Skip to main content

We will keep fighting for all libraries - stand with us!

Full text of "What do deer eat? / by Stephen A. Liscinsky, Charles T. Cushwa, Michael J. Puglisi, and Michael A. Ondik"

See other formats


m&S'n.lkSlk STAINS LIBRARY 

docu>-i:e'Tts section 


What Do Deer Eat? 

By Stephen A. Liscinsky, 
Charles T. Cushwa 
Michael J. Puglisi 
and Michael A. Ondik 



Reprinted from PENNSYLVANIA GAME NEWS 
Av ailable from the Bureau of Information & Education 
Pennsylvania Game Gommission, 2001 Elmerton Avenue, Dept MS 
Harrisburg, Pa 17110-9797 
Publishing paid for with Game Commission funds 


An Equal Opportunity Employer 


The following paid publications are available from 

Pennsylvania Game Commission 

2001 Elmerton Ave. 

Harrisburg, Pa. 17110-9797 


Bird and Mammal Charts by Ned Smith 
Size 20x30 inches 


Set No. 1, four charts, $6 delivered 
Winter Birds 
Marsh and Water Birds 
Waterfowl 
Birds of Prey 


Set No. 2, four charts, $6 delivered 
Mammals of Farm and Woodlot 
Mammals of the Mountains 
Birds of the Forest 
Birds of Field and Garden 


Set No. 3, same as above, except 11 x 14 inches 
Eight charts, $5 delivered 

Gone for the Day, by Ned Smith. All of the columns and excellent artwork which 
appeared in GAME NEWS over a four-year period, 216 pp., softbound, 
$4 delivered. 


Birds of Pennsylvania, by James and Lillian Wakeley. Up-to-date information on the 
biology and behavior of the birds commonly found in this state. 214 pp., 
hardcover, with 40 full-color paintings by Ned Smith, Guy Goheleach, Randy 
Rowe and others, $10 delivered. 

Mammals of Pennsylvania, by J. Kenneth Doutt, et al, 6x9, paperbound, profusely 
illustrated, 282 pp., $4 delivered. 


Pennsylvania Game Cookbook, a 96-page collection of delicious recipes, $4 
delivered. 


Pennsylvania Big Game Records, 1965-1986. Scores of all deer and bear measured 
in our nine official measuring sessions. Hundreds of photos, plus the stories 
of dozens of the successful hunts. 237 pp., hardbound, $10 delivered. 


The Shooter’s Comer, by Don Lewis, covers nearly every facet of the shooting 
sports. Beginning with the history of firearms, Don covers actions, stocks and 
barrels; scopes and metallic sights; rimfire, big game and varmint cartridges; 
shotguns, gauges and fit; and a whole lot more. 449 pp., hardcover, $15 

delivered. py G192.2 W555d 1990 C.l 


What do deer eat? 



FIG. 1 — REGIONS based on physiographic and vegetative criteria. 


What Do Deer Eat? 

By Stephen A. Liscinsky, Charles T. Cushwa, 
Michael J. Puglisi, and Michael A. Ondik 


A lmost everyone wants to 

know what deer eat. Students, 
teachers, farmers, hunters, nature 
lovers, biologists, land managers and 
planners— all are interested in the food 
habits of Pennsylvania’s state animal, 
the whitetailed deer. 

A short simple answer might be 
that deer are primarily vegetarians, al- 
though they have been known to eat 


Stephen A. Liscinsky is a uildlife 
biologist with the Pennsylvania Game 
Commission’s Division of Research; 
Charles T. Cushwa is Program Leader, 
Institute of Northern Forestry, U.S. 
Forest Service, Fairbanks, Alaska, and 
formerly assistant leader of the Penn- 
sylvaia Cooperative Wildlife Research 
Unit at Pennsylvania State University; 
Michael }. Puglisi is a research as- 
sistant in the Institute for Research on 
Land and Water Resources at P.S.U., 
and Michael A. Ondik is a research 
assistant in the Wildlife Research Unit 
at the same university. 


meat. But such a short answer seldom 
satisfies those who inquire; they want 
something more specific and those 
who are responsible for deer habitat 
improvement certainly need more de- 
tailed information. In addition to 
knowing exactly what deer eat, habitat 
managers need to know how rhuch 
they eat, and when and where they 
eat it. These men also need to know 
how important various foods are in 
the diet of deer during all seasons of 
the year. 

This information can be, and has 
been, acquired by a number of meth- 
ods. Recently, the Pennsylvania Game 
Commission, in cooperation with the 
Pennsylvania State University Wildlife 
Research Unit, used stomach content 
analysis technique to determine the 
seasonal and regional uses of food by 
whitetailed deer. 

The state was divided into seven 
regions based on physiographic and 
vegetative criteria (Fig 1). A few 
game protectors in each region were 


assigned the task of collecting a dozen 
samples each season from road-killed 
deer. The rumen content samples were 
preserved in one-quart jars containing 
two cups of 10 percent fonnalin, and 
the date and location of each sample 
was recorded. In all, 1028 samples 
were collected and forwarded to the 
Wildlife Research Unit laboratory 
where they were analyzed by wildlife 
biologists from the Game Commission 
and the Research Unit. 

The samples were washed through 
a series of three sieves to separate the 
fine from the coarse particles of food. 
Only the coarse particles were re- 
tained for examination as earlier stud- 
ies had shown that the proportions of 
various food items in the fine particles 



FIG. 2 — Seasonal foods of deer, based on 
importance values. Study the area taken 
up by each category, not the height of the 
line above bottom. 



FIG. 3 — Seasonal use of leaves from 
woody plants by deer, based on importance 
value. Use is associated with seasonal 
availability. 

were about equal to those in the 
larger pieces, and that it takes about 
ten times as long to separate and iden- 
tify the small particles as it does the 
large ones. 

Material that did not pass through 
the sieves was emptied onto large 
aluminum sheets and separated by 
species, when recognized, according 
to plant parts as fruit, green leaves, 
dead leaves, succulent twigs, and 
hardened twigs. Materials that could 
not be identified by species were sep- 
arated into grossly different categor- 
ies. The volume of each item was 
measured by water displacement. 

Some foods showed up frequently 
but in small volume, others were 
found in large volume but low fre- 
quency; and still others were found 
in combinations of these two char- 
acteristics. 


OTHER 

PEAR 

BLACKBERRY 

DEERBERRY 

BLUEBERRY 



ROSE 

HAWTHORN 

RAPE 

SUMAC 


ilarities in the use of the 
various parts of woody 
plants. When fruits are 
readily available during the 
fall and summer, for ex- 
ample, they make up a larger portion 
of the diet. On the other hand, leaves 
are eaten uniformly throughout the 
year and the use of evergreen leaves in 
the winter compensates for the ab- 
sence of leaves from deciduous plants. 
The stems from woody plants make up 
about 20 percent of the diet and this 
remains rather constant throughout 
the year. The importance of evergreen 
stems and leaves is even more signifi- 
cant, considering that only about 10 
percent of our forests are evergreens. 
The high and rather constant use of 


FIG. 4 — Seasonal use of fruit from woody 
plants by deer, based on importance value. 

To better evaluate and illustrate the 
frequency of occurrence and the vol- 
ume, these two measured character- 
istics were combined into one by 
adding the percent of frequency to 
the percent of volume and dividing 
by two. This characteristic is called 
the importance value. Using it, the 
significance of both the volume and 
presence of each item is maximized 
and believed to be more realistic than 
using volume or frequency above. 

The findings of this study have been 
summarized in the graphs that ac- 
company this article. When examin- 
ing Figs. 2 through 5, readers are 
cautioned to study the area taken up 
by each category, not the height of 
any particular line above the bottom. 

In Fig. 2, the seasonal foods of 
deer based on importance value, note 
the overall greater importance of 
woody plants as compared to her- 
baceous or non-woody material, and 
also the seasonal differences or sim- 



FIG. 5 — Seasonal use of broad-leaved her- 
baceous plants, based on importance value. 



REGIONS 












FIG. 6 — Seasonal and re- 
gional use of deciduous 
stems by deer, based on 
importance value. Use of 
stems was quite similar 
in all seasons and all 
regions. 


STATE 

WIDE 


IMPORTANCE VALUE 




SPRING 


□ 


SUMMER 


□ = 


FALL 


= WINTER 


herbaceous plants, an average of about 
30 percent, shows the importance of 
thisj:)lant group. 

A closer look at the use of leaves 
from woody plants (Fig. 3) reveals 
red maple, cherry, blueberry, grape, 
and oak were the most prevalent in 
summer, while hemlock, laurel and 
pine were more prevalent in the 
winter. Note how closely use is as- 
sociated with availablity. 

Apples and acorns were important 


as indicated in fruits. Fig. 4. It 
should be mentioned that there was 
an exceptionally large crop of apples 
produced during the time of the sur- 
vey. Nevertheless, even during normal 
or average years, the use of apples 
by deer is rather high. Acorns too 
play a very important role in the diet 
of deer even though, like apples, their 
production is erratic and variable from 
place to place. It may surprise you 
to note the presence of fruits of cherry, 



FIG. 7 — Seasonal and 
regional use of leaves by 
deer, based on impor- 
tance value. Importance 
of leaves was quite dif- 
ferent in different re- 
gions and seasons. Note 
importance of ever- 
greens during the winter. 




LWWil 0 

r E 



7 



I "To 


STATE 

WIDE 




;i I -'-f D 

IMPORTANCE VALUE 


S = SPRING □ = SUMMER EH = FALL ^ = WINTER 
E -EVERGREEN D DECIDUOUS 


blueberry, grape, blackberry and other 
plants present in the stomach of deer. 

Illustrated in Fig. 5 are the most 
commonly occurring broad - leaved 
herbaceous plants in order of relative 
importance. Clover was apparently 
a highly sought after food in spring 
and summer. Other species such as 
plantain, speedwell, trefoil, straw- 
berry and cinquefoil were commonly 
utilized to various degrees during the 
four seasons. Many other herbaceous 
plants were also used. Table I gives 
the eomplete listing of all plants posi- 
tively identified in the samples. 

To show some regional differences 
and or similarities of foods used by 
deer it was necessary to single out 
distinct species or groups of plants. 
Fig. 6 shows that the use of stems from 
woody plants was quite similar in 
all regions and in all seasons. On the 
other hand, the importance of leaves, 
both evergreen and deciduous, was 
quite different between regions and 
seasons (Fig. 7). Note again the im- 
portanee of evergreens during the 
winter. 

Acorns were more important in 
some regions than in others, as indi- 
cated in Fig. 8. These differences are 
obviously caused by the presence or 
absence of oak trees and/or acorn 
mast. Acorn production varies from 
year to year, and place to place with- 
in and between species. 

As w’Ould be e.xpected, large dif- 
ferences also e.xisted between the 
seven regions in the oecurrence of 
corn in the rumens sampled. Fig. 9 
shows corn occurred more frequently 
in rumens from the farming regions 
than in the forested regions. Even at 
that, the winter use of corn, especially 
in the low corn producing areas, is 
surprising. Perhaps these values were 
exaggerated by proximity of waste 
corn in fields near woodlands and the 
use of corn in “winter feeding pro- 
grams.” 

In general terms, seasonal dif- 
ferences in foods were found to be 
greater than regional differences. 
About 60 percent of the diet year- 




SPRING 

SUMMER 

FALL 



WINTER 



IMPORTANCE VALUE 


FIG. 8 — Seasonal and regional use of 
acorns by deer. Regional differences are 
caused by the presence or absence of oaks. 


round consisted of woody plants. The 
importance of woody stems, leaves 
and fruit changed with the seasons in 
all regions. Fruit utilization was the 
most variable, because of seasonal 
availability. Leaves were an im- 
portant year-round food, with ever- 
green utilization inereasing when 
deciduous leaves were less available. 
Woody stems also were an important 
year-round food, with hardened stem 
utilization increasing when succulent 
stems were less available. 

It is obvious, however, that deer 
make choices from what is available. 
Succulent plants or parts of plants 
were chosen over hardened vegetation. 
Hardened twigs and evergreens were 
used more when other sourees of food 
were less available, and individual 
species of plants or parts of plants 
were utilized to various degrees and at 


various times throughout the year. 

In summary, it can be said that 
deer utilize many kinds of food, their 
choices being strongly governed by 
the succulence and palatability of 
whatever is available at a given time. 
It follows that habitat management 
for deer should be geared to making 
food available when and where deer 
need it most, in the most economical 
fashion. 

Table I 

Plants, or Parts Thereof, Identified 
in the Stomach Content Samples. 


Woody Plants 


Apple 

Jack Pine 

Arbor Vitae 

Juneberry 

Ash 

Larch 

Aspen 

Mountain Laurel 

Beech 

Mulberry 

Birch 

Oak- 

Blackberry 

Orange 

Black Cherry 

Partridge-Berry 

Black Locust 

Pear 

Blue Beech 

Persimmon 

Blueberry 

Pine 

Cherry 

Pitch Pine 

Chestnut Oak 

Privet 

Coralberry 

Red Oak 

Crab Apple 

Red Cedar 

Decrberry 

Red Maple 

Dewberry 

Rhododendron 

Dogwood 

Rose 

Elderberry 

Sassafras 

Elm 

Spruce 

Grape 

Sugar Maple 

Gray Dogwood 

Sumac 

Greenbriar 

Sweet Fern 

Hawthorn 

Teaberry 

Hazelnut 

Tulip Poplar 

Hemlock 

Virginia Creeper 

Hickory 

White Pine 

Honeysuckle 

W'illow 

Witch Ha'zel 

Non-Woody Plants 

Alfalfa 

Bellwort 

Aster 

Cabbage 

Bean 

Canada Mayflower 



FIG. 9 — Seasonal and regional use of corn 
by deer. This food’s importance in low 
corn producing areas might have been 
exaggerated by winter feeding programs. 

Plantain 
Pokeweed 
Potato 
Ragwort 
Rye 

Slijeep Sorrel 
Soybean 
Speedwell 
Spikenard 
Spring-Beauty 
Strawberry 
Tomato 
Trefoil 
Violet 
Wheat 

Wild Geranium 
Wild Mustard 


Cantaloupe 

Carrot 

Cinquefoil 

Clover 

Club Moss 

Cohash 

Corn 

Crown Vetch 

Dandelion 

Domestic Lettuce 

Goldenrod 

Ground Cherry 

Indian Pipe 

Liverwort 

Mayapple 

Milkweed 

Oats 

Panic Grass