  Conflict,  Vol.  I,  p.  106. 

^ff  Register  of  Debates,  lit  Session,  23rd  Congress,  p.  1772. 

27S  Register  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  23rd  Congress,  p.  1780. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  273 

ations.*^®  Hugh  L.  White  of  Tennessee,  much  to  the  irrita- 
tion of  Jackson,  conducted  the  inquiry ;  and  he  found  that 
this  treaty  like  the  one  of  Indian  Springs  was  signed  by 
only  a  minority  representation.  The  Senate  was  advised 
of  the  situation,  and  without  ado  refused  ratification.*®^ 

If  the  Cherokees  saw  in  this  rejection  of  the  Govern- 
ment's treaty  any  signs  to  encourage  their  persistence,  they 
deluded  themselves.  Both  houses  were  impatient  of  grant- 
ing any  more  consideration  to  the  Cherokees  until  they 
should  acquiesce  in  the  demands  of  the  Georgians  and  in 
the  advice  of  the  Executive.  The  few  speeches  of  philan- 
thropic New  Englanders  and  Ohioans  could  never  change 
this  sentiment.  The  Georgia  members  and  the  delegations 
from  the  central  and  western  States  were  omnipresent  and 
in  the  majority.  And,  indeed,  when  it  came  to  debate  it  be- 
hooved the  champions  of  the  aborigines  to  explain  the  sins 
of  their  own  forefathers.  Their  perorations  invited  cyn- 
ical reflections  when  the  Georgia  delegation  demanded  to 
know  what  had  become  of  the  hordes  of  Indians  who  once 
occupied  the  soil  of  New  England.  Surely  small-pox  alone 
had  not  swept  from  the  woods  all  of  *  *  those  pernicious  crea- 
tures to  make  room  for  a  sounder  growth '',  as  Cotton 
Mather  wrote  of  the  Plymouth  fields  I  The  colonists  had 
pushed  back  the  natives.  Why  should  not  the  Georgians 
follow  their  example?  Did  not  the  oration  of  John  Quincy 
Adams  in  1802  on  the  anniversary  of  the  landing  of  the  Pil- 

279  Executive  Journal  of  the  Senate  (1887),  Vol.  IV,  pp.  445,  446.  Senator 
White  was  Chairman  of  the  Committee  on  Indian  Affain  and  reported  from 
that  committee  the  resolation  that  the  Senate  do  not  advise  and  consent  to  the 
ratification. 

280  In  a  letter  to  J.  A.  Whiteside,  September  17,  1835,  White  defended  his 
action  against  the  charge  that  he  was  hostile  to  the  Administration's  Indian 
policy.  Speaking  of  the  treaty  of  1834,  he  said:  '*I  could  find  no  principle 
or  precedent  which  would  justify  me  in  calling  that  a  treaty,  which  not  only 
had  not  the  assent  of  the  Indians,  but  was  made  against  their  express  wishes; 
therefore  I  held  myself  bonnd  not  to  recommend  its  ratification." — Scott's 
Memoir  of  Hugh  Lawson  White,  p.  169. 


274    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

grims  apply  as  well  to  Georgia  as  to  New  England  f  ^' Shall 
the  lordly  savage'*,  declared  the  then  youthful  Adams,  "not 
only  disdain  the  virtues  and  enjoyments  of  civilization 
.  .  .  •  but  shall  he  control  the  civilization  of  a  world  f 
Shall  he  forbid  the  wilderness  to  blossom  like  the  rosef 
.  .  .  •  No,  generous  philanthropists!'*^®^  Adams,  now 
in  the  role  of  philanthropist  himself,  was  compelled  to  listen 
to  the  sarcasm  of  the  Georgians : 

Could  the  principle  which  regulated  the  colonies  from  their  earli- 
est day  of  strength,  and  beyond  which  Georgia  has  never  gone,  have 
been  more  forcibly  expressed,  or  eloquently  illustrated  [than  by 
this  same  Adams]  ....  Can  it  be  that  in  such  wide-sweep- 
ing assertion  of  colonial  right,  the  mind  of  the  orator  had  nar- 
rowed its  vision  to  the  horizon  of  New  England,  and  the  defense 
of  his  own  puritan  ancestors!  Who,  that  has  heard  the  announce- 
ment of  such  a  principle,  could  for  a  moment  imagine  that  the  mind 
which  had  adopted,  and  the  tongue  which  expressed  it  with  sucb 
eloquence  and  force,  should  now  utter  immeasured  denunciation 
against  Georgia  for  having  acted  short  of  the  extent  of  his^wi» 
principle!*" 

No,  the  Cherokees  could  never  ask  for  further  attention 
from  Congress  unless  they  quitted  their  *doumess  and  ac- 
cepted the  generous  grants  in  the  western  country  —  lands, 
indeed  desirable,  broad  in  extent  and  fertile.^®*    The  advice 

2BiAn  Oration  Delivered  at  Plymouth,  December  eg,  1802  (Boston  1802), 
p.  23. 

A  modem  defense  of  the  New  England  Indian  policy  may  be  found  in 
Channing's  History  of  the  United  States,  Vol.  I,  pp.  338-341,  402,  403,  Vol.  11^ 
pp.  76-79. 

^^^  Begister  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  4505. 

288  For  descriptions  of  the  Cherokee  country,  see  Executive  Documents,  1st 
Session,  26th  Congress,  No.  2,  p.  466;  2nd  Session,  26th  Congress,  No.  2,  p.  310^ 

During  the  debates  on  the  bill  for  the  armed  occupation  of  Florida,  Benton 
elicited  information  from  the  War  Department  which  he  made  the  basis  for 
a  defense  —  one  of  the  most  able  ever  made  —  of  the  United  States'  Indian 
policy. —  Senate  Documents,  1st  Session,  26th  Congress,  No.  616.  The  purpose- 
of  his  contention  was  to  answer  De  Tocqueville 's  rather  flippant  but  withai 
very  picturesque  account  of  the  American  mode  for  ejecting  the  Indian  peo- 
ples from  their  lands. —  Benton's  Thirty  Years'  View,  Vol.  I,  p.  691,  et  seq^ 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  275 

of  Webster  was  as  prophetic  as  that  of  Jackson  was  authori- 
tative. They  were  contending  against  the  inevitable.  The 
reception  in  the  Senate  of  Clay's  proposal  of  February, 
1835,  exhibited  this  fact  in  a  pronounced  manner.  When 
Clay  brought  forward  a  plan  whereby  the  Cherokees  who 
did  not  choose  to  emigrate  westward  should  receive  the  pro- 
tection of  the  courts  in  confirming  their  titles  to  small  par- 
cels of  land,  his  proposal  was  contemptuously  brushed  aside 
by  Cuthbert  of  Georgia  and  by  Benton,  while  Hugh  L. 
White  of  Tennessee  was  provoked  into  delivering  a  long 
eulogy  upon  the  now  sacred  policy  of  removal  whose  origin 
he  traced  to  the  great  Jefferson.^®* 

Clay  might  well  reflect  that  his  efforts  in  behalf  of  the  In- 
dians, beginning  with  his  appeal  for  the  Seminoles  in  1819, 
had  ended  in  much  the  same  manner.  We  might  ask,  what 
motive  could  this  Kentuckian  harbor  which  moved  him  to 
persist  in  pleading  the  Indian  cause  like  Webster  and  Ev- 
erett, Calhoun  and  Vinton.  Unlike  Vinton,  Clay  did  not 
harbor  any  prejudice  in  his  heart  against  the  men  and  wom- 
en who  left  the  East  to  find  homes  on  the  f rentier.^®*  Clay 
was  one  of  them  himself.  Indeed,  this  pioneer  trait  in  his 
own  life  accounts  for  his  cheerless  attitude  toward  the  des- 

Reeve's  Translation  of  De  Tocqueville 's  Democracy  in  America  (Cambridge: 
1863),  Vol.  I,  p.  436,  et  aeq, 

Benton  showed  that  between  the  years  1789  and  1840,  ninety  million  dollars 
had  been  paid  to  the  Indians  by  the  Government  for  their  land.  This  was  a 
sum  nearly  six  times  as  much  as  the  whole  of  Louisiana  cost  and  three  times 
as  much  as  all  three  of  the  great  foreign  purchases  of  Louisiana,  Florida,  and 
California.  To  the  Cherokees,  alone,  for  eleven  millions  of  acres,  was  paid 
about  fifteen  millions  of  dollars,  the  exact  price  of  Louisiana  or  of  California. 
Benton  reviewed  the  patient  efforts  of  the  United  States  to  civilize  the  In- 
dians, and  the  careful  mode  of  treating  with  them  for  land  cessions.  Lo* 
gicians  will  indeed  concede  that  he  proved  the  trivialness  of  De  Tocqueville's 
criticism. 

284  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  23rd  Congress,  p.  300,  et  seq.  For  a 
description  of  Clay  *s  eloquence  on  this  occasion,  see  Mallory  's  Life  and  Speeches 
of  Eenry  Clay,  Vol.  I,  p.  177. 

285  See  above  p.  225. 


276    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

tiny  of  the  Indian  race.  The  Diary  of  John  Qnincy  Adams 
reveals  a  light  on  this  phase  of  Clay 's  entente,  although  that 
light  is  somewhat  highly  colored.^^®  Adams  records  that 
when  Barbour  proposed  in  the  Cabinet  meeting  of  Decem- 
ber 22,  1825y  to  incorporate  the  Indians  as  citizens  of  the 
States,  Clay  declared  himself  as  utterly  opposed  to  granting 
the  Indians  any  such  privilege.  It  was  impossible  to  civ- 
ilize them,  said  Clay ;  they  were  destined  to  extinction ;  and 
although  he  would  never  use  or  countenance  inhumanity  to- 
wards them,  he  did  not  think  them  as  a  race  worth  preserv- 
ing. Their  disappearance  from  the  human  family  would  in 
fact,  he  asserted,  be  no  great  loss  to  the  world. 

Such  expressions  indicate  a  distinctly  pioneer  conception 
of  the  Indian  problem  —  for  pioneers  never  idealized  the 
American  aborigines.  Their  judgment  was  Teutonic  and 
harsh.  Throughout  all  of  Clay's  impassioned  appeals  in  be- 
half of  these  benighted  people  there  is  seldom  a  glimmer  of 
hope  for  their  advancement  as  a  race.  His  eloquent  plead- 
ings for  justice  were  but  the  promptings  of  a  humane  heart 
who  pitied  their  condition,  read  their  destiny,  and  saw  how 
hopeless  and  cheerless  it  was.  But,  withal,  there  is  a  deli- 
cate distinction  to  be  noted  in  Clay's  opinion.  It  was  the 
race  —  namely,  the  tribal  relations,  and  barbarous  customs, 
and  separatism  —  that  Clay  believed  to  be  unworthy  of 
preservation.  The  civilization  of  individual  members  was 
another  matter.  Indeed,  the  ethnology  of  these  peoples 
might  seem  to  prove  that  Clay  was  not  far  in  the  wrong. 

The  Twenty-third  Congress  adjourned  unheeding  the 
Cherokee  petition.  The  day  was  now  at  hand  when  the 
chapter  of  Cherokee  struggles  in  Georgia  would  be  closed. 
In  December,  1835,  the  tribe  gave  way  and  at  New  Echota 
signed  the  treaty  exchanging  all  their  lands  east  of  the 
Mississippi  for  five  million  dollars  and  lands  in  the  West ; 

2B9  Memoirs  of  John  Quincy  Adams,  Vol.  VII,  p.  90. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  277 

and  they  promised  to  remove  within  the  space  of  two 
years.*®^  A  stubborn  faction,  headed  by  the  venerable 
chief,  John  Boss,  still  protested  against  this  decision  and 
denied  the  validity  of  the  treaty ;  but  they  protested  and  de- 
nied in  vain.*®®  Senator  White,  chairman  of  the  Indian 
Committee  who  in  the  preceding  year  had  defeated  the 
Eaton  Treaty,  found  nothing  in  the  negotiations  to  inval- 
idate Jackson's  new  treaty.  On  April  19th,  he  reported  in 
favor  of  ratifying.*®^  A  month  later  the  ratification  was 
considered  in  executive  session,  and  the  champions  of  the 
Indians  then  gave  the  last  battle  for  Indian  rights.*®^  Clay, 
Webster,  and  Calhoun  in  turn  argued  for  the  rejection  of 
the  treaty.  What  they  said  has  not  been  accurately  pre- 
served. But  the  Administration  triumphed  on  May  18th, 
when  one  vote  more  than  the  necessary  two-thirds  was  cast 
for  ratification.*®^  A  small  number  of  anti-administration- 
ists  in  the  lower  house  witnessed  the  defeat  attending  the 
efforts  of  Clay,  Webster,  and  Calhoun  in  the  Senate  and  pre- 
pared to  make  a  resistance  to  the  appropriation  necessary 
to  carry  the  treaty  into  effect.  The  Committee  on  Ways  and 
Means  did  not  long  delay  the  little  conflict.  In  the  annual 
bill  making  appropriations  for  Indian  treaties,  which  was 
soon  after  reported  to  the  House,  an  item  for  the  New 
Echota  Treaty  was  found.*®*  Adams,  supported  by  Wise  of 
Virginia,  moved  to  strike  out.*®*  They  were  answered  by 
Haynes  of  Georgia,  who  confused  the   Opposition  with 

28T  Kappler  'a  Indian  Affairs :   Laws  and  Treaties,  Vol.  II,  p.  439. 

2»»  Executive  Documents,  Ist  Session, '24th  Congress,  No.  286.  John  Quincj 
Adams  presented  the  John  Boss  memorial  in  the  House  of  Representatives. — 
Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  576. 

280  Executive  Journal  of  the  Senate  (1887),  Vol.  IV,  p.  532. 

290  Benton ^s  Thirty  Years'  View,  Vol.  I,  p.  624,  et  seq. 

291  Executive  Journal  of  the  Senate  (1887),  Vol.  IV,  p.  546. 

292  Register  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  4501. 
29SB€gist€r  of  Debates,  1st  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  4502,  et  seq, ;  Memair» 

of  John  Quincy  Adams,  Vol.  IX,  p.  299. 


278    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS^ 

Adams's  own  rhetoric  on  the  *4ordly  savagefir^\^**  Jack- 
son's administration  was  then  energetically  defended  by 
Haynes  as  follows : 

When  that  administration  came  into  power,  seven  years  ago,  it 
found  a  partial  system  of  Indian  colonization  west  of  the  Mississippi 
in  operation.  .  .  .  Within  the  last  six  or  seven  years,  the 
I>olicy  of  removing  and  colonizing  the  Indians  in  the  States  east 
of  the  Mississippi,  to  the  westward  of  that  river,  in  a  region  remote 
from  the  habitation  of  the  white  man,  has  been  among  the  topics 
of  universal  and  bitter  discussion  from  one  end  of  the  Union  to  the 
other.  Nor  on  any  other  subject  has  the  course  of  General  Jack- 
son's administration  been  more  violently  or  unjustly  assailed.  And 
here  I  take  leave  to  say,  that  so  far  from  Indian  hostilities  having 
been  provoked,  either  by  the  negligence  or  injustice  of  that  admin- 
istration, they  may,  with  much  greater  justice,  be  ascribed  to  the 
political  philanthropy,  so  loudly  and  pharisaically  displayed  by  its 
political  opponents;  and  I  will  further  say,  that  should  war  arise 
on  the  part  of  the  Cherokees,  the  sin  of  it  lies  not  at  the  door  of  this 
adjninistration,  or  its  supporters. 

Bonldin  of  Virginia  in  an  attempt  to  be  sarcastic,  almost 
raved  when  he  declared : 

What  is  the  policy,  the  design,  of  the  United  States,  in  regard  to 
the  Indians!  ....  Whence  did  they  derive  the  title  to  all 
the  wide  domain  of  which  they  are  the  proud  owner  t  Did  they  not 
derive  it,  or  rather  wrest  it,  from  the  possession  of  the  natives  —  the 
Indians!  and  has  it  not  been  the  uniform  and  persevering  policy 
of  the  United  States,  hitherto,  to  drive  them  off,  or  exterminate 
them  f  What  means  this  change  of  policy  f  Have  they  relented,  or 
repented,  and  do  they  mean  to  change  their  policy  f  Let  them,  then, 
give  up  all  the  lands  they  have,  by  the  tomahawk  and  scalping- 
knife,  or  the  rifle,  taken  from  that  gallant  but  unfortunate  race,  and 
I  will  believe  in  their  pity  and  their  repentance.  If  they  do  not 
mean  this,  what  do  they  mean  f  Do  they  mean,  after  having  driven 
these  unfortunate  beings  from  the  North  and  East  to  the  South  and 
Southwest,  by  treaties  and  cruelties  far  worse  than  have  been  lately 
practiced^  to  use  the  whole  power  of  the  confederacy,  thus  acquired, 

*9ABeg%9ter  of  Debates,  Ist  SesBion,  24th  Congress,  p.  4505. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  279 

to  compel  the  people  of  Georgia  and  their  neighbors  to  submit  to 
the  scalping-knife  and  the  tomahawk!  Do  they  mean  that  an  inde- 
pendent savage  nation  shall  remain  forever  in  the  heart  of  a  civil- 
ized sovereign  State  f  ....  Do  they  mean  that  these  savages 
shall  remain  there,  scalping  and  tomahawking,  under  the  protec- 
tion of  the  Federal  Court  or  the  Federal  Gtovemment,  until  they 
have  taken  their  vengeance  on  these  helpless,  defenceless  women 
and  children,  and  obtained  as  much  money  for  their  land  as  they 
may  think  proper  to  demand  t^** 

Grantland,  another  Georgia  Eepresentative,  warned  the 
House  against  **  misplaced  philanthropy  *\^®®  But  no  warn- 
ing was  necessary.  The  amendment  offered  by  Adams  was 
rejected  without  even  a  division;  and  Benton  was  able  to 
congratulate  the  country  that  the  North  and  the  South  had 
united,  notwithstanding  the  opposition  of  Calhoun,  in  ex- 
pelling the  Indians  from  the  South.^*^ 

Jackson's  administration  was  drawing  to  a  close.  Much 
had  been  accomplished  for  the  policy  of  a  general  removal 
since  the  President 's  inauguration  in  1829 ;  and  Jackson  did 
not  forget  to  congratulate  the  nation  upon  the  success  of  the 
removal  policy  in  his  last  annual  message  of  December,  1836. 
He  considered  this  success  consummated  by  the  late  treaty 
of  New  Echota.^®*  To  the  Opposition  these  felicitations  ap- 
peared, perhaps,  premature,  for  the  Cherokees  under  the 
terms  of  their  treaty  had  still  a  year  of  grace  before  quitting 
their  lands. 

The  end  of  the  first  year  of  Van  Buren's  administration 
v^itnessed  an  increased  public  interest  in  the  Cherokee  ques- 
tion. The  details  of  Jackson's  treaty  had  become  well 
known,  and  Webster  could  truly  say  in  the  Senate  that  there 
was  a  **  growing  feeling  in  the  country  that  great  wrong  had 

295  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Sesiion,  24th  Congress,  pp.  4526,  4550. 

2»e  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  24th  Congress,  p.  4554. 

^^f  Begister  of  Debates,  Ist  Session,  24th  Congreis,  p.  4565;  Benton's  TMr- 
iy  Years*  View,  Vol.  I,  p.  626. 

298  Begister  of  Debates,  2nd  Session,  24th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  9. 


280    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

been  done  to  the  Cherokees  by  the  treaty  of  New  Echota '  \^^ 
Multitudes  of  petitions  adverse  to  the  removal  of  the  Cher- 
okees came  to  the  House,  only  to  be  tabled  at  the  motion  of 
the  Georgia  delegation.*^^  Lumpkin  denounced  the  **  slan- 
ders ' '  cast  by  these  memorials  with  the  evil  purpose  of  dis- 
paraging the  State  of  Georgia.  He  condemned  ^'the  idle, 
silly,  and  false  sympathy  set  forth"  as  coming  from  a  dis- 
tant people  **who  are  obviously  ignorant  of  the  merits  of  the 
subject  with  which  they  are  impertinently  intermed- 
dling. '  ^^^  Clay  of  Alabama  charged  the  northern  Senators 
with  an  evident  desire  to  ''loose  the  tomahawk  and  scalping 
knife"  upon  the  Alabama  frontiersmen,«>^  King  of  Ala- 
bama declared  that  the  continued  discussion  of  the  subject 
in  Congress  created  false  hopes  in  the  minds  of  the  Cher- 
okees and  would  result  in  dangerous  disturbances.  And  his 
colleague,  Senator  Clay,  said  that  the  recent  scenes  in  Flor- 
ida ought  to  admonish  all  of  the  ''danger  of  tampering  with 
a  subject  of  such  fearful  importance,  and  that  firmness  and 
energy,  with  a  rigid  adherence  to  the  terms  of  the  treaty, 
was  the  only  course  to  prevent  war  and  bloodshed."*** 

When  Webster  ventured  to  say  that  "many  excellent  and 
worthy  men  had  it  in  their  consciences  on  their  pillows,  that 
some  great  wrong  had  been  done  to  the  Cherokees  in  the 
treaty  of  Echota '  \  the  proverbial  reply  was  made  by  Alfred 
Cuthbert  of  Georgia.  "Where  were  the  Indian  tribes  which 
once  covered  the  territory  of  Massachusetts?",  he  said,  us- 
ing phrases  almost  stereotyped  by  repeated  expression. 
"Where  slumbered  the  consciences  of  the  people  of  Massa- 

290  Congressional  Glohe,  2xid  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  403. 

800  Many  petations  came  from  Massachusetts. —  JoumcA  of  the  House  of 
Representatives,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  pp.  726,  776,  778,  911,  986,  1020, 
1127 ;  Memoirs  of  John  Quinoy  Adams,  Vol.  IX,  p.  518. 

801  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  376. 

802  Congressionol  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  263. 

808  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  pp.  263,  402. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  281 

chusetts  when  these  tribes  were  exterminated  by  themf 
Yes,  sir,  butchered!'* 

Further  discussions  were  vain.  *  *  The  treaty  must  be  ex- 
ecuted", thundered  the  Georgia  delegation  on  all  occasions. 
No  bill  was  passed  for  Cherokee  relief.*^*  And  at  last,  close 
following  upon  the  adjournment  of  Congress,  the  problem 
was  put  forever  beyond  the  pale  of  Congressional  recon- 
sideration when  the  treaty  was  enforced  in  the  Cherokee 
country  by  an  officer  of  the  army  —  General  Winfield  Scott. 
*  *  The  full  moon  of  May  is  already  on  the  wane,  * '  read  his 
proclamation  to  the  Cherokee  people,  **and  before  another 
shall  have  passed  away,  every  Cherokee,  man,  woman,  and 
child  ....  must  be  in  motion  to  join  their  brethren 
in  the  far  west. '  *  When  the  last  remnants  of  these  people 
passed  the  Mississippi  their  petitions  against  removal 
ceased  to  annoy  Congress.*^* 

DEFENSE  OF  THE  OBEGON   OOUNTBY 

The  census  map  of  1840  presents  a  different  picture  of 
the  frontier  line  than  does  the  map  of  1820.*^®  In  Louisi- 
ana, Arkansas,  and  Missouri  the  settlements  had  been  ex- 
tended westward  to  Texas  and  to  the  edge  of  the  Indian 
country.  The  country  on  the  right  bank  of  the  Mississippi 
River  was  covered  with  farms  as  far  north  as  Prairie  du 
Chien,  and  straggling  claims  were  found  even  further  to 
the  north  and  west.  On  the  east  side  of  the  Mississippi  the 
northern  frontier  had  been  pushed  well  into  the  interior  of 
Wisconsin  and  Michigan.  And  the  great  inland  frontiers 
which  appear  on  the  map  of  1820  were  fast  disappearing; 

304  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  404.  The  ilogan  of 
the  Georgian  delegation  is  illustrated  by  Lumpkin's  Bpeeeh,  p.  403. 

305  l^iles'  Weekly  Begister,  Vol.  LIV,  p.  210. 

306  Eleventh  Censtts,  Population,  Vol.  I,  Part  1,  Map  facing  p.  xiiv.  For  the 
military  frontier,  see  Executive  Documents,  2nd  Session,  27th  Congress,  No.  2, 
p.  80,  pi.  D;  and  American  State  Papers,  Military  Affairs,  VoL  VII,  Map  facing 
p.  780. 

VOL.  IX — ^20 


282    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

for  the  land  titles  of  the  Cherokees,  Creeks,  Choctaws, 
Chickasaws,  and  of  the  northern  tribes  (with  a  few  excep- 
tions like  the  Miamis  and  the  Menominees)  had  been  ex- 
tinguished and  their  lands  surveyed  and  sold  to  the  pioneers 
and  southern  planters.  The  two  decades  which  had  passed 
since  the  year  1820  had  witnessed  the  consummation  of  the 
policy  for  Indian  removal  from  the  eastern  half  of  the 
Mississippi  Valley,  and  the  scene  of  Indian  affairs  was 
now  shifted  across  the  Mississippi  to  the  further  West. 

Benton  had  long  kept  before  Congress  the  necessity  of 
patroling  the  southwestern  frontier  bordering  upon  Mex- 
ico, which  was  peculiarly  exposed  to  the  attacks  of  the  no- 
madic Comanches  and  Apaches.  In  the  year  1825  he  called 
upon  Congress  to  protect  from  the  depredation  of  these  In- 
dians the  overland  trade  between  Missouri,  Santa  Fe^ 
Chihuahua,  and  Sonora.*^^  Five  years  previously  the  trad- 
ers of  the  prairies  had  established  the  Santa  Fe  Trail  over 
the  desert  prairie  between  the  town  of  Independence  on  the 
Missouri  Biver  and  the  capital  of  New  Mexico;  and,  said 
Benton  in  1825,  it  seemed  like  a  romance  to  hear  of  cara- 
vans of  trade  traversing  in  season  the  vast  plain  between 
the  Missouri  and  the  Bio  del  Norte.  The  biU  Benton  intro- 
duced for  improving  the  Trail  and  pacifying  the  Indians  en 
route  was  passed  by  both  houses.*^® 

Starting  from  the  same  Missourian  locale  another  and 
longer  trail  traversed  the  plains  and  mountains  of  the 
Northwest.  This  was  the  trail  to  Oregon.  like  the  Santa 
Fe  Trail  its  congressional  guardians  were  the  Missouri 
Senators,  Benton  and  Linn.  At  an  early  day  they  urged 
Congress  to  protect  the  emigrants  to  Oregon.  While  the 
story  of  the  struggle  for  Oregon  belongs  to  another  chapter 
of  western  history,  there  are  parts  of  the  story  which  too 

»07  Begister  of  Debates^  2nd  Session,  18th  Congress,  p.  341. 
»08  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  IV,  p.  100. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  283 

intimately  concern  the  defense  of  American  settiers  on  the 
frontier  to  be  excluded  from  this  narration.  A  discussion 
of  one  particular  phase  —  defense  of  the  Oregon  pioneers 
—  tangled  as  it  is  in  a  question  of  greater  importance,  will 
nevertheless  throw  a  new  light  on  the  Oregon  question. 

Since  Benton  and  Linn  are  the  heroes  of  the  tale  it  is  well 
to  begin  with  their  earliest  exertions.  Benton  in  his  first 
term  as  Senator  from  the  newly  created  State  of  Missouri 
ably  supported  Floyd's  bill  of  1822  for  the  armed  occupa- 
tion of  the  Columbia  Biver,  which  bill  also  contemplated 
grants  of  land  to  settlers  and  supervision  of  the  Indians.  He 
had  also  introduced  resolutions  on  his  own  initiative  looking 
towards  the  retention  of  the  Oregon  country.*^^  Sixteen 
years  later,  February  7, 1838,  Lewis  F.  linn  introduced  the 
first  of  his  series  of  bills  for  the  establishment  of  an  Oregon 
Territory  f^^  and  from  that  day  until  his  death,  he  became 
the  special  advocate  for  Oregon. 

To  what  extent  Benton  and  linn  fostered  these  bills  as 
an  open  defiance  to  England  and  a  part  of  the  game  in  the 
Oregon  diplomacy  and  to  what  extent  they  favored  them 
simply  as  a  means  to  protect  and  give  the  emigrants  a 
government  can  not  be  exactiy  measured;  nor  would  it  be 
profitable  to  elaborately  essay  any  such  measurement.  The 
latter  motive  is  not  to  be  entirely  overlooked,  although  it  is 
probably  the  lesser,  in  the  case  of  Benton.  It  should  be  re- 
membered, however,  that  Benton  was  a  western  man ;  and  of 
western  problems  he  studied  the  real  conditions,  not  merely 
the  theories.  Unlike  the  ex-President  who  debated  the 
same  question  in  the  House,  and  who  had  played  a  part  in 
the  early  diplomacy  of  the  case,  Benton  saw  not  only  the 
raison  d'etat  but  he  also  saw  the  great  bare  plains  of  the 
Northwest  through  which  ran  the  Oregon  Trail  to  the  South 

300  AnruUs  of  Congress,  2xid  Sestion,  17th  Congress,  p.  246. 
810  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  25th  Congress,  p.  168. 


284    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

PasSy  and  the  thousand  slow  moving  caravans  of  daring 
men  and  pioneer  women  travelling  toward  the  West  to  make 
their  homes  in  the  romantic  land  of  the  joint-occnpancy. 
The  hopes  and  the  fears  of  these  emigrants  he  understood. 
And  being  himself  of  kindred  spirit  he  championed  their 
canse.  Nor  was  Benton  alone  among  western  members. 
He  typified  the  sentiment  of  western  expansion.  Linn  and 
Douglas  were  of  his  mold. 

On  February  6, 1840,  Linn  gave  a  new  feature  to  the  Ore- 
gon question  by  moving  resolutions  calling  upon  the  Secre- 
tary of  War  for  his  opinion  concerning  establishing  forts 
along  the  Oregon  Trail  for  the  purpose  of  encouraging  and 
protecting  the  American  fur  traders  and  caravans  to  the 
new  country.^^^  Poinsett's  report  in  reply  was  agreeable 
to  such  a  scheme  and  proposed  locations  for  three  posts 
along  the  Trail.*"  Linn,  however,  did  not  include  this  item 
in  his  plan  of  Columbian  colonization,  although  upon  the 
28th  of  April  he  introduced  a  biU  to  extend  jurisdiction  over 
Oregon.  Later,  in  May,  he  agreed  not  to  urge  the  Oregon 
question  in  any  phase,  pending  the  delicate  state  of  affairs 
in  the  Northeastern  boundary  negotiations.*^* 

As  to  the  Tyler  administration,  both  the  President  and 
his  Secretary  of  War,  Spencer,  were  of  the  opinion  that 
forts  should  be  established  on  the  Oregon  Trail.  Lideed, 
in  his  annual  report  of  December,  1841,  Spencer  asked  for 
a  chain  of  posts  from  Council  Bluffs  to  the  mouth  of  the 
Columbia,  and  Tyler  added  his  recommendation  in  the  an- 
nual message.*^*  Both,  forsooth,  cautiously  limited  their 
reasons  to  one,  and  that  was  protection  of  fur  traders  from 
the  Lidians.    Nine  days  following  the  President's  message 

811  Congressional  Globe,  let  Session,  26th  Congress,  p.  166. 

812  Senate  Documents,  let  Session,  26th  Congress,  No.  231. 
818  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  26th  Congress,  p.  363. 

^i^^  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  27th  Congress,  Appendix,  pp.  4,  12. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  285 

Linn  introduced  his  Oregon  bill  revised  up  to  date.*^*^  It 
contained  a  section  providing  for  forts  along  a  trail  leading 
from  the  Missouri  into  *  *  the  best  pass  for  entering  the  val- 
ley of  the  Oregon*'.'^®  Before  it  was  discussed  at  length 
Lord  Ashburton  arrived  in  Washington,  and  again  congres- 
sional discussion  of  the  Oregon  question  was  postponed  be- 
cause of  the  international  negotiations.*^^ 

The  treaty  with  Ashburton  was  concluded  in  August  of 
1842,  and  when  Congress  convened  in  December  the  per- 
sistent and  patient  Linn  again  introduced  his  bill.*^*  Li  re- 
gard to  Lidian  affairs  it  provided  for  two  agencies  to  super- 
intend all  tribes  of  the  westernmost  West.*^*  The  omission 
of  any  compromise  on  the  Oregon  boundary  in  the  Webster- 
Ashburton  Treaty  made  the  time  ripe  for  acute  discussion 
of  such  a  bill.  The  opposition  was  decided.  First  Cal- 
houn,32o  then  M*Duffie,«2i  Choate,*^^  Crittenden,»23  Ber- 
rien,*^* and  Archer*^  spoke  against  it.  Calhoun  interpret- 
ed the  measure  as  an  act  of  hostility  toward  England,  and 
upon  this  premise  he  argued  for  the  rejection  of  the  bill. 
The  country  was  unprepared  for  war  if  England  resented 
the  action,  was  the  burden  of  his  thesis.*^*    The  section  do- 

31S  Congressional  Glohe,  2nd  Session^  27th  Congress,  p.  22. 

816  For  details  of  bill,  see  Niles'  Weekly  Register,  Vol.  LIX,  p.  338;  Con- 
gressional Globe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  p.  112. 

317  Linn  and  Sargent 's  Life  and  Public  Services  of  Dr.  Linn,  p.  239. 

818  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  p.  61. 

819  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  p.  112. 

»2o,  Congressional  Glob^,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  pp.  133,  227  j  Appen- 
dix, p.  138. 

821  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  pp.  198,  240. 

^^2  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  pp.  171,  239;  Appen- 
dix, p.  222. 

823  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  p.  105. 

824  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  p.  212. 

^2i  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  pp.  104,  220,  244;  Ap- 
pendix, p.  130. 
826  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  139. 


286    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

nating  lands  to  settlers  he  pointedly  disapproved  as  a"  vio- 
lation of  treaty  rights.*^^  Calhonn  believed  the  tide  of 
American  emigration  would  soon  reach  the  Bocky  Moun- 
tains of  its  own  accord  and  be  ready  to  pour  into  the  Oregon 
country.  Such  a  theory  would  seem  to  preclude  the  idea 
that  military  posts  should  not  precede  actual  settlement. 
Be  that  as  it  may,  Calhoun  closed  his  speech  with  a  long 
defense  of  his  conduct  as  Secretary  of  War  when,  perceiv- 
ing the  resources  of  the  Northwestern  fur  trade,  he  had  ad- 
vanced the  military  stations  high  up  the  Mississippi  and 
Missouri.**® 

Choate  disapproved  of  the  section  making  donations  to 
settlers  as  a  contravention  of  the  Convention  of  1827.'** 
And  he  further  explained  at  length  how  Oregon  had  been 
exploited  by  Massachusetts  enterprise.  Might  not  the  East, 
therefore,  be  the  rightful  judge  of  the  disposition  to  be 
made  of  the  country  of  the  Northwest? 

So  far  as  to  the  bill  being  an  act  of  hostility  to  Great 
Britain  it  is  difficult  to  conceive  such  a  nature  therein,  save 
in  the  section  making  the  donation  of  land.  The  other  fea- 
tures gave  the  settlers  the  protection  which  Great  Britain 
had  already  given  her  own  Oregon  citizens  by  act  of  Parlia- 
ment in  the  year  1821.^®  But  the  proposed  land  grants 
were  a  questionable  matter.  Calhoun  sought  the  reference 
of  the  bill  to  the  Committee  on  the  Judiciary  in  order  to 
strike  out  this  objectionable  feature,  but  the  friends  of  the 
bill  would  permit  no  such  emasculation.'*^  On  the  other 
hand  Calhoun  was  equally  stubborn.  When  Bayard  pro- 
posed an  amendment  to  the  effect  that  the  proposed  dona- 

i27  Congressional  Glohe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  p.  134. 

9^B  Congressumdl  Globe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  141. 

tn  CangressiofuA  Q^he,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  222. 

uo  1  and  2  Qeoige  IV,  cap.  LXVL 

881  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  pp.  134,  239. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  287 

tions  should  be  altered  to  mere  claims  against  the  United 
States,  an  arrangement  which  would  be  in  no  wise  hostile 
to  England,  Calhoun  objected.**^ 

On  February  3rd,  by  a  vote  of  24  to  22  the  bill  passed  the 
Senate ;  but  it  failed  in  the  House.***  Before  the  next  ses- 
sion of  Congress  death  had  come  to  Senator  Linn,  leaving 
to  his  colleagues  the  legacy  of  his  Oregon  bill.*** 

In  the  two  sessions  following  Linn's  death  several  differ- 
ent Oregon  bills  were  considered,  but  all  failed  to  pass  both 
houses.***  The  discussions  thereon  were  of  course  a  part 
of  the  extensive  Oregon  debate  and  may  be  noticed  here 
only  because  of  references  to  the  question  of  protection 
from  the  Indians,  which  was  ever  but  a  side  issue.  Benton 
continued  to  point  out,  as  in  earlieir  speeches,  the  dangers 
which  would  ensue  if  the  agents  of  the  Hudson  Bay  Com- 
pany should  instigate  the  natives  to  war  upon  the  emi- 
grants.**® Buchanan,**^  Hannegan  of  Indiana,***  Doug- 
las**® —  soon  to  be  appointed  chairman  of  the  House  Com- 
mittee on  Territories  —  and  Duncan  of  Ohio**®  also  pointed 
out  this  danger. 

Arguing  from  the  same  fact,  namely,  the  hostilities  of  the 
Indians,  Senator  Dayton  of  New  Jersey  came  to  different 

882  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  p.  134. 

888  Congressional  Globe,  3rd  Session,  27th  Congress,  p.  240.  For  Linn 's  bill, 
see  Appendix,  p.  154.  Adams  from  the  House  Committee  on  Foreign  Relations 
to  whom  the  Senate  bill  was  referred  reported  that  the  House  do  not  concur 
therein. —  Journal  of  the  House,  p.  382. 

88*  Benton 'a  Thirty  Tears'  View,  VoL  11,  p.  486. 

^^s  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  28th  Congress,  pp.  56,  77,  104,  366; 
2nd  Session,  28th  Congress,  pp.  36,  38,  63. 

836  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  28th  Congress,  p.  637. 

337  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  28th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  346. 

888  Congresswnat  Globe,  1st  Session,  28th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  245. 

880  CongressioncU  Globe,  2nd  Session,  28th  Congress,  p.  226. 

840  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  28th  Congress,  p.  216 ;  Appendix,  p. 
181. 


288    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

conclusions.  He  declared  that  the  United  States  conld  nev- 
er wisely  make  **  Oregon  a  State  of  this  Union  .  .  .  . 
[or]  a  separate  government^  the  effect  of  which  would  be 
to  pen  up  342,000  Indians  between  it  and  our  western  fron- 
tier. It  would  either  be  the  cause  of  exterminating  the  In- 
dians, or  making  them  a  horde  of  depredators,  or  both.'***^ 
Senator  Choate  of  Massachusetts,  one  of  the  most  persist- 
ent opponents  to  the  retention  of  Oregon,  sought  to  prove 
that  the  Northwestern  danger  was  overrated  by  western 
congressmen  f^^  and  Adams  in  the  House  implied  that  *  *  the 
enterprising,  and  warlike  young  men"  of  Oregon  should  be 
able  to  protect  themselves.*** 

In  December,  1845,  Benton  made  a  sensible  move  in  the 
Oregon  question  —  a  move,  indeed,  which  it  is  a  matter  of 
wonder  was  not  made  long  before.  He  separated  the  prop- 
osition of  immediate  protection  to  the  Oregon  emigrants 
and  the  vital  issue  of  the  Oregon  question.  This  was  done 
by  a  bill  which  he  reported  from  the  Military  Conunittee, 
providing  for  a  regiment  of  mounted  riflemen  and  several 
outposts  with  the  object  of  guarding  the  Oregon  Trail.'** 
Such  a  bill  was  one  that  could  consistently  be  supported  by 
Calhoun  and  Crittenden,  although  the  latter  considered  it 
of  little  real  importance.***  The  Senate  passed  it  on  Jan- 
uary 8,  1846,  but  the  House  delayed  its  becoming  law  until 
almost  a  month  after  the  adoption  of  the  joint  resolution  to 
abrogate  the  Oregon  Convention.**®  The  credit  for  this  bill 
is  not  entirely  to  be  laid  to  Benton.  President  Polk's  bold 
message  at  the  convening  of  Congress  had  practically  rec- 

841  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  28th  Congress,  p.  315. 

842  Congressional  Globe,  Isti  Session,  28th  Congress,  p.  407 ;      Appendix     p. 
587. 

848  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  28th  Congress,  p.  228. 

844  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  29th  Congress,  p.  108. 

845  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  29th  Congress,  p.  162. 

846  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  29th  Congress,  pp.  162,  830. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  289 

ommended  that  the  question  of  providing  defenses  for  the 
pioneers  be  separated  from  the  question  of  the  acquisition 
of  Oregon.  In  this  matter  the  President  and  Benton  had, 
indeed,  been  in  full  accord  for  some  time.^*^ 

The  committees  on  Indian  affairs  in  both  houses  reported 
bills  to  regulate  trade  and  intercourse  with  the  Oregon  In- 
dians and  to  make  peace  with  them  ;^*®  but  both  bills  were 
postponed  pending  the  outcome  of  the  Buchanan-Pakenham 
Treaty  and  were  never  taken  from  the  table  during  this  ses- 
sion.^*® 

On  August  5, 1846,  almost  at  the  close  of  the  session,  Polk 
was  able  to  communicate  to  Congress  the  fact  that  ratifica- 
tions of  the  convention  for  the  final  adjustment  of  the  Ore- 
gon question  had  been  exchanged  with  Great  Britain.**® 
At  last  the  great  objection  to  giving  the  Oregon  settlers  a 
government  and  protection  from  the  Indians  was  overcome. 
The  exclusive  jurisdiction  of  the  country  was  now  vested  in 

S47  Congressional  Globe,  let  Sessioiiy  29th  CongresSy  p.  7 ;  Diary  of  James 
K.  Polk,  Vol.  I.  p.  70. 

It  should  be  noted  that  President  Tyler  also  had  advocated  practically  a 
separate  discussion  of  protection  to  the  emigrants.  In  his  last  annual  mes- 
sage, December  3,  1844,  after  informing  Congress  that  the  negotiations  of 
Secretary  of  State  Calhoun  with  the  British  Government  concerning  the 
Oregon  jurisdiction  were  still  pending,  he  renewed  his  previous  recommenda- 
tions for  laws  * '  to  protect  and  facilitate  emigration  to  that  Territory. ' '  Con- 
cerning these  measures  Tyler  said:  *'The  establishment  of  military  posts  at 
suitable  points  upon  the  extended  line  of  land  travel  would  enable  our  citizens  to 
migrate  in  comparative  safety  to  the  fertile  regions  below  the  falls  of  the 
Columbia,  and  make  the  provision  of  the  existing  convention  for  the  joint 
occupation  of  the  Territory  by  subjects  of  Great  Britain  and  the  citizens  of  the 
United  States  more  available  than  heretofore  to  the  latter.  These  posts  would 
continue  places  of  rest  for  the  weary  emigrant,  where  he  would  be  sheltered 
securely  against  the  danger  of  attack  from  the  Indians,  and  be  enabled  to 
recover  from  the  exhaustion  of  a  long  line  of  travel. ' ' —  Congressional  Globe^ 
2nd  Session,  28th  Congress,  p.  3.  The  Executive  attitude  in  1844-1845  is  dis- 
cussed on  p.  387,  but  evidently  Tyler's  attitude  had  little  weight  in  the  matter. 

848  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  29th  Congress,  pp.  121,  888. 

8*8  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  29th  Congress,  p.  834 ;   Journal  of  the 
Senate,  p.  320. 
i^o  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  29th  Congress,  p.  1199. 


290    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

the  United  States;  and  Congress  under  the  Constitution 
was  authorized  to  give  the  Territory  a  government.  But 
for  two  years  this  power  was  held  in  abeyance,  and  the 
Oregon  country  remained  in  the  same  lawless  state  for  want 
of  congressional  action.  The  cause  of  this  inaction  had  al- 
ready been  foreseen.  The  northern  extremists  pointed  to- 
ward Calhoun.  His  policy  of  a  **wise  and  masterly  inac- 
tivity** in  1845  had  been  interpreted  into  **no  more  free 
soil  territory ' ',  and  now  his  opponents  were  to  find  another 
sin  to  lay  at  his  door.  Calhoun  was  too  shrewd  a  man  not 
to  know  that  the  northern  party  would  insist  upon  inserting 
a  slavery  restricting  clause  in  the  Territorial  biU  for  Ore- 
gon. That  country  was  north  of  the  Mason  and  Dixon  line. 
No  one  asserted  that  slavery  would  ever  find  a  root  there. 
Why  then  meet  the  question  of  slavery  on  a  bill  so  vital  to 
the  Northwest!  Simply  because  this  was  the  logical  op- 
portunity to  force  the  issue  of  the  constitutionality  of  slav- 
^jy  .861  g^^  Calhoun's  opponents  were  not  loth  to  accept  the 
challenge,  no  matter  what  the  cost  of  delay  might  be  to 
Oregon. 

As  soon  as  the  President's  message  announcing  the  ex- 
change of  ratifications  in  regard  to  the  Oregon  Convention 
of  June  and  urging  the  early  establishment  of  a  government 
for  that  Territory  was  communicated  to  the  House,  Douglas 
from  the  Committee  on  Territories  introduced  a  biU  pro- 
viding both  a  government  and  Federal  protection  for  Ore- 
gon.^* This  bill  had  been  prepared  some  months  in  ad- 
vance of  the  President's  announcement  and  had  been 
framed  with  an  eye  single  to  the  welfare  of  the  Territory. 
As  introduced  it  contained  no  clause  oti  slavery  to  block  its 
passage.    But  on  the  same  day,  after  the  House  had  put  it 

«»i  For  Benton's  criticism  of  Calhoun  for  ** forcing  the  issue",  see  his  Thirty 
Years'  View,  VoL  11,  p.  698,  et  seq. 

8S2  Congressionai  Globe,  1st  Session,  29th  Congress,  p.  1200. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  291 

through  the  first  two  readings  in  the  Committee  of  the 
Whole,  the  bill  was  amended  to  forever  exclude  slavery 
from  the  Territory.  The  vote  on  this  amendment  was  de- 
<5isive  — 108  ayes  and  only  43  nays."*  The  expedition  of 
the  House  in  this  matter  was  commendable.  Within  a  few 
hours  time  Douglas's  bill  as  amended  passed  the  third 
reading  and  was  sent  to  the  Senate.*^* 

Undoubtedly  the  upper  chamber  would  also  have  passed 
this  bill  with  the  same  promptness  had  the  slavery  restrict- 
ing clause  been  reversed  or  entirely  omitted.  As  it  was  the 
fiouthem  majority  tabled  it  at  the  instigation  of  Calhoun  — 
80  Benton  claims.*^**  Thus  the  Oregon  people  were  left  for 
a  year  in  their  extra-legal  status,  with  no  authoritative  gov- 
ernment and  embarrassed  with  threatening  Indian  wars. 
This  was  also  their  fate  for  another  year,  for  the  history  of 
the  first  Territorial  bill  was  repeated  when  the  second  bill 
-came  from  the  House  in  the  session  of  1846-1847.  The  Sen- 
ate tabled  it.*'® 

In  the  whole  Oregon  a£tair  there  is  one  man  who  stands 
out  in  a  peculiarly  satisfactory  way  —  and  that  man  is  the 
President.  Polk  viewed  the  question  with  the  executive  at- 
titude. Oregon  was  without  a  government  and  without  ade- 
quate protection.  Both  shoulij  be  immediately  supplied. 
Twice,  in  a  special  and  in  an  annual  message,  Polk  told 
Congress  this.  He  had  even  promised  the  Oregon  settlers 
that  he  would  demand  action  from  Congress;**^''  but  that 
was  all  he  could  do.    The  situation,  he  rightly  described  in 

853  Congressional  Glohe,  let  Scsiion,  29th  Oongress,  pp.  1200,  1204. 
354  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  SeeBion,  29th  Congress,  p.  1205. 

855  Journal  of  the  Senate,  1st  Session,  29th  Congress,  p.  505;  Benton's  Thirty 
Years'  View,  Vol.  11,  p.  698,  et  $eq, 

856  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  29th  Congress,  pp.  199,  571. 

357  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  30th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  40.  Com- 
pare Diary  of  James  K.  Polk,  Vol.  II,  pp.  444-449;  also  NUes'  Weekly  Begister, 
Vol.  LXXII,  p.  148. 


292    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

his  Diary  when  he  wrote:  "The  present  defenseless  condi- 
tion of  the  people  of  Oregon  is  wholly  to  be  attributed  to  the 
neglect  and  inattention  of  Congress  to  their  condition^  and 
•  .  •  •  refusal  to  legislate  in  accordance  with  the  Exec- 
ntive  recommendation  *\**^®  Polk  could  not  lead  Congress 
in  the  thorny  path  it  had  elected  to  pursue  on  the  slavery 
question. 

It  was  with  a  decided  tone  of  irritation  that  Polk  remind- 
ed Congress  in  his  annual  message  of  December  7,  1847, 
that  no  government  or  Indian  agencies  for  Oregon  had  been 
established.**^®  The  Federal  defense  of  the  Oregon  Trail 
and  the  Oregon  country  at  this  time  was  indeed  weak. 
Benton  *s  bill  of  1846  had  provided  for  a  regiment  of  mount- 
ed riflemen  for  duty  in  the  Northwest,  but  they  had  hardly 
been  recruited  before  they  were  ordered  to  service  in  the 
Mexican  War.*®®  The  Northwest  was  left  quite  defenseless. 
In  regard  to  this  condition  the  report  of  the  Commissioner 
of  Indian  Affairs  sounded  a  distinct  warning.'"  Thirty 
thousand  savages  inhabited  the  Columbia  Biver  valley,  the 
report  pointed  out,  rendering  the  position  of  the  settlers  in 
this  far-away  country  peculiarly  exposed. 

Benton  repeated  this  warning  in  the  Senate.  He  attrib- 
uted **all  the  murderous  outrages**  committed  by  the  In- 
dians upon  Oregon  settlers  to  the  delay  of  the  Government 
in  extending  its  political  jurisdiction  and  protection  over 
the  new  Territory  in  the  Northwest.  * '  Our  meritorious  set- 
tlers, at  a  distance  of  three  thousand  miles,  have  deserved 
well  of  their  country  from  their  enterprise*',  Benton  de- 

858  Diary  of  James  K,  Polk,  Vol.  IV,  p.  155. 

8B»  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  30th  Congress,  p.  10. 

860  For  the  history  of  this  regiment,  see  Diary  of  James  K,  Polk,  Vol.  IV^ 
p.  155 ;  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  30th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  20 ;  2n(l 
Session,  30th  Congress,  Appendix,  p.  21;  1st  Session,  3l8t  Congress,  Appendix,, 
pp.  11,  12. 

861  Senate  Documents,  Ist  Session,  30th  Congress,  No.  1,  p.  752. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  293 

dared,  and  he  hoped  ''they  would  not  be  left  exposed  to 
danger  and  inconvenience  from  calamities  which  a  proper 
attention  to  their  wants  on  the  part  of  the  Government 
would  prevent. '*^®2  Senator  Hannegan,  one  of  the  few  re- 
maining Senators  who  seems  to  have  retained  the  confi- 
dence of  the  Administration,  called  upon  Congress  to  drop 
the  useless  discussion  of  slavery  in  regard  to  this  question 
and  give  attention  to  *'the  cries  of  our  citizens  in  Oregon, 
surrounded  by  hostile  Indians '  ^ 

Full  intelligence  of  the  beginnings  of  Indian  hostilities  in 
Oregon  was  confirmed  in  May,  1848,  by  the  arrival  in  Wash- 
ington of  two  messengers  to  the  President.®^*  They  came 
from  the  provisional  government  of  the  settlers.  One  had 
sailed  by  the  way  of  San  Francisco  and  the  Isthmus  of  Pan- 
ama ;  the  other  had  followed  the  Oregon  Trail  to  St.  Louis, 
and  thence  to  Washington.  When  their  definite  informa- 
tion  of  outbreaks  on  the  Columbia  River  was  received,  Polk 
immediately  communicated  it  to  Congress  and  urged  expe- 
dition. Territorial  government  should  immediately  be  es- 
tablished and  authority  granted  to  raise  a  volunteer  force 
for  the  protection  of  the  inhabitants.  Besides,  according 
to  the  program  Polk  outlined  for  Congress,  a  regiment  of 
mounted  men  should  be  enlisted.  If  aid  was  to  be  carried 
to  Oregon  before  winter  blocked  access  to  the  country  from 
the  land  side  immediate  action  was  necessary.  And  a  delay 
of  another  year  **may  prove  destructive  to  the  white  settle- 
ments in  Oregon",  urged  Polk.*®*  With  all  the  force  that 
he  could  exert,  Polk  recommended  personally  to  members 
of  Congress  the  immediate  needs  of  Oregon  and  proposed 
that  the  Missouri  Compromise  line  be  revived  and  extended 
to  the  Pacific.^^^    Such  an  agreement  would  make  possible  a 

M2  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  30th  Congress,  p.  804. 

863  Diary  of  James  K.  Polk,  Vol.  Ill,  p.  463. 

M*  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  30th  Congress,  p.  788. 

866  Diary  of  James  K.  Polk,  Vol.  Ill,  pp.  501,  504;  Vol.  IV,  p.  12. 


294    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

logical  retreat  by  both  parties  upon  a  precedent  already  es- 
tablished. 

Pricked  by  the  exasperating  condition  in  Oregon,  the  Sen- 
ate resumed  discnssion  of  the  Territorial  bill,  and  after  a 
prolonged  debate  resorted  to  a  select  committee  headed  by 
Senator  Clayton.*  ••  This  compromise  committee  respond- 
ed with  a  bill  to  organize  the  Territories  of  California  and 
New  Mexico  as  well  as  Oregon.  The  laws  of  the  provisional 
government  of  Oregon  prohibiting  slavery  were  to  remain 
until  altered  by  the  new  Territorial  legislature;  while  the 
legislatures  of  California  and  New  Mexico  were  forbidden 
to  make  laws  interdicting  slavery.*®^  This  compromise  was 
finally  accepted  by  the  Senate,  but  the  House  contemp- 
tuously rejected  it.*®®  After  the  failure  of  the  compromise 
of  the  Committee  of  Eight,  Douglas  proposed  Polk's  com- 
promise.**® The  Senate  accepted  it,  but  the  House  again 
refused  to  compromise.*^®  Finally  at  the  end  of  a  tiresome 
session  the  Senate  gave  up,  and  the  Douglas  bill  with  the 
restrictions  of  the  Northwest  Ordinance  was  accepted  by 
both  houses  and  presented  to  the  President  upon  the  last 
day  of  adjournment.*^^  Polk  immediately  gave  his  sanc- 
tion —  which  indeed  he  had  been  prepared  to  give  for  some 
time,  although  Calhoun  had  personally  exerted  his  utmost 
influence  upon  him  to  obtain  a  veto.*^*  The  President's 
prompt  signature  was  a  rebuke  to  the  long  wrangle  in  Con- 
gress, which  for  two  years  had  delayed  justice  to  Oregon. 

M6  Congressionai  Globe,  let  Session,  30th  Congress,  p.  932. 

997  Congressionai  Globe,  1st   Session,  30th  Congress,  p.   950.     The  bill  is 
printed  on  p.  1002. 

888  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  30th  Congress,  p.  1007. 

860  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  30th  Congress,  p.  1048. 

3T0  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  30th  Congress,  pp.  1061,  1062. 

871  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  30th  Congress,  p.  1078. 

872  Diary  of  James  K,  Polk,  Vol.  IV,  pp.  22,  72-74. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  295 

OREGON  TEBBITOBT  AND  THE  INDIANS 

The  first  session  of  the  Thirtieth  Congress  i>assed  a  Ter- 
ritorial bill  for  Oregon,  but  the  entire  program  of  legisla- 
tion for  that  Territory  as  laid  down  by  the  President  in  his 
message  of  May,  1848,  was  not  carried  out.'^'  The  struggle 
over  the  slavery  clause  had  been  too  engrossing  and  all- 
absorbing  for  careful  consideration  of  other  details;  and 
perhaps  there  was  also  some  truth  in  the  President's  bitter 
reflection  that  Congress  had  been  **more  occupied  at  the 
last  session  in  President  making  than  in  attending  to  the 
public  business/'*^*    On  the  tenth  of  October  Polk  wrote: 

I  read  to  the  Cabinet  a  communication  which  I  received  this 
morning  from  George  Abemethy,  the  Governor  of  the  Temporary 
Government  in  Oregon,  dated  April  3rd,  1848,  in  which  he  states 
that  an  Indian  war  is  raging  in  Oregon,  presents  their  destitution 
of  arms  and  the  means  of  defense,  and  earnestly  calls  upon  the 
Government  of  the  U.  States  for  assistance  and  protection.  We 
have  no  means  of  affording  timely  aid  other  than  that  which  has 
been  already  ordered.  It  is  most  unfortunate  that  Congress  had 
not  granted  the  force  for  which  I  called  to  protect  the  people  of 
Oregon  in  my  message  of  May  last.  .  .  .  Congress  not  only  re- 
fused to  do  this,  but  after  the  orders  had  been  issued,  upon  the  con- 
clusion of  the  Mexican  War,  to  have  the  Mounted  Rifle  Begt.  march 
to  Oregon  the  last  summer  for  their  protection,  that  body,  without 
the  recommendation  of  the  Executive  &  against  our  wishes,  author- 
ized every  man  of  that  Regiment  who  would  ask  it  to  be  discharged. 
The  effect  [of]  this  was  ....  to  disband  the  Regiment  & 
to  recruit  it  again,  and  in  the  mean-time  the  season  was  too  far  ad- 
vanced to  enable  the  Regiment  to  be  marched  across  the  Rocky 
mountains  before  the  impassable  snows  of  winter  would  set  in.  The 
present  defenseless  condition  of  the  people  of  Oregon  is  wholly  to  be 
attributed  to  the  neglect  and  inattention  of  Congress  to  their  con- 
dition, and  ....  refusal  to  legislate  in  accordance  with  the 
Executive  recommendation  at  the  last  Session.*^' 

873  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  30th  Congress,  p.  788. 

374  Diary  of  James  K.  Polk,  Vol.  IV,  p.  155. 

876  Diary  of  James  K,  Polk,  VoL  IV,  pp.  154,  155. 


296    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

In  lien  of  a  military  force  during  the  autumn  of  1848, 
Polk  used  the  navy  to  succor  the  Oregon  people.  Orders 
were  transmitted  to  the  commander  of  the  American  squad- 
ron in  the  Pacific  to  dispatch  to  the  assistance  of  the  Oregon 
settlers  a  part  of  the  naval  forces  under  his  comjuand,  and 
to  furnish  them  with  arms  and  ammunition  and  protection 
until  the  army  could  arrive.*^®  When  Congress  convened  in 
December  a  large  part  of  the  President's  message  was  de- 
voted to  the  state  of  affairs  in  the  Oregon  country.'^  ^  In 
plain  words  Polk  exhibited  the  culpable  neglect  of  Congress 
for  **the  continuance  of  the  Indian  disturbances'*  and  for 
**the  destitution  and  defenseless  condition  of  the  inhabit- 
ants. ' '  If  Indian  agencies  had  been  established  in  Oregon, 
Polk  declared,  the  aboriginal  tribes  would  have  been  re- 
strained from  making  war. 

The  immediate  and  only  cause  of  the  existing  hostility  of  the  In- 
dians of  Oregon  is  ...  .  the  long  delay  of  the  United  States 
in  making  to  them  some  trifling  compensation  ....  for  the 
country  now  occupied  by  our  emigrants,  which  the  Indians  claimed, 
and  over  which  they  formerly  roamed.  This  compensation  had 
been  promised  to  them  by  the  temporary  government  established  in 
Oregon,  but  its  fulfillment  had  been  postponed  from  time  to  time, 
for  nearly  two  years,  whilst  those  who  made  it  had  been  anxiously 
waiting  for  Congress  to  establish  a  territorial  government  over  the 
country.  The  Indians  became  at  length  distrustful  of  their  good 
faith,  and  sought  redress  by  plunder  and  massacre,  which  finally 
led  to  the  present  difficulties.  A  few  thousand  dollars  in  suitable 
presents,  as  a  compensation  for  the  country  which  had  been  taken 
possession  of  by  our  citizens,  would  have  satisfied  the  Indians,  and 
have  prevented  the  war. 

Again  the  President  called  upon  Congress  to  provide  In- 
dian agents  to  reside  among  the  Indian  tribes  and  for  ap- 
propriations to  enable  these  agents  to  cultivate  friendly 

979  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  30th  Congress,  p.  7. 
877  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  30th  Congress,  pp.  6,  7. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  297 

relations  with  them.  Especially  did  the  President  recom- 
mend an  appropriation  to  cover  the  militia  service  of  **onr 
fellow-citizens  of  Oregon  [who]  have  been  compelled  to 
take  the  field  in  their  own  defense  *  \ 

Howbeit,  the  session  passed  by  with  little  effort  to  formu- 
late into  law  any  of  these  Presidential  recommendations. 
The  militia  claims  were  not,  of  course,  even  broached,  for 
the  reason  that  there  was  no  one  to  present  them  for  allow- 
ance. By  the  Organic  Act  of  August  14, 1848,  the  Territory 
was  entitled  to  be  represented  by  a  Delegate  to  Congress.*^® 
None  appeared,  however,  in  this  session,  for  the  Territorial 
act  had  been  passed  so  late  in  the  summer  of  1848  and  the 
journey  to  Oregon  was  so  long  that  time  did  not  permit 
a  Delegate  to  arrive  or  even  to  be  elected  before  the  ses- 
sion of  1848-1849  adjourned.  The  Organic  Act  had  been 
carried  to  the  new  Territory  by  the  first  Governor  and  Mar- 
shal whom  the  President  had  hastily  dispatched  to  the  West 
immediately  following  the  passage  of  the  act  of  August  14, 
1848.  Taking  the  Santa  Fe  and  Gila  trails  to  California, 
because  the  approaching  winter  forbade  access  by  way  of 
the  Oregon  Trail,  these  officers  crossed  the  continent  to  San 
Pedro  harbor ;  thence  they  sailed  to  their  destination,  arriv- 
ing on  the  second  day  of  March,  1849.  The  proclamation 
of  Oregon 's  Organic  Act  was  made  the  next  morning. 

The  days  of  legislative  neglect  were  now  numbered.  Af- 
ter the  establishment  of  the  Territorial  government,  a  Dele- 
gate to  Congress  was  elected.*^®  This  Delegate  —  Thurs- 
ton by  name  —  arrived  at  Washington  in  November  before 
the  first  session  of  the  Thirty-first  Congress  convened.  The 
character  of  this  first  Delegate  from  the  Northwest  is 
worthy  of  note.  Bom  in  Maine  and  educated  at  Bowdoin 
College,  Thurston  emigrated  to  Oregon  in  1847  while  yet  a 

878  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  IX,  p.  329. 

879  The  Whig  Almanac,  1850,  p.  51. 

VOL.  IX — 21 


298    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

young  man.  Despite  his  short  sojourn  in  the  new  Territory 
of  the  Northwest,  he  is  said  to  have  rivaled  the  crudest  of 
western  politicians  with  his  harsh  and  impulsive  manners 
and  his  over-bearing  confidence.^®  Be  that  as  it  may, 
Thurston  knew  what  legislation  the  Territory  needed  and 
how  to  obtain  it  from  Congress.  He  addressed  himself 
most  carefully  to  the  committees  of  both  houses  before  tak- 
ing the  floor  of  the  lower  house  in  person.  The  results  of 
his  activities  may  be  judged  from  the  statute  book  of  the 
United  States  at  the  end  of  the  session.'®^ 

One  of  the  first  bills  which  the  Delegate  had  a  share  in 
bringing  to  a  successful  issue  was  a  bill  reported  to  the 
Senate  by  its  Committee  on  Indian  Affairs.*®*  Early  in  the 
session  the  committee  had  under  advisement  a  resolution 
offered  by  Douglas  concerning  the  expediency  of  extin- 
guishing the  Indian  title  to  certain  portions  of  the  western 
Territories,  including  Oregon  and  California.^'  Senator 
John  Bell  of  Tennessee  was  chairman;  and  seems  to  have 
depended  entirely  upon  Delegate  Thurston  for  his  informa- 
tion in  regard  to  conditions  in  Oregon.®®*  It  was  high  time 
that  some  measure  be  taken  in  regard  to  Indian  cessions. 
All  American  settlers  save  those  who  appropriated  to  them- 
selves the  property  of  former  British  subjects  were  nothing 
more  nor  less  than  trespassers  upon  unceded  Indian  terri- 
tory. There  was  not  an  inhabitant,  Bell  truly  declared,  who 
could  improve  his  land  or  build  a  home  with  confidence,  be- 
cause there  was  no  land  to  which  some  Indian  tribe  did  not 
set  up  a  claim.®®**    The  necessity  of  the  inmiediate  extin- 

880  Bancroft 's  History  of  Oregon,  Vol.  II,  pp.  114,  et  seq, 

881  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  IX,  pp.  437,  438,  440,  496. 

882  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  31st  Congress,  p.  262. 

883  Journal  of  Senate,  1st  Session,  31st  Congress,  pp.  42,  62,  122. 

884  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  31st  Congress,  p.  262. 

9BS  Congressional  Qiohe,  let  Session,  Slst  Congress,  pp.  262,  411. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  299 

guishment  of  these  Indian  titles  in  order  to  preserve  peace 
was  beyond  the  need  of  elaborate  proof.  Under  the  man- 
agement of  the  chairman  and  Douglas  the  bill  passed  the 
Senate  in  April  and  the  lower  house  on  May  29th.*®® 

Well  it  was  for  the  good  fame  of  the  American  Indian 
policy  that  the  Indian  treaty  bill  preceded  in  point  of  time  a 
certain  bill  already  reported  to  the  House  by  its  Committee 
on  Public  Lands.  This  was  a  bill  to  survey  the  public  lands 
of  Oregon  and  to  make  donations  to  the  white  settlers.  Al- 
though following  so  closely  upon  the  act  to  treat  with  the 
Indians  for  the  purchase  of  their  Oregon  lands  the  objec- 
tion does  not  seem  to  have  been  made  that  the  act  of  May 
29th  might  not  be  successful  in  exfinguishing  the  Indian 
titles.  The  right  of  the  Oregon  settlers  to  the  Indian  lands 
upon  which  they  had  squatted  without  so  much  as  asking 
leave  was  unquestioned  in  Congress,  and  no  one  burdened 
the  Delegate  to  frame  a  defense  of  their  technical  trespass- 
ing.*®^ 

In  regard  to  military  matters,  the  Senate  was  equally 
compliant  to  western  demands.  Jefferson  Davis,  Chairman 
of  the  Committee  on  Military  Affairs,  introduced  a  bill  to 
increase  the  army  with  the  avowed  purpose  of  protecting 
the  Indian  f  rentier.*®®  **You  cannot  stop  the  travel  to  Cal- 
ifornia '  \  said  Rush  of  Texas,  thinking  more  of  his  own  lo- 
cality than  of  the  Northwest,  **or  the  settlement  on  the 
frontiers  of  Texas  and  in  New  Mexico,  and  it  becomes  there- 
fore the  imperative  duty  of  Congress  to  protect  them.'**®* 
The  bill  passed  both  houses.**®  Moreover,  in  the  following 
session  Thurston  with  the  aid  of  Douglas**^  and  Armistead 

886  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  31st  Congress,  pp.  798,  1090. 

887  Congressional  Globe,  Itt  Session,  31st  Congress,  pp.  791,  1030. 

888  Congressional  Globe,  Ist  Session,  3l8t  Congress,  pp.  395,  1139. 
ZS9  Congressional  Globe,  1st  Session,  3l8t  Congress,  p.  1180. 

890  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  IX,  p.  438. 

801  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  Slst  Congress,  p.  332. 


300    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Burt,'**  Chairman  of  the  House  Committee  on  Military  Af- 
fairsy  procnred  a  settlement  of  the  Caynse  War  claims  — 
the  same  militia  claims  mentioned  by  Polk  in  his  last  annual 
message.*** 

At  the  close  of  the  Thirty-first  Congress,  Thurston  might 
truly  write  his  constituents  that  the  last  of  the  measures  to 
meet  Oregon's  present  needs  had  been  consummated.**^ 
All  this  was  done  in  spite  of  the  exhaustive  debates  on  the 
compromise  bills  which  excluded  the  much  needed  legisla- 
tion in  the  first  session.  The  attention  of  Congress  had 
been  definitely  fixed  upon  the  Pacific  coast  and  the  period  of 
its  neglect  was  past. 

CONCLUSION 

As  to  the  frontier  in  the  three  decades  from  1820  to  1850 
the  story  is  briefly  told  by  the  census  maps  for  the  begin- 
ning and  the  end  of  the  period.  In  1820  this  frontier  had 
hardly  crossed  the  Mississippi  above  the  Missouri  settle- 
ments ;  and  vast  stretches  of  wilderness  existed  even  within 
the  boundaries  of  some  eastern  States.  By  1850  the  west- 
ernmost frontier  was  far  beyond  the  Mississippi,  while  the 
interior  frontiers  had  been  reduced  to  ahnost  nothing,  espe- 
cially in  the  South.  The  land  titles  of  the  Indians  had  been 
extinguished  in  exchange  for  lands  beyond  the  Arkansas 
and  the  Missouri  rivers,  and  the  aborigines  who  had  been 
the  annoyance  of  every  Middle  State  were  now  far  re- 
moved.*®" 

But  even  in  their  new  homes  the  advance  of  civilization 
was  following  the  Lidians.  From  Texas  they  were  being 
pushed  northward;  from  the  Iowa  country  pressure  west- 

892  Congressional  Globe,  2nd  Session,  Slst  Congress,  p.  446. 

80S  United  States  Statutes  at  Large,  Vol.  IX,  p.  566. 

894  Bancroft 's  History  of  Oregon,  Vol.  II,  p.  134. 

896  Eleventh  Census,  Population,  Vol.  I,  Part  1.    Map  facing  p.  xxiy. 


THE  PIONEERS  AND  THE  INDIANS  301 

ward  and  southward  was  about  to  begin ;  while  their  retreat 
across  the  Rocky  Mountains,  as  if  it  were  not  already  pro- 
hibited by  Nature,  was  cut  off  by  the  new  settlements  in 
Oregon  and  California.  Economic  forces  were  the  cause 
of  this  contraction  of  the  Indian  country.  Every  period  of 
financial  distress  in  the  older  States  increased  the  influx  of 
settlers  into  the  bounty  lands  of  the  West,  while  large 
German  and  Irish  migrations  from  Europe  had  swelled  the 
tide  of  pioneers. 

Now  in  all  this  matter  the  sympathy  of  the  majority  in 
Congress  was  with  the  advance  of  civilization,  as  the  pre- 
ceding pages  have  shown  time  and  again.  How  pertinently 
had  the  case  been  stated  by  Adams  in  1802 1  The  rights  of 
the  lordly  savage  were  light  in  the  balance  with  the  rights 
of  civilization.  This  even  the  philanthropists  could  not  dis- 
prove; nor  did  many  care  to  deny  it.  But  withal  the  ma- 
jority in  Congress  was  ever  aware  of  Indian  rights.  Sel- 
dom do  we  find  even  individuals  who  had  the  heartlessness 
to  condemn  the  Indians  as  hopeless  or  to  assert  that  the 
only  **good  Indian"  was  a  **dead  Indian**.  Their  rights 
were  to  be  observed  and  their  customs  respected  as  much 
as  was  possible  in  the  nature  of  the  case.  Their  lands  were 
to  be  purchased  by  annuities  and  by  the  grants  of  new  lands 
in  the  far  West.  Treaties  negotiated  with  minorities  of 
tribes  were  rejected.  Trade  and  intercourse  laws,  revised 
and  perfected  as  needs  arose,  were  to  guard  them  from  the 
lawless  encroachments  of  the  whites.  Against  lawless  in- 
vaders the  army  of  the  United  States  was  to  strike. 

But  on  the  other  hand  any  Indian  denial  of  the  inevitable 
retreat  before  civilization  was  suppressed.  There  could 
not  exist  an  imperium  in  imperio  in  Georgia  nor  in  any  oth- 
er State.  Civilization  must  not  be  thus  thwarted.  The  pio- 
neer settlers  on  the  frontier,  also,  deserved  on  their  part 
protection  from  savage  resentment,  and  unprovoked  hos- 


302    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

tilities  must  be  suppressed  and  punished,  and  prevented  in 
the  future  by  separation. 

Thus  Congress  was  between  two  fires.  While  westerners 
complained  that  the  Indian  title  was  not  being  extinguished 
rapidly  enough,  many  easterners  denounced  in  bitter  terms 
the  policy  of  removing  the  Indians.  Each  side  had  its 
spokesmen  in  the  long  debates  on  the  removal  question. 
When  it  came  to  vote,  however,  the  policy  of  continuing  the 
western  expansion  was  not  impeded. 

Even  before  all  of  the  Indians  had  retreated  across  the 
Mississippi,  the  frontier  line  had  also  passed  beyond  its 
western  bank;  and  much  of  the  Lidian  history  of  the  Mid- 
dle West  was  beginning  to  be  repeated  in  the  far  West 
The  annexation  of  Texas,  and  the  acquisition  of  the  South- 
west and  of  Oregon  enlarged  the  Lidian  problem  without 
adding  many  new  features.  The  problem  in  Oregon  had 
been  under  congressional  consideration  since  1840.  When 
action  was  finally  taken  in  1849  and  in  1851,  that  action  was 
simply  a  repetition  of  the  former  Federal  policy  as  to  In- 
dian lands  and  supervision.  The  questions  relating  to  the 
Calif  omian  and  Texan  Indians  belong  properly  to  the  next 
decade. 

Kenneth  W.  CoiiOROVB 

Habvabd  Univeesity 
Cambeidoe 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS 

AMERICANA 

GENERAL  AND  MISCELLANEOUS 

The  Library  of  Congress  has  recently  published  an  elaborate 
catalogue  of  American  and  English  Genealogies  in  the  Library  of 
Congress. 

The  work  of  taking  the  United  States  Census  of  1910  is  described 
with  considerable  detail  in  the  Report  of  the  Director  which  has 
recently  been  published. 

The  fourth  number  of  the  Maryland  Quarterly,  published  by  the 
Maryland  Peace  Society,  contains  a  paper  entitled  The  Peace  Move- 
ment Practical,  by  Theodore  Marburg. 

An  Education  Department  Bulletin  published  in  February  by 
the  New  York  State  Library  is  devoted  to  a  digest  of  American 
Ballot  Laws,  1888-1910,  compiled  by  Arthur  C.  Ludington. 

The  Story  of  the  Short  Ballot  Cities  is  the  title  of  a  pamphlet 
published  by  the  Short  Ballot  Organization,  which  contains  infor- 
mation concerning  the  workings  of  the  short  ballot  under  the  com- 
mission plan  of  municipal  government. 

A  paper  on  The  Doctrine  of  Continuotts  Voyage,  read  by  Charles 
Noble  Gregory  at  the  Guildhall  in  London  on  August  2,  1910,  at  a 
conference  of  the  International  Law  Association,  has  been  reprint- 
ed from  the  Harvard  Law  Review. 

The  Importance  of  Judicial  Settlement  is  the  subject  discussed 
by  Elihu  Root  in  a  pamphlet  published  in  February  by  the  Amer- 
ican Society  for  Judicial  Settlement  of  International  Disputes,  the 
headquarters  of  which  are  at  Baltimore. 

A  Bulletin  of  the  Virginia  State  Library  published  in  October 
contains  a  v^ry  comprehensive  Bibliography  of  the  Conventions 

808 


304    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

and  Constitutions  of  Virginia  including  References  to  Essays,  Let- 
ters and  Speeches  in  the  Virginia  Newspapers,  prepared  by  Earl 
G.  Swem. 

Samuel  O.  Dunn  is  the  writer  of  a  pamphlet  devoted  to  Current 
Bailway  Problems.  The  valuation  of  railways,  the  limitation  of 
railway  profits,  railway  rates  and  efSciency,  and  the  new  long  and 
short  haul  law  are  the  problems  discussed. 

General  Wesley  Merritt  is  the  subject  of  a  biographical  sketch, 
by  Eben  Swift,  in  the  March  number  of  the  Journal  of  the  United 
States  Cavalry  Association.  Among  the  Reprints  and  Translations 
is  a  lengthy  article  on  The  Campaign  of  1777,  by  Charles  Francis 
Adams. 

David  Ricardo:  A  Centenary  Estimate  is  the  title  of  a  mono- 
g^raph  by  Jacob  H.  Hollander,  which  appears  as  number  four,  series 
twenty-eight  of  the  Johns  Hopkins  University  Studies  in  Historical 
and  Political  Science.  It  is  divided  into  three  chapters  devoted 
respectively  to  the  life,  work,  and  influence  of  the  great  economist. 

Pamphlets  published  during  January,  February,  and  March  by 
the  American  Association  for  International  Conciliation  are  re- 
spectively: School  Books  and  International  Prejudices,  by  Albert 
Bushnell  Hart;  Peace  and  the  Professor,  by  Grant  Showerman; 
and  Wom^in  and  the  Cau^e  of  Peace,  by  Baron  d'Estoumelles  de 
Constant. 

E.  P.  Ripley  contends  for  the  value-of-the-service  principle  in  the 
regulation  of  railway  rates  in  an  article  on  The  Railroads  and  the 
People,  which  is  reprinted  from  The  Atlantic  Monthly  for  January. 
The  writer  has  discussed  the  subject  in  a  sane  and  conservative 
manner,  devoting  himself  to  its  ethical  phases  rather  than  its  ju- 
dicial aspects. 

The  Heroic  Story  of  the  United  States  Sanitary  Commission, 
1861-1865,  by  William  Howell  Reed,  which  has  been  reprinted  from 
the  Christian  Register,  is  a  contribution  in  a  field  in  which  com- 
paratively little  has  been  written.  The  work  of  the  various  agen- 
cies engaged  in  the  alleviation  of  suffering  in  tiie  armies  during  the 
war  deserves  much  study. 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS  305 

One  of  the  most  pretentious  works  of  genealogy  which  has  ap- 
peared recently  is  that  devoted  to  the  Descendants  of  Edward  Small 
of  New  England  and  the  Allied  Families  with  Tracings  of  English 
Ancestry,  prepared  by  Lora  Altine  Woodbury  Underbill.  The 
work  covers  three  large  volumes,  and  is  amply  illustrated  by  nu- 
merous excellent  cuts. 

An  account  of  the  visit  of  Governor  John  Winthrop,  of  Con- 
necticut, to  New  Amsterdam  in  July,  1661,  is  to  be  found  under  the 
title,  A  Notable  Visit  to  New  Amsterdam,  in  the  January  number 
of  The  New  Netherland  Register.  The  most  extended  article  is  one 
dealing  with  Pioneers  and  Founders  of  New  Netherland,  which  is 
•contained  in  the  February  number. 

Hiram  Bingham,  in  the  January  number  of  the  Bulletin  of  the 
American  Geographical  Society,  writes  a  description  of  Potosi,  the 
■ancient  and  interesting  South  American  city  which  was  so  long 
famous  for  its  fabulous  wealth.  F.  Y.  Emerson  is  the  writer  of  a 
pertinent  article  on  Geographical  Influences  in  the  Distribution  of 
Slavery,  which  is  continued  in  the  February  number. 

The  Twenty-fourth  Annual  Report  of  the  Commissioner  of  Labor, 
recently  issued  from  the  (Jovemraent  Printing  OfBce,  consists  of  the 
first  volume  of  a  treatise  on  Workmen's  Insurance  and  Compensa- 
tion Systems  in  Europe.  The  systems  employed  in  Austria,  Bel- 
gium, Denmark,  France,  and  Germany  are  treated  in  this  volume 
by  diflPerent  writers.    The  work  will  be  in  two  volumes. 

Albert  Anthony  Giesecke  is  the  author  of  a  volume  entitled 
American  Commercial  Legislation  Before  1789,  published  by  the 
University  of  Pennsylvania.  The  book  deals  with  England's  com- 
mercial policy  toward  the  American  colonies;  import,  export,  and 
tonnage  duties;  bounties,  inspection  laws,  and  embargoes;  port 
regulations;  and  commercial  policy  from  the  Revolution  to  1789. 
There  is  a  bibliography  which,  as  the  author  indicates,  is  only 
partial. 

The  Legislative  Power  of  Congress  Under  the  Judicial  Article  of 
the  Constitution  is  the  subject  discussed  by  Frank  J.  Goodnow  in 
an  article  which  opens  the  December  number  of  the  Political  Science 


306    IOWA  JOUBNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Quarterly.  Clement  F.  Robinson  writes  on  The  Mortgage  Record- 
ing Tax;  Joseph  B.  Ross  tells  of  Agrarian  Changes  in  the  Middle 
West;  and  Charles  Franklin  Emerick  presents  an  article  on  A  Neg- 
lected Factor  in  Race  Suicide. 

The  four  hundred  page  BuUetin  of  the  University  of  Mississippi 
published  in  June,  1910,  is  entitled  Historical  Catalogue  of  the 
University  of  Mississippi,  1849-1909.  It  contains  a  history  of  the 
University  and  of  all  the  various  departments  and  schools,  together 
with  sketches  of  the  Presidents  and  Chancellors  and  lists  of  trus- 
tees, officers,  professors,  instructors  and  students,  from  the  begin- 
ning down  to  the  present  time.  The  volume  is  worthy  of  hearty 
commendation. 

Edinburgh  in  1544  and  Hertford's  Invasion  is  the  title  of  a  con- 
tribution by  J.  Balfour  Paul  which  appears  in  the  January  num- 
ber of  The  Scottish  Historical  Review.  A  number  of  Jacobite 
Songs  are  contributed  by  Andrew  Lang.  Henry  W.  Meikle  is  the 
writer  of  a  brief  article  on  Two  Glasgow  Merchants  in  the  French 
Revolution.  Other  articles  are :  Charter  of  the  Abbot  and  Convent 
of  Cupar,  1220,  by  James  Wilson;  and  an  illustrated  account  of 
A  Roman  Outpost  on  Tweedside:  The  Fort  of  Newstead,  by  Joseph 
Anderson. 

The  January  number  of  The  Annals  of  the  American  Academy 
of  Political  and  Social  Science  is  devoted  to  the  general  subject  of 
Electric  Railway  Transportation.  Traffic  and  financial  problems 
and  public  regulation  of  electric  railways  are  the  main  subdivisions 
under  which  the  numerous  articles  are  grouped.  The  supplement 
to  this  number  contains  a  number  of  addresses  on  the  subject  of 
The  Need  for  Currency  Reform.  In  the  March  number  The  Public 
Health  Movement  is  the  topic  of  discussion. 

Among  the  articles  in  The  Survey  during  the  past  three  months 
are:  The  Findings  of  the  Immigration  Commission,  by  H.  Parker 
Willis;  Immigrant  Rural  Communities,  by  Alexander  E.  Cance 
and  Immigrants  in  Cities,  by  E.  A.  Ooldenweiser  (January  7) 
The  St.  Louis  Meetings,  by  Henry  Raymond  Mussey  (January  14) 
The  Correction  and  Prevention  of  Crime,  by  Edward  T.  Devine 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS  307 

(January  21) ;  The  Pittsburgh  City  Plan,  by  Frederick  Law  Olm- 
sted (February  4) ;  The  Social  Basis  of  Religion,  by  Simon  N.  Pat- 
ten (March  4). 

Arthur  Wentworth  Hamilton  Eaton  is  the  author  of  a  nine  hun- 
dred page  volume  devoted  to  The  History  of  Kings  County, 
Nova  Scotia:  Heart  of  the  Acadian  Land.  The  volume,  as  is  further 
indicated  on  the  title  page,  contains  a  sketch  of  the  French  and 
their  expulsion,  and  a  history  of  the  New  England  settlers  who 
came  in  their  place,  together  with  a  large  number  of  brief  bio- 
graphical and  genealogical  sketches.  The  work  is  apparently  done 
with  care,  but  it  is  to  be  regretted  that  are  no  citations  of  sources 
and  that  the  index  is  so  brief. 

Among  the  articles  in  the  January  number  of  the  Journal  of  the 
American  Institute  of  Criminal  Law  and  Criminology  are  the  fol- 
lowing :  Needed  Reforms  in  the  Law  of  Expert  Testimony,  by  Ed- 
ward J.  McDermott ;  Crime  and  Punishment,  by  George  W.  Kirch- 
wey ;  and  Public  Defense  in  Criminal  Trials,  by  Maurice  Parmalee. 
In  the  March  number  may  be  found :  Needed  Reforms  in  Criminal 
Law  and  Procedure,  by  William  P.  Lawler;  The  Unequal  Applica- 
tion of  the  Criminal  Law,  by  Gerard  G.  Brandon;  and  the  State's 
Guardianship  Over  Criminals,  by  Stephen  H.  Allen. 

Volume  four,  number  one  of  The  University  Studies  published 
by  the  University  of  Illinois  is  devoted  to  a  monograph  on  The 
Origin  of  the  Land  Grant  Act  of  1862  and  Some  Account  of  its 
Author,  Jonathan  B.  Turner,  written  by  Edmund  J.  James.  The 
author's  thesis  is  that  Jonathan  B.  Turner,  who  was  at  one 
time  a  professor  in  Illinois  College  at  Jacksonville,  deserves  the 
credit  for  having  brought  about  the  movement  which  resulted  in  the 
Morrill  Act  of  1862,  making  land  grants  to  the  States  to  encourage 
education  along  the  lines  of  agriculture  and  mechanic  arts. 

The  Lure  of  Buried  Wealth  is  the  title  of  an  interesting  article 
by  Louis  Baury,  which  appears  in  the  December  number  of  Amer- 
icana, J.  B.  Ofner  is  the  writer  of  a  discussion  of  Military  Orants 
in  the  United  States,  which  is  begun  in  this  number  and  concluded 
in  the  January  number.    In  the  latter  number  may  also  be  found 


308    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

an  account  of  The  President's  New  Year  Receptions,  Then  and  Now, 
by  Helen  Harcourt ;  and  an  unsigned  article  on  The  Settlement  of 
the  Maine  Boundary  Dispute,  The  series  of  articles  on  Little  Wars 
of  the  Republic,  by  John  R.  Header,  runs  through  these  munbers 
and  an  installment  may  also  be  found  in  the  February  number. 

A.  L.  Smith  is  the  writer  of  an  article  entitled  A  Nation  in  the 
Making,  which  appears  in  The  Yale  Review  for  February.  The 
Union  of  South  Africa  is  the  subject  discussed.  Another  article 
deals  with  the  Taxation  of  Corporate  Franchises  in  Massachusetts 
and  is  written  by  Charles  A.  Andrews.  A  second  chapter  on  The 
Statistical  Work  of  the  Federal  Oovemment  is  contributed  by 
Julius  H.  Parmalee.  In  a  discussion  of  Rhine  and  Mississippi  River 
Terminals,  E.  J.  Clapp  points  out  some  important  facts  concerning 
the  possibilities  of  river  transportation  in  America.  The  concluding 
article  is  an  analytical  description  of  The  British  Election  Address, 
by  George  L.  Fox. 

The  January  number  of  The  Quarterly  Journal  of  the  Univer- 
sity of  North  Dakota  opens  with  an  excellent  article  by  O.  G.  Libby 
on  The  Correlation  of  Literature  and  History,  in  which  he  points 
out  how  the  spirit  of  various  periods  of  the  world's  history  has  been 
reflected  in  the  great  literature  of  those  periods,  and  how,  on  the 
other  hand,  literature  has  had  a  great  influence  over  the  people  and 
has  thus  helped  in  shaping  their  ideals.  There  is  a  second  chapter 
of  John  Morris  Gillette's  discussion  of  the  City  Trend  of  Popula- 
tion and  Leadership;  Andrew  Alexander  Bruce  contributes  An  Un- 
written Chapter  in  the  History  of  South  Africa;  and  Frank  L. 
McVey  discusses  A  Rational  System  of  Taxing  Natural  Resources, 

Among  the  articles  in  the  Columbia  Law  Review  for  January 
are :  The  Constitutionality  of  Race  Distinctions  and  the  Baltimore 
Segregation  Ordinance,  by  Warren  B.  Hunting;  and  Nature  and 
Scope  of  the  Power  of  Congress  to  Regulate  Commerce,  by  Freder- 
ick H.  Cooke.  In  the  February  number  Alfred  Hayes,  Jr.  is  the 
writer  of  a  discussion  of  Partial  Unconstitutionality  with  Special 
Reference  to  the  Corporation  Tax.  Two  contributions  of  special 
interest  among  the  contents  of  the  March  number  are :  American 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS  309 

Citizenship,  by  Dudley  0.  McGovney ;  and  The  Exclusive  Power  of 
Congress  over  Interstate  Commerce,  by  Charles  W.  Needham.  A 
cumulative  index  of  over  one  hundred  pages,  covering  the  first  ten 
volumes  of  the  Review,  has  recently  been  published. 

In  an  article  in  the  January  number  of  The  American  Journal  of 
Sociology  Sophonisba  P.  Breckinridge  and  Edith  Abbott  point  out 
the  need  of  improvement  and  regulation  in  the  Housing  Conditions 
in  Chicago  Back  of  the  Yards.  Gteorge  E.  Vincent  presents  some 
observations  concerning  The  Rivalry  of  Social  Groups,  in  which  he 
shows  the  importance  of  studying  the  conduct  of  the  individual 
from  the  standpoint  of  the  social  group  to  which  he  belongs. 
Municipal  Review  1909-1910,  by  Clinton  Rogers  Woodruff;  and 
The  Transition  to  an  Objective  Standard  of  Social  Control,  by 
Luther  Lee  Bernard,  are  other  articles  in  this  number. 

An  article  of  interest  to  the  average  citizen  is  one  by  William  Z. 
Ripley  on  Railway  Speculation  which  opens  the  February  number 
of  The  Quarterly  Journal  of  Economics.  The  writer  outlines  the 
course  of  speculative  activity  since  1890  and  illustrates  his  points 
by  discussions  of  various  railroad  pools  and  syndicates,  closing  with 
suggested  remedies  and  an  estimate  of  future  developments.  Rob- 
ert H.  Smith  is  the  author  of  an  article  on  Distribution  of  Income 
in  Great  Britain  and  Incidence  of  Income  Tax.  Other  articles  are : 
Economic  History  and  Philology,  by  Leo  Wiener ;  a  second  install- 
ment of  Railway  Rate  Theories  of  the  Interstate  Commerce  Com- 
mission, by  M.  B.  Hammond ;  and  Some  Aspects  of  the  Wool  Trade 
of  the  United  States,  by  P.  T.  Cherington. 

The  presidential  address  on  the  subject  of  The  Law  and  the  Facts, 
delivered  by  Woodrow  Wilson  at  the  seventh  annual  meeting  of  the 
American  Political  Science  Association  occupies  first  place  in  the 
February  number  of  The  American  Political  Science  Review.  The 
address  is  a  plea  for  a  more  earnest  eflPort  to  fathom  the  spirit  and 
the  motives  behind  political  phenomena,  rather  than  the  mere  study 
of  the  facts  as  they  appear  on  the  surface.  Paul  S.  Reinsch  pre- 
sents a  careful  survey  of  Diplomatic  Affairs  and  International  Law, 
1910,  Oswald  Ryan  discusses  The  Commission  Plan  of  City  Gov- 
ernment in  the  light  of  its  workings  thus  far,  and  his  conclusions 


310    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

on  the  whole  are  distinctly  favorable  to  the  plan.  Tendencies  To- 
ward  Ministerial  Responsibility  in  Oermany  is  the  subject  of  an 
article  by  Walter  J.  Shepard. 

The  State  of  New  York  has  added  another  handsome  volume  to 
its  already  large  list  of  publications  of  documentary  material.  This 
time  it  is  volume  one  of  the  Minutes  of  the  Executive  Council  of  the 
Province  of  New  York  which  is  printed,  and  the  editor  is  the  State 
Historian,  Victor  Hugo  Paltsits.  The  material  included  in  this  vol- 
ume covers  the  administration  of  Francis  Lovelace,  the  second 
English  Governor  of  New  York,  from  1668-1673.  No  minutes  for 
the  administration  of  Richard  NicoUs,  the  first  Governor,  have 
been  found  and  in  fact  it  is  not  known  that  any  such  records  were 
kept.  Besides  the  minutes  themselves,  which  occupy  less  than  half 
of  the  volume,  there  are  a  number  of  Collateral  and  Illustrative 
Documents  which  throw  much  additional  light  on  the  transactions 
of  the  Council.  The  editorial  work  has  evidently  been  done  with 
great  care.  The  documents  have  been  transcribed  with  commend- 
able accuracy,  and  the  notes  and  annotations  are  unusually  fuU 
and  explanatory. 

Defense  of  American  Commerce  and  the  Spirit  of  American  Unity 
is  the  subject  of  an  article  by  Henry  Moore  Baker  which  appears 
in  The  Journal  of  American  History  for  the  first  quarter  of  the 
current  year.  The  article  centers  about  the  siege  of  Louisburg  in 
1745  and  the  events  immediately  preceding.  Under  the  heading, 
Original  Manuscript  of  a  Witness  of  the  American  Revolution, 
Yamum  Lansing  Collins  contributes  a  description  of  the  battle  of 
Princeton  and  of  the  ravages  of  the  British  and  Hessians,  written 
by  an  eye-witness.  The  results  of  an  Investigation  into  American 
Tradition  of  Woman  Known  as  '^Molly  Pitcher'^  are  presented  by 
John  B.  Landis.  Among  the  other  contributions  are :  a  third  in- 
stallment of  transcripts  from  Original  Orderly  Books  Written  on 
the  Battlefields  of  the  American  Revolution,  by  Charles  Tallmadge 
Conover ;  Discovery  of  the  Cheat  Anthracite  Regions  of  the  Middle 
West,  by  Louise  Hillard  Patterson ;  and  a  discussion  of  a  Journey 
to  the  Northern  Regions  "before  the  American  Republic,  by  Eliza- 
beth W.  Chandler. 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS  311 

WESTERN 

An  address  by  J.  B.  Oakleaf  on  Abraham  Lincoln:  His  Friend- 
ship for  Humanity  and  Sacrifice  for  Others  has  been  printed  in  an 
extremely  neat  and  attractive  pamphlet. 

A  History  of  Macalester  College,  by  Henry  Daniel  Punk,  is  a 
three  hundred  page  volume  of  western  interest.  The  volume  has 
been  written  in  a  scholarly  manner,  with  frequent  references  to 
sources  of  material,  and  is  worthy  of  emulation  on  the  part  of  other 
colleges  and  universities. 

Among  the  articles  in  The  Graduate  Magazine  of  the  University 
of  Kansas  for  January  is  a  brief  sketch  entitled  Thirty  Years  Ago 
at  K.  U.,  by  Edwin  C.  Meservy.  The  February  number  opens  with 
an  article  on  The  Alien,  by  R.  D.  O'Leary.  There  are  also  a  num- 
ber of  articles  paying  tributes  to  the  memory  of  the  late  Professor 
Frank  Egbert  Bryant. 

A  bulletin  published  in  December  by  the  University  of  Oregon 
contains  the  proceedings  of  the  Second  Annual  Commonwealth 
Conference  held  at  the  University  on  February  11  and  12,  1910. 
The  University  is  performing  a  worthy  service  in  maintaining  this 
conference  at  which  questions  relative  to  the  welfare  and  progress 
of  the  State  of  Oregon  are  discussed. 

Cherokees  **West**  1794  to  1839  is  the  title  of  a  volume  compiled 
and  published  at  Glaremore,  Oklahoma,  by  Emmet  Starr.  It  con- 
tains, in  the  first  place,  a  number  of  reminiscent  letters  written  by 
Cephas  Washburn,  an  early  missionary  among  the  Cherokees.  Then 
follow  a  number  of  laws  of  the  Cherokee  Nation,  together  with  some 
historical  notes  relative  to  the  tribe.  The  lack  of  an  index  is  to  be 
deplored.  Mr.  Starr  announces  his  praiseworthy  intention  to  pub- 
lish a  number  of  other  volumes  on  the  Cherokees. 

The  Pox  Farm  in  Mason  County,  Kentucky,  near  Maysville  and 
not  far  from  the  historic  town  of  Washington,  is  the  locality  the 
aboriginal  history  of  which  is  related  by  Harlan  I.  Smith  in  a  mono- 
graph on  The  Prehistoric  Ethnology  of  a  Kentucky  Site,  which 
constitutes  volume  six,  part  two  of  the  Anthropological  Papers  of 


312    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  The  writer  has  sac- 
ceeded  in  an  admirable  manner  in  reconstructing  the  life  of  the  pre- 
historic inhabitants  of  the  locality,  and  the  monograph  contains  a 
large  number  of  excellent  illustrations. 

The  Stone  Age  in  North  America  is  the  title  of  a  two-volume 
work  by  Warren  K.  Moorehead,  which  has  come  from  the  press  of 
the  Houghton  Mi£9in  Company.  It  is,  as  stated  on  the  title  page, 
an  archaeological  encyclopedia  of  the  implements,  ornaments, 
weapons,  and  utensils  of  the  prehistoric  races  of  this  continent. 
The  many  hundred  illustrations,  some  of  thei^  in  color,  form  a  most 
praiseworthy  part  of  the  work,  which  throughout  gives  evidence  of 
a  vast  amount  of  diligent  labor  in  preparation. 

lOWANA 

A  Biographic  Sketch  of  8.  B.  McCaU,  written  by  C.  L.  Lucas, 
is  printed  in  the  Madrid  Register-News  of  March  23, 1911. 

A  supplement  to  the  Morningside  College  Bulletin  issued  in  De- 
cember  contains  the  proceedings  and  addresses  at  the  inauguration 
of  President  Freeman  on  October  6,  1910. 

The  Swastika,  Its  History  and  Significance  is  an  article  by 
Thomas  Carr  in  the  January  number  of  The  American  Freemason, 
and  there  is  a  second  installment  in  the  February  number. 

College  Purpose  and  College  Failures  is  the  topic  of  a  sketch  in 
the  February  number  of  The  Chrinnell  Review,  where  may  also  be 
found  a  brief  article  on  Orinnell  College  and  Public  Affairs. 

A  neat  pamphlet  containing  an  account  of  the  Dedication  of  the 
First  English  Evangelical  Lutheran  Church  of  Cedar  Rapids  opens 
with  a  brief  historical  sketch  of  the  church,  which  was  organized  in 
1856. 

The  Sage  of  Monticello  is  the  topic  of  a  sketch  by  William  Cyrus 
Hanawalt  in  the  January  number  of  Midland  Schools.  Here  may 
also  be  found  a  Proposed  Pension  Bill  for  the  benefit  of  public 
school  teachers. 

The  Efficiency  and  Limitations  of  Bank  Examinations  is  the  title 
of  an  article  by  M.  A.  Kendall  which  appears  in  The  Northwestern 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS  313 

Banker  for  January.  The  Banker  and  the  Farmer,  by  Henry  Wal- 
lace; and  Banking  and  Finance,  by  E.  B.  Qumey,  are  other  articles 
in  this  nnmber. 

Some  interesting  local  history  of  Jefferson  County  is  to  be  foun^ 
in  an  article  on  The  Oldest  Burj^ng  Ground  in  the  County,  by 
Hiram  Heaton,  in  the  issue  of  the  Fairfield  Tribune  for  January 
25, 1911. 

Emma  Robinson  Eleckner  is  the  writer  of  a  little  pamphlet  en- 
titled Sioux  City.  The  author  traces  the  history  of  the  city  from 
the  time  when  Lewis  and  Clark  and  their  party  camped  on  Iowi| 
soil  at  that  point,  and  buried  Sergeant  Charles  Floyd  on  a  high 
bluff  overlooking  the  river. 

A  handsome  volume  of  over  two  hundred  pages  contains  the  Re- 
port of  the  Iowa  State  Drainage  Waterways  and  Conservation  Com-r 
mission  for  the  biennial  period  ending  in  January,  1911.  The 
Commission  was  created  by  an  act  of  the  legislature  in  1909  and 
consequently  this  is  the  first  report.  A  large  number  of  excellent 
illustrations  and  maps  accompany  the  report. 

0.  A.  Byington  is  the  writer  of  a  brief  article  on  Universii$ 
Alumni  and  the  Legislature  which  is  printed  in  the  January  nun^ 
ber  of  The  Iowa  Alumnus.  In  the  February  number  there  is  a  state- 
ment concerning  the  Resignation  of  President  MacLean,  and  an 
article  by  Mira  Troth  on  General  Thomas  J.  Henderson,  who  was  a 
student  in  the  institution  known  as  Iowa  City  University  in  1845- 
1846. 

The  proceedings  of  the  Eleventh  Annual  Conference  of  the  Iowa 
Daughters  of  the  American  Revolution  have  been  printed  in  a  neat 
pamphlet.  This  organization  is  performing  valuable  historical  ser- 
vices in  the  way  of  marking  and  preserving  historic  sites,  colleetiiig 
historical  relics,  and  educating  the  people  on  historical  subjects.  It 
is  also  aiding  in  the  movement  for  child  labor  legislation  and  other 
similar  reforms. 

A  paper  on  Education  for  the  Iowa  Farm  Boy,  read  by  H.  C. 
Wallace  before  the  Prairie  Club  of  Des  Moines,  has  been  printed  in 
pamphlet  form.    The  author  discusses  the  systems  of  agricultural 

VOL.  IX— 22 


314    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

education  .and  rural  public  schools  employed  in  yarious  European 
countries,  and  compares  tiiem  with  the  conditions,  past  and  present, 
along  the  same  lines  in  this  country  in  general  and  in  Iowa  in  par- 
ticular.   The  great  need  for  improvement  is  pointed  out. 

^^  Yida  E.  Smith  is  the  writer  of  a  Biography  of  Patriarch  Alex- 
ander Hale  Smith  which  occupies  first  place  in  the  January  number 
of  the  Journal  of  History  published  at  Lamoni  by  the  Reorganized 
Church  of  Jesus  Christ  of  Latter  Day  Saints.  An  Open  Letter  of 
Charles  W.  Wandell  to  the  President  of  the  United  States  is  an- 
other contribution,  and  the  remainder  of  the  Journal  is  largely 
taken  up  with  continuations  of  biographical  sketches,  as  is  also  the 
April  number. 

In  the  February  number  of  Midland  Municipalities  there  may  be 
found  An  Open  Letter  to  County  Attorneys  of  Iowa,  by  f^rank  O. 
Pierce.  Municipal  Law  of  Iowa,  by  A.  W.  Osborne ;  Uniform  Ac- 
counting, by  Henry  Shuff ;  and  Need  of  Comparative  Reports  and 
Uniform  Accounting,  by  Thomas  H.  Pratt,  are  among  the  articles 
in  this  number.  In  the  March  number  there  are  some  extracts  from 
a  paper  on  Railroad  Taxation  in  Iowa,  by  Frank  T.  True;  and 
Extracts  from  a  Paper  on  Tax  Reform  in  Iowa,  by  John  E.  Brind- 
ley. 

SOME  RECENT  PUBUCATIONS  BY  IOWA  AUTHORS 

Bailey,  Bert  Heald, 

Two  Hundred  Wild  Birds  of  Iowa   (New  edition).     Cedar 
Rapids :  Superior  Press.    1911. 
Betts,  George  Herbert, 

The  Recitation.    Mount  Yemon,  Iowa:  Hawk-Eye  Publishing 
Co.    1911. 
Breckenridge,  Mrs.  John, 

Mahanomah.    New  York:  Cochrane  Publishing  Co.    1911. 
Brewer,  Luther  A.,  and  Wick,  Barthinius  L., 

History  of  Linn  County,  Iowa.     Cedar  Bapids:  The  Toreh 
Press.    1911. 
Brindley,  John  E., 

History  of  Taxation  in  Iowa  (2  volumes).    Iowa  City:  The 
State  Historical  Society  of  Iowa.    1911. 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS  315 

Brown,  John  FranUin, 

The  Training  of  Teachers  for  Secondary  Schools  in  Oermany 
and  the  United  States.   New  York :  The  Macmillan  C!o.   1911. 
Cooky  (George  Cram, 

The  Chasm.    New  York :  Frederick  A.  Stokes  Co.    1911. 
Fairbanks,  Arthur, 

A  Handbook  of  Greek  Religion.    New  York:  American  Book 
Co.    1911. 
Garland,  Hamlin, 

Hesper.    New  York:  Grosset  and  Dnnlap.    1911. 
Herr,  Horace  Dnmont, 

Country  and  River-side  Poems.    Humboldt :  Published  by  the 
author.    1910. 
James,  Edmund  Janes, 

The  Origin  of  the  Land  Grant  Act  of  1862.    XJrbana :  Univer- 
sity of  Illinois.    1911. 
Jones,  Marcus  Eugene, 

Montana  Botany  Notes.     Missoula:  University  of  Montana. 
1911. 
Eleckner,  Emma  Robinson, 

Sioux  City.    Sioux  City :  Published  by  the  author.    1910. 
Mangold,  George  B., 

Child  Problems.    New  York:  The  Macmillan  Co.    1911. 
Marshall,  Carl  Coran,  and  (Goodyear,  Samuel  Horatio, 

Inductive  Commercial  Arithmetic.    Cedar  Rapids:  Goodyear- 
Marshall  Publishing  Co.    1911. 
Rich,  Joseph  W., 

The  Battle  of  Shiloh.     Iowa  City:  The  State  Historical  So- 
ciety of  Iowa.    1911. 
Rockwood,  Elbert  W., 

Laboratory  Manual  of  Physiological  Chemistry  (Revised  and 
enlarged  edition).    Philadelphia:  F.  A.  Davis  Co.    1910. 
Starch,  Daniel, 

Principles  of  Advertising.    Madison:  University  Cooperative 
Co.    1910. 
Tilton,  John  Littlefield, 

Pleistocene  Deposits  in  Warren  County,  Iowa.    Chicago :  Uni- 
versity of  Chicago.    1911. 


316    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Veblen,  Oswald  (Joint  author), 

Projective  Oeometry.    Boston :  Ginn  &  Co.    1911. 
Wallace,  H.  C, 

Education  for  the  Iowa  Farm  Boy.    Des  Moines:  The 
Club.    1911. 
White,  Hervey, 

A  Ship  of  Souls:  A  Oroup  of  Poems.    Woodstock,  New  York: 

Maverick  Press.    1911. 
New  Songs  for  Old.    Woodstock,  New  York:  Maverick  Press. 

1911. 
In  An  Old  Main's  Garden:  Poems  of  Humor.    Woodstock,  New 
York:  Maverick  Press.    1911. 

SOMB  REGENT  HIBTOBIOAL  FTEMS  IN  IOWA  NEWSPAPERS 

The  Register  and  Leader 

T.  E.  Booth  —  One  of  the  Honored  Veterans  of  Newspapering  in 
Iowa,  January  8, 1911. 

Dr.  A.  A.  Noyes  —  Oldest  Practicing  Physician  in  the  United 
States,  January  8, 1911. 

Earliest  Street  Cars  of  the  Des  Moines  System,  January  15,  1911. 

James  Hayes  —  One  of  Iowa's  Noted  Pioneers,  January  22,  1911. 

Mrs.  Mary  McFall  —  One  of  the  Pioneer  Women  of  Iowa,  January 
22, 1911. 

Story  of  the  Early  Iowa  Banditti  and  the  Fight  at  Bellevne,  Jan- 
uary 29, 1911. 

Calvin  Brockett,  a  Polk  County  Pioneer,  by  L.  F.  Andrews,  Jan- 
uary 29, 1911. 

"Uncle"  Asa  Turner,  January  29, 1911. 

Circus  Men  Who  Were  Bom  in  Iowa,  February  5,  1911. 

Crimes  of  Pioneer  Days,  by  L.  F.  Andrews,  February  5,  1911. 

Founder  of  the  Henderson  Family,  a  Pioneer  of  Four  States,  Feb- 
ruary 5, 1911. 

Lincoln  as  his  Neighbors  Knew  Him,  by  Wayne  Whipple,  February 
12, 1911. 

A  Oet-Bich-Quick  Scheme  of  the  Olden  Days,  by  L.  F.  Andrews, 
February  12, 1911. 


SOME  PUBLICATIONS  317 

Memories  of  the  Prohibitory  Amendment  Campaign  of  1882,  by 
Mrs.  Addie  B.  Billington,  February  12, 1911. 

Cousins  of  Abraham  Lincoln  Living  in  Iowa,  February  12,  1911. 

Some  Men  Who  Helped  Make  Iowa  at  an  Early  Date,  by  L.  F. 
Andrews,  February  19,  1911. 

How  Edward  P.  Heizer  Made  Gk)od  in  the  Newspaper  Oame,  Feb- 
ruary 19, 1911. 

Judge  David  Ryan's  Career,  by  L.  F.  Andrews,  March  5, 1911. 

General  William  L.  Alexander  —  One  of  Iowa's  Famous  Fighting 
Men,  March  5, 1911. 

Jones  County  Calf  Case  which  Began  in  1874,  March  5,  1911. 

Iowa  Soldiers  at  Columbia,  South  Carolina,  by  A.  W.  Hepler, 
March  19,  1911. 

John  Howard  Stibbs  —  An  Iowa  Soldier  on  Commission  that  Tried 
Wirz,  March  19, 1911. 

Indian  Stone  Implement  Collection  at  the  State  Museum  of  His- 
tory, by  T.  Van  Hyning,  March  19,  1911. 

Injustice  to  the  Tama  Indians,  by  0.  H.  Mills,  March  19, 1911. 

The  Burlingtan  Hawk-Eye 

Twenty  Years  Ago.    (In  each  Sunday  issue.) 

The  Last  White  Man  Scalped  by  MusquaMe  Indians  in  Iowa,  by  0. 
H.  Mills,  January  15, 1911. 

Sketch  of  Life  of  Lafayette  Young,  January  22, 1911. 

The  Tax  Ferret  Must  Go,  January  29,  1911. 

Failure  of  the  Third  Party  Prohibitionists  in  Iowa  Politics,  Janu- 
ary 29, 1911. 

Abraham  Lincoln's  **Must",  by  George  L.  Ferris,  February  5, 1911. 

Tribute  to  T.  G.  Foster,  February  5,  1911. 

Recollections  by  W.  P.  Elliott,  February  19, 1911. 

Hugh  L.  Cooper,  Father  of  the  Keokuk  Water  Power,  by  G.  Walter 
Barr,  February  26, 1911. 

The  Law  of  the  Taxation  of  Moneys  and  Credits,  by  W.  M.  Kelly, 
February  26,  1911. 

The  Test  of  a  Year  of  the  Commission  City  Govemmenti  March  12, 
1911. 


318    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Sketch  of  Lives  of  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Angust  Feldman,  March  19,  1911. 
The  Pioneer  Ross  Family  in  Burlington  and  Southern  Iowa,  March 
26, 1911. 

The  Dubuque  Telegraph-Herald 

Review  of  News  and  Events  in  Dubuque  and  Vicinity  During  1910, 

January  1, 1911. 
Booster  Club  in  Olden  Days,  January  15,  1911. 
Old  Murder  Case  Recalled  at  Tama,  January  22, 1911. 
Dr.  A.  A.  Noyes  —  Oldest  Physician  in  the  United  States,  January 

22,  1911. 
Robert  T.  Lincoln,  son  of  Abraham  Lincoln,  February  12,  1911. 

The  Sioux  City  Journal 

Twenty  Years  Ago.    (In  each  Sunday  issue.) 

Recollections  of  Dakota  in  Territorial  Days,  January  1,  29,  and 

February  19,  1911. 
Personal  Recollections  of  Lincoln,  January  29, 1911. 
The  Wreck  of  the  Kate  Sweeney,  February  19,  1911. 


HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES 

PUBLICATIONS 

An  address  on  The  History  of  the  West  and  the  Pioneers,  by 
Benjamin  F.  Shambangh,  has  been  reprinted  from  the  Proceedings 
of  the  State  Historical  Society  of  Wisconsin  for  1910. 

Number  five  of  the  Memorial  Papers  of  the  Society  of  Colonial 
Wars  in  the  District  of  Columbia  contains  a  biographical  sketch  of 
OUbert  Thompson,  by  Marcus  Benjamin. 

The  Sauks  and  Foxes  in  Franklin  and  Osage  Counties,  Kansas, 
is  the  title  of  an  article  by  Ida  M.  Ferris,  which  has  been  reprinted 
from  the  eleventh  volume  of  the  Kansas  Historical  Collections. 

A  brief  article  on  Medford  Milkmen,  by  Francis  A.  Wait,  may 
be  found  in  the  January  number  of  The  Medford  Historical  Reg- 
ister.  An  unsigned  article  bears  the  title,  How  Medford  Began  to 
Orow. 

The  December  number  of  the  Records  of  the  American  Catholic 
Historical  Society  is  largely  taken  up  with  Propaganda  Documents 
relative  to  the  appointment  of  the  first  Bishop  of  Baltimore,  con- 
tributed and  edited  by  E.  P.  Devitt. 

In  the  January-February  number  of  the  Records  of  the  Past  may 
be  found  the  Preliminary  Report  to  the  Minnesota  Historical  So- 
ciety on  the  Kensington  Rune  Stone,  The  report  on  the  whole  is 
favorable  to  the  authenticity  of  the  stone. 

The  Third  Biennial  Report  of  the  North  Carolina  Historical 
Commission  contains  an  account  of  the  work  of  the  Commission 
during  the  years  from  1908  to  1910,  together  with  a  report  of  other 
historical  activities  in  the  State  during  that  period. 

The  Proceedings  of  the  Bunker  Hill  Monument  Association  at  the 
annual  meeting  on  June  17,  1910,  contains  three  addresses:  the 
presidential  address  by  John  Collins  Warren;  Fighters  and  Spec- 

319 


320    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

tators  at  Bunker  HiU,  by  Curtis  Onild,  Jr. ;  and  A  Hero  of  Dor- 
chester Heights,  by  Archer  Bnfler  Hulbert. 

A  Memorial  Tablet  at  Ticonderoga  is  the  title  of  a  pamphlet  is- 
sued by  the  Ticonderoga  Historical  Society.  It  contains  an  account 
of  the  exercises  on  October  4, 1910,  at  the  unveiling  of  a  tablet  pre- 
sented by  the  Ticonderoga  Pulp  and  Paper  Company. 

The  New  England  Historical  and  Oenedlogical  Register  for  Jan- 
uary opens  with  two  biographical  sketches :  Charles  Edtvin  Hurd,  by 
Edward  Henry  Clement ;  and  James  Brown  of  Middletown,  Conn., 
by  Edwin  A.  Hill.  Among  the  other  contributions  is  a  continuation 
of  Albion  Morris  Dyer's  discussion  of  the  First  Ownership  of  Ohio 
Lands. 

The  Journal  of  the  Presbyterian  Historical  Society  for  December 
opens  with  The  Earliest  Account  of  Protestant  Missions,  A.  D.  1557, 
by  J.  I.  Gk)od.  The  Early  History  of  the  Ninth  Presbyterian  Church 
and  the  Chambers  Independent  Church  is  contributed  by  John  Ed- 
mands;  and  under  the  head  of  Ancient  Documsnts  and  Records 
there  are  a  number  of  petitions  To  the  General  Assembly  of  the 
Delaware  State. 

A  new  series  to  be  known  as  the  Kentucky  Historical  Series,  ed- 
ited by  Jennie  C.  Morton,  has  been  initiated.  The  first  volume  to 
appear  is  one  by  John  Wilson  Townsend,  entitled  Kentucky:  Mother 
of  Oovemors,  Mr.  Townsend  has  presented  in  a  very  readable  way 
some  biographical  data  concerning  a  large  number  of  the  chief  ex- 
ecutives of  Commonwealths  and  Territories  who  were  sons  of  Ken- 
tucky either  by  birth  or  by  adoption. 

Two  brief  discussions  of  the  much  mooted  question  of  whether 
the  American  Indians  or  an  earlier  race  built  the  mounds,  written 
by  E.  Ralston  Goldsborough  and  John  Sexton  Abercrombie,  are 
printed  in  The  Archaeological  Bulletin  for  December.  Newly  Dis- 
covered Ruins  of  the  Ancient  Pueblos,  by  J.  A.  Jeancon ;  Notes  from 
Pulaski  County,  Kentucky,  by  W.  L.  GriflSn ;  and  The  Indian  Trails 
in  Clark  County,  Ohio,  by  W.  H.  Ryner,  are  other  contributions. 

Among  the  articles  in  the  January  number  of  the  Deutsch-Amer- 
ikanische  Oeschichtsbldtter  are:  The  Americanizing  Influence  of 


HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  321 

the  Foreign  Press  in  America,  by  Emil  Baensch;  Ziistdnde  in  einer 
kleinen  Sictdi  von  Missouri  vor  50  Jahren,  by  Julius  Elaufmann; 
General  W.  T,  Sherman  as  a  College  President,  by  David  French 
Boyd;  Die  Deutschen  in  der  PoUtik  im  Staate  Indiana,  by  W.  IT. 
Fritsch ;  and  Die  Deutsch-Amerikaner  and  die  deutsche  Revolution, 
by  C.  F.  Huch. 

John  F.  Philips  is  the  writer  of  an  article  on  Governor  WiUard 
Preble  Hall  appearing  in  the  January  number  of  the  Missouri  His- 
toricdl  Review  in  the  series  of  articles  on  the  Administrations  of 
Missouri  Governors.  Joseph  H.  Schmidt  presents  some  Recollec- 
tions of  the  First  Catholic  Mission  Work  in  Central  Missouri.  E. 
M.  Violette  discusses  The  Battle  of  KirksvUle,  August  6, 1862;  and 
there  is  a  second  installment  of  Monumental  Inscriptions  in  Mis- 
souri Cemeteries. 

Henry  FoUansbee  Long  is  the  author  of  an  historical  sketch  of 
The  Salt  Marshes  of  the  Massachusetts  Coast  which  may  be  found 
in  the  Historical  Collections  of  the  Essex  Institute  for  January. 
There  are  continuations  of  The  Houses  and  Buildings  of  Oroveland, 
Mass.,  by  Alfred  Poore ;  and  of  the  Revolutionary  Orderly  Book  of 
Capt.  Jeremiah  Putnam  of  Danvers,  Mass.,  in  the  Rhode  Island 
Campaign;  and  a  fifth  chapter  in  Sidney  Perley's  study  of  Marble- 
head  in  the  Year  1700. 

Nathaniel  Pope  is  the  subject  of  a  biographical  sketch  by  William 
A.  Meese  which  appears  in  the  January  number  of  the  Journal  of 
the  Illinois  State  Historical  Society.  Isabel  Jamison  contributes 
an  interesting  sketch  of  the  Independent  Military  Companies  of 
Sangamon  County  in  the  30* s.  The  story  of  Judge  Theophilus  L. 
Dickey  and  the  First  Murder  Trial  in  Kendall  County  is  told  by 
Avery  N.  Beebe.  Some  Extracts  from  the  Memoir  of  Alvan  Stone 
are  presented  under  the  head  of  reprints. 

The  principal  contributions  in  the  nineteenth  number  of  the 
Publications  of  the  American  Jewish  Historical  Society  are:  The 
Jews  and  Masonry  in  the  United  States  before  1810,  by  Samuel 
Oppenheim ;  A  List  of  Jews  Who  were  Orand  Masters  of  Masons  in 
Various  States  of  this  Country,  by  Albert  M.  Friedenberg;  Jews  in 


322    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Connection  with  the  CoUeges  of  the  Thirteen  Original  States  prior 
to  1800,  by  Leon  Hiihner ;  and  The  Beginnings  of  Russo-Jewish  Im- 
migration  to  Philadelphia,  by  David  Sulzberger. 

A  contribution  to  the  literature  on  the  subject  of  the  Mound 
Builders  is  to  be  found  in  Bennett  H.  Young's  monograph  on  The 
Prehistoric  Men  of  Kentucky,  which  constitutes  number  twenly-five 
of  the  FUson  Club  Publications.  The  writer  gives  a  brief  diacnflmon 
of  the  theories  concerning  the  origin  and  identity  of  the  Mound 
Builders  and  then  proceeds  with  a  history  of  the  life  and  habits  of 
these  ancient  people  in  Kentucky,  and  with  a  description  of  the  ma- 
terial remains  left  by  them. 

The  April,  July,  and  October,  1910,  numbers  of  The  "Old  North- 
west'*  OenecUogiccU  Quarterly  are  combined  into  one  number.  The 
first  contribution  is  the  Journal  of  John  Cotton,  M.  D.,  who  was  a 
lineal  descendant  of  the  famous  John  Cotton  of  colonial  times.  An- 
other article  is  on  the  subject  of  the  Fugitive  Slave  Law  of  Ohio. 
Other  articles  are:  Prince's  Annals  and  Its  Notable  List  of  Sub- 
scribers,  by  David  E.  Phillips ;  and  The  Notable  Pedigree  of  Wen- 
dell Phillips  and  Phillips  Brooks,  by  the  same  writer. 

The  belated  September  number  of  The  Quarterly  of  the  Oregon 
Historical  Society  opens  with  an  extended  biographical  sketch  of 
Peter  Skene  Ogden,  Fur  Trader,  by  T.  C.  Elliott.  T.  W.  Davenport 
writes  a  brief  appreciation  of  The  Late  Oeorge  H.  Williams.  Pub- 
lic expenditures  is  the  subject  treated  in  the  installment  of  the 
Financial  History  of  the  State  of  Oregon,  by  F.  G.  Young,  here 
printed.  Under  the  heading  of  Documents  there  is  a  letter  and  cir- 
cular of  information  for  prospective  emigrants  to  Oregon. 

The  Heroic  Career  of  a  Kentucky  Naval  Officer:  Rear  Admiral 
Lucien  Young  is  described  by  George  Baber  in  the  January  number 
of  The  Register  of  the  Kentucky  State  Historical  Society.  John 
Wilson  Townsend  contributes  a  brief  sketch  of  Rosa  Vertner  Jef- 
frey: Noted  Kentucky  Singer.  Martha  Stephenson's  discussion  of 
Education  in  Harrodsburg  and  Neighborhood  Since  1775  is  con- 
cluded in  this  number.  There  is  another  installment  of  the  Cor- 
respondence of  Oov.  Isaac  Shelby,  copied  from  the  State  Archives 
by  W.  W.  Longmoor. 


HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  323 

In  Yolomes  fifteen  and  sixteen  of  the  Documentary  History  of  the 
State  of  Maine  the  Maine  Historical  Society  continues  the  publica- 
tion of  The  Baxter  Manuscripts,  edited  by  James  Phinney  Baxter. 
The  letters  and  documents  presented  in  volume  fifteen  cover  the 
period  from  January,  1777,  to  April,  1778,  and  illustrate  the  part 
played  by  the  people  of  Maine  during  the  early  years  of  the  Revo- 
lution. Volume  sixteen  covers  the  months  from  April,  1778,  to 
August,  1779,  and  contains  an  especially  good  collection  of  ma- 
terial dealing  with  the  Penobscot  Expedition. 

The  life  and  services  of  the  late  Oeorge  Pierce  Oarrison,  whose 
death  has  been  greatly  felt  in  historical  circles,  is  discussed  by  H. 
Y.  Benedict  in  an  article  in  The  Quarterly  of  the  Texas  State  His- 
torical Association  for  January.  Stephen  F.  Austin:  A  Memorial 
Address  was  delivered  by  Alex.  W.  Terrell  on  the  occasion  of  the 
removal  of  the  remains  of  Stephen  F.  Austin  from  Peach  Point  to 
the  State  Cemetery  at  Austin  in  October,  1910.  The  remainder  of 
the  Quarterly  is  taken  up  with  a  scholarly  monograph  on  Apache 
Relations  in  Texas,  1718-1750,  by  William  Edward  Dunn. 

Some  Extracts  from  a  Journal  Kept  During  the  Earlier  Cam- 
paigns of  the  Army  of  the  Potomac,  by  Charles  C.  Bombaugh,  which 
are  printed  in  the  December  number  of  the  Maryland  Historical 
Magazine,  relate  the  experiences  of  a  surgeon  with  the  brigade  of 
General  E.  D.  Baker.  Under  the  heading,  Oeorge  Pedbody  and  his 
Services  to  the  State,  are  published  a  number  of  letters  from  the 
Executive  Archives.  The  Last  Bloodshed  of  the  Revolution  is  the 
subject  of  an  article  by  Francis  B.  Culver.  A  number  of  letters  re- 
lating to  the  Battle  of  Bladensburg,  and  an  article  on  The  Quit  Rent 
in  Maryland,  by  Beverly  W.  Bond,  Jr.,  may  also  be  found  among 
the  contents  of  this  number. 

Two  contributions,  with  an  introductory  note,  make  up  the  con- 
tents of  the  July-September,  1910,  number  of  The  Quarterly  Publi- 
cation of  the  Historical  and  Philosophical  Society  of  Ohio,  The 
first  is  the  Trenton  circular  To  the  Respectable  Public,  written  by 
John  Cleves  Symmes  on  November  26,  1787,  in  which  he  set  forth 
the  advantages  and  prices  of  the  lands  which  he  owned  on  the  Miami 


324    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

River  and  which  he  hoped  to  sell  to  emigrants  from  New  England. 
The  second  is  a  letter  from  John  Cleves  Symmes  to  Elias  Boudinoi 
discussing  St.  Clair's  disastrous  campaign  against  the  Indians  in 
1791.  The  October-December  number  is  devoted  to  the  annual  re- 
port of  the  Society  for  the  year  ending  December  5,  1910. 

A  thirty  page,  illustrated  article  by  A.  B.  Stout  on  Prehistoric 
Earthworks  in  Wisconsin  opens  the  January  number  of  the  Ohio 
Archaeological  and  nistoric(U  Quarterly.  Then  follows  an  address 
by  Frederick  Jackson  Turner  on  The  Place  of  the  Ohio  Valley  in 
American  History.  Mrs.  Jennie  C.  Morton  is  the  writer  of  a  brief 
paper  on  the  history  and  character  of  the  American  Indian  which 
appears  under  the  title  A  Vanishing  Race,  adopted  from  Edward  S. 
Curtis 's  picture  of  the  same  name.  Some  notes  concerning  the  Wy- 
andot chief  tan,  Tarhe  —  the  Crane,  are  contributed  by  Basil  Meek, 
who  is  also  the  writer  of  an  article  on  Oener<d  Harmar's  Expe- 
dition. Among  the  editorials  is  one  on  Jefferson's  Ordinance  of 
1784. 

The  portion  of  The  Randolph  Manuscript  published  in  the  Jan- 
uary number  of  The  Virginia  Magazine  of  History  and  Biography 
covers  the  years  from  1684  to  1686.  Perhaps  the  most  notable  doc- 
ument in  this  group  is  a  letter  from  Charles  II  relative  to  a  grant 
which  had  recently  been  surrendered  by  Lord  Cidpeper.  Among 
the  Miscellaneous  Colonial  Documents  are  a  number  which  throw 
light  on  the  regulation  of  trade  and  commerce  in  the  colonies  early 
in  the  eighteenth  century.  An  Extract  from  the  Sir  William  John- 
son Papers,  contributed  by  G.  A.  Taylor,  contains  material  relative 
to  the  dealings  with  the  Indians.  Franklin  R.  Carpentier  contrib- 
utes Henry  Bartlett's  Diary  to  Ohio  and  Kentucky,  1805,  which 
tells  of  a  journey  taken  during  the  months  of  April,  May,  and  June 
of  the  year  indicated. 

Volume  fourteen  of  the  Buffalo  Historical  Society  Publications  is 
devoted  to  documentary  material  relative  to  The  Holland  Land  Co. 
and  Canal  Construction  in  Western  New  York,  edited  by  Frank  H. 
Severance.  The  scope  of  the  volume  can  best  be  stated  in  the  words 
of  the  editor's  introduction:  ''The  present  volume  consists  chiefly 
of  documents  bearing  on  the  original  construction  of  the  Erie  canal 


HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  325 

in  Western  New  York,  and  on  the  early  harbor  work  at  BuflCalo  and 
Black  Bock.  There  are  also  here  printed  two  journals  of  travel  in 
New  York  State  in  the  early  years  of  the  canal ;  a  valuable  study  of 
the  influences  of  the  Erie  canal  on  the  settlement  of  the  West ;  and 
sundry  other  papers  which,  although  perhaps  of  minor  importance, 
find  an  appropriate  place  in  this  collection."  The  editing  has  been 
done  in  the  careful  and  painstaking  manner  characteristic  of  the 
work  of  Mr.  Severance,  and  the  volume  is  printed  neatly  and  on 
good  paper. 

Volumes  six  to  nine,  inclusive,  of  The  Chicago  Historical  Society  ^s 
Collection  are  devoted  to  The  Diary  of  James  K.  Polk  During  his 
Presidency,  1845-1849,  edited  by  Milo  Milton  Quaife,  with  an  intro- 
duction by  Andrew  Cunningham  McLaughlin.  The  original  manu- 
script of  this  valuable  diary  has  for  about  ten  years  been  in  the  pos- 
session of  the  Chicago  Historical  Society  and  has  been  occasionally 
<;onsulted  by  historians,  but  it  is  now  printed  for  the  first  time  and 
made  generally  accessible.  Viewed  as  a  source  for  the  history  of  a 
period  over  which  there  has  been  no  end  of  controversy  the  diary  is 
of  great  importance.  Furthermore,  it  reveals  with  minute  clear- 
ness the  daily  life  of  a  President  sixty  years  ago,  recording  with 
•equal  frankness  the  whole  gamut  of  executive  cares  from  the  peti- 
tion of  the  lowliest  ofSce-seeker  to  the  great  questions  of  diplomiatic 
affairs.  The  editing  has  been  done  in  a  careful,  scholarly  manner, 
and  the  volumes  are  printed  and  bound  in  an  attractive  and  perma- 
nent manner  appropriate  to  their  contents. 

The  nineteenth  volume  of  the  Collections  of  the  State  Historical 
Society  of  Wisconsin,  edited  by  Beuben  Gold  Thwaites,  is  devoted 
almost  entirely  to  documentary  material  relating  to  the  early  fur 
trade  in  the  Great  Lake  region  and  the  upper  Mississippi  Valley. 
The  first  collection,  however,  occupying  one  hundred  and  sixty 
pages,  is  entitled  The  Mackinac  Register  and  contains  a  record  of 
baptisms,  marriages,  and  interments  covering  the  period  from  1695 
to  1821.  Then  follows  A  Wisconsin  Fur-Trader's  Journal,  1804-05, 
written  by  Francois  Victor  Malhiot  for  the  North  West  Pur  Com- 
pany. The  journal  furnishes  a  good  picture  of  the  life  of  a  fur 
trader  and  the  goods  used  in  transacting  business  with  the  Indians. 


326    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

The  Fur-Trade  on  the  Upper  Lakes,  1778-1815,  is  illnstrated  by  a 
large  nnmber  of  documents  and  letters  by  various  traders,  includ- 
ing John  Askin.  The  concluding  group  of  documents  relates  to 
The  Fur-Trade  in  Wisconsin,  1815-1817.  The  volume  will  be  of 
great  value  to  students  of  early  western  history,  and  the  compre- 
hensive index  will  be  appreciated  by  all  who  have  occasion  to  use  it 

The  Governors  of  New  York  is  the  title  of  an  extensive  article  by 
Charles  Z.  Lincoln  which  appears  as  the  opening  contribution  in 
volume  nine  of  the  Proceedings  of  the  New  York  State  Historical 
Association.  Under  the  title,  A  Native  of  Jefferson  County,  New 
York,  First  Organized  and  Named  the  Republican  Party,  Irvin  W. 
Near  presents  a  brief  biographical  sketch  of  Alvin  Earl  Bovay.  An 
illustrated  account  of  A  Recently  Found  Portrait  Medallion  of 
Jacques  Cartier,  by  John  M.  Clark,  is  of  general  interest.  John  H. 
Brandow  discusses  Washington's  Retreat  Through  Westchester 
County.  Everyone  engaged  in  local  historical  work  will  be  inter- 
ested in  the  Report  of  the  Committee  upon  the  Establishment  of 
Closer  Relations  Between  the  Historical  Societies  of  the  State. 
Among  the  other  contents  are :  The  Study  of  History  as  Corrective 
of  Economic  Eccentricity,  by  Thomas  R.  Slicer ;  The  Executive  Re- 
lation of  New  York  State  to  Historical  Scholarship,  by  Victor  Hugo 
Paltsits ;  and  a  number  of  papers  by  various  authors  relative  to  The 
Ticonderoga  Expedition  of  1775.  It  is  somewhat  surprising  that  a 
volume  containing  so  much  valuable  material  has  no  index  that  is 
worthy  of  mention. 

A  new  series  in  the  Collections  of  the  Illinois  State  Historical  Li- 
brary to  be  known  as  the  Bibliographical  Series  has  been  begun  in  a 
volume  containing  a  list  of  Newspapers  and  Periodicals  of  Illinois 
1814-1879,  compiled  and  edited  by  Franklin  William  Scott.  In  an 
introduction  the  editor  presents  an  historical  sketch  of  the  news- 
papers of  Illinois  which,  he  states,  is  to  be  considered  only  prelim- 
inary to  a  more  detailed  treatment  of  the  subject  to  appear  later. 
The  greater  part  of  the  volume  is  taken  up  with  a  descriptive  list 
of  newspapers  and  periodicals,  arranged  alphabetically  by  towns 
and  cities.  In  each  case  where  information  could  be  secured,  the 
character  and  politics  of  the  respective  papers,  their  editors,  and 


HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  327 

various  other  facts  are  given,  and  the  place  is  indicated  where  files 
may  be  found  when  any  are  extant.  Following  this  general  list 
there  is  a  list  of  libraries  containing  Illinois  newspapers,  with  the 
files  which  each  contains.  A  chronological  list,  an  index  to  news- 
papers, an  index  to  names,  and  an  index  to  counties  complete  the 
volume.  The  arrangement  is  admirable  and  offers  every  possible 
convenience  to  the  investigator,  to  whom  the  volume  will  be  of  great 
value. 

ACTIVITIES 

The  Missouri  Historical  Society  has  come  into  possession  of  some 
letters  from  members  of  the  Doniphan  expedition,  and  from  Cali- 
fornia gold  seekers  in  1849. 

The  Department  of  Archives  and  History  of  the  State  of  Ala- 
bama has  begun  the  publication  of  a  quarterly  periodical  known  as 
the  Alabama  History  Journal,  edited  by  Dr.  Thomas  M.  Owen. 

Professor  Julius  Goebel  of  the  University  of  Illinois  will  edit  the 
German  version  of  the  American  adventures  of  Christoph  von  Graf- 
f  enried,  which  will  be  published  by  the  Historical  Commission  of  the 
State  of  North  Carolina. 

The  Illinois  State  Historical  Society  held  a  special  meeting  on 
April  14th  in  commemoration  of  the  beginning  of  the  Civil  War. 
Two  sessions  were  held,  one  in  the  afternoon  and  one  in  the  evening, 
and  there  were  speakers  representing  the  various  sections  of  the 
State. 

The  fourth  annual  meeting  of  the  Mississippi  Valley  Historical 
Association  will  be  held  at  Chicago  and  Evanston  May  18-20,  1911. 
The  Illinois  State  Historical  Society  and  the  North  Central  Teach- 
ers' Association  will  hold  their  annual  meetings  at  the  same  time 
and  places. 

A  movement  is  on  foot  in  Indiana  for  the  erection  of  a  State  Li- 
brary and  Museum  Building  as  a  permanent  memorial  for  the  cen- 
tennial of  Indiana's  statehood  in  1916.  The  Indiana  Historical 
Society  and  other  historical  agencies  have  been  particularly  active 
in  this  movement. 


328    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

The  annual  meeting  of  the  Virginia  Historical  Society  was  held 
on  December  29, 1910.  The  officers  chosen  at  that  time  were :  Presi- 
dent, W.  Gordon  McCabe ;  Vice  Presidents,  Archer  Anderson,  Ed- 
ward V.  Valentine,  and  Lyon  G.  Tyler;  Corresponding  Secretary 
and  Librarian,  William  G.  Stanard ;  Recording  Secretary,  David  C. 
Richardson;  Treasurer,  Robert  A.  Lancaster,  Jr. 

At  the  January  meeting  of  the  Louisiana  Historical  Society  the 
Battle  of  New  Orleans  was  the  principal  topic  of  discussion.  The 
following  officers  were  elected  at  this  time :  Alcte  Fortier,  President ; 
Charles  T.  Soniat,  First  Vice  President;  Gaspar  Cusachs,  Second 
Vice  President;  Arthur  T.  Prescott,  Third  Vice  President;  Charles 
G.  Gill,  Recording  Secretary;  Pierce  Butler,  Corresponding  Secre- 
tary ;  W.  0.  Hart,  Treasurer. 

The  Madison  County  Historical  Society  held  its  eighth  annual 
meeting  at  Winterset.  There  was  an  interesting  program,  with  sev- 
eral papers  on  local  historical  topics  and  an  address  by  Benj.  F. 
Shambaugh,  Superintendent  of  The  State  Historical  Society  of 
Iowa.  The  following  officers  were  elected  for  the  ensuing  year: 
President,  H.  A.  Mueller;  Vice  President,  E.  R.  Zeller;  Secretary, 
Walter  F.  Craig;  Treasurer,  W.  H.  Lewis;  Directors,  J.  J.  Gkuston, 
W.  S.  Wilkinson,  William  Brinson,  and  Fred  Beeler. 

THE  STATE  HISTORICAL  SOCIETY  OF  IOWA 

Dr.  Louis  Pelzer's  biography  of  Henry  Dodge  is  now  in  press  and 
will  probably  be  distributed  during  the  summer. 

It  is  expected  that  Mr.  Johnson  Brigham's  biography  of  James 
Harlan  will  be  ready  to  go  to  press  during  the  summer. 

Professor  John  E.  Brindley's  two-volume  History  of  Taxation  in 
Iowa  has  been  distributed.  In  response  to  a  resolution  of  the  Gen- 
eral Assembly  each  member  of  that  body  was  furnished  with  a  set 
of  this  work. 

The  following,  persons  have  been  appointed  by  Qovemor  Carroll 
to  the  Board  of  Curators  of  The  State  Historical  Society  of  Iowa: 
Mr.  Marsh  W.  Bailey,  Washington,  Iowa;  Mr.  F.  M.  Edwards, 
Parkersburg,  Iowa ;  Mr.  J.  J.  McConnell,  Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa ;  Mr. 


HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  329 

John  T.  MoflSt,  Tipton,  Iowa ;  Mr.  Byron  W.  Newberry,  Strawberry 
Point,  Iowa;  Mr.  A.  C.  Savage,  Adair,  Iowa;  Mr.  B.  W.  Stanton^ 
Ames,  Iowa ;  Mr.  W.  H.  Tedf ord,  Corydon,  Iowa ;  Mr.  J.  B.  Weaver, 
Jr.,  Des  Moines,  Iowa. 

The  following  persons  have  recently  been  elected  to  membership 
in  the  Society :  Mr.  Henry  L.  Adams,  West  Union,  Iowa ;  Mr.  A.  L. 
Ames,  Traer,  Iowa ;  Mr.  James  A.  Hall,  Denison,  Iowa ;  Mr.  Robert 
Healy,  Fort  Dodge,  Iowa;  Mr.  Thos.  EQckenlooper,  Albia,  Iowa; 
Mr.  F.  M.  Meyers,  Denison,  Iowa;  Mr.  Wm.  E.  G.  Saunders,  Em- 
metsburg,  Iowa;  Mr.  John  H.  Stibbs,  Chicago,  Illinois;  Mr.  Howard 
Vaughn,  Ames,  Iowa;  Mr.  A.  H.  Wallace,  Washington,  Iowa;  Mr. 
Charles  Baldwin,  Salt  Lake  City,  Utah ;  Mr.  W.  J.  Brown,  Emmets- 
burg,  Iowa ;  Mr.  Will  L.  Clifton,  Webster  City,  Iowa ;  Mr.  LaMonte 
Cowles,  Burlington,  Iowa;  Mr.  Ernest  M.  Engvall,  Des  Moines,. 
Iowa ;  Miss  Ellen  Geyer,  Iowa  City,  Iowa ;  Mr.  W.  F.  Hunter,  Web- 
ster City,  Iowa;  Rev.  John  A.  McEIamy,  Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa;  Mr. 
W.  C.  Ralston,  Pocahontas,  Iowa;  Mr.  Alfred  C.  Torgeson,  Beres- 
ford.  South  Dakota ;  Mr.  G.  A.  Wrightman,  Des  Moines,  Iowa ;  Mr. 
Edgar  Ashton,  Iowa  City,  Iowa ;  Mr.  John  A.  L.  Campbell,  Sheldon^ 
Iowa;  Mr.  Walter  F.  Craig,  Winterset,  Iowa;  Mr.  Sherman  W.  De- 
Wolf,  Reinbeck,  Iowa;  Mr.  D.  A.  Emery,  Des  Moines,  Iowa;  Mr. 
Charles  E.  Hall,  Des  Moines,  Iowa ;  Mrs.  Charity  Lothrop  Kellogg,. 
Charles  City,  Iowa ;  Mr.  John  E.  Luckey,  Vinton,  Iowa ;  Mr.  W.  W. 
Mercer,  Iowa  City,  Iowa ;  Mr.  James  M.  Pierce,  Des  Moines,  Iowa ; 
Mr.  C.  G.  Sauerberg,  Ames,  Iowa;  Mr.  James  Saum,  Adair,  Iowa; 
Mr.  H.  H.  Stipp,  Des  Moines,  Iowa ;  Mr.  H.  C.  Wallace,  Des  Moines,. 
Iowa;  and  Mr.  Arthur  Springer,  Wapello,  Iowa. 


NOTES  AND  COMMENT 

The  National  Civil  Service  Reform  League  held  its  thirteenth 
annual  meeting  in  Baltimore  on  December  15  and  16, 1910. 

The  third  National  Peace  Congress  will  be  held  at  Baltimore  un- 
der the  auspices  of  Johns  Hopkins  University,  May  3-5,  1911. 

A  Bureau  of  Economy  and  Efficiency  has  been  established  in  the 
city  of  Milwaukee  to  perform  a  service  similar  to  that  performed  by 
the  Pittsburg  Survey. 

Mr.  Francis  W.  Dickey,  formerly  of  the  Iowa  State  College  of 
Agricidture  and  Mechanic  Arts,  now  occupies  the  i>08ition  of  in- 
structor in  political  science  at  Western  Reserve  University. 

The  amount  of  work  devolving  ux>on  the  Legislative  Reference 
Department  of  the  Indiana  State  Library  during  the  recent  session 
of  the  legislature  was  so  large  that  four  additional  assistants  were 
required. 

An  effort  is  being  made  at  Grinnell  College  to  raise  a  fund  of 
$450,000  for  the  establishment  of  a  Department  of  Public  Affairs 
embracing  chairs  in  political  science,  sociology,  economics,  and  mod- 
em history. 

Elihu  Root,  John  W.  Foster,  Andrew  Carnegie,  Eugene  Wam- 
baugh,  Charles  Noble  Gregory,  Simeon  E.  Baldwin,  and  Harry 
Pratt  Judson  were  among  the  speakers  at  a  conference  on  interna- 
tional arbitration  held  at  Washington,  D.  C,  December  15-17, 1910. 

Qovemor  Deneen  in  his  message  to  the  legislature  of  Illinois  in 
January  urged  that  action  be  taken  providing  for  the  marking  of 
the  route  traversed  by  Abraham  Lincoln  when  removing  from  Ken- 
tucky to  Illinois.  He  suggests  that  the  route  thus  marked  shall  be 
known  as  **The  Lincoln  Way''. 

The  movement  in  favor  of  the  so-called  **  Short  Ballot",  limitiTig 
the  number  of  elective  offices  in  State  and  local  governments,  has 

880 


NOTES  AND  COMMENT  331 

become  qtiite  wide-spread.  During  the  year  1910  the  movement  re- 
ceived decided  encouragement  in  New  York,  Pennsylvania,  Ohio, 
New  Jersey,  Iowa,  Sonth  Dakota,  Washington,  and  California. 

The  commission  form  of  municipal  government  is  rapidly  gaining 
ground  in  Illinois  where  a  number  of  the  smaller  cities,  including 
Springfield,  Joliet,  Quincy,  Eewanee,  Oalesburg;  Peoria,  Jackson- 
ville, Moline,  and  Bock  Island,  have  either  decided  to  vote  on  the 
question  or  are  actively  agitating  the  subject 

Professor  Herbert  E.  Bolton  expects  to  return  to  Mexico  during 
the  coming  summer  to  continue  his  work  in  the  archives  of  that 
country.  He  spent  the  greater  part  of  the  mid-winter  holidays  in 
tracing  the  route  of  Father  Eino,  an  early  missiouary  and  explorer 
who  is  thought  to  have  been  the  first  white  man  within  the  limits  of 
Arizona  after  Coronado.  It  is  understood  that  Professor  Bolton  is 
planning  to  publish  Father  Eino's  chronicle  of  early  Spanish  ex- 
plorations which  has  recently  been  discovered.  It  is  largely  as  the 
result  of  Professor  Bolton's  work  that  provision  has  been  made  for 
indexing  the  Mexican  archives. 


CONTRIBTTTORS 

Kbknbth  W.  Coloeovb,  Pertrna  Scholar  at  Harvard  TTni- 
TOnity.  Born  at  Waukon,  Iowa,  in  1886.  Graduated  from  tht 
Iowa  State  Normal  School  in  1906.  Graduated  from  Ths  Statt 
lhiiT«int7  of  Iowa  in  1909.  BeeeiTed  the  degree  of  !£.  A.  at 
The  State  TTniTermty  of  Iowa  in  1910.  Wou  the  Colonial 
Damee  Prize  for  the  heat  eesay  on  Iowa  history  in  1908.  Won 
the  Jesap  Prize  for  the  heat  eaaay  on  present-day  citizenship  is 
1909.  Aathor  of  The  Delegates  to  Congnts  from  the  7emf«ry 
of  Iowa. 

Glabbnob  Bat  AimNEB,  Member  of  The  State  Historical  So- 
ciety of  Iowa.  Bom  in  Illinois.  Gnwlneted  from  the  Iowa 
State  Nonoal  School  in  1891.  Saperintoident  of  Schools  at 
Waverly,  Adel,  Avoca,  and  Tipton,  Iowa.  Graduated  from 
The  State  Univermty  of  Iowa  in  1903.  Received  the  degree  of 
M.  A.  at  The  State  Univendty  of  Iowa  in  1909.  Aathor  (tf  i 
Topical  History  of  Cedw  County,  Iowa. 


•'  1  ^ 

^9- 


T  L9H 


i- 


THE  IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  fflSTORY  AND  POLITICS 

'^Z'   JULY  NINBTBBN   HUNDRED   BLBVBN 

VOLUME  mm  NUMBBR  THREE 


▼OL.IX— 23 


I 


THE  EXPEDITION  OF  ZEBULON  MONTGOMERY 
PIKE  TO  THE  SOURCES  OF  THE  MISSISSIPPI 

With  the  purchase  of  Louisiana  in  1803  the  United  States 
assumed  the  responsibiUty  of  the  control  of  a  territory 
whose  expanse  was  twice  the  nation's  area  and  whose  bor- 
ders were  little  known.  When  the  news  of  the  conclusion 
of  the  negotiations  reached  President  Jefferson  he  was  sur- 
prised and  not  a  little  embarrassed,  for  it  was  his  plan  to 
purchase  simply  the  port  of  New  Orieans  and  such  tract  of 
land  thereabouts  as  would  gain  the  command  of  the  mouth 
of  the  Mississippi,  which  was  so  vital  to  American  com- 
merce. But  now  he  found  the  whole  of  the  vaguely  defined 
Province  of  Louisiana  thrust  upon  him,  and  with  it  the 
burden  of  a  fifteen  million  dollar  debt.^ 

Jefferson  showed  his  good  statesmanship  when  at  this 
critical  period  he  planned  for  an  immediate  and  thorough 
exploration  of  the  new  territory.^    At  the  south  a  command 

1  Hosmer  's  The  History  of  the  Louiaiarui  Purchase,  p.  148 ;  Hosmer  'b  A 
Short  History  of  the  Mississippi  V alley ,  pp.  118-127;  Salter's  Iowa:  The  First 
Free  State  in  the  Louisiana  Purch4ise,  p.  51 ;  Whiting  *s  Life  of  Zehulan  Mowt- 
gomery  Pike,  published  in  Jared  Sparks 't  Library  of  American  Biography, 
Vol.  XV,  pp.  221,  222. 

For  a  full  account  of  the  history  of  this  period,  tee  Adama'a  History  of 
the  United  States,  Vol.  II,  pp.  1-134;  McMaster's  A  History  of  the  People  of 
the  United  States,  Vol.  II,  pp.  621-635;  Vol.  Ill,  pp.  1-36. 

s  Even  before  the  purchase  of  the  Louisiana  territory  President  Jefferson 
transmitted  to  Congress  a  confidential  message  under  date  of  January  18,  1803, 
in  which  he  advocated  the  exploration  of  the  newly  acquired  territory  and  out- 
lined an  expedition  which  should  "explore  the  whole  line,  even  to  the  Western 
ocean,  have  conferences  with  the  natives  on  the  subject  of  commercial  inter- 
course, get  admission  amoDg  them  for  our  traders,  as  others  are  admitted,  agree 
on  convenient  deposits  for  an  interchange  of  articles,  and  return  with  the  in- 
formation acquired,  in  the  course  of  two  summers. ' ' —  Annais  of  Congress,  7th 
Congress,  Second  Session,  1802-1803,  pp.  25,  26.  See  also  Biehardson's  Mes- 
sages and  Papers  of  the  Presidents,  VoL  I,  pp.  353,  354. 

335 


336    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

of  the  lower  Mississippi  had  opened  the  West  to  the  control 
of  the  government  by  way  of  numerous  tributaries.  Bnt 
to  the  northy  west,  and  southeast  there  was  much  uncer- 
tainty as  to  the  boundaries.  On  the  north  the  territory  ex- 
tended to  the  as  yet  undiscovered  sources  of  the  Mississippi. 
It  was  assumed  that  the  mountains,  which  at  that  time  were 
almost  unknown  to  the  white  man,  formed  the  western 
boundary  line,  but  the  amount  of  territory  which  lay  be- 
tween them  and  the  Mississippi  was  a  matter  of  mere  con- 
jecture. And  still  more  uncertainty  prevailed  with  respect 
to  the  boundary  on  the  southeast.^ 

In  his  choice  of  explorers  President  Jefferson  exercised 
remarkable  judgment,  of  which  the  results  of  the  explora- 
tions are  ample  evidence.  In  the  army  he  found  the  most 
efficient  men  for  the  work,  although  few  scientific  men  were 
available  even  from  that  source.  Moreover,  funds  for  car- 
rying on  the  work  were  not  to  be  had  without  much  effort 
Jefferson  seems  to  have  been  reluctant  in  asking  for  extra 
means  for  the  work  —  probably  because  he  felt  that  there 
would  be  opposition  to  an  appropriation,  since  the  adminis- 
tration was  strongly  in  favor  of  ^^ economical  reform'*.* 

Early  in  1804  Captain  Meriwether  Lewis  and  Lieutenant 
William  Clark  were  chosen  for  the  purpose  of  exploring  the 
Missouri  to  its  source  and  of  discovering  the  most  advan- 
tageous water  route  to  the  Pacific  Ocean.  This  expedition 
covered  a  period  of  about  three  years  and  is  without  doubt 
the  most  remarkable  and  creditable  of  the  early  explora- 
tions of  the  Louisiana  country.*^ 

8  WMting  's  lAfe  of  Zehulan  Montgomery  Pike,  published  in  Jared  Sparki  *b 
Library  of  American  Biography,  Vol.  XV,  pp.  221,  222. 

«  Whiting's  Life  of  Zehulon  Montgomery  Pike,  published  in  Jared  Sparki 'i 
Library  of  American  Biography,  Vol.  XV,  pp.  222,  223.  See  also  Salter's  lowi: 
The  First  Free  State  in  the  Louisiana  Purchase,  pp.  52,  53,  61;  and  McMaster's 
A  History  of  the  People  of  the  United  States,  Vol.  II,  pp.  628,  629. 

s  For  a  complete  account  of  this  expedition,  see  Thwaites  's  Original  JounuAs 
of  the  Lewis  and  Clark  Expedition,  Vols.  I- VII. 


EXPEDITION  OP  ZEBULON  M.  PIKE  337 

Contemporaneous  with  and  probably  not  less  worthy 
than  the  work  of  Lewis  and  Clark  were  the  explorations  of 
Zebulon  Montgomery  Pike,  who,  however,  had  the  misfor- 
tune to  receive  his  commission  from  the  commander  of  the 
western  army.  General  James  Wilkinson,  instead  of  from 
the  government.® 

Bom  in  what  is  now  a  part  of  Trenton,  New  Jersey,  on 
January  5,  1779,''  Zebulon  M.  Pike  moved  during  his  child- 
hood to  Easton,  Pennsylvania.  There  he  received  such  edu- 
cation as  the  rural  schools  of  the  time  afforded.  He  is 
described  by  some  of  his  school-mates  as  ^  ^  a  boy  of  slender 
form,  very  fair  complexion,  gentle  and  retiring  disposi- 
tion, but  of  resolute  spirit''  and  always  capable  of  defend- 
ing himself  when  put  to  the  test.®  The  time  spent  in  ob- 
taining an  education  was  necessarily  short,  since  he  entered 
his  father's  company  as  a  cadet  when  he  was  about  fifteen 

<The  idea  that  Pike's  Mississippi  expedition  was  conducted  hj  the  goveni- 
ment  seems  quite  generaL  The  expedition  was  entirely  in  the  control  of  General 
WUkinson.  Later  goyemment  officials  approved  of  the  undertaking. —  See 
Salter's  The  Eastern  Border  of  Iowa  in  1805-6  in  the  Iowa  Bistorieal  Beeard, 
Vol.  X,  p.  107. 

General  James  Wilkinson  lost  his  reputation  in  connection  with  the  Burr  con- 
spiracy. Although  he  was  tried  and  acquitted,  evidence  later  appeared  which 
proved  without  doubt  that  he  was  a  traitor.  And,  indeed,  it  has  been  thought 
by  some  that  Pike's  explorations  were  a  scheme  on  the  part  of  Wilkinson  to 
obtain  more  definite  information  concerning  the  western  country,  which  might 
be  used  in  carrying  out  the  traitorous  plot.  However  this  may  have  been,  Pike 
was  beyond  doubt  unconscious  of  any  such  purpose. 

f  The  data  concerning  Zebulon  M.  Pike's  early  Hfe  used  in  this  paper  are  for 
the  most  part  taken  from  Whiting's  Life  of  Zebulon  Montgomery  Pike,  pub- 
lished in  Jared  Sparks 's  Library  of  American  Biography,  VoL  XV,  pp.  220,  22L 

The  father  of  Zebulon  Montgomery  Pike  was  Major  Zebulon  Pike,  a  soldier 
in  the  Revolutionary  War  and  captain  of  infantry  in  the  army  of  the  United 
States  in  1792.  He  received  a  promotion  to  the  rank  of  Major  in  1800,  and 
served  in  the  first  regiment  of  infantry  under  Colonel  Hamtramk  in  1802. 

Among  the  ancestors  of  Zebulon  Montgomery  Pike  wbb  one  Captain  John 
Pike,  who  was  noted  in  the  traditions  of  the  family  for  his  gallant  service  in 
the  Indian  Wars. 

8  Whiting's  Life  of  Zebulon  Montgomery  Pike,  published  in  Jared  Sparica'i 
Library  of  American  Biography,  VoL  XV,  p.  220. 


338    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

years  old,  and  received  the  commission  of  ensign  at  the  age 
of  twenty.® 

It  was  on  April  1,  1802,  that  Pike  was  promoted  to  the 
rank  of  First  Lieutenant  of  the  First  Regiment  of  United 
States  Infantry.  And  under  date  of  July  30,  1805,  he  re- 
ceived orders ^^  from  General  Wilkinson  to  undertake  the 
exploration  of  the  Mississippi  Biver  to  its  sources,  noting 
the  rivers,  prairies,  islands,  mines,  quarries,  and  timber,  as 
well  as  Indian  villages  and  settlements.  He  was  instructed 
to  keep  a  journal  in  which  distances,  calculated  by  time, 
were  to  be  noted  together  with  comments  on  the  ^*  winds 
and  weather".  Furthermore,  suitable  locations  for  mili- 
tary posts  were  to  be  selected  and  reasonable  means  for 
conciliating  the  Indians  were  to  be  employed.^^ 

The  journal  of  the  expedition  is  an  interesting  and  most 
valuable  source  of  information.  The  original  edition,^  ^  was 
published  in  1810  by  Lieutenant  Pike,  and  is  divided  into 
three  parts,  each  dealing  with  a  single  expedition.  To 
these  parts  are  added  numerous  appendices,  charts,  and 
tables.  On  the  whole,  the  work  is  exceedingly  complicated 
in  its  arrangement,  and  little  or  no  effort  seems  to  have 
been  made  to  put  the  material  in  good  English.    It  is  inter- 


•  Coues  's  The  Expeditions  of  Zebulon  Montgomery  Pike,  Vol.  I,  p. 

10  The  letter  containing  the  orders  was  transmitted  by  General  Wilkinson 
from  St.  LfOuis.  It  appears  in  full  in  Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the 
Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and  through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc. 
(original  edition,  1810),  Appendix  to  Part  III,  pp.  65,  66. 

11  All  of  the  purposes  noted  are  mentioned  in  General  Wilkinson  '0  communi- 
cation of  July  30,  1805. 

12  There  is  a  publication  relative  to  the  Mississippi  expedition  which  ap- 
peared in  1807.  This,  however,  was  not  written  by  Lieutenant  Pike  but  by 
some  person  who  had  access  to  his  notes.  There  seems  to  be  no  evidence  con- 
cerning the  identity  of  the  writer. 

From  Lieutenant  Pike's  original  edition  of  1810,  an  English  edition  was 
prepared  under  the  editorial  supervision  of  I>r.  Thomas  Bees.  There  is  also 
an  edition  in  French  and  one  in  Dutch. —  Coues 's  The  Expeditions  of  ZehuJon 
Montgomery  Pike,  Vol.  I,  pp.  xxxiii-xliv. 


EXPEDITION  OF  ZEBULON  M.  PIKE  339 

estmg  to  note  that  at  the  close  of  the  author's  preface  a 
note  by  the  publisher  is  inserted  to  the  effect  that  he 
''owes  it  to  truth,  and  to  colonel  Pike,  to  state  that  he  very 
much  doubts  whether  any  book  ever  went  to  press  under  so 
many  disadvantages '  \ 

Lieutenant  Pike  himself  realized  many  of  its  defects. 
The  following  extracts  from  one  of  his  letters  will  serve  to 
explain  many  of  its  faults : 

The  journal  in  itself  will  have  little  to  strike  the  imagination, 
but  a  dull  detail  of  our  daily  march.  .  .  .  The  daily  occur- 
rences were  written  at  night,  frequently  by  firelight,  when  extreme- 
ly fatigued,  and  the  cold  so  severe  as  to  freeze  the  ink  in  my  pen, 
of  course  have  little  claim  to  elegance  of  expression  or  style ;  .  .  . 
I  do  not  possess  the  qualifications  of  the  naturalist,  and  even  had 
they  been  mine,  it  would  have  been  impossible  to  have  gratified  them 
to  any  great  extent,  as  we  passed  with  rapidity  over  the  country 
we  surveyed.  .  .  .  And  indeed,  my  thoughts  were  too  much 
engrossed  in  making  provisions  for  the  exigencies  of  the  morrow, 
to  attempt  a  science  which  requires  time  and  a  placidity  of  mind 
which  seldom  fell  to  my  lot.^' 

Of  the  three  divisions  of  the  work  the  first,  with  its  ap- 
pendices, is  devoted  entirely  to  an  account  of  the  expedi- 
tion to  the  sources  of  the  Mississippi.  The  material  con- 
tained therein  forms  the  basis  of  the  account  given  in  the 
following  pages  of  this  essay. 

Late  in  the  afternoon  of  August  9,  1805,  Lieutenant  Pike 
sailed  from  his  encampment  near  St.  Louis  in  a  keel  boat 
with  a  party  of  twenty  men,^*  carrying  with  him  provisions 

13 Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Ap- 
pendix to  Part  I,  p.  32. 

14  In  the  Appendix  to  Part  III,  pp.  67,  68,  of  the  edition  of  1810,  Lieutenant 
Pike  gives  a  lift  of  the  persons  employed  in  the  expedition.  Of  the  twenty 
men  in  the  company,  there  were  two  corporals,  one  sergeant,  and  seventeen 
privates.  The  name  of  an  interpreter  is  also  included  in  the  list  bnt  he  was 
not  of  the  original  party  which  started  from  the  encampment  near  St.  Lonis. 


340    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

for  only  four  months.  For  more  than  eight  months  he  and 
his  imrty  were  to  push  their  way  northward  amid  dangers 
and  hardships  which  all  but  cost  them  their  lives.  But  with 
the  consciousness  that  he  was  the  first  citizen  of  the  United 
States  to  undertake  the  ascent  of  the  river,  and  with  the 
assurance  that  whatever  he  should  discover  would  be  eager- 
ly received  by  the  public,  his  enthusiasm  rose  above  any 
misgivings  with  regard  to  the  trials  of  the  undertaking. 

With  considerable  difficulty,  due  to  rainy  weather  and 
the  numerous  islands  in  the  channel,  Lieutenant  Pike  and 
his  company  made  their  way  to  the  Des  Moines  Biver, 
which  marks  the  junction  of  the  present  Commonwealths 
of  Iowa,  Illinois,  and  Missouri.  Here  the  rapids  presented 
a  formidable  obstacle  —  more  especially  because  there  was 
no  one  on  board  who  had  ever  passed  them.  The  rapids 
were  eleven  miles  in  length  ^^with  successive  ridges  and 
shoals  extending  from  shore  to  shore.  .  .  .  The  shoals 
continue  the  whole  distance. ''^^  In  the  midst  of  the  diffi- 
culty the  party  was  met  by  an  agent  to  the  Sao  Indians  in 
this  vicinity,  who  piloted  them  safely  to  his  establishment 
above  the  rapids.  Here  Lieutenant  Pike  found  himself  on 
the  east  bank  of  the  river  at  a  point  where  the  dty  of  Nau- 
voo,  Illinois,  is  now  located.  Directly  opposite  was  the  vil- 
lage of  the  Sac  Indians  on  the  present  site  of  Montrose, 
Iowa. 

Impressed  with  the  suitability  of  the  location  for  a  trad- 
ing establishment  for  the  Sac,  Fox,  Iowa,  and  Sioux  In- 
dians of  the  region.  Lieutenant  Pike  tarried  for  the  greater 
part  of  a  day.  In  council  with  **the  chief  men  of  the  vil- 
lage'' he  expressed  the  desire  of  the  President  of  the 
United  States  ^Ho  be  more  intimately  acquainted  with  the 

16  Thia  description  appears  in  the  entrj  of  Augoit  20th  in  Pike's  An  Aeeowkt 
of  BxpedUiont  to  the  Sowees  of  the  Miasiaeippi  and  through  the  Wettem  FmrU 
of  LomUiama,  ote.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I,  pp.  4,  5. 


EXPEDITION  OP  ZEBULON  M.  PIKE  341 

situation,  wants,  &c.  of  the  different  nations  of  the  red  peo- 
ple, in  our  newly  acquired  territory  of  Louisiana**.^*  In 
addition  there  was  some  discussion  of  the  location  of  a 
trading  establishment,  but  no  definite  conclusions  were 
reached. 

After  presenting  the  Indians  with  some  ^^  tobacco, 
Bjiives,  and  whiskey  ^^  Lieutenant  Pike  proceeded  up  the 
river  about  six  miles,  landing  on  the  spot  where  Fort  Madi- 
son was  erected  three  years  later  and  where  the  city  by  the 
same  name  now  stands.  Lieutenant  Pike  made  no  par- 
ticular mention  of  the  place,  nor  did  he  recommend  it  as  a 
suitable  location  for  a  fort  or  trading  post.*^ 

Two  days  later  the  party  reached  the  present  site  of 
Burlington,  Iowa,  which  Lieutenant  Pike  mentions  as  ^^a 
very  handsome  situation  for  a  garrison^'*^  and  describes 
in  some  detail. 

The  channel  of  the  river  passes  under  the  hill,  which  is  about  60 
feet  perpendicular,  and  level  on  the  top.  Four  hundred  yards  in 
the  rear,  there  is  a  small  prairie  of  8  or  10  acres,  which  would  be  a 
convenient  spot  for  gardens ;  and  on  the  east  side  of  the  river,  there 
is  a  beautiful  prospect  over  a  large  prairie,  as  far  as  the  eye  can  ex- 
tend, now  and  then  interrupted  by  groves  of  trees.  Directly  under 
the  rock  is  a  limestone  spring,  which,  after  an  hour's  work,  would 
afford  water  amply  sufiScient  for  the  consumption  of  a  regiment. 
The  landing  is  bold  and  safe,  and  at  the  lower  part  of  the  hill,  a  road 

18 Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I, 
p.  5. 

IT  Some  few  writen  have  erroneously  credited  Pike  with  the  founding  of  Fort 
Madison.  For  instance,  in  the  Portrait  and  Biographical  Album  of  Lee  County, 
Iowa,  p.  627,  the  writer  claims  that  the  first  settlers  at  Fort  Madison  were 
troops  sent  out  by  our  government  under  command  of  Captain  Z.  M.  Pike  to 
protect  the  country  both  from  the  British  and  the  Indians.  A  similar  error 
is  made  by  Stevens  in  his  Black  Hawk  War,  p.  37. 

The  selection  of  Fort  Madison  was  made  in  September,  1808,  by  Lieutenant 
Alpha  £[ingeley. —  Annais  of  Iowa,  Third  Series,  Vol.  VI,  p.  314. 

18  This  site  is  the  one  now  oeeupied  by  Grapo  Park  at  BarHngton,  Iowa. 


342    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

may  be  made  for  a  team  in  half  an  hour.  Black  and  white  oak  tim- 
ber in  abundance.  The  mountain  continues  about  two  miles,  and 
has  five  springs  bursting  from  it  in  that  distance.^* 

'  Li  this  vicinity  the  Indians  seemed  to  be  quite  numerous. 
Horses  and  other  signs  of  inhabitants  were  seen  along  the 
river  bank.  A  few  miles  above  the  bluffs  Lieutenant  Pike 
met  a  company  of  Indian  traders,  with  three  boats  from 
Mackinac,  who  informed  him  that  out  on  the  prairie  only 
two  and  a  half  miles  was  located  one  of  the  largest  Sac  vil- 
lages.2o 

After  continuing  a  short  distance  up  the  river,  Pike  and 
one  of  his  men  went  on  shore  for  a  hunt.-^  The  journal 
does  not  state  which  bank  of  the  river  they  were  on,  but 
from  the  description  of  the  country  it  is  not  difficult  to  infer 
that  they  were  hunting  on  Iowa  soil.  Owing  to  the  marshi- 
ness of  the  ground,  two  of  their  favorite  dogs  became  ex- 
hausted  and  were  lost  in  the  return  to  shore.  Two  men  im- 
mediately volunteered  for  the  search.  But  at  evening  nei- 
ther men  nor  dogs  had  returned.  Lieutenant  Pike,  how- 
ever, was  not  in  the  habit  of  waiting  for  anyone  on  shore. 
Accordingly,  the  party  continued  up  stream  but  always 
camped  on  the  Iowa  side  and  made  every  effort  to  attract 
the  attention  of  the  lost  men  by  firing  guns  at  various  inter- 
vals. But  the  men  were  bewildered  by  the  marshy  ground 
and  the  thick  undergrowth  of  the  lowlands,  and  for  eight 
days  they  wandered  northward  half -exhausted  from  lack  of 
food.  They  finally  chanced  to  fall  upon  a  village  of  Fox 
Indians,  whose  chief  gave  them  com  and  moccasins  and 
sent  them  with  a  guide  to  the  mines  of  Dubuque  where  they 

10 Pikers  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I, 
p.  7. 

20  Lieutenant  Pike  was  now  at  a  point  which  was  considered  half  way  be- 
tween St.  Louis  and  Prairie  du  Chien. 

21  This  was  on  Saturday,  August  24,  1805. 


EXPEDITION  OP  ZEBULON  M.  PIKE  343 

found  their  commander  and  the  remainder  of  his  company. 

Meanwhile  Lieutenant  Pike  had  passed  the  mouth  of  the 
Iowa  River,  which  he  merely  mentions  in  his  journal.  He 
had  passed  the  present  site  of  Muscatine  —  at  one  time 
known  as  Bloomington  —  which  he  describes  as  the  point 
**  where  the  river  Hills  join  the  Mississippi '  \  He  had 
crossed  the  rapids  of  Rock  River  with  even  more  diflSculty 
than  those  of  the  Des  Moines.  It  was  here  that  he  met 
Black  Hawk,  who  recalled  the  occasion  in  detail  many  years 
later.  Although  Lieutenant  Pike  makes  no  mention  of  the 
meeting  with  Black  Hawk,  the  Indian  chief's  account  of  the 
visit  is  so  accurate  in  many  points,  which  may  be  verified, 
that  it  is  hardly  to  be  doubted. 

Black  Hawk  stated  that  when  the  boat  arrived  at  Rock 
River  **the  young  chief  came  on  shore  with  his  interpre- 
ter", made  a  speech,  and  gave  some  presents  to  the  Indians. 
Continuing,  the  chief  said : 

We  were  all  well  pleased  with  the  speech  of  the  young  chief.  He 
gave  us  good  advice ;  said  our  American  father  would  treat  us  well. 
He  presented  us  an  American  flag,  which  was  hoisted.  He  then  re- 
quested us  to  pull  down  our  British  flags  —  and  give  him  our  Brit- 
ish medals  —  promising  to  send  us  others  on  his  return  to  St.  Louis. 
This  we  declined,  as  we  wished  to  have  two  Fathers!  .  .  .  He 
went  to  the  head  of  the  Mississippi,  and  then  returned  to  St.  Louis. 
.  .  .  He  was  a  good  man,  and  a  great  brave  and  died  in  his 
country's  serviee.^^ 

It  was  at  noon  on  Sunday,  September  1st,  that  Lieutenant 
Pike  arrived  at  Dubuque's  lead  mines,  where  he  was  ''sa- 
luted with  a  field  piece,  and  received  with  every  mark  of  at- 
tention, ]}y  Monsieur  Dubuque,  the  proprietor".-^     Pike 

21*  Autobiography  of  Black  Hawk,  p.  26. 

>3Pike^8  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I, 
p.  10. 

Julien  Dubuque,  a  French  Canadian,  came  to  this  vicinity  for  the  purpose  of 
trading  with  the  Indians.    Taking  a  squaw  as  his  wife,  he  soon  made  friends 


344    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POIilTICS 

was  charged  by  General  Wilkinsoii  with  orders  to  make  cer- 
tain investigations  relative  to  the  lead  mines.  But  owing 
to  the  fact  that  there  were  no  horses  at  the  house  and  the 
mines  were  six  miles  away,  the  Lieutenant  found  it  ^'impoe- 
sible  to  make  a  report  by  actual  inspection".  His  report 
was  therefore  nothing  more  than  a  series  of  evasive  and  in- 
definite answers  to  questions  put  by  Pike.^^  In  transmit- 
ting the  report  to  Wilkinson,  Lieutenant  Pike  himself  says 
that  ^^the  answers  seem  to  carry  with  them  the  semblance 
of  equivocation  ^\ 

While  at  Dubuque's  quarters.  Lieutenant  Pike  took  on 
board  a  Frenchman  by  the  name  of  Blondeau,  who  proved  a 
useful  addition  to  the  party  since  he  could  speak  the  lan- 
guage of  the  Indians.  Up  to  this  point  Lieutenant  Pike  had 
been  without  an  interpreter,  and  for  this  reason  had  found 
himself  at  a  great  disadvantage  among  the  Indians.  But 
with  means  for  making  known  the  purpose  of  his  explora- 
tion, '*he  found  himself  at  once  the  object  of  friendly  atten- 
tion",^ although  the  first  question  put  by  the  Indians  was 
always  whether  they  were  ''for  war,  or  if  going  to  war". 

Through  his  interpreter  Lieutenant  Pike  learned  that  the 
Indians  of  this  vicinity  were  much  in  dread  of  white  men, 
that  *  *  the  women  and  children  were  frightened  at  the  very 
name  of  an  American  boat",  and  that  the  men  believed  the 

with  the  Foxes.  The  diAcoverj  of  the  lead  mines  induced  him  to  seeure  ''a  per- 
mit to  work  the  mines,  with  a  monopoly  of  the  right"  under  date  of  November 
22,  1788.    Thus  was  founded  the  first  white  settlement  in  Iowa. 

Dubuque  died  on  March  24,  1810.  His  claim  was  sold  at  St.  Louis  for  the 
payment  of  his  debts.— See  Salter 's  Iowa:  The  Fint  Free  State  in  the  Lomd- 
ana  Purchase,  pp.  41-45,  79,  86. 

s«  The  report  to  General  Wilkinson  appears  in  the  Appendix  to  Part  I,  p.  5, 
of  the  original  edition  of  1810.  Perhaps  the  only  definite  statement  made  hj 
Dubuque  was  that  the  mines  were  about  twenty-seven  leagoea  long  and  from 
one  to  three  leagues  wide,  yielding  from  twenty  to  forty  thonaand  pounds  of 
lead  per  annum. 

M  Whiting's  Life  of  ZebuUm  Montgomery  Pike,  publiahed  in  Jarad  Spaifci'k 
jAbfwy  of  Aw^eriean  Biography,  VoL  XV,  p.  238. 


EXPEDITION  OP  ZEBULON  M.  PIKE  345 

whites  to  be  ^^very  quarrelsome,  and  much  for  war,  and 
also  very  brave''.  Such  information  was  ^^nsed  as  pru- 
dence suggested''.^* 

On  September  4th  lieutenant  Pike  reached  Prairie  du 
Chien  at  the  junction  of  the  Wisconsin  and  Mississippi,  and 
opposite  McGregor,  Iowa.  Prairie  du  Chien,  an  early 
French  settlement,  had  been  distinguished  as  a  center  for 
the  fur  trade  of  the  lake  region,  but  at  the  time  of  Pike's 
visit  it  was  little  more  than  a  village  of  Indian  traders.*^ 
Among  these  traders  Lieutenant  Pike  spent  several  days, 
engaged  in  making  choice  of  a  suitable  location  for  a  post, 
holding  councils  with  neighboring  tribes  of  Indians,  and  in 
preparing  for  the  remainder  of  the  journey. 

As  the  most  suitable  location  for  a  military  post  in  this 
region.  Lieutenant  Pike  recommended  a  bluff  just  north  of 
the  present  town  of  McGregor,  Iowa,  which  commanded 
both  the  Wisconsin  and  the  Mississippi.^  Plenty  of  timber 
and  a  spring  near-by  added  to  the  desirability  of  the  situa- 
tion. On  the  whole,  however,  the  Lieutenant  considered  the 
Burlington  site  far  superior. 

Finding  that  it  would  be  impossible  to  continue  the  ascent 
of  the  river  with  so  large  a  craft.  Lieutenant  Pike  hired  two 
light  barges  and  began  the  work  of  transferring  provisions 
and  baggage  to  the  new  boats. 

With  the  addition  of  two  interpreters,  Pierre  Bosseau 
and  Joseph  Beinulle,^  the  party  left  Prairie  du  Chien  on 
September  8th  **with  some  expectation  and  hope  of  seeing 

26  Pike 'a  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I, 
pp.  11,  12. 

27  For  an  account  of  Prairie  du  Chien  and  other  trading  posts  of  the  upper 
Mississippi,  see  Folwell's  Minnesota,  pp.  39,  40. 

28  Coues  's  The  Expeditions  of  Zehulon  Montgomery  Pike,  Vol.  I,  p.  37. 

2»  This  name  is  probably  that  of  Joseph  Beinville  or  Benville.  He  was  sm 
interpreter  of  some  note. 


346    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

the  head  of  the  Mississippi  and  the  town  of  Saint  Louis" 
before  the  end  of  the  winter.  This  statement,  in  a  letter  to 
General  Wilkinson,^^  shows  how  little  the  Lieutenant  real- 
ized that  many  weeks  of  suffering  and  discouragement  lay 
between  him  and  the  source  of  the  Mississippi,  and  that 
months  of  bitter  hardship  must  separate  him  from  his 
encampment  at  St.  Louis.  Nevertheless,  such  hopes  as 
this  alone  kept  up  his  courage  and  made  possible  the  long 
struggle. 

A  few  miles  above  Prairie  du  Chien  the  party  met  Waba- 
sha, the  chief  of  the  four  lower  bands  of  the  Sioux.  The 
Sioux  had  been  enjoying  a  feast  the  night  before.  In  conse- 
quence, the  salute  which  they  gave  to  Lieutenant  Pike  and 
his  party  as  they  arrived  in  front  of  the  lodges  was  attend- 
ed by  **some  hazard*',  since  **some  of  them,  even  tried  their 
dexterity,  to  see  how  near  the  boat  they  could  strike.  They 
may,  indeed,  be  said,  to  have  struck  on  every  side  of  us. 
When  landed,  I  had  my  pistols  in  my  belt,  and  sword  in 
hand.*'^^  Hereupon  the  chief  invited  Lieutenant  Pike  and 
some  of  his  men  to  accompany  him  to  his  lodge  for  a  conn- 
cil.  In  a  speech  of  considerable  length  Wabasha  ex- 
pressed his  pleasure  at  ha\ing  the  young  Lieutenant  in  his 
own  village  and  a  desire  always  to  remain  at  peace  with 
the  white  and  red  people.  To  this  Lieutenant  Pike  replied 
in  a  statement  of  the  objects  and  purposes  of  his  expedi- 
tion. He  gratefully  accepted  a  pipe  which  Wabasha  pre- 
sented  to  him  to  be  shown  to  the  upper  bands  as  a  token  of 
peace,  which  later  was  of  much  service." 

80 Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Ap- 
pendix to  Part  I,  p.  3. 

81  Pike 's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  It 
p.  15. 

S2  This  pipe  was  used  in  the  council  at  Leech  Lake  on  Febniaiy  16,  1806. 


EXPEDITION  OP  ZEBULON  M.  PIKE  347 

While  in  the  village  Lieutenant  Pike  witnessed  a  **  medi- 
cine dance''  which  was  attended  by  **many  curious  ma- 
noeuvres. Men  and  women  danced  indiscriminately.  They 
were  all  dressed  in  the  gayest  manner;  each  had  in  their 
hand,  a  small  skin  of  some  description,  and  would  frequent- 
ly run  up,  point  their  skin,  and  give  a  puff  with  their  breath ; 
when  the  person  blown  at,  whether  man  or  woman,  would 
fall,  and  appear  to  be  almost  lifeless,  or  in  great  agony; 
but  would  recover  slowly,  rise  and  join  in  the  dance ' '.  Tliis 
they  called  their  great  medicine  dance  or  dance  of  re- 
ligion.^^ 

Before  his  departure  Pike  presented  the  chief  with  to- 
bacco, knives  and  eight  gallons  of  made  whiskey  (three- 
fourths  water).  Leaving  the  Sioux  village  on  the  afternoon 
of  September  10th,  and  proceeding  but  a  few  miles  further. 
Lieutenant  Pike  crossed  what  is  now  the  northern  boundarv 
of  the  State  of  lowa.^*  Seven  months  passed  before  he 
again  camped  on  Iowa  soil. 

On  September  23rd  the  party  reached  a  Sioux  village  lo- 
cated near  the  site  of  old  Fort  Snelling.  Here  a  council 
with  the  chiefs  of  the  village  was  held  by  which  Lieutenant 
Pike  secured  for  the  government  a  grant  of  a  tract  of  land 
containing  about  100,000  acres,  for  which  he  gave  in  return 
presents  to  the  amount  of  only  about  two  hundred  dollars.^ 

38  Pike  '8  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I, 
p.  17. 

«<  Cones 's  The  Expeditions  of  Zebulon  Montgomery  Pike,  Vol.  I,  p.  48;  Sal- 
ter's The  Eastern  Border  of  Iowa  in  1805-6  in  Iowa  Historical  Beeord,  Vol. 
X,  p.  115. 

8B  This  tract  of  land  was  near  the  mouth  of  the  Minnesota  Biver  and  later 
included  the  site  of  Fort  Snelling  and  the  city  of  Minneapolis. —  Pike's  Ex- 
plorations in  Annals  of  Iowa,  Third  Series,  VoL  I,  p.  532. 

A  copy  of  the  speech  delivered  by  Lieutenant  Pike,  a  copy  of  the  treaty,  and 
a  copy  of  a  letter  addressed  to  General  WUkinson  on  the  subject  appear  as 
Documents  No.  3  and  4  in  the  Appendix  to  Part  I  of  Pike's  An  Account  of 


348    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

So  far  as  negotiations  with  Indian  tribes  are  conoernedi 
this  was  doubtless  lientenant  Pike's  most  important  enter- 
prise. Referring  to  the  transaction  in  a  letter  to  General 
Wilkinson,  he  remarks  that  the  grant  was  obtained  ^'for  a 
song".  At  the  same  time  he  valnes  the  land  at  only  two 
hundred  thousand  dollars. 

Lieutenant  Pike's  speech  in  the  council  forms  a  part  of 
the  journal  and  is  a  most  interesting  document.  It  shows  a 
keen  understanding  of  the  character  of  the  Indians  as  well 
as  remarkable  tact.  There  is,  however,  one  pecnliar  and 
altogether  amusing  portion  of  the  document,  which  is  sig- 
nificant of  Lieutenant  Pike 's  usual  attitude  toward  the  sub- 
ject referred  to.  After  a  rather  strong  exhortation  against 
tiie  purchase  of  intoxicating  liquors,  witii  much  emphasis  on 
their  injurious  effects,  Lieutenant  Pike  concludes  his  speech 
as  follows :  **I  now  present  you  with  some  of  your  father's 
tobacco,  and  some  other  trifling  things,  as  a  memorandum 
of  my  good  will,  and  before  my  departure  I  will  give  you 
some  liquor  to  clear  your  throats '*.  This  clearing  process 
seems  to  have  required  sixty  gallons  of  liquor.** 

When  Lieutenant  Pike  had  reached  the  Falls  of  St 
Anthony  he  began  to  realize  that  he  had  made  a  serious 
blunder  in  starting  on  his  expedition  so  late  in  the  season; 
for  many  of  his  men,  unused  to  the  climate  and  necessary 
hardships,  were  daily  succumbing  to  illness  and  fatigue. 
Pike  writes  of  the  situation  as  follows:  ** These  unhappy 
circumstances  ....  convinced  me,  that  if  I  had  no 
regard  for  my  own  health  and  constitution,  I  should  have 

Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and  through  the  Western  Pcrts 
of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  pp.  6-13. 

For  a  detailed  criticism  of  the  treaty  and  accompanying  eommonieationBy  see 
Coues'e  The  Expeditions  of  Zehulon  Montgomery  Pike,  Vol.  I,  pp.  232-239. 

'•Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  tmd 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition^  1810),  Part  I, 
p.  25;  see  also  Appendix  to  Part  I,  p.  8. 


EXPEDITION  OP  ZEBULON  M.  PIKE  349 

some  for  those  poor  fellows,  who  were  killing  themselves 
to  obey  my  orders/'®^  Accordingly,  several  days  were 
spent  in  the  erection  of  block-houses  which  should  serve  as 
a  shelter  for  the  sick  and  those  who  were  otherwise  unable 
to  continue  the  journey.  An  abundance  of  game  in  the 
vicinity  insured  not  only  comfort  for  the  men  who  were  left 
behind  but  also  **  plenty  of  provision '^  for  the  return  voy- 
age. 

In  order  to  hasten  progress,  which  was  daily  becoming 
more  and  more  difficult  on  account  of  the  rapid  freezing  of 
the  river,  the  heavy  boats  were  exchanged  for  canoes. 
These  were  constructed  with  no  little  trouble  owing  to  the 
scarcity  of  tools,  there  being  in  the  whole  party  *  *  only  two 
falling-axes  and  three  hatchets".  In  spite  of  many  hin- 
drances three  canoes  were  completed,  but  one  sank  when 
loaded  with  a  large  quantity  of  ammunition.  In  the  process 
of  drying  this  powder  it  exploded  and  nearly  blew  up  **a 
tent  and  two  or  three  men  with  it".*® 

Such  misfortunes,  combined  with  the  **  isolation  and  in- 
activity" of  the  region,  cooled  somewhat  the  ardor  of  the 
young  commander.  He  confessed  that  he  found  himself 
**  powerfully  attacked  with  the  fantastics  of  the  brain, 
called  ennui ' ',  and  elsewhere  adds  the  following : 

It  appears  to  me,  that  the  wealth  of  nations  would  not  mduce  me 
to  remain  secluded  from  the  society  of  civilized  mankind,  surround- 
ed by  a  savage  and  unproductive  wilderness,  without  books  or  other 
sources  of  intellectual  enjoyment,  or  being  blessed  with  the  culti- 
vated and  feeling  mind,  of  a  civilized  fair.'* 

37  Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I, 
p.  34. 

38  Whiting's  Life  of  Zebulon  Montgomery  Pike,  published  in  Jared  Spaiks's 
Library  of  American  Biography,  Vol.  XV,  p.  246;  Pike's  An  AceowU  of  Bx- 
peditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and  through  the  Western  Parts  of 
Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I,  pp.  36,  37. 

8» Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
VOL.  IX — 24 


350    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POIilTICS 

The  freezing  and  thawing  of  the  river  made  it  impossible 
for  the  party  to  proceed  with  any  degree  of  safety  or  rapid- 
ity.   Accordingly,  all  but  one  canoe  were  abandoned  early 
in  December.     Provisions  and  baggage  were    loaded  on 
sleds,  each  drawn  by  two  men  abreast.     The  difficulties 
which  beset  this  method  of  transportation  are  well  illus- 
trated in  the  following  entry  of  December  26th:  **  Broke 
four  sleds;  broke  into  the  river  four  times,  and  had  four 
carrying  places '  \^^    On  many  days  the  distance  covered  did 
not  exceed  three  or  four  miles.    Writing  of  his  misfortunes. 
Lieutenant  Pike  said:  ** Never  did  I  undergo  more  fatigue, 
in  performing  the  duties  of  hunter,  spy,  guide,  commanding 
officer,  &c.    Sometimes  in  front ;  sometimes  in  the  rear ;  fre- 
quently in  advance  of  my  party  10  or  15  miles ;  that  at  night 
I  was  scarcely  able  to  make  my  notes  intelligible."*^ 

Under  such  circumstances  together  with  conBiderable  dis- 
couragement among  his  men.  Lieutenant  Pike  found  it  diffi- 
cult to  keep  up  his  spirits.  But  as  the  weather  became  cold- 
er and  the  ice  stronger,  progress  was  much  easier.  As 
much  as  twenty  miles  a  day  were  covered. 

Early  in  January  signs  of  Chippeway  Lidians  were  seen, 
from  whom  Lieutenant  Pike  had  every  reason  to  expect  a 
demonstration  of  hostility.  His  fears,  however,  were  soon 
relieved  when  four  of  these  Indians  presented  themselves 
at  his  camp  in  company  with  an  English  trader  who  was  lo- 
cated at  a  post  on  Sandy  Lake.  Mr.  Grant,  the  English 
trader,  accompanied  Lieutenant  Pike  and  his  party  to  the 

through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiarui,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I, 
pp.  37,  64. 

40  Pike '6  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I, 
p.  55;  Whiting's  Life  of  Zebulon  Montgomery  Pike,  published  in  Jared 
Sparks 's  Library  of  American  Biography,  Vol.  XV,  pp.  250,  251. 

*i  Entry  of  December  23,  1805. —  Pike  'a  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the 
Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and  through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc. 
(original  edition,  1810),  Part  I,  p.  55. 


EXPEDITION  OP  ZEBULON  M.  PIKE  351 

British  trading  post,  where  they  made  their  headquarters 
for  several  days.*^  Such  a  sojourn  among  the  trading  es- 
tablishments of  this  region  was  altogether  agreeable  to 
Lieutenant  Pike  since  one  of  the  objects  of  his  expedition 
was  to  investigate  and  report  upon  the  trading  posts  of  the 
upper  Mississippi.  On  several  occasions  he  was  received 
in  a  most  cordial  and  hospitable  manner  by  the  officials  in 
charge  of  the  various  posts  of  the  Northwest  Company. 
His  accounts  of  existing  conditions  are  detailed  and  quite 
authentic.  Aside  from  general  observations  on  the  trade, 
Lieutenant  Pike's  journal  contains  some  interesting  cor- 
respondence between  himself  and  one  of  the  traders,  Hugh 
M'Gillis. 

Under  date  of  February,  1806,  Lieutenant  Pike  sent  a 
conmiunication  to  Mr.  M'Gillis,*^  which  contained  a  frank 
discussion  of  the  conditions  existing  among  the  trading 
posts  and  some  pointed  remarks  on  the  relations  between 
the  Northwest  Company  and  the  government  of  the  United 
States.  He  affirmed  the  right  of  the  British  to  carry  on 
trade  with  the  Indians  within  the  territory  of  the  United 
States,  but  protested  strongly  against  their  exemption  from 
*  *  paying  the  duties,  obtaining  licenses,  and  subscribing  unto 
all  the  rules  and  restrictions  of  our  laws".  It  was  esti- 
mated that  the  United  States  was  annually  defrauded  of 
duties  to  the  amount  of  $26,000.**  For  the  correction  of  this 
evil  the  establishment  of  a  government  custom  house  at  the 
mouth  of  the  St.  Louis  Eiver  was  suggested. 

42  Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana^  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I, 
pp.  56-58. 

4s Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Ap- 
pendix to  Part  I,  pp.  14-16. 

44 Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Ap- 
pendix to  Part  I,  p.  37. 


352    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

In  addition^  lieutenant  Pike  mentioned  the  fact  that  the 
savages  were  being  aUenated  from  onr  government  by  re- 
ceiving  at  the  hands  of  the  traders  British  medals  and  flags. 
In  conclusion.  Lieutenant  Pike  expressed  the  opinion  that, 
in  case  war  should  be  declared  between  the  United  States 
and  Great  Britain,  these  establishments  would  serve  as  so 
many  posts  for  the  deposit  of  arms  and  ammunition.  In 
spite  of  a  certain  bluntness,  with  no  attempt  to  evade  any 
real  convictions  on  the  subject  under  discussion,  there  is  a 
tone  of  genuine  courtesy. 

In  an  equally  courteous  reply,**^  Mr.  M'Gillis  expressed 
his  desire  to  pay  the  duty  on  goods  imported  by  the  North- 
west Company  if  it  could  be  done  without  conveying  goods 
already  received  to  the  custom  house  at  Mackinac.  Owing 
to  the  fact  that  most  of  the  year's  supply  of  goods  had  al- 
ready been  received,  such  transportation  would  be  a  "vast 
expense  and  trouble '  \ 

With  regard  to  the  use  of  the  posts  as  garrisons  in  time 
of  war,  Mr.  M  'Gillis  was  astonished  to  learn  that  the  Amer- 
ican government  should  have  apprehended  any  such  pur- 
pose. He  explained  that  the  establishments  were  for  the 
security  of  property  and  life  in  a  country  exposed  to  the 
cruelty  of  many  savages.  *  *  We  never  formed  the  smallest 
idea",  he  added,  **that  the  said  inclosures  might  ever  be 
useful  in  the  juncture  of  a  rupture  between  the  two  powers, 
nor  do  we  now  conceive  that  such  poor  shifts  will  ever  be 
employed  by  the  British  government,  in  a  country  over- 
shadowed with  wood,  so  adequate  to  every  purpose.  Forts 
might  in  a  short  period  of  time  be  built  far  superior  to  any 
stockades  we  may  have  occasion  to  erect." 

«s  This  letter  bears  the  date  of  February  15,  1806,  and  appears  in  Pike's  A% 
Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Miseissippi  and  through  tho 
Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Appendix  to  Part  I, 
pp.  17-19. 


EXPEDITION  OP  ZEBULON  M.  PIKE  353 

Although  apparently  unconscious  of  the  error  conunitted 
by  exhibiting  the  flag  of  Great  Britain  in  American  terri- 
tory, Mr.  M'Gillis  pledged  himself  to  use  his  **  utmost  en- 
deavors, as  soon  as  possible,  to  prevent  the  future  display 
of  the  British  flag,  or  the  presenting  of  medals,  or  the  ex- 
hibiting to  public  view,  any  other  mark  of  European  power, 
throughout  the  extent  of  territory  known  to  belong  to  the 
dominion  of  the  United  States  *\  The  communication  is 
concluded  with  a  high  tribute  to  Lieutenant  Pike 's  personal 
integrity  and  to  the  government  which  he  represented. 

On  January  20th  Lieutenant  Pike  resumed  his  journey 
toward  the  source  of  the  Mississippi,  reaching  the  junction 
of  the  waters  of  Leech  Lake  with  the  main  channel  of  the 
river  on  the  last  day  of  the  month.  Instead  of  continuing 
in  the  direction  of  Lake  Winnibigoshish,  up  what  is  now 
considered  the  main  course  of  the  river.  Lieutenant  Pike 
turned  westward  and  made  his  way  to  Leech  Lake,  believ- 
ing that  he  had  accomplished  the  chief  object  of  his  expedi- 
tion,  and  firmly  convinced  that  this  was  the  ultimate  sonrce 
of  the  great  Father  of  Waters.*® 

The  conclusion  with  respect  to  the  Leech  Lake  system  is 
not  surprising  since  the  idea  was  quite  prevalent  among  the 
traders  and  Indian  tribes  of  the  region,  from  whom  Lieu- 
tenant Pike  obtained  most  of  his  information. 

Other  **true  sources"  have  been  found  by  subsequent  travellers, 
and  the  last  has  gone  a  little  beyond  his  precursors,  and  thus  fan- 
cied himself  entitled  to  the  merit  of  being  called  the  Bruce  of  the 
Mississippi.  This  may  be;  but  it  is  probable  that  all  have  been 
right.  It  would  be  difiScult  to  determine  which  branch  of  a  large 
tree  extends  furthest  from  the  parent  root.  It  may  be  equally,  or 
more  so,  to  determine  which  of  the  many  head  branches  of  the 
Mississippi,  that  have  been  discovered,  is  the  most  remote  from  the 

«•  Coues  's  The  Expeditions  of  Zehulon  Montgomery  Pike,  Vol.  I,  note,  pp. 
152,  153;  Pike's  Explorations  in  Annals  of  Iowa,  Third  Series,  Vol.  I,  pp.  532, 
533. 


354    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Oulf  of  Mexico;  and  the  initial  gush  of  its  waters  undoubtedly 
varies.  A  wet  season  may  open  many  small  tributaries  to  a  small 
lake,  which  had  no  existence  in  a  dry  season.  Hence  the  spring 
traveller,  and  the  traveller  of  the  summer  solstice,  may  have  dif- 
ferent descriptions  to  give,  and  yet  both  be  correct.*^ 

It  was  on  February  14th  that  Lieutenant  Pike  began 
preparations  for  the  homeward  journey.  Two  days  later 
he  held  a  council  with  some  of  the  Chippeway  Lidians  of  the 
lake  region.  In  a  speech  of  considerable  length  Lieutenant 
Pike  persuaded  the  Indians  to  give  up  most  of  their  British 
medals  and  flags.*®  Furthermore,  he  urged  the  Chippeways 
to  cease  their  hostilities  with  the  Sioux,  who  had  also 
promised  to  bury  the  hatchet.  As  a  token  of  their  promise 
the  young  American  produced  the  pipe  of  Wabasha.**  As 
a  result  of  this  council  two  of  **the  most  celebrated  war- 
riors'* accompanied  the  party  to  St.  Louis,  where  Lieuten- 
ant Pike  planned  to  have  a  council  of  peace  with  represent- 
atives of  the  various  tribes  in  the  Upper  Mississippi  Val- 
ley. 

Amid  '^acclamations  and  shouts"  on  the  part  of  the  In- 
dians, the  party  took  their  departure  from  Leech  Lake  on 
February  18th.  Marching  by  land  across  wooded  and 
marshy  ground,  they  did  not  reach  the  Mississippi  Eiver 
until  six  days  later.*^^     Lieutenant  Pike  had  long  since 

^T  Whiting's  Life  of  ZebtUan  Montgomery  Pikej  published  in  Jared  Sparks 't 
Library  of  American  Biography,  Vol.  XV,  pp.  255,  256. 

M  In  return  for  their  British  medals  and  flags.  Lieutenant  Pike  pledged  him- 
self to  send  those  of  the  United  States  to  the  savage  chiefs,  ' '  but  owing  to  the 
change  of  agents,  and  a  variety  of  circumstances,  it  was  never  fulfilled".  Bee- 
ommendations  were  made,  however,  to  General  Wilkinson  that  such  pledge  be 
kept  for  the  good  of  the  government. —  See  Pike's  An  Account  of  Bxpeditiomi 
to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and  through  the  Western  Parts  of  LouisiaMO, 
etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Appendix  to  Part  I,  p.  31. 

«•  See  above  note  32. 


so  Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I, 
pp.  71,  73. 


EXPEDITION  OP  ZEBULON  M.  PIKE  355 

learned  that  the  only  expeditious  method  of  travel  was  by 
means  of  snow  shoes.  With  the  aid  of  these  he  was  able  to 
make  the  descent  of  the  river  in  much  less  than  half  the  time 
consumed  in  the  ascent.  But  in  spite  of  many  advantages 
the  task  proved  arduous  enough,  as  the  following  entry  in 
the  journal  will  show : 

The  pressure  of  my  racket  strings  brought  the  blood  through  my 
socks  and  mockinsons  [moccasins] ,  from  which  the  pain  I  marched 
in  may  be  imagined.^^ 

On  March  5th  Lieutenant  Pike  found  himself  at  the  post 
where  he  had  left  the  sergeant  in  charge  of  the  sick.  Much 
to  his  chagrin  he  found  that,  while  he  himself  had  been  ex- 
tremely frugal  in  the  use  of  provisions  in  order  that  a 
goodly  supply  might  be  on  hand  for  the  downward  journey, 
the  sergeant  in  charge  of  the  post  had  squandered  nearly 
all  of  the  provisions  in  his  custody  and  had  given  away 
practically  all  of  the  whiskey,  including  a  keg  which  the 
Lieutenant  had  for  his  own  use." 

The  party  remained  at  the  post  until  April  7th.  Mean- 
while several  councils  were  held  with  some  Menominee  In- 
dians in  the  immediate  vicinity.  Without  any  new  or  im- 
portant experiences  Lieutenant  Pike  continued  the  descent, 
arriving  at  the  northern  boundary  of  the  present  State  of 
Iowa  on  April  16th.  At  noon  on  the  following  day  he 
reached  the  camp  of  Wabasha  where  he  remained  all  day 
and  night  in  the  hope  of  seeing  the  chief,  who  unfortunately 
remained  out  all  night  on  a  hunting  trip.^* 

Bi  Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sowrees  of  the  Miseiaeippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiantk,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I, 
p.  73. 

s2  Whiting's  Life  of  ZebuXon  Montgomery  Pike,  pnbliilied  in  Jared  Sparks 't 
lAhrttry  of  American  Biography,  VoL  XV,  pp.  256,  267. 

Bs Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 
through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I, 
p.  99. 


356    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Leaving  some  powder  and  tobacco  for  him,  Lieutenant 
Pike  left  in  the  morning  for  Prairie  du  Chien,  which  he 
reached  at  two  o  'clock  in  the  afternoon.  Here  he  received 
a  hearty  welcome,  being  presented  with  some  much-needed 
supplies  and  treated  in  a  most  hospitable  manner  by  the 
traders  and  Indians  of  the  place.  Moreover,  he  **  received 
a  great  deal  of  news  from  the  States  and  Europe,  both  civil 
and  military '* — a  welcome  bit  of  the  civilization  from 
which  he  had  been  isolated  for  so  many  months. 

On  the  afternoon  of  April  20th  Lieutenant  Pike  witnessed 
a  most  interesting  game  of  *  *  the  cross ' '  on  the  prairie  *  *  be- 
tween the  Sioux  on  the  one  side,  and  the  Puants  and  Rey- 
nards on  the  other".    He  describes  the  game  as  follows : 

The  ball  is  made  of  some  hard  substance  and  covered  with  leather, 
the  cross  sticks  are  round  and  net  work,  with  handles  of  three  feet 
long.  The  parties  being  ready,  and  bets  agreed  upon,  (sometimes 
to  the  amount  of  some  thousand  dollars)  the  goals  are  set  up  on  the 
prairie  at  the  distance  of  half  a  mile.  The  ball  is  thrown  up  in  the 
middle,  and  each  party  strives  to  drive  it  to  the  opposite  goal ;  and 
when  either  party  gains  the  first  rubber,  which  is  driving  it  quick 
round  the  post,  the  ball  is  again  taken  to  the  center,  the  ground 
changed,  and  the  contest  renewed ;  and  this  is  continued  until  one 
side  gains  four  times,  which  decides  the  bet.  It  is  an  interesting 
sight  to  see  two  or  three  hundred  naked  savages  contending  on  the 
plain  who  shall  bear  off  the  palm  of  victory ;  as  he  who  drives  the 
ball  round  the  goal  is  much  shouted  at  by  his  companions.  It  some- 
times happens  that  one  catches  the  ball  in  his  racket,  and  depending 
on  his  speed  endeavors  to  carry  it  to  the  goal,  and  when  he  finds 
himself  too  closely  pursued,  he  hurls  it  with  great  force  and  dex- 
terity to  an  amazing  distance,  where  there  are  always  flankers  of 
both  parties  ready  to  receive  it ;  it  seldom  touches  the  ground,  but 
is  sometimes  kept  in  the  air  for  hours  before  either  party  can  gain 
the  victory.  In  the  game  which  I  witnessed,  the  Sioux  were  vic- 
torious, more  I  believe,  from  the  superiority  of  their  skill  in  throw- 
ing the  ball,  than  by  their  swiftness,  for  I  thought  the  Puants  and 
Reynards  the  swiftest  runners.*** 

B4  Pike's  An  Account  of  Expeditions  to  the  Sources  of  the  Mississippi  and 


EXPEDITION  OP  ZEBULON  M.  PIKE  357 

The  remainder  of  the  journey  was  uneventful.  Numer- 
ous unimportant  councils  and  meetings  with  various  In- 
dians  took  place,  and  in  many  cases  British  medals  were 
given  up.  The  account  of  the  descent,  however,  is  extreme- 
ly meagre,  there  being  almost  no  mention  of  the  country 
through  which  the  party  passed.  This  is  probably  due  to 
the  increase  in  the  distance  covered  on  the  return  —  only 
about  two  months  being  spent  in  the  descent,  while  the  as- 
cent had  occupied  more  than  six  months. 

It  was  on  April  30,  1806,  that  the  party  arrived  at  the 
town  of  St.  Louis.^*^  It  would  seem  that  there  had  not  been 
a  loss  of  a  single  man  on  the  expedition,  since  a  report*^®  of 
the  number  of  persons  returned  to  St.  Louis  corresponds 
exactly  to  the  number  of  the  original  party. 

When  his  reports  and  observations  were  completed. 
Lieutenant  Pike  had  accomplished  far  more  than  his  or- 
ders. He  had  given  to  the  public,  as  well  as  to  the  govern- 
ment officials,  information  which  was  not  only  new  but  espe- 
cially accurate  in  details.  This  information  covered  every 
phase  of  the  voyage,  and  included  extended  observations 
with  regard  to  the  climate,  soil,  drainage,  timber,  etc.,  of 
the  country.  The  results  of  careful  and  painstaking  inves- 
tigation of  the  British  trade  brought  many  corrupt  prac- 
tices to  light  which  resulted  in  preventatives  on  the  part  of 
the  general  government.  Knowledge  of  the  Indians  — 
their  tribes,  numbers,  and  characteristics  —  was  afforded 
by  tables  and  charts  carefully  compiled  and  included  in 
Lieutenant  Pike's  journal.  Without  doubt  the  efforts  of 
Lieutenant  Pike  did  much  to  create  a  friendly  attitude  to- 

through  the  Western  Parts  of  Louisiana,  etc.  (original  edition,  1810),  Part  I, 
p.  100. 

B<^  The  time  consumed  in  the  exploration  was,  therefore,  eight  months  and 
twenty-two  days. 

B«  Annals  of  Congress,  10th  Ck>ngress,  Second  Session,  1808-1809,  p.  1794. 


358    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

ward  the  United  States  on  the  part  of  the  Indians  of  the 
Iowa  and  upper  Mississippi  regions.  British  medals  and 
flags  were  replaced  by  the  stars  and  stripes;  hostilities 
among  various  tribes  ceased;  and  there  was  a  marked  in- 
crease  in  the  respect  of  the  Indians  for  the  American  peo- 
ple. 

Although  Lieutenant  Pike  so  far  as  possible  carried  out 
the  orders  of  General  Wilkinson  as  well  as  those  of  the  gov- 
ernment, there  seems  to  be  no  record  of  any  compensation*^ 
either  to  Lieutenant  Pike  or  to  any  of  his  companions  for 
their  untiring  efforts.  At  various  times  attempts  were 
made  in  Congress  to  secure  such  compensation,  but  all  such 
efforts  were  in  vain.  Conunittees  were  appointed,  reports 
were  heard,  and  the  matter  was  even  presented  in  the  form 
of  bills.*^®  The  measure,  however,  was  successively  de- 
feated, even  though  it  was  always  by  a  small  majority. 

Ethyl  Edna  Mabtin 

The  State  Historical  Society  op  Iowa 

Iowa  Cfty 

ftT  AnnaU  of  Congress,  10th  Gongreei,  First  Session,  1807-1808,  Vol.  II,  pp. 
1659,  1767;  Annals  of  Congress,  lOth  Congress,  Second  Session,  1808-1809,  pp. 
486,  487,  862,  902,  1788,  1794;  Annals  of  Congress,  11th  Congress,  1809-1810, 
Part  I,  pp.  218,  263;  AnniUs  of  Congress,  12th  Congress,  First  Session,  1811- 
1812,  Part  II,  p.  1576. 

^»  Annals  of  Congress,  lOth  Congress,  First  Session,  1807-1808,  VoL  n,  p. 
1767;  Annals  of  Congress,  10th  Congress,  Second  Session,  1808-1809,  pp.  862, 
902;  Annals  of  Congress,  11th  Congress,  Part  I,  pp.  218,  263. 

On  July  3,  1812,  a  petition  from  Lieutenant  Pike  asking  compensation  for 
services  rendered  in  exploring  the  interior  parts  of  North  America  was  pre- 
sented. But  this  was  ordered  to  be  laid  on  the  table  and  it  seems  never  to 
have  been  considered. —  Annals  of  Congress,  12th  Congress,  First  Session,  1811- 
1812,  Part  II,  p.  1576. 


THE  SETTLEMENT  OF  WOODBURY  COUNTY 

[The  following  paper  is  the  reeolt  of  a  limitod  though  critical  inyestiga- 
tion  undertaken  hj  Professor  Garver  with  a  view  (1)  to  ascertaining  from 
whence  the  early  settlers  of  Woodbury  County  came,  and  (2)  to  suggesting 
the  variety  of  viewpoints  from  which  data  upon  such  a  subject  may  be 
studied. —  Editor.] 

Woodbury  County  is  situated  on  the  western  border  of 
the  State  of  Iowa,  and  is  bounded  on  the  west  by  the  Mis- 
souri and  Big  Sioux  rivers.  It  is  a  little  north  of  the  cen- 
ter of  the  State,  there  being  three  counties  to  the  north  of 
it  and  five  to  the  south.  It  is  one  of  the  largest  counties  of 
the  State  both  in  area  and  in  population.  Sioux  City,  the 
largest  town,  contains  about  50,000  inhabitants :  the  rest  of 
the  population  dwell  in  villages  or  upon  farms.  Thus  it  is 
seen  that  Woodbury  County  is  in  no  sense  peculiar;  its 
characteristics  are  similar  to  those  of  hundreds  of  other 
counties  of  the  great  north  central  States.  Moreover,  the 
one  magnet  which  served  to  attract  the  first  settlers  was  an 
abundance  of  rich,  fertile  land  to  be  had  at  a  remarkably 
low  price. 

The  permanent  settlement  of  eastern  Iowa  was  begun  in 
the  early  thirties ;  the  occupation  of  western  Iowa  occurred 
about  twenty  years  later.  The  period  of  the  settlement  of 
Woodbury  County  may  be  set  down,  roughly,  as  from  1850 
to  1870.  The  town  of  Sioux  City  was  laid  out  in  1854  and 
1855.  While  the  ranks  of  the  old  settlers  are  being  rapidly 
thinned  by  death,  there  remain  in  the  county  a  considerable 
number  of  residents  who  came  prior  to  1870,  and  some,  even, 
who  were  here  before  1860.  The  comparative  newness  of 
the  county  has  made  possible  the  collection  of  the  data  upon 
which  this  study  is  based. 

John  Fiske,  the  historian,  has  called  attention  to  the  fact 

359 


360    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

that  the  migrations  of  Americans  westward  from  the  old 
States  to  new  have  been,  to  a  remarkable  degree,  along  par- 
allels of  latitude.^  Li  connection  with  this  statement,  at- 
tention is  called  to  the  fact  that  Iowa  covers  abont  three 
degrees  of  latitude  extending,  practically,  from  forty  de- 
grees and  thirty  minntes  to  forty-three  degrees  and  thirty 
minntes,  north.  If  the  northern  and  the  sonthem  bonn- 
daries  of  Iowa  are  projected  eastward  across  the  United 
States  to  the  Atlantic  Ocean,  they  enclose  a  zone  which 
would  include  in  the  north  central  States,  the  northern 
part  of  Illinois,  Indiana,  and  Ohio,  as  well  as  the  south- 
em  part  of  Wisconsin  and  Michigan ;  in  the  north  Atlantic 
group,  the  northern  two-thirds  of  Pennsylvania,  the  north- 
em  third  of  New  Jersey,  and  all  of  that  part  of  New  York 
(about  two-thirds)  which  lies  south  of  Lake  Ontario;  and 
in  New  England,  all  of  Rhode  Island,  Connecticut,  and 
Massachusetts,  together  with  the  southern  part  of  Vermont 
and  New  Hampshire.  These,  then,  are  the  States  from 
which  we  may  expect  the  early  settlers  of  Woodbury 
County  to  have  come  if  Fiske's  statement  is  correct. 

For  the  purpose  of  securing  the  data  required  for  this 
brief  study  a  blank  was  prepared,  which,  together  with  a 
letter  explaining  the  same,  was  sent  to  about  one  hundred 
and  forty  old  settlers  of  Woodbury  County.  The  blanks 
were  in  the  following  form : 

1  —  Name. 

2  —  Present  address. 

3  —  Place  of  birth  (Give  both  State  and  County). 

4  —  Date  of  birth. 

5  —  Nationality. 

6  —  When  did  you  move  to  lowat 

7  —  Prom  what  State  1 

8  —  When  did  you  move  to  Woodbury  County! 

9  —  Prom  what  County,  if  from  another  County  in  lowat 

1  Fiike'6  CivU  Oavemment  in  the  United  States,  p.  81. 


SETTLEMENT  OF  WOODBURY  COUNTY  361 

10  —  Please  give  the  names  and  addresses  of  other  old  settlers  in 
your  neighborhood. 

To  these  inquiries  replies  were  received  from  ninety-two 
individuals.  Two  of  the  replies  were  incomplete  and  could 
not  be  used.  Appeal  was  then  made  to  other  sources,  with 
the  result  that  the  desired  information  was  gathered  con- 
cerning ten  additional  old  settlers.  Thus,  facts  were  at 
hand  relative  to  one  hundred  different  individuals  —  a  con- 
venient number  with  which  to  deal.  By  a  comparison  and 
analysis  of  the  different  items,  some  interesting  results  are 
ascertained. 

Taking  up,  in  the  first  place,  the  matter  of  the  nativity  of 
the  one  hundred  old  settlers  whose  migrations  are  here  in- 
vestigated, we  find  that  twenty-six  of  them  were  bom  in 
foreign  countries  and  seventy-four  in  the  United  States. 
A  somewhat  different  statement  of  results  may  be  made  by 
adding  those  bom  in  Canada  and  in  the  United  States,  in 
which  case  it  may  be  said  that  twenty-two  were  bom  in 
Europe  (including  the  British  Isles)  and  seventy-eight  in 
America.  Twenty-six  per  cent  of  foreign-bom  settlers 
seems  to  the  writer  to  be  a  rather  large  proportion  in  view 
of  the  fact  that  Woodbury  County  is  in  the  very  heart  of 
the  United  States  and  that  it  was  settled  so  late  in  the  his- 
tory of  our  country  —  at  a  time  when  so  many  Americans 
were  moving  westward.  And  yet  that  same  **lure  of  the 
land**  which  drew  the  Americans  out  of  Vermont  and  New 
York  proved,  no  doubt,  equally  attractive  to  the  foreign  im- 
migrant. 

Of  the  twenty-six  old  settlers  bom  outside  of  the  United 
States,  Germany  gave  birth  to  eight,  England  and  Ireland 
to  five  each,  Canada  to  four,  Switzerland  to  two,  and 
France  and  Denmark  to  one  each.  These  facts  give  Ger- 
many the  lead,  unless  those  bom  in  England,  Ireland,  and 
Canada  are  added  together  and  the  total  of  fourteen  is 


362    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

credited  to  the  British  Empire.  Li  this  group  of  foreign 
settlers  those  of  Teutonic  stock  predominate  over  those  of 
Celtic  stock  in  about  the  proportion  of  two  to  one. 

The  years  1850  and  1870  have  been  mentioned  above  as 
bounding,  in  a  rough  way,  the  period  of  the  settlement  of 
Woodbury  County.  Li  the  former  year  the  number  of 
States  in  the  American  Union  numbered  thirty-one,  in  the 
latter  year  thirty-seven.  A  comparison  of  the  facts  rela- 
tive to  the  seventy-four  old  settlers  who  were  natives  of 
the  United  States  shows  them  to  represent  thirteen  States 
as  follows :  twenty-four  were  bom  in  New  York ;  eight  each 
in  Vermont  and  Pennsylvania;  seven  in  Ohio;  six  in  Illi- 
nois ;  four  each  in  Indiana,  New  Hampshire,  and  Connecti- 
cut; three  in  Massachusetts;  two  each  in  Virginia  and 
Iowa ;  and  one  each  in  Maine  and  Missouri. 

If  the  States  here  mentioned  are  grouped  into  sections, 
the  result  shows  that,  of  the  seventy-four  individuals  under 
discussion,  there  were  bom  twenty  in  New  England,  thirty- 
four  in  the  middle  Atlantic  States  (including  Virginia  and 
West  Virginia),  none  in  the  southem  States,  eastern  di- 
vision, seventeen  in  the  east  central  States  (including  Ken- 
tucky), three  in  the  west  central  States  (including  Mis- 
souri), and  none  in  the  southem  States,  western  division. 
Thus  it  is  seen  that  the  middle  Atlantic  section  leads  with 
thirty-four  to  its  credit,  and  that  New  England  comes  sec- 
ond with  twenty.  In  the  two  divisions  of  the  north  central 
States,  taken  together,  twenty  also  were  bom.  None  seems 
to  have  been  bom  in  either  division  of  the  southern  States^ 
but  this  is  because  the  grouping  adopted  above,  following 
the  plan  of  present  day  geograpliies,^  includes  Virginia 
among  the  middle  Atlantic  States  and  Missouri  in  the  west- 
em  division  of  the  north  central  States. 

There  are  twenty-eight  States  either  wholly  or  largely 

2  Frye  '•  Complete  Geography,  etc. 


SETTLEMENT  OF  WOODBURY  COUNTY  363 

east  of  the  Mississippi  River.  As  far  as  the  facts  under 
analysis  are  concerned  only  eleven  of  these  gave  birth  to  pi- 
oneers of  Woodbury  County.  The  only  southern  State  to 
contribute  was  Virginia.  A  more  remarkable  fact,  perhaps, 
is  that  in  those  sections  in  which  the  largest  numbers  were 
bom  there  were  States  (located  side  by  side  with  those  most 
largely  represented)  which  in  themselves  gave  birth  to 
none  of  the  old  settlers.  Thus,  in  New  England  every  State 
is  represented  except  Rhode  Island.  In  the  middle  Atlantic 
section  three  States  are  represented  (New  York,  Pennsyl- 
vania, and  Virginia),  while  four  are  not  (New  Jersey,  Del- 
aware, Maryland,  and  West  Virginia).  It  is  rather  inter- 
esting to  speculate  as  to  why  New  York  and  Pennsylvania 
should  give  birth  to  so  many  Woodbury  County  pioneers, 
relatively  speaking,  and  neighboring  States  to  none.  It  is 
true,  however,  that  West  Virginia,  Maryland,  and  most  of 
New  Jersey  are  south  of  the  latitude  of  Iowa.  In  the  east- 
ern division  of  the  central  States  three  are  represented 
(Ohio,  Indiana,  and  Illinois),  and  three  are  not  (Michigan, 
Wisconsin,  and  Kentucky).  Michigan  and  Wisconsin  were 
not  old  enough  to  be  the  birth-place  of  pioneers  who  should 
settle  new  lands  as  early  as  1850.  Wliile  Kentuckj-  was  old 
enough,  it  was  probably  far  enough  to  the  south  of  the  lati- 
tude of  Iowa  and  especially  of  Woodbury  County,  to  make 
the  latter  fact  sufficient  reason  for  her  failure  to  send  us 
any  old  settlers. 

Glancing  for  a  moment  at  the  individual  States  and  the 
number  of  Woodbury  County  pioneers  to  whom  each  gave 
birth,  it  is  seen  that  New  York  leads  with  Vermont,  Penn- 
sylvania, Ohio,  and  Illinois  following  in  order.  New  York^s 
lead  is  large  —  in  fact  more  of  our  number  were  bom  with- 
in her  boundaries  than  within  those  of  her  three  closest 
competitors  taken  together.  New  York  gave  birth  to  more 
of  our  old  settlers  than  all  of  the  rest  of  the  middle  Atlantic 


364    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

section  together ;  more  than  all  of  New  England ;  and  more 
than  all  of  the  central  States.  Indeed  New  York  was  the 
mother  of  twenty-four  per  cent  of  the  one  hmidred  pioneers 
whose  careers  form  the  basis  of  this  study;  of  thirty-two 
per  cent  of  the  seventy-four  who  were  bom  in  the  United 
States.  New  York,  Vermont,  and  Pennsylvania  —  three 
contiguous  States  —  taken  together,  gave  birth  to  forty  out 
of  seventy-four  or  fifty-four  per  cent  of  those  bom  in  the 
United  States. 

If  Virginia  and  Missouri  are  counted  as  southern  States, 
as  has  been  the  rule  in  American  history,  then  three  of  our 
number  were  bom  in  the  South  as  against  seventy-one  in 
the  North.  Three,  also,  were  bom  west  of  the  Mississippi 
as  against  seventy-one  east  of  it.  Iowa  was  a  free  State 
and  would  not  admit  slaves.  This  fact  coupled  with  that 
other  fact  that  Iowa  was  far  to  the  north,  and  out  of  the 
latitude  of  the  southern  States,  probably  accounts  for  the 
smallness  of  the  number  bom  south  of  the  Mason  and 
Dixon  line. 

Another  item  on  the  blanks  sent  out  called  for  the  nation- 
ality of  each  old  settler ;  but  owing,  perhaps,  to  the  fact  that 
sufficient  explanation  was  not  given,  it  would  not  be  safe  to 
draw  many  conclusions  from  the  data  returned.  For  ex- 
ample, some  counted  themselves  as  ** Americans**  whose 
parents  were  evidently  bom  abroad;  while  others  an- 
swered **of  German  descent'*  whose  ancestors  had  un- 
doubtedly been  in  the  United  States  for  several  genera- 
tions. To  be  brief,  forty-four  out  of  one  hundred  indicated 
a  foreign  ancestry,  although  we  learned  above  that  only 
twenty-six  had  been  bom  outside  of  the  United  States. 
The  numbers  returned  for  each  nationality  were:  Amer- 
icans, forty-seven;  ** Yankees**,  nine;  English,  nine;  Ger- 
mans, nine ;  Irish,  eight ;  French  Canadians,  three ;  French, 
two ;  Welsh,  two ;  Swiss,  two ;  Dutch,  one ;  and  Danish,  one ; 


SETTLEMENT  OP  WOODBXJRY  COUNTY  365 

together  with  six  who  gave  a  double  nationality.  It  is  in- 
teresting to  note  that  nine  called  themselves  ** Yankees**, 
of  whom  five  were  bom  in  New  England.  Adding  these 
nine  Yankees  to  the  group  of  Americans,  we  have  fifty-six 
of  the  latter.  About  all  that  it  seems  safe  to  say  on  the  sub- 
ject of  nationaUty  is  that  twenty-six  were  bom  abroad  and 
that  the  number  of  bona  fide  Americans  is  fifty-six.  This 
leaves  eighteen  to  be  accounted  for.  Undoubtedly  all  of 
them  could  classify  as  Americans  of  some  degree.  As 
between  Teutons  and  Celts,  the  proportion  seems  to  be 
about  four  of  the  former  to  one  of  the  latter.  One  element 
(namely,  the  French  Canadian)  did  not  figure  as  largely  in 
the  returns  as  the  writer  had  reason  to  expect  from  the 
large  number  of  that  class  who  trapped  and  traded  in  this 
section  in  its  early  days.  Indeed,  only  three  designated 
themselves  as  French  Canadians.  The  reasons  for  such  a 
small  number  need  to  be  noticed,  and  so  this  matter  will  be 
recurred  to  again  in  another  connection.^ 

Of  the  twenty-six  pioneers  bom  abroad  (out  of  the  one 
hundred  studied)  twenty-four  made  at  least  two  moves, 
coming  first  to  some  other  one  of  the  United  States  and  mi- 
grating later  to  Iowa.  Still  another  made  two  moves,  com- 
ing from  Ireland  to  Canada  and  thence  to  Iowa.  Only  one 
came  directly  from  his  foreign  home  to  Woodbury  County. 
Of  the  twenty-four  who  stopped  in  other  States  before  com- 
ing hither,  seven  came  first  to  Illinois,  four  to  New  York, 
four  to  Ohio,  two  to  Nebraska,  two  to  Wisconsin,  and  one 
each  to  New  Hampshire,  Pennsylvania,  Indiana,  Tennessee, 
and  Missouri. 

It  has  already  been  explained  that  one  foreign-bom  pio- 
neer moved  from  Ireland  to  Canada  and  thence  to  Iowa, 
and  that  a  second  one  moved  directly  from  Canada  to  this 
State.    Somewhat  earlier  in  the  paper  it  was  noted  that  two 

3  See  below,  p.  3S1. 

VOL.  IX — 25 


366    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

were  bom  in  Iowa.  One  of  these  never  left  his  native  State, 
while  the  other  one  moved  to  Kansas  and  back  again.  In 
the  following  analysis  the  latter  case  is  ignored,  that  is  to 
say,  the  move  to  Kansas  and  back  is  ignored  and  the  indi- 
vidual is  treated  as  a  native  lowan  who  never  left  Ids  State. 
Eliminating  these  four  cases,  we  have  the  result  that  ninety- 
six  pioneers,  out  of  one  hundred,  came  to  Iowa  from  some 
other  State  of  the  American  union.  Of  the  ninety-six, 
seventy-two  were  native-bom  and  twenty-four  foreign- 
born,  as  has  already  been  shown. 

These  ninety-six  settlers  came  into  Iowa  from  eighteen 
diflFerent  States.  The  States  from  which  they  came,  to- 
gether with  the  number  in  each  case,  are  as  follows :  from 
Illinois,  twenty-six;  New  York,  fifteen;  Ohio,  eleven;  Wis- 
consin, eight ;  Pennsylvania  and  Indiana,  five  each ;  Massa- 
chusetts, Virginia,  Vermont,  Missouri,  and  Minnesota, 
three  each;  Connecticut,  New  Hampshire,  Michigan,  and 
Nebraska,  two  each;  and  from  Tennessee,  Montana,  and 
California,  one  each.  The  number  that  moved  to  Iowa  from 
each  State  is  radically  diflFerent  from  the  number  that  was 
bom  in  each.  A  glance  at  the  first  and  last  columns  of  the 
accompanying  table  will  show  how  true  is  this  statement. 
(See  Table  I.) 

The  migrations  of  ninety-six  persons  to  Iowa  may  seem 
to  be  a  simple  matter,  but  in  reality  it  is  one  of  great  com- 
plexity. The  case  of  New  York  may  be  taken  as  an  illus- 
tration. In  that  State  twenty-four  of  our  pioneers  were 
born.  Nine  of  them  moved  directly  from  the  Empire  State 
to  Iowa.  The  other  fifteen  came  to  this  State  indirectly, 
that  is  to  say,  they  moved  first  to  other  States  and  came 
thence  to  Iowa.  Of  this  number  seven  came  by  way  of  Illi- 
nois, four  by  way  of  Wisconsin,  and  one  each  by  way  of 
Massachusetts,  Ohio,  Vermont,  and  Montana.  Altogether 
fifteen  came  directly  from  New  York  to  Iowa.    This  num- 


SETTLEMENT  OP  WOODBURY  COUNTY  367 

ber  was  made  up  of  the  nine  natives  of  the  former  State, 
already  mentioned,  and  six  who  came  into  New  York  from 
the  outside.  Two  of  the  six  entered  New  York  from  other 
States  —  one  each .  from  Connecticut  and  Pennsylvania. 
The  other  four  came  from  foreign  countries  —  two  from 
Germany,  one  from  England  and  one  from  Ireland.  Thus 
thirty  old  settlers  were  bom  in  New  York  or  came  through 
that  State  to  Iowa.  Fifteen  came  direct  to  this  State  and 
fifteen  through  other  Commonwealths.  The  cases  of  sev- 
eral other  States  are  as  complicated  as  that  of  New  York 
—  just  as  many  elements  entering  in,  although  not  so  many 
pioneers  may  have  been  concerned. 

Because  of  this  complexity  it  is  out  of  question  to  re- 
view all  of  the  facts  relative  to  each  State.  They  are  pre- 
sented in  detail,  however,  in  the  accompanying  table.  (See 
Table  I).  Column  one  shows  how  many  pioneers  (out  of 
ninety-six)  were  bom  in  each  State.  Colunm  two  shows 
how  many  of  these  came  directly  to  Iowa,  and  column  three 
how  many  came  indirectly.  Columns  four  and  five  indicate 
the  number  that  came  from  other  States  and  from  foreign 
countries,  respectively,  through  each  State  to  Iowa.  The 
last  column  shows  the  number  that  came  directly  from  each 
State  to  this  one.  The  numbers  given  in  the  first  column 
should  equal  the  sum  of  those  given  in  the  second  and  third 
columns.  The  numbers  found  in  the  last  colunm  should 
equal  the  sum  of  those  in  the  second,  fourth,  and  fifth  col- 
umns. It  will  also  be  noticed  that  colunms  three  and  four 
total  the  same,  as  they  should. 

With  the  facts  before  us  as  vividly  as  the  table  presents 
them,  it  is  possible  to  make  several  valuable  comparisons. 
Let  us  take  first  the  figures  of  the  first  two  colunms,  those 
showing  the  number  of  births  in  each  State  and  the  number 
of  the  same  that  came  directly  to  Iowa.  The  facts  show  that 
all  that  were  bom  in  the  three  States  of  Virginia,  Illinois, 


368    IOWA  JOTJBNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

and  MisBonri  came  directly  to  tbiB  State.  Maine  is  the  only 
State  representiiig  the  other  extreme.  Prom  other  States 
the  natiTe-bom  pioneers  came  directly  to  Iowa  in  such  ra- 

TABLEI 


S 

1 

ll 

11 

III 

1: 
,t 

11^ 

1 

Sis 

11 

Hi 

Maine 
Venn  out 
ConnecticQt 

0 

1 

2 

1 
1 

0 

0 

0 

0 
2 
3 
3 
2 

Total   for   Bection 

20 

5 

IS 

10 

Pennsylvania 

Virginia 

24 

8 

9 
4 
2 

15 

15 
S 
3 

Total   for   aection 

34 

15 

19 

23 

Ohio 

Ulinoia 

Michigan 

WucnaBia 

4 
2 
6 
0 
0 

13 

11 
3 

ZG 
2 
8 

Total   for   section 

14 

52 

NebrBBka 

Missonri 

0 
0 

1 

3 
2 
3 

Total   for   sectioa 

1 

8 

Montana 

California 

0 

0 

0 
0 

0 

J 

1 
1 

1 

Total   scattared 

0 

0        1        0        1        2 

3 

Grand  Totals 

72 

33 

30 

39 

24 

96 

tioB  as  one  out  of  four,  four  out  of  eight,  or  nine  out  of 
twenty-four.  The  general  average  of  all  these  different  ra- 
tios is  found  in  the  totals  which  show  that  out  of  seventy- 
two  native-bom  pioneers,  thirty-three,  or  nearly  forty-six 
per  cent,  came  direct  from  the  State  of  their  birth  to  this 
State. 


SETTLEMENT  OF  WOODBURY  COUNTY  369 

The  results  of  this  comparison  for  each  section  follow : 

New  England,  5  out  of  20  or  25  per  cent  came  direct  to  Iowa. 
Mid.  Atlantic,  15  out  of  34  or  44  per  cent  came  direct  to  Iowa. 
North  Central,  12  out  of  17  or  70  per  cent  came  direct  to  Iowa. 

As  might  have  been  expected  the  percentage  increases  as 
the  section  is  located  closer  and  closer  to  Iowa. 

Another  fruitful  comparison  may  be  made  of  the  number 
of  pioneers  bom  in  each  State  and  the  total  number  that 
came  directly  from  each  State  to  Iowa.  (See  columns  one 
and  six  of  Table  I).  One  might  expect  these  numbers  to  be 
practically  the  same,  but  this  supposition  is  far  from  the 
truth.  Not  all  that  were  bom  in  each  State  came  directly 
to  Iowa  as  we  have  already  seen,  and  certainly  not  all  that 
came  from  each  State  were  bom  in  the  Commonwealth  from 
which  they  happened  to  come. 

The  total  number  of  pioneers  that  came  directly  from  the 
various  States  to  Iowa  was  made  up  of  three  groups :  first, 
those  bom  in  the  States  from  which  they  came;  second, 
those  received  from  other  States ;  and  third,  those  received 
from  foreign  nations.  The  first  of  these  three  groups  has 
just  been  discussed.  The  facts  relative  to  the  second  may 
1)8  found  by  reference  to  column  four  of  Table  I.  A  com- 
parison of  columns  four  and  six  shows  what  proportion  of 
the  numbers  sent  to  Iowa  by  each  State  was  received  from 
other  States.  Four  States,  indeed,  (New  Hampshire,  Penn- 
sylvania, Nebraska,  and  Tennessee)  received  none;  while 
four  others  (California,  Montana,  Minnesota,  and  Michi- 
gan) received  all  they  sent  from  this  source.  In  most  cases 
such  accessions  were  small,  only  four  States  (Ohio,  Minne- 
sota, Wisconsin,  and  Illinois)  receiving  as  many  as  three 
each.  Wisconsin  with  six  and  Illinois  with  thirteen  are 
easily  in  the  lead.  This  is  logical  since  these  States  border 
Iowa  on  the  east  and  were  natural  gateways  into  the  latter 
in  the  early  days. 


370    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

The  results  of  this  comparison  by  sections  are  instructive. 
In  the  following  table  the  figures  in  the  first  column  indicate 
the  persons  received  from  other  States;  the  figures  of  the 
second  column  indicate  the  persons  sent  to  Iowa. 

New   England  received    4  out  of  10  sent,  or  40  per  cent. 

Middle  Atlantic  received    3  out  of  23  sent,  or  13  per  cent. 

East  Central  received  26  out  of  52  sent,  or  50  per  cent. 

West  Central  received    4  out  of    7  sent,  or  57  per  cent. 

From  this  showing  it  is  seen  that  the  middle  Atlantic  sec- 
tion received  the  smallest  percentage  of  pioneers  sent  to 
Iowa  from  other  States.  It  is  logical,  again,  that  the  north 
central  sections  should  receive  the  largest  percentage  from 
the  same  sources  because  they  are  on  the  road  to  Iowa,  so 
to  speak.  In  the  case  of  New  England  the  percentage  is 
large ;  but  this  may  be  abnormal  since  the  total  number  of 
individuals  was  so  small  that  the  movements  of  one  or  two 
had  an  undue  effect  upon  the  results.  Finally,  it  may  be 
said  that  the  total  number  of  pioneers  received  from  other 
States  was  thirty-nine  out  of  ninety-six  sent  to  Iowa,  or  six 
more  than  the  number  of  native-bom  sent  directly  from 
their  native  States. 

The  third  group  which  goes  to  make  up  the  ninety-six  sent 
directly  to  this  State  comprises  the  foreign-bom.  The  fig- 
ures for  this  group  are  to  be  found  in  column  five  of  Table 
I.  A  comparison  with  column  six  shows  the  proportion  of 
the  foreign-bom  to  the  total  number  sent.  Eight  States  re- 
ceived none  from  this  source,  while  five  received  one  eacb, 
and  two  received  two  each.  New  York,  Ohio,  and  Illinois 
received  the  largest  numbers;  the  two  first  named  States 
four  each,  and  the  last  named  seven.  Nebraska  and  Tenn- 
essee received  all  the  pioneers  whom  they  sent  to  Iowa  from 
this  source  —  which,  of  course  is  only  a  coincidence. 

If  we  tabulate  the  results  for  the  sections  we  get  the  f ol- 


SETTLEMENT  OP  WOODBURY  COUNTY  371 

lowing  percentages  —  the  first  figures  stand  for  the  number 
of  f  oreign-bom  received : 

New  England  received  1  out  of  10  sent  to  Iowa,  or  10  per  cent. 
Middle  Atlantic  received  5  out  of  23  sent  to  Iowa,  or  22  per  cent. 
East  Central  received  14  out  of  52  sent  to  Iowa,  or  27  per  cent. 
West  Central      received   3  out  of   8  sent  to  Iowa,  or  43  per  cent. 

The  percentages  favor  the  western  sections.  While  all  of 
the  foreign-born  pioneers  under  consideration  came  ulti- 
mately to  Iowa,  it  is  a  fact  that  their  original  attraction  was 
for  the  western  States  in  preference  to  the  eastern  sections. 
The  total  number  of  foreign-bom  received  was  twenty-four 
or  exactly  twenty-five  per  cent  of  the  whole  number  sent  di- 
rectly to  Iowa. 

It  is  not  to  be  understood  that  the  contingents  sent  to 
Iowa  by  the  various  States  were  made  up  in  every  case  of 
all  three  of  the  elements  mentioned  above.  Indeed,  this  was 
true  of  only  five  States,  namely,  New  York,  Ohio,  Indiana, 
Illinois,  and  Missouri.  Wisconsin  sent  no  native-bom  pio- 
neers to  Woodbury  County;  New  Hampshire  and  Pennsyl- 
vania contributed  none  received  from  other  States;  while 
Vermont,  Massachusetts,  Connecticut,  and  Virginia  sent 
none  who  were  bom  abroad.  Four  States,  namely,  Michi- 
gan, Minnesota,  Montana  (Territory),  and  California  sent 
neither  native-bom  nor  foreign-bom  settlers  —  their  whole 
contingents  being  received  from  other  States.  Nebraska 
and  Tennessee  sent  only  foreign-bom.  The  number  of  pio- 
neers of  each  class  sent  by  the  sections  are  as  follows : 

States  Native-horn    Born  in  other  States  Foreign-horn 

NcAv  England  5  4  1 

Middle  Atlantic  15  3  5 

East  Central  12  26  14 

West  Central  14  3 

From  this  tabulation  it  will  be  seen  that  the  native-bom 
element  was  the  most  important  one  in  the  contingents  sent 


372    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

by  New  England  and  the  middle  section ;  while  the  two  di- 
visions of  the  north  central  section  received  from  other 
States  the  largest  single  element  in  their  contributions  — 
in  each  case  exactly  one-half  of  the  total  number  sent. 

Having  treated  in  this  detailed  way  of  the  various  ele- 
ments that  went  to  make  up  the  total  number  of  pioneers 
who  came  from  the  different  States  directly  to  Iowa,  a  brief 
comparison  should  be  made  between  the  latter  and  the  total 
number  that  was  bom  in  each  State.  The  figures  may  be 
found  in  columns  one  and  six  of  Table  I.  There  it  will  be 
seen  that  a  total  of  seventy-two  pioneers*  of  Iowa  were  bom 
in  twelve  different  States,  and  that  a  total  of  ninety-six 
came  to  this  State  from  eighteen  different  States.  It  may 
also  be  noticed  that  pioneers  were  bom  in  only  one  State 
(Maine)  which  sent  none  directly  to  Iowa;  while  seven 
States  which  gave  birth  to  none,  sent  settlers  to  our  State. 
Six  States  gave  birth  to  more  than  they  sent,  one  to  the 
same  number,  while  twelve  sent  more  than  were  bom  with- 
in their  borders.  It  has  already  been  mentioned  that  New 
York  gave  birth  to  the  largest  number  with  Vermont,  Penn- 
sylvania, and  Ohio  following  in  order,  while  Illinois  sent 
the  largest  number  directly  to  Iowa,  with  New  York,  Ohio, 
and  Wisconsin  coming  next  in  order.  As  a  rule  the  States 
farther  east  gave  birth  to  more  of  our  numbers,  but  those 
farther  west  sent  us  the  larger  contingents.  The  compari- 
son bv  sections  is  instructive. 
« 

New  England      gave  birth  to  20  pioneers,  sent  Iowa  10. 

Middle  Atlantic  gave  birth  to  34  pioneers,  sent  Iowa  23. 

East  Central        gave  birth  to  17  pioneers,  sent  Iowa  52. 

West  Central       gave  birth  to    1  pioneer,    sent  Iowa    8. 

From  this  showing  it  may  be  seen  that  there  is  a  relative 
falling  off  in  the  first  set  of  figures  and  a  relative  gain  in 
the  second,  without  exception,  as  we  come  westward.    The 

*  Excluding  from  consideration  the  two  born  in  Iowa. 


SETTLEMENT  OF  WOODBURY  COUNTY  373 

middle  Atlantic  States  were  the  birth-place  of  the  largest 
number  of  pioneers  (thirty-four  or  nearly  one-half  of  the 
seventy-two  bom  in  the  United  States)  and  yet  its  percent- 
age relative  to  the  number  actually  sent  was  not  as  great 
as  that  of  New  England.  By  far  the  largest  number  of 
settlers  came  directly  from  the  north  central  section,  even 
that  division  west  of  the  Mississippi  making  a  respectable 
showing. 

It  appears,  then,  that  the  early  settlers  of  Woodbury 
County  were  largely  bom  in  the  middle  Atlantic  and  New 
England  States  and  that  they  came  to  their  future  home 
chiefly  from  the  east  central  and  middle  Atlantic  States. 
This  brings  up  the  question  of  the  route,  or  routes,  by  which 
they  came  westward  —  a  question  already  touched  upon  in 
an  indirect  way,  but  one  of  such  importance  that  it  needs 
further  treatment.  Table  I  contains  two  columns  of  figures 
(the  third  and  the  fourth)  which  tell  in  a  general  way  the 
story  of  the  routes  taken  by  the  westward  moving  pioneers. 
By  comparing  the  figures  of  column  three  with  those  of  col- 
umn two  for  a  moment  it  will  be  seen  that  New  England 
sent  fifteen  out  of  twenty  bom  in  that  section  to  Iowa  indi- 
rectly ;  that  is  to  say,  they  moved  first  to  other  States  and 
came  thence  to  this  State.  The  middle  Atlantic  States  sent 
nineteen  out  of  thirty-four  by  the  same  indirect  route;  but 
column  three  does  not  show  by  what  States  these  pioneers 
came  to  Iowa.  Column  four  contains  the  same  total  of  fig- 
ures as  three,  referring  indeed  to  the  same  thirty-nine  in- 
dividuals ;  but  while  it  shows  the  numbers  received  by  cer- 
tain States  which  sent  them  on  to  Iowa,  it  does  not  indicate 
tlie  States  from  which  they  were  received.  These  two  sets 
of  facts,  needed  to  throw  light  upon  the  subject  of  the  routes 
taken,  are  shown  in  Table  II. 

Table  II  is  designed  to  illuminate  the  facts  given  in  col- 
umns three  and  four  of  Table  I.    Down  the  left-hand  side  of 


374    IOWA  JOURNAI^  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

the  table  appear  the  names  of  the  States  and  countries  in 
which  the  one  hundred  pioneers  who  comprise  this  study 
were  bom.    In  column  one  is  ^ven,  merely  for  convenient 


FABLE  II 

1 

£ 

1 

1 

£ 
1 

i 

1 
1 

1 

^ 

i 

1 

■ 
1 

o 

i 

, 

^ 

s 

s 

1 

s 

S 

s 

1 

1 

i 

i 

New  Hampshire 
Vermont 

Oonneclirnt 

4 

3 
i 

U 

I 

2 

1 
1 

1 
1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 
2 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 
3 

a 

3 

1 

- 

New   York 

rennsylvania 

Virginia 

24 

B 
2 

1 

1 

I 

i 

. 

1 

1 

7 
1 

1 

4 

' 

16 

4 
0 

._... 

IndiaoB 
niinoia 
Uicbigan 
Wiieonrin 

7 

i 

e 

0 
0 

i 

1 

2 

I 

e 

0 

: 

1 
1 

3 

a 

0 
0 
0 

1 

NobrMka 
Uiwouri 
Iowa 

0 

1 

8 

0 

1 

a 

0 
0 

0 

Montana                  l|  D 
California               ||  0 

i 

a 

0 

"6 

Q 
0 

II 

Germanj' 

Ensland 

IrelaiKl 

Canada 

8wit»r)and 

Pranee 

Denmark 

5 
S 

4 

I 

1 

3 
1 

1 

1 

1 

s 

1 

1 

5 

1 

1 

1 
1 

1 
1  1 

1 

1'    ' 

1! 

1 
1 

B 
6 
5 
3 

2 
1 
I 

Sent    Directly    H      1  01  2'  31  31  2N15|  51  3 

111  6 

31  2   3H  11  ll  111  ail 

reference,  the  total  number  bom  in  each,  Reading  across 
the  page  from  left  to  right  one  may  see,  by  reference  at  the 
same  time  to  the  names  at  the  top  of  the  table,  by  what 


SETTLEMENT  OF  WOODBURY  COUNTY  375 

States  —  that  is  by  what  routes  —  the  native-born  of  each 
State  and  country  came  to  Iowa.  The  total  number  sent  in- 
directly by  each  State  and  country  is  given  in  the  last  col- 
umn, at  the  right-hand  side  of  the  table.  The  number  of 
native-bom  pioneers  sent  directly  to  Iowa  by  the  States  of 
their  birth  are  given  in  the  squares  which  run  diagonally 
across  the  table  from  the  upper  left-hand  comer  toward 
the  lower  right-hand  comer  —  the  numbers  being  indicated 
by  heavier  type  in  order  to  differentiate  them  from  the  oth- 
ers of  the  table.  The  figures  in  heavy  type  are  omitted  in 
making  up  the  totals  given  at  the  right-hand  side  of  the 
table. 

At  the  top  of  the  table  are  found  the  names  of  the  States 
and  the  one  country  which  sent  pioneers  directly  to  Iowa. 
Glancing  down  the  columns  one  may  see,  by  reference  at 
the  same  time  to  the  names  at  the  left-hand  side  of  the  table, 
from  what  States  and  countries  —  that  is,  by  what  routes  — 
the  pioneers  sent  to  Iowa  were  received.  The  figures  at  the 
bottom  of  the  table  indicate  the  total  number  sent  to  Iowa 
directly  by  each  State.  In  this  case  the  numbers  standing 
for  the  native-born  pioneers  sent  directly  (indicated  by  the 
heavy  type)  have  been  added.  Table  I  was  limited  to  those 
States  of  the  American  union  which  gave  birth  to  or  sent 
pioneers  on  to  Iowa.  Table  II  includes  those  foreign  coun- 
tries, as  well,  which  performed  similar  services.  The  name 
of  Canada  occurs  at  the  top  of  the  table  because  it  sent  one 
native-bom  pioneer  direct  to  Iowa.  The  name  of  Iowa  ap- 
pears on  the  table,  but  it  affects  only  the  figures  of  the  first 
column. 

The  table  under  consideration  shows  very  plainly  two 
things :  first,  by  what  States,  or  routes,  the  native-bom  of 
each  State  and  country  were  sent  to  Iowa  when  they  did 
not  come  direct  from  their  places  of  birth ;  and  second,  from 
what  States  and  countries  —  that  is  by  what  routes  —  the 


376    IOWA  JOURNAL  OF  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

pioneers,  exclusive  of  native-born,  sent  to  Iowa  by  the  dif- 
ferent States,  were  received.  Taking  up  the  first  group, 
who  may  be  referred  to  as  native-bom  pioneers  sent  to 
Iowa  indirectly,  we  see  that  Pennsylvania  sent  four  indi- 
viduals by  way  of  four  different  States,  that  Vermont  sent 
six  by  way  of  five  States,  while  New  York  sent  fifteen  by 
way  of  six  States.  The  States  through  which  these  pio- 
neers were  sent  are  scattered  from  Vermont  to  California. 
The  only  preferences  shown  by  individual  States  were  a 
slight  one  by  the  Vermont  pioneers  for  the  Illinois  route 
and  a  more  decided  one  by  New  Yorkers  for  the  Illinois  and 
Wisconsin  routes.  Among  the  foreign-born,  the  English 
show  a  slight  preference  for  Ohio  and  the  Germans  for  New 
York;  the  only  marked  preference  being  that  of  the  Ger- 
mans for  the  Illinois  route. 

A  comparison,  section  by  section,  reveals  the  following 
marked  preferences  for  the  route  of  the  east  central  States : 

New  England  seni; 
•  Middle  Atlantic  sent 
Central  States  sent 
Foreign  nations  sent 

The  totals  for  the  sections  show  that,  out  of  sixty-four  pio- 
neers sent  to  Iowa  indirectly,  forty  came  by  way  of  the 
eastern  division  of  the  central  States  as  against  twenty- 
four  by  way  of  all  other  sections.  If  those  coming  by  the 
western  division  of  the  central  States  are  added  to  those 
sent  by  way  of  the  eastern  division,  the  results  become 
f ortj^-seven  as  against  seventeen. 

The  results  just  presented  are  complemented  by  those 
growing  out  of  a  review  of  the  second  group  of  facts  which 
Table  II  was  constructed  to  illustrate.  In  noticing  the 
States  and  countries  from  which  the  pioneers,  sent  to  Iowa 
by  the  various  States,  were  received  we  are  giving  atten- 


By  Central  States 

By  all  other  sections 

8 

7 

15 

4 

3 

2 

14 

11 

SETTLEMENT  OP  WOODBURY  COUNTY  377 

tion  to  the  same  body  of  facts  as  those  just  analyzed  but 
from  a  different  point  of  view.  Excluding  native-bom 
pioneers,  a  glance  at  the  table  shows  that  New  York  sent  to 
Iowa  six  settlers  received  by  her  from  five  different 
sources,  Wisconsin  eight,  received  from  five  sources,  Ohio 
seven  received  from  six  sources,  and  Illinois  twenty  re- 
ceived from  nine  different  sources  —  that  is,  from  nine 
States  and  foreign  countries.  In  every  case  the  sources 
were  widely  scattered.  The  chief  sources  for  Illinois  were 
New  York,  Germany,  and  Vermont;  for  Wisconsin,  New 
York ;  for  Ohio,  England ;  and  for  New  York,  Gtermany. 

Out  of  sixty-four  pioneers  sent  indirectly  to  Iowa,  New 
England  shows  no  one  source  of  supply  predominating 
over  another.  The  middle  Atlantic  States  and  the  western 
division  of  the  central  States  received  from  foreign  nations 
a  few  more  than  from  other  sources.  The  east  central 
States  attracted  fifteen  from  the  middle  Atlantic  section, 
fourteen  from  foreign  nations,  and  eight  from  New 
England. 

From  such  analyses  as  these  it  is  seen  that  the  pioneers 
of  Woodbury  County  came  from  many  different  places  by 
way  of  many  different  routes.  The  tracing  of  the  routes 
followed  is  complicated  by  the  fact  that  a  large  number  of 
the  individuals  concerned  made  two  or  more  moves,  instead 
of  only  one,  in  coming  to  Iowa.  Three  distinct  elements 
enter  into  the  proposition.  In  the  first  place,  there  are 
those  native-bom  pioneers  who  came  to  Iowa  from  the 
places  of  their  birth  by  indirect  routes.  Then  there  are 
those  who  came  directly  from  certain  localities.  This  num- 
ber was  made  up  of  two  groups,  namely,  native-bora  pio- 
neers who  came  directly  from  the  places  of  their  birth  and 
those  received  from  other  localities  to  be  sent  on  to  this 
State.  The  routes  followed  may,  in  a  general  way,  be  di- 
vided into  two  parts.    First,  many  routes  leading  from  the 


378    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

birth-places  of  the  pioneers  converged  upon  certain  inter- 
mediate points.  Chief  among  these  were  Illinois,  Wis- 
consin, Ohio,  and  New  York.  The  chief  section  upon  which 
the  routes  of  pioneers  converged  was,  of  course,  the  north 
central  section.  The  second  part  of  the  route  taken  led 
directly  from  certain  centers  to  Iowa.  The  most  important 
centers,  as  far  as  the  States  of  the  Union  are  concerned, 
are  exactly  the  same  as  the  chief  converging  points  just 
mentioned;  but,  since  the  pioneers  coming  over  these 
routes  included  an  element  of  native-bom  settlers  as  well 
as  those  received  from  other  sources,  the  centers  in  ques- 
tion mav  not  be  ranked  in  the  same  order.  While  Illinois 
leads,  New  York  comes  second,  Ohio  third,  and  Wisconsin 
fourth.  The  second  part  of  the  general  route  followed  led 
directly  from  these  States  to  Iowa.  As  far  as  sections  are 
concerned,  the  main-traveled  route  led  from  the  north  cen- 
tral section  with  that  from  the  middle  States  second,  and 
that  from  New  England  third. 

The  reader  can  get  a  clear  mental  picture  of  the  general 
routes  followed  by  conceiving  a  map  with  a  heavy  line  lead- 
ing from  Europe  to  the  north  central  States  and  a  some- 
what lighter  line  from  Europe  to  the  middle  Atlantic  sec- 
tion ;  a  heavy  line  leading  from  the  middle  Atlantic  section 
to  the  north  central  States,  and  a  somewhat  lighter  one 
from  New  England  to  the  same  locality ;  and  lastly  a  heavj' 
line  leading  from  the  north  central  States  to  Iowa  together 
with  lighter  lines  from  the  middle  Atlantic  section  and 
from  New  England  to  this  State.  A  complete  map  show- 
ing all  the  by-paths  followed  by  various  groups  or  indi- 
viduals would  contain  many  more  lines  than  those  just  indi- 
cated, but  the  picture  here  drawn  shows  the  main-traveled 
routes  and  avoids  the  confusion  which  would  arise  from 
the  crossing  and  re-crossing  of  lesser  by-paths. 

Before  leaving  this  part  of  the  subject  it  may  be  pointed 


SETTLEMENT  OP  WOODBURY  COUNTY  379 

out  that  seven  pioneers  (out  of  ninety-six)  entered  Iowa 
by  way  of  the  southern  States.  Three  of  them  came  from 
Virginia,  three  from  Missouri,  and  one  from  Tennessee. 
Four  (out  of  ninety-six)  came  liither  from  western  States 
as  follows:  from  Nebraska  two,  and  from  Montana  (Ter- 
ritory) and  California  one  each.  None  of  these  four  were 
natives  of  the  States  from  which  they  came. 

From  the  States  which  border  upon  Iowa  there  came  a 
total  of  forty-two  pioneers.  It  is  interesting  to  note  that 
thirty-four  of  these  came  from  the  two  States  on  the  east- 
em  border,  leaving  eight  to  enter  from  the  four  States 
on  the  three  other  sides  of  Iowa.  The  numbers  entering  by 
way  of  each  border  State  were:  from  Illinois,  twenty-six; 
Wisconsin,  eight;  Minnesota,  three;  Nebraska,  two;  South 
Dakota,  none;  and  Missouri,  three.  The  large  numbers 
coming  from  Illinois  and  Wisconsin  are  accounted  for  by 
the  fact  that  those  States  were  situated  directly  in  the  path- 
way of  the  incoming  pioneers.  Bearing  in  mind  the  fact 
that  so  much  early  travel  was  by  way  of  the  Missouri  River, 
the  one  surprising  result  in  the  comparisons  just  made  is 
that  so  few  settlers,  relatively  speaking,  came  to  Wood- 
bury County  from  Missouri.  Possibly  the  pioneers  coming 
from  Missouri  desiring,  like  Daniel  Boone,  to  be  ever  on 
the  frontier,  had  moved  on  to  newer  regions  before  the  data 
for  this  paper  were  gathered.  The  writer  is  sure  that  this 
occurred  to  a  certain  extent,  especially  in  connection  with 
the  French  Canadians  to  be  mentioned  below.^ 

Out  of  one  hundred  pioneers  whose  movements  form  the 
basis  of  this  study,  sixty-six  came  directly  to  Woodbury 
County  upon  reaching  the  State  of  Iowa;  thirty-four 
stopped  first  in  some  other  coimty  before  coming  here.  It 
may  be  of  interest  to  note  from  what  particular  counties 
some  of  them  came.    A  total  of  sixteen  came  from  four 

»  See  below,  p.  381. 


380    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

oonnties  as  follows:  from  Dubuque,  where  the  first  settle- 
ment in  the  State  was  made,  came  eight;  from  Potta- 
wattamie,  four ;  and  from  Linn  and  Monona,  two  each.  The 
other  eighteen  came  from  as  many  different  counties  scat- 
tered all  over  the  State.  Ten  came  from  counties  bordering 
on  the  Mississippi ;  nine  from  counties  on  the  western  bor- 
der of  Iowa.  Of  the  latter,  seven  came  from  counties  on 
the  Missouri.  If  these  were  added  to  the  three  who  came 
from  the  State  of  Missouri,  it  may  be  said  that  at  least  ten 
came  by  the  Missouri  River  route. 

The  most  interesting  fact  brought  out  in  the  last  para- 
graph is  the  large  number  of  pioneers  coming  to  Wood- 
bury County  from  Dubuque  County  located  clear  across  the 
State  on  the  Mississippi  River.  Of  the  eight  who  came 
from  the  latter  county,  one  was  native-bom,  two  were  from 
Pennsylvania,  and  five  from  foreign  countries.  Dubuque 
and  Woodbury  counties  are  in  the  same  latitude.  To-day 
they  are  connected  by  the  Illinois  Central  Railway,  but 
this  consideration  was  of  no  great  importance  since  seven 
of  the  pioneers  came  to  Woodbury  Coimty  before  the  rail- 
way was  built. 

From  counties  bordering  on  Woodbury  there  came  five 
pioneers:  one  each  from  Plymouth  and  Cherokee  on  the 
north,  one  from  Ida  on  the  east,  and  two  from  Monona  on 
the  south. 

Stopping  in  other  counties  of  Iowa  before  coming  on  to 
Woodbury  had  the  effect  of  increasing  the  number  of  moves 
made  by  our  pioneers  on  their  way  hither.  From  the  char- 
acter of  the  questions  asked  on  the  blanks  sent  out  it  is  not 
possible  to  determine  the  exact  number  of  moves  made  by 
the  one  hundred  pioneers  on  their  way  to  Woodbury 
County.  We  are  able,  however,  to  figure  out  that  twenty- 
two  made  at  least  one  move ;  sixty  at  least  two ;  and  eight- 
een at  least  three  moves  before  arriving  at  their  destina- 


SETTLEMENT  OF  WOODBURY  COUNTY  381 

tion.  It  is  not  surprising  to  find  that  all  of  the  eighteen 
who  moved  at  least  three  times  are  included  in  the  number 
of  those  who  came  to  Woodbury  from  some  other  county 
of  the  State. 

In  this  very  limited  study  of  the  pioneer  settlers  of 
Woodbury  County,  Iowa,  the  emphasis  has  been  placed 
upon  the  source  of  supply,  or  the  nativity  of  the  pioneers, 
the  routes  by  which  they  came  to  this  county,  and  the  num- 
ber of  moves  made  on  the  way.  Eelative  to  the  first  point, 
it  was  found  that  twenty-six  out  of  one  hundred  were  bom 
abroad,  chiefly  in  Germany,  England,  Ireland,  and  Canada. 
The  three  who  came  from  Canada  were  French  Canadians. 
It  was  remarked  above®  that  such  a  small  number  did  not 
do  justice  to  this  particular  people  because  it  has  been  con- 
clusively shown  by  Mr.  C.  B.  Marks  that  the  first  settlers 
of  the  county  were  French  Canadians  and  that  they  came 
to  this  locality  in  considerable  numbers.^  The  explanation 
may  be  found  in  the  character  of  the  French  Canadians 
themselves.  When  they  first  came  into  this  vicinity,  prob- 
ably as  early  as  the  thirties,  it  was  in  the  capacity  of 
traders,  trappers,  boatsmen,  hunters,  etc.  They  belonged 
largely  to  the  river  and  the  river  trade,  to  the  period  of 
exploration  rather  than  to  that  of  settlement.  It  was  their 
work  to  open  up  the  new  country,  not  to  possess  it  per- 
manently: they  paved  the  way  for  actual  settlers.  When 
the  latter  came  it  was  time  for  the  French  Canadian  to 
move  on  up  the  river  to  newer  and  wilder  regions  —  regions 
better  suited  to  his  particular  kind  of  life.  This  was  actu- 
ally done  by  large  numbers,  and  is  a  fact  which,  when  taken 
in  connection  with  the  time  that  had  passed  before  this 

«  See  above,  p.  365. 

7  Marks 's  PoJit  and  Present  of  Woodbury  County,  Iowa,  p.  763  aeq.  See  alao 
his  article  entitled  French  Pioneers  of  Sioux  City  and  South  Dakota  in  the 
South  Dakota  Historical  Collections,  Vol.  IV,  pp.  255-260. 

VOL.  IX — ^26 


382    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

investigation  was  attempted,  sufficiently  accounts  for  the 
small  showing  made  by  the  French  Canadians  in  the  popu- 
lation elements  of  the  county  to-day. 

The  figures  showed  seventy-four  pioneers  born  in  the 
United  States  —  only  three  of  them  in  the  South.  Among 
the  sections,  the  middle  Atlantic  States  led,  with  New 
England  and  the  north  central  States  following  in  order. 
Among  the  States,  New  York,  Vermont,  and  Pennsylvania 
stood  out  especially  prominent  as  the  birth-place  of  Wood- 
bury County  pioneers,  giving  birth  to  forty  out  of  the 
seventy-four  native  Americans,  or  fifty-four  per  cent.  New 
York  alone  had  twenty-four  to  her  credit,  contributing 
thirty-two  per  cent  of  the  native-bom  Americans  and 
twenty-four  per  cent  of  all.  It  is  not  too  much  praise  to 
call  the  Empire  State  the  '*  Mother  of  Woodbury  County 
Pioneers ' '. 

We  have  also  seen  that  our  hundred  pioneers  moved  into 
Iowa  from  eighteen  different  States,  together  with  one  com- 
ing from  Canada.  More  than  half  came  from  the  north 
central  States,  with  the  middle  Atlantic  States  and  New 
England  coming  next  in  order.  Among  the  States,  Illinois 
led  with  the  large  total  of  twenty-six  to  her  credit.  New 
York  came  second  with  fifteen,  while  Ohio  and  Wisconsin 
sent  eight  each. 

The  foregoing  analysis  has  brought  out  the  radical  dif- 
ference between  the  pioneers  bom  in  a  State  and  those  sent 
to  Iowa  —  a  difference,  not  only  in  numbers  but  also  in 
composition.  The  complexity  of  the  matter  of  the  routes 
taken  has  also  been  revealed.  Out  of  seventy-two  native 
born,  thirty-three  came  to  Iowa  directly  from  the  States  of 
their  birth,  thirty-nine  indirectly  by  way  of  other  States. 
Those  coming  from  the  various  States  were  found  to  be 
made  up  of  three  clafeses:  namely,  native  bom,  those  re- 
ceived from  other  States,  and  those  received  from  foreign 


SETTLEMENT  OP  WOODBURY  COUNTY  383 

nations.  The  foreign  bom  came  chiefly  by  way  of  the  north 
central  States.  Among  the  States  they  preferred  Illinois, 
New  York,  and  Ohio  in  order. 

As  to  the  general  route  followed,  an  attempt  was  made  to 
divide  it  into  two  parts :  first,  converging  upon  certain  sec- 
tions and  States ;  and  second,  leading  from  those  places  to 
Iowa.  Later  it  was  seen  that  a  thirji  part  of  the  general 
route  was  to  be  found  within  the  State  of  Iowa.  The  main- 
traveled  routes  were  pictured  as  running  from  Europe  to 
the  north  central  and  middle  Atlantic  States ;  from  the  lat- 
ter section  and  New  England  to  the  north  central  States; 
and  from  all  three  sections,  but  especially  from  the  north 
central  section,  to  Iowa.  Within  the  State  the  chief  routes 
were  from  Dubuque  and  Pottawattamie  counties  to  Wood- 
bury. 

Among  other  results  it  was  found  that  four  pioneers 
entered  the  State  from  States  west  of  Iowa;  seven  from 
southern  States ;  and  forty-two  from  States  bordering  upon 
this  one.  The  number  coming  from  Missouri  was  surpris- 
ingly small.  Thirty-four  stopped  in  other  coimties  of  the 
State  before  moving  to  Woodbury.  In  general  the  pioneers 
studied  may  be  said  to  have  done  much  moving  about  be- 
fore they  settled  down  —  much  more,  indeed,  than  facts 
brought  out  in  the  paper  indicate. 

Although  this  study  has  been  based  upon  facts  which  con- 
cern only  one  hundred  individuals,  the  writer  has  no  reason 
to  believe  that  the  results  would  have  been  radically  dif- 
ferent, as  far  as  percentages  are  concerned,  if  figures  had 
been  at  hand  relative  to  a  much  larger  number.  The  one 
important  exception  of  the  French  Canadians  has  already 
been  noted.  We  may  say,  therefore,  that  the  findings  of 
this  paper  relative  to  the  nativity  of  the  pioneers  of  Wood- 
bury County,  Iowa,  and  to  the  routes  traveled  by  them  in 
coming  to  the  county  are  reasonably  accurate.     What  is 


384    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

true  of  Woodbury  County  would,  probably,  be  true  also  of 
northwestern  Iowa.  The  same  claim  could  not  be  made  for 
the  eastern  and  southeastern  parts  of  the  State  which  are 
much  older  sections  and  — to  mention  only  one  point  — 
received  large  numbers  of  settlers  from  Kentucky,  Vir- 
ginia, and  other  southern  States. 

It  may  be  said  in  closing  that  John  Fiske's  dictum,  re- 
ferred to  at  the  beginning  of  this  paper,  namely,  that  ^  ^  The 
westward  movement  of  population  in  the  United  States  has 
for  the  most  part  followed  the  parallels  of  latitude",  has 
been  found  to  be  remarkably  true  when  applied  to  the  set- 
tlement of  Woodbury  County,  Iowa. 

Frank  Habmon  Gabvbb 
MoBNiNasmE  College 

Sioux  Crrr  Iowa 


THE  TERRITORIAL  CONVENTION  OP  1837 

The  Territorial  Convention  which  was  held  at  Burlington 
on  November  6,  7,  8, 1837,  was  perhaps  the  most  important 
convention  held  in  the  Iowa  country  prior  to  the  establish- 
ment of  the  Territory  in  July,  1838.  Three  subjects  of 
vital  concern  were  acted  upon:  (1)  the  Missouri  boundary 
line;  (2)  preemption  laws;  and  (3)  the  division  of  the 
Territory.  Documentary  materials  relative  to  this  conven- 
tion are  given  below.  They  include  (1)  Proceedings  of  a 
Public  Meeting  of  the  Citizens  of  Des  Moines  County  held 
on  September  16,  1837;  (2)  Proceedings  of  a  Public  Meet- 
ing of  the  Citizens  of  Dubuque  County  held  on  October  13, 
1837;  (3)  Proceedings  of  a  Public  Meeting  of  the  Citizens 
of  Louisa  County  held  on  October  21,  1837;  (4)  Proceed- 
ings of  a  Public  Meeting  of  the  Citizens  of  Henry  County 
held  on  October  23,  1837;  (5)  Proceedings  of  the  Terri- 
torial Convention  held  at  Burlington  on  November  6,  7,  8, 
1837;  (6)  Memorial  on  the  Subject  of  the  Missouri  Boun- 
dary Line;  (7)  Memorial  on  the  subject  of  Preemptions; 
and  (8)  Memorial  Praying  for  a  Division  of  the  Territory. 


PROCEEJ)INGS  OP  A  PUBLIC  MEETING  OP  THE  CITIZENS  OP  DES 
MOINES  COUNTY  HELD  ON  SEPTEMBER  16,  1837 

[The  people  of  Dee  Moinee  County  took  the  initiatiye  in  oaUing  the  Terri- 
torial Convention  of  1837.  The  following  account  of  the  meeting  held  at 
Burlington  is  reprinted  literally  from  the  Iowa  News  (Dubuque),  Vol.  I,  No. 
18,  September  30,  1837. —  Editoe.] 

At  a  large  and  respectable  meeting  of  the  people  of  Des 
Moines  county,  held  in  this  town  on  Saturday,  the  16th  inst., 
in  pursuance  of  previous  public  notice,  the  Hon.  Isaac  Lep- 

385 


386    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

FLEB,  was  called  to  the  Chair,  and  C.  S.  Jacobs,  Esq.,  ap- 
pointed Secretary. 

The  chair  having  briefly  and  appropriately  stated  the  ob- 
jects of  the  meeting,  it  was  moved  by  David  Eorer,  Esq., 
and  seconded  by  Col.  W.  W.  Chapman,  that  a  committee  of 
five  be  appointed  to  draft  resolutions  expressive  of  the 
sense  of  the  meeting.  Whereupon,  the  Chair  appointed 
David  Eorer,  Esq.,  Col.  W.  W.  Chapman,  Judge  William 
Morgan,  Col.  Arthur  Ingram  and  Dr.  George  W.  Teas,  said 
committee,  who  having  retired  for  a  short  time,  returned 
and  presented  the  following  resolutions,  which,  after  due 
deliberation,  were  unanimously  adopted. 

1st.  Resolved,  That  while  we  have  the  utmost  confidence 
in  the  abiUty,  integrity  and  patriotism  of  those  who  control 
the  destinies  of  our  present  Territorial  Government,  and  of 
our  delegate  in  the  Congress  of  the  U.  States,  we  do,  never- 
theless, look  to  a  division  of  the  Territory,  and  the  organ- 
ization of  a  separate  Territorial  Government,  by  Congress, 
west  of  the  Mississippi  river,  as  the  only  means  of  imme- 
diately and  fully  securing  to  the  citizens  thereof,  the  bene- 
fits and  immunities  of  a  government  of  laws. 

2d,  Resolved,  That  we  view  with  extreme  solicitude  and 
regret,  the  efforts  of  a  portion  of  the  people  of  Missouri  to 
obtain  an  extension  of  their  northern  boundary  line,  and 
deem  it  the  duty  of  ourselves  and  all  our  fellow-citizens 
west  of  the  river,  to  take  prompt  measures  to  prevent  the 
same,  as  an  infringement  upon  our  Territorial  rights. 

3d.  Resolved,  That  as  settlers  on  the  public  lands  of  the 
United  States,  we  are  entitled  to  the  protection  of  the  Gov- 
ernment in  our  homes,  and  the  improvements  made  by,  or 
paid  for  by  us ;  and  that  [it]  is  a  duty  we  owe  to  ourselves 
and  our  fellow-citizens,  to  call  the  attention  of  Congress  to 
that  subject  by  a  fair  and  full  presentation  of  our  claims. 

4th.    Resolved,  That  we  respectfully  and  earnestly  rec- 


TERRITORIAL  CONVENTION  OP  1837  387 

ommend  to  the  people  of  the  Territory  west  of  the  Missis^ 
sippi  river,  immediately  to  hold  county  meetings  in  their 
respective  counties,  and  appoint  three  delegates  from  each 
county,  to  meet  in  Convention  at  this  place,  on  the  first 
Monday  in  November  next,  to  take  into  consideration  the 
subjects  embraced  in  the  foregoing  resolutions,  and  the  best 
means  of  securing  the  speedy  action  of  Congress  thereupon. 

5th.  Resolved,  That  as  the  county  of  Du  Buque  is  large 
and  ought  and  should,  in  the  opinion  of  the  citizens  thereof, 
be  divided,  it  be  entitled  to  a  double  representation,  or  six 
members,  in  said  Convention,  if  they  deem  it  expedient  or 
necessary  to  appoint  so  many. 

6th.  Resolved,  That  we  deem  it  our  duty  to  call  the  at- 
tention of  the  Executive  of  the  Territory  to  the  encroach- 
ments of  the  State  of  Missouri  upon  our  Territory,  and  that 
he  be  hereby  requested  to  use  all  means  within  his  control 
to  maintain  the  sacrcdness  of  our  boundary  and  laws. 

7th.  Resolved,  That  the  repeated  and  constant  failures 
of  the  mails  in  the  western  portion  of  this  Territory,  and 
the  habitual  neglect  and  gross  delinquencies  of  some  of  the 
contractors  for  the  conveyance  thereof,  is  such  as  in  a  great 
measure  to  deprive  the  people  of  the  benefits  of  the  public 
mail ;  and  that  the  Postmaster  General  is  hereby  and  most 
earnestly  requested  to  correct  such  abuses,  if  practicable, 
at  the  earliest  possible  period. 

8th.  Resolved,  That  we  have  selected  the  town  of  Bur- 
lington as  the  place  of  meeting  of  the  proposed  Convention, 
by  reason  of  its  being  the  temporary  seat  of  Government, 
and  as  the  place  of  the  meeting  of  the  Legislature  about 
that  time. 

9th.  Resolved,  That  the  people  of  Des  Moines  county  be, 
and  are  hereby  requested  to  meet  on  the  second  Saturday, 


388    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

the  12th  of  October  next,  in  this  town,  at  10  o  'clock,  A.  M., 
for  the  purpose  of  selecting  three  delegates  to  the  afore- 
said Convention. 

Charles  Mason,  Esq.,  hereupon  made  an  appropriate  ad- 
dress to  the  meeting  upon  the  subject  of  the  7th  resolution. 
—  The  total  inadequacy  of  the  present  mail  arrangement, 
and  the  shameful  neglect  and  delinquencies  of  some  of  the 
mail  contractors  and  post  masters  —  and  concluded  by  mov- 
ing that  a  committee  of be  appointed  to  draft  a  petition 

to  the  Post  Master  General,  stating  the  facts  in  the  case,  and 
soliciting  his  immediate  attention  to  a  correction  of  the 
evils  complained  of,  whereupon  the  chair  appointed  upon 
said  conmdttee,  Charles  Mason  and  C.  S.  Jacobs,  Esquires, 
of  Burlington,  Mr.  Mason  Wilson,  of  Augusta,  Mr.  Jona- 
than Morgan,  of  Flint,  Mr.  William  Stewart,  of  Marshall, 
Mr.  John  Lorton,  of  Casey  Prairie,  and  Mr.  James  G.  Guf- 
fey,  of  Taney  Town. 

Judge  Morgan  then  moved  that  this  committee  be  di- 
rected to  furnish  each  Post-Master  in  the  county  of  Des 
Moines  (old  Des  Moines)  with  a  copy  of  the  Petition  when 
prepared  for  circulation  and  signature. 

C.  S.  Jacobs,  Esq.,  addressed  the  meeting  upon  the  sub- 
ject of  the  mails  for  some  time,  and  observed  that  he  appre- 
hended the  resolution  in  regard  thereto,  just  passed,  though 
very  good  in  itself,  did  not  go  far  enough,  and  cover  as 
much  ground  as  the  importance  of  the  subject  seemed  to 
require,  and  he  would,  therefore,  offer  a  short  preamble 
and  resolutions  in  addition,  which  were  unanimously 
adopted. — 

Whereas,  The  present  arrangement  of  the  mails  for 
this  portion  of  the  Territory  of  Wisconsin,  is  not  such  as 
the  population,  business  character,  enterprise  and  intelli- 
gence of  the  people  require  or  deserve  —  Therefore,  be  it 


TERRITORIAL  CONVENTION  OP  1837  389 

Resolved,  That  a  committee  be  appointed,  to  consist  of 
seven  persons,  whose  duty  it  shall  be  to  draft  a  petition  to 
the  Post  Master  General,  stating  fully  the  facts  of  the  case, 
and  requesting  him  to  take  such  steps  as  may  be  deemed 
necessary  in  the  premises. 

(This  committee  was  appointed  under  the  resolution  of 
Mr.  Mason,  for  which  this  was  substituted.) 

Resolved,  That  it  is  the  decided  opinion  of  this  meeting, 
that  there  should  be  a  tri- weekly  eastern  mail  to  this  town. 

Resolved,  That  it  be  strongly  recommended  to  the  Post 
Master  General  to  establish  as  early  as  may  be  practicable, 
a  tri- weekly,  or  semi-weekly  mail  to  this  place,  to  intersect 
the  eastern  mail  at  Peoria,  111. 

Resolved,  That  it  be  recommended  to  the  Post  Master 
General,  to  take  the  earliest  and  most  efficient  steps  to  cor- 
rect the  abuses  now  existing  in  the  present  mail  arrange- 
ment —  to  investigate  the  conduct  and  official  character  of 
the  mail  contractors  in  this  portion  of  the  Territory  —  and 
also,  the  manner  in  which  the  Post-masters  execute  their 
duties. 

Resolved,  That  our  delegate  in  Congress  be  requested  to 
use  his  utmost  influence  and  exertion,  to  induce  the  Post 
Master  General  to  have  the  several  subjects  of  these  reso- 
lutions carried  into  early  and  full  effect. 

On  motion  of  Jas.  W.  Woods,  Esq.,  it  was 

Resolved,  That  the  foregoing  proceedings  be  published  in 
the  Wisconsin  Territorial  Gazette,  and  such  other  papers  in 
the  Territory  as  feel  an  interest  in  the  subject  matter  of 
them. 

On  motion  of  Judge  Morgan,  the  meeting  adjourned. 

Isaac  LsFFiiEB,  Ch'n. 

C.  S.  Jacobs,  Sec'y. 


390    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

PBOCEEDINOS  OF  A  PUBLIC  MEETING  OF  THE  CITIZENS  OF  DUBUQUE 

COUNTY  HELD  ON  OCTOBEB    13,  1837 

[The  following  account  is  reprinted  literally  from  the  Iowa  News  (Da- 
buque),  Vol.  I,  No.  20,  October  14,  1837. —  Editor.] 

At  a  general  public  meeting  of  the  citizens  of  Du  Buque 
and  vicinity,  convened  at  the  Court  House  on  Friday  13th 
inst.,  pursuant  to  previous  notice, 

Wabneb  Lewis,  Esq.  was  called  to  the  Chair,  and  John 
Plumbe,  Jr.  appointed  Secretary. 

Whereupon  the  following  preamble  and  resolutions  were 
adopted. 

Whereas,  a  number  of  our  fellow-citizens  assembled  at 
Burlington  on  the  16th  day  of  September  last,  recommend- 
ed, amongst  other  things,  that  a  convention  of  delegates, 
representing  the  people  of  Wisconsin  residing  in  that  por- 
tion of  the  Territory  lying  west  of  the  Mississippi  river, 
should  be  held  at  Burlington  on  the  first  Monday  of  No- 
vember next  for  the  purpose  of  consulting  upon  the  pro- 
priety of  petitioning  Congress  to  organize  us  into  a  separate 
Territory.  And  whereas,  the  people  of  Du  Buque  county 
do  approve  of  said  recommendation,  and  do  cordiaUy  unite 
with  their  fellow-citizens  of  Burlington  in  desiring  a  full 
and  fair  expression  of  public  opinion  and  promoting  con- 
cert of  action  upon  this  important  subject,  therefore 

Resolved,  That  there  be  twenty-one  delegates  to  repre- 
sent the  county  of  Du  Buque  in  said  convention,  and  in  case 
of  the  death,  resignation,  refusal  to  serve,  or  absence  of  one 
or  more  of  said  delegates,  that  the  vacancy  so  created  shall 
be  filled  by  such  person  or  persons  as  a  majority  of  the 
delegates  attending  may  select  and  appoint. 

Resolved,  That  J.  T.  Fales,  W.  W.  Coriell,  S.  Hempstead, 
John  Plumbe,  Jun.,  L.  H.  Langworthy,  L.  Jackson,  F.  Ge- 
hon,  T.  S.  Wilson,  W.  Hutton,  and  J.  M.  Harrison,  be  dele- 
gates  to   said   Convention,   to   represent   the   Town   and 


TERRITORIAL  CONVENTION  OP  1837  391 

vicinity  of  Dnbuque,  and  that  we  recommend  to  the  inhab- 
itants of  the  different  settlements  in  this  county  to  meet 
together  for  the  purpose  of  choosing  delegates  of  their  own. 

Resolved,  That  in  the  opinion  of  this  meeting,  the  im- 
portance of  our  Territory  on  the  score  of  population,  com- 
mercial enterprise,  and  of  immense  agricultural  and  min- 
eral resources,  demand  that  we  should  be  organized  at  once 
as  a  separate  Territory. 

Resolved,  That  we  have  full  and  unabated  confidence  in 
our  worthy  and  highly  esteemed  Executive,  Henry  Dodge, 
believing  as  we  do,  that  his  administration  of  our  Terri- 
torial Government  has  been  conducted  with  sagacity,  pru- 
dence and  great  honesty  of  purpose. 

Resolved,  That  we  have  undiminished  confidence  in  our 
Delegate  to  Congress,  Geo.  W.  Jones,  and  that  he  deserves 
the  thanks  of  the  community  for  the  zeal,  ability  and 
promptitude  which  he  has  evinced  in  the  discharge  of  the 
trust  which  has  been  reposed  in  him. 

Resolved,  That  the  proceedings  of  this  meeting  be  pub- 
lished in  the  papers  of  the  Territory. 

Wabkeb  Lewis,  Chairman. 

John  Plumb,  Jr.  Sec^y. 


PROCEEDINGS  OF  A  PUBLIC  MEETING  OF  THE  CITIZENS  OF  LOUISA 

COUNTY  HELD  ON  OCTOBE»B  21,  1837 

[The  following  account  is  reprinted  literally  from  the  Wisconsin  Territoriai 
Gazette  and  Burlington  Advertieer  (Burlington) ,  Vol.  I,  No.  17,  November  2, 
1837.—  Editor.] 

At  a  large  and  respectable  meeting  of  the  people  of 
Louisa  county,  held  in  the  town  of  Wapello,  on  Saturday 
the  21st  inst.  in  pursuance  of  previous  notice,  William  Milli- 
gan,  Esq.  was  called  to  the  chair,  and  Z.  C.  Inghram  ap- 
pointed Secretary. 

The  object  of  the  meeting  was  briefly  and  appropriately 


392    IOWA  JOUBNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

stated  by  James  M.  Clark,  Esq.  It  was  moved  by  Daniel 
Brewer,  and  seconded  by  J.  M.  Clark,  that  a  committee  of 
five  be  appointed  to  draft  resolutions  expressive  of  the 
sense  of  the  meeting:  whereupon  the  Chair  appointed 
Daniel  Brewer,  John  H.  Benson,  B.  S.  Searls,  Isaac  H. 
Binearson,  Esq.  and  William  H.  B.  Thomas  said  committee, 
who,  after  having  retired  for  a  short  time,  returned  and 
presented  the  following  resolutions,  which,  after  due  delib- 
eration, were  unanimously  adopted. 

1.  Resolved,  That  we  highly  approve  of  the  objects  and 
motives  of  the  Territorial  Convention,  to  be  holden  in 
Burlington;  and  that  so  far  as  lies  in  our  power  we  will 
heartily  co-operate  with  our  brethren  in  the  adjoining  coun- 
ties,  in  carrying  those  motives  into  effect. 

2.  Resolved,  That  we  deem  it  highly  essential  to  the 
interest  and  convenience  of  our  Territory  that  a  division 
of  the  same  take  place,  and  that,  in  our  opinion,  the  Missis- 
sippi suggests  a  very  natural  and  proper  Une  of  separation. 

3.  Resolved,  That  the  deficiency  of  post  offices,  the  in- 
equality of  mails,  and  the  apparent  gross  delinquencies  of 
mail  contractors  in  this  western  part  of  our  Territory,  are 
evils,  which  call  loudly  for  .redress,  and  that  we  would  sug- 
gest to  the  Territorial  Convention  the  propriety  of  using 
their  influence  and  exertions  to  have  these  abuses  ferreted 
out  and  corrected. 

4.  Resolved,  That  we  look  upon  the  attempts  of  a  por- 
tion of  Missouri  to  encroach  upon  our  Territory,  as  highly 
unjust  and  aggressive,  and  that  however  much  we  may  re- 
gret that  any  difficulties  should  arise  between  us,  we  are 
determined  to  resist  her  encroachments  by  every  just  and 
honorable  means. 

5.  Resolved,  That,  as  settlers  upon  these  frontiers,  en- 
during the  privations  and  hardships  always  incident  to  the 
settling  of  new  countries,  we  are  justly  entitled  to  be  se- 


TERRITORIAL  CONVENTION  OP  1837  393 

cnred  in  the  possession  of  our  homes  and  improvements  by 
the  passage  of  a  pre-emption  law  in  onr  behalf. 

6.  Resolved,  That  we  would  suggest  to  our  own  dele- 
gates, and  the  convention  at  large,  the  propriety  of  calling 
the  attention  of  Congress  to  this  subject  by  memorial  or 
otherwise. 

7.  Resolved,  That  we  deem  this  a  fitting  occasion  to  ex- 
press our  entire  satisfaction  with  the  present  boundaries 
of  our  county,  and  look  upon  those  who  are  endeavoring  to 
effect  a  division  of  the  same  as  acting  contrary  to  the  best 
interest  of  the  county  at  large. 

The  committee  reported  the  following  list  of  delegates, 
viz :  William  L.  Toole,  James  M.  Clark,  Esq.,  and  John  J. 
Binearson,  who  were  chosen  by  the  meeting. 

8.  Resolved,  That  the  proceedings  of  this  meeting  be 
published  in  the  Burlington  Gazette. 


William  Milligak,  Ch'n. 
Z.  C.  Inghram,  Sec'y. 

PROCEEDINGS  OF  A  PUBLIC  MEETING  OF  THE  CITIZENS  OF  HENBY 

COUNTY  HELD  ON  OCTOBER   23,  1837 

[The  following  account  is  reprinted  literally  from  tfae  Wiscofmn  Territorial 
GcLsette  and  Burlington  Advertiser  (Burlington),  VoL  I,  No.  17,  November  2, 
1837. —  Editor.] 

A  meeting  of  the  citizens  of  Henry  county  was  held  at 
Mount  Pleasant  on  the  23rd  inst.  Mr.  John  H.  Bandolph 
was  called  to  the  chair,  and  Dr.  J.  D.  Payne  appointed 
Secretary. 

W.  L.  Jenkins,  Esq.  explained  the  object  of  the  meeting, 
and  the  proceedings  of  the  late  Burlington  meeting  were 
read  and  approved  of.  A  motion  was  then  made,  that  the 
meeting  ballot  for  three  delegates  to  the  proposed  conven- 
tion, to  represent  Henry  county;  whereupon,  tellers  being 
appointed,  it  appeared  that  Messrs.  W.  H.  Wallaob,  J.  M. 
Mters,  and  M.  L.  B.  Hughes  were  duly  elected. 


394    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Resolved,  That  the  proceedings  of  this  meeting  be  pub- 
lished in  the  Wisconsin  Territorial  Gazette. 

John  H.  Randolph,  Preset. 
J.  D.  Payne,  Sec'y. 


PBOCEEDINGS  OF  THE  TEBBITOBIAL  CONVENTION  HEIiD  AT 
BURLINGTON  ON  NOVEMBEB  6,  7,  8,  1837 

[The  proceedings  along  with  the  memorials  adopted  by  the  Convention  were 
printed  in  pamphlet  form  and  thus  transmitted  to  Congress.  A  oopj  of  this 
pamphlet  was  discovered  by  the  writer  in  the  office  of  the  Clerk  of  the  House 
of  Representatives  at  Washington.  The  text  of  the  printed  pamphlet  does  not 
differ  from  what  appeared  in  the  Iowa  News,  The  following  account  is  re- 
printed literally  from  the  Iowa  News  (Dubuque),  Vol.  I,  No.  23,  November  25, 
1837.—  Editor.] 

The  Convention  of  Delegates,  from  that  portion  of  the 
Wisconsin  Territory  west  of  the  Mississippi,  met  at  the 
capitol,  in  the  town  of  Burlington,  on  Monday,  Nov.  6, 1837. 

The  Convention  was  called  to  order  by  C.  S.  Jacobs,  Esq. 
of  Des  Moines  co.,  and  on  motion  of  Mr.  Warren,  of  Du 
Bnque,  Mr.  Jacobs  was  elected  Chairman,  pro  tern,  of  the 
Convention  for  the  purposes  of  organization;  and  on  motion 
of  Mr.  Russell,  of  Du  Buque,  J.  W.  Pabker,  Esq.  of  Du 
Buque  was  elected  Secretary  pro  tem. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Davis  of  Musquitine,  the  counties  were 
called  over  to  ascertain  the  names  of  the  Delegates  from 
each.  The  following  gentlemen  answered  to  their  names, 
exhibited  their  credentials,  and  took  their  seats  in  Con- 
vention. 

From  the  county  of  Du  Buque. —  P.  H.  Engle,  J.  T.  Fales, 
G.  W.  Harris,  W.  A.  Warren,  W.  B.  Watts,  A.  F.  Russell, 
W.  H.  Patton,  J.  W.  Parker,  J.  D.  Bell,  J.  H.  Rose. 

From  Des  Moines  county. —  David  Rorer,  Robert  Rals- 
ton, Cyrus  S.  Jacobs. 

Van  Buren  county. —  Van  Caldwell,  J.  G.  Kenner,  James 
Hall. 


TERRITORIAL  CONVENTION  OP  1837  395 

Henry  county. —  W.  H.  Wallace,  J.  D.  Payne,  J.  L.  Myers. 

Musqnitine  comity. —  J.  B.  Struthers,  M.  Couch,  Eli  Rey- 
nolds, S.  C.  Hastings,  James  Davis,  S.  Jenner,  A.  Smith, 
E.  K.  Fay. 

Louisa  county. —  J.  M.  Clark,  W.  L.  Toole,  S.  J.  Binear- 
son. 

Lee  county. —  Henry  Eno,  John  Claypool,  Hawkins 
Taylor. 

Ordered,  That  the  Convention  elect  its  officers  by  ballot. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Davis,  a  majority  of  all  the  votes  pres- 
ent was  made  necessary  to  the  election  of  officers. 

Mr.  C.  S.  Jacobs  was  elected  President  of  the  Convention 
upon  the  first  ballot  and  Messrs.  J.  M.  Clark  and  W.  H. 
Wallace,  Vice  Presidents ;  and  Messrs.  J.  W.  Parkeb  and 
J.  E.  Struthers,  Secretaries. 

The  Convention  then  adjourned  till  to-morrow,  at  3 
o'clock,  P.  M. 


Friday,  Nov.  7 — The  convention  assembled  at  3  o'clock 
pursuant  to  adjournment,  and  was  called  to  order  by  the 
President. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Warren, 

Resolved,  That  the  Governor,  members  of  the  Legislative 
Council,  Judges,  and  members  of  the  bar  of  Buriington,  be 
invited  to  take  seats  within  the  bar. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Eno, 

Resolved,  That  a  committee  of  seven  be  appointed  by  the 
President,  to  draft  a  memorial  to  Congress  on  the  subject 
of  the  attempt  making  by  the  state  of  Missouri  to  extend 
lier  northern  boimdary  line. 

Messrs.  Eno,  Claypool,  Kenner,  Ralston,  Davis,  Watts, 
and  Toole  were  appointed  said  committee. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Kenner, 

Resolved,  That  a  committee  of  six  be  appointed  by  the 


396    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

President  to  prepare  a  memorial  to  the  Congress  of  the  U. 
States,  praying  for  the  passage  of  an  act,  granting  the  right 
of  pre-emption  to  actnal  settlers  on  government  lands,  and 
that  said  committee  report  the  same  to  this  convention  at 
some  period  before  its  adjournment. 

Messrs.  Engle,  Kenner,  Payne,  Stmthers,  Patton,  Borer, 
and  Smith  were  appointed  said  committee. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Borer, 

Besolved,  That  a  committee  of  seven  be  appointed  by  the 
President,  to  draft  a  memorial  to  the  Congress  of  the 
United  States  in  relation  to  the  organization  of  a  separate 
territorial  Government  in  that  part  of  the  Territory  of  Wis- 
consin west  of  the  Mississippi  river, 

Messrs.  Borer,  Hastings,  Caldwell,  Myers,  Glaypool, 
Binearson,  and  Harris  were  selected  to  compose  said  com- 
mittee. 

On  motion,  the  Convention  adjourned  until  to-morrow, 
at  2  o'clock  P.M. 


Wednesday,  Nov.  8. 

The  Convention  met  [pursuant]  to  adjournment  and  was 
called  to  order  by  the  President. 

The  committees  appointed  yesterday  to  draft  memorials, 
being  prepared  to  report,  Mr.  Engle,  chairman  of  the  com- 
mittee appointed  to  draft  a  memorial  in  relation  to  pre- 
emptions, reported  a  memorial,  which,  on  motion,  was 
unanimously  adopted. 

Mr.  Eno,  chairman  of  the  committee  to  draft  a  memorial 
upon  the  subject  of  the  northern  boundary  line  of  Missouri, 
reported  a  memorial,  which,  on  motion,  was  unanimously 
adopted. 

Mr.  Borer,  chairman  of  the  committee  appointed  to  pre- 
pare a  memorial  relative  to  the  division  of  the  Territory, 


TERRITORIAL  CONVENTION  OP  1837  397 

reported  a  memorial^  which,  on  motion,  was  nnanimonsly 
adopted. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Davis, 

Resolved,  imanimonsly,  that  the  Hon.  G.  W.  Jones,  is  en- 
titied  to  the  thanks  of  the  citizens  of  the  Territory,  for  the 
able  manner  in  which  he  has  discharged  the  various  and 
complicated  duties  imposed  upon  him,  as  our  delegate  in 
Congress. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Davis, 

Resolved,  unanimously.  That  we  entertain  the  highest  of 
respect  for  the  able,  patriotic,  and  distinguished  manner  in 
which  his  excellency,  Governor  Dodge,  has  at  all  times  ad- 
ministered the  affairs  of  the  Territory. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Hastings,  the  following  was  unanimous- 
ly adopted : 

In  order  that  a  full  expression  of  the  sentiment  of  this 
convention  may  be  publicly  made  known,  upon  the  subject 
of  the  extension  of  the  northern  line  of  the  state  of  Mis- 
souri, therefore. 

Be  it  resolved.  That  we  most  cordially  approve  of  that 
part  of  the  message  of  the  Executive  of  this  Territory, 
which  relates  to  the  said  northern  boundary,  communicated 
to  the  Legislative  Assembly  at  their  present  session,  and 
with  him  believe  that  Missouri  has  made  an  encroachment 
upon  our  Territorial  rights  in  extending  her  northern 
boundary  lines,  north  from  where  it  was  formerly  located. 

On  motion. 

Resolved,  That  the  Legislative  Council  and  House  of 
Representatives  be  requested  to  co-operate  with  the  Con- 
vention, in  memorializing  Congress  on  all  the  subjects  acted 
upon  by  this  Convention. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Davis, 

Resolved,  nem.  con.,  That  the  members  of  the  Convention 
jtender  their  thanks  to  the  members  of  the  House  of  Repre- 

voL.  IX— 27 


398    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

sentativeSy  for  their  liberality  in  tendering  the  use  of 
Hall  for  our  deliberations. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Warren, 

Resolved,  unanimously,  That  the  President  of  the  Con- 
vention be  requested  to  forward  the  proceedings  of  this 
Convention,  with  the  memorials,  to  our  delegate  in  Con- 
gress, Hon.  G.  W.  Jones. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Fales, 

Resolved,  unanimously.  That  a  vote  of  thanks  be  tendered 
to  the  officers  of  this  Convention,  for  the  able  and  impartial 
manner  in  which  they  have  discharged  the  duties  that  de- 
volved upon  them. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Hastings, 

Resolved,  That  the  memorials  be  signed  by  the  officers 
and  members  of  the  Convention. 

On  motion  of  Mr.  Davis, 

Resolved,  That  all  editors  in  the  Territory  be  reqnested 
to  publish  the  proceedings  of  this  Convention. 

On  motion, 

Resolved,  That  a  committee  of  three  be  appointed  to 
superintend  the  printing  of  the  proceeding  of  this  Conven- 
tion. 

Messrs.  Ralston,  Davis,  and  Engle  were  appointed  said 
committee. 

The  President,  in  a  short,  impressive  manner,  returned 
thanks  to  the  Convention,  in  behalf  of  himself  and  associate 
officers,  for  the  honor  conferred  upon  them. 

The  Convention  adjourned,  sine  die. 

Cyrus  S.  Jacobs,  President. 
J.M^CnABK,         I  Vice PresidentB. 

W.  H.   WAUiACE, 


I  Vi 

1.   3 


J.  W.  Pabkeb,       I  Secretaries. 
J.  R.  Stbuthbbs,  f 


TERRITORIAL  CONVENTION  OP  1837  399 

lOSMOBIAIi  ON   THE  SUBJECT  OF  TH^  MISSOUBI  BOUNDABT  LINE 

[The  following  memorial  which  was  adopted  by  the  Territorial  Convention 
18  reprinted  literally  from  the  Iowa  New$  (Dnbnqne),  VoL  I,  No.  23,  November 
25,  1837.—  Editob.] 

To  the  Honorable  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives 
of  the  United  States,  in  Congress  assembled: 

The  Memorial  of  a  Convention  of  Delegates,  from  the  sev- 
eral counties  in  the  Territory  of  Wisconsin,  west  of  the 
Mississippi  river,  convened  at  Burlington,  in  said  Ter- 
ritory, Nov.  6, 1837, 

RESPECTFULLY  BEPBESENTS  I 

That  your  memorialists  are  desirous  of  asking  the  atten- 
tion of  Congress  to  the  adjustment  of  the  boundary  line 
between  the  State  of  Missouri  and  the  territory  of  Western 
Wisconsin.  Much  excitement  already  prevails  among  the 
inhabitants  situated  in  the  border  counties  of  the  State  and 
Territory,  and  it  is  much  to  be  feared,  that,  unless  the 
speedy  action  of  Congress  should  be  had  upon  the  subject, 
difficulties  of  a  serious  nature  will  arise,  militating  against 
the  peace  and  harmony  which  would  otherwise  exist  among 
them.  At  the  last  session  of  the  Legislature  of  Missouri, 
Commissioners  were  appointed  to  run  the  northern  boun- 
dary line  of  the  State.  They  have  recently  been  engaged 
in  the  work,  and  according  to  the  line  run  by  them,  there  is 
included  within  the  limits  of  the  State  of  Missouri,  a  con- 
siderable tract  of  country,  hitherto  supposed  to  belong  to 
the  Territory  of  Wisconsin,  and  which  is  still  believed  of 
right  to  belong  to  it.  The  northern  boundary  line  of  Mis- 
souri was  run  several  years  ago  by  conmdssioners  appoint- 
ed by  the  State  of  Missouri,  and  will  cross  the  Des  Moines 
river  at  a  point  about  twenty-four  miles  from  its  mouth. — 
This  line,  if  continued  on  due  east,  would  strike  the  Missis- 
sippi river  near  the  town  of  Fort  Madison,  about  ten  miles 
above  the  rapids  in  said  river,  long  since  known  as  the  Des 


400    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

Moines  rapids ;  and  this  line,  so  run  by  the  commissioners, 
has  always  been  considered  as  the  boundary  line  between 
the  State  and  Territory.  The  present  commissioners,  ap- 
pointed by  the  State  of  Missonri,  giving  a  different  con- 
struction to  the  act  defining  the  boundary  line  of  the  State, 
passed  up  the  Des  Moines  river  in  search  of  rapids,  and 
have  seen  proi)er  to  find  them  some  twelve  or  fourteen 
miles  further  up  the  river  than  the  other  commissioners  of 
Missouri  formerly  did,  and,  selecting  a  point  which  they 
call  the  rapids  in  the  Des  Moines  river,  have  from  thence 
marked  out  a  line  which  is  now  claimed  as  the  northern 
boundary  line  of  the  State.  Were  this  line  extended  due 
east,  it  would  strike  the  Mississippi  river  at  the  town  of 
Burlington,  some  thirty  miles  above  the  rapids,  as  stated 
above,  as  the  Des  Moines  rapids. 

Missouri  was  constituted  an  independent  State,  and  her 
boundary  lines  defined,  in  June  1820.  At  that  time,  the 
country  bordering  on  the  Des  Moines  river  was  a  wilder- 
ness, and  little  was  known,  except  from  the  Indians  who 
lived  on  its  banks,  of  its  geographical  situation.  There  was 
at  that  time  no  point  on  the  river  known  as  the  Des  Moines 
rapids,  and  at  the  present  time,  between  the  mouth  of  the 
river  and  the  Raccoon  forks,  a  distance  of  two  hundred 
miles,  fifty  places  can  with  as  much  propriety  be  designated 
as  the  one  selected  by  the  commissioners  of  the  State  of 
Missouri. 

Your  memorialists  conceive  that  no  action  of  the  State  of 
Missouri  can,  or  ought  to  affect  the  integrity  of  the  Terri- 
tory of  Wisconsin;  and  standing  in  the  attitude  they  do, 
they  must  look  to  the  General  Government  to  protect  their 
rights  and  redress  their  wrongs.  The  difficulties,  which,  for 
so  long  a  period  of  time,  existed  between  the  Territory  of 
Michigan  and  State  of  Ohio  relative  to  their  boundaries, 
will,  it  is  hoped,  prompt  the  speedy  action  of  Congress  on 


TERRITORIAL  CONVENTION  OP  1837  401 

this  exciting  subject.  Confidently  relying  upon  the  wisdom 
of  the  General  Government,  and  its  willingness  to  take  such 
measures  as  will  settle  this  question,  the  people  of  Wiscon- 
sin will  peaceably  submit  to  an  extension  of  the  northern 
boundary  line  of  the  State  of  Missouri,  if  so  be,  that  Con- 
gress shall  ordain  it ;  but  until  such  action,  they  will  resist 
to  the  utmost  extremity  any  attempt  made  by  the  State  of 
Missouri  to  extend  her  jurisdiction  over  any  disputed  Ter- 
ritory. 

We,  therefore,  pray  that  Congress  will  appoint  Commis- 
sioners, whose  duty  it  shall  be  to  run  the  line  between  the 
State  of  Missouri  and  the  Territory  of  Wisconsin  accord- 
ing to  the  spirit  and  intention  of  tiie  act  defining  tiie  boun- 
dary lines  of  the  State  of  Missouri,  and  to  adopt  such  other 
measures  as  in  their  wisdom  they  may  deem  proi)er. 


MEMOBIAL  ON  THE  SUBJECT  OF  PBE-BMFTIOKS 

[The  following  memorial  which  wai  adopted  by  the  Territorial  Convention 
IB  reprinted  literallj  from  the  Iowa  New$  (Dubuque),  VoL  I,  No.  23,  November 
25,  1837.—  Editor.] 

To  the  Honorable  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives, 
of  the  U.  States. 
A  Convention  of  citizens  representing  all  the  counties  in 
that  part  of  Wisconsin  Territory  lying  west  of  the  Missis- 
sippi river,  have  assembled  at  Burlington  the  present  seat 
of  Government  of  said  Territory  for  the  purpose  of  taking 
into  consideration  several  measures  immediately  affecting 
their  interests  and  prosperity.  Among  the  most  important 
of  these  is  the  passage  by  your  honorable  bodies  at  the  ses- 
sion about  to  be  commenced,  of  a  pre-emption  law  by  which 
the  settlers  on  the  public  land  shall  have  secured  to  them  at 
the  minimum  price,  the  lands  upon  which  they  live,  which 
they  have  improved  and  cultivated  without  fear  of  moles- 
tation, or  over-bidding  on  the  part  of  the  rich  capitalist  and 


402    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

speculator.  It  is  a  fact  well  known  to  yonr  honorable 
bodies^  that  none  of  the  land  in  Wisconsin  west  of  the  Mis- 
sissippi River  in  what  is  called  the  ^^lowa  District/^  has 
yet  been  offered  for  sale  by  the  Government.  It  is  equally 
true  that  that  tract  of  country  is  now  inhabited  by  twenty- 
five  thousand  souls  composing  a  population  as  active,  intel- 
ligent, and  worthy  as  can  be  found  in  any  other  part  of  the 
United  States.  The  enterprise  of  these  pioneers  has  con- 
verted what  was  but  yesterday  a  solitary  and  uncultivated 
waste  into  thriving  towns  and  villages,  alive  with  the  en- 
gagement of  trade  and  commerce,  and  rich  and  smiling 
farms,  yielding  their  bountiful  return  to  the  labors  of  the 
husbandman.  This  district  has  been  settled  and  improved 
with  a  rapidity  unexampled  in  the  history  of  the  country, 
emigrants  from  all  parts  of  the  United  States  and  from 
Europe  are  daily  adding  to  our  numbers  and  importance. 
An  attempt  to  force  these  lands  thus  occupied  and  improved 
into  market  to  be  sold  to  the  highest  bidder,  and  to  put  the 
money  thus  extorted  from  the  hard  earnings  of  an  honest 
and  laborious  people  into  the  coffers  of  the  public  treasury, 
would  be  an  act  of  injustice  to  the  settlers  which  would 
scarcely  receive  the  sanction  of  your  honorable  bodies.  In 
most  cases  the  labor  of  years  and  the  accumulated  capital 
of  a  whole  life  has  been  expended  in  making  improvements 
on  the  public  land,  under  the  strong  and  firm  belief  that 
every  safeguard  would  be  thrown  round  them  to  prevent 
their  property,  thus  dearly  earned  by  years  of  suffering, 
privation  and  toil,  from  being  unjustly  wrested  from  their 
hands.  Shall  they  be  disappointed!  Will  Congress  refuse 
to  pass  such  laws  as  may  be  necessary  to  protect  a  large 
class  of  our  citizens  from  systematized  plunder  and  rapine! 
The  members  composing  this  convention,  representing  a 
very  large  class  of  people,  who  delegated  them  to  speak  in 
their  stead,  do  most  confidently  express  an  opinion  that 


TERRITORIAL  CONVENTION  OP  1837  403 

your  honorable  bodies  will  at  its  present  session  pass  some 
law  removing  ns  from  danger,  and  relieving  ns  from  fear 
on  this  subject.  The  members  of  this  convention  for  them- 
selves, and  for  the  people  whose  interests  they  are  sent  here 
to  represent,  do  most  respectfully  solicit  that  your  honor- 
able bodies,  will,  as  speedily  as  possible,  pass  a  pre-emption 
law  giving  to  every  actual  settler  on  the  public  domain 
who  has  made  improvements  sufficient  to  evince  that  it  is 
bona  jfide  his  design  to  cultivate  and  occupy  the  land,  a 
right  to  enter  at  the  minimum  government  price,  one  half 
section  for  that  purpose,  before  it  shall  be  offered  at  public 
sale. 


MEMORIAL  PRATING  A  DIVISION  OF  THE  TERRTTORT 

[Tbe  following  memorial  which  was  adopted  by  the  Territorial  Convention 
is  reprinted  literally  from  the  Iowa  New$  (Dubuque) ,  Vol.  I,  No.  23,  November 
25,  1837.—  Editor.] 

I'o  the  Honorable  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives 
of  the  United  States,  in  Congress  assembled: 

The  Memorial  of  a  general  Convention  of  Delegates,  from 
the  respective  counties  in  the  Territory  of  Wisconsin, 
west  of  the  Mississippi  river,  convened  at  the  capitol 
in  Burlington,  in  said  Territory,  Nov.  5th,  1837, 

RESPECTFULLY  RE^PBBSENTS : 

That  the  citizens  of  that  part  of  the  Territory  west  of  the 
Mississippi  river,  taking  into  consideration  their  remote 
and  isolated  position,  and  the  vast  extent  of  country  in- 
cluded within  the  limits  of  the  present  Territory,  and  the 
utter  impracticability  of  the  same  being  governed  as  an  en- 
tire whole,  by  the  wisest  and  best  administration  of  our 
municipal  affairs,  in  such  manner  as  to  fully  secure  indi- 
vidual right  and  the  right  of  property,  as  well  as  to  main- 
tain domestic  tranquility,  and  the  good  order  of  society, 
have  by  their  respective  representatives,  convened  in  gen- 


404    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

eral  convention  as  aforesaid,  for  the  purpose  of  availing 
themselves  of  their  right  of  petition  as  free  citizens,  by- 
representing  their  situation  and  wishes  to  your  honorable 
body,  and  asking  for  the  organization  of  a  separate  Terri- 
torial Government  over  that  part  of  the  Territory  west  of 
the  Mississippi  river. 

Without,  in  the  least,  designing  to  question  the  official 
conduct  of  those  in  whose  hands  the  fate  of  our  infant  Ter- 
ritory has  been  confided,  and  in  whose  patriotism  and  wis- 
dom we  have  the  utmost  confidence,  your  memorialists  can- 
not refrain  from  the  frank  expression  of  their  belief  that, 
taking  into  the  consideration  the  geographical  extent  of  her 
country,  in  connexion  with  the  probable  population  of  West- 
em  Wisconsin,  perhaps  no  Territory  of  the  United  States 
has  been  so  much  neglected  by  the  parent  government,  so 
illy  protected  in  the  political  and  individual  rights  of  her 
citizens. 

Western  Wisconsin  came  into  the  possession  of  our  gov- 
ernment in  June  1833.  Settlements  were  made,  and  crops 
grown,  during  the  same  season ;  and  even  then,  at  that  early 
day,  was  the  impulse  given  to  the  mighty.throng  of  emigra- 
tion that  has  subsequently  filled  our  lovely  and  desirable 
country  with  people,  intelligence,  wealth,  and  enterprize. 
From  that  period  until  the  present,  being  a  little  over  four 
years,  what  has  been  the  Territory  of  Western  Wisconsin  f 
Literally  and  practically,  a  large  portion  of  the  time  with- 
out a  government.  With  a  population  of  thousands,  she 
has  remained  ungovemed,  and  has  been  quietly  left  by  the 
parent  government  to  take  care  of  herself,  without  the 
privilege  on  the  one  hand  to  provide  a  government  of  her 
own,  and  without  any  existing  authority  on  the  other  to 
govern  her. 

From  June  1833  until  June  1834,  a  period  of  one  year, 
there  was  not  even  the  shadow  of  government  or  law,  in  all 


TERRITORIAL  CONVENTION  OP  1837  405 

Western  Wisconsin.  In  June  1834,  Congress  attached  her 
to  the  then  existing  Territory  of  Michigan,  of  which  Terri- 
tory she  nominally  continued  a  part,  until  July  1836,  a 
period  of  little  more  than  two  years.  During  the  whole  of 
this  time,  the  whole  country  west,  sufficient  of  itself  for  a 
respectable  State,  was  included  in  two  counties,  Du  Buque 
and  Des  Moines.  In  each  of  these  two  counties  there  were 
holden,  during  the  term  of  two  years,  two  terms  of  a  county 
court,  (a  court  of  inferior  jurisdiction,)  as  the  only  sources 
of  judicial  relief  up  to  the  passage  of  the  act  of  Congress 
creating  the  Territory  of  Wisconsin.  That  act  took  effect 
on  the  3d  day  of  July,  1836,  and  the  first  judicial  relief  af- 
forded under  that  act,  was  at  the  April  term  following, 
1837,  a  period  of  nine  months  after  its  passage ;  subsequent 
to  which  time  there  has  been  a  court  holden  in  but  one 
county  in  Western  Wisconsin  only.  This,  your  memorial- 
ists are  aware,  has  recently  been  owing  to  the  unfortunate 
indisposition  of  the  esteemed  and  meritorious  judge  of  our 
district;  but  they  are  equally  aware  of  the  fact,  that  had 
Western  Wisconsin  existed  under  a  separate  organization, 
we  should  have  found  relief  in  the  services  of  other  mem- 
bers of  the  Judiciary,  who  are  at  present,  in  consequence 
of  the  great  extent  of  our  Territory,  and  the  small  number 
of  judges  dispersed  at  too  great  a  distance,  and  too  con- 
stantly engaged  in  the  discharge  of  the  duties  of  their  own 
districts,  to  be  enabled  to  afford  relief  to  other  portions  of 
the  Territory.  Thus,  with  a  population  of  not  less  than 
twenty-five  thousand  now,  and  of  near  half  that  number  at 
the  organization  of  the  Territory,  it  will  appear  that  we 
have  existed  as  a  portion  of  an  organized  Territory,  for 
sixteen  months,  with  but  one  term  of  courts  only. 

Your  memorialists  look  upon  those  evils  as  growing  ex- 
clusively out  of  the  immense  extent  of  country  included 
within  the  present  boundaries  of  the  Territory,  and  express 


\ 


406    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

their  conviction  and  belief,  that  nothing  would  so  effec- 
tually remedy  the  evil  as  the  organization  of  Western  Wis- 
consin into  a  separate  Territorial  government.  To  this 
your  memorialists  conceive  themselves  entitled  by  prin- 
ciples of  moral  right  —  by  the  sacred  obligation  that  rests 
upon  their  present  government  to  protect  them  in  the  free 
enjoyment  of  their  rights,  until  such  time  as  they  shall  be 
permitted  to  provide  protection  for  themselves ;  as  well  as 
from  the  uniform  practice  and  policy  of  the  government  in 
relation  to  other  Territories. 

The  Territory  of  Indiana,  including  the  present  states  of 
Indiana,  Illinois,  and  Michigan,  and  also  much  of  the  east- 
em  portion  of  the  present  territory  of  Wisconsin,  was 
placed  under  one  separate  territorial  government,  in  tiie 
year  1800,  at  a  time  when  the  population  amounted  to  only 
five  thousand  six  hundred  and  forty,  or  thereabouts. 

The  Territory  of  Arkansas  was  erected  into  a  distinct 
territory,  in  1820,  witii  a  population  of  about  fourteen  thou- 
sand. The  Territory  of  Illinois  was  established  in  1809, 
being  formed  by  dividing  the  Indiana  Territory.  The  exact 
population  of  Illinois  Territory,  at  the  time  of  her  separa- 
tion from  Indiana,  is  not  known  to  your  memorialists,  but 
the  population  in  1810,  one  year  subsequent  to  that  event, 
amounted  to  but  eleven  thousand  five  hundred  and  one 
whites,  and  a  few  blacks  —  in  all,  to  less  than  twelve  thou- 
sand inhabitants. 

The  Territory  of  Michigan  was  formed  in  1805,  by  again 
dividing  the  Indiana  Territory,  of  which  until  then,  she 
composed  a  part.  The  population  of  Michigan,  at  the  time 
of  her  separation  from  Indiana,  your  memorialists  have 
been  unable  to  ascertain,  but  in  the  year  1810,  a  period  of 
five  years  subsequent  to  her  separate  organization,  her  pop- 
ulation amounted  to  but  about  four  thousand  seven  hundred 
and  sixty ;  and  in  the  year  1820,  to  less  than  nine  thousand 


TERRITORIAL  CONVENTION  OP  1837  407 

—  so  that  Michigan  existed  some  fifteen  years,  as  a  distinct 
Territory,  with  a  population  of  less  than  half  that  of  West- 
em  Wisconsin  at  present;  and  each  of  the  above  named 
Territories,  now  composing  so  many  proud  and  flourishing 
states,  were  created  into  separate  territorial  governments, 
with  a  much  less  population  than  that  of  Western  Wis- 
consin, and  that  too  at  a  time  with  a  national  debt  of  mil- 
lions. Your  memorialists  therefore  pray  for  the  organiza- 
tion of  a  separate  territorial  government  over  that  part  of 
the  Territory  of  Wisconsin  west  of  the  Mississippi  river. 


PROCEEDINGS  OP  A  COUNCIL  WITH  THE 

CHIPPEWA  INDIANS 

[The  report  given  below  of  the  proceedings  of  the  Coaneil,  held  bj  Oovemor 
Henry  Dodge  of  the  original  Territory  of  Witeonain,  with  the  Chiefs  and  prin- 
eipal  men  of  the  Chippewa  Nation  of  Indians  in  July,  1837,  is  taken  from 
YoL  I,  Nos.  11  and  14  of  the  Iowa  News,  a  newspaper  pablished  at  Dabnqne. 
The  report  is  reprinted  literally,  no  attempt  having  been  made  to  secure  uni- 
formity in  the  spelling  of  the  Indian  names  which  appear  in  the  report  and  in 
the  treaty.  The  articles  of  the  treaty  concluded  at  this  Council  are  taken  from 
Kappler's  Indian  Affairs,  Laws  and  Treaties,  Vol.  11,  p.  491. —  Editob.] 

PBOCEEDINGS  OF  A  COUNCIL  HELD  BY  GOVEBNOB  DODGE  WITH  THE 
CHIEFS  AND  PBINCIPAL  MEN  OF  THE  CHIPPE,WA  NATION  OF 
INDIANS,  NEAB  FOBT  SNELLING,  AT  THE  CONFLUENCE  OF  THE 
ST.  PETEBS  AND  MISSISSIPPI  BIVEBS,  COMMENCING  ON  THE 
20 TH  DAY  OF  JULY,  1837. 

The  head  men  of  the  nation  having,  by  direction  of 
Governor  Dodge,  been  advised  of  his  desire  to  meet  them  in 
council,  their  different  bands  assembled  together  near  Fort 
Snelling,  between  the  1st  and  20th  of  July  to  the  number 
of  about  a  thousand  men,  women  and  children,  and  on  the 
last  mentioned  day,  met  the  Governor  at  the  council  house. 

Gen.  Wm.  R.  Smith,  of  Pennsylvania,  appointed  by  the 
President  of  the  United  States,  the  colleague  of  Gov.  Dodge 
in  the  commission,  did  not  arrive  to  be  present  at  the  coun- 
cil. 

The  following  named  Chiefs  were  present,  and  recog- 
nized as  such  by  the  Governor : 

From  Leech  Lake. —  Aish-ke-boge-kozhe,  or  Flat  Mouth, 
and  Ozawickanebik,  or  the  Yellow  Snake,  commonly  called 
by  the  French  Fiereaince,  or  elder  brother. 

From  Gull  Lake  and  Swan  River. —  Pa-goona-kee-zhig, 
or  Hole  in  the  day,  &  Songa-komok,  or  the  Strong  Ground. 

From  Mille  Lac. —  Wash-ask-ko-kowe,  or  Bat 's  Liver. 

408 


COUNCIL  WITH  THE  CHIPPEWA  INDIANS       409 

From  Sandy  Lake. —  Ea-nan-dwa-winza,  or  Le  Broch- 
enx. 

From  Snake  Biver. —  Naudin,  or  the  Wind,  Sha-go-bai, 
or  the  Six  Pay-a-jig,  and  Na-qna-na-bic,  or  the  Father. 

From  Fond  du  Lac. —  Mongo-sit,  or  Loon's  Foot,  and 
Shin-go-be  or  the  Spruce. 

St.  Croix  Biver. —  Pe-she-ke,  or  the  Buffalo. 

Ver  Planck  Van  Antwerp,  of  Indiana,  appointed  by  the 
President  Secretary  to  the  Commissioners,  was  also  pres- 
ent at  the  meeting  of  the  Council. 

The  council  pipe  having  been  first  smoked  by  Gov.  Dodge, 
with  the  Chiefs,  the  Governor  addressed  them  as  follows  — 
Chiefs,  Head  men,  and  Warriors  of  the  Chippewa  Nation: 

"Your  Great  Father,  the  President  of  the  United  States, 
has  sent  me  to  see  you  in  council  to  propose  to  you  the 
purchase  of  a  small  part  of  your  country,  east  of  the  Missis- 
sippi Biver. 

This  country,  as  I  am  informed,  is  not  valuable  to  you  for 
its  game,  and  not  suited  to  the  culture  of  com,  and  other 
agricultural  purposes. 

Your  Great  Father  wishes  to  purchase  your  country  on 
the  Chippewa  and  St.  Croix  rivers  for  the  advantage  of  its 
pine  timber,  with  which  it  is  said  to  abound. 

A  map  of  the  country  which  your  Great  Father  wishes  to 
buy  from  you  will  be  shewn  to  you,  in  which  the  rivers  and 
water  courses  are  laid  down;  and  such  explanations  given 
through  your  interpreter,  as  will  fully  explain  to  you  the 
particular  part  of  your  country  east  of  the  Mississippi 
Biver,  which  your  Great  Father  proposes  to  purchase  for 
the  use  of  his  white  children. 

Your  Great  Father  knows  you  are  poor,  and  this  pine 
region  is  not  valuable  to  you  for  hunting  purposes;  his 
wish  is  to  make  you  a  fuU  compensation  for  the  country  by 


410    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

giving  you  its  full  value,  payable  in  such  manner  as  will  be 
most  serviceable  to  your  people. 

An  estimate  will  be  made  of  the  probable  value  of  your 
country,  which  it  is  proposed  to  purchase,  of  which  you  will 
be  informed.  I  will  request  you,  after  fully  deliberating 
upon  the  subject,  to  tell  me  your  price  for  the  country  with 
as  little  delay  as  possible. 

Your  Great  Father,  the  President,  was  desirous  that  the 
Chippewas  should  be  f  uUy  represented  in  this  council,  that 
all  might  know  what  had  been  done,  and  that  equal  justice 
should  be  done  to  all.  I  wish  you  to  be  prepared  with  your 
answer  to  the  proposition  made  you,  at  our  meeting  in 
council  to-morrow.'* 

Gov.  Dodge  having  concluded  his  remarks  and  intimated 
his  readiness  to  hear  anything  which  the  Chiefs  or  prin- 
cipal men  might  have  to  say  to  him,  Aish-ke-boge-khoze 
(Flat  Mouth)  advanced  and  spoke  as  follows:  My  father,  I 
have  but  little  to  say  to  you  now.  Living  in  a  different  part 
of  the  country  from  that  which  you  propose  to  buy  from  us, 
I  will  be  among  the  last  of  those  who  will  speak  to  you  upon 
that  subject.  After  those  shall  have  spoken  who  live  in  & 
nearer  to  that  country,  I  will  talk  more  to  you.  My  father, 
my  people  have  all  the  same  opinion  with  me,  and  wiU  abide 
by  what  I  shall  say  to  you ;  I  have  come  to  listen  first,  to  all 
you  have  to  say  to  us,  and  will  afterwards  speak  to  you. 
My  heart  is  with  you.    I  have  nothing  more  to  say  now. 

Nadin  (the  Wind)  then  came  forward  and  said,  **My  fa- 
ther, I  once  shook  hands  with  our  great  Father  beyond  the 
mountains,  as  I  do  with  you  now.  I  have  not  much  to  say 
at  present,  and  my  brother  who  stands  near  me  wishes  to 
speak  with  you.  To-morrow,  I  expect  that  some  more  peo- 
ple will  be  here  from  the  country  you  wish  to  buy  from  us. 
I  was  present  when  they  began  to  run  the  boundary  line 
between  our  country  and  that  of  the  Sioux  at  the  Bed 


COUNCIL  WITH  THE  CHIPPEWA  INDIANS       411 

Deer's  Bump.    When  you  are  ready  to  examine  that  line  I 
will  say  more  to  you. ' ' 

Pe-she-ke  (the  Buffalo)  **My  Father,  I  am  taken  by  sur- 
prise by  what  you  have  said  to  us,  and  will  speak  but  few 
words  to  you  now.  We  are  waiting  for  more  of  our  people 
who  are  coming  from  the  country  which  you  wish  to  buy 
from  us.  We  will  think  of  what  you  have  said  to  us,  and 
when  they  come,  will  tell  you  our  minds  about  it.  Men  will 
then  be  chosen  by  us  to  speak  with  you.  I  have  nothing 
more  to  say  now. 

Na-can-ne-ga-be  (the  man  that  stands  foremost)  My  fa- 
ther, the  people  will  come  from  the  country  where  my 
fathers  have  lived  before  me.  When  they  arrive  here,  they 
will  speak  to  you.    Until  then  I  have  nothing  more  to  say. 

Gov.  Dodge,  after  urgently  impressing  upon  the  Chippe- 
was  the  necessity  of  remaining  quiet  and  at  peace  with  the 
Sioux,  during  the  continuance  of  the  council,  adjourned  to 
meet  again  to-morrow. 

Friday,  July  21st. 

The  Governor  was  advised  this  morning  by  Mr.  Vine- 
yard, their  agent,  that  the  Chippewas  did  not  wish  to  meet 
in  council  to-day,  as  the  people  whom  they  expected  had 
not  yet  arrived,  and  they  wanted  more  time  to  talk  with 
one  another. 

Saturday,  July  22. 

The  morning  being  cloudy,  with  an  appearance  of  rain, 
the  council  did  not  meet  until  3  o'clock  P.  M.,  when  Gov. 
Dodge  directed  the  Interpreter  to  say  to  the  Indians,  that 
when  he  had  parted  with  them  two  days  ago,  they  had  told 
him  that  they  expected  to  meet  more  of  their  friends  here, 
and  were  desirous  before  taking  any  further  steps  about 
what  he  had  spoken  to  them,  of  talking  to  one  another  — 
that  he  had  now  met  them  to  hear  what  they  might  have  to 
say  about  their  absent  friends,  and  to  listen  to  any  com- 


412    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

mnnications  which  they  might  wish  to  make  to  him  in  re- 
gard to  the  comicils  which  they  had  held,  and  the  condnsion 
to  which  they  had  arrived. 

After  an  interval  of  15  or  20  minutes,  during  which  time 
the  Interpreter,  by  direction  of  the  Governor,  repeated  the 
expression  of  his  readiness  to  hear  any  remarks  which  the 
Indians  might  wish  to  make  to  him,  Aish-ke-boge-kozhe, 
(Flat  Mouth)  rose  and  said,  ^'My  Father,  I  shall  say  but 
little  to  you  at  this  time.  I  am  called  a  chief.  I  am  not  the 
chief  of  the  whole  nation,  but  only  of  my  people,  or  band. 
I  speak  to  you  now  only  because  I  see  nobody  else  ready  to 
do  so.  I  do  not  wish  to  take  any  further  steps  about  what 
you  have  proposed  to  us,  until  the  other  people  arrive  who 
have  been  expected  here.  They  have  not  yet  come,  and  to 
do  anything  before  their  arrival,  might  be  considered  an 
improper  interference,  and  unfair  towards  them.  The  resi- 
dence of  my  band  is  outside  of  the  country  which  you  wish 
to  buy  from  us.  After  the  people  who  live  in  that  country 
shall  have  told  you  their  minds,  I  will  speak.  If  the  lands 
which  you  wish  to  buy  were  occupied  by  my  band,  I  would 
immediately  have  given  you  my  opinion.  After  listening 
to  the  people  whom  we  are  expecting,  and  who  will  speak 
to  you,  I  will  abide  by  what  they  say,  and  say  more  to  you 
myself. 

My  father,  on  getting  up  to  speak  to  you,  I  hardly  knew 
what  to  say.  If  I  say  no  more,  it  is  not  because  I  am  afraid 
to  speak  my  mind  before  my  people  and  those  of  the  whole 
nation,  and  all  others  present,  but  because  I  have  nothing 
more  to  say. 

Pe-she-ke  (the  Buffalo)  I  am  deaf  and  cannot  hear  dis- 
tinctly what  is  said.  I  have  seen  the  lips  of  the  great  chief 
move,  but  did  not  well  hear  his  words,  I  have  turned  each 
ear  to  him  to  listen.  There  is  another  man  here  who  has 
the  confidence  of  my  people  beside  myself,  but  we  do  not 


COUNCIL  WITH  THE  CHIPPEWA  INDIANS        413 

wish  to  say  more,  until  the  rest  of  our  nation  we  are  ex- 
pecting shall  arrive. 

Pay-a-jig.  My  father,  your  children  are  not  displeased 
with  what  you  have  said  to  them,  but  they  wish  you  to  give 
them  four  times  more  tobacco  than  you  have  given  them. 
My  father,  what  has  happened  to  yout  Have  you  cut  off 
your  breasts,  that  you  cannot  suckle  your  children.  If  you 
did  so,  it  would  render  them  more  pliant  and  ready  to  yield 
to  your  wishes.  This  was  the  case  at  the  treaty  of  Prairie 
du  Chien.  I  was  there,  and  know  what  was  done.  The 
boundary  line  between  our  country  and  the  Sioux  was  then 
established,  and  my  people  wish  now  to  have  it  explained 
to  them.  I  have  been  told  by  the  warriors  and  chiefs  to  say 
what  I  have  said  to  you.  I  do  not  say  it  of  my  own  accord. 
My  people  have  chosen  me  and  another  to  talk  with  you 
about  the  proposition  that  you  have  made  to  them  to  buy 
a  part  of  our  country.  I  am  ready  to  proceed  whenever  the 
others  are  ready.  Other  men  of  power  and  authority  are 
behind,  and  are  expected  here.  They  will  soon  come,  when 
we  will  give  you  our  answer. 

Nadin  (the  Wind.)  There  is  no  dissatisfaction;  we  are 
all  contented.  Your  children  around  you,  both  Chippewas 
and  Sioux,  wish  to  be  friendly  together,  and  want  to  carry 
on  a  little  trade  and  bartering  among  ourselves. 

My  father,  I  wish  you  would  give  the  same  advice  to  the 
Sioux  you  have  given  us,  but  do  not  wish  to  prevent  them 
from  making  friendly  visits. 

Monday,  July  24. 

The  Council  met  at  11  o'clock,  A.  M. 

Gov.  Dodge  directed  the  Interpreter  to  inform  the  lu- 
dians  that  four  chiefs  of  their  nation  whom  they  had  been 
expecting,  had  arrived  at  their  encampment,  and  that  fifty 
others  were  said  to  be  near  here,  who  had  come  from  La 
Pointe  with  Messrs.  Warren  and  Bushnell,  who  would  prob- 

voL.  IX — 28 


414    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

ably  arrive  this  evening,  and  as  they  were  all  of  the  same 
nation  and  brethren;  he  wished  those  present  to  consult 
with  them ;  that  he  did  not  wish  to  hurry  their  deliberations 
among  themselves,  but  to  give  them  full  time  to  consult  their 
friends,  who  had  arrived,  and  those  who  were  coming,  and 
that  he  would  not  hear  any  thing  they  might  have  to  say 
to  him. 

Nadin  (the  Wind)  then  rose  and  said,  *'My  father,  I  am 
very  sorry  to  keep  you  so  long  in  a  state  of  suspense  re- 
specting the  matters  which  you  have  proposed  to  us.    My 
people  are  glad  to  see  you,  and  are  gratified  at  the  proposi- 
tion you  have  made  to  them.    My  father,  I  now  speak  to 
you  through  the  lips  of  the  Buffalo  (the  latter  had  advanced 
to  the  Governor's  table  with  '*the  Wind,*'  shaking  him  by 
the  hand  and  remarking  that  he  would  do  the  same  with  all 
those  present,  but  his  arm  was  too  short;  after  which  he 
stepped  back  to  allow  the  ''Wind*'  to  speak  for  him).    He 
has  been  to  see  our  Great  Father  beyond  the  mountains, 
and  has  come  back  safe.    When  I  look  at  you  I  am  struck 
with  awe.     I  cannot  suflSciently  understand  your  impor- 
tance, and  it  confuses  me.    I  have  seen  a  great  many  Amer- 
icans, but  never  one  whose  appearance  struck  me  as  yours 
does.    You  have  heard  of  the  coming  of  those  whose  absence 
has  prevented  our  proceedings  in  the  matter  proposed  to 
us.    This  is  the  case  with  all  our  people  here.    My  father, 
listen  to  what  I  am  going  to  say  to  you.    I  listened  to  our 
Great  Father  beyond  the  mountains  and  have  never  for- 
gotten what  he  said  to  me.     Others  will  speak  after  me, 
whose  language  will  please  you  and  put  all  things  right. 
My  father,  we  are  a  distracted  people,  and  have  no  regular 
system  of  acting  together.    We  cast  a  firm  look  on  the  peo- 
ple who  are  coming  and  all  think  alike  about  this  matter. 
What  we  are  going  to  say  will  not  dissatisfy,  but  please 
you. 


COUNCIL  WITH  THE  CHIPPEWA  INDIANS        415 

Pay-a-jig  (The  one  who  stands  alone.)  What  I  am  going 
to  say  to  you  is  not  my  own  language  but  the  words  of  the 
chiefs  and  others  among  you.  They  look  at  you  who  are 
all  white,  while  they  are  half  breed.  How  can  we  forget 
our  traders  in  this  matter.  You  are  come  to  dispense  bene- 
fits to  us,  and  we  much  think  of  the  traders.  I  think  well  of 
them.  They  have  used  me  well  and  supported  me,  and  I 
wish  to  do  them  justice.  We  should  certainly  be  all  very 
miserable  if  they  would  not  do  for  us  what  they  have  done 
heretofore.  And  if  we  do  wrong  to  them,  how  can  we  ex- 
pect it.  My  father,  look  around  on  all  your  red  children, 
the  trader  has  raised  them,  and  it  is  thro'  his  means  that 
they  are  as  they  are.  We  wish  you  to  do  them  justice. 
They  will,  by  this  means,  go  on  and  support  us  as  hereto- 
fore. I  referred,  when  I  began  to  speak,  to  the  half  breeds ; 
many  of  them  have  been  brought  up  among  us,  and  we  wish 
to  provide  for  them. 

Ma-je-ga-bo,  (The  man  who  stands  foremost)  My  father, 
I  shall  not  say  much  to  you  now.  You  are  not  a  man  to  be 
spoken  to  in  a  light  manner.  I  am  not  a  Pillager,  (the  com- 
mon name  of  the  Leech  Lake  Band)  but  went  among  them 
when  small,  which  gives  me  the  right  to  speak  as  one  of 
them.  My  brother,  (the  Wind)  stands  beside  me,  and  we 
are  descended  from  those  who  in  former  days  were  the 
greatest  orators  of  our  nation.  My  father,  I  am  not  back- 
ward in  sajdng  what  I  wish,  I  am  not  going  to  say  any 
thing  to  make  your  heart  lean,  and  am  not  going  to  tell  you 
what  will  be  said  by  the  chiefs.  I  will  answer  you  when  you 
make  us  an  oflFer  for  our  lands.  As  soon  as  our  friends  ar- 
rive, and  I  hear  their  decision,  I  will  say  all  I  have  to  say. 
I  finish  that  subject  for  the  present,  and  will  speak  upon 
another.  My  father,  listen  closely  to  me,  I  will  hide  nothing 
from  you  that  has  passed.  But  for  the  traders,  you  would 
not  see  all  your  children  setting  around  you  as  they  do  to- 


416    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

day.  It  was  not  the  chiefs,  but  the  traders  who  have  sup- 
ported them  to  the  present  time.  Our  Great  Father  has 
told  us  that  an  agent  would  be  sent  to  us,  but  he  has  not  yet 
been  among  us.  The  traders  are  in  our  country  to  trade 
for  the  skins  of  animals,  which  we  take  to  them.  Half  of 
what  they  bring  into  the  country  and  sell  to  yotir  children 
is  lost  to  them.  I  am  glad  to  see  the  agent  here  who  is  to  go 
into  our  country,  and  support  our  young  men,  women  and 
children. 

We  wish  to  do  justice  to  the  half  breeds  who  have  been 
brought  up  among  us,  and  have  them  provided  for. 

Sha-go-bai,  (the  Little  Six)  My  father,  I  heard  of  you 
when  I  was  yet  a  young  man,  a  long  time  ago  —  and  now  I 
see  you.  I  am  struck  with  awe  when  you  look  at  me.  I  am 
startled  when  the  wind  comes  rustling  by,  and  the  thunder- 
cloud, though  I  know  it  will  pass  along  without  harming, 
alarms  me.  So  it  is,  my  father,  when  you  talk  to  your  chil- 
dren around  you  of  their  lands,  which  you  wish  to  buy  from 
them.  I  have  great  confidence  in  the  chief  here,  and  others 
who  are  coming.  When  they  come  to  treat  fully  with  you, 
we  (pointing  to  the  two  men  standing  beside  him,  and  him- 
self) will  set  far  off  and  listen.  I  sprung  from  the  same 
stock  with  the  people  who  stand  behind  you  —  white  men  — 
(Sha-go-bai,  half  breed)  and  am  related  to  all  the  half 
breeds  in  the  country  where  I  live.  My  father,  look  at  the 
man  who  is  standing  near  me.  His  and  my  ancestors  were 
the  chief  men  of  the  country  that  you  want  to  buy  from*  us. 
The  traders  have  raised  our  children  and  we  like  them.  I 
owe  my  life  to  the  traders,  who  have  supported  us.  I  am 
glad  to  see  the  agent  here  who  will  live  among  us,  and  give 
us  tobacco  when  we  want  it. 

Pe-she-ke  (the  Buffalo.)  My  father,  listen  to  what  I  am 
going  to  say  to  you,  let  it  enter  deeply  into  your  ear,  and 
rest  upon  your  heart.    Tho'  I  may  appear  little  in  your 


COUNCIL  WITH  THE  CHIPPEWA  INDIANS        417 

sight,  when  I  address  the  warriors  of  my  tribe  they  listen 
to  me.  Nobody  —  no  trader  has  instructed  me  what  to  say 
to  you.  Those  who  have  spoken  before  me  have  told  you 
the  truth,  and  I  shall  hereafter  speak  upon  the  same  sub- 
ject. I  have  been  supported  by  the  trader,  and  without  his 
aid,  could  not  get  through  the  winter  with  naked  skin.  The 
grounds  where  your  children  have  to  hunt  are  as  bare  as 
that  on  which  I  now  stand,  and  have  no  game  upon  them. 
My  father,  I  am  glad  to  see  you  here,  to  embrace  the  earth. 
We  have  not  much  to  give  the  traders,  as  our  lands  and 
hunting  grounds  are  so  destitute.  Do  us  a  kindness  by  pay- 
ing our  old  debts.  I  have  nothing  more  to  say.  You  are 
our  father,  and  we  look  up  to  you,  and  respect  you.  I  have 
come  here  and  seen  you,  and  my  heart  is  at  peace.  I  have 
talked  with  my  warriors,  and  heard  their  words,  and  my 
mind  is  tranquil. 

Aish-ke-hoge-bozhe  (Flat  Mouth.)  My  father,  your  eyes 
are  upon  me,  and  mine  upon  you.  Wherever  I  have  been 
the  print  of  the  white  men's  hands  have  been  left  upon  my 
own.  Yours  are  not  the  first  I  have  shaken.  It  is  I  and 
those  men  (pointing  to  the  Elder  Brother,  the  Strong 
Ground,  and  the  Hole  in  the  Day,)  who  have  brought  many 
of  your  children  here.  Their  opinions  are  mine.  My  an- 
cestors were  Chiefs  of  the  tribes,  and  the  villages  while 
they  lived.  I  do  not,  however,  hold  my  title  from  them,  but 
have  obtained  it  by  my  own  acts  and  merits. 

My  father,  when  I  came  here  this  morning,  I  supposed 
you  wanted  to  talk  to  us  about  the  lands  you  wished  to  get 
from  us,  and  not  about  the  traders. 

After  the  question  about  selling  the  land  shall  be  settled, 
it  will  then  be  time  enough  to  talk  about  these  traders. 

My  father,  I  shall  not  be  backward  in  speaking  about 
what  you  propose  to  us,  at  the  proper  time.  Many  of  my 
people  have  told  me  to  say  so ;  but  we  can  do  nothing  until 


418    IOWA  JOURNAL  OP  HISTORY  AND  POLITICS 

the  other  people  arrive.    We  must  listen  to  them.     As  I 
have  told  you  before,  after  they  shall  speak  I  will  say  more. 

Pa-goona-kee-zhig  (the  Hole  in  the  Day.)  He  who  is  the 
master  of  all,  hears  me  speak.  I  know  the  traders,  and 
what  has  been  their  conduct.  I  know  which  of  them  are 
good  men,  and  those  who  are  bad  and  act  like  drunken  men. 
When  our  people  come,  I  will  speak  again. 

Wash-ask-ko-kowe,  (Bat's  Liver.)  My  father,  I  am  but 
little  accustomed  to  speaking,  and  am  generally  one  who 
listens.  My  father  here  (the  agent)  knows  me  and  is  ac- 
quainted with  my  character.  If  I  wished  to  speak  much  I 
should  feel  no  shame  for  my  personal  appearance ;  but  this 
you  may  not  wish  to  hear.  We  are  talking  about  the  land 
which  you  have  come  for.  I  have  walked  over  it  with  my 
war  club  in  my  hand.  My  forefathers  and  those  of  Pa- 
goona-kee-zhig,  (Hole  in  the  Day,)  were  the  chiefs  and  pro- 
tectors of  that  country,  and  drove  the  Dakcotah  away  from 
it. 

My  father,  it  is  only  to  you  that  I  look  and  listen,  and  not 
to  the  bad  birds  that  are  flying  about  us  through  the  air. 
My  own  merit  has  brought  me  to  the  place  I  occupy  to-day ; 
and  I  do  not  wish  any  body  to  push  me  forward  as  a  speak- 
er. I  have  nothing  to  add  now,  but  will  say  more  when  the 
business  about  the  land  has  been  settled. 

Que-we-shan-shez,  (Big  Mouth.)  My  father,  what  I  am 
going  to  say  to  you  now  is  not  of  much  consequence.  I  have 
smoked  with  my  friends  and  come  to  tell  you  the  result 
After  reflecting  upon  the  subject,  we  concluded  to  agree 
with  those  who  have  already  spoken  to  you.  We  do  not 
wish  to  do  anything  to  injure  the  people  who  wear  hats. 
My  father,  all  that  has  prevented  us  from  doing  what  you 
came  here  to  have  us  do,  is  that  we  have  been  waiting  for 
others  of  our  people,  who  have  been  expected  here,  and  who 
we  are  afraid  to  dissatisfy;  I  never  before  have  spoken  to 


COUNCIL  WITH  THE  CHIPPEWA  INDIANS        419 

your  people  at  any  length,  and  fear,  my  father,  that  you 
will  think  I  am  drunk,  but  I  have  here  (putting  his  hand  to 
Mb  head)  a  great  deal  of  sense  which  I  have  obtained  from 
the  white  people,  and  as  soon  as  the  others  of  our  nation 
come  we  will  tell  our  minds  to  you. 

Sha-wa-nig-na-nabe,  (South  feather  seated.)  My  father, 
what  I  have  to  say  to  you  place  it  strongly  at  your  heart. 
The  Master  of  life  and  the  earth  both  listen  to  us.  The 
Master  of  life  made  the  earth,  the  grass,  and  the  trees  that 
grow  upon  it,  and  the  animals  that  roam  over  it.  When  the 
Great  Spirit  made  the  earth,  he  placed  the  red  men  upon 
it ;  it  became  very  strong.  Some  of  our  chiefs  are  now  here, 
and  others  are  coming.  They  do  not  wish  to  act  pr